The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.309NorthThirdSt.012-00 '"NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #00-12 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEE G ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) nsider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from .rovisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the pro ce' vited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear perso at , you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such vari ard of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners ers ed in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the he Date: November 2, 2000 Time: 4:00 P.M. RECEIVED OCT 2 / 200n COMM~~N I PITKIN DEVELOPMENT Owner for Variance: Name: Me! and Marilyn Gallant Address: 309 N. Third Street Aspen, CO 81611 Location or description of property: 309 N. Third Street, Lots R & S, Block 35 Variances Requested: The applicant is requesting a five (5) foot rear yard setback variance and a ten (1 rear yard setback variance for the construction of a single-family home and Acces ot combined nt and Dwelling Unit. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: X NO: The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman ~ THE CITY OF ASPEN City Clerk's Office 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Fax Cover Sheet DATE: December 4, 2000 TIME: 12:27 PM TO: PAUL TADDUNE PHONE: FAX: 925-9199 FROM: Jackie Lothian PHONE: (970) 920-5063 FAX: 920-5197 RE: Number of pages including cover sheet: 2 Message Dear Paul The City Board of Adjustment Case #00-12, Me! and Marilyn Gallant, 309 North Third Street has been withdrawn per the applicant's request. A copy of the Notice is attached. Thank you. e::an Deputy City Clerk SIRKIN 66=:i334'31 P.l2Jl To: Sarah Oates, Aspen COlllll\unity Development Department, 970-920-5439 Date: October 28 2000 From: Alan & Alicia Sirkin, 3500 S. Bayhomes Dr., Miami, Fl & 426 W. Hallam St. Aspen ' RE: Propose<! Variance for 309 N. Third Street, Aspen CO before the Board of Adjustment Meeting on November 2M , At thc October 3'" Planning & Zoning Conunission meeting, this same variance request was denied. We believe there is no valid reason for another Board to re-hear this same request again so soon. It rnay be il1approprtalc for the Board of A<ljustment to over rule the prior decision. Since we are not able to be in Aspen to make another presentalion in person for this second public hearing, we have asked Paul Taddune, Esq. to represent u. and we ask that the followine; sl:ltement be read to the Board: This applicant proposes to build a new home with an ADD underground on this very small lot of 3 000 square fecI. The proposed variance would allow the Ownel' to bring the house forward towards Third Street b)' 5 reel, and closer to the north side alley by 5 feet. The city is considering the alley to be the rC3! yard in this case. The ~ull of this requested varilUlC8 will be to ~t enough room at the west side of the home, in the back nearest our bedrooms, to allow stacked unenclosed parking of 3 - 4 vehicles at grade level. The variance would maximize use of the property, not minimize it's use, and could result in more house with less open space on the site An open carport and open outside parking would allow the building of more enclosed floor area for the homc; thus a larger home with more square footage could be built than would be allowed with enclosed parking. With enclosed parking, the house would have a more reasonable ratio to its lot size and not impact the neighbors as much. The applicant has demonstrated no viable proof of need or hardship nor ,!,,-'Cial OOlIditions or circumstances, and the variance should not be aranted. Wc arc the owners ofth" house immediately to the west of this property and fear that the result of the Board grantill$ of this variance will be the creation of an unenclosed parking area just 8 fuet from our bedrooms and 3 feet from the property line, without any additiona1 buffering provided by the applicant. We oppose this parking arrangement because of the noise and fumes that would result. We do not feel it is appropriate to , ,,~~cc a parking area of this size so close to a neighbor's home. An unenclosed parkill$ lot for up to 4 vehicles is just that _ a parking lot. This is not appropriate in Aspen's historic West End premiere residential neighborhood. Granting such a variance would create a special privilege for excess parking and development for the applicant. The home's parking area has been in front of the home accessed from Third Street. The city is now against vehicle parking in the front of the home for aesthetic considerations, but they are willing to support a variance, which would expand and move the vehicle parking behind the house, shifting all the negative impacts to adversely affect the next-door neigllbors. We believe this is unjust! We purchased our home in tho West End anticipating a high quality of life and protection by the city from negative developments. This open parking area as proposed is not in our best interests We believe that the parking lot would lower our property's value and create an ongo~ nuisance. Nowhcre in Aspen's West End are other new homes built with unenclosed multi-car parking areas adjacent to ncighbors' bedroom windows. This would not be proper and would set a bad precedent. The mwer can certainly find another dcsign alternative that will provide parking that is not offensive to their neighbor. We arc adamantly opposed to this variance. We oppose lot line to lot line development. Setbacks are required for the betterment of neighborhoods and should not we waived just to provide parking or more house area for the convince of the applicant. The trees on the site are within the setback area and would be protected without the variance. Unsed upon the above, we ask that the requested variance please be denied again. _ Q J)~ Alan Sirkin ~l'-,~~l~ Alicia Sirkin ,..., NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #00-12 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for vanance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time ofMeetin2: Date: November 2, 2000 Time: 4:00 P.M. Owner for Variance: Applicant for Variance: Name: Mel and Marilyn Gallant Earl Anderson Address: 309 N. Third Street Aspen, CO 81611 Anderson Design Studio 33 Sagewood Court Basalt, CO 81621 Location or description of property: 309 N. Third Street, Lots R & S, Block 35 Variances Requested: The applicant is requesting a five (5) foot rear yard setback variance and a ten (10) foot combined front and rear yard setback variance for the construction of a single-family home and Accessory Dwelling Unit. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: X NO: The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman NU.'::Jc:.c:. r-'.l :' OCT .12.2000 9: 34AM" CITY OF ASPEN , il '.' NO'IlCE ARlNG , RECEIVED ty of Aspen Board of AdJutment I BY THE ~QUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE. , ~ -t /X~ Urt7-hy..-.Ad in ~. I~. tr 1:>::VpJn tJ:J/eS. AppJicant for Variance: \4 Before the particulars of the hearina and requested Date and Time of Meetlnr. Date: November 1, 1000 Time: 4:00 P.M. OwDer for VariaQce: Name: Mel and Marilyn Gallant Address: 309 N. l'bkd Stteet Aspen. CO 81611 Location or dellcriDtioft of prooerty: 309N. Third Street, Lots R & S, Block 3, : , CASE_12 , N()\! ')3 i!~iI! ASPEN I PITKIN '~OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N" Earl Anderson Anderson Design Studio 33 Sagewood Court Basalt, CO 81621 Varf.". Reaaatecl: I The applicant is rcquesUng a five (5) foot yard setbaclc1variance and a ten (10) foot combined front and rear yard setback variance for the co~on of a siD&le-~Y home and Accessory Dwelling Unit. Will apulieut be nuresented by cowJeb YES: X NO: , , of Aspen Boardlo! Adjustment 130 S. Galena StIeet Aspen, CO 81611 , . les PatersOn, Cbairlnan , OCT.31.2000 1l!1'09f'Y1 CITY OF ASPEl'I 'I I' :1 :1 !i :1 ,.. ) II. ii State of Colorado } Ii . L .ECIt' / A7k~ t. . being onepnsenting an ApplicaDt to the City of AspeD. petoaally c~ tlw. I bave complied with the public uotice ~ pursuant ~ Section 2~.3Q4.060 (E) oethe AspeI1 Land Use 'RegulaIions in the . fbQowlq ...-.-; ii ! . 11 I .!\ f . . 1. By .....l1Ihf of notice, a ~oP:Y of which i~ attaclted heretO, by first-class. postage prepaid r . ,I f i U.s. Mail ~ all owne~io propertywitp. tbree hundred (300) feet oCtile s~jec:t propertY, as indicated o~ the attached ~t, on the L day of HN. .199_ (which is.!..t;) Ii . ~ AI. /} IIA. / I - J_ / b. dayspriortothepUblic~earlnidateof!/r'bV'. ~ ell? f!.lr~~ "1 ~ tJ:JIet;. - ~ ~ f:;b A.r~m~ ~-6ht0 I . :h;PI j~;:,~-rD~~ . ..' I. lith b' (' Idb~ 2. By posting a SIgn U1 a cfnsplcuous p acf 00. e 5U ~ec:t property as It cou e seen \1 : frolll the nearest public ~"'IY) and that the said sign ~1lS posted and visible continuously :1 I I . from the day 9f , :199_. 0--'lust be posted for at lea:: ten (10) full I, i days before the hearing ~te). A photograph of the posted si is attached hereto. II ' :\ ' I ,I II I II II ,I II I, :1 I, II [1 :1 II !I . II ,"", ,~ eo_ tllldda ) (Attach photopph here) .' NO. 268 P.l "-. .'" i AJJ1DAvtr or NonCE PURSUANr TO ASPEN LAND USE IlIGULAnON SEcrION 26.304.060 (E) Signed before me th.i! /-5+ day ,IAJ /Jve""b~ I ..;;>ooo.~_by ~ i P i<.r I U. fl-,.d er s.0")\.. I , I . WITNESS MY HAND AND OffiCIAL SEAL My commission =cpires: III b J C> :l I I I I I (!.. 01'\1'\.1 e ~\ t..e...- NO~ r t . '<Sf( . '. L-J Notary Public's Signature I , I' , i 0 JOel-- -=1>~o;ck. ~. ~. L'arb'?,d~( cu:" 'Y?1{.;L3 , MELVIN OR MARILYN GALLAN 05-83 DLRS449432 12 FALLING BROOK 791-7520 CINCINNATI, OH 45241 Q;7 -i Q....., 6 0 2 6 /~/;h om 1~~1~ $ /:55:(;d ~ '''''.''' I DOLLARS I :::~."... I -- : ~ PNCBAN~ PNC..... N.A. 070 -. l'OU R)R ._~ r OCT. 12.2000 9:38AM CITY OF AS~EN NO. 922 P.? County of Pitkin } } State of Colorado } SS. AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATlONS SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, 'Br. ~ being or representing an Applicant to the City of ~pen, persJ ally certify that ,I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26. 04.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following , , I , m8IUler; I 1. By mailing of notice, a copy fwbich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property wi' e hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list. on the '2'3 day ~c ~~200 ~ (which is / tJ days prior to the public ,- - hearing date of .AIov: '2., '2()D{) ), i . 2. By posting a sign in a conspi I ous place on ~ subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the s: . d sign was posted and visible continuously from the ~ ~ day of tb-/r;h.dr ,200~, to the ~day of AiJN. ,2oo.J2... (Must be posted for at 1e~ ten (10) full days before the hearing 1 ), A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. ,_..'/-;:::J /: /:'/'./ , ./. .# . >/ tV . ....... ,'.' . 19na....." ,/ / , . ,/ ,~.//' , / Si~iore me this 2} day of 200~.b)' y "/~r\ ""'~~~ o~ ~~- WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JOHN 'A. FORSTER NOTARY PUBLIC $TATEOF COLORADO COIJMISS~ON EXPIRES 02I25I2lJ03 . c 318 FOURTH STREET LTD C/O BUSTER FELDOM PO BOX 445 HOUSTON,1)( 77001 BlAICH ROBERT I BLAICH JANET S 319 N FOURTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CONNOR F HAYDEN 444 GRAPE ST DENVER, CO 80220 EPPLER KlAUS TRUSTEE PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & MENDELSHON C/O 2255 GLADES ROAD 1340 W BOCA RATON, FL 33431 FIVE CONTINENTS ASPEN REALlY C/O EDWARDS JOSEPH 1/1 !502 MAIN ST STE 201 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 GLENN SALLY RAE 504 W HALLAM AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUGH JENNINE 255 BRIGHTON RD NE ATLANTA, GA 30309 KOHNER ELLEN P ~UNT ELLEN C/O "0 BOX 8770 '8PEN, CO 81612 .EISSER JUDITH E REVOCABLE TRUST 132 E DELAWARE APT 6201 :HICAGO,IL 60611 tEED CAROL ,17 N FOURTH ST .SPEN, CO 81611 I"" ~ ALLEN ROBERT H & JUDY LEY 4545 POST OAK PL STE 101 HOUSTpN, TX n027 BUDINGER WILLIAM & PEYTON 134 W HOPKINS ASPEN, CO 81611 CUNDILL JOAN REED 432 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 FIRESTEIN CHESTER & BEVERlY 9n7W1LSHIRE BLVD STE 501 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 FRIEDBERG BARRY S 555 PARK AVE 7W NEW YORK, NY 10021 HALLAM LLC 5850 SAN FELIPE SUITE 205 HOUSTON. TX n057 JANSS MARY 1992 REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 1667 FAlRMONT BLVD EUGENE, OR 97403 KOUTSOUBOS TED A 415 E HYMAN AVE 1206 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATRICK JAMES K 417 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 RH ASPEN LLC 323 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BARKER JACK 1/2 INT BARKER CARRYN ADRIANNA TRUST 1/2 INT PO BOX 7943 ASPEN, CO 81612 CllY OF ASPEN 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN. CO 81611 DIIANNI DONNA 323 W HALLAM ST ASPEN, CO 81611 FISCHER SISTIE 442 W BlEEKER ASPEN. CO 81611 GALLANT MARILYN 617 VINE ST STE 1430 CINCINNATI.OH 45202 HALPERIN ELLEN & BARRY 420 W FRANCIS STREET ASPEN, CO 81611-1233 KINNEY STEPHEN J & SUSAN M 3323 1/2 S FLAGLER DR WEST PAUJI BEACH, FL 33405 NATHAN REVOCABLE TRUST 718 N LINDEN DR BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 POTVIN BALLY ALLEN 320 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SAX JOEL D ' 303 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN, CO 81611 SCHLOFFER BRUNHILDE P PO BOX 941 ASPEN, CO 81612 TITUS JOHN W & JOAN E 3025 BRYN MAWR DAllAS. TX 75225 TEAGUE LEWIS TRUST 862 NORTH BEVERLY GLEN BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 UHL MARGARETE A PO BOX 122 ASPEN, CO 81812 WALNUT CREEK RANCH LLC 4520 MAIN ST STE 1050 KANSAS CITY, MO 64111-1816 . /J ,: ." ~., . f ; /' .:\..1 ,,~' /"'" '.......- Board of Adjustment Application Package Subject Property: 309 N. 3rd St. Aspen, CO Submitted By: Earl Anderson Anderson Design Studio, Ltd. PO Box 3313 Aspen, CO 81621 970-927-0332 OCT. 12.2000 9: 35AM CITY Of ASPEN 'I ) '. ,. ~ 1 NO. 922 P.2 - I CASE# t!P() - / ~ PHONE 'It ':/ - (; '332. I CtJ 1/~2.- OWNER PHONE 91-C) - 6F ~ 1 MAILINOADDRBSS ~o~ 1'1 ~'; 5(. kr, u f/~11 LOCATION OF PROPERTYM !I/ gr1~. I 'Pkcl ~5'"; N'~ ~ ~I 1-ok (Stl'eet, Block Number and Lot Number) '/<- WILL YOU BE REPRESBNTE4 BY COUNCIL~ Ye~ No f 5. II Below, describe clearly the pro:t variance, inc1luding all dimensions andjtlStification for the variance (additional pape may be used if ~cessary), The building permit application and any other info non you feel is pertinent should lUlcompany this application, and will be made pll1l1 oftms case. ..' 1k_ ""pea"f is I -1'11 ~ /;';~/G)~#I r:eAA.'t* ~-efbet. Y~n~~ ;,,&1 " foH. {I ~ lJ~f c,,,,,);,,<;t .fJ".,.;f ~ ~ ~ ~fhc~ ytJr,"",&-, .,0,;. i Ct/ItICW-lIefilh? ;/1" ~ ~i" k,....fJ,J.ity IJ~ ~ A~'5~ '/1in1 1',,;1. i / ,.,~JI/'If;U &,,1.' /)rI Applicant's Si , ~--. 1;1 , o OF. D PERMIT, BAS AS CITY CODE, CHAPTER 16. I OPINION CONCERNING TmS VARIANCE .WlLL BE PRESENTED TO BOARD BY, THE Z()NING DEPARTMENT STAFF TIli em OF As,pEN B OF ADJtISTMENT APPLICATION J;' ACKET DATE PERMIT DENIED I DATE OF APPLICATIO~ ! . : OFFICIAL : HEARlNODATE 1 r" ........ Page l(a), Variance Description and Justification Cont'. According to the current zoning regulations, the required setbacks for a 3000 s.f. lot in the R6 zone district are as follows: Side Yard: Combined Side Yard: 5 ft. 10 ft. Front Yard: Rear Yard: Combined FrontlRear Yard: 10 ft. 10 ft. (principal buildings) & 5 ft. (accessory buildings) 25 ft. Adhering to these required setbacks will force the proposed residence to be built in the upper left corner of the property and, if built in this location, the proposed residence will be in conflict with, and contradict, the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan and Residential Design Standards. Consequently, in order to alleviate and resolve the existing contradictory setback requirements, the applicant is proposing the following setbacks: (See Attachment A & B) Side Yard: 5 ft. Combined Side Yard: 10 ft. Front Yard: 10 ft. Rear Yard: 5 ft. Combined FrontlRear Yard: 15 ft. As Attachment B clearly illustrates, the granting of these two proposed variances will allow this property to comply more fully with the Residential Design Standards, and do so in two significant ways. First, it will allow the applicant to move their parking from the front, where it is now in conflict with the current zoning, to the rear, where it will be in compliance. As the code states, "For all residential uses, parking, garages, and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road if one exists." Second, it will allow the proposed residence to satisfy and comply with the city's desire to create a consistent "facade line" and requirement to "Build to Lines." as brought forth in Section 26.58.040 of the Residential Design Standards. In short, the applicant's variance request is simple, clear and to the point, and we look forward to your affirmative vote to help us in our efforts to not only satisfy, but comply with the city's Residential Design Standards. - '-" '. Applicant's Responses to Criteria for Variances 26.314.030 Authorized Variances Variances may only be granted from the following requirements of this Title 26: A. Dimensional requirements. B. Permitted uses, but only to allow for the temporary off-site location or storage of materials, structures or equipment pursuant to building construction or construction staging. Response: The applicant is requesting a variance from "A" Dimensional requirements. 26.314.040 Standards Applicable to Variances 1. Standard: The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title. Response: The applicant's variance request is consistent with the AACP and this Title. The applicant's property has inherent and contradictory setback requirements as set forth in the Residential Design Standards. The applicant's proposed variance request will resolve this conflict. (See Attachment A & B). 2. Standard: The granting of the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. Response: The applicant's property has an allowable FAR of 2400 s.f. The applicant is proposing a small house with an above grade FAR of 2176 s.f. Granting this variance will allow the applicant to make reasonable use of their allowable FAR as well as provide the (3) required parking spaces. The applicant is also providing a basement ADD. 3. Standard: Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structures, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or Response: The applicant's parcel is very unique. The special conditions and circumstances are inherent with the property and not a result of any actions on the owner's part. In particular, the lot is 50' wide by 60' deep and, per zoning, the front and rear setbacks are perpendicular to each other and not opposite each other as they would be normally. This setback issue creates practical difficulty with the applicant's ability to comply with the city's Residential Design Standards. l"'^' \,....r , Page 2, Applicant's Responses to Criteria for Variances, Cont.' b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, the terms of this title to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Response: Due to the unique dimensional conditions and setback requirements of this parcel, the applicant is requesting these variances to more fully comply with the AACP and Title 26, and not for any convenience on their part. Granting the two variances will insure compliance with the Residential Design Standards and not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied to any other parcel in the same zone district. See Attachments A & B. ~. ~' '- '. 26.58.040 Residential design standards A. SITE DESIGN. The intent of these design standards is to encourage resi- dential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent "facade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist, or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the bound. aries of private property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street. ---' -,_..... 1. BuiltH,.. orlll..tntion The front facades of all prin- cipal structures shall be par- allel to the street. On comer lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arC of the street. One element, such as a bay window or dormer, placed at a front comer of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if desired. '--' 2. BuiJJl-to lim!s. On parcels or lots of less than 15,000 square feet, at least 60010 of the front facade shall be within 5 feet of the mini- mum front yard setback line. On comer sites, at least 60% of both street facades of the building shall be within 5 feet of the minimum setback lines. porches may be used to meet the 60% standard. I Yes. I I Yes. I 1 m_____: ::::j:::::.-::::: ::::l::-~---- - -:h r..... '-' C. PARKING. GARAGES AND CARPORTS. The intent of the following park- ing, garages, and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages, and carports on alleys, or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exisl '-"' 1. For all residential uses, parking, garages, and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road if one exists. Alley. ~: I . . Yes. I I i . Yes. (j r I I \ No. Stree t. 2. For all residential uses that do not have access from an alley or private road. the following standards shall be met: '",,-......" .. On the street facing facade(s), the width of the living area on the first floor shall be at least five (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. -"1 . I . >t:! ~y." I l-. r , I . I , I . -!'-x-+->x..'-r .~ /-x 7' /-;PA':~~'-7' b. The front facade of the garage or the frontmost supporting column of a car- port shall be set back at least ten feet (10' 0") further from the street than the frontmost wall of the house. 0 0 1 ~-----------------------------~ I ~-----l j I I I I I I I I I I: I I I I 1 , I, I I I Existing Home Typical I I I I I 0 I I , I 0 I I CD I I Property Line Typical I I I , I I I I I I Setback line Typical I I I I I I , I I ______1 , ---l rrn I I , , r ------ , I . I I t-= l- I I , I I CJ) I I I CJ) I I I I I I 2 I I I CJ) I I I I - <( , I I () I I I I I ~ I I Z ~ 0 I I , I I <( 0 I , <( CD I a: , I I I I I I Ll.. I I I . I I 3: I I 3: , , , I I I L____ I I , I I L____n___________________ 5 SUbng Site Plan Exiale: 1 "=20'-0" Area with All, Attachment A 06/28/2000 08:47 7917649 1 11120e0 81:84 g7eS27e~ '-" PATTERNS ANllERSON WIG'! sr' PAGE 01 PAGE 82 Mcllk MarilYll Gallant JeWN.3rdSt. ....pell. CO 81611 970.920-6869 Qclober 17. 2000 AtpIllII'kkiD 0XIIDJUIIi1Y DtvalopllUmt DqlIItIl1lWt 130 S. Galeaa Stnlet Alpen.0081611 Re: BOA Vu\aD.CC To wbom it may coacen1: We hereby authorize Bad AndenoD, of Andmoa t*ip Studio, Ltd. . Tom Smith, Attorney to be our ...lIIt1lives fOI the )09 N. 3rd St. BOA propoaed vanallCt a*U0I. ~~ fUG.30,2000 12:00PM STEWART TITLE ASPE~ NO.9'l3 P.2 ,....;."" '-' SmWART Trn.B OF ASPEN. INC. OWNERSHiP AND ENCUMBRANCE REPORT 0rdD No... ooo"'SI PREPARED FOR: 9999'00 STEWART17TLE OF ASPEN, tNe. HEREBYCEJf11FJES,(rom a s.arm.fm. books I. this oft" thar mle 10: rhe North B.l~ cE ~ot R and the North Half a~ ~oe S, Bloak 35, ern AND 7'OVN1~fl. 01 MIEN ,ilwmtI In tht o,Wlry of Plrk,", SIOI' of CnlnrOlin, .PP~.,s ro be "'Sled In ,ht .om~ .f: If1lRILr1l ".u.tAlf~ IJIId that tht IlbO'IIlkscrlbtd P'ofW~ apptars In b. ,ubjeer ro rbe fot/owing Ii..,: 1. A Deed of rrv*~ dated Auguse 12, 1994, ~x.cut.d by HarjJyn a.Zlant and NelvLn aallant, to ~. ~ublic 1~u.t.. ot Pitkin County, to ..aure an jndebtedn... o~ $J9S,OOO.OO, ~n Lavor of Norv..t Nortg_V8, In~., r~ord.d Auguse 15, J,,4 in Joo~ 7J' at p~g. 491 as ..empeion No- J'JJSl. EXCEPT l2IIY IJIId all raxe, alld arrmmenrs. EXCEPT all easemltUSI rlglus 01 way, flsrrlcrionr and res~rYari()nl o/record. 17Js "'pon ..os '0< ~ecr any of rh./o1liJwing mart"': (1) Ban/rTuplclt. whIch, from dolt qf Dqiudication nf ,h. mnxr rece.. hanJ:ruprclts. allfedOlt lhe reporr by /IlOTerhon founttn (14) yoars. (2) SuIIs <l7ldjudgTMntr which. from dOle ofefWY. antedQI~ "" repon by f1/lJre tIvJn s....n (7) years 0' unrl/ rhe grNe17lfllg stOlll< of /lmirfltioflS hAl' expired, whlch6vtr is IIu! long" period.. (3) Unp;lJd rClXIie1U which. from dflte of payment, antlldot. lhe reporr by mare rhan ...... ye.,s. Although ... ~litvt tht foro sUlltd are trUi!, this len" I. .., 10 be conslrued as a. abstract oftllle, PJQr an opinion oftit/e, ""r a ,uoranry ofrltlt, IJIId ills undmlood and agmd that Stewart nd. of Aspen_ fnc.. ..lrhIIr a.r.rIl/lleS, ""r 'Wilt bt chI2r,ed wfth /11I)I jwmcll11 ohUgOlion or liah/liry whOle"'" o. any l1artmeru corualned herein. -- ~ - -.....) ANDERSONDESIGN October 23, 2000 Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer Aspen/Pitkin Community Development 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Gallant Residence, BOA Variance Package Dear Sarah, Enclosed, please find the following documents for your review and use: 1. Nine (9) copies of the completed Application Package 2. Affidavit of Notice, notarized along with a copy of the Notice of Public Hearing and a copy of the mailing list of all the owners within 300 ft. of the subject property. 3. Check for $155.00, Application Fee At your convenience, please review the package contents and let me know if you need further information. The owners and I appreciate your time and attention toward this application and 1 look forward to meeting with you and the BOA on November 2nd at 4:00 PM. V. Anderson ANDERSON DESIGN STUDIO cc: Mel & Marilyn Gallant, Owners Tom Smith, Attorney P.O. Box 3313 Basalt, CO 81621 970-927 -0332 Fax 927-0333