Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.hpc.021-2012 RECEPTION#: 592514, 09/2512012 at 10:07:25 AM, 1 of 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), RELOCATION, DEMOLITION AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1006 E. COOPER AVENUE, LOT L AND THE WEST 10' OF LOT M, BLOCK 34, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION #21, SERIES OF 2012 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-32-004 WHEREAS, the applicant, BMD Aspen LLC, represented by 1 Friday Design Collaborative, requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Relocation, Demolition and Variance approval for the property located at 1006 E. Cooper Avenue, Lot L and the West 10' of Lot M, Block 34, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, in order to approve Relocation, according to Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property, it must be determined that: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and 1006 E. Cooper Avenue HPC Resolution #21, Series of 2012 Page 1 of 3 Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security; and WHEREAS, in order to approve Demolition, according to Section 26.415.080.A.4, Demolition of Designated Historic Properties, it must be determined that: a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance, and Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located and b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated September 12, 2012, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended restudy of some aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 12, 2012, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the 1006 E. Cooper Avenue HPC Resolution #21, Series of 2012 Page 2 of 3 proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of 4 to 3. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Relocation, Demolition and Variance approval for the property located at 1006 E. Cooper Avenue with the following conditions: 1. The proposed one story connector piece between the historic house and addition is to be increased in length in the north/south direction so that it is 10' long. The addition is to slide 2' closer to the alley. 2. A 7' reduction in the rear yard setback requirement is approved. 3. Provide further information about the design and history of the chimney on the west side of the Victorian, for review at Final. 4. At building permit, provide a $30,000 letter of credit or cashier's check to insure the safe relocation of the Victorian building, as well as a plan for protection of the building from a housemover or structural engineer. 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of September 12, 2012, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of September, 2012. Ann Mullins, Chair Approv as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: athy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 1006 E. Cooper Avenue HPC Resolution#21, Series of 2012 Page 3 of 3