The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.apz.005-2013 RESOLUTION NO. 5 (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING AN 8040 GREENLINE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PUD-OTHER AMENDMENT FOR LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE MOSES LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION, COMMONLY DESCRIBED AS 605 AND 675 S. ALPS ROAD,CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel IDs: 273718256003 and 273718256001 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from S. Alps Road LLC and Icie Jackson LLC (Applicant), represented by Alan Richman of Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting approval of a 8040 Greenline review and a recommendation of approval for PUD-Other Amendment from the Planning and Zoning Commission and also requesting Subdivision — Other Amendment, which is only subject to review by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests 8040 Greenline review to build an addition to the residence located on 675 S. Alps Road, PUD-Other Amendment to amend the individual floor area allowances for Lot 1 and 2 of the Moses Lot Split but not increase the total floor area granted to the two lots, and Subdivision - Other Amendment to adjust the lot lines between the two lots; and, WHEREAS, as part of the application, Applicant offers to extinguish a Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) on Lot 2; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed 8040 Greenline review and PUD—Other Amendment and recommended approval with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a meeting on February 19, 2013 the Planning and Zoning Commission opened a duly noticed public hearing to consider the proposal and approved an 8040 Greenline review as well as a recommendation of approval for PUD-Other Amendment for City Council by a four to zero (4-0) vote, with the findings and conditions listed hereinafter; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Approvals Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the 8040 Greenline review to build an addition onto the existing single family residence located on Lot 2 of the Moses Lot Split (675 S. Alps Road) and recommends approval of the PUD — Other Amendment to amend the allocation of the individual Floor Area allowances for Lot 1 and 2. A. 8040 Greenline review. The 8040 Greenline review is approved as represented in Exhibit 1 of this resolution. The approval is subject to the terms and conditions of the Land Use Code RECEPTION#: 597478, 03/06/2013 at 10:09:48 AM, Planning and Zoning Commission 1 OF 7, R $41.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 Page 1 of 4 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO unless outlined below. As part of the 8040 Greenline approval, the following conditions shall be met: 1. Building Envelope. The building envelope for Lot 2 shall be amended to contain the existing footprint of the building, proposed addition, and existing hardscape improvements to the lot such as retaining walls, etc. so that the requirements of Section 26.575.110, Building envelopes, are met. The amended envelope shall be depicted on the ls' amended lot line adjustment plat that is to be approved by City Council. 2. Residential Design. Recognizing the existing conditions of the site and residence, the 8040 Greenline approval permits the development of a site specific design that is compatible with the local terrain and mountain character; however, the new additions shall be subject to applicable residential design standards with the exception of secondary mass (section 26.410.040 B.1.). The addition shall replicate the design approved by the Planning Commission and incorporated as Exhibit 1 of this resolution. B. PUD-Other Amendment. The Commission recommends that the City Council approve the change in the size of Lots 1 and 2, amend the Floor Area allowance for each lot as noted in the table below, and require the extinguishment of one Historic Transferable Development Right as part of the amendment to the PUD. Lot 1 Lot 2 Floor Area 300 5,800 Lot Size 15,072 54,762 Section 2: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant's design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan. The application shall meet the mitigation requirements of the Mud and Debris Flow Analysis prepared by Tetra Tee, Inc., dated August 29, 2012 and provided in Exhibit D of the staff memo reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission dated February 19, 2013. Section 3: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. Section 4: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5,Series 2013 Page 2 of 4 Section 5• Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Section 6: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 7• Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. Section 8• Building Permit Application The Applicant, the Applicant's General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission requirements, the requirements of this Ordinance, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 9 (Series of 2012). b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. e. A construction management plan (CMP) pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. f. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. g. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Sect= All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5, Series 2013 Page 3 of 4 Section 10: This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 11: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 19th day of February, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMM ON: Deb Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ,Ersparner, hair ATTEST: a Lothian,Deputy City Clerk Exhibit 1 —Exterior elevations and site plan Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 5,Series 2013 Page 4 of 4 - 11111 , 111 „ � 1 � : 111 ) Jlll W I L L I A M T. GEORGIS A R C H I T E C T I C TERING KITCHE ADDIT ON GE � 1 5 SOFT. ---- IR y PIT - ---- i ii ® OFFICE/Y0 STUDIO ADDITION OVER I EXISTING TERRACE �0 Oa II 295 SOFT. o e I '; �I TOTAL ADDED SOFT. = 630.00 MUDROOM ADDITION _ aoa O 150 SOFT. N - L-ITTLE NELL RESIDENCE UPPER LEVEL PLAN-PROPOSED ADDITIONAL SQ.FT. 675 SOUTH ALPS ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 7 NOVEMBER 2011 SCALE:1/8 ® +rr ® ® • ® ® �r • • ® � ® � • • ® � ® • � 11i • i► iiiiiiiii � iiiiiii • � GEORGIS 4 I _ I. PROPOSED ED YOG P OS A STUDIC OFFICE 7 E514 iPi :.. PROPOSED MUD ROOM ADDTION r h I __ _.._._._.__I, .._..._ _{-'7' ' Fe�c•�v ?eel I � I I (� I `� �/1 ❑ ,� ❑ ❑ O (J �_EAST ELEVATION (FF ONT) �.' i' �J / .__ fill I T <7f I �I r i': A _ I. ;3 _ r PROPOSED MUD ROOM ADDITION r ' F I I i I I � n _ - -- ------- - SOUTH ELEVATION ' I � � a � 1J � o a–100-0•.Lo74.67 .. .— - I/4'.P_O� c I ' I LITTLE NELL RESIDENCE 675 SOUTH ALPS ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 27APPIL 2011 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS GEORGIS r— i1 li [Jf 7 r`= 1 `f�"� �T q »i ��`a•� �� A ( +� r•,�` � � .— k a 41, P s ILL I -- ON - - - - - El- 1 I PROPOSED KITCHEN ENCLOSURE L a - !. �� L_� .. � l`! % d-O•I tkTF.6'! I.ni \ .1 C.LA1 G/ I _ r I PROPOSED YOGA STUDIO/OFFICE __ r J. 1 et•f r �#�h� i �.:._! L, t F li_._c L t �r _.Q.;H-_ Fow '11 II 1 J LITTLE NELL RESIDENCE 675 SOUTH ALPS ROAD ASPEN,COLORADO 27APPIL 2011 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS