HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.0150PitkinMesaDrive.004-99
,onCE OF PUBLIC HEARING
3f.A..
CASE #99-4
Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE
DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the
BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority
for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons
affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you
have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions
of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for
vanance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meetinl!:
Date: June 10, 1999 - continued to June 17, 1999
Time: 4:00 P.M.
Owner for Variance:
Applicant for Variance:
Name: Judy Schramm
Address: 0150 Pitkin Mesa Drive
Aspen, CO 81611
John Wheeler
48 Katydid Lane
Snowmass, CO 81654
Location or description of property:
0150 Pitkin Mesa Drive, with a legal description of Lot 13, Block 1 Pitkin Mesa Subdivision, Aspen, CO
Variances ReQuested:
The applicant is requesting a six foot (6') side yard setback variance to allow for expansion of an existing
non-conforming structure.
Will applicant be represented bv Counsel: YES: NO:X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Charles Paterson, Chairman
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of Adjustment
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 4~iv/
Sara Thomas, Zoning Office@ ~v
0150 Pitkin Mesa Drive, Setback Variance
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
June 17, 1999
---------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARYIBACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting a six foot (6') variance from
the side yard setback requirements in order to enlarge one unit of an existing non-
conforming duplex structure. The structure is located on a 15,190 square foot parcel in
the R-15 zone district and is subject to the following dimensional requirements:
Front yard setback
Side yard setback
Rear yard setback
Maximum Height
Floor Area Ratio
25 feet
10 feet
10 feet
25 feet
4174 square feet (adjusted for slope reduction and
right-of-way easements)
The parcel contains approximately 5000 square feet of areas in excess of 30% slope and
is also encumbered by the thirty foot Pitkin Mesa Drive dedicated right-of-way. The
duplex is situated on a flat bench between the steep area and the right-of-way. The
existing structure is located approximately four (4) feet from the side property line and is
non-conforming in that area. The applicant is proposing to convert an existing garage
into a bedroom and to add a new carport/garage with a bedroom above. The proposed
addition would be aligned with the existing structure in the side yard. The proposed
addition appears to conform with height and floor area requirements, but all dimensional
requirements will be re-verified at time of building permit submittal.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the setback
variance request finding that the Review Standards have been satisfied.
APPLICANT:
Judy Schramm, represented by John Wheeler, Architect
LOCATION:
0150 Pitkin Mesa Drive
Lot 13, Block 1 Pitkin Mesa Subdivision
Aspen, CO
REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section
26.108.040 of the Municipal Code, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional
requirements of Title 26, the board of adjustment shall make a finding that the following
three (3) circumstances exist:
1. Standard: The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and this title.
Response: Granting the variance will not conflict with the goals of the
Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan.
2. Standard: The grant of the variance is the minimum variance that will
make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure.
Response: The existing structure is situated on the only level area of the
property. The parcel is extremely limited in expansion area due to the
presence of the Pitkin Mesa Drive right-of-way and the steep slopes. The
proposed location ofthe addition appears to be one ofthe few areas available
for expansion that would minimize disturbance to the steep bank and would
also minimize the visual impact to the surrounding neighborhood. In
addition, the proposed expansion has been designed to provide only a modest
increase to the unit's living area, and has been located so that there will be no
further encroachment into the setback than the existing structure.
Therefore, it is staWs opinion that the six foot (6') side yard setback variance
request is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use
of the building.
3. Standard: Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and
provisions of this title would deprive the applicant ofrights commonly enjoyed by
other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would
be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions
apply:
a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel,
building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or
buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the
applicant; or
b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege
denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan the terms of this title to other
parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district.
Response: The right-of-way which crosses the rear third of the property
combined with the extremely steep slopes at the front third of the property
are conditions unique to the parcel and are not a result from any actions of
the applicant. Granting the variance will not confer any special privileges
upon the applicant and will allow for development of the parcel in the area
that will require the least amount of disturbance to both the steep slopes and
to the visual impact of the neighborhood.
ALTERNATIVES: The Board of Adjustment may consider any of the following
alternatives:
. Approve the variance as requested.
. Approve the variance with conditions.
. Table action to request further information be provided by the applicant or interested
parties.
. Deny the variance finding that the review standards are not met.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the side yard setback
variance request finding that the Review Standards have heen met.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the six foot (6') side yard setback
variance request to allow for expansion of the dwelling unit located at 0150 Pitkin Mesa
Drive, finding that the Review Standards have been met."
c:/saratlhomelboaschramm.doc
.
w
JOHn ( WHeeUR . AlA
AHMIT(CTUPr & PLAnninG
May 19, 1999
City of Aspen
Board of Adjustments
Dear Board Members:
We are requesting a variance to the 10' side yard setback for the property at 0150
Pitkin Mesa Drive, Lot 13,Pitkin Mesa Subdivision, Aspen Co. The original residence is
located on a bench between the two sloping areas of the site. The site slopes from the
road up to the benched flat area where the residence is and then slopes up again to
Red Butte. The existing side yard as shown on the survey is 4.1' to 4.4'. Are request is
to maintain this side yard for the proposed addition.
. The area of the site that allows for alevel building site is fairly small. The proposed
structure is within the benched area and does not disturb the sloped areas. We are
requesting this variance due to the topographical hardship oUhe site_The original
residence is screened from the road by the steep sloping bank and the proposed
structure will also be screened from the road by the same bank. Since the structure is
at a higher elevation than the road and not visible from the road the new structure will
be a minimal visual impact.
The addition to the existing residence is modest and is best located as shown on the
plans and elevations. The requested variance does not exceed the existing
encroachment. Due to the topography of the site and the access easements the
building envelope is constrained. The small area to the rear of the property the falls on
the bench is better to remain open and not encumbered with structure so that the
adjacent property view planes are not disturbed.
We would like to thank the board for its consideration in this application.
Sincerely
John Wheeler AlA
48 KATYDID LANE SNOWMASS COLORADO 81654
PHONE: 9709279765
FAX: 9709270778
5-24-1999 11 ,00AM
FROM STITT 970 925 3893
"
,.
. .,
AUSTINE N. 8Tlll
1450 Sn.VERKlNG DRIVE
ASPEN. CO 81611
!l70 925 1331
lI79 !I2S m3 FAX
E-mail Austinesti@aol.com
May 21, 1999
City of Aspen
Board of Adjustments
130 S. GaIeua Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Members of the Board of Adjustmems:
,......
It is my understanding that Ms. Judy Scluamm, owner of the property at 01S0 Pitkin
Mest: Dto~ itt AspeIt, is seekiftg a nrilllcc for tile- side)'llfd setliaCt adjaceiU to ..~
located at 0140 and 0130 Pi1kinMesaDri~, owned by the EWS Trust anct'theKLS Trust
respeettvdy.
P.1
As the trustee for these properties, I would like you to know that neither I nor the other
b",,~':' fur the }Ilv....,ti~ birR' ilDyobj~tiun to this- ....;......,. In ~ "bc.liefe Ms:
Schramm's proposed improvement to her pro~ will be of benefit to the entire neighborhood.
Please feel free to contact me if I can be of any help. I do hope you approve Ms.
Sc;lnmm's appIi~
Sincerely,
4-.
_..._r
.
/
~
RESOLUTION NO. ~
Series of 1999
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN
GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 99-0J../.
RELATING TO PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH A STREET-AnDRESS OF
0150 PITKIN MESA DRIVE. WITH A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LOT 13. BLOCK
1. PITKIN MESA SUBDIVISION.
WHEREAS. Ms. Judy Schramm made application. dated May 19.
1999 to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the
dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal
Code; and
WHEREAS. this matter came on for hearing before the Board of
Adjustment on June 17. 1999 and after full deliberations and
consideration of the evidence and testimony presented.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN. COLORADO:
Section 1. Findings of Fact.
The Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of
fact:
1. A development application for a variance was initiated
by: Ms. Judy Schramm for property located at 0150 pitkin Mesa
Drive. Aspen. Colorado.
2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to
surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 24-6-
205(E) (4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such
notice is on file with the City Clerk.
111111I1111I1111I11111 1111111I11111111111I11111 11111111
433256 07/12/1999 03:23P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0,00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
F".......
3. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with
the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the
Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the
Aspen Municipal Code.
4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that
will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel,
building or structure.
5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the
terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code
would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed
by other parcels in the same zone district, and would
cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical
difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights
would be deprived absent a variance, the Board
considered certain special conditions and circum-
stances which are unique to the parcel, building or
structure, which are not applicable to other parcels,
structures or buildings in the same zone district and
which do not result from the actions of the applicant.
Section 2. Variance Granted.
The Board of Adjustment does hereby grant the applicant the
following variance from the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen
Municipal Code:
A six foot (6') side yard setback variance to allow for
expansion of an existing non-conforming structure.
Section 3. Conditions Upon Which Variance is Granted.
The variance granted by Section 2, above, is specifically
conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions:
1. The variance is subject to the dimensions represented in
the application packet.
2.
Section
Unless vested as part of a development plan pursuant to
24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted
2
1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111
4332~8 07/12/1999 03:23P RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI
2 of 3 R 1~,00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO
herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from
the date of approval unless development has been cOlllIllenced as
evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension
granted by the Board in which case the variance shall expire at
the end of the extension.
3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a
building permit, cause to be recorded with the Clerk and
Recorder's Office of pitkin County a copy of this resolution.
of the
INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment
City of Aspen on t~y~9.
Chairperson
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy
City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate
copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the
City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove
stated. ~~+-hA_:
(jeputy Cir:.~';;;K-/
Approved as to content:
City
1 11111I 1111I 1111I1 1111 11111 11I11 IIIIUIIlIl!!l\1 ~~l~'1
433256 1/l7/12/1999 1/l31/l1/l:2~PI/lR~~O;ITKIN COUNTY CO
3 of 3 R 15,I/ll/l 0 I/l. .
>! n'-1 '\j:'T\:J
". 'i ,_,~ ~""
3
.~ ~ /' ~-'l ',~l~ i
I., '-'.1 "., I i\ .-,'
"".... 't!~ .,' '\ 'f~ 'r, J
. \ '0' ",.".!, ,
:~n0i
. '!...} ~:,,1rJ ~
': ~ ".,~ .~.~\ f" i,
~.' ~ +~~l G".'-';. "."! j.,-;.,
.1.!' I,-u.. ~ (.c" \'
i, t- ',' t ;'~
~~()~;.)
CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Ni\ME OF PROJECT:
('I"Y'~'~ ,",," ';t"'--"'7
_,' . :; X . :i. .:L!.':.K..t..,.:
~r:r./\.FP: .' ....
U711"';1:' S{1 ~';' (1-')
'i'J .'._ l".,.t..J~ U.....,l.'. ~
\Z)
<ID
@
@
EXHIBITS:
o
Staff Report
@ Affidavit of Notice
fD Board Cliteri2 Sheet
o
40
MOTION:
VOTE:
YES
NO
CHARLES PATERSON
RICK. HEAD
HOWARD DELUCA
YES_ NO_
YES_ NO___
YES_ NO
JIM IGLEHART
DAVID SCHOTT
V,iS NO
. YES__ No.,""
YE8___ N1;:\m
BOAFORM.DOC
RETLm' . ~,i.'-'- -- -.-
( ~"'''a 1; "
l ,:.....a~~ a....... .. ... _..
(',:!; )
-,-,"'-' ~ ~!."d,.,"'~t
; ';:I",'i ~j p'"!.~''''' "
::.. ".~ J "ifl:::"6? L.S- j ka..\J''-
'd"~"",
::=21 .. . , __
-' -'--1"--:-
.--.-'.-,/ ~..-
"-."--"_,._-~-.,,,..,~---
~.<'. -.,.,.-,..-....~.. . ,,---'
CITY OF ASPEN
~OARD OF ADJUSTMENT
130 SOUTH GALENA ST.
ASPEN, CO 81611
FRIEDLANDER & SINGER L TO
SINGER & FRIEDLANDER
12-4 RIDGEWAY ST
DOUGLAS ISLE OF MAN,
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
130 SOUTH GALENA ST.
ASPEN, CO 81611
(-::,~~?':
;:., ',' -' ". ~ ,.,
'J) r~l ", r,~. '
>-':,
I
',;, .~
r
"'....- '"
.'-..--'
. "_~__ or
CASSIDAY BENJAMIN B
CASSIDAY SUZANNE B
POBOX 11110
ASPEN,CO
CA55~~0 8~6~2~0~0 ~2q8 07 03/271QQ
FORWARD TIME EXP RTN TO SEND
CASSIDAY .JR
PO BOX ~262
ASPEN CO 8~6~2
RETURN TO SENDER
8.10.1. 1-0000
11..1....11,11..,..11."1111...11...11,..11,,.,.11,1
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
130 SOUTH GALENA ST.
ASPEN, CO 81611
0...:.'
,.-~(\ f'1/'
....'<_.:- -"'._-,,,-,".'
E',
/
....~~-~
.....c: ':'
1.:..L'~' i,of."', <'ll~P.
....'1'''._' LJ~;:;., i'
\, ~y]q
'.~ . ,-
. .,-""""'"
4.~"'a.""""''''''
County of Pitkin }
} ss.
State of Colorado }
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT
TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION
SECTION 26.52.060 (E)
L f(-tJo. r7Ch X Kfl,/ Zn14 n" ( j,' . being or representing an
Applicant to the City of Aspen. personally certify that I have complied with the public notice
requirements pursuant to Section 26.52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the
following manner:
I. By mailing of notice. a copy of which is auached hereto, by tirst-class. postage
prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet
of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list. on the 2!/!!Jmy of
/1tvc t . 1991 (which is &. days prior to the public hearing date orJtr. 'I ~ Irtl
2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be
seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible
continuously from the ;'8111 day of )/hrJ, .199f. (Must be posted for
at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted
sign is attached hereto.
~~7~~'
Signature
Signed before me this
'--17kiAr/--
?~
,1991by
day
h-CUlrIS k. Yrl?fl1(Vf,1tcA-
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEMi
~ ." , ';',',
Mycommissionexpires: 10' (",WiJiX..... '. "': .
...:.~\,ond ....
. -.;. --c-.- : -
.~;;:..1 ~'IlQ'~....i /
'. ~.,) ---~ ,~
....... 1'1/ mi')." ..."..,
'- ""'''' ."" .
~. t . &#;1-/<-
NotatY Public
tl. () <5. 771 {!}tad .qf ItH k.p4'. & fI f, II
,
I
,
I>.SPEN CLINIC BUILDING
I>. COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP
100 E MAIN ST
I>.SPEN, CO 81611
BACON SHIRLEY R
3 GROVE ISLE DR #1608
COCONUT GROVE, FL 33133
3EAVER R HART AND JOAN S
;}37 WILLOW ST
PO BOX 1140
.EBANON, PA
30WMAN AL
3580 NW 10TH AVE
JAKLAND PARK, FL 33309
3ROWN ANTHONY
~/O FOX GRACE
250 MARTIN ST STE #100
3IRMINGHAM, MI 48011
3UDINGER WILLIAM & PEYTON
2306 DELAWARE AVE
NILMINGTON, DE 19806
~ASSIDAY BENJAMIN B
~ASSIDAY SUZANNE B
00 BOX 11110
~SPEN, CO
~OLLlER J STUART JR
JNE COMMERCE SQUARE STE 2800
I.1EMPHIS, TN 38103
JE TURRIS EMILIO
31 BRAMBLE LN
I.1ELVILLE, NY 11747
JURANT AND ORIGINAL ASSOCIATES
NC
730 E DURANT ST
~SPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN HOTEL PARTNERS L TO
PARTNERSHIP
A MICHIGAN LTO PARTNERSHIP
250 MARTIN ST STE #100
BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009
BARNETT SAUL H & SALLY A
200 W HOPKINS AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
BERNSTEIN POLLY A
C/O STRAZZ
1271 LAFAYETTE
DENVER, CO 80218
BOYNTON FRANK E & ELIZABETH J
104 ST ANDREWS LOOP
KERRVILLE, TX
BROWN MICHAEL HAYDEN
PO BOX 25282
WEST BLOOMFIELD, MI 48325
BUTT CYNTHIA W
944 HARMAN AVE
DAYTON,OH 45419
CHISHOLM EDITH 1/2 INT
205 W MAIN ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
CRAWFORD THOMAS B JR
PO BOX 8110
HORSESHOE BAY, TX 78654
DEAN MARY EMMA
PO BOX 8035
ASPEN, CO 81612
ERBJANE
PO BOX 3207
ASPEN, CO 81612
ASPEN SKIING COMPANY
PO BOX 1248
ASPEN, CO 81612
BARZELL WINSTON
7360 POINT OF ROCKS RD
SARASOTA, FL 34242
BISHOP ALBERT & PEARL
202 S GARMISCH ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
BRENNAN JAMES C
417 ROYALE ST
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130
BROWN MICHAEL HAYDEN 2/3
250 MARTIN ST STE 100
BIRMINGHAM, MI
CARRICO WILLIAM N
27343 URSULA LN
LOS ALTOS, CA 94022
COLES ELLIOT L
2929 E HARTFORD AVE
MILWAUKEE, WI 53211
DACOSTA MAUREEN C
PO BOX I
ASPEN, CO 81612
DIMITRIUS RALLI
HUEBNER.DIMITRIUS JO.ELLAN
200 S SIERRA MADRE BLVD
PASADENA, CA 91109
FABER ROBERT G & EUNICE N
1921 BOULDER DR
ANN ARBOR, MI 48104
FOSTER FRANCES 1/2 INT
MORGAN JOAN 1/2 INT C/O LARRY
SNYDERINC
500 OLD YORK RD
JENKINTOWN, PA
HAAN R E TRUST
7115 LEESBURG PIKE STE 309
FALLS CHURCH, VA 22043
HOTEL ASPEN L TD
::;/0 ASPEN GROUP
415 E MAIN #210
IISPEN, CO 81611
KAPLAN WILLIAM M AND KATE
PO BOX 406
MILFORD, DE 19963
LEE DAVID W
LEE DORA
13562 CAMINITO CARMEL
DEL MAR, CA
LUBIN RICHARD G
1217 S FLAGLER DR 2ND FL FLAGLER
PLAZA
VIlEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
MARKLE JUDY
C/O POOL JUDY
10 MEADOWVIEW LN
LITTLETON, CO 80121
OLIVER WILLIAM THOMAS & ANN GARY
542 WARNER AVE
LOS ANGELES, CA 90024
RANCE CAROL
FLAT 4B MOUNTAIN LODGE
44 MTKELLET RD
THE PEAK HONG KONG,
SLOVITER DAVID
1358 ROBIN HOOD RD
MEADOWBROOK, PA 19046
FRIEDLANDER & SINGER L TD
SINGER & FRIEDLANDER
12.4 RIDGEWAY ST
DOUGLAS ISLE OF MAN,
HITE HENRY H & ANGELA R
PO BOX 155
WOODY CREEK, CO 81656
HOTEL ASPEN L TD
ASPEN HOTEL PARTNERS LTD
250 MARTIN ST STE #100
BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009
KEY JOHN
6476 MIMOSA LN
DALLAS, TX 75230
LEWIS BRETT H
548 FRANKLIN ST
DENVER, CO 80218
MARCUS MARTIN L & FANNON JOHN H
C/O LEFF MARILYN
7660 BEVERLY BLVD APT #365
LOS ANGLES, CA 90037
MELTON DAVID
135WMAINST
ASPEN, CO 81611
PIETRZAK FAMILY L TD PARTNERSHIP
COLORADO L TD PARTNERSHIP
1796 E SOPRIS CREEK RD
BASALT, CO 81621
ROSS PAULINE
PO BOX 9969
ASPEN, CO 81612
SPEARS NANCY M
530 MEANS ST #405
ATLANTA, GA 30318
FTG ASPEN LLC
6735 TELEGRAPH RD #110
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI
HOROWITZ LEONARD & ARLENE
86 ACORN PONDS DR
NORTH HILLS, NY 11576
JDJ GROUP LLC
300 PUPPY SMITH ST #205-220
ASPEN, CO 81611
KOENIG RAYMOND J AND
TRAGGIS ELIZABETH G
POBOX 284
NEW LONDON, CT 6320
LEWIS EILEEN
108 W HYMAN AVE #9
ASPEN, CO 81611
MARK CAROL KRAUSS
PO BOX 9283
ASPEN,CO
NEWKAM CLAIRE M
PO BOX 2808
ASPEN, CO 81612
PRICE DOUGLAS L AND VALERIE
8611 MELWOOD RD
BETHESDA, MD 20817
SILVERSTEIN PHILIP
SILVERSTEIN ROSALYN
25 KNOLLS CRESCENT
BRONX, NY 10463
STRAUCH ELAINE B
4327 S YOSEMITE CT
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110
.
.
TIPTON JOHN K TRUST NUMBER ONE
1/2
6477 E MANOR DR
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111
WILKE JOHN H AND BONNIE K
TRUSTEES OF WILKE LIVING TRUST
153 S BEACHWOOD DR
LOS ANGELES, CA 90004
VAUGHAN HEIDI 1996 TRUST
N2322 SYLVAN LN
LAKE GENEVA, WI 54137
WARSHAW MARTIN R & ALICE M
PO BOX 8976
ASPEN, CO 81612
WINKELMAN WENDY L
108 W HYMAN AVE #8
ASPEN, CO 81611
----------- .1--
AGENDA
ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Thursday, April 8, 1999 at 4:00 p.m.
Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall
I. ROLL CALL
II. MINUTES (2/11/99) ./
III. DISCLOUSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
IV. COMMENTS
A. Commissioners Comments
B. Staff Comments
C. Public Comments (not concerning items on the Agenda)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Case #99-02
ASPEN MOLLY GIBSON LODGE, 101 WEST MAIN - (6')
six foot rear yard set back variance and (6") six inch west yard
setback variance to allow for construction of deed restricted
employee units.
VI. ADJOURN
----.---..,....-1 ..-
CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
FEBRUARY 11. 1999
Charles Paterson, chairman, opened the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
meeting at 4:05 p.m. with members Rick Head, Jim Iglehart, David Schott and
Howard DeLuca present.. City staff in attendance were: David Hoefer, Assistant
City Attorney; Sara Thomas, Community Development Zoning Officer; Jackie
Lothian, Deputy City Clerk.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CASE #98-03 KRUMM. BUSH .105 & 101 EAST HALLAM
John Kelly, attorney and representative for the applicant and new owners, James
and Patricia Gorman, requested an extension of the variance approval that expires
on May 7, 1999. He noted a companion HPC approval expires on December 10,
1999. Kelly said the extension was needed to review the building plans that were
on file with the planning office. He stated there were no changes in the conditions
or circumstances requested in the original variance granted.
MOTION: Jim Iglehart moved to approve a one year extension for the
four foot rear yard and five foot side yard setback variance granted in
Case #98-03,105 & 101 East Hallam, on May 7, 1999, to allow for the
expansion of an existing shed. David Schott second. APPROVED 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
"
j
1
N" .,ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #99-2
Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE
DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the
BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority
for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons
affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you
have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions
of surrolmding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for
variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time ofMeetine:
Date: April 8, 1999
Time: 4:00 P.M.
Owner for Variance:
Auulicant for Variance:
Name: Aspen Molly Gibson Lodge Company, LLC
Francis Krizmanich
Address: 101 West Main St., Aspen, CO 81611
0079 Light Hill Road, Snowmass,CO 81654
Location or descriution of urouertv:
120 West Hopkins Street, with a legal description of Lots 0, P, Q, Block 59, City of Aspen
Variances Requested:
The applicant is requesting a six foot (6') rear yard setback variance and a six inch (6") west side yard
setback variance to allow for construction of deed restricted affordable housing units for employees of the
lodge.
Will auulicant be reuresented bv Counsel: YES: NO: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Charles Paterson, Chairman
1..-----
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Board of Adjustment
Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Directo97tv
Sara Thomas, Zoning Officer
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
120 West Hopkins Street, Molly Gibson Lodge
DATE:
April 8, 1999
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting a variance from the rear and side yard setback
dimensional requirements in order to construct a deed restricted three bedroom dwelling
lmit to house employees of the lodge. A portion of the new structure would encroach
into the rear and side yards requiring a six (6) foot rear yard setback variance and an
approximate six (6) inch west side yard setback variance. The 9000 square foot parcel is
located in the LP (Lodge Preservation) zone district, which has the following dimensional
requirements:
Front Yard - 10 feet
Rear Yard - 10 feet
Side Yard - 5 feet
Floor Area - Not to exceed 1: 1
Height Limit - 25 feet
The project appears to have adequate floor area available, however all dimensional
requirements will be re-verified at time of building permit application.
Please refer to the attached drawings and written information provided by the applicant
for a complete presentation of the proposed variance.
APPLICANT:
Aspen Molly Gibson Lodge Company, LLC.
LOCATION:
120 West Hopkins Street
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots O,P,Q, Block 59, City of Aspen
REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section
26.108.040 of the Municipal Code, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional
requirements of Title 26, the board of adjustment shall make a finding that the following
three (3) circumstances exist:
-.-------1 ~~ ----------
1. Standard: The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and this title.
Response: The Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan strongly encourages
development of on-site affordable housing units to help reach the stated goal
of housing the majority of the local work force within the Aspen metro area.
Granting the variance will be consistent with this standard.
2. Standard: The grant of the variance is the minimum variance that will
make possible the reasonable use ofthe parcel, building, or structure.
Response: The proposed dimensions of the employee housing unit do not
appear to be in excess of what would be required to provide a livable, usable
unit. However, the applicant has not indicated that the proposed location is
the only area within the building or parcel that could accommodate this size
dwelling unit. Redesign or relocation of the unit elsewhere on the property,
or within the existing building itself, could feasibly be accomplished in a
manner that would either require a lesser variance, or eliminate the need for
a variance at all. While these options may present greater economic and
logistical hardship for the applicant, they appear to be feasible and therefore
staff finds that the variance request fails to comply with Standard #2.
3. Standard: Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and
provisions of this title would deprive the applicant ofrights commonly enjoyed by
other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary
hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would
be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions
apply:
a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel,
building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or
buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the
applicant; or
b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege
denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan the terms of this title to other
parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district.
Response: While the Community Development Department is certainly
supportive of the applicant's desire to provide on-site employee housing, staff
is unable to find unique conditions or circumstances on the parcel that
warrant granting the variance. Relocating the unit to an area that would not
necessitate the need for a setback variance might create a greater burden for
the applicant, however the applicant's rights cannot be considered to have
been deprived by denial of the variance request. Staff concludes that
granting the variance would confer special privileges to the applicant and is
therefore unable to find that the variance request complies with Standard #3.
ALTERNATIVES: The Board of Adjustment may consider any of the following
alternatives:
. Approve the variance as requested.
. Approve the variance with conditions.
. Table action to request further information be provided by the applicant or interested
parties.
. Deny the variance finding that the review standards are not met.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is of the opinion that the variance request does not
technically comply with Standards #2 and #3. The Board may make one of the
following findings, or may approve with conditions:
MOTION #1: "I move to deny the request for a six (6) foot rear yard setback variance
and a six (6) inch west side yard setback variance to allow for construction of a three
bedroom deed restricted affordable housing unit, finding that review standards #2 and #3
have not been met."
MOTION #2: "I move to approve the request for'a six (6) foot rear yard setback
variance and a six (6) inch west side yard setback variance to allow for construction of a
three bedroom deed restricted affordable housing unit, finding that the review standards
have been met."
dsaratlhome/boakeJly.doc
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DEVELOP~ APPUCXITON
DATE-1!Jttrc? -3 19f}i CASE #
APPUCANT i&r~-(J-J.~) WA",ds "f. K ((Zm""l!Ii(~ . PHONE q J., 1- '1163
MAlLlNGADDRESS CO?! !.,/1Mt MIl ({~) 5t1fJ...o~tJ.-'Ss (1) U65Lf
OWNER DO\v; d ""G.:s h - ~ollr~i~n W, Mdifr PHONE 1J5 3'-131}
MAlLlNG ADDRESS
LCCATIONOFPROPERTY LA5 ~ ~~ 0, BI~/t- 51
\Street'. BI CK. umd'er:ma LJt .:-fumcer)
W1LL YOU BE REPRESE'ITED BY COCNCli.? YE~_ ~a5 Kr/2-VVlo.",,'cR 9~1 'iJt,3
Below. describe de:lriy the proposed variance. including :ill dimensions :md justific:uion for the
'1ari:mce. (Additional paper may be used if necessary,) The building permit J.Ppiic:uion and :my
other information 'IOU reei is oertinem should accomoanv this aooiic:uion. md wiiI be made oart of
.... .. ~ ~ .. ...
rhis cnse.
ne- M~!lr G:~'5Gt\ Wry- J~I~ -10 oJ! ~?~eK- te)VrP/rt5 tlll} *,ree- Pb~
tL + ~e ~rit1~+- Cf.4'VIer 1- the.. b011JI~ (M ~ tAlley). The- e.N~1
bl{,U1; 15 f/Ot/CdltforM/~ ~ r~r ~nI [al,) beaMS€. of C/~ ~1711lJ' A.
5"1 x:: 'aD+- llaf'lMee. 't/o - ~<L 1bz U f'eAr yac~ 5e$d IS ~~r
~ o~ ~Ptee-- f?~Ufif:!!. If leJhr ~I Jra/)h~~ A O-~'/
. Appbc:mt'S~atUre:::;;:::3; -. h
A tov.r +" s()< il"C~, "37&\"",_ YM'd 1I0fltttllce. 15 A.ls6 r~v.,e:/ ,
REASONS FOR DE:'IIAL OF Bun.DING PElt.'\IllT, BASED ON THE ASPEN CITY
CODE, CHAPTER 24. AN OPINION CONCER.."lING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE
PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARTMEJ."iT STAFF.
DATE PER.'vIIT DE:.'ITED
OFFICIAL
DATE OF APPUCATION
HEARlNG DATE
.-
---
Francis X. Krizmanich
Land Use Planning
0079 Light Hill Road
Snowmass, Colorado 816 I 1
(970)-927-4263
March 3, 1999
Ms. Sara Thomas
Zoning Administrator
Aspen/Pitkin County
Community Development Dept.
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Molly Gibson Lodge Zoning Variance Request
Dear Sara:
My client, the Molly Gibson Lodge, requests a hearing before the Board of Adjustment to consider
granting a 6 foot variance to the 10 foot rear yard setback and a 4-6 inch variance to the side yard
setback to allow the construction of desperately needed employee housing.
The Molly Gibson Lodge is presently zoned LP. Because the lodge was constructed prior to the
imposition of the current zoning, non-conformities as to setbacks were created. The existing lodge
encroaches 6 feet into the rear yard setback on the northwest comer of the building (see attached
drawing). This encroaching portion of the building contains an entryway into the rear of the Lodge
and an employee apartment. By "filling in" the undeveloped comer of the Lodge, the Lodge can
create three apartments with shared kitchen space, without increasing the existing encroachment. If
the variance is not granted, the allowed apartment space would be too small to justifY the expense
required for planning and construction costs,
The Applicant has wanted to construct additional employee housing for some time; however, a
proposed code amendment to allow dimensional flexibility in the LP Zone that began in June, 1998
was not successful. While the Applicant supports the proposed amendments that were developed by
the staff, we cannot wait any longer to address our critical employee housing need; therefore; we are
requesting a variance to allow this project to proceed. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
--:-
;(f;./,?,'~
Francis X. Krizmanich
Land Use Planning Consultant
._.. . .,.---
1 uondo U1!ld
31.L1.L:JNIMYHU :I.LVU NUISI^:lH/tlIISSI ~
ttH'Ot6'Ol6 'XYd SH6'Ot6'Ol6 'll1.L
. .1S3.M 101 O:J 'NlI.dSY .LlIlIlI.LS "IJo'l H.LlION SSS ; <
.13.3.11.1S NIVW
NOSQID A'1'10W
.LJtllOlld
,'----.
v
.
~
IJv'1.,j ~~O,~ chi 1 H .1
,
--- 0
00'
A;aYz!OI\Y1 ~ dl:llH.1. '
-\-l5ll-P.IJ'::oI I\'WH.l. 99&.::O:r' ~., at-J .
-- ~~
~~ .1.f...I~ OI-l '
~~-~~.;.=
,- u ~i.f7.lS ~1d6 ':
u HE.lCI<:J9 ~-rr1'8 '.:
'2:lQ:2:1 J.HQd::I ~ri '
<;ii)P ~ aa:;!I\:!;!:I
.~-
.~
~"';1_ ,,~o".d I:::II-lO?a~
r
,-
--
I
1--1\0(1.1 ,jQ~1'::l ~lJnol:l'9
..
~
f@1
11
[
r -- .
c
I...
00
11$$
~ ill
I$,+,
- 00 ---l
-~
.
-- .~~"--'...~-"";',";'-~"....,.,.;-..-..
,.-. '"" ._,,;."'~..~.-
,
~
""""'.
"4~ ,~
d.
~~C:;:C-'::~~~:!~;~~;Z:=- ~~
-_... -
.01-
D~
JU.
,
. - j,
" 1'-'=
-,
W E: ~ T
lis-II.... 11 ~ 0"
MlO-POlttr d'- fZ..xr
U'_OI~~
-
---..- --.-_.
___.0..___.___..._
- .__.....
--.. - -
--- ----
'",:
...., -.-
r ~ ?;>PV fi..<?0I2-
,
,
.o=~
D..
o. __ .
.. ; .----..--. '.
'-:'
'/)(>..., /'(
J
~.
ill-' .------
.- - .-
. -. ._.
'm _ ~_'._.
/ ,~<>
/ /V/'~
X'Y/'
,''''''~ ", " ------
'xf4f .
~bu/
'~~/)
\!'
,
\))1
: ~Dp~
---~------
,-
!
~~:
-~
. .~--
~ D U i Ii
VS' · l'~~P
>~
N~
S I UO I 0 II
PROIF.("'T
archItects
MOLLY GIBSON
101 WEST MAIN STREET
555 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN, CO
TEL: 970,920,9428 FAX: 970.920.7822
1~~IIF./RF.VI~rON nATR
DRAWINGTITI F.
,
Elevations Options 1
_....."'-_.~~"
---.--.."........'.,q.....J'