The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.Tiehack Water Tank Site.0055.2011.ASLUA c Â¥L,1 0 04 st* S.V Lot \ 0055.2011.ASLU 273511302801 I/ W B JD) 4. 6Â» *44 03 liB 4 7 .. THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0055.2011.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273511302801 Ar-1-1~ov o P.(15+-â‚¬/ 2-ke,~+60 + PROJECTS ADDRESS LOT 1 OF-1-I I[ MAROON CR[[K GUUEL= PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION PUD REPRESENTATIVE CITY ENGINEERING DEPT DATE OF FINAL ACTION 8/12/11 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.20.13 .. DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date o f this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. City of Aspen, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lot 1, Arthur O'Pfister, Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Wireless telecommunications facility Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Administrative approval. reception number 582566 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) September 18,2011 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) September 19,2014 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued iii accordance with Section 26.308.010 ofthe City of Aspen Municipal Code.) th Issued this 18 day of September, 2011, by the City of Aspen Community Development Directqr. 444*tii; - 11'7\ M/7, 1Â· wl'-- -1/l- loL Al.{/Lyl/\L- a Q}~*IIris Berid.gA, Community Devdiopment Dirk* 4-3 . 1 0 0 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ASIA , Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) Â»01 6 Sceâ‚¬-0 being or representing an Applicant to the City OI Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: \/0' Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 1 . Se----~ Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Cltlay of 561 Y , 2011, by Al*\PEA Sec---c-~~ r< PW~ESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBU-NOTICE Of . 0.0 ....~~/~ DEG-LOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a slte specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to ,12.- ' 4* cdm ssion expires: 641/51)-011 the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lot 1, Arthur O'Pfister Fully Developed Lands 1\6 3%\M~,3 - Le<%94,46232.#I.4 Subdivision Exemption, by order of the Community Development Director on September 2, 2011. The Applicant, the City of Aspen (City Engineer) re- Â«~ . ublic ceived approval of Wireless Telecommunication Services facilities, An Insubstantial PUD Amend- ment, and 8040 Greenline Exemption. For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Ga- lena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. ATTACHMENTS: sl City of Aspen Publish in the Aspen Times Weekly on September COPY OF THE PUBLICATION 18,2011 [7006636] .. NOTICE OF APPROVAL WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES FACILITIES / EQUIPMENT APPROVAL, INSUBSTANTIAL PUD AMENDMENT, AND 8040 GREENLINE EXEMPTION FOR LOT 1, ARTHUR O'PFISTER SUBDIVISION Parcel ID No. 273511302801 APPLICANT: City of Aspen, Tricia Aragon, City Engineer SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Lot 1, Arthur O'Pfister, Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption (part of Maroon Creek Club PUD) involving the approval of Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. SUMMARY: The Applicant has requested approval for the installation of an antenna and cabinet for GPS data to be provided to users of the city system. The antenna is approximately ten feet in height with a small, accessory cabinet. STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.575.130, Wireless telecommunications services facilities and equipment must comply with a list of general provisions and review standards. 'These requirements seek to ensure that the placements of these facilities are compatible with surrounding development. Depending on the type of telecommunication device installed (i.e. monopole, whip antenna, ground tower. etc.), specific requirements apply. Setbacks from the property line are required to be met. The applicant has amended the cabinet location to meet the minimum required setback of 50 feet. For Staff' s response to the review criteria see '1Exhibit B." The request will also be memorialized via an Insubstantial PUD Amendment as well as an 8040 Greenline Exemption. The property is located within the Maroon Creek Club PUD and meets the criteria for an insubstantial amendment (Exhibit C). Finally, due to the projects elevation it is subject to 8040 Greenline Review; however, it meet the criteria for an exemption (Exhibit D). DECISION: Staff finds that the Wireless telecommunication services and equipment application for the antenna and cabinet should be granted. The location is appropriate for this type of accessory use, and it compatible with surrounding development. Final location of the equipment is shown in Exhibit A. RECEPTION#: 582566, 09/08/2011 at 09:28:15 AM, 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Page lof2 .. APPROVED BY: Oked 1.-all Chris Bendon Date Community Development Director APPROVED Attachments: Exhibit A - Location map of equipment 0-r Â£ 20 11 r -- Exhibit B - Wireless telecommunication review criteria Exhibit C - Insubstantial PUD Amendment review criteria COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Exhibit D - 8040 Greenline Exemption review criteria CITY OF ASPEN Exhibit E - Application Page 2of2 R.-Htlal-t>-A ' PHASE I QUANTI-I~ ~~110)1'4 9/06/11 COORDINATES (NAD 83 - CO STATE PI~ ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY PEikrfi LOCATION NORTHING EASTING ELE. (FT) 211 INSTALL HILTI ANCHORS AND ADHESIVE EA 8 . -" 1<%k-# 712\4\ 1 GPSANTENNA 1499781.395 2617270.461 8123.30 203 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY 8.3 -NA 41 203 EMBANKMENT(PLACE ONLY) CY 8.1 ~Or,! f. f.Â¢' ~\\ CABINET 1499785.463 2617303.033 8110.52 1 INSTALL 1-2" PVC''~ 212 LANDSCAPE RESTORATION LS 1 / SCH 40 CONDUIT 1 - ~ r-FUL:.- 1 1 THE CITY oF AspEN 601 CONCRETE CLASS B CY 0.2 ' BEGIN ELECTRICCONDUIT ~ 30 LF (EA) \ / / .L:Â· PL U-1 Â·Â· 1 602 REINFORCING STEEL (#5) LB 13.0 ANDINSTALLGROUND \ 1 - * TRENCH = 1.5' DEEP (MIN)/ '' Li ~'*)45 1.~ - ': Â· \ ROD AT UTIL. POLE - 613 FURNISH & INSTALL 2 INCH SCH 40 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LF 315 - 741 4 700 FUR/INST 5/8" X 10' COPPER-CLAD GROUND ROD & APPURTENANCES EA 1 INSTALL 1-2" PvC 7 7 .t _< LOT 2 O%0 ;~ SCH 40 CONDUIT Â«ff -- 8-1 414 35 LF P HASE 11 QUANTITI ES - TRENCH = 1.0' DEEP (MIN) ~ /~/22 - INSTALL 30"X22"X12" 7-,A CIWE- ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY ,/CONSTRUCTION LIMITS A 1 42' / CONCRETE PAD AND s f ZONE "RR CC 614 FURNISH AND INSTALL UF/B 12/2 OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL WIRE LF 30 ~f FASTEN CABINET UPON o ~ 1, (SEE DETAIL ~") w 700 FURNISH & INSTALL 120V ELECTRICALOUTLET EA 1 i 09 %3 2 F Ail ..VA 0 0Â¢= 700 FUR/INST 5/8" X 10' COPPER-CLAD GROUND ROD & APPURTENANCES EA 1 700 FURNISH AND INSTALL JUNCTION BOX, METER SOCKET AND DISCONNECT EA 1 00 0 1 NOTES *J <U I r T 1- FURNISH & INSTALL 30 LF OF UF-B 12/2 O 4 PROPERTY LINE 1 i REIMOVE 1" PVC ~\ 1 ~ OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL WIRE W/GROUND, 2" PVC U#42 - PRO-SITE-1 - u~~~~~~~~ ~~,~~ \ ~ UTILITY POLE TO6'BELOW NEUTRALWIRE WITH ~ ~~ g0 \ / CONDUIT AND PULLCORD. PVC TO EXTENDUP .aw .Â«61 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ~ , METER SOCKET AND DISCONNECT. OR AS *4 C-5 W ~% INSTALL 456 BASE PLATE . 0\ 7 ELECTRICIAN FINDS APPROPRIATE. \ 0 ANCHOR W/ SUPPLIED / 2 - FURNISH & INSTALL A 2" PVC CONDUIT AND 04 Z 2-2 HILTI PRODUCTS < (SEE DETAIL "All) ~ ~ PULL CORD. 00 5 .. r- 1 3 - IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO * 64 A e 0 7.5 15 30 60 0 , LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO t.. Eur 4"X4" POST 1 INCH= 30 FEET % 4 -IF TRENCH IS NOT BACKFILLED ON DAYOF vt' TO REMAIN /ly. / CONSTRUCTION. MOBILE/ le COMMUNICATION 100 TOWER WITH \ / EXCAVATION, SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLEDON SOLAR PANEL LOW SIDE OF TRENCH. 3 'S 5 - CONSULT ENGINEER FOR EXACT LOCATIONS Cze= . OF STRUCTURES TO BE CONSTRUCTED. UWU; 3 111 INSTALL 1-2" PVC ,/ ffÂ« -Â·onu ~- SCH 40 CONDUIT / NN\/ 250 LF (EA) / 01-3 -- 1/ 7 1 / 0--/1 /\ ch 1 ~ 71 f - - 7 TRENCH,O.5'DEEP (MIN)/ 14 / 11 7 1 f- 0 h - 1 \ m -- f 9 I .3 . 1 COMMON // - 1 i / to + 13 3â‚¬Â» U C ../ 1 3 V r: r. 7 U 7+ I~ ZON E A- i.Â», 5 1 GR Wic A /LL // \ 4 \ W#W>. / I \\,3 W E- 8- B- /1 1 9 -\ /. e,5 CONDUITTOCONNECT -\ 1 100Â«\~ 9 (SUPPLIED BY QWEST) C TO ETHERNET CABLE 5813 U t. - --..*- CONCRETE DRIVE ~~'- 7 treft (DRIVEWAY EASEMENT) (RECEPTION #439302) ---- 1 4.f X <Â©E-Â©. < 4/ \ 1 ~ ACCESS EASEMENT f LOT 48 -- C \11 ~21.001 -2 I- SCALED FROM THE 7 7'1 A i r I I n Â·1 r ,Â·. I L L, 1 4 c m, Â·- 1 0 +1 1 1 MAROON CREEK PLAT (NO DIMENSIONS GIVEN) RECEPTION No. 363275 \ A (UTILITY EASEMENT; RECEPTION 1 of 2 #367232) C /Ift-fts Nf-100 iNGIIATAL}[Vdfla .. Exhibit B Wireless telecommunication services and equipment Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 26.575.130 The following standards are designed to foster the City's safety and aesthetic interests without imposing unreasonable limitations on wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: 1. Setbacks. At a minimum, all wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the minimum setback requirements of the underlying zone district; if the following requirements are more restrictive than those of the underlying zone district, the more restrictive standard shall apply. a. All facilities shall be located at least fifty (50) feet from any property lines, except when roof-mounted (above the eave line of a building). Flat-roof mounted facilities visible from ground level within one-hundred (100) feet of said property shall be concealed to the extent possible within a compatible architectural element, such as a chimney or ventilation pipe or behind architectural skirting of the type generally used to conceal HVAC equipment. Pitched-roof-mounted facilities shall always be concealed within a compatible architectural element, such as chimneys or ventilation pipes. Staff response: The Conservation zone requires a 100 foot front yard setback and then the 50 foot minimum required by the wireless standards must be met. The applicant has amended the location of the cabinet to meet the setback requirement. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Monopole towers shall be set back from any residentially zoned properties a distance of at least three (3) times the monopole's height (i.e., a sixty (60) foot setback would be required for a twenty (20) foot monopole) and the setback from any public road, as measured from the right-of-way line, shall be at least equal to the height of the monopole. Staff response: Not applicable. c. No wireless communication facility may be established within one-hundred (100) feet of any existing, legally established wireless communication facility except when located on the same building or structure. Staff response: The Applicant supplied a vicinity map displaying proximity to other telecommunication devices. The proposed facility will be co-located on the water tank structure meeting the allowance to have two facilities located within 100 feet of each other. Staff finds this criterion met. .. d. No portion of any antenna array shall extend beyond the property lines or into any front yard area. Guy wires shall not be anchored within any front yard area, but may be attached to the building. Staff response: The proposed antennas and facilities do not extend beyond the property lines. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. Height. The following restrictions shall apply: a. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and/or equipment not attached to a building shall not exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height or the maximum permissible height of the given Zone District, whichever is more restrictive. Staff response: the proposed antenna is approximately ten feet in height, well below the maximum height allowance of the Conservation zone. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Whenever a wireless telecommunication services antenna is attached to a building roof, the antenna and support system for panel antennas shall not exceed five (5) feet above the highest portion of that roof, including parapet walls and the antenna and support system for whip antennas shall not exceed ten (10) feet above the highest portion o f that roof, including parapet walls. Staff response: Not applicable. c. The Community Development Director may approve a taller antenna height than stipulated in b. above if it is his or her determination that it is suitably camouflaged, in which case an administrative approval may be granted. Staff response: Not applicable. d. lf the Community Development Director determines that an antenna taller than stipulated in b. above cannot be suitably camouflaged, then the additional height of the antenna shall be reviewed pursuant to the process and standards (in addition to the standards of this Section) of Chapter 26.430 (Special review). Staff response: Not applicable. e. Support and/or switching equipment shall be located inside the building, unless it can be fully screened from view as provided in the "Screening" standards (26.475.130 and 26.575.130.F.5) below. Staff response: The proposal includes a plan w for support cables to be located underground. In addition to the antenna a small cabinet will be located on the site and are reasonably shielded by existing vegetation. Staff finds this criterion met. .. 3. Architectural compatibility. Whether manned or unmanned, wireless telecommunication services facilities shall be consistent with the architectural style of the surrounding architectural environment (planned or existing) considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and character. In addition: a. If such facility is accessory to an existing use, the facility shall be constructed out of materials that are equal to or of better quality than the materials o f the principal use. b. Wireless telecommunication services equipment shall be of the same color as the building or structure to which or on which such equipment is mounted or as required by the appropriate decision-making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). c. Whenever wireless telecommunication services equipment is mounted to the wall of a building or structure, the equipment shall be mounted in a configuration designed to blend with and be architecturally integrated into a building or other concealing structure, be as flush to the wall as technically possible and shall not project above the wall on which it is mounted. d. Monopole support buildings, which house cellular switching devices and/or other equipment related to the use, operation or maintenance of the subject monopole, must be designed to match the architecture of adjacent buildings. If no recent and/or reasonable architectural theme is present, the Community Development Director may require a particular design that is deemed to be suitable to the subject location. e. All utilities associated with wireless communication facilities or equipment shall be underground (also see "Screening" below). Staff response: The only utilities involved for this proposal are the electrical and coax conduits located underground. The property has no buildings on site only a water tank. The equipment will be painted an earthy tone as requested by neighbors. Staff finds the applicable criteria met. 4. Compatibility with the natural environment. Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be compatible with the surrounding natural environment considering land forms, topography and other natural features and shall not dominate the landscape or present a dominant silhouette on a ridge line. In addition: a. If a location at or near a mountain ridge line is selected, the applicant shall provide computerized, three-dimensional, visual simulations of the facility or equipment and other appropriate graphics to demonstrate the visual impact on the view of the affected ridges or ridge lines; an 8040 Greenline Review, pursuant to the provisions of Section 26.435.030. may also be required. .. Staff response: The wireless communication facility is not located on a ridge and meets the criteria for an 8040 Greenline Exemption. Staff finds this criterion met. b. Site disturbances shall be minimized and existing vegetation shall be preserved or improved to the extent possible, unless it can be demonstrated that such disturbance to vegetation and topography results in less visual impact to the surrounding area. Staff response: Any disturbance of vegetation shall be revegetated as outlined in the application. Staff finds this criterion met. c. Surrounding view planes shall be preserved to the extent possible. Staff response: This property is not located within a Mountain View Plane. Staff finds this criterion met. d. All wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall comply with the Federal Communication Commission's regulations concerning maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions. Staff response: The Applicant is aware of all FCC regulations and committed to compliance. Staff finds this criterion met. 5. Screening. Roof-and-ground-mounted wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment, including accessory equipment, shall be screened from adjacent and nearby public rights-of-way and public or private properties by paint color selection, parapet walls, screen walls, fencing, landscaping and/or berming in a manner compatible with the building's and/or surrounding environment's design, color, materials, texture, land forms and/or topography, as appropriate or applicable. In addition: a. Whenever possible, if monopoles are necessary for the support of antennas, they shall be located near existing utility poles, trees or other similar objects; consist of colors and materials that best blend with their background; and, have no individual antennas or climbing spikes on the pole other than those approved by the appropriate decision- making authority (Community Development Director, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, as applicable). Staff response: Not applicable. b. For ground-mounted facilities, landscaping may be required to achieve a total screening effect at the base of such facilities or equipment in order to screen the mechanical characteristics; a heavy emphasis on coniferous plants for year-round screening may be required. Landscaping shall be of a type and variety capable of growing within one (1) year to a landscape screen which satisfactorily obscures the visibility ofthe facility. .. Staff response: The antenna proposed is not very tall and should be adequately screened by the existing vegetation. Staff finds this criterion met. c. Unless otherwise expressly approved, all cables for a facility shall be fully concealed from view underground or inside of the screening or monopole structure supporting the antennas; any cables that cannot be buried or otherwise hidden from view shall be painted to match the color of the building or other existing structure. Staff response: All cables and conduits associated with this facility will be underground. Staff finds this criterion met. d. Chain link fencing shall be unacceptable to screen facilities, support structures or accessory and related equipment (including HVAC or mechanical equipment present on support buildings); fencing material, if used, shall be six (6) feet in height or less and shall consist of wood. masonry, stucco, stone or other acceptable materials that are opaque. Staff response: Not applicable. e. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the facility shall comply with all additional measures deemed necessary to mitigate the visual impact of the facility. Also, in lieu of these screening standards, the Community Development Director may allow use of an alternate detailed plan and specifications for landscape and screening, including plantings, fences, walls, sign and structural applications, manufactured devices and other features designed to screen, camouflage and buffer antennas, poles and accessory uses. For example, the antenna and supporting structure or monopole may be of such design and treated with an architectural material so that it is camouflaged to resemble a tree with a single trunk and branches on its upper part. The plan should accomplish the same degree of screening achieved by meeting the standards outlined above. Staff response: The proposed screening plan does not require any additional materials or landscaping. By painting the antenna visual impacts created by this plan are significantly reduced. It does not pose a legitimate concern that necessitates additional screening. Staff finds this criterion met. 6. Lighting and signage, In addition to other applicable sections of the code regulating signage or outdoor lighting, the following standards shall apply to wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment: a. The light source for security lighting shall feature down-directional, sharp cut-off luminaries to direct, control, screen or shade in such a manner as to ensure that there is no spillage of illumination off-site. Staff response: There is no lighting planned for this facility. Staff finds this criterion met. .. b. Light fixtures, whether free standing or tower-mounted, shall not exceed twelve (12) feet in height as measured from finished grade. Staff response: Not applicable. c. The display of any sign or advertising device other than public safety warnings, certifications or other required seals on any wireless communication device or structure is prohibited. Staff response: There is no signage proposed for this facility. Staff finds this criterion met. d. The telephone numbers to contact in an emergency shall be posted on each facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this Title. Staff response: The equipment will have the contact information of the appropriate entity in the event of an emergency. Staff finds this criterion met. 7. Access ways. In addition to ingress and egress requirements of the Building Code, access to and from wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment shall be regulated as follows: a. No wireless communication device or facility shall be located in a required parking, maneuvering or vehicle/pedestrian circulation area such that it interferes with or in any way impairs, the intent or functionality o f the original design. Staff response: This facility will be located on a water tank. Staff finds this criterion met. b. The facility must be secured from access by the general public but access for emergency services must be ensured. Access roads must be capable of supporting all potential emergency response vehicles and equipment. Staff response: The equipment is located on private property and does not pose a threat to the public. Staff finds this criterion met. c. The proposed easements for ingress and egress and for electrical and telephone shall be recorded at the County Clerk and Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of building permits. (Ord. No. 1-2002 Â§ 18; Ord. No. 52-2003, Â§Â§ 14,15) Staff response: Not applicable. .. Exhibit C Review Criteria and Staff Findings Insubstantial PUD Amendment. 1. A change in the use or character of the development. Staff Finding: The proposed amendments will not change the use or character of the development. The primary use of the property with a water tank is not changing and there already exists a wireless telecommunication facility. The addition of the new antenna will not change the character of the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. An increase by greater than three (3) percent in the overall coverage of structures on the land. Staff Finding: rhe proposed improvements will provide a negligible change in the overall coverage ot structures on land. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 3. Any amendment that substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. Staff Finding: Trip generation and demand for public infrastructure are not affected by this amendment. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. A reduction by greater than three (3) percent of the approved open space. Staff Finding: The amount of open space will not be reduced by the proposal. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. A reduction by greater than one (1) percent of the off-street parking and loading space. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not reducing parking. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. A reduction in required pavement widths or rights-of-way for streets and easements. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing changes to right-of-way widths. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 1 .. 7. An increase of greater than two (2) percent in the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial buildings. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing to increase the gross leasable floor area. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 8. An increase by greater than one (1) percent in the approved residential density of the development. Staff Finding: The Applicant is not proposing a change in the residential density. Staff finds this criterion not to be applicable to this application. 9. Any change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a further variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. Staff Finding: Staffdoes not believe that the proposed amendment is inconsistent with a condition of approval or representation made in the property's original approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2 .. Exhibit D Review Criteria and Staff Findings 8040 Greenline Exemption B. Exemption. The Community Development Director may exempt the expansion, remodeling or reconstruction o f an existing 8040 Greenline development i f the following standards are met: 1. The development does not add more than ten percent (10%) to the floor area of the existing structure or increase the total amount of square footage of areas of the structure which are exempt from floor area calculations by more than twenty-five percent (25%); and Staff Finding: The proposed antenna and accessory cabinet will add approximately 7 sq. ft. of structure on the ground, well under the twenty-five percent allowance. Staff finds this criterion met. 2. The development does not require the removal of any tree for which a permit would be required pursuant to Section 15.04.450 or the applicant receives a permit pursuant to said Section; and Staff Finding: No tree will be removed via this request. Staff finds this criterion met. 3. The development is located such that it is not affected by any geologic hazard and will not result in increased erosion and sedimentation. Staff Finding: The development is not located by any geologic hazard. Staff finds this criterion met. 4. All exemptions are cumulative. Once a development reaches the totals specified in Subsection 26.435.030.B.1, an 8040 Greenline review must be obtained pursuant to Subsection 26.435.030.C. I r. *T#*,IFD ~Â»thefu AUG 31 2011 i. Â£32 // THE CrrY OF AspEN CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT WRITTEN DESCRIPTION W/ STANDARD COMPLIANCE The City of Aspen is proposing to install a permanent CORS (continuously operating reference station), located on a city owned parcel of land situated in section 11, township 10 south, range 85 west of the 6th prime meridian, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The CORS will be positioned at known coordinates in the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), currently NAD 83 (North American Datum of 1983). CORS will continuously collect GPS data to be made available, by radio and/or internet, to the public for GPS differential computations. This will allow users within the coverage area the ability to have real time, or post processed, "centimeter accuracy" with a single GPS receiver (capable of differential measuring). 26.575.130(F) - Review Standards: 1) Setbacks: The Antenna is setback approximately 61' from its nearest property edge. The Econolite cabinet is setback a lesser amount of approximately 50' from the nearest property edge. These two (2 setbacks meet the minimum requirement of 50' set for wireless telecommunication structures. 2) Height: The proposed antenna tower will be attached to a structure which also supports an antenna for the City of Aspen Water Department and will not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 3) Architectural compatibility: The structure that the antenna base will be mounted to is currently covered with native soil. After consulting the neighboring property owners and a Landscape Designer it was decided that all equipment would be painted an earthy tone described as matte cream brown. The proposed structure will be anchored directly to the existing concrete cover of the water tank. All utilities associated with the said structure will be buried a minimum of 1.5' below the surface of the existing ground and all disturbed areas will be revegetated with native seed mix. 4) Compatibility with natural environment: Disturbance to existing vegetation will be minimal. Any area that is disturbed will be vegetated with native seed mix to a level equal orgreater than its existing state. The proposed facility complies with all FCC regulations. See detailed map showing the locations of all continuously operating reference stations within the United States and world, at the link below. After finishing this application process and establishing the facility we hope to have the antenna recognized by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS). http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/ 5) Screening: Both structures shall be painted a earthy matte cream brown color as seen in the before and after photos. In addition the property's location and topography supply an exuberant amount of natural screening for the cabinet structure. 6) Lighting and signage: There is no lighting to be placed at this facility. Contact information will be placed at the facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this title. .. 7) Access ways: The facility meets all access requirements. Furthermore there are currently two existing easements for this property. One allowing access to utilities and the other allowing access and parking from a neighboring property. .. REC . FIVEn AUG - 9 2011 ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF Ats PEN COM&;"NITY AC\...9'-t rÂ·,DI,r.T PROJECT: Name: Ma-roon CnÂ»k Ciok 64)3-9 \de*-tter a.-tentÂ·Â·, q Location: La-1 1, arthor C)'PP,Â·iler : dlbral Af la-41,4, Se<j. 11-,4.unsl,flosceÂ·lk,rAge As- (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 29Â·3S 11302801 6,Â·,4 of +Lt CÂ® R h. i CA-42Â¢ polk&, CO. APPLICANT: Name: -77,~cr. dtr&4. A, P. E. (COA rtp.') 1 J Address: 130 5, fer'EL 64.. aspen - CO. 68/6,1 Phone #: (970) 920 - see O REPRESENTATIVE: Name: 1 rle k af-61Â©'1 , P. E Address: Act, 1-411 34.ex, 6-7 4 a. Nopkks ave., aspen C- . 81 G Il Phone #: (996) 429- 2'? 8S TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U GMQS Exemption O Conceptual PUD D Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment O Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Text/Map Amendment D Special Review Â¤ Subdivision ~ Conceptual SPA U ESA - 8040 Greenline, StreamA U Subdivision Exemption (includes El Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane El Commercial Design Review D Lot Split Â£ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion D Residential Design Variance E Lot Line Adjustment k Other: El Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) -1-Uts ~6-r-cA If) currz.<l-~l~ OCCC ple.3, \07 (1. (,na;-rj,unc c.jecto- -6-n k. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Prt,/705#AA -1-n r~.ont a gpS L.se.5-6.-Wor~ 40 -lop ofekli,IVA, c.xkr-Â·LL. L) LJ Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 33 F Q Pre-Application Conference Summary ~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of mil written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary willindicate if you must submit a 3-D model. .. ATTACHMENT3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM project: Mr,-rnon Cree,\: C \06 GPS -A \UiÂ©A Lu- Â£1.nk,n Ack . Applicant: 014-y â€žP darkA , re_p: Tr,châ€¢- CkrÂ·cÂ·.c~on , e. 5, U Location: Lo + i: Or-11-Â·ur- O' PAblcr Zone District: C PO n Lot Size: 42,501 94-2, 1.439 A Cre-5 Lot Area: 62, Sol A- 21 11 435 acre. 3 (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition ofLot Area in the Municipal Code.) Nj N j Commercial net leasable: Existing: IA Proposed: tA Number ofresidential units: Existing: ~ Proposed: ~ Number ofbedrooms: Existing: Proposed: Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Al Floor Area: Existing: /IX Allowable: Proposed: Principal bldg. height: Existing: C Allowable: Proposed: Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: % Site coverage: Existing.Â· Required: Proposed: % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined F/R: Existing. Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: V Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed: Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: kID Variations requested: M o .. NW View Before E 4. 41,Â« . 11... 1. ./4 1 . . . I ,:2"i-' <Al~k .~ ~7 I :'Â· % u /37'~ -- :4 r.,4,2~11'.5.191,.â‚¬4... .; - . 4 - 7, NW View After e . . re , .Y. ' ' A. 43. -2 . 2 2~,r ~ . .Â· ~ n~ - ~~~_ ~ ~7~1 ....1 -1.3..16:Â¥14:â€¢1 * Â·:- Â· -4~It'N., Â·11.14'....IN- 'C-I 'l & A 4.-- - '.'Â·,4~~~~%:â‚¬~~ iu. 4674% Â·. 7,194 .1 .. Before and After Photos SE View Before - ..m ... , 22' ' . /4 â€ž9 t 4. 1,4315Â·17. 6*.9 . . 9 - * ..4, ... et 3- '. - lt,- 4Â·42 rk : % ' I '4 3 , ..'Cur.:020,Â·:.2 Â· .:,49 GY: 1 SE View After V .ALÂ·' ..1- * .CA#: 1, 4 *,1. ~, Â¢ ' 'Â·' ".ti 1 4 + 47 - 0 . / 21*44 .,4 2 26.A ./ . CA .Â£ .. NE View Before f I ' . i./* 1 t. ..,4241 32... 0.-C 44- a?Fs ... 71.#fk.â€¢14~ . j : .....~. ~'231 4 :" 0 24.-Â· Â· '/1 +~;6*bulfwit'*er: Lids'Liziegil =tr 4 1 Â·Â·*. t NE View After f 4 ....~. 44 Â¥ lillinE. 'YT304%~ 4 161 ./ilf 6-I. I .4,3..~ 4 ., ~F097â‚¬':W~~ b '19 V, 1, â€¢ 4* A -7#4'. . 4 9/ r. . f, e - It 't ' tâ€¢ I. . .. I '2 - . 4â€¢ *. ./Mr..6'007:140../0~ - PHASE I QUANTI-IM. . h il- ... 8/01/11 / COORDINATES (NAD 83 -CO STATE PLANE) ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY 47 1 F 211 FURNISH & INSTALL CONCRETE MASONRY ANCHORS (1/2"X5") EA 4 1,jil\\ 211 INSTALL HILTI ANCHORS AND ADHESIVE EA 4- LOCATION NORTHING EASTI N G ELE. (FT) GPS ANTENNA 1Â£99781.395 2617270.461 8123.30 203 2 0 L - f ' 0 ~ CABINET 1499817.984 2617280.825 8113.09 UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION CY 41.7 j 203 EMBANKMENT (PLACE ONLY) CY 41.5 1 / */ \ 212 LANDSCAPE RESTORATION LS 1 I NSTALL 30"X22"X12~;-47->, O 601 CONCRETE CLASS B CY 0.2 CONCRETE PAD AND \ -- FASTEN CABINET UPON THE CITY OF ASPEN 602 REINFORCING STEEL (#5) LB 13.0 (SEE DETAIL "B") 613 FURNISH & INSTALL 2 INCH SCH 40 ELECTRICAL CONDUIT LF 600 I INSTALL 1-2" PVC ;$ SCH 40 CONDUIT ~ P HAS E 11 QUANTITI ES , 4 TRENCH = 1.0' DEEP (MIN) ~ ~~ Â¤WA jTEM NO. DESCRIPTION NIT QUANTITY j 40 LF 1 OT J Cke /CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 614 FURNISH AND INSTALL UF/B 6/2 OUTDOOR ELECTRICAL WIRE IF 280 ~ CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 2 614 FURNISH AND INSTALL OUTDOOR WATERPROOF ETHERNET CABLE - CAT5E LF 280 ,/ x. =mi 700 FURNISH & INSTALL 120V ELECTRICAL OUTLET EA 1 2%5= 700 FUR/INST 5/8" X 8' COPPER-CLAD GROUND ROD & APPURTENANCES EA 2 1 21 , 1 64 0. 7 700 FURNISH AND INSTALL jUNCTION BOX EA 1 r - ~e* PROPER~LINE~ OUTDOOR ELECTRICALWIREW/GROUND AND 2" ~ 1, -- REMOVE 1" PVC ~Â£l, U 64 ame NOTES PRO-SITE-1 1 - FURNISH & INSTALL 280 LF OF UF-B 6/2 .CWY e?// PVC CONDUIT. W Â© *44 INSTALL 45G BASE PLATE ~ ~ 2- FURNISH & INSTALL 280 LFOF OUTDOOR ANCHOR W/SUPPLIED ~ / WATERPROOF ETHERNET CABLE AND 2" PVC 04 k &-16 HILTI PRODUCTS W.\\ CONDUIT. (SEE DETAIL "A") 0 7.5 15 30 60 4"X4" POST / *. \ - 1 11 i-j i / 3-ITIS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO i ELE 1 INCH = 30 FEET 11/ TO REMAIN LOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO 1 /69 CONSTRUCTION. e =-U -MRED' / COMMUNICATION 4 - IF TRENCH IS NOT BACKFILLED ON DAY OF 10 1 1 SOLAR PANEL LOWSIDEOFTRENCH. TOWER WITH / EXCAVATION, SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTALLED ON ,-22 / =06% INSTALL 2-2" PVC ~ 5-CONSULT ENGINEER FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES TO BE CONSTRUCTED. U@QUA SCH 40 CONDUITS / p i i 280 LE (EA) 1 ,t TRENCH = 1.5' DEEP (MIN) 2/ il \ i / 2 f - /4 im F 4 1, 9.k 9 + 1/ 1 M ,/ ~44 1 - .A-'% 'll~ _ 4 CA L tip, A ZONE R- 15A 1 tfI i i \ / Al ..A 61:1 E- E-1 E- 64#W> . i / / Â£0342 TO ETHERNET CABLE (SUPPLIED BY COMCAST) ~Â»%Â» W-%;. AND INSTALLGROUND * 24 ES t CONCRETE DRIVE ~Â«' Â»Â·Â·Â· BEGIN ELECTRIC CONDUIT 09 EE ROD AT METER HOUSING 4Â©B-(Â¢: (DRIVEWAY EASEMENT) -\ (RECEPTION #439302) 1 0 ('' . 3< \ 2 1* 44 4;L x Â«/Â¥0- / LOT 48 \41<13\ -10 \ 1 -A- \\-7 \1/- It==m -- - - 44 2 1? IN t fut--3 3,4,4 b #h i MAROON CREEKPLAT - _ 1 4 RECEPTION No. 363275 \ --49 - - - (UTILITY EASEMENT; RECEPTION 1 of 2 #367232) (NO DIMENSIONS GIVEN) INGIWi}Irdaa 8/01/11 DETAIL A ELEVATION (A) NOTES: PLAN (A) 1 - CABINET TO BE SECURED TO THE CONCRETE BASE WITH FOUR (4) CONCRETE MASONRY THE CITY OF ASPEN ANCHORS, MINIMUM 1/2" DIA X 5" LENGTH. r-<i> 2 - #5 @ 8" O/C EACH WAY AT MID DEPTH 3- 5/8"X 10'COPPER-CLAD DRIVEN GROUND ROD W/ APPROVED GROUND ROD CLAMP 4-2-2"SCH 40 PVC CONDUIT TO FURNISH INTERNET CABLE AND UF-B 14/2 OUTDOOR l r-2 2 <ii> -.17' ELECTRICAL WIRE WITH GROUND. PVC TO EXTEND A MINIMUM OF TWO (2) INCHES Ck / .17' - ABOVE CONCRETE SURFACE. 4 W 5 - 30"W x 22"L x 12" D CONCRETE (CLASS B) FOUNDATION PAD WITH 1" CHAMFER. ~ * ~ ~ 6 - SIZE 3 - 36 IN, G ECONOLITE CABINET (24.5"W x 17.25"L x 40.0"H). USE CONCRETE ~ ~ a 0 0 MINIMUM OF 2" D PROTRUDING FROM EXISTINGGROUND. ANCHOR BOLTS TO MOUNT TO CONCRETE FOUNDATION. 4 k fl 1,1 7 - EXISTING 0.81" DIA DRILL HOLE LOCATED 1" FROM EDGE. TO BE USED WITH HILTI O 4 || 1.67' MOUNTING ADHESIVE AND ANCHOR PRODUCTS. (CITY OF ASPEN TO SUPPLY) U#* 11 8 - EXISTING HOLLOW STUB AND DRILL HOLE FOR SUPPORT OF ANTENNA STRUCTURE. 2 64 0 U 9-3- 3/4" MIN DRILL HOLES, TO BE DRILLED BY CONTRACTOR, FOR MOUNTING OF BASE 5Â©# PLATE TO EXISTING CONCRETE COVER. 4 Z A f 7 0Â© 10 -4- HIT - RTZ ROD 3/4" TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING CONCRETE COVER USING HILTI 00 5 .. | ~ | MAX-SD ADHESIVE. PRODUCTS SUPPLIED BY CITY OF ASPEN. FOLLOW HILTI INSTALLATION 44&- 4 2.0, ~ | INSTRUCTIONS ANDCONSULTCOAENGINEERFORLOCATIONSOFDOWELING. #1 M u 11 - ANTENNA STRUCTURE TO BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY CITY OF ASPEN. Ck<U 12 - 1" OFGROUTTO BE USED IF ENGINEER DETERMINES THE EXISTING CONCRETE COVER E- k IS NOT LEVEL. CONSULT ENGINEER 21Gzo 13 - 45G BASE PLATE ASSY. TO BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN. TZO~ 14 - EXISTING 10" THICK CONCRETE COVER WITH PRESTRESSED AND NONPRESTRESSED UWUA REBAR. CONSULT ENGINEER FOR LOCATIONS OF REBAR. 15 - PVC EXTENSION TO BE LOCATED AS NEAR TO THE CENTER OF THE CABINET AS DETAIL B POSSIBLE. MIN OF 2" EXTENDING PAST CONCRETE FOUNDATION. 16 - INSTALL JUNCTION BOX FOR WIRE GAUGE CONVERSION TO 12 GAUGE. 12 GAUGE ELEVATION (B) WIRE TO EXTEND ELECTRICITY TO A 120V OUTLET. 17 - i" DIA HOLE TO BE CONSTRUCTED FOR INSTALLATION OF GROUND ROD. 18 - NATIVE SOIL. ENSURE ALL ORGANICS ARE REMOVED BELOW CONCRETE FOUNDATION AND ADEQUATELY COMPACT PRIOR TO FORMING CONCRETE. P LAN ( B) lul / / 11 0 19 - I r--15) / 1/ i / 11 "11 1 11 I ilL..Lit, 11 Il I u O 0 i 1321 1 1- c--~~==f=]===2:=2 1-Li i 21110111 11 1 =11 1 27*~ 7 2 1.83 0/ COZZLIC/2 w u i mi , ,-fLE I lit- k H 7 1 2 3 i 3 - 1 17 7-. 1 1 t ~W. -%-7 :1 1 .1 a --lil - Eli E--11 r y- EN i q -4 1 L : I 1 1 7 ; . 08'-44- 0 ---~ 1 1--i I i -111- r I iii --' k '-: (MIN) 4.64 I :-1 1 1 --/ 11-- w i ' 'Â«--=' I i----' -<4> i '--Â·-1 1 1- -- 1 1 '1---Â· 1.- ~ -'' i. -f. 1 I _/ 1 0 0 f ~ â€ž2--21 M M / xm..uâ‚¬e,~Â·Â·,/,/ ' ] i - M / I Â·33' ,< A *' 1 1131 i p it- \ \.\ f grjoil fri- / 1 ---7 j it 7-. \ \\ \\ -,23 I 11 ]_ \ 1 .* 2.33 -'t i . 't h'.----.-- 25 !it 2 of 2 AAOISI}IHO GLLIS 113LLY Â£117Â£-*179 (0Â£6) AINIf}OO NI>Illd INI~IWINVdla DWIMIE[ - SNO) Sdp ... &43 P45 FINAL PLAT OF THE 04% ARTHUR O. PFISTER SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION 1/ N FULLY DEVELOPED LANDS M :Co â€¢r SCALEÂ· Â»50 VICINITY MAP - COC LEGAL DESCRIPTION 20â‚¬ 3.7 FEEÂ·\ 2 45 Â·2 9 Z + C 5 â‚¬FE>Â·, ID -375Â·J Al,!-L TH : 72.7 7 L.AND Â©CLATEI 1 3/36) I . 4 4. 0 M 2 47 1 1 ~12 4.. 2224 '1 1 . ' . ,-', -- "'~ -+27~.r 2â‚¬ING Plort FUL.lf -3'5509 2,3.- i . r â€¢. . . I;/ uJU /1 Y. - 2Â· '051'JAED' Â·1* ; MSN'Â·' . 3 z A FONT PreÂ·.CE -HE 'Â©eTEÂ«331 CON~KER OF 4 .' 6/ i.*46rt. ar ,=r- Â·Â· PFAP' 9 132, 55 2-7 K 36,4 95 72. CEZ 1 r r .9 2 35 4 1 u Y r'-'h â‚¬V 1/1 f '':., 42 6. 3-5\C 5 77. 27 55 5 62 EC =EN 0. y 4 Â» N /CE N '20 32 3 5 Â°230 eST-, I _1222122- E 7-2-CE 5 770 2-31 33' 3 33920 yEET . -335 00 j *Â·Â·SCE 3 25'57'32' E 137 3,3 =5E- 2 {T- - --9 - ' 7--1% i*r-- J.= #= -Â» ~A Z==CT -- 7 Â·31 Â· f:, -Â·Â·cÂ·,25 30-7-' 345 22 =â€¢'CT Â· 2/ - 'Ch . =Ill -1. ... --I- 3' Â·.3 \ 7Â° 9. 45: '6 220 36 FEET, ~79 mit - -= Â· ...5 9 '1 D 32 45 1,1 35 32 --22: 5 LOI_ 2 _ 74 394*4'lp vE %2*LY~%;&4&&(p-J =.Â·'.r N /:'* Â£7'56' .9 28003 752-7 _ - . A ._ Â·1 14 52 -0 Z 25.C CO --=. TC ThE 03, 8,-Try 2 -0 Â«Le-:. Z &7 L. r =1, 1! 4 97~1 - 51.3 ' Â· .' LS ED'Â·CAth<Ne 5 243 â‚¬Pet, TRE OP LES-5 r r . i AE 2/ 3/4 ve--Ft ,- Â£ i , t* OWNER'R CERTIFICATE / /\3, BOARD OF COUNTY 3 ~ 1 1-<4 4.- +109 5Â¥ Ted-55 2,â‚¬ESS>75 -9- 'Irr .03 =~373./3 COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL i i DI'E Â· - .4.6 - -59-1 7--IiÂ© *NAL FLAT :-DE THE .ART.of ,3 1* 575,7 PUL_Y' L-r., I.6-(D .7NÂ«ZJ V i 1.4, 5. L-.01.-, t>7-=-1 4% r ... 1/L.'v=<A =x=HFTION le: .APPROVED aY 7-,E F'Â»h 31 1.-Tr 84499 JF 02'11Â·1195ENEKS Â·34 -0-4 9 20* 06.rep U&,-66Â·., Njiq : C....923 3.40 ZÂ»-2.Â·. . -Â·~ --- 6 -=t_ _2~,iâ‚¬ r--E cRAE A.,5 25"r_E OF --5 -â‚¬- 4 2 FF 9-â‚¬ i =Â·1<t , Efr FESCDLCTION he Â·Â·11>33 LOT 1 1.~/, a 2 1 . f Uff 3 T ~p ER- /CLE' Â£- ftj:; UL f. (4-x- Â·b. 2-~m~y- - - ---_Â· h 4 4 1 30~61 4 9=\Â©....FT '+1-- 1 ~ ./4452â‚¬ 4- 145â‚¬ 0 9,= S 2-FL . t/ 1 .p W ' / 42,1 I. 0 - 0-25- 61- ---Â»30Â»Â«. WRVEYOU CERTIFE:ATE leÂ» 7 . i - h,Â»7' 9% - -2.'f 1 2.3-6.2,02 -3 . a _-4IÂ© p'+AL PLA- _f t. r,Al?7 Â·..Â·P Â· Â· '- 1~Ze F--w-Y 35, f. .--'27 - <-Â«â‚¬ 9 â‚¬ 01,3 ~ -7.- >4 33 = Ar 30 -EEED: 22- 4 7'i,T m. 5 pe=, 0~2 9, ... /3--! =>UNTÂ·'7 =Â·TKIN '1-- 4.Â·25 3.53 .'N:h ExtÂ·'--,2. -Â·- C .0-~Â·1304 0- --1 3.r).CIE ele Â·1>=:Â·, t'Â·4 Â·:Â· -:.0. I-,Â·-'-Â·.- ,ir:29 â‚¬2 4226,973_f . . 1 7.15 Â«DKEED.8 -*594'ing. 49%5 45Â«-W..55Â¥BED REFC-'RE-'E 4%2 2Â«67Â·.Â· 3.0.' 573'.' - - --E 9,02 .AFTE DRDED - .:~'~3' 5 -Â· 2 1~. 477-53 5*Tjf. ANO 7-*â‚¬ rdr,/DO D-:9 ke-~CFÂ« 7_2*522-Â¥ _ _--.iÂ·' .1 39 --7.,4:0 937513 74 =E-3 5L':.1 Â·3 -/ 1- 1:-0 46 1 8 2 1 'N , . =1 Â» 2= 441 '16 1 ;=2 -2 ---* 92.-,7=7.-1 4-4/ 2. / . Â· -- 1--W:=4Â·Â·-7 Ch~r ' C-fi C~2Â»Â· - - e. I 1 Z-' I v l- - Le- g-\1! /0* ../L,L---L.-_: 91-02. Tr .-LE:Z C jÂ·C~ -E -t= 31<0.--4-Â· -- . /c ; I -- I O-5,259 ' " #5 +02 reCIA. BEAL ~ Er.Â·efe '0 . ..V' A , Â·- ~,FrÂ·.3 1*133 NCI -r. re = REâ‚¬â‚¬ L.9 9!84 _ >97-* FLSLIC ~~ - OAZARD WARNING_AND_DISCIATMER- -1--5 - Ft 7.Ne ,54<NO-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· ED:35 -.Â·vt-~ 7<.9- -4â‚¬/5 31[irÂ·. 3 15 9- 4 Â·:.:4 01; 2- 2 7--3 5,33-I'-Â·CI C,~ '35/ 7 .-'*k .0= 0 -7-<1 44 : * - -/-/.-/r/-.-~ .--~%F - . - iÂ»L hy)~I~I'7Â·6 '43/21 5.â„¢-~ E, .-)~ -~R, I7/ _E_7(95.0 x.te.i '.7--1-Â«An,Â»>-5FJ&Â£!.CÂ·-- -- . .,ea Om K.Â·,=L.- 0-4 33 4 23/4 ,Â·Â·2 2/u tll-'. ' . EEÂ»â‚¬, OL-Â©DE O- T-E 215~3 6673 4 '32.95 '.1-Â·~ 29.1/*Ci. DLFIKEÂ·ir- ~9./92-- L.6 -Ae .vi- X Fe:ES CtÂ», -,AZA-DE. 2:2 7---6--_ p'. L.- v . 'UrÂ·- I Ju/,~ i . 2..4.3~~.,Ftit h -_ G., 2Â·30.4.\ 1 c Z _ -|~ '....;~/ 7-= 1.. 7- 0./-06.-I. i Â· 2..Â·557 -236 00 Â·Â·-1 Â·Â· 4415 -~.-1=1 M 1 / NOTES , (1 Â»1) 43-46/ ~. K L-' r Â·'D - > _07 3 Z>-A- 33 _VI-LD-C =4302 23. -1-33 :Ac-its:,2 22Â· Eâ‚¬* KEZIE.â‚¬_Crb.-.ST OF 11-IE #5- 2 D- 2,tÂ·Â·Â·iG F...23~ .,L.eft Ale -3.-=. =n F I I.--- - Ic /%---9 -le~ *..;c</F, ./_ I ~~.-~_:_I .- . CeÂ¢.1. Ve,Jor 7- 4/ 0 14.=7 _ 1 < -/'1 1 #â€¢LQ-/5 -L - . I -1 i " ./ â‚¬EJECES. *' Â·- 3,29 NiST- -4 '434_,f - N Â·bÂ·K.<5--55 ,t-- SOCES,5 7=-- SE J Tz--15 E>< 5--ING ED-X.031_â‚¬2 <.,CEE 4~27~_;'~~~~~~lE 334212=-= 77.. 7.- ...7 9:@RE & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE 6455 20 FE -EET '40LUD >41 43 a 93_-Aâ‚¬E EE :C = 02.1 25...-rE AEET '--5 1.2=LCANT- iff-JAze> A 0- Â©42 2 3,6 902.AKE -El- OF M,6 0 NAL <AT OFÂ· --5 --Â·Â·Â· e C x t -R =, . _v SEV'ELL, 0 4=.N.,2 50 5 --â‚¬. --5,26 e .162 4 558 5,0u'leE LAND 5'3521,' 3.5.4 5,2' Â·- -3~ 3 --- EF-3----' FL (45 iN Ti-if C'L.-- - .Â·n _74 7 OvE>1 â‚¬34-5 ' fi EL.XZED I\ DOO< 10' 6 -12 Ch. -â€ž~91 #FS tâ‚¬rr' . Â·*4 < OFFe r f..9 NU 02-1.1. .i- â‚¬-4-Â·Â·: - -1-5.2<:.1--32â‚¬ 3-:-4,0 _lgth 71 . Â·'Â·- 5'4 1, 4'; --Â·* 5 3x kiwDES ~0 fift ~PV.N. re ....4,2.040'2 --45 5 â‚¬5.h...6 3-r OF.,tic ril c '4 + Â· - 7 524Â·- /1 gr VAGE -48> L Â· ' ./FE --E LZED SCL,-â‚¬52 FOX- 727- AfEA â‚¬26 3â‚¬71. 62 2 - h 'EL. E-b .AN ~k.ZLIE.5/ J\,FLICâ‚¬ e RECE F ,Â·0< ho . 4 0% JÂ»fi- â‚¬23 -2 1 0-io< .2-MLEâ‚¬ Sk. 1 35 54=45=- TO Â·24 Er<4'.f>'.'Ch-k /7/21 I NO SCEXC FSÂ«EGEÂ·,440 0,Â·ge_.Ax fr.r,w// 2 A._LDEVE-OnvlE.NT ,Â«13 ,EZIEv E_-7 Zh-- 047-5 b.b...ECT Pâ‚¬7527 5.-4.-_ M XNE 41 233.11 -\Of 4 .OBE XAâ‚¬.5; 01 COCh-Y- C~E.<i.1 55 (iNEâ‚¬e> 2- 3 -7< 6 __-Jifljol{2(1 DDE 4;2#tifyi Â·'Â·' -1 * L L OT-nE,â‚¬. 25'-k-NIAK.39 .*j\.2 <-6'3*432\5 47 Â·230.--z <520_17-Ch \40. Â°4-.23Â° =Cf. SEX,07,3.9 2= 2.9% i treâ‚¬PER TLS M ) -<r h- Ca)> 19 1.A-2 -,9= 2025 -0Â«02>L le .9.1 : / 4.-22 , Alpine Surveys. Inc. Surveyed 4 -2 -2â‚¬C Revsky>s 3 29 14 TÂ».< ACLEY,3. LE ,E --_ Job No <22- 32 ritie -NA_ F- - 0 - ' Drafted 02 93> ER . 1.94 --â‚¬- 0 --ko FF 2575â‚¬ 1 CÂ»Â·11 07957157 Post Office BOK 1730 ,-tâ‚¬LA irtaLUSE I.i 47~3'lte; Â£=.~,p..- A-Â·.)~-- r -71 -Â· DrEN LAN cr- Aspen, Colorado 81611 303 925 2688 1 . - . 11'~-Â·â€¢ 1-<L\Â·tri' C>-, r -<14 C'LÂ·J -4 COLOKADC 4 .... . ....UL.10 111 11'lul 'JI ..6.J - SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF: 1 LOT 1, ARTHUR O'PFISTER A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN SECTION 11 It. Â».. liB\ ' vilge< ( 923 '1 VTÂ¥729#-E TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. .~ fi''L 'BÂ·.A.1..14Â¢l 5%.*'-: 13*t ' 1 40 34 1044.) Nr Vt /0 1 Il 11.1,1. 1 1 1 1 COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ~ _-5.' ,4 ~'~~'~~ ~~~ ~~~ ,~~I ', ''~i,~,U .'~~,~~' ~ ~WÂ· jl , T,.~ r _ 2~ SHEET 1 OF 1 7 aL r,- 'tt>. 0- ~lli'~Ffit , , . r: r-:*,~.1- IN~4 COMMON Luff-44 PARCEL ND 47 t.5 184(#PINE) - lili 7-41,11 7.13 ... V - ... I. "J " An N â€¢ aos .0 840 , b 04. 4 2-9 ltd - 1% 1 11 1 1 9 DI OWE~ . 1 ~ 1 - -0. I- .: . W ERS@X . 111, - r OU D RE@AR\ 11 11 11 =t'_ ' '14 1-1 4- ~> / 4' 2'. "I ~ g 17.. P n CAA i L. 2.51 ALIh~IE~ -1....46 I % 1, /V*1- 1 1 ' aE/$* - ~______-0 __~---- oe - 6 tfiES<i:02:Immiii. . 1.> 7 --: 1,7.. 1 A # GRAPHIC 5CALE 2' PVC P PE \ LOT 2 00 SC,LE: 1' â€¢ XIOC O8 o. VICINtTY MAP 1 IN FEE) % ~\ FOUND 115 REBAR linch= 20 ft. - I ,/(071/.22\25 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 6 The FInal Plat of Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision ANTENNAE / Exemption as recorded In the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin MOUNTED ON County In Plat Book 42 at Page 45 as reception No. 403369. F e COUNTY OF PITKIN J STATEOF COLOUDO Med COM~UNICATION - 4 NUU "OVTÂ£-1 0 0 . TOWER WITH NOTES qr LOT 1 SOLAR PANEL 62,501 5Q. FT. 1) Date of Survey: April 25 & 27,2011. 1.435 ACRES CONCRETE L - 2) Date of Preparation: April 28, 2011. W/DOOR A UNDERGROUND WATERTANK OUND NS REBAR 3) Basis of Bearing: A bearing of S 12Â·32'05" E between the found #5 rebar & & PLASTIC MP plastic cap L.S. #9184 monumenting the Southwest boundary corner of Lot 1 and LS, 20151 (ALPINE) the found #5 rebarand plastic cap L.S. 9184 monumenting the Northwest < boundary corner of lot 2, as shown, 4) Basis of Survey: 1 he Final Plat of the Maroon Creek Club as Recorded in the ; Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin Co unty In Plat Book 33 Pages +15 as 6Â« VENT PIPE Reception No. 363275. EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND / The Final Plat of Arthur O. Pflster Fully Developed Lands Subdivlsion Exemption as recorded In the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of P[tkin County in Ptat Book % COMMON 42 at Page 45 as receotion No. 403369, various documents of record, and the CATVPEDESTAL PARCEL found monuments, ai shown, 1, lip. 5) This survey does not constitute a title search by Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) ELECTRICMETER to determine ownership or eaements of record. For all information regarding E] ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER Â® SEWER MANHOLE L L- plats described in note 4. No title commitment was used in the preparation of . d e w. nup WATER TANK %/ easements, rights of way and/or title of record, SE relied upon the above said this sulvey WATER VALVE 6) Basis of elevation. An NAVD 88 elevation of 7720.88 feet on the NGS station WATER HYDRANT FOUND #5 REBAR & PlASTIC CAP % GUY WIRE L.S.9184 (ALPINE) ) S-159, being part of the City of Apen GPS control monumentation 2009 survey , prepared by Marc:in E ngineerlng LLC, which established a project specific POWER POLE 4 - benchmark elevation of 8095.0' feet the found #5 rebar and plastic cap L.S. 9184 monumenting the Northwest boundary comer of lot 2, as shown. GA5 SIGN jj -- -- __ 3 - 7) Contour Interval rwo {2) feet. DECIDUOUSTREE CONCRETE DRIVE CONIFEROUS TREE 1 SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT ~ 0 EDGEOFVEGITATION 8100 ACCESS EASEMENT . SCALED FROM THE I, Geoffrey R. Keller, do hereby state that this site improvement survey was ' MAR(jON CREEK PLAT prepared by Sopris Engineering, LLC for The City of Aspen, and that it is true and i a $ # RECEPTON No. 363275 correct to the best of my knowled$.ad belief. This site improvement survey is 3 not an improvement surv~*t@im,95?li Intended to show all easements of INO DIMENSIONS GIVEN) CONCRETE MOUNTABI 1 LOT 48 CURI G*off,* R. Keller LS 14%*997 : 2,4 /2// PFEIFERPLACE A PRIVATE ACCESS Â· |1 EASEMENT WITHIN LOT 46 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC CIVIL CONSULTANTS LOT 46 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 L NOTICE: Aax*/4/ To CLORADO *W VOU */ CO'.t-/0/ /0'zi \ LOT 47 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 /LCt~ba~k-*-{Wm./.Sl-U~WS i (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM I YEL..OM â„¢E ... CERâ„¢,CAT~Â»1 m,0-1~~OIL 1107?E*CONO OUA 11 ,10,7EXCONÂ©DWO tz)* 63 Â® O Ytix, .. THE CITY OF AspEN LANDSCAPE PLAN Existing vegetative cover and the extents of landscaping are shown on the site improvement survey provided. The representative did not submit a landscape plan due to the minimal disturbance to common vegetation within the identified parcel. It is the representative's desire to have the landscape plan waived. There shall be no disturbance to any type of vegetative cover, other than the disturbance to low lying common vegetative cover within the trenched area for the extension of utilities to the facility. All disturbed areas will be reseeded and vegetated to a level equal or greater than its preconstruction state. Existing vegetative cover and the extents of landscaping are shown on the site improvement survey provided. .. TIle 05 orllipen Memorandum DitÂ¥ miomen omee TO: Community Development Department FROM: John P. Worce s~~~~~~~;~B,/4,(2ti- DATE: June 14, 2011 RE: Lot 1, Pfister Subdivision - Tiehack Water Tank Site Please be advised that the City of Aspen is the owner of that certain parcel of land identified as Lot 1 ofthe Final Plat of the Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivision Exemption recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office in Book 42, Page 45. This parcel is commonly known as the Tiehack Water Site and legally described with metes and bounds in that certain Quit Claim Deed between Arthur O. Pfister and Elizabeth H. Pfister as grantors and the City of Aspen as grantee, recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorders Office in book 460, page 385, on February 3,1984. .. THE CITY oF ASPEN WRITTEN DESCRIPTION W/ STANDARD COMPLIANCE The City of Aspen is proposing to install a permanent CORS (continuously operating reference station), located on a city owned parcel of land situated in section 11, township 10 south, range 85 west of the 6th prime meridian, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. The CORS will be positioned at known coordinates in the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS), currently NAD 83 (North American Datum of 1983). CORS will continuously collect GPS data to be made available, by radio and/or internet, to the public for GPS differential computations. This will allow users within the coverage area the ability to have real time, or post processed, "centimeter accuracy" with a single GPS receiver (capable of differential measuring). 26.575.130(F) - Review Standards: 1) Setbacks: The Antenna is setback approximately 61' from its nearest property edge. The Econolite cabinet is setback a lesser amount of approximately 24' from the nearest property edge. It is understood that the proximity of the cabinet is less than the 50' required within the review standards. We are hopingthat after viewing the before and after photos the community development team will approve the location do to the surrounding vegetative cover supplied within the said property. This location is not only suggested by the applicant, but also approved by representatives of the managing company, being Sara Smith and Leonard Lansburgh (President), for the Maroon Creek HOA. 2) Height: The proposed antenna tower will be attached to a structure which also supports an antenna for the City of Aspen Water Department and will not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 3) Architectural compatibility: The structure that the antenna base will be mounted to is currently covered with native soil. After consulting the neighboring property owners and a Landscape Designer it was decided that all equipment would be painted an earthy tone described as matte cream brown. The proposed structure will be anchored directly to the existing concrete cover of the water tank. All utilities associated with the said structure will be buried a minimum of 1.5' below the surface of the existing ground and all disturbed areas will be revegetated with native seed mix. 4) Compatibility with natural environment: Disturbance to existing vegetation will be minimal. Any area that is disturbed will be vegetated with native seed mix to a level equal or greater than its existing state. The proposed facility complies with all FCC regulations. See detailed map showing the locations of all continuously operating reference stations within the United States and world, at the link below. After finishing this application process and establishing the facility we hope to have the antenna recognized by the National Geodetic Survey (NGS). http://www. ngs.noaa.gov/CORS/ .. 5) Screening: Both structures shall be painted a earthy matte cream brown color as seen in the before and after photos. In addition the property's location and topography supply an exuberant amount of natural screening for the cabinet structure. 6) Lighting and signage: There is no lighting to be placed at this facility. Contact information will be placed at the facility in conformance with the provisions of Chapter 26.510, Signs, of this title. 7) Access ways: The facility meets all access requirements. Furthermore there are currentlytwo existing easements forthis property. One allowing access to utilities and the other allowing access and parking from a neighboring property. .. ' 4 42/1-4-RA/, I-N,-74*F' C,~%*SEi?-r#~r-~ -\2.94*142>360,#44Â» ,-. 2 / /4/Â«4413 1>AfF--k ** E j. 2 X:, 1%I:'*pÂ«li&~ 4.Â»toL /l<>P: ./ 4'$*$~#i;,L~~FÂ«bf~<~ lq>?,>24 2 Ff 4 ' I *221Â» 4 a// 3 1 \ - -1, \ 78.,6\\ % 46447%~ \4<\ 0 PL'llxl \. C 41 BeÂ© 1- 304~ - - . \0311 :cvV.1 Â·, 4 . NO' 0. C 0 8 ... tÂ¢ C l~ K....1.. - V ~ -1 L C 1~_- - * Atzih.<c irÂ·:, ' ' 1-1-4 1 J '' E ' 9.0 1 .l 4 / " 9 ~'Ii. it + '--h \â€ž 1 3 1 . Â·0( ..: 1, Â· â€ž - 1 .,, . 10 #2, , D \5.1 ZE 40>3 4% IC f .99 14\>0 \1 19 1,/7 4tb-?% I tA j)8 ; .J ~LI J t# r ? 4,9 4,7.Â· j f t Â« .13'49% \ 7.: h <f ...f . -t'40 c" :A:ff#<4-,<:.- 1?ti i:~ \31/ 1 .----1 ~-i Lf,Â·,Â· , /- - - -- h~44 (; 1. ' 2 07- T~ ,;~~'iâ€¢ .$ I. -/ 2~ i.'61 I. â€¢â€¢Al \ -- 1 6-3 9 cyril; P /(73) *2349. ---9,9,152/ )/~(- 1 . Â«~rimg,.. /k j '10 f~ / tie:.I /6 ./. -h k., - ------*-I) .2 4' V / 4 04 4 - . <4.--- - Â·. - 0 9 Ty iliffr~ * r--2 .4/4,1.6 z , 9/' -44,2,7hi . . * 4.' , . C...-'1: b M. c \,t , 1-/~ 1-0~ 1 I W. Â· 0 0/1 t , - 4 ..W , 1 J , . *+ 1 '.~j '. 3\. 43 .2~ 2 + l -1, ., /- h\ -- --- 19.4 .21 \469 j , ' - . ~l- 2, j 1,1 ) 4, I . 1.- 4 . .- . t â€¢F 1\ 7, i I -1 } -- 49464 5. ~(1 /' Â·\1~54'; 6-4 :./1 4 ; /f * *-Ip-* 05* r' N 'i,k"A',9 Â£/\#-IS: 2-27.2:.~C<17/#242 %272 I.*l 7/ 47 4 , 241.14 1 i 4 '1 / .. 11 1 ,'.f:M,11Â»1 , / .. b L , A V f v 59Â«*puff #27Â·' /t~*-..r 1 / 40,04. '04, Ail , hÂ»41 , picifty , ,),4 MIT , ,Â· , i <0/70 <Â£~f~..~~-*i :91'f{(49#M .4,4 ,===#12/Atir, 1,2 itv.//t d#\\k /j #,Wt {f<)61'L..,1,111,1 .*-2 4-31Â« 3 L,260Â»AÂ·g:--4,--1,~~I jl 1\Â» 4 a VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' EX Â· â€¢ .. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees TÂ· CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and i r i c toÂ·~ Arafer,P.E.CCOA rep) (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 0 3 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Maroon Cre,01 0\06 GPS ..4 Wejker Antenna, (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that the City ofAspen has an adopted fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Historic Preservation Commission, Planning and Zoning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 135 which is for 3 hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to.CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing ofthe application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $245.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: By: I r.1,1 (Ar-yÂ» , R, E Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: 08 ~01 ~ 11 Billing Address and Telephone Number: C:4-4 1.lar'\ dnaix- Eb. Oe,fiT, S-1 E, MopkÂ¢w, <Ave.. Aspen. 60. 81611 (940) 920-9020 .. ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FEE POLICY The City of Aspen, pursuant to Ordinance 52 (Series of 2007), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required, as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staffmembers may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and staff can provide a summary report ofhours spent at the applicant's request. After the deposit has been expended, the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner's time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals, up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required, no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or .not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the next page. .. THE CITY oF ASPEN AUTHORIZATION LETTER To whom it may concern, I, Steve Barwick, hereby authorize the City Engineer, Tricia Aragon, to act on the behalf of the City of Aspen for any and all matters associated with the Maroon Creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna project. This authorization will exist till further written notice from me. You can contact me In case you need any clarification. Thank you, Applicant: Representative: Steve Barwick Tricia Aragon, P.E. City Manager City Engineer City of Aspen City of Aspen City Hall City Hall 130 S. Galena St 130 S. Galena St Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 920-5000 (970) 920-5000 x:#L &449 X U / 4 Steve Barwid Tricia Kragon, P. E. / City Manager City Engineer .. THE CrrY oF AsPEN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY All of the structures and anchoring devices associated with this facility have been premanufactured, with exception to the concrete pad (see CDOT Standard), and are assured to be structurally stable by the manufacturing company. Design capacities and details are included. Antenna - ROHN Products Base Plate - ROHN Products Anchoring Products - Hilti Products Concrete Foundation Design -Colorado Department of Transportation Cabinet Foundation Design. (Standard Plan No. M-613-1) This facility is to be erected for the sole purpose of serving as a Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS). No other antenna is to be constructed or attached within the limits of this proposed structure. After reviewing the allowable stresses for the premanufactured products used to construct this facility, it is apparent that there is no concern for failure of the facility. In the unforeseen case that a failure did occur, it is seen within the site plan that there is adequate space within the Tiehack Water Tank Property limits to easily contain all debris. E 0 m - LIJ : kR tb N . I Â£ S EF, 0 U . 20.00 7.56 12.11 0.56 (3 HOLES) ~~ f \ m N 12.00 \/ I I . \)245*Â© \ 16.75 ./.1 (REF) 24 00 1 1 i j / 1 2%3 \/ 1 14.50 1.00 0.81 TEMPORARY STEEL GUYING IS NECESSARY DURING (REF) - INSTALLATION AND DISMANTLING. 1.00 F 1.25 X 6 HOLLOW STUB 1.63 ~ FOR 45G TOWER 14GA 0,45 7/7 E- 0.33 41 1- 1pi_-1-7- 0.25 DRAIN HOLE // / 1-63 , U._1 1 111 (PART NO. BPC45(3) ~ ~ ~,25 BASE PLATE FOR CONCRETE PIER (SEE DRAWING C770972 FOR FABRICATION) NOTES: 1. DUE TO VARIABLES INVOLVED IN ROOF AND OTHER INSTALLATIONS, IT SHALL BE THE CUSTOMER'S OR INSTALLERS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDESTRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE SUPPORTS FOR PIER & ANCHOR CONNECTIONS. IT MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FOR THE CUSTOMER OR INSTALLER TO SECURE THE SERVICE OF A LOCAL ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THAT INSTALLATION COMPLIES WITH LOCAL BUILDING CODES. 2. AFTER GALVANIZING CHECK DRAIN HOLES TO SEE THAT THEY ARE NOT PLUGGED. 3. FOR USE WITH GUYED AND BRACKETED TOWERS ONLY. WV 05'.DI Â£00~JÂ£E/923 -,3\ FILE NO. 91 - 0" 1-9 0 -1 Standard-45G - 9" 1--4 BAYS @1535" EACH - 2' - Or-~ 1 -0 - ~1/4"NPT ADDED B.IM.INWORMATION REVISIONS 1 21 - 011-~ 11 - 6" 1 REV. DESCRIPTION DWN CHK APP REDRAWN INTO A(JTOCAD FORMAT 11 DU JDM HA DATE: Jun/0!/?006 LTS 2.00 0.D. 1 1/4 STD. PIPE L 2 STD. PIPE Â· (16 GA.WALL) (1.66" O.D.) (2.38" O.D.) ASSY P/N: 45AG 1 - R-45A]BK ASSY INN: 45AG1 ASSY P/N: 45AG2 1 - R-KS157 1 - R-45]BK 1 - R-45â„¢K 1-7' -8"- 1 - R-KS158 1 - R-KS 159 1- 8- - 2-9 -01, -1 L TS 2.25 O.D. ASSY P/N: 45AG3 (14 GA.WALL) 1 -R-45AJBK ~ LTS 2.75 O.D. 11 1 - R-KS160 ASSY P/N: 45AG4 / ASSY P/N: 45,A(35 (14 GA.WALL) ~ 1 - R-45JBK 1 -R-45JBK 1 - R-KS 16 1 1 - R-KS162 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW NOTE: SPECIFICATIONS OF TOP SECTIONS ARE THE SAME (FOR ALL SECTIONS EXCEPT 45AG4) AS SECTION NO.45G EXCEPT AS NOTED ABOVE, 10' - 5" ~-1' - 2 Z" - -- 941 - , 9"5@15 0" E â€¢11 5 * - -24 1- 9101,1 - DWG REFERENCE 1/f//1 -4 JK- 74_ (14 GA.WALL) L BAR 7/16 DIA. Z 1 1/2 OD SAE GRADE 5 BOLT ASSY'S P/N:45AJBK OR 45JBK REQUIRED 111 1/4 <FpÂ· 3/16|/ Vp (3) 5/16" DIA. X 2 3/8" LG. (NC BOLTS) ASSY P/N: 45G SECTION (3) 7/16" DIA. X 2 1/2" LG. (NC BOLTS) 1 - R-45.]SK 1- R-KS154 SEC.>> 45G TOWER SECTION PROPERTIES ITEM LEGS BRACES SECTION NOMENCLATURE SIZE TS 1.25 ODX.083 WALL BAR 7/16 DIA. N/A Fy 50.0 36.0 N/A A = CROSS SECTIONAL AREA (SQUARE INCHES) A 0.3043 0.1503 .913 C = COMPRESSION CAPACITY WITH 1/3 INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS (KIPS) Râ€ž S 0.0833 0.0082 4.15 I = MOMENT OF INERTIA ABOUT CENTROIDAL AXIS (INCHES**4) I 0.0521 0.0018 42.7 Fy = MINIMUM YIELD STRENGTH (KSI) 6718 WESTPLANKROAD PEORIA, IL 61601 K = EFFECTIVE LENGTH FACTOR (DIMENSIONLESS) TOLL FREE 800-727-ROHN r 0.4136 0.1094 6.84 L = UNBRACED LENGTH (INCHES) Til]% DRANONG IS THE PROPERTY OF ROHN. ]T [S N(jr TO BE L 15.75 22.1 VARIES M = MOMENT CAPACITY WITH 1/3 INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS (FT.-KIPS) REPRODULED, COMED OR TRACED IN WHOLE OR IN PART W!â„¢OUT OURWRITTENCON'ENT. K 1.0 0.70 1.0 N/A= NOT APPLICABLE KL/r 38.0 141.4 VARIES r = RADIUS OF GYRATION (INCHES) SECTION ASSEMBLY C 10.6 1.50 N/A S = ELASTIC SECTION MODULUS (INCHES**3) 45G SECTIONS T = TENSION CAPACITY WITH 1/3 INCREASE IN ALLOWABLE STRESS (KIPS) T 9.46 N/A N/A W = WEIGHT PER FOOT (POUNDS) M N/A N/A 11.4 DWN: CHK'D: DATE: Ws = WEIGHT PER SECTION (POUNDS) GPW WDU Feb/13/1988 W 1.035 0.512 7.000 ENG'R: WS 35.0 35.0 70.0 ROB NOTE: CAPACITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ANSI/EIA-222-D-1986. DRAWING NO: REV: C630645 11 \Frectk,1\ luv06,7007 6:36:22 PM .. BASE PLATE WIT H LPOXY ANCHORS 11 SC AL F 1/2" = 1 "x" DIA HILTI I IAS-F RODE WITI I F 'ILT I F 11-A 17 150 MAX/HIT-IC EBADHESIVE ~ tEER 1 9673 1" 7110< b L 1 /4-" TI-~ IC K // 1 r , .1 BASE PLATE GROUT SPEC I U 1 / EMB EDMENT DEPTH I - / F--1 -f 1 \ 1 1 SPECIFY AOPTIONS: SPACING B SPECIA DIAIVETER AND QUANTITY SPEC IFY ROD HAS- ROD (9258 ksi) c HAS SJDER ROD (fy 1 105 ksi) HAS 304 OR 316 3% ROD (fy,2 45 ksi) SPFC 177 ADHESIVE HILTI HIT HY 1 50 VAX/HIT-ICE HILTI HIT RE 500 .... PEDESTAL COMPONENT LIST ~ UTILITY PROVIDER REQUIREMENTS. 0 1254 120/240V NEMA 3R METER HOUSING CONFORMING TO 24'*2" | ~ 1004 250V, HEAVY DUTY, 2-POLE, NEMA 3R, SERVICE ENTRANCE INSTALL JUNCTION ' 18" MIN. 11 1 11 RATED DISCONNECT SWITCH WITH GROUND AND NEUTRAL BARS. PAVEMENT CUTOUT ~ ~ SURFACING OR FINAL GRADE - el - BOX HERE ~ 1004 MLO, 120/240V-10-3W, 8-SPACE, NEMA 3R LOAD CENTER 7/is" DIAMETER HOLES (USE TWO i - - WITH BRANCH BREAKERS AS USTED ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE. PANEL 3/8 ' DIAMETER BOLTS WITH NUTS 43 ~ HEAVY DUTY, GALVANIZED C-CHANNEL TYPE RACKING SET IN CONCRETE. 9"*2" STAKE) STUB CONDUIT AND WASHERS TO ATTACH UNIT TO PAINT TO MATCH PANEL COLOR. INTO JUNCTION BOX ---12 / WARNING TAPE 3 1 lili - Â© 30-AMP 12-POLE ELECTRICALLY HELD UGHTING CONTACTOR FURNISHED WITH 120-VOLT COIL AND NEMA 3R 120V PHOTO ELECTRIC CONTROL 6Â» TO 12" DEEP ~\20* 24" MINIMUM UNDER GROUND WITH TWIST-LOCK RECEPTACI-E BASE. ~ 30' MINIMUM UNDER ROADWAY 48" MAXIMUM 9- 111111 COMPACTED (D W x 80-0" COPPER-CLAD DRIVEN GROUND ROD WITH APPROVED - BACKFILL 1 1 GROUND ROD CLAMP. >215/*2" 06 KNOCKOUT FOR CONDUEr li +01<<9...5 73.. L FINAL GRADE MAY BE USED IF APPROVED BY ENGINEER. Illo"12" 2. 994 6 / :'ty/ -7;/iT '31 p 4 49<4/ NOTE: UNDERGROUND COMBINATION METER/SERVICE PANEL ASSEMBLY -1 ----*I- 1 TA d , 44 5/8" DIA. x 8' COPPER-CLAD - 3485 3< 8, 44 /31 Â¢ Prit-__Jd DRIVEN GROUND ROD 4" (MIN.) -p- 1-CONDUIT 4- ' 36" 10" BELOW SURFACE AND 6" (MIN.) -6"- -17/" || 4172"i 2" AWAY FROM BASE. CONNECT -~~ 31 9\9Â« 1 ,/7,-~ *S - CONDUCTOR TO GROUND ROD Â©Â«AÂ« 2 ' 1 2%55*,14/ H Â© WITH APPROVED GROUND ROD SECTION-TYPICAL CONDUIT BURIAL 8' (MIN.) -H - 8' (MIN.) u CLAMP. , v NOTES: 6 FT. LONG GALVANIZED 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE TRENCHING WITH OTHER UNDERGROUND FRONT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION GALVANIZED STEEL STAKE CABINET COMPONENT LIST CONDUITS UTILITIES, RAMP METERING AND IRRIGATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 1. / COMMON mENCHES AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS WHERE POSSIBLE. LIGHTING CONTROL CENTER (PEDESTAL) ~ 30 IN. W. x 48 IN. H. x12 IN. D. NEMA 3R HINGED ENCLOSURE 2. ONE #14 AWG LOCATE WIRE AND A NYLON PULL STRING WITH 6 IN. LEGS ANCHORED TO THE CONCRETE FOUNDATION PAD. IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS. THE BACK OF THE CABINET SHALL BE LOCATED 6 IN. MAXIMUM SECONDARY SERVICE PEDESTAL FROM THE EDGE OF THE CONCRETE PAD. (FRONT VIEW WITH COVER UFTED) ORIENT PHOTO ELECTRIC ~ ~ NEMA 1, 100-AMP MLO 120Â¥/240V 10 3W LOAD CENTER (SEE CONTROLS TOWARD - PANEL SCHEDULE). MINIMUM SPACES AS REQUIRED PLUS A NORTH MINIMUM OF TWO AVAILABLE SPACES FOR FUTURE USE. INSTALL- CONCREIE (CLASS B) SUPPORT RING IN CABINET WITH FULL-SIZE GROUND, COVER, AND BRANCH 9 I~3 9 F=hq - (NOT REQUIRED WHEN EMBEDDED IN H i U r' i i BREAKERS AS USTED ON THE SCHEDULE. - CONCRETE SIDEWALK OR OTHER SUITABLE 111 I i i METER) i i.. 6 . . : ' / \ CONCRETE PAD) 48 " x 4" GALVANIZED U 1 11 1 4--<' 1 - ~ ELECTRICALLY HELD UGHTING CONTACTOR FURNISHED WITH I. . : 12" L--2 F 120-VOLT COIL AND NUMBER OF POLES REQUIRED. INSTALL l J-BOLT WITH NUT AND J -â‚¬) ' .(MIN.) ' I I Â· Â·4 INSIDE CABINET. 'Z . FLAT WASHER C ~ f r ~ : I ~0 4 â€¢' ~A - 12"- (4 REQUIRED) - M. â€¢ : Â·Lil W Â© NEMA 3R 120V PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL WITH 3-PRONG TWIST-LOCK RECEPTACLE BASE, INSTALL THE BASE INSIDE THE 4. -'. 1 0 4. 8/ d ~ ~ ~.~1~ CABINET. THE PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL SHALL BE MOUNTED ON dll . 6 11 1./ :4- .44 1. 4.4 4342 TOP OF THE CABINET AND ORIENTED NORTHWARD TO MINIMIZE . 6 4 12 : .' I.:' ... :. 4.I 1 60 W. x 36" L. x 12" D. \ THE SUN'S INTERFERENCE. I ELECTRICAL I =10 CONCRETE (CLASS B) -- 12' - . . (,MIN.)~ ... 4 4 .Mt.N *~ FOUNDATION PAD WITH-~ ~ . 8 20-AMP GFCI MAINT. RECEPTACLE IN A 1 -GANG BACK BOX WITH 4 ~ 024*4514* ml~.m n 4Â»Â«Â«/2// 1' CHAMFER COVER. INSTALL INSIDE THE CABINET. Â° Â·(MIN.) i 4 1 11 111 . 94/94 Hull 414*._1 u U.1 ultÂ« 16" x 28" PROVIDER'S REQUIREMENTS. - 6" DEEP GRAVEL BED PULL BOX ~ ~ NEMA 3R, 100-AMP, 2-POLE FUSED DISCONNECT, UL USE FOR 4, & I |||| Â© 1254 120/240V, METER HOUSING CONFORMING TO THE UTILITY I I ~ . "210 5 * A Â· 66 9. 1 lili ..J :/4Â«Â«4 DIAGRAM WITH NEUTRAL AND GROUND BARS. MOUNTED ON BACK I 12" 446161~Â°|~~ U A H 11 Ll 3, . . SERVICE EQUIPMENT AND FRN FUSES AS SHOWN ON ONE-UNE 4 4 4 1 "01.11 "-"1.110 0 1 SIDE OF ENCLOSURE. 24~ 1 4<01* Â·~ 1. /9Â£1 "IRHILT.*47<44#Y A~~ PLAN VIEW SECTION A-A ~ 48 " x 8'-0' COPPER-CLAD DRIVEN GROUND ROD WITH /0//4///7//Â«<j ilt ~4 VA. **dr<T~~*4 02 (MIN.) #5 AT 8" O.C. EACH **35 44 2 h APPROVED GROUND ROD CLAMP. | WAY AT MID-DEPTH </ , 1 2--721Â»0~4*4 4%*lj~ir#.47* NOT SHOWN IN THE DETAIL: TYPICAL PULL OR SPLICE BOX - -r--Ir -Z,CZAER_Zr.23J.11.X 64> 9 ..14 4Â»2- r 1. VOLTAGE SURGE ARRESTOR, 650V A.C. TO GROUND MAX. - - - //\1>0/>3~932*39 NOTES: 1 %46/Avi.. H v \ LTWO 3. pVC 1. ALL PULL OR SPUCE BOXES SHALL BE TRAFFIC RATED 20,000 PSI MINIMUM. L 2* PVC 2. "HAND-OFF-AUTO" KEY SWITCH. KEYED FOR AGENCY RESPONSIBLE 8'-41NjÂ»Â«4~ 2. BOX DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FOR 2 IN. CONDUITS MAXIMUM. FOR CONDUITS ~ ' FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM. u b LARGER THAN 2 IN. REFER TO N.E.C. SECTION 314.28A FOR BOX SIZE REQUIREMENTS. LIGHTING CONTROL CENTER (CABINET) Computer File Information Sheet Revisions STANDARD PLAN NO. Colorado Department of Transportation Creation Date: 07/04/06 Initials: SJR ~ Date: Comments -. i 4201 East Arkansas Avenue Last Modification Date: 07/04/06 Initials: LTA ~ Denver, Colorado 80222 ROADWAY LIGHTING M-613-1 , Phone: (303) 757-9083 Full Path: www.dot.state.co.us/DesignSupport/ , Fax: (303) 757-9820 Drawing File Name: 613010404.dwg DEPARâ„¢ENT OF TRANSPORTATION CAD Ver.: MicroStation V8 Scale: Not to Scale Units: English ~ Project Development Branch SRJ/LTA Issued By: Project Development Branch on July 04, 2006 Sheet No. 4 of 4 .. ESR-1562* rS REPORTâ„¢ Issued December 1, 2004 This report is subject to re-examination in one year. ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Business/Regional Office â€¢ 5360 Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California 90601 â€¢ (562) 699--0543 Regional Office â€¢ 900 Montdair Road, Suite A Birmingham, Alabama 35213 â€¢ (205) 599-9800 www.icc-es.org Regional Office â€¢ 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478 â€¢ (708) 799-2305 DIVISION: 03-CONCRETE A 493, AISI Type 316. The minimum tensile strength for both Section: 03151-Concrete Anchoring HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods is 94,000 psi (650 MPa). Specifications and installation parameters for HIT-TZ and REPORT HOLDER: HIT-RTZ rods are noted in Table 2 of this report. 3.2.2 Hilti HIT HY-150 Adhesive: Hilti HIT HY-150 HILTI, INC. adhesive, recognized in legacy report ER-5193, is a hybrid 5400 SOUTH 122ND EAST AVENUE adhesive mortar combining urethane methacrylate resin, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74146 hardener, portland cement and water. (800) 879-8000 3.2.3 Normal-weight Concrete: Normal-weight concrete www.us.hilti.com shall conform to Section 1903 of the IBC and Section 1905 of HiltiTechEng@us.hilti.com the UBC. EVALUATION SUBJECT: 4.0 DESIGN AND INSTALLATION 4.1 Design: HILTI HIT-TZAND HIT-RTZADHESIVEANCHOR SYSTEMS Use of Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems 1.0 EVALUATION SCOPE in conjunction with the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ steel rods is recognized in this evaluation report to resist dead loads, live Compliance with the following codes: loads and short-term loads, such as those resulting from wind â€¢ 2000 International Building CodeÂ® (IBC) orearthquake. Allowable tension and shearloads forthe HIT- TZ or HIT-RTZ anchors in concrete are given in Tables 5 and â€¢ 2000 International Residential CodeÂ® (IRC) 6 of this report. â€¢ 1997 Uniform Building CodeTM (UBC) The allowable tension loads in Table 5 of this report are Properties evaluated: permitted to be adjusted for short-term loading conditions in accordance with Section 5.2 of this report. Structural Allowable loads for anchors subjected to combined shear 2.0 USES and tension forces shall be determined by the following The Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems are equation: used to resist static tension and shear loads in uncracked, (Ps/Pt) + CK/Vt) 5 1 normal-weight concrete having a minimum compressive strength of 2,000 psi (13.8 MPa)or4,000 psi (27.6MPa). The where: anchor systems are alternatives to cast-in-place anchors Ps = Applied service tension load. described in Section 1912 of the IBC and Section 1923.1 of the UBC. The anchorsystems mayalso be used in structures 8 = Allowable service tension load. regulated by the IRC, provided an engineered design is Vs = Applied service shear load. submitted in accordance with Section R301.1.2 of the IRC. K = Allowable service shear load. 3.0 DESCRIPTION For anchors installed at edge distances less than critical 3.1 General: edge distance, ccr, or anchor spacing less than critical The Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems spacing, sco or both, the allowable load of the anchor based consist of specially formed steel rods and Hilti HIT HY-150 on the bond/concrete strength given in Tables 5 and 6 of this Adhesive. report shall be reduced in accordance with reduction factors in Table 3 of this report. 3.2 Materials: 4.2 Installation: 3.2.1 HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Steel Rods: HIT-TZ and HIT- RTZ steel rods have a helical cone shape on the embedded 4.2.1 General: Installation of the Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ end and standard threads on the exposed end. HIT-TZ rods Systems shall conform to Hilti's published installation are manufactured from carbon steel with specifications as instructions and the requirements of this evaluation report. referenced in the quality control manual. HIT-RTZ rods are Holes for installation of the anchors shall be perpendicularto manufactured from stainless steel that complies with ASTM the concrete surface and drilled using a drill that is set in roto- *Revised March 2006 ES REPORTS'- are not to be construed as representing aesthetics or any other attributes not specifically addressed. nor are they to be construed as an /0-3 endorsementofthesubjectofthereportorarecommendation jorits use. There is nowarranty by ICC Evaluation Service. Inc.. expressorimplied. as to any ~~ jinding or other matter in this report, or as to any product covered by the report. Copyright Â© 2004 Page 1 of 5 .. Page 2 of 5 ESR-1562 hammer mode and that has a carbide-tipped drill bit that 5.5 The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems complies with ANSI B212.15-1994, or a matched tolerance shall be installed in holes predrilled using a carbide- diamond core bit using a diamond coring machine as tipped drill bit manufactured within the range of the specified by Hilti. Holes do not need to be cleaned, but shall maximum and minimum dimensions of ANSI B212.15- be drilled one drill diameter deeper than the embedment 1994; or using a matched tolerance diamond core drill length, to contain any drilling debris remaining in the hole. bit of diameter specified by the manufacturer. Holes are permitted to be wet with standing water. 5.6 Special inspection in accordance with Section 4.2.2 of The dual-cylinder foil cartridge is self-opening, and the this report shall be provided for all anchor installations. adhesive shall be dispensed through an injection nozzle, equipped with an internal helical mixing element, that is 5.7 Calculations and detailsdemonstrating compliance with attached to the cartridge manifold to ensure proper mixing of this report shall be submitted to the building official for the components. Material from the firsttwo "trigger pulls"shall approval. The calculations shall be prepared by a be discarded to ensure that only properly mixed product is registered design professional where required by used. Holes shall be filled approximately two-thirds full with statutes of the jurisdiction in which the project is to be the mixed adhesive, injecting from the bottom of the hole constructed. towards the top, and the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ rod is pushed 5.8 Anchors are not permitted for use in conjunction with directly into the hole to the required embedment depth. The fire-resistive construction. Exceptions are: adhesiveshall be flush with theconcrete surface. The anchor may be adjusted only during the gel time shown in Table 4 of Â· Anchors resist wind or seismic loading only. this report. Anchors are permitted to be fastened or attached â€¢ For other than wind or seismic loading, special to building components tothe design load only afterthe cure consideration is given to fire exposure conditions. time shown in Table 4 of this report has passed. See Section 5.14 of this evaluation report for limitations on base-material 5.9 Adhesive anchors may be used to resist tension and temperature during installation. Installation instructions are shear forces in overhead or wall installations only if illustrated in Figure 3 of this report. consideration is given to the effects of elevated temperature conditions on anchor performance. Load 4.2.2 Special Inspection: Installation of adhesive anchors reduction factors for elevated temperatures are requires special inspection in accordance with Section 1704 illustrated in Figure 2 of this report. of the IBC or Section 1701 of the UBC. The special inspector shall record product description (including product name); 5.10 Sincean ICC-ES acceptance criteria for evaluating data adhesive production or expiration date; concrete type and to determine the performance of adhesive anchors strength; anchortype (TZ or RTZ), diameter, and steel grade; subjected to fatigue or shock loading is unavailable at compliance of drill bit with this report; hole diameter and this time, the use of these anchors under these location; and anchor embedment. Additionally, the special conditions is beyond the scope of this report. inspectorshall state in the report supplied to the code official whether the anchor installation is in accordance with the 5.11 Since an ICC-ES acceptance criteria for evaluating the manufacturer's published installation instructions and this performance of adhesive anchors in cracked concrete evaluation report. The manufacturer's instructions are is unavailable at this time, the use of the anchors is included with each unit of adhesive for the adhesive and in limited to installation in uncracked concrete. Cracking the box for the HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods. occurs when 4 > frdue to service loads ordeformations. 5.0 CONDITIONS OF USE 5.12 Use of the HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems in conjunction with HIT-TZ carbon steel The Hilti HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ Adhesive Anchor Systems threaded rods shall be limited to interior exposures. described in this report comply with, or are suitable Installations exposed to severe, moderate or negligible alternatives to what is specified in, those codes listed in exterior weathering conditions, as defined in Figure 1 of Section 1.0 of this report, subject to the following conditions: ASTM C 216 (IBC or IRC) or Figure 21-1-1 of UBC 5.1 The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZAdhesiveAnchorSystemsare Standard 21-1, shall be permitted where HIT-RTZ permitted to be used to resist dead loads, live loads and stainless steel rods are used. short-term loads, such as those resulting from wind or 5.13 HIT HY-150 with HIT-TZ or HIT-RTZ rods may be used earthquake forces as described in Section 4.1 of this in base materials having interior temperatures between report. 41Â°F (5Â°C) and 110Â°F (43Â°C) at the time of installation. 5.2 When using the basic load combinations in accordance Installation of HIT HY-150 in base materials having with IBC Section 1605.3.1.1 or UBC Section 1612.3.1, interior temperatures outside this range is beyond the allowable loads are not permitted to be increased for scope of this report. The temperature of the HY-150 wind orearthquake loading. When using the alternative adhesive shall be between 41Â°F (5Â°C) and 95Â°F (35Â°C) basic load combinations in IBC Section 1605.3.2 or at the time of installation. UBC Section 1612.3.2 that include wind or seismic 5.14 When anchors are located where the interior base- loads, the allowable shear and tension loads for material temperature may exceed 100Â°F (37Â°C), anchors installed in normal-weight concrete are allowable tension and shearloads in this reportshall be permitted to be increased by 331/3 percent, Alternatively, adjusted for in-service temperatures in accordance with the basic load combinations may be reduced by a factor Figure 2 of this report. The use of HIT HY-150 in base of 0.75 when using IBC Section 1605.3.2. materials having interiortemperatures exceeding 212Â°F 5.3 The anchors may be installed in holes without special (100Â°C) during their service life is beyond the scope of cleaning procedures in accordance with the this report. manufacturer's published installation instructions and 5.15 The HIT HY-150 adhesive is manufactured by Hilti this report. GmbH at their facilities in Kaufering, Germany, undera 5.4 During anchor installation, the hole and surrounding qualitycontrol program with inspectionsby Underwriters location shall be permitted to be dry or damp, or holes Laboratories Inc. (AA-668). The anchor rods are may contain standing water. manufactured by Hilti, Inc., at its facility in Schaan, .. Page 3 of 5 ESR-1562 Liechtenstein, under a quality control program with 7.0 IDENTIFICATION inspections by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (AA-668). The HIT-TZ and HIT-RTZ rods are identified by labels on the 6.0 EVIDENCE SUBMITTED packaging bearing the product name, size, and evaluation report number (ESR-1562); the Hilti, Inc., company name; 6.1 Data in accordance with ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for and the name or logo of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. The Adhesive Anchors in Concrete and Masonry Elements Hilti HY-150 adhesive is identified in accordance with ER-5193. (AC58), dated November 2001. 6.2 A quality control manual. TABLE 1-APPLICATION DESCRIPTION BASE MATERIAL ADHESIVE ANCHOR INSERT SPECIFICATION DATA LOAD DATA PRODUCT Normal-weight concrete HIT HY-150 HIT-TZ and Tables 2,3,4 Tables 5 and 6 HIT-RTZ Rods TABLE 2-SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS IN CONCRETE USING HILTI HIT-HY-150 ADHESIVE PROPERTY ROD DIAMETER 3/8 inch 1/2 inch 5/8 inch 3/4 inch Ancm = Nominal area of threaded rod (inchD 0.1105 0.1963 0.3068 0.4418 7, 9/ 11~ 13~ BD = Nominal bit diameter (inches) '16 '16 16 16 T = Maximum torque (ft-Ibf) HIT-TZ rods 18 30 75 150 HIT-RTZ rods 15 20 50 105 Maximum thickness fastened (inches) 1 11/2 21/4 21/4 Overall length of anchor rod (inches) 41/2 511, 7716 89/16 '16 Standard embedment depth (inches) 27/8 31/2 4 514 Minimum base material thickness (inches) 334 514 6 77/8 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 ft-Ibf = 1.4 N-m, 1 inch2 =645.16 mmi TABLE 3-REDUCTION FACTORS FOR REDUCED SPACING AND EDGE DISTANCE IN NORMAL-WEIGHT CONCRETE ANCHOR SPACING FACTOR (S), EDGE DISTANCE FACTOR (C), EDGE DISTANCE FACTOR (C), TENSION AND SHEAR SHEAR ONLY TENSION ONLY Scr Smin FA cer emin TRI cmin tRN C 2.5 x hw 0.7 x hef 0.7 1.9 x he 0.7 x hef 0.25 1.9 x hef 0.7 x hef 0.54 TABLE 4-MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED CURE TIME FOR HILTI HY-150 ADHESIVE MINIMUM BASE-MATERIAL TEMPERATURE GEL TIME1 CURE TIME2 (Â°F) (minutes) (minutes) 41 13 90 68 5 50 86 4 40 104 2 30 For SI: tÂ°C = (tÂ°F - 32) + 1.8. 1Ge| time is the period during which the anchor rod can be installed and adjusted, and length of time prior to the adhesive beginning to harden. 2The cure time is the minimum time that must elapse from time of installation until the anchors achieve full design capacity. .. Page 4 of 5 ESR-1562 TABLE 5-ALLOWABLE TENSION LOADS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS INSTALLED IN 2,000 psi AND 4,000 psi CONCRETE USING HILTI HY-150 ADHESIVE 1.2,3,4 ANCHOR EMBEDMENT CRITICAL EDGE CRITICAL ALLOWABLE TENSION LOAD FOR HIT- ALLOWABLE DIAMETER DEPTH DISTANCE, SPACING, TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS BASED ON TENSION LOAD (inch) (inches) CC~ (inches) Scr (inches) BOND/CONCRETE CAPACITY BASED ON (pounds) STEEL STRENGTH fc = 2,000 psi fc = 4,000 psi (pounds): CARON STEEL AND TYPE 316 SS 3/8 274 51/2 7 1,880 2,490 3,170 31/2 63/8 9 2,865 3,835 5,635 I 2 5/8 4 71/2 10 3,730 5,640 8,805 3/4 51/4 10 14 4,375 8,420 12,685 For SI: 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 pound = 4.45 N. 1Allowable load shall be the lesserof tabulated bond/concrete and steel values. Load-reduction factors given in Table 3 for reduced edge distance (c) and anchor spacing (s) shall be applied to values in the bond/concrete capacity column Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate spacings, edge distances, embedments and concrete strengths. Load-reduction factors are cumulative foranchors with multiple anchorspacings and/or base-material edge distances. 2-The tabulated values are for anchors installed in concrete having the designated compressive strength (fc) or higher at the time of installation, tonerete thickness shall be equal to or greater than 1.5 times the anchor embedment depth. 'When anchors are used to resist short-term loads, allowable tension loads may be adjusted in accordance with Section 5,2 of this report. TABLE 6-ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOADS FOR HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS INSTALLED IN 2,000 psi AND 4,000 psi CONCRETE USING HILTI HIT HY-150 ADHESIVE 1,2,3,4,5 ANCHOR EMBEDMENT EDGE DISTANCE, SPACING, ALLOWABLE SHEAR LOAD FOR HIT- ALLOWABLE DIAMETER DEPTH Ccr (inches) Scr (inches) TZ AND HIT-RTZ RODS BASED ON SHEAR LOAD (inch) (inches) CONCRETE CAPACITY BASED ON (pounds) STEEL STRENGTH fc = 2,000 psi fc = 4,000 psi (pounds): CARBON STEEL AND TYPE 316 SS 3/8 27/8 514 7 1,725 2,440 1,635 14 314 63/8 9 2,440 3,450 2,900 5/8 4 71/2 10 3,420 4,835 4,535 3/4 514 10 14 5,875 8,305 6,535 For St 1 inch = 25.4 mm, 1 pound = 4.45 N. 1Allowable load shall be the lesser of tabulated bond and steel values. Load-reduction factors given in Table 3 for reduced edge distance (c) and anchor spacing (s) shall be applied to values in the concrete capacity column. Linear interpolation may be used for intermediate spacings, edge distances, embedments and concrete strengths. Load-reduction factors are cumulative for anchors with multiple anchor spacings and/or base- material edge distances. 2-The tabulated values are for anchors installed in concrete having the designated compressive strength (fc) or higher at the time of installation. aconcrete thickness shall be equal to or greater than 1.5 times the anchor embedment depth. 4When anchors are used to resist short-term loads, allowable shear loads may be adjusted in accordance with Section 5.2 of this report. .. Page 5 of 5 ESR-1562 fattij . > FIGURE 1-HIT-TZ AND HIT-RTZ ROD 110 3 (100Â°F, 100%) 100 4 90 - 80 - 70 - 60 - (212'F, 64%) 50 - 40 - 30 - 20 - 10 - 0 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Temperature ('F) For SI: fC =(tÂ°F-32) + 1.8. FIGURE 2-INFLUENCE OF BASE-MATERIAL TEMPERATURE ON THE BOND OR CONCRETE CAPACITY OF THE HILTI HIT HY-150 ADHESIVE ANCHOR 21 1.74>1Â» 1 -3 /:Lte 6 fut,L:M..fmi 1 a HT 91 1% m HTEE a -1,1 6 , '111 1,35 1, / 1 .: ' /1 LJ -â€¢'rÂ· Â· , 1 - IT-N>9 0 111111.12.fIC -3 f A 114.11.151.2 I....Â· 41#1!HY154' i --' ... IHITHY,5(1', D -* m Â·~-- Â·f 6 11, Â·M ' 51%1z ti~LE 7 . 1.11 :INCE 5 74 g. 1,T.11 f .. . HTÂ·11 1 4 1 "Â· M , 2' I . i H 11 .=.1.14 L :Â¥. Wâ€¢Â·ti 'Â· ~ 2'*-0~-.5 . .27 .. .1. Ll J . ./ . . 27'. I - ' 1 il . Jlili hole oinga Plkh Ille 11 [TI m tip hcle 10 M.tily sullieient hola Iriedadhesimstalling Filthe hcle 1.2-22,& full. H Ihehdeis lullol Do not adjust the HITÂ·TZ rotanmine[ 01 Hlti depth gily threails,Â·bitle). Fo[ Ihoi agtileatic,~ lica the bitorn 01 wak, il is sumesled lo start inlecthg [ran the rod bet.,Em Ihe gel and damond ming FulÂ·ing the Nd oin-pris Ihe di il du51. the hole. botbm ol the hcle a,ililiailiielÂ·, with alhai,e. cum times Apit a load Iwrhine. Dityallet Ihe appiÂ©pdate aile time Ass elapsed. FIGURE 3-ILLUSTRATIVE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS Percent of AilowabIe Load Values Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration - OffAirport Page 1 of2 ~~ h. Federal Aviabon ~ Administration Â« OE/AAA Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration - Off Airport Project Namâ€¢: CITY -000180048-11 Sponser: City of Aspen Details for Case : Continuously operating reference station Show Projeci Summary Case status ASN: 2011-ANH-1695-OE Date Accepted: 07/18/2011 Status: Accepted Dati Determinld: Letters: None Documents: 07/18/2011 Â® 11077EX-CONDILC-, Construction / Alteration Information Structure Summary Notice Of: Alteration Structure Type: Antenna Tower Durationt Permanent Structure Name: Continuously operating reference station ir Temporary 1 Months: Days: NOTAM Nâ€¢mb.: Work Schedule -Start 09/01/2011 0 FCC Number; Work Schedule - End: 10/01/2011 Prior ASN: *For temporary cranes-Does the permarent structure ,Â«qul,â€¢* separate notice to the FAA? To find out, use the Notlce Crite,li Tool. If separate notice M refvured, pkas. Insure it Is Mied. IF It Is not med, please state the reason in the Discriptjoi of Preposal. State Fiiing: Not filed with State Structure Details Common Fr*quincy Bands Latitude: 39â€¢ 11Â· 45.43. N Low FAq "igh Iraq Fraq Unit ER' ERP Unit Longitude: Spedfic Frequencies 1060 51' 16.46" W Horizontal Datum: NAD83 -Low ir,4 - High rreq Freq Unft ERP ERP VIR S]te Elevation (SE): 8123 (nearest foot) 450 470 MIl 35 W Structure Height (AGL): 10 (nearest root) * If thi entered AGL ts e proposed change to In existing structure's height Indude th, current AGL In thi Descriptlen of Proposal, Riqu,sted Marking/LIghtlng: None Other t Recommended Marking/Lighting: Current Marking/Ughting, Nole Other i ~ Nearest City: Aspen Nearest State: Colorado Description of Location: A parcel of land situated In section 11 townsh;p 00 the Project Summary page upload any c,reitted wrigy. 10 south, range 85 w est of the 6th P.M. County oF Pltkin. State of Colorado. (Lot l; Tha Anal plat ' ef Arthur O. Pfister Fully Developed Lands Subdivislon Exemption. Reception No.403369 Discriptpon of Pigposal: The Instanation of a p,nnanent contlnuousty operating reference station (CORS). We are proposing to mount the new GPS receiver to the tup of an existing Oty Water Tmk. .. THE CITY OF ASPEN FCC LICENSING Frank Kochevar, Mesa County GPS/Survey Supervisor, manages Mesa County's current FCC license and has agreed to include the City of Aspen's wireless facility on his approved FCC license for the interim period. The Mesa County license is used for the same frequency and range as our approved license will condition. Mesa County FCC license # WPJV827 The City and its representatives have submitted an FCC form 601 to the FCC for review. This will allow Pitkin County to acquire an individual FCC license to cover proposed and future CORS. The approval process takes approximately 90 days. All licensing tasks will be managed by Mark Gamrat, Pitkin County Communications Director. Contact Information: Frank Kochevar Frank.kochevar@mesacounty.us (970) 244-1826 Mark Gamrat Mark.gamrat@pitkin911.org (970) 315-2181 .. THE CITY OF ASPEN EVIDENCE OF EFFORT During the winter of 2010 representatives of the City of Aspen met with the Frank Kochevar (Mesa County, VRN Coordinator) and visited several potential sites in the Aspen Metro Area. The VRN GPS receiver needs access to power, clear view of the sky with maximum horizon, and lack of interference with other equipment. The Tiehack Water Tank Site was found to be a best fit for these necessities. Additionally, the location selection of structures within the site was determined by selecting locations that would maximize the visual obscurity, of said structures, from neighboring properties. The Tiehack water tank currently serves as a wireless telecommunication services facility for the City of Aspen Water Department. The antenna servicing the Water Dept. is sporadically transmitting data to the water plant located in Castle Creek. There will not be any concern for frequency interference between the two antennas. Additionally, computerized projections show that the radio antenna will approximately cover a 10 km radius range. This will allow any surveyor within that range to receive real time adjustments to their GPS land survey. .. THE CITY oF ASPEN AFF [ DAVIT OF GOOD FAITH State of Colorado County o f Pitkin L 144,4 Dc bler , an employee ofthe City ofAspen GIS Department hereby pledge Wn this 24/ day of Ii,ne , 20_it., that a good faith effort was made in locating a facility for the establishment of a CORS (continuously operating reference station) associated with the Maroon creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna Project. Furthermore, I pledge that my facility selection was in accordance with the site selection process outlined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code Section 26.575.130Â£2. ff/14-6Â©L 6/24 40 n Mary Lackatr: Date: 1 1 2 6 . 4 JA Â¢06 l-mit 44 4/=Â£/0-0,1 ~#tnessed by: LPrint full name after signingl Date: I R= 0- D AUG - 9 20{1 CITY OF ASPEN CITY OP r~i>, coN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNER: Drew Alexander, 970.429.2739 DATE: 10/28/2010 PROJECT: Maroon Creek Club GPS and Weather Antenna REPRESENTATIVE: Tricia Aragon, 970.429.2785 OWNER: City of Aspen TYPE OF APPLICATION: Insubstantial PUD Amendment, Wireless Telecommunication DESCRIPTION: The Engineering Department is representing a proposal to install three antenna at Lot: 1 of the Maroon Creek Club Planned Unit Development (PUD). This area is zoned Conservation (C) and is the current site of a water storage tank and cellular tower. This proposal is subject to two reviews; Insubstantial PUD Amendment and Wireless Telecommunication. Staff reviewed the scope of work and agreed that this was insubstantial in nature and did not warrant a substantial PUD review before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Also, wireless telecommunication devices must be reviewed under the criteria found in Land Use Code section 26.575.130, Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment. This review ensures that the antenna will conform to the regulations such as spacing, height, and screening. Both of these reviews are handled administratively. The applicant or representative shall submit a completed land use application with all associated materials to the Community Development Department. The case will be reviewed for completeness and then assigned to a planner to complete the review. No public noticing is required. Below are links to the Land Use Code and Land Use Application for your convenience. Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use- Code/ Land Use Application Form: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/AppsÂ°/020and%20Fees/landuseappform.pdf Land Use Code Section(s) 26.445.100.A Insubstantial PUD Amendment 26.575.130 Wireless telecommunication services facilities and equipment (specifically sections 26.575.130.D and F) Review by: Community Development Staff for complete application Public Hearing: Not required Planning Fees: $735 for Community Development Administrative Review. This includes three (3) hours of staff review time. $735 for review of an application in response to work completed without permit or in error. Additional time over three (3) hours will be billed at $245 per hour Total Deposit: $735 Total Number of Application Copies: 2 Copies Includes appropriate drawing for board review (HPC = 12; PZ = 10; CC = 7; Referral Agencies = 1/ea.; Planning Staff = 2) .. To apply, submit the following information General Requirements: El Total Deposit for review of application. U Pre-application Conference Summary. 1 Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Â£ An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcels within the City of Aspen. CE] Completed Land Use application and signed fee agreement. E-1 Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 2 copies of the complete application packet and maps. Insubstantial PUD Amendment: 1-1 A written description of the proposal and a written explanation of how a proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application E] A copy of the approved PUD Wireless Telecommunications: EL] Site plan or plans drawn to a scale of one (1) inch equals ten (10) feet or one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet, including "before and after" photographs (simulations) specifying the location of antennas, support structures, transmission buildings and/or other accessory uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting, landscaped areas and all adjacent land uses within one hundred fifty (150) feet. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate compliance with the review standards of this Section. 1~1 Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified (wet ink signed and stamped and dated within the past twelve (12) months) by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the State. 2 Landscape plan drawn to a scale of one (1) inch equals ten (10) feet or one (1) inch equals twenty (20) feet, including "before and after" photographs (simulations) indicating size, spacing and type of plantings and indicating steps to be taken to provide screening as required by the review standards of this Section. The landscape plans shall also indicate the size, location and species of all existing vegetation and whether each of those indicated are proposed for removal (indicate proposed mitigation), relocation (indicate from and to) or preservation. The planner can determine if a landscape plan is necessary; for instance, when an antenna is to be attached to a building, this requirement may be waived. E] Elevation drawings or "before and after" photographs/drawings simulating and specifying the location and height of antennas, support structures, transmission buildings and/or other accessory uses, fences and signs. U Lighting plan and photometric study indicating the size, height, location and wattage of all proposed outdoor lighting sources. This study must also include a graphic indicating the spread and .. degree/intensity of light from each source/fixture. This requirement can be waived by the Community Development Director if little or no outdoor lighting is proposed. U Structural integrity report from a professional engineer licensed in the State documenting the following: a. Tower height and design, including technical, engineering, economic and other pertinent factors governing selection of the proposed design, b. Total anticipated capacity of the structure, including number and types of antennas which can be accommodated; c. Failure characteristics of the tower and demonstration that site and setbacks are of adequate size to contain debris in the event of failure; and d. Specific design and reconstruction plans to allow shared use. This submission is required only in the event that the applicant intends to share use of the facility by subsequent reinforcement and reconstruction of the facility. 1 FAA and FCC coordination. Statements regarding the regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), respectively, that: a. (Required only if the facility is near an airfield) The application has not been found to be a hazard to air navigation under Part 77, Federal Aviation, Federal Aviation Regulations or a statement that no compliance with Part 77 is required and the reasons therefor. A letter from the Sardy Field Airport Administrator will also be required if the Community Development Director determines that the proposed facility may impact airport operations; b. (Required of all wireless telecommunication services facility or equipment applicants) The application complies with the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission with regard to maximum radio frequency and electromagnetic frequency emissions or a statement from the applicant that no such compliance is necessary and the reasons therefore. EJ Evidence that an effort was made to locate on an existing wireless telecommunication services facility site including coverage/ interference analysis and capacity analysis and a brief statement as to other reasons for success or no success. 2 Written documentation in the form of a signed affidavit demonstrating a good faith effort in locating facilities in accordance with site selection order of preference outline below. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. Fee Waivel Request Form . City of Aspen THE CrrY oF ASPEN 8 1 j 6 -- D Community Development Department This form should be completed and submitted tothe Community Development Director for review. You will be nÂ®liddthen a decision has.been made to waive or not to waive the fees regarded in this request form. 41 f 4.. For what fees are you requesting waiver? E BUILDING X PLANNING Applicant Name: 7,:c,WA Aru,jon,P E, C C C.)AJ~ Contact Ph.# ( 99-0 42-9 - 2 lb s- Mailingaddress: E-:;nee.,1-~i, leÂ»-g,- r--\-rne,~11430 6.(le. l.".. 54, 1 A*~pn CO. R'k 'c E-mail address: 4-r.-2,6. OCri~Â«i,rh 00 0.i,a.50,3 A . <O,c , S i J L i Project name & address: Mi~rÂ©c.7 CrabL CLAn 6-95 -? \~/rel-L<.r- 6.bleARÂ« . Lo j- 1.- .2 44. En.\ PLA- 09 4-4 Arl-Lor O. PAsÂ·ler FL\\1 2*ve\Â©pe.1 -5>u\0 clivosin. rn F.ke-p-kon . (T, e.~ACUL.k INPi-~tr Ibl-J Fee Breakdown: Original Fee Requested Original Fee Requested Fee Description Fee Description Amount Waiver Amount Waiver Energy Code Fee REMP Fee Excavation Foundation Fee Zoning Review Fee Inspection Fee Planning Application Fee 43-39 11 935 Permit Fee HPC Application Fee Plan Check Other: TOTAL OF FEE WAIVER REQUEST $ Reason for Waiver: ~<~General Fund Department D Waived or decreased by City Council (specify ordinance or other decision document) H Other-Please explain: -- i (ltit, UMA Bfolit A tlieant Signature Date For office use only: Type of fees waived: Total fees waived: $ -9--9y- i ~ APPROVED D DISAPPROVED mmu~:~J~velopment Director ~~~~f~ Dat 13 *11 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE WAIVER POLICY ~ PURPOSE Fee waivers to eligible individuals and organizations submitting for building permit or land use application may be considered upon filing a fee waiver request form to the Community Development Department. Approval of fee waiver requests may be made bythe Community Development Director, according to the adopted fee policy of the City of Aspen. Costs for all building permit and land use applications, otherthan those waived by the Community Development Director, shall be paid as specified by the fee policy; prior to the issuance of building permits and at the time of submittal of land use applications. PROCESS Fees administered bythe Community Development Department can only be waived by submitting a completed fee waiver form to the Community Development Director. The request shall contain a description of the project along with a statement expressing eligibility for fee waiver. The Community Development Director will review the request and give approval or disapproval in accordance with provisions set forth in this policy. The Community Development Director does not have the ability to waive fees administered by other City Departments or other organizations. All organizations and individuals seeking fee waiver MUST submit their written request to the City of Aspen Community Development Director priorto submittingthe building permit or land use application. The approved fee waiver must then be presented at the time the building permit or land use application issubmitted tothe buildingorplanningdepartments. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA General Fund Departments do not pay fees to the Community Development Department for building permits or planning applications, with the exception of Capital Projects. The fees waived for these projects will be tracked bythe Community Development Department (journal entries are therefore unnecessary). In effort to keep paperwork and applications consistent, General Fund Departments shall still be required to submit the approved fee waiver with all applications for building and planning applications. General Fund Departments include: -.-2.Ill=12*lk,~17il' 1-'Efi-,:bilâ‚¬-G E-' , _ _- :f ,1,32'~1 _iLlil~c ".ttiIikjl3~: --,i,riI-1 C -lilli 'LI= I I -' 1 ; Non-Departmental 001.00 Streets Department 001.41 Z i ~ City Council 001.03 -~ Parks Department 001.55 1 City Manager 001.05 1 GIS Department 001.60 ~ IT Department 001.61 Personnel 001.06 1 City Clerk 001.07 Special Events 001.70 i City Attorney 001.09 . Recreation Activities 001.71 , Risk Management 001.10 Aspen Recreation Center (ARC) 001.72 1 City Finance Department 001.11 Ice Garden Operations 001.74 i Community Development 001.13 -~ *Capital project 001.9 Cons. Trust FD/Lottery 001.75 [ ' Engineering Department 001.15 1. I . 1 ' 4 Building Department 001.21 1 Asset Management Plan (AMP) 001.91 [ ~ EnWonmental Health 001.25 ~ *Tabor Capital Projects 001.94 -1 1 ; Police Department 001.31 - Outgoing Transfers 001.95 1 1 1 1.Records ~ -' ' 001.33 . 1 1 1 .. 4 :1 ~I ' ~ .Communications 001.39 f 1 NOTE* Capital Projects are not exempt from fees ' .. 2739 I \ 302 76 1 00 9-sÂ· 20 l\- A-f LU 1 Ble Edit Record Navigate Fam Reports Format Iab Belp i@ 4 * , e 4 411 i 4.1 6 3 d d.1 i }1 1 > 4 0 Â£ i lump 1 : Â¥ li 0161 let] JQ@o â€¢li'.3.30 40941 220 Rogting Status | Fees | Fee Summarl ~ Actions | Attachments |Routing Mistory | Yaluation | Arch/Eng ~ Custom Fields ~ Sub Bermits 1 ) 9 f -2 + ./.#..,74.-,44-, :,4. - 8 Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # 0055.2011.ASLU ..~ ~: ~ Address 130 S GALENA AÂ©dte City ASPEN Rate F-1 Zip 81611 7 Permit Information L Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 8/102011 . 1 Projed Statl6 per)dhg Approved 0 Â·5 Description CITY ENGINEERING DEPT REQUESTS A PROPOSAL TO INSTALL 3 ANTENNA AT Igued LOT 1 OF THE MARON CREEK CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUDO aosedjfinal t . 1'&'=1*% 11 31 + Submitted TRICIA ARAGON, PE. 429 2785 Clock ~ Days ~ Expires 8/4/2012 4 Submitted via ~(3 Owner Last name CITY OF ASPEN First name 130 S GALENA ST 1 i 1+.IM I <' 115 ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (970) 920-5000 Address itilâ‚¬* 3 Appljcant 11/ 24 0 Owne[ is applicant? El Contractor is applicant? - Ift Last name CITY ENGINEERING DEPT First name TRICIA ARAGON 517 E HOPKINS AVE CITY HALL ANNEX < Phone (970) 429-2785 Cust # 29090 Address ASPEN CO 81611 I i 4., )3. Lender 1 Last name First name 4 i, Phone ()- Address - 14 .!4* 1 - .AspenGdd5 [swygliang*Â§- 912% 1 Ge -44 Â«UU- 4,41-J -140 'r~ 0Lb~.3 1 e.,%&YA 643-9