The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.council.050-13 RESOLUTION #,50 (Series of 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, APPROVING CONTRACT AMENDMENT #21 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ASPEN AND OZ ARCHITECTURE AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AMENDMENT #21 ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council contract amendment #21 between the City of Aspen and OZ Architecture, a true and accurate copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, That the City Council of the City of Aspen hereby approves contract amendment #21 between the City of Aspen and OZ Architecture, a copy of which is annexed hereto and incorporated herein, and does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 22nd day of April, 2013. Michael C. Ire d,.�v�a.1 t I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the s foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held, April 22, 2013. R Kath n S. Koch, City Clerk R L B I Rider Levett Bucknall 1675 Larimer Street Suite 470 EXHIBIT A Denver,Colorado 80202 T: +720 9041480 memorandum To Scott Miller, Chris Everson City of Aspen cc From Rob Taylor Date 12 April 2013 Subject OZ Architecture— Burlingame Ranch Phase II - Proposed Reference No. Contract Amendment#21 - Recommendation Scott/Chris The purpose of this memo is to recommend additional fee for additional civil design work performed by Alpine Engineering who are a subconsultant to OZ Architecture. The memo should be read in conjunction with the OZ Architecture Proposed Contract Amendment#21, (dated April 12; 2013). This was discussed with Alpine and CoA staff on March 5, 2013. Background The original 2009 OZ proposal for Burlingame totaled $1,675,686, broken down as follows: Ini I De Phase $814,759 &. e f hi` ase $386,357 Co ru fly $474,670 Total $1,675,786 To date, the first two"base services" phases have been approved by the City Council. The$474,670 for Construction Phase Services was initially planned for a single construction phase of all 167 units and this has been partially awarded, reflecting the phased construction approach. Amendment 8 was accepted by City Council in April 2012 for Access and Infrastructure construction administration (CA)for$207,211 and Amendment 20 for$315,594. The construction phase is now anticipated to be significantly longer than the initially proposed single phase and this means that the overall project CA phase observation fees will be"drawn out" over a longer duration, given the less intensive building construction phases. www.rtb.com R L B I Rider Levett Bucknall 12 April 2013 Memorandum Page 2 The OZ Contract amendments to date are summarized below: Approved Value Original Contract, approved 3/8/10 $814;759: Amendment No. I, Impl. Does, approved 9/27/10 $386,357 Amendment No. II, Life Safety Design, approved 3/22/11 $22,048 Amendment No. III, Model, approved 7/12/11 $14,265 Amendment No. IV, ALTA Survey & Plat, approved 9/26/11 $21;665 Amendment No. V, Logo/Finish/PUD, approved 9/26/11 $17,677 Amendment No. VI, Suppl. Drainage, approved 9/26/11 $35,880 Amendment No. VII, Reuse Line Utilities Inclusion, approved 2/27/12 $10750. Amendment No. Vlll, 2012 All Construction Admin (construction account) -419112 $207,211 12 Amendment No. X-Addition Duration of IPD Design, Reso77, Aug 13, 12 $18;574 Amendment No. MI - Pump House Detailed Design, Reso77, Aug 13, 12 $"' 0 2 , Amendment No. XIII - Revised Irrigation Water Source Analysis and Design, Reso77, Aug 13, 12 Amendment No. XIV -Additional Drainage Report, Reso77, Aug 13, 12 $46.g'84 Amendment No. 15 -Change to Single Phase Electrical57tf Amendment No. 16 - Earthwork Mining Plan to reduce potential import co $5,060 Amendment No. 17- Recirculation Pipe Design $x,280 Amendment No. 18- Breakout B1-B5 Permit Set $12,397 Amendment No. 19- Early Start CA and VE Services $24;750 Amendment No. 20 -2013 Construction Administration $315,54 Contract Value to Date $2,019,627' Proposed Amendments Amendment No. 21 -Alpine Additional Services $30,$17 Subtotal Proposed Amendments $30, 17 Percentage of total current contract value{$2,019,627} 1.5% Contract Value including Proposed Amendments $2,05®,444 Proposed Amendment No. 21—Alpine Additional Services $30.817 Given the project packaging Alpine had to do redesign work to the A/I project documents and also more design work to the vertical civils. The fact that both A/I and vertical had some storm structures, utilities, hardscape and grading meant than when the overall Master Drainage Report was approved, this affected two other design packages. The design effort by Alpine is detailed in the attached, and they partially offset this total fee with CA expenditures which weren't fully expended in January, February and March. R L B I Rider Levett Bucknall 12 April 2013 Memorandum Page 3 Budget Status The approved 2013 budget is in good shape, and contingency is currently over 70% more than the November 2012 budget-given we have seen savings to the construction contract and some other smaller design contracts. Also, some of these design changes have actually reduced construction costs (such as in AS115)which in the macro view, ultimately offsets some of this design cost. Recommendation RLB recommend that OZ Amendment#21 for$30,817 of additional design work is accepted. This cost can be absorbed by the current 2013 Owners project contingency and does not require any additional budget allocation. The project budget remains in good shape. Please contact me for any queries relating the attached or above. Sincerely, Rob Ta Ibr Y Associate Principal Rider Levett Bucknall Ltd Encl: OZ Architecture-BGRPII Proposed Amendment#21.