Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
coa.lu.gm.400 E Hyman Ave.0009-2012
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0009.2012.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 400 E. HYMAN AVE PROJECTS ADDRESS GMQS TOM THUMB BUILDING PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION GMQS-CARRY FORWARD REPRESENTATIVE KEN SACK DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3/20/13 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.20.13 o oo q •2-ot 7- t-q -A_A31 File Edit Record Navigate Fprm Reports Format Tab Help JJ iiX 1, V J0, Jump- -=tai A A k] A A Routing Status i Feel i Fee Summary. [Main]actions Attachments Routing History Valuation I ArchjEnq Custom Fields 1 Sub Permits I k pen,"t em aslu lAspen Land Use Permit*F000g 2012.ASLU Address KO E HYMAN AVE AptMite city ASPEN State GO zip Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 2f28Q01 2 Project i status pending Approved F— Description APPLICATION FOR MAJOR GRCVVrH MANAGEMENT LAND USE FOR THE Issued TOM THUMB CONDO ADDITION ClosediFinal Submitted Clock Days Expires F2t22E01 3 KEN SACK 954 680 5490 1 EEil F70 Submitted via Owner Last name ISACK I First name IKEN F4690 SOUTH UNIVERSITY DR DAVIE FL 33328 Phone ( 4)680-5490 Address Applicant Owner is applicant? ❑Contractor is applicant? Last name IIRVMN First name IPAUL 1219 HARRISON AVE — LEADVILLE CO 80461 19)221-3232 Cust 129056 Phone F(7 Address it Lender Last name First name Phone 1( Address I Displays the permit lender's address AspenGoIc15(server) angelas 1 Of 1 -2 0 -7 v \ 400 Hyman LLC 5454 County Rd 346 Silt,CO 81652 954-249-5674 I am applying for an HPC Minor Development and Consolidated Commercial Design Review for the property listed below. Louis Loria,Atmosphere Design Group is authorized as my representative. LLC R010570 273707343015 400 HYMAN - 400 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision: TOM THUMB BUILDING Unit: C-301 R010�69 273707343014 400 HYMAN LLC 400 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN Subdivision:TOM THUMB BUILDING Unit: C-201 I hereby withdraw the pending growth management application on the above referenced properties. If there is any further information needed,please contact me at 954-249-5674 - Kenneth Sack '� Sara Adams From: Sara Adams Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 1:19 PM To: ripple @rockymountains.net Subject: Tom Thumb Building Hi Paul, My sister and brother-in-law live in Leadville (Em and Mike Bordogna), so I am in your neck of the woods a lot. I have reviewed your application for Growth Management Review and I need some more information. • First, you need to apply for Subdivision Review in addition to the application for Growth Management. The review criteria and application requirements are found in Land Use Code Sections 26.480.050 and 26.480.060 here: (please submit 21 copies of the subdivision application requirements and review criteria) http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/clerk/municode/coaspent26-400.pdf • The review criteria that you need to address for Growth Management are as follows: B. General requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. 2. The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan. (this is on our website here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Long%20Range%20PIanning/2000%20AACP.pdf ) 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval, as applicable. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. (Ord. No. 6—2010,§2) 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent(30%)of the additional free- 1 market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. (Ord. No.6—2010,§2) 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. (Ord. No. 14, 2007,§1) What is the existing net leasable on the site (the entire building) and what amount of net leasable is proposed? A definition of net leasable and how to measure it is found in our Land Use Code Section 26.104.100 Definitions and 26.575.020.1 Measurement of Net Leasable Commercial Area. I understand that you are proposing to decrease the amount of net leasable, but I need specific numbers for the application. • 1 need new net livable numbers and floor area number for the new free market residential unit and for the entire building complex. Measurement of Net livable area is found here: 26.575.020.1 in the Land Use Code. Affordable housing mitigation for the new residential unit is equal to 30%of the new net livable area. • The application indicates a request to pay cash in lieu for the affordable housing, which is$76.93 per square foot. The numbers in the application (439 sq. ft.) indicate that the mitigation requirement is less than one full unit, but it is difficult to tell if this is floor area'or net livable area and how you did the calculation. Please provide more detailed information on the floor plans as to how you got to the net livable numbers. Assuming that the housing requirement is less than one full unit, Planning and Zoning reviews the cash in lieu payment request. • Please provide more information on how you are calculating net livable area, net leasable area, and floor area for each use and overall so that I can verify your numbers. The easiest way to do this is to label the floor plans (existing and proposed).These need to be scaled and 24 x 36 in size. Two copies are sufficient at this point-you do not need to submit extras for P&Z yet. Also, make sure that you note the non-unit space and how it is attributed to the different uses in the building for the floor'area calculation. • A 3-D model (either digital or physical) needs to be prepared for the P&Z and the City Council meetings that show the proposed building in the context of the downtown historic district. The City has a sketch up model of the downtown area that you can drop the proposed building into. Let me know if you need a copy of the model. Feel free to call me if you have any questions about the proposal. I am happy to help walk you through it if needed. I cannot schedule a hearing before P&Z until this information is adequately addressed. Best, Sara Sara Adams, Senior Planner City of Aspen,136 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 tele 9701429.2778 fax. 9701920 5439 2 Peter Goldstein, President ASPEN/PInGN Tom Thumb Condominium Association CDMMUMTY DEVELoPMENr DEPARTMENT 400 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 April 4, 2012 Re: Land Use Application for redevelopment of Tom Thumb Building at 400 East Hyman Ave. Dear Mr. Goldstein, I have reviewed the letter of consent and conditions for the Tom Thumb redevelopment application. The City of Aspen cannot ensure that the application will meet the conditions of the letter of consent. Be Regards,. a Adams, Senior Planner Community Development Der- y----' 970-429-2778 SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIvERY Sara.adams @Ci.aspen.co.us 0 Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Sig ure item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. X ❑ ■ Print your name and address on the reverse -..ressee so that we can return the card to you. ■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece, B. Received by(Prin ed Name) C. Date of Delivery or on the front if space permits. D. Is delivery address different from Rem 1? 13 Yes 1. Article Addressed to: If YES,enter delivery address below: 0 No ��rrlrlrrllr���i n i�liir�li�ll�l Tom Thumb Condo Association c/o Peter Goldstein 400 East Hyman Ave 3. Service Type Aspen, Co 81611 >47Certifled Mail Q Express Mail ❑Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise ❑Insured Mail ❑C.O.D. 4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes 2. Article Number (rransferfrom service labeq 91 7199 9991 7 0 3 0 0696 3 8 5 9 PS Form 3811,February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET • ASPEN,CDLORADo 81611-1975 PHONE 970.920.5090 • FAX 97U.YZU.59sv - Pdwd on Recycled Paper S ovs Pps'- � F ti. Z PfTNEY BOWES /( '/J�n W 02 1A �F 05.75 THE CITY OF ASPEN '''v,vt tiy��' 00 0426326 ARROS 2012. 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET 0696 - MAILED FROM ZW CODE 8161 1 91 719 9 9991 7 0 3 ASPEN,COLORADO 81611-1975 a�•Cid�'a- �� 5 AGf j /o 00 e*t Av4"<,, ®Printed On Recycled Paper RECEIVED FEB 15 2012 CITY OF ASPEN COWUNITY DEMOPN ENT ATTACHMENT 2-Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: Location: ( LOTS M (indicate street address, of&block number or metes and bounds description of property Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) APPLICANT` Name: Address: 1 Phone#: Fax#: E-mail: ken REPRESENTATIVE' Name: Address: Phone#: Fax#: E-mail:41, 1'1 f; +c�a+«c.the TYPE OF APPLICATION: lease check all that ❑' Historic Designation ❑ Relocation(temporary,on ❑ Certificate of No Negative Etiect ❑ or off-site) Certificate of Appropriateness ❑ Demolition(total ❑ -Minor Historic Development demolition) jZ -Major Historic Development Historic Landmark Lot Spli ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment ExisTiNG CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc. PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc. SIR Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 24,2007 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item#10 on the submittal requirements key. ..�Not/n�ecceesssaary for all projects.) Project: �7m 4-C_i f C.."`a,dL� 1. 1� Applicant: C'L1,1 Akc— - Project Location- -Zone District: ( U Lot Size: (v[?X 100 4- Lot Area: I CpC[3 T= (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes.Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code:) Commercial net leasable; Existing: 'JPropused:_LL Number of residential units: Existing:: Proposed: Ntnnber of bedrooms: Existing., Proposed:__ _„� Proposed%of demolition:":_ DINIENSIONS: (write n1a where no requirement in the zone district) q Floor Area: Existing —I—rtllowable: 041— Proposed:4Q 7 4 Htigbl Nob G5/ Principal Bldg.: Existing: _['I—Allowable: ' Proposed.: _ Accessory Bldg.: Existing:MAt xlowable: MA. Proposed: RAn On-Site parking: Existing. G�? _._Required: (_Proposed:_ %Site coverage: Existing:7�._Requlred:__ _Propvsed:� %Open Space- / t Existing:Required,-___'2 Proposed: // Front Setback: ! Exlsfing Required; © Proposed: Rear Setback: Existng:_tp Required: Q Propviced: d r Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N.S.E.W Existing:_ ___Required:__Q Proposed: _ Q , Side Setback: Existing: Q Required Q Proposed.` Side Setback: Existing.-P Required::_1Proposed.' G Combined Sides; Eacisting;0_Required:• 0 Proposed: 16P' J - Distance between Existing:"_0 Required:-0 Proposed.•____Q buildings; Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: Variations requested(identify the exact variances needed):. _ Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use.Application Requirements.Updated:May 29,2007 , S 400 E Hyman Ave. Aspen, CO Growth Management Application: 1 . The general application information required in Common development review procedures, Chapter 26.304. 2. A site-improvement survey depicting: a. Existing natural and man-made site features. b. All legal easements and restrictions. c. All requirements for improvement surveys outlined in the current City Engineering Department regulations. 3. A description of the project and the number and type of the requested growth management allotments. 1 . Project involves partial demolition of existing 2 story building element which is replaced with a 3 story structure. Basement and street level uses remain mercantile/commercial. The 2" level use is changed from buisness/commercial to residential. The new 3' level will be residential. The one new residential unit will occupy both the 2nd and V levels. 1 . One residential unit growth management allotment is requested 4. A detailed description and site plan of the proposed development, including 1 . proposed land uses of residential and commercial are within the development zone limits re FAR calculations 2. densities - Net density is reduced with change of use from commercial to residential on existing 2nd level. 3. natural features, - there are some existing trees just outside of the property line along Hyman and Mill. These trees will be protected during construction and since the existing foundation is to remain, they should not be affected by new construciton. 4. traffic and pedestrian circulation_ - Pedestrian access to the lower courtyard is enhanced by the widening of the existing stairs. ADA compliance is achieved with the addition of an elevator and wheelchair rail lift. 5. off-street parking - Project creates no additional demand 6. open space areas-There is a reduction in the existing open space area in exchange for an elevator. 7. infrastructure improvements -A new water line will be installed to upgrade from the existing line. Size will depend upon the sprinkler system demand for the entire building 8. site drainage -We are exploring different options for bringing the existing storm drain up to code. 9. off-site improvements - NA 5. A description of the proposed affordable housing and how it provides adequate mitigation for the project and conforms to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. City of Aspen Land Use Code 1. Approximately 500 sq ft of affordable housing is required and cash in lieu has been proposed. 6. A statement as to how the application should be considered "exceptional' if multi-year allotments are being requested. 1 . NA 7. A statement specifying the public facilities that will be needed to accommodate the proposed development, proposed infrastructure improvements and the specific assurances that will be made to ensure that the public facilities will be available to accommodate the proposed development. 1 . Water-The existing 3/4" diameter main water line will be replaced in order to accommodate new sprinkler demands for the entire condominium 2. Sewage -Capacity of existing pipe has not yet been determined 3. Storm Water-At the present time, storm water drains into the sanitary sewer. There is also an overflow drain from the fountain which may connect to this system but has not been confirmed. A drainage system which does not utilize the sanitary sewer is being developed. 4. Electric -Site has immediate and existing access to power, phone, and cable. 8. A written response to each of the review criteria for the particular review requested. 9. Copies of required approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission, Historic Preservation Commission and the City Council, as necessary. Attached. 10.As applicable, a recommended community objective score according to the scoring criteria applicable to the type of development as outlined in Section 26.470.120 and a brief explanation supporting the recommended score. (Ord. No. 14, 2007, §1) 1 . NA WING-FAR Calculations lot size 6168 sq fl Existing area breakdown percent (Unit# Zoning above grc sq It sq It A-101 C 406 0.13 53 A-102 C 645 0.17 110 A-103 C 421 0.15 63 A-201 C 1286 1 1286 A-202 C 511 1 511 A-301 FM 515 1 515 A-302 A 396 1 396 A-303/304 FM 604 1 604 B-101 C 1083 0.1 108 B-201 C 433 1 433 B-202 C 464 1 464 B-301 C 954 1 954 C-101 C 810 0.16 130 C-201 C 806 1 806 C-301 C 817 1 817 %non unit space non unit alloc total sq It FAR actual FAR max sq It left 1119 TotoIGeemarket 15.44% 141.85 1260.85 0.2 0.5 1823.15 5734 totalcommercia� 79.10% 726.95 6461.43 1.05 2 $874.57 396 Totalaffordable 5.46% 50.2 446.2 0.07 999999999 ### GCE 1-1 124 104gp ) GCE 1-2 73 73 GCE 1-3 75 75 GCE 1-4 49 49 GCE 2-1 124 124 GCE 2-2 73 73 GCE 3-1 115 115 613 TOTAL GCE LCE 1-1 36 36 LCE 2-1 73 73 LCE 3-1 197 197 306 TOTAL LCE Total 8168 8168 7249 Total Unit floor area 919 Total Non u nit floor area PROPOSED-FAR Calculations lot size 6168 sq ff Proposed area breakdown percent Unit# Zoning abovegrc sgff sgff A-101 C 406 0.13 53 A-102 C 645 0.17 110 A-103 C 421 0.15 63 A-201 C 1286 1 1286 A-202 C 511 1 511 A-301 FM 515 1 515 A-302 A 396 1 396 A-3031304 FM 604 1 604 B-101 C 1083 0.1 108 B-201 C 433 1 433 B-202 C 464 1 464 B-301 C 954 1 954 C-101 C 810 0.16 130 C-201 C 806 1 806 C-301 EV 817 1 817 C-401 F^n 106 T�6 %non unit space non unit alloc total sq fl FAR actual FAR max sq ff left 2642 Total6eemarket 33.21% 371.62 3013.62 0.49 0.5 70.38 4917 total commercial 61.81% 691.68 5609.16 0.91 2 6726.84 396 Total affordable 4.98% 55.7 451.7 0.07 NA no limit GCE 1-1 124 104 GCE 1-2 73 73 GCE 1-3 75 75 GCE 1-4 49 49 GCE 2-1 124 124 GCE 2-2 73 73 GCE 3-1 115 115 613 TOTAL GCE LCE 1-1 36 36 7955 Total Unit floor area ILCE 2-1 73 73 1119 Total Non unit floor area ILCE 3-1 197 197 0 LCE 1-2 100 100 LCE 2-2 100 100 506 TOTALLCE Total 9074 9074 7955 Total Unit floor area 1119 Total Non unit floor area NEW NET LEASABLE AND FREE MARKET EXISTINCADDITIONTOTAL Parldng sq It Unit# Zoning SQ FT SQ FT SQ FT 26-515 A-101 C 359 359 commercial 1 per 1000 sq It 0.0000 30k'percentage $0.00 A-102 C 601 601 (residential nonerequired formixed use in commercialcore A-103 C 388 388 A-201 C 1185 1185 A-202 C 472 472 Affordable Housing requirement -281.4000 sq H total A-301 FM 467 467 26.470.100 A-302 A 0 0 commercial 4.1 employee/1000 sq It A-303/304 FM 556 556 #of employees= -3 j(�I B-101 C 993 993 60%OFREQ -1.8000 -720 (400sgff/emp( B-201 C 393 393 8-202 C 423 423 residential 1462 new FM sq ft 8-301 C 894 894 31%of f ee market 439 C-101 C-------.z,2 0 742 q C-2Ql C 747 `,, 0 747 Options In town 500 sq It C-301 FM 756 0-, 756 within urban growth boundary 500 sq ft C-401 FM 0 706 '+\706 purchase of affordable housing credits l �•lIF '1 8976 cash in lieu TOTAL NEW NET LEASEABLE= 0 SQ FT r TOTAL NEW FREE MARKET= 1462 SO FT Public amenity O 26-575.030 I 4 n � '^„ Public amenity-existir 883 sq It ` /� C 0.14 Public amenity-props 858 sq It 1 0.14 Ike. 1�.�{� t. V 25 sq It Existing minus proposed Cash in liew 4$75/sq f $1,875,00 ,� Fwd: Signed Paperwork from Peter Goldstein Tom Thumb Condominium Association 400 East Hyman Ave Aspen,CO 81611 The Tom"Thumb Condominium Association approves with conditions 400 East Hyman LLC's hereinafter"Applicant" permit application for partial demolition and renovation of the Tom Thumb Condominium per the permit application now on file with the City of Aspen regarding Units C101, C201,and 0309. Conditions; 1, Applicant will provide the HOA with all future submittals to the City during the permit application period.A reasonable amount of time for review and comment by the HOA will be planned for during the application process. 2. The Applicant shall provide the HOA with copies of material pertaining to the results of design review meetings during the application process.: 3. It is understood that the costs of some infrastructure and miscellaneous improvements associated with this application are not known at this time.Cost for said improvements shall be the responsibility of the applicant. It is also understood that the applicant will be responsible to the HOA and or it's owners for any additional costs which will arise from this application. 4: The HOA will review the final application for permit and may approve it,or approve it with conditions,before the final application is submitted to the City for approval. Thom Thumb Condo Association Peter Goldstein -President r'r !r 2 of 3 2/14/2012 1:28 PM ALLEY O— Rao ar E o— ------------_------- N-----� I W E 'k I� ---------I I i - oi o- t - - o 6.1 3}- e I I of k oil 6i! I II itr-------- ---i- !ij I ii I Hyman Ave.mall LINI 31. � 9 9 �.E~ b d C bb as b o ro QN 1 Slit PUN 1x5nric N l— C1 10.Ex ST11C.SEWER LLNE 02/15/12 PI PI ARCHITECTURE PI N IN E IN Tom Thumb Condominum Ken Sack 400 E. Hyman Ave. 4690 South University Drive Aspen, CO Davie, FL 33328 C 1 7 1 I"21.3 v-ss�-s25 i t I 4 ry r. SURVEYOR'S UPDATE CERTIFICATE SURVEYOR'SN GERTBFBGATE i �ARAETELY�DCPIGTS 1F bURVnl�t TEST DF.R Mr .NCHFI Y 111]''ll 1 1 tl SUKRV 610N 011 NO�EMBfR�.18 OFJtN6 R.WC L a ILi M BLOCK fib.C'n'Of A6PF1J IJII'N 4FKfiv.,kYllt l_a�N TMEK111-TI RADO <AT ON AND DiM1bN IOM HON h.1'.D^-DIfiD NE u+ PROVEMENTS GOEME 9 GMi6-OP- Af 1' EVIDENLE Gk�KNGWM l0 MF AND EN M S by � CROAC� THESE PRENtBFS R Ka.URVELY !i4i DFLEMBE2 i�RrSCR... i 91 BA 1 M PR VEMENT _...,..._.. _ 0 SURVEY 81 IES LOTS K e L.B PARE LOT M.BLOCK 88. BAGLEY CITY OF ASPEN, z e� a J' PITKIN COUNTY.COLORADO. �� _ e_�>, � „� t' f P- - �. � � __ "- - .,.-„y.�L..,,Qy —. ,. � �-�-. i i s r _ - � __...__ is ., � i ,_ , _ _ t � F y r v �i � a a a m I �i y10'p� �r_ VUenergy �Ul Q n tEdIlol.bil I 19-2214252� Monday, October 3, 2011 Attn: Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation-City of Aspen RE: Historic Preservation Conceptual Review October 121h Tom Thumb Condominum Partial Renovation - - - - Dear City of Aspen, Attached are revised elevations and contextural studies. Please view these pdf's on a computer if possible. I will also be happy to share the sketch-up model with any commissioners before the 12111 should it be requested. We have reduced the height to 33' along Hyman and Mill. The roof of the structure is stepped down at the existing plaza in order to remain at most 36' above the various plaza levels adjacent to the structure (and to cast a stepped shadow into the plaza.) The building is in proportion in both scale and massing, as can be seen in the elevation studies, even though there are about 4 individual 3-4 story structures which now exist near by but have not been updated on the sketch up model. The approach perception study shows the corner defining qualities of the building, some of the architectural design techniques we are exploring, as well as the building's respectful relationship to the Wheeler across the street. There is also a rendering depicting the reflections of the surrounding context in the glazing. Calculations for; FAR, net leasible, public amenity, parking requriements, and affordable housing remain the same as the previous submittal. I would respectfully request that any new members on the commission review the previous two submittals in order to become familiar with the process to date along with our intentions behind the design. I look forward to discussing the project with the commission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Paul Irwin, PE Ripple Design Studio Ripple Design Studio- 1219 Harrison Ave. Leadville, CO 80461 -ripple @rockymountains.net BRONZE METAL SIDING PANELS MARBLE VENEER BEHIND STEEL BRONZE COLORED WINDOW MULLIONS BRACE AT SECOND LEVEL 18'-0 CLOTH CANOPY/INSULATING SYSTEM 117- 3 OI gO 101 Ej 0 � 10'-0" —a5'-6" MARBLE VENEER INTERIOR Mill St.Elevation Hyman Ave.Elevation EXPOSED STEEL LATERAL BRACING MARBLE VENEER EXTERIOR ROOF STEPS BACK OVER STAIRS NEXT TO PLAZA W/VINES SURROUNDING ELEVATOR .-ry O 3 -- - --- It - M E« i North.Elevation Plaza Elevation Hyman St. Building - Tom Thumb Condos - Design Development 10/12/11 BRONZE METAL SIDING PANELS - MARBLE VENEER BEHIND STEEL BRONZE COLORED WINDOW MULLIONS BRACE AT SECOND LEVEL CLOTH CANOPY/INSULATING SYSTEM > 0 a I � o > o > o x - � c co a' .a_�-.., C�.,_ �F t- Ys•a=r, tr O n O N L10'-0° - 45'-6° MARBLE VENEER INTERIOR Mill St. Elevation EXPOSED STEEL LATERAL BRACING VAPPIF VrNrrR rYTrRInR ROOF STEPS BACK OVER STAIRS NEXT TO PLAZA MARBLE VENEER BEHIND STEEL BRACE AT SECOND LEVEL J -- o n_ a o a } o > o 0 o O U� N X -O X � O F11. w ❑[IMP ❑ cn d I I N o 8'-6" Hyman Ave. Elevation MARBLE VENEER EXTERIOR W/ VINES SURROUNDING ELEVATOR 18'-0" ? o � o _ I - C) 1 00 I i� o- _ U"rrjLj I N North. Elevation Q N Q m (D Q O� 38'-0" MAX 3 STORY A J. n" s � / s' 's��"• � r4 5, 2 1 "t'.dz ...:r. .,,, ..y..{:'-,. .:, x 0.L ...x ,. •,::e £ - .,,/- , �,i / £:',3a" ,.. ➢ �a::':':: ''::� a'.:: ,. ..�.f.�... .. - ..... '.. •..-., t ,gyp,.�.•�,..,-, ,.Y ,E :�/ Y / j'�' J+` L„,�;�:� "� J£�y ,—t—.,. �� x. -��_ 3�`�/ -ate-. �:- 2,,," ����,.a-~�;` � � /��, �:• ',�i'. Hyman Ave. Elevation Study / y - E.�I�mt€1 lea ht P, ul o• Eye I'���� ��' � � z li Mill St. Elevation Study Tom Thumb Renovation Gontextural Design Study Building Approach Perception Study Approach from West along Hyman Ave. l Wheeler remains dominant architec- Lightness of new structure becomes evident,perhaps Corner defined Marble objects within street level space become leg- tural mass weight of Wheeler becomes more evident ible,view through building and into plaza becomes ap- parent Approach from North along Mill St. kA i Building extends historic street edge Street level glass reflects fountain,upper level glass re- Plaza entrance widened. Transparency gives view to plaza businesses,canopy flects sky and mountain lowers pedestrian"ceiling"along edge Approach from East along Hyman Ave. v Setback along Hyman Ave property Corner of building interupted by canopy element Transparency of lower level extends visual perception Resolution of variable exterior elements with moment of line retains view of Wheeler of building setback even further into the property symmetry at Hyman Ave.entrance �3 �.f Contextural reflections A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT(CONCEPTUAL),COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW(CONCEPTUAL)AND PUBLIC AMENITY APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 E. HYMAN AVENUE,TOM THUMB BUILDING, CONDOMIUM UNITS A-101 THROUGH A-103,A-201,A-202,A-301 THROUGH A-304, B-101,B-201,B-202,B-301, C-101,C-201,C-301 AND THE CONDO ASSOCIATION COMMON AREA,LOTS K AND L AND A PORTION OF LOT M,BLOCK 88, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COUNTY OF PITKIN,STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION#11,SERIES OF 2011 PARCEL ID: 2737-073-43-001 through-005, 2737-073-43-009 through-015, 2737-073-43-706 through-708 and 2737-073-43-801 WHEREAS, the applicant, 400 Hyman LLC, Ken Sack-CEO, represented by Paul Irwin of Ripple Design Studio, has requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual) and Commercial Design Review (Conceptual) and Public Amenity approval for the property located at 400 E. Hyman Avenue, Tom Thumb Building, Condomium Units A-101 through A-103,A-201, A-202, A-301 through A-304, B-101, B-201, B-202, B-301, C-101, C-201, C-301 and the Condo Association Common Area, Lots K and L and a portion of Lot M, Block 88, City and Townsite of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;"and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Public Amenity Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Section 26.575.030 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with RECEPTION#: 583681, 10/1912011 at 400 E. Hyman Avenue 01:26:21 PM, HPC Resolution#11, Series of 2011 1 OF 2, R $16.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Page 1 of 2 Janice K.Vas Caudill,Pitkin County, CO conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated October 12, 2011, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found that the review standards had been met, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meetings on July 27, 2011 and August 10, 2011, and October 12, 2011, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and recommended approval with conditions by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Commercial Design Review (Conceptual) and Public Amenity approval for the property located at 400 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 1. At Final Review, provide detailed analysis of possible lightspill effects that would result from a primarily glass fagade. 2. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of October 12, 2011, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may,at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of October, 2011. Ann Mullins,Vice Chair Approved as to Form: im True, Special Counsel ATTEST: Kathy StKckland,Chief Deputy Clerk 400 E. Hyman Avenue HPC Resolution#11, Series of 2011 Page 2 of 2 Sara Adams From: Kenneth Sack (kensack @me.com] Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 9:34 PM To: Sara Adams Subject: Re: tom thumb gmqs application We are looking at the expense and feasability of tearing down the building vs remodeling. This way we could have a building that meets our needs, has all required sprinkler systems. and will allow us to add a single story residential unit that we can use for our employees... Ken Sack Panerai Boutique 150 Worth Ave Palm Beach, Florida 33480 561-833-8955 On Apr 16, 2012, at 02:38 PM, Sara Adams <Sara.Adams@ci.asggn.co.us> wrote: Hi Ken, I sent a email to Paul a few weeks ago about requirements for the GMQS application that was submitted in February. He called me at the end of last week to follow up on my email. Are you planning on pursuing the gmqs application or are you going to proceed with the remodel that we discussed a week or two ago? I don't want to spend the time explaining the Code and information that I need to Paul if you are going to withdraw the application. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thanks, Sara Sara Adams, Senior Planner City of Aspen,130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 61611 tle, 0701420,2775 fax. 070020,6430 www.aspenpitkin,com i Sara Adams From: Sara Adams Sent: Friday, April 20, 2012 2:46 PM To: 'ripple @rockymountains.net' Subject: code change for downtown Hi Paul: Below is a link to the changes to the CC zone district that take effect on May 2"d. A complete application must be received by May 2nd to be reviewed under the current code requirements. http•//www aspenpitkin com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Recent%2OCode%2OAmendments/Ordinance%2012%2OSeri es%202012 CC%20and%20Cl%20amendments APPROVED%20.pdf Call me if you have any questions and happy weekend, Sara Sara Adams, Senior Planner City of Aspen,130 Smith Galona Street Aspen, CO 81611 tele. 9701429.2778 fax, 9701920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com i Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and - Property Ken Sack Phone No.: 954-680-5490 Owner("I"): Email: kensack @bellsouth.net 3' Address of 400 E. Hyman Avenue Billing 4690 S. University Drive 0C2 Property: Address: Davie, FL 33328tt,� (subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and 1 understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $_4,410 deposit for_14 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$315 per hour. $_265 deposit for_1_hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Name: Ken Sack Chris Bendon Community Development Director Title: Owner of Unit B-101 B-201-C-101. C-201 and C- 3 1 n I om T humb Condominium City Use: Fees Due:$,_4,675 Received:$ DEVELOPINIENT DEPARTMENT CONIMU Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative — meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner(e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(6/17/06) SCHEDULE A Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Stewart Title Guaranty Company P.O,Box 2029 Houston,Texas 77252-2029 Prepared by: Colorado Regional Production Center Title Officer: Linda Williams Order Number: 944021 Policy Number: 0-9301-1724840 Date of Policy: May 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM (or the date of recording of the insured deed,whichever is later) Amount of Insurance: $500,000.00 Premium: $1,327.00 *Address Reference:400 East Hyman Avenue Unit C-101 Aspen,Colorado 81611 1. Name of Insured: 400 Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 2. The estate or interest in the land that is insured by this Policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: 400"Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Unit C-101 THE TOM THUMB BUILDING CONDOMINIUM According to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at page 27 as Reception No. 240634 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 as Reception No. 240677 and the First Amended Condominium Declaration recorded March 31, 1986 in Book 508 at Page 156 as Reception No. 276893 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO .FOR COMPANY REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY,NOT AN INSURING PROVISION ALTA Owner's Policy—Schedule A stewart• Page 1 of 1 Policy Typist:tv �btle guaranty company ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(6/17/06) I SCHEDULE A I Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Stewart Title Guaranty Company P.O.Box 2029 Houston,Texas 77252-2029 Prepared by: Colorado Regional Production Center Title Officer: Linda Williams I Order Number: 943563 Policy Number: 0-9301-1724841 Date of Policy: May 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM (or the date of recording of the insured deed,whichever is later) Amount of Insurance: $1,800,000.00 Premium: $1,784.00 *Address Reference:400 Bast Hyman Avenue Unit C-201 Aspen,Colorado 81611 1. Name of Insured: 400 Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company I 2. The estate or interest in the land that is insured b y y this Policy is: Fee Simple 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: i 400 Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company 4. The land referred to in this olic is described as follows: p Y Unit C-201 THE TOM THUMB BUILDING CONDOMINIUM According to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at page 27 as Reception No. 240634 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 as Reception No. 240677 and the First Amended Condominium Declaration recorded March 31, 1986 in Book 508 at Page 156 as Reception No. 276893 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO 1 14FOR COMPANY REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY,NOT AN INSURING PROVISION ALTA Owner's Policy-Schedule A Estewartm Page 1 of 1 Policy Typist:tv tma guaranty company ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(6/17/06) s SCHEDULE A I Name and Address of Title Insurance Company: Stewart Title Guaranty Company P.O.Box 2029 Houston,Texas 77252-2029 Prepared by: Colorado Regional Production Center Title Officer: Linda Williams Order Number: 944017 Polic y Number: 0-9301-1724839 Date of Policy: May 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM (or the date of recording of the insured deed,whichever is later) Amount of Insurance: $600,000.00 Premium: $1,572.00 *Address Reference:400 East Hyman Avenuc Unit C-301 Aspen,Colorado 81611 1. Name of Insured: I 400 Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company I 2. The estate or interest in the land that is insured by this Policy is: Fee Simple - 3. Title to the estate or interest in the land is vested in: 400 Hyman LLC, a Colorado limited liability company i 4. The land referred to in this policy is described as follows: Unit C-301 THE TOM THUMB BUILDING CONDOMINIUM According to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 13 at page 27 as Reception No. 240634 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for The Tom Thumb Building Condominiums recorded April 15, 1982 in Book 425 at Page 202 as Reception No. 240677 and the First Amended Condominium Declaration recorded March 31, 1986 in Book 508 at Page 156 as Reception No. 276893 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO — *FOR COMPANY REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY,NOT AN INSURING PROVISION ALTA Owner's Policy—Schedule A E§tewart* Page 1 of 1 Policy Typist:tv title guaranty company CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970.429.2758 DATE: 05/24/11 PROJECT: 406 E. Hyman Ave, Tom Thumb building REPRESENTATIVE: Paul Irwin, Ripple Design Studio TYPE OF APPLICATION: Commercial Design Review, Certificate of Appropriateness, Growth Management Review for Expansion or New Commercial Development, Growth Management Review for New Free-Market Residential Units within a Mixed-Use Project, Pedestrian Amenity variance, Subdivision DESCRIPTION: The Tom Thumb building is a condominium with 12 commercial units and 3 residential units. Community Development has recently been asked to summarize the process for demolition and replacement of the building area at the southwest corner of the site. When rebuilt, the corner piece would have a slightly larger footprint and an additional floor level. Approximately 600 square feet of new net leasable space would be added, and a new free market unit would be added. The subject building is located within the Commercial Core Historic District. All exterior changes require a Certificate of Appropriateness as well as Commercial Design Review to be granted by the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). Within that process, HPC will address Parking and Pedestrian Amenity Space. The project appears to require approval to reduce the amount of Pedestrian Amenity that exists on the site. The new net leasable space requires additional on-site parking, which may be paid as cash-in-lieu. The applicant will need to receive Major (Conceptual) design review approval for the building remodel prior to submitting for any other land use reviews. This initial application need not specifically address the criteria found in Sections 26.470, 480, 540 and 610, listed below. However, the project must accurately represent the applicant's intention to provide affordable housing mitigation on-site or off-site. The HPC approval would have to be modified if the housing approach changes during the process in a manner that affects architectural design. Once approval is granted by the HPC, the owner may then apply for the necessary Growth Management Reviews required for net leasable and free-market expansion. The Growth Management reviews fall into the category of Major review at the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant must apply for one of the 18 free market units generally available on an annual basis. Applications are accepted only twice a year (February 15th and August 15th), and a scoring component is part of the review process. In recent experience, there are adequate units available annually to meet demand. Among the approval requirements that must be met for the new free market unit is affordable housing mitigation in the form of a 100% above grade Category 4 deed restricted unit that contains at least 30% as much net livable area as the free market unit that is created. The project also requires affordable housing to offset the new net leasable space. Affordable housing may be built on site, or may be in the form of Affordable Housing Credits, purchased by the developer from a third party who has built equivalent housing elsewhere in town. The applicant must meet all dimensional requirements of the Commercial Core Zone district, including FAR and height. An individual free market unit cannot be larger than 2,000 square feet of net livable area. This 6,000 square foot lot can have no more than 3,000 FAR square feet of free market housing on-site in total. It appears from the condominium plat that the existing (free-market?) Units A301, A302, and A303 amount to approximately Y2 of the allowable free market FAR on the site. After Growth Management review, the project proceeds to Council for•Subdivision/Condominiumization review in order to create a separate ownership right for the units within the building. HPC Major Development (Final) is the last review step. Before proceeding, please meet with a planner to better understand the submission requirements. An HPC land use application can be found at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/form historic land use app.pdf A Planning land use application can be found at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/landuseappform pdf The design review guidelines can be found at: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/PIanning-and-Zoning/Current- Planning/ One last important consideration is that the application must contain a letter demonstrating that the land use application has been authorized by the HOA/Condominium Association. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.415.070 Development Involving Designated Historic Property 26.415.070 C or D, certificate of Appropriateness for a Minor or Major Development (depending on the scale of the project) 26.470 Growth Management Quota System 26.470.050 GMQS General Requirements 26.470.070(4) Affordable Housing 26.470.080(1) Major Planning and Zoning Commission 26.470.100 Calculations 26.470.110 GMQS Review Procedures 26.470.120 Community Objective Scoring Criteria 26.480 Subdivision 26.515 Parking 26.540 Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.575.030 Public Amenity 26.610 Impact Fees 26.710.140 Commercial Core zone district Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Public Hearing: Required at HPC, P&Z and Council Planning Fees: $2,940, which includes twelve (12) hours of staff review time. Additional time will be billed at $245 per hour. Less hours will be refunded at $245 per hour. Housing Referral: $212 Engineering Referral: $212 Total Deposit: $3,576 Total Number of Application Copies: (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2), To apply, submit the following information Total Deposit for review of application. D Pre-application Conference Summary. D Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. D Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State of Colorado. A site plan depicting the proposed layout and the project's physical relationship to the land and its surroundings. Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. D An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. THE CITY of ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: March 6, 2012 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0009.2012.ASLU — 400 E. Hyman, GMQS review. The planner assigned to this case is Sara Adams. 0 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Your Land Use Application is complete: there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. (::nnifeyrPhelan,ou, t� Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required SPA PUD COWOP Yes No 72f-- Subdivision(creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing Yes No Commercial E.P.F.