The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.ca.190 Park Ave.0040.20120040.2012.ASLU 190 PARK AVE INTERPRETATION OF NATURAL GRADE C�I "Jilu I�� 0 E THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER PARCEL ID NUMBERS PROJECTS ADDRESS PLANNER CASE DESCRIPTION REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION p0040.2012.ASLU INTERPRETATION 190 PARK AVE JEN PHELAN INTERPRETATION GILBERT SANCHAZ 7.11.12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9.6.12 • oDt{D•2olz• r gY ti}ti A File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help A-SLL-1 l .. ►X ► ►> 1�r 21 J• 1 i 1A jump i FI " Routing Status ' Fees Fee Summary Main Actions _ Attachments Routing jstory Valuation I Archf Eng Custom Fields !Sub Permits I Parcels Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use ftTnt# 0040.2012.ASLU _-- Address 1190 PARK AVE AptjStete °o City ASPEN State CO ZoCr 81611 Permit Information Master permit Ra#ing queue aslu:C Applied 7M 1 f2012 Project r- Status pending � Approved Description APPLICATION FOR LUC INTERPRETATION OF NATURAL GRADE FOR 190 PARK AVE Issued FEES OF $315.001 HR PLANNING ARE WAIVED PER CHRIS BENDON - SIGNED BY JEN PHELAN ClosedJFinal Submitted STUDS B Cbdc Running Days Expires 7r6C2013 Submitted via Owner Last name ZALE First name MILTON 190 PARK AVE Phone (312) 576-4821 Address ASPEN CO 81611 Applicant Owner is applicant? Contractor is applicant? Last name ISTUDIO B ARCHITECTS First name 1501 R10 GRANDE PL 104 Phone (970) 920-9428 Cust # 23032 Address ASPEN CO 81611 Lender Last name First name Phone () Address AspenGoId5 (server) angelas _ 1 of 1 • E SECTIONSENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS ON DELIVERY ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A. Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑ Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X ❑ Addressee so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No Ilrrlrrrrllrllr�rrrllrrlrlrrlrll Marjorie and Timothy Rodell PO Box 8005 Aspen, Co 81612 3.. Se ce Type `Certified Mall ❑ Express Mail ` ❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number 91 7199 9991, 7030 0694 3455 (transfer from service label) r PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-0 - - o COMPLETE ------------------- •COMPLETE ■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete A- Signature item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. ❑Agent ■ Print your name and address on the reverse X so that we can return the card to you. ElAddressee ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailplece, B. Received by (Printed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. 1. Article Addressed to: D. Is delivery address different from item 1? ❑ Yes If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No Irll�rllrrr�llrrllrrrrrrlllrr�ll Colleen Grosz 155 North Harbor Drive #3612 3. Seryice Type Chicago, Illinois 60601 Certified Mail ❑Express Mail Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes 2. Article Number (transfer from service fal 91.E 7199 9991 7030 0694 3448 PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt p 102595-02-rd-1540 • Sherman & Howard L.L.C. Curtis B. Sanders Office Number (970) 925-6300 Ext. 214 E-mail: csandersAshermanhoward.com ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAW JEROME PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 201 NORTH MILL STREET, SUITE 201 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1557 TELEPHONE: (970) 925-6300 FAX: (970) 925-1181 OFFICES IN: DENVER • COLORADO SPRINGS • ASPEN. VAIL STEAMBOAT SPRINGS • PHOENIX • SCOTTSDALE • RENO LAS VEGAS • ST. LOUIS July 17, 2012 Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested and Via Email: mrodell�a,comcast.net Marjorie and Timothy Rodell P.O. Box 8005 Aspen, Colorado 81612 CP-@premierivest.net Colleen Grosz 155 North Harbor Drive 43612 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Re: Milton Zale, Trustee of the Milton Zale Trustee dated December 18, 1980; Redevelopment of Zale Property Ladies and Gentlemen: I am contacting you on behalf of my client Milton Zale, Trustee of the Milton Zale Trust dated December 18, 1980 (the "Zale Trust") and in connection with that certain Settlement Agreement dated June 30, 2009 by and among the Zale Trust, Colleen Grosz, Timothy C. Rodell, Marjorie Rodell (the "Settlement Agreement"). This letter is a follow up to my previous letters dated August 1, 2011 and September 14, 2011. Pursuant to Section 8.b and Section 6.c.ii of the Settlement Agreement, with this letter, the Zale Trust encloses one compact disc which contains forty-five pages of materials which collectively comprise the building permit set of plans for the Zale Trust's intended design for the construction of a new one story residence on the "Zale Property" as defined in the Settlement Agreement and pursuant to the provisions of the Deed recorded in Book 275 at Page 113, Pitkin County, Colorado, including the construction of a "New Retaining_ Wall" as defined in Section 6.c of the Settlement Agreement. If you have questions or comments, please direct them to me, and I will facilitate providing any additional relevant information. LITIGATION0562435.1 Jennifer Phelan From: Jennifer Phelan Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 4:57 PM To: mrodell@comcast.net'; 'cg@premierivest.net' Subject: Notification of administrative determination, 190 Park Ave. Attachments: approval. pdf Dear Ms. Rodell and Ms. Grosz: The intent of this email is to apprise both of you of the recent administrative determination that was granted with regard to the Zale property (190 Park Ave.). The city requires pre -development grade (natural topography) be submitted with a building permit application. In cases, such as the Zales, where the grade has been affected by development activity an estimation may be permitted. Attached is the determination that was granted. As a neighbor and party of interest, staff wanted to inform you both of the decision. Any appeal of the decision should be submitted within 14 days of this email. If you have any questions with regard to the determination, please feel free to contact me. Kind regards, Jennifer Jennifer Phelan, AICP Deputy Planning Director Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2759 www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ACCEPTING AN ESTIMATION OF PRE - DEVELOPMENT TOPOGRAGHY FOR 190 PARK AVENUE Parcel ID No. 273718107009 APPLICANT: Milton Zale Trust REPRESENTATIVE: Gilbert Sanchez SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: The Community Development Director is charged with accepting "an estimation of pre -development topography" in cases where a property's natural grade "has been affected by prior development activity," pursuant to Section 26.575.020, Calculations and measurements. 190 Park Avenue previously contained a single-family residence that has been demolished and most of the lot is in some state of excavation. SUMMARY: As mentioned previously, the lot is currently, in an excavated state (Figure A). Neighboring properties contain steep grades and varying amounts of retaining walls. Applicant's representative has met with engineering and community development staff on site to discuss an approach for determining pre -development topography. The city's development engineer reviewed the geology of the neighborhood to assist in evaluating the neighborhood's topography. Additionally it was requested by the development engineer that certain spot elevations be taken and certain site sections be developed as part of the interpolation. Page lof 3 1 PROM `ORY SUBDIVISION RECEPTION NO. 105731 Ilif I II \ I♦\� ♦�\\ site benc I ♦I \l �♦♦♦� � ♦♦♦�� 1 oo�F •rx u 5j3�s�a / ♦� ♦�♦♦♦♦♦`` r i / I I I \ I 1 � ♦ ♦ ♦♦ lt� / i i I 1 l � � � I\ \♦b8r2t SQ.FT. \ 1 ♦1 r \�♦ \♦ 1 1 1 1 \\ \�1I II II 1I II II II II I% II 11� js I I °Wn +Ili 4-1 I! I 1 I I I I I I+ I + it /'y I d ! I I I I I I I+! 11 a /titLv I I I I I I STAN r r/ I I I I I I I I I I If I I ' rcLft, pt L , � r • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, (name, please print) being or representirvk an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. - -e_� S"', Signatur The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 7 day of 2011g, by ,.�- � s��-=-•-, • PUBLIC NOTICE of Administrative Determinetion At administrative determination with regartl to an estlmat on of pre -development topography for the lot known as 190 Park Avenue has been approved by the Community Development Director on July 31, 2012, as permitted by Section 26.575,020, Cal- Culations and Measurements, of the City of Aspen Land Use Code and is available for public inspec- tion in the Community Development Department. V City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on August 9. 2012 (6247263j V STgTEOfA S MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL commission expires Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION a- d1JlS L�] Jennifer Phelan From: Josh Rice Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 10:24 AM To: Jennifer Phelan Subject: 190 Park Historical Grade Interpolation Jennifer, I have reviewed the historic grade interpolation proposed by Studio B Architects for 190 Park and I believe the interpolation is reasonable. Prior to visiting the site I reviewed geologic maps and historical photographs to determine the general topography of the area during the early mining days. Based on the geologic map and photographs, it appears that the entire area between Midland Avenue and the Roaring Fork River was gently sloping alluvium. There may have been a slight increase in slope between Midland and Park Avenues as these two streets were likely built on two different alluvial benches. During the construction of the railroad and the ensuing construction of housing, it is reasonable to assume that the area between Midland and Park underwent cut and fill. Soil borings were presented by Studio B which provide evidence of fill on an adjacent property near Midland Avenue. The historic grade interpolation proposed by Studio B Architects generally follows a gentle slope between two benches. The proposed historic grade interpolation removes a high point, located immediately east of the property, because it was assumed to be fill and not natural historic grade. The historic grade interpolation is reasonable based on the information reviewed. Sincerely, Josh Rice, P.E. Development Engineer 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 429-2750 We are interested in your opinion. Please fill out the survey below and tell us how we are doing: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/2012Eng5vcs "?he mission of the Engineering Department is to enrich Aspen's distinctive character so that it remains one of the world's premier mountain communities by protecting the natural environment, improving water quality, enhancing the pedestrian experience and minimizing construction impacts for the enjoyment of residents and guests alike." NOTICE OF APPROVAL ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ACCEPTING AN ESTIMATION OF PRE - DEVELOPMENT TOPOGRAGHY FOR 190 PARK AVENUE Parcel ID No. 273718107009 APPLICANT: Milton Zale Trust REPRESENTATIVE: Gilbert Sanchez SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: The Community Development Director is charged with accepting "an estimation of pre -development topography" in cases where a property's natural grade "has been affected by prior development activity," pursuant to Section 26.575.020, Calculations and measurements. 190 Park Avenue previously contained a single-family residence that has been demolished and most of the lot is in some state of excavation. SUMMARY: As mentioned previously, the lot is currently in an excavated state (Figure A). Neighboring properties contain steep grades and varying amounts of retaining walls. Applicant's representative has met with engineering and community development staff on site to discuss an approach for determining pre -development topography. The city's development engineer reviewed the geology of the neighborhood to assist in evaluating the neighborhood's topography. Additionally it was requested by the development engineer that certain spot elevations be taken and certain site sections be developed as part of the interpolation. A: Aerial of site Page 1 of 3 • • STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to section 26.575.020, Calculations and measurements, of the City of Aspen Land Use Code, "the Community Development Director may accept an estimation of pre - development topography." In addition to providing requested spot elevations and site sections (Exhibit B), Applicant's representative provided a subsoil study and improvement survey for 131 Midland Ave. (a neighboring lot) to assist in understanding existing slopes and historical fill in the neighborhood (Exhibit Q. The resulting interpolation has been reviewed by the development engineer, based on the requested information, and is determined to be a reasonable estimate of pre -development grade. DECISION: In Accordance with the procedures, standards and limitations of Title 26, this Administrative Determination acknowledges and accepts the estimated pre -development topography certified by professional land surveyor Robert Hutton dated, July 10, 2012 (Exhibit A). This estimated topography shall be used as the basis for development allowances for this property. APPROVED BY: WBendon Community Development Director �, / ?PI&F Date Attachments: Exhibit A — Interpolated grade plan Exhibit B — Spot elevations and sections Exhibit C — 131 Midland survey and soils report Page 2of 3 III T I w mw-- 1 Interpreted Existing Retaining Wall & AI.,+,.. -I (`_..,A- w - -..— - � r:ii -c w � - - - _. n- -- - . 7941.1 4- 0 0 01 -0 w a� 3 7957.4 SECTION 1 : INTERPRETED NATURAL GRADE SCALE: 1/8" This diagram uses spot elevations provided by Robert C. Hutton dated June 2012. �q�M4M f i / ► / r / I Me4NOlr v�-� _OT 6 PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION lr-'-C' ION NO. 10573' I.AK'-VIEW -,)WN O-S_ ('N,OVI\ UVS AT UCC< 33, 'ACL 93 BURRES ARC=1 713ST AME\DM=NT THE HOBCOOD- URR�S SU3D VISION EXCEPTION P_AT PLAT BOOK /9, PAGE i U\IT ' ADA i DU=L=X CONDOM N UW-; P_A- PCIO< t7, PA.=1 m N U m t U 1 c6 � N CD C N N c cc L cc 0 Z 03 a) O. i 1= cc SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CONTOUR LINES SHO*4 HEREON WERE PREPARED BY STUDIO B ARCHITECTS BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD WEASUREWENTS TAKEN BY WE, BY SURVEY INSTRUMENT ON THE GROUND, IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD JUNE 12, 201Z THAT THE RESULTING CONTOUR COMPILATION APPEARS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, r AND MAY BE ACCEPTED AS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF NATURAL GRADE AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN. DATED: ------------ BY- -------------------------- ROBERT C. HUTTON, PLS #24312 • • • c«�t�BRB�}, iadoJd M JU9Wanad Z �O 843 O o V W m U adoJd 3 S S adoJd M cc �UaWaned �O a6P3 a d 0 J d 3 adOJd M V Q� N � O N L' N cm 21 C C) L L CD C CD C ca b- cv O. O O� Getech HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL Hep*Ipb'!Iak eotechnic 1, nc. G 5020 County Road 154 Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 Phone:970-945-7988 Fax:970-945-8454 email: hpgeo®hpgeotech.com SUBSOIL STUDY FOR FOUNDATION DESIGN PROPOSEDRESIDENCE 131 MIDLAND AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO JOB NO. 110 398A DECEMBER 10, 2010 PREPARED FOR: BRIAN AND JENNIFER HERMELIN c/o STUDIO B ARCHITECTS ATTN: JOSEPH SPEARS 501 RIO GRANDE PLACE, SUITE 104 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Parker 303-841-7119 • Colorado Springs 719-633-5562 * Silverthome 970-468-1989 • PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF STUDY This report resent h p presents the results of a subsoil study for a proposed residence to be located at 131 Midland Avenue, Aspen, Colorado. The project site is shown on Figure 1. The purpose of the study was to develop recommendations for the foundation design. The study was conducted in accordance with our proposal for geotechnical engineering services to Brian and Jennifer Hermelin dated November 11, 2010. An exploratory boring was drilled to obtain information on the subsurface conditions. Samples of the subsoils obtained during the field exploration were tested in the laboratory to determine their classification and other engineering characteristics. The results of the field exploration and laboratory testing were analyzed to develop recommendations for foundation types, depths and allowable pressures for the proposed building foundation. This report summarizes the data obtained during this study and presents our conclusions, design recommendations and other geotechnical engineering considerations based on the proposed construction and the subsurface conditions encountered. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The proposed residence will be a two story structure with an attached garage above a full basement. Basement and garage floors will be slab -on -grade. Grading for the structure is assumed to be relatively minor with cut depths up to about 10 feet. We assume relatively light foundation loadings, typical of the proposed type of construction. The existing house will be razed prior to new construction. If building loadings, location or grading plans change significantly from those described above, we should be notified to re-evaluate the recommendations contained in this report. SITE CONDITIONS The property is occupied with a single family home constructed in 1959. The existing residence is a wood frame split level with an attached garage. Garage floor is slab -on - Job No. 110 398A ,..,P rgrade. The property is landscaped with lawn, brush and evergreen trees. There was about 8 inches of snow cover at the time of our exploration. The ground surface is relatively flat rin the front along Midland Avenue and steepens behind the house. MINE SUBSIDENCE Portions of the Aspen area are underlain by mine workings. The workings are primarily underground tunnels between Aspen and Smuggler Mountains southeast and east of the downtown area. The works consist of numerous tunnels beginning a few hundred feet below the ground surface becoming shallower to the south. Under certain conditions Ithese workings may collapse and cause surface subsidence. Glory Hole Park, located about 1500 feet southwest of the project, is the site is of a surface depression caused by ' the collapse of one or more tunnels. The subject site appears to be about 1000 feet east of the main tunnel works. Our boring was relatively shallow and for foundation design only, however, no indications of subsurface voids were found at the subject site. We believe the risk of subsidence due to the collapse of underground mine works throughout the service life of Ithe proposed development to be low. If further evaluation of the mine works subsidence potential is desired, we should be contacted. FIELD EXPLORATION The field exploration for the project was conducted on November 30, 2010. One exploratory boring was drilled at the location shown on Figure 1 to evaluate the subsurface conditions. The boring was advanced with 4 inch diameter continuous flight augers powered by a truck -mounted CME-45B drill rig. The boring was logged by a representative of Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechl ical, Inc. Samples of the subsoils were taken with a I % inch I.D. spoon sampler. The sampler was driven into the subsoils at various depths with blows from a 140 pound hammer falling 30 Job No. 110 398A G99teCh 0 - 3- inches. This test is similar to the standard penetration test described by ASTM Method D-1586. The penetration resistance values are an indication of the relative density or consistency of the subsoils. Depths at which the samples were taken and the penetration resistance values are shown on the Log of Exploratory Boring, Figure 2. The samples were returned to our laboratory for review by the project engineer and testing. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS A graphic log of the subsurface conditions encountered at the site is shown on Figure 2. The subsoils consist of about 2 feet of loose silty sand and gravel fill overlying silty sandy gravel with cobbles and boulders down to the depth drilled of 12'/z feet. Drilling in the dense granular soils with auger equipment was difficult due to the cobbles and boulders and drilling refusal was encountered in the deposit. Laboratory testing performed on samples obtained from the boring included natural moisture content and gradation analyses. Results of gradation analyses performed on a small diameter drive sample (minus 1% inch fraction) of the coarse granular subsoils are shown on Figure 4. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling and the subsoils were slightly moist to moist. The boring was backfilled following drilling. FOUNDATION BEARING CONDITIONS The natural granular soils are adequate for support of spread footing foundations. Existing fill from site grading and foundation wall backfill should be removed from beneath proposed footings. The basement excavation should penetrate fill from previous site development. The City of Aspen requires an engineered excavation stabilization plan if proposed foundations are within 15 feet of a neighboring structure or public travel way. The plan is Job No. 110 398A G95tech �-4- • not required if excavations are less than 5 feet below existing grades or further than 15 feet from travel ways and less than 15 feet deep. Slope bracing (if needed) through use of Ia variety of systems such as grouting, micro pile and soils nails should be feasible at the site. A shoring contractor should provide design drawings to support the proposed excavation slopes. Other City requirements may also be applicable. I DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ' FOUNDATIONS ' Considering the subsurface conditions encountered in the exploratory boring and the nature of the proposed construction, we recommend the building be founded with spread footings bearing on the natural granular soils. The design and construction criteria presented below should be observed for a spread footing foundation system. 1) Footings placed on the undisturbed natural granular soils should be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 4,000 psf. Based on experience, we expect settlement of footings designed and constructed as discussed in this section will be about 1 inch or less. 2) The footings should have a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for isolated pads. 3) Exterior footings and footings beneath unheated areas should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevation for frost protection. Placement of foundations at least 42 inches below exterior grade is typically used in this area. 4) Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 10 feet. Foundation walls acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist lateral earth pressures as discussed in the "Foundation and Retaining Walls" section of this report. Job No. 110 398A G �. �p _ • LEGEND: ® FILL; about 4 inches of screened gravel overlying silty sand and gravel, loose, moist, black and brown. GRAVEL (GM); with cobbles and boulders, sandy, silty, dense, slightly moist, light brown, subrounded rocks. Drive sample; standard penetration test (SPT), 1 3/8 inch I.D. split spoon sample, ASTM-1586. 40/12 Drive sample blow count; indicates that 40 blows of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches were required to drive the SPT sampler 12 inches. Disturbed bulk sample. TPractical drilling refusal. NOTES: 1. The exploratory boring was drilled on November 30, 2010 with a 4-inch diameter continuous flight power auger. 2. Location of the exploratory boring was measured approximately by pacing from features shown on the site plan provided. 3. The exploratory boring elevation was obtained by interpolation between contours on the site plan provided. 4. The exploratory boring location and elevation should be considered accurate only to the degree implied by the method used. 5. The lines between materials shown on the exploratory boring log represent the approximate boundaries between material types and transitions may be gradual. 6. No free water was encountered in the boring at the time of drilling. The boring was backfilled following drilling. Fluctuation in water level may occur with time. 7. Laboratory Testing Results: WC = Water Content (%) +4 = Percent retained on the No. 4 sieve -200 = Percent passing No. 200 sieve 110 398A � ��''I LEGEND AND NOTES Figure 3 • RECEIVED JUL 11 2012 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT VICINITY MAP V=400' a® CITY OF ASPEN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY A PART OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, RIVERSIDE ADDITION LOT 7, BLOCK 1, PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION LOT 8, BLOCK 1, PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO / LOT 9 / PROMONTORY / LOT 7 PROMONTORY SUB. DURRES PARCEL HOBGOOD PARCEL 20.64. laT x &1( 7 / RIVER510E A00. PARCEL 'A ro ir � 7 � PC DLr g / ( i♦♦♦///jjj C 18 Y r� a1T�lf/ + a PIC jet♦!, DLI3' ♦ Al' +� d♦V a DLY Ch- /T \` \ C ♦Vl o � /5 REBAR♦ WpppDEC( NO CAP 4 J +` ♦� + LY 1YIT:1L ARF..1=5.322 Se -FT.- + ROOC N75 / � 00•W I/ YPC C(l oD\ LS/ 237e \1 % � r � j 66.16, s8s7r20w CITY OF ASPEN CPS MONUMENT / \ NO. 1 LOT 2 MARGARET MEADOW SUB. 3 m YPC LSO 22 CONCRETE HATCHING DENOTES DRIVEWAY AREA OF DRIVEWAY ENCROACHMENT S75'06'00 n1r E ae' 16'0p' SET 3.6 0 5 T. COR. l AS PSI' DLY Olt--, P1�0 DLI} �P10�� qLt P,w 2 STORY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE P1YA�i i �• 3 / O p PARCEL _n p / P19' 6 a9• LOi L01 8B �, Qy PARCEL•C 3 ,8 / CAAVEL / DRIVEWAY d iT9y1/ � W t LEGEND O' /Its INDICATES FOUND MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED. Pr 77�� DLr O INDICATES SET MONUMENT LS► 37972 P,YPC DL6' Wi YELLOW PLASTICCAP .SPLASTICL Sj eIIa POWER POLE [4--��] FENCE LINE YPC 4 12376 & (I[ LIGHT POLE ---OUL-- OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE CiWARK 154.3Y �'3' ® ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER EM ELECTRIC METER (D TELEPHONE RISER ®N,, ASPEN TREE ® CABLE RISER PINE TREE O.H. OVERHANG TYPICAL D9• (DECIDUOUS 9 NCH DIAMETER TRUNK) `PJ WV WATER VALVE P6- (PINE 6 INCH DIAMETER TRUNK) {ice DLS (DRIP LINE 8 FEET) SLOPE ANALYSIS CITY JF ASPEN GPS MONUMENT N0. 18 - SLOPES 20% < 30% (97 S0. FT.) — SLOPES 30% AND OVER (427 SO.FT.) 0 5 10 20 1' = 10' NOTES 1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL A: LOT 3. BLOCK 7. RIVERSIDE ADDITION. EXCEPTING FROM SAID LOT 3, THE SOUTHERLY 15 FEET. PARCEL B: A PORTION OF LOT 7, BLOCK 1 PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 105731 IN DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 240 OF THE RECORDS FOR PITKIN COUNTY, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 SAID PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION BEARS N75'06'W 3.61 FEET; THENCE S75U6'E 46 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE N17'45'E 40 FEET; THENCE N75'06'W 16 FEET; THENCE IN A SOUTHERLY AND WESTERLY COURSE ON A STRAIGHT LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: A PORTION OF LOT 8, BLOCK 1 PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION. WHICH SUBDIVISION PLAT IS RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 105731 IN DITCH BOOK 2A AT PACE 240 OF THE RECORDS FOR PITKIN COUNTY. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHENCE THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8 BEARS N17.45'E 20.92 FEET; THENCE N17'45'E 20.92 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT B. WHICH IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 7, SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE N7506W 42'61 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE S24.06'W TO A POINT 15 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 3, BLOCK 7, RIVERSIDE ADDITION; THENCE 57596'E TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE N2417'E TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 2) BASIS OF BEARING: A BEARING OF S24'3r00'W BETWEEN A FOUND REBAR AND YPC LS/ 2376 AT THE S.E. PROPERTY CORNER AND A FOUND REBAR AND YPC LS/ 2376 ALONG THE EASTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF LOT 2 MARGARET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION. 3) THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR. TITLE INFORMATION REUED UPON FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY FURNISHED BY STEWART TITLE. ORDER NO. 42962, DATED 10/14/2004 . 4) ELEVATIONS BASED UPON OPS MONUMENT NO.1. BENCHMARK= 7954.37' AT S.E. PROPERTY CORNER. CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1(ONE) FOOT. 5) NATURAL HAZARDS: A: ACCORDING TO FIRM MAP 08D97CO203. PANEL 203 OF 325. DATED JJ NE 4, 1987. SAID LOT IS CONSIDERED TO BE IN ZONE X AND OUTSIDE THE 500 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. B: ACCORDING TO THE 2001 SURFACE DRAINAGE MASTER PLAN, SAID LOT IS CONSIDERED TO BE OUTSIDE THE MUDFLOW HAZARD AREA. C: ACCORDING TO THE 2009 PERCENT SLOPE MAP, SAID LOT IS SHOWN TO HAVE SLOPES LESS THAN 105 6) CITY OF ASPEN BUILDING RESTRICTIONS: SETBACK RESTRICTIONS: R-6 ZONE DISTRICT REGULATIONS. SIDE YARDS: 5.0' REAR YARD:10.0' FRONT YARD:10.0' RES, 30.0' SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I. MICHAEL P. LAFTERTY. HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS AN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT PERFORMED UNDER MY SUPERVISION ON 10/2008 AND REVISED 7/2010 OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND. THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS —OF —WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THESE PREMISES ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN. ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1/15.000. _�DOp(L I MICHAEL P. LAFFERTY PLS./ 37972 ` _ DATE. Z 37972 'z 2-7-11 4 PTQ Rocky Mountain SMnrryYp DATE SURVEYED: 10/2008 REVISED: 7/2010. 2/2011 FOE N0: 08548 CLIENTHENAIELIN all] ayWal yAgs N uNml�Ymttfi]] NOTft'ArnmfinFaCa:mdolmywi mvP myYplrmm FnW pNar 9TOJ741Ht upm mY Jefm �n W:, Iimry vBAin Mee Yem.An p�bv Amm+valde(m M1n tTO%]38T] mrY mY mim Wxd WmmY drRr, n Ili, auray 6'mmumtlmm' MnOaWrM.mt tlun �rn rem Om We dne attlr mu6.-drY�v.n Mam a r c h i t e c t s July 10, 2012 Jennifer Phelan Community Development Deputy Director City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Determination of Natural Grade for 190 Park Avenue Dear Jennifer: RECEIVED JUL 11 2012 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I am writing to request your determination of natural grade for 190 Park Avenue as permitted by the City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.575.010 which states, "In instances where the natural grade of a property has been affected by prior development activity, the Community Development Director may accept an estimation of pre - development topography prepared by a registered land surveyor or civil engineer." On May 16, 2012, you informed me that the City of Aspen would not accept our completed Improvement Survey illustrating the current disturbed conditions of the site. A new document representing an estimation of pre - development topography would be required. Our process to prepare this estimation occurred as follows: 1. An onsite meeting and visual observation of the site and its context with you and Josh Rice of the Engineering Department occurred on May 31, 2012. 2. Josh provided a geologic map of the area to inform our on -site discussion. 3. 1 provided existing surveys of the subject property and the neighboring property at 131 Midland Avenue for discussion. In addition, I discussed completed soils reports for 190 Park Avenue and 131 Midland Avenue that revealed the subsoil conditions. 4. Josh requested new spot elevations at identified locations and site sections be prepared for his evaluation. 5. On June 21, 2012, a meeting with you and Josh Rice occurred at City Hall to review & discuss the surveyor's information. This included spot elevations and site sections. 6. At the June 21s' meeting, I presented a preliminary sketch of the estimated natural grade developed from the process & materials identified above. Josh agreed that this was a reasonable interpretation, and I was instructed to prepare a final document for submittal with this request. This letter is accompanied by the following items for your reference: 24 x 36 Items - 1. 190 Park Avenue Interpretation of Natural Grade dated July 2, 2012 / Certified on July 10, 2012 by Robert C. Hutton Improvement & Topographic Survey for 190 Park Avenue dated October 4, 2011 by High Country Engineering. 190 Park Avenue Spot Elevation Survey dated June 2012 by Robert C. Hutton 11 x 17 Items - 1. Improvement Survey for 131 Midland Avenue dated February 7, 2011 by Rocky Mountain Surveying 2. Section 1: Interpreted Natural Grade (References 24 x 36 Item 3 above) 3. 190 Park Avenue Interpretation of Natural Grade with Section Lines 4. Sections A, B & C (References 11 x 17 Item 3 above) 8-112 x 11 Items - 1. Geotechnical Review for 190 Park Avenue dated October 18, 2011 by HP Geotech 2. Subsoil Study for Foundation Design for 131 Midland Avenue dated December 10, 2010 by HP Geotech I hope that our meetings, methodology and the attached materials permit you to find that our submitted final document, "Interpretation of Natural Grade", represents a reasonable estimation of the pre -development topography as defined by the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Please call or email if you or Josh require additional information to make your determination. e ards, Gilbert Sanc ez Principal gilbert @studiobarchitects.net 501 rio grande place suite 104 aspen co. 81611 970.920.9428 fax 970.920.7822 w w w .studiobarchitects.net tech HEPWORTH - PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL October 18, 2011 Milt Zale c/o Studio B Architects �ftpttnrtll•I'att Iak (icutrilmtial. Inn. 5i120 Gunn R,md 154 Phone: S)i(� �11i•7U,titi Fix 970-045 ,454 r111,+11: hhtr,'dhh;i„trth.t„m Attn: Gilbert Sanchez 501 Rio Grande Place, Suite 104 Aspen, Colorado 81611 ilg bertAstudiobarchitects.net Job No. 106 0243 Subject: Geotechnical Review, Proposed Residence, 190 Park Avenue, Aspen, Colorado Gentlemen: As requested, we have performed a geotechnical review of the existing conditions with respect to the current proposed construction at the subject site. This report summarizes our findings and recommendations. The review was performed as part of our agreement for professional engineering services to Milt Zale, dated September 19, 2011. Background Information: Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical previously performed a geotechnical review of the site for a previous proposed residence and submitted our findings in a report dated March 31, 2006 under the above job number. The excavation for the residence was begun and shoring installed when the project stopped. We recently observed the site conditions during our September 12, 2011 site. Proposed Construction: The proposed residence will be a one story structure over a walkout basement level daylighting to the west. The lower level will be primarily concrete construction. Ground floors will be slab -on -grade. Cut depths will range up to about 12 feet. Foundation loadings are assumed to be moderate. Site Conditions: The previous residence on the site has been removed. The terrain consists of a relatively flat bench on the adjacent lot to the east with a steep slope down through the subject site and to Park Avenue. Portions of the uphill (eastern) side of the site are shored with a micro -pile wall with a maximum retained height of about 12 to 15 feet. Most of the lot is excavated at one level to about the elevation of Park Avenue. There is a three tier timber wall about 9 feet high retaining the slope above the excavation. The soils exposed in the partial excavation consist of relatively dense, slightly silty sand, gravel and cobbles with scattered boulders to several feet in diameter. No free water was observed in the excavation or from the uphill cut area. Mine Subsidence: Portions of the Aspen area are underlain by mine workings. The workings are primarily underground tunnels between Aspen and Smuggler Mountains Parker 303-841-71l-) * Colorado 719-633-i562 • '-ikrthornt 070-46,S-19NQ Milt Zale October 18, 2011 Page 2 southeast and east of the downtown area. The works consist of numerous tunnels beginning a few hundred feet below the ground surface becoming shallower to the south. Under certain conditions these workings may collapse and cause surface subsidence. Glory Hole Park, which is located about 1,500 feet southwest of the subject site, is believed to have been caused by the collapse of one or more tunnels. The subject site appears to be outside of these main tunnel works. If further evaluation of the mine works subsidence potential is desired, we should be contacted. Recommendations: The sand, gravel and cobble soils at the site are considered suitable to support moderately loaded spread footings with relatively low settlement potential. Spread footings bearing on the coarse granular soils and designed using an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf can be assumed for support of the proposed residence. We should observe the foundation excavations to evaluate the exposed soil bearing conditions. Temporary excavation cut slopes up to about 10 feet high should be no steeper than 1 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical). Where slopes cannot be laid back to a stable grade, shoring of the excavation cut slopes will be needed and is planned. Micro -pile walls or chemical grouting are feasible for the shoring system. The micro -pile walls can be designed as permanent or temporary shoring. Chemical grouting should be considered as temporary shoring. Permanent slopes should be graded at 2 (h) to 1 (v) or flatter and protected from erosion by re -vegetation or other means. The spread footings should be a minimum width of 16 inches for continuous walls and 2 feet for columns. All fill, debris, topsoil and any loose disturbed soils should be removed and the footing bearing level extended down to the undisturbed natural coarse granular soils. Exterior footings should be provided with adequate soil cover above their bearing elevations for frost protection. Continuous foundation walls should be reinforced top and bottom to span local anomalies such as by assuming an unsupported length of at least 12 feet. Foundation walls up to 12 feet high acting as retaining structures should also be designed to resist a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid unit weight of at least 45 pcf for on -site granular soils, excluding debris and oversized rocks, as backfill. For walls taller than 12 feet, the walls should be designed to resist a uniform lateral earth pressure of 23H in psf where H is the wall height in feet. Foundation walls adjacent to within about 3 feet of permanent shoring should be designed for a 30 pcf equivalent fluid pressure for walls up to 12 feet tall and a uniform pressure of 15H psf where H is the wall height in feet for walls 12 feet and taller. The pressures assume minus 1 % inch screened rock as backfill. Surcharge pressures such as from an upward slope or the exiting timber retaining wail to the east should be added to the lateral earth pressure values. To resist the lateral earth pressure a coefficient of friction of 0.50 at the base of the footing and a passive earth pressure based on a equivalent fluid weight of 350 pcf at the sides of the footing can be used. A perimeter foundation drain should be provided to prevent temporary buildup of hydrostatic pressure behind the basement and retaining walls and Job No. 106 0243 GeC ech 41. Milt Zale • 0 October 18, 2011 Page 3 prevent wetting of the lower level. The underdrain system should include at least 4 inches of free draining gravel below the basement floor slab. Structural fill placed within floor slab areas can consist of the on -site sand and gravel soils compacted to at least 95% of standard Proctor density (SPD) at a moisture content near optimum. Backfill placed around the structure should be compacted to at least 90% SPD and the surface graded to prevent ponding within at least 10 feet of the building. We should review the foundation, grading and shoring design prior to construction and perform additional analyses as needed. Limitations: The recommendations submitted in this letter are based on our observation of the site conditions and our experience in the area, and does not include subsurface exploration to evaluate the actual subsurface conditions. The risk of foundation movement may be greater than indicated in this report because of possible variations in the subsurface conditions. It is possible the data obtained by subsurface exploration could change the recommendations contained in this letter. Our services do not include determining the presence, prevention or possibility of mold or other biological contaminants (MOBC) developing in the future. If the client is concerned about MOBC, then a professional in this special field of practice should be consulted. We should observe the foundation excavation at the time of construction. If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact our office. r•1 Sincerely, HEPWORTH — PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC. '06 David A. Young, P.E.je 32-216 1 Rev. by: SLP DAY/ljg 11#811116100 cc: Studio NYL Structural Engineers - Julian Lineham (ilineham(iistudionyl.com) Heritage Builders — Ty McSwain (t wheritaeebuildersinc.net) Job No. 106 0243 G( c&ech 0 L_O1 6 PROMONTORY m N SUBDIVISION RECEPTION NO. 105731 +.► v PE y T f a� 1 ! -•1:0FUlkikil LAKEVIEW TOWNHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS -C 1 PLAT BOOK 33, PAGE 93 I � aPE4 !PACE PAS ■K 7m/m m tmmoT D 040 40 It mc 4k a %wr S14'02'15"E 21.13' c� L7 ; u BURRES PARCEL FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HOBGOOD—BURRES SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT PLAT BOOK 49, PAGE 11 I... -WAR ka 4 r Li��M7 \ UNIT 1 ADAIR DUPLEX CONDOMINIUMS PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 49 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: RECEIVED JUL 11 2012 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE CONTOUR LINES SHOWN HEREON WERE PREPARED BY STUDIO B ARCHITECTS BASED ON ACTUAL FIELD MEASUREMENTS TAKEN BY ME, BY SURVEY INSTRUMENT ON THE GROUND, IN THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD JUNE 12, 2012, THAT THE RESULTING CONTOUR COMPILATION APPEARS CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, AND MAY BE ACCEPTED AS A REASONABLE INTERPRETATION OF NATURAL GRADE AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN. DATED:--t—t-- ---- BY: ------ ROBERT C. HUTTON, PLS #24312 oPPpO RE��ST 24312 Z� fr cc cc i. cc Cz ■O cc 01-+ Co CD co cc M. Co Cn 7T 0 N S g 3�� 00 OFF O 10 Cf00 —w1 w- ow OY I �,`� p ez3v 1�- 00 O 0 88 0" G C I i "'b • o 0 g o a YC•1 0 0' ~' vtor ' B�°0f o w • in 0 0 SMI e v fl L �7 0 5� 2 GRAPHIC SCALE 30 a 1n 30 NO 140 ( IN FEET) I inch - 30 ft. 4111 K� ti w IN It iPE"�T ST Frl a/ ""°^°r411 am, _, •- A � IP so J " K e. " q n DALE A VEN U '~~ ~�� 1 IAA N�� 10?947.3 YEP j� LEGEND Z EP ER — EDGE OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT EG — EDGE OF RIVER — EDGE OF GRAVEL SHOULDER > ES — EDGE OF SHOULDER SSMH — SANITARY SEVER MANHOLE TB — TOP OF HANK BASIN INV. — INVERT LAT. — LATERAL C R.V. — RATER VALVE TOP QFIREHYDRANNC�RETE CURB gHQ _ GIRD. — GROUND —T & E— — TELEPHONE & ELECTRICAL LINE —G— — GAS LINE —W— — NAIL AND SHINER N&S — JOINT POLE —U— — UNDERGROUND H OVERHEAD COT — COTTONWOOD TREE / DIAMLITER 0 DBl DI — DRAIN INLET CL — CENTERLINE FNC — FENCE FL — FL )WLINE B/W — BACK OF WALK k The utilities existing on the surface and shown on this drawing have been located by field survey. All underground utilities shown on this drawing are from records of the various utility companies and the surveyor does not assume responsibility for their completeness, Indicated location, or size. Record utility location should be confirmed by exposing the utility. FOUND BLM BRASS DISC (Q-159) SW CORNER OF FOUNDATION — SOUTH SIDE OF PITKIN COUNTY COURTHOUSE, f 1 FT, ABOVE GROUNi ELEVATION 7911.98 FEET. NAVD88 ALL FEATURES SHOWN EXCEPT FIELD MEASURED SPOT ELEVATIONS TAKEN FROM 1998 ASPEN GIS AND AERIAL TOPOGRAPHY. &ftmo SPOT ELEVATION SURVEY LANDS OF MILTON ZALE TRUST 190 PARK AVENUE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN (ASSESSOR PARCEL �2737-181- 07009) ROBERT C. HUTTON 725 CEMETERY LANE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 544-9952 IMPROVEMENT AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A PART OF LOTS 6 AND 9 OF THE PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION, RECEPTION NO. 427535 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 1 1 �S �1 i GRAPHIC SCALE �1 10 0 9 10 20 40 ( IN FEET) 1 inch - 10 ft. LEGEND SLOPE LEGEND O SANITARY MANHOLE 0% TO 20% pd WATER VALVE s WATER SPIGOT 20% TO 307. DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE ® 30% + LOT 6 PROMONTORY RECEPTIONSUBDIVISION • 105731 -FOUND NO, 5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED PROP CORNER HCE L.S. NO. 19598 AT GRADE SITE BENCH MARK FOUND NO. 5 REBAR & EXISTING YELLOW PLASTIC CAP S156 MARKED PROP CORNER O.tEA OVE GRADE ^�FENCE ELEVATION: 7963.13 CITY OF ASPEN�� GPS CONTROL MONUMENT GPS-4 FOUND 3-1/4" DALE o S } } Ul 6? ALUMINUM CAP O AVENUE } / \ } rrl \ \ \ SET NO. 5 REBAR &--- / \ } YELLOW PLASTIC CAI` MARKEDP HCELS NO19598 AT GRADE V / / O { ( rn/ o . p LA STAIR ENCROACHMENT , AGREEMENT PER ;qua h"1, RECEPTION NO, i� � 303634 4 / ! 7943 { / / RETAINING WALL } ENCROACHMENT / AGREEMENT RECEPTIONNO. / 303634' r / — POINT OF BEGINNING ,277.2 FOUND PK NAIL & SHINER / ' LS NO, 25947 IN ° WOOD RETAINING WALL 0�:CITY OF ASPEN GPS CONTROL MONUMENT GPS-1 FOUND 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP OTICE; ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL CTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS FTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION ASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN EARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON, TREE CHART TREE TYPE SIZE DRIP 1 DECIDUOUS 4" 10' 2 DECIDUOUS 4" 10' 3 CONIFEROUS 6" 15' 4 CONIFEROUS 6" 15' 5 DECIDUOUS 3 4" 30' r 7 BUILDING ENVELOPE T (SEE NOTE 8) �1V OVI INCR� DRIVE a ° awl 9 • tl II+—L TIMBERS E OPEN SPACE PARCEL BK 689/PG 805 EXHIBIT D 738/PG 820 EXHIBIT D (P833) FOUND 5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP ILLEGIBLE S14'02'15"E IURRE�.► PARCEL 21.13' FIRST AMENDMENT TO } \: A DECK R 3"P THE HO BGOOD^BURRES \jam R1 PLANTER SUBDIVISION FOUND PK NAIL EXCEPTION PLAT & SHINER i LSIN WOO59 D47 PLAT ODIC 49, PAGE I I " / RETAINING WALL ADJOINER % ETE% BUILDING r /AN /Lh°,SCf2 E VAAbATED PpALE AVENUE • `' / / / / PER/THE PLAT OF FROMWTORY S68DIVI�S16N /DITCH OK 2A/, PAGE/240 FOUND NO. -4 REB BELOW GREL � ✓OWN i / // // ,// // // // // // / // // / ` L L FOLIND PNAIL ` LSN HffNE9 IN WOOD RETAINING WALL / / / / / / / 14 UNIT I ADAIR DUPLEX ' CONDOMINIUMS / PLAT BOOK 57, PAGE 49 / V it—j 41 1 Y MAY SCALE: 1" = 2,000' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN LOTS 6 AND 9 OF THE PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HOBGFOOD—BURRES SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT RECORDED IN RECEPTION NUMBER 427535 SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY OF PARK AVENUE, THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE LEAVING SAID HOBGOOD—BURRES SUBDIVISION N05'03'00"W ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY A DISTANCE OF 43.39 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT—OF—WAY N10'04'00"W A DISTANCE OF 71.56 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL DESCRIBED IN RECEPTION NO, 375895; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT—OF—WAY S75'06'00"E ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY, A DISTANCE OF 67.31 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID HOBGOOD—BURRES SUBDIVISION; THENCE LEAVING SAID RECEPTION NO. 375895, S07'02'58"W ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 45.72 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY S14'02'15"E A DISTANCE OF 21.13 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY SII*56'47"W A DISTANCE OF 41.93 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY N75'06'00"W A DISTANCE OF 40.93 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 5,685 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1, BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S26'49'05"W BETWEEN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PART OF LOTS 6 AND 9 OF THE PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION, A NO. 5 REBAR AND PLASTIC CAP LS NO, 19598 IN PLACE AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF A PART OF LOTS 6 OF AND 9 OF SAID SUBDIVISION, A PK NAIL AND SHINER LS NO, 25947 IN PLACE AS SHOWN HEREON. Z DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 25, 2011. 3. LINEAR UNITS USED TO PERFORM THIS SURVEY WERE U.S. SURVEY FEET, 4. THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT OF THE PROMONTORY SUBDIVISION (DITCH BOOK 2A AT PAGE 240 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE), THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE HOBGOOD—BURRES SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION PLAT (BOOK 49 AT PAGE 11 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS OFFICE), RECEPTION NO. 375895 OF THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, DOCUMENTS OF RECORD AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE AS SHOWN. 5. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY OF ASPEN (ORDER NO. 43859, DATED MAY 26, 2005). 6. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) REFERENCED FROM NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY (NGS) BENCHMARK STATION S159, 7. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 8. BUILDING ENVELOPE HAS A TEN (10) FOOT FRONT AND REAR SETBACK. THE SIDE YARD HAS A 13.9 FOOT TOTAL SETBACK FOR BOTH SIDES AND HAS FIVE (5) FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK ON ONE SIDE, PER THE CITY OF ASPEN. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. FOR MILTON ZALE, I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE, MAY 25, 2011, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. LINER ERROR OF CLOSURE IS LESS THAN 1:15,000. / BY: ------ `--* / FRANK W. Hi / / / r PND� t ItI . A�m M EL i r`"'1 T U ac X 0 PROJE( 21116 duel A. Fee Wai r Request Form THE CITY of AsiE\T City of Aspen Community Development Department This form should be completed and submitted to the Community Development Director for review. You will be notified when a decision has been made to waive or not to waive the fees regarded in this request form. For what fees are you requesting waiver? Applicant Name: Mailing address: E-mail address: i � L-s- BUILDING ��,, ❑ PLANNING Ma 2--_ ontact Ph.# 920-9L4-2'i� Project name & address: [ q,0 1�?cr� A-V--p— o Fee Breakdown: Fee Description Original Fee Amount Requested Waiver Fee Description Original Fee Amount Requested Waiver Energy Code Fee REMP Fee Excavation Foundation Fee Zoning Review Fee Inspection Fee Planning Application Fee Permit Fee HPC Application Fee Plan Check Other: TOTAL OF FEE WAIVER REQUEST $ 3 I S� ' 0 O Reason for Waiver: eneral Fund Department Waived or decreased by City Council (specify ordinance or other decision document) ❑ Other —Please explain: V((�"\ Pkw.Q-- Applicant"Signature For office use only: Type of fees waived: )<1"PROVED ❑ DISAPPROVED rl-41ve Co ity Development Director Date Total fees waived: $ 31 � - O o V11 /1--2- ate CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT is FEE WAIVER POLICY 9 PURPOSE Fee waivers to eligible individuals and organizations submitting for building permit or land use application may be considered upon filing a fee waiver request form to the Community Development Department. Approval of fee waiver requests may be made by the Community Development Director, according to the adopted fee policy of the City of Aspen. Costs for all building permit and land use applications, other than those waived by the Community Development Director, shall be paid as specified by the fee policy; prior to the issuance of building permits and at the time of submittal of land use applications. PROCESS Fees administered by the Community Development Department can only be waived by submitting a completed fee waiver form to the Community Development Director. The request shall contain a description of the project along with a statement expressing eligibility for fee waiver. The Community Development Director will review the request and give approval or disapproval in accordance with provisions set forth in this policy. The Community Development Director does not have the ability to waive fees administered by other City Departments or other organizations. All organizations and individuals seeking fee waiver MUST submit their written request to the City of Aspen Community Development Director prior to submitting the building permit or land use application. The approved fee waiver must then be presented at the time the building permit or land use application is submitted to the building or planning departments. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA General Fund Departments do not pay fees to the Community Development Department for building permits or planning applications, with the exception of Capital Projects. The fees waived for these projects will be tracked by the Community Development Department (journal entries are therefore unnecessary). In effort to keep paperwork and applications consistent, General Fund Departments shall still be required to submit the approved fee waiver with all applications for building and planning applications. Gei feral Fund Departments include: --I tF-1 1W11114141. t .. 111mklq Non -Departmental 001.00 Streets Department 001.41 City Council 001.03 Parks Department 001.55 City Manager 001.05 GIs Department 001.60 Personnel 001.06 IT Department 001.61 City Clerk 001.07 Special Events 001.70 City Attorney 001.09 Recreation Activities 001.71 Risk Management 001.10 Aspen Recreation Center (ARC) 001.72 City Finance Department 001.11 Ice Garden Operations 001.74 Community Development 001.13 Cons. Trust FD/Lottery 001.75 Engineering Department 001.15 *Capital Projects 001.90 Building Department 001.21 Asset Management Plan (AMP) 001.91 Environmental Health 001.25 *Tabor Capital Projects 001.94 Police Department 001.31 Outgoing Transfers 001.95 Records 001.33 Communications 001.39 NOTE* Capital Projects are not exempt from fees