Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.201 W Hallam St.0041.2009.ASLU
0041.2009.ASLU 201 W. HALLAM 2735 12 4 35 002 - RES DESIGN REVIEW ' .- 1 8 ... ~Wt~ 0411 3 \ S R , A 1--10 LEGEND AND NOTES 0 10 20 1 FOOT CONTOURS G CITY MONUMENT O SURVEY MONUMENT TO BE FOUND OR SET WHEN CONDITIONS PERMIT O UTILITY BOX 0 CUT UTILITY POLE BEARINGS *09 It'W A SURVEY CONTROL 0 0 0 FENCE CALLS IN ( ) RECORD POSTED ADDRESS -201' HALLAM STREET TITLE INFORMATION BY: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE. INC. NO. PCT21910L DATED: FEBRUARY 22. 2008 TREE CALIPER (D-DECIDUIOUS. F-CONIFER. DL-DRIPLINE) 14\0 WATER LINE LOCATED I N HALLAM STREET ALL OTHER UTILITIES LOCATED IN ALLEY BACK OF ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS MONUMENT NO.9: EL. 7901.255 (1929 NVGD) IN 75. 24-0 BEARING BASED ON THE CITY MONUMENTS FOR THE NORTH LINE OF BLOCK 50 CURB OUTSIDE 500-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN) AS SHOWN ON FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 09.11. N 75'09'll- W 270.00 BASIS OF ~ IF 22'UL 270.00.) 4 THIS PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN ZONE -X- (AREAS DETERMINED TO BE 7884 PREPARED BY F.E.M.A.. FOR PITKIN COUNTY COLORADO. COMMUNITY-PANEL NUMBER 08097C0204 C. EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4. 1987 (N 75 THIS PROPERTY LIES ENTIRELY INSIDE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN MUDFLOW 3 PROJECT NUMBER 1963, FIGURE ES-15. HAZARD AREA AS DEFINED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN. 90.00') 7.0 k 7885 VICINITY MAP 5 4 $ 4 6 670 1311 1 - - 400' < 12-18-0 4 rjoo~1,~~06 "43:« ~ ~£'pad~ Bar < 4 20'[1_ 4 4 LJ.41,&,A < < 70' .1 7< e o gc; *€~·\~~ ,~ 80L 10'F < 6~[) h 8'El. 2 5-0 6-0 SOL 5-0 ' 13'[JL 7< 54 /F 229 5 4.11 . .7 + 10'[1- 50 - 4 4.- A- 7-1 0 < 40 HORI OL < FIL < 70 /4./ STONE A 7,409 b,6 1<9 61 0610 -7/"L~A k% 47#~ 8'CL -M O 1 4(81 g /. 09 . 4 r / 1:*:D Oot aol 4*42 2212 5 0 0 . 6549 r~ 4 0 ''8-F FF•7885.89 0 7 y 'J 17 O CP / 8-, 41* 4 W FRANC 11 V LJ < a *OUS, 0009 4 731*3 <=0611 5-D 4.v./90 < 10'F EL 4.5 HO USE HOL t ft] 041 G' Ck' h < 'VIA \P 4 <tiv 2.5 BEL 4 R 0 FOOTPRINT 2.343 SF ./- 14/4 0 m j MLIAE 43*·i L~~Oqt ¢ 11)* ' < AREA 2. V-SITE.1/ A49; 934 - 8 127 97. 9'[1_ 60 PUL ' W SLE{1(11 51 20- A-i '/ 8 47 I .... 76.4/ r 0,-7 2 8,0¢47.90 e . 22 **4*t] 4- -/D-CO fiot~91 i°_~pgic 0 PAT 10 8.2 4 8 6 P (78751 9. W NAN JT - <029 4 7 E WA* 51 0:11£ --4 U 1 kIIA 50 029!R{)41\ r] 1 50l_ ln,1 \1 I CO rITZ . . 5 56141,1 *f-44#7<«f 64\1 0% 0 512-r'Th- 2 ¥ 0 4 6I1- *- 41 74&004 - 14 FF•7885.6 \~0 I# "4 # i, : ic:~.,:,n: *cilnw. " < BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE N 31 4 \,5 50< L.n 7-[J 6'01- S CS 75*09 < A < 7-0 41 7-[1 5 G a CERTIFICATION 470 4 0 4 44 4-0< - 44 E'F 6OL 2 THE UNDERSIGNED STATES THAT THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON WAS 22.3 FIELD SURVEYED DURING JA 4 2009 AND IS ACCURATE A Er[L 80 12|7 C#D DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD, BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS. ENCROACHMENTS . EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME. 10~[]L 13118 EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES WITH NO ABOVEGROUND 8I1- ro < 5-0 10'[1 4 SECT I ON CORNER ~:=:mt APPURTENANCES. AND DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPL I ED TO THE STL SURVEYOR ARE' EXCEPTED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLESS WET STAMPED W I *!-44 6644*OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW. SURVEY PRECISION >1: 10.000. 6.0 4%>.74/47 5.0 CONC 8-F 4 £ D,i¥~ze* 0 6'EL 8[1 - - I I 5rk 4 *LI62* DRIV6 £4 J . HOWORTH P.L.S. 25947 8'EL 1 1. C 50 4 t dee .., G OSI GIl- 6) 9*85:61 6D 147 0 42"Un 6'ttl $. III'A\\' 6[JI- *~~ AP-- . 4 50 5'DL 5[1 60 It'E 90.00') VD191 4 4 6.01< < 09 4 8-0 4 POL < 6'CL ALLEY BLOCK 50 10 701- 60 6'EL PAVED TOPOGRAPHIC IMPROVEMENT SURVEY OF LOTS G.H AND I BLOCK 50. CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN. COUNTY OF PITKIN STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 9.000 S.F. +/- PREPARED BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COP~ENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT ON THIS PLAT WITHIN THREE YEARS PHOME/FAX (303) 925-3816 AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN DATE YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. THE CERTIFICATION IS VOID IF NOT WET STAMPED WITH THE SEAL OF THE 01/09 38059A SURVEYOR. , etesS -- W¥ IC 60 - - 6002'DO'20 -- PNS VISOeE'PI€» PP•/ laie-O~ J 00'001 3.64.0 &d JEFFREY BERKUS HALLAM STREET ARCHITECTS VARIANCE #1: WINDOW ~ ELEMENTS FACING FRONT STREET JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS 430 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 PHONE 970.925.7017 FAX 970.925.7026 -78 L-- 04 75°09'11"W 270.00') BASIS OF BEARINGS (N 75'09'11"W 90.00') \ 16 1* 7883 CD 1 10 1 4 1 1 1 1 I <92« 1'' 11 I - | |~ u || 1 11 11 1 11 1 4 1 1 11 1 u-- r--r | i LU 11 11 1 1 1121 1 ~1 1 11 I 1/NA\1' 1 1 1 ZIE J 11 1 1 -441*G/. 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 1 / billi 1 1,1111, 11 11 4 1 11 141111 lilli 11 1 'Er 1 r ~Ii· ~~ ~imnMLK&~~~ P~FA#<8B6 49 0 8&kji A#19WEMVW'~1111 &9* LT~ ~iiiII,IiII :1111 1.111111111111.1111111.. 11 ~ 1 J ''1, , Ft ·· :'Ip*,w·"i: .,AlBlihlimT '4r „, i n, .4 Ill. 11 1 i. 21 · 111 1 1 11 111 + 1111,11 11 i' ZLI,1 1 DECK ACCESS -J~ 1 1 i .1 M \, VARIANCE #2: , i WINDOW 5 1' ~0 ELEMENTS .. 31 F 12 9 STREET 1 FACING SIDE Ld VARIANCE #3: b 1 10 etback 1 1 ~6 *tback CA ONE STORY ·01.11 ~ GARAGE 10 1 18 Projecteddress 91- 1 1 ELEMENT 1 - Private Residence 11 11 1 , 01 lin 1 z 201 West Hallam 1 E, 1 , 1 1 Aspen, CO 81611 FIll. 11 4 Pr \ 1 I Projectno. 08021 --1 '1 1 L '' 11 Plot Date 1, 161 1 1 1 06.25.09 ~ Issue Date/Descrlptlon l| PRELIMINARY 11 05.28.09 ZONING REVIEW 1 1 i'' | FINAL ZONING 06.25.09 VARIANCE REVIEW PARKING AREA i, ~ I I - FOR 2 CARS 14 11 11 1 1 - 1 1 11 1 I' Liz-zizE==2=ZEZZ--- -22222222--222*/2.4.~: ~ 1 1 1 1 - 1 - t. 1 1 KLS:f 1 *fl.. 1 1 I - 1 - 1 1 G lili 1 - E --- - -- ---------1 - 10 / - 1 0 10 1 177 (S 75'09'11"E 90.00') ALLEY BLOCK 50 Drawing Title ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Scale 1/8"=1'-0" Drawing No. SITE PLAN SHOWING GARAGE LOCATION, PARKING, OVERVIEW OF VARIANCE LOCATIONS Al.1 INV11VH 193M LOZ ON3aIS3hl out 'spel!40,V snnped Am#er JO luesuoo pue uolislured uetipi sse,dxe 041 jujulleqo tallt inoll'At 419(1 Plig Aue oi peuti,sse aq ot Aewl @JE Joi 'JIA@OileVAA Jauuew m uuo, Aue ul peidoo Jo pe6uelo 'peonpalde) eq 01 lou eJe sueld es@41 ·sueld ...41 U s14611 Apedold Jeluo pue 146!,Adoo mel uoujuuoo su se/uese, /lsse,dxe ·oul 'sioei!,40,¥ smpeg Xe,#er 8.. - dal- ~1444 44~ .2.-2.-06.-*AL;6....;444.JU . ;_~~- ght.i:==-=„=~,=- ,~~HT< LIMIT - 4, . 4. ..1. .211 4,1. .T, h 4/24« . 3 19 ,4. 1zr .4. . . j -CE'ZNK *1114£2LE 5 -/- ' . rn - li \ , //evt .th,0. ...U. //5»»110 UKE:V / 00 ».\ ler t . . . , 9©42\ 12· .4 ..': tO AS.2 4 1. ~U' . -4 I ' . - 1 . 433/ 1 .WN I . · 0 2 ' ™mOOIDA,5 K GUY. · ·· 1. . C\%\ I ·. . 1: 12 y · ues=-ee *c . \-,4 1/f. . I L:. · 1 , 1 4. 1 NX . 1 1 -4 -\«h , , ----k4- f / If..L., I · .. V -- 1 . 1 . 1 '' . K , 1 , / 4-3 12:- M 411 91 8 1 ;1 - 1 -re. ·l~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ f Im\11 1 .11/>4,1 1 +19, \1 -1 3 Wit~ ' ~ i (p) 1.0 r. . .;11.i. 1 19-0 , "-" fiE ~12+ 1 -...22/ ~L, 1 p - --2-i_34-1.t FRIN¥ ap,•40,5 005*1 t .' ¢ , , ' >.41,4 BUM.T. 064,1r ker»iM . 4 :. COMNPR , 8526. · i. W p + lf. I :5 , , 4. a . 1,470*10'K aps, -. I . i. 1 -*--- . m g: - lA S LAF 2,19/ Ma - N-7 1 '~52£1_ 4287% 7 i. -4 CEPAM 23"VELD' \LA52 1/ · 614 1.'T -14/ e ) # 1 , 4 ./ d ( 644> , '34~11*~ -,-1 . - Ill-,2 · 0 ~ . ·· 151•ICK VENE¢VA- ; F, ty 3/-, -3 ty 1 elyelic' ~ ~ < i LA, SONG 4 -a .Al . , PELT-1 - , h . L . , . fx-· 01. 1 / 46 1 ./ 11\ 40 1/1 1 4 · r.'t L, 3 1 If 1 . »« li - ~ T ..t ·• • 1 ·3 / fil .H~i ' ¢ ; 1 1 40 ®f i© (9\ »5,2* t . 11 .. I. 4 F ·,, t I .~ 9 - -fJ·< f -i<)0040 f.~n.~ j 4 ! ......1.-li i-.Il- -#.1----/Mi, 4# 1 fa ./4,¢,4 GE,Ak ·TRIM 145.27 F /9\ . . / 211 . .1 0, . - - 24 .- 111 4 -\10 I. 11 1 \ Ny' .,. un:- , ..1 , i' - i 1 1 1; PLY 1 \-1 1420-0 41' 1. . . 1. . 1 1 ...*..r ..1/ 1 AN-Fll~SH dier*17£ 1 6 / I *9 :. 1,1 ,1: 1 · ir---6---4 1 1\ 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1.- 0.1- .1 r 12.8. r f.. 4 4 1 aRAP,15 ' I 1 EXISTING TWO : ~ STORY NON- 5 1 464©rl-0-1 ~@~Okil ' LWITH NON-CONFORMING ~ e ' '- . xy 0.0 4 0 . 1 \ EXISTING STAIR VOLUME 1 i CONFORMING 1 ~ WINDOWS 1 P+115 ~ 0 'in· 2...0.1. 1 -1 1 1 , 40 1 ·· 1 FRONT ENTRY 11 1 6~4"=11.8,1, i .~ , ~.. 11 M 08 GLAZING ;i · ~ - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 . 1 // 13 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 J Ney .1 1 1 1 1 11 1 -1 1 1 1 1 1 1 _4____-1 4 .1 L--1.--1 -- - --- -- - - *----- - --1 - ----·4 -- - 1 --- ---- 1.- -- .1 .I./I --I- I...I - -· I i . - 2 - I .· t L Ht .1-IMIT l 1 A 9 r-1 1 a I. 1 1 7 RIP¢*E , 71- . . 1 -1 . 127-5 44-- ' . U #Aj -4 : ' | ' 4 · 0««12 422.1 1 . / //7 1 .% 4.-? »L X<4>~0 - . \04\ -40:4 5Fn <1 a 2 - ./7 AN> 1 - 1 1 fi ,1 ff 1 - C /, C f. 71\ » N , 120-0 »24 : Or f 1 9~ 0~ g. 'i-41 ~--14. ~ -'4- --YEE~ -f-- 1 =10 ft@ 1 N 9 . P f-' 1 2 'rt_ ' . EXISTING ONE- - m 41. (0> 1 i- Mi le} . .: 1 1 Ng -=-f.1 -.- 1 J , . 1 1/ ft t,/42.-.P. STORY GARAGE M-X VOLUME: - -- O, /6 - 5 994 - 4 '11 , 111-1 111 ATTACHED ------ 1 1 1 . 14\3X-· i @1'11| 0 F g J; 67.19 1/4 / 0*, . I. ; A In': I r.~ : ' 1 7 11'4 ...j S 1 1 ~¥ 4, , . L 47 ARy 1 41, -1. B (9 1 . a .-- i A +·r. FLY ¥ 06 6 - 1 --4 9 94 . 1\11 1¥ A.. - 1 t: 1 .... 1:j ~I D-XyL.. i , :1 1 1,1 , H I : I •: .1 o4 4 A , i : 1 ~ ; 0 5-7 3-111%7 1 J- 4 11/ 4 44/ ,0 9 9 i \111~1 44 Nui .1-r ;,11 1 11 4/@ · : 9 !2 4'1 1 4 - ' 141<9 :I ) (9 -: r i % 10 @1 -\ ly!' 4. ~Lt »i 111. 'f ;1 1 -- r # /,1 .1 1 /0 \ 1 41 -- . ..:mq 1 A I \ L_b P/-,. + till~f lilli.a : 111 4~ ~'0. 4.A F - . I .4/ 95.27 !- .,1.7 11 1 -I i *,:f 6,3#~~ i· 1 T Per j 1 1. -- 4 -< - 2 f 1-,4 -tw 1 . 0 - 1 1 f. 100-0 '14€11 t , 1 T. 1 - . r'WaH GRAPE ' 1 1 , 1 ./1 .. 047£) | 1 1 ~- EXIST#. MNAPE ,£91-14 . . ,p' 3 1 4 l |- ~ 601*~N : fe>E ~ 1 .1 1 / 1 1 1 1 1 . 0.4.Cillio ..1~ Lib...M fIt · i-·. i i ~'-£.hy'*F' 5319 - i I 't , LJo-10~6 : '~~"~-1£-- 28.··89.-1. ·r.: 1 1 ·z I ~ | 3 SEE U OR-TH ELEVATISIU·. 1 1 + 11 «' · ' FOR No-FES 1 1 1 Ill 1 . 44/~4/:.'ll.' 4 1, ~~ilt:' 44; ~ I ./ I -' I 1 :.i Ik .6 2./1 : -. ... . # U... " 1 i ··.EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ELEVATIONS ;,/idipt-.1 6 : ; irea2¤ ..k'.../8....5 2.*1 2 3 ·· I . . 1 , .- . ..#Ill , ---11,4,11 . 1 . r. · .. · · ' 7 - 7-, RIDGE . HI LIMIT - __ ~ ..4 /1' - , /5/4« R 0/23\ AN-110 , >-_- trEPAR SHINGLES ' , ·71#80045 4< GUY , EXISTING ONE- klr.4-~#-7 - /~-STORY GARAGE: til ATTACHED . COPVAIGHT ' I rfl;%62 6-. F 1-- Ii- 4 ABSOCiATES PC r 120 -O - . & t. 1 20 - 572 1 - 1. 31. C .EX b.=i 29 24%4- ~ ute , , 1 f , 4 ' L '' N h. \ 6 , ... 111 ./ , EXISTING STAIR 0 7 0 i , Ak 1:21 -r= 11. . 1/ 11 116.-4 9% VOLUME WITH NON- J 4 - CONFORMING 3/X *./-4 .lili# d ,=U=--, . 71 ; f L. li i -HI %3 9 , 7 --** WINDOWS - --- tfy> 1 60 I -.........5>- . - Ul- , 9*4 FAIN¥ GRAPE / h> 1, a -r. ie.. . 2~05•.FC CORLI ER 695. 1 la- + 3 lul 10 FLY . 2 0 + P 1% ' .6 04 4(EPAR *EvELEP i), . 11 FE \ S , 4 1 -.1. - 4 LAp• SIP[kt,3 - 1*4 CEPAR TRIM-7. 110 -0 - 22 2 , ... 1 ---- 0, / i i 2 -=7 ,-F 1/ 11 ..1 11 \ OP I . 40 :© 1 - @ 2.1 F / 4. M \ r \ C , 1 1 W 9 I I. EL , / LOG . t 1 . , 11 , . ..4 , t - M . 29\ 4 . 3 . I r. 3 / r .i I *. ~-4" 0504.M erVELIfef z·: · r --, :,Ul < . 01'0~~·~ I ~U'·9+ <cRUISH GRAVE LAP' 6/Pikta ~ .~- ' «. ./1 1.. m0 100.0 1 1 1 .4 1 'CEPAR TUrEK\OV't BPS. t ~7533 EMIST'G =RAps - 919 8 2 . r * . 0 !: 1, di Ze* 0 id 9 I:U:r . 1 .. t 1 1 1 47 , r --.-4111 I 0- X 4 K or.; 0.1-'„Ula) 1 i .... * 1. 1 1 63 851- ELEVATIok! · ~ *'IN d.:.8 1 1 1 . 1 (224'=11-0,1 k 1-·• :M: R *91*/ lili I i i * · 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 n f. g ..11 51. = 1 1 . , , 1. -- ...1-. ......... 1.-- ...1-,-- I- - .1-„= -- - -- ..1 .f.. tA 01. ~ 4 I (P )6 0. i . - r-1 r--1 4 - 4 0 1 ./.'...'*'ll.*. ~ -1 . ·· HI LIMIT- , 1 1 -·11 T MusE 9 12 7.- S 3/4 . i · / /.69\ It EXISTING ONE- , r-- p / ~.. STORY GARAGE ' 101 p : - '/ X.1 1 .; 21 / * ATTACHED ~ i i - - . 0-7.~f««_ »/7 1 - 1- IC- 4 .I i t. 1 - 1 1 4. i.. 1 170-0 j !1 . 1 44 U./ . -Arp %4 - 434,~ - U. 9=5 I. 1,--1 Jeta'k . 4 * , ©7 \1 ¢ 9 -4 12> 4 2- |14- r 1111 fl P 7 6 U eli . I . 1 ,- 110 Ill ~ . 11 L . L -1 L 9 i j . 1 :,0 1 ' ....1 i ' ; --· -4-- == ----- '4*F.QI ' ' ./I"' . 4 1 - XY .2 + 9 1 7 0 , t~ i f FLY '111. 1. . ..il' 1,1-,-11 - 1 '~ , 111-0 £ - 21- I -42< 1 - 1 , 1 1 · LE--1.f·'. ' p J . - __ r. 11 ' ¢ 1 , I 41/lo ' ': . I 4% - ... 1 - 6. . ~-1.-1.- . l . 1 - r'..li , , - 11 114 00 0 W 3 ' \Elli <21: 1 1 % V tk ' ~ 1 Ul R . 1 \ i + 2-_ LI - ~ 4=:99' ,-11 N -- . 1 ./.% , 11- . -- - 2,11.JA=Cp · : - W. f J f < a. . i RAIL ' {L '-R 111· I /· ./. .. , , ..R T " r 9. ,Z 1 4 __ _ T Ft,>r ~ 1 1.p · 1 - 1 1 i ' _ .........-*--_ i too.cy » .*'. - ' -~ - EnsT'G GRAvE __)~ f 1 -- 4- -.1. ........ f | | | <FINISH.GIZAPE A i 1-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 NOTE: FOR NoTES SEE RE.ST * c,,1.BICED,· 2\4·9' - | 1 DRAWN' 1-13kt...1 f 1 EAST" ~ El-EbgrIONI I I I E.LEVATION. 1 ISSUE=· il-28 89:.2. 1 ..1 -1 1 1 1 0 1 lilli l f 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . . , .1 1 1 1 1 - rt_ _rn - . -4. . 1- -73 --·- 3 . -- 4- - - - - --4 - -4 1 - A-.1 -1 l i~ · , ~ EXISTING NON-CONFORMING ELEVATIONS 'K · .· JEFFREY BERKUS 1 A4.02 ff f ARCHITECTS 1 1 1 STONE TILE CHIMNEY BEYOND STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF an JEFFREY BERKUS rk ROOF LAP SIDING 4" EXPOSURE --- 121' -4-3-liw--1 ARCHITECTS '7-121'--41/2" NEW PRIMARY - GABLE AT / 430 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 STREET 1 \ , 1 / \ ,\ / PHONE 970.925.7017 /\/\ /\ / STEELSUNSHADE FAX 970.925.7026 / 1 / \\ 1 / / \ NEW ONE-STORY \ / // \ PORCH ELEMENT 1 / E-3 STUCCO @ WALL BEYOND AT FRONT ELEVATION E-3 SHT. MTL. CORNER WRAP rlA UPPER LEVEL UPPERLEVEL .h 111'- 11" ~- I - - 111'-11"-1 9 FT HEIGHT LINE \ ALCOVE WALL BEYOND FENCE BEYOND ~ / \2 \ \ /\ / 1\ LU clA MAIN LEVEL f f ' MAIN LEVEL .\ C.) r-160'- 0" 100'--0"/ Z STON TILE CLADDING CUSTOM CAST LIMESTOE COLUMN TYP. 3 2 1 P NTER W/ STONE TILE STONE TILE CIADDING A5.01 A5.01 A5.01 C DDING VARIANCE #1: NEW LU NEW PRIMARY NEW FRONT rn NORTH ~ WINDOWS AT STAIR 1 WINDOW AT ENTRY WITH 7'-6" 4/-174"=1-CO" VOLUME. REDUCED NON- STREET DOOR CONFORMITY 2 4 A4.01 DEA4.02 F *d- VARIANCE #3: Private Residence ONE STORY GARAGE ELEMENT 201 West Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 ATTACHED STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF Project no. I I I I I I 08021 Plot Date e --- 06,25,09 9,111 Issue Date/Description 1 4, , 1 03.06,09 PRELIM. PRICING SET 1 1 1, 11, Ek_ROOF ROOF /3 I ----i*~~1~- - --- -- - -I-I ------- VU 121'-4 1/2" 121' - 4 1/y«V 05,28.09 PRELIM, ZONING REVIEW FINAL ZONING 06.25.09 VARIANCE REVIEW [>71] 7 /// \\\ I L _ LAP SIDING 4' EXPOSURE STAIRVOLUMEBEYOND 1 1, /1_UPPER LEVEL_ Ill '11 / \ / \ / \/ I _UPPER LEVEL_-AD - r-ill' -11" --- 111'-11" Cl/ - 9FT HEIGHT LINE - 0 / \ / I E . 17-71 ~ NEW ONE STORY PORCH ELEMENT I 1 1 2 / \ / 1/\1 / \ \-,1 \ %- - .\ 1 cia MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL_,1 ~0' - O" 100'- O" cl/ Drawing Title VARIANCE #2: ELEVATIONS PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR ROOF SUNSHADE - STONE TILE SIDING @ SOUTH TERRACE ONESIOEM Scale ELEMENT: 2 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 - A4.02 LARGE WINDOW NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Drawing No. AT CORNER rn EAST A3.01 2 Ly-1/4"=1-EQ" IN ¥11VH 193M LOZ ·Dul '51021!40,V sn>liag Xe.I#er,0 luasuoo pue uo!SS!uued ual}kit~ sse.,dxe al# 6u!U!lego ;Si!; Ulot#VA Al·led P,!41 *Ue 01 peU8!SSe eq 01 Kel# ele iou '1@1905[wL,AA leuueul 10 U.uo, Aue u: padoo Jo peBueqo 'peonpo,de, eq o; jou ele SUe~d eseqi 'Sueld @Sel# ut slqSp 4.ledold laqo pue 146//~doo AAe: UOUILUOO S;! Se/Jesel dISS@ld,<e 'OUI 'SPel!401¥ Sr'DlieS *34#er 3 · 1 1 4-9--DA4.02 4 7 GLASS PANELINFILL f f SNOW FENCE ~ JEFFREYBERKUS STEEL POST AND CABLE ARCHITECTS RAILING EA. SIDE. @ CORNER | STONE TILE CLAD CHIMNEY - PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS ATTACHED TO STANDING ~ SEAM METAL ROOF 'b METAL CIADDING @ ======== LANDING SUPPORT rl~ ROOF TO MATCH ROOFING METALSUNSHADE ROOF .-h C-121'-4 1/2" -i+- --- - - - 121' - 4172«7 VARIANCE #3: / / N JEFFREY BERKUS / j LAP SIDING ARCHITECTS ONE STORY GARAGE 1 ' 4'EXPOSURE / ELEMENT ~ 430 WEST MAIN STREET ATTACHED ' i , ASPEN, CO 81611 - \ PHONE 970.925.7017 03 PHOTOVOLTAI \ FAX 970.925.7026 1_UPPER_LEVEL ' SOLAR ROOF UPPER LEVEL /I) -- ~-3 111'-11" 111'- iT«, SHT MTL CORNER WRAP TO MATCH WINDOW CLADDING SHTMTLSILL fJ/-- f TYP. Ek_MAIN LEVEL MAIN LEVEL--AR - ---100' - 0" l- ONE STORY ELEMENT: LARGE WINDOW WRAPS CORNER TO STREET r© SOUTH 1/4"=1-Eb" 2 A4.01 Project address E D Private Residence GUARDRAIL @ROOF TERRACE MARIANCE-#3: 201 West Hallam ONE STORY Aspen, CO 81611 GARAGE 1 1 1 1 ELEMENT Project no. STEEL POST & CABLE 08021 GUARDRAIL @ STAIR LANDING ~ ATIACHED Plot Date 06.25.09 Issue Date/Description METAL SUNSHADE 6 1 03.06,09 PRELIM. PRICING SET m METAL SIDING @ LANDING SUPPORT CA ROOF TO MATCH STANDING SEAM ROOF ROOF /1 - 05.28,09 PREUM. ZONING REVIEW il---i- -- ---- - C-121-'-4 1/2" 121'-419"-1 FINAL ZONING 06.25.09 VARIANCE REVIEW - SHT MTL 7 1 / CORNER WRAP ~ ~ ~ ~ - . 1 STAIR VOLUME 1 I - / WITH FEWER \ / \ / STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF WINDOWS E-3 - Ch UPPER LEVEL UPPER LEVEL /I) - ~11" - - - -- -- 111'-11"Fl 1 1 1 PLANTER BEYOND , 1 1 1 1 LAP SIDING b \ 1 \ 4' EXPOSURE SHT MTL SILL :·i ~- - IN i N TYP. ~ ED \ \ \ 41 K E~B A tch-MAIN LEVEL r100'-0" ----- -300'-6" MAIN LEVEL /3 Drawing Title ELEVATIONS Scale 1 /4" = 1'-0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Drawing No. A3.02 11 WEST 1/4"-2-*0" IN¥11¥H 193M LOZ 30N3aIS3k:1 ·oul '906[1!40™ sn>peg Ae.luer,o luesuoo pue uo!SS!uued uell!.IA, sse-,dxa el# 6u!u!1eqo ls,!J 111 /4W• 4,ed pi!4; Ale 01 peuS!sse eq 01 Ael# eie lou '18/~eosnewA deuueuu io u.uoi *ue u! pa.doo 10 pe¢Ue40 'peonpoidel eq m lou e,e sueld ese41 ·su eld es,41 u ! SNSH Medold an o pue 146!Md oo mel u ou,uloo 9! Ie/gasel dISseldxe ·oul 'SP@1!40-,V snlleg ,(elier External Media Located Here M-006942 gtal-Ilm RMMI THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0041.2009.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 2735 12 4 35 002 PROJECTS ADDRESS 201 W. HALLAM PLANNER JESS GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE REPRESENTATIVE 201 WEST HALLEM HOLDINGS DATE OF FINAL ACTION ABANDONED 12/16/12 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 3.22.13 -39- 002- uss- 12-4 -3 S -002. 2765-(2.-4 0041.2009. MLU 151 Permits DIe Edit &ecord Navigate Ferm Reports Format Iab t!flp @ @ * )* v 4 F ~ 4.1 e 13 ih e -] Ji 4 B M E 4 96 2ump 1 : 4] - 0-10 ~-- ed AHEd .1 ..3.3000 - Main~ Custom Fields ~ Attachments~ Folle-Up Notifications ~ Fees ~ Londitions ~ Actions ~ Fee Summary ~ Parcds ~ Sub fermits ~ Routing History ~ Royting Status Permit T j,pe .livlul--- Permit # |0041.2009.ASLU Address |201 W HALLAM ST ~ Apt/Suite ~ City |ASPEN State 15-3 Zip |81611 ~ - Permit Information ---- Master Permit | g| Routing Queue |asiu07 Applied |06/26/2009 21 Prolect ~ .21 Status ~pending Approved ~ 11 p I Desc,iption ~RESIDENTIAL DESIGN VARIANCE. MAJOR RENOVATION Issued ~ Final ~ Submitted |STEPHANIE 970-925-7017 Clock ~ning Days ~-0 Expires |06$21/2010 £,] Owner -- Last Name |201 WEST HALLAM HOLDINq| First Name | EUCLID AVE 1500 HANNAH BLDG Phone I ~CLEVELAND OH 44115 P Owne, Is Applicant? Applicd,Il Last Name ~201 WE5T HALLAM HOLDINI ~ First Name | 1422 EUCLID AVE I1500 HANNAH BLDG Phone~ Cust # ~28601 ~ |CLEVELAND OH 44115 Lender Last Name | ~ First Name 1 Phone~ Enter he permit type code - E-" AspenGold{bl - 1 peai ft-41=261 61* ¥1 j \ 4 9-- €2,2-€/ 0-5 x09001 ~ sdi¤9 gel 1 ~ aski ./1-r 2«r=Gat~iv --hot// k/3 7-LI) 4 (20 -7 ~ 1 ti~j~·g -7 -*3.-»1 .l,/7 04 47 3 0 -r/*1 u or'*3 v Cd) O-8 Q , 17©g . c)2 93° 77 K-1 0 ~-1 301- foroy -9 * r> w 72(11 Jennifer Phelan From: Jennifer Phelan Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 1:34 PM To: 'Stephanie Gerwin' Subject: RE: 201 W Hallam, Requested Supplemental information for Variance application Hi Stephanie: I have received yoursupplemental information forthe land use application on 201 W. Hallam and will be assigning the case to Errin Evans. She may have additional questions once she has a chance to review the file. Have a good weekend, Jennifer Je,bFUAr Pileta*, AICP Deputy Director Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 PH: 970.429.2759 FAX: 970.920.5439 www.aspenpitkin.com From: Stephanie Gerwin [mailto:stephanie@berkusdesign.com] Sent: Thursday, July 09,2009 4:55 PM To: Jennifer Phelan Cc: 'Jeffrey Berkus' Subject: 201 W Hallam, Requested Supplemental information for Variance application Dear Jennifer, At noon today, I submitted the supplemental information that you requested for our Administrative Variance application for 201 W Hallam St. project. There was a paper copy as well as a CD with the electronic files (.pdf and .doc format.) Drew was the person who received it and said that he would deliver it to you. Please review the content of letter and let us know via email whether it satisfies your request. If there is anything additional that we need to address we'll like to get it to you immediately. We'd also be interested to know who on your staff may have been assigned to handle our project. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Stephanie Gerwin Project Manager JEFFREY BERKUS.ARCHITECTS, INC. 430 West Main Street, Aspen, CO 81011 970. 925.7017 Phone 970.925.7026 Fax 1 I . JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS INC. 430 West Main Stmet, Aspen, CO 81611 P. 970.925.7017 F. 970.925.7026 July 9,2009 FROM Jeff Berkus ~ Community Development TO Department, PROJECT 201 W. Hallam St., Aspen \ Attention: Jennifer Phelan Administrative Variance Request COMPANY City of Aspen RE: Supplemental Information FAX NO. TEL NO. The following is the supplemental information requested in your letter dated July 2,2009, which should complete our application for Administrative Variance to the Residential Design Standards. This should be added to and used in conjunction with the explanatory letter dated June 25,2009, drawings and other application information submitted to the Community Development Department on June 25,2009, Case number 0041.2009.ASLU, 201 W Hallam. Project: Private Residence at 201 West Hallam St., Aspen, Colorado Lots G, H, and 1, Block 50, City & Townsite of Aspen Parcel ID: 2735124350002 With these documents, we are requesting three instances of Administrative Variance from the Residential Design Standards, Land Use Code Section 26.410.040. The proposed design complies with the majority of the Residential Design Standards and remedies many of the non-conformities of the existing structure. As per Land Use Code section 26.410.020 (D), the following is in response to review criteria for granting a variance, a.) Pattern of development 1. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (D)(3) "Windows" The proposed design of the new W. Hallam Street fagade of the stair volume has a series of stacked small windows. The small scale of the windows relates to the traditional lap siding. This series of windows is in keeping with the architectural style of the area because the historical context and vernacular architecture of Aspen is a blend of Victorian-style and mining buildings. Each of these styles has taller elements and proportions. The mining architecture created buildings that followed the utilitarian requirements of how the building should function and provided openings at irregular locations according to the needs of the interior spaces. Our proposed design of the house also blends vernacular forms and functions. The 2-story gable forms and horizontal element of the front porch are balanced by a 1 M story stair element that has window openings to provide natural light to the interior. The stair is a unique element that spans the two floors, the windows follow suit and exist to provide natural light within the whole stair. In these ways, our proposed design is in keeping with the Aspen architectural setting and the intent of the Residential Design Standards. RECEIVED HJL 0 5 2004 CITY OF ASPEN IOMMUNITY DPIEL OPUFRAT (Continued, 201 W. Hallam, Requested Supplemental Information, July 9, 2009) 2. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (D)(3) "Windows" The proposed design of the new First Street fagade has a one story element with windows that wrap the fagade in order to capture a high view of the mountains and is proportional to the flat roofed, one-story element. The house responds to the side street by stepping down in massing. The front porch and smaller rectangular volume attached to the 2-story fagade provide relief from the height of the gable end wall. The flat roofed element of our proposed design also responds to the flat roofed Yellow Brick School across the street from it. The Yellow Brick School contains modern architectural elements which include rows of windows which sit high in the fagade and extend up to the top of the interior ceilings. In these ways, our proposed design responds to the context of the neighborhood and is in keeping with the intent of the Residential Design Standards. 3. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (B)(1) "Building Form-Secondary Mass" The proposed design of the one-story garage element will be built on the existing garage foundation footprint. The existing garage element is a one-story element attached to the house. This element is located approximately 19ft off of the alley and allows for 2 off-street parking spaces between the garage and the alley. In order to detach the garage from the existing-house foundation-footprint, the garage volume would move 6ft closer to the alley thereby eliminating the parking spaces in front of the garage. We believe that the new house design complies with the major intent of providing secondary massing by stepping down the volume of the house both at the garage volume and at the flat roofed rectangular volume along the First Street fagade. Furthermore, if we are able to build on the existing footprint of the garage, then we will be all the more compliant with the intent of section 26.410.040 (c) Parking, because we are keeping the parking along the alleyway. To relocate the garage would compromise available parking spaces in the area as well as increase the site disturbance and increase the site coverage of the building. The adjacent school and children's playground are heavily used by the community and require multiple parking spaces for the community use. This parking requirement is more than what is typically required for a neighborhood comprised solely of single-family homes. Therefore, the ability to maintain two off- street parking spaces on this specific corner benefits the community by improving community access to the park and school. In these ways, our proposed design responds to the context of the neighborhood, responds to community parking needs, and is in keeping with the intent of the Residential Design Standards. As per Land Use Code section 26.410.020 (D), the following is in response to review criteria for granting a variance, b.) site-specific constraints Aside from those site conditions mentioned above, there are no site-specific constraints. We appreciate your consideration in granting these minor variances to the Residential Design Standards. RECEIVED jUL 0 0 2009 CITY OF ASPEN :OMMUNITY ,}FVE! OPUFNT THE CrrY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: July 2,2009 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0041.2009.ASLU, 201 W. Hallam. ~S~Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: 1) Written responses to the following review criteria for granting a variance: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. U Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, 3€nnifer P ~11, Deputy Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jennifep\My Documents\planning\Templates\Templates\Land Use Cases\Completeness Letter Land Use.doc OO41~7009,AUU ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: FR,vATE: R#,9'QPNar Al 201 INesT 140.LAM ST, AspE+J Name: 20 1 W asr HA.uL. M €rf Location: --- --- - 6Ts € 1-1 AND I BLocw, 50 , Cry +11WNsiTE opA-,FEN (Indicate stree~address, lot 2block number, legal'description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) APPLICANT: Name: Zo I WEST 9 •,u-4 4401-DiAGS j A-1 1-61•116) Nt•,4 .6159~ Address: 1€00 F|ANWAW BviLDING ; 14202 Vive.ip.~ve,CLEVELAND, CUI o Phone #: 1 70 -9 10·001- G 44/iF REPRESENTATIVE: Name: JEFF#ey Be.Bus Afc.~IT.cre : deFF- 86*.us~ SrEAIA,·KE (@»014 Address: 430 491- MAIR ST. A61'84 3 Co 81611 Phone #: 9 3.0 -915 - 70 17 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condommiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ~ Commercial Design Review U Lot Split El Small Lodge Conversion/ Al:Mi,J '6:™KT N EL RE.4 i EW Expansion 04 Residential Design Variance £ Lot Line Adjustment El Other: ~ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) AlleTIN & 1-louse BuiL·r 'Al '9Si PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 148-0 p. A.w bv ATI ©43 SEE E~Gue SED Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ U Pre-Application Conference Summary 61 Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form ~ Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3 -D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. mmmm ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project 20 1 146$T HA1-LAM ST. Applicant: 101 vU E4'r AALLAM MOL•DIN¢ZS LLC Location: 2-ol kle.,r HAI-,-Av! ST, Al.Pew ; CO Zone District: R - 6, Lot Size: 9 0 00 562€r Lot Area: 4,000 sevr (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition ofLot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: - Proposed: --- Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Number ofbedrooms: Existing: 4~ Proposed: 5 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): TDP- DIMENSIONS: + 2 So Floor Area: Existing: 3660 Allowable: 3600 Proposed: 39 to Principal bldg. height: Existing: 29 Allowable: 25' Proposed: 24 ' Access. bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: On-Site parking: Existing: ~2.-4~ Required: Proposed: 2 +2- % Site coverage: Existing: Required: 4,5ootna,Proposed: 275&10 % Open Space: Existing: Required: Proposed: Front Setback: Existing: ID' Required: 10' Proposed: l o t Rear Setback. Existing: 242 Required: Id Proposed: 1-0 Combined F/R: Existing: 30' Required: 2-0 ' Proposed: 50' Oil Side Setback. Existing: I% Required: G'-8" Proposed: - 1 Side Setback: Existing: 10' Required: m \O~ Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: 29' Required: \ 6' - % Proposed: 31' Distance Between Existing Required: 5' Proposed.' Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: SEE- ENCWSED BLEVATIoodS 1=0124 Re6iDSNWAL DE.s~ld 5-TANDAADS NoN -CoNFol*le"he-S Variations requested: 513€ E.NC©091>13 , Jun 18 09 11:52a Adam Joseph Lewis 970-9 -0062 p.1 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of City ofAspen Development Application Fees 201 West Hallam Holdings CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for 201 West Hallam St. (hereinafter, THE PROJECI). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 48 (Series of 2006) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full exient of the costis involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPI.ICANTona monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees be will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANTS application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the PlAnning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the C]TY' s waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPUCANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ 735.00which is for three hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $235.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such Periodic payments shaIl be made within 30 days of the billing dae. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANr Br. 891 1 -,19.-- Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: Jj~ft L Billing Address and Telephone Number: Required 201 West Hallam Holdings 1500 Hannah Building 1422 Euclid Ave O-\Thr•mirnente InA Cot-tin ac\:niannil,r\Ile.lrtr•-\T I TR,um A cn-AD Anr Jun 18 09 11:52a Adam Joseph Lewis 970-9 0062 p.2 201 West Hallam Holdings 1500 Hannah Building 1422 Eudid Ave Cleveland, OH 44115 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena St. 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 June 16,2009 To whom it may concern With this letter I authorize my architect, Jeffrey Berkus Architects (represented by Jeffrey Berkus or Stephanie Gerwin) to act on my behalf in matters pertaining to our application for Administrative Variance from the Residential Design Standards for my property located at 201 West Hallam Street, Aspen. For questions regarding the property and this application please contact them. Jeffrey Berkus Architects 430 West Main St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel 970-925-7017 Thank you very much. Signed: f! U 00 Adam J. Lewis "t KRABACHER I SANDERSPc Curtis B. Sanders csanders@krabacher. com Al rORNEYS AND COUNSELORS At' LAW 8.Joseph Krabacher Jerome Pefessional Building Legal Assistant Curtis B. Sanders 201 N. MILL STREET, SUITE 201 Cheryl M. Heiberger Jennifer M. Causing' ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1557 Diana G. Ettlinger T(970) 925-6300 Robert S. Hoover" F(970) 925-1181 David T. Halley Heather J. Manotakas- Email/ Website: krabacher@krabacher. corn tu,0 8,83<ed in AAMMa and Ne# Je/Ney www.krabacher.com ~'Aboail-dirid#nuks Ah' Ld,Wled" 60'ama June 22, 2009 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: 201 West Hallam Holdings, LLC; Certificate of Ownership Dear Sir or Madam: I am an attorney licensed by the State of Colorado to practice law. This letter shall confirm and certify that 201 West Hallam Holdings, LLC is the owner of certain improved real property located at 201 West Hallam, Aspen, Colorado 81611, and legally described as Lots G, H and I, Block 50, city and Townsite of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado (the "Subiect Property"). For your convenience, a copy of the vesting deed confirming ownership of the Subject Property is attached. This letter shall further confirm that as the owner of the Subject Property, 201 West Hallam Holdings, LLC has the right and authority to file and pursue land use applications, variance requests, and other requests with the City of Aspen with respect to the Subject Property, and that Adam J. Lewis is the Manager of the 201 West Hallam Holdings, LLC. Very truly yours, IpABA€KgR & SANDERS, P.C., a /ProfessiosQ]. Corporation By< ~ThROS&44--8~Ild@75- RECEPTION#: 550950, 07/11/2008 at 11:32:12 AM, 1 OF 3, R $16.00 DF $605.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Documentary Fee $ 605.00 WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made July 10, 2008, Between MUNDAY TRUST NUMBER ONE of the County of , State of TEXAG, GRANTOR, AND 201 WEST HALLAM HOLDINGS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, GRANTEE whose legal address is :0/60'1 64 6 1500 HAR}Nfl BUJ . /'102-EudiA AR . (lvekND, 04 99tir of the County of , State of WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which 18 hereby acknowledged, the grantor has granted, bargained,sold and conveyed, and by these presents coe& grant, bargain, sell and convey and confirm unto the grantee, ITS heirs and assigns forever, all the real property together with improvements, if any, situate and Iylng and being In the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO, described as follows: LOTS G, H and 1, BLOCK 50, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN TOGETHER with at! and singular the hered[taments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or In anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantor either In law or equity, of in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, unto the grantee,ITS heirs and assigns forever, And the Grantor, for ITS, ITS heirs and assigns, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the. Grantee, ITS heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of ~ these presents, ITS is weR seized of the premises above conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of in heritance, in law, In fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful authotily to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, Ilens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restric{Ions of whatever kind or nature soever, except those matters as set forth on Exhibit W attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargatned premises iA the quiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, ITS heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. The singular number shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this dead, SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 Return to. di TY ce ASPEN SITY OF AdPEN WREIT PAID 1 DAE REP NO. DATE REP NO. BRETT PAID 11(42% - 473444 7<,bps~ ¥401- 33446 1 RECEPTION#: 550950, 07/11/2008 at 11:32:12 AM, 2 OF 3, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO SIGNATURE PAGE TO WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 MUNDAY TRUST NUMBER ONE ; BY: WILLIAM F. MUNDAY, TRUSTEE STATE OF . 7*0.416: ). SS COUNTY OF 7-9240/5 ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9'£ day of VL</ ,2008, by WILLIAM F. MUNDAY, TRUSTEE OF THE MUNDAY TRUST NUMBI~R ONE, WITNESS my hand and official seal *&,tak.>-6--<a my commission expires: Notary Publid ~- 22?2371 ; f4~4g~ Notaty Publk StaloofTexas ~ My Br#mission Explms PCT22095L ' ;4£30 December 1, 2010 ~ 9 J RECEPTION#: 550950, 07/11/2008 at 11:32:12 AM, 3 OF 3, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO EXHIBIT "A" 1. Taxes for the year 2008 not yet due or payabte. 2, Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 118 providing asifollows: 7hat no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, oinnabar or copper or to any . valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws" CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Enin Evans DATE: 06.03.2009 - PRCUECT: 201 West Hallam - - REPRESENTATIVE: Jeff Berkus, Stephanie Gerwin - 925 - 7017 DESCRIPTION: The Applicant is seeking to remodel their home at 201 West Hallam. The Applicant is reducing multiple non-conformities that are present and seeking to exceed City of Aspen energy efficiency code requirements. The result of pursuing more efficient construction requires the applicant to demolish multiple exterior walls in order to add greater levels of insulation. This demolition is at a level of greater than forty (40) percent. For the most part, the Applicant's scope of work will be carried out using the existing foundation. Due to the demolition of greater than forty (40) percent of the residence during the remodel, the residence is required to meet the Residential Design Standards. Staff reviewed the reasons for the 40% demolition and feels that the home meets the intent of the code and the remodel and subsequent demolition is for the betterment of the home. Because of this staff does not require the home to come into compliance with all of the residential design standards, namely the "Secondary Mass," which would result in the loss of several off street parking spaces, as well as, the inability to keep the home on its existing foundation. The Applicant may apply for up to three (3) Administrative (staff level) variances; any number in excess of three (3) must receive approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.410.040 Residential Design Standards 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures http://www.aspenpitkin.com/depts/38/citycode.cfm Staff has reviewed the three (3) administrative variances the applicant is requesting and supports them. The variances supported by staff are for: 1. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (D)(3) «Windows" a. These windows are located on the North side of the residence, on the primary street facing fagade, and are a large reduction from an existing non-conformity. 2. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (D)(3) "Windows" a. This window is located on the East side of the residence, on a secondary street facing fagade. 3. Variance from Residential Design Standard 26.410.040 (B)(1) «Secondary Mass" a. There is an existing secondary mass; however, it is not detached from the main residence by a linking element. In order to create a code compliant secondary mass the applicant would need to demolish the garage and pour a new foundation. This new secondary mass would create a loss of current off street parking that exists behind the current garage. Review by: Staff Administrative Approvals require a deposit of $735 for 3 hours of time. Additional time is billed at a rate of $245 per hour. Referral Agencies: None. Referral Agency Fees: None. Planning Fees: $735. Total Deposit: $735. To apply, submit the following information: Il Proof of ownership with payment. O Comoleted Land Use Aoolication. O Pre-application Conference Summary. O Signed fee agreement. ¤ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. O Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 0 Total deposit for review of the application. Il 1 Copy of the complete application packet and maps. Planning Staff = 1 O An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. O Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed, O Copies of prior approvals. 0 Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text only on either of the following digital formats. Compact Disk (CD)-preferred, Zip Disk or Floppy Disk. Microsoft Word format is preferred. Text format easily convertible to Word is acceptable. 0 Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make surethat your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920- 5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS, INC. 430 West Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611 P. 970.925.7017 F. 970.925.7026 DATE June 25,2009 FROM Jeff Berkus Community Development ; TO PROJECT 201 W. Hallam St., Aspen Department \ i COMPANY ; City of Aspen ~ RE: : Administrative Variance Request FAX NO. TEL NO. With these documents, we are requesting three instances of Administrative Variance from the Residential Design Standards. The proposed design complies with the majority of the Residential Design Standards and remedies many of the non-conformities of the existing structure. Proiect description: Design renovation of an existing 1980's non-conforming single family residence located at 201 West Hallam, Aspen. The zone district is R-6, lot size is 9,000sqft and allowable FAR is 3,660sqft. We are undergoing a major renovation and more than 40% of the house will be demolished. The proposed design will use the existing foundation and the forms of the house will be similar to the existing but will conform to the Residential Design Standards. In addition, our new construction will have LEED Gold certification as its goal. In our reconstruction, we are dramatically improving the quality and performance of the structure. The existing house design has multiple non-conformities to the residential design standards. In the new design, we propose to amend the majority of those non-conformities with two exceptions for which we request a variance review. The non-conformities which we are correcting are: 0 1 7 story front porch roof • Front porch is shallower than 6ft • Two story glazing at main entry • Two story elements only on the streetscape (Lack of one-story elements) • Front fagade has more than one non-orthogonal window • Two story glazing at the stair volume • Double-width garage doors will be made to look like a pair of single-width doors Note: Please see the attached drawings for graphic descriptions, the variances are numbered and noted where they occur: Attachment 1 : 201 W Hallam Elevation analysis: These drawings show the existing building elevations highlighting their non-conformities and follows with the proposed building elevations highlighting the manner of the design amendments to the buildings non- conformities as well as graphically showing the items requested for variance review. Attachment 2: 201 W Hallam site plan: This file shows the site plan and garage location. (continued on next page) 201 W. Hallam Administrative Variance request, dated 06.23.09 Variance Request 1: Window elements facing the front : West Hallam The proposed design of the new street facades amend many of the non-conformities which currently exist. There are many two story glazing elements which are amended in the new design. However there are two locations for which we request consideration for a variance. The existing stair volume has significant glazing on all sides. We have substantially reduced this non- conformity but would like to have a simple window grouping to provide consistent natural light to a stairway which features a two-story winding stair. Variance Request 2: Window elements facing the side : First Street The side street (First Street) has a one story element that has a large corner window that wraps from the rear fagade to the street-side fagade in order to capture a high view of the mountains and is proportional to the taller one story element. Variance Request 3: Detached Garage Element The proposed garage element will be built on the existing garage foundation footprint. The existing garage element is a one-story element attached to the house. This element is located approximately 19ft off of the alley and allows for 2 off-street parking spaces between the garage and the alley. In order to detach the garage from the existing-house foundation-footprint, the garage volume would move 6ft closer to the alley thereby eliminating the parking spaces in front of the garage. Complete detachment of the garage from the rest of the house would also adversely affect planned access to roof decks for the project. We believe that we are maintaining the major intent of the stepping down of the building volumes to create a secondary mass at the rear of the house. To relocate the garage would compromise available parking spaces in the area as well as increase the site disturbance and increase the site coverage of the building. We appreciate your consideration in granting these minor variances to the Residential Design Standards.