The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.330 E Main St.0005.2012.ASLU THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0005.2012.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 07 315it '), � � /� F K's PROJECTS ADDRESS 330 E. MAIN ST PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION INSTUBSTAINIAL PUD AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE VAAN ASSOCIATES DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.20.12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9.4.12 0005.2012.ASLU 330 E MAIN ST 2737-07-3-21-001 INSUBSTANITAL PUD AMENDMENT 7. P Lt,Nu g tr AMJe }11- 4 .&~ .~ I - HOTELJEROME RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2012 HISTORIC INVENTORY CITY Or AbreN 01 February 2012 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENI - -0 ,- .r t 1 r 4 rk; . .4 49* r~\4*AL:e .i: illill'lilli -Ill#[ItÂ·7:f . 6-2 Di.'Am!!. L F. f. 4111* h. /7 ' 1% t . . 4 . 1 -- . I . te;1*- r - I t 3 . ~.r eQ29 + . Snowstorm, Hotel Jerome, 1952 : 4.... owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com ... 1,!M 1 persono hotels List of Historically Significant Items - interior Hotel Jerome Numer-Di,27*Fin Allowed per PUD (March, 22 071-----~--~-~5 ] Bar #1 ~Front & Back Bar To remain as they are with refurbishment as needed. To remain astheyare with refurbishment as needed. Original to the bullging, but relocated in 1946. Ceiling isa replica according to historic photographs & previous J Bar #2 IPressed Tin Ceiling To remain in the central section of the room, with refurbishment as needed. To remain vÂ¢0 refurbish~EEt-ps needed. contractor. J Bar #3 Oil Lamps (now electric) 'To remain as they are. To remain as they are. Previously located in alcoves, not windows. Basis for determination is thatthere is no evidence thatthis is NOT 1 Bar ##4_- 10pening to Lobby Opening to remain in place, removal not approved. Opening to remain In place. original. However early Sanborn maps show a solid wall. Basis for determination 45 that there is no evidence that this is NOT original. However early Sanborn maps show a solid wall. HPC notes J Bar #5 ~Door to Lobby To remain in place iiTo remain in place. that the door matches the J-Bar entry door. (2) atthe entry vestibule shall remiIA-in place, The remaining (4}U be relocated to the restaurant ~(2) at th~entry vestibulishall remain in place Thelemairing (4) to remain in place or be relocated En~21 -13!fam Radiators corridor. Radiators to remain in historic portion of the hotel, to a location TBD within the historic section of the building. To remain in place. Existing stone top to be replacedto 'ideally replicate' the original materials & To remain in place. If replaced, the exiting stone top will Ideally repl,cate the original matenals & ~ design. No alterationtothe shape of the top is allowed. The northern most side panel may be design. No alteration to the shap will be made. The southern panel will remain and be refurbished Entry #2 ~Front Desk rE!*ced, but the southern most panel is historic and must remain. as necessary. Entry #2A Room Key Boxes ,The key box is not approved to be relocated or altered The key box will not be relocated or altered. It may be refurbished as necessary. ~To remain pending code determination. The current cab size is does not comply with code New ,Elevator was entirely replaced in 1985, not historic. Verify condition Entry #3 Elevator To remain burt with new elevator doors and new interior. i,doors and interior will be installed. of the machinery, shaft, & doors. Floor tiles in the entry are scheduled to remain. They may be covered with area rugs. Interior ~ designers have requested permission to explore options to install a wood floor and re-use the Blue tiles are cobalt copper and not reproducible. HPC contends Entry #4 -Floor Tiles -~Retaln the entire tile floor in the lobby is required. Sealers should be invet gated. ~*sting cobalt copper tiles asa decorative focal point. |that the pattern in historical and shoud remain. Atrium #1 Ilnterior Columns To remain as is or be restored back to their original appe,pnce May restore to their original appearance of black (or verydarkcolor) with white caps at the ceiling. .They are currently painted faux marble? pstairs, newel posts, -~Xil are scheduled-6 remain as isÂ»th refurbishment as needed. The railinEare not code _ ~The railings are not code compliant. Leaving them was approved in Atrium #2 ballusters. ~To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. compliant, and will require approval to remain in place. 1985, will be subject to Building Dept review. To remain asis. The clock may be moved as required for the revised layout, but will remain as close Atrium #3_ ~Lobby Clock__ .To remain as is, but be moved a few feet to center in new wall. to its original location as possible. Original to the hotel. Atrium #4 1 Room Call Paging Device 'To remain as is. -To remain Isis. _ - ~Original to the hotel. Original skylight framing isto remain in place. The upper skylight glass may only to accommodate Removal of the 5kylight framing is not approved. Replacement of glass may be approved with performance specifications and assure that it is water tight, Code consultants have advised thatthe Atrium #5 Skylight Ceiling submittal of glass specifications. ~lower Coriginal) skylight framing may require that glass be installed to provide fire separation. The original skylight ceiling was removed in 1985. 'HPC notes in item E-4 that only tile In the entry Is original, The Atrium #6 Floor Tiles IIRemoval of floor tile is allowed in the Atrium Lobby. TBD. ~concern elsewhere seems to be maintaining the pattern. Jacob's #1 ~Dining Room Chandel!ers Relocation of these ch~deliers within the public areas on theground floor of the hotel is approved. Chandeliers in both rooms arescheduleÂ¢19 be removed. retained and stored. 'The chandeliers are fromthe Paepke era, not original. ~To remain in its current pLition. The size of the room may be reduced, but the design is schecluled |'to remain intact. The pressed tin ceiling may be removed to allow for repairs above, and will be Library #1 _ 1Pressed Tin Ceiling Remove tiles to repÂ£ leaks (piping?) above, add HVAC/Lighting, and rehung. rehung. Ceiling is a replica, not original. The door opening is scheduled to remain in place. The door will likely remain as well, but may be Library #2 Ubrary/Lobby Door The existing door openings into the Library and Front Desk must be retained. replaced. |Notoriginal but brought in from the Palmer House Hotel by Other #1 Lobby Fireplace & Mirror ~To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. ~Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. Century Room Fireplace & Not original but brought In from the Palmer House Hotel by Other #2 Mirror Relocation of the fireplace and mirror to the Antler Baris approved. Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. We have not been able to locate the referenced list. No furniture is known to be original. Furniture ~ Dati of all pieces are unknown. Known antiques were brought to Furniture #1 ,Furniture All items to be re-used as noted in attached list. ~the site in 1985, but not original. |maybe reused as desired. Furniture #2 |Mining Maps May be removed entirely May be replaced or reused as desired. Not original. ... = t 1 r, 1 ' per-sonci hotels HPâ‚¬ Resolutions - Exterior 11{}tel,Jerome ~ Description Planned Use Development Current Plan Comments All replacement windows on the ground floor must be of wood. Upper floor windows are permitted to be clad. Cut sheets must be submitted for review and approval by HPC staff and monitor. If there are any historic windows left on the building they must be repaired and preserved. Tinted glass is not Replace upper windows. Will be wood framed, function exactly as they currently do. The glass spec shall approved for any of the window units. Detailed drawings of th window openings proposed to be be clear, 1" insulated, low e Lower (storefront) windows do not need to be replaced unless required for restored at the sidewalk level on the east facade must be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and performance standards (impact resistance?). Frames to be repainted to match above. Any new doors Window Replacement monitor. need to be styled to match existing. Entry doors are to be refurbished but not replaced. Awnings are only approved for the J-Bar and 'Jerome Shop' (Library) spaces. Require approval of HPC to more closely match historic awnings. Must be retractable & removable. Upper awnings must be Awnings mocked for approval/denial. No awnings will be installed. Signage HPC will review the proposed signage. Signage will remain as existing Balcony Railings Metal balcony railings on the exterior of the building must be mocked up for approval/denial of HPC. New railings will not be installed. No new column features or materials that are inconsistent with the design of the original columns may Columns be added. Building columns will not be altered. Final Lighting Plan is to be reviewed and approved by HPC. Any added fixtures, particularly sconces, are Site lighting in the plaza will require adjustment for renovations, The building is fairly well lit and should Site Lighting to match the original period. HPC supports a design competition for the entry pendant lamp. remain as it currently. Re-lamping to match energy & exterior lighting standards may be needed. Historic materials must be repaired in place. Should the parapet require reconstruction, it should be based on documented evidence and photographs of the original appearance. Specific guidelines for Only necessary repairs will be performed. All must be documented as necessary. Proceedures must meet Masonry Repairs repair must be followed. guidelines for both local and federal standards. The masonry walls need to be analyzed to better understand the impact of sealing the walls. Should it be deemed to have no negative effect, the process for sealing must be approved and meet both local and Masonry Cleaning/Sealing Cleaning, repointing, application of sealer, etc will require futher information and approval by HPC. federal standards. Sidewalk Treatment Sidewalk tretament must be reviewed and approved by HPC No decorative elements will be installed in the sidewalk. There should not be any unforeseen conditions on the exterior of the building. No deviations should Deviations Must be approved by HPC occur. The canopy may be painted to match cornices and window frames only. No reconstruction or alteration Canopy Silent will occur. Cornices Silent The cornices will be repainted to match any revised color scheme of the hotel. Owner shall record a coneptual landscap plan as a part of the Final PUD Development Plan (submitted) and a Final Landscape Plan for review and approval by the City Parks Department and HPC prior to issuance of a building permit. Owner shall be responsible for implementing the plan, which plans shall The current plaza landscaping is not original to the building. The previously submitted Conceptual Plan Site Work be accomplished as subdivision improvements in accordance with this agreement. was very elaborate. Future efforts will be less than previously planned. J Bar #1- Bar Front anu Back T â€¢ .- . 892/ f. t, 4 64. 6 h - I . , , - .. 3'~4' 7 INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #1 - Bar To remain as they are with refur- To remain as they are with refurbishment as needed. Front and Back bishment as needed. Additional Comments: Bar is original to the building, but was relocated in 1946 to it's current location. owland+rroughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com I. 0 Nal \9=3:. 1 I ...,1 R. < 0,2 % .. a-Y . 11 41 - - 1 - , I. R 1 + 4 .fl , l. 1 4 t 4 &1â€¢ *01Â¢~~â€¢4* , 1 ..1 It J . . . i.' f ~40-* 0 i - M - d ..1,1,4 1 1'.*:- ': 1 , 17*TYÂ»NU, I - Â· - - 1 ./ i I' ,/...19/' ., + 32 ' *.'.../-."'. -al. i. r i.7/ ---4/'ll//A l 4 11 - ~1,1- 1 F. ' 1 1 / .:. 0 - .. . . 0. 0 ........ .. J Bar #1- Bar Front anu Back laB I Quaq, f~ , " , %%-1 1 14Â¢ F im,141Â¥ 1 Â·114 - t 0 N'i , u. 4 , 1 b e _ 1 .'. , - , r #941 . 1 I v .4 N , ' , h - . ./-Ii- -I- I 11 . -- -- 7 F ~ 42% -- 10.~"'71 I - 1...m.YE..9.. 4 1 .- --- :J #11 "/4 ;7 ,~ r .* owland+ roughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com .. ... Â»\17 ' I Z.V*:2Â·~I... t \* ....421 1% 9-244,2 * - 4 . I.. 9 . 7 : 1 4. 1 .. \ 1 -r.11/A .0 - ei. -- , 4 - 4 -- i b., . j . - .. 0 . Â¥71 /i . 8,7.11 5 - 4 1, 9 i 1 1411< 8 iII] M jil * Vi 4 2. Â· 1,411 1 .t: . .6 j , 1 2//C â€¢11. 9 1 1 J -4 .1'; AS 1 :M' .111/. :0 1 17 3 r.,0 Â¢ j .0996 1Â£ 1 /11./,46 .1 :.2 . 1 .-<. ... 4. 1.41 - IM-44' "4 -I.J." 1 * 1 4 . 1 0 444 91 , - . TF: 1 *i ' 11 0 T firt ir'.1 11* 40.4*9Â¢.Dii' )11.Zi..,1 Eff t. ..94@4 -=+ 1 E. 11 4 1 0'.i. .:. 0 - ... ........ J Bar #2 - Pressed Tin ceiling !1 >411 IT , .et- . 5 'P / 1 4 7 4. i e ' 7, pt INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #2 - Pressed To remain in the central section of To remain as is with refurbishment as needed. Tin Ceiling the room, with refurbishment as needed. According to historic pho- tographs, and the previous con- ' tractor, the ceiling is a replica. Retaining and refurbishing is ap- proved. Additional Comments: N/A owland+.-roughton architecture and urban design www. rowla ndbroughton.com ' J Bar #3 - Oil Lami 4 . f. 1 4 . INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #3 - Oil To remain as they are. To remain as they are. Lamps Additional Comments: The lights were previously relocated in front of the windows from the original location in alcove. rowland+Droughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #4 - Opening to. ar Sitting Room ~ . 0 . 74 ,' 4: .1 4 V .c ,#3-4 -Ira . A 1 6/ a -. 9- I A Zis ) r -Ir ./ â€¢ i i .. 4/4 't:.St 6,3. I br,1V =EL , Bi 1. & 4 A Â¢3# ' I Lit~ , 41 -T -9,Â·- *# ' - 7.19 -= 21, r, . b . , ff X #90" - 1 111, I L C 6,1 4 ~27 1 1 ./ 2 / Â»Mr N K./ 1 71 4.4, : f P:91 P I %.9. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #4 - Open- Opening to remain in place, remov- Opening to remain in place. ing to Lobby al not approved. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland+ roughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #5 - Door to bby (from J Bar) T > 41 1 , 4 16 I *>Ity / 1 'r A 9 5 Â»A * m r 0 ./ Y k - - 15/1 . 1 W/ki FO 11 1 . it; 9 1 1.1 11 9 1 i 4/1 J 4- 3 r A . 1 , 62% Â¥ h ' 1 4; . INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #5 - Door to To remain in place. (3/7/07 Steve To remain in place. Lobby Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland+Â°roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #5 - Door to J-Ba, cfrom Lobby) N .4 4 1 ... It' - ' t.+ / ~44 4-4!31 7--T ' + L.fLI. f 1 '0,1. *11- r 1 0 (,71 0 i ' 01 MME i 41 7 ir. . 'lhâ„¢\Â·~ 9 1.I L 1/3 1 1 1 '4-1 1 -~ 1 i. -7 1 . F . owland+hroughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #5 - Door to lar (from street) 1-/.Me:*:.-g-Il--I . i .1,1 . 8 - 1 F ihizerirrilli fae==Ru'l ifil-#4.4 ~ I -# *r771 ,- 1.611" Hotel Jerome Bar door; matches interior door to lobby owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar - Historic Images 1 - 1. ?117 1 . i. N 1, W,; 3,3 |4|k ** .. 1 I - A: 14 , 1 1 4 154-,t . ti 9 19â€¢â€¢75. 0.3Â¢ 1 4 111 1 1 1,~11, 4 iL ch 1. . ...Â¥ 1. 9.. 0 ..1 t- i WA , 8Â· . - 4: 64,1 Hotel Jerome Bar before 1920 owland+ roughtor architecture and urban design www. rowla ndbroughton.com ' . - â‚¬09â‚¬ 1 UL k lili- -I.....C.=..41.....F, T ** la . e , 1~.... 2 Â¥ â€ž,,f ~~'!;#~~ip' ~ A 1,1,00 iff 11*. 24 ,/ , - ...1 I a. ... 0 0. . .:. . I ... 0. I. .....:.. J Bar - Historic Images A 4 F /4 0 r ....el:mprm. , . . -Er- 4 In'.at - 1 ,1 0 1 I. I 1,4 i Ji , -#14 "...... ' S , The bar after renovation c. 1946-47 owland+ roughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar - Historic Im - BS Â¢*t = 97, <Â« 4 4 F --22 t. _ i. 4# 1,1 $ 2- * 1 i . - y. X, The bar lounge area of the Hotel Jerome after restoration, c. 1946-47 (lt was the sitting area off the lobby; the photo shows oil lamps and what appears to be the current door to lobby on the left) owland+broughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com 341 Entrv #1 - Steam Radia.ors (East entry) . ' fws> 0 4 ' -n. 2 31*.It, 7 .. 'f 2.j 4 i 1 - I i + 1 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #1 - Steam Two (2) at the entry vestibule shall Two (2) at the entry vestibule shall remain in place - Radiators remain in place - the remaining the remaining four (4) to remain in place or be relo- four (4) to be relocated to the res- cated to a location TBD within the historic section of taurant corridor, with refurbish- the building. ment as needed. Radiators to re- main within the historic portion of the hotel. Additional Comments: N/A owland +t,rough tor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com 45 *14'*Â¢4 1 - . . Â¥= . 13 l Â«4*"Fir 411'. \' r441, 1141''t 1. 'Wil ..1 - 't ... . 1 f/. 4/(Al-1 \'fli ~7 511 #B . 4%1 ir *flin.yllÂ·-'A t~ 7(* Ii,|1$~t Â·(kÂ·Â· f43 "*316 itÂ¢.1(IiÂ·9,;'i ':6 Â·c#:' 1. '441 . ~~*O l (//9+ w/~~bt1144., 1 : 4.# A r .4 * 43 A\,9-9 4 * 93;: 1 744m,~, 21 i. l 4/8 f '' h..1 . 811.~, /1, ' -- %14' 9- 1 , -, f 1 . 42.41 1: 9, - , . 111 , 1 -28. V . 1 11= 7 ;. 4, 9 - + 1 -- 1 . 1. 12 . 4Â· 1% 4* Â· t . 4 1 i 4 4 4/ i.6 , . * S i : 4 4.11 f-' F.t Â·f ,-; 4, ' . ,/t#.33.....: , .:. . ..0 ...0 0 ...:.. Mul Entrv #1 - Steam Radia,ors (Near Front Desk) ~-â‚¬ t--47 82/4/% E,21122 fla U .7 342 4, - b. 44 , r, ,Â· Ir" e, 0,. Ip.r 6> .7. 4 , crÂ·" 6, 1.Â·.a Â·Â·Â· 1 4 0 + 0 + 6 L 6 y.'.4 4 .. . * I .1/: '~4 I ./ '47 :7 44 .4 0- 0. â€¢ A -0_ ek 9 --'â€¢ 14 -~ *~84 * co /'chh â‚¬ I T 2 1/1 j.* 3 0 . -=* 4 3 -f . /., f /2 - . 11 ./1 , V 4 . 464& /% v , r: 0'. ; I â€¢ N ':' 10 ',9.Â· rr---4 .4 ,- 4. C , 2 - . 2 .' I 0--0 M 41 ~~ :*%.4 1 I . 9 ./ v ....Â«-2-,1 7 4.4 - 1 , I 1 4,~i.#c<~$4 ~01 fl 1 . ...1. 11 7.1 .. . 244* , Â»r " . .t. a +ri<d k.- 1. 1 , 4. ,1 1 --I l- ' e owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entrv #2 - Front D c (North side panel) I- L WA - a . ~11 1 /. 1 - I i f ''1 1 , 1 1 , 11- : 1 yf \ ..1, y, -CYC- -- ....3 -'llÂ¥ , , INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #2 - Front To remain in place - if the existing To remain in place - existing stone top is not anticipated Desk stone top is to be replaced it is to to be replaced. 'ideally replicate' the original ma- terials & design - no alteration to shape of top is allowed - the north- ern most side panel may be re- placed, but the southern most pan- el is historic and must remain. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final deci- sion) Additional Comments: N/A lowland+broughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com 4+ â‚¬ C. Entrv #2 - Front Desk ,.,outh side panel) St'' A - A 4 . A 6 1 ' . n Ii'11 It 1 R lA 1, I Â¢ 2 0 ' 4. Y owland+broughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entry #2 - Front D c -- 1Ae, '/ , 'iIi -- 4 ' 1 4 â‚¬4 4 1 1. 94 I J N -' m, - . rowland+Droughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J, Entrv #ZA - Room Kei -oxes 4 n Aha A A 1 1\ A . *1. ~ ~-31*%737,7 , 1 6 4 1 112 10[inll Qi'! r 1 r J. All 2 - 2 9. 4. ,2... 4 1 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #2A - ' The key box is not approved to be To remain in place. Room Key Boxes relocated or altered. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland+broughtor architecture and urban design www. rowla nd broughton.com ' Entrv #3 - Elevato 1 t - % - 7 'k.,2 1. A --I- 1 .:k: -4-QU ~ â‚¬ -Il --- 1 /'lu i INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD RENOVATION PLAN Entry #3 - To remain but with new elevator To remain pending code determination - new interi- Elevator doors and new interior. orto be installed. Additional Comments: The previous contractor has indicated that the elevator was entirely replaced in the 1980's. owland+rroughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entrv #3 - Elevator 4t . 1 '.WÂ· ' 41't.0 r . , 1Â¢4 : t i 1,#diÂ·i li# 4k 4 V.'.., f * 711,1 4 ....1 . 4 4 -j . 't rowland+proughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entrv #4 - Floor Ti 4â€¢. .Wâ‚¬.3 1-: 4/. 4~6-.9 -* * f A %63* INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #4 - Floor Retain the entire tile floor (with Floor tiles in the entry are to remain - they may be cov- Tiles necessary refurbishment) in the ered with area rugs. lobby is required. Sealers should be investigated. 0/7/07 Steve Bar- wick final decision) Additional Comments: The tile in the lobby area contains significant amount of original tiles and was re-installed during the 1980's remodel with the original decorative border pattern in order to preserve as much of the original t:ile floor and design as possible. owland+broughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entrv - Historic Image, b.-I.I. - .,1 A e 6, ,'1Ei!1 ... IL-1 U -- Lobby prior to 1946 renovation showing front desk area owland+. roughtor architecture and urban design www. rowlandbroughton.com ' Entry - Historic Im _es . 46-'milli~ -. 0 .Ul--f'.//Fl-5, - 0 33> . t. 7Â· -Il- 1 - -*. -- -79. - Photo from 1945 shows front desk panel and floor tile border owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com h. 1 2, 1,4<1 , 1 Entrv - Historic Image i. 112 + .4 A 1, '< i., 5:4 Â¢ 0 r a Ij . -- - - 6,1 '.... r,4.. ----f 4 742 . - Front desk in original location (Photo taken from front entry) owland+hroughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entry - Historic Irr es - LA 4, It Â¥,r." . r.. , 1. 4.. 4 'Â»9 I .64 .- riti - ./ fi:32&06'21 - -.'* .I 'Â»=10-zi,- =r-j E-=* 1=1 -=-=CL Z. A ) 'I .,0 .2. .7 .i~1 42 3 72 - 24 Hotel lobby 1945, floor tiles, west stairway, door to library owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Entrv - Historic Image_ 4: 444+ e 99, ..1 - .1 - - t-- * ./. .-" - 4 ' 2 1.7 ~..26- 4,1:2,Li. - 1., r - -- Hotel lobby 1946, floor tiles, east and west stairwells, columns and door to street (Photograph taken from reception desk prior to renovation) owland+broughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com 04 4 Entry - Historic In ~es . ,r-e~. Â¥*-- . 1 11 .. - . 11,124'54--,1-= r; Fyit r ./-- - - ... lili ... 1 - ... . Hotel lobby c. 1946-47, floor tiles, east stairwell, columns and door to street (Photograph taken from entry following the renovation) owland+Kroughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Atrium #1- Interior C---1mn i -- . 4.'A 4{ JI - ht 11 14 1 - .. I . 9 * -- - - & + I - - ,.4,} . . - 1...6 jr(y .... INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #1 - Inte- To remain as is or be restored to May restore to their original appearance of black (or rior Column their original appearance. very dark color) with white caps at the ceiling. Additional Comments: These are cast iron and original to the structure. They were originally painted black (or a very dark color), then top half was painted white (or very light). The top leaf parts are the only original decorative elements. owland+rroughtor architecture and urban design - www.rowlandbroughton.com ' A . .... ... . w i, 0 0 jIll CO - ~~ ~ ' -lil, - 0 0 000 O 40 0 9000 0000 ~ .4 '141.11 . :.~4 1 .,4 0 0 0.12 T. FÂ® 0 ~ 2 'd j 14 -', ~ 1. f 8,44$10$- /,I. -= lili - Un , - 7/ fÂ£= 44= L- /. -~111216, ~1: ,- <T.tpAl... __1!'1 + Il 1 i i i I , f ./9.-9 - -1 . . 2. 4) - 1- r -31]111] 1 11,1- .- 1 ...... .... ........ .. . e. 0 . I .- I . 4 . .-. 0 - 0 - I 0. 0. 1. e. . - . ...... . .:. 0 . . I D .....:.. Atrium #3 - Lobby Cio -.. - f-1 7 .- .............. . , 1 . 411 '-1 'M 'Â· 41 Â» INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #3 - Lob- To remain as is, but be moved a To remain as is, but be moved as required for the re- by Clock few feet to center of new wall. vised layout. Additional Comments: Original to the hotel in close to original location; has been moved as part of past renova- tions. owland+Droughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com l,j Atrium #4 - Roorr -all Paging Device hb 1 <#Ve p .4 :31 ---- r C i b - I. . 1 . 11 k 4 1 42 - . . .. .. -4 . 2 4 l . .. ... 4/. .4 $4*.. - f<m --9.- .-#Il - 3. 4,%*4'Â£4" .. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #4 - To remain as is. To remain as is. Room Call Paging Device Additional Comments: Original to hotel, but in a different location. owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com 4L ,t.,, 4444 Atrium #5 - Skylight CL. ng . - M..P<1 1. - M . l 42=%4\ 4 /92A<211- al -I-&1 -I r -41 2 --p..v , INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #5 - Sky- Removal of the skylight framing is Original skylight framing is to remain in place - re- light Ceiling not approved - replacement of place the upper skylight glass only to accommodate glass may be approved with sub- performance specifications and assure that it is mittal of glass specifications. water tight. Additional Comments: Original skylight ceiling was removed in 1985 renovation, with only the framework left in place. owland+ roughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Atrium #6 - Floor -s ~i 4 4 - - ...& , - IliA V".4 la .a 14* I. 0 1* . Â£1. 1 11 - 1//1 1*Kild ,=644 11 14 I.a 4 '-469, /41 4 7.4 1 1 1- 141 1 It 1 Â«1 11"41 Waa:- - I . - 1 V 11 J li#Wi.i. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #6 - Floor Removal of floor tile is allowed in TBD tiles the Atrium Lobby. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A rowland+broughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Â¥4 4 1 111 /lll ... . 1 . ... . 0. - h Vaav- Y 4.- - - 2 63 4.11 ...L .1 . r . I . i -7 3-he, 42 - 7-1~ 8 - .ilillillillillillillill . 1.- IF ..... ... -.... .. .. .. . 0 . 8. .... .... ..0 .. 0 . ..... 0 - A .... I . 0. . ....: 0 0 .. Librarv #1 - Pressi- Tin Ceiling -- 00" - -#~i-=i-~9~,;1~-=39<~:~f; 5 :.,4 : ~., . 203, '' 4 9:*01Â¥04&41Â¥Â»lit.,.Â¥117"4Â£**180%14*.44.,0. *< 11Ii*f 0 .: 4 C - - *.I- .*&- .. ----- 1,0 1..::ill'.3.331"ilit. 1 / I 1,14Â£k!&!ikENg-*]01*14<1 lili 1 1 OIl-'Out P/O/ele . 7 -'.7...~- - 1 1 \ \ iqw W / 1 '1 i-\ I 1 , j..32 1 r a J. ..... , /1 Â·'f \ . / INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Library #1- The ceiling appears to be a replica- To remain in its current position and condition. Pressed Tin Ceil- lion of the original. The tin ceiling ing must be retained and sensitively treated in terms of lighting and HVAC. Additional Comments: Ceiling needs some repair. owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Library #2 - Library/ Lo.uy Door I i i:*4 H L 'i 11 1 t Â·1 Â· I i i# 3 . 1 0 /1 1 1 ~'fF I 1 1 ... 1*41. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Library #2- The existing door openings into the The opening is to remain. Library/ Lobby Library and Front Desk must be Door retained. Additional Comments: The previous contractor has indicated that these door openings are original, but the doors and trim are replicas from the 1980's. There is no need from a historic preservation point of view to salvage the door panels for re-use in another location. owland+broughtor ~ architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com ' 4 "11 N c Other #1- Lobby L .. aplace and Mirror . & I -1-7/7 , -V- -r -14 4 1 --0 C. 4496.1, Â¥ , f 4 + W,9... Ip ....,1-1 '*': W. I .rL- - ch -4 .~ 4 â€¢ I i ' lul. i ch Ni* ' 1 .Â¥0 6 - â€¢*gr I &, 4 ./ 0 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Other#1-Lobby To remain as is, with refurbish- Possibly relocate to accommodate a more grand fireplace. Fireplace and ment as needed. Mirror Additional Comments: Not original but installed during the Paepcke remodel in 1946. They were brought from the Palmer House Hotel in Chicago by Elizabeth Paepcke. owland+troughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Other #2 - Century Ro U,1 1 i Fireplace and Mirror ~ 4 fe '4*1 . 4 l 1 j 0 P t 1 18 4 4 j: 3.01% 41, - 3< 4 A f INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Other #2- Relocation of the fireplace and Possibly relocate to accommodate a more grand fire- Century Room mirror to the Antler Bar is ap- place. Fireplace and proved. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick Mirror final decision) Additional Comments: These items were added during the Paepcke remodel in 1946. owland+broughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Furniture #1 - Fur ure 1.-,4 t 110 6 1 , . 1 - - 1 - -711 W . -r ./ ft A 4 Â¥ INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture #1- All items to be re-used as noted in Furniture may be reused as desired. Furniture attached list. Additional Comments: We have not been able to locate the "attached list. Dates of all pieces are unknown - known antiques were brought to the site in 1985, but not original. owland+ roughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Furniture #2 - Mining ..ups *A; 9 UW D.8/&/Ill'll.3/1.-.1-/B f 111 I 2 -A~v~~77*~le f ,%* &1*I.1. :f ,D; ' #11"-9 Inaw, 4 - . ..4 1 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture #2- May be removed entirely. May be replaced or reused as desired. Mi ning Maps Additional Comments: Not original. owland+.Â·roughtor architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Furniture #3 - Bul n Boa rd I 4 . 4 Â«ffreÂ» M- INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture #3- Plan for item requested. To be stored and relocated. Location to be deter- Bulletin Board mined. Additional Comments: Can be seen in the 1940's era photograph in the lobby. rowland+broughton architecture and urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0005.2012.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2737 07 3~ ch / 001 IC S PROJECTS ADDRESS 330 E. MAIN ST PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION INSTUBSTAINIAL PUD AMENDMENT REPRESENTATIVE VAAN ASSOCIATES DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3.20.12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 9.4.12 9AA A. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: -~Â»quenur A? favaL , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, ~,Acl-2, a S c O---6 (name, please print) being or repredenting an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: t~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signaturd The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 272-day of H 0Â«+ , 2O12rby -An=h-eloz 9 C <4â‚¬1 -. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PU~LIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby jiven to the general public of the My commission expires: all 0- ~ Re approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 41 9 A Eu_ foÂ«Â» 24, Article 68. Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following described property: Parcel ID #2737-073-21-001, Legally described as The Hotel Jerome. 330 East Main Street, Lots A - 1. and Lots Notary Public O - S, and the easterly 20 feet of Lot N and the easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley all in Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado by an administrative approval by the Community Development Director. The applicant received an insubstantial amendment to Ordi- nance No. 42, Series of 2006. The approvals are depicted in the land use application on file with the ATTACHMENTS: City of Aspen. For further information contact Sa- ra Adams at the City of Aspen Community Devel- COPY OF THE PUBLICATION opment Dept., 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2778. City of Aspen Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 22,2012 [7694071] r-< 9 4-2-0~ M DEVELOPMENT ORDER City ofAspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three (3) -year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless the change is accomplished or a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number: Jerome Property, LLC, 540 West Madison, Chicago, IL 60661, (312) 542-1030. Legal Description and Street Address of Subiect Propertv: The Hotel Jerome, 330 East Main Street, Lots A-I and Lots O - S, and the easterly 20 feet of Lot N and the easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley all in Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Parcel ID# 2737-073-21-001. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan: Insubstantial PUD amendment to reduce the approved net leasable commercial area, increase the floor area allocated to "other" uses, and decrease the overall approved floor area for the site. Land Use Approval Received and Dates: Administrative approval granted on March 19,2012 Effective Date of Development Order: March 22,2012. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) Expiration Date of Development Order: March 22, 2015. (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this Fnd day of March 2012, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 4*4 Chris Bendon Community Development Director City of Aspen AMENDEW NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to 330 Eut Main Street, aka the Hotel Jerome Parcel ID No. 2737-073-21-001: APPLICANT: Jerome Property, LLC 540 West Madison, Chicago, IL 60661 REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC P.O. Box 4827, Basalt, CO 81621 970/925-6958 SrIE O, AMENDMENT: The Hotel Jerome. 330 East Main Street, Lots A- I, and Lots O - S, and the casterly 20 fect of Lot N and the easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley all in Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval to reduce the approved net leasable commercial area. increase the floor area allocated to "other" uses, and decrease the overall approved floor area for the site. The proposal includes the following: â€¢ Reduce the size of the spa, â€¢ Relocate offices on the second floor to the basement â€¢ Convert the second floor offices to a fitness room, â€¢ Convert the Century dining room to a hotel living room. â€¢ Reconfigure 3 guest rooms to allow the creation of lodging suites without changing tho number of lodge units or the number the pillows previously approved in 2006. BACKGROUND: PRIOR TO 2006 In 1986 the Amended and Restated PUD Plat (Book 518, Page 949) permitted 94 lodge rooms. Various land use approvals were granted to the Hotel Jerome prior to 2006. All of these approvals,wre supergedcd by the PUD amendment in 2006 with the exception of a requirement that 20 full time equivalents are housed in the Cortina Lodge. 2006 City Council approved Ordinance No. 42, Series of 2006 replacing the previous entitlements with a new approval that permitted the enlargement of the Hotel's net leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renovation of the Hotel's Main and Mill Streets courtyar(Is, and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of the Hotel's parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. In addition, the renovation of the Cortina Lodge was approved to meet the Hotel's employee housing mitigation requirements. Preservation of historic interior clements of the Hotel and a desigfin application for the Cortina Lodge were also required 1 The amendment oely changes clerical errors to the commercial act tcasable arm in Table 1, #cummt emendment,Â» and ihe now commercial not leasable calculation related to affordable housing mitigation Page l of 6 RECEPTION#: 588634, 04/27/2012 at 02:37:32 PM, 1 OF 6, R $36.00 Doc Code NOTICE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO The number of lodging units (94 keys) was notincreased in 2006. The only aspectofthe project that generated housing mitigation was an increase to the net leasable commercial area. Using the growth management benefit for the enlargement of historic landmarks, it was determined that 1.42 full time equivalents (FIEs) required mitigation. During tile 2006 approvals, a total of 21 FTEs were calculated to be housed at the Cortina Lodge. Considering the prior requirement of 20 FTEs housed at the Cortina, a credit of l FTE was available. The 2006 approval permitted the 1.42 FTE mitigation requirement to be fulfilled by housing 1 FTE at the Cortina, thus utilizing all 21 FTEs housed in the Cortina, and paying a cash in lieu fee for the remaining 0.42 FTE by averaging the cash in lieu payment for Category 2 and Category 3. The vested rights for the 2006 approval expired on January 14,2010. 2008 In 2008 the Community Development Depattment approved an insubslantial amendment to allow the conversion of an office space to a lodge unit without triggering the requirement to mitigate for the 1.42 FIEs associated with the lodge expansion. At the time of the request there were only 92 lodge units in the Hotel, thus granting an amendment to allow the conversion of office to lodge was compliant with both the 1986 and the 2006 approvals which allowed 94 lodge units. 2010 In 2010 the Community Development Department approved an insubstantial amendment to bifurcate the entiticments to allow construction on the Cortina Lodge component prior to beginning construction of the Hotel renovation. Phase I included the renovation, a designation application, and deed restriction of Corlina Lodge units b affordable housing. Phase II included the renovation and enlargement of the Hotel Jerome component It was determined that Phase 1 did not trigger any impact fees; however Phase II will have impact fees assessed at the time of building pelmit submittal for the Hotel component. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed changes to the Hokl Jerome PUD meet the review criteria for an insubstantial amendment, attached as Exhibit A. Dimensional Requirements: Staff supports the proposed internal changes to the project which reduces the overall floor area, reduces the net leasable commercial area, and increases the "other" floor area calculation for uses associated with the lodge use. The proposal does not increase the total floor arca approved in 2006 for the project. The reduction of commercial net leasable area does not adversely affect the growth management allotments allocated in the 2006 approvals. The following calculations in Table 1 compam the approved 2006 dimensional requirements to the proposed amendment The "current amendment" column is calculated based on thecurrent 2011 Land Use Code: Page 2 of 6 Table 1: Current Notes 2006 approval amendment' Reduction based on conversion of Commercial 15,985 aq. ft 13,838 sq. ft Century Room to hotel living room floor area and smaller spa in basement. No change to lodge unit numbers or floor area. The slight decrease Lodge units 59,214 sq. ft 59,072 sq. ft. results from changes to how floor noor area area is calculated in the 2006 and current Code. Increase based on more back of house hotel functions, conversion "other" floor 39,735 sq. ft. 40,823 sq. ft. of office to fitness room, and area conversion of Century Room to hotel living room. Total floor 114,934 sq. i 113,733 sq. ft. *rea Reduction based on smaller spa and smaller Century Room. The current Commercial amendment calculations are based net leasable 14,891 sq. ft 14,734 sq. ft. on the 2011 net leasable area area definition which is much more inclusive regarding which elements count towards net leasable area. Staff supports the elimination of the requirement to use the 2006 floor area calculations listed in Article 3, Part 1 of the PUD Agreement (Recordation # 533928) to require future amendments be subject to the Land Use Code in place at the time ofapplication. Affoniable Housing: As described above, the affordable housing mitigation requirement of 1.42 FTEs approved in 2006 resulted only from an increase in the commemial net leasable component of the project as described above. Due to the proposed reduction of the net leasable commercial area proposed in this amendment, affordable housing generation is re-calculated below. The following calculations are all based on the current regulatory requirements: ' Calculated pursuant to the ourmmt 2011 Land Ux Code requirementa. Page 3 of 6 I i New commercial net leasable calculation: Existing Hotel: 0,412 sq. ft. basement + 12,851 sq. it. ground level) = 14,263 sq. it. of net leasable area3 Proposal: (2,360 sq. ft. basement + 12,374 sq. R. ground level) = 14,734 sq. fl of net leasable area4 Amount of new net leasable area: 471 sq. B. Emviovec generation calculation: 471 sq. ft. in basement @ 3.075 FIEs generated/1,000 sq. ft. net leasable = 1.45 FI'Ea Employee miliantion calculation: Enlargement of a historic landmark mitigates the first 4 employees generated at 0%, the second 4 are mitigated at 30%, and the remainder is mitigated at 60%. First 4 employees are mitigated at 056, and since 1.45 FIEs are generated there is no employee mitigation requirement for the proposed expansion. The 2006 approvals requitcd 20 FTEs to be housed at the Cortina Lodge to mitigate for the lodging component ofthe Hotel pursuant to the 1986 approvals. The Cortina houses 21 FTEs, so there is 1 FIE at the Cortina that is not used for mitigation purposes and can be used as a credit for future mitigation requirements at the hotel. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment as noted above and on Exhibit 'A' to be comistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby, APPROVES the request with the following conditions: 1. Prior to Building Permit submittal, amend the PUD Agreement (recordation #533928) to reflect the changes to the dimensional requirements Usted in Article 2, Paragraph 2.2 of the Agmement, and the affordable housing mitigation requirements listed in Article 3 Paragraph 33, described herein. 2. Prior to Building Permit submittal, amend the PUD Agreement to omit the requirement that the project be reviewed punaant to the 2006 Land Use Code regarding floor area calculations and measurements, described in Article 3, Paragraph 3.land attached as Exhibit A. 3. Prior to Building Permit submittal, update the Final PUD floor plans to reflect the changes in floor area and commercial net leasable area calculations, and the reconfiguration of spaces ~ The existing commercial not leasable arm is calculated based on the current 2011 Code requirement:. Tlie amount of new commercial net leasable is below the 2006 approved commeltial net leasable amount of 14,891 4 8. + Page 4 of6 .,0~054â€¢./.;/1./ I.-Illm-0M-*----$*-=-*$-*<.---#-.. APPROVED BY: 6-$#4444,6 4 19- loobia ~hris BendoN Date / Community Development Director L, ACCEPTED BY: * ---3 Property LLC Date Attachments: Exhibit A: Review Criteria Page 5 of 6 EXHIBIT A Section 26.445.100 Amendment of PUD development order A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial mnendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment 1. A change in the use or character ofthe development. Tlwre is no change in the use or characler of the building. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (350) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. The there is no increase in coverage. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Trip generation and demandjbr public services will not be impacted by this amendment. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. There is no change fo the open space. The building envelope size and activity envelope size does not change. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off-street patking and loading space. There is no change in the parking/loading space. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. There is no change in the ROW's widths, streets or easements. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. The approved net leasable floor area of the commercial component is reduced by ]48 sq. 11.0,194 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density ofthe development Wa. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The change U consistent with the approved use and the site specific approval. Page 6 of 6 RECEI - IN#: 587589, 03/20/2012 at 01:23: . - M, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROVAL 330 East Main Street, aka the Hotel Jerome Parcel ID No. 2737-073-21-001: APPLICANT: Jerome Property, LLC 540 West Madison, Chicago, IL 60661 REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC P.O. Box 4827, Basalt, CO 81621 970/925-6958 SITE: The Hotel Jerome. 330 East Main Street, Lots A - I, and Lots O - S, and the easterly 20 feet of Lot N and the easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley all in Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. PURPOSE: Compliance with City Council Ordinance number 42 (Series of 2006), Section 12: Inventory and Treatment of Interior Features SUMMARY: The PUD amendment approved via Ordinance number 42, series of 2006 (recordation # 533926) required the property owner to create an inventory of original historical elements in public spaces of the Hotel Jerome and to indicate proposed treatment. Community Development must review and approve, or identify changes, to the preservation approach for these features. Section 12 of the Ordinance reads as follows: The applicant is required to submit a written inventory of all original features existing within those interior areas ofthe Hotel Jerome that are customarily open to the public, or where the public is typically invited. This inventory must be accompanied by current photographs and copies ofany photographs of the interior of the Hotel Jerome available from the Aspen Historical Society Archives. The Historic Preservation Office Will verify the completeness of the inventory. Any overlooked elements that can be documented as original will be added to the list. Said inventory shall identify proposed treatment of the items that are on the inventory. The inventory shall be reviewed by the City's Historic Preservation Officer. To the extent that there is a disagreement to the proposed treatment, the applicant may appeal to the City Manager. The City Manager's decision in the matter shall be subject to an appeal to the City Council as a de novo review. Once the proposed treatment is agreed to by the City and the applicant, no changes shall be allowed without the consent of the City's Historic Preservation Officer, subject to the appeal provisions set forth above. Page 1 of 2 RECEPTION#: 588633, 04/27/2012 at 02:37:31 PM, 1 OF 49, R $251.00 Doc Code NOTICE Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO kvu*61- 4Â® AÂ»d fic WRE A A significant amount of documentation and findings were made in 2007, but sale of the hotel prevented any remodeling work from moving forward. Rowland and Broughton re-submitted the inventory and noted where the work proposed for 2012 complies with the 2007 discussion and where the work is a departure from the 2007 discussion. Staff finds the work included in the February 1, 2012 inventory chart, attached as Exhibit A, to be appropriate with the following exceptions: 1. Entry #4 (floor tiles): The floor tiles in the lobby, adjacent to the check-in desk, are historic and are required to remain as-is. This was the original staff finding and was upheld through an appeal to the City Manager. Area rugs can be used, but the proposed option to install a wood floor is not approved. 2. Atrium #5 (skylight ceiling): Glass can be re-installed in the lower atrium skylight. Glass specs will be required before work goes forward. 3. Other #1 (lobby fireplace and mirror): Removal/replacement of the fireplace in the main lobby is not approved. This is considered a historic feature that was introduced during the Paepcke remodel. APPROVED BY 1 41 8 1 1 70 C z- 044 i / Amy butl#ier Date Historic Preservation Officer ACCEPTED BY: 443 i V:;' < Jerome Property LLC Date ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Hotel Jerome historic inventory chart dated February 1,2012. Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT HOTELJEROME 2 3 4 ~ 2 - :.. IM M 16 1 URIL I N, / E N T O R Y 01 F, C 9 1 ~/I"/6 ' - '4*.. 1 *ir I * L 1/ -1 - ~'~ , ..11, 111111 4/2. 04 3 1 6 4 ?2% n 1111'.:17 1 :I Â£- 3 fi . e F - 4 - Â£ B V ./b -11. i- 91%*P. i . 1. -,54-014,1%: Ali. 1. I 11,- - &--7/.*.* _=g 1 -1â€¢ 1. , .* &? *.i =- - IA . 1 :i:11: 4 81141. '11 1, i 1 .' 1-F = 4.. J.13:6,4 . < +12 1'- ' '~ 4 7 . Snowstorm, Hotel Jerome. 1 952 Â© 1 owland+, roughton ,Â·ir,hitm .'3,</4 â€ž04,/5 $ fiâ€¢i.Â·Â·.,â€ž1 *V/Vv' .r e ,~*<2 iand brouith on. corn .fi,h 61 A- persona hotels List of Historically Significant Items - interior Ilotel-jernme j Bar #1 Front & Back Bar To remain as they are with refurbishment as needed. To remain as they are with refurbishment as needed. Original to the building, but relocated in 1946. Ceiling is a replica according to historic photographs & previous J Bar #2 Pressed Tin Ceiling To remain in the central section of the room, with refurbishment as needed. To remain with refurbishment as needed. contractor. J Bar #3 Oil Lamps (now electric) To remain as they are. To remain as they are. Previously located in alcoves, not windows. Basis fordetermination is that there is no evidence thatthis is NOT J Bar #4 Opening to Lobby Opening to remain in place, removal not approved. Opening to remain in place, original. However early Sanborn maps show a solid wall. Basis for determination is that there is no evidence that this is NOT original. However early Sanborn maps show a solid wall. HPC notes j Bar #5 Door to Lobby To remain in place To remain in place. thatthe door matches the J-Barentry door. (2) at the entry vestibule shall remain in place. The remaining (4) to be relocated to the restaurant (2) at the entry vestibule shall remain in place. The remaining (4) to remain in place or be relocated Bltry #1 Steam Radiators corridor. Radiators to remain in historic portion of the hotel, to a location TBD within the historic section of the building. To remain in place. Existing stone top to be replaced to 'Ideally replicate' the original materials & To remain in place. If replaced, the existing stone top will ideally replicate the original materials & design. No alteration to the shape of the top is allowed. The northern most side panel may be design. No alteration to the shap will be made. The southern panel will remain and be refurbished E Front Desk replaced, but the southern most panel is historic and must remain. as necessary. Entry#2A Room Key Boxes The key box is not approved to be relocated or altered, The key box will not be relocated or altered. It may be refurbished as necessary. To remain pending code determination. The current cab size is does not comply with code. New Elevator was entirely replaced in 1985, not historic. Verify condition Entry #3 Elevator To remain but with new elevator doors and new interior. doors and interior will be installed. of the machinery, shaft, & doors. Floor tiles in the entry are scheduled to remain. They may be covered with area rugs. Interior designers have requested permission to explore options to install a wood floor and re-use the Bluetiles are cobalt copper and not reproducible. HPC contends Entry #4 Floor Tiles Retain the entire tile floor in the lobby Is required. sealers should be investigated. existing cobalt copper tiles as a decorative focal point. thatthe pattern in historical and should remain. Atrium #1 Interior Columns To remain as is or be restored back to their original appearance. May restore to their original appearance of black(or very dark color} with white caps at the ceiling. They are currently painted faux marble? Stairs, newel post'' All are scheduledto remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. The railings are not code The railings are not code compliant, Leaving them was approved in Atrium #2 ballusters. To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. compliant, and will require approval to remain in place. 1985, will be subjectto Building Dept review. To remain as 15. The dock may be moved as required forthe revised layout, but will remain as close Atrium #3 Lobby Clock To remain as is, but be moved a few feet to center in new wall. to its original location as possible. Original to the hotel. Atrium #4 Room Call Paging Device To remain as is. To remain as is. Originattothe hotel. Original skylight framing is to remain in place. The upper skylight glass may only to accommodate Removal of the sky light framing Is not approved. Replacement of glass may be approved with performance specifications and assure that it is watertight. Code consultants have advised thatthe Atrium #5 Skylight Ceiling submittal of glass specifications. lower (original) skylight framing may require that glass be installed to provide fire separation. The original skylight ceiling was removed in 1985. HPC notes in item E-4 that only tile in the entry 15 original. The Atrium #6 Floor Tiles Removal of floor tile is allowed in the Atrium Lobby. TBD. concern elsewhere seems to be maintaining the pattern. Jacob" #1 Dining Room Chandeliers Relocation of these chandeliers within the public areas on the ground floor of the hotel is approved. Chandeliers in both rooms are scheduled to be removed, retained and stored. Thechandeliersare from the Paepke era, notoriginal. To remain in its current position. The size of the room may be reduced, but the design is scheduled to remain intact. The pressed tin ceiling may be removed to allow for repairs above, and will be Li Pressed Tin Ceiling Remove tiles to repair leaks (piping?) above, add HVAC/Lighting, and rehung. rehung. Ceiling isa replica, not original. The door opening is scheduled to remain in place. The door will likely remain as well, but may be Library #2 Library/Lobby Door The existing door openings into the Library and Front Desk must be retained. replaced. Not original but brought In from the Palmer House Hotel by Other #1 Lobby Fireplace & Mirror To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. Century Room Fireplace & Not original but brought in from the Palmer House Hotel by Other#2 Mirror Relocation of the fireplace and mirror to the Antler Bar is approved. Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. We have not been able to locate the referenced list. No furniture is known to be original. Furniture Dates of all pieces are unknown. Known antiques were brought to Furniture #1 Furniture All items to be re-used as noted in attached list. may be reused as desired. the site in 1985, but not original. Furniture #2 Mining Maps May be removed entirely May be replaced or reused as desired. Not original. ........................................... [EEEZZEGEEZZI~ ;11111111bbb1111111111111111111111111111113. 23-3 persona hotels DAI, f A. ]IPC Resolutions - Exterior #leUer{}me All replacement windows on the ground floor must be of wood. Upper floor windows are permitted to be clad. Cut sheets must be submitted for review and approval by HPC staff and monitor. I f there are . any historic windows left on the building they must be repaired and preserved. Tinted glass is not Replace upper windows. Will be wood framed, function exactly as they currently do. The glass spec shall approved for any of the window units. Detailed drawings of th window openings proposed to be be clear, 1" insulated, low e. Lower (storefront) windows do not need to be replaced unless required for restored at the sidewalk level on the east facade must be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and performance standards (impact resistance?). Frames to be repainted to match above. Any new doors Window Replacement monitor. need to be styled to match existing. Entry doors are to be refurbished but not replaced. Awnings are only approved for the J-Bar and 'Jerome Shop' (Library) spaces. Require approval of HPC to more closely match historic awnings. Must be retractable & removable. Upper awnings must be Awnings mocked for approval/denial. No awnings will be installed. Signage HPC will review the proposed signage. Signage will remain as existing Balcony Railings Metal balcony railings on the exterior of the building must be mocked up for approval/denial of HPC. New railings will not be installed. No new column features or materials that are inconsistent with the design of the original columns may Columns be added. Building columns will not bealtered. Final Lighting Plan is to be reviewed and approved by HPC. Any added fixtures, particularly sconces, are Site lighting in the plaza will require adjustment for renovations. The building is fairly well lit and should Site Lighting to match the original period, HPC supports a design competition for the entry pendant lamp. remain as it currently. Re-lampingto match energy & exterior lighting standards may be needed. Historic materials must be repaired in place. Should the parapet require reconstruction, it should be based on documented evidence and photographs of the original appearance. Specific guidelines for Only necessary repairs will be performed. All must be documented as necessary. Proceedures must meet ry Repairs repair must be followed. guidelines for both local and federal standards. The masonry walls need to be analyzed to better understand the impact of sealing the walls. Should it be deemed to have no negative effect, the process for sealing must be approved and meet both local and Masonry Cleaning/Sealing Cleaning, repointing, application of sealer, etc will require futher information and approval by HPC. federal standards. Sidewalk Treatment Sidewalktretament must be reviewed and approved by HPC No decorative elements will be installed in the sidewalk. There should not be any unforeseen conditions on the exterior of the building. No deviations should Deviations Must be approved by HPC occur. The canopy may be painted to match cornices and window frames only. No reconstruction or alteration Canopy Silent will occur. Cornices Silent The cornices will be repainted to match any revised color scheme of the hotel. Owner shall record a coneptual landscap plan as a part of the Final PUD Development Plan (submitted) and a Final Landscape Plan for review and approval by the City Parks Department and HPC prior to issuance of a building permit. Owner shall be responsible for implementing the plan, which plans shall The current plaza landscaping is not original to the building. The previously submitted Conceptual Plan Site Work be accomplished as subdivision improvements in accordance with this agreement. was very elaborate. Future efforts wi[1 be less than previously planned. Description Planned Use Development Current Plan Comments A :-2. ....1 , 11(.JLE.th List oi Ilislorically Significant Items -Interior linliktrume J Bar#1 Front& Back Bar To remain as they are with refurtishment as needed, To remain as they are with refurbEhment as needed. Original to the building, but relocated in 1946. Ceiling Isa replica according to historic photographs & previous J Bar#2 Pressed Tin Ceiling To remain in the central section of the room, with refurbishment as needed. To remain with refurbishment as needed. contractor. 1 Bar#3 Oil Lamps (now electric) To remain asthey are. To remain as they are. Previously located in al.ove., not windowi 88: fordetermination is that there M no evidencethat this k NOT ] Bar #4 Opening to Lobby Openingto remain in place, removal not approved. Opening to remain in place. origmal. Howeverearly Sanborn maps show asolid wall, Basis for determination is that there is no evidence that this is NOT original. However early Sanborn maps show a solid wall. HPC notes JBar#5 Doorto Lobby To remain in place To remain in place. thatthe door matches the J-Bar entry door, [2) at the entry vestibule shall remain in place. The remaining (4) to be relocated tothe restaurant (2) at the entry vestibule shall remain in place. The remaining (4) to remain in place or be relocated Entry #1 Steam Radiators corridor. Radiators to remain in historic portion of the hotel. to a location TBD within the historic section of the building. To remain in place. Existing stone top to be replaced to 'ideally replicate' the original materials & To remain in place. If replaced, the existing stone top will ideally replicate the original materials & design. No alteration to the shape of the top is allowed. The northern most side panel may be design. No alteration to the shap will be made. The southern panel will remain and be refurbished Entry #2 Front Desk replaced, but the 5outhern most panel is historic and must remain. as necessary. Entry #2A Room Key Boxes The key box i, not approved to be relocated or altered. The key box will not be relocated or altered. It may be refurbished as necessary. To remain pending code determination. The current cab size is does not comply with code. New Elevator was entirely replaced in 1985, not historic. Verify condition Entrz-'ll Elevator To remain but with new elevator doors and new interior. doors and interior will be installed. of the machinery, shaft, & doors Floor tiles in the entry are scheduled to remain. They may be covered with area rugs, Interior designers have requested permission to explore options to install a wood floor and re-use the Blue tiles are cobalt copper and not reproducible. liPC contends Entry#4 Floor Tiles Retain the entire tile floor in the lobby is required. Sealers should be inven,gated. existing cobalt copper tiles as a decorative focal point. that the pattern in historical and should remain. Atrium #1 Interior Columns To remain as is or be restored back to their original appearance. Mayrestore to theiroriginal appearance of black (or very dark color) with white caps at the ceiling. They are currently painted faux marble? Stairs, newel post'. All are scheduled to remain as is, with refurbishmentas needed. The railings are not code The ralling. are not code compliant. Leaving them was approved in Atrium #2 ballusters. To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed. compliant, and will require approval to remain in place. 1985, will be subject to Building Dept review To remain as is. The clock may be moved as required forthe revised layout, but will remain as close Atrium #3 Lobby Clock To remain as is, butbe moved a few feettocenter in new wall. to its original location as possible. Original to the hotel. Atrium #4 Room Call Paging Device To remain as is. To remain as is. Original to the hotel. Original skylight framing is to remain in place. The upper skylight glass may only to accommodate Removal of the skylight framing is not approved. Replacement of glass may be approved with performance specifications and assure that it â€ž water tight. Code consultants have advised thatthe Atrium #5 Skylight Ceiling submittal of glass specifications. lower (original) skylight framing may require that glass be installed to provide fire separation. The original skylight ceiling was removed in 1985. HPC notes in item E-4 that only tile n the entry is onginal. The Atrium #6 Floor Tiles Removal of floor tile is allowed in the Atrium Lobby. TBD. concern elsewhere seems to be maintaining the pattern. lacob's #1 Dining Room Chandeliers Relocation of these chandeliers within the public areas on the ground floor of the hotel is approved. Chandeliers in both rooms are scheduled to be removed, retained and stored. Thechandeliers are from the Paepkeera, notoriginal. To remain in its current position. The size of the room may be reduced, but the design iS 5[heduled to remain Intact. The pressed tince,ling mayberemoved to allow for repairs above, and will be Library #1 Pressed Tin Ceiling Remove tile5 to repair leaks (piping?) above, add HVAC/Lighting, and rehung. rehung. Ceiling Isa replica, not original. The door opening is scheduled to remain in place. The door will likely remain as well, but may be Library#2 Ubrary/Lobby Door The existing dooropeningsintothe Library and Front Deskmustbe retained. replaced. Not original but brought In from the Palmer House Hotel by Other#1 Lobby Fireplace & Mirror To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed, Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. Century Room Fireplace & Not original but brought in from the Palmer House Hotel by Other #2 Mirror Relocation of the fireplace and mirror to the Antler Bar is approved. Possibly relocate to accommodate a grand, double sided fireplace. Paepcke. We have not been able to locate the referenced list No furniture is known to be original. Furniture Dates of all pieces are unknown, Known antique' were brought to Furniture #1 Furniture All itemsto be re-u5ed as noted in attached list may be reused as desired. the site in 1985, but not original. Furniture #2 M ining Maps May be removed entirely May be replaced or reused as desired. Not original. Number Description Allowed per PUD (March, 2007) Current PIan Comment5 11/ btrhdona hotels 1!PE Resolutions - Exterior 1=Jitionpbineduse~evelopment Currentplan Comments All replacement windows on the ground floor must be of wood. Upper floor windows are permitted to be clad. Cut sheets must be submitted for review and approval by HPC sta ff and monitor. If there are any historic windows left on the building they must be repaired and preserved. Tinted glass is not Replace upper windows. Will be wood framed, function exactly as they currently do. The glass spec shall approved for any of the window units. Detailed drawings of th window openings proposed to be be clear, 1" 'insulated, lowe. Lower (storefront) windows do not need to be replaced unless required for restored at the sidewalk level on the east facade must be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and performance standards (impact resistance?). Frames to be repainted to match above. Any new doors Window Replacement monitor. need to be styled to match existing. Entry doors are to be refurbished but not replaced, Awnings are only approved for the J-Bar and 'Jerome Shop' (Library) spaces, Require approval of HPC to more closely match historic awnings. Must be retractable & removable, Upper awrings must be Awnings mocked for approval/denial. No awnings will be Installed. Signage HPC will review the proposed signage. Signage will remain as existing Balcony Rallings Metal balcony railings on the exterior of the building must be mocked up forapproval/denial of HPC. New railings will not be installed. No new column features or materials that are inconsistent with the design of the original columns may Columns be added. Building columns will not be altered. Final Lighting Plan is to be reviewed and approved by HPC. Any added fixtures, particularly sconces, are Site lighting inthe plaza will require adjustment for renovations. The building is fairly well lit and should Site Lighting to match the original period. HPC supports a design competition forthe entry pendant lamp, remain as it currently. Re-lamping to match energy & exterior lighting standards may be needed. Historic materials must be repaired in place. Should the parapet require reconstruction, it should be based on documented evidence and photographs of the original appearance. Specific guidelines for Only necessary repairs will be performed. All must be documented as necessary. Proceedures must meet Masonry Repairs repair must be followed. guidelines for both local and federal standards. The masonry walls need to be analyzed to better understand the impact of sealing the walls. Should it be deemed to have no negative effect, the process for sealing must be approved and meet both local and Masorry Cleaning/Scaling Cleaning, repointing, application of sealer, etc will require futher information and approval by HPC. federal standards. Sidewalk Treatment Sidewalk tretament must be reviewed and approved by HPC No decorative elements will be installed in the sidewalk, There should not be any unforeseen conditions on the exteriorof the building. No deviations should Deviations Must be approved by HPC occur, The canopy may be painted to match cornices and window frames only. No reconstruction or alteration Canopy Silent will occur. Cornices Silent The cornices will be repainted to match any revised color scheme of the hotel. Owner shall record a coneptual landscap plan as a part of the Fnal PUD Development Plan (submitted) and a Final Landscape Plan for review and approval by the City Parks Department and HPC priorto issuance of a building permit. Owner shall be responsible for implementing the plan, which plans shall The current plaza landscapingis notoriginal tothe building. The previouslysubmitted Conceptual Plan Ske Work be accomplished as subdivision improvements in accordance with this agreement. was very elaborate. Future efforts will be less than previously planned. J Bar #1- Bar Front and Back '.4ill 64 NO* IN*,7. Rip 4 , 1 1, 2, 'tl Â·,6 , -- 44 . I '4Â· 9/111111 4+1 . 111= .,920 - 6*w-74 6Â·Â·~eaaa=' ~ 1 ..'L,914 .f fr =r ... Â·Â·i $#1'1 .. 1.2 INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #1 - Bar To remain as they are with refur- To remain as they are with refurbishment as needed. Front and Back bishment as needed. Additional Comments: Bar is original to the building, but was relocated in 1946 to it's current location. owland+I roughton architecture ond urban design wwvf . ~~09 / 1 t~ Cl <~i D t~O i.1 iâ‚¬ 1'~1' 0 ~ '1. C O m U ..I.-1.'e . . .. 0 r I 4 M 11* .ii~.'I . 1 @ I t{ 1,111'llt 1 :i qi,0 dill-F .MI : d 3 I ./ 1 . ##ijf d.j P 'Â· 5 3 ..t : T----M'.4 -p.L , *AUL S # h ..... 1 1 .fl 'PI t- 'Al'11 1 , 1 . 1 1. Mmak 1~11?0% P IL 1111: i 11 2 D...11 011 1 1 i EN -- 1"* ' 'z ' = ;:~ tusea' Â· j,'tri~ ,*' ~ ,a,0*fc 11,1 4, 1 1 lili fll, 1911 '06Â·t'..4 14% 16|, /WY . .1,11111~~111 r,i 11.11 - - * 4 F ~*1 b. It 7 , 1; f I - 91 1 16.11.=-u 11***!1':1'i,1!tit Â·'42!*~ 1 1~1- ti ,-4 - L'.4- 1. .1 R.',t' f't .1-~'-:r~. 4,044~.3:1:<i. 11 ; 1 -1. 11 4.11 '.. ..I' b-6..I .. 1, 1 114 1 A 1 ... -: â€¢'.1 IL,-Ev 41.10 ' 1 .1 1 1 1 11:. .6.91 ..1.46= 141 1 1.1.346.:*U , ..1 rr--~-9- im 11111'1 11 -- -1 j. 1-2-,9 . f 1m11 , T L= 1.14 ' -:*.~e; -17117 -0//r-, ~*~-1-w =-=â‚¬ 1 ~7 "~I'll|~NMM~|||Nmi||â€¢ ~ i m.- r 1 11 111111~~IN' .. |In~â€žJ ./Y44Â·,iMMI~+r-p-1-_ *6 .-H~Il . 1 J Bar #1- Bar Front and Back -2 4#1 r . , ... i|Il"O Im* i I L 1 /AW" b . - . 1 . IL ki. Â· ' t ~ li ZÂ·Â· ".Â·.I.,-, "' M.: 1 111 1 7 " .4 FL z â€¢ 'A. * . I '4 -2. . :.. 'U i .... I . 1. 1,4 - -1- --1.-~ ~ * ;32 ..Â· l '1Â·t 4 - 1 4, . - . 34 3 -- - u t...i:. 771. t 7' f =P.*16 Â· % . fri , F 2. 3 KAXPe * 0644: Ke.4.~2Â·Â· 1 -4. Â·Â·*Â·Y * , owland+# roughton architeâ‚¬,tur'e (2'24: urban design ww'Â·vu. ~ ovjlac~d oi~ot.jutrioit.c orn J Bar #1- Bar Front and Back =01,14 -Â·.1%1;0*ir. :. ... 17~ -14-Â·-- . * : 111 .11 P lilli! . t.:11 8, 2 7-49:, . ji' i.1 1 - -Â· '. ' . 2. '7 3 m 14,131 : ..Â·-"~. ..~ ~A . . ' 4/ 8 2 - I~:m... 1 I ~Â· 1 I~ 011 owland +Â· Fought on cy(.niteiture ond urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #2 - Pressed Tin Ceiling Ir..1. :br . 1/: 4: : 75â€ž,%.':444.,f?.f..t.Al h . W Fâ€¢- : s, -.. . ".lah.-id/41/~1 li .4 '2&Â· 6.Â· *Le< e . r 1 1 I. ... * L -,Ca Â¥ lf~-0- ..1 I -Â·.*CÂ· . 1, .0. I t .. .. 2 - I : ..4. $ . I . 4 .. . t I. . + 44.0 INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #2 - Pressed To remain in the central section of To remain as is with refurbishment as needed. Tin Ceiling the room, with refurbishment as needed. Accordingto historic pho- tographs, and the previous con- tractor, the ceiling is a replica. Retaining and refurbishing is ap- proved. Additional Comments: N/A owland+ iroughto.i fuchiteiture and urban design vgwu. mwAME :):.li?, F)tot }.corri 1 ... J Bar #3 - Oil Lamps ..r ..F k " 1 Pt:4 *64*4 I 114;:*.111111111~ 1,11 1 1 1 .1-1~111114 4 -lt.~ ~ . 4, /ill 1 _ =tfi ~ ~ i i , r/l/*-1 T .4/4.-: * - u..2 i e 'r 1 .C r.Â£. 74 . 4 1- aeÂ·'-*IiÂ·-1 INVENTORY # 2007 APPROVED PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #3 - Oil To remain as they are. To remain as they are. Lamps Additional Comments: The lights were previously relocated in front of the windows from the original location in alcove. ow land + .roughton architecture ond urban design www.rowlandbroughton.com Â¢11:.1 0,6*?Â»D:PI. J Bar #4 - Opening to J Bar Sitting Room â€¢k A ' ba~~T--Il/,- , ~Â·Â·r,&24~**f,Irch& I A~f<j. Ailit; 11, ~~t:>4:, El:~ 1 4 .. 'r f t=De..9 - f ' 4.1 .... 69,1 1. . 7. u=;~-ta ~/94,1 1=--7 7, 1 - 4 :111>*ti. 15 r r 19*?90 1. 048. 14 111 . -- Â·Â· Â· ' ' *4 4rk i.tr. .1., . 164....1 : rmle.- 44,Yr..f/ 1 ! 4 I 3%j .- - rk'F *i .1 .4. 11'.. -4 01~-'M~~ 1 % ' 64 '. 0 i 1 -c- 0 -/:1 4 4 + = i L., ' * 11 1.'. :.. Â¢ f .:*-31 0414. , 1 ':3. 1_~ ||||||||~ U H 40 47 . - blidli :: Fud' ' Â·,I 1 1 > . ~ f-3 ~~ Â» .- . t=. =1-.*=i)z.#:6 -~. .~ . *24 ;Â·4 - : L.Â·/ rk.Â·Â·Â·Â·09-#'213 *F . -1 J. 1 I j .0. .0 Â·r * %.,16 .*r INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #4 - Open- Openingto remain in place, remov- Openingto remain in place. ing to Lobby al not approved. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland +Droughton architecture und urban design v.'ww.rowlandbroughton.com J Bar #5 - Door to Lobby (from J Bar) 1 T.EN, 1 -3 1 14,6 2 1 : A+:,41 '15.LÂ·. Â· f .Â· 1 ..' 3, Â©.,â‚¬s. E..... 4 - ' 1 4 -,63 ti..,1 2 - 9 I 8'R :Â·*. Â·.Il . 44 . J ~ 43 f' Y lg~P , 4,4 .* 1}.L., ~2:A~... '. 427'. 'f.* 1 i 24 5 i, 1 1 '16,7 P 1 - . , ?Â· U Â· E - .If . . - . 4. . "'r % ; 0,Â·b J I - 46&.24 . Â·,7*-ii., h 'AfF 0 ' & 2 ... 4~. 1 4 Â¥ 41. 1%L 50, 1 . . ... 1 , 1 ,/ % Th e ,-# ~ -:*b'li~ ' f. Â·a :.~-~ :Â¢tg L . .' 1.1 -1 -- .. 1#.41 i 9%<- Â· k.~â‚¬ F---; i Â¥-L. - r.lj. * - 1.â€ž,1. . T ,â€¢,4 k e. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN J Bar #5 - Door to To remain in place. (3/7/07 Steve To remain in place. Lobby Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owlard+t roughton archftectore ond urban des}(fi, 40.:~:.rowlanabroughton. co jr, J Bar #5 - Door to J-Bar (from Lobby) 4.'' 4% ... 1 1 34 . -, ... I 1 .:.1 ... . . .t:..~. 3 .. 4~ ,.,b N ./2:Â·' -Â· =. Â·Â·t Â£4&. 3/ . C., '2> - 91"f- .:2 f.%23 7.F.~ .9 A. 'tt r -1 I F 1 . . 1 J 0 i'. 11 1 0 7.1 4.-p 1 11â€ž 24,1, 4 - i / Â¥M,11.9,4,4 \ 4 12 f. ..1 .. 1,1 11 11 .. 1 - 1 ' i ..1-1 I ! i Â£ ' , r -Ir. . 1 v 1.8 .. 6 LIV.. 41 - -4 0 7-2 7 - ... 1. I,7 .. ''111 1 . . :~ 1 Jll - 4 & e, , hi, 9 ; t 1. 1 .N 4 , 1 "t 11 ! r , Â· Â·44'-' ~ ' "i . C a.i - p B=F .C~ 2 @ = /5 ./ rati .1 6 â‚¬9Â·6 owland+,roughton architecture and urban design w ,vw. r owlandbrOi,lfihion.com . 4% J Bar #5 - Door to J-Bar (from street) , . ..vE.* ..1â€ž f, 2241==1 1 41/1/ .-14 2-1 ~ - . .=10 41:mill ' Illill &13 1./I./.El/. : p ~ 1 / . . 1---i --6 9~ell a )kin 4. Iii 1111 11 It My j F Or Hotel Jerome Bar door; matches interior door to lobby owland+broughton firchitecture and urlion design Wbvvi' :ovjlattdb~~011#li'11.0~1.{lom J Bar - Historic Images -- 1 .4. - i .: -1 1 ft,-- 4 t * - 191 'r~~ j~ 1 , 1 1,411 6it '. .14 * --.. 1.. 1 - 1 0.4 4 Â£ 1 - 1. 1 .. 11 11 : fi 4 1 40 - 1' 112 : 14,1Â¥Â·..,. . + 1 Fy at331 4 ,! 11 * .... 4 61 1.1. ",4 2 2*1 -;' 4.10 '4 .... 43 41 1 4 1- i 11.1 i Jul, Â· ItT. I 4Â¥.... 4- 1 0 I' j111 L a--I.~qmIIIIIILM-1/--~~ . 1 6 5' -,- JYMw#** ,, 5&25 â€¢*- /* A...... Hotel Jerome Bar before 1920 o w land +,Â·roughton FfÂ·hiiÂ»Â· Â·if p and whan ded vivvi.rowlart< Moughton.{ oin 6 J Bar- Historic Images # I rk.,0...4- 1.<. Â·: ....t.. I. f !@49 ~:~E:#:E~~:Â·'~* :Â·i,wâ€¢Â·Â· . , ... .~~~e~ . - Â·Â· . Â·Â·--~-~~ ~~ ~~ pl ........â€ž.............. 'di'Ipv)'-'..0. . -Â·,0~.. f Â·~ ~~I~. 1 . 2> f.... a.,-1/ 4, -*-,+ 4 1.1 - D. I 2,#Â·iar. . 41.9 -9 . ..17 11 Hotel Jerome Bar and Soda Fountain (Photo taken prior to 1945 renovation) owland+2 rought on architecture ond urban de,ign www.rowlandbroughton.corn J Bar- Historic Images 4 1 .. Fmte. 3%01 1. ... 5=-,41 ..... : I ... I E 4. -IBM: W:. -A . .4 4â€¢,4$. ..2.= 1.... r... i? 9 : 1 3. litâ€ž :4 ? . Â·11 2 ? ~Â·140.fu-4,6#ab 1 1 - The bar after renovation c. 1946-47 owland+iroughton Off hitel,ture ort(f urban aestift", WwW.rowianabroughton.com ...7 3. J Bar- Historic Images m.&4/9*44%1.: 1 Â¥h-. -"IÂ·'t4ff*'2*4Â·Â· tr . --T I *rzle IN 2 'Â£49 IÂ». . Â· . i bi 4 I ' 1. .-..'P o . I .. . . ' 'M.- :9,iii'tq:LÂ·Â· r Â· 14*f :/FÂ· 4.'Â·3.-,.. : 4 "#Ft -"J L -/ # <,ft ?; . 26=~ _ The bar lounge area of the Hotel Jerome after restoration, c. 1946-47 (It was the sitting area off the lobby; the photo shows oil lamps and what appears to be the current door to lobby on the left) owland +broughton architecture ond urban design v./9.fv- . ,~02? m d Fld b FO#.AL j'40 51. t.0 71 Entrv #1 - Steam Radiators (East entry) .."...7.: .92 . +1. 11 111@ :2 +Par~ . '11. X ~ 1. & 1. 21.1 ..17 ..ni 5%11 ~! . IiI3. %Â®41 4 :t-a J UG 1,1 I k J 7 --'i c 1., Â· Fv 4 819 i,Â®iiA ~ 93>t- 111: '1~ r ~ 11 . 41 *1 V, 1 1. * "%11 , 1 44 ./ *Ur t' 4 21 4 9 1~~ lilli L *' b *~QI lili 11 .A 1 - 14 1 111 1. .6 m , Â·5 - -1 . 4 .' - INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #1 - Steam Two (2) at the entry vestibule shall Two (2) attheentry vestibuleshall remain in place - Radiators remain in place-the remaining the remaining four (4) to remain in place or be relo- four (4) to be relocated to the res- cated to a location TBD within the historic section of taurant corridor, with refurbish- the building. ment as needed, Radiators to re- main within the historic portion of the hotel. Additional Comments: N/A owland+broughton architecture ond urban design www.r 0%via ndbrot titi'lloi~. c.z,rrl Entrv #1 - Steam Radiators (West entry) . :*12>:. ~ Â»- 1-1~11 - '9â‚¬*0 921% * :.:*.'Lth ::. ...4 1 . t i I t . 4 ..4,10 % - 4 . :r 2.-Â·93â€¢' i. Â·:Â·1~ 1 -'...4 21 *. '\1 ' ~ ~ **i IÂ¥ - mi Ve 111/#14 2 111,11 :Â·,744&~ 196 I 8 4 1 It . 111 11 :11.1 WI K . .. I. f-'143 2,1,~. 12 It IF;. 1- .111 1,6, i *4'fli A It. 1-Iii /111 1 4,7 .11 2.6* -ti i g ./1:, Pf , 44% - 4- ..9- & . , .11Â» 1~ 1 1 R .:. a..,tA .yX.K.., ..1 ==â‚¬ 4:*b.- --. -.1. 1*UL,Â» , - '4 owland+ roughton architecture mid li r bo 1 1 <i"tign WWW.r{,}NA/~>: ft( 12>i'O~.lgrti.O~ : Om Entrv #1 - Steam Radiators (Near Front Desk) IiÂ·v '.z - ~- *'00 Avpi#*~.: ~~:~ ~."~~i-~il-:~w.:+Mif~W * 4'407.*t Â· 4,Â·12-* 1,9,. DOY.:.1 1. ' Azyd.k - 4 12 11.?lih',11 :b?.1:7.Y, :ry #Al 4 9,1 4 -1 r.- m-tay 6 . r! 1 r,Â·3.~1 1 lin'Ii. 'Â· 4 11 j.,11 i f /L.:.:136 3 3 f 4 j I. 1 1 1 9 1 1 ; 1 46.4"': lt. 1 111 : 1 Y . ..', i:Â· 1 ' ..Â·ta â‚¬>24-AÂ·-254 1 . *Â· Â· : :'t....Â·.-,1 73 7.Â©222'- Â·.. 10%3.*9,JI ...ViR:. ~ 6 .1,1 4 Iq J ./. I. t 11,1.1 4'GL ' a.i . f. owiand + roughton mt#k. {01 2 ond urban fiesign VJW'VV.i 0*jid rd#m#Wn.COrY) Entrv #2 - Front Desk (North side panel) 'Â· , t. -~ Â¤4 : -. * I: J '7 * 4 4 Â·f -U,--'4a8.Qi#...":~=I"...L--ram~ - - .---- 12 -4* 1 :12 Â¥7 5% ~: '-6 2 0.- 71 #: . 0 4 h â‚¬ 1 49- -t ti. I 14Â¥. t. ; INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #2 - Front To remain in place - if the existing To remain in place - existing stone top is not anticipated Desk stone top is to be replaced it is to to be replaced. 'ideally replicate' the original ma- terials & design - no alteration to shape of top is allowed -the north- ern most side panel may be re- placed, but the southern most pan- el is historic and must remain. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final deci- sion) Additional Comments: N/A owland +: roughton architecture and urban design viww. rowl andbroughton. Com Entrv #2 - Front Desk (South side panel) 11 2 .': -:7 ill: I. f.. 4,*rl../AW.?0:14 , th 7 1(t'*34 41:.14 f :1 , - 49 9 4!14 4,2- 1:;1, 1 L I 11 4 21- 2 4 - 1 12, 1.: 111'11 11Ehe . 9 W.& - .f i I. â‚¬+ 1. : - 1041 :â€¢ :~0. 11 1:> -J N h' 1 Â·Â·JA M 1/- 3.,<):P,,xvitiff>31%3,1 1 I owland+f roughton architecture ond urban design www.roviliandbrot tittition.corri :4 Entrv #2 - Front Desk - :1 j.. .. .i :*~to:-4.=.~-~'~ - Â· ./4 Â¢ :-':04Â·~ A<:4<{.*, 1 -Ir ' - 'lili* 1 Lmi B 11 'liu.4:- * L a 4 k. ... tnzÂ·.-1 3: .2; . owland+broughton a.cniteituye (ing urban design www ,0* irt r~d m (,Milghtoi Mtorri Entrv #ZA - Room Key Boxes A 0 4' 1 , 21 ... 6 Â¢ F I 1 Ek 6 6 1 F 41 1 A F L. & 1 - 41.- d -4 ... 01 -4% 1- Â£ ~ E ,FiTERI iÂ·V1 11? I 1 0'2339LY 1-1-1-3=rÂ»fl- .3 1 ||~ 41Â· 4, J ....Jl.. i,jcl.:i.*i Â· iâ€¢:,4? # -Wk..4.:,-& yl k.ll 4 7 I ' Â·Â·Â· 11 j: 1, INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #2A - The key box is not approved to be To remain in place. Room Key Boxes relocated or altered. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A O w land +H roughton wmN E 5 wj,%tr)(n â€žAlâ‚¬#Wn.Corrl Entrv #3 - Elevator Ato I 1 Â£ 4,-17#qÂ·" 1 It E* 3 6 ~r ~ ~1~1 --1 U \ .. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD RENOVATION PLAN Entry #3 - To remain but with new elevator To remain pendingcode determination - new interi- Elevator doors and new interior. or to be installed. Additional Comments: The previous contractor has indicated that the elevator was entirely replaced in the 1980's. owland+broughton architecture ond urban design. vÂ·wÂ·w,rowlandbroughton.com Entrv #3 - Elevator @; 11: , fj ic''. 4, .... fi '4~54/ *AK i . , . WF . .MeNee' Â· 1, 11 a 6 b. . .. ..... ..:i....2.,%4 E.?-SS:4 I ila' ~fru'~ ~IÂ·-:i: - ~ig . ' . ..1....39 I . .. . ,.....%;.0 1 .. ' lip I Â·Â·Â·pÂ·, PÂ·. 4 4415'' 1 - . ..: 'a . . ' ~ F. Â·~2' 4 'Â·..$:.. ~~ Â£1. .. I :.11 Â·Â· ... 4:, 1 .E.6-1 -310â€¢ f- -~~-+ -= .. i *c F...6 l.. I owland+ roughton .8. t.2 2 ': ./.1.'b#~ 8- ff<#lj Ul K.:ati de)'/g. ; www.rowlanal,roughton.corn 7 Entrv #4 - Floor Tiles d. Â·Â· 1 -- - - - 1 . i Â· i ../i\ ...... ./- 7 ',. /1- 1 62%;'A 2: ./41./ f 6 #/, 11,6.f=*. ;45 U . .: 4 1 1. 1 .,g,0%1 .*1'~. :2~'.. . Â·Â·k./ ::.. I -.5.--- ./.1 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Entry #4 - Floor Retain the entire tile floor (with Floor tiles in the entry are to remain - they may be cov- Tiles necessary refurbishment) in the ered with area rugs. lobby is required. Sealers should be investigated. (3/7/07 Steve Bar- wick final decision) Additional Comments: The tile in the lobby area contains significant amount of original tiles and was re-installed during the 1980's remodel with the original decorative border pattern in order to preserve as much of the original tile floor and design as possible. owland+Droughton 1,0.hitecture grid urban design 3.vef.: owlandbroughton.corn Entrv - Historic Images . 2,1 -?1 . r 4L 41 1 $- .4j- 7 I. / *d.: 1 1 ' Â· t. . i L . :A - 11 1 ...1 1 .- -kEL. r . . ... .9. L .. ....4 Lobby prior to 1946 renovation showing front desk area o wiand + broughton architecture and urban design WVJ~g.~<>~.*M~&31â‚¬hlon.:.0 n Entrv - Historic Images - ./.." 1111.0~- 1 1~*tf '*32; 1 - . & A . 4 2, -- /4 --'. . . 1.1 -: 96 - ..- F - - . .., . M 1 ./ .. Photo from 1945 shows front desk panel and floor tile border n u, 124@}r' 4-''rfil. 5.7 h tr; n vy .Â·: i. , owlandbroughron.corn -4 Entrv - Historic Images .. :* 1 : 141; DIJ 722. 1 9, 1 1 lilli EJ 112 Â£4. 0-k M, ~ 4 /7 ~ R .& {2 , 25Â·t. I 62 y 4311 ' w. :.1:,: :.....1 ..3.=39:% f 2.*mu :.41. 1.2.r . i .,.2 .'t . Â·Â· I :Â·*;91F1~-- .. Front desk in original location (Photo taken from front entry) o w land+brough ton iy,484, i:Â»,p niv4 nyivs.. cli,c:,1,1 -flÂ·â€¢.s'.6.v.C ..413 0,4-lf lit...,9,1 vw :Av.i ovv~r3ndu~~ougato~1.0.i.)Fr~ 14.'~i ' ':-' t./ Entrv - Historic Images -- 9 0,*.1.4,0,~pei. Â·,Li./.g I.- Â·Â· . 1 .~-'.-~ fi ~{97#fj~.--:*,i p. < .--Â· iâ‚¬*12* 4' 1#DE m â„¢11 11 1 4 ' 4 ..: 111 iÂ·*ULÂ·NX-~.:t<-32--.2 -~.~:. Â·..: E f 2 5 . r f ..7 z E -5 - t 3,4 Â·. . L Hotel lobby 1945, floor tiles, west stairway, door to library owland+broughton architecture ond urban design wvjvj. ~ ovy iat~d b~~ougt~to j:.corn *01'...0,0 d#" 7 0% .7 -, b. 4244*0* Entrv - Historic Images . 126::0 ...... 29 J = 4 11%: / , 1. + I. I. f. * .. k .. ' Hotel lobby 1946, floor tiles, east and west stairwells, columns and door to street (Photograph taken from reception desk prior to renovation) owland+broughton architecture ond urban design wv.'.4. r ovj~a f id bm .:M.jgh-lors.:orn Entrv - Historic Images 11 - 7 1 , m. 1411 . L ..1 t.46 .....ill Â«* , 1 7*31 1-1.. '. t....1 T.E. 6 : t. 4Â·Â·Â· , '* ..'_ A. 1 -7.1. _ . . ... 4.1.ls'.1 1.1 - * .4. - - *. ' . I - .-3 - =4'im,1,"11'"1:12(E, .IIll . - - Â·*'444Â·.6#Â£-4"8"lit. 4. - . . I ..1 & * 11 Hotel lobby c. 1946-47, floor tiles, east stairwell, columns and door to street (Photograph taken from entry following the renovation) owland+brougnton architecture and urban design v:fwvv . mo v: ,â‚¬1 n ('i t) R w:;,litoil.tory) 11 Â· Â· tri i Atrium #1 - Interior Column b 4 r - 1.-*DE ': ~ 64/ E=Ei /7 *S f : 364 ,# E--1 - â‚¬ ;.Â· Â¥11.1/ f:11 ~1 l.4111 1~ ! ~. 1111 t: Id 1 4 #-s:tif:~Câ‚¬*Â·Â·. , - ifir :=12 k ./ INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #1 - Inte- To remain as is or be restored to May restore to their original appearance of black (or rior Column theiroriginal appearance. very dark color) with white caps at the ceiling. Additional Comments: These are cast iron and original to the structure. They were originally painted black (or a very dark color), then top half was painted white (or very light). The top leaf parts are the only original decorative elements. o w land +broughton architecture and urban design www.,Mt,~ ~ 32 ~ Mm~**M.com Â¢t.tu , 24* Atrium #2 - Stairs, Newel posts, Balusters A ' , ''4 ' E i. * -~ r ~ Nz Â» ..... 1 ~M J . I acl . 9 .........1 . 1 -17 4,6 11 1, 1.1 . *65 â‚¬â‚¬ 4 1 1/1 s f< INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #2- To remain as is, with refurbish- To remain as is, with refurbishment as needed Stairs, newel ment as needed posts, balusters Additional Comments: Stair is in original conditions with no alterations to the original detailing. OVVIand+broughton ychited ire ond urban design v.*. Â·w. i owlandbroughton.com Atrium #3 - Lobby Clock m...~ 11. %74:.: ,Â·2~435Â· Â·~ c 9<4 1-0!~t .~Â·Â· ft N. - ... r. . t:F i F.,t "4 bi'4Â· 1.11 /1 - 14 , i + 0 Â£ F i. 3 x1* '511 Iri elf 1 F Â£61 21 =r~ - ./. 31 r 11!61:f 3*Vt'.9 Â»..,= ~ -Â¢381, L Z ir, 1 :4Â·'A+Ofiti : iÂ¥ Â·14 .r INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #3 - Lob- To remain as is, but be moved a To remain as is, but be moved as required for the re- by Clock few feet to center of new wall. vised layout. Additional Comments: Original to the hotel in close to original location; has been moved as part of past renova- tions. owland+trough ton :fitutacture ind urban design 9/9 w.row! pndbroughton.com Atrium #4 - Room Call Paging Device --1 r/Il- ': 111.< 414:*trt..L.J.lilluled. uj ij 1.. p - I 1 -0~1~124.'- - ==.--il 4 4.0 Â·Â· Â· 3- J. .- 1.- &0,4 W).h: ':/ .5 :.. I . 4 1 - 1.'fi~405 . + +t,-Â¥ 0.1 - * .f INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #4 - To remain as is. To remain as is. Room Call Paging Device Additional Comments: Original to hotel, but in a different location. owland+trough ton orchiteiture and urban tiesign 8%.2 .ff.roi:Ji:-Fldbioughloti.torri Atrium #5 - Skylight Ceiling EA.81/~ 3 .~4 4 - -:- dll \. 4 1/44/*C ,i '1 ~ : kill. ' 4 111 7 3 ..1 ...99 ...I E- 1% 'A r . 1/%*4 41Â»~~- 1 1 -1 924- 1 .. f 1[ . 4*... ... 1 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #5 - Sky- Removal of the skylight framing is Original skylight framing is to remain in place - re- light Ceiling not approved - replacement of place the upper skylight glass only to accommodate glass may be approved with sub- performance specifications and assure that it is mittal of glass specifications. water tight. Additional Comments: Original skylight ceiling was removed in 1985 renovation, with only the framework left in place. D w land +aroughto., wi hitecture und urban design www.rowland brouighton. com Atrium #6 - Floor tiles I. NA. 1 2 M- 4 1. V i| |!|~8' Ft#/6 ' *'116'* : ..a - ./.A 9 -:* ..A t $.7.-\ '~â€¢. 1-. Ik 1 14.3, lat# Â®m "la ..# ."1 ' ..1 Ny* 4 0/1 Â©39 1. 2 0.4 - - .1 . B- ~1 -:id E=,1 . 9 11 1. \ . - - -0 â€¢ ..i.~ lÂ·2':~. P.... 1 ' elÂ· :' t 1 1 14 y.;... t. . _-_...~ Â· ..Lal.kâ€¢*IR'..'.. - INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Atrium #6 - Floor Removal of fioor tile is allowed in TBD tiles the Atrium Lobby. (3/7/07 Steve Barwickfinal decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland+ ;roughton of ci, recture Ond urban des ign v:VA:. f f'lÂ·.r! andbrouighton. com Jacobs #1 - Dining Room Chandeliers Â¥,11.4 4 --1 14# IL:*.4.1 . ~040Â·t 4; Â·,1 2 , I -1,2.7 4 ,..2 1,3 - G.Â· ... : , V :....t INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Jacobs #1- Relocation of these chandeliers Chandeliers in both rooms are to be retained and stored. Dining Room within the public areas on the Chandeliers ground floorof the hotel is ap- proved. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick final decision) Additional Comments: N/A owland+% ro u ghton architecture and urban design WV. w.B 09-?~3(,dbrot.liti'nion. i OrT) Library #1 - Pressed Tin Ceiling 4 - .:%, I. . : 9./ . 1 14 ,% .1 %111 4 INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Library #1- The ceiling appears to be a replica- To remain in its current position and condition. Pressed Tin Ceil- lion of the original. The tin ceiling ing must be retained and sensitively treated in terms of lighting and HVAC. Additional Comments: Ceiling needs some repair. owland+hroughton architecture and urban design WW'24.mUNd&e#Wn.cort'~ Library #2 - Library/ Lobby Door I ,1. 0 f.: 1 ~' 7 :1 4. .3.- 1 f . r-.4 le a. f fa'.~~~Z- i. 1 . L -1 1- . 1 : :.If - ' - 1, I I. :1 . .-I ./. ......1 T r '4 f N: ...t. I * , 11 a ./ - 1 : . 1 -511-/ .:. ..1. . :AN: r :1 .6 i 9 - $ 1 1 3 e. 1 1 mr|, , *0., i i 11 - 11*4 9 1 l .' INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Library #2- The existing door openings into the The opening is to remain. Library/ Lobby Library and Front Desk must be Door retained. Additional Comments: The previous contractor has indicated that these dooropenings are original, but the doors and trim are replicas from the 1980's. There is no need from a historic preservation point of view to salvage the door panels for re-use in another location. owla id+proughton circhitecture and urban design .vww .rowlandbroughton.com 4:Â·Â·Â·.â€¢Â·fâ€¢:bijw Other #1 - Lobby Fireplace and Mirror & 9 1 1177 i. 3 . *<Af :04 4 %40-â‚¬ 0 5%7:4 3..Â·c INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Other#1-Lobby To remain as is, with refurbish- Possibly relocate to accommodate a more grand fireplace. Fireplace and ment as needed. Mirror Additional Comments: Not original but installed during the Paepcke remodel in 1946. They were brought from the Palmer House Hotel in Chicago by Elizabeth Paepcke. owland+broughton architecture and urban design wwvg ~ 4.~v:j~ctritlt.)~â‚¬)11Â£41'iton.c.o'T) A : i Other #2 - Century Room Fireplace and Mirror 11,2 :ff.Â§ . YUT-1/A 1 ik j'.Â·#K..:Â· .:Â·Â·. 1. I. i I34 '3'J 2.2 -t -'ri, i K ' . ': W .. .SM. 1 1 P f t. .ii. Â« â‚¬*C 4 t, ht, 411 Â· .*1 2 4,Â· %4.- 4 . . ./-~F I *462. '-93.. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Other #2- Relocation of thefireplace and Possibly relocate to accommodate a more grand fire- Century Room mirror to the Antler Bar is ap- place. Fireplace and proved. (3/7/07 Steve Barwick Mirror final decision) Additional Comments: These items were added duringthe Paepcke remodel in 1946. O 13/ land+broughton architecture ond urban design 49'uvvy .i ovy~it~~ab~~otigt~toil.torri Furniture #1 - Furniture + 'f -11/5 - . t ; 1 1. 1,#..., IP , *r.'44-= . 1 '9 1, .....le ~ a~ 3- 0 Ill + 1 = & 1 . f := 1.1 14, 1 t 'Al/64 5 J. 1 -7, r Â¥ 1,- , , *11 - ~1*41.tit Â· - Â©-*-RARN F f/M .:. ' t f i 7 'Inld,1111 2 .4 Â»3 - 1.4~ .i 1.- I 1 . ..1 .1 H* , . 3.Jit. p v .0,1 4* - - I INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture #1- All items to be re-used as noted in Furniture may be reused as desired. Furniture attached list. Additional Comments: We have not been able to locate the "attached list." Dates of all pieces are unknown - known antiques were brought to the site in 1985, but not original. owland+broughton archfte.Cure and urban design ef ; 1 .i Owlanaorougnion.Corn Furniture #2 - Mining Maps '6 -I. . 111 44 8- .. . '. tt477 h.toÂ· 11 i .. 9 4461 . -. #d ~ - I 4 rÂ· 1 6% *1 46 . it>*400*'aixt Â£ hÂ·. n r 2/J . fal fif.flf.:.2 /*3 Â·'IT . .4.C f - 2 # :Mial.9,< . i: + .,i:j'i:. . f'. INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture#2- May be removed entirely. May be replaced or reused as desired. Mining Maps Additional Comments: Not original. owland+ roughton ' 11,6 Ul UW, i,it,3 19 4 1 wwKA ~4*3-*Bugm Furniture #3 - Bulletin Board : / 1 .2 . 9- 11 :..9 :.. LJ' 1. fiw M ::11 f ..0 ... -- -~- # 11 41 - 1/I'll INVENTORY # APPROVED 2007 PUD CURRENT RENOVATION PLAN Furniture #3- Plan for item r:equested. To be stored and relocated. Location to be deter- Bulletin Board niined. Additional Comments: Can be seen in the 1940's era photograph in the lobby. rowlandÂ·+ Droughton architectule and urban design wvqfmmwit}ridb~~outi?~toll.corr~ P~ 587590, 03/20/2012 at 0.V.93:51 PM, 1 OF 5, R $31.00 Doc Code APPROVAL NOTICE OF APPRO Â¥ /111 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO For an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to 330 East Main Street, aka the Hotel Jerome Parcel ID No. 2737-073-21-001: APPLICANT: Jerome Property, LLC 540 West Madison, Chicago, IL 60661 REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC P.O. Box 4827, Basalt, CO 81621 970/925-6958 SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Hotel Jerome. 330 East Main Street, Lots A - I, and Lots O - S, and the easterly 20 feet of Lot N and the easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley all in Block 79, City and Townsite o f Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval to reduce the approved net leasable commercial area, increase the floor area allocated to "other" uses, and decrease the overall approved floor area for the site. The proposal includes the following: â€¢ Reduce the size of the spa, â€¢ Relocate offices on the second fioor to the basement, â€¢ Convert the second floor offices to a fitness room, â€¢ Convert the Century dining room to a hotel living room. â€¢ Reconfigure 3 guest rooms to allow the creation of lodging suites without changing the number of lodge units or the number the pillows previously approved in 2006. BACKGROUND: PRIOR To 2006 In 1986 the Amended and Restated PUD Plat (Book 518, Page 949) permitted 94 lodge rooms. Various land use approvals were granted to the Hotel Jerome prior to 2006. All of these approvals were superseded by the PUD amendment in 2006 with the exception of a requirement that 20 full time equivalents are housed in the Cortina Lodge. 2006 City Council approved Ordinance No. 42, Series of 2006 replacing the previous entitlements with a new approval that permitted the enlargement of the Hotel's net leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renovation of the Hotel's Main and Mill Streets courtyards, and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of the Hotel's parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. In addition, the renovation of the Cortina Lodge was approved to meet the Hotel's employee housing mitigation requirements. Preservation of historic interior elements of the Hotel and a designation application for the Cortina Lodge were also required. The number of lodging units (94 keys) was not increased in 2006. The only aspect o f the project that generated housing mitigation was an increase to the net leasable commercial area. Using the growth management benefit for the enlargement of historic landmarks, it was determined that 1.42 full time equivalents (FTEs) required mitigation. During the 2006 approvals, a total of 21 Pagel of 5 FTEs were calculated to be housed at the Cortina Lodge. Considering the prior requirement of 20 FTEs housed at the Cortina, a credit of l FTE was available. The 2006 approval permitted the 1.42 FTE mitigation requirement to be fulfilled by housing 1 FTE at the Cortina, thus utilizing all 21 FTEs housed in the Cortina, and paying a cash in lieu fee for the remaining 0.42 FTE by averaging the cash in lieu payment for Category 2 and Category 3. The vested rights for the 2006 approval expired on January 14,2010. 2008 In 2008 the Community Development Department approved an insubstantial amendment to allow the conversion of an office space to a lodge unit without triggering the requirement to mitigate for the 1.42 FTEs associated with the lodge expansion. At the time of the request there were only 92 lodge units in the Hotel, thus granting an amendment to allow the conversion of office to lodge was compliant with both the 1986 and the 2006 approvals which allowed 94 lodge units. 2010 In 2010 the Community Development Department approved an insubstantial amendment to bifurcate the entitlements to allow construction on the Cortina Lodge component prior to beginning construction of the Hotel renovation. Phase I included the renovation, a designation application, and deed restriction of Cortina Lodge units for affordable housing. Phase II included the renovation and enlargement of the Hotel Jerome component. It was determined that Phase I did not trigger any impact fees; however Phase II will have impact fees assessed at the time of building permit submittal for the Hotel component. STAFF EVALUATION: The proposed changes to the Hotel Jerome PUD meet the review criteria for an insubstantial amendment, attached as Exhibit A. Dimensional Requirements: Staff supports the proposed internal changes to the project which reduces the overall floor area, reduces the net leasable commercial area, and increases the "other" floor area calculation for uses associated with the lodge use. The proposal does not increase the total floor area approved in 2006 for the project. The reduction of commercial net leasable area does not adversely affect the growth management allotments allocated in the 2006 approvals. The following calculations in Table 1 compare the approved 2006 dimensional requirements to the proposed amendment. The "current amendment" column is calculated based on the current 2011 Land Use Code: Page 2 of 5 Table 1: Current Notes 2006 approval amendmenti Reduction based on conversion of Commercial 15,985 sq. ft. 13,838 sq. ft. Century Room to hotel living room noor area and smaller spa in basement. No change to lodge unit numbers or floor area. The slight decrease Lodge units 59,214 sq. ft. 59,072 sq. ft. results from changes to how floor foor area area is calculated in the 2006 and current Code. Increase based on more back of house hotel functions, conversion "other" floor 39,735 sq. ft. 40,823 sq. ft. of office to fitness room, and area conversion of Century Room to hotel living room. Total floor 114,934 sq. ft. 113,733 sq. ft. area Reduction based on smaller spa and smaller Century Room. The current Commercial amendment calculations are based net leasable 14,891 sq. ft. 14,743 sq. ft. on the 2011 net leasable area area definition which is much more inclusive regarding which elements count towards net leasable area. Staff supports the elimination of the requirement to use the 2006 floor area calculations listed in Article 3, Part 1 of the PUD Agreement (Recordation # 533928) to require future amendments be subject to the Land Use Code in place at the time of application. Affordable Housing: As described above, the affordable housing mitigation requirement of 1.42 FTEs approved in 2006 resulted only from an increase in the commercial net leasable component of the project as described above. Due to the proposed reduction of the net leasable commercial area proposed in this amendment, affordable housing generation is re-calculated below. The following calculations are all based on the current regulatory requirements: New commercial net leasable calculation: Existing Hotel: (1,412 sq. ft. basement + 12,851 sq. ft. ground level) = 14,263 sq. ft. of net leasable area2 Proposal: (2,360 sq. ft. basement + 12,374 sq. ft. ground level) = 14,735 sq. ft. of net leasable area3 Amount of new netleasable area: 471 sq.ft. Employee generation calculation: 471 sq. ft. in basement @ 3.075 FTEs generated/ 1,000 sq. ft. net leasable = 1.45 FTEs ' Calculated pursuant to the current 2011 Land Use Code requirements. 2 The existing commercial net leasable area is calculated based on the current'2011 Code requirements. 3 The amount of new commercial net leasable is below the 2006 approved commercial net leasable amount of 14,891 sq. ft. Page 3 of 5 Employee mitigation calculation: Enlargement of a historic landmark mitigates the first 4 employees generated at 0%, the second 4 are mitigated at 30%, and the remainder is mitigated at 60%. First 4 employees are mitigated at 0%, and since 1.45 FTEs are generated there is no employee mitigation requirement for the proposed expansion. The 2006 approvals required 20 FTEs to be housed at the Cortina Lodge to mitigate for the lodging component of the Hotel pursuant to the 1986 approvals. The Cortina houses 21 FTEs, so there is 1 F'IE at the Cortina that is not used for mitigation purposes and can be used as a credit for future mitigation requirements at the hotel. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Administrative Application for an Insubstantial PUD Amendment as noted above and on Exhibit 'A' to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby, APPROVES the request with the following conditions: 1. Prior to Building Permit submittal, amend the PUD Agreement (recordation #533928) to reflect the changes to the dimensional requirements listed in Article 2, Paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement, and the affordable housing mitigation requirements listed in Article 3 Paragraph 3.3, described herein. 2. Prior to Building Permit submittal, amend the PUD Agreement to omit the requirement that the project be reviewed pursuant to the 2006 Land Use Code regarding noor area calculations and measurements, described in Article 3, Paragraph 3.1 and attached as Exhibit A. 3. Prior to Building Permit submittal, update the Final PUD floor plans to reflect the changes in floor area and commercial net leasable area calculations, and the reconfiguration of spaces APPROvED BY 4 8, e Chris Bendon, Date Community Development Director ACCEPTED BY: Ob f 36860 Property LLC Date Attachments: Exhibit A: Review Criteria Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT A Section 26.445.100 Amendment of PUD development order A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. There is no change in the use or character ofthe building. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. The there is no increase in coverage, 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates o f the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Trip generation and demand for public services will not be impacted by this amendment, 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. There is no change to the open space. The building envelope size and activity envelope size does not change. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off-street parking and loading space. There is no change in the parking/loading space. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. There is no change in the ROW's widths, streets or easements. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. The approved net leasable floor area of the commercial component is reduced by 148 sq. ft. or 1%. S. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density of the development. 11/a. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The change is consistent with the approved use and the site specific approval, Page 5 of 5 VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants February 1, 2012 RECEIVED FEB 0 2 2012 CITY 01- ASPEN HAND DELIVERED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Hotel Jerome Insubstantial PUD Amendment Dear Chris: Please consider this letter an application for an insubstantial PUD amendment for the Hotel Jerome Planned Unit Development (see Exhibit 1, Pre-Application Conference Summary, attached hereto). The application is submitted pursuant to Section 26.445.100.A. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations") by Jerome Property LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter "Applicant"). The Applicant's ownership of the property is evidenced in the attached Title Insurance Policy (see Exhibit 2). Permis- sion for Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. A land use application form and an application fee agreement are attached as Exhibits 4 and 5, respectively. Background In December of 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 42 which amended the Hotel Jerome's prior PUD approvals. The amendment approved an extensive renovation of the existing Hotel, an expansion of its net leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renovation of its Main Street and Mill Street courtyards, and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of its parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. The amendment also approved the renovation of the existing Cortina Lodge to meet the Hotel' s affordable housing mitigation requirements. The Historic Preservation Commission ("HPC") granted final development plan approval for the Hotel' s renovation pursuant to Resolution No. 37, which was also approved in December of 2006. Minor development approval for the renovation of RO. Box 4827 ' Basalt, Colorado 81621 Â· 970/925-6958 Â· Fax 970/920-9310 vannassociates@comcast.net Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 2 the Cortina Lodge was granted by the HPC in March of 2006 pursuant to Resolution No. 6. Final PUD development plans and a PUD agreement (the "Agreement") for the project were recorded in January of 2007 (see Exhibits 6 and 7, respectively). As Article I, paragraph 1.2 of the Agreement indicates, the 2006 amendment essentially superseded all prior land use approvals pertaining to the Hotel. The Agreement incor- porated all pertinent provisions of City Council Ordinance No. 42 and HPC Resolu- tions No. 6 and 37. In the event o f any conflict between the Agreement and the Ordinance and/or Resolutions, Article II, paragraph 2.1(d) provides that the Agree- ment shall govern. The Hotel Jerome and Cortina Lodge were subsequently sold prior to issuance of a building permit for the project. An application for an insubstantial PUD amendment was submitted by the Hotel's new owner, CLP-Elysian Aspen, LLC, in October of 2008. The amendment requested approval to convert an existing office in the Hotel to a lodge unit. The request was consistent with the Hotel' s prior 2006 approval and was granted by the Community Development Director in November of 2008 (see Exhibit 8). While the office conver- sion was subsequently completed, no further renovation activities were undertaken by the then Hotel owner. The Hotel Jerome and Cortina Lodge were purchased by the Applicant in December of 2009. In June of 2010, the Applicant submitted a second application for an insubstantial PUD amendment to permit phasing of the original approvals. The Applicant wished to proceed with the renovation and historic designation of the Cortina Lodge, as provided for in the Agreement and final PUD development plans, prior to undertaking the renovation of the Hotel. While the Agreement did not specifically address project phasing, Article III, paragraph 3.2(b) requires that a Certificate of Occupancy ("CO") be issued for the renovated Lodge prior to issuance of a CO for the renovated Hotel. The insubstantial amendment was approved by the Community Development Director and a Development Order was issued in July of 2010 (see Exhibit 9). The renovation of the Cortina Lodge was undertaken by the Applicant in the fall of 2010, and the property was historically designated pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 25 in January of 2011 (see Exhibit 10). Certificates of Occupancy for the Lodge were issued by the Building Department in September of 2011 (see Exhibit 11). The two buildings which comprise the Cortina Lodge contain four studio units and four 2- two bedroom dormitory suites. The Agreement credits these units with housing 21 employees (i.e., 5 employees in the four studio units and 16 employees in the four 2- bedroom dormitory units). The deed restriction encumbering the units was recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk in January of 2011 (see Exhibit 12). Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 3 As discussed in the 2006 Hotel Jerome PUD amendment application, various land use approvals given to the Hotel prior to the 2006 PUD amendment required the housing of 20 employees in the Cortina Lodge. Article III, paragraph 3.3 of the Agreement requires affordable housing mitigation for an additional 1.42 employees, one of which was to be housed in the renovated Lodge. The additional mitigation was required to permit the expansion of the Hotel's existing net leasable commercial area. The remaining 0.42 employees was to be mitigated via a cash-in-lieu payment to the City prior to issuance of a building permit for the Hotel renovation. The amount of the payment is to be calculated based on an average of the Aspen Pitkin Housing Authori- ty's Category 2 and Category 3 payment-in-lieu fees in affect at building permit submittal. Proposed Amendment Having renovated the Cortina Lodge, the Applicant now wishes to proceed with the renovation of the Hotel Jerome. Various changes to the recorded 2007 final PUD development plans, however, are proposed. In general, all of the changes fall within and/or are consistent with the Dimensional Requirements contained in Article II, paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement and the 2006 PUD amendment's approval conditions. The proposed. changes consist primarily of revisions to the layout of the Hotel's C - basement spa and back of house areas, the ground floor public spaces, and some of (,~j,A.18Â¢Â«' ,- the guest rooms. _The previously proposed expansion of the Hotel's basement for mechanical and storage purposes, and a proposed second_ floor addition above the annex's existing ground floor gallery, have also been eliminated. No changes are pro- posed to the Hotel's J-Bar and Library Room. More specifically, the size of Hotel's basement spa has been significantly reduced and reconfigured. Minor changes to the basement parking garage to accommodate the Hotel' s required 47 off-street parking spaces and the consolidation of its vehicular en- try/exit doors are also proposed. The Hotel's ground floor entry and the adjacent atrium will remain unchanged. The arched openings which link the atrium to the existing Cenmry Room, however, will be enlarged to facilitate its use as a Hotel living room. A "Certificate of No Negative Effect" and a "Development Order" for the proposed enlargement have been issued by the City' s Historic Preservation Officer and the Community Development Director, respectively (see Exhibit 13). The existing Jacobs restaurant space, and the adjacent corridor leading to the Hotel annex, will be reconfigured to enhance their functionality. In addition, the Wheeler Room will also be reconfigured to accommodate the use of the Elisha Room for ski con- cierge purposes and to provide an adjacent ski storage area. Three of the guest rooms located in the southwest corner of the annex on the ground, second and third floors will be reconfigured to permit their occupancy as two or three D 1/to, 40(49_ 447 4 6Arry\â‚¬ li~\ 4iat(4 ' vA (/16' 1 14 tv Ila/~7 Mr. Chris Bendon Dthut February 1, 2012 Page 4 bedroom suites. The suites will include an enlarged bathroom, a walk-in closet and a wet bar. The_Hotel's key count, however, will remain unchanged at 94 keys. All of the guest rooniEWill b-6-BjffeniR@lf-fâ‚¬fGFbfihed, and--an improved HVAC system will be installed to enhance in-room comfort. Finally, the Hotel offices, which are located on the second floor, will be relocated and the space converted to a small fitness center. The Applicant's proposed changes to the Hotel's internal layout are depicted on the attached floor plans (see Exhibit 14) and outlined in detail in the attached memorandum from the project architect (see Exhibit 15). Changes to the exterior of the Hotel will be limited to repair work to its masonry walls, the installation of metal coping along its parapet, and the removal of a column at the existing entrance to the basement parking garage. These changes have also been approved by the City's Historic Preservation Officer and are noted in the attached Certificate of No Negative Effect. No changes to the Hotel's existing Main Street and Mill Street courtyards are proposed at this time. The Applicant, however, may elect to amend the previously approved landscape plans for these areas at a later date. The various changes to the interior of the Hotel discussed above will result in changes to its approved allowable floor areas which are contained in Article II, paragraph 2.2(1) of the Agreement. While the floor areas contained in the Agreement were _ calculated based on the Regulations in effect in 2006, the proposed floor areas 4 of previously approved building additions, and to minor variations in area takeoffs contained herein have been calculated ybased--0~ current-regulatory requirements. As Exhibit 16 indicates, the Hotel's total allowable floor area will decrease frdâ‚¬ 114,954 -11~~,-A,--04~*7-~-.--*-_ .- _iguare.-feet to 113,733 square feet. This decrease can be attributed to the elimination between the project's prior and current architects. The floor area of the Hotel's commercial uses and lodge units will also decrease. The commercial uses will decrease from 15,985 square feet to 13,838_ square fuet--due primarily to the reduction in the size of the basement spa and the elimination of the former Century Room dining area. The floor area of the lodge -units will decrease _ from_29,215 -square feet 10.59.072-square feet. As the area devotedto-abtual lodge units remains essentially unchanged, the decrease is most likely attributable to differences in the prior and current takeoffs. The floor area devoted to other uses (e.g., public spaces, circulation, etc.) will increase-from 39,735 square feet to 40,823 square_feet. This increase is due priniariITiothe conversion of the Century Room dining area to a new Hotel living room. No other changes to the Dimensional Requirements contained in Article II, paragraph 2.2 are proposed. The Hotel's net leasable commercial area, however, will decrease slightly as a result of the proposed changes. As Article III , paragraph 3.1 of the Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 5 1'/. du#(Aâ‚¬6 Agreement indicates, a maximum of 14-1891. square feet of net leasable area Mas previously approved. The Hotel's revised net leasable area totals _11734 square feet (see Exhibit 17). The 157 square foot decrease in net leasable commercial area can be attributed to a similar, albeit larger, reduction in the Hotel's commercial floor area. As various provisions of the 2007 Agreement will change as result of the proposed .._ insubstantial PUD amendment, or are no longer relevant due to the completion of the'ft) - Cortina Lodge renovation and its historic designation,an_amended PUD agreament thdi hm will be submitted for recordation following the approval of this application. Revised ~ B final PUD developments plans will also be recorded to memorialize the amendment. 4 Affordable Housing Mitigation As discussed previously , 1.42 additional employees were required to be mitigated in connection with the 2006 PUD amendment approval. This mitigation requirement was calculated pursuant to then Section 26.470.040.C. 1. which permitted the enlarge- ment of a Historic Landmark's net leasable commercial area exempt from the City's Growth Management Quota System competition subject to compliance with certain affordable housing mitigation criteria. While the above section of the Regulations has been superseded by Section 26.470.070.1., the applicable mitigation criteria remain unchanged. The City's definition of net leasable area, however, has been amended to include various areas (e.g., storage, etc.) that were excluded at the time of the 2006 __ PUD amendment. As a result, the Hotel's existing net leasable commercial area is greater than that which was calculated in 2006. Based on current regulatory requirements, the existing Hotel contains 14,263 square 6% (9119 feet of net leasable area of which 1,412 square feet is located in its basement (see Exhibit 18). The remaining 12,851 square feet is located on the~Ilat~s ground floor. The Hotel's net leasable area following its renovation will totaÂ¤1734.Isquare feet of 41 which_2~360_ and 12,374 square feet will be located in the basement and on the ground pÂ¥Wvdl floor, respectively. While the basement's net leasable area will increase, the net leasable area on the ground floor will actually decrease. Based on the CC, Commercial Core, zone district's employee generation rate of 4.1 employees per 1,000 square feet of net leasable area, and the provisions of Section 26.470.100. A. 1. which permit a 25 percent reduction in the generation rate for fi_ ~t~----- basement commercial space, the Hotel's additional basement net leasable commercial i area will generate 2.95 employees calculated as follows. Illb I '2*0 948 Sq. Ft. Basement Net Leasable Area + 1,000 Sq. Ft. = 0.95 11/61 ~194 0.95 x 3.1 Employees/1,000 Sq. Ft. = 2.95 Employees K 3,014 2 12,Â· PrEC 14 -413 -- 41\ 1.LIP) Elic Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 6 No new employees will be generated by the proposed reconfiguration of the Hotel' s ground floor as its net leasable area will decrease by 477 square feet. 15 MAK< Â· 1. Pursuant to Section 26.470.070.1.a) of the Regulations, noaffordable housing I ~k. mitigation is required for the first four employees generated. As a result, no further ..1,9,- affordable housing mitigation will be required as less than four employees will be ~generated by the Applicant's proposed insubstantial PUD amendment. .In fact, aÂ· 477- ~Mare foot 114< leasabkÂ£~mercial area credit will remain on th-~1Â¤el' s grouna-- mon.- In addition, there will remain an affordable housing ~ ~*p' ~j!3:21 credit for one employee at the Cortina Lodge as only 20 employees were ~ required to be housed therein to accommodate the Hotel' s various pre 2006 approvals ~ (1.e, Its existing lodge units and commercial areas) . n 1 ~ 0/ni VIV- A A.l L. 1 -. A,/6 b Hotel Jerome Interior Features 0 kvw* 1,1,4 FEE 9 Pursuant to Article III, paragraph 3.6, of the Agreement, a written inventory of all original features existing within those interior areas of the Hotel that are customarily open to the public, or where the public is typically invited, must be submitted to the Historic Preservation Officer along with a description of the proposed treatment ~ thereof prior to building permit submittal. A copy of the required inventory accompa- nies this application. Review Requirements Pursuant to Section 26.445.100.A. of the Regulations, the Community Development Director may approve an insubstantial amendment to a final PUD development plan subject to certain requirements. The specific requirements, and the proposed amend- ment's compliance therewith, are summarized below. 1. The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the develop- ment. 2. The proposed amendment does not increase overall coverage of structures on the land by greater than three (3) percent. The proposed amendment does not increase the Hotel's site coverage. 3. The proposed amendment does not substantially increase trip generation rates or the demand for public facilities. 1(01'.'a',4.1â€¢1 +11[â€¢192 Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 7 The proposed amendment does not increase trip generation rates or the demand for public facilities. 4. The proposed amendment does not reduce the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. The proposed amendment will not reduce the Hotel's approved open space. 5. The proposed amendment does not reduce the approved off-street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. The proposed amendment will not reduce the Hotel' s approved parking or loading space. 6. The proposed amendment does not reduce the required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. No reductions in pavement widths or street rights-of-way are proposed. 7. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings by greater than two (2) percent. The proposed amendment does not increase the Hotel's approved net leasable commercial area. The Hotel's net leasable area following the proposed renovation will total 14,734 square feet which is less than its approved net leasable area of 14,891 square feet. 8. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. This criteria is not applicable as the Hotel does not contain a residential component. 9. The proposed amendment does not involve changes which are inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The proposed amendment does not involve changes that are inconsistent with the project's original approval conditions. While the Hotel's floor areas will change as a result of the amendment, its proposed commercial, lodge unit and total floor areas are less than previously approved. Mr. Chris Bendon February 1, 2012 Page 8 As the Applicant would like to undertake the renovation of the Hotel Jerome in the coming fall off-season, your timely review of this application would be sincerely appreciated so as to permit building permit submittal as soon as reasonably possible. Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, lk.7-i.JIC VAN7~~OO- ann SMWV Attachments CC: Hans Pusch, Jerome Ventures, LLC Sarah Broughton, Rowland + Broughton d:\oldc\bus\city.app\app57811.ins 122 EXHIBIT RECEIVED FEB O 2 2012 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970.429.2758 DATE: 11/11/11 PROJECT: 330 E. Main Street, Hotel Jerome REPRESENTATIVE: Vann Associates, Rowland+Broughton Architecture and Urban Design TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial PUD Amendment, PUD Condition regarding historic interior features, Certificate of No Negative Effect DESCRIPTION: Historv The Hotel Jerome, a three-story red brick hotel occupying a prominent corner location in downtown Aspen, was built in 1889 and named in honor of its owner, Jerome B. Wheeler, one of Aspen's greatest benefactors. A financier from New York, J.B. Wheeler was president of the famous Macy's Department Store. Wheeler invested in several mines in Aspen and was responsible for the construction of other important buildings in town, in particular the Wheeler Opera House. The Jerome was built to rival the Ritz in Paris and had many amenities, including one of Colorado's first elevators. After the Silver Crash, demand for luxury hotel rooms in Aspen disappeared and Mansor Elisha took over the building as a boarding house. When the Washington School in the West End was tom down and the Red Brick School was under construction, some rooms in the Hotel Jerome we re-used for classes in 1941. Walter Paepcke purchased the building in 1946 and completed a badly needed renovation. Paepcke's project was overseen by Herbert Bayer and included painting the exterior a pale gray with blue trim. In the mid-1980's the Jerome was restored and remodeled again, including removal of the paint and construction of the north addition. Some of the period finishes that exist today on the interior were added at this time, although many original interior appointments still exist on the first floor level. The Hotel Jerome is one of the most important public buildings in Aspen. It reflects the growth and success of the town and was built to equal the grand hotels of major cities. Past approvals The Hotel Jerome underwent a major renovation in 1986, including a large addition. The property was designated a PUD, which allowed for all dimensional requirements to be set by City Council. The PUD approval was amended several times afterwards, most notably in 2006, when approval was granted for the following (as summarized in the PUD Agreement: (a) Pursuant to Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) adopted on December 11, 2006. the Aspen City Council granted final approval o f a PUD Amendment for the Hotel Jerome including an extensive renovation ofthe existing IIotel Jerome, an expansion of the Hotel s existing net leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renovation of the Hotel's Main Street and Mill Street courlyards. and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of the Hotel's parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. The PILD Amendment also approved the renovation of the existing Cortina Lodge to meet the Hotel's employee housing mitigation requirements. The property then changed ownership twice. During that time, some requirements of the 2006 PUD, such as Historic Designation of The Cortina Lodge and renovation to improve its use as required employee housing, have been completed. The current owners would like to undertake revisions to the interior floor plans which they believe comply with the previously approved project parameters and with the applicable criteria for an Insubstantial PUD amendment. The work includes redecorating guest rooms, and upgrading mechanical systems and back of house areas. Some renovation of the public lobby area and restaurant are planned, along with exterior repairs and replacement of the existing, non-historic windows. 44 The Community Development Director will review an application to determine that Insubstantial PUD Amendment criteria are met. Historic Preservation staff will review all interior work that triggers the following condition of the 2007 PUD: Interior Condition for The Hotel Jerome: The applicant is required to submit a written inventory of all original features existing within those interior areas of the Hotel Jerome that are customarily open to the public, or where the public is typically invited. This inventory must be accompanied by current photographs, and copies of any photographs of the interior of the Hotel Jerome available from the Aspen Historical Society archives. The Historic Preservation Officer will verify the completeness of the inventory. Any overlooked elements that can be documented as original will be added to the list. Said inventory shall identify proposed treatment of the items that are on the inventory. The inventory shall be reviewed by the City's Historic Preservation Officer. To the extent that there is a disagreement to the proposed treatment, the applicant may appeal to the City Manager. The City Managefs decision in the matter shall be subject to an appeal to the City Council as a de novo review. Once the proposed treatment is agreed to by the City and the applicant, no changes shall be allowed without the consent of the City's Historic Preservation Officer, subject to the appeal provisions set forth above. The Historic Preservation Officer worked with a previous property owner to create the inventory of interior features described above. A level of agreement was reached as to how those features would be preserved or treated, but the work never went forward. The HPO will need to collaborate with the current architect to ensure that the condition is met. There is no specific application form. Please submit drawings and photographs for review. Regarding recently identified repair work that was not addressed in the PUD (parapet walls, sandstone windowsills, and removal of a column at the parking garage entry), please submit an application for Certificate of No Negative Effect. Aspen Land Use Code is found here: htto://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26- Land-Use-Code/ Insubstantial Amendment Land Use application is found here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform.pdf Certificate of No Negative Effect Land Use application is found here: http:#www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/form historic land use ap D.Ddf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.445.100.A Planned Unit Development -PUD Insubstantial Amendment 26.415.070.C Historic Preservation, Certificate of No Negative Effect Review by: Community Development Staff for Completeness and Determination Public Hearing: No Planning Fees: Please submit separate applications. Insubstantial PUD Amendment, $1,260 for 4 billable hours. Additional time will be billed at $315 per hour. Certificate of No Negative Effect, $79 flat fee. Total Number of Application Copies: 2 sets of each application RECEIVED CITY OF AbPEN To apply, submit the following information: FEB 0 2 2012 r-1 Total Deposit for review of application. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEMI E-1 Pre-application Conference Summary. E] Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 1-1 Proof of ownership 0 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. Fl A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. 1-1 Completed Land Use application [-1 Signed fee agreement [-1 An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. E-1 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. FLI File No.: 454-H0301993-610-ETO ENDORSEMENT Attached to Policy No. G47-Z234547 Issued By Fidelity National Title Insurance Company 1. Under Schedule A, the effective Date ofPolicy is hereby amended to read July 14, 2010 at 3:45 PM. 2. Under Schedule A Paragraph 3, the vested owner is amended to read as follows: Jerome Property LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 3. Under Schedule A, the Amount of Insurance is amended to read $38,911,667.84. 4. Under Schedule A, Paragraph i the Insured Mortgage is amended to read as follows: Deleted 5. Schedule B is amended as follows: Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Revocable Encroachment License Application recorded February 17, 2010 at Reception No. 567076. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Revocable Encroachment License Application recorded July 08, 2010 at Reception No. 571875. The Company does not insure against loss or damage sustained by the Insured, and the Company will not pay costs, attorney's fees, or expenses, by reason of the avoidance, in whole or in part, or a court order providing some other remedy, based on the voidability of any estate or interest shown in Schedule A or the Insured Mortgage, as originally recorded or as modified, because of the occurrence, after the prior Date of Policy stated in Schedule A of the policy, of a fraudulent transfer or a preference under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws. This endorsement is issued as part of the policy. Except as it expressly states, it does not (i) modify any of the terms and provisions of the policy, (ii) modify any prior endorsements, (iii) extend the Date of Policy, or (iv) increase the Amount of Insurance. To the extent a provision of the policy or a previous endorsement is inconsistent with an express provision of this endorsement, this endorsement controls. Otherwise, this endorsement is subject to all of the terms and provisions of the policy and of any prior endorsements. Dated: : February 08, 2011 Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ~-Ellij~ b/NeL k_A /2 A President 044 - SIC:.tar, Authorized Signature Endorsement Colorado Form 107.12A-06 Title Down Date (Owner/Lender) dA10712A06 .S"qqm 1 Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation OWNER'S POLICY SCHEDULE A 12/08/2009 10:07:56 pk PK File No.: 454-00261384-036-MEJ Policy No.: H0261384OTP Amount of Insurance: $38,000,000.00 Date of Policy: December 10, 2009 at 2:12 PM 1. Name of Insured: Jerome Ventures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 2. The estate or interest in the land which is covered by this policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: Jerome Ventures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation File No.: 454-H0261384-036-MEJ Policy No: H0261384OTP SCHEDULE A (Continued) Exhibit A PARCEL A: LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 73, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PARCEL B: A parcel of land situated in the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, being all of Lots A B, C, D, E, F, G, H, L O, P, Q, R, S, and the East 20.00 feet ofLotN, all in Block 79, together withthe East 170.00 feet of the Alley in said Block 79, Vacated by Ordinance No. 1 (Series of 1951) of the City ofAspen, Colorado, according to the Hotel Jerome Lot Line Adjustment and Subdivision Exemption Plat filed June 12, 1991 at Reception No. 331521, in Plat Book 26 at Page 52, also described as follows: Beginning atthe Southeast Comer of said Block 79 (An aluminum disk marked "16129 McB]ide"); thenceN 75Â°09'11" W 170.78 feet along the Northerly line of East Main Street to the Southwest Corner of the East 20.00 feet ofLot N; thence N 14Â°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the West line of the East 20.00 feet of Lot N; thence S 75Â°09'11" E 0.78 feet along the South line of the Alley in said Block 79 to the West side of the Vacated portion of the Alley in said Block 79; thence N 14Â°50'49" E 20.39 feet along the West side of the Vacated portion of the Alley in said Block 79; thence N 75Â°09'11" W 101.40 feet along the North line of the Alley in said Block 79; thence N 14Â°50'49" E 100.00 feet along the East line ofNorth Monarch Street to the Northwest Comer of said Block 79; thence S 75Â°09'11" B 271.40 feet along the South line of East Bleeker Street to the Northeast Corner of said Block 79; thence S 14Â°50'49" W 119.39 feetalong the West line of North Mill Street; thence S 75Â°09'11" E 0.50 feet; thence S 14Â°50'49"W 100.70 feet; thence N 75Â°09'11" W 0.50 feet; thence S 14Â°50'49" W 0.30 feet to the point ofbeginning. PARCEL C: A non-exclusive easement for purposes of maintaining two existing window wells, a portico and a stairwell to the basement of the Hotel Jerome as set forth in an encroachment agreement recorded March 5, 1992 in Book 671 at Page 33 (Affects Parcel B) and a non-exclusive easement for purposed of a drive ramp and snowmelt to parking garage as set forth in an encroachment agreement recorded October 20, 2005 as Reception No. 516494 (Affects Parcel A). File No.: 45+H0261384-036-MEJ Policy No.: H0261384OTP SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachments, encumbrances, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by Public Records. 4. Any lien or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for the value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings By a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether ornot shown by therecords of such agency ofby the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, (c) water right, claims of title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records. 8. All taxes and assessments for the year 2009 and subsequent years, a lien but not yet due or payable. 9. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 521 (as to Parcel A) and Book 59 at Pages 15, 159, 199, 200, 262, and 492 (as to Parcel 13), providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Notice of Historic designation recorded January 13, 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515 and Ordinance 9, series of 1982 recorded April 30, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 904. (Affects Parcel B) 11. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Ordinance No. 60, Series of 1976 recorded in Book 321 at Page 51. (Affects Parcel A) Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation File No.: 454-H0261384-036-MEJ Policy No: H0261384OTP SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (Continued) 12. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on.fhe Hotel Jerome Lot Line adjustment and Subdivision Exception Plat recorded June 12, 1991 in Plat Book 26 at Page 52 and Hotel - Jerome Planned Unit Development recorded January 30, 2007 in Plat Book 82 at Page 42. (Affects Parcel B) 13. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Ordinance No. 5, Series of 1983 recorded May 17, 1983 in Book 445 at Page 81. (Affects Parcel B) 14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Encroachment agreements recorded March 05, 1992 in Book 671 at Page 33 (Affects Parcel B) and recorded October 20,2005 at Reception No. 516494 (Affects Parcel A). 15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded May 19, 2006 at Reception No. 524233 as Resolution No. 5 (Series of 2006). (Affects Parcel B) 16. Tenns, condilions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded October 26,2006 at Reception No. 530238 as Resolution No. 20 (Series of 2006). (Affects Parcel B) 17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Resolution of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission recorded January 25,2007 at Reception No. 533744 at Resolution No. 37 ( Series of 2006). (Affects Parcel B) 18. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Ordinance No. 46, Series of 2006 by Aspen City Council recorded January 30,2007 at Reception No. 533926. (Affects Parcel B) 19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement recorded January 30,2007 at Reception No. 533928. (Affects Parcel B) 20. Rights or claims of tenants as tenants only, with no option to purchase or rights of first refusal. 21. Deed of Trust from LCP-Elysian Aspen Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Inc., a New York corporation to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $48,000,000.00, and any other amounts and/or obligations secured thereby, dated May 24,2007 and recorded May 25, 2007 at Reception No. 238266. The Deed of Trust was assigned to Jerome Property LLC, a Delaware limited liability company recorded September 01, 2009 at Reception No. 562446. Assignment of Rents in connection with said deed of trust recorded May 25,2007 at Reception No. 538267 and assignment thereto recorded September 01, 2009 at Reception No. 562447. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation File No.: 454-H0261384-036-MEJ Policy No: H0261384OTP SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE (Continued) 22. Financing Statement from LCP-Elysian Aspen Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability - company, Debtor, to Lehman Brothers Bank FSB (n/]da Aurora Bank FSB), Secured Party, recorded September 04,2009 at Reception No. 562540. The Financing Statement was assigned to Jerome Property, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company recorded September 11, 2009 at Reception No. 562684. 23. Any right or asserted right of a creditor, trustee or debtor in possession in Bankruptcy to avoid that certain conveyancing document recorded December 10, 2009 at Reception No. 565212 of the official records ofPitkin county pursuant to Title II U.S.C. (BANICRUPTCY). NOTE: Exception No. 23 above will be deleted upon transfer to a bonafide purchaser for value or after a one (1) year period subsequent to recordation of the subject conveyancing document. This exception will be omitted from any policy or policies of title insurance issued by this Company for the benefit of a bonafide purchaser for value, provided no petition in Bankruptcy appears ofrecord at that time. NOTE: Exceptions 1 through 4 are hereby deleted. EXHIBIT February 1, 2012 Mr. Chris Bendon, Director Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Mr. Bendon: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent us in the processing of our application for an insub- stantial PUD amendment for the Hotel Jerome Planned Unit Development. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertaining to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, JEROME,*iÂ¥~mESÂ· LLC R.â€¢Ter#Y C TRV- X Donald Wilson, Manager DRW Trading Group 540 West Madison Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 542-1030 d.lokle\bus\city. Itr\1057811.cbl EXHIBIT LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: Name: de,Â»"a FÂ»re,7/ UL Location: 916Â»jeig- H'Â»09&61, Cul<:64,6 ,/6 4,544-t (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcelll)#(REQUIRED) 27'37-6573-2/22AV REPRESENTATIVE: Name: AA>61+JV 94+Jw iv*/d Ate**Â«729% idaL Address: r.culck 4-22= 1 i TST&*Lf, as 29â‚¬2/ Phone #: 925.09 52 PROJECT: Name: gEEC JEÂ»--It /Wâ‚¬2219FAtin,~a rtÂ» /4-le.-1 r>l-ki-tr Address: 12* 6.9 /*,4 9. yofs=e+ 1; a 214, 1 Phone #: 31 2-- 44-2- /ede> TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U Conditional Use El-eonceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. U Special Review E Final PUD (& WD Amendment) U Final Historic Development El Design Review Appeal gl Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt 0 GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) U Historic Demolition El GMQS Exemption U Subdivision U Historic Designation U ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane Lot Split U Temporary Use U Other: Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Â£-UE:E /9Â¥Uvitu PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) C=ElE 'frocer,eN HaiÂ£ you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 4 427 - [EFPre-Application Conference Summary TAttachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement ,J lesponse to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form L lesponse to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards m El r-==-1 COMMUNITY DEVEl.OPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property _ Phone No.: 3,", 1-2,4 - ''.13 CI' I ~ Owner ('.1.)- 3 +LAN.i L ~14-2.-27:,5 3 9 4. J Address of Billing Property: 3 *3Â· Z . .t,Â·94 9,1 -a.-- Address. (subject of isend bills here) application) 644'4 62. 32/ 6/,4 :1145,4.4Â£1 ,/.1 - 32 + 0 / 1 I understand that the City has adopted. via Ordinance No. . Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application- For fiat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the fotlowing fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. S flat fee for Q flat fee for I. S flat fee for S flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand tnat because of the size nature or scope of the proposed project it ts not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involvea tn processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review. and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above hs:ed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read understood and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render arl application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my apprication at the hour,y rates hereinafter stated. S l; 4,9 deposit for 21 hours of Communtty Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $315 per hour. S deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $265 per hour. city of Aspen: propery 9Iwner: Y fl y I // Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name p...,4. .; - '. i .,Â·.~ J Ji:_ City Use: Titler , a,,1..: 4 4: .., Fees Due: $ Received: $ NouNnber. 2011 lit> c,t'.\*penl 1 -1(1 >4. Cizilena>;I. (97(1) 92(9-5090 'Mqq. 69& 0 4> HOTEL JEROME PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FROJECT DIRECTORY UHAWIAHS AL)24 CA ' m' 'CNE I~ .C.t. 1,11' 7- â€¢. Â·42 R.D '...:Â·.i.aus: - 4 ./1.- :I , 5, - - Â·â€¢'0&1'C ' 1 .t,W % ./ke Â·Â·Â·Â· J Â· 21 4 ' ..... l,â€¢t~Lto ) e 4/ ~ .1 , ka U : t 1 i. L. 1...:.'EC 4â€¢**. 4-Â·137,~,Â·f *p/Â· .p ' ' '' . 23,1 ,~/ 'Wh*. 1- f,Ti 4 v J 40:3'.,4 0,4 143Â·47..,4 4~,4>4 ;ii, I 54.4 ir 21.1 "'.1 jitil lk=d -- 1-32 5t , 7 - 4.....I : 44/5 ' ~ 111111'llf 1111111111~1/11[1111171;,- Hotel 3~â‚¬n i pUSS Al(ClÂ·IlltCIURL+PLAINING immm-: ,21, COVER S .' [All -/ ./11 .... ~Â¢1~116~ MI 3/,2 't~AW IkEul. ~:V'-4*',3Â·11,5:Â®'0~el'Â»lu~Â·ial.n~.-v.'a# .,I,nitil'. 3-*1, '.: ~J~T'-~ 60 943 - LAND SURVEY PLAT - A PORTION OF BLOCK 79 TOWNSNE OF ASPEN & PHI<IN COUNTY, COLORADO A 6 -- --1 2 . w-. -s,-Â«UUD=2 - 1 k ' D 9 2: I J."N~/ r./ ' .'1 ~ 4 â‚¬ 4, r 44 N i 351'... , 8 / '>%2274*/ 2 '*$.4-b 6 71 HLOOK P /9 Â»/EM X. / P /,0.... ~-' /1 ' / 1 ./ 1! 1 -Â·-- . F..f * *:Le f ki k e.--~44,Â¢~14**26-'.04-44 7 .4 .-- -- It r 'hej! I I .3 , k LEGAZ DETRPRON 5 . 1.- f.,273*2242Â·12Â¢'Â· Lr- 1 ---Â·-' 4--P, L. .' / P , ' 4 hi : 4 .01 # I, (, a. E. F. 1 i. i Q P 9. P. 1 Ail 'M EASI Cy 20 'EET y a-4 ..... nri *:I,y .......... r....9 I. ...:4.4 /V P: 1 ii- tultÂ· 1 t: F ./1/4.-/. tr-Frair.-- ~.rv'.. ,/:ir.36/6.:6/t/-1Â»~ . 7 ..,1. 4.~1. f ;~ 4/, 1 re A.,P .4 3426 6,02% 4. Clirr g /,81.4 5/i,T / Ck~~5J 1 1 IL it #..:.- 9.,Â· .,.,-Â· i...JI .: -Â»~Â»7.7- < 4792[-,f *~. -t SURVEYOR'S CERPFCATE i * 4 /IES < 1/SUAE â€¢ PROFESS/.â€¢ t// Sughfi/9 RE/Slll I r ~ Â¥ 1 ~ .41?55~,;.r f.~ .,1-,1--,~ ill~ ''. ~- -Â»91Â«i-Uâ‚¬~4--6~Â·~~ '- - AE x30.â‚¬ DISCR,ID PRA,4 WAS WADE D W: CA Â»- ., 1% .; u (4.0 04 8 AS 540/,Â· 1 4.9/â€žf~ CÂ£RBA' Mp G. 5.9.9 5 /. I + 14</17Â» O 7-- 2 '14,7 207 1 1 4 1 t A O 0 16'~&#Ah.22&17 â€¢ 'N*It#Z -\4?19# I '.2 ' .' 14 9 L ##Writrb!Â¥-U Â· - I; --<4 L.o sav. Cj =3, ....1 7- , 4-'-Â·'.1 -3 . e i ,â‚¬-9.1,7. y-, -le P , i'.0 +,:In. w , i,Â»Fri <--Ult?-0,4 9.- ' ..2 , 1 'Fled' Ir /7, r..C zauu. 1 .... ".fwi .!i ./ t.. A i./. irCE.K'D 2 1,4 -, \2,.,coca,eâ€žme - U~Z *4'i "4 IkU1 * .. .U 1 . .4 U# Â·-. I ~L.4~ n.... . Â·R Â¥9 fidw. 4/4, 4.1/ 4'4 9.jrp AW w.Â¥EÂ· i %5 RÂ·'P 'Â· AI f)' â€¢ --y Sfp-1 - e 7,770'6 Â·~ ,iâ€ž; , - 1 ~7, .,imr .:4 9, fr i. .....A--4.... SMâ„¢ 1.9,4 ,/Ar WS 'iOT tlS W,f A nm Â£ 04Â©, 9 EASEW:Ar ef 124?31 / 4:150~ A 'AS r..,S S '450 â€¢il :M /; I i . 'C. J J,-Il'. â€¢It' .....''IC. /.i.,..iÂ¢r'/ I'- .. 1./C ...,-im'r,.- r"'â€¢J A'y,71 4-- ~' - .â€¢*4~' .10P rA:C i I I.KI /5/k ...7/Â·. â€¢/I /*'ll 41 00411//4 R*/ FA *rg UÂ£4564/ Fit>, W GUAD S.Â«Cf â€¢Â·.2 Aâ€¢;Â£ 51:S fi'.R.91 ".,7%,: U:fy;*4&'EX.@Lk''UNS,Â¥ se 22 31Â§939.6 2-'ll Â·Â·452 / A.r /52Â·0 :/i'..IN/'' 1 â‚¬10)*Wt/1 OP:â‚¬/Et.17 , , i./5 7.... d Â·Il l....:....... '.3.â€¢~Â·,e Â·Â· 'â€¢I Â»'r - Â· 1--ic,Â».4 ,Â·Ar n wea- ,â€¢'-PE 45 25/. Al //f & 02 # 4 1 - h- 1 FRE I ....r 1.111 2.3 7 ..9 7Â» . I I. . 4. . L.I' po~ BLOCK #ac~,4!J Anderson & Hastings _n_ DCALL 1 " = 40 1 \ .-.-.-Â·,-1- m-1 8/ Lonsulting Engineers inc. ,/ /606 W. UniÂ·oud 1.Â·,)., */O 360 f . 1.akewood. Colorado 80228 \~ Il DEC~OUS 'll/92' 45./CATED) 4 (ao~.1,~-~~,i.~15:.,ptpÂ·,29Â°.0,, 7 Pee./I:J 5.4 .14 1, PA,V DATE ... 2,44-6.0 24 I i. 1...r ..'i.... WVâ€¢ 44. 14/31,4 .EU PE EASTELEEKER STREET -1 # -1 - - D. 84/ SCREN V.AU BLEEKEK STREE' 51,Â£9/. ,/40 , ColE ' 1 f t 1,161,Abll,NAI *tull!*Milith _ 11 ilk ~41 i f 1 i { 2 1 ' . 1 -- - 1 1 1 4,713 .1 ~1.1 -,i- Jr ik 111 M~.,AUI., lot Â·althÂ· 70 fea te Mirlinjum Fiont Yaid Setoack Nore ' , b *i '' iIi M'Ii'llul./051**Id.h "U, C 44---Â·F{diak Â·i~-w,'. 0.Â·:i! 'i~Â· .:-t~1;:Â·.. , t. 'Indir,Lir LI, 7/il.....i 11Â·4 113*101.9 HEell 5. leel El NCIrt:M: .':ire, 0 7. I 11, 4 11,~.IWI LilbUll. Zebite,1 0/11 1,1. liAÂ·/,ill bll-,+ i j} ktin;IM Poioart 0-1 ..Ce Pc. '.41'n. Con.'bon, m Â· 11,1 Tjash Arces. Area Pe PEZ Res:, No 2-86 1 - Â· 2,1.1 11 ; 1 -- 11) A 10.,able F:GO, Alea 114,934,4.It r.t * LuJ. br,Â¢l' : 9.2 14 D..1: COmile,Â·0 51 L Ual 54. It L--n-rl..â€žrl.,0. it...Ct...." 1Â¢. 9:1 I 9-I--'-- P 9J ' '1' : m In#ttiAR]tf"'Tr 'n. :limÂ·num Clf St.eet P.Â·Â·Kid'. 17 U)3'~65 D : 11 F H ' b ' t~L32*2.I ~UI -:Â· ~~~ ~~~~ a ~ t 4 .],(J bui'.e, rIA 'Jo~J OuL=I Zâ€¢K ~000. LÂ¢ Â·~~U,Jcu inll, r,lidl t.ljo GG~ol4~mgrl P~,r P - 44.11---- 1 1 1 1 12 Luu 2 . A lula 1 - / .nal 6 1 ROOM 'EARACE ' 1~ ~9. 1 ~1 I __ 0 --CD,EREDFORCH 1 i ~ -r #-r~--+ -AAit~:.AL- ALLCV 3..,~' ~ 11 ~, -7 Â° 1 , ' R ..al -_21-F' , 7 I 1==n.=2 1 L_= - e, 1,11 '11 1 1 1 riÂ·â€¢-TGRY,4. ~ ~ 1 -1.:.'.1=4 12-=lj--1-d 1 1 9 __ ' GA~E- ._ _.< EAISTIP,G i'.AlFR CHANNFI --~14 - ~ __- -I ...1,1/ 1 V,1 1. MUTILJOHOME ~ 1'- 1'32~1. L.Ufetial. ..__ R 'NELE--7 5.- 1 1 C WATE,CHALIE'.1 n i , , I,,-ga.:clâ€¢Je.iT irKâ€¢JI' :râ€¢ Fl m ' .-.-a-7-- ~ GST-,45 80Â£* 2, 412 32 11 1 â‚¬1 - i - """""w b 4-Â·7- .4--1-1. ~--'..-_I.' .4 T' 11,1,11 lili'~ 11 11* 1 I , 14 1 .......... '1 11Â· 700? - 1 1. 1 1 1 1 11 1 0 ACCCPTA,IC, FOA AECORDÂ»IC idin-fiL! 1 1.05.6.-1- d THIS HOTEL JEROME FINAL PUD DEVELOPI ENT PLAN IS ACCEPTED FOR FIgG IN TME OFFICE JF lhE I.. 'PEE' 518â€¢AU ' 7 CLERK AIF RECORDERpF PITKIN COUNTYÂ·.COLORAD[J. IHIS:14 DAY 01 /&1â€¢.0...FLJO IN PLA . 1 TE â€ž 00Â°'ut .t Â·~Â·r .Aoe_~..1- 1 --, 2/ECUTÂ·3 .='4./.Iâ€¢LI/=iiI .uNCeÂ·tra Â·, 83Â·r ~141Â·1 '3" CUT Â»,-rth" '6"-i ""A â€ž19Â·M:ducn 533927 HOTELJEROME Asoal Cobalo p OSS.ARCHITICTURE , PLANNING m [Ill1611 FINAI PI In DFVFI APMENT PI AN m 2 1 , JAN'.1,117 2 2.' 0 100 Noell MDIAIÂ·CH STÂ¥E[T M I./(m ...6 11/ 2 31- .S 1-IWHIMON Bta +45- bip---~ Â¤ - -q~=~ C===, =-gz~5 9 L. . IC Q C 0 I 0 . m D 4 I ,[1 '1 , 1 ./- /1 1 U I lÂ»1111 J IiI '. 1 1, a.Â· 4 - D , 27" 1 A ~ [aLN =r ./. n 9 'Jg I E- ra L j n L T. [+1 :-~~-Â· - CO -~0 1 '-r_ d .:- L E L 1-- -E- 'Â·Â·-~!FÂ·" 1% .1 ;==@I= i 1 4 ... 1 L -1 1 ---3 L Fj~ A .1 =,tb C .====3 0 I . 11 -,-,.J ,- , #L -~ r -- LL.=@.1 -1 h Hi 1.4 (ji-4,7-<,&1-=irJI;b'%25:4 l.,1.JIC' t' i 1 ,d , 4.- 1 - 1| 1 -,- Pil d. 1.Je ,- ' 121Â£r j U.1 * ' L.... 6 6% 11 'f 31 GO 2- & - M..,J'I'U~ ziff â€ž2 4 irÂ·'1, 5 J , Ul .. 0_J . 0/1 *11 -2,1-43 41 -6.41.-~ i rfol El ~. ' + BET ': ait. _, 5 1 + .Â· 1 f I EL] t 1 1- f.1 -1 *6 '- ~72 Joil~ co 111'11111{1111Â·11~1111,111(lili rili - Hotel Jerome 330 E-/ Uc, i Stic,a j poss Anall[TECTUR[ , 1~1ANNINI, ~~IMIG.Il , 'I LOWER LEVELPLAN,101 sho: 2Uof.25~i Â¢)0 41,1,â€¢:6Â·,pr.Â¢Â· Hell,N,10,:Wa,Â·,~Vil.Â·{11,50?~5184.4, p ,1.~ 6%3Â·Â· 996 ~ ~Â·~~7~ ''T#- EF~ETTI--][_ 4 Ikq ' Fi--~4Â·:- r-r-InÂ·=1~Â·Â·i. -Â·: p,i:,i --lk rm-1 --1 PÂ¥=m :Tru '~c-Dn rÂ£* 4 I .1 - 1 F' 'r. 7 Mi: 1Â·29 -4 151-trJ.1 F*7.1 Â¤ 1.77-Â·1 - 1 * F r_ 2==1 -=r--1=1 - 91!35Â·L E - . 4.- '- -] D 35' U L - I L 4. il@Â· 24 LÂ£143 L i 4 5. I .1 -D ,;-t, _I -6.- ~7Â·i-12- 14 --t . LI--- tf u 7 1111 lEI 7_-1 9 F~ L.49 #-1. n=11!- P 0 L==1 ~ I --- I -~ Â»-2~ d -CJ| . CLJ~~ .-0 11 IL ...5. 1 11 Ild ]1 -,g -0 . W 1 0 mi-'r- Fj 21 1 1 1.11 1. 1 'J 1 -j H=h =- 'til.... . g AL T==4~[? ~ 11'-_~ d ~ _0311 - = [1 -9 It.~ ..ar. 1 r-- -- IJ: u_1 '2 3~1~ _1-r' LE g0202' Hotel Jerome 330 Eari Main Street pOSS ARCHITECTURE +PLAI'INING 1|1~Iiteipti :T, M AINLEVEL PLAN 11. 1!11111U I Ull!11 ..,Â·Â· 2--T--37----" .C l N Â·,/I Ir'.r 1. 4,7102 . C> Â· Il--C=} -C }-1 ..rath kV.... .*In'~W,O!*314 ,2$R.*M.Â·I.*Il!~1/51=/Ajo.C 6 92 P (-1 7 i -Tr-r--1 ~MIF M '~- 4- 7 0- 1 2 ...... -Â·uÂ·Â·. 1 I ~ b ~ ~ '5' I 's 1 -b IL 11 -1' T 1 ~11=1 27.1151 115 lut .1-,9 1 1-9 1 Â· "I" -T q r- Â¥=-=t - cr~75 - emT -t_ - 1 I .:)12 . 812 ~41 .J F Pret A i LI. 1 1 (111 1 4 1 -- -- 1.-,--1 r' 11 A-i E U F I 1 111 -1 .--1 b - Â»777 APM Q 1,1 1 Â» -1 Â·!FUN. Â»-,-7e J.irÂ·,4 1*61 11 frh/U Elmi~ 11 / i A -if 1 ..6 11 L....1 111~Ili'(11'1~111,1111111111.111; Eli Hotel Jerome 3311 h.t &.48,0 2,=01 ~OSS ARCHITECTURL + PLANNING mil[11611 - â‚¬FrAN n IF\/Ft PLAN ~~~ J . . bid Â£91 -9 4 0 P. - 23 -L _ i n. _r- 3-~~r-~~'-' -1-11 . d'-1 11 4.211 - I F L JA L Â£ + - lr'. f 1 ,! Lj- -S ~ ~ 1 - 1,1 1 11 11'.1 '11 1 ~ 1.1 51 1 o 14122=LJ 1 1 U Il H h. 4 41 5.4 I I 1 4*73. An Â·,12 F , l+J.l, L W,1 -1 De ==--1===a ---1 Â«4Â¢-1 j ~ 2-p t.9 t. k q * 9 ' 1 0- F==3 i n ' i _Ath [6==-- - W "Ill~Illill:Illilll]11|1 N.1.:h' Hotel jerome 310 6/5/ f.Â·'/In y.'edt ~OSS ARC.lilli-CTUREÂ·Â·PLANNING THIRD LEVVLFLAN ~~~ J a ./" . 3 -/' .' '.,9- RED 0 49 il .27 +To r61 11 I 3' U' i V' Â·4Â¥Â· rmi> 2-n-6-4-9 1 2=u-Gh=-G -6 -1B6 l, 4 1 irm Â·-'"21 - ~d #7 = : t. 1 --'-r- E 1 L -- It .Lb j p LL-W:=L.-~ L Hotel Jerome 330 Easi kidii, Street poss Al?r.Illfl-P~rlIRI- i PI ANI,IING F All R THLIVEI PI AN 4drk,4/ E. 105 â€¢alle X Vâ€¢LNeMNâ€¢,c 2[1150 8 04 Hae .-r k.,Ivaâ€¢.iw...r=J,Lk-{10:K)NW 8,0.&1..;.0.,t ED 0 1 -P <0 1 1 024=L 2 rl f.miti 1 1 % 0 4 1 1 , a Â£12 .3 Q lN' i* â‚¬21Â·' r. I i ... 11Â£: i :I. 1 r.--1129 1 .:lo 4, 171 ,-1103Â« : l --G lit 4 0 14:=4 [U'-1 1 1 1.11[1 7 11 1 11 0 Ji-- A 1 If. -Kiry 20 fl -12 1=1 - Â·Â·câ€¢. ~m.e le-P . .. .ACE....LIC....'1% ~ r-X , 1 21.Â£L . . 2//ING........1 '' ' =-*,AT,t:GUÂ·1:rSTOREPEÂ·Â·,2.ID 123 r'26 * 4,.a ' . -% S ; i 1~, U 1 - 1 Ti~rÂ·mÂ·- dlL â€¢ ~ 533927 1 '.6. g .1 1, Hotel Jerome 0.3/ L.obi ~Â·1~/I .ICCE 1Â·-- ROOF PLANJ 106 .i.=4 16.- , .41':, .. 114,1,0 Iâ€¢~0 -!21 < I'Â·/U .......L....D)1.,6-01~ .i,-.I-il'lie'll....51.,4.-r 622 Pu 1 F- U L L '[3 ---'_001 - 1â€ž.. :-f.. ~~, I_' LL--'i~]Pi (e- i k b-1 4 P - -1 1 1 1 dr. /9. ri UU 41=t rlt-~-u..g L,tu p_,, r Â· 4 9--ii 1..h u t_1 1 ..ill 1 1 9 ...=3:.1 r- -~ -11- 41 U %4 1 tri' 1-[4 2-Lt=.1-1-. 11 li I~ Il-4 , 4 1-=il K 1 - 1 1 1.- -1 i 1 -2-0-4-4--LA#LiÂ·:ii-11..l'Â·Â·A'4444* *14---21--i L Ii_. ,----Â«1 4+C LE- crl 1 1 I 1--~ , ~Â·Â·=c, 9~ i ~ 1 1 li ' ' 7-11 4 1 ' 1 == .4 2 1=4=.... P . al Â£ (' 13 souTII ELIVATION <' 4 j NOKIntltV,\1!UNWMILL STREET Ly 1 - - -1.11 0=' 1 111 '... 1. '. .' "4. a.Â») t - --a . CO 'S-* 377<Â·~T | '-*S !-~-rl 1 ' =1-2 U U 1--1 2 I Jt * ,;iM,IN||Ii:|,~~~|;" b _- E 9. j L: E 8 4- M i. ,0 0 :~ ~ 2 7, i'*.Â·:. 04 :fl. '5'P' ---.. 4---- --- 0 0 - lili -r.!4 2 Â·r==e==- Â¥,11 4.~1 ' 1 1/1 1 1 l. 7 :-1-JI ' 1 1 11 1-2 - E U wi C.11 2 2121 '' 1 1 m P ~ ' L:~J L.- 1-71 t.- r===trp '- -- - ,-.r ...1 U-u W 'Â·,4,11.y'-W _L: 4.:14 i rÂ· 5 75 1 ~7\ FAST Fl FVATION Lj Hotel Jerome 330 East Main Street f~ - --- ---- - ~ ~OSS,ARCHH~~0.1~li.':P~,APININC IM#ML . I ELEVATION9107 .al i.la:, itÂ· ~00Â·Ci Jâ€¢fle.el,f,ir~ Re~, 1,~U,-11.=MV IX[I!;2Â»8 6 132 0 -9 3 1 1 -1 1 1 261 1-2 :ea 22:=82 /-6. 2260.--1 Jtf - 92 2Â·Cst czcul 1 1 k.41' ., F14 444 L' ~ 2 &*. Ut,-r 1-119 444 1 442 in'.W:I : 1 u. Sup.:/ 1 lillil 1%!m i 00 Â·2 N. 1 m M 70 7 1 5! it ~ MGRâ„¢ El EVATION CONTINUATION (1\ WEST ELEVATION U, <:0 7 -- 00*nu 1 El {0 Fl -L'r! [3 R 2110:1 RU L:~~i IRI p ill; 12 8~ UJU 5111 1 L-11.--'!-2 1.2-UL'!2 -*- 21=11.2 , iw -1 437 <23. - CELD- - 134 , [~ CD 2 -YI~ 1 -EC;Ll:3 2 2 210~23 /44 44- LED r )F) -tuÂ· 1-11.-â€ž1 -1-il Q/Q/ L. Ll r-1--1 U 9 -1-". â‚¬ C.~ | ~ rem M- UA. UW Â»=E-4 6+4 14 1 9..4.4 iii *=12== 1 ..H, -*AA -,% -Tr- 2- 44 J.lin ...1 .1./4!..... 1-4,2 6 ./.4.4 t.-TU ' 1-L. .=.:JU= ' 2 - r. 1 7 7 7 M Z Z_ _Z__ 11 _ Z_ __Z_ 1.-_E__ Z E Al -- - - '" ' 1:.1"Â°' '1, i E= Fl NORTH ELEVATION. Hotel Jerome l z:r=_. _ 13,1 Facr Main Street pOSS ARCHI]FC[tIRF"PIANNING _ E L E V A T I O N.9 108 M.'.ttâ€¢l.V'.â€¢..â€¢.'*.1.'.U'tt-'2!f!A~0 â€¢1'1 ~81:11 (I. *A . 1- 0Â· ..i.q p..â€¢~g,~.~,~, 0â€ž.,i,...*I<#L.'~2,004<12-~n 8Â© Pr,3 EAST BLEEKER STREE I.-,-1,7/ 0/ r 1- I.,Ii' .DIC"i ...,Il - . Â·- 1 ---- BLEEKEli 51[HEET SIDE:.Al.K T.41(U Â·, -ObC / iARD 'ARK .// 1 1 1 :i 11 tl d ~%3.:f.EMA.go,.ri=~11 â€žA- A.Â·f:t-Â·Â·''i~ ~~"~~ -'~~'~'~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~"~ ~~~~~~~~:.1 1 Â· Â·Â·2 - t. - 1 i 1' Â· ' Â·'rel , 1 I 1., 41 D- 1 Â£ 1 4 ' % -1 11 2 1,11 1. 11 . Â·, It C -'d.-/-! pi ..i"g pats i ~ 3 . . !5'Â· r.p , Sq'.' 1 a 1 .89 f ilkk..*Ul*.mZKFWfff/ ,,ti' 10. d ' - Â· 0.,L'.1..8! i 11 rtd---: /*.dIA.UL U Y Â·t i 0.31 Â· SPA M.....~,b 1 .1 ." WATER FEATURâ‚¬7 1 FOOL Â· - 404 0 Â¤ 41-j ROOM TERAACE-' ALLEY 09rEMALL | f IT ..C-%) 1 LEGEND W....1,21 1 ~ ~ PROPOSED GROUND CO.Â·ERS ,~ID 1 ..4:NNIAIS POTS A. & aNE? PROPOSED SHRUBS tAIÂ©;I,~J OrnUGC~ ~ .. A+2 â€¢1,11,1/ i ~ TREES 10 REMAIN ~ 6 9 TERRACE 4 1 EXISTING HOTEL ,-rucrec).-c,Â©uu*Tcl. WOOD FENCE JEROME 0 Â·i ....All' , EXISIINGTREES -0 PLANTER _ li . 1 pom- n.3,1% Â« 4 4 i 1 11 1,-~l . 1 J.r LITi LIT, ENCLOSURE - -rÂ·2=1---- ---9 ,-J_|-_-jl~ Â·Â·tÂ· ' .: '< 1 1 --Â·1 Â· I! ' 0 '-1--L--U 1_1._L m ASPE:,Ttâ€¢El IUILDING *-~i,~TFT-11m-- m *2 7Â·; [ t %44;1- -1-Â·-=--jEJ'- m 1 ~ CARL'S PHARMACY 43 2 i 9. i:E ' I' t: 010-Es: 1 d --~ & , fli,irTIL-Ir , f r,ISTING P,EEE 1925 11 / To 'E /Â«ACEC i EUSTING*RUCE _.4-Â·QJ 1, 1 12 , 1. TIC rifial Li.!.DECATIC )1.4, LI â€ž,12297 78 142/ RFVIFW ANn APPROVAL AND IdAY BE 9 4 ~ TRES 10;4Â·,AIN -~O. ' ~ ~~FFERENT THANPEPRESEN-EDON THIS CONCEPriJAL UNI,SLAPEFLA,4. Â£ i jA- -1-..m 4,5253 ' --- ----lk L. f.t,te STR.ET SIDE*.Al K TREATMENi 4, BL r,ElERI.tlfIED IFI c'CHNEel l{,N *11 -1 WPROVAL '* 4//AL , AlicÂ·SCAPE d.Â·44. 1 - 9.Ne CHET SIDEWALK 7 / __ 'CURl ... l VISTiNG STREETi' EAST t.:A.N STRE[1 533927 411 0@,Â· HOTEL JEROME Aspen, Cohirado 01 {ITICTUR[ 1 PLANNING ~ 11 [SIC 11 CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPEPLAN 109 JANDAR, .~.ji# '911 Â·11'CO Il EWALK fIQULS 7-Wil j flam 5* 9 5-4 liD -------- \â€ž :1 â€ž t EAST BLEEKER S , i 1 -i 101_3 - -J P.-- , 1 Â·,lut ,ehlÂ¥,|IL, ~ 710CC0H WS K *U Stâ„¢- I ' 1 Â·1 n' , 7, d ' , ..: -Â·. -- 7 'MU'<F~fth.U . .- -- ..... -i ./'DIA"LS.M. h 1 1 hi[18 11'f .1 _22' 55 L=1 k ExCT -4 - .:..117--13~~ ~ i ' 'L J'C-WÂ«,11,1 3 ... 11 U 1--4--1.-il 1 1 | 4..iÂ·"61.ni,v_.4 Â·res-Â·ret'G=:2 Il 2-13 1 -~_33='I'~rff:jiM FÂ· l.. CÂ·K 1 '' 1: S im At[W U,INL nP-- 4- _LL . 1' - 1 liarM) A: 7=r-11- ; ' * TAL -1-19 1 03- . -- - ...5/ -Â· r.613*ECON AQ.. -3 1%%79'-~52 -i-Â·â€¢~:--p - '~- , -1. - . .... !~..IT ' AEA .ErS - ...Â¥-In' iÂ·y 1 |r | |~ || 61 k r'.i ./7,Â· . ~- f '-- ---"----- f.4-<f-"WE"- SmtÂ¢f .. I Ll 4 L Ad.A.IN TERRACE DRAINACF PI AN , 1. 3,392 11 :1,11 161''i ./.7.- 9 10 20 40 30 Hotel Jerome SCALE: r =20 320 Eact M.,n Strcot POSS ARCIÂ·llily# I'l.Aill{HIO ~IM!11iitifil DRAI NAGE PLAftlin -*R li~* NCRTH MONARCh E. â€¢v ... BU a .... r 79!rli.Fur 1 4 911* 0 - STJa,O 32 --41 1 F r 1 i f-nu,~E r__ 1 -=....2....41 1 1 1 ; ===1 0 BEDROOM If 1 1 EE 0 1 IC'-muviâ€¢ 1 .1 4 111 r -1 1 111 .....11 1 1 4 33 3 '. 1 Ir-~~~~~ 21- F~- UP W - ' =P==9 47/1.=: 'L A n.c ===01 Im~ 'EURCX]u 1-yr ~TCDO 21 LAA:)07 I,'ECH ~ .1 520 1- ~ cla- I 533927 Cl~ BASEMEN I LEVtL FLOOK f-=481 AA MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN DA'..2 ~1 MAIN LEvt.L FLOOK PLAN Cortina Lodge 22u East Main aireet ~OSS Al(CHiltllUI<t. 11'LANNING BASEMENT AND MAIN LEVEL PLAN Jbf...., 1 ..,111 ./11 X .....'_... MIC.....'â€¢*.â€¢â€¢.,cUMâ„¢~ru.....7./. ,Â·,mi I./.i 8 24 P 1,6 1 .1 â‚¬EEY, i 1 -Lâ€¢1*=G-Â»= t, 1 1 J r 1-11 ... ...M-/ ...& : b = 4 ==.=' 6; 42-3 EL,= . 1 3-6 4,3.N LN I ' LU 1 - 3 zi - ' UP .. KIll ./. 11 53392, ./:... Cl. Cortina Lodge 22,0 C.:~'. Maii, 3{,ect pOSS Al?CltITF[mIR[ + PIM,INING UPPER LE V E LJdPL AN ...112 1., 0 . . loc Â·Ah X!'hwet/'L 'Uâ€¢5-m8#*M**bf*.!Mn;'fil. *. 14~-dit 3 P 8%~ Pil It ./â€¢Â·5 1{ ; I , /' 1 'biâ€¢ 1.,1 1 ~ ~ Abl~L-bEÂ·5'Â£~~M!~Â· 1 I 'W.. .. rei â€¢A k. 1 1, 1 1 1 lin -1.,1 f 1. 1 . 11 1 {-1- 11 1 1 Ii. 11 1 Col-tina Lodge 12 0 Eja /jin itiect p OSS ARCHITECTURE i PLANNING JIii ROOF PLAN 112 - r $Â· n k...'Â·Â·Â·PIL ?L://mfl:Il-1/'.......WI.,0,f-Â¥U)01':.7UÂ·~/Il,Â»1.d 1."4 4,E 9 91 9 59 'AiÂ· B-' '; ---, L --- i,79 â€ž i- li , 17-31: 1 1.-1,1 Ir -1 r...11 1 . il It-,11 jr:41-3 L.8- 1.--1.-11 ...1-1 -2 .,..-_._11 - --L...ij _1=- l r--I 11 11, 1! 1 IIi 1 .1 1 11 , 111 i L , Fl ' 1 11 .1 11 1 14 4 1 (A Mt<UPUSEL) Wtbl tLEVAHON '.-. Atg *)5 fr#\ 1 -3 6 -Ill. .*-'/ -U tâ€¢Â·Vi.........laf w. I.IlA#, 07 C . '41.1 W.Le- 'f : ' ~ ~ ~ 12 =.9 2.--- /-/ 1.,...1 b.4.1 0,/ Â·~il Â· 72%3" ._L 1- 11111:111- 11 A-S rÂ© PROPOSED WORTH ELEV 633927 r . G PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Cortina Lodge 220 Ed:l Ull 311:de. 0 p OSS ARC1111'17.THRF , IM ANNING /rÂ· an!,a'Y 13 ELCVATION5 114 i,th r U*P->I:... l~l,whe: Hw..11,4,10â„¢.iri~WIJ(]]INÂ·15!., U.i,HÂ·elca~â€¢â€¢-.1:-r Â©cq 6 sa I 1 ..''IiI ...t~44.Â·Il mi.'.Â·Ji-f i.Â£,6, 1 ! ~~i==er/ --7~- Â·= :-zr:r. ...c -=~7 - Li-~2--i Â· . - i" __Â· fir.12..1-~r= n-_ ~-r==r I-.- ~-~-ri i IL Â· .1- 1 1 ; 11 -41 'IT -2- 11- 11 ...1 1, r 1 i--J r-Â·1 PROPOSED CAST ELEVATION '1 1.A\\ I.let':~ #2-2 092% 216 -- - - 6 , *A "Â·,4. w, â€ž: JUI' ~Â·~' 11 1 3 /1 PROPOSFD SOIITH A FV .-. PROPOSED NORTH ELEV C ~ 1 14 J 1 71 --7.- 7-~i=---FÂ· R. zÂ· ' --- 1 1-- _ftd-:.--- --iÂ·Â·~----1--Â·- fpt--493 -22-Lil=Â· =- (~133 I-~-t-~ ----#17- - --~t- - . 1 533927 - *Â·NA' = W. ' I..,.... fl'1!j,/E:L.' fih PROPOSED WEST ELEVA-1 IUN Cortina Lodge 220 50,1 Mum hiedi QOSS ARCIIITECIURE+PIANNING (13 CLEVATIONS 115 22 0 1 4 4 11, Uni,11%1'Tâ€¢ FW I C.~111, t~,Â· 2=neÂ·Mi:,ru:â€¢~ir,J~JOUNâ€¢t.MiliCÂ©!i.1~ â€¢+â€¢U,.bi. 5339 EXHIBIT 1[1111111111 1 111- lili lilli 1 01/30/2007 02:241 Page: 1 of 23 JANICE K VOS CHU[ ILL PI IKIN ZOLNTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 2007 HOTEL JEROME PUD AGREEMENT THIS 2007 HOTEL JEROME PUD AGREEMENT (the "2007 PUD Agreement") is made and entered into this 30 day of O.zz Â·Â·n,+Gen , 2007, by and between THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and HOTEL JEROME, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner has submitted to the City an application (the "Application") for a PUD Amendment to permit the renovation o f the Hotel Jerome property located at 330 East Main Street in Aspen, Colorado, said property being more particularly described as Lots A-I and Lots O-S and the Easterly 20 feet of Lot N and the Easterly 170 feet of the vacated alley, all in Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Hotel Jerome Property"), and the renovation of the Cortina Lodge property described as Lots P and Q, Block 73, City and Townsite ofAspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Cortina Lodge Property") (collectively, the "Property"), which application requests the approval and recordation of a Hotel Jerome Final PUD Development Plan and related documents (collectively, the "Final PUD Development Plan"); and WHEREAS, City has fully considered the Application, the Final PUD Development Plan, the proposed development and improvement of the Property, and the effects of the proposed development and improvement of said Property on adjoining or neighboring properties and property owners and on the Aspen community; and has determined that the development proposal set forth in the Application meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval ofthe Application, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, City has imposed certain conditions and requirements in connection with its approval of the Application and its approval and recordation of the Final PUD Development Plan, such matters being necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public welfare; and WHEREAS, Owner is willing to acknowledge, accept, abide by and faithfully perform the conditions and requirements imposed by City in approving the Application and the Final PUD Development Plan; and WHEREAS, under the authority of Sections 26.445.070.C and 26.480.070. C and D of the Aspen Municipal Code, City is entitled to certain financial guarantees to ensure (i) that the re4~ired improvements to the public right-of-way are installed and (ii) that the required landscaping is implemented and maintained, and Owner is prepared to provide such guarantees as hereinafter set forth; and WHEREAS, contemporaneously with the execution and recording ofthis 2007 PUD Agreement, City and Owner have recorded the Final PUD Development Plan as Reception 1 I~Illl111lll Illl~l 111 Mill'llll11ll~l 11~li ~iii illl 533928 Page: 2 of 23 01/30/2007 02:241 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITK.N COUN-Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 No. 653 Pli1 in the Office ofthe Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration o f the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and the approval and acceptance for recordation by City of the Final PUD Development Plan, and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND EFFECT OF 2007 PUD AGREEMENT 1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this 2007 PUD Agreement is to set forth the complete and comprehensive understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the renovation of the Hotel Jerome and the Cortina Lodge and to enumerate all terms and conditions under which such renovations may occur. 1.2 Effect. It is the intent of the partiesÂ· that this 2007 PUD Agreement shall effectively supersede and replace in their entirety certain previously recorded plats, PUD agreements, protective covenants, and land use approvals that encumber the Hotel Jerome Property and/or the Cortina Lodge Property, including without limitation those matters identified in Article VI below (collectively, the "Prior Instruments and Approvals"), and City and Owner agree to cooperate in the execution and recording of such documents as may be necessary or appropriate to accomplish the vacation and/or termination of said Prior Instruments and Approvals. The parties anticipate that these recordings will take place contemporaneously with the recording o f the Final PUD Development Plan. However, a delay in the recording of any such vacation/termination documents shall not affect or delay the recording of this 2007 PUD Agreement or the Final PUD Development Plan. All prior land use approvals associated with the Hotel Jerome Property that are not identified as Prior Instruments and Approvals in Article VI below shall remain unmodified hereby and in full force and effect. ARTICLE II ZONING AND REGULATORY APPROVALS 2.1 Approval Ordinance and Resolutions. (a) Pursuant to Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) adopted on December 11, 2006, the Aspen City Council granted final approval of a PUD Amendment for the Hotel Jerome including an extensive renovation of the existing Hotel Jerome, anexpansion of -,rn thiHotel' s existing ngt leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renoid{Pon-Of .-I ~*1_~the Hotel's Main Street and Mill Street courtyards, and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of the Hotel's parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. The PUD Amendment also approved the renovation of the existing Cortina Lodge to -_ meet the Hotel' s employee housing mitigation requirements. (b) Pursuant to Resolution No. 37 (Series of 2006) adopted on December 13, 2006, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (the "HPCD granted final development plan approval for the contemplated renovation of the Hotel Jerome. h.) 533928 l illill 1111111'lll Il l lill I ] lit Ill lil i Ill lili Page: 3 of 23 01/30/2007 02:24f JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PI [KIN COUNTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 (c) Pursuant to Resolution No. 6 (Series of 2006) adopted on March 8,2006, the HPC granted minor development approval for the renovation of the Cortina Lodge. (d) This 2007 PUD Agreement incorporates all of the pertinent provisions of Ordinance No. 42 and HPC Resolution Nos. 6 and 37. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of Ordinance No. 42, HPC Resolution No. 6 and/or HPC Resolution No. 37, and the provisions of this 2007 PUD Agreement, the provisions of this 2007 PUD Agreement shall control. 2.2 Dimensional Requirements for Hotel Jerome. Ordinance No. 42 established and approved the following dimensional requirements for the Hotel Jerome PUD: (a) Minimum Lot Size 47,735 sq. ft. (b) Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit N/A-No Dwelling Units (c) Maximum Allowable Density 94 Lodge Units (d) Minimum Lot Width* 170 feet (e) Minimum Front Yard Setback* None (f) Minimum Side Yard Setbacks* None (g) Minimum Rear Yard Setback* None (h) Maximum Height 54 feet at Northeast Corner of Existing Building (i) Minimum Distance Between Buildings N/A-Single Structure U) Minimum Percent Open Space* Per Existing Conditions (k) Trash Access Area Per P&Z Res~Â· No. 8-86 (1) Allowable Floor Area 114,934 sq. ft.I Commercial: 15,985 sq. ft. 1 Lodge Units: 59,214 sq. ft. j Other: 39,735 sq. ft.~_ On) Minimum Off-Street Parking 47 spaces * Per Land Survey Plat dated October 24,2006 to be recorded with Final PUD Development Plan 2.3 Vested Rights. Under Development Order of the City o f Aspen Community Development Department issued January 5,2007 with an effective date of January 14, 2007 (the "Development Order"), the right to undertake and complete the development and use of the Hotel Jerome Property and the Cortina Lodge Property pursuant to the terms and provisions of this 2007 PUD Agreement and the Final PUD Developmeâ‚¬.fla.n is.Yeed until January 14. _ 2010, and shall not be altered, imp/ked, diminished or delayed by any subsequent zoning or land -use-action that is prohibited by Section 24-68-1050) of the Colorado Revised Statutes. In accordance with the requirements of CRS Section 24-68-103(b), a properly noticed public hearing concerning the establishment of such vested rights for the Property was conducted on December 11,2006. As authorized by CRS Section 24-68-102(4)(a), City and Owner agree that the site specific plan for the Property consists of and includes, but is not limited to, the number, permitted size, and configuration of the Hotel's lodge units, the commercial areas, the parking 3 I illill lilli Illi" m. illill L' illiJ 1 1 -Illi lili ll-l 01/30/2007 02:24; 533928 Page: 4 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITK-N COUN-Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 spaces, and the other spaces and areas in the Hotel Jerome; the number, permitted size, and configuration of the affordable housing units and the other spaces and areas in the Cortina Lodge; the number of employees mitigated by the Cortina Lodge; and all other matters set forth in Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006), HPC Resolution Nos. 6 and 37 (Series of 2006), the Hotel Jerome Final PUD Development Plan recorded.Â·4564/17'SM, 2007 as Reception No. â‚¬4552fZ this 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement, and all other documents and plans recorded concurrently therewith. For purposes of this Section 2.3, this 2007 PUD Agreement shall be considered a "development agreement" as that term is used in CRS Section 24-68- 104(2). ARTICLE III DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS - HOTEL JEROME 3.1 Hotel Jerome Component. The renovated Hotel Jerome will contain (i) 94 lodg. units containing a maximum of 59, 214 square feet of floor arearcalculated in accordance with -r<--31 the City' s floor area regulations in effect on January 5,2007 (the date ofthe Development- < Â·jf ) Order), which floor area regulations are attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereofby ~*-) 4 this reference (the "Floor Area Regulations"),fii) 14,891 square feet of net leasable commercial area, (iii) 47 parking spaces located in the Hotel garage, and (iv) vabous back-of-house facilities_~)6 ~i and areas containing a maximum of 39,735 square feet of floor area. The prior requirement that , 1% 279 the Hotel' s-on-site-parking spaces be reservarroFF{otel employees is hereby fully and ~~P" forever waived and terminated. 3.2 Cortina Lodge Component. (a) The renovated Cortina Lodge will contain (i) four (4) studio units in the Lodge's one-story structure, ranging from 264 square feet to 299 square feet of net livable area, (ii) four (4) two-bedroom dormitory suites with a shared bath and individual closets in the Lodge's two-story structure, ranging from 535 square feet to 659 square feet of net livable area, and (iii) a common kitchen, dining area and laundry. The net livable areas set forth above are approximations only, and the final unit sizes will be in substantial conformity therewith. City hereby approves the foregoing variation of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority ("APCHA") minimum size requirements for Category 1 units. The renovated Cortina Lodge shall be credited with housing 21 }lt S - employees. (b) The eight (8) affordable housing units in the Cortina Lodge (the "Affordable Housing Units") must be deed restricted to APCHA' s Category 1 income and occupancy rental guidelines, and a Certificate of Occupancy must be issued therefor, before a Certificate of Occupancy will be issued for the Hotel Jerome renovation. The - deed restriction will be in substantial conformity with the form of Deed Restriction attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a part hereof by this reference. The Deed Restriction provides that any units not rented to Hotel Jerome employees may be rented to any employee that qualifies under APCHA Guidelines. 4 533928 11-11 l ili-Ill'- 11 lili 1 1111111 11111Ill 1-1 01/30/2007 02:241 Page: 5 of 23 JAN.CE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUN-Y Co R 116.00 D 0.00 (c) The Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for the Cortina Lodge recorded December 15, 1988 in Book 581 at Page 332; Resolution No. 1 (Series of 1987) of the Aspen City Council recorded June 6, 1990 in Book 622 at Page 347; and the Amendment to Cortina Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 373, will be deemed fully and forever terminated u*on the recording of the new Deed Restriction on the Affordable Housing Units, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B. (d) Unless a different arrangement is worked out with the City, and only to the extent necessary to comply with applicable Colorado law, at the time of recording of the deed restriction Owner will convey a one-tenth of one percent interest in the Cortina Â· Lodge Property to APCHA. Said one-tenth of one percent interest is hereinafter referred to as the "APCHA Interest". The conveyance ofthe APCHA Interest shall be expressly subject to the understanding and agreement of Owner and APCHA that (i) ownership of the APCHA Interest only gives APCHA the right to enforce the deed restriction on the Affordable Housing Units, and does not give APCHA any authority or rights that are not specifically set forth in the deed restriction, (ii) in all other respects, APCHA shall be deemed to have no ownership interests, rights or responsibilities in connection with the Affordable Housing Units or the Cortina Lodge Property, and the record owner of the remaining interest in the Cortina Lodge Property shall have full right and authority to lease, encumber, or otherwise deal with the Cortina Lodge Property and the Affordable Housing Units therein as if such owner held a 100 percent ownership interest therein, (iii) APCHA shall have no liability to third persons arising solely out of its ownership of the APCHA Interest, and Owner (and any successor or assign of Owner in the ownership of the Cortina Lodge Property) shall indemnify APCHA and the City from and against any claims, liabilities, losses, damages, fees or expenses arising solely out of the ownership of the APCHA Interest, and (iv) the APCHA Interest will be conveyed to the then record owner of the remaining interest in the Cortina Lodge Property if and when the Colorado legislature or a court of competent jurisdiction legalizes the imposition of rent restrictions on affordable housing units. (e) Owner reserves the right to provide substitute affordable housing for the affordable housing being provided in the Cortina Lodge, subj ect to the prior approval of the City of Aspen. 3.3 Affordable Housing Mitigation. The renovated Hotel Jerome's additional net leasable commercial area will require affordable housing mitigation for a total of 1.42 employees, one (1) of which will be housed at the renovated Cortina Lodge. The remaining 0.42 employees will be mitigated by a cash-in-lieu payment by Owner to the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit for the Hotel renovations. The amount of such payment shall be calculated based on an average of APCHA's Category 2 and Category 3 payment-in-lieu fees in effect at the time of Building Permit submittal. 3.4 Construction in Accordance with Plans and HPC Resolutions. 5 Imdillilli]_111111 -lilli lillill I Page: 6 of 23 5 328 01/30/2007 02:24 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 116.00 0 0.00 (a) Hotel Jerome. The Hotel Jerome renovation, and all of its component parts, shall be accomplished in substantial compliance with the Hotel Jerome Final PUD Development Plan and with all architectural plans and elevations, utility plans, drainage plans, and landscape plans that are recorded contemporaneously with the recording of this 2007 PUD Agreement. Ill addition, the Hotel Jerome renovation shall comply with the conditions of approval set forth in HPC Resolution No. 37 (Series of 2006), to wit: (i) All replacement windows on the ground floor must be of wood. Upper floor windows are permitted to be clad. Cut sheets must be submitted for review and approval by HPC staff and monitor. If there are any historic windows left on the building, they must be repaired and preserved. Tinted glass is not approved for any of the window units. Detailed drawings of the window openings proposed to be restored at the sidewalk level on the east fa~ade must be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. (ii) Awnings are only approved for the J-Bar and "Jerome Shop" spaces. The proposed awnings must be.redesigned for review and approval by HPC staff and monitor in order to more closely match the historic awnings. The awnings for the J-Bar and "Jerome Shop" will be retractable and removable. Upper awnings must be mocked-up for review and approval or denial by the HPC Board. HPC staff and monitor will review proposed signage. (iii) Metal balcony railings on the exterior of the building must be mocked-up for review and approval or denial by the HPC Board. (iv) No new column features or materials that are inconsistent with the design of the original columns can be added. (V) The Final Lighting Plan must be reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, as set forth in Section 3.8(a) below. The proposed decorative exterior light fixtures, in particular sconces, must be restudied to be less contemporary. The H]?C Board supports a design competiti6n for the pendant lamp at the Hotel entry, with the understanding that the HPC staff and monitor must still grant approval. (Vi) Any historic materials must be repaired in place, and to the extent that portions of the parapet require reconstruction, it should be based on documented evidence and photographs of the original appearance. (vii) All other masonry repairs, including cleaning, repointing, application of a sealer, etc., will require further information and approval by HPC staff and monitor. (viii) The sidewalk treatment must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. 6 533928 Page: 7 of 23 01/30/2007 02:24F JAN.CE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COLNTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 (ix) There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor, or the full HPC Board. (x) These conditions of approval must be printed on the cover sheet of the building_permitplan setand all other_prints made for the purpose of construction. (b) Cortina Lodge. The Cortina Lodge renovation and reconfiguration, and all component parts thereof, shall be accomplished in substantial compliance with the architectural plans and elevations therefor that are recorded contemporaneously with the recording of this 2007 PUD Agreement. In addition, the Cortina Lodge renovation and reconfiguration shall comply with the conditions of approval set forth in HPC Resolution No. 6 (Series of 2006), to wit: (i) Owner shall provide further information about lighting and any exterior utilities or conduit for review and approval by HPC staff and monitor before purchase or installation of same. (ii) Owner shall retain existing door and window openings wherever possible, even if such openings are made non-functional. Revisions shall be reviewed by HPC staff and monitor. (iii) Owner shall install a front door on the two-story structure and a more appropriate window on the laundry room, guided by old photographs if available. (iv) There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed by HPC staff and monitor, or by the full HPC board. (v) These conditions of approval shall be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and oil all other prints made for the purpose of construction. (vi) Owner shall provide the contractor with a copy of HPC Resolution No. 6 (Series of 2006), and the contractor shall submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval contained in said Resolution are known and understood. The contractor shall also meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 3.5 Guest Transportation. Owner shall provide transportation within the City of Aspen and Aspen airport pickup and delivery for the guests of the Hotel Jerome. Any vehicle owned, possessed or operated for such purpose by Owner shall be stored in the Hotel's underground garage when not in operation. 3.6 Inventory and Treatment of Interior Features of Hotel Jerome. (a) Prior to or contemporaneously with submittal of an application for a building permit for the Hotel Jerome renovation, Owner shall submit to the Historic 7 ~ 533928 1 1 lilli ill I Ill ilill'l--1 - 1 lilill Page: 8 of 23 01/30/2007 02:24; JANCLE K VOS 3 -C:LL r ITKIN 2 Z JIN.TY C. R 116.00 D 0.00 Preservation Officer a written inventory of all original features existing within those interior areas of the Hotel Jerome that are customarily open to the public, or where the public is typically invited. The inventory must be accompanied by current photographs, and copies of any photographs of the interior of the Hotel Jerome available from the Aspen Historical Society Archives. (b) The City's Historic Preservation Officer shall review the inventory and shall verify the completeness thereof. Any overlooked elements that can be documented as original shall be added to the inventory. The inventory shall also identify the proposed treatment of the items on the inventory. To th& extent there is any disagreement between Owner and the Historic Preservation Officer, the Owner may appeal the matter to the City Manager. The City Manager's decision in the matter shall be final, unless such decision is appealed by the Owner to the City Council, which body shall then conduct a de novo review of the issue. (c) Once the proposed treatment is mutually agreed upon by City and Owner, no changes in treatment shall be allowed without the prior consent of the Historic Preservation Officer, subject to the appeal rights of Owner described in Section 3.6(b) above. 3.7 Cortina Lodge Historic Landmark Designation. Before a building permit is issued for the renovation of the Hotel Jerome, Owner shall submit to the HPC an application for Historic Landmark Designation for the Cortina Lodge pursuant to Section 26.415.030.B ofthe Aspen Municipal Code, "Criteria for Listing on Aspen Inventory o f Historic Landmark Sites and Structures". 3.8 Hotel Jerome Landscape Improvements. (a) Owner shall record a Conceptual Landscape Plan for the Hotel Jerome Property as part of the Final PUD Development Plan, and shall submit a Final Landscape Plan for the Hotel Jerome Property for review and approval by the City Parks Department and the HPC staff and monitor prior to issuance of a building permit for the Hotel renovation (the "Final Landscape Plan"). Owner shall be responsible for implementing the Final Landscape Plan, and landscaping improvements shall be accomplished as subdivision improvements in accordance with Article IV of this 2007 PUD Agreement. (b) -All-landscaping in the public right-of-way shall meet the requirements set forth in Municipal Code Chapter 21.20, Trees and Landscaping on Public Right-of-Way, and shall be approved by the City Parks Department prior to installation. Before installing any landscaping or other improvements in the public right-of-way, Owner shall obtain a Revocable Encroachment License (in the event required) from the City Engineering Department. (c) Owner shall obtain a tree removal permit from the Parks Department and pay the applicable tree removal fee (in the event required) prior to issuance of a building 8 11-1111 Ill Illili Illill'll I lillil 533928 Page: 9 of 23 01/30/2007 02:24 JANICE K VCS CAUDILL PITKIN COLA -Y CJ R 116.00 0 0.00 permit for the Hotel renovation. The permit shall be submitted with the building permit application. (d) Owner shall install tree saving construction fences around the drip line of any trees to be saved on the Hotel Jerome Property as approved by the Parks Department. The Parks Department must.inspect-and-approve_the fence location before any construction activities commence. No storage of materials, storage o f construction equipment, construction backfill, or foot or vehicular traffic shall be allowed within the fenced drip line. Any work and/or minor excavation for the installation of additional landscaping, property fences and surface materials located within the drip line protection zone will be required to be hand excavation only with no over digging. All work within the drip line requires oversight from the Parks Department for approval of soil amendments, root pruning and grade changes. Excavations outside of the tree protection zone shall address tree and root protection in the following way: All roots shall be cut prior to full excavation using a clean sharp pruning saw; all roots will be cut flush with the exposed soil line; six inches of mulch is required to be placed within the zone of vegetation protection and maintained at a level of six inches during the entire project; irrigation o f trees is required throughout the entire duration o f the project with the contractor supplying water to the trees at a rate which is appropriate for proper health. burlap shall be placed over the edge of the excavation covering all freshly cut roots; contractor will irrigate the burlap with an appropriate amount of water in order to keep the burlap moist, preventing the ends o f the roots from drying out. 3.9 Utilities. (a) Owner shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with applicable standards o f Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City Water Department. (b) Owner shall comply with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District' s rules and regulations. No clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter drains) shall be allowed to ACSD lines. A completed tap permit for service with the District shall be submitted with the building permit application for the Hotel renovation. (c) Owner shall comply with all Fire Marshal requirements in connection with the Hotel renovation. 3.10 Engineering Requirements and Conditions. (a) No construction material or dumpsters shall be stored on the public rights- of-way unless a telliporary encroachment license is obtained from the City Engineer. (b) Owner shall submit a construction management plan to the City Engineering Department with the building permit application for the Hotel renovation, and shall abide by any additional construction management requirements in effect when 9 | | ~~|| ||| | |~|~| |~ | ~ ~| ~~ | 01/30/2007 02:24 533928 Page: 10 of 23 JANICE K VOS CHUC=LL PITKIN COLNTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 the building permit application is filed. The management plan shall include a noise, fugitive dust control, and construction traffic and construction parking management plan which address, at a minimum, the following issues: (i) A fugitive dust control plan including proposed construction fencing, watering of haul roads and disturbed areas, daily cleaning of adjacent paved roads, construction speed limits, and other measures necessary to prevent windblown dust from crossing the property line. (ii) A description of construction debris hauling routes and associated impacts on adjoining streets; and (iii) Construction parking mitigation. Except for essential trade trucks, no other personal trucks shall be parked in the area around the site. The City encourages that site workers be shuttled in from the airport parking area. (iv) Owner shall not track mud onto City streets during construction. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction. (v) Owner shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Monday through Saturday. 3.11 Air Oualitv Impact Fee. Before a building permit is issued for the Hotel renovation, Owner shall pay to the City an Air Quality Impact Fee in an amount calculated in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time of building permit submittal. 3.12 Park Development Impact Fee. Before a building permit is issued for the Hotel renovation, Owner shall pay to the City a Park Development Impact Fee in an amount calculated in accordance with the methodology and fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit submittal. No new bedrooms or commercial space are being created at the Cortina Lodge, hence no Park Development Impact Fee is due and payable in connection with that project. 3.13 School Land Dedication Fee. No School Land Dedication Fee is required for either the Hotel renovation or the Cortina Lodge renovation, as no subdivision of either Property is occurring or approved. 3.14 Exterior Lighting. All exterior lighting within the Hotel Jerome Property shall comply with Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting, of the Aspen Municipal Code unless otherwise exempted by the Community Development Director. A Lighting Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the HPC Monitor prior to issuance of a building permit for the Hotel renovation. 3.15 Building Permit Matters. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the Hotel renovation, the following shall occur: 10 il__ili - ill illill lili illill i....1 illilll jil Illill _illil 01/30/2007 02:24; 5339: Page: 11 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 116,00 D 0.00 (a) The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director and to HPC staff stating that the conditions of approval ofthe Hotel renovation have been read and understood including, without limitation, the conditions set forth in HPC Resolution No. 37 (Series of 2006), and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer before submitting the building permit application. (b) The primary contractor and/or superintendent shall obtain a specialty license in historic preservation. (c) All tap fees, impact fees, housing fees and building permit fees shall be paid. If an alternative agreement to delay payment ofthe Water Tap and/or Parks Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. (d) Prior to any demolition, Owner shall complete the Building Department's asbestos checklist and, if necessary, a person licensed by the State of Colorado to perform asbestos inspections shall conduct an inspection. The Building Department cannot sign any building permits until submittal of this report. If there is a finding of no asbestos, the demolition can proceed. If asbestos is present, a licensed asbestos removal contractor must be retained to remove it. ARTICLE IV A. HOTEL JEROME LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS Owner shall complete the landscaping of the Hotel Property and of the adjoining public right-of-way in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan referred to in Section 3.8(a) above, no later than six (6) months following the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Hotel renovation. Owner shall be responsible for ensuring the success of alllandscaping installed pursuant to the Final Landscape Plan for a period of two (2) years following the date of installation, and shall replace any landscaping that fails during such two (2) year period. Owner or it successors or assigns shall have the right to plant additional native vegetation within the Hotel Property, as it may consider appropriate from time to time, without further approvals being required. Before a building permit is issued for the renovation, Owner shall provide the City Engineering Department and the City Parks Department with a cost estimate for the proposed landscaping improvements (including two (2) years of maintenance thereo f) prepared by a landscaping contractor licensed in the State of Colorado, and the Engineering Department shall approve the cost estimate. B. FINANCIAL ASSURANCES In order to ensure construction and installation of the landscaping improvements described in Section A above, and to guarantee 125 percent of the approved estimated cost of the landscaping improvement (including two (2) years of maintenance thereof), Owner shall provide to the City an irrevocable letter of credit from a financially responsible lender in the amount of the approved estimated cost of such landscaping improvements. Said letter of credit shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the Hotel renovation, shall be 11 l i lli lilli 111111 1 111111 lili I lill i 111111111111 533928 Page: 12 of 23 01/30/2007 02:246 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN CoL,EY Co R 116,00 D 0.00 in a form reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Manager, and shall give the City the unconditional right, upon default by Owner, to draw funds as necessary and upon demand to partially or fully complete and/or pay for any of such improvements or pay any outstanding and delinquent bills for work done thereon by any party, with any excess letter of credit amount to be applied first to additional administrative or legal costs associated with any such default and the repair or deterioration in improvements already constructed before the unused remainder, if any, of such letter of credit is released to Owner. Provided, however, that Owner shall be given fourteen (14) days' written notice of default (and the right to cure during said period) prior to the City's ability to make a draw under the letter of credit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, delays or other problems resulting from acts of God or other events beyond the reasonable control of Owner shall not constitute a default hereunder so long as a good fith effort is being made to remedy the problem and the problem is in fact resolved within a reasonable period of time following its occurrence. As portions of the improvements required are completed, the City Engineer shall inspect them, and upon approval and written acceptance, he shall authorize a reduction in the outstanding amount of the letter of credit equal to the agreed estimated cost for the completed portion of the improvements; provided, however, that twenty-five percent (25%) of the estimated cost thereof shall be retained until the landscaping improvements have been maintained in a satisfactory condition for two (2) years. It is the express understanding of the parties that compliance with the procedures set forth in Article V below pertaining to defaults under and amendments to this 2007 PUD Agreement shall not be required with respect to the enforcement and implementation of these financial assurances and guarantees to be provided by Owner as set forth above. ARTICLE V NON-COMPLIANCE AND REQUEST FOR AMENDMENTS OR EXTENSIONS In the event that the City Council determines that Owner is not acting in substantial compliance with the terms of this 2007 PUD Agreement, the City Council shall notify Owner in writing specifying the alleged non-compliance and asking that Owner remedy the alleged non- compliance within such reasonable time as the City Council may determine, but not less than 30 days. If the City Council determines that Owner has not complied within such time, the City Council may issue and serve upon Owner a written order specifying the alleged non-compliance and requiring Owner to remedy the same within thirty (30) days. Within twenty (20) days of the receipt of such order, Owner may file with the City Council either a notice advising the City Council that it is in compliance or a written petition requesting a hearing to determine any one or both of the following matters: (a) Whether the alleged non-compliance exists or did exist, or (b) Whether a variance, extension of time or amendment to this 2007 PUD Agreement should be granted with respect to any such non-compliance which is determined to exist. 12 |~| ~~||| ~| |~||| ~ ~| ~~ | 01/30/2007 02:241 53392E Page: 13 of 23 JAA.CE K VOS CAUCILL PI-IKIN COLN -Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 Upon the receipt of such petition, the City Council shall promptly schedule a hearing to consider the matters set forth in the order of non-compliance and in the petition. The hearing shall be convened and conducted pursuant to the procedures normally established by the City Council for other hearings. If the City Council determines by a preponderance of the evidence that a non-compliance exists which has not been remedied, it may issue such orders as may be appropriate, including the imposition of daily fines until such non-compliance has been remedied, the withholding ofpermits and/or certificate of occupancy, as applicable; provided, however, no order shall terminate any land use approval. The City Council may also grant such variances, extensions of time or amendments to this 2007 PUD Agreement as it may deem appropriate under the circumstances. The parties expressly acknowledge and agree that the City Council shall not unreasonably refuse to extend the time periods for performance hereunder if Owner demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that the reasons for the delay(s) which necessitate said extension(s) result from acts of God or other events beyond the reasonable control of Owner, despite good faith efforts on its part to perform in a timely manner. ARTICLE VI PRIOR INSTRUMENTS AND APPROVALS 6.1 Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Agreement - Hotel Jerome - Renovation and Addition recorded September 15, 1986 in Book 518 at Page 921 as Reception No. 281483. 6.2 Supplemental PUD Agreement - Hotel Jerome recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 376 as Reception No. 333508 and rerecorded July 9, 1991 in Book 650 at Page 952 as Reception No. 334427. 6.3 Amended and Restated Planned Unit I~velopment Plat - Hotel Jerome - 22tl1r03;Ul~22.in Plat Book 19 at Pag~ and related drawings recorded 6.4 Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Plat - Hotel Jerome -recorded July 1, 1991 in Plat Book 26 at Page 89. 6.5 Ordinance No. 70 (Series of 1990) o f the Aspen City Council, amending the Final PUD Development Plan for the Hotel Jerome. 6.6 Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for the Cortina Lodge recorded December 16, 1988 in Book 581 at Page 332 as Reception No. 307031. 6.7 Amendment to Cortina Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 373 as Reception No. 333507. 6.8 Resolution No. 1 (Series of 1987) of the Aspen City Council, granting substitution of Cortina Lodge Employee Units for On-Site Hotel Jerome Employee Units, recorded June 6, 1990 in Book 622 at Page 347 as Reception No. 323313. 13 1 11111111111111111 lili llilll lili illilll ill Ililll Ill lili 01 /30/2007 02: 24; 533928 Page: 14 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 116,00 D 0.00 ARTICLE VII GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.1 The provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Owner and City and their respective successors and assigns. 7.2 This 2007 PUD Agreement shall be subject to and construed in accordance with the laws ofthe State of Colorado. 7.3 If any of the provisions of this 2007 PUD Agreement or any paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section or the application thereof in any circumstance is invalidated, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this 2007 PUD Agreement, and the application of any such provision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, word, or section in any other circumstance shall not be affected thereby. 7.4 This 2007 PUD Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto contain the entire understanding between the parties hereto with respect to the transactions contemplated hereunder. Owner, its successors or assigns, may, on its own initiative, petition the City Council for an amendment to this 2007 PUD Agreement or for an extension of one or more ofthe time periods required for performance hereunder. The City Council shall not unreasonably deny such petition for amendment or extension after considering all appropriate circumstances. Any such amendments or extensions of time shall only become effective upon the execution by all parties hereto that are affected by the proposed amendment. 7.5 Numerical and title headings contained in this 2007 PUD Agreement are for convenience only, and shall not be deemed determinative of the substance contained herein. As used herein, where the context requires, the use o f the singular shall include the plural and the use of any gender shall include all genders. 7.6 Upon execution of this 2007 PUD Agreement by all parties hereto, City agrees to approve the Final PUD Development Plan and to accept the same for recordation in the office of the CIerk and Recorder for Pitkin County, Colorado, upon payment of the recordation fees by Owner. 7.7 Notices to be given to the parties to this 2007 PUD Agreement shall be considered to be given if hand delivered or if deposited in the United States Mail to the parties by registered or certified mail at the addresses indicated below, or such other addresses as may be substituted upon written notice by the parties or their successors or assigns: 14 i illill lilli 111111 lili illill illl illilll Ili llilll Ill lili 01/30/2007 02:24 33928 Page: 15 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 116.00 0 0.00 CITY: City of Aspen City Manager 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 OWNER Hotel Jerome, Inc. c/o The Broadmoor Hotel P.O. Box 1439 Colorado Springs, CO 80901 With Copy to: Arthur C. Daily, Esq. Holland & Hart LId? 600 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 7.8 This 2007 PUD Agreement may be executed in counterparts, in which case all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument which is binding on all o f the parties thereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart. Facsimile signatures shall be treated as original signatures hereon. 7.9 The terms, conditions, provisions and obligations herein contained shall be deemed covenants that run with and burden the Property and any and all owners thereof or interests therein, their respective successors, grantees or assigns, and further shall inure to the benefit of and be specifically enforceable by or against the parties hereto, their respective successors, grantees or assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as o f the day and year first above written. CITY: City of Aspen, Colorado, a Colorado municipal cori?oratiop , / mir//1 I By // A--79TA*0,**<***#d- Mayor Attest: 1/ ( r 0~EL#~4-Uekb-i < 64- k4'j~1'Ac Kathryn S. Koch, City Cle& APPROVED AS TO FORM: tkilf-*Â» Â·461*iNVorcester, City Attorney 15 OWNER: Hotel Jerome. Inc. By: ~0~.1 Its: Lb- 9 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 30Â¢4ay of <~**,66Ul,2007, by Helen Klanderud as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch as City Clerk of ~~(he City of Aâ‚¬ben, Colorado, a municipal corporation. U Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 04/1 ?>400 P . hpfastuazo _UL tie. ary Public 1150; U STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNT-Y OF Â£\ ~164, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15'h day of Ult,uat \A , 2007, bytifeike,1 lia-Ao\-,r, as VY- of Hotel Jerome, Inc.,-2 Colorado corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 3114loq it.4-0 9 k.QQ-4-0 Notary Public 3646668_2.DOC l illill lilli Illill ilillifillillifillillill illill Ill lill Page: 16 of 23 533928 01/30/2007 02:24; JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUNTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 16 EXHIBIT 1 li i I-li 'llill lill illill -- 1 ill 1 1 illill ill fill 01/30/2007 02:24; 533928 Page: 17 of 23 JAN.CE K VOS CAUDILL PDK.-N COUN-Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 Chapter 26.575 MISCELLANEOUS SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS Sections: 26.575.010 General. 26.575.020 Calculations and measurements. 26.575.030 Open Space. 26.575.040 Yards. 26.575.045 Junk Yard and Service Yards. 26.575.050 Fences. 26.575.060 Utility/trash service areas. 26.575.070 Use square footage limitations. 26.575.080 Child care center. 26.575.090 Home occupations. 26.575.100 Landscape maintenance. 26.575.110 Building envelopes. 26.575.120 Satellite dish antennas. 26.575.130 Wireless Telecommunication Services Facilities and Equipment 26.575.140 Accessory uses and accessory structures. 26.575.150 Outdoor Lighting. 26.575.160 Dormitory. 26.575.170 Fuel storage tanks 26.575.180 Restaurant. 26.575.190 Farmers' market. 26.575.200 Group Homes. 26.575.010 General. Regulations specified in other sections of this Title shall be subject to the following supplemental regulations. 26.575.020 Calculations and measurements. The purpose of this Section is to set forth supplemental regulations which relate to methods for calculating and measuring certain enumerated terms as used in this Title. The definitions of the terms are set forth at Section 26.104.100. A. Floor area. In measuring floor areas for floor area ratio and allowable floor area, the following applies: 1. General. In measuring floor area for the purposes of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area, there shall be included that floor area within the surrounding exterior walls (measured from their exterior surface) of a building, or portion thereof. 2. Decks, Balconies, Porches, Loggias and Stairways. The calculation of the floor area of a building or a portion thereof shall not include decks, balconies, exterior stairways, terraces and 689 (Aspen Supp. No. 2,4-03) 26.575.020 ill'1111 ill lill i-1- illill 1-1 1 lill 111 li lili Page: 18 of 23 E 928 01/30/2007 02:241 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITK.N COUN-Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 similar features, unless the area of these features is greater than fifteen (15) percent ofthe maxi- mum allowable floor area of the building (the excess of the 15% shall be included). Porches shall not be counted towards FAR. 3. GaraEes, Carports and Storave Areas. In all zone districts except the R- 15-B zone district, for the purpose of calculating floor area ratio and allowable floor area for a lot whose principal use is residential, garages, carports, and storage areas shall be excluded up to a maximum area of two hundred fifty (250) square feet per dwelling unit; all garage, carport, and storage areas between two hundred fifty (250) and five hundred (500) square feet shall count fifty (50) percent towards allowable floor area; all garage, carport and storage areas in excess of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit shall be included as part of the residential floor area calculation. For any dwelling unit which can be accessed from an alley or private road entering at the rear or side of the dwelling unit, the garage shall only be excluded from floor area calculations up to two hun- dred fifty (250) square feet per dwelling unit if it is located on said alley orroad; all garage, car- port and storage areas between two hundred fifty (250) and five hundred (500) square feet shall count fifty (50) percent towards allowable floor area. For the purposes of determining the exclu- sion, if any, applicable to gaÂ¢~24 carports, and storage areas, the area ofall structures on aparcel shall be aggregated. In the R~~lone district, garage, carport, and storage areas shall be limited to a five hundred (500) square root exemption 4. Subgrade areas. To determine the portion of subgrade areas that are to be included in calculat- ing floor area, the following shall apply: a. For any story that is partially above and partially below natural or finished grade, which- ever is lower, the total percentage of exterior surface wall area that is exposed above the most restrictive ofthe grades shall be the total percentage ofthe gross square footage ofthe subject story included in the floor area calculation. Subgrade stories with no exposed exterior surface wall area shall be excluded from floor area calculations. (Example: If fifteen (15) percent of the exterior surface wall area has been exposed above natural or finished grade (whichever is lower), then fifteen (15) percent of the gross square footage of the subject story will be included as floor area.) b. Also excluded from floor area calculations shall be any portion of a subgrade accessory dwelling unit whose exterior surface wall area is exposed above grade for glass, window openings, doors, and similar ways of getting light and air into the unit, or that provides re- quired Uniform Building Code egress to the unit. The maximum amount of this exclusion shall be one hundred (100) s.f of the floor area of the accessory dwelling unit. c. For any dwelling unit that can be accessed from an alley or private road entering at the rear or side of the dwelling unit, the garage or cari)ort shall only be eligible for the exclusions described in sub-sections a. and b. if it is located along said alley or road. (Aspen Supp. No. 2,4-03) 690 26.575.020 d. In the R-15B zone district only, garages, carports, and storage areas shall be excluded from residential floor area calculations up to a maximum of five hundred (500) square feet per dwelling unit. 5. (Repealed by Ord. No. 56-2000, Â§ 8) 6. Accessorv D-wellinz Units. An Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be calculated and attributed to the allowable floor area for a parcel with the same inclusions and exclusions for calculating Floor Area as defined in this section, unless eligible for an exemption as described below: Detached and permanently affordable ADU Floor Area Exemption. One hundred (100) per- cent of the Floor Area of an ADU which is detached from the primary residence and deed re- stricted as a "For Sale" affordable housing unit and transferred to a qualified purchaser in accor- dance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended, shall be ex- cluded from the calculation of Floor Area. 7. LinkedPavilion. Any element linking the principal structure to an accessory structure shall not be included in the calculation of floor area provided that the linking structure is no more than one (1) story tall, six (6) feet wide and ten (10) feet long. Areas of linking structures in excess often (10) feet in length shall be counted in floor area. 533928 Illlilli-lili lilli-- 1- 1-11111111 Page: 19 of 23 01/30/2007 02:241 JANICE K VCS -DA-DILL r ITAI.1 0-JURTY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 690-1 (Aspen Supp. No. 2,4.-03) EXHIBIT [I] -il l I-~1 li~H IIL *1111! Ell 1-1 mil l.11!lill li ll-1 01/30/2007 02:24; 533928 Page: 20 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COUN-Y CO R 116.00 D 0.00 OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS CORTINA LODGE THIS OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT (the "Deed Restriction") is made and entered into this day of , 2007, by and between HOTEL JEROME, INC., a Delaware corporation, whose address is c/o The Broadmoor Hotel, P. O. Box 1439, Colorado Springs, CO 80901 (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and the ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, a multi-jurisdictional housing authority established pursuant to the TIIIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT recorded on January 8,2003 at Reception No. 477066 in the Office o f the Clerk and Recorder o f Pitkin County, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as "Housing Authority"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of Lots P and Q, Block 73, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, on which is situated a renovated structure known as the Cortina Lodge (hereafter, the "Cortina Lodge"); and 0 WHEREAS, the Cortina Lodge contains four (4) studio units and four (4) two-bedroom dormitory suites (each, an "Affordable Housing Unit" and collectively, the "Affordable Housing Units"), together with a common kitchen, dining area and laundry, as authorized and approved by Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) adopted by the Aspen City Council on December 11,2006 and recorded , 2007 in said records. The Affordable Housing Units are depicted on the floor plans attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by this reference, and contain the following net livable areas, to wit: Unit Number Unit Type Net Livable Area Unit 1 Studio square feet Unit 2 Studio square feet Unit 3 Studio square feet Unit 4 Studio square feet Unit 5 2-bdrm. dorm suite square feet Unit 6 2-bdrm. dorm suite square feet Unit 7 2-bdrm. dorm suite square feet Unit 8 2-bdrm. dorm suite square feet The foregoing variation of APCHA' s minimum size requirements for Category 1 Affordable Housing Units was approved by the City of Aspen in Section 10 of said Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006); and 533928 01/30/2007 02:241 Page: 21 of 23 JAN.CE K VOS CAUDILL PITK.N COUN-Y CO R 116 , 00 D 0.00 WHEREAS, in accordance with said Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) and the 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement recorded , 2007 at Reception No. in said records, Owner desires by this instrument to deed restrict the use and occupancy of the Affordable Housing Units to persons who are employed in Pitkin County (and their families) and who-meet_the_qualification_guidelines-set-forth_in_the_Aspen/Pitkin-County-Affordable-Housing__- Guidelines established and indexed by the Housing Authority on an annual basis (the "Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, as set forth in Paragraph 1 (f and g) ofthat certain Master Termination Agreernent recorded , 2007 as Reception No. in said records, the previous Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for the Cortina Lodge recorded December 16, 1988 in Book 581 at Page 332 as Reception No. 307031, as amended by Amendment to Cortina Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 373 as Reception No. 333507,.shall be deemed fully and forever vacated, terminated, cancelled, released, extinguished null, void, and of no further force or effect whatsoever upon the recording of this Deed Restriction. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Owner covenants and agrees as follows: 1. The Affordable Housing Units shall at all times be rented in accordance with the . terms of this Deed Restriction. 2. The use and occupancy of the Affordable Housing Units shall henceforth be limited exclusively to housing for persons who are employed in Pitkin County (and their families) who meet the definition of"qualified Category 1 employee" as that term is defined by the Guidelines. Owner shall give first priority for occupancy of the Affordable Housing Units to employees of the Hotel Jerome. Any Affordable Housing Units not rented by Owner to Hotel Jerome employees may be rented to any "qualified Category 1 employee selected by Owner. If the Owner does not lease an Affordable Housing Unit to a qualified employee of his own selection, then the Housing Authority shall select the tenant in accordance with the Guidelines. Employees shall be qualified by the Housing Authority as to employment, maximum income and asset limitations. 3. Written verification of employment of employee(s) proposed to reside in an Affordable Housing Unit shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authority by Owner prior to occupancy thereof, and such verification must be accepted by the Housing Authority. 4. An Affordable Housing Unit shall be rented for periods of no less than six (6) consecutive months. Upon vacancy of an Affordable Housing Unit, Owner is granted forty-five (45) days in which to locate a qualified employee, unless a longer period is authorized by the Housing Authority. Approval for such additional time may be requested by Owner for repair and/or refurbishment of an Affordable Housing Unit, for renovation and/or redevelopment of the Cortina Lodge property, or for an unexpected breach of the lease agreement by the tenant, and ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~_~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~1~~~~~-~ 533928 , 1 Page: 22 of 23 1_| 01/30/2007 02:24; JANICE K 905 CA_OIL_ PITKIV CC-NTY C. R 116.00 0 0.00 such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by the Housing Authority. If a qualified employee is not placed in an Affordable Housing Unit within the above-prescribed period, the Housing Authority may rent the Affordable Housing Unit to a qualified employee of its own selection. 5. The maximum rental rate for an Affordable Housing_Unit-shalhot.exceed the ~ Category 1 rental rate as set forth in the Rental Guidelines established by the Housing Authority as part of the Guidelines, subject to annual adjustment as permitted by the Guidelines. The maximum permitted rent for the studio units on the date of execution of this Deed Restriction is $ per month, and the maximum permitted rent for the 2-bedroom dormitory suites on the date of execution of this Deed Restriction is $ per month. Rent shall be verified and approved by the Housing Authority upon submission and approval of the lease. 6. Each Affordable Housing Unit must meet minimum occupancy requirements as - stipulated in the Guidelines, i.e., one person per bedroom. 7. A written lease agreement shall be executed by Owner and the tenant for each occupancy of an Affordable Housing Unit, and shall provide for a minimum rental term of six (6) consecutive months, subject always to the Owner's right to terminate the lease if the tenant defaults in the performance ofthe tenant's obligations thereunder. An executed copy of the lease shall be provided to the Housing Authority by Owner within ten (10) days of the Housing Authority's approval of the proposed tenant. 8. The terms and provisions o f this Deed Restriction shall constitute covenants running with the title to the Cortina Lodge property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Colorado, and their respective successors and assigns, by any appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction, abatement, or eviction o f non-qualified tenants. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: HOTEL JEROME, INC., a Delaware corporation By: Its: STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Deed Restriction was acknowledged before me this day of ,2007, by as of Hotel Jerome, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public ACCEPTANCE BY HOUSING AUTHORITY The foregoing Deed Restriction and its terms are accepted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority this day of ,2007. ASPENNITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY By: Chairperson STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing Acceptance was acknowledged before me this day of 2007, by as Chairperson of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Board. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public 3654258 1.DOC l ili 11111111 11111111111111111111111 lili 01/30/2007 02:241 533928 Page: 23 of 23 JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITK.N COLâ€žEY CO R 116.00 D 0.00 Ill 111Ilill-11'fi ll lillil lil i 11111-li l i 01/30/2007 02:255 533929 Page: 1 of 4 JAN:CE K VOS CAUDILL PI'IKIN COL,FY CO R 21.00 0 0.00 MASTER TERMINATION AGREEMENT -- HOTEL-JEROME-PUD-- THIS MASTER TERMINATION AGREEMENT (the "Termination Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 37 day of <~94//#4.4-, 2007, by and between THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a munici~ corporaton (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and HOTEL JEROME, INC., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) adopted on December 11,2006, the Aspen City Council granted final approval o f a PUD Amendment for the Hotel Jerome Property described in said Ordinance, including an extensive renovation of the existing Hotel Jerome, an expansion of the Hotel's existing net leasable commercial area, the reconfiguration and renovation of the Hotel's Main Street and Mill Street courtyards, and the elimination of a prior condition that a portion of the Hotel's parking garage be reserved for Hotel employees. The PUD Amendment also approved the renovation o f the existing Cortina Lodge situated on the Cortina Lodge Property described on said Ordinance to meet the Hotel's employee housing mitigation requirements; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006), Owner and City have executed that certain 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement, which instrument was recordecl.,448â€¢*00 30,2007 as Reception No.535753 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado (the "2007 PUD Agreement"); and WHEREAS, Section 1.2 of the 2007 PUD Agreement provides that it is the intent o f the parties thereto that the 2007 PUD Agreement effectively supersede and replace in their entirety certain previously recorded plats, PUD agreements, protective covenants, and land use approvals that encumber the Hotel Jerome Property and/or the Cortina Lodge Property, including without limitation those matters identified in Article VI o f the 2007 PUD Agreement, and further provides that the City and Owner shall cooperate in the execution and recording of such documents as may be necessary or appropriate to accomplish the vacation and/or termination of such prior instruments and approvals; and WHEREAS, City and Owner desire by this Termination Agreement to accomplish the vacation and/or termination of such prior instruments and approvals. 11111111-1111111111111 1 1 1 532 9 Page: 2 of 4 01/30/2007 02:25; JANICE K VOS CAUDILL PITKIN COLN-Y CO R 21,00 D 0.00 NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained and for other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Vacation and Termination of Instruments and Approvals. From and after the execution and recording of this Termination Agreement by City and Owner, the following-described recorded PUD agreements, plats, protective covenants, and land use approvals, and all covenants, agreements, obligations, approvals, conditions, benefits and burdens set forth therein, shall be and shall be deemed fully and forever vacated, terminated, cancelled, released, extinguished, null, void, and of no further force or effect whatsoever, and shall no longer constitute either a burden upon or a benefit to aIl or any part of the Property or either o f the parties hereto or their respective successors and assigns, to wit: (a) Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Agreement - Hotel Jerome - Renovation and Addition recorded September 15, 1986 in Book 518 at Page 921 as Reception No. 281483. (b) Supplemental PUD Agreement - Hotel Jerome recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 376 as Reception No. 333508 and rerecorded July 9, 1991 in Book 650 at Page 952 as Reception No. 334427. (c) Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Plat - Hotel Jerome - recorded September 15, 1986 in Plat Book 19 at Pag,fand related drawings recorded contemporaneously therewith. (d) SecondÂ·Amendment to Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development Plat - Hotel Jerome - recorded July 1, 1991 in Plat Book 26 at Page 89. (e) Ordinance No. 70 (Series of 1990) of the Aspen City Council, amending the Final PUD Development Plan for the Hotel Jerome. (f) Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for the Cortina Lodge recorded December 16, 1988 in Book 581 at Page 332 as Reception No. 307031.** (g) Amendment to Cortina Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions recorded June 12, 1991 in Book 648 at Page 373 as Reception No. 333507.** (h) Resolution No. 1 (Series of 1987) of the Aspen City Council, granting substitution of Cortina Lodge Employee Units for On-Site Hotel Jerome Employee Units, recorded June 6, 1990 in Book 622 at Page 347 as Reception No. 323313. ** These two documents shall remain in full force and effect until the Deed Restriction attached as Exhibit B to the 2007 PUD Agreement is recorded in the Office o f the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, upon which recording said two documents shall be deemed fully and forever vacated, terminated, cancelled, released, extinguished, null, void, and of no further force or effect whatsoever. 2. Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures. This Termination Agreement may be executed in counterparts, in which case all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument which is binding on all of the parties thereto, notwithstanding that all of the parties are not signatory to the original or the same counterpart, and facsimile signatures shall be treated as original signatures hereon. 3. Binding Effect. This Termination Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WIIEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. CITY: The City of Aspen, CoLorado, a municipal corpg*Dif~~&* - "EM 8 - 8 By: //XMG.*064 10[ayofLA/f Attest: 0Â»6Â»149114 Kathrynt. Koch, City Cler APPROVED AS TO FORM: damrworce;te"r, City Attorney Owner: Hotel Jerome, Inc., a Delaware corporat~ Its: 147 . 533929 1111111111 *111111-1-11-1.11111111 01/30/2007 02:25; Page: 3 of 4 JANICE K VOS CHUDILL PITKIN COLN-Y CO R 21.00 D 0.00 STATE OF COLORADO) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 252Â¢~ay of e'li444A4/ , 2007, by Helen Klanderud as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch as City Clerk of p cit~of Aspen, Colorado, a municipal corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 04~(7~2.00.:~-- u .p>r... i D 1 0 -El k: f /2. .t .1 ~~~~' Notary M lie : 60 1 STATE OF Co\DraA o ) ) SS. COUNTY OF E \ f*60) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dgr-'Aay of -30.rAicj.1-u, 2007, by -844*exÂ·~ 4ar\-0 An, as 1/-~ , of Hotel Jerome, Inb., a Delaware corporation. Witness my hand and official seal. 11 \ r.O My commission expires: 43 1 h I U 1 4 1) hilh f 6-0) Notary Public 533929 Il l 111---Ill -- lilli 1 --1--l illi- I 01/30/2007 02:25F Page: 4 of 4 JANICE K VOS CAUC:LL PI-IKIN COLA.TY CO R 21.00 D 0.00 3321546_2.DOC EXHIBIT NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to The Hotel Jerome, 300 E. Main Street Parcel No.: 273707321001 APPLICANT: CLP-Elysian Aspen Owner, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann (Vann Associates, LLC) SUBJECT & SITE OF AMENDMENT: The Hotel Jerome 300 E. Main St. SUMMARY: The applicant has requested an Insubstantial PUD Amendment to convert an existing office into a rentable lodging unit for the hotel. Currently there are 92 rooms in the hotel. The Amended and Restated 1986 PUD allowed for 94 guest rooms. Affordable housing mitigation was provided in 1986 for the 94 rooms. Ordinance 42 (series of 2006) approved an extensive renovation to the existing hotel and an expansion of the net leasable space. ItÂ·also approved the renovation of the Cortina Lodge to meet the affordable housing mitigation. To date, the major renovations/improvements to the hotel have not been undertaken, and therefore the housihg lititigation has not changed from the 1986 PUD. Additional mitigation is to be provided at the time of a building permit for the overall renovation/improvements ofthe hotel, as per Ordinance 42 (Series of 2006). Staff has determined that the proposed change of an office to a rental unit is not associated with the large scale project and is in compliance with the original 1986 approval of having 94 guest rooms, with affordable housing mitigation previously provided. STAFF EVALUATIONS: Staff supports the proposed change to the Hotel Jerome through an amendment to the PUD. The changes proposed are consistent with the approvals granted in 1986 and 2006 allowing for 94 rooms. The change allows for the conversion of an office into a rentable lodging room, which is consistent with the intent of the former approvals. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Insubstantial PUD Amendment to be consistent with the standards within Ordinance No. 42, Series 2006, and thereby APPROVES the amendment for the conversion of an office to a rental unit. 323 , 981 9 Â·*'b Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A: Approved Changes on Plan Set Exhibit B: Review Criteria Exhibit C: Application RECEPTION#: 554143, 11/10/2008 at 02:01:17 PM, 1 OF 7, R $36.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO poss 9.1'llu'lwâ‚¬+9~BQ 9 - P EliÂ· 11 ~ EN El ~ 2! 21 8; 2; ~ 21 11 i. " .....1 ......111 ./4 -~ ---n 01 ..1,1,1.'.0 11'....T.â€žâ€ž e -,-/ 1 - -M g lap[*~pu--umnimb--1.mIK- 1.9 1 -Â·Â·- 1 0-2 1 Alf "!coma~~t:,21 6 1 1 ep-- HL 1 iuj--T- rrp, 11 1 1 1-1 1 -~42=* ~ Â® e e e , 1*HLU ~ = EL-= ~abr- 1 .W: 14 -1 216-f Ny 3 1 vE-3Ix! It. (I-_123 .44..... 1 '....3 Ct---t, [12}1 - 1, 11 lit:. - - .Â·Â·12' ~ C *flj~SF b \ ill 74 2 - HOIEL JEROME 0 - 4 19 9 00' COUNTED' Â· 011...~ RENOVATION -5- e.mm Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Sâ€ž .......O 1.2. - MI,ILCOWâ€ž*, CIttl C:*12 11 641.1 - Pas' 0 1 4 9 1 1 11 4 4 ..â‚¬==- // tabbler M 1 1 ..1. 1 r-) SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING 7 m S 0-0 - I_F__T -Â® 0 EXHIBIT \W, 6 poss OrD FrÂ·E â€¢fi,'hÂ¥, L -1@1Â· 3068 ALIGN WALLS TO EXISTING-7 NEW TS COLUMN W FIREPROOFING ~ r-ALIGN NEW WALL / TO EXISTING WALL. ~~ . XISTING FIRE L 3'~. CLR. j, / 1 SPRINKLER RISER ., 4.1, .. ...In ".1, 14..... 1..,1 TYPE B UNIT 15 1 \1 , 1 4+M1N. 1 |07-~ r-1 OBECOVEREDWITH ..Er M.4.h=IN l " PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL. â€ž WOOD PANELING. 213 : 6 U E - f c=E F=@2~ U DI'~ -9 OPTIONAL BED--n ~ ~~ ALIGNMENT \ \ L -- 1 FIJI :A-0 1 - - -- -v. - --I. T I Il 0 1 t #, 1--- 1 V 1 .It 1 Il r 11 --3068" < 1 i liti 1'. 3 / d 1-J liA U -4YNISHED-*~ ~ \1 4 0 --- CQUNTER i ...11 - 1*=21 2 34â€¢ ~ HT. .-- 1 1 1 U-t==j- 2 T - ~ -- MAID{ 7 49~ NEW % , 4 1.320,#0 R 212 i c L u ~/ / i Y \B 14160 5 LOPTION B TOILET & BATHING HOTEL JEROME FACILITY ~ STAIR #2 210 RENOVATION ELEV. LOBBY ..Â¢...U.1 *C~0= 209 READING ROOM 211 n r 1.- 1 4 L I A /lili\ /111 11 1.- .1-1-4 tabblesÂ· LEGEND 1 ~-=~~ C EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN rg) SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - PROPOSED 11. d Gilaeg NEW WALL 1 NEW DOOR X LEI 1841 6 poss P A fl- BE - --==11 L 11 1 .Ell,INDÂ·ZER -I- 4/9.PC MAD I EXEC. \ 2-â‚¬XISTING FIRE 212 â€žâ€ž--1,0- SPRINKLER RISER 7 OFFICE 40 1*43 ..i"I ...,1.. U U \ 4-4I----- ---~ f; : 213 .-,/4-1--I--- -fl-*.I- -..I - 1 F=== Â° DN\ -Ir ,-aÂ·E lf] 1.--- f- 1 - , 3 .1,1 49 C / Id , H Fill U 11 11 : \.. 11 L / - -11 HOTEL JEROME ~ STAIR #2 ELEV. LOBBY 210 RENOVAT!ON Nrnt te-Â·Moe, 209 READING ROOM ~211 ~ /-- Y n "*t:. @ /1," 1 1 1 =41 1\ A 111\ /111 11 11 ~ ~.rn- D, 11 Ui LEGEND Ir -- SrOOND LEVA ....UOIDO.1011'lla 11 \ A-1310 CEZEJ EXISTING WALL Te REMAIN rh SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - DEMO 11 \ Â£11 .... C - :3 WALL TO BE REMOVED u 1 DOOR TO BE REMOVED .Â»I=/=1.4 di %1 0- EXHIBIT'B' A. PUD Insubstantial Amendments. An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amAndment 1. A change in the use or character of the development. There is no change in the use or character of the building/development. 2. An increase by greater than three percent (3%) in the overall coverage of structures on the land. There is no change in the overall site coverage, the proposed change is internal. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development or the demand for public facilities. Trip generation and demand for public services will not be impacted by this amendment. 4. A reduction by greater than three percent (3%) of the approved open space. There is no change to the open space. 5. A reduction by greater than one percent (1%) of the off-street parking and loading space. There is no change in the parking/loading space. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. There is no change in the ROW's widths, streets or easements. 7. An increase of greater than two percent (2%) in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. There is no change in the gross leasable floor area. 8. An increase by greater than one percent (1%) in the approved residential density ofthe development. There is no change to the residential aspect ofthe PUD. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The change is consistent with the projects original approval. EXHIBIT NOTICE OF APPROVAL For an Insubstantial Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for the Hotel Jerome, to allow for a phased development plan in order to initiate the Cortina Lodge renovation, located at 220 East Main Street. Parcel ID No. 2737-07-3-20-707 APPLICANT: Jerome Ventures, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC SITE & SUBJECT OF AMENDMENT: The Cortina Lodge ("Cortina"), a Planned Unit Development, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, commonly known as 220 East Main Street. The Cortina Lodge affordable housing renovation was approved through Ordinance No. 42, Series of 2006, which also granted a renovation and expansion of the Hotel Jerome. Additional approvals related to this site specific development plan include: â€¢ The PUD agreement (G'Agreemenf') recorded in January of 2007; â€¢ Resolution No. 37, Series of 2006 - Historic Preservation Commission final development plan approval; and â€¢ Resolution No. 6, Series of 2006 - Historic Preservation Commission Minor Development approval for the Cortina Lodge. REVIEW PROCEDURE: The Community Development Department may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an insubstantial amendment to an approved PUD pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.100, Planned Unit Development (PUD). SU1MMARY: On behalf of Jerome Ventures, LLC, Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC has applied for an Insubstantial Amendment to the approved Hotel Jerome Planned Unit Development for the purpose of initiating the Cortina Lodge affordable housing renovation. The original approvals, including the Agreement (recorded in January of 2007) did not establish a phasing plan for the redevelopment. The Applicant seeks to amend the PUD, thus allowing construction on the Cortina Lodge component prior to beginning the renovation to the Hotel Jerome. The Hotel Jerome renovation and expansion is Page 1 of 5 dependent upon two items within the Agreement that must first be satisfied by the Cortina. These include: â€¢ A deed restriction and a Certificate of Occupancy for the Cortina; and e Submission of an application for Historic Landmark Designation for the Cortina Lodge STAFF EVALUATION: -- The approvals for the Hotel Jerome and Cortina were not acted upon in the timeframe that was initially envisioned. The work was never initiated and the ownership of the property was transferred. Building permit materials, including architectural drawings, were the only items completed prior to the vested rights expiring in January of 2010. The owners of the property would like to begin work on the Cortina Lodge, in accordance with those approvals granted in 2006 and 2007. This amendment would allow them to do so, while keeping the Hotel Jerome component dormant. Staff finds this approach reasonable given Applicant's commitment to satisfy those requirements found within the Agreement. A two-phased process would be created: - Phase I: Cortina Lodge Component, permitting a renovation (both interior and exterior) and reconfiguration of the Lodge. The exterior changes have been approved through Resolution No. 6, Series of 2006 by the Historic Preservation Commission. Four studio units and four dormitory units will replace the existing affordable housing configuration and the Cortina will be credited with housing 21 employees on-site. The Certificate of Occupancy and deed restriction for this phase must be finalized prior to a Certificate of Occupancy being issued for Phase II. - Phase II: Hotel Jerome Component, to be developed in accordance with those approvals and conditions found within the final development plan approval (Ord. No. 42, Series of 2006) and the 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement. Prior to receiving a building permit for this phase, the Applicant is required to submit for a Historic Landmark Designation for the Cortina Lodge. The impact fees for the Cortina Lodge and Hotel Jerome Renovation have been discussed by Staff. All zoning impact fees are assessed upon new net leasable area, or new bedrooms (not new beds). The scope of work for the Cortina includes a reconfiguration of the affordable housing. There will be a conversion of the existing two bedroom units into a dormitory category of occupancy with two beds in each bedroom. Therefore, Phase I does not include any new additional bedrooms, and no fees will be assessed for this phase. The Hotel Jerome, Phase II, will have Parks Development and TDM/Air Quality fees assessed prior to building permit issuance due to an increase in net leasable space. Page 2of 5 DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the Insubstantial PUD Amendment for the Hotel Jerome and Cortina Lodge to be consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit A) and thereby, APPROVES the amendment as specified below. The approved Insubstantial PUD Amendment for the Hotel Jerome allows for a phased development plan and the initiation of the Cortina Lodge renovation. APPROVED BY: 861* 342*,70*7 dMis Be-ndo-n Date ' Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Review Standards Exhibit B - Existing and proposed floor plans for the Cortina Lodge Page 3of5 Exhibit A Hotel Jerome/Cortina Lodge Insubstantial PUD Amendment: Sec. 26.445.100.A An insubstantial amendment to an approved development order for a final development plan may be authorized by the Community Development Director. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff finding: This PUD Amendment will not alter the use of character of the Cortina Lodge or Hotel Jerome. Adherence will be maintained to prior approvals (including those from the Historic Preservation Commission) that dictated the materials and appearance of the buildings. This plan. allows for the bifureation of the approved development for the Hotel Jerome and Cortina Lodge. Staff finds this criterion met. 1. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff finding: Not applicable. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff finding: Not applicable. 4. A reduction by greater thanthree (3) percent ofthe approved open space. Staff finding: Not applicable. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff finding: Not applicable. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Staff finding: Not applicable. Page 4of5, 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff finding: The increase of gross net leasable area in the Hotel Jerome was approved through Ordinance No. 42, Series of 2006. Staff finds this criterion met. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development Staff finding: Not applicable. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation Of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. - Staff finding: This plan is not inconsistent with the project' s original approval and does not require a variance from the projects dimensional requirements. Staff finds this criterion met. Page 5of5 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City o f Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and Telephone Number Jerome Ventures, LLC, 540 West Madison, Chicago, Illinois 60661, (970)948-0813 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property â€¢ Hotel Jerome - Subdivision: City and Townsite of Aspen, Block: 79 Lot: A and Lot: Thru I, and Lots O Thru S & E, 20 FT OF LOT N, commonly known as 330 East Main Street. â€¢ Cortina Lodge - Subdivision: City and Townsite of Aspen, Block: 73 Lot: P And: Lot: Q, commonly known as 220 East Main Street. Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Insubstantial Amendment to the approved PUD development plan (approved through Ordinance No. 42, Series of2006). Land Use Approvaks) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Administrative approval by the Community Development Director for an Insubstantial Amendment to the Hotel Jerome Planned Unit Development for the creation of phased development, thus allowing the Cortina Lodge renovation and reconfiguration to occur prior to the Hotel Jerome component. Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) July 111 2010 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) July 11% 2013 Is.e*his,p"d~- - Â£ T..1- 'Al 0, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. Out#b Chris Bendon, Community Development Director EXHIBIT ORDINANCE #25 (Series of 2010) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO APPROVING LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 220 AND 230 E. MAIN STREET, LOTS P AND Q, BLOCK 73, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-20-707 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jerome Ventures, LLC, represented by Poss Architecture and Planning, applied for landmark designation for the property located at 220 and 230 E. Main Street, Lots P and Q, Block 73, City and Townsite ofAspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.030 of the Aspen Municipal Code establishes the process for Designation and states that an application for listing on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures shall be approved if City Council, after a recommendation from HPC, determines sufficient evidence exists that the property meets the criteria; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated October 13, 2010, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards had been met, and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on October 13, 2010, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the application consistent with the review standards and recommended approval to City Council by a vote of 5 to 0; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, THAT: Section 1: Historic Designation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Aspen City Council hereby approves Historic Designation for 220 and 230 E. Main Street, Lots P and Q, Block 73, City and Townsite of Aspen. Section 2: Severabilitv If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 3: Existing Litigation This ordinance shall not have any effect on existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances amended as herein provided, and the same shall be construed and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Public Hearing A public hearing on the ordinance was held on the 10th day of January, 2011, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice ofthe same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City ofAspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City ofAspen onthe 25th day of October, 2010. 1AA 1.1,1 1 -;4 6(4/(~ 61, U -lolt , Michael C. Ireland, M*or ATTEST: Â¢m)*m, 1kc Kathryn Kocl~ity Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 10th day of January, 2011. /M 0*6 #9 - 11 --20/* Michael C. Ireland,'Mayor Arr T: Vaal. 1*Ujuu#71 Kathryn Ko~ City glerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: L-:Tal[ii'Worcester, City Attorney EXHIBIT N 1 - Certificate of Occupancy Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department This certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of the edition of section of the International Building Code. It certifies that at the date of issuance, the structure as described below was in compliance with the various resolutions and ordinances regulating building construction and use in this jurisdiction. Use Classification: MFR Building Permit: 0053.2010.ARBK Legal Description: CITY AND TOWNS[TE OF ASPEN LOTS P&Q BLOCK 73 Building Address: 220 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Owner of Building: JEROME VENTURES, LLC Owner Address: 540 W MADISON CHICAGO IL 60661 Group: Rl Type of Construction: VB Use Zone: MU LP PUD Description: INCLUDES: COMMON AREA: ONE MECHANICAL ROOM STUDIO #1: ONE BEDROOM, ONE FULL BATHROOM, ONE KITCHEN, ONE WALK IN CLOSET. STUDIO #2: ONE BEDROOM, ONE FULL BATHROOM, ONE KITCHEN, ONE WALK IN CLOSET. STUDIO #3: ONE BEDROOM, ONE FULL BATHROOM, ONE KITCHEN, ONE WALK IN CLOSET. STUDIO #4: ONE BEDROOM, ONE FULL BATHROOM, ONE KITCHEN, ONE WALK IN CLOSET. Comments & Restrictions: NFPA 13 FIRESPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED *i. 2920/t CMef Building Official ~ ~ Date Note: In all occupancies, except R, this 50â€¢icate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or~e of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this C.O. and subjedt it to revocation. iII Certificate ot Odcupancy ." Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department This certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of the edition of section of the International Building Code. It certifies that at the date of issuance, the structure as described below was in compliance with the various resolutions and ordinances regulating building construction and use in this jurisdiction. - Use Classification: MFR Building Permit: 0054.2010.ARBK Legal Description: CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN LOTS P&Q BLOCK 73 Building Address: 230 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 Owner of Building: JEROME PROPERTY, LLC Owner Address: 540 W HANSON CHICAGO IL 60661 Group: R1 Type of Construction: VB Use Zone: MU LP PUD Description: INCLUDES: COMMON AREA: ONE COMMON KITCHEN/ LAUNDRY ROOM, ONE COMMON KITCHEN, ONE STORAGE ROOM, ONE MECHANICAL ROOM, ONE FIREPL-ACE. SUITE #1: TWO BEDROOMS, ONE 34 BATHROOM, FOUR WALK IN CLOSETS. SUITE #2: TWO BEDROOMS, ONE % BATHROOM, FOUR WALK IN CLOSETS. SUITE #3: TWO BEDROOMS, ONE % BATHROOM, FOUR WALK IN CLOSETS. SUITE #4: TWO BEDROOMS, ONE 34 BATHROOM, FOUR WALK IN CLOSETS. Comments & Restrictions: NFPA 13 FIRESPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLED 114Â«Â«-UL Ofief Building Official 7' Date 54.30 247 Note: !n all cLpancies, except R, this cening,d;lust be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use *4ese described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this C.O. and subject it tolevocation. _ L. 1 1 1 lilli RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10/i011 at 01:58:05 PM, 1 OF 30, R $156.00 DF $0.00 Janice K. Vo audill, Pitkin County, Co EXHIBIT OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS THIS OCCUPANCY DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT (the"Deed Restriction") is made and entered into this Stoday of:-12.â€¢t*.0,,4 , 2014, by and between JEROME PROPERTY LLC, a Delaware limited liability cQmbany ("Owner"), and the ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY, a multi-jurisdictional housing authority established pursuant to the FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT dated December 20,2007 and recorded on January 2,2008, at Reception No. 545387 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado c'Housing Authority") WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Owner is the owner in fee simple of Lots P and Q, Block 73, City and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado on which is situated a renovated structure known as the Cortina Lodge C.Cortina Lodge"); and WHEREAS, the Cortina Lodge contains four (4) studio units and four (4) two-bedroom dormitory suites (each an "Affordable Housing Unit" and collectively, "Affordable Housing Units"), to be deed restricted as Category 1 rental units in accordance with the APCHA Guidelines and as they are amended from time to time, together with a common kitchen, dining area and laundry, as authorized and approved by Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) adopted by the Aspen City Council on December 11, 2006 and recorded on January 30,2007, at Reception No. 533926. Floor plans attached hereto as Exhibit A. Unit Nurnber Unit Tvoe Net Livable Area Unit 1 Studio 248 square feet Unit 2 Studio 257 square feet Unit 3 Studio 281 square feet Unit 4 Studio 284 square feet Unit 5 2-bdrm. dorm suite 600 square feet Unit 6 2-bdrm. dorm suite 547 square feet Unit 7 2-bdrm. dorm suite 650 square feet Unit 8 2-bdrm. dorm suite 670 square feet The foregoing variation of the Housing Authority's minimum size requirements for Category 1 Affordable Housing Units was approved by the City of Aspen in Section 10 of said Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006); and WHEREAS, in accordance with said Ordinance No. 42 (Series of 2006) and the 2007 Hotel Jerome PUD Agreement recorded January 30,2007 at Reception No. 533928 in said records, Owner desires by this instrument to deed restrict the use and occupancy of the Affordable Housing Units to persons who are employed in Pitkin County (and their families) and who meet the qualification guidelines set forth in the Aspen/Pitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines established and indexed by the Housing Authority on an annual basis (the "Guidelines"); and WHEREAS, as set forth in Paragraph 1(f ) and (g) of that certain Master Termination Agreement recorded on January 30,2007 as Reception No. 533929, attached hereto as Exhibit B, the previous Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions for the Cortina Lodge recorded December 16, 1988 in Book 581 at Page 332 as Reception No. 307031, as amended by Amendment to Cortina Declaration of Covenants, Restrictions and Conditions recorded June 12,1991 in Book 648 at Page 373 as Reception No. 333507, shall be deemed fully and forever vacated, terminated, cancelled, released, Corrina Deed Restriction Page 1 RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10 / ria 11 at 01:58:05 PM, 2 OF 30, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pi n County, CO extinguished, null, void, and of no further force or effect whatsoever upon the recording of this Deed Restriction. NOW, THEREFORE, for in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and for good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Owner covenants and agrees as follows: 1. The Affordable Housing Units shall at all times be rented in accordance with the terms of this Deed Restriction and the Guidelines as amended from time to time. 2. The use and occupancy of the A ffordable Housing Units shall henceforth be limited exclusively to rental housing for persons who are employed in Pitkin County (and their families) who meet the definition of "qualified Category I employee" as that term is defined by the Guidelines. Owner shall give first priority for occupancy for the Affordable Housiog Units to employees of the Hotel Jerome. Any Affordable Housing Unit not rented by Owner to Hotel Jerome employees may be rented to any "qualified Category 1 employee" selected by Owner. If Owner does not lease an Affordable Housing Unit to a qualified employee of its own selection, then the Housing Authority shall select the tend in accordance with the Guidelines. Employees shall be qualified by the Housing Authority as to employment, maximum income and asset limitations. 3. Written verification of employment of employee(s) proposed to reside in an Affordable Housing Unit shall be completed and filed with the Housing Authority by Owner prior to occupancy thereof, and such verification must be accepted by the Housing Authority. 4. An Affordable Housing Unit shall be rented for periods of no less than six (6) consecutive months except i f employee resigns or is terminated for cause. If employee resigns or terminated for cause Owner shall be entitled to terminate the lease on at least fourteen (14) consecutive days notice or such greater notice as may be required by Colorado law. Owner shall provide tile Housing Authority wittl an affidavit stating that the employee resigned or was terminated for cause and the date of such action. Upon vacancy of an A ffordable Housing Unit, owner is granted forty-five (45) days in which to locate a qualified employee, unless a longer period is authorized by the Housing Authority on a case-by-case basis. Approval for such additional time may be requested by Owner for repair an<For refurbishment of an Affordable Housing Unit, for renovation and/or redevelopment of the Cortina Lodge property, or for an unexpected breach of the lease agreement by the tenant, and such approval shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by the Housing Authority. If a qualified employee is not placed in an Affordable Housing Unit within the above-prescribed period, the Housing Authority may select a qualified teoant for the Affordable Housing Unit, to whom the Owner is required to lease the Unit. 5. The maximum allowed occupancy for the four (4) studio units shall be limited to two (2) persons per unit The minimum occupancy for the four (4) two-bedroom units shall be two (2) persons per bedroom. 6. The maximum rental rate for an Affordable Housing Unit shall not exceed the Category 1 rental rate as set forth in the Guidelines established by the Housing Authority as part of the Guidelines, subject to annual adjustment as permitted by the Guidelines. The maximum permitted rent for the studio units on the date of execution of this Deed Restriction is $545.00 per month, and the maximum permitted rent for the 2-bedroom dormitory suites on the date of execution of this Deed Restriction is $908.00 per month, or $222.00 per person. Rent shall be verified and approved by the Housing Authority upon submission and approval of the lease. Corrina Deed Restrfction Page 2 RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10 â€¢el.- 11 at 01:58:05 PM, 3 OF 30, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pi n County, CO 7. A written lease agreement shall be executed by Owner and the tenant for each occupancy of an Affordable Housing Unit, and shall provide for a minimum rental term of six (6) consecutive months, subject always to Owner's right to terminate the lease if the tenant defaults in the performance of the tenant's obligations thereunder and the Owner's right to terminate the lease as provided in paragraph 4 above. An executed copy of the lease shall be provided to the Housing Authority by Owner within ten (10) days of the Housing Authority's approval of the proposed tenant. 8. Owner agrees to provide the Housing Authority upon request all infonnation reasonably necessary to detennine i f there is full compliance with this Deed Restriction in a timely manner. 9. In the event the Housing Authority has reasonable cause to believe the Owner anÂ£For tenant is violating the provisions of this Deed Restriction, the Housing Authority, by its authorized representative, may inspect the Cortina Lodge or the Affordable Housing Units between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, after providing Owner with no less than 24 hours' written notice. 1 0. The Housing Authority, in the event of a violation of this Deed Restriction is discovered, shall send notice of violation to the Owner and/or tenant, as may be applicable, detailing the nature of the violation and allowing the Owner and/or tenant fifteen (15) days to cure. Said notice shall state that the Owner and/or tenant may request a quasi-judicial hearing before the Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority Board ("Housing Authority Board") pursuant to the Grievance Procedures of the Housing Authority Guidelines within fifteen (15) days to determine the merits of the allegations. If no hearing is requested and the violation is not cured within the fifteen (15) day period, the Owner and/or tenant shall be considered in violation of this Deed Restriction. Ifa hearing is held before the Housing Authority Board, the decision of the Housing Authority Board based on the record ofsuch hearing shall be final for purposes of determining i f a violation has occurred and for the purpose of judicial review. It . There is hereby reserved to the parties hereto any and all remedies provided by law for breach of this Deed Restriction or any of its terms. In the event the parties resort to litigation with respect to any or all provisions of this Deed Restriction. the prevailing party shall recover damages and costs. and shall be awarded its reasonable attorney's fees. 12. In the event an Affordable Housing Unit is leased without compliance herewith, such lease shall be wholly null and void and shall confer no interest whatsoever upon the purported tenant. Each and every lease, for all purposes, shall be deemed to include and incorporate by this reference, the covenants herein contained, even without reference therein to this Deed Restriction. 13. In the event the Owner or tenant fails to cure any breach, the Housing Authority may resort to any and all available legal actions, including, but not limited to, specific performance of this Deed Restriction or a mandatory injunction requiring compliance by Owner and/or tenant. 1 4. Whenever possible, each provision of this Deed Restriction and any other related document shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law; but if any such provision shall be invalid or prohibited under applicable law such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or prohibition without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Deed Restriction or other document. 15. This Deed Restriction is to be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. Cortina Deed Restriction Page 3 RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10 11 at 01:58:05 PM, 4 OF 30, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pi n County, CO 16. No claim of waiver, consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Deed Restriction shall be valid against any party hereto except on the basis o f a written instrument executed by the parties to this Deed Restriction. However, the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted herein shall have the unilateral right to waive such condition. 17. The parties to this Deed Restriction agree that any modifications of this Deed Restriction shall be effective only when made in writing signed by both parties and recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. 18. The terms and provisions of this Deed Restriction shall constitute covenants running with the title to the Cortina Lodge property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Colorado, and their respective successors and assigns, by any appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction, abatement, or eviction of non-qualified tenants. 19. This Deed Restriction constitutes the placement on the title to the Cortina Lodge ofa deed restriction that limits rent on the property pursuant to a voluntary agreement between Owner and APCHA in accordance with C.R.S. Â§ 38-12-301 (2)(b) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first written above. OWNER: JEROME PROPERTY LLC, a DelawqÂ»limited liability company *onaMR. Wilson, Jr., as Manager STATE OF Ihindis _ ) ) SS. COUNTY OF Coot _ ) The foregoing Deed Restriction was acknowledged before me thisk_day of-IdA\lary. 2011, by Donald R. Wilson, as Manager of Jerome Property LLC, a Delaware limited liability compahy Witness my hand and official seal. r-3==--~ My commission expires: 4/ IC~ 1 9 NIN .*AEY ~ NOTARVMUC- STATE OFIUNDIS | UJ,~~6~#AM No*J ACCEPTANCE BY HOUSING AUTHORITY The foregoing Deed Restriction and its terms are accepted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority this _ day of ,2011. ASPEN/PITKIN HOUSING AUTHORITY Tom McCabe, Executive Director (Notary on following page) Cortina Deed Restriction Page 4 Â· ~ ~~< - -â‚¬;~tit<t~Z] RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10/201 t 01:58:05 PM, 5 OF 30, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin inty, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing Acceptance was acknowledged before me this 12day of Cul#C , 201 1, by Tom McCabe as Executive Director of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Board:-' Witness my hand and official seal. 4-114- My commission expires: Mcrae Public / \ ~ CINDy-CHASTENSEN NOfARY Fl IFI; ff ' 1 L.yoTE op CÂ·el,Â· L i Â·-, ' 1 -- '-I' ...'' My CO,),m!3.12.-E.JIFE:JE,-56/ Cortina Deed Restriction Page 5 ~r.11â€ž* 9 EXHIBIT A poss ARCilIT[ CTURC + PLANNING 1 1., 2.- i==f (1 OF 2) ---r---milT,1,770 m I_._,r'11,11111,1~111, iUP 0---1 - 1 ,- +F= =- ------O 8 0 0 Â¢ -.... g-TI.* I --1 - STUDIO .4 - F - P ,Â·-1 1-* ,- k 1/1-1 -=.1 - . , 0 P. - - - UNIT. L.-1 /- F -0 - O STUD O .3 ri=r . .. EDI. *6Â·<P - tl - 00 Ln 0 2 GAS STATION -- 0 - 0,000~ i NEW UNIT SIZES AREAâ€¢ ' Ull / I L.' .L.. i ~ STUDIO 1 1 248 SF =R--1 . STUDIO #2 257 SF STUDIO #3 281 SF STUDIO #4 284 SF b -<D UNIT #5 600 SF CORTINA LODGE UNIT #6 547 SF ._ SUIT[ 05 RENOVATION Â· NET UVABLE PER APCHA. 1 - 1- E m. MA..~ inUn k urnâ€¢ *m' NOTE:INTERIOR DIMENSIONS NQI FIELD , i VERIFIED, SO AREAS MAY VARY SLIGHTLY. k i 1!11 ../ L k _ . 1. . sTUDIO,1 C 1 / 1 >-7==17 1 1 ' 011-111-1 11 2,1?11. NORY.'Cl y LWEL - ..1,41 MAINIEVEL CORTINA LODGE REFERENCE I;IAN A-120 li 7 1 ENTRY DRIVE hejaiIELE. imi#Tgrge& &l Janice K. n Count RECEPTION#: 576617, 01/10/0011 a :05 PM, 6 OF 30, .k Tel ~ EXHIBIT A poss ARCHITICTUR + PIANNING Ir., ..11Â· 1 ' I (2 OF 2) O 0} -Â»__ Â°41] 11111111 ,1 0 in o o Dj (h .LOR= 1 - 0 : h z _L __ L gj ~\=Elit 1 10 P 1 -, 9 140 k- 0*,U, I 1 Elli -EFEE /4 -7 /1-/i ~.r- ~ - k b 'lug,AW .,1.. ...m A-Â¥1Â», NEW UNIT SIZES AREAâ€¢ - --- -- -6 & 06~ 0 64 0 .. Ul UNIT #7 650 SF - - E-1 01 0 Cl 'p am UNIT #8 670 SF - 0 -__LL -7 2 - o 0 - itc,1.-1 74.GAS STATION â€¢ NET LIVABLE PER APCHA. 6 .- "' NOTE: INTERIOR DIMENSIONS NOT FIELD It . k - i VERIFIED. SO AREAS MAY VARY SLIGHTLY, i':E E5 "06 P --*--w--6 CORTINA LODGE ilisfty:. - - - - - RENOVATION Irrl n '.'./.i lic ct~ 5 - - DN GE H 1,9,a . I ..11,1) 91 - upaj -~~ =. - b 15 9 WI~ 1.1 52?.R.. REFERENCE FLAIâ€¢ 11 -1--- _ ------*--P A-130 ION#: 57 01/10/-011 at :05 PM, 7 OF 30, 1 -- 1â€¢11LD.-r. ...D.-r e e n Count =.19-4, Oil Ili~mira .. EXHIBIT Certificate of No Negative Effect THE CITY OF ASPEN X Approved E] Denied Applicant: Jerome Property, LLC, represented by Rowland + Brouqhton Architecture and Urban Design. Property: 330 E. Main Street, Lots A-1, & O-S, and the easterly 20' of Lot N, and the easterly 170' of the vacated alley, Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2737-073- 21-001 . This 27th day of January , 2012, The following alterations have been approved as represented in the application: â€¢ Mortar joints repointed as required. Submit a description of mortar composition for review and approval as part of building permit. â€¢ Metal coping applied to all rooftop parapet walls. Minimize drip edge as much as possible. â€¢ Replace deteriorated bricks as required. Rotate deteriorated bricks, salvage from other locations on the building where possible, or provide sample of any replacement brick sourced from elsewhere for review and approval. â€¢ Removal of column at parking garage door in the Annex. â€¢ Widening of the openings between the Atrium and former Century Room. fÂ» Historic Preservation Officer Expires 3 years from date of separately issued Development Order. Issuance of this certificate does not exempt the applicant from complying with all City codes, including land use and building codes. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order'Â·', is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested propelly right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304,075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26,308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to f any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Jerome Property. LLC. 540 W. Madison Street, #2500, Chicago, IL 60661, 312-542- 1000. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property 330 E. Main Street. Lots A-I. & O-S, and the easterly 20' of Lot N, and the easterlv 170' ofthe vacated alley, Block 79, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2737-073-21-001 . Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan The Community Development Department has approved exterior repair work to the masonry walls. metal coping along the parapet, removal of a column at the parking garage entry, and widening of two interior wall openings in the lobby. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) Approved per Certificate of No Negative Effect dated January 27, 2012. Effective Date of Development Order. (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) February 2.2012. Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) February 2,2015. Issued this 27th day of January, 2012 by the City of Aspen Community Development ' Director. AC 1, A An C) c / /1/1 /14/1 X Ljov vivvc Chris Bendon, Community Development Director GENERAL- NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM FINISHED DRYWALL. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR COORDINATION AND REFERENCE ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. 3 PLUMBING FIXTURES SHOWN FOR INFORMATION & LOCATION I rowland + broughton ONLY ~ architecture and urban design 4. CHANGE IN CEILING PLANES ARE SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLANS AND INTERIOR ELEVARON 234 e hopkins st 3377 blake nt, 106 DRAWINGS. ~ aspen, co 81611 denver. cO 80205 970 544.9006 v 303308.1373 v 5 ENTRY DOORS FROM CORRIDOR ARE 3'-0~ * 6'-8-, TYP. 970.644.3473 f 303.308.1375 I 6 WOOD TRANSITION STRIPS FROM CORRIDOR TO GUEST ROOMS IN ORIGINAL BUILDING ONLY, CARPET TO CARPET TRANSITION IN ANNEX. 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD. SUITE 440 LAS VEGAS. NEVADA P. 702.BBB.5000 F.702.888.5001 Â·Â· Â· Consultants SJS JS JS 408 STAIR 1 1 [*}7 ~11 ~1-01--1 =JEP 1 1 ii l ROOFBELOW . 1 1242%2113Â©12Â£1-25Â£I A 1 r Issue: /2 : â€ž1 ~ CORRIDOR , XI> ao, 1I 02.01.2012 t..-4 U i STAIR - MI> ad I INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT 1.mair-1 -6 fil, 1- r--T --- - ~Rt-[EEI Pih~ j I 1 -1 ~DaL 9 [0 ) 1 m=11* 1 tul- 91 * EL.Ev -ST-/Il 25111 ' Â·"Ih*F L.2-1 Â¤:1*1 1~ 24 LS 5 -ry~frit]/9/7 1 1 1 1 0 An LIN STOR ~370/11 -- -- ROOF ROOF ROOF 1 BELOW BELOW BELOW ===J E--1 ROOF BELOW HOTELJEROME REMODEL 330 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 KEY PLAN PROJECT NO 21132 DWG FILE. 21132_A2 40.dwg SHEET TITLE LEGEND: PROPOSED LEVEL 4 - PROPOSED OVERALL PLAN ( 1 j LEVEL 4 OVERALL PLAN SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0" = PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE <,2.407 SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0~ PLAN TRUE RECORDED PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS ne A2.40 EXHIBIT EXE denver. co 80205 k 3377/ake st, 1/6 303.308.1373v 970.544.3473f 303.308.1375f 10001 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD. SUITE 440 LAS VEGAS. NEVADA P. 702888.5000 7" " r T ' SPRINKLER 1 ' RISER STORAGE F. 702.888.5001 1 1 1 r-Gii] r--GE] ENGINEERING t 11 2345,#6 7~819 10 11 12 13 Consultan~ E i 1 11- i vi-- 1 1 P J ~ 14 15 18 17 18 19 20 21 47 PARKING 46 PMS L.1-1-1 COMPUTER ROOM PMS r-Gil 45 COMPUTER ROOM e Â· 020 - KITCHEN COMPRESSORS Issue: TO BE RELOCATED 02.01.2012 44 | '.S 0.- 7 - ~ 1-= " 1 Li' /28 40 39 38 37 , 36 ~ 36 , 34 33 32. 31 30 i 29 m . 1 1 1 1 Â§-7, 5 11/2/ 3 1 1 - 9'7 2 27 26 25 24 23 22 43 l i . 1 . '4 1% N ['CJ STAIR I 0EE -CE L 1 CEI~:4 4 STORAGE OP4/OP5 STAIR / 1 OBRCE 1 ' STORAGE ' 8 017 =611 42 41 1 299-SF .ft 023 f 1 MECHANICAL _ ~ 7FF&E STORAGE Â· MECHANICAL 11 . 1 p. 1 475-SF < BUS LINE AND PANEL r---1. 01 ABOVE .P'â€¢W#*Imb 14 Z\ " P .{LEâ‚¬.Â£1â€¢.'illlâ€¢'. f , P.3 11 LAUNDRY 6 7 1/ STOR ELECTRICAL h GE 018 DISTRIBUTION PANEL 1 Â·â€žA:,If~1.00---THFCLOCK ELECTRICAL ~ UNIFORM CE--j P -~Py ~ /STORAGE ir:/U/111 r' 1 INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT F 7====1 12104F P10 E 011 J :1 / ,1 - ~ Oill W 1 /1 . 1 U..9 1 r 11 L*&1 -E|~~R- --7 J 11--11 lap=6 LINEN 33 Â£-'748-- 11_ p~.~-1 r~ EMPLOYEE b 62Â·LOCKERS t |bi _ - kI) J /Â¥,1- -1 DINI,5OM 005 0 e e /U'.4. / TH U 11% L 1 25-SEATS Fl ['4 1/ 11--1 1 1 008 : ~0- -1 - -1- 1 / 11% 4 HR, FIRE SEPARATION - i i ' 2, 1 22 H 1/ IS , 1 ----- , F# ~â‚¬ AN HOTEL JEROME 1 19 -,%- FINANCE-STORAGE a REMODEL BENCH - 8 L- |T - - 330 E. MAIN STREET h>fi Â· '- ~ .35'*.0 ' STAIR ' .. - STAR ASPEN, CO 81611 [66iKk - Â·Â·Â·--Â·---'5~Â·y'7"'7 IT.3 ~ J14 :5 ,{ ~ P aâ€ž- . LU 1 laÂ·,1~RE IÂ®4{-COPY MAIL KEYPLAN *3 Â·- 9 1 -M :5 9 - P MECH. a=,4 u 2 P--2g ,~- 2 - ..1= 1,5 1 1 STO 4 88% Scs i N h MECH:i f --- 1 -, I- 1 OFS' Fald 1 3. I acl (2 SC) Scâ€¢ I ~I 'M 1 ~111 4 I-------- 7.> 7-----. ----9./Â£.Ke&~3 - E i ' 01 /,layÂ»//emfg PROJECT NO: FIRE SPRINKLER RISER 21132 DWG FILE: 21132_A2.00.dwg SHEET TITLE LEGEND: PROPOSED LEVEL 0 /- PROPOSED OVERALL PLAN < 1 ~ LEVEL 0 OVERALL PLAN SCALE: 1/16"= 1'-0" = PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE Mi3/ SCALE: 1/16.= 14 PLAN TRUE RECORDED PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS me A2.00 t 0 Â¥**:%4 1 Â·moxâ‚¬:<.1 Â·erÂ· :I:NN.<\NA. r-71 rowland + broughton ' architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins mt. 3377 blake st. 106 aspen,co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970./44.34731 303.308.1375 f r- EXPANSION JOINT 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD. SUITE 440 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA P. 702.888.5000 ~ DK | OK ~ DK ~ 01< ~ OK DK F. 702.888.5001 I M |L-- r H - ~1**jY fÂ¥1Â« - 01=F -VigÂ«Ar - - 1-1--2 1Â® 1 i |L ~ 14 L=- ==1.1â€¢1.--leet Â¥ ==Ir==4 6-~ Consultants U\- / 4 --- 4@44=/turit--LCIAN[-\11-192*Â©ECLIC =-4& - ti/U/= W 1 - EL LIN STOR-7- | ~17 CORRIDOR 02 /Aw l ' 0 4 -la__ un.. ~ De h L f li OD 42 Â£ - Ir-le'.a-*a . 1 =:*La- -al. r-r 1[49 1 l_X. ; 23 3 ' ~ 8 L.12-1 q U 1 ~ DQI--1--- r-- 1Â«'~RIDOR" == j =-f---3Ft--Â»~ BALI.RooN ____. ~ Issue: L/.12 ~ IL====49 CORRIDOR.~ ED INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT 02.01.2012 F/' DE -01*p ,*1-~ 1 ~ ~ Ul,LI f 9.253.5 \~ 3 JS JS JS 1 ~ - ~~~ ~~ ~1 ANSI STAIR, -/ tr' '= UIE 0 4 -- 1 1:7* 134722 JS -III. 17, 6-i #~-,1ih ~ 3' STAIR =.k:l,i.ilfÂ¢F~~ELI C i-* 3 =p-r imi j-~ Utr '1 4 I I rE' ~ 1 * HEE 7--f- - ----~-1-~tjL~~rL=LAIMP Â«444 POOL ~ GALLERY I ~ L.._ ff'.i 1 EXTERIOR KITCHEN COURTYARD F, E H --r--1 11 //0 1 -~92.Â·-r--Â·t--1 -=Â«p[-bu --AL m - -Ii .I..... WHEELER = ROOM ~407 *61 /-CE] 1 [-A fi iiinndl_JEWA,waa#wai,67- Ilimil 1 4 HR. FIRE SEPARATION ~~~STRO [*RÂ»---* @* 11 ma ~00 6 --77.--r c LAJ ElLi 2** @* â€¢IL ~%33**4 â€ži r~~1 roA SK ~ HOTEL JEROME ~ CONCIERGE REMODEL -CE] 1 ,~,5 h .F-:01.r f 11 E ~ LUGGAGE | Ut-1 - 1 1 I.â€ž16.-Il.-6.-u . i--U-i -- -r-- rl_1 330 E. MAIN STREET STAIR ADMIN. ASPEN, CO 81611 ASSISTANT = KEY PLAN ~ I l EL-] r. / Ca-- 2, i r LI 90-9]-*rit/-04 3 LjtÂ» L_ --j--f~~~~=47~6~~~:~~~Tr ~ GENERAL MANAGER'S COVERED / \ \ OFFICE ENTRY ~ \--Â·---CE PROJECT NO. 21132 OWG FILE. FRONT DESK \ FR=.W=FE 21132_A2.10.dwg 113 \---[fRJ SHEET TITLE LEGEND: PROPOSED LEVEL 1 /- PROPOSED OVERALL PLAN ( 1 j LEVEL 1 OVERALL PLAN SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" = PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE A2.10 SCALE: 1/16" =1'% PLAN TRUE RECORDED PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS NORâ„¢ N RTH A2.10 1 --- rowland + broughton architecture and urban design 234 e. hopkins st. 3377 blake st, 106 aspen, co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD. SUITE 440 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA [==-39-==f=-7-3~--~==7==J 7-~0 7377-=] r-[El P. 702.888 5000 LIN STOR F. 702.888.5001 - H E 1 I-Â«i [@] 11 - L Consultants i ~ ~17; ~ CORRIDOR LAN'.2 UBQ==AJ=u:.Agiq~*~Â®2.Di-Yjut.72~il M ANTLER BAR -fla)'"tAB=EFT1IiA LA :7-r.m f]~~ - --=c~p~ STAIR l' - , BELOW - 1*lj* UN STOR OFFICE CENTER , rl--272 0 4 ACTIVJÂ·rf rim_.1 LIN STOR Js t,n- rtÂ·'1 -441 ,(01 1 1 8 r-tyÂ» t LE-1 =2 1/ \ IssueÂ· CORRIDOR ~ DE _LEAW-- if i 2 --1--2 0 ~~ _-2 ~NE~ ~~.11 ~ ~ 02.01.2012 1 1 1 11 1 A. Ir-/-1 -r =7771 INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT pirkÂ·r /7 ~~t=19) ELEV 'llf /~-12 trw,1 El 22 2-, 1 -li JS | 11 ~~ 1 '112- 1*-6Â©r-1 O/3 72 E [m~ i ~ ~ ====~Â£~~ ~*~:~~~~12 &L.'= ANSI I 1 JS wlr- 21 7-7 1mr--ee~B-- _---L---*,-L_ LELI BALLROOM BELOW /55Â« ~ ~1Â¥NESS >1 i c. EXPANSION JOINT -~ CENTER ' || .- 9 #--11 0 rt-<2 - 4 HR FIRE SEPARATION - ROOF ROOF BE.OW ~ 5 BELOW 1 1 =-1 -1 I. -1 F 1 5 01 4 Â»F-- 1 , [*}/Â· >Imir'l- 11 UL} 21 1 El,371[.d=~ i [~~ [R] 1 E- E % 1 Ill> 4 1 CEO J [Z] 1 CORRJOOR EZIn-_ Gcc=N 1- F yÂ« , ~ 42--p:I,m J * 21 C MN C, ~ E--9 0,1 I HOTEL JEROME REMODEL E trdEL.11 ' ~ ATRIUM 1 a il.h_W [1 oio ' luh:0 E 11* 4 1 i , r: XD f r 330 E. MAIN STREET STAIR CORRIDOR STAIR 1 -f ASPEN, CO 81611 E : 1 .,4111 Ela/ KEY PLAN 08 h PK ~ PK O M 1 08 1.1 U 1 Eill 1 Ilil li Ell 1 0/0 M ---Ci 1611LE.-lip- --- 6- PROJECT NOÂ· 21132 DWG FILE. 21132_A2.20.dwg SHEET TITLE LEGEND: PROPOSED LEVEL 2 - PROPOSED OVERALL PLAN ( 1 ~ LEVEL 2 OVERALL PLAN SCALE: 1/16' = 1'-0Â· = PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE A2.20 SCALE. 1/167 =1'-Or PLAN TRUE NORTH NORTH RECORDED PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS aa A2.20 GENERAL NOTES 1. DIMENSIONS ARE TAKEN FROM FINISHED DRYÂ¢VALL. 2. DIMENSIONS ARE PROVIDED FOR COORDINATION AND REFERENCE ONLY CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS IN FIELD. 3. PLUMBING FIXTURES SHOWN FOR INFORMATION & LOCATION rowland + broughton ONLY architecture and urban design 4. CHANGE IN CEILING PLANES ARE SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES. 234 e. hopkins st. 3377 blaki st, 106 REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLANS AND INTERIOR ELEVATION aspen. co 81611 denver. co 80205 DRAWINGS 9704544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v 970.544.3473f 303.300.1375 I 5. ENTRY DOORS FROM CORRIDOR ARE 3'-0Â· x 6:8Â·. TYP. 6 WOOD TRANSITION STRIPS FROM CORRIDOR TO GUEST ROOMS IN ORIGINAL BUILDING ONLY, CARPET TO CARPET TRANSITION IN ANNEX. 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD SUITE 440 LAS VEGAS. NEVADA --Â·--L~~ l P. 702 888.5000 DK!OK ' F. 702.888.5001 DK DK OK DK 1 312 1 32 47Â£ 1= 0%2 1 1 Consultants / U - -- j d#!>*~ 1=LJOLici,f QD= 1213<~ r-m-' [*] Â® ; DO Â» -1 --4-=44?FR 1--f -- ---r- Issue: Hy 114 .1' ~L<*_ t,9 -1~-*2**1 9Â«*emqd-2=3*Eniworgl Â® I 1 JS . STAIR 1*15 aol C :-2~--M - ~~~~~ co~OR~A - ~ I CORRIDOR < c-CE] Â· .._. . <~ : 02.01.2012 *21 rl- .=~~ZZ==-=== 1 â‚¬]â€ž11 ELEV T/~ v '~ Da ; ~ 1 CORRIDOR rip p DO 1~ INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT 1....fy -.7 . . . 1 JS 7111" 1%~11 vii I = DE AllÂ® : 010 ' 1 Cika=&-* i<rlm 12 21& [*1 IMA#L Â® '7 Er,S 'rf lulf Mll r - - --- - -- 1 -- - 1 --- ' A ~ dz}.911>11 161 ANSI '=1 7 d. w[9 -Id y STAIR 1 ---..-If ~Er- lEal 1 Â¤76 M ----1 1 4- ki===!W=114 LIN STOR ~ d ' 1 IICI 1 Al ]] %'F; -I; . rm A w, .1-30 / Â· 1 1 :1 1 - 1 0 R=-71 0'2 ~ 4, : ROOF ROOF ROOF ~ BELOW i BELOW BELOW \ SOB / 1 1 * 4 \0111 1 1 L [*]aUIL n oa 3 0 *P L-â‚¬-11=/-1] ~' CA] ~ DE 1 ~4 1 1 - 7.0-1 -9215 4 - I 1~ ~~ Ir[I-7,1 CORRIDOR , 0 f 0 ---U 1 13-= Id E [*f] j [*] 8<il U --1---- 1-__1 , p ,=i < CORRIDOR -1 -- EIE=r.9-_Ld__LI~ i '~ - 1 LIN STOR / CORRIDOR / L rk -4 HOTELJEROME [*1-/ 1 Ill _01 DQ P REMODEL ATÂ·RIUM F 1,97-M' 110 11 010 61*04 M 2- 1.11 11 11 1-4 330 E. MAIN STREET STAIR CORRIDOR STAIR | BERI [El Â· E i ASPEN, CO 81611 KEY PLAN A .1 --2, Dion F 41 1 , ./213.1.*ZE= F F p* E~ pK PROJECT NO 21132 DWG FILE 21132_A2.30.dwg SHEET TrTLE LEGEND: PROPOSED LEVEL 3 - PROPOSED ~ OVERALL PLAN < 1 j LEVEL 3 OVERALL PLAN i I SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0' = PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE A2.30 SCALE: 1/16. = 1'-0~ PLAN TRUE | NORTH NORTH RECORDED PUD DEVELOPMENT PLANS aa A2.30 r-==n f_7-1 r f ~4 1 ,#- 7 /1 Â·:ft-4.-- I I jel. . r 1-/ -/-/*Â» 3 44Â¢~Â·it 4.r k - -7 <WN 2 56 ke 0 .Â« Unle 2 h CD L-1 rowland+broughton 32 architecture and urban design MEMORANDUM Project: 21132.20 Hotel Jerome Subject: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Narrative Date: 24 January 2012 To: Sunny Vann From: Sebastian Wanatowicz CC: Sunny, Please see the narrative below describing the differences between the 2007 Approved PUD and the proposed drawings. 63 3 Crl Level 0: â€¢ Parking garage in the proposed plan has a reconfigured layout to allow for more storage in the North West corner. â€¢ The security office has been moved adjacent to the service elevator. â€¢ The proposed plan does not have the sub grade addition for mechanical and storage along the west foundation wall of the original building. â€¢ The proposed plan alters the garage door configuration. There will be one large door to allow for ingress and egress at one point adjacent to the existing security office and existing man door. The existing man door will be moved to the current second garage door location - this second door is located adjacent to the sprinkler riser closet. The existing second garage door /7 will be framed in and removed. t â€¢ 9 The spa has been greatly reduced. The proposed spa has three treatment rooms. The retail space and locker rooms have been minimized. â€¢ The proposed employee locker rooms will remain relatively in the same location as they exist currently on site to reduce the alteration to the mechanical infrastructure. â€¢ The mechanical equipment along the west wall of the original building will remain to reduce the alteration to the mechanical infrastructure. The 2007 plan indicates this location for the employee locker rooms. â€¢ The mechanical and laundry area remains the same in both plans under the original building kitchen as well as the mechanical room that was added with the Annex construction. â€¢ The rest of the original building basement floor plan will be utilized for employee offices and workstations. The two plans differ in the layout and implantation of uses but the program is similar in nature. â€¢ The previous plan shows keeping the bakery. The bakery is deleted in the proposed plan. â€¢ The mechanical space below the J-Bar and the restrooms did not change in either plan. Page 1 of 3 1 ho %33-73925 1 75%452247293 ' 973~fI~~83 nci oil i on ,om o fice@rowlandbroug i on coin rowland +broughton architecture and urban design Level 1: Public Space: â€¢ The entry and atrium to remain as shown in both plans. The proposed plan shows the arched openings from the atrium into the Century room to be enlarged by two feet each toward the fireplace. â€¢ The general office manager's office behind the front desk is a different configuration than the previous plan. Both utilize the same space. â€¢ The J-Bar remains the same in both plans. door from the Elisha room through the Library pantry to access the exterior door to allow for rl~ The Library remains the same as it is currently in both plans. The proposed plan has added a -7 skis to be brought to the front of the hotel similar to the previous plan. ; .. _4 The Elisha room has changed from the previous plan in the proposed plan. Ibe.greyi.91-s ~plans show three ANSI restrooms and the proposed has two. The proposed plan uses thi Elliha room for a ski concierge area. â€¢ The existing luggage room remains the same in the proposed plan with the addition of a coat check. The previous plan has an enlarged luggage area. 63>rhe previous plan indicates the removal of two large structural brick walls to create the reconfiguration of the Wheeler room, Jacob's Corner and Century room. The previous plan completely reconfigures the public area and creates more Net Leasable area. The proposed plan keeps the current structure and works with the existing layout of the building with some modifications. o The corridor from the atrium to the gallery and ballroom in the annex has been moved to the north of the restaurant adjacent to the kitchen access. â€¢ The previous plan shows the ballroom coat closet reconfigured to allow access into the annex restrooms from the Antler bar pre-function area. The proposed plan has the coat closet remaining and the existing access to the restrooms. â€¢ Both plans keep the existing paths of emergency egress from the building. The proposed plan and the previous plan show some of the existing egress doors from the gallery becoming fixed panels to allow more seating in this area. â€¢ The proposed plan does not have any kitchen modifications. â€¢ The previous plan has two pool pavilion structures out in the courtyard that are not in the proposed plan. The previous plan had substantial exterior courtyard scope that is not in the proposed plan. This includes an addition to the East side of the kitchen structure in the courtyard facing Old Mill Street. The proposed plan does not have any additional space in this area. o The pool and spa as well as the existing decks are to remain in the proposed plan. Level 2: Public Space: â€¢ The existing Boardroom 214 remains the same in both the proposed and previous plans. The proposed plan will have some activity space for computer use and gaming. â€¢ The previous plan show the executive offices spaces reconfigured from their existing use over the kitchen. o The proposed plan introduces a fitness center in place of the offices along with Iwo ANSI compliant restrooms. There will still be some office and storage space adjacent to the egress stair 219. The proposed plan removes the existing stair that exits to the gallery below. Instead there is a one-hour rated corridor from the original building that passes the fitness center and ties into the annex egress stair 219 through the existing corridor 267 from the elevator lobby [noted as corridor 266 to the egress stair 219. o The previous plan shows an addition above the gallery space below to create a fitness center on the existing roof. This fitness center is accessed by a corridor created along Page 2 of 3 rowland+broughton architecture and urban design the West window wall of the office space and ties into the original building and the annex elevator lobby. Guestrooms: [All Levelsl â€¢ The previous plan indicates gas appliance fireplaces in each guestroom. The proposed plan does not currently have any fireplaces. The executive suite stack 136, 236 and 336 may have Â«gfireplace units. C_t .~The proposed plan shows the Superior one bedroom units 136, 236 and 336 to have a walk-in~ closet and enlarged bathroom. A wet bar and connector doors to the adjacent units to create a-L lock off suite. This also includes a revised entry vestibule with double doors to create the ability to a three room suite. ~) The ANSI rooms have been revised from the previous plan. The proposed plan will stack three ANSI rooms starting with room 123; the other rooms are 223 and 323. The other two ANSI rooms for the total of 5 are 314 and 339. Al[ ANSI rooms are in the annex in the proposed plan. Tlis-layQui_has been approved by the building department. The previous plan had ANSI rooms in the annex and original building. â€¢ The previous plan shows and enlarged room at 213 and 313 with additional square footage as an addition the structure extending toward the South. Above 313 the previous plan shows an enclosed porch on Level 4 accessed from the elevator lobby. The proposed plan does not present any addition to the annex or original buildings. Thank you, Sebastian Wanatowicz Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT U... - 1 1 = #* 1 i. EE *N . -- 1 ~ . ... . 1 /* Â¥/mmw /7 - -1 1 r -ixrl--1.4- 1 NprÂ·,Ir-~ * 1, S m : M 0. 1~-#01 . 20 Â· V i.._t .3 4 lp... 2, ; W I . .. 1 L 11.- ' t-JSM U:,.'U:Â·N 3377 blake 4 106 denver' CO 80205 ... ~ nt-31 41.j_~7 2 1 . 4 W~t[Fi Bl 970.544,3473f 303.308.1375 f LE k 27 - - *Li>FILi:fil," . - 4 970 5/9006 I 303.308.1373 v + 46 uu J v...2 ./..11Mirk lilli 11 < R rÂ· 1Â· :. 1 . 1 :.:%944*. r, â„¢ fl 1 - -; b7P91Â£ . 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD SUITE 440 5 -81 1 ~- "~ LI.0 1, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 4 2 .:1 4 vioy\' r-Â¥'tal'll,6-4 E l=J~ P. 702 888 5000 F.702.888 5001 ;9 0-4 7*.Â£'.4 1 U (Â·Â· 4 Consullar,15 l- '!,â€¢age,r ~ ~ , '.. .1, 4<:. .1 t--im IEN!.-Will 4- .ir 2 1 . E -t=-Â«3... 1 Â»- ' I & f le-*14*+PE*tr-=.'-A L.&* Alis-J/Mit~f~-Jiibu*m' &*-â€¢â€¢â€¢a~~Â· '*1 E / 1 1 1 "IM LA#(AU#lt ti*%*kE&211. 1.Flall~ 9 7. 6 ..,w,LÂ·,~ :.9 ~' Â« :M -X ' Lin.2 3: 1.- ky An-8 Issue ; :I' '. v 02.01.2012 INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT PLAN-LEVELO PLAN .LEVEL 1 PLAN - LEVÂ£L2 - in "AF.A.'*ANÂ¢~r~ --aty=---~WN,/VM-a,WING-,9,/1.-k,96-,1 T . 4 -2..1-,=10##//= . igr-mi i= 0@46, El /1. 1 '-1 1~ Ila ilez ~ 0 7 *- i"~~ $*00* = W. ..11-Â·.---I-Â·91,-ptrialrll EL.CJ W 07 M In I - im~' 1 jk gl - -=. E-Il....I- .... HOTELJEROME REMODEL ' 330 E. MAIN STREET i ASPEN, CO 81611 1 KEY PLAN PLAN - LEVEL 3 PLAN - LEVEL 4 PROJECT NOÂ· PROPOSEL FLOOR AREA SLMMARY UEGEND 21132 DWG FILE. COMMERC/AL HOTEL UNITS OTHER TOTAL COMMERCIAL 21132_AO.7.dwg LEVELO Â·991 SF OSF â€¢13,744 SF Â·14,735 SF HOTEL UNITS 1 SHEET TITLE LEVEL 1 12,847 SF 9,880 SF 11,303 SF 34,030 SF CIRCULATION/ PUBLIC SPACES FLOOR AREA - LEVEL 2 OSF 18,434 SF 8,091 SF 26,525 SF B.O.HJ HOTEL SUPPORT PROPOSED PLANS LEVEL 3 OSF 24,581 SF 5,686 SF 30,247 SF OPEN To BELOW 2011 LAND USE CODE LEVEL 4 0 SF 6,177 SF 2,019 SF 8,196 Sf ~ SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0Â· TOTAL 13,838 SF 59,072 SF 40.823 SF 113,733 SK Â· = 42% OF GROSS AREA AO.7 W -0.011--*cn~Nou- i 41 EXHIBIT - ..... -I;/..I--6JI'll//6,1 ...11.-U ~-,*1.6a .-.1/IL.61.-0 +3 4 ..:.-749 i - . . . . . . 9-1 ; ./1 ~----~ ~~ ,REmgme,IM E] 1 5 0 .4.. i|i w PVL & -- rmi . --m.2. p 970.544.9006 v 303.308.1373 v .. aspen. co 81611 denver, co 80205 970.544.3473 f 303.308.1375 f 07'v J -1 60Â¤Oklb /1, E 70;51 - ./ . . *0 --4- ili Itt- p 1/8 - . -Ill .U= 2 -6251 ... I.; firr*Â·Â·L 0 > . 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD 1,1 4--'t SUITE 440 - 1 9 4<#4*rn ir-r t.Â·t:Â·Â·~ -'# 16- LAS VEGAS. NEVADA 9 -.lptaLÂ»1 P 702.888.5000 1 6-6.-4> - e J A. A.C EllEr F 702.888,5001 9Â»4 1.17 14.0 Consultants 3,*%* 4 19231_1 IZI%Â·~iâ€¢m~ â€¢7 09* 4*Â·'0**1 0 1 ;-9 [---ri E ASÂ·* 2* tel aÂ·~114314+ I Mific ' Tr~1~MMN:F: F-i= :i - $* f Issue: v 02.01.2012 INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT PLAN - LEVEL 0 PLAN - LEVEL 1 PLAN - LEVEL2 a ,1111.4 U t+FRi~~EÂ£f .Clgizz~Zzilimillillit IdFA tihix K 101. =â„¢490 Â· -ER- 1 M _11 ---11 11 0-2 - V i-A=â‚¬ r 1. .1. HOTELJEROME REMODEL iW~ 330 E. MAIN STREET dEL-:4- 9,#Ii=, ASPEN, CO 81611 1--4 T F* KEY PLAN PLAN - LEVEL 3 PLAN - LEVEL 4 NET LEASABLE SQ. FT. LEGEND Sâ€¢CÂ·"10'hl~ 0~01'*=1 L- U-G- PROJECT NO: 21132 LEVEL 0 2,360 NET LEASABLE DWG FILE. 21132_AO.6.ch,g LEVEL 1 12,268 '11---/1-1--C-*-*~1.-I.-~1-1/NILI- SHEET TITLE LEVEL 2 0 . , NET LEASABLE - LEVEL 3 0 i PROPOSED PLANS 1.EVEL 4 0 P 2011 LAND USE CODE TOTAL 14,628 -I.*....=-./0.-I.......'.... SCALE: 1/32'=1'-0" /~m.---c~1..Il.4.-~-leâ€¢-a--1--I AO.6 j E-Â« F11-9. EXHIBIT â€¢ A-. I - 1 9 -U . - . til I. , 1 2#Ads*WA"/ rafrr- S~.....1,=, i I 1 1 0 13/8/8/ - 1.-1 architecture and urban design ...... 4 - 1 234 e. hopkins st 3377 blake st, 106 . 1 M 3 970 544.9006v 303.308.1373 v " aspen. co 81611 denver, co 50205 nat. 9.--4.4, 11 11 1 â€¢ u 970644.34731 303.308.1375 1 I .Â£1 . L Â® Â® 1 2119 ~-- -4121 1 :1 n .. L-4 "11 11==1=1121 o I F=[4fl E--3 fir ft-li 1 10801 WEST CHARLESTON BLVD SU1TE 440 &2.-IL LAS VEGAS, NEVADA . U Ul / W .. .1 P. 702.8885000 1 L 0- -5-2-iLL 1 F. 702.888.5001 Consultants 0 -BIIWIkdLE~6 -*As, ...,- 4---_P Jilld L - -- f#+râ€¢:my i :wkpre1 4r 91 14.11 *-~h 11- -7-ull It- Uli.Â· 9 .----' Â· ~' nu t V' .-- 1,Bue: JIll ...1 -~ll~_ Â¥.... ----Il-..-'. 02.01.2012 INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT PLAN -LEVEL O PLAN-LEVEL 1 PLAN - LEVEL2 ill-1--1=11 ' ' 51 -71**R-, .1-2 I LVI])v 1 .--IllA l 11 1 HOTELJEROME REMODEL REE 330 E. MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 i KEY PLAN PLAN - LEVEL 3 PLAN - LEVEL 4 PROJECT NO ...1.1.. O.0.1.0- 211 -0 - Co.1 NET LEASABLE SQ. FT. LEGEND 21132 DWG FILE: LEVELO 1,412 NET LEASABLE Â· Â· ' ) 21132-AO.6-Existing Net Leasable.dwg LEVEL 1 12,851 , ./.I--nt./. -.--r,--n' .--n ......Â» SHEET TmLE LEVEL-2 0 , - -- - -- NET LEASABLE - LEVEL 3 0 EXISTING PLANS LEVEL 4 0 2011 LAND USE CODE TOTAL 14,263 L---*......I-//~~~~n--/.IL-V/Co..*.c~*1 SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0" ,.0*.-.--*I-L---f-'-h AO.6e i THE CITY OF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: February 9,2012 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 005.2012.ASLU -Hotel Jerome Insubstantial PUD. The planner assigned to this case is Sara Adams. J Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all o f the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. ThY-ou, ~-tlÂ» ~-1\- 1 e iter Phel~, Deputy Director ~ City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes - No_PL Subdivision (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes ~ No=71 Commercial E.P.F. Il 7BA-~J 2737-07-3-24 -00, 0005 20/ 2 4% LU Elb Edit Rmd my# Fgm Repe Fe-mt Iab , ~ g# 4 K ) V 4 41~ Ql, 3 j 3,1 1 11 4 , 4 0 j i -41 : 1~,0 I 01 iheuddJ,1 -il i 3 4 a .9 38 # 10!0,28~5 k. ~85=Z ~~|Miom Attd# Rol**1 yt8Um Rd#Blg '(l~Illfiel~ ilbEWIIh IPâ€¢* 1 P,Ifit, ~adu ~Aspen Lpd Use Pemt# ~0Â®53!2ASLU -~ Add'ez 330 E MAIN ST *3lte F B ASBI 45-1 ~ 1@611 ~ LAN/komim Mder 0 - .w @-1 *$ i ~ Prot 555 08%69 Aped ~ 0 i &Krl@on APPUCAEN FORHOTEL JEROME- NSUBSTANTIAL AD AMENDIENT REGARDING 3&,1 1 HSTXNER FEATURES * & 0849il i Â¢ 3- Su~ittd Sunny Vam ad FF Da% [-1~ [*es I}212013 J imodu | i Â·*Scal Ld nane EROMEPROPiiFILC 8% lai 540 WIIANSON CHCAÂ® IL 60661 ,â‚¬4 3 MUE 312)542.1030 *855 Appkit 0 041 is@ludi OCON[8010(isagid? Â· i Lmtnane VANNiASSOCIATES Frst 68111 230 EHOPKINS AYE - 21 CO 81611 Am 17%92&6958 Cli# 26499 Address LenÂ® Lanme Frsteme Address . .-4-Â·.Ii.,Â·4. ,"Â·i,,w *4Â®.-ta.-:u,1~~w*i~.â€¢7-adu~- M-~Â·Â·- :;-1.~~~-CUA~,-Â·, ~Â·~~ -%- , 4â€¢L~W~'*Â» Â«U AspmGolEI:~vml angdas M~1011 c,EL * C ll,- AMâ‚¬k %1/16 0 - CD ile K 3/tplf 1**AU; .Ine' 1 *Iogic...11 *'Ino