The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20020123ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 23, 2002 REGULAR 1MEETING, 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOON - SITE VISITS - 735 W. Main and Holland House 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes - Nov. 28, 2001 and Jan. 9, 2002 minutes. III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. Project Monitoring VII. OLD BUSINESS A. 110 E. Bleeker - Conceptual (cont'd from 12/12/2001) Public Hearing (Reso #2) VIn. NEW BUSINESS 5:40 A. 950 Matchless Drive - Conceptual - Public Hearing (Reso #3) IX. WORKSESSION 6:20 A. Holland House 6:50 X. ELECTION OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR 7:00 Xi. ADJOURN BIROJECT MONITORING V Suzannah Reid 414 N. First- POLE 78 and Main 330 Lake Avenue 620 W. Bleeker Historical Society 328 Park Ave. 515 Gillespie 205 S. Third 935 E. Cooper Jeffrey Halferty 414 N. First- POLE 918 W. Hallam/920 W. Hallam 620 W. Bleeker - Historical Society 213 W. Bleeker 200 E. Bleeker 328 Park Ave. - Lane 209 S. Galena 332 W. Main 101 E. Hallam 735 W. Bleeker Gilbert Sanchez 333 W. Bleeker Street 501 W. Main Christiania Lodge 330 Lake Ave. 110 W. Main 200 E. Bleeker 214 E. Hopkins Wagner Park 428 E. Hyman Rally Dupps 501 W. Main Street - Christiania Lodge 129 W. Francis 104 S. Galena- St. Mary's Church 302 E. Hopkins 610 W. Smuggler 232 W. Main - Christmas Inn elanie Roschko Teresa Melville 513 W. Bleeker 515 Gillespie 0 232 W. Main - Christmas Inn 735 W. Bleeker Neill Hirst 450 S. Galena 101 E. Hallam 205 S. Third 419 E. Cooper 409 E. Hyman Mike Hoffman Paul D'Amato CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 640 N. Third- expires May 23,2002 135 W. Hopkins- expires September 26,2002 232 W. Main- expires October 24,2002 629 W. Smuggler- expires November 26,2002 233 W. Main- expires November 28,2002 ~~?C Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit of notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staffpresentation Applicant presentation Board Questions and Clarifications PH opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director ~ Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director 44 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 110 E. Bleeker Street- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Variance, and Landmark Designation- Continued Public Hearing DATE: January 23,2002 SUMMARY: The project involves an addition and restoration work on the existing house. The applicant is requesting a 252 sq.ft. FAR bonus. This property is listed on the City's historic inventory, but has not been designated as a landmark. Landmark designation is currently required in order to receive the proposed variances. Staff has added the landmark criteria to this memo, although depending on the outcome of the City Council's review of the new HP program on January 2801, this step may not be needed since, if the ordinance is approved, all properties on the inventory will 0 become eligible for the benefits. APPLICANT: Robert and Lexie Potamkin, represented by Alstrom Group. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-37-006. ADDRESS: 110 E. Bleeker Street, Lot L and M, Block 65, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential) LANDMARK DESIGNATION Any structure or site that meets two (2) or more of the following standards may be designated as "H," Historic Overlay District, and/or historic landmark. It is not the intention of the Historic Preservation Commission to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those, which are unique or have some special value to the community. A. Historical importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of 0 historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. 1 0 Staff Finding: Staff and the applicant are unaware of any historical significance in connection with this site with respect to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Staff finds this standard is not met. B. Architectural importance. Based on the building form, use, or specimen, the structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type. Staff Finding: The original house has numerous features that are typical of 19th century residences in Aspen. There are relatively few 19th century brick homes left in Aspen, and based on historic photographs, this was once a fine home. The applicant plans a restoration. Staff finds this standard is met. C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Staff Finding: The original designer is unknown, therefore this standard is not met. 0 D. Neighborhood character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Staff Finding: The property is located in the West End neighborhood, which has the highest concentration of historic properties of any neighborhood in Aspen. There are numerous 19th century homes immediately surrounding 110 E. Bleeker, and all of the houses on this block except for the two buildings immediately east of the subject parcel are from the 19th century. Staff finds this standard is met. E. Community character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location, and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Staff Finding: The house is representative of the modest scale, style, and character of homes constructed in the late 1800's, which is Aspen's primary period of historic significance. Staff finds this standard is met. 0 2 0 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessoly dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The proposal is to make an addition on the west side of the existing house. No alterations are proposed for the historic building other than restoration work, which is an enhancement offered as part of an FAR bonus request. The architect has made some modifications to the design since the December 12th 0 meeting. The addition has been shortened in length by approximately 2 feet, resulting in it's front faGade being 14 feet, rather than 12 feet back from the front of the historic house. The porch on the addition has been modified so that it is a quieter element. The height of the connector has been lowered 1 foot, and the connector has been simplified on the rear elevation. Previously, staff has stated a strong objection to the design in terms of compliance with the following guideline: 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. The changes to the proposal are all improvements. Staff finds that the addition is more simple and somewhat smaller, but still has concerns about its prominence in relationship to the existing house. 0 There was comment in the previous hearing that if a new single family house were built on the west side of 110 E. Bleeker, it would have to be aligned with the front of the 3 0 historic building, and so any setback on this addition is less competitive with the historic resource. Staff totally disagrees. There is a significant difference between two completely detached homes, and an attached addition which, if located too far forward on the site, alters one's perception ofthe width and proportions ofthe original structure. In order to meet design guideline standard 10.8 and to complete a truly exemplary project, which this could easily be, staff maintains that the addition should be moved back on the site. It could be shifted back as much as 16 feet without interfering with the parking area. This would require removal of the large spruce and smaller trees already affected by the proposed design. While it is unfortunate to lose the tree, it is not a resource as rare as the historic home. The Parks Department is willing to permit these tree removals with proper mitigation. Staff finds that the design is excellent beyond this one, very important point. FAR Bonus In the process of preparing this memo, staff has located, and provided to the architect, a historic photograph of this house taken sometime in the 19th century. A reconstruction to this design is proposed in the application. In order to rebuild the porch to its original condition, an exterior wall that has been demolished will have to be rebuilt. It is important that proper consideration is taken in the procedure and choice of materials when constructing this wall and porch. The following guidelines are relevant to this work: 5.5 and 2.7. 0 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. o Use materials that appear similar to the original. o While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. o If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. The photo documentation also shows the original decorative front faGade window, which was removed. It is recommended to restore the window to its original condition, per design guidelines 3.4 and 3.6 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining 0 facades. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. Staff further recommends that the owner consider removal of the paint from the brick surface to reveal the underlying material and original character of the home. There are relatively few 19~h century brick homes left in Aspen and the renovation of this nicely detailed Victorian would benefit the neighborhood and the community. The HPC should consider the following guideline (2.10). 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. o Once the non-historic siding is removed. revair the original. underlving material. In order for this project to be "exemplary," as is necessary to qualify for the FAR bonus, these restoration actions should be carried out, along with compliance with design review standard 10.8. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The proposal is in line with other efforts to restore and expand historic homes throughout the neighborhood. If the recommendations made above are addressed, then the project will be a successful addition to the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project as proposed has the potential to affect the significance of the home by destroying its scale and character due to the prominent location of the addition. i The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project could enhance the current state of historic significance of the home by restoring the porch, the front window and brick, to their original condition. With adjustments to the addition as described above, it will not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity ofthe designated historic structure or part thereof. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. 5 0 Staff Finding: The partial demolition of the existing porch is necessary for restoration and is recommended by staff. The partial demolition of the west wall of the existing house may be necessary to attach the addition, but should be as minimal as possible to allow for a connection of the two structures. Staff continues to be concerned that the location of the addition causes the demolition of the majority of the west wall of the historic house. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The addition could be connected to the original structure with less impact to the house, by a smaller connector. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the four review standards are not met. Staff recommends HPC continue 0 the hearing on conceptual development, partial demolition and FAR bonus request with the following direction: 1. The addition must comply with the design guidelines by moving further back from the front faâ„¢le of the existing structure. 2. In order for this project to qualify for the FAR bonus, the porch and front window should be restored to original condition. Removal of paint on the masonry is also recommended. 3. As part of an overall restoration of the historic character of the property, staff recommends the owner work with the City Parks Department to remove and replace the existing trees on the City right of way with more appropriate trees. The current trees disrupt the relationship between the front of the house and the street. If the owner is in agreement, this will be done at the City's expense. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to continue the application to a date certain." Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated January 23,2002 B. Application 6 ALSTRO M GROUP P. C. ECOLOGICA L ARCHITECTURE post office box 551 aspen, colorado 81612 usmail 432 twining flats road woody creek, colorado 81656 fedex 970 925 1745 tel. 970 925 4576 fax. 10 January, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Com munity Development / City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 REVISED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPUCATION / PROPOSED FAR POTAMKIN RESIDENCE 110 EAST BLEEKER / ASPEN, COLORADO Attached are REVISED building elevations and floor plans following 4. the HPC meeting input of 12 December, 2001. The plan revisions have pushed the building back further from the historic fa,ade, and again reduced the required bonus request. We are now asking for onlv 1/2 of the 500 sq. ft. bonus ! NEW FAR TOTAL upper level new FAR 711.90 sq. ft. upper level exist FAR 810.76 sq. ft. 1,522.66 sq. ft. main level new FAR 806.00 sq. ft. main level gist FAR 1,271.10 sq. ft. 0 (less porch restoration)-(108.00) sq. ft. 1,969.10 sq. ft. Total Proposed FAR 3,491.76 sq. ft. Requires bonus of only 251.76 sq. ft. Please note that we have significantly reduced the size of the main stair and eliminated the existing interior stair. The m ain stair is now more directly incorporated into the addition(s) and much smaller in all dimensions, including height. Secondly, the new addition front porch now has no columns and an overhanging balcony instead of the more massive formal columns of the original proposal. On the upper level the existing bedrooms are now directly connected to the new exit stairway, while the previous narrow stair is now removed. The m aster bedroom balcony is now much smaller than the previous upper level porch. The building is 14 feet behind the existing fa,ade; and the upper level balcony and is 9 feetbehind the line of the original building - the new addition is well behind a -BUILD TO LINE" if this were a historic lot split project or if the original building at this site was still in-place. The basement level is unchanged except for the stair design aspect of the plan. Sincerely, ~ Edk Alstrom AIA Â£60'IUMA 0 -/ p- rÂ·/:V62'Â· - - Â· . - t 1 . 4-4.:r I KING clÂ»kb . - MENE---IREB-ETAR Â».NT 1/400[3 1,NINa)1/43 -_INESTES.Nl RED GEC)AR s<DINâ‚¬- PqÂ©OD, BEPLACEMENT 24) F.ANELI S ED - SEBBLE 12Â·ooF - Â· KESTORE 23-1 '1 C i i - S-TA jR ROR= ~ E>fioND ,, Â· OR)FEI~~42- 120 op=L,INE<s~ 4 91 / EXISE 4 --_ . _1---eluES - i ~- 1-2. C)[)~ME~ -110 5 4 _ - 1 14 . e IÂ» ' 2 0 1 H 1.0 -1 4 - 1 VERMION; 1 11 1 11 i 1 4. 0 Floop 5 ID INâ‚¬ 11!IN 1 1 - ,-0 -TOR. E 1 11 -, 8 3.-0 CE]â‚¬INAI, pefich,4 4 ---- SEEUP RES-TORE Fj,@To IN I NDOIN 20"F Zo-Eks EF--TZ.J+~1* DEVEL 0*2* N-T - -- - 110 EAS.7 *5/26-.Mxgz,SROUFE-- _ -.- -01-9-124-_ _ -- _ -- I - : 0 1 -64'r..Â¥'Â·7~ - . cE =--_12_D*<_*_-_PINE - -0Â£-4<2Â«GUAD CoNNECTO R. -2Â£24 1 73*Â£ 41. -1- w . L *T i p ~ -_ErÂ« 1 INED \ 275,4 NELIZED i 5 * - j-1 : ~ - ",1 1 1 --1- 1*11 , 4 : 3(NOOD. S D I N. 4+ - 1 - -- --- r i , '45/ (D. 4.-lit-- li 51,~titil 1 23Â« ' - . 0 f . 1 #.4 lit:3 , 1 :2!Clk-=.. ' ' , .,1 - - 4 1 INOOD SDI!40 1 -1 . 1 -t 61- 0 11, .At .6,Â«RAâ‚¬2 E -EXESTi---ADD~N , -1 Le u , . . 1 -Toi I FrE K/Â»4 hi _70fs_Ee BoUND. ~ --+40_92* ELEVA-71 ON - (ALL-59 51361 GRI-CEPTIJÂ»L Â«Ez 9-9-- 0- 6 0 11 DEVELÂ©Ph?121%17 AUSTRav*Roup-- 1-5211*JaN_--I -2 eD '2< 13 -_-f I 1 --1- _ I . 4.uuÂ·.1 & 4,41 0 . ; 4 \ 1 1, i i 1 1 lihi EXISTIN B dA Bite E Â· f. 16 1,; f r 1- 5% 1 61-1Ne L .3 5><151- Ne ; 75Â« S 1< 11>E - M~ N LE VEF< ' ~ 5 9,0 E | 1- 513Â«cLE 1 - . 9, LAReE 5 ~ PINE JTBE E 1 =frE?)20-E cy MIR 7 - 3-- j- 0 1 Ft, 4, 1 U **SÂ·Â· 0 : o I y. P " 1 er f "~ f' ' :, , ~ ~ ON I 61:,41; : .1 1 i 1 /0 .1 1 1 0 11 ~ . 2/ 1 -4 /0 -0 4 L- --DEd-K -c-T MUDRIVI C E)19~ N O 4.4 T fli,j - ~~ T:zifta-~ ..4 ~: . - - ,Â· r 'Â·i it . I - - : p . 4#i.-4 i FL-U 70 9 -' /5,5Â©rls .536.5 ,"i Â·Â·' 1 -i .)5.0 1 CE 1-1. Is -=. KITCH F N t~iI (Ej P --~ C. 4 2 i'' = 547-5 59. r y 7-7 -= 1 315 , 6 0 OFI=162 , #--i. -1 131 7 1 1,5 - 51. 6 1 C , }A 7 â‚¬1 1 - 5 PRN/1 -01 < h'- VÂ·' 1 1 1 0 1 1 91 i ' n g- FAMI LY + 4 , i. ~ 1 . 1 i Â· ' V~/1 $ '4 . Fâ‚¬001%/1 it , 5 V (80-1 p :537 .-. 1 DININe 1 Â· ijÂ£44/3 /4 1 1. f $ f.1 91 2 - .4 C Â©DRM - . ' -...4 ~LIWIN 9 1 -- . -1- 1 .1-L W - 1 -7- .._I~ RESTORED ~ 41 0, 1- C Â° C FOFÂ«N-1 it 5Â«L, do NY O- 1-1 1 1 - - 1 O 1 0 1 0 - 4 0 . 11 10 1 1 1271-eli , el O" f 1 , f - 1,1 L I - nir lk[,61-KI----L.IN'VE~L-~ PDANI 010----E ~51/EEKE'R-_ _ .Ely--&30.--4--JUrhi- '011-_ 2------2- - 1 - I - e 2.r ' 1 1 11? 4.Th--INEW M5Â«19 2 - -- 600/ 0 LONCEPTUAL 2-5*167-< 19%-Ef -- -1 1,271, ID OÂ¤vel,Â©PMENT -2-COEâ‚¬s-- 73---f36*}43 - 2( 1 0-6.03 Al-,STROMOROUT= 1 -TO--Thlk.,..FAL - I I /7 4, 01, 10 1 0 JA' N 1 00 2, li 0- TA 15 Level/ fra .. AD Â«,lp , *tc /14 4* \ 0/1 (3//,40 b 4 + U & /21 \ 9 4 1* ' .-11_eli I . . I r f.I -- DN--- ~ F>41 ST - R.009 0 , goom 70 REMAIN ~ \ , 9 - -91 -1 I ~I-_-14'rA'g'b4'Â©~U%~~fl , 111 U M, 5â‚¬H 4 -4- -111 r , 1,~1 Ili-1 11-Â· 11 1 'Â·~' 3- i ,T I ' r 11 1 j . ; 1 HA LL. 94 , e , .6,4-71.[4 tfflort_ . MASTER 14Â·ER 3 D klÂ«1 1 1 - - DEN . n /Mob & h - NANÂ« p BALC 0 NY - H.E A * 11 OPRCE / 1 / . j 19,1- 1011 1 N .1---- M 1275-9 4 el- 011 ... 3 . I. . f - .-i-1.- 1 442:., '' Â· 6-UF PERI -1~EVE L FLAN _-- 110 5, mi-002Â¤1<ER -=617%11-4--114. 011 NEW - FFÂ».Bt -- 7 1 1, 1 0 CON(DEF-TUAG EXISTI- F.APL- - BIO.749 De VED OF=~MEN 3- 70 -1-6-U<17 13Ad< - ,A WSTRolvieR OUP 74115- ~t...e VELp,,Â·1524134459,FTL 1 o JAN Soo 2- 54;, , t. ' ~ 1 .k tr a . , 4 -O11/ 291-oil 141- 0, ALSTROM GROUP P. C. ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE Npost office box 551 aspen, colorado 31612 usmail 432 twining flats road woody creek, colorado 81656 fedex 970 925 1745 tel. 970 925 4576 fax. 12 January, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Com m unity Development / City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 WEST ELEVATION REVISED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION POTAMK[N RESIDENCE 110 EAST BLEEKER / ASPEN, COLORADO Dear Amy, Attacheijs a west elevation for your review prior to the January 23 meeting. Please note that our proposal fs 14 feet behind the existing house which is - on the build-to-line" established by 100 east hallam, next door. The stair connector is now much smaller in plan (7ft 6in x loft Oin); and 1 ft 6 lh. less in height which will allow'an 8ft 6in ceiling in the connecting hallway. The histolic bay window, seen here in side view, at the front of the historic house 0 will require some detailed msearch induding dose inspection,during demolition in order to determine and e\4(tiate the approximate dimensions hs shown in the historic photograph of the REnt view. I have omitted the historic cMmneys (beyond) - not shown for clarity on this west building elevation. Sincerely, ,Â»h diP*241/\ Sven Erik Alstrom AIA RECEIVED JAN 1 5 Â®02 ASPEN / Pm(IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .. - .4137-! -d.%*ir I . /1 . . - 1 - 1 2 .7... i ERSEmBJ_Â¢ _ 02GNI1RD-01~ ~ DN-GONY -011Â«Â»Â¤_-2 -6--_ --_2]1%12_21-_ =PINEK,41% IN -~X_[6~13 -- - -fIEL_BEN-13]N_-1__ -____ ____ _PRE_,_MTINISHED (B E#<b N â‚¬3 \ ---affil-(3 fi-kÂ©01:9- - . - \ \ -4 1/ i . 1 1 45.-TE- S ) 0 ~ IN --45*ff 5 H.ADO 61 - Â»1-1-N[x) lAi (22440%20 i i 1 =3Ps\5. J _-66 NNECPD S.. 10 1-0 11 -=OVEfâ‚¬Tj CAL 1 4 1-011 16 1 -eli 400(3 SIDIN~ 70 h/LÂ»~1 N BUILD- TE) -PANE L ILED 75Â«c,Â«DE Ls-1 NE 017_373-1 54Â«-EON ~ . 12>0 D_.. 5 D INO 6 32Â» NE)3 5X [57, 4.% 5--T-OB L C b 9-5-1-TBAC K -=*NdEP*-U,,60- DEVELOITÂ»fENTL__ =DI=yâ‚¬NR=-6692 -- - :-L Z. I ... 1 , 1 .. 5,>< 1STI N 0 1 6 -_Â»< Frase ..t.04 1 671Ne 1 -=XISVINg PA S 1% 11?xe -112--HA-N L EVE-R 258%62 2 6 f ,L0'An 5Jeho 5'Si- . li '// 0 4 LA ReE 1 (1 - 3...i L M? 1 C :Â·1Â°INE JrBEE , 4/9165-0-MT-Tur- 7 .1 4.' 1 1. 11 1 4 14! & 1, 315 11 L; 1, L i.,0, ':' I.I /= f 24 i 4- ,Â·, r =..1.+ .1.71 , 1 ON o1 1 /0 -1, ;73 . rl-- , ftÂ·i l.:41 1 1 - 1. li 1.1 . : CK 11 0, U , 19 1 . I.'. .. :1 1 69 $41 113 .1 i -0 *:â‚¬- --bes-s _--2~2-- MUDKN/1 C E:)1-401~UN 0 Ir'' , 1-? '1 Mi, - 1':lk'!., ... %:11.1 .i:?.:' , '. , 4 , 1. rÂ·i Â·., 1,1,4 d . 1 ; f H-1 s --NITCHEN 30 UlA-1 + 1 / 5,5 1 21 -- 6360% 75,0, -eI %41 -7.9 v /0 = 5, 8 y 7-7 -= 3 3 5, 6. - Ul ( 9% T]~ 7 1%,5 - 54 9 :. I 5 P R,/1 Yfr 1 .1 , .1 1. 1 ,-1 \ :1 .1 4) .1 FAMILY .- Â» ' IT\1 j . Fe oo lvi - ! . 1 4L -r In DINI Re j (E 3 4.1 j Â·2 1194.41/4 Â·cÂ·. -4 Â©DRIÂ«f t, V: IiI f %4 1 'Â·' i 1 1 /1 0 --/ i 1. 1 ~ L I WIN G i RE STORE D | N f'Â·14.1 ..1 C F=D B 61--1 0 7 - 1 0 4. 50&,L, dD Wh' - 1 -11. K TIL '1,6,50\,/E. -; 0 '11 1 1 1 ' In- 0 - , 0 127|-47" 1 eL OM. 1 ' , I . C , /' j i.1. 1 1 2, 'ti-Â· 1/ 11 1-4Â«1-til-3-3 l.1 -0.9-r LI)--~i- -- f:71-Â»Â·J--,1 cONIÂ«_1-@fiBIL,EE_gra. _ - _ -,1-3]gE]al --iff,6<19~--Ii--~-_f--J--- -- -40<0, o UNCEPTUAL - _LE,%(56-70.-_FEEJ J J.1.. 111277,1,Â· 1. D REV EFI/-0 F:' 'frENT =-692Â»5.1-117.-FORÂ¢193 -6-2-6-1-21-69 0-3- . 1 _Â»1-'STRON4-Â©BOUT= _7_Tdi]36 LR--f F,4-Â©tr -- - .- 11 ~~9 4; 1, IP . 10 414; N - 2 00 2, 7 413 LEVEP ALSTRO M GROUP P. C. ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE post office box 551 aspen, colorado 81612 usmail 432 twining flats road woody aeek, colorado 81656 fedex 970 925 1745 tel. 970 925 4576 fax. 10 January, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Community Development / City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 REVISED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION / PROPOSED FAR POTAMKIN RESIDENCE 110 EAST BLEEKER / ASPEN, COLORADO Atta ched are REVISED building elevations and floor plans following 21* the HPC meeting input of 12 December, 2001. The plan revisions have pushed the building back further from the historic fagade, and again reduced the required bonus request. We are now asking for ontv 1/2 of the 500 so. ft. bonus ! NEW FAR TOTAL upper level new FAR 711.90 sq. ft. upper Level exist FAR 810.76 so. ft. 1,522.66 sq. ft. main level new FAR 806.00 sq. ft. main Level exist FAR 1,271.10 sq. ft. (less porch restoration)-(108.00) so. ft. 1,969.10 sq. ft. Total Proposed FAR 3,491.76 sq. ft. Requires bonus of only 251.76 sq. ft. Please note that we have significantly reduced the size of the main stair and eliminated the existing interior stair. The main stair is now more directly incorporated into the addition(s) and much smaller in all dimensions, including height. Secondly, the new addition front porch now has no colum ns and an overhanging balcony instead of the more massive formal columns of the original proposal. On the upper level the existing bedrooms are now directly connected to the new exit stairway, while the previous narrow stair is now removed. The master bedroom balcony is now much smaller than the previous upper level porch. The building is 14 feet behind the existing faqade; and the upper level balcony and is 9 feetbehind the line of the original building - the new addition is well behind a "BUILD TO LINE" if this were a historic lot split project or if the original building at this site was still in-place. The basement Level is unchanged except for the stair design aspect of the plan. Sincerely, ~_}po'r\' DMA' 5-ven Erik Alstrom AIA ... $ I 4 0 r 4. l.1 ' , 'LO : 11Â·'e t 4 602Â© k 1 44-Lipo & .45 \ 19 / , _t Lei' . F . 'h .6 pr - DN- '.11.1 1\\74 041 ST 0 1 FLOOF 0 --- J~ 2*M 70 R E MAI hi . 1 447 1 J-1 1 1 -1 17 1\ c'/0 72* 6 fut - 11111 11DR~NS ~{ --le-/f 1-__115EDFC.OON/1 1 L Iv[, 5â‚¬-1-1 ~ - :1 - -'-- 1-1-t ---i , -4< r-]L\/11 1 .1-1 1-16-L'/ 1 4 6 E 12Â«02- - 14 IL VAST ER 144 1-IER r i ~- 5 D KN'01 1 , 1 3 2 DEN' -41[t~>-]1 rp / h = NA KNY Ft 0 l J SAL<00 NY : . Hepi --\ / OPEGE I . i / 19,1 - 1,011 / I , 1 \ - -- '1 1271- 411 , . el- 011 I. I 4 0 2 , . I . f--IL-1-171 FRE-Rl-~,ITLE'VE'1.-1~.~ PL,A N -- 1 10 13, B L E[ZI<E 1%. H -4-1/4-11--43.-litt- C) 11 ~ ~~~ . 0 r :i 3>le\61-_-_fÂ»<R. . 7\\,90 GONCEFUWAD i 51<1572/ENK.- - - .810,741 DE VED OPMEN 7 1 -7-0336-1423- 13Â« ft.-0.-.--2- --~ : ,,A > ST- BolvlÂ© R DUP j ThÂ·-Ils-:44*Vel.-ii,;itil~64'*i*Â»Â·50,FI: | o JAN 1.00 2.- 11 I , ' - 1 i 11. , 1 W. . ' 1 .4 291-011 141-04 - - S. INC 6 DAD . 3-62.07---f.~liÂ«ER:-E]P~R b,&,~T- ! t =,4 ._INEST EB- hi KEED CEDAR PVOOD 1/NIN[Â»45 2 ... 40.j - -SES@LE S.00 FA 9 2 .- H) FANEL[SED 75(DINâ‚¬-161.toD. B E P L.ACEMENT - 8.ES-FORE ST;Â«IR ROOM ~ MioND --c 1 P - = 408=Ehk--59 oft-*INE(Â© 24 -- - EX ) 16'.1*6-4+ .4, pÂ· - _ _. _81*ES - - 1 12. Â®IMER / 1 1 5 - '6 4 - U - t.. 100 -16 - - 1 VER1104-Â· 1 - Al ooP 041- 5 ICE>IN@ 01- 011 1 - -TORS IN 5108 5-0 101-611 0 R Le INAL Pact-4 It -I- RES=ORE P-*76 1/4 1 NDOI/4 EME< -=-8-6'C-FFFEUAL- 2[2-9595~ Nff--i_ -- - Â· 110 NA 67 -~SCUS__ _ LIZ23-6117I-rE-9-~~A- --4-89222--3,2&-T&ig--m *231**1929-2-2 - ~-336-lt--=-1/1------- - , r.. C,r - - ~--PINE - <4124/510Â» D 0 . Â· 6-CHINECTE> R. 1 1 1 1 1 -=TiE] NED 1 -PANIELIZED 1 -1-0021. s ]D-[Ne 11 I --- / 1 1 1 1 r - ' 159316Â«L 1 1 39-650 -5 ID 1 42 lili 1 Ill - 1 - Â©AR.Ae E f -E.XES-77.-EADDINI -7 Leli a'. o u --~Dli.BE-MAINI -3m8E Â© BOUNDÂ· L ' flf, aINEEST 0-613.--~ -~- - ~37 at-9.-2- 9Â·-O- 11 - . - CZE.VEL-PENMEN-IL__ -z_z:.a._ 1 E'ISTROUÂ» FROURP - liCE-326-42.-2-OD_'247-3-27-730 - 3.3 I. . ..N,44Â¢4Â¢11 ALSTROM GROUP P. C. ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE ~"post office box 551 aspen, colorado 81612 usmail 432 twining flats road woody creek, colorado 81656 fedex 970 925 1745 tel. 970 925 4576 fax. 12 January, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Community Development / City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 WEST ELEVATION REVISED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION POTAMKIN RESIDENCE 110 EAST BLEEKER/ ASPEN, COLOIV\DO Dear Amy, Attachecus a west elevation for your review prior to the January 23 meeting. Please note that our proposal is 14 feet behind the existing house which is - on the "build-to-Line" established by 100 east hallam, next door. The stair connector isnow much smaller in plan (7ft 6in x 10ft Oin); and 1 ft 6 th. less in height which will allovtan 8ft 6in ceiling in the connecting hallway. The historic bay window, seen here in side view, at the front of the historic house will require some detailed rEsearch including dose inspectiorkduring demolition in order to determine and ewattiate the approximate dimensions hs shown in the historic photograph of the ftont view. I have omitted the historic chim neys (beyond) - not shown for clarity on this west building elevation. Sincerely, NG'h dibÂ» Sven Erik Alstrom AIA RECEIVED ]All 1 5 2802 ASPEN / PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ==gÂ¥ - ......AC@n.. 0 . - -- 1 PIE[NORD_<_ 1 . =Jil,LEE-*-E-*i--I ~i----.-- -. '79-8244Â©N 1 -~SIâ‚¬33-- -207â‚¬16*635-71 ' 1 --2gE----ELIN-iS k=IED r - (2> EXON Db ! --~~~-~-~~~~~- - -- - 1.-- 1 1 i t.jing)Â¢2~-[~ - IN - -- -144-}-NEX) N--1 5 HADO 101 1 (EVEND) 1 F _/521-NI NEE(4T99)fR. lri Lo 11 213 -O/ 1 . =;1 1 - Â¢ JUERT) CÂ»L 1 4 1-011 i 161 -43}1 94 OOD 's] DIN.8 70 N/LAJ N.4 BUILD-TO ~ _-J-PANE L PLED f5Â«0Â«[DE b]NE 3*or D--- BID INIO (52Â» Bbb NX-En b E-rib[09 1 6 11- --9â‚¬5 r_-LED E~4,Â«3JDN - -Earrm.Â«c k ..: ' 320-22*RE)18-6-gr-- . * EXHIBIT ' 44, 4 /7 ZI ALSTROM GROUP P. C. 171 ECOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE post office box 551 aspen, colorado 81612 usmail 432 twining ftats road woody aeek, colorado 81656 fedex 970 925 1745 tel. 970 925 4576 fax. 23 January, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer and The Historic Preservation Com mission 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 PLAN B dated 22 January 2002 REVISED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION POTAMKIN RESIDENCE 110 EAST BLEEKER / ASPEN, COLORADO Dear Amy and Commission Members, In response to Amy's MEMO for this meeting we have further reduced the height and - mass of the stair connection. The stair connector now has a sloped roof toward the alley which the attached building section shows how the stair and roof height were developed. We are asking for an FAR BONUS of only 251.76 sq. ft. which has been reduced since our last m eeting. I am also presenting alternate window designs for your review of the new stairway and also on the front fa,ade which is 14 feet behind the historic house. Please note on both the main and upper floor plans, the size of the addition relative to the Length and width of the historic house. Sincerely, -5*efF Erik Alstrom AIA CE Robert & Lexie Potam kin Herb Klein Karl Schindler BERN_._.rIR-FilfIPARÂ»NT- p40O D 1/NINI[EDIALS .pleSTER N RED CE DAR Hy i96+IELISED -Net Â»07 S (D INâ‚¬ BEPLÂ«CE MENT STAIR ROOM FdE 33-OR B EVON D .CREEkÂ«p- Boo FLINE (Â© E><1674 .]31 -0.-0/ iri Ne L ES 1 CORK/fER 4 1 - 4 | -7 L e !14 334~ ~ --y-- / / A f litiliwilillop'~10 - 1001- 9-11Â¢ - hIN\.A riu,lia t i Â· h. I -- .'' 111 61 VERTs,+ , I , 1 1: <'. .%If : . 11 1 * 1 . . --2 I I 0 ~000 510 I hi.0 , .J - 1/ 1 - - 11 1.-- - - 1 1 -1111. - - 1 11 -1 8 610 1-51 -43 11 5-0 OR~INIAL / 1/ . i h 1 1 -1 -- - 0- Af -- P-F=Fort RES-FORE 1/4 1 N DolAi 34*f# z D NCE.Fy.TUAL- 11 0 EAST DEVELOPÂ¢1537 *%STE-Rob>flâ‚¬ BOUP 1-_INOUCE.Â·mf- -CLI-SNA-n-0 N - ~~ C 5_0 62_K:3B__I ----- --- ~ - ~~----- - --1/25" = 1.1.=-0-U I ---- - 3,2 46Â§4 --9. 002- 0 . - & 11-1 5_ ar ' f , 44, r': . 14 \ 7 KA 8-1 1> Ill M o 1[1 1 AL o 2 FD ?3 - 0_0' tz 9 A ll-, aÂ· N k 0 1 1-Jt Â£ 1) 0 --~3 z Ji \Rt i <8 2 0 [il 4 4 4 %13 un 4 10 0 4,~le 11 ; It 1 3 _cfjj o. fizo n/, 0 = '.4 0 1-1/1 0 4 1 191 -7 L[1 o - -Â·Â· F? 0 44 -7/C == 0 In - - - -'- -- Ill i j n ygmrwt : 2 i= -i 4- 3 41 4 .===== 1 P . C) - .................4 â€ž, 1 iLL| 1 9 1-- K t Â· - 1 Z !11 0 ,0 _'eÂ·.~< ' F. i ifiliN/,//////./3- (212 j 1. mr. 1 1 1 -I> 11 1- UZZ -11/ Bi Ul r 11 ill' 1 -- -- il r -1-1 i - I. I 1 - ] 1 1 4 3 1 -81 L-9- la D ~<I JL~ 111 MI Itz i<'lo' %3114 ... ~ S AN 1/192 NaLLÂ» A 2 9-2 -941EO-f -1.lial 1 0 - fl - 3._Il 11;4 q: / *STO Re) C / PtÂ« LIN ROOM ~ -E\r./DMID 1 ~ 54.0099 _PEARaE PINE rTO-~~--BEVAN ~f LE)< PST: -068+4:â‚¬ <- - ~ 4311-KEIVAN _-__FRE - FINISHED ---- --- --- 1 , rv r E / RE~1-0 RE Â¢41 5'0-TE)-PE ) c~ 1 -7-% l' / 11 1 14 1 -124] NEÂ©lAi m,ENO KID '14 'rit - 72 % 1 1 Sh-ACK)161 .~ , 1Â°-65471 hi 61-ED WN-C- 51 DINe 10 1-011. 21'-6'j ,51 3 -STri IR.-- DNL>F - c i , 0\ 1% 242 VERTI CAL l ., 141- 011 16 1 -6 It b 161 OOD SIDINB To h/L,Â«INI BUILD- TE) ~ /---~NE L PLED 94(ADE >INE Â»100 [D_. 510 1140 51<-15-7, Â«37Â©RIC _-1-XEST---- EL..0, EVÂ«-t-TON j ErrmÂ»= H . ~" _ - -------------- -- 20_NOE_Frt UAD BEVEL-8 7 MENTâ‚¬ ; 4 .. H ] STDR 1 6 10Â© B ME FR.. TO FREVAIN %1 570 BIO BEVOKID k - -il-lill - - 1.- 4 1 / REST.DgE / HIS-TO F21( 1 5- 251 - / OAY ININEx>Al --- rl - 3 1 1 - 7 -~ lot. - 1~ . * 1 , *). --- V- 1 - - LES 1 - 1 -- -0 Ee 1 1 11-23-~fi-UFE,T - - ' --*L-Â¥ ---- --- ./.* / \ 1 El r 1 . --1 - - b * 2 -7 -- - - - - Ill 1 --=. \ =3 1. T- I - - 20 74 r \71. 7 . Â«0 -1-3-/'' -~ -.Ill--i-----Illl-1----il---li ' 1 1 #\ .1 41 / \ 19 - 1 5,>< l ST ' 1 - - 531 61% i (FA I STOFe 16 ) t-4 , 1 -650-EON 73-Â« U 447+3 hi OjÂ»Â·IFC liu 2, 51+Eer KER -- UNCEPTI --DEVELL 07~NT ,Al/STRoh/E:RO U P -2,2,-6\N 2002.- r. -AN#::'-u ... *54#4426 1 -- 59<-1STIN 0 _456 15,415= - 1; f 12----r><-ISTI We 1 "- e><liST- 1,42 + 15Â« B 1% 11'he 1 4.-- 1Â«16 N L E Ve'l~ 5190 es C -317*62 70 " Â£ Â· i: A . i. ,1 100 PINE - 7-0 KEN/64 IN - J TZ//FGEOFF- 2*.3 - ,p 0 4 11 -- 1 . dIÂ° '=4. 'r k \ 1 ; 1 \Â»/1 Uill 1 - 1 0 ;trokbkil * MUD , C E)LAUN liz.t , ol 7 L' i / 5,5 7 29 --5 - 1 541-kla -1 -17-it LE) Fl 7 6 V /0 = - UL n 3:4= ~2 ---i L./ - S. 6 1 27 -- 13 5 IPx It 5 ----27-11- - - ---- -1, fri 7 xÂ·%,9 - 51. 5 . L// C 4 31 -10 49 r1 1x 11 . ~--'- 1-1 7 EAMILY -7 1 ROD M 7 DININe -6==. 10 ,>C 1,2/ i \ ~~2-22|~ amELL,12 4 r Â©DRN/f , 116% 10 tJEAAJ [Ded* , 1 LIWIN 0 13- 1 1 - 1 , 1% x 12 --1-Â·~1~ RESTOFâ‚¬ED ' r po Fe C1-1 Ill 0 EXI S Tr---*0 TREES o 0 0 ' 1 LE'-0 11 Hs' - Gi" 9400. 12 1 .:1 - , '' 1 4-KÂ«IN-- L. EVEL- FLAN . //87 11 2 1/-0 0 1 J o r. al/Eeke IK 2-85]61 _r=A~ --1 - 809, 0 --F.12>% N B 2-%<-1 97 -- f:9% B. - 12-771,10 COMICEPTUALÂ· ._t-!4@65. po Re kl - - ( i ob , o) - DEVEL,0 PMEAJT ~H-16- LVL, TT--TAA 1, 1 M, ID .T 61-05-TFAOK./hemoue '22 +41 00 0 + ... , *7'- 0 " .-1-_ 1 4 0 _-Tormhi 70 - AL**7 EXIST I L I Ze,E I~DIN_____ -C. 1 \/ R.DOM O.I -. alÂ» -Tb RE %54 4 . .% T, Al k-1 1 0 1 1 17x -4 . 1 6. 1 . ~1 :=~ eIRD 14 -2. 1 1.4~ BEDRE~ov' f i_lid, 3>k-[HÂ· n u 961 0 1 / \ P L: 1 DN NFIN HALL -9- 1 1 EATH[ 1Â«[AS-TEB. MDRM' 1 BER 00 DEN V . 3Â«1 =- 11- 7 LE) - I NANNY 15Â»660 NY HER --' - OFFICE ~ 1 9.1- 6 11 VOID ~Â·<~ 1 t - - Â»7-37/ 1 1 27 L 61' Bloil D & / t UPPE'R. DWVZL PLAR 110 5 abEEKE A _I- -176'1- 4 1 ' 40 " FbAN 5 NEI/4 f=AR------ -111,90 CONCEPT-UAG E>4 1ST- 1=Â» B. 8 1 0,74 DEVE 1.01"IVINT -ToTÂ«0 - PAR.. ,ALST-RON,leROU P -114 IS D EVEL 1 52-'2, 6 l> 54Fm 12.12- ..]AN -20 00 12.. ... 141- 011 2 9'_ou - 9 51-OIl t .. ./ / HTS-Tâ„¢ 10 -CPORMES. TO - FRENÂ«IN F,1 ST D B 16 .ND, LL - 1 V / 4*ToR k O 7-- 1 - 4:2 / BAY LNINEX)/\1 ,- r / \#/ 1 0- 1 - \ 1 /94 )- -- 1 - ~W I j --Â» Â«-1- -1.Â»-0Â«Â«F f 1110 E p - - --T-53&=*In 1 273 2-7 ) \ Â» U it 0 ---- 1..- I I trit-/-_ - -- 42 \\â‚¬ / 119 - --Â·--- t - -- --- -' Smle K , - (94 ] STOFâ‚¬ JC ~ _550 -TION -- 7-bÂ«U *[Al hi 3-TÂ».1 8. liu 5, 56 25 AER ---2-Ve\\ 611\-13-1----2 LCONCEÂ¥,T646 -DEVED 01Â°h/ENT _4Â«LASTROK/feR,0 0 1~' -SS -<16 N 2 00 2- MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning DirectorOAO Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer FROM: Christina Amato, Historic Preservation Intern Ck RE: 950 Matchless Drive- Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Temporary Relocation and Variances - Public Hearing DATE: January 23, 2001 SUMMARY: The project involves building an addition to the existing house. The applicant is requesting the 500 sq.ft. FAR bonus and a setback variance, and proposes some restoration work on the historic house. APPLICANT: Alan Becker represented by Kim Raymond Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737 - 074 - 02 - 003. 0 ADDRESS: 950 Matchless Drive, Lot 4A Dunn / Bishop Subdivision Exemption, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 PUD (Medium Density Residential) SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings onthe lot exceedtheallowed floorarea by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the 0 neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed 1 those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessoly dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The proposal is to make an addition on the rear of the house and vertically lift the house to create a basement underneath the whole building. No alterations are proposed for the historic building other than to restore the fagade to as close to the original condition as possible. This would include replacing some modern windows with windows of a more historic size, style and proportion. This is an enhancement offered as part of an FAR bonus request. It is recommended to restore the windows according to any physical evidence of their appearance found during construction. If there is no evidence left of the previous windows' size, shape or placement, the replacement windows must be in keeping with the typical windows of the time and style of the historic house, and a cut sheet from the manufacturer must be approved by the HPC or the monitors. Per design guideline 3.4 - 3.7: 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character- defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 0 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. o A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 2 In terms of the addition, staff commends the project on the relatively small size and sympathetic placement of the addition. There are a few concerns with the second story deck that connects the addition to the existing house, and with some of the proposed windows. An addition should have the least amount of impact possible on the materials and integrity of the historic structure. By attaching the addition and the existing structure with the proposed deck, portions of the roof will be unnecessarily destroyed, the roof line obscured and some distinction between the old and the new structure lost. The current drawings are confusing without floor plans to know exactly the dimensions of the deck, but staff has concerns with its size and the manner in which it lands on the existing historic house. When planning an addition to a historic building, one should minimize negative effects that may occur to the historic building fabric. While some destruction to historic materials may be a part of constructing an addition, such loss should be minimized. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eave lines should be avoided. The windows on the east side of the connector portion of the addition, and the one long, new window proposed on the west side of the historic house are large openings of glass and not traditional in proportion. They are not scaled to a historic structure and need to be reconsidered per the guidelines mentioned below. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. o Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character-defining facade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. FAR Bonus As discussed at the work session, this neighborhood "down-zoned" themselves when they annexed into the city. For a property of this size in an R-6 zone district, they would normally be allowed 3420.88 sq.ft. of FAR. With the bonus, they are requesting 2954.6 sq.ft. of FAR, 466.28 sq.ft. less FAR than normally allowed. As the project is well below the FAR allowed for a parcel of this size, and the addition is properly placed in relation to the existing structure, staff recommends the approval of the FAR Bonus request on the conditions that any changes or restoration done to the house need to be as accurate as possible. 3 SetbackVariance The applicant is requesting a combined side yard setback variance of 12' and an east side setback of 5'7" to allow the design as proposed. The addition is appropriately placed in relation to the property and the historic structure. Because of the sensitive placement of the addition, staff recommends approval. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The proposal is in line with other efforts to restore and expand historic homes throughout the neighborhood. If the recommendations made above are considered and in some form executed, then the project will be a successful addition to the neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project does not detract from the historic significance of the existing structure, but could if the above guidelines and recommendations are not considered in this process. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project could enhance the current state of historic significance of the home by rehabilitating the faede of the existing structure. Once all of the addition and rehabilitation is in compliance with the design guidelines, it should not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of the designated historic structure or part thereof. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The partial demolition of a portion of the rear of the existing house is necessary for the connector to the addition, and is therefore recommended by staff. The partial demolition of the roof of the existing structure to attach the second story deck is not necessary and should be restudied. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: 4 (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: Impacts to the existing structure's integrity and materials could be lessened by the recommendations for the new addition as noted above. TEMPORARY RELOCATION The house will be temporarily moved to build a basement and then returned to its original location. No approval for temporary relocation shall be granted unless HPC finds that the following standards are met: 1. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-sitting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Response: A structural report will be required as a condition of final approval and/or information about how the house will be stabilized during relocation may be provided by the house mover. 2. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security approved by HPC with the engineering department, to insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Response: A bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 will be a condition of final approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual development, partial demolition, variance and FAR bonus request with the following conditions: 5 1. For final review, the addition must comply with the design guidelines by repositioning, or reducing the second story deck so it does not in any way interfere with the materials or integrity ofthe existing historic house. 2. Restudy the large window on the east side of the connector and the new window on the west side of the historic house to be approved at final review. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2002." Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated January 23, 2001 B. Application 0 0 6 RESOLUTION NO. - SERIES OF 2002 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, TEMPORARY RELOCATION AND VARIANCES LOCATED AT 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE, LOT 4A DUNN / BISHOP SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID #: 2737-074-02-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, Alan Becker, represented by Kim Raymond Architects, has requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, Temporary Relocation and Variances approval for the property located at 950 Matchless Drive, Lot 4A Dunn / Bishop Subdivision Exemption, R-6 PUD zone district; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and b) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. WHEREAS, No approval for temporary relocation shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all ofthe following standards are met: 1. Standard: The structure has been demonstrated to be capable ofwithstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-sitting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. 2. Standard: A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security approved by HPC with the engineering department, to insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance ofthe physical relocation. WHEREAS, Christina Amato, in her staff report dated January 23,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on January 23, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with a vote of_to_. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development, partial demolition, temporary relocation, and variances for the property located at 950 Matchless Drive, Lot 4A Dunn / Bishop Subdivision Exemption, City and Townsite of Aspen, finding that the review standards are met, with the following conditions: 1. For final review, the addition must comply with the design guidelines by repositioning, or reducing the second story deck so it does not in any way interfere with the materials or integrity of the existing historic house. 2. Restudy the large window on the east side of the connector and the new window on the west side of the historic house to be approved at final review. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of January, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name ALA J 15184|d ef- 12,6,25,~C:>Â£0~40e- 2. Project location q,5 r, M18'115 14 6066 D 12lv 6 LOT' 4-A Â·17Uklid/16,9#10? Sole>DiviSIC>,4 EVEâ‚¬#2~1206.l (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning A -6 iii )D 4. Lot size 77 08 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number ALA }.1 3Frk-eg- 61Â£50 MA1-0/46,869*13'izivif, A=Per.14 61'25- 140,2 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number Al 1-/\'R>Vt-'bidVE> 4-1 0 14. rliLL- 91-- /As PE A\, 61Â·15- Â·2-29Â·z 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA / Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark 0 - GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliVLot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 14 6-FORJ C +1 1 N ETC' 5 coTrAG, 2- 9/9 *5 50. Pr~ w / 3 1320146 C>Â«ACA ED aA?AaE- 16/ APO 4.[*vv . 6:,Aâ‚¬-A-4,2- 97/12 50 P.1- j AÂ©u 70'70,8 50 FT c.01 115Â£42* 9. Description of development application A MC){PE,97- A'op,-DorÂ·, -12> -17-12 r-/1, *1020% Co-T-TA 49. 1 5 196 706Â£-0 AL-GAIC:, L.3/ 7D--rT,146 A 'i?>ASF.iled-T- unPPLR- 2.V/511#46 2,01(LD,K~67 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Â£/ Attachment 1- Land use application form ~-- Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form 4 Response to Attachment 3 0 - Response to Attachments 4 and 5 llllllll ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: ALA d fpet Jeep Address: 01'50 1#*Al'aÂ·111665 DFIVE: AS'Eld Zone disti-ict: R -O FeD Lot size: 77 09% S a FT Existing F AR: 18Â£508 - PleesE, FT>i; 4 64,AGE- Allowable FAR: 2.'?Rro 'b + 5004) 15Al# 5 Proposed FAR: 79 â‚¬ 4 1 LP* Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposeci net leasable (commercial): ~~j~A Existing % of site coverage: )896 Proposed % of site coverage: N 3.690 Existing 90 of open space: Aln K Fat) 1 f ErÂ·16, 7 -T Proposed % of open space: ,, Existing inaximum height: Principal bldg: 10'- 7 Accesorv bldg: Rtc> Proposed max. height: PrinciDal blda: 1% L j Accessory bldg: /810 Proposed % of demolition: 5.-/0~9n//1 1,?r,1 J., E 1 0 ADO Existing number of bedrooms: ivl 1,0 Â£ 4 6.1Â£ 1,1 AT)l) Proposed number of bedrooms: Existing i)n-site parking spaces: 75 On-site parking spaces required: 45 - 2 6 r kill V 6 f APO Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 1./'-Ce Front: fo'.0 Front: 1.1' fo Rear: 92 30 Rear: ;r,LO Rear: 5 2'-ri Combined Combined Combined Fronurear: 7 5 4, Front/rear: 30 1 0 Fronurear: -7 34P Aw, Side: 6-0 Side: '3 L O Side: 04/h F E-/ Side: 1:-0 Side: 7'9 c>,1'to,nge.Â· 91& Side: 2'-O Combined Combined Combined Sides: 13, CP Sides: â‚¬ 3LO Sides: /1 '-0 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: C.0 r./1726,#dfLE> fi p ELYACD<6 Fbf- '346'A6Â£,/'ADO - VAINAAME *VA,77*0 81 /4PG Variatjons requested: 1210 9>iDED yABD COM\134 dED 4 1 1-0 .../Aer sing YAW> 4 506 4 1&66 11% (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks. distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage hfill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) ZONING 0 tril02 OWNER: ALAN BECKER ADDRESS: 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ZONING: R-6 PUD LOT SIZE: 7708 SQUARE FEET ALLOWABLE F.A.R. 2486 SQUARE FEET (+ 500' bonus) EXISTING F.A.R. Existing house 963.0 ADU) 690.8 Garage (250 exempt) 250.00 add'I 250 @.5 125.0 add'I full 71.2 Decks (15%= 373) 200.75 -0- TOTAL 1850.0 PROPOSED F.A.R. House 2067.60 ADU 690.8 Garage (250 exempt) 250.00 add'I 250 @.5 125.0 AIA add'I @ full 71.2 Decks (15%= 373) 315.75 -0- TOTAL 2954.60 ACKS: See SITE PLAN, VARIANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED FOR THE COMBINED SIDE YARD SETBACK, PER HPC FOR THE ADU WORK/NG ON HOUSE VAR/ANCES 2'0 from lot line on SE side so we need 7'0 side yard variance and a 12' combined side yard variance TE PARKING: Three spaces, two for the house, one for the ADU iT LIMIT: 25 FEET FOR PRINCPAL BUILDING 21 FEET, FOR AN ADU SPACE: NO REQUIREMENT DOVERAGE: 23.5% PROPOSED (18% EXISTING) .. . ALAN BECKER PHOTOGRAPHY & FILM 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE ASPEN, CO 81611 1/7/02 Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Dear Madams and Sirs, I am seeking to renovate and add onto my home at 950 Matchless Drive in Aspen. My name is Alan Becker, and my phone number is 925-1462. My representative, authorized to act on my behalf in regard to this project is Kim Raymond, whose office is located at 412 N. Mill Street, Aspen. Her phone number is 925-2252. Sincerely, Â«041Â» Alan Becker 1fl I02 BECKER RESIDENCE RENOVATION AND ADDITION The project, located at 950 Matchless Drive, exists of a small miner's cottage and a detached garage with an ADU above. We are proposing a renovation of the cottage along with a modest addition to the rear of the building. S The renovation will include replacing windows that have been changed throughout the history of the building, back to windows of the same style and proportion as the original ones. (note the windows on the South East elevation). During construction, we will be able to determine what type and size of windows that were on the North West side of the original building, and replace those. If we cannot determine the exact window that was originally in the building, we will use windows that will, in our opinion, replicate windows that might have been used. The owner has already spent much time and effort restoring and refinishing the existing wood siding and trim work bringing it back to it's original state. The addition to the building will include putting a basement under the existing building and adding a two story element to the rear of the building. The only part of the existing building that will be altered, is the wall at the back of the cottage, where the addition will be connected. Both of the corners of the existing building will still be visible, and the roof line of the lower, shed roof will be maintained, keeping the integrity of the original building. COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS 1. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposed development is compatible in general design with the historically designated miner's cottage in that the addition is at the rear of the building, preserving the entire original cottage. There is only a partial demolition of the back wall of the structure that will no longer be visible, as this is where the addition will connect to the existing building. The link between the existing and COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS, cont. the new elements is down played and shows a clear distinction between the old and new parts of the project. The roof lines of the addition will resemble the existing roof; as the slope of the main roof, as seen from the street, will be mirrored by the slope of the new roof. All of the new elements are of a small scale to reflect the size of the original building, and the use of materials will respect the heritage of this simple cottage, not overpowering it with expensive or 'heavy" veneers. The site plan is compatible with the historic layout of these cottages with "outbuilding" situated at the back of the lot, with the main residence set off the street enough to have a small yard. We are not changing the location of the building, thus keeping the streetscape the same. And the addition is small enough so as to leave a yard and trees between it and the existing garage/ADU. The massing and volume are compatible with the existing house, not over powering it. With the addition, the building is still smaller and shorter than the house to the west, but has enough mass to not look so overwhelmed by it's neighbor. By offsetting the addition from the existing building, and encroaching into the side yard, toward the street (not the neighbor), we are able to leave more of the existing building unaffected and visible from the addition. 2. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed addition reflects the character of the neighborhood by the scale of the new elements. The elements are also a play of shapes that are consistent with the other small houses on the street, by virtue of their proportions being smaller and the shapes simple, not competing for attention. 3. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of the designated historic structure located on the parcel. Response: The proposed addition does not detract from the historic significance of the miner's cottage as the addition leaves the entire building intact. The modest size of the addition, in addition to the fact that we are not moving the building on the site, enhances the significance of the original building and it's site. By not trying to replicate the existing and showing a clear distinction between existing and new, shows a respect for the original structure as a unique entity, worthy of preserving. COMPLIANCE WITH DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STANDARDS, cont. 4. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development to this excellent example of a miner's cottage will enhance the architectural character of the building and it's site. The original building will be restored to it's original state, as completely as is possible with current construction practices: repairing the siding and trim work, replacing windows that have been altered over the years, back to the original size and style and repairing the roof and the very disintegrated foundation. The addition will detract from the original character of the building, as we are not changing any of the original building, just hiding a small portion of the back of the original structure with the link to the new construction. Both of the corners of the back of the building will remain visible, as well as a portion of the ridge and the shed roof at the lower level at the back of the building. The integrity of the original structure will remain, unchanged (except for the renovations). PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE- CONCEPTUAL HPC DESIGN REVIEW, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, TEMPORARY RELOCATION, VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 23, 2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Becker requesting conceptual design, partial demolition, temporary relocation and variance approvals. The variances requested are a 500 square foot FAR bonus, a 12 foot combined sideyard setback variance, and a 7 foot east sideyard setback variance. The property is located at 950 Matchless Drive, Lot 4A ofthe Dunn/Bishop Subdivision Exemption, City and Townsite ofAspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 5,2002 City of Aspen Account 0 0 oddo 1/9/02 engineering Historic Preservation Commission 130 S. Galena Aspen, Co 81611 Re:Becker Residence, 950 Matchless Drive, Aspen, CO To Whom It May Concern, I have made a preliminary inspection of the home at 950 Matchless Drive in Aspen, to check the integrity of the structure for the purpose of moving it. The plan is to move the building straight up and support it while a new foundation is constructed beneath. When the foundation is completed, we will set the house directly back in the original location. I have found that with the proper bracing and shoring, the building will be capable to withstand the physical impacts of lifting it straight up and setting it back down on a new foundation. I shall advise both the architect and the house -mover of any details required for this project. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, ODDO ENGINEERING, INâ‚¬~0111,4/iw##/, 2%8%90.*:tty 4'65GPIT 4. A. 0/5 1 e6_,4/fr= 28085 91% Robert A. Oddo, P.E. baol Principal *4=ey '%%///mt 11 lilli\\0* IE-mail: info@oddogws.com 302 Eighth Street, Suite 325 â€¢ P.O. Drawer 160 â€¢ Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 (970) 945-1006 + Fax (970) 945-2977 + E-Mail info@oddogws.com 431/ 1>---~Or= 11 AF &*iywAMY Y, /*1~til q Vicinity Map \4 1~+34 \2./Aw-W, j>\4\\~ Alpine Acres Lot 4a \\ N\>\. .\\ m kl\~CFk\>RÂ¥,t \7.11 H I 41- C- hÂ« Lot 4a Lot 5 1. Lot 4b 0 4401 Â« L yh 49. f~ I. e . . I. ' ~ Lot 3 ~ f. 1 . / *A 1 1/ e \ , 1 le D \ \ Lot 2 - \\\ \\\\ b,2- 14 04 -- j - - ~ Lot 1 U 44 . I \Â» -;QU W-%li Wt- 1 i â€¢01 0- / kr-9 ~ 14. I .4 7 122 :Al,2 - 1 *.h.. --- 1 - 7*ba,-47 9- 45:.S. =*t- 7 7 ' m AÂ« 1 - . ZOO'd 69SI'ON XE/X.L 90:ZI I 0/9Z/60 0 COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A LOAN NO 6785783 NORWEST MORTGAGE, INC. 3601 MINNESOTA DRIVE STE 200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 1. Effective Date, February 9, at 7:00 AM Order No. 405302 -C RS/am Custamar Reference BECKER 2. ALTA Owner'B Policy Amount: $ Propaaed Insured: ALAN K. BECKER 3. ALTA Loan Policiag Amount: $ 435,000.00 Propoded Insured: NORWEST MORTGAGE, INC., its Successors and/or Assigns Propoged Ingured: Amounts $ 0 4. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: FEE SIMPLE and title thereto ia at the effective date hereof vested ina ALAN K. BECKER issued by: Owner's Premium: S ASPEN TITLE CORPORATION Lender's Premium: $ 586.00 . 600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE #305 Add'l Lender Chg: S ASPEN CO 81611 Add'l Charges: $ FAX 970-920-4052 Tax Certificate: $ 10.00 PH 970-920-4050 DENVER 303-595-8463 Endorsement Chg: $ 75.00 TBD Charges: S TOTAL CHARGES: $ 671.00 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 990-2 900/200-d 099-1 290Â¥026010 Sal)00@ 3Hi dO ANÂ¥d,100 31111-moid 10819 :01 1002-92-BO Â£00'd 69SI*ON XH/Xi 90:ZT IO/9g/60 0 COMMITMENT Plat id No. 20/40 SCHEDULE A (continued) Order No. 405302 -C 5. The land referred to in the Commitmant iâ€¢ covering the land in the State of Colorado, County of Pitkin , described as follows; Lot 4A, THE DUNN/BISHOP SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION, according to the Plat thereof recorded December 11. 1987, in Plat Book 20 at Page 40. 0 ~~ST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 890-d 900/Â£00*d 099-1 250Â¥020018 Sal )130@ Elli 30 ANÂ¥,1100 311 11-0'0 J d umls:01 1002-92-00 POO'd 699I'ON XH/Xl 90:ZI I0/9Z/60 0 COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B Order No. 405302 -C Section 1 REQUIREMENTS TEE FOLLOWINg ARE THE REQUTREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Item (b) Proper instrument (s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to wit: 1. Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County of the Deed of Trust from Alan K. Becker for the use of Bancplus Mortgage Corp., to secure $444,376.00, dated May 7, 1996, and recorded May 7, 1996, at Reception No. 392448. NOTE: Assignment of the above Deed of Trust to Barnett Mortgage Company, recorded September 4, 1996, at Reception No. 396707. NOTE: Assignment of the above Deed of Trust to The First National Bank of Chicago as Trustee, recorded April 18, 1997, at Reception No. 403547. 2. Deed of Trust from ALAN X. BECKER to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for 0 the use of NORWEST MORTGAGE, INC., its Successors and/or Assigns, to secure $435,000.00. THE MORTGAGE POLICY, WHEN ISSUED. WILL NOT CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS NO. 1, 2. 3 AND 4, AND WILL CONTAIN ENDORSEMENT FORM 100, PROVIDED THAT (A) THE ENCLOSED FORM OF INDEMNITY AGREEMENT OR FINAL AFFIDAVIT AND AGREEMENT IS PROPERLY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE PARTY (IES) INDICATED AND RETURNED TO THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, (B) THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT RECEIVES AND APPROVES AN IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE PROPERLY CERTIFIED BY REGISTERED SURVEYOR OR ENGINEER, AND (C) APPLICABLE SCHEDULED CHARGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $45.00 ARE PAID TO THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT. THE MORTGAGE POLICY, WHEN ISSUED, WILL CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING ENDORSEMENT FORM (S), PROVIDED THAT APPLICABLE SCHEDULED CHARGES IN THE AMOUNT (S) FOLLOWING EACH ENDORSEMENT ARE PAID TO THE COMPANY OR ITS DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT- 8.1 $30.00 ~ AERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 890-6 900/000-d 099-1 290Â¥026018 Sal)DOM 311 dO ANY,IM00 311 11-wold "889:01 [002-92-80 SOO'd 69ST 'ON XH/X.L 90:ZI I 0/9Z/60 0 COMMITMENT SCHBDULE B Section 2 EXCEPTIONS Order No. 405302 -C The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following matters unless the Fame are disposed of to the satisfaction of the company: Any loss or damage, including attorney fees, by reason of the matters shown below: 1. Any facts. rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of said land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 2. Easements or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any other facts which a correct survey would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records. S. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters. if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date 0 hereof, but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special aggessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. 1. Taxes and assessments for year 1997, a lien now due and payable, but not yet delinquent. Taxes and aseessments for the year 1998. a lien not yet due and payable. 2. Right of the Proprietor of a Vein or Lode to extract and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 25, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69. 3. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as reserved in United States Patent recorded November 25, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69. 4. Agreement between Luke W. Anthony and the City of Aspen, recorded February 9, 1977, on Book 324 at Page 657. 5. Restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter clauge, as contained in instrument recorded April 26, 1977, in Book 327 at Page 887. (Continued) AIIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 890-d 900/900*d 099-1 290Â¥026016 S31)DOM 31LL :10 ANÂ¥Â£3100 311 1 1-20 J :I ulegg: 0 1 1002-82-80 900'd 699 T 'ON XH/Xi 90:ZI Io/9Z/60 EXCEPTIONS (continued) Order No. 405302 -C 6. Statement of Exemption between Luke W. Anthony and the City of Aspen, recorded August 4, 1977, in Book 333 at Page 4. 7. Agreement between Luke W. Anthony and Charles D. Bishop et al.. recorded December 30, 1983. in Book 458 Page 149. 8. Statement of Exception between Chip Bishop, et al. and the City of Aspen, recorded December 11, 1987, in Book 552 at Page 876. 9. Access easement as shown on the Plat of said Subdivision. said easement being 20 feet in width along the Northerly portion of subject property. 10- Front Yard metback line as shown on the Plat of said subdivision, said easement being 25 feet in width along the Southerly portion of subject property. 11. Encroachment of Herron Drive onto subject property as shown on the Plat of said subdivision. 12. Restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiture or reverter clause, as shown on the filed Plat of said Subdivision. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 890-d 900/900 d 099-1 250y026016 SBI)008 3LL 30 ANY,IM00 311 11-10' d lu009:01 1002-32-60 ... LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND 00 SET SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCAÂ¢*0 6 FouND OR SET SUIvEY CONTROL MANHOLE ----0 FENCE 0 UTILITY 801 TI TLE INFCAMAT,ON FURN-HED 1, fSPEâ€¢ TITLE CORPORAYION ORDER Â£ 405302-C DATED FEBRUARY 9. 1 .,0 . "TER VAL'vE I. \\. .Ath POSTED ADDRESS 950 9ttÂ¥ 'B.' 0 10 N A 0Nt FOO r COUN1 OUA~ \ \ 1 I \I 10~ !1 1 - 1 \ 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 \\ / I \ 9184. .\ \\\ \\\\\ .'\N \\ SLAB 99 3.-* 4 \ \ 1.,1 i.2.3 9 . '' / '' /1Â£*n - f -- - I-Â·47 \\\ -DRIVE Eâ€¢CPOâ€¢CHE' \ \\\\\ 1 / GARAGE /L" 0 1~ 1 ~ ~' fEllow CiP DISTURBED / 4 7 \ \\\\ 1 ' .câ‚¬0 \\\\\ / / 98 9--9 / 1 4, N \\\\1 //. \ 1 h \\\/ \ /4, 1 \ 1.19 t /4 \ I 111 / Â£ 1 1// I Cli // 1 14 . J 1 1 \I / '47//4 5/4 99 7- ~ ~ i ici 1 1 I . .92 1 , 4/ 1 '~' GARAGE ~/1' j 1 \ I, :/ 20 /127 7-- -- --4 \1 0 14 . 1 \ I 4 CLE-<01 ::/ 41 1 1 + 3 HOUSE ,Â· , 1 , , .'/24#/9 / 1 7/ \ 1 : -i ...11, C \ 1 Itt 1 26 0 -----a /,7 /5/ 14<kÂ« 1 1 I - \ ' I / K /7.U, I. . 4 '' N .0.,2, / 2 2 2\ , 4*4'' 99 5.- I ale . - :i , , i-%:Er, N \ 11 , \ I .5 I 3 ./19 '4 . \ .0 .4. IM â‚¬47 1\ '' \9 ' /.1\ //ill HOUSE SILL ./ ; 44.. / . . . I. .... Te. t, . 7, I <t I + ..f I \\ 9 2 .A ./ 19/ 2/ V \ 1 2 44 N 0 Tie WALL-1 -ty \ 0 \ 9 4%/ 14 1 : 7~/ 9, Floc ~ P \ . ----- --- // \4 54 /4 > 4% 4]lU>' ~~ ~V' L ,# i, . 6 97 61 0 t 4/44* S ' 1, OP -/O CERTIFICATION "5'0 Â°N THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN ANO MT IHERE ARE NO THE UNDERSIGNED SITES THIT THE PROPERTY DESCR!860 HERECN *AB FIELD SURVEYED DURING. 0. 2001 AND 1 5 ACCUNE DISCREPANCES OF RECORD BOUNDAPY LINE CONFLICTS ENCRIA"MENTS EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIEtl EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDER/OUND UTILITIES IN NO VOVEGROUND APPURTENANCES AID'DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPLIED TO THE SURVETOR ARE EXCEPTED THIS SURIEN 15 volO UNLESS WET STAMPED I I TH THE SEAL OF THE SURVEYOR BELOW DAIED Â£11Â£1Qt.- 142 1Â§=lcdo/0 "7 M '0~OR'H Ft-Â§-15537 IMPROVEMENT TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF LOT 9 THE OUNN/BISHOP 5UB[ VISION EXEMPTION ACCORDI NG TO THE PL.1 THEREOF RECORDED DECEMBER Â· I 1 0,8 ; I N el/1 BOOK 20 . PIGE 40 CITY OF ASPEN C...1. OF P.KIN 5TATE OF ImORAD[ CONTAINING 7.708 50 Fl PREPAPED 87 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET 15/EN COLORADO 81611 5*An~ 15*&1752:.LUAW PHONE/FIX 2970} 925 3816 DATE JOB 11/01 3 I 265 1 21'.:,:,67&'&,r,;w=71#= =1:51/:,:7- - /7-%1-41 'Lâ€ž 4" VERTICAL 4771 1 1- WOOD S[DING ~I li h '~ /11 h / ' 11 11 11\ 1 /1, . 11 1 11 11:1 1 1 / . 11 \ MASTER BEDROOM '1 1 1 T.O. PLATE 117'-10" 1 11 11 11 11 \4\ 1, :1 11 11 1% 11 11 1, M K lili 11 || P !1 MASTER BATHROOM // '* 11 1 1 . 1 1 1 11 11 T.O. PLATE 11 6'-2" \X A ~ 11 1 \ 1 // -4 Â· 1 2 0 2 11: 4 - STEEL POST 11 11 1 , \ 1 6,1.;1.11:illf,Hil~~11,1 ,1- \ N '1 i J .1.1 1~ 11 lili }111 1, 11 11 1 111 1~ 11 11- Li , 11 1 1- .. 0 1 4 - Â· MASTER BEDROOM Â· T.O. PLY 110'-6 1/2" ~ 1 1 i '''' GREY BRICK - / VENEER, STUCCO OR , LU 9 , WOOD SIDING ./. 9-jill-- 11 - 00 - 1 1 1 F '- --1 11 2 2 - t. 5 - 1% - i. 1/ 1 . 1 1 1 KEEP EXISTING / -- 1 1 - =6 - 1 - i - WINDOWS & DOORS 4 - LI 1 - UVING ROOM ----- ---- ' - , KITCHEN T.O. PLY 100'-O" 6~ T.O. PLY 100'-O" Â¢ C 11 1 1 j 6" CONCRETE 1 1 11 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - I- 1 0 ---- 1 CE) SOUTH ELEVATION 43-17 Alb t INb NtW 1, U 11-11 ! _I_IL_JL-3-_ _.JLALr-JL-FL- 1~~~' 'L_â€ž--~~~JL..2--7-|L-r--1 !!111: 1-L_+L_P~L_i.,JL-r-*LLL- 111'.-1-7777Â»-%771-7- 11,10['~---EZZ-4-44Ltzzp]Etrl~-; 1 ~ '44#FL---a=04-JL~-L--=---- '"' MASTER BEDROOM W+; L-rr *IM---* L- ----'i--1--il ------ --Ii-<- --I--i-I.--Il-. -I--ifi..---- ----~ -------- LA---11 - ~--4Fc---- T.0. PLATE 117'-10" /1\ ---2- --Et--1=2272?--- ---Â»~rSHINGLES--7.Ll-- -----4-L-~nf-- -- |-- 2~2----INN-'+ 11---3-- ,-u421--Â»L-F---'~-F--IL,Ju,_~ 1 ~~~ ~--- STEEL COLUMN , 1 -.7- -1 L- -=72Â»Â»- -- ----4 -- GUEST BEDROOM --- -- T.0. PLY 111'-2" MASTER BEDROOM T.0. PLY 110'-3 1/2" 1 1 1 [1~2}1; 1 1 '. 1..1 I A.Tj L// I KrrCHEN DEN - T.O. PLY 100'-O" T.O. PLY 100'-0" + 11 1 1 1 -5--7 1 i , , WINDOW , ./ . i ' ' - WELL \\\ 2 RESTORE ORIGINAL / 60 *' x 1 - 4 ~ D, , f/Gs % F c.~ STYLE WINDOW ' -~ L --J L_-- 1 1 h/, 1 11,Â« 1 - + -- - -- -94-- -- %- ----*-- - ------ ---*- -+---- -7 /71 EAST ELEVATION Ui-1 -:7--1. 11----- _2=_W--- -JU-r~ 7_-1-~L---LL/J;__ 4 - -~72-232/Inj-_ _~y=-r_2_2331-21-~ -----r-L_-tr-~'7~- --rr~--r--Â»UL_ULLTLL----R~-n-~7~~ " -r--=r'-----7~in---7;--r -777~L-7 !-Fr-r'~-7-t--4 I-2332322Ir --li~.Li-- MASTER BEDROOM --r--T.0.-PLATE117'-1-67 LL---rAÂ»--!LT--w,IJ--1-+AL--E--J---Tr--*- MASTER BATHROOM â€ž-L T.O. PLATE-116'-2"-M'- 1. 1 / 1/. t...... 1 MASTER BEDROOM , ~T.O.PLY110'-61/2" T.O. PLY 108'-8" 1 1 1:li~!~1111 STUCCO, VE~CAL Â» WOOD SIDING OR - ~ IMI OLD BRICK- GREY il41 Â·'Mil 11 1 1 41 , 41 1 1 , r.- 11 1 / 1 111 - ..HI I lili, 111 I i EXISTING [L~=1211 P j lEE===111 |~ ~|~ ~~ ~ HORIZONTAL u'li . I'll' WOOD SIDING I ill i :11! 11 lili IIi 11 1 :IL~11: I ! 1-1 1 1 1|11,Â·!ill 111; d PANTRY/LAUNDRY PANTRY/LAUNDRY i T.O.-ETEE----Â¥- ~T.O.PLY 10673" , / / 5 HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING VERTICAL WOOD SIDING 1 1 0 -----------9---- -1 - -- ~~~\ NORTH ELEVATION 13.1 -,2-4 z_Ell.gIST'2& 1 "FLAT" ROOF AT . AREA OF TWO LEVEL / "LINK" / / ./ - - .-6---tre#-Tipt~=.-1---------r-Tru-,72=29Â«~ 1' 11 'i 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 11 MASTER BEDROOM ---41 4/- C!Â¢!11 = L.......- -22---'_1__r"L__.pL_,IL_.~.--17 -Trl--17,=fÂ»r=-M-=-:--'---r'-10=r-r; ASPH ARCH -33.PLATE116'-2-7- ----11-4 03Â»9Â» 1 1 111'11 11111'11 1 24.*JUU- Lrl'-02Â«342343EÂ»-2-~22121 -Â»L -LT-L--477-41" 7. 1 .1 2 -LI-TE- -7.-,-1-L---94(T--23/42----ttiLfut-' HORIZONTAL 11 .1 WOOD SIDING-- ~ 1 111 11:1111 :1 1 11 1,! -L~U----1/r)117%9.-7227. -7.72%4rht GUEST 1,1 , T.0. PL -7 ----------- MASTER BEDROOM 11 1 1 ---_- T.O. PLY108'JB" - -~----------3-r-2 ------Â«L--------- ------ --<--------+*.-----p------1 ------z.--------------*------.------------*--- ' 1 teilt'litill 1 1~Im 1151111Â£'m 1111111; il kill'lli~ ----- \ EXISTI 1-- SIDINC - ---1-- /1 1 111 11 - 4 1 -----1 11 CONCRETE 11 1 lilli / till 1 It. + ___2]Ill* 1 1=27 vk ) 2-_IL_-1 lili 1111 11,1 1 il f k bill' 1 11 +11 11 02-In ji~ 1 1 -----I-Ii#.I.-Il lili! 11 - 1 EEad.1 VERTICAL i 11,/M!1: 11: . i i ' 1 1 i i ---- --4 i; 1 -__ WOOD SIDING - 'lilil' lililli :lili.1 il 1 1 1 ----4-----il--LI---- 1 1--; ~ iii lilil. ,1 : 111;Â· 3 III 141 ---- 1 ------ 1 111!lj' 1 9: 1.111!:11.Ul UVING 11 lilli Ililli';11 Il Ill 111 i -- -= La -----*-------- KITCHEN ----I-- I--- ----- - 11 T.O. PLY 100'-0" - --------------- T.O. PL '056- J rvix WEST ELEVATION 4 3,1) r---------------- ----------1 / L---- \\ NX r- A \%> i 1 1 1 i r \ 1% li 111 t , , 1 1 1 r Â¢ i/385. 1 1 1 /-,>00' Ul \ 4 Ex 1 F-- - -- --- ----- --- ---- - ----- -- - --- --- i i DECK i "FLAT" ROOF ~ 1-1 ' 1 3 1 It 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 ; .:1 / 1 1 . / 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 \\ 1 L . ----------------- -------- 7 1 1 1 1 1 A # 11 11 /-1 11 It / t.Â·- 11 ) 1, C ' ' ORIGINAL ROOF i ' 1, 11 11 It 47 \ 't \ 11 \ '1 11 \ It 1 It 11 1 11 11 \ It 1 1 1 0 1 1 \ 11 It \ 11 1, It E- \ 7 11 \ 1 1 1 1 1 It 1, 11 \ 11 11 we- 1 - 94 I \ 'L____ L- ------------------ -- 1 .. NÂ¥ld =10021 LAW â€¢ED M~*rO+UE!52 /25. 4 EE}J L *t Z.,2 . --1, 1 2)'~ ~i~~- Â£. .-1.2 1 .*- 6â€¢7,7. 0 0 -1 1Â».*14â‚¬ PUBUC NOTICE DATE_JAbl23 TaL,2.Gas ' 1 PLACE 9111.Ha-L PURPqi~_HPL_ _Coer@i/JU-Laibu -/ t.41./0 .+ _.grkEnabtgead <11&.22&,00==Du - Pal&71EA (JA#V 11, SLe>ez_ 4 A u A . 78=C+I 1212- SO *TC 14-LESS 7316 446*EN ./,2 *3Pfil~:1 83196'Vi~3*~~.'.:42- .. - 1. 17#F/~f/9 3591* /1/Al.k- 1//Iffl#p<*, W . 0 PUBLIC NOTICE ?OJEttlf - - PLACE _-=22,_ 7=ya,; -ga=lahÂ»:fl . , . **1 1'~ Ul- .0,1/ Ili ./.I/- - i I 7' I, li baÂ£-Ct=&11.,z 11 1 0 r , - 1--Il - 3;1 2 ... Ds:rern JAN. n, 20 01 . AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ~9) |*1*Te-AL:;51 7SK\Vâ‚¬ , Mpen.co SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: U A Pu#DeN -26 , 200.2- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) . 1, 0~ L ,4A,/ -*E (2<'2X . (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: JPublication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 4~osting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made o f suitable, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) da* prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the//14 of d Avv Mli , 200-1, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. i photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto, 4- Mailing ofnotice. By the mailing o f a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to.the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that ownsÂ· property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. ~A l LCh U AP. 1 /, 2-WL (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part o f a general revision o f this Title, or whenevef the text of this Title is tp ble pmended, whether such revision be malit 61; Apeal of tHistritle ancteitactmeat 67 a new land use regulation, or otherwise, tho requirerm,~nt o fan accurate survey map or other stifficient legaldeÂ§cription oti knd tile notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. I 07&-*TO .:A4.. Af- 7 , Al-1 ' ~ S ignature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 1*fi day of -1=,uÂ·=LILA , 2001, by Olan (~ckÂ£.r . I 0 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Mycommission expires: 4~9~0-02 0. 29â‚¬L-- NaFB,EPublic ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL . . , I # 7 4 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 950 MATCHLESS DRIVE- CONCEPTUAL HPC DESIGN REVIEW, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, TEMPORARY RELOCATION, VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, January 23, 2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. be fore the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Alan Becker requesting conceptual design, partial demolition, temporary relocation and variance approvals. The variances requested are a 500 square foot FAR bonus, a 12 foot combined sideyard setback variance, and a 7 foot east sideyard setback variance. The property is located at 950 Matchless Drive, Lot 4A of the Dunn/Bishop Subdivision Exemption, City and Townsite ofAspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on January 5,2002 City of Aspen Account v 9 600 v -Flze K 1 9ID *f Frea LESâ‚¬ ,/f, < DZ- ARCHULETA KEITII ARCHULETA KEITH ASPEN BASE OPERATION INC 2755 132 MAPLE LN 69 E AIRPORT RD ~CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 BECKER ALAN K BENTLEY CARL F BRIGHT GALEN PO BOX 119 427 PARK CIR PO BOX 1848 WOODY CREEK CO 81656 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 BROOKS VICKI BUREK DEBORAH J CARSON BARBARA 328 COWPER ST #A PO BOX 812 PO BOX 10298 PALO ALTO CA 94301-1501 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL C()LORADO MOUNTAIN NEWS MEDIA COSTELLO STEPHANIE TRUST 130 MAPLE LN 500 DOUBLE EAGLE CT 328 OAK LN ASPEN CO 81611 WASHOE NV 89511 ASPEN CO 8161 1 CUNNINGHAM CAITLYN E CUNNINGHAM JAMES MURRAY CURTIS DEBRA 425 PARK CIR #Al PO BOX 9333 142 MAPLE LN ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 1 D STONE AND DAY ISABEL T & ESTER T DODARO CHRISTINE M & PETER W RUSSELL LYNN C 120 TURTLE COVE 1509 WOODLEA DR SW PO BOX 8904 ASPEN CO 81611-9610 LEESBURG VA 20175 ASPEN CO 81612 DUNAWAY WII,LIAM R EISENBERG NORTON AND JANET EPLER AND! E FARR TENA D 407 PARK AVE #A PO BOX 785 PO BOX E ASPEN CO 8161 1 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 FEINSTEIN JEROME D FAMILY'rRUST FISHER CONSTANCE A FLUG DEBORAH 120 SPRING ISLE TRAIL 330 ANAYA RANCII RD 616 E HYMAN ALTAMONTE SPRINGS FL 32714 GALISTEO NM 87540 ASPEN CO 81611 GOODMAN RAYM1 COATES HATANAKA I IOWARD H HIGHT NEIL C & SEWELL KATHRYN PO BOX 9671 980 KING ST 520 E COOPER AVE ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 AYLOR KELSO, DOUGLAS P. KERR, RICHARD MMDA S HANEK 134 MAPLE LANE 138 MAPLE LN 231 COTTONWOOD LN ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN. CO 8161 1 ASPEN CO 81611 Di e I KHALAF DALAL & RALPH KINKELAAR EILEEN M KRIEBEL KATHLEEN 1050 - -ATCHLESS DR 85 MEADOWOOD#81 PO BOX 910 A 'O 81611 CARBONDALE CO 81623-9214 ASPEN CO 81612 KROMELOW BASIL M & LAUREANNE L LANG DONALD W LEWIS LORA J HOEBEE 55 W DELAWARE PL PO BOX 4166 935 GIBSON AVE CHICAGO IL 60610 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 LOEWENSTERN CAROL REVOCABLE MAGILL REBECCA N 60% INT LUU TONG KHON TRUST MILLER THOMAS F 40% INT - JT TENANTS 435 E MAIN ST 910 GIBSON AVE 227 COTTONWOOD LN ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 MAPLE CHARLES A & BRYCE M MCCROSKEY PAMELA MICKEY JAMES & MARLENE 927 GIBSON AVE 2260 S COOK 931 GIBSON AVE ASPEN CO 81611 DENVER CO 80210 ASPEN CO 81611 MILLER LEE L MILLER THOMAS F 40% MORK HALBERT L FAMILY TRUST 11575 FOLSOM POINT 227 COTTONWOOD LN 77 ASPEN WAY FRANKTOWN CO 80116 ASPEN CO 81611 ROLLING HILLS CA 90274 NICHOLS GARY T & LUCINDA C & N BENJAPORN PATTERSON KAREN & CHARLES KENNETH E FLAT 9 22 RED LION ST 129 MAPLE LN PO BOX 8i 16 LONDON WCIR4PS UK ASPEN CO 816 11 ASPEN CO 81612 PATTERSON. KAREN REEl) ANI) l'Al JI,!DES BROOKE A l'At JLIDES I IERBERT B & CAROLYN F PATTERSON. CHARI.liS PO BOX 11023 160 CONCORD RD 129 MAPLE LANE LONGMEADOW MA 01106 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN. CO 81611 REYNOLDSTHOMASS PETERSON SHIRLEY H LIVING TRUST RUGGIERI LISA ANN FISHER MORGAN 1909 E RIVER PKWAY 136 MAPLE LN 228 COTTONWOOD LN MINNEAPOLIS MN 55414 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 RYAN MARTHA SABATASSO MARY L FAMILY TRUST SALTONSTALL ANDREW C 127 MAPLE LN 64 OCEAN VIS PO BOX 9802 ASPEN CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660-6224 ASPEN CO 81612 IDT SUSAN SINGER DAVID J B SMALLS RAY 41-...EE SILVER CT 409 PARK CIR #4 PO BOX 3197 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611-2478 ASPEN CO 81612 5 6 SMALLS RAY SMISEK LINDA L E SMITH KATHLEEN M PO nnX 3197 429 PARK CIR C-3 1023 WILLITS LN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611 BASALT CO 81621 SMUGGLER MOBILE HOMEOWNER'S SMUGGLER RACQUET CLUB SMUGGLER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION C/() SUE COOK ASSOCIATION 136 MAPLE LN IN) BOX 8788 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 FARBET JOSEPH R TAYLORJANE SPECK KIM JENNIFER TARBET BARBARA P HANEK LINDA S PO BOX 9912 980 GIBSON AVE 231 COTTONWOOD LN ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 816!1 ASPEN CO 81611 WAI.DRON K BRENT rEUSCHER JONATHAN W WAGAR RIC! IARD 11 COATES REID & WALDRON C/O 126 MAPLE LN 601 EllYMAN AVE 720 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 WIRTH JANET B ZIRBEL NANCY P O BOX 9525 PO BOX 8998 ASPEN CO 81612-9525 ASPEN CO 81612 EXHIBIT 1 9476, ~'CIr ALAN BECKER PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. P.O.BOX 119 WOODY CREEK, CO. 81656 TEL. 970-925-1462 FAX 970-925-7224 CELL 970-948-6688 January 22,2002 TO: THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISION I am writing to inform the commision that, due to a prior work committment, I am, regrettably, unable to attend the application meeting on the evening of January 23rd, 2002. The proposed preservation, restoration and addition to my house, located at 950 Matchless Drive is of great importance to me. I think the ideas and designs, and changes to those ideas and designs, we have worked on together here constitute a truly outstanding project. I feel that with Kim Raymond, Architect and Alan Richman, Planner present, all relevant material can be well presented, and that all relevant questions can be asked and answered. I would like to thank you all for your participation, ideas, suggestions, guidance, and time. Sincerely, 1 Aian tjecKer Il'll/Vi~,/1:il MEETING DATE: NAME OF PROJECT: CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: 0) 1 Je t - b triz a 1-- 0,5 -t,0 -_ Cf- c 3 62, - (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report 1 9 (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice C ) (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet C ) (Check If Applicable) 4 1 %(t #10 ' T E -f CO-Â«L-7 1 21/LLOU~.~ 5 d MOTION: C Ok--AÂ»-v- , 1 1 c .G-*u-4 J X./ir-fts VOTE: YES NO JEFFREY HALFERTY YES U- NO NEILL HIRST YES >~NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES ./ NO MIKE HOFFMAN YES L/-NO RALLY DUPPS YESv NO PAUL D'AMATO YES NO TERESA MELVILLE YES NO SUZANNAH REID YES L.10 MELANIE ROSCHKO YES L/NO HPCVOTE