The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.400 Dean St.A16-92.. :40 6 +Dect\A, 44 Al O.. 1 '~~0~~ ~RITZ-CARLTON HOTEL INSUB AMEND. : 1 A16-92 J ' la 9 /Â»U foilk lilliA 4p A . CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 3/02/92 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: - - - A16-92 STAFF MEMBER: DM PROJECT NAME: Ritz-Carlton Hotel Insubstantial Amendments Project Address: Durant Street Legal Address: Aspen Mountain Subdivision, Lot 1 APPLICANT: Savannah Limited Partnership Applicant Address: 600 East Cooper Avenue, Aspen, 925-4272 REPRESENTATIVE: Joe Wells Representative Address/Phone: 130 Midland Park Place, #F2 Aspen, CO 81611 925-8080 PAID: (YES) NO AMOUNT: $345.00 NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED 3/3 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO Planning Director Approval: Paid: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: Date: REFERRALS: City Attorney Mtn Bell School District City Engineer Parks Dept. Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Holy Cross State HwyDept(GW) Aspen Water Fire Marshall State HwyDept(GJ) City Electric Building Inspector Envir.Hlth. Roaring Fork Other Aspen Con.S.D. Energy Center DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: Joseph Wells Joseph Wells, ARP Land Planning and Design June 26, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Planning Director, City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Diane: Thank you for your letter of June 15, 1992 forwarding your comments on the Insubstantial Amendments for the Ritz-Carlton (the Fifth Amended Plat). In reviewing your comments, we have concluded that the City is prepared to sign and record the Fifth Amended Plat drawings (including a new Certification Sheet, Architectural Cover Sheet, Sheets Al through A18, Sheets Ll through L4 and Sheet 6) as submitted, with the following exceptions: 1. The elimination of the on-street parking resulting from the redesign of the curbline on the west side of Mill Street. 2. Changes to the tabulation of the amount of parking required to be provided on Lot 5. (Any changes to the parking to the Dean Street parking on Lot 5 will be handled on the Plat Amendments for the Ice Rink.) 3. Conversion of 22 lodge units in the Blue Spruce Building to 6 residential units, as well as revisions to the off-street parking required resulting from this proposed conversion. 4. Revisions to employee generation calculations. 5. Revision of the Dean Street entry to serve the second level of the Blue Spruce Building. In addition, you have requested a revised drawing which more clearly reflects the changes involved in the new Dean Street entry to the Sports Activity Center on the lower level of the Blue Spruce Building. I have requested that Heery Architects and Design Workshop revise the Fifth Amended Plat drawings to reflect only those approved changes to Lot 1. The Blue Spruce lodge units will remain on the drawings and we will request 130 Midland Park Place, Number Fl Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 Ms. Diane Moore June 17, 1992 Page Two approval of the conversion of these lodge units to residential units through a full PUD Amendment application to be filed shortly. I have received a new sheet A3A from Heery which illustrates in more detail the plan revisions to the Blue Spruce Building resulting from the new Dean Street entry to the Sports Activity Area. I would suggest that we not record this additional drawing (since it would be one more drawing that would have to be amended if there is a change in the interior layout, for instance). I would prefer to use it as an informational drawing and modify sheet A3 as necessary to agree with your sign-off. The other remaining issue which we need to resolve now, rather than through the PUD Amendment application, is that of the curbline locations on the west side of Mill Street and the east side of Monarch Street. These curbs are scheduled to be poured in the next two weeks so that site work can continue on schedule. Therefore, a decision on a final location cannot be postponed until the full PUD Amendment process is completed. The site plan for the Aspen Mountain PUD/Subdivision (Sheet L-3) which was approved by the City and reflected on the recorded drawings provides for two travel lanes and 200 feet (10 spaces) of parallel parking on the west side of Mill Street. No on-street parking is shown on the east side of Mill Street. On the east side of Monarch, 50 feet (2 spaces) of parallel parking is shown above the island and 200 feet (10 spaces) is shown below the island. Because the City did not take into account the approved plan for the Aspen Mountain PUD when the streetscape improvements on Mill Street were implemented to the south of our site, there is now inadequate width between the east curbline on Mill Street to permit us to build the street through the PUD as shown on our approved plan. In addition, the recently installed gas meter encroaches on the Monarch Street sidewalk as approved. As we have discussed, the City Engineer's office has requested that we eliminate the on-street parking on both Mill and Monarch; the Fire Marshal has also requested that the Monarch Street parking be eliminated so that unobstructed access to the building for fire equipment can be maintained. Your response has been that the elimination of on-street parking should be reviewed through the full PUD Amendment. We would like to propose a compromise which will allow us to proceed with installation of the curbs and then discuss the parking issue later as you are suggesting. We have determined that under our revised plan for "Phase I" as proposed, there is adequate space to maintain two travel lanes on Mill Street as well as a row of parallel parking spaces on the east side of Mill Street. This can be accomp- lished without modifying the interim sidewalk and off-street parking Ms. Diane Moore June 17, 1992 Page Three. area between Mill Street and the Grand Aspen. There is room for at least 11 parallel parking spaces on the east side of Mill. We are requesting that you approve as part of the Insubstantial Amendments the temporary relocation of the 10 spaces on the west side of Mill Street to the east side, so that the travel lanes on Mill Street can be modified as required to match the curblines uphill of the project. We also request that you approve the temporary relocation of one space on the east side of Monarch Street to the east side of Mill Street, to accommodate a shifting of the Monarch Street sidewalk around the gas meter. These changes are reflected on sheets 1 and 2 of the Curb and Gutter Design drawings which I am including. (Note that these drawings provide for 3 spaces above the island and 8 spaces below the island on Monarch Street.) If you can agree with this solution, we can then discuss the desirability of eliminating the on-street parking as requested by the City Engineering Department under the full PUD Amendment application. Please let me know if you have additional questions about my letter. I would like to finalize all of the drawings to reflect these changes so that we can submit two sets of mylars for recording as soon as possible. ~ Sincerely, / U / Joseph Wells, AICP V. Tw / su CC: Ferd Belz Perry Harvey Paul Donahue Alan Gray A. J. Zabbia June 15, 1992 Mr. Joe Wells 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Insubstantial Amendments for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Dear Joe: In your letter of June 9, 1992, you requested that I provide you with a written response confirming those items that I am prepared to sign off on relating to the Insubstantial Amendment request. 1. It is appropriate to address the elimination of the eleven (11) lodge units through the insubstantial plat amendment process. 2. The revised parking plan (elimination of on-street parking) proposed for Mill Street should be addressed through the PUD amendment process identified in Section 24-7-907 of the Municipal Code. 3. The revised parking tabulations reflect the elimination of one (1) parking space in the porte cochere area on the south side of Dean Street. the city code requires a thirty (30) foot setback from the street corner (for unobstructed spaces). It is appropriate to address the elimination of this space through the insubstantial plat amendment process. The revised parking tabulations also reflect a reduction in three (3) subgrade parking spaces within the parking garage and the elimination of the three spaces can be addressed through the insubstantial plat amendment process. I would ask that you revise Table 2, Revised Parking Requirement, and only include the parking figures for Lot 1 as the insubstantial amendments will only address Lot 1. 4. Regarding the replacement of the twenty-two (22) lodge units in the Blue Spruce building with a maximum of six (6) residential units (with 18 bedrooms) , Section B of the PUD Agreement states that no residential units are permitted in Hotel Phase I. The proposed replacement in the Blue Spruce building shall be addressed through the PUD amendment process identified in Section 24-7-907 of the Municipal Code. It should be noted that the off-street parking required for the proposed residential units must comply with the current parking requirements of the Lodge zone district. 5. The applicant has proposed to establish a Sports Activity for guests of the hotel in the entry level space of the Blue Spruce Building. This use will replace two of the four spaces approved for retail shops with an equipment storage and rental area, reception desk and lounge. One of the two remaining retail spaces will open directly onto the Activity Center reception area. The uses are consistent with the uses identified in the PUD Agreement and this revision can be addressed through the insubstantial plat amendment process. I would like to bring to your attention that paragraph H(17) of the PUD Agreement states that the four accessory retail uses may not be combined to create larger retail spaces. The intent of this paragraph is to insure that a large, independent retail shop is not established outside of the commercial core. If the equipment storage and rental area is converted back to retail space in the future, the applicant cannot combine the retail space into a large, independent retail shop. 6. As we have discussed previously, the applicant has agreed not to readdress the employee housing requirement relating to the elimination of the hotel rooms. This will be addressed at the time the Ritz institutes the employee audit for the hotel, which is required one year from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the hotel. 7. In your letter to me dated May 28, 1992, you have outlined a minor change to the Dean Street entry to the lower level of the Blue Spruce Building. The location of the entry into the Blue Spruce building has been shifted to align with the entrance into the hotel and this could be considered as part of the insubstantial amendments. I will need a revised sheet (A-3) to correctly reflect the changes along with the revised south elevation (sheet A-18). The proposed exterior stair from Dean Street up to the second level of the Blue Spruce building shall be addressed during the PUD Amendment process outlined in Section 24-7-907 of the Municipal Code. 8. Table 1 reflects the proposed revisions to the recorded plat drawings and the proposed revisions can be addressed through the insubstantial plan amendment process. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Dialle Moore, City Planning Director CC: Perry Harvey Bill Drueding Jed Caswall Stephen Kanipe 3 . Joseph Wells JUN 1 0 42 Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design June 9, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Planning Director, City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Diane: The architects for the Ritz-Carlton have expressed increasing concern to me that the Building Department is still working with an old set of construction documents prepared by an architectural firm which is no longer in existence. As I understand it, it is the Building Department's position that they must continue to use the drawings prepared by Clark, Tribble, Harris and Li until the Insubstantial Amendments are recorded, because the updated documents filed under the name of Heery Architects is not consistent with the recorded drawings. The architects are anxious to correct this situation as soon as possible for legal reasons. It would therefore by very helpful to us to get a written response from your office confirming those items from our February Insubstantial Amendment Request which you are prepared to sign off on, as well as any that we still have a disagreement about. As I have mentioned to you, it was originally our intention to remove any elements about which there is a disagreement and incorporate them in the full PUD Amendment for the conversion of the Blue Spruce lodge rooms. In light, however, of the fact that the schedule agreed to with the City requires that construction proceed as quickly as possible, we are concerned that we do not have adequate time to deal with a lot of unresolved issues in the PUD Amendment. We would therefore like to see if we can come up with solutions to any items with which staff is not yet comfortable, so that construction can continue. It might be helpful to have a site visit to look at some of these proposed changes in the field. Before the drawings can be recorded, it will be necessary to incorporate any further changes on the drawings and then produce the mylars, so it is going to take some time to get these in hand. 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 Please let me know when we can expect a written response. We appreciate your continued assistance in trying to bring this project to a successful conclusion. sific@rely, < Joseph Wells, AICP CC: Paul Donahue Ferd Belz Perry Harvey Bob Hughes Brian Venable Joseph Violi JW/su . Joseph Wells Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design June 4, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Director, Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Ritz-Carlton Food & Beverage Space Dear Diane: I met with Bill Dreuding of the Zoning Department yesterday to go over his square footage calculations of food and beverage space in the Ritz-Carlton hotel. He has calculated the net square footage of the dining areas as 4,860 sq.ft., which is 360 sq.ft. in excess of that allowed in Section H, paragraph 18 of the PUD Agreement. In addition, because Bill's calculations indicate that the total dining, kitchen and lounge net square footage is 13,696 sq. ft. (well in excess of the net total of 11,317 sq.ft. that we submitted in the Insubstantial Amendment request), he has concluded that we have underestimated the current employee generation of the project in the application. Bill also had a question about the employee lounge on one of the lower levels as well as the area shown as the "Club Lounge" on the Fourth Level of the Main Building. The employee lounge will not generate additional employees, in our opinion. The Club Lounge is not a full-time food and beverage facility, although drinks and light iare will be available from time to time for the convenience of the guests on this level of the hotel. It will usually function as a sitting room or library for these guests. This facility has been shown on the drawings for many years and I think it has been generally understood that any employee generation associated with this space has been taken into account in the factors agreed upon for the hotel as a whole. Bill's take-offs of the food and beverage space resulted in the following net square footage breakdown: Dining: 4,860 Kitchens: 5,044 Lounge: 3,792 Total: 13,696 sq. ft. 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 Ms. Diane Moore June 4, 1992 Page Two Because I had previously been relying on the architect's square footage figures, I decided I should do my own take-off of the food and beverage square footage within the hotel based on my understanding of what had been agreed upon in the past should be included. I have delineated these areas on the attached drawing; you may want to review the original with me, since it won't copy well. The architect's totals as submitted with the Insubstantial Amendments are somewhat higher than mine; these are noted in parentheses beneath my subtotals. You will note that the major discrepancy between our numbers and Bill's is in the kitchen square footage. This is because there is a large amount of separate storage rooms and service corridors which are excluded from our numbers. These areas have not historically been included in the gross square footage count, since they are not work stations, or areas where employees will be performing the bulk of the work to be performed in the kitchen areas. The reduction in gross square footage of 20% which is provided for in the Agreement was intended to provide for the inefficiencies within the work spaces themselves, such as the circulation corridors from one work area within the kitchen to another. These areas logically must be kept open and staff previously agreed with us that there needed to be a method for taking these areas out of the calculations of employee generation. Gross Sq.Ft. Net Sq.Ft. (As Submitted) 1. Dining a. Cafe 2,578 b. Private Dining 340 c. Grille Dining 1,579 Subtotal: 4,497 3,598 (3,713) 2. Kitchen a. Main Kitchen 3,398 b. Service 290 c. Apres-Ski Prep Kitchen 471 Subtotal: 4,159 3,327 (4,441) 3. Lounge a. Apres-Ski Lounge 2,241 b. Grille Bar 1,098 c. Lounge in Lobby 725 Subtotal: 4,064 3,251 (3,163) Total Food & Beverage Sq. Ft. 12,720 10,176 (11,317) Ms. Diane Moore June 4, 1992 Page Three Without getting into a lengthy discussion about the somewhat "unscientific" manner used during the long history of this project to revise the employee generation factors, we nonetheless knew that the language being used in the Agreement for "Gross" and "Net" might lead to differing opinions about the correct interpretation at some point. This is one of the reasons that the idea of using the audit to establish the actual number of employees on a year-round basis once the facility has been in operation was suggested. I don't believe that spending a great deal of time debating what spaces should or should not be counted in the totals is a very productive use of anyone's time, particularly given the uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the employee generation factors to be applied to the total. We are requesting that you accept the figures for food and beverage space as submitted in our Insubstantial Amendment Request of February 25, 1992. Please call me if you would like to discuss this further. Sincerely, 3+1>Â«1-- 6 Joseph Wells, AICP JW/su CC: Ferd Belz Perry Harvey Paul Donahue Brian Venable Joseph Violi Bob Hughes Joseph Wells MAY 29 992 Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design May 28, 1992 Ms Diane Moore Director, Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Change to Ritz-Carlton Aspen Insubstantial Amendments (Fifth Amended Plat) Dear Diane: The architects for the Ritz-Carlton, Aspen have forwarded prints to me which reflect some minor changes to the Dean Street entry to the lower level of the Blue Spruce Building. I am forwarding photocopies of these changes. A new stair has been added to create a more gracious entry into the Sports Activity Area for guests picking up and dropping off their skis and boots. If you do not object, we would like to add these changes to the Insubstantial Amendments currently under review by staff (the Fifth Amended Plat). When we bring in the full amendment for the proposed conversion of lodge rooms in the Blue Spruce Building to residential units, we will also be adding a new exterior stair from Dean Street up to the second level of the building. Since this change is appropriate only if the conversion is approved, we have decided that it would be best to include it in the full amendment review. Let me know if you have any questions about the stair revision. Are you making any progress on the review of the other changes in the Insubstantial Amendments? I would like to resolve any outstanding issues on those as soon as possible so that we can get those recorded. Thanks for your assistance. Sincerely, Joseph Wells, AICP CC: Perry Harvey Joseph Violi Brian Venable 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 Joseph Wells MAR I 7 I992 Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design March 17, 1992 Ms. Dianne Moore Planning Director, City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Dianne: As you requested by phone, I have looked into the square footage of the health club in the Ritz-Carlton, Aspen as it has evolved since the project was first proposed in 1983. We discussed that as a result of the elimination of some substandard rooms in the south wing of the hotel, and the addition of that square footage to the health club, the facility now includes 5,063 sq.ft. Under the original GMP request filed in 1983, health club square footage was listed as 4,500 sq.ft. This was increased to 5,300 sq.ft in the GMP amendments filed in 1985. Under the amendments filed after that date, the health club facility was reduced in size as a result of overall reductions in the size of the hotel. In 1987, the health club square footage was reduced to 3,600 sq.ft. and in 1988, the square footage was reduced further, to 2,100 sq.ft. I don't recall any specific discussions directed at the size of the health club facility during past reviews of the project. It has always been an area below natural grade tucked away at the end of a corridor of rooms and I just don't think the size was ever an issue in the past. I mentioned to Perry Harvey your concern regarding the use of the health club and Perry confirmed that it is still the applicant's intention to use the health club as an accessory use for guests of the hotel. Ijetfitp know if you have additional concerns. 44Â» f Jdseph Wells, AICP U CC: Perry Harvey JW / su 130 Midland Park Place, Number Fl Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 t Joseph Wells Joseph Wells, Al(:P Land Planning and Design October 6, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Planning Director, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Insubstantial Amendments for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel ( Sixth Amended Plat ) Dear Diane: In support of our application dated October 1 for approval of the Sixth Amended Plat for the Ritz-Carlton, Aspen under the Insubstantial Amendments procedure, I am forwarding the current seating layouts for the Cafe, Private Dining Room and the Grille (Fine Dining). These layouts show a total of 194 seats. As you know, a specific limitation of 204 dining seats and 4500 sq. ft. of net dining area (exclusive of lounge areas and seasonal outdoor dining areas) was incorporated in Section H(18) of the First Amended and Restated PUD/Subdivision Agreement (the "Agreement") which governs the project. Savanah, of course, wishes to reserve its rights under the Agreement to provide in the future up to 204 dining seats in the hotel's dining areas. Now that the interior designer has prepared layouts of the three dining areas at a much larger scale (1/4"=1'0"), I have been able to do a much more accurate takeoff of the dining square footage to confirm compliance with the limitation of 4,500 sq ft of net dining area. With the addition of the Grille/Bar space to Grille Dining, the net dining square footage is now 4,178 sq ft, well within the limitation established in the Agreement: Gross Sq.Ft. Net Sq.Ft. Dining Areas a. Cafe 2,630 2,104 b. Private Dining 354 283 c. Grille Dining 2,239 1,791 Subtotal: 5,223 4,178 130 Midland Park Place, Number 142 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 - #-#*-*-$.*-*-&/*$-*.-Y v _=. 1,..... . -,I .......' j...4.j._~,â„¢~..â„¢~~â€ž.,.~I--*.I=Il:='=.Ili=;0'-MI' al'.4/4~~â€¢.~'ii.}25' 1'1PP'* . / 4 1% ../.- : 1 % , Â·pl, - ~ * --L:.i,. 4-' "" -~~-~- ~~~~-~~~~-~- ' '< -. fi ~.,2,~ i - Â· 2 Â·â€¢Â·Â·Â·'.h':ir'8Â·'>lfZ'-F3%~79Â·~,.. â€¢ 1, 'Â·,â€¢ '-â€¢*â€ž'Â·~ 4~1554'.04.,rNÂ¥ 'PlÂ¢9. - 1 . .. . I. '' 04 1 TH' 1,9 U '4 1 . I. b , 1.. . ' 1 > . 1.0 1 ./Â·râ€¢ , ~ - RETAIL RETAIL 7 0 11 2 .9 e .f. 1- r - r.. ' / '. t'' 11_J < A 1Vvi "11>. e., - '. ,~94Â·*;,A,43;Â·~~~:~~ 414'*-7 - .- 1 , . 141 -r"$ <v ENTRY 4 - 6 4-3 ~. I , 4%, 171 1 # 2. -14,-le//te - E .1 .71 lit k\L .:29 ': /3/f ' ./ , *Z-Â·j, Ed /F :4*Â·.c. . .r-Â· -_2*=a T|Ble-| /6 9 .... 4 - * ' -'$ 3 A. -L' ~Kto., Â·444Â· 1 .Â·Al : 7. . ...14'r -I . (*14,b ,/218/4//1 "friAH,/6Ld/2(44:, t?%44 w:,1,0.j.Â£3~44 14?3733:iv w 1 9 W 'm~-,6 .. - .2 \011'r 111,\ 21 1 f --1 --7 , ,~<+1* tÂ·' I .â€¢ i .'i #,"e ~4 1 4 . .1 , , i .; 1. 3 ' b .4%'.g ., , .. .31 Tr'.-- A.1;;P'it,i:ifI~,ff/~)2 1 1 4 1 2111 '1(1'' 3 + i 14'... C .1 11 1 'dil. 14 Ut-1,1 , 1 2 b h=xmt.2 r-1 0 L.W RENTAL/ACTIVITIES ~7 , AREA ' '.. 9 - *'- ,|h r SL - >: ' ~ i i ~t . 136 ., 4,5#.., , ' 1....1 .1 1.-1 hi,J 'A Iri-r- SKI STORAGE -9 -/4 Al' r b " 6. 0 , Â·d O.N PELÂ£/ i .,e_limmup tri ~7. /1 * 1 - , .9..11.!fli..:11..,1.... f 412/ DAL i. ij Â·retâ€ž - .. u- U- th-224.2962:'i,Â·-,~ .Ma#.444,5?U,:Â·1*4:,34'1Â£ 4271 rn / -Ue .1 - - - 1 â€¢ --,5.:7 f;-145"-'3'Â·90$'*f NO. 13 1 . Â· e ' Â¥,1.. 4. b ...i:,420*,%,rt~,4,46,#M#';* Â·Â·! . ~f-64*%1LC,%91~)'*,2, ~;~- -.- 1, TMEN'f.T..'.-â‚¬*-i?- ... 1,#dic'm /00'lle. . -- 1. -1,/ M. L :LÂ«Â·1 .-~1 -tr 1. t;:, t . ' . / 6;5*&*'Ca. 6%-Â·-1'9 1 1, 5 y.: 4-'6Â»'a-; 1,~Â·~ SHEET ' TITLEf:41Â·140*:~< e - -e 2 Pt 9 r 4 ' ENTRY LEVEL PLAN , , 6 ''Ii''I, , SCALE ' . . ..f. f r' ' ' 0 10 20 SHEET NUMBER : 5 2 ' El N 2 4 1.*44â‚¬21 c#*v,r: 4~,1 *rk 4: 1,Â£1' P,mv ,â€¢, , P :.' :. '(4Â· / - *77 4,*4 43' ~ '4 1 < 2- I. â€¢9 t. . .14 . .7. I 1 V. 1 .1 ' 7~ .1 i.... L'.Â·t-- f#:4:.., .....1.3 Â· ..2 - 1 Â· 11 6 I. .11 1 44~~Â· ..... Â·Â· /Â· : 297<51"5&-Â·ti4*+1Â· L - ' .1 7 14:,4 Â·'9 ,33:2..4Â· A 44 1.22- - 1-ell. 1.74 9, f:.-3 ... 6 71 1.1 -1, gli- , otri Â«~24 =f ., O.= Â«2%Â»- =/roÂ» 1 \ 0 . N 4'4-- I /Fits=th= \ ==8â‚¬55~ =Mer MA# -R#-7 -1 11.1 11 1 1 . 1.11#1111.1 - 1 ls- -B 4 6 1 1--J ' 1---- ---2 -fiT -71\13 -7 37 1- -191 1 1 1 11- c n i fl 1 LINE OF L-d 6 - 1 O-NAIURAL ' GRADE v U / / Ctopt.... C.*Ll, >-14- _r--- \ - Ul -1 1, 0 -1- 1 \ 1/1.*17.3$.Ir:"Wil:Aum LL --ih-1-- 1- -11 1 I i -,4 7,4'1&~ /1180kin111 =ll~Jj , 1.1'' f-I 1. 0 -1 ~ LLINE OF ~~1~ 4 <~ -rJ FINISI lED 2 2. & 405?."....*a 1 1 I--1 - 1/7/9 1 ~ ''W '9 Â· . 'ligi 0 r-â€¢ GRADE r. SHEET TITLE .>Â·r / I :06/7 - --21 0,Â·0 D w Alouu s - #Â£~15- -OI.:Ek. BLUE SPRUCE BLDG. a DEAN AND MILL.'ST. ELEVATIONS 41 Â· .- 14 SCALE . ... , ... ..A 0 5 101 fâ‚¬' 2~ 1., .21 C -) DEAN STREET ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION SHEET NUMBER .. 4(9 I cli t' ; :â€¢ 1 1 2.0Â£*C r.4*. ..=2=L i ~ 40,4 1 . ./. '.Ily... . .4 . 1 ./.A 'A .t , I Joseph Wells 24FN# .A Â· /7 Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design May 28, 1992 Ms Diane Moore Director, Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Change to Ritz-Carlton Aspen Insubstantial Amendments (Fifth Amended Plat) Dear Diane: The architects for the Ritz-Carlton, Aspen have forwarded prints to me which reflect some minor changes to the Dean Street entry to the lower level of the Blue Spruce Building. I am forwarding photocopies of these changes. A new stair has been added to create a more gracious entry into the Sports Activity Area for guests picking up and dropping off their skis and boots. If you do not object, we would like to add these changes to the Insubstantial Amendments currently under review by staff (the Fifth Amended Plat). When we bring in the full amendment for the proposed conversion of lodge rooms in the Blue Spruce Building to residential units, we will also be adding a new exterior stair from Dean Street up to the second level of the building. Since this change is appropriate only if the conversion is approved, we have decided that it would be best to include it in the full amendment review. Let me know if you have any questions about the stair revision. Are you making any progress on the review of the other changes in the Insubstantial Amendments? I would like to resolve any outstanding issues on those as soon as possible so that we can get those recorded. Thanks for your assistance. 1 Sinceyly, &5 Nof Â¢42-di 0.1/ 441 L ---i--/,*.) y ./'.,- r.7. 26) 4,65/4 1-v u /Joseph Wells, AICP Adj/Â·Acj LJ,~00-) 0-â‚¬( 8 CC: Perry Harvey --110,~~ 4 02Â¥\ 51 - Joseph Violi Brian Venable 0 2-_ c,0 Nu + Lit 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 8 i Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Bodiliccul~4 , Facsililile (303) 925-8275 Joseph Wells MAR- 21992 816 - Joseph Wells, AICP Land Planning and Design February 25, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Planning Director, Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Insubstantial Amendments for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel Dear Diane: As we have previously discussed with staff, some recent changes have been made in the Ritz-Carlton project subsequent to the recording of the last Plat amendments which necessitate a request for Insubstantial Amendments under the provisions of Sec.7-907(A) and Sec. 7-1006(A) of the Code adopted on May 25, 1988 or Sec 24-8.26(a) of the code in effect prior to May 25, 1988. As you know, the Applicant has taken the position that the First Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement, Aspen Mountain Subdivision (The "Agreement") calls for the processing of any subsequent amendment to the PUD under the provisions of the Code in effect prior to May 25, 1988. This is not an issue which affects the processing of these Insubstantial Amendments, however, because there are no significant inconsistencies between the language of the old code and new code. To facilitate your review, but without prejudice to our position in the matter that the code in effect prior to May 25,1988 is the appropriate code to be used in the review of amendments to the PUD, we have therefore addressed the review standards of the new code. Other than a number of minor changes which are documented on Table 1, attached, the changes center on three issues: 1. Because of an error in topographic information, some of the lodge rooms in the South Wing along Mill Street would have been subgrade. The Ritz-Carlton management requested that these substandard rooms be eliminated; a decision has been made to add this space to the health club facility. 130 Midland Park Place, Number F2 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Telephone (303) 925-8080 Facsimile (303) 925-8275 Ms. Diane Moore Page Two February 25, 1992 2. We have also revised the Mill Street curb design between Lots 1 and 5 to respond to the street realignment uphill as implemented by the City when the improvement district work was undertaken. In order to accomplish this, on-street parking has been eliminated. These changes are illustrated on Sheets Ll through L4. 3. The Applicant is proposing to establish a Sports Activity Center for guests of the hotel in the entry level space of the Blue Spruce Building. This use will, in the near term at least, replace two of the four spaces approved for retail shops with an equipment storage and rental area, reception desk and lounge. One of the two remaining retail spaces will open directly onto the Activity Center reception area as illustrated on Sheet A3. Under paragraph H(17) of the Agreement, the four accessory retail spaces on the entry level of the Blue Spruce Building may not be combined to create larger retail spaces. This was done to avoid the establishment of a large independent retail shop outside of the commercial core; a guest amenity such as that proposed here was not accommodated under this language. If the entry level space is converted back to retail spaces in the future as provided for in theAgreement, the Applicant's previous commitment to not combine the retail spaces will remain in effect. We have also discussed with you the replacement of the 22 lodge units in the Blue Spruce with a maximum of six residential units containing a maximum of 18 bedrooms; these residential units would be deducted from our reconstruction credits. We are aware of your interpretation that because Section B of the Agreement states that no residential units are anticipated in Hotel Phase I, that this change should not be included in this request for Insubstantial Amendments. Therefore, we will be filing an additional application at a later date addressing the proposed replacement of the Blue Spruce lodge units. The proposed modifications are illustrated on the attached Plat submittal drawings. A new Certification Sheet is provided as well as a new Cover Sheet and drawings numbered Al through A18, Ll through L4 and Sheet 6. These changes are eligible for your approval as insubstantial amendments; they do not fall within any of the criteria which may not be considered as insubstantial amendments, as follows: la. The changes do not constitute a change in the use or character of the development. lb. The changes do not result in an increase by greater than three (3%) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. (There is no increase in coverage.) Ms. Diane Moore Page Three February 25, 1992 lc. The changes do not substantially increase trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. (There is a reduction in trip generation as a result of the reduction in the lodge room count from 292 to 281; the demand for public facilities is not increased.) ld. The changes do not cause a reduction by greater than three (3%) percent of the approved open space. le. The changes do not result in a reduction by greater than one (1%) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. (Off-street parking and loading is reduced by four spaces from that previously required but the program changes in the project cause a nine space reduction in parking demand.) lf. The changes do not result in a reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. lg. The changes do not result in an increase of greater than two (2%) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. (Floor area remains within the limitations of the prior approval.) lh. The changes do not result in an increase by greater than one (1%) percent in the approved residential density of the proposed development. (Density is unchanged from the previous approval.) li. The changes are not inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or require granting of a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Effect of the proposal on required parking: Under paragraph B(6) of the Agreement, 220 subgrade spaces are required to be provided on Lot 1 for the approved 294 lodge bedroom facility. While the parking demand for the PUD is based on a series of formulas developed by Transportation Development Associates, the subgrade parking requirement nonetheless equates to a factor of .75 spaces per lodge bedroom. Using the same factor of .75 spaces per bedroom, the subgrade parking requirement for the 281 bedroom facility proposed in this application is 211 spaces. A total of 217 subgrade spaces is provided under the proposed amendments. The revised PUD parking requirement for Hotel Phase I is documented on Table 2, attached. Ms. Diane Moore Page Four February 25, 1992 Effect of the proposal on required employee housing: The employee housing requirement as documented in Exhibit B of the Agreement has been revised in Table 3, attached. The revised number of employees to be housed for Hotel Phase I, Galena Place, Summit Place and Replacement Housing is 156.7. The requirement for an audit which is provided for in the Agreement will ultimately establish the employee housing requirement for the hotel. In reviewing the proposed insubstantial amendments, it may be helpful to briefly discuss some of the past decisions regarding the Aspen Mountain Subdivision. In 1985, John Roberts was granted approval for a 447 room hotel with fourteen residential units within the hotel and three restaurants on Lots 1 and 5. This approval was amended by Savanah beginning in 1987 and ending in 1990; the amendment resulted in several changes from the Roberts plan due to operator needs and changes in the Aspen market. During the period 1985 to 1990, the Little Nell Hotel was opened, the Hotel Jerome was expanded, the Sardy House was opened and the Aspen Club Lodge was renovated and substantially upgraded. Finally, Ritz-Carlton, the operator chosen for the hotel, preferred to have about 300 rooms to be located not in two phases, but in a single building. To accomplish the goals of the operator and to respond to the economic changes in Aspen, the prior Savanah amendment proposed the elimination of one restaurant, the reduction in the hotel room count for Phases I and II by 105 rooms, from 447 to a maximum of 342, and the relocation of the residential units from Lot 1 to Lot 5 of the Subdivision. The changes now being proposed further reduce the total lodge room count in Hotel Phase I from 292 rooms to 281 rooms. As you are aware, we are currently processing an amendment to the PUD and request for subdivision approval to construct an Ice Rink and Park on Lot 6 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision. This amendment process involves notice, publication and public hearings. We will also be filing a PUD Amendment request to eliminate the hotel rooms shown in this package for the second and third levels of the Blue Spruce Building. Additionally, we will be submitting another amendment to the PUD process, in four steps, for approval of development plans for Lots 3 and 5 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision. We mention this because of the sensitivity of the public regarding accessibility to the PUD approvals. With one amendment in process and others planned in the future, the public has complete access to the PUD. Ms. Diane Moore Page Five February 25, 1992 Bob Hughes is submitting a letter to you under separate cover with a suggestion as to how we modify the PUD Agreement to account for the minor language changes that are prompted by these Insubstantial Amendments. Please let me know at your earliest convenience if you need additional information regarding these changes. Thankyou for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, Joseph Wells, AICP LAW OFFICES OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THIRD FLOOR. ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LEONARD M OATES ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 AREA CODE 303 ROBERTW HUGHES TELEPHONE 920-1700 RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH TELECOPIER 920-1121 TED D GARDENSWARTZ March 5, 1992 OF COUNSEL: JOHN THOMAS KELLY MAR - 6 1992 HAND DELIVERED ATIN: Diane Moore Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Infubstantial Amendments to Aspen Mountain PUD Dear Diane: On behalf of Savanah Limited Partnership, Joe Wells and Perry Harvey recently made application to you for administrative approval of certain Insubstantial Amendments to the Aspen Mountain PUD. It occurred to me that, because the amendments vary somewhat the provisions of the First Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement for the Aspen Mountain Subdivision, it might be advisable to prepare and record a written confirmation of an Amendment to that agreement in order to implement the Insubstantial Amendments recently sought. To that end, I have prepared for your consideration an instrument that confirms that fact. If you find this to be in order, I would appreciate your executing it and returning it to me for recording in the Pitkin County public records. If this form works for you, let me know and I will arrange Savanah's signature. As always, thanks for your help. Sincere~y, ~ OATF~~~IES & KNEZEVICH, P.C. By: ~~ i ~* Ro#eMW. #lighes RWH/tu Enclosure savanah\Itrs\moore.02 CONFIRMATION OF AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, on March , 1992, Savanah Limited Partnership ("Savanah"), as the owner of Lot 1 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and Planned Unit Development ("Lot 1"), according to the First Amended and Restated Planned Unit Development/Subdivision Agreement Aspen Mountain Subdivision recorded in Book 574 at Pages 792, et seq. of the Pitkin County records (the "PUD Agreement"), made application (the "Application") to the City of Aspen Planning Director for approval as insubstantial amendments certain modifications to the hotel approved for construction upon Lot l (the "Hotel"), which modifications are more particuliarly described in the Application incorporated by this reference as though set forth in full herein; and WHEREAS, the purpose of the modifications sought to be approved by the Application is to: a. eliminate certain sub-grade hotel rooms and add the square footage of such eliminated rooms to the health club facilities to be constructed within the Hotel, with the consequent reduction in the below-grade parking and employee housing requirements for the Hotel resulting from the elimination of such rooms; b. revise the Mill Street curb design to respond to the realignment of Nlili Street implemented by the City of Aspen in connection with Mill Street Improvement District work; and c. provide for a sports activity center for guests of the hotel by combining entry level retail space in the Blue Spruce wing of the hotel into a single larger space; WHEREAS, the Planning Director has reviewed the Application and has found that the requested modifications constitute Insubstantial Amendments under applicable City code guidelines. WHEREAS, the Planning Director has confirmed approval of the requested modifications as Insubstantial Amendments (hereinafter so called) by executing the Certification of Planning Director on the Cover Sheet for the Fifth Amended Plat for the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and Planned Unit Development, which has been recorded in Book at Pages of the Pitkin County Records, and wishes hereby to confirm an amendment to the PUD Agreement to the extent necessary in order more fully to evidence and implement approval of the Insubstantial Amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the City of Aspen Planning Director hereby confirms that the PUD Agreement shall be and it is hereby deemed amended, pro mnto, to the extent necessary more fully to evidence and implement the Insubstantial Amendments, and the below-grade parking requirement set forth in paragraph 6 of Section B of the PUD Agreement and the employee housing requirement set forth in Exhibit B to the PUD Agreement are specifically amended to reflect the revised calculations therefor set forth in Tables 2 and 3 to the Application, copies of which are hereto annexed as Exhibit "A." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Confirmation has been given this day of , 1992. CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DIRECTOR By: CONSENT OF SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership, hereby approves and consents to the foregoing this day of , 1992. SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership BY: ASPEN ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation, its General Partner By: 2 STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS . COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1992, by as the City of Aspen Planning Director. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: (SEAL) Notary Public STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS . COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1992, by as of ASPEN ENTERPRISES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation, and General Partner of SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a District of Columbia Limited Partnership. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: (SEAL) Notary Public savanah\docs\agreement 3 Ms. Diane Moore page two Please let me know if you would like to go over the specifics of my calculations. Sincerely, r 1- / .,I.><fj~ , W f Joseph Wells, AICP 0 CC: Ferd Belz Perry Harvey Bob Hughes Joseph Violi Frank Nicholson Michael Vinckler Paul Donahue February 25, 1992 Table 1, cont. 21. Sheet A18 Blue Spruce Elevations 1. Minor revisions to finish grade on east side of the Blue Spruce Building (adjacent to Mountain Chalet). Landscape Architectural Drawings- DWI 22. Sheet Ll 1. Mill Street Alignment modified to reflect realignment required to match curblines established .11 -0,73 by Improvement District construction. 2. Additional trees have been indicated to remain at the southwest corner of South Wing (these are '04 r existing but were not indicated previously). 23. Sheet L2 1. Mill Street alignment modified to current alignment; the grading has been adjusted along east side of Building B. 2. Grading behind spa wall revised to match current construction documents. 24. Sheet L3 1. Mill Street alignment modified to current lÂ« 7 alignment. 2. Trees previously indicated in lawn areas along Mill Street are now shown in special paving tree grates b adjacent to curb. 3. Special paving area at corner of Mill Street and vacated Dean has been expanded to match current v design. Tree grates and trees have been added. 4. Additional indications of enriched paving have been added to South Wing decks on east and south v sides and on decks along Monarch Street. 25. Sheet L4 1. Mill Street alignment modified to current Â« alignment. 2. Modifications made to spa area and grand stair. v South Wing perimeter revised to match current architectural and landscape construction documents. 26. Sheet 6 1. Mill Street alignment modified; additional changes have been made to match other changes on â‚¬Â» r t- previous sheets. L. L .- c . / , MI 9 1 INSUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO APPROVED PUD OR SPA PLAN Application Package Contents Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Development Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application torm and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in *this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. appcover 1 . IAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1) Project Name '27 Project Location (irxlicato street address, lot & block number, legal description where apprupri. :0Â£3) 3) Present Zoning Â· . 4 ) Int Size 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # 6) Representative' s Name, Address & Phone # 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual Historic Dev. Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Coneeptual PUD - Minor Historic Dezv. Stream Margin Final FUD Historic Demolition . Mountain View Plane Subdivisian Historic Designation Corxicminilmlization Text/Map Amer~ent (2135 Allotment. Ict SpliVIot line (MOS Exenption Adj ustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (rucber and type of existing st=ructures; approximate sq. ft.; number of bedroams; any previous approvals granted to the property). 9) Description of Developmerrt Applicatian '10) IIave you attached the following? Response to Attadlment 2, Minimum St hniss ion Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Subnission Oontents Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application ATTACHMENT 2 Minimum Submission Contents for All Development Applications All Development Applications shall include, at a minimum, the following information and materials. 1. The applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on which the development is proposed to occur,, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A written description of the proposal and an explahation in written, graphic or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the Development Application. attach2.applications ATTACHMENT 3 Specific Submission Contents: Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption Approval By Planning Director The request for Planning Director approval of an Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption shall contain the following items: 1. A written description of the existing conditions on the property which are requested to be altered via the amendment or exemption. 2. Such site plan drawings or elevations as may be necessary to adequately evaluate the proposed amendment or exemption. 3. A listing of all previous development approvals granted to the property, with the approximate dates of said approvals. 4. A copy of any recorded document which affects the proposed development, including but not limited to recorded plats, agreements and deed restrictions. If changes are proposed to said recorded documents, these should be "red-lined" onto a copy of the original document. at3.insubstantial . ATTACHMENT 4 Review Standards: Development Application for Insubstantial Amendment to Approved PUD or SPA Plan 1. An ' insubstantial amendment to an approved Final DeVelopment Plan may be authorized by the Planning Director. An insubstantial amendment shall be limited to technical or engineering considerations first discovered during actual development which could not reasonably be anticipated during the approval process. The following shall not be considered an insubstantial amendment: a. A change in the use or chatacter of the development. b. An increase by greater than three (3%) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. C. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. d. A reduction by greater than three (3%) percent of the approved open space. e. A reduction by greater than one ( 1%) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. f. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. g. An increase of greater than two ( 2%) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. h. An increase by greater than one ( 1%) percent in the approved residential density of the proposed develompent. i. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting of a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. The Planning Director's evaluation shall compare the proposed amendment to the original approval and if any other amendments have been approved since the original approval, shall consider the cumulative impacts of all approvals granted. 2. All other modifications shall be approved pursuant to the terms and procedures of the Final Develop- ment Plan, provided that the proposed change is consistent with or an enhancement of the approved Final Development Plan. If the proposed change is not consistent with the approved Final Development Plan, the amendment shall be subject to both Conceptual and Final Development Plan review and approval. 3. During the review of the proposed amendment, the Commission and City Council may require such conditions of approval as are necessary to insure that the development will be compatible with current community conditions. This shall include, but not be limited to, applying to the portions of the development which have not obtained building permits or are proposed to be amended any new community policies or regulations which have been implemented since the original approval, or taking into consideration changing community circumstances Â· as they affect the project's original representations and commitments. The applicant may withdraw the proposed amendment at any time during the reviewÂ· process. 4. In the absence of an approved Final Development Plan, an accurate improvements survey of existing conditions may be substituted to permit evaluation of whether the proposed activity is an insubstan- tial or other change to the site. at4.amend.pud 2 Attachment 6 General Summary of Consent Agenda/Staff Approval Application Process 1. Application Types: The following are the Development Applications which are processed as staff level approvals: * Exempt Historic Development * Exempt ESA Development GMQS Exemption for remodeling or reconstruction, minor development to a historic landmark, development of a single family or duplex dwelling or minor expansion of a commercial or office use. * Minor Amendments to approved Conditional Use, Special Review, SPA, PUD, Subdivision or GMQS. 2. Development Review Procedure Summary: The zero step staff approval application process is shown in the attached figures and can be described as follows. Stage One: Attend pre-application conference. The purpose of this one-on-one meeting with staff is to determine whether your development proposal can be processed at the staff level and if so, to identify the materials staff will need to review your application. Stage Two: Submit development application. Based on your meeting with staff, you should respond to the appropriate portions of the application package and submit the requested number of copies of a complete application, with the appropriate processing fee, to the Planning Office. Stage Three: 'Determination of Completeness. Within five working days of the date of your submission, the application package will be reviewed by a member of the staff. You will be notified in writing of whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required at this time. Stage Four: Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete, it Will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. Within five working days, a memo will be written by the staff member for signature by the Planning Director. ,The memo will explain whether your application complies with the Code and Will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved. + - 1.'/20/Ir TOTAL . 1.2/,el-/4%3/4 .4~*1~,16'll......../.. . . . . ..1 ..9., 9,-1 -1 2 1. _ NII;P'~ 17 -a 9TAIR . 7-1! - -- 44-- 18 40@ "16.0 1 tr, f 6 , -~r- -0- -'r- m- 7 |~ .~~ WOMEN ~" 1â€¢ 7 L , Poek.J RETAIL RETAIL Â£~ MEN h/73 â‚¬ - 9 | L_ 00,4714" 0 90LT-723' 4 ~1 -6 ~LOUNCE . STAZR - - t,Litelid..Â£161161&-09/0.14~ Un r'- 151 7- MIMII I EL EVJrr=â€¢ 7 ..r LE,42/tT7: STAIR NO. 14 MeFERV~ 6~ /1-\ 1 413' ROMENADE ( GLEVATC"~ STAIRL , 1 ,\ ~SKI SHOP/RENTAL Â·+ * -'- / I; ./. - t. -, V Â©~ t= --- \ E ! ! '-tRi[ : 6 // *U - 4=-1/2.-444 â€¢ SKI STORAGE " SAFETY Il 0Eposil;~L ~~ 1- /P. - VIEWINe;r ~1 - \413/ I ~ CONCIERGE-~â€¢ L I 9TAI NO. 19 . AIR NOâ€¢15 - 97- 1 4, .= 1 MA '- /27 1 1 1 ./.- . 14 11 -1 VÂ¥ 4,12 419/ 11 .SUBLLE - 1 1 PORTE 1 1 I -_f==HERE 1 1 -I- - a-- / 944 ' / .IIJA- - . . / / IN / / 0. RETAIL . 4, , 9OMENADE , 1 4 ... . 1 1 \. A 11 11 . 11 / . JIFTYARD RETAIL i ~.0~~ , i ,; ~ . / , - 44\ - ENTRY LEVEL /. PROMENADE EL.:35.00 I PCT.ABOVE NATURAL GRADE PCT. BELOW NATURAL ORA[ EÂ·rAIR AND ABOVE FINISHED GRA 1 : GIFT . , SUNDRY .0.10 SIDE/LENGTH x PCT. SIDE/LENGTH x PCT. U SHOP Â£ Slop 1 4 is A - 250 x 92.85 Â· 233.16 A - 250 x 7.14 Â· 17.ir - 1 1 11,1,ini 8-280 1 27.85 - 77.38 8 - 280 x 0.00. 0.0( / C-05' 0.00 - 0.00 c - es * O.00 â€¢ 0.0[ UN,11 1 - â€¢ F az 56.35 - 15.50 F - 28. 44.64 â€¢ 12.5[ 40 taliu 0 - 192 x 9.10 - 17.47 0 - 192 1 42.67 - 82.1, E - 112 1 42.85 - 48.00 E - 112 x 57.14 - 64.0[ 0 - 58 1 39.28 - 22.71 0 - 58 x 60.70 â€¢ 35.20 H - 67 x 0.00 â€¢ 0.0[ H - 67 x 75.00 Â· 50.25 ImT --- Â»Il 1 -/ff - STAIR NO. 1072 - 477.56 1072 . 139.1 (477.56)/1072 - 44.54% (199.27)/1072 - 18.5 t~ STAIR-2 - 10.0 ~-----~ NO. 17 --- FAR - 28.950 SF i (.44840 - 8.5. - 12.894 S. F. y .- , . 24.4. 1 FAR a 28.980 SF . (.085 /. ! .: ,;ili': \40 MEMORANDUM TO: Diane Moore FROM: Bill Drueding DATE: September 2, 1992 RE: Ritz Carlton - Changes Between Approved 4th Amended Plat and 5th Amended Plat Sheet Al: No change in parking. Door changes by stair #9. Doors added to Board Rooms opposite Ballroom. Sheet A2: Add service corridor and lift. Minor configuration changes at wine storage and directors' offices. Sheet A3: Blue spruce layout revisions. Minor square foot changes in "main building" calculations block. Mechanical space changes. Minor changes and labeling of retail space by stairs #2 and #10. Sheet A4: Guest room key number reduced by total of nine. Eleven intermediate level guest room keys eliminated from tabulation box on Blue Spruce. Minor FAR calculation changes. Sheet A5: Health club is enlarged, which eliminated four guest rooms. Minor changes in FAR calculation box. Landscape curb SE corner change. Sheet A6: Minor FAR changes in boxes. Sheet A7: Minor change in guest room and FAR calculation box. Sheet A8: Connecting door change. Guest room and FAR calculations revised. (This will keep happening throughout. Project will have a net loss of nine keys.) Sheet A9: Roof stair change NW corner. Changes to road alignment. Smooth out curb on Mill St. Sheet Alo: No change. Sheet All: Elevator penthouse changed - appears smaller. Facade changes at apres ski courtyard. Below grade windows now shown. Building extension at health club level is new. Sheet A12: New stairwell below grade. Sheet A13: Health club level shown. 1 - Sheet A14: Minor - louvers shown at apres ski roof. Minor window changes. Sheet A15: Minor changes. Sheet A16: Facade detail at Mill Street corner. Gallery now labelled promenade. Sheet A17: No change. Sheet A18: Extended tower height? Dean Street elevation. Diane: My list, sheet by sheet, pretty well compares to those of Steve Kanipe and Joe Wells. The total reduced key count of nine appears to just be a door game. The FAR changes are minor. 2 MESSAGE DISPLAY TO Rob Thomson CC Diane Moore From: Diane Moore Postmark: Aug 17,92 2:50 PM Status: Previously read Subject: Ritz Insubstantial Plat amendments Message: Rob, I need a letter from Engineering regarding the pending insubstantial plat amendments for Lot 1 (Ritz) of Aspen Mtn. PUD. Your letter needs to address the elimination of parking along Mill Street and Monarch st - these were (incorrectly??) reflected on plat drawings but you have pointed out that there would be inadequate travel lanes on Mill St. if parking were placed onsite. Also, elimination of parking on Monarch necessary for safe travel lanes and fire marshall request. Also, 2 parking spaces at Dean & Mill St. cannot be provided due to 20' clear access for fire lane - continued- ------- I I | -OCT TOTAL - '2~r'r **~9'19'Ma#*-INIM ---- - .4 - C *i:'.:.4118. . . -7.37404*4.2 *522:71,*94.fr= I - -' ~" f 7-7..I-12- <- ---Â»*'eziefu...4,3Â¥2:tg 17 - /- - H MlllinnmfsTA~R - 0 FI~&1#kiti~Fl~ m er=1:- I I TI-1 6 0 -T- -7 -3- -T- ip 6% R/JW .1..1 1 7 2022>11 r l , d.-1491 2041 RETAIL RETAIL L MEN 1D r,e* C 12 --_CFWC LOADING DOCK Â© O in/-7 E spactâ‚¬Â» ~LOUNGE 1 1 ON Hill VU 1.Will]111.. \,STAIR .)-1.- 41#451-gUEUKANÂ°An 4 NO. 14 4 ERVI (-A 18 ROMENADE ( il.EVATC Â©, ,, ,~ STAIR / SKI SHOP/RENTAL Â·.- U LOBBY .6-1 1 11 \\ ,# 1 1 FRONT L-- , SKI STORAGE SAFETY 'I ~ DEPOSI 1 b VIEWI 1 CONCIERS I 9TAI I NO. 19 AIR hia.15 1 & == 1-1- 14 . : b li I 6>. - 1 4 III I A U181 W ,~... Â· ENTRY ~ - 1 11 0 1 1 1 1 VESTIBU.E - ::. ItiS- 1 4 1 11 PORTE 1 1 1 1 | tmeE 1 1 A.....1 ' . / 0 11 1 1 r 1 4- DN. 7 1 1 /r ......' At 0 0~0#- 04* *~20.1 '/ -~/ ..2.... ./D "' - 11 -91 -'-- # : QOMENADE RETAIL = 1 1 ,/ ./ /- t 162/Â· / j: 3, 0- ..4. I I . JURTYARD RETA I L '* ~ / , 1 , 1 / - -T - ENTRY LEVEL Â« , /0 PROMENADE j EL. 135.00 PCT. ABOVE NATURAL GRADE PCT. BELOW NATURAL GRAI AND ABOVE FINISHED GRA c,AIR SIDE/LENGTH x PCT. | I 1 3. FT & 17.20' .- SIDE/LENGTH x PCT. ' U 9,4Cp <C SMOP A - 250 x 32.85 Â· 233.16 A - 250 x 7.14 . 17.8 8 - 280 * 27.85 - 77.38 8 - 280 * 0.00 - 0.0 C - 855 x 0.00 - 0.00 C - 80 x 0.00 â€¢ 0.0 Iii . 0-192 , 9.10 Â· 17.47 0 - 192 1 42.67 - 82.1 E- 112 * 42.e - 48.00 E - 112 x 57.14 - 64. Of F - 28 1 55.35 - 15.50 F - 28 . 44. 64 - 12.5( ...L =~LLUL_ p,4.j~#41Â£-'1 1 . 0; li G - 58 1 60.70 â€¢ 35.20 0 - 58 1 33.28,- 22.7 H - 67 x 0.00 ' 0.0 H . 67 . 75.00 Â· 50.25 TITrr 7. - - 1072 . 477.56 1072 139" STAIR NO. (477.56)/1072 - 44.64% - 10.0 (199.27)/1072 - 10.5 17~E1 STAIR--1 - -- FAR - 28.950 SF i 4.4.48â€¢I =U NO. 17 ,---j Â· 12.894 S. F. --4 5" - .24.4. FAR Â· 28.950 SF . (.085 â€¢-~AO NOMINAL *30:c ~-~-*-- -- - - 1, \ \ A 6 -ar 1/%41 . 4! h /Art- --- 470 . / 0 \\1 r4;%= L r - N ; - I . 11 1 11,1 1 1 5 4 Â¢4414'E i i E--- 11144 0 9 irD r: It i )n i J \ / _i- 1 3 1 5.Ji, f '; 1 2 C -1 1 1 -1-/L.â€¢-Il./*"I'.*I-9 . [lilli .1 . I Ull t_-1 ~ t*eME'fte/'U 10%4 7 41,1!111 1, El al]-1 lilli 1--T 1 i~Emr j-1 SECOND FLCOF L- 1- . 1 1 r.,9 ; Â¢ , li 4-1 E-H E-, 1, 1/Ev ! 1 0/Ii\' 1'' 1 14!31 /1 f W ' IF..1-11, f ~ 1 E I. Z / 1 <T-b C- 1 1 1 19-4 1 1 1 /--44AI I F.1 FT7 ! , 0 ..! K I / il i 1.k 1 1.1 , i mt : 1/, P r. 3 r 1 Â»1411.11 Â· r 2 4 I :*TillillITN IMMA I ~11 911110 11 :_1 . . - 4- -l -- 11 1 i 1- 1-- 11 ---- -- ...Y...... .... ..2- ...1 all- Farnz.L t>/ 1 1; 2.E TAIL LE.'C'.- Â£.1. _ _ -..-'.-~---./-.--2.----2,; ..........___~__ .__-__ #,62.2 ---;--E--- 1 4 ' /-1 DEAN STREET ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION \- ./ 1/~in'.n' I -Il .9 MESSAGE DISPLAY TO DIANE MOORE From: Stephen Kanipe Postmark: Jun 01,92 3:05 PM Subject: RITZ 5th Message: I have reviewed the letter from Joe Wells and agree that the interior stair change is minor. However, the windows and window well addition will, in my opinion, change the appearance and feeling of the build at the area around the connecting bridge and are not minor. ---------X----------- ------ ------ ... APR 27 i MEMORANDUM SA To: Diane Moore From: Stephen Kanipe CE Date: April 23, 1992 ..36 'diSAL nv/X' ' Subject: Ritz Carlton / lelly\56 The following is a list of changes noted in the submitted 5th amended plat and the approved 4th amended plat: Sheet Al --rework doors and foyer exiting at stair #9 and coat room. Sheet A2 --add service corridor and lobby bar lift. Sheet A3 --add mechanical space behind stair #4 (southeast corner parking area); --rearrange partitions at retail space stair #10; move coat room; --rearrange partition layout and designated use at Blue Spruce. Sheet A4 --no change. Sheet A5 --enlarge health club to existing light well and below grade space at stair #4; --eliminate 4 rooms at south end of south wing; --remove partition at parlor room, northeast corner. Sheet A6 --remove 3 connecting doors at adjacent rooms, south wing; --remove parlor wall at northeast room. Sheet A6A --remove 3 connecting doors at adjacent room, south wing. Sheet A7 --no change. Sheet A8 --remove 3 connecting doors at adjacent room, south wing. Sheet A9 --roof stair layout at elevator penthouse, northwest corner. , Sheet A10 --no change. Sheet All --south wing elevator penthouse, lower elevation from 107'0" to 104'5 1/2", reduce volume; *\A 84' 13.1 ---eliminate archway facade architectural detail at apres ski courtyard; --reduce volume elevator penthouse, main building. Sheet A12 --below grade stairwell detail. Sheet A13 --add below grade health club, mechanical space, south wing. Sheet A14 --modify roof line section #1, main building. Sheet A15 --eliminate guest room window, 2nd floor south wing. Sheet A16 --no change. Sheet A17 --no change. Sheet A18 --eliminate windows, enlarge below grade area, section e *fc Â· 1. --lower_finish grade line at Blue Spruce. 3 NOTE: Sheets Ll - L4 and Sheet 6 not reviewed for changes. This summary compares these changes to the list in Joe Well's letter of 2/25/92. V Sheet Al -- we agree. Ballroom Level ~Sheet A2 -- add service corridor and lobby bar left. Mezzanine Level Sheet A3 -- we agree. Entry Level Sheet A4 -- guest room, key count requires explanation. Intermediate Level Plan Sheet A5 -- health club space increased by eliminating Second Level Plan lodge rooms and below grade light well space. Sheet A6 -- we agree. Third Level Plan Sheet A6A -- we agree. Fourth Level Plan .. Sheet A7 -- we agree. Fifth Level Plan Sheet A8 -- we agree. Sixth Level Plan Sheet A9 -- we agree. Roof/Site Plan Sheet A10 -- we agree. Dean St. & Corner Tower Elevations Sheet All -- we agree. Mill St. Elevation Sheet A12 -- we agree. Monarch St. Elevation Sheet A13 -- add below grade health club and mechanical South Elevation space. Sheet A14 -- we agree. East Courtyard Elevations Sheet A15 -- we agree. West Courtyard Elevations Sheet A16 -- we agree (archway not shown on this sheet). North Courtyard Elevation Section/North Sheet A17 -- we agree (Blue Spruce entry doors Blue Spruce unchanged). Elevations Sheet A18 -- we agree on Blue Spruce; add space, eliminate Blue Spruce windows at South wing. Elevations .b SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP MAR 1 2 1992 March 9, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore Planning Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Diane, I am writing as a follow-up to our phone calllast week. In determining the allowed accessory uses for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel you, as Planning Director, have a certain degree of latitude. The language in Section H-17 of the First Amended and Restated Agreement states that "the accessory retail uses permitted within the Hotel Phase I shall be limited to the following and similar uses:" To evaluate what should be allowed under "similar uses" some background is necessary. The L/TR zone district purpose is "to encourage construction and renovation of lodges in the area at the base of Aspen Mountain and to allow construction of tourist-oriented detached, duplex and multi-family residential dwellings." This does not address a full service hotel such as the Ritz. In fact, we had to gain a conditional use approval for the restaurants to allow for service to the general public. The code only permits dining rooms for guests of the hotel. Thus, the permitted use of "customary accessory commercial uses" was intended to address lodges and not full service hotels. Because of this we submitted a list of proposed uses for approval. The intention in the PUD was to define the type of uses that a full service hotel would need to provide to their guests. It was recognized that some latitude was necessary because of the uniqueness of a Ritz-Carlton in Aspen. During the discussions regarding allowed accessory uses the guidelines were that the uses, except for the restaurants, should be primarily to serve the needs of the hotel guests. We wanted to avoid creating commercial uses that would attract retail customers from the rest of Aspen to the hotel while allowing uses so that hotel guests would not have to run around town for necessities or answers to questions. Our plans for accessory commercial agree with this format and philosophy. The primary facility will be oriented toward guest sporting needs. This will include, among other facilities, ski storage, ski rental and repair, an activities desk and sale of sports related goods. In the summer this area will be for summer sports such as tennis, golf, hiking, fishing, biking and other Aspen activities for both the group and individual guests of the hotel. The lobby uses will be for a sundry shop, gift shop and other uses as outlined in the PUD. As a full service hotel there are many services which will be provided to guests. These include, among others, a center for guests who need to conduct business, a concierge, a desk for help with travel arrangements, a desk for help with car rental arrangements and a property information service for guests wishing information on rentals or purchase of property. 600 E.Cooper St. Suite 200 â€¢ Aspen, CO. 81(511 â€¢ 303/925-4272 â€¢ FAX 925-4387 Ms. Diane Moore March 9, 1992 Page -2- As the property information service is of immediate concern let me elaborate on what is planned. Currently Ritz-Carlton's bookings show that some 70% of the reservations are people who have never been to Aspen. Many of these people will be here with corporate groups and will want to return with family members for a vacation. Aspen has many separate real estate and nianagement companies and very few large central properties that are for rental. Snowmass is essentially a separate resort in terms of property availability. Because of this situation we feel it is essential to have on-site information for guests wanting to explore alternatives in Aspen and Snowmass. A property information desk will not attract people from outside of the hotel. It will not sell any stock in trade, supplies or product on the premises. It is not in itself a traffic generator. It is anticipated that this will be a desk operated by one person and will refer people to specific properties in Aspen and Snowmass. This use meets all the terms and intents of the accessory commercial use language. It is a critically important service for the Ritz-Carlton Hotel. To deny this use serves no planning purpose. What a denial will accomplish is to compromise the effectiveness of the Ritz-Carlton to provide service to their guests at the expected level. Please review this information and call me so we can discuss the required uses. Sincerely yours, 70 07 NO/-7 Perry Harvey PH:ks SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Ferdinand L. Belz 111 I XI-(l 11\1.1 )11<1-3 i()1; FEBI 21992 February 10, 1992 Ms. Diane Moore City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Lot 1, Aspen Mountain PUD, The Ritz-Carlton Aspen Dear Diane, It was a pleasure meeting with you last week. Per our conversation I was to provide you two items--one, a list of our proposed accessory retail pursuant to paragraph 17 of the Amended PUD Agreement and two, the original and proposed layout for the retail spaces in the building on Durant Street (the Blue Spruce Building) pursuant to paragraph 17 of the Amended PUD Agreement. These items are attached. We feel these items are consistent with the intent of the PUD Agreement. Let's discuss how to process these. Further, you are to inform us concerning a procedure that provided for making minor interior adjustments to the building without going through an amendment process. Finally, you informed me that you felt that going to residential units in the Blue Spruce Building would require a formal amendment. Please confirm this. Thank you for your time and assistance on these matters. Sincerely, 00/1 . 08/9 ,--IL L FLB:kms ec: Perry Harvey (i(H) E. Cooper St. â€¢ Suite 200 â€¢ Aspen. CO 81(311 â€¢ 303/925-4272 FAX :103/925-4387 ASPEN MOUNTAIN PUD AND SUBDIVISION LOT 1, RITZ-CARLTON, ASPEN ALLOWABLE ACCESSORY RETAIL sundry shop car rental desk travel desk ski rental and repair store ski and sports activity center hotel operator souvenir store -t,JU beauty shop CIO,/6, florist shop %42314 -~1 ' A~ gift shop -/3:1 < ~ 'i 34/1 â‚¬ fbi -)0/8 4 1 \01, i : 0 jewelry store NO Ve\(1 UJ/143 , l ~- men's and women's fine apparel 4.1,1542 .=jud*, ~ ski and sports shop - ~ ,/--- business center *12Â¢404* 9-' card shop - 2- r.p Â«39 , r,r~ I ./ real estate information desk 1----1 1 Ed ) 2 l.61 1, " l Â·.~2 Net .st,(/ul , f.40 e,L~/ 3 .4-~ J 1*EFf ive,$1 1/4 - j ru 0 4 + \\-2/ , 1 k\~\ 4/1 y-1 11 1(61,r /' Not 4/ 14. 1.319: U cny -th D *~*U F,j' i. A~4 100 l~ PAVIC,2, lor reAfal 0-3. , y 1 2 140 real Â£54, 4/et, 4 1 ~) Ph*-01 4 43 .-fÂ»-*42\ 1 0446 2% l of - LT 447Â·4wfdo Â£06<2,2> ---LD: 1 1 Z Pt -No I,>ki_ , r n A pÂ·tiM ut:/ U 012 / r vj, 1 r . 4 dc 6l NG 02*1 - ex'52, 4Â«tief 32/- 0,4 /9/33-Â£ / Hot \/14101,6 M Â»Ai |Abk -to 315& n / . Be<0Â£ C:Â£,467 i 3/24<6,1, 11 9 'ttift _L--- -ts) N* ofÂ©a ovAUL ffla-3 9,Â¢ Vice 'V ~j 1, 2,17, -. 1 \ i~~dÂ· f Stf-\/142- \Ud loi 'Rlt_b~- Quij it) 4 c~~j<~r ut r~jo - , /.1 4 31(11 3 , f , - L..1 1//1,(i/MAÂ£Â·01Â·j 5 Au; My n 4 1, / , Â¥ f i 6/CÂ·G.. L' Al/ PROGRESS DATE -j ' REAWY-&9 1 . 1 00(611'MAL i $ 4 /7 \ iL .. f , ' IEJIL-*--- AA: it/: . . LA. .4.,141 . RETA':tr ./' t . .1/ RETAIL 1. , , l ., f lÂ·. CT , 11 .., ,...1 -1 1 1 . .1 .1 â‚¬ E IJ/trllall-IM - - - . .11 91 1 \R IT E '' ---r --rv- ~EUV. c '''fj, r. 4 1, ./. .. V I I 1 7 -9 O i i L 0--f Â· LL . V. 11 r . SK I SHOP ' ' 1 + ' t:'r. ill /2/ ill . 84.3] T'Out 1 ; â‚¬ SKI STORAGE 1 1 1 1 I , 14 r fiÂ· i 11 1 Â· i' ' :L,/ ! , up ~ - - 1-2-- 0--=79 E-] r 'C, cro Â· 4 S-[AiR MO. 16 11 ,. if%'. f *4 Fl: : 1 '. .*''H. , 4 24 1 2140.1 .....:.....t. Ill ' ' .. . A- . - Â· "6 1 i i I .. . % 887-AlL fhoR#eo - - !, .. 6ETALL AKCA .. u..f,., . 1 1 .1/ S - . 1 Â· th *mr ..1. . .. 1 f .. ELEY. STAIR . 6 . 1 . I NO. 14, I .1 ... I . ./0 .. ral . 1 0 - \4Pr 1 1 1- . . 1 .. . . 11 , 1. 1 J 8201-AL/ACTIVI-riA t â‚¬=4- . Â· 1 . 0 '. /419 EA - 5*06#5 2 32 r-b Â·-- . .. . , 0 .. up .. --. 1 .. m u vi . 0 t . "/ 4 - MEMORANDUM TO: Chuck Roth Rob Thomson FROM: D iane Moore <,~~~ RE: Savanah Request for Insubstantial Amendment to PUD DATE: March 24, 1992 Savanah submitted a request for an insubstantial amendment to the PUD Agreement several weeks ago. I have had several conversations with them regarding their request and I have also met with Stephen Canipe of Building Dept. We have some questions and concerns that we have expressed to Joe Wells and he is getting additional info for us. Could you please review the attached request and forward me your comments regarding the request? I would appreciate your comments ASAP as I am leaving next Wednesday (April 1) and would like to give them our concerns/comments before I leave. Sorry for short notice but I thought that Amanda had circulated this for referral comments. Thanks. See me if questions. BLUE SPRUCE SITE MAIN G.F.A. 7.ABOVE FAR ABOVE %BELOW FAR BELOW TOTAL GUEST BUILDING NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL FAR ROOM GRADE GRADE & ABOVE & ABOVE ABOVE (KEYS) RETAIL LEVEL FJNISHED FINISHED EL.:26.125' ENTRY LEVEL 23.250 44.54 ~242 14,136 0 HEERY 12.534 18.56 PCT.ABOVE NATURAL GRADE PCT. BELOW NA'URAL GRADE / / ,-: .. 1 AND ABOVE FINISHED GRADE I.- /- ./. \. .\ SOUTH WING 0.F.A. ZABOVE FAF ,45/VE WBELOW FAR BELO'â€¢â€¢' T07AL GUEST SIDE/LENGTH . PCT. SIDE/LENGTH x PCT. NA- URAL NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL F.â€¢R ROOM WAS}~GTON, D.C. A - 37 x 42.85 - 11.57 A - 37 I 0.00 Â· 0.08 / i J CRADE GRADE L ABOVE & ABC.'E ABOVE (KEYS) Elll; SHED FINJOHED PARKING PROVIDED 8 - 70 1 64.28 - 45.00 6 - 70, 0.00 . 0.00 1 1 ..2/ C - 97 i 85.71 Â· 83.14 C - 37 x 14.28 - 13.85 ./.-// .*: / >41\ ENTRY LEVEL 9.251 :9.28 1.261 32.30 1.333 2.534 0 97,44,BARD COM CT D - 77, 64.28 - 49.43 D - 77 3 0.00 - 0.00 LEVEL 34.000 e 341 213.20 341 13.85 LEVEL 39.50' 37 (219.20)/341 - 64.287 (13.851/341 - 4.06% , 1 BLUE G.F.A. MABOVE FAR ABOVE YBELCn' FAR BE.C'*- TENAL CUEST TOTAL - 43 FAR - 6Â·812 x (.6428) ..\C SPRUCE NATURAL NATURAL NA7URAL NATUFAL FAR ROOM UPASE GRADE & ABOÂ·'E L ARCVE ABOVE (KEYS) - 4.378 3F LESS THAN 10% f DOES NOT APPLY ) PROJECT TOTAL - 217 FINISHED Cir:SHED RETAIL 6,8:2 64.28 4.37% C. 10 2 4.376 2 \Joisi 0 0 1.\ 5 12.32 - /\ 1_t 1 C -~.- .M -- --.*. W -4-~4 . 9,:OFERTY LINE l .1 -- m18&Â£57â€¢- ,11.1, p -* /9-AIR M , ~ ri---â€¢ur kr Â·Â· / / r=,Fle':i"*../* 1. . ae =-92 S/ 3 11 1 -XUZZI,--EZZL STAIR â€¢8- - ---4 i. 4/1 rirâ€¢ ** 1 '4~ 6. SE:~f-t- 1.FJD:9 | 1,,010'1,- 11-. r- 1[ . 111 ./ ./.4 r -1 >< 1 _ _- , T- E-1-L,EFAN -T' 51 [3-42/-11 -I. 13><L ~ - 1 :4 ~ 19:ff-i,1.-62 1[ --{( 1 ' ~ ~ ~ft:~~- 1 - r - 1 11 == --I~f,li~itiI=5--4 1 f h.4. 1 111 ID-ep --- v. -- -â€¢T?,---i?'---"1~~ 1 1 . //0 - IN , Z. A - 1 --Wzy/,fifinG:%Â· *1: 1, r,Tri ta ..7. B ' ' 1 1 iii 1 1 - F . J.Â» 1 1/4]1 1, .4 J 1 Wk . = L,..41:, N 1 1 -, g:~le F i *-Jit- Â·1 6 *==, .1 11,2 1,~01 1- ~ , -Off -1 <L/.97. 1/1.1( i.* 4* f. c.14; aui*AN'.3-'0Â·:*RIE= .i [fl k . 011-_j i ' !1 1 - -\1-r i ,Â·.2 . 511/31/7,:i~H/7.Ir *2*bm'fÂ°./ .IU.- WOME!. 0 1 4 - I. 1 .9 ':79Â· 1 Li Â·Â·43 .-.- .. . .10. 1 "t_ A.L ' ' Fli Rh~A~L - 12.- ... 14 -3 t-'f Â· ' 1 R 1_r-L ! It 7 0 n Â· N 2 LOCK r 7 -11.51 _Z:.*.<2'125, + -- Lriâ‚¬k 2-Â· 1.: Â·- EMERGENCY 7 ---2-i 4., I UENE.RAI OR, ~ - - 1.-7 I!-1 14-,2.-4[-71 :,1, -,z,itÂ·---=---4:9 I , OUNCE 1 4 . g *44 Â£ ... .42 h j 7,-ig &211/Ir#16Ng#.1 f. 1, t . -9- Ittl{111 - k V < -~4~'JF i 0 2=1~ ,~ 16 _1 .. i ..:...2*41%9&5. r==:9[1Â£4---p==U e U Â·u- it,sug g[ 7 - --- - - -- 391 Ma==Â®fll o SOUTH WING --I , 4. .B. -I' I - r- ~r--13 >Gri:,1. P.4415=...kÂ· i.,Â·Â·. ' - . ' h= . 11: . 2 70. ift .0,Â£84* ~ 11} i *ij k C===41 i ' ./ ENTRY LEVEL .. 3 .-1 . 41. 40 EL.:35.00 PCT.ABOVE NATURAL OPADE PCT.BELOW NATURAL OR.ACE t.~ =r _ k ..4. 97 0~1144Â» t--r- - Tm Rm - Calltw A-N - - - r= ===~1 AND ABCVE FINISHED GRADE ----1---- -t . 41...4i -4, i ...?.~#V*f *:6 -9.; 2 .? Sf~*...CU .,72 , ] 0 Li - - , -'1,1.~r --Â·=---Â·u,Zilli-~ 11 4 k't'.'ATJ-#9- .,Â·,7 , :<Er,F~<P 3 -/7 D' U AIFEN. CULCeRADO n SIDE/LENGTH i PCT. SJOE/LENOTH * PCT. . . 11525 .. Â·,1-2,02.-,A-, _ = \ F -; 3*f.-'ll,ZU' Â· iN -~ 11 ."|L*Â· '' // ~ ' LUU,- 6-Â· 1 ' ' 1 ' Â¥ 'Â¥- '7.2 , 0' ; ; --3 2. 2-1 0 A - 76 I c. 00 - 0. 00 A - 76 * 0.00 - 0.02 1 1 , T.GY:tti 'V ~ 1 1 8 - 119 i 13.65 Â· 16.24 B -119 , 47.11 . 56.06 i A '14$. it,1,7 6 . eva - / L ! O 1-'titi 1111.' -' 1 14: i E iii :1 -Jik 1 1 /'' . C - 76 . 35.72 - 27.14 C - 76,50.89 - 39.30 ' il'Â· Â· . | -~jg]- ~-~~70.~3- 1 1 D Â·119 i 59.36 Â· 70.64 0 -119 i 13.65 - 16.24 ~ - i 4 L - 1 L _ .1 6 2 --3 4 - It , re' ~3 - 390 Â· 59.62 390 - 165.00 ~ -~~ - ~22 -6 _- -1 -_ _.. ---1 El... 7 1/r -~i=-17 tal. . -. a. , Lm 2=27-2-3 4 mL-1'k -I --- A",4 ( 59.62 }/330 - 15.28% -- -- ----- C FAR - 8.251 1 (.]5281 r :1.r...-:12. 1 1 ' I - - .0 1 ------ Â· 1.261 S.F. I: 1.49.-'Â·111 /III 1 ~~1 SKI sicc.AGE. I FAR - 8,250 y f.3230:Â· 2.665 . 50Â· , -1 E-j~u,_p~I'-4 1.333 S. F. 1 / 4 - '.?Nt:L-:LÂ· ' --- I - 7 NE . f ' 9-AIR Â·-- //--' 1 -- - 1 L :f: I.: 1~-T~ t 4-46 -f#-t: 6 -- 4 \1. St.-RAL PLANT lily L _ T f ' 11 -' 11 1, 1-1--~( 11-LE___]L- - 9 Ir 04 ./1- ./. , \0 ' 07 -â€¢ i W' ; ~J U.: -49r 4 ~~ 11 - i L 11 ' 11 4 1.- ..'' 11 1 C-*.-C:. 11 .Â·-r ...cr 1 1 W & i 1 .1 ' '11 i I r.:Mts=;, 1428-00 \\ .- I i. I \\ /,; 1 4 *52'L - 9---43 4-~A Â·- 03.4Â» ...11=Â«/ , -~lilli: 11! . m ~ ,4iÂ·f#/ted] Ill 1 L.-TI' : 1 11 : 1 11 - -~ CHECKED eY t ''Â·]i 1 111 1; I 4-31 \ }-r-**kAL j . -3<.5*â€¢,0- , . N ,/0 1 \ / 1 -\ LAt-E .4.\ .A ' .= - it J 1, : 1 2-21 1 Â»a I :.kil :|~4 - 1 '1 . . 1- /25.1-1 47.-4 , . . -19)3 1 j 1 1 -k- LI- . 1 .-' il ; " 1 /2. /4 : 0 , REV DATE 1 1 ~1~ 2 ~.~ ~1 B i i I i 14 0. 2-x , - 1 1; 11 ~ REVIS)ON 7 DECEMBER 6.1991 I! ! El i / 6 il-,0.- 11- -40 , E--121 2.----R~ 1 . 7 *ANALE -1 , U + 4 ION 9 0-_---4 FW~Z~;~r~Â¤52 -- tl=u-+u K . 43~J"T2--- 1 -Â·3~~~/1, Â·~ REWSION 8 DECDBER 18.1991 4,4 i#,/,417? 411/K\ /0. JANUARY 23.1992 r 11141.. L...J"F-J~1 :C.....Ck,Ar,r- il I L u / 1 3.1-~ /34.Â·:., 4.. 1 ALv-- - 1 ~ % ic \: , i \N\ i.ici - -%1 REVISION 10 FEBRUARY 20. 1992 El G -7-- --[- I.1 [ 1 J ..11/ 39--484-r'â‚¬ REVTSJON 11 FEBRUARY 26.1992 11- .lfe.... C - 10 1 11.1 0 ---- r i LE,. ' i 4 18.Â· 2 '1 E C. - . 1 .4Sfs- - 4 14 - 1 1 i 1-re-YE rae ' ~~~~~ *RL ..1 155.=#/1 , / 1 - A.' f. 7 , Â¥ 11 = -*f.. ' \34>. i /3/ Â·7#4'5' 1.,1~*33' , - - -23-1, 1:1 -- - - -â€ž--*f.9 1 - _ _ GritÂ© j i*J.. 21.3-40.4*- .I. ENTRY LEVEL -9 4,4 .... rNA,1 - . h: i EL. 39' - 1 1 L:.. 33 -, 11 1 4-2537 - . 0 jt '291*#r. I / 2 . I /4 .4 7 L 11 1 ' r .3.=64-z fjt; C '~ 45:*4.%7:c. 4:< ... C.. 4 Â»4 L. ./ - FC. ABL'E :.A-'JR.AL '9:ADE PET.RELC# 14-UCAL OCALE 419 Ela AND ABCVE UNISHED J?ADE 0 -- 41 - C ..iâ€¢. -0 974_8_ 33...fritell: -==ll H 1 , ~i .Â· 1 -e ~r:SP/46*;.4 2*4 4 Or-E/LEN--w , nE- \4 2.,2 - M 0. 1. 11 - 1 0:2- - - "139. ,==11 No. :0 11 1 5:32/LENC.H > FCT. 11 j e .97'bir??PL..14: ..5-~..,.r 'Ii!..___ !; 1 A g .1 .1 1 I r f-- -7 't4 . - /1//+23 1 c 280 ' 27 . 5' 0 -- . C L b Â· C . 1 0.02 -2.0 - 11 11!,i V /#IM- 1 -- AM ..r. r./r/.. . ~92, 9.:I. :.27 [. lE) 1 4..6/ Â· 82.14 KEY P. A. NO FCALE -r-1 J'" -443ea:r- -Â£~il. ' L , 9 4 1 . /3 111,1 W -, I 1.1 1 A- 32-LIVILLU-- ' 4/1 2 - IS , 12.26 Â· 22.76 , . 12:,21- 0.-*3 -4 , C :3 > 44.64 - '2... 1 .1 - I - Â·Â·rt,-'TH --A. / I /f- - , i A-1 .r : 00 - 2.22 1 LY. L I J Â£4 1 - *#1~ . ....-- -Il Â¢* 02~ A- ,==1~*4 - 1 /J ! r. 4 0. , 12-2 11 . F.- .* 1 :U'. - 2 99.27 .4.-4 5 r, , A ----Loy'Zii:11~-1- 1---1 93:IR.-7-11 .4 hi /r.77.plu. -1 ir=7---' - I - . ./ Â·112.271/1 272 - 18.5 MIC.4. ~3 1.,/--~~.. 1 1 - : TA RAMP CP, 1.1. i > 5142.17 4 P I S.:A:c No. 4 1~1 1 0/ N . FAR . 2/.952 0/ I .4=4; - 10 - :VÂ·' 1 / 1116 1 V FAR Â· 2Â·j,?53 SF , 5 . 23,3 ) 3. SLI / // e ..5 111 1 4 ' ~ COPÂ·,M. O 1~_. B' â‚¬L)' DI'rEÂ»lâ€¢TEÂ»*AL Â£ 4 0,6,7, or i,ri,4, roet-MA, t. 1242 SF Al L R,â€¢r S k.y;Pr Ct. -lct Dee-Wor, 5 72 10*A= FAR Â· 12.59Â·, \)1 14 EL UED ON C- PIC.* eIS Â©t EY-TENÂ»ONS TO UN-'â€¢TD 0* IrrE-ED -10 fITI *23 8 NOY 70 - ~ ~ â€¢ 1.242 n 5 10 * US[I ON~.Y FC]~ l'IÂ·E itcfT PIC./Cl . 04.136 T,rs /1/OJECT. â€¢4 MU CI P.,1. !3(20,1 1-r -- - IXÂ·plus D-ETE.,â€¢ 4-lin Wl-;4 *O cc,60'ENSâ€¢r TION .0 â€¢â‚¬Irf .Â·rERÂ·'ANIONAL. k SHEET TITLE 01 A ENTRY LEVEL PLAN 41.1/ ' 1 /-.1, SCALE , .... 0 10 20 40 SHEET NUMBER - ENTRY LEVEL PLAN A3 Il, -/ 1'Â·20'-0' 0. 2 r. C. O 0 . MCI