Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.20121030 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting— Minutes October 30 2012 Comments 2 Conflicts of Interest 2 AVH Aspen Valley Hospital 2 616 E Hyman — Conceptual Commercial Design Review 9 1 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting— Minutes October 30 2012 LJ Erspamer opened the special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission in Sister Cities Meeting Room at 4:30. Commissioners present were, Keith Goode, Cliff Weiss, Bert Myrin, Jim DeFrancia, Jasmine Tygre, Stan Gibbs, and LJ Erspamer. Commissioner not present was Ryan Walterscheid. Staff in attendance were Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney; Jennifer Phelan, Deputy City Community Development Director; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. Comments Cliff noted the letter from Suzie Harman delivered to each commissioner. Jennifer has a meeting with her. Bert Myrin requested a Tuesday to meet on priorities for the Council list to work on changes to parking, stream margin and different applications. Cliff asked Bert for the email to be re-sent to the commissioners. Bert suggested November 13th for a special meeting. Jackie checked and both Rio and the Library are booked for that day. Declaration of Conflicts of Interest None stated. Public Hearing: Aspen Valley Hospital (AVH) Phases III & IV LJ Erspamer opened the public hearing on Aspen Valley Hospital Phases III & IV. Jennifer Phelan stated this was one of three meetings scheduled for the Hospital the next one would be on November 20th and then December 4th. Jennifer said tonight P&Z and the public will have an overview of development opportunities and comments. Debbie Quinn reviewed the public notice, which was in order and entered as Exhibit B. Jennifer said this application was for Phases 3 & 4 and there was a site visit with a number of P&Z and staff members attending. Jennifer explained that this PUD was a 4 step review process with 1 Conceptual at P&Z and 1 Conceptual at Council then back to P&Z for Final and then to Council for Final. Phase 1 was the Obstetrics and Phase 2 was completed now with the parking garage; 2°a story medical offices, cardiac rehab; partial construction of the loop service road; development of affordable housing; access improvements to the site; drainage and utility improvements. Jennifer said the Phase III included a 2 story addition and a basement with the greatest amount of expansion on the ground floor (approximately 33,000 square feet) abutting the west side of the existing building. The upper story addition 2 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 includes medical office space and circulation (approximately 18,000 square feet), a basement of about 19,000 square feet, completion of the loop service road, 3 bay ambulance garage, new entry and parking. Jennifer said there would be remodeling of the existing building also. Phase IV proposes an addition to the ground floor (approximately 6,500 square feet) and basement (approximately 1,800 square feet) as well as a renovation of the existing building. Leslie Lamont introduced Dave Ressler, CEO and Russ Sedmak, project architect. Dave showed a power point from the work beginning on the project to bring in high technology for the faculty with a lot of thought and flexibility put into it. Dave said they were sensitive to the neighbors and met with them. Dave said Hazleton has been active in the LEED Certification for the project providing natural light and reducing the footprint of the office space sized for the Orthopedic Physicians now located in the building and accomplished decompressing the Physical Therapy. Dave said in the hospital they have moved out of the formerly semiprivate rooms for privacy and dignity of patients and their families. Dave said the Emergency Department showed what it looked like today and they will have essentially the same number of beds but with walls between the beds to maintain that privacy; there were break away doors that separate the patient to be private. Dave said the plans have been refined and some plans that will carry this hospital into the future. Russ explained an exhibit from the Master Plan needs assessment that they went through several years ago and they have been updating ever since on power point. Russ said they compared what the hospital is working in the terms of their interior environment to contemporary standards; there are national guidelines that dictate how much square footage is needed for specific functions at a hospital and circulation, corridors, exiting and the ADA, American Disabilities Act, dictate how much square footage is required for a hospital that are National Standards that they work with and is required for any community hospital. The chart Russ showed was not in the packet but will be made available to the commission which showed the proposed square footages based upon what the code says we need and the deficiency. The National Standards dictate the number of beds needed, the privacy factor, support spaces, storage facilities and very little of this was provided in the old facility. The modern standard for operating rooms is 600 net square feet the existing operating rooms at AVH are from 390 to 440 so they are not at the standard and everybody knows that AVH does a lot of orthopedic surgery and it is equipment intensive and the rooms are very crowded and don't meet contemporary standards. Russ said they are a big part of the Phase III application in terms of the 3 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 PUD. Russ reiterated the Phase I and Phase II along with the food service moved to the front of the building. Russ with power point showed what was completed today and what will be completed with the inpatient lobby to the building and the parking structure connected to the right connected to the hospital on a basement level and a level below that which also serves receiving and food service for the new kitchen. Phase III is a combination of expansion and renovation just as Phase II but a bit smaller is scope of the project. From the power point Russ showed the new construction and renovated areas. Russ spoke about the current emergency accesses and how important it was to be able to have walk in patients separated from Ambulance delivery patients. The helipad was originally on the roof of this second story is being moved down to the first floor to keep it out of the view of the neighbors and reduce the some of the massing of the building. Russ said Phase IV is really the extension of the new outpatient and there is a small portion added onto the building and the cafeteria but it is mostly renovation. Russ said they are trying to reorganize the hospital so all of the inpatient functions stay in the back of the facility accessed by a separate entrance and all of the outpatient functions are now along the front. Russ said the current update to the facility are in the booklet that show the cleaned up facility and overall facility ground meaning the 1 st and 2nd floor are basically the same but have added more square footage to the basement level. Russ said they have reduced square footage on the second floor to balance the amount of square footage above ground. They have decided to take the bulk of the mechanical off the roof of the building and locate it in the basement to reduce the visual impacts and potential noise impacts to the neighbors. Russ said also by putting the equipment in the basement it gets it out of the elements and increases the life span and saves energy by putting them inside. Russ said this gives you a sense of how much less construction is involved in Phase III as compared to Phase II. Russ said there was natural landscaping in the rendering and a sense of what the Phase III and Phase IV will look like. Dave said through the construction of Phase II we have been having discussions with the neighbors as much as we can and Frank Goldsmith has a monthly meeting at the hospital to have neighbors look at the progress of Phase II and any problems they might have; Frank also has an HOA meeting and meets with the Whitcomb 4 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting— Minutes October 30 2012 Terrace residents. Dave said there were a lot of people here tonight and he was anxious to hear the feedback. Bert Myrin said he wanted to know what P&Z was supposed to be looking at; the site review today was internal. Bert asked about the 3 bullets on page 2 of the staff memo; how does the internal layout relate to those 3 bullets on page 2. Jennifer said with the scale of this project she didn't think that the details were at the lst meeting of land use reviews. Jennifer said that you can start to talk about the Growth Management Review of Commercial Development which is the medical office space so we will be talking about that and the allotment for that and the mitigation for that because they are proposing additional medical office space. Jennifer said the Essential Public Facility is the Hospital and you may go with a recommendation to City Council on that for that Growth Management. Bert asked from the 3 things if this should be the size it is being proposed, twice the size or half the size. Jennifer answered Russ said what their space needs were so that was what their space needs are; what does the hospital have now for space, what are their needs and how does that translate into square footage and also understand that in the conceptual approval was granted on this project. Bert asked if the internal layout is important for us to consider. Jennifer said the design standards of today are driving the request before you and you might want to talk about understanding those needs. Leslie said that this property was publically zoned and any development in public zoned district requires a review by Planned Unit Development. Leslie said appendix H in the application would help because it talks about the entire site which is roughly 18 acres and defines your dimensional requirements based upon the entire site. LJ said usually you put exhibits in the memo and I know this is just a presentation. Jennifer stated you will have more exhibits in the next hearing. Leslie stated the applicant presented this in the application from the applicant's perspective. Cliff Weiss asked staff about Phase II and the outcome of Phase II; is he allowed to ask questions or request information regarding Phase II. Cliff said the outcome of Phase II has some influence on his thinking about III and IV. Debbie Quinn said the purpose of the hearing is to review III and IV or not to do an action on Phase II unless somehow it relates what is going on in III and IV. LJ said that he would agree that there is a link. Stan Gibbs asked about demolition recycling walking through today seeing the old PCU being torn apart and there is a huge amount of materials and he wanted to know what you think is going to happen because III and IV will be a lot of the 5 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 same recycling. Steve Selby, service manager at the hospital, stated there was roughly about 70% recycling of all of the stuff and at the end of that gets presented at the end of project everything is weighed at the recycle center. Stan asked if the mechanical that is being screened will be moved to the basement as part of Phase III and IV or is that still going to stay outside. Russ replied that is remaining outside with the large screen and needs to be outside because it requires a certain amount of air ventilation. Leslie said that they did a noise level analysis prior to conceptual and we just completed another noise analysis in the neighborhood and put a new one today and the results will be provided to you on the noise with Tom Dunlop scheduled before P&Z on the December 4th hearing. LJ asked Leslie about the helicopter having about 70 or 80 decibels and since you moved the helicopter pad do you have to review this study again. Leslie said according to Howard McGreggor and Tom Dunlop the relocation of the helipad from the second floor to the 1St floor does not change that reading that they got. LJ asked if it was closer to the nearest house. Leslie replied that it is further away from the nearest house from its current location and she will ask Tom to answer that question in his report. Russ said from relocating it down to the ED it is much further away for anyone in the neighborhood and virtually invisible to them. LJ asked if they had data on what the current grade is and what the grade will be when you are done with this. Leslie replied they submitted a rooftop plan that has spot elevations to identify height because the grade changes so much on the footprint of the building. Russ said they were basically digging out a portion of the site to erect this building. Cliff asked if this should be ready for the second meeting. Public Comments: 1. King Woodward, public, asked about the existing things on the top of the roof, are those big things going to moved to the basement. Stan said that his question was about the chiller on the northwest corner of the building with a screen around it. Russ replied that one of the units that serves the existing surgery department will be moved but the other ones are not; they are being replaced with new units that are actually smaller in physical footprints and they will be behind the high wall of the lobby so from the ground you won't even see them. Russ said with the new technology we are adding 3 new air handlers in the basement and replacing the other 3 on the roof. 2. John Keleher, public, asked for a count of the number of air handlers on the roof and tell us how many are going to remain on the roof and there is a new large air handler unit on top of the physical therapy area, unless you want to 6 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 put that in the parking garage and get rid of the lights. John said that you just completed a noise study and asked where they put the monitors for that. Leslie said some were put on somebody's decks. John also said that the light were an issue. 3. Jack Silverman, public, said that he seconded John. LJ asked where the lights were located. 4. Bob Raphelson, public, said that he lives on Castle Creek Road and appreciate the services at the hospital. Bob said the hospital has become gargantuan for a town of 6,000 people and a little bit of an attitude that if you build it they will come but more than that the county has issued a guideline that this is a scenic road and shall not be distressed by certain kind of building. Bob said that he was in favor of cutting off anything new; there were 2 speed bumps and the sign for them was about 2 1/2 feet before them. 5. Hal Fore, public, said he lived in Meadowood and too look at the new phase we have to look at phase I1; there is an incredible lighting problem, especially at night. Hal said it was light up at night like 42nd and Broadway. Hal said before voting on Phase III and IV we have to clean up I and II especially the lighting aspects. 6. Dorothy Fore, public, said that most architects are not lighting experts; there are lighting designers and experts and she wondered if the hospital consulted lighting people. Dorothy said after being away and coming home at night from the highway you could see the hospital lights like the X-Games. 7. Junee Kirk, public, said she looks at this hospital directly, the traffic and the lights and costs efficiency. Junee stated when this hospital was built it had 60 rooms and then the hospital reduced the rooms to about 25 and we are now an outpatient hospital. Junee said everyone before me stated she agreed with but it follows the National Guidelines for square footage but we are a hospital in a small community. Junee asked if we were providing more services and she answered no,just subsidizing orthopedic surgeons offices. 8. Gram Means, public, said he was a neighbor of the hospital and he wanted to talk about the lighting because it was a major issue. Gram said in the City of Aspen there is no other building that has this level of lighting. Gram said the parking garage is hung with tarps because the lighting is so objectionable; it casts an aura. The loop road was lit with 12 foot lights and they are lowering them. Gram said that Planning & Zoning needs to back up and take a look at the existing lighting and question the need for a lot of it and the design of it and in the future III and IV needs to limit it. 9. Dr. Balko stated that he was a physician in the hospital emergency room and he asked for Phases III and IV because of safety issues, the way the patient rooms are designed we could have a bad outcome and need a secure room 7 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting— Minutes October 30 2012 where patients can be monitored. Dr. Balko said there currently are curtains dividing the patients from one another and we are constantly bumping into one another and there are privacy issues. 10. Nancy Hall, public, said she has the same concerns that other people have expressed. Nancy said the hospital used to be below the tree level and now it is next to Meadowood Drive and looks like a big mechanical building. 11.Peggy Carlson, public, said she lives in Meadowood and the loop road was supposed to be for fire emergency only and there is a bay for ambulances on the loop road and it presents more traffic and 5 physicians parking spaces. The lights and traffic need to be addressed. 12. Becky Ayers, public, said she has been a volunteer at the hospital for the last 24 years and thought the improvements that they were making were for the good. Becky said that she lived in Meadowood and she wasn't bothered by the construction and once it is landscaped it will be something that we are very proud of 13. Crystal Logan, public, stated that she worked at the Aspen Institute and applauds you for your leadership and foresight for approving this project and some of the phases. Crystal said that she has toured the hospital and the construction company and Dave's team have done a great job. Crystal said that she was in favor of the project and when she worked there 15 years ago people used closets as their offices and was happy with this upgrade. 14. Steve Wicks, public, stated he was absolutely in favor of phases III and IV and wanted you to be on the lookout for booboos; the gaping mouth of the garage from Castle Creek Road he wished that he had foreseen that but didn't. Steve said there was an L-shaped stairwell and window that was the large expanse of glass may be need to be lighted in the wintertime. 15.Bart Artzen was a radiologist at the hospital and has been at AVH for 16 years and the beauty of the area drew him here and you people need to keep in mind is the word quality; what we are doing is really really good as is the service. Bart said that this is a 30 year footprint and we cannot make those standards happen with the footprint that we have. U closed the public comment section of the hearing. Dave said he got the light and in the garage in particular and make the time to come back at the next meeting to replace the draping which is very unattractive and accomplish addressing the light in the next meeting in greater detail. The commissioners were all concerned about lighting. 8 Regular City Planning& ZQning Meeting— Minutes October 30-2012 - - Jasmine asked for a copy of the hospital standards and the square footages of what we have and what the standards are what the deficiencies are. Cliff said that we have had 3 site visits and the hospital needs to make more outreach to the community. Keith echoed Jasmine and Cliff with examples to the community. Jim said he understands why the expansion is being done but the hospital needs to educate the public more. Bert was reading the April, 2006 minutes and all the same comments were about light and noise; that seems to be reoccurring. Bert said we heard about the things that can be fixed. Bert read from the staff memo of April 2010 that the loop road would only be used for service traffic for the function of the hospital so nothing was new tonight. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to continue the hearing on the AVHMaster Facility Plan for phases III and IV to November 20`h, seconded by Jasmine Tygre. All in favor. Continued Public Hearing: 616 E Hyman — Conceptual Commercial Design Review LJ Erspamer opened the continued public hearing for 616 East Hyman— Conceptual Commercial Design Review. Jennifer Phelan noted that this was a continued hearing for 616 East Hyman which was last heard on October 16th and the application was reviewed for conceptual commercial design. Jennifer said the one issue that was not resolved was the building height, since that meeting she asked the applicant to submit sections of the building and a roof plan so the commission could understand better how the building will be built with floor to ceiling heights and floor to floor heights. Jennifer said that was exhibit G of the - - - - packet. The roof plan is included on the first page (page 25) with color coding. Jennifer said the elevations were on pages 26 and 27 you can see the actual floor to floor height and the floor to ceiling heights. Staff is still recommending that the building come down to 36 feet rather than the 38 that is being requested. Staff feels that the roof parapet which is 18 inches could be removed and it would reduce the height right there and if you reduced 6'inches floor to ceiling height on the 3rd floor you would be down to your 36 feet. 9 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 Cliff asked what the commercial core was for C-1 on the 1 st floor are we okay. Jennifer said the floor to ceiling heights are a discussion at final commercial design. Jennifer said that we saw one code at the time which did not have a floor to ceiling height but the commercial design standards talk about minimum floor to ceiling heights. Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning introduced Andy Wisnowski and Les Rosenstein from Poss Architecture and Planning. Mitch said they were at 40 feet on the building height at the highest points of the building and dropped down a little bit. Mitch used power point to show the changes except they were in a mirror image and with Charles Cunniffe's Building next to it and showed the 10 foot piece and the 9 foot. Mitch said the parapet functional purpose as a drainage system and from the street perspective looking up from the street you won't see the parapet; there is a reason that all of the old buildings have parapets because they are an important feature. There is not a parapet on the second story behind the wall because you are recessed back. Mitch reminded the commission that this whole block was going through a Renaissance if you will; the building on the corner was going through a change with a 37 foot height limit; between that building and this building, the Charles Cunniffe Building that was approved by HPC with a 38 foot in the back portion of the building. The Crandall Building already has portions of 3 8 feet and the other side of the street has everything bigger the Garfield Hecht Building is 36 to 38 feet; The Muse building is 38 feet and the Museum is 57 feet. Mitch said if you want to see over that Museum you need to get as far back as you can which is what we have tried to do. Mitch said 1.24 they have followed the letter of this one precisely using one or more of the following; setting back upper floors to vary the building fagade profiles and the roof forms across the width and depth of the building. Mitch said they have set back the upper floor and varied the roof form heights and if we lower the roof to 36 feet it will be a flat roof all the way across the upper 3rd floor. Les showed the next slides where the building drops from 40 to 38 feet; he showed aerial views. Cliff said the 1 st floor is 12 foot from floor to floor, the 2"d floor is 11 foot and the 3rd floor is anywhere from 12 feet. Jennifer said the floor to ceiling heights are from 9 to 11.6 feet and you add 2 feet extra feet for structure so you are going from 11.6 to 13.6 and an extra 18 inches for the parapet. LJ asked if you didn't have the parapet you would be within the code. Jennifer replied it would be 6 inches off; the floor to top of the parapet runs from 12 feet 6 inches to 15 feet depending on the area of the building because there are different floor to ceiling heights on the 10 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting — Minutes October 30 2012 3rd floor. Mitch said the qualitative measurement mitigates the quantitative; looking at it the setback, the architecture elements, variation of the roof height takes all of that number that we are focusing on. Andy said that you can see from these images they are not going to be seen. Jim said the issue is 2 feet. Mitch replied right. Jim said staff wants 36. Jennifer replied yes. Jim asked why are you expecting 36. Jennifer said if you look at the design guidelines granting additional range in variation in building they are talking about the street fagade so you don't want every cornice line at the same height on the whole block so you want undulation of different buildings. Jennifer said there doesn't seem the basis for height in granting the additional height variance to meet the criteria in the commercial design standards. LJ said the canopy was at 36 feet. Andy said it was below that and it helps to screen that height to some degree. Stan asked what drove thQ size of the 3rd floor. Andy replied that floor area controls the size of the area. Stan asked if there was a lot of mechanical on the roof. Andy responded there would be a little mechanical shed in the back and we have mechanical down in the basement. Andy said it was in the roofline section. No public comments. Commissioner Comments: Jim said that he would support this application with the 38 foot height. LJ asked if the parapet was the just going up or does it have to do with the ceiling. Bill Poss explained the parapet was like a curb on the roof that helps control drainage, helps screen things. LJ said and that was 18 inches high. Mitch said that was correct. Jasmine agreed with Jim because the 38 feet is only going to be for a portion of that top floor and seems to be a reasonable compromise and when you are faced with a monster across the street everything is going to look minuscule. Jasmine said that is not a reason and unlike Jim she really didn't care for the architecture; if there weren't those big panels in front the top the heaviness of the building would be greatly improved. Jasmine said the compromise fits well enough into the code. Stan said we have to look at the intent of these guidelines and look at 1.23 the new building should reflect variation but more importantly it is about the massing that this building presents and there is a lot of variation because of the way that this building is designed. 11 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting—Minutes October 30 2012 Bert said he was reading the guideline from the 1.23 which was pretty clear when we can grant height variances is to achieve different levels in heights; primary function of this building is civic; some portion of the building is affected by height restriction where it may be appropriate for affordable housing or demonstrate energy efficiency. Jim said it makes a demonstrable contribution to the building's energy. LJ asked what section of the code were we talking about. Jennifer said it was on page 24 of the guidelines. Mitch said the standard was 1.23 everything below that were guidelines. MOTION: Keith Goode moved to extend the meeting to 7:16pm, seconded by Stan Gibbs. All in favor. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution 20 approving the conceptual design review for 616 East Hyman shall not exceed 38 feet in height as represented in the attached exhibits; seconded by Jasmine Tygre. Roll call: Stan Gibbs, yes; Keith Goode, yes; Cliff Weiss, yes; Bert Myrin, no; Jasmine Tygre, yes; Jim DeFrancia, yes; LJErspamer, yes. APPROVED 6-1. n Jennifer said the applicant asked for a second motion to add all other dimensional requirements except for the height shall be at final design review and the existing public amenity space is 420 square feet. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to accept the motion to add all other dimensional requirements except for the height at 38 feet shall be at final design review and the existing public amenity space is 420 square feet; seconded by Jasmine Tygre. Roll call vote: Bert Myrin, no; Keith Goode, yes; Cliff Weiss, yes; Stan Gibbs, yes; Jasmine Tygre, yes; Jim DeFrancia, yes; LJErspamer, yes. APPROVED 6-1. Adjourned at 7:20 pm. SA�- Ak-tz) ckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 12