HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.hpc.028-2012 RECEPTION#: 594287, 11/29/2012 at
09:55:21 AM,
1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OFT Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
AMENDING HPC RESOLUTION NUMBER PRESERVATION COMMIS
DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), COMMERCIA SION (HPC)
ER 17 SERIES OF 2012 G
(CONCEPTUAL), DEMOLITION, AND VARIANC RANTING MAJOR
SERVICE AREA DIMENSIONS FOR L DESIGN STANDARD REVIEW
SERVICE
AVENUE LOT O R THE PROPERTY LOCATED ITY
BLOCK 88, DUVI RECYCLE
TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CONDOMINIUMS, CITY AND
COLORADO
RESOLUTION#28, SERIES OF 2012
PARCEL ID: 2737-037-39-020 THRU _027
AND 2737-073-39-801
WHEREAS, the applicant,
Conceptual Commercial al Desi Duvike Inc.
requested Major Development
Conceptual
Y g Standard Review, Demolition, and a (Conceptual),
y/Rec cle service area dimensions for the
Avenue, Lot O, Block 88 variance of the
, City and Townsite of Aspen, property located at 420 East
p , Colorado; and Hyman
WHEREAS, 420 East Hyman Avenue is located within the Commercial Core H
and is not considered a contributing building to the integrity of the Historic District District
; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Co
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged
de states that "no building or structure
designated historic Property , altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving
y or district until plans or sufficient information have been s
to the Community Development Director and a a
established for their review approved in accordance with the procedures
,"and
s
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented aathe HPC must review the application
conformance with the City
26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Cod caring to determine the
Aspen of Historic Preservation Design Project's
may approve, disapprove, and other applicable g Guidelines per Section
pprove approve with conditions or continue the Sections. The HPC
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve to obtain
pprove or deny; and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented e a the HPC
conformance with the must review the application,
Objectives and City of Aspen Commercial, Lodging to determine the
Guidelines per Section 26.412.040.A.2 project's
Procedure, an the Municipal Code and other applicable g g and Historic District Design
Commercial Design Standards Review
disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the Code Sections. The HPC ma approve,
necessary to make a decision to a pplication to obtain additional info ation
pprove or deny; and
420 East Hyman Avenue
HPC Resolution#28, Series of 2012
2
Pagel of 3
desHn�AS� in order t
g ated historic ° authorize a De
following criteria; Properties, it must be demon' according to S
demon'
ection 26
a. The that the application 5.080
a , Demolition of
prop has n meets any one of the
safety and been Bete
b manner, the °�ner/aPPlicantneduby the city to
' Is be an i
The structure ' le to make the needed hazard
Proper) is not structural) re to public
C. Y Uae tc nnhs structure, sound despite evidence pairs in a timely
The stru struct
d Aspen, or of practical) °f the owner's effo
No documentation y be moved its to
architect exists to to another appropriate location
architectural,
archaeolo suppo or
gica1 demonstrate in
Additional) , engineering that the
a for a royal to demolish g or cultural significancepsrty has historic,
all of the , and
The structure follow
district i does not �'in criteri
b. The loss which it is located tribute to the significance a mast be met:
inte Of the buildin ' and gnificance of
amity of the hi sto g, structure the Parcel or
to adjacent nc district °r object historic
C. designated or its historic would
Demolition of properties and ' architect not adverse)
needs of the he struct oral or aestheticy affect the
e area; and ore will be inconsequential relationship
WHEREAS nsequential to the
for approval of historic Preservation
report Section and the evidence reduction Of f ation
26.430 of the presented trash/utilit /
Munici at a hearing Y service area di
l• pal Code, that the g to deter dimensions,
There is a de reduction: mine' per Sectio ns' a staff
totals the
n 26 575-060.13 square n that, 75.060.B and
2 adequate. ft the utility/�ras�ec nature of the pots
Access tot Ycle s Potential uses of t
3. Measures are ultility/trash/recycle Se service area proposed to be e building and its
4. Whrennnel. Provided for enclosing ras is adequate. provided will be
bms and goats.
develo aPPr°prlate making
pment ' provisions them Basil
and for trash y movable b
S'
The earea for in the bloc ores are taken to compaction are Y trash
or public P encoura Provided
b
Placement of utility lacement and maintenance
ge trash compactions Proposed
6• Adequate tilities.
got pOf utilities.
io Y other
Provisions are inco
heREAS9 Sara Adams • rporated to ensure the c is adequate and safe for t
Pphcation b construction Of he
based on the her staff repot to HP
stand the access area.
mmended continuation; standards'port
that dated July 25
n; and the r , 2012
review Standards Performed
an analysis
not been met, and
420 East Hyman
Avenue Remand
,-,PC Resolution # Amend
28, Series Of 2012
Page 2 Of 3
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on July 25, 2012, continued from June 27, 2012, the
Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public
hearing, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review
standards and recommended approval with conditions by a vote of three to two Q - 2).
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 13, 2012 City Council was provided notice of
call up and voted to call- up HPC Resolution number 17, 2012 in accordance with Municipal
Code Section 26.412.040.B; and p
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on August 27, 2012 City Council voted to remand the
project back to UPC for reconsideration of mass and scale; and
WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report to HPC dated November 14, 2012 performed an
analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards had not been
met, and recommended continuation; and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on November 14, 2012, the Historic Preservation
Commission reconsidered the mass and scale of the application during a duly noticed public
hearing, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review
standards and recommended approval with conditions by a vote of four to zero (4—0).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby amends HPC Resolution Number 17, Series of 2012 for the property located at
420 East Hyman Avenue, Lot O, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the
following conditions:
1. The approval and conditions granted pursuant to HPC Resolution Number 17, Series of
2012 are valid, with the exception of the amendments specified herein.
2. Condition 5 of HPC Resolution 17, Series of 2012 is hereby omitted.
3. The mass and scale is approved as represented in the application.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 14th of Nov bet
2012.
Approv.fd as,to Form Ann ullins, Chair
Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney
ATTIPST:
�hy K St ickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
420 East Hyman Avenue (Remand Amendment)
HPC Resolution # 28, Series of 2012
Page 3 of 3