The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.101 E Hallam St.003-98 / ..... CITY OF ASPEN B<CD OF ADJUSTMENT "lBRUARY 11. 1999 Charles Paterson, chairman, opened the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment meeting at 4:05 p.m. with members Rick Head, Jim Iglehart, David Schott and Howard DeLuca present.. City staff in attendance were: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney; Sara Thomas, Community Development Zoning Officer; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #98-03 KRUMM. BUSH .105 & 101 EAST HALLAM John Kelly, attorney and representative for the applicant and new owners, James and Patricia Gorman, requested an extension of the variance approval that expires on May 7, 1999. He noted a companion HPC approval expires on December 10, 1999. Kelly said the extension was needed to review the building plans that were on file with the planning office. He stated there were no changes in the conditions or circumstances requested in the original variance granted. MOTION: Jim Iglehart moved to approve a one year extension for the four foot rear yard and five foot side yard setback variance granted in Case #98-03,105 & 101 East Hallam, on May 7,1999, to allow for the expansion of an existing shed. David Schott second. APPROVED 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 4:20 p.m. - 1 APPLICANT: Donald Krumm and Alan Bush ADDRESS: 105 and 101 East Hallam REQUESTED ACTION: Extension of Variance for One Year From Date Granted Extension. The board of adjustment may grant a one time extension of a development order incorporating a variance for up to twelve (12) months. All requests for an extension must: Be submitted thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the existing development order, Must demonstrate good cause showing that an extension is necessary, and Must demonstrate that the circumstances as set forth in Section 26.108.040(1) or (2) are still applicable. Please note that unless an extension is obtained pursuant to the criteria set forth above that the original grant of the variance "shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from the date of the approval unless development has been commenced as illustrated by the issuance of a building permit. Section 26.108.040(1) states that "The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title." Section 26.108.040(2) states that" The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure." ASPEN HISTORIC,---ESERV A TION COMMISSI~INUTES OF MAY 13.1998 . Bill stated to the Board that he is familiar with what is going on with the house within the last eleven years. No one has given it the care that it should have. The owner is a long time family friend. There were a lot of other places that the owner could have bought but they chose this house. Bill suggested a wrought iron fence. MOTION: Heidi moved that HPC continue 234 W Francis, Conceptual and Final until May 27, 1998. At that time information will be provided on previous approvals and drawings; age of the garage, materials and notice; second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried 6-0. Susan felt that the fence was a Herbert Bayer fence because there is another one down the street and it should be saved. Gary asked about the carriage house and the request to change the roofto wood shingles. The attorney suggested they meet with staff. 101 & 105 E. Hallam - Partial Demolition Mitch Haas, planner stated that the HPC has seen the project as a worksession i.e the garage portion. Sworn in were Augie Reno, Alan Bush, Lisa Gotlieb Bush and Sven Alstrom. Mitch stated that the property is not an historic landmark but it is within the historic overlay and the only standards that apply are partial demolition. It is on the inventory of historic sites. Typically this would be a significant development but since it is not a landmark it doesn't apply. Mitch stated that part of the request is for the shed which is historic and is on the middle of the property line. The proposal is to convert it into a garage but save the shed and add onto the back of it. The roof would be II ASPEN HISTO~RESERV ATION COMMIS~ MINUTES OF MAY 13. 1998 . torn off and existing brick would be removed to put in a garage door and the extra brick would be used to increase the height 2 Y, feet. Part of the building on the west elevation has a door which is recessed and the request is to pull the door forward out to the existing wall with a slight jog and use the same door and add new windows around the door. The next part is to add windows to the addition. There is also a request to add the addition of a basement. The basement would include five window wells. The next proposal is to lift the existing roof off and demolish the roof and add about five feet to the height of the second story and then put on a new roof with a hip form on the front, three dormers on the west elevation with two above which is a total of five dormers on the west elevation. The east elevation would also have new dormers. The last request is to relocate or adjust the southern walls or the alley side and bumping them out and adding some window space. The entire south end of the house is an addition and the entire second story has been changed and modified through the years. Mitch stated it was difficult to look at this proposal under the partial demolition standards but that is all they had to work with. The recommendation includes approval ofthe shed remodel with conditions. On the west elevation the bump out, staff is recommending approval with conditions. The east elevation proposal for a door which would lead to the basement from the outside of the structure is recommended only if the door goes where a window once was. The light wells are all on the street side and would need a variance from the residential design standards. There is not a structural report yet on the lifting of the house. Variances are needed on the windows and proper noticing has not been done. Augie Reno stated that the house will be occupied by the Bush family. The shed received a setback variance from the Board of Adjustment. The new basement goes under the entire footprint of the existing house and the proposed connection and the shed. Augie discussed the floor plans. The l2 ASPEN HISTORIC r~SERV A TION COMMISSI<Y YUNUTES OF \. MAY 13. 1998 floor area on the second floor is very tight and they are proposing to raise up the wall to a six foot plate height. They are raising it about 3 Y, to four feet. The roof would go to a five foot maximum height. They propose a hip roof with an intersection gable. The south elevation would be a wood shingle. Clarifications and Comments The Board felt that the application is a significant development. Mitch explained that it cannot be a significant development because it is not a landmark structure and not within the historic overlay. Roger stated that the Board could grant demolition and ask them to come back with certain architectural elements for revision. Sven Alstrom relayed that he is interested in the procedural process. The proposal is changing the character from a one story element to a two story verSlOn. Susan stated that she is concerned about the moving of the house and the numerous lightwells on the historic house. She is also concerned about the entire roof being raised up and possibly just the back portion should be . . raised. Bush stated that they are not visible from the street. Julie Ann informed the HPC that the applicant could redesign regarding the lightwells or go to DRAC and request a variance from the residential design standards. Jeffrey relayed that the massing is not completely thought out. He refers the houses as the "historic trio". Concerns about the height differentials between the two other existing structures and now the proposed structure as far as the main ridge height. The shed is one of the more interesting structures in town and it is vital to the history of the site. II feet difference in the ridges are a concern for a corner lot. 13 - ASPEN HISTO( ~\PRESERVATION COMMI()N MINUTES OF MAY 13. 1998 .- The majority of the Board agreed with Jeff's comments. The entire design seems too complicated and out of character. Some of the lightwells on Garrnisch could be acceptable. In general there is a lot of glazing. The western elevation ridge is overwhelming. Bush asked for a compromise on the upstairs because ifthey do not start digging they will not be able to do the project this year and that brings up the question of putting the house on the market and moving down valley. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve at 101-105 East Hallam St. an approval of the proposed shed remodel as proposedfor both the Bush side and the Krumm side, provided (1) all existing materials that are salvageable are reused and these decisions shall be made by the assigned HPC monitor, and the selection of roof materials must be approved by the assigned HPC monitor. (2) Construction of a new basement be approved as proposed, provided (1) structural reports verifYing the ability of the historic structure to withstand the intended method of construction are provided by the applicant, and the HPC approves the intended method of construction; and, (2) the location and amount of light wells to be installed (particularly the one proposed for the north elevation and the two northermost light wells proposedfor the' west elevation) come back to the HPC for approval after further study. And provided even if HPC approves the location of the proposed light wells, a variance from the criterion 26.58.040(F)(II), Subgrade Areas, of the Residential Design Standards would be required. Motion second by Mary. All in favor, motion carries 5-1. Heidi opposed. MOTION: Mary moved to continue 101 105 E. Hallam St. project to include all the items not approved tonight from the Staff memo dated May 13, 1998 until the May 27th meeting, second by Suisan. All in favor, motion carried 5-0. MOTION: Susan moved to adjourn; second by Mary. All infavor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. 14 YA. LAW OFFICES OF OATES. KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ. P.C. PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION THIRD FLOOR, ASPEN PLAZA BUILDING 533 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 I LEONARD M. OATES RICHARD A_ KNEZEVICH TED D. GARDENSWARTZ TELEPHONE (97D) 920-1700 FACSIMILE (970) 920-1121 e-mailohkg@rof.net December 28, 1998 DAVID B. KELLY OF COUNSEL JOHN THOMAS KELLY Ms. Sarah Thomas Zoning Enforcement Officer City of Aspen Department of Community Development 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Request for Extension ofVariance/l0l & 105 East Hallam Dear Ms. Thomas: This office represents James and Patricia Gorman who purchased the property known as 101 East Hallam, Aspen, Colorado on November 10, 1998. A copy of the Deed is attached. Pursuant to the Pre Application Conference held December 2, 1998, and subsequent phone conversations, the purpose of this letter is to apply for a one time Extension of a Development Order Incorporation of Variance pursuant to Section 26.108.70 of the Code. As you are aware, the Board of Adjustment granted a setback variance to Alan Busch and Donald Crwn for 101 East Hallam on May 7,1998. Our clients purchased 101 East Hallam on November 10, 1998 of this year. The expiration date ofthe resolution is May 7,1999. The applicants also have a companion Land Use Approval granted by the Aspen Historical Preservation Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 7, Series of 1998. This approval is in effect until December 10, 1999. Applicants respectfully request an extension of the variance for an additional one year period based on the following: 1. No changes to the existing variance are requested other than the "one time" extension of time to allow an additional one year to commence the project or obtain a building permit. The conditions upon which the existing variance granted by the Board of Adjustment as set forth in Resolution No. 2 remain unchanged and accordingly, the circumstances set forth in Section 26.108.040 (1) and (2) are still applicable. OATES, KNEZEVICH & GARDENSWARTZ, P.C. Ms. Sarah Thomas Zoning Enforcement Officer December 28, 1998 Page 2 2. The extension of the variance is necessary due to the fact that 1) a building permit has not been issued on the property and 2) Applicants, who have only recently purchased the property, need time to hire and contract for a contractor and architect and to have plans approved. It will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to be prepared to proceed by May 7, 1999. We would appreciate having this matter placed on the next available agenda, which I understand is January 14, 1999. Thank you for your kind consideration in this matter and feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, James and Patricia Gorman ByJL John T. Kelly, Esq., Attorney for James and Patricia Gorman JTKlelh c:'MyFiles\Backup\wp{wp}.bk1 -~ Ms. Sarah Thomas Zoning Enforcement Officer City of Aspen Department of Community Development 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Letter of Authorization Dear Ms. Thomas: December 3, 1998 The purpose of this letter is to authorize John Thomas Kelly, Esq. and the law firm of Oates, Knezevich & Gardenswartz, P.C. to represent us before the Board of Adjustment to obtain an Extension of Variance granted pursuant to Resolution no. 2, Series of 1998. JTK/elh C:\QATA\JTK\Gorman\Aulh Ltr.wpd Sincerely, ~jJ;JA--- ' O"~ &E~ Patricia Gorman MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Adjustment Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Deputy Director ~ . Sara Thomas, Zoning Officer V . THRU: FROM: RE: Alley shed at 101 and 105 East Hallam Street DATE: April 30, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicants are requesting a variance from the rear and side yard setback requirements to allow for expansion of an existing non-conforming storage shed. The shed currently spans across the rear property lines of the properties located at 10 I East Hallam Street and 105 East Hallam Street. Both parcels are nonconforming in regards to minimum lot size and minimum lot width. The applicants for the property located at 101 East Hallam Street are proposing to excavate a basement under their portion of the shed, as well as to expand the above grade portion of the shed in order to accommodate a 1- 1/2 car garage. The applicants for the property at 105 East Hallam are proposing to place a new foundation below the existing structure. The building will be returned to its current location following the construction of the basement and new foundation. However, the construction will result in an expansion to the building in the setback areas where it is currently nonconforming, requiring a five foot side yard setback variance and a four foot rear yard setback variance for both properties. The owners of the property at 101 East Hallam Street are also proposing to excavate a basement and add an addition to the existing non-conforming single family residence. As currently proposed, the new construction on the main residence will either comply with the zone district setback regulations or will not result in an expansion of any existing nonconformities. Both of the properties are listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Structures, however neither has been Landmarked. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) has review authority over inventoried properties, but is unable to grant variances to properties which are not landmarked. The HPC has reviewed the project in a very general way and is in support of the concept of converting the shed into a garage, but has not fully reviewed the design. The proposed expansion and partial demolition of the shed will require further review by the HPC. The properties are located in the R-6 zone district, which has the following dimensional requirements: - Front Yard Setback - 10 Feet - 6'8" for second street facing yard on corner lots - (applies to 101 E. Hallam St.) - Rear Yard Setback - 10 Feet for Principal Buildings, provided that the rear yard for that portion of a principal building used as a garage shall be a minimum of 5 feet. - 5 feet for Accessory Buildings - Side Yard Setback (for lots less than 4500 square feet): - 5 feet minimum! 10 feet combined - Site Coverage - no limitation for lots less than 4,499 square feet - Minimum Lot Width - 60 Feet - Minimum Lot Depth - 100 Feet - Minimum Lot Size - 6000 square feet The property at 101 East Hallam is a 3496 square foot lot with a lot width of 34.96 feet. The property at 105 East Hallam is a 3304 square foot lot with a lot width of 33.04 feet. The proposed development appears to conform with all other setback requirements, as well as with the required height and floor area criteria of the zone district. However, all setback, height and floor area calculations will be reverified at time of building permit application. Please refer to the attached drawings and written information provided by the applicant for a complete presentation of the proposed variance. APPLICANT: Mr. Alan Bush, represented by Gibson-Reno Architects Mr. Donald Krumm, represented by Gibson-Reno Architects LOCATION: 101 East Hallam Street (The Bush Property) 105 East Hallam Street (The Krumm Property) REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.108.040 of the Municipal Code, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the board of adjustment shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. Standard: The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title. Response: The Residential Design Standards (Chapter 26.58 of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code), encourage garage entrances to be located off of an alley when a property has alley access. The proposed variance will be consistent with that policy. 2. Standard: The grant of the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure. Response: The proposed development is hindered by a number of factors. The shed is an historic structure and, as such, it is desirable to leave the building in its existing location. The variance requested at 105 East Hallam is indeed the minimum variance possible, as the applicant is requesting to only add a new foundation under that portion ofthe existing building. The variance request for 101 East Hallam is more significant, however this property is constrained by the location of the existing historic residence as well as by the location of an existing tree. Based on these factors, it appears that the requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make reasonable use of the parcels. 3. Standard: Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the terms of this title to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Response: Both parcels have special conditions which are unique and which are not a result from the actions of the applicants, i.e., both lots are nonconforming in regards to minimum lot width, which limits where development can occur. In addition, both lots contain historic structures which also limits where and how development can occur. Based on these circumstances, staff feels that granting the variance requests will not confer special privileges to the applicants. AL TERNA TIVES: The Board of Adjustment may consider any of the following alternatives: . Approve the variance as requested. . Approve the variance with conditions. . Table action to request further information be provided by the applicant or interested parties. . Deny the variance finding that the review standards are not met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the side and rear yard variance requests for both properties to allow for expansion of the existing shed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the request for a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed, finding that the review standards have been met." NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #98-3 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: April 30, 1998, City Hall Time: 4:00 P.M. continued to May 7,1998 Owner(s) for Variance: Applicant for Variance: Alan Bush Represented by Gibson-Reno Architects Address: 210 E. Hyman, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Name: Donald Krumm Location or description of properties: (The Krumm Property): 105 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of the East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the West 8 feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. (The Bush Property): 101 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of Lot A and the Westerly 4.96 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. Variances Requested: The applicants are requesting five foot side and four foot rear yard setback variances on both properties to allow for the expansion of an existing non-conforming storage shed which spans both properties. Will applicant be represented b.y Counsel: YEs: NO: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman - , RESOLUTION NO.~ Series of 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 98-3 RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4.96 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65; AND THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush have made application, dated April 1, 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing before the Board of Adjustment on April 30, 1998 and after full deliberations and consideration of the evidence and testimony presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of fact: 1. A development application for a variance was initiated by: Mr.Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush for properties with street addresses of 101 East Hallam Street and 105 East Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. 2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 24-6- 205(E) (4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such notice is on file with the City Clerk. 111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111 424379 11/11/1998 09:26A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ~"".., 3. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights would be deprived absent a variance, the Board considered certain special conditions and circum- stances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; to wit: The existing non-conforming location of the historic shed, which spans both properties, combined with the non- conforming lot width of the properties, significantly constrains the area available for development. Section 2. Variance Granted. The Board of Adjustment does hereby grant the applicant the following variance from the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code: A four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the existing west wall of said shed. .2. I111I1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111I 424379 11/11/1998 09:26A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 0' 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ~ ....... section 3. Conditions Upon Which Variance is Granted. The variance granted by Section 2, above, is specifically conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions: 1. No balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted within the east side yard setback. 2. Unless vested as part of a development plan pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from the date of approval unless development has been cOllUllenced as evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension granted by the Board in which case the variance shall expire at the end of the extension. 3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a building permit, cause to be recorded with the Clerk and Recorder's Office of Pitkin County a copy of this resolution. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen on t 7th day May, 1998 I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. J ~ / ~ /kA...~ /))'__ ~ ~eputy City Clerk ~_ Approved as to content: rL{~ Assistant City Attor y \; ;-'; -1 j .,...... l~ -i~; --'< i : . . ~ , ,..J .... t " ~ !: '~" . :. ...., f..l ~ j;'-; "..... i '''"'' W' ; ..J _Li""P. \ i" ';-- \ i........~ ~ ~ 1,,; ;,'~ {J E. c 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 424379 11/11/1998 09,28A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 0' 3 R 18.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO J. . .. - ! '- '. ....., '"" ".. ,. {. . I ! .., ., r U I (; ,f.,) \. '..., """ i"'- i' t ,~ .~1 \...~ JII#' I'i .. ':/ ~ " i ; \_' i.?- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 07, 1998 PUBLIC HEARING: CASE #98-03 DON KRUMM - 105 EAST HALLAM, ALAN BUSH - 101 EAST HYMAN Rick Head opened the continued public hearing and asked Augie Reno, architect, to present the case. Reno stated the Bush's intend to make this their home. The proposal included the existing renovation and added onto the historic house with an old storage building on the alley approximately one foot from the property line and extends onto the Krumm's property. Reno utilized bluelines to illustrate the site and the proposed building renovation with the addition of 4'h feet. He said the storage building would be removed and rebuilt in the same location which had gone through HPC. Reno there would be a garage also built on the site. There would be improvements with the addition of windows. Sara Thomas explained HPC conceptually approved and will have final review next week. Ron Erickson asked what the hardship was and ifthere was any square footage added to the house. Reno said the hardship was the on site parking requirement and there would be an addition to the house. Head agreed with Erickson on the lack of hardship. Erickson said that buying a house on a 30'x40' lot does not automatically cause a hardship. Jim Iglehart said there was a practical difficulty with the parking in the area with the Red Brick. He said that HPC was the deciding board for the re-development of historic buildings. Dan Martineau said the last case had similarities with this one regarding parking problems and a garage would not fit in any other place on the property. Howard DeLuca stated the structure will not look the same with the remodel, garage addition and re-building ofthe shed. Erickson said the problems were not the same with these two cases; each case was a separate entity and should be treated as such. He said to add a massive structure on a small lot to get a car offthe street was not a hardship. He stated that he could not vote in favor of this variance. Head said it was an interesting use of a historical building and there were parking difficulties in the area. He felt comfortable with HPC reviewing the project and was in favor of granting the variance. 3 -_----..."..-..-~..,-".,-- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MAY 07.1998 Martineau noted this property did not have on site parking. DeLuca commented the plans show a deck on the top of the building that appeared to be in the setback. . Reno said the deck does not occur in the rear yard setback but there was a section of approximately 3' on the east side yard setback. Reno said HPC did not have any problems with the way they were doing the project. Erickson asked how were they going to take down a building that was one size and put it back up 4' larger. He said it was no longer historic. Reno said where the garage door was placed would account for some ofthe extra brick and the north side wall. DeLuca said the board could approve a minimum variance but not more. Bush said the neighbor across the alley encroached into the alley and that was the reason the garage had to be in the setback. Reno said the hardship had to do with the historic value of the house and was not a very big house at 3500 sf. The first motion was withdrawn to include the motion as it stands for clarity. MOTION: Dan Martineau moved to approve a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the existing west wall of said shed, finding the review standards have been met. As a condition of this approval, no balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted within the east side yard setback. Jim Iglehart second. Roll call vote: DeLuca, yes; Erickson, no; Martineau, yes; Schott, yes; Jim Iglehart, yes; Head, Yes. APPROVED 5-1. Meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m. Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 4 APPLICANT: Donald Krumm and Alan Bush ADDRESS: 105 and 101 East Hallam REQUESTED ACTION: Extension of Variance for One Year From Date Granted Extension. The board of adjustment may grant a one time extension of a development order incorporating a variance for up to twelve (12) months. All requests for an extension must: Be submitted thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the existing development order, Must demonstrate good cause showing that an extension is necessary, and Must demonstrat that the circumstances as set forth in Section 26.108.040(1) or (2) are still applicable. Please note that unless an extension is obtained pursuant to the criteria set forth above that the original grant of the variance" shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from the date of the approval unless development has been commenced as illustrated by the issuance of a building permit. Section 26.108.040(1) states that "The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title." Section 26.108.040(2) states that" The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure." ~ , .' - RESOLUTION NO.~ Series of 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN GRANTING A VARIANCE WITH CONDITIONS IN CASE NUMBER 98-3 RELATING TO PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF ASPEN WITH STREET ADDRESSES OF 101 EAST HALLAM STREET AND 105 EAST HALLAM STREET, ASPEN, COLORADO AND LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF LOT A AND THE WESTERLY 4.96 FEET OF LOT B, BLOCK 65; AND THE EAST 25.14 FEET OF LOT B AND THE WEST 8 FEET OF LOT C, BLOCK 65, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, WHEREAS, Mr. Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush have made application, dated April 1, 1998 to the Board of Adjustment for a variance from the dimensional requirements of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, this matter came on for hearing before the Board of Adjustment on April 30, 1998 and after full deliberations and consideration of the evidence and testimony presented. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The Board of Adjustment makes the following findings of fact: 1. A development application for a variance was initiated by: Mr.Donald Krumm and Mr. Alan Bush for properties with street addresses of 101 East Hallam Street and 105 East Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado. 2. Notice of the proposed variance has been provided to surrounding property owners in accordance with Section 24-6- 205(E) (4)b) of the Aspen Municipal Code. Evidence of such notice is on file with the City Clerk. 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11111111 424379 11/11/1998 09:26A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 16.00 D 0,00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ~ ' ........... 3. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code. 4. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure. 5. The literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining that the applicant's rights would be deprived absent a variance, the Board considered certain special conditions and circum- stances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; to wit: The existing non-conforming location of the historic shed, which spans both properties, combined with the non- conforming lot width of the properties, significantly constrains the area available for development. Section 2. Variance Granted. The Board of Adjustment does hereby grant the applicant the following variance from the terms of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code: A four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed by 4 1/2 feet to the west of the existing west wall of said shed. 2. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 424379 11/11/1998 09:26A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 16.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ,...~ ~ - Section 3. Conditions Upon Which Variance is Granted. The variance granted by Section 2, above, is specifically conditioned upon and subject to the following conditions: 1. No balcony or similar improvement shall be permitted within the east side yard setback. 2. Unless vested as part of a development plan pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the variance granted herein shall automatically expire after twelve (12) months from the date of approval unless development has been commenced as evidenced by the issuance of a building permit, or an extension granted by the Board in which case the variance shall expire at the end of the extension. 3. Applicant shall, prior to filing an application for a building permit, cause to be recorded with the Clerk and Recorder's Office of Pitkin County a copy of this resolution. INTRODUCED, READ AND ADOPTED by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen on t 7th day May, 1998 I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Deputy City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and accurate copy of that resolution adopted by the Board of Adjustment of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held on the day hereinabove stated. /~ hy~.P~-,,/'?/.' t2::!:^City ~;.r~ ~~~ Approved as to content: ...iD,y -ldL .~ \ t")"" J !'~", ;1.'j"; . 1 . '}., '.....:1 ,_t , :,,,.,-,, "--' \.f ! ,'; .~ ~ . t.,..,; t~ ~ .~! ...., I " r~, j'Lil'-j ., \ ,,) ., ~ ~...,. _~ i~~ ~. ~',; '~fC" f" 1. .j. \.....~ ':...l ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 424379 11/11/1998 09:28A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 of 3 R 18.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO J. ...n . "'. (..... , I .~,.., ,.' ) \..iIO,f.,) " ....., """; *..~ ~\ ,: ~ .,ll_i....' i .. -:f i ..1 :L;ir- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #98-3 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: April 30, 1998, City Hall Time: 4:00 P.M. continued to May 7, 1998 Owner(s) for Variance: Applicant for Variance: Alan Bush Represented by Gibson-Reno Architects Address: 210 E. Hyman, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Name: Donald Krumm Location or description of properties: (The Krumm Property): 105 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of the East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the West 8 feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. (The Bush Property): 101 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of Lot A and the Westerly 4.96 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. Variances Requested: The applicants are requesting five foot side and four foot rear yard setback variances on both properties to allow for the expansion of an existing non-conforming storage shed which spans both properties. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: NO: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CASE #98-3 Before the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the BASEMENT MEETING ROOM, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 26, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for vanance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: April 30, 1998, City Hall Time: 4:00 P.M. Owner(s) for Variance: Applicant for Variance: Alan Bush Represented by Gibson-Reno Architects Address: 210 E. Hyman, Suite 202 Aspen, CO 81611 Name: Donald Krumm Location or description of properties: (The Krumm Property): 105 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of the East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the West 8 feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. (The Bush Property): 101 East Hallam Street, with a legal description of Lot A and the Westerly 4.96 feet of Lot B, Block 65, City and Townsite of Aspen. Variances Requested: The applicants are requesting five foot side and four foot rear yard setback variances on both properties to allow for the expansion of an existing non-conforming storage shed which spans both properties. Will applicant be represented by Counsel: YES: NO: X The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Charles Paterson, Chairman MEMORANDUM THRU: Board of Adjustment Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Deputy Director ~ . Sara Thomas, Zoning Officer V - TO: FROM: RE: Alley shed at 101 and 105 East Hallam Street DATE: April 30, 1998 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The applicants are requesting a variance from the rear and side yard setback requirements to allow for expansion of an existing non-conforming storage shed. The shed currently spans across the rear property lines of the properties located at 101 East Hallam Street and 105 East Hallam Street. Both parcels are nonconforming in regards to minimum lot size and minimum lot width. The applicants for the property located at 101 East Hallam Street are proposing to excavate a basement under their portion of the shed, as well as to expand the above grade portion of the shed in order to accommodate a 1- 1/2 car garage. The applicants for the property at 105 East Hallam are proposing to place a new foundation below the existing structure. The building will be returned to its current location following the construction of the basement and new foundation. However, the construction will result in an expansion to the building in the setback areas where it is currently nonconforming, requiring a five foot side yard setback variance and a four foot rear yard setback variance for both properties. The owners of the property at 101 East Hallam Street are also proposing to excavate a basement and add an addition to the existing non-conforming single family residence. As currently proposed, the new construction on the main residence will either comply with the zone district setback regulations or will not result in an expansion of any existing nonconformities. Both of the properties are listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Structures, however neither has been Landmarked. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) has review authority over inventoried properties, but is unable to grant variances to properties which are not landmarked. The HPC has reviewed the project in a very general way and is in support of the concept of converting the shed into a garage, but has not fully reviewed the design. The proposed expansion and partial demolition of the shed will require further review by the HPC. The properties are located in the R-6 zone district, which has the following dimensional requirements: - Front Yard Setback - 10Feet - 6'8" for second street facing yard on comer lots - (applies to 101 E. Hallam St.) - Rear Yard Setback - 10 Feet for Principal Buildings, provided that the rear yard for that portion of a principal building used as a garage shall be a minimum of 5 feet. - 5 feet for Accessory Buildings - Side Yard Setback (for lots less than 4500 square feet): - 5 feet minimum! 10 feet combined - Site Coverage - no limitation for lots less than 4,499 square feet - Minimum Lot Width - 60 Feet - Minimum Lot Depth - 100 Feet - Minimum Lot Size - 6000 square feet The property at 101 East Hallam is a 3496 square foot lot with a lot width of 34.96 feet. The property at 105 East Hallam is a 3304 square foot lot with a lot width of33.04 feet. The proposed development appears to conform with all other setback requirements, as well as with the required height and floor area criteria of the zone district. However, all setback, height and floor area calculations will be reverified at time of building permit application. Please refer to the attached drawings and written information provided by the applicant for a complete presentation ofthe proposed variance. APPLICANT: Mr. Alan Bush, represented by Gibson-Reno Architects Mr. Donald Krumm, represented by Gibson-Reno Architects LOCATION: 101 East Hallam Street (The Bush Property) 105 East Hallam Street (The Krumm Property) REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF EVALUATION: Pursuant to Section 26.108.040 of the Municipal Code, in order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the board of adjustment shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. Standard: The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and this title. Response: The Residential Design Standards (Chapter 26.58 of the Aspen Municipal Land Use Code), encourage garage entrances to be located off of an alley when a property has alley access. The proposed variance will be consistent with that policy. 2. Standard: The grant of the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building, or structure. Response: The proposed development is hindered by a number of factors. The shed is an historic structure and, as such, it is desirable to leave the building in its existing location. The variance requested at 105 East Hallam is indeed the minimum variance possible, as the applicant is requesting to only add a new foundation under that portion of the existing building. The variance request for 101 East Hallam is more significant, however this property is constrained by the location of the existing historic residence as well as by the location of an existing tree. Based on these factors, it appears that the requested variance is the minimum variance necessary to make reasonable use of the parcels. 3. Standard: Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's right would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the terms of this title to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Response: Both parcels have special conditions which are unique and which are not a result from the actions of the applicants, i.e., both lots are nonconforming in regards to minimum lot width, which limits where development can occur. In addition, both lots contain historic structures which also limits where and how development can occur. Based on these circumstances, staff feels that granting the variance requests will not confer special privileges to the applicants. , ALTERNATIVES: The Board of Adjustment may consider any of the following altemati ves: . Approve the variance as requested. . Approve the variance with conditions. . Table action to request further information be provided by the applicant or interested parties. . Deny the variance finding that the review standards are not met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the side and rear yard variance requests for both properties to allow for expansion of the existing shed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the request for a four foot rear yard and a five foot side yard setback variance at both 101 East Hallam and 105 East Hallam to allow for the expansion of an existing shed, finding that the review standards have been met." AGENDA ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT COMMISSION Special Meeting Thursday, May 7,1998 at 4:00 p.m. City Council Meeting Room, City Hall I. ROLL CALL II. MINUTES 4!:3tJJQs III. COMMENTS A. Commissioners Comments B. Staff Comments C. Public Comments (not concerning items on the Agenda) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Case #98-04 Liz Talenfeld, 915 West Francis Street, Aspen, CO 4'6" east side yard setback, 15' rear yard setback, 2V,% increase in site coverage for garage construction. B. Case 98-03 Don Krumm, 105 East Hallam Street, Aspen, CO Alan Bush, 101 East Hallam Street, Aspen, CO 5' side yard setback and 4' rear yard setback variances on both properties for expansion of storage shed. VI. ADJOURN , , April I, ]998 Ms. Sara Thomas Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 8]611 RE: 101 East Hallam Historic Alley Storage Building Proposed 11/2 Car Garage, requested Setback Variances Dear Sara: Based upon oUr previous discussions, please accept this submission on behalf of Mr. Alan Bush. The submission attached includes: ] . The City of Aspen, Board of Adjustment Development Plan Application. 2. Nine(9) copies of the proposed Architectural Drawings including a current improvement survey. 1 J. Mailing list of all property owners within a 300 foot radius of this property. 4. Application fee of$]05.00. 5.. Warranty Deed 6. Letter of Authorization to represent Alan Bush. We respectfully request that we be scheduled to present to the Board of Adjustment as soon as our posting requirements have been met. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. cc. A. Bush (w/enclosure) ",-, Dt\VID GI!))UN ,\1/\ i\UGUST RENO AlA SCOTT S,vllTH AlA GIBSON-RENO ^ R CHI TEe T S. L.l.C. . III 210 E, HYMAN NO' 202 ASPEN COLORADO 81611 ')'70.')25,5%8 fACSIMILE tJ70.nS,59CJ3 P.O. BOX 278 117 N. \VILlOW N 2 TEI.LURID[ COLORADO 81435 970.71B,6007 FACSIMILE <J70,72B.6()5B , , April 1, 1998 Ms. Sara Thomas Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 101 East Hallam Historic Alley Storage Building Proposed 11/2 Car Garage, requested Setback Variances Dear Sara: Based upon our previous discussions, please accept this submission on behalf of Mr. Alan Bush. The submission attached includes: 1. The City of Aspen, Board of Adjustment Development Plan Application. 2. Nine(9) copies of the proposed Architectural Drawings including a current improvement survey. " ~. Mailing list of all property owners within a 300 foot radius of this property. 4. Application fee of$105.00. 5. Warranty Deed 6. Letter of Authorization to represent Alan Bush. We respectfully request that we be scheduled to present to the Board of Adjustment as soon as our posting requirements have been met. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Respectfully, August G. Reno, AlA ce. A. Bush (w/enclosure) " . DAVID GIllSON .AlA AUGUST RENO oIlA SCOTT SMITH AlA GIBSON-RENO "ARCHITECTS, L.L.C.' III 210 E. HYMAN N" 202 ASPEN COLORADO 8161] 970.'125.5968 FACSIMILE 970.925.5993 1'0 BOX 278 117 N. WILLOW N"2 TELLURIDE COLORADO 81435 970.728.0607 F:\CSIMILE lJ7Q.728.6658 , CITY OF ,\SPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION DATE 4-1- 19.::!l. CASE it APPLlCAl~ Gibson-Reno Architects, LLC PHONE 925 -5 968 MAlLING ADDRESS 210 E. Hyman Ave., Suite 202, Aspen, CO. 81611 OWNE.~ Mr. Alan Bush PHONE 92 5 - 7 0 6 0 MAlLlNGADDRESS 210 E, Hyman, #7, Aspen" CO. 81611 LOCATION OFPROPERTI 101 E. Ha11um/ Lot A and the Westerly 4,96 feet S Bl' "-.T ,VI. kUL"P. ~ D..LUl;J<.. O:J ( treer.. OCl( _ ,umoer ana Lot :~urnoer) WILL YOU BE REPRESE.:.'lTED BY C01..;l'ICIL:' YES_ 2'10_ Below, describe clemy the proposed variance. including all dimensions and justification for the vanance. (Additional paper may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and any other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this application. and will be made part of this case. SEE ATTACHED Applicant's Signarure J. REASONS FOR DE~U OF BliTI..DING PERi'vIIT, B ON THE ASPEN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 24. .~'I/ OPINION CONCER."IING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARThIEl"U STAFF. DATE PER.vIIT DENlED OFFICIAl. DATE OF APPLICATION HEARING DATE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF .ill.JUSThIENT .-\PPLICATION PACKET Brierly stated. the foil owing steps are nec::ssary to obtain a varianc:: one:: a de'/e!opment proposal has been denied in writing by the Community Development staff. 1. Complete the attached application form. Oearly stare your varianc:: request. 2. Provide nine (9) copies of the infonnation necessary for the Board of .-\djustment to review your case, as specified by the City Zomng Officer. 3. Provide a current mailing list of all property owners within a 300-foot ~adius or your property. ,Tne names and addresses shall be those on the current' tJ..,( records or Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the pubiic he:lIing. You ;nay obtain this inronnation in ::he Counrv .-\ssessors Offic:: or throu9:n a title somoanv. . -.. . .l.. Submit the application fee or S105 (effecjve January 1. 1996). Cnecks should be made payable to the ,-\spen City Clerk. 5. When all or this infonnation has been submitted. a ;nember or the Community Development staff will review your application ror compieteness. and '.vii! then forward it to the City Oeri< ror scheduling. 6. The City Oerk will Jdvis~ you or the he:lIing dare and will provide a copy or the notice co be mailed to ill owners within 300' or the property. Tne sign for posting on the property will also be orovided bv the Cirv Oerk. . . . /. Post the "Notice of He:lIing" sign ten (10) days prior to the he:J.ring in a conspicuous ?lace on the property. 8. Notice shall be mailed to all owners of property within 300' at least ten (10) days prior to the public he:lIing; notice shall be mailed fifteen (15) days in advance to any federal agency, state. county ;nunicipal government. schooL service distric: or other governmental or quasi- governmental ~aency that owns property within 300 feet of the [lroperty. (See attached public he:lIingnotice requirements) 9. Bring the completed "Afficbvit or Posting" (attached) to the he:J.ring along with a pic:ure or the posted sign. 10. Present your appeal at the he:lIing and Good Luck! Applicable sections from the Aspen Y[unicipal Code are attached. . , " BUSH PROPERTY HARDSHIP: An existing Historic Building Storage Building is located at the Southeast comer of the property (non-conforming rear and sideyard setback). This building spans over the East property line with the adjoining property. The proposed plan is to temporarily move this building, place a new basement foundation below, and relocate a partially demolished building (north and West walls to be demolished) in its exact location. This will require a sideyard setback variance of five (5) feet on the East property line and four (4) feet on the South property line, even though the building is being replaced on its exact location. The building will be located on the East property line and one (1) foot from the South property line. HARDSHIPS: This Historic Storage Building becomes the entry to a proposed I [/2 car garage. The location of the proposed garage has been determined by: 1. The existing location of the Historic Storage Building. 2. The existing location of the Historic House 3. The width of the lot, which is 34.86 feet. 4. The location of existing tree at the Southwest comer of the property. The Owner wishes to preserve the tree. 5. The location of an existing patio to the West which relates to the existing house. Interior Plan 6. A sideyard setback variance OffOUT (4) feet, is required. The proposed new garage. East wall will be located one (1) foot from the East property line. , Alan, Steven and Lisa Bush 210 East Hyman Ave, Apt 7 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-4243 March 25, 1998 Ms. Sara Thomas Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 101 East Hallam: Remodel and Alley Shed - Easements and Setback Variances Dear Sara, Community Development, Board of Adjustment and other interested Parties: Please accept this letter as authorization for the fIrm of Gibson & Reno Architects, L.L.c. located at 210 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, (970) 925-5968, to submit and process the application on our behalf as the owners of 101 East Hallam, Aspen, CO 81611, for the easement and setback variances needed for our remodel. If we cannot be present, then Gibson & Reno Architects may represent our interests related to the easement and setback variances at any meetings, hearing or presentations that are required. Sincerely, 1}~/LvL Alan Bush .. " Mr. Don Krumm 105 East Hallam Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7062 March 25, 1998 Ms. Sara Thomas Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 105 East Hallam, Alley Shed - Easements and Setback Variances Dear Sara, Community Development, Board of Adjustment and other interested Parties: Please accept this letter as authorization for the firm of Gibson & Reno Architects, L.L.c. located at 210 East Hyman A venue, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, (970) 925-5968, to submit and process the application on my behalf as the owner of 105 East Hallam, Aspen, CO 81611, for the easement and setback variances needed to lift, repair and reseat the alley shed back in its existing location. If I have been notified and if I cannot be present, then Gibson & Reno Architects may represent my interest specifically related to the easement and setback variances needed to lift, repair and reseat the alley shed back in its existing location at meetings, hearing or presentations that are required. Sincerely, (:~~'Y~~~~ Don Krumm ~. ~~l' qg 1) I ~..) WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, made this JL day of September, 1996, between Maria P. Segall aIkIa Maria Segall, whose address is 9749 E. Ida Circle, Greenwood Village, CO, ("Grantor") and Alan David Bush and Steven S. Bush, as tenants in common, whose address is 210 E. Hyman Avenue., Aspen, CO ("Grantees"): \ :If, WITNESSETH, That Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum ofTen and no/100 Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, S. convey and confirm, unto Grantees, their heirs and assigns forever,all the real property, together with cj:<> improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, described as ~ Z 1.1 follows: o ~ ~ fu ll./ Lot A and the Westerly 4.96 feet of Lot B, Block 65 ~ ~ a: 'j City and Townsite of Aspen >-., COUNTY OF PITKIN t:~w~ o ~0 STATE OF COLORADO o ~ also known by street and number as 101 E. Hallam Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611. ~ ~ '- '- \- \j ~ ~ .<::\ 010 ZoZ-S W -..... D..H <Il-=: -=:D.. . ~~~~ E~ ~ u ~~ O~ TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of Grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the ::0 appurtenances, unto Grantees, their heirs and assigns forever. And Grantor, for herself, her successors, IT! n and assigns, does covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with Grantees, their heirs and assigns forever, 0 that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, she is well seized of the premises above ~ conveyed, has good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, m ;u and has good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature, except: The lien for general real property taxes for 1996, due and payable in 1997; and, Subject to: Reservations contained in deed recorded in Book 59 at Page 518 of the Pitkin County real property records, and encroachments as shown on survey by James Sexton dated March 9, 1993. Grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of Grantees, their heirs and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming the whole or any part thereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. 1!l~/I;/~Jid/ I(/gf.'( ;JjMtf x"d Mar a P. Segall a Maria S gall _ ______~U ( ~ UJ (.J .....'" rO' <:--1 .....w D-I> tl D <:s .....'" UJ' S UI , '" 0' S -I> 1;).. .....s -l-l> A 1;) ..... 21;) G) o 0... c Z -l -<:0 " o r... IT! ;u A I/O ;u O'IT! '0 S S 0>0 "'0 '0 -I> 1\' c o n 396 734 Transfer Declaration Received 09/05/96 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF MIT,oA-dO~ ) ) 55, ) The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me this l/-7;;.. day of September, 1996, by Maria P. Segall aIkIa Maria Segall. WIlNESS my hand and official seal. MY COMMISSION EXPlRI::S: My commission expires: Nv\cmbcr 211 1996 ; (~4~M1>1J (ltfh ~< _, Notary Public 0' i?J,c.. C 'j, '.~ 'tV." " (...~/. ,;.~ ~ t' \' I) T 1<;(/. . r'" : :\ , . -<>-<' ,.,,:.~ l C'\O'fICIl\"FIIIII\WPOOCl>\UGLOOCS\MUC\WAllR'DID.~1l0 \ I:J I~ ". <1',... UD L' . ..."f" . ~ '. Or-,. , / April I, 1998 Ms. Sara Thomas AspenlPitkin County Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 8161 I RE: 105 East Hallam Historic Alley Storage Building Requested Setback Variances Dear Sara: Based upon our previous discussions, please accept this submission on behalf of Mr. Don Krumm. The submission attached includes: ]. The City of Aspen, Board of Adjustment Development Plan Application. 2. Nine(9) copies of the proposed Architectural Drawings including a current improvement survey. , .J. Mailing list of all property owners within a 300 foot radius of this property. 4. Application fee of$105.00. 5. Warranty Deed 6. Letter of Authorization to Represent Don Krumm We respectfully request that we be scheduled to present to the Board of Adjustment as soon as our posting requirements have been met. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. cc: D. Krumm (w/enclosure) DAVID CjIBSOi-\' i\IA AUGUS1 RENO AlA SCOTT SMITH AlA GIBSON. RENO . ^ R CHI TEe T $, L L.C. . III 2](1 [ HYMAf\.i N 202 ASI'EI\: COLORA[)() 8]611 970()2S.5968 fACSLlI.llLF 970_0~S,::;l)03 1'.0. f\O\ 278 ]]7!\.:. WILLOW N 2 TELLURIDE COLORAO() 81435 970 72.s.6607 ~AL\)i\t!Lf 970.72t>,l16S's . ' , CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADruSTMENT DEVELOP~1 APPUCATION DATE April 1 192 CASE # APPUC.\NT Gibson-Reno Architects, LLC PHONE 925-5968 210 E. Hyman, Suite 202, MAlLlNG ADDRESS .. ' Aspen CO,' 81611 O~R Donald Krumm PHONE 925-7062 MAlLlNG ADDRESS 105 East Hallam, Aspen, CO. 81611 105 E, Hallam LOCATIONOFPROPERTY The East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the West 8.00 feet (Streer. Block )lumb~ and Lot ~umber\ of Lot C, Block 65, Clty and Townsite of Aspen WILL YOU BE REPRESE.:."\!TED BY COUNCll...? YES_ NO_ Below, describe clearly the proposed variance. including aJl dimensions and justific:ltion for the variance. (AdditionaJ paper may be used if necessary.) The building permit appiic:ltion and any other infonnation vou feel is oertinent should accomoanv this auolication. and will be made Dart of .. ~ .... .. .. this case. SEE ATTACHED \ Applicant's Signature REASONS FOR DE;-.IIAL OF BVILDING PElt.'VIIT, BAS N THE ASPEN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 24. A1'l OPINION CONCElt."llNG THIS VARIANCE WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARThIE1'1T STAFF. DATE PER.\1IT DE.'ill:D OFFICIAL DATE OF APPUCATION HEARING DATE ~ ' CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION PACKET Brierly stated. me following steps are necessary to obtain a variance once a development proposal has been denied in writing by me Community Development staff. 1. Complete me attached applic:uion form. Clearly stare your variance request. .., Provide nine (9) copies of me information necessary for the Board of Adjustment to review your case, 3S specified by me City Zomng Officer. ~. ?7ovide a current mailing list of all property owners within a 300-root radius of your property. The names and addresses shall be mose on me current t:lX records of Pitkin County US they app=d no more man sixty (60) days prior to the public hearing. You may obtain this information in me County Assessors Office or through a title company. cl. Submit the application fee of 5105 (effeC"jve January 1. 1996). C1.ecks should be made payable to the Aspen City Clerk. 5. When all of this information has been submitted. a member of me Community Development staff will review your applic:uion for compieteness, and will then forward it to me City Clerk for scheduling. 6. The Ciry Clerk will advise you of me hearing date and will provide a copy of me notice to be mailed to all owners within 300' of me propert'j. Tne sign for posting-on me property will also be provided by the City Clerk. .. Post me "Notice of Hearing" sign ten (10) days prior to me hearing in a conspicuous place on me property. 8. Notice shall be mailed to all owners of property within 300' at least ten (10) days prior to me public hearing; notice shall be mailed fifteen (15) days in advance to any federal agency, state. county municipal government, school. service district or omer governmental or quasi- governmental agency mat owns property within 300 feet of me property. (See attached public hearing notice requirements) 9. Bring me completed "Affidavit of Posting" (attached) to me hearing along wim a picture of me posted sign. 10. Present your appeal at me he:uing and Good bck~ Applic:lble sections from the Aspen Municipal Code are attached. , , KRUMM RESIDENCE HARDSHIP: An existing Historic Brick Storage Building is located at the Southwest corner of the property (non-confonning rear and sideyard setback). The building spans over the West property line with the adjoining property. The proposed plan is to temporarily move this building, place a new foundation below, and relocate the building in its exact location. This will require a sideyard setback variance of five (5) feet on the West property line and four (4) feet on the South property line, even though the building is being replaced in its exact location. The building will be located on the West property line and one (1) foot from the South property line. ;~. -; \ ~' , ~ ,I j) -Il. I ~f '~, ., .. II I Ii : ,~ 'or. o ~ ....0 ....\P ~~ .... -'"-"''''''''''''''~:;"",'--'\l:r-''tl'V"';:~"':~~'_';'''~'"''" .....'c~ ,;'.;~i':;.1Ir.WG.}iflII ~~;~,.~'.~~ ..~_ _. . _.' ,v..._ . "IY'~ ... ,.. " r'.." ~ , '" . ,.,C...>;; ":::Jiii ,..;-~ .- .~ -~] ~ 8&1 1-"lta L.:-r..l "1 tl . "an~ '~.J law1 the fori ?1 ban abov ,; ',,..:..;0';-- lW .. - ..I.~ ..'r't~"1l"" , Rf"cordrd at 418 1977 __o'clock P.M.. F('>l.lr\,,;un' IH, P"c~ption No. _192_~64 -....----..- -- "-.--- Julio linn,.. __n~cotder GENEML WARMllTY rn:o .W';325 iI', 71 THIS DEED, made this the ...18.t.b....- day of J~bn!ary 1977, botween ROBERT H. LFSTER, an unmarricam.'l", of the County of EJ. Paso, and State of Colorado, r.'rty or the firsr. p,ut, and OONIILD PAUL XRUMM and PETER H. I!On'UANN,JR., of the County of Pitkin, and State of Colorado, parties of the second part, whose address is P.O. Box 874, Aspen, Colorado 81611. WITNESSETH: That the said party of the fi rst part, for and in consideration of the sum of T~n Dollars and other good and valuable connideration to the said party of the first part, . in hand paid by the said p~rties of the second part, the receipt whereot i. hereby conte..ed and aCknowlcdged, h.. qranted, bargAinod, aold and conveyed, and by these pre~rnt. doc. grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the 9~jd parties of the second part, as tenants in common, their heirs and assigns forever all the following described lot or p.lrcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of Pitkin and State of COlorado, to wit: The East 25.14 feet of Lot B and the W~st 8.00 feet of Lot C, Block 65, City and Townsite of IIspenl subject to the following liens, encumbrances, reservations and reatrictions: 1. Reservations as contained in d~ed recorded November 28, IS88, in Book 59 at Page 518, to-wit: "that no title shall be hereby acquirpd ta any mine or gold, silver,/cinnabar or co~p~r, or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws: and provided further, that this deed is hereby subject to .11 the conditions, limitstionw and r~"trlctions contatn~d In "~ction 2386 of tho Revised Statutes of the United States, so far as the same is applica~le ~hereto." 2. Any t.-=~ ~or 1977, due and payable in 1978. 3. Any easements for telephone, electricity, water and sanitary sewer, and subject to ~uilding and zoninq regulations, and restrictive covenants of record. 'l'C~ETHER with all and singular the hereditam~nts and 1ppurtcnanceB thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, rcmninder and rem~inders, rrnt~, iSSU~B and profit~ thereof; and all the estate right, title, interest claim and demand what!~oever of the said party of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargaining plcmises, with the hcrcdit~ments and ,'ppurtr.nnnccs. TO HAVE ANC TO HOLD the same premises above bargained and described, with the appurtenances, un~~ the said parties of the ~0cond pnrt, ~heir heirs and a~Rigns for~ver. And the ~;ilid pnrty of the first part, for hi,mRclf, his hrirR, executors, onu auministrators does covenant, grant, bargain and agree to ilnd with the said parties of the second part, their heirs and nssi<lns, that at the time of the ensenling and delivery of these l)rC~~!lts, 11e is well seized of the premises above conveyed, .1S of qood, !'iurc, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full Ill~W('r .1nc1 l..:wful authority to grnnt, b"rgain, neII ^nd convey '.h" :~.lIn(' in mLlnnpr and form a~ ~fon:IR.,id, .1,nd that the s{\mc .lr~ r,.('(' ilnd c10a- from ~ll form~r nn(} other grants, bnrqnins, ; t. ..: r ~)~; ,..~ ~. -~~: "-' .:f~ ; :'-:---.' -.,';": ;-.d I STAT: o " COOll ,o!'! . :~ .1 the ( u1llll8i .._ . J.:. :'; .(l<;,~~'<:-l . " '7'-1' ;"t..:.i.l.. ......'"... -, ..t ;.;. i1 t- ained, ::': " J ,. .~ (" f I:" .. " ,325. 72. aales, liens, taxes, .!9seSSl"'ents and encwnbranC~!1 of ....hate.ler kind or nature whatsoever, excepting those liens, encumbrances, reservations and restrictions set forth in nur.~ered paragraphs 1 through 3 ahove, and the atove bargained premises in the quiet anc peaceable possession of the said parties of the second part, their heirs and assigns against all and every per50n or persons. lawfully claiming or to clai~ the whole or any par't thereof, the said party of the first D~r~ shall and ....ill warrant and forever defend. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ~~e said party of the first part has hereunto get his hand and seal the day, ~cnth.' and year first above written. ! , , // /' d-- ,/:: ./ . ,Y :lObe:''': !-!. !..es<:.er (SFALl I d:" STATE OF COLORADO SS. COUNTY OF EL PASO Thl'/. fareaaing . ,...{... v ~ the ~ day of '..lnma rl.ea man. My commission ~st:'.".mlent ......as ~~'-C'4 I expi::-es: (_ aCknowledqed .~efore me this , 1977, by Robert P.. Lester, an C,..., "~i' (e;-,7 'J Wi~ness my hand and official senl. I I ' . e j t l...;(\\ \.~'t' ~ ~1""1 Notar.... ?uhl.:.c ~ f /~- ,... 7:--- _.- .--- ; I ~, a-"*.'.I:: ~kH~. ..~.~ : ~ t_~.__,~1wt: A ....~US\l:..:~~ 1:., Julr J. .1.V! ~lr(.t ta llannf't --_K.! ')Q1 ~~." I !:no.> oIU I'll;.t ac;o , , .- I.. Ki !.:.,] r 'I'm.- DrUi, IIta..k tb. : r-:' i . Ii a.-. ?t'TEr. f\. HOfF'XANt, h. iotu.. Coqtyo~ I Cok--..k., "1 the flnt. par.. &DC: -"holl~ eddre.:s h: P.o. n.ut r..,.\:t~:._nlri FIr U:1 ot JULI../ .If n. M<' JQ.m of {X)NALD PAUL r.:RlfKoo: !oJ: 87t;. As~r.. r;Olnrlicir > JU,-:' PAID I"... c...." p,,,,,. ",,,to.,,, ':;'.:5~ ,CoJOI"&do.o!tM-...c!Jl4;rt. '--- ""lTNI:S!JrTR. n.a.: tbollU-l,.~~. ~ UK tilT. p&1"'., to~ .~ Ir. ~tlOIl or u... __ o! ttN DOLLlRS ('10.00) and uth., ""nd an' v,luab1. con"deratlon xJ!l!\~ i'.......,'.." y "."'"....."~....,_.,"".."P.,,y .frh._........._"."'_: I ""'nb, "'.r..... "" ~-....... h.. -.... ..,...... ~". ........ ... QUIT CLArnD. aM " ; th." p....". d. .. -'.. ........ "". .....,. "'" QUIT cU,/I< "'.. ... ..Id .... " '" ... _, ..n. /h'. "'n. n_N~'M """". '''''''. "'''' "&'h< ""', "'_ ,"'" ",,' -.., .h~h ... '"" ' 'p,,, " .r .... ,,"" p'" he . .. "" .. tho t,,,_,", d_bod "" K _, .f ""'" ....... ,,,., "" "bol.,;,... """""'" p'lk',. ""."."001......,...", I/n.. 'oat '!oj( I.., of Cot! ani th,. w." '.OC r..: of Lot C, >1o,l ,~. "It, an, TovrlliJ tf' of AJtper., 81611 , i I i II I ;i il r , f I , i I f: f! ~ Ii ,I I , I I TO HA V< OlD TO HaLO ... -- ........, """ ." an< "..'''~ tho "'-- ... """,-..._ I """- " .. u""," -.. _at... aa' .u tho ""., n&'he "tW. ,,_ ... rIoJa ."_" '" "" ...,..... " .'....."m..... ~11t"" I..., "'''r, .. "" "" '....' _ ....", ... :.- " ... ""I JI&rt y et Uw Mmnd P&r"l, hh A.lft Me: .......(0_'. IN "",,,rl'l~ W'HI:RJ;O,. 'fh. aUcI ~., ~ the rr,..t pan Iu. a.r-... 100( hh hue .... - .... dOT ~, - tin: ..... ""~. I M~l/ I I .~ ~ ~ ~"_""'_ _ i&VP!'1~;f'::'p ", . . v V r I ! .........-fetAL; ._r!lt;AL; t f I f j t'I'.t':'l. or COLOf.J.Dc, i.. i c...tt K ) !' ""--'--_"',n_... : "f..~:~.~~.!lo.!f:Tn H. 1.0f"FMAm', Jr. ." . ~ ~ I . . ~~...'-!...'I.. 1/./. ,U't ."'I"'layhM(..ett\dal~ ~.,' y- ~t h'~ _ 'Ih:~:~,\>~ I ..........'~ "- ._rUAL) ....[btA.!..) , ..,,, r~'< 'J'fl' ;= ,I ,-- II ~~~~ , ~ L I ,-_. , . I , Jrl.~ 11. Cltllr n",.ur Drn._.__...~ e... 1"_ ~ ...... t>-_. ~ . Il .;"" ---~- -- .-- ~ NO. >-'CERTIFICATE OF copy OF RECORD STATE OF COLORADO, ) County of pitkin 55. ;,::J L u 1.Y;f[}) e. e UU f.--u. and Recorder in and for said County. in the State afore aid. full. true and correct Copy of Reception #,d.o.~C;/I;:!.~. B )ok - u.,=f)C?/B/t/u. --- ..uu"-' ):s?p..L?....yu.. County Clerk do hereby c' :ti fy that the foregoing is a uS$Y.., Page uJ?f!..?.uuu as the same appears upon the records of my office. cfi. Given under my hand and o:Ticial seal. this .......d..7...~.uuuu...u. day 01 ../YlAi',QJ+. A.D ,~q,Kuuu. ..J.L;uL5uuo'c!ock ul+:~..uM uU' ... . . ...Juu..,K?:...,k~.................... County Clerk and Recorde r ." It ~5;J / J<)2 U /71iJ1 ~ Do !-oo / ;( cull u.5 ).. 7"35' 12.. Lt 7 0 D D ?.. lj.3 ~DO~ Le 't700D/ u SIt!' 7 ~OJi '1-"3 'S () J t:. ~ "T ,'rJ IJ J ~e 1- :3 .t;"J)--'L...~ . .J. JV~~.trr /J~ _ L-. '/2(.6 1.f-34;L)> ....;,:.. ,., ,~,~ r'; l ..\" .' COMMUNI-'\:Ev ElJPMENT .,.-.-- .------. Lf3(P~5"o ':J~/lovU BnJ 5vl~e/ ;J~ 5C/j"o/ ~f-jll~-I 0;l3S JI~J. J~ k/J If~/ L{) &it II Fr~l~t','J 13 ;!~r) )8C) W JI....i/~ 51 H~/ C. 6 f; /// 1/ . l.j-;lI007 . 't~ OD~ LIJ...~t ..N)) E)/l.-I~~ .L Nt>/~ ) Lj-~ &Je/l nlj-< IkW) J?/ Po,,, )0/;41Z 71 730 nlf7100 ~J~onY Ae-berT .J- i7l,,/)/~ Nt w ) }'1/~ )J. l3~slol"~ PI'" /VP/.,1.. $/ IT..-m; 1 FL 3 31g / _ '-+J... } 00 3 _ .n. (t3~/f- n/:) J "-V/~ H-. jI~ Jr-<:~ J I) 0 5. .y.rIA.J 1t )~l ~6 q/~ 1/ t~ IfI'L-IUL ;J tt.rf4.J; f)/; 'I fD/I. +~ LI~)".tt /lJvj tf) I!ri dC-S-s. _ . flN11- ~ tI~ j re.. ;jt!'~,. f--:~ _.._ 3...2 0 8~ Lf"~J ()O~ (,1"If. tJ,,/;) &N:JDrJ {) ,F-".W,'/l J 1;< '-t-<g .JUJ.^ G.Jf (J) yJ t)/IlA.-L. 1)Jtf3 6E>ls 7 ;'/7 -; 7 b 7 2>) 3~()) f{cJ IJ/~ JJ-J t..-It-) '/ J-~ ) 10 5. &al~A. #- 11 ~ I {tP 151t, II J.j14~SJ .. (13~/.I. -y &1 ver. hsl, I~ ;{~ j Llnl'l/&~~! ~J~/'J# /Jp'l.-/k/ ?D tAl" :z~) 1AJ111,~ L >&p,u'/1 f t) ;8 rX 1-).. 7Lf /l-- ~ ?l5 f51t, /.2 ;1.7'3707131 (PO()2. ( I<rw-.....~^Ii __..31 (.,ffo I ... ( ).(; ...,.,. ,,^ 'Y 4~ ?-tl7nRl~.'h Iin,'tJ;1l..d.it4-1 dvJ.. )J~ N IJ~ 51 ;J~/ a fJl.? // .__3'~fl'O -3 J!:>-O() I k~/".;f 5 .r J:1t~ l() 54---/1&,. f50 I );Z II )- ~ .s 5 fy: '1-06 Nl4f/~ '/ ; ~ "33'1 $LD .' ?v 737 01 . 3;500;< '} J~t;o 3 r;. 735)J.. _ 4-'370)/ _ _ Lf~7oc>tt Lj- 3 7 t>8~ u'13700S- ~"-') [: 11:.-/1/1 .511.5 o-n W hilA /{.5-o5 4y~/ J//". .T11,l/~""/tJ/...~/ 1-#' lft,,26D 11U>Jcc f}' jf A ~-/ J / (er rl'~' fll If/'/l~ "'-::>4..d/<i T,I.(.~/.:-~ 101' ~/~~)l ,4 '>:J/~/ ~~ c //<-;.57 I 0 ~n c21Q;f Il ~I L 2) B/t;./~ C- ..-?l.5 f- d4I c..e ;J1 333 13. ~<E{11 )vtw 7..".k/ N / ;le.J ue- + .5f /00:2.../ &5 tv FHrI;~ k....rIj~ J.. T)7 h/f~e/.sjyY 12. f) rI=.J. 1307 ) / D WA(;~/;~/ W Vel" O()3 )..ex-/'-e iJ/DJe.v4..> 77/7<- Fif)r:r .r~/.-.J f}, ;::>;'/e:/ L/~ FL d3/l) 1-06 t. AJ~tN;1l GfO~5~ Il~vo~ ~ik l"i,!> !;-".11 ~ A WI ~ J: <:f- f}J-t}h ~ /ll r/u sl-<<:.r / po E_ I.J/r-e/<wt ~ j~/ L-D <BIt-II' . . .. 4'37Do~ !. . . 't3700J l i l . .... , . ...137002- ( de., J. "/I? ) t . , l ~ , ..4-37~o/ (Kr---~'J . '- L L /a./ /JLvl ~ /1l. 1.<./1"" d ti>v ..]:/1.::..... /0 /(e/'~/f S'. 54'fhn, ~ [) I J~ g ~ vr::: ..5 ..>Ie f"O() IV,,/k,//,c1. 531 'TD !{lcJ~r) or /lJ~/1/A..~ JnJf Jd/lJ-. ~1?2o 13/',..l6~'y IJA-! I"V Tx 7S ,2,)0 f}trn "'/,( 1~lA./ kr """'''''' I 0 1ft??! $ 7'7 hf1h'r ~!) ~/~/;) j))""" A'-I') ~ 5.f~v~ 8,--~) ..( / D E. J) /?l "'" ;J rl/ 4t~? ;J~/ ? 0 fflt /1 3363 GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS, L.L.C. 210 E. HYMAN AVE.. SUITE 202 ASPEN. CO 81611 (970) 925-5968 ALPINE BANK ASPEN. CO 81611 82-340/1021 4/6/98 PAY TO THE ORDER OF I $ **105.00 City of Aspen Community Development One HwuJred Five and 00/100**'" *.*... ** **... **...... **... **......... **...... ***... **...... *** **** *****...... **......... ***... ** ** *** **... *** ***...... *** ** ******......... * City of Aspen Community Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO. 8161l MEMO Bush/Krumm 11'003 3b 311' I: ~o 2 ~o 31,0 71: 20 20003 5 ~ loll' DOLLARS A Securityl88lure5 W:OObact .. GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS, L.L.C. 210 E. HYMAN AVE.. SUITE 202 ASPEN. CO 81611 (970) 925-5968 ALPINE BANK ASPEN. CO 81611 82-34011021 4/6/98 3362 " '" PAY TO THE ORDER OF City of Aspen Community Development I $ **105.00 ~, One Hundred Five and OOII 00******************************************************************.*************.**********. City of Aspen Comnllmity Development 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO. 816ll MEMO Bush 11'003 3b 211' I: ~o 2 ~o 31,0 71: 20 20003 5 ~ loll' DOLLARS toSeclJrilyfealur8s i_ t Oetllilsonbaclt ..