HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.647 Monarch St.005-90
v. '"
.'
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
.
DATE LI- J ~ 1910 CASE #
APPLICANT DOLLJ'~ llen_ .-- PHONE c~ 07..)'- ~gc)O
MAILING ADDRESS_ S:>O C; (vlu(/)d..s{"CYl" LCJ 'i?:/b/J
OWNER Pe.Te..r C.A.",rv...r PHONE S 0)'-/)'3> ~(;';)'6<r
MAILING ADDRESS PO GD,.. ~ IS r.=.5 rCA.f"O/ e. fUeu...J N@:>..c/(O
LOCATION OF PROPERTY G4 7 1'1 ufl 0. r< h
(Street, Block Number and Lot Number)
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES V NO_ DOlA.."\ f.i \ \ f? n
============================================================~====
Below, please describe clearly, the proposed variance, including all
dimensions, and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and any
other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this
application, and will be made part of this case.
">e..~ a..,~'-'-L\-,..,J 1",-T1"<? ( ,
Applicant's signatu
;;~~;;-;~;-~~~-~~-~~-;;;;N~--;;~;,~~;f ;;~id,.~~~~~~~;,
CHAPTER 24. AN OPINION CONCERNING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE PRESENTED
TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF.
,. " /' .
(' . ^ Cttto.-c0~ d .
:vQ
f
DATE PERMIT DENIED AilaKL.. ~ q d
DATE OF APPLICATION if/I (1 /7()
I '
~
OFFICIALj}JJ .0.,(G-I1
HEARING DATE
.
"~ ,
~JL{;~i~ ~lkc (.J~~ LC ,,::... -*l", i/T I~ ^
\; ''1' c.,.. 'I I
'~ '2dvv,-,~ (. Cc~~ "Io~. . \ .Ju,""'-~'-~r& ~L-r -19(" "J "-
fbC()"l;<.J.I (~* \oC\.;CI/.> C^-u. F nhv-- \r- \ ~ c; '- L~ t;,tt \Lx C~/l , 10 . ~~ .
c4tot- C--Ll' ~~ ; - 2} ~ (I? )~~ ~4)8 C~).
~'-'/L -ek \r ~ ~ ~~ (tu-rz~t.L 3> ~~ .
(f\5~~~~~( lliU ~CC~~~C~)
m~wlLeo--,__'(- C\jtQ/uC ~ h J'Ulr'o~
C01:1u++n1\L'ML l.\rlA& ~!<- le.Nk~~
.~ . 1. c, C'tr~.vV'\llv;' -X_^"..-t)'telc\.L O\,/W'e---_.V;tL.R...rt'--- J' (k
l?:).2.?r -C-\- ~ Y~1.J ~C~-- \';'CU k VC~~.
. ~~ ~ 0- c.tic.L-~ ~J1AO-c' e\..(A~0~S:i.k
(J) 1. ,"2. \:"C ~ <; L ~.~ '1 CVll $ L t ~~'-.L k t )C~~'--
~ G.- c{J'l~ ~A)Ct.ett.!~>du.lt~:dt,
. ~. '4- 'CiJjb'lM-/H~Ob7.tc6;K.
~ CL'.,~ -1e +--00 '" b~""",,'c.;jri eLL.>
/~)
t& Cl -Gc ~^ o. Lu
VC\JtA..v...,. u-e.e'l..-,
~lJ\{,\.iJ\.Jol( / ~
. .. .k~~O-"-<l-L~}0Vl&.
VJ1<' It ~ ~
. J \)8 ~t..~,J b'l
6 + , ~ I\.,lt~e.e '1'>. J fts L_
)'. ~ <1~
-
,'-",,",
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE #90-S
PETER CANTRUP
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapt~r 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, you are urged to state
your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such
variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meetinq:
Date:
Time:
May 3, 1990
4:00 p.m.
Owner for Variance:
Appellant for Variance:
Name: Peter Cantrup Doug Allen
Address: PO Bx 38
Espanole, New Mexico
Location or description of property: 647 Monarch
Variance Requested: Property is located in the L/TR zoning
category. Required setbacks are Front 10ft, Side Sft, Rear,
10ft. Chapter 24 See S-21S(D) (3) (4) & (S). Corner 10t rule
applies, Article 3 also. (Aspen Land Use Regulations)
Applicant appears to be requesting:
#1. 1.1 foot rear yard setback variance for a column
encroachment on west side.
#2. 2.8 foot side yard setback variance for a column
encroachment on east side.
#3. 1.2 foot side yard setback variance for a column
encroachment on south side
#4. Appeals to two administrative decisions
#S. A wall height variance varying between .S feet and 3 feet.
Maximum wall height is 6 foot. (Article 3, Aspen Land Use
Regulations)
will applicant be represented bv counsel:
Yes: X
No:
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney Deputy City Clerk
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
DATE L'-J~ 1910
APPLICANT DOLL.' -Ii II e n
- J .- _ A,
MAILING ADDRESS_ S J, 0 C; ,-1", 1/)
OWNER P....Tt"f Cl.\.Y"Iiru.f>
MAILING ADDRESS PO \:'0,.. ~ IS
CASE #
PHONE C~ q"l)'- Sdc)O
.-
4..s,.-,CYl: {O 'i?:/bl/
PHONE S 0')--7 5-3> -(;,)'6~(
r.= .5pCA.f"V/e, ILJeu..; N@:>../Co
LOCATION OF PROPERTyL~17 l'1u.,c<Y-< h
(Street, Block Number and Lot Number)
WILL YOU BE REPRESENTED BY COUNCIL? YES (../ NO_ DtX''":l f.i \ \ <? n
============================================================--====
Below, please describe clearly, the proposed variance, including all
dimensions, and justification for the variance. (Additional paper
may be used if necessary.) The building permit application and any
other information you feel is pertinent should accompany this
application, and will be made part of this case.
c a..-r-"'~Lh..,J 1",-1"'''''' r
)~~
Applioant'" Siqnatll 1/ 0;; ~.
;;~;~~;-;~;-~~;~-~~-~;~~-I~~--;E-;;;!!!:!s;f~~'1!1&~~~d~:r~~~; ,
CHAPTER 24. AN OPINION CONCERNING THIS VARIANCE WILL BE PRESENTED
TO THE BOARD BY THE ZONING DEPARTMENT STAFF.
DATE PERMIT DENIED
OFFICIAL
DATE OF APPLICATION
HEARING DATE
April 18, 1990
Francis Krizmanich
Senior Planner
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Francis,
Nasser Sadeghi, Doug Allen and Davis Horn Inc. represent Peter
cantrup. Peter is in the process of constructing a duplex located
at 647 South Monarch. We are seeking variances for four separate
items and appealing administrative decisions regarding two other
items. Each of the requests are described below.
1 - Rear Yard Setback Variance (Refer to Figure 1 Item #1)
The Subject building is located on the corner of Gilbert and
Monarch Streets. Monarch Street is contiguous with the front yard
and Gilbert Street is the side yard. The rear yard setback in the
L-2 zone is 10 feet. An existing structural/architectural column
encroaches 1.1 feet within the required rear yard setback. The
applicant is requesting a().l foot rear yard setback variance.
The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals and objectives and policies of the Aspen Area
comprehensive Plan and the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The
proposed variance will not impede the realization of the goals,
objectives and policies of the Plan, nor be inconsistent with the
intent of the Regulations.
The variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the structure.
Robert Pattillo P.E. indicated in a November 20, 1989 letter to
Nasser Sadeghi that the new columns on the east and west sides of
the building are necessary for the structural support of the second
and third floors (refer to attachment 1). Furthermore, Sadeghi
believes that a 12 inch architectural projection should be allowed
since the column has great aesthetic value.
Granting of the requested variance will not result in any special
privileges for the applicant. Any property owner may request a
variance and the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance based
upon special circumstances affecting a parcel or structure.
2 - Front Yard Setback Variance (Refer to Figure 1 Item #2)
The front yard setback in the L-2 zone is 10 feet. An existing
structuraljarchi tectural column encroaches t. 8 feet within the
required front yard setback. The applicant is requesting a 4.8
foot front yard setback variance.
The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals and objectives and policies of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan and the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The
proposed variance will not impede the realization of the goals,
objectives and pOlicies of the Plan, nor be inconsistent with the
intent of the Regulations.
The variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the structure.
Robert Pattillo P.E. indicated in a November 20, 1989 letter to
Nasser Sadeghi that the new columns on the east and west sides of
the building are necessary for the structural support of the second
and third floors (refer to attachment 1). Furthermore, Sadeghi
believes that a 12 inch architectural projection should be allowed
since the column has great aesthetic value.
Granting of the requested variance will not result in any special
privileges for the applicant. Any property owner may request a
variance and the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance based
upon special circumstances affecting a parcel or structure.
3 - South Side Yard Setback variance (Refer to Figure 1 Item # 3)
'.
The side yard setback in the L-2 zone district is 5 feet. There
is an existing structural column on the south side of the building
which encroaches 1.2 feet within the side yard setback. The
applicant is requesting a 1.2 foot side yard setback variance. The
structural column is part of a party wall which separates the two
dwelling units within the duplex and supports glass skylights
located on the top floor. The structural column was approved by
the Aspen-Pitkin Building and Zoning Departments on plans stamped
February 9, 1989. The applicant constructed the column in
compliance with approved plans. It would be a severe hardship for
the applicant to remove the column which complies with approved
plans.
The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals and objectives and policies of the Aspen Area
comprehensive Plan and the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The
proposed variance will not impede the realization of the goals,
objectives and policies of the Plan, nor be inconsistent with the
intent of the Regulations.
The variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the structure.
The applicant constructed the structural column based upon plans
approved by the Building and Zoning Departments. The applicant
relied upon the approved plans. Removal of the column would result
in an unnecessary hardship not created by the applicant.
Furthermore, in a December, 22, 1989 letter from Robert Pattillo,
to Nasser Sadeghi, Pattillo indicates that the column is "required
structurally to support these new tube beams from the third floor
beams below" (refer to attachment 2).
Granting of the requested variance will not result in any special
privileges for the applicant. Any property owner may request a
variance and the Board of Adjustment may grant a variance based
upon special circumstances affecting a parcel or structure.
4 - East and West Side Fence/Wall Height Variance (Refer to Figure
2 Item #4)
The existing fence/walls on the east and west sides of the site
exceed the height limitation between .5 and 3 feet at 6 separate
locations. The applicant requests a 3 foot height variance for
the walls.
The grant of the variance will be generally consistent with the
purposes, goals and objectives and policies of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan and the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The
proposed variance will not impede the realization of the goals,
objectives and policies of the Plan, nor be inconsistent with the
intent of the Regulations.
The variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the structure.
Granting of the requested variance will not result in any special
privileges for the applicant. In fact, the fence/wall on the
subject site is lower than the fence/wall on the neighboring site.
Any property owner may request a variance and the Board of
Adjustment may grant a variance based upon special circumstances
affecting a parcel or structure.
5 - North Fence Walls Appeal of Administrative Decision (Refer to
Figure 1 Item # 5)
Two fence walls have been constructed around the trash areas on the
property line contiguous with the south side of Gilbert street.
The walls are constructed of concrete and faced with irregularly
shaped rocks. Several rocks encroach .1 - .2 feet within the
Gilbert Street right-of-way. The staff has required the applicant
to either shave off the ends of the rocks or seek relief from the
Board of Adjustment. The applicant is appealing the
administrative decision because the literal interpretation of the
Regulations creates a hardship for the applicant.
-_.._.._..~-----~
6 - North Side Yard Setback Appeal of Administrative Decision
(Refer to Figure 1 Item # 6)
Since the subject site is a corner lot, the north side yard setback
is 6.6 feet (Gilbert street). An architectural projection on the
north side yard projects .88 feet into the side yard setback.
Section 24-3.7 of the Municipal Code permits architectural
projections to project 1 foot within the side yard setback.
The Staff has made an administrative decision that the setback
encroachment is not an architectural projection. We request the
Board of Adjustment to reconsider the administrative decision.
On December 19, 1988 Doug Allen, Peter Cantrup's attorney, met with
Fred Gannett and Bill Dreuding to discuss the architectural
projections on the north side of the building. Attachment 3 is a
December, 23 1988 letter from Doug Allen to Fred Gannett and Bill
Dreuding summarizing their December 19 meeting. The attachment
documents that Gannett and Dreuding agreed at the meeting that the
drains on the north side are architectural projections and will be
allowed. The applicant proceeded with plans to construct the
architectural projections in reliance upon attachment 3. Removal
of the architectural projection at this time will create a
significant hardship for the applicant.
On behalf of the applicant we request that you consider this
application for relief from the Board of Adjustment. We will be
happy to supply any additional information which may be required.
The applicant and his representatives would like to thank the city
staff for assisting us in resolving the numerous difficulties
associated with this project.
Sincerely,
~.:Z:::;S~0/J~
Nasser Sade<rhi
/l /?;y}I}
6--tI;~f1: (Y!~
Dou'y"llen .
, <JtLV\-
Glenn Horn
cc: Peter Cantrup
Krizmanich
~.;
.,..-... ..
,. , ~ .
LAW OFFICES OF
, Dougla" P. Allen
COURTHOUSE PLAZA BUilDING
S30 EAST MAIN STREET. FmST FLOOR
ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1
(303) 925,8800
DOUGLAS P. ALLEN
KAREN L. WULC
December 23, 1988
IFRED:-GANNET~
City Attorney
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
tMr-:"" Bill..,
Zoning Of
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Hearst Duplex
'To Whom It May Concern:
^ \--",,0(\1
0" <-^-l- "'5
This will confirm our'mee~ingocof-December-19,__1988~coll(,l" "ing the
above property covered by Building Permit No. 10095. The
rOl~owing~matter~wer~addressed~and-reso1ved_at_tha~eet;ng:
1. Documentation 'was presented concerning the
height of the building in form of three
sheets of drawings prepared by Aspen Survey
Engineers and labeled Sheets 2, 3 and 4 of 4,
dated December 9, 1988, as well as three
photographs of the property reflecting the
site conditions, one in 1968 and two from the
year 1976. The survey certification was made
part of the file as were the three
photographs. They reflect tha t the bUilding
in its present state of construction
satisfies the height limitations of the Aspen
City Code.
2. The chimney flues shown on a previously
.submitted drawing to extend beyond the
masonry shown on the three sheets of the
Aspen Survey Engineers drawings of December
9, 1988 must be eliminated. The chimney cap
will not more than two inches higher than
the existing masonry as shown on the Aspen
Survey Engineers drawings of December 9,
1988.
3. The drains shown in the architectural
projection8~n~thQ~north side of the elevator
tower;~' having"'been placed there' mere1Y-'for
ponvenienc_ll.lfJr'e"'X'esul t' of the' archi tectur'al
F ^)( f303J g ~ 5.9 3 go
/
/,...
. .
Mr. Fred Gannett
Mr. Bill Drueding
~mber-~, 1988
Page 2
rt- 4.
~jecL.r......--n-a~"",".lJ:owed"l
The fire..,escape~ shown, on PagBJ>_4-,--~..and 6 of i
the October 24, 19B8"architec,~raY.J:,sipn-ofT
Fhe plans, shall ~e-~~lL~lna~ed. ----
The architect will submit revisions to the plans as required to
reflect the above changes.
Very truly yours,
Douglas P. Allen
DPA/pkm
Enclosures - 3 pictur~9
,
Aspen Board of Adjustment
Aspen City Hall
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Members of the Board of Adjustment:
April 29, 1990
,.
I am ]01n1ng the Applicant in the Height Variance Request for the
Fence Wall on the West of Applicant's Property, being the Easter-
ly Property Line of my Property and state as follows:
1. Fence Wall Issue
a. The Subject Fence Wall Height affects only the Ap-
plicant and myself.
b. views from Gilbert Street into the Property are not
effected by a Height Variance as the Fence Wall portion on
Gilbert Street is in compliance.
c~ The height of the Fence Wall is the minimum height
required to keep snow and ice from falling onto Applicant's
Property from my three story high roof.
d. Last winter's (1988-89) buil~up was clear to the top of
the Fence Wall as now constructed.
e. Any lower Fence wall will require me to mitigate this
condition by the construction of a Roof Top Fence retaining the
ice from falling down and onto Applicant's Property.
f. Applicant and myself have reached an agreement that the
present wall height as constructed is acceptable to all parties.
2. Balcon~SuPPort Column: 0.1 Foot into 10' Setback.
I am in favor of a Variance allowing said Balcony Support Column
to protrude into the required 10' Setback on the Westerly side of
Applicant's Property.
3. In general terms, I am in favor of all of the variances
sought by Applicant, and urge the Board to allow Applicant to
complete the building without any further delay.
Z~8
~
~ 5J~rd~
Howard B. Awrey
>~
".
---
'-.....J
AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
P.O. BOX 827
ASPEN. COLORADO 81 61 2
(303) 925.1 441
May 1, l,;",U
CASe ~9o-S-
Board of Adjustments
city of Aspen
130 S. Galena street
Aspen, colorado 81611
Dear Sirs:
This wall should not need a variance at all!
We feel the wall in question meets the intent of the Code, namely
allowing the property owner to have a 6' minimum high fence around
his property and allowing such a wall to be stepped up on a steep
grade in keeping with the horizontal lines of design of the project
itself. and that of the neighboring properties. '
No expense has been spared on this well designed project that
is a welcome addition ,to this neighborhood.1
-
t
.
"
.
i
J
]
~
.
J
.
.
L
j
,
I
I
.~
.
r
J
"
I
i
]
I
l
Si?/:Y, BoL-
A"'~('-7 a7~f-
jl/z..-t<.-<!- ~ja .#<,;.. ';;"M.5
~
~.
.. ...
/'
...........
"'-.....
Hr. Alan Bush
For AJ!\n and Steven flush
210 EaHt Hyman # 7
Aspen, CO 81611-2912
30,1 - 9 25 -124 c\
Hay 2, J990
City of Aspen Co~nissiorlers
Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CU 81611
RE: Case # 90 - 5
Dear Cummissioners Dnd Board Members:
1 heeeby support the applicant, Mr. Peter Cantrup, in his
application for variances and administrative actions. As the
closest neig'hbor, Co-owner of Silver Shadow Condo # 104, 651
South ~tonarch, and as a 10 year resident of Aspen, I believe
that my support of the applicant warrants serious evaluation by
J'OU.
,
Mr. Cantrup has been extra-ordinarily couperative and sensitive
to every concern J or our Condo Association have expressed. He
has desig'ned and built It balanced, beautiful structure that 1
be I i eves comp 1 i es with every INTENT of the zoning and code
ordinarlces I am aware of.
.'
He has spent hours go ing over the de ta i I s of
our propert~. Today, he discussed his variance
with me. As I have been out of town, we
earl ieI'. I bel ieve that in every instance,
warranted.
every impact to
request to you,
could not meet
a variance is
In particular, the Monarch Street "stepped wall" is very much
in keeping wi th the Archi tecture and Character of the Street.
It is also in proper scale. Most importantly, lowering it
would expose the unsightly electrical transformer and allow
passcr-bys to glance directly into the ground level rooms.
By stepping the wall, he has keep the proper street level look.
Lowering it, or requiring a continuous slope would be VERY
'disruptive to the architecture 9f the building and the
character of the street.
The other variances are so minor and open to al ternative
interpretat ions that they also should be granted. Forcing
~
these small changes would create no real DISCERNIBLE BENEFIT to
the City of Aspen and the neighboring properties and would cost
a great deal. Such No-win:Lose situations should be avoided.
"
...,-.
Let. me conclude by adding that I hope that you consider the
RESULTS and Ihe BENEFITS of any actions you do take, and NOT
JUST the LETTER of the codes and ordinances. If the INTENT of
such laws is to create equality and prevent abuses, then I
believe that it is clear that INSIGNIFICANT and benefit-less,
but costly revisions simply add to the divisiveness this
community is t.rying to put behind us.
Your charter could be
public. I believe that
both by granting these
refine" the ambiguities
the first place.
said to be to "Protect and Serve"
this is one instance ,,-here you can
appropriate variances and continuing
that may have lead to this situation
the
do
to
in
~
Sincerely,
/~~
Alan Bush
For Alan an~ Steven Bush
AB:ad
~
ANGUS- CAMPBELL INC.
INDUSTRIAL PLASTICS
TECHNICAL ELECTRICAL MATERIAL
4417 S, SOTO STREET, VERNON (LOS ANGELES), CA 90056 . (213) 587-1236' FAX: (213) 588.7816
MA y 3, 1990
JAN CARNEY-CITY CLERK
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, COLORADO
RE: ZONING VARIANCE, CASE ~90-6
DEAR MS. CARNEY,
WITH REGARDS TO,THE ABOVE REFERENCED CASE, WE AS OWNERS
OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 919 WATERS AVENUE IN ASPEN, OB-
JECT TO THE PROPOSED VARIANCE. SUCH A VARIANCE WILL ~REATE
A PUBLIC HAZARD AND POSE AN AESTHETIC NUISANCE. WE APPLAUD
THE PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH EMPLOYEE HOUSING IN THE PROPOSED
STRUCTURE; HOWEVER, WE BELIEVE THIS CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH-
OUT THE GRANTING OF THE PROPOSED VARIANCE IN A MORE AESTHETIC
AND SAFE MANNER THAN THTS' PROgOSAL.
RESPECTFULLY,
/J;u. 'f"/Ik; ~ {-
MR. & MRS. KENNETH CAMPBELL
919 WATERS AVENUE
John and Frank Dolinsek
, .0. Box 275
"Aspen, Colorado 81612
[".,
'.. -'"
Board of Adjustment
City of Aspen
130 s. Galena street
Aspen, Colorado 81612
R.E. Case# 90-5
Gentlemen:
This letter is to formally state our full support for
the variance application being sought by Cantrup.
We live directly North of the project in question and
have strong feelings that it should remain as built currently.
It is a well designed building and to require the owner to
remove large sections we feel would ruin the outside look.
The balcony columns are very pleasing aesthetically and are
needed for support.
The fence wall in question looks perfectly fine to us, and
cutting down the wall at the set up points will serve no
practical value.
Thank you for the opportunity to express our concerns as
we are located immediately adjacent and are strongly
impacted by this new project~
'Sincerely yours, ~
;ohn Dolinsek ~!'~J CJL~~I ,
Frank DOlln"k ~~~ ~~~
1'25"- )3f2
>
I
DOLOMITE VILLAS OF ASPEN
I
Your townhoult on A.;ax Mountain.
April 28, 1990
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Dear Commission Members:
We are in receipt of a Board of Adjustment Notice for the 647 Monarch Townhouses,
1. Fence Heil!ht on Monarch Street
The Dolomite Units are located directly across the street from the subject. We would like to take
the opportunity to ioin the Applicant and request a minimal fence wall height adjustment for the following
reasons:
It appears that the intermillent step-up of the wall when a steep gracd is involved (a condition
not addressed in the Code) would justify an adjustment in maximum height based on a practical
difficulty encountered at the step-up points (hil!h points) in order to maintain a 6' minimum
height at the low Doints, so pedestrians on the sidewalk cannot look into the bedroom
windows, The step-up design is in our opinion far more aesthetically pleasing and Iits well
with similar walls approved on adjacent properties, than trying to meet the 6' maximum by
a wall following the grade in a parallel line.
}
A portion of the wall on the upper Monarch St. side of the Property, where a height adjustment
would be very benelicial is where a large utility transformer is situated on grade and hidden
behind said wall screening it from public view,
Finally, it should be noted that the front 12' of said wall along Monarch St. and 9' along Gilbert Sl.
are only 5' high, allowing pedestrian view into the open/green space, especially on the narrow Gilbert
St. side,
2, The rock column supporting, dividing and screening the third Ooor balcony should be considered as
part of the allowed balcony projection of 3'4" into the 10' setback, therefore requiring no variance,
3, In summary, we feel the project to be a very pleasing addition to the neighborhood on a non-
conforming, difficult site, We strongly recommend the minor variances be granted as sub milled by
the applicant.
4. Thi'; '~p.lt~~r is ':~'[it~~.,~ tr: go on record in fp.vor of a variance as requested because I am out of lawn
0;:"1 tb: d~te ("~' "".,Jrj';g and ',1/(Hlld otht'r',I.:isc appear in person.
Thank you, , 1" //~
/{U-/ cflL-
'f0({ U"IO"", 0.<1 c,...- 1; '^" ((o..l.{
650 South Monarch Street · Aspen, Colorado 81611 · (303) 925-7624
....."'...
L1LLlCK & McHOSE
101 WEST BROADWAV, SUITE leoo
SAN OIE:GO, CA~\FOR""IA 92101
TE..EPI-IONE (6191 23"'~SOOO
IRA S. \..llllCK (Ie7S~1967l
A PARTNERSHIP lNC..UDING PROFESSIONA" CORPORATIONS
CA6i..!:S ....ll..ICKMCI-IOSE"
INTeRNATIONAL TElEX-47 2.0401
TELECOPIER l213) 629-1033
ATTORNEYS AT L-AW
725 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET
SUITE 1200
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-2513
TELEPHONE (213) 488-7100
W""TER'S DIRECT OIA.. NUMBER
(213) 488-7111
May 1, 1990
The City of Aspen
Board of Adjustment
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Attention: Chairman, Remo Lavagnino
Re: Public Hearing Case No. 90-5 Peter Cantrup
Hearing Date: May 3, 1990, 4 p.m.
Gentlemen:
I only recently received a notice of the above pub-
lic hearing. I request that the hearing be continued so that
my views can be presented in person and/or additional time
allowed for me to resolve matters in dispute with this
proj ect.
On behalf of myself, and on behalf of one of my
neighbors, Robert Green (owners of two of the four units in
the adjacent building, 651 Monarch), we oppose the requested
variances.
During planning, before construction, during con-
struction, and after the building was almost completed, we
attempted to contact the developer, Hans Cantrup. ~o one
responded to our many efforts to find out exactly what was
planned and why the project was going up in a fashion that
appeared to us to be in violation of zoning requirements.
Specifically, it appeared the bu{lding was too high and too
close. We hired a civil engineer who investigated the mat-
ter, and he reported that individuals in the building depart-
ment would not discuss the matter, except to say there were
various zoning and use regulation violations. We were also
informed that by choosing the particular design shown on the
permit applications, this project was able to be built to a
height in excess of our building, despite the fact this
building sits at a lower elevation. Hans Cantrup also built
our building, and he built our building as tall as he could.
Therefore, it's inconceivable that he could lawfully build
the subject building higher than our building, despite the
fact it sits at a lower elevation.
.
The City of Aspen
May 1, 1990
Page Two
This past December, 1989, I observed construction
work going on and finally reached someone with knowledge
about the project. It was Peter Cantrup, the son of Hans
Cantrup. Peter told me that there were numerous problems
with the project, and various violations, and that he knew
nothi~ about them. He said it was his father's project. He
simply came down from (I believe) New Mexico to help out with
construction over the holidays. I'm therefore surprised to
see that the public hearing lists Peter Cantrup, rather than
Hans Cantrup, as the builder.
Part of the subject building has actually been con-
nected to our building, without our permission or approva~
A sheltered walkway to the building's utility panel requires
access across our property to gain access to the utility
panel. Without our approval they have been utilizing various
utility outlets inside our underground garage, and there have
been various cables connected from our garage to this project
during construction. Our efforts to inquire as to the status
of what has been going on were unsuccessful.
In summary, the building is too close to our build-
ing and, we beli2ve, actually encroaches on our property
lines. Both sides of the building stick out too far and
because of this we have obstructed views of Red Mountain as
well as the City. The violations should be enforced and the
building reduced to lawful size and setbacks. For the fore-
going reasons, we oppose the variances requested and suggest
that Mr. Cantrup, or someone representing the developer, com-
municate with us to try and resolve our various disputes with
him over this project.
If you wish to discuss any of the matters set forth
above, please call me at my office (213) 488-7111 and I will
be happy to respond. If there is inadequate time for you to
evaluate this matter for the scheduled hearing on May 3, we
request a continuance so that we may discuss the matter fur-
ther with your staff and possibly with Mr. Cantrup. Thank
you for your attention in this matter.
Sincerely, '\';
, ( ,/ ( ",\
, ~L-..-\.-~- \l.
Kenneth R. Chiate
cc: Robert Green
017:LTR0274D90 0430901\.
Mc~TNEY
PROPERTY
:-t A NAG E MEN T
BUILDING 421, SUITE G
ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER
ASPEN, COLORA[X) 81611
TELEPHONE, 303-925-8717
FAX, 303'920-4770
,~
...<.....
May 2, 1990
City Board of Adjustments
City of Aspen
City Hall
130 S. Galena St.
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Case # 90-5
To Whom It May Concern:
..
Today I had the oppo~tunity to meet with Mr. Peter
Cantrup at the property in question, #647 S.
Monarch. Of the three issues we discussed, 1)
rock wall height, 2) stone column balcony support
setback issue, 3) other minor 1 to 2 inch
intrusions into setbacks, I support the granting of
a variance for these issues. By my inspection, I
believe that the building, as is, is an asset to
the neighborhood and these minor technical
infractions of the code have no negative impact on
our property.
Sincerely,
e~::r
Managing Agent
Telemark Condominium Association
611 S. Monarch
Aspen, CO 81611
"
CM/jp
or..
PATTILLO ASSOCIATES
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
.-.~. . .... ...... ..
&. r - '~..A (F"J'I
'I,..
," .:'~i i ....~:. !.;':',
" ....
,"-:;;._,',J.
'4 . .~.,
. p ". ~. . _"":":"i t,
/\ \Iete h (Y'\ Q- ,-
I
"::}.::::'.
"i, .,....:.... -.1
~. "
,."
Mr. ,Nasser ',Sadeghi
',' "P~O:'Box' 758"
'Aspen, Colorado 81612
.;';.'
RE: HEARST DUPLEX ("THE CASCADES")
'Project 1187132
Dear Nasser:
As-reque-s t edT-personnel-or-t:hrs~6f free-have comple tecfl:a-f-ina 1,
frallling_evaluat.i-o~ ovthe-...gubject-buildin~. The as -built
structural condi tions, including modifications made to our most
recent framing plans (1/9/89), have been reviewed. Our
conclusions are presented herein.
Verification of the major framing elements (joists, beams, and
columns), and their locations, sizes, and spans was confirmed on
three separate ~. v'sits in late October and early November by
our personnel. Mos elements correspond to our original design
specification xcept for a few variations with column
locations, especially at the sub-basement and entry levels.
Gravity loads have been retraced through the building framework,
from roof to foundation level, and all major support elements
reanalyzed.
Due to the field modifications, certain columns needed to be
added (f irst level framing, line 9) and certain beams needed to
be strengthened (entry level framing, line 9; ,first level
framing, lines 8 and 9). The structural framing plans dated
November 15, 1989, which accompany this letter, reflect the as-
built conditions and show the additional details required to
provide a safe and adequate,structure. The Bui-lding Depart~ent
should utilize these plans to verify the as-built structural
condi tions. The drawings have been sealed wi th my Professional
Engineer's stamp and signature. -
"It area-on....each _bui.ldi ng-end..,was~lIlod if ied::::,by :,: the....addttfon"'rof'-a
pew, ,col.~ On.,,,both,,,,the~east 'andwestexterior-.walh; ,--a.-stone-
;ou;apped...,..uppar.t.....walL,exists,~near".l..ine-IIC,l' . "JI.:"'Steel", pipe-column'!'
yaxists within~the'-wall_cavity' there which supportsHthe'"balcony-
..framin9-.on-the-second-and~third - floor. ,As-framea7the sa-columns'
),.re...neces sary"'f or-the-s tructur al,...su pport'" of -'those':"'fIbcii s .
....1' )
PO oox 751 . '~LENWOOO SPRINGS. COLORADO G 1 602 . (303) 9.a5-9695
.:....; ."
"
,) ',I1ea'rst Duplex
November 20, 1989
7 Page two
, ,
..~(j::J.~,~'~ ,': ..: "", ~ .'
. ~'.".
"',:"~t:lier mOj:ir-f1C~t:lo~:firSh~n-;ca.~" the ,r:o~f:,fr aJIling~pl~,- f'long-;the
, ,.ou.th-;and...west;!;.\sides~( aJ.so"'on.."the~ east::+Wall.,~of: "'-the ,. eas t~ unt to) .
' 2'" - :;~,8"'i;D~overhang-of-t:h~Overhelld ~ g laz i rig. requi res.,the~ su ppO'r:,t
pf._a""s tee l._tube""e-l-eme n t-,-a 5-" the-;, third -:f loor7wall ~ha s!:Iiibeen'
lFe10ca ted"Ttback<T,t~the~setl:ia:elc'!rlin~-;= TWo -tCO 1 linn"'; lemen ts~a t ,.each";
.unit-musb,-emain-tO-,.;support..,.,~~~ew"",be~'__ at "li~es~7"'lmd' "9-ron'.
ri:he~pla'nS-;---DetaiT~r"-relaEing'~ to-the -- cons truction of-the se-tube.
elements-ar6'-5hown--on.....Si1ee~h~~~:::~5~
This concludes my report. Please contact me should you have any
questions or require further information.
Sincerely,
, flM/lJr/iWIJo
R:~';l~~. Pattillo, P.E.
~,\\"nmll'''ltllll
#'~ ,~~!~.9r.p;i'~~
~~~.-tb'STER;".. ~%
~~..~ o...<o~
fgQt: .. ~
~ .b ~. =
= ." 167911 w.*=
~*:o . w: g
~ ..~ ~:o~
::..(J'>..A..~..r _...0._Q '"
~ . .,511 C(:..~. ~
~"'S")-...ONA\. _..n..~~
~ ~ ....... o'(~~
~IIII OF CO'-- ,\~<>
I{/fllllllllll\l\\\\\\
RMP/kmk
i
~ i
f
,
;
f,
i
'.-. ~.,
''''i .~;{" .
..!. .-.,- :.~ :. .~.
..; ....:-~ :.. . ~ .
',! ~..~ .,,\ .;.
...~.; .
",l-. ::!" 'J. ~
.' ~'~'::'..' ':'.~ ~ ';, :
.l\"','.!'.:'
1:'".'
,',
." . . I.
1.
,
r :,','
~
.
. -...\~
. .."
..t;.:
.........-...
.~ie~t. .~..,,.~--.....~r~...;....:_.,., :,~: ..
,.._,...;.......-...... "
. ,.--. , , -... ~.; .
. '., . .'" ..,.--:: ..;....::, ;.. ~ :...-.:..,~1 :
, .
. .-... "."
'.-,",.
.: ,..~.~
! -!..~
~~;:"':'::";,.:... '-'-':':'"7::' ""':~ ..~...,.__..
.,",
...("
'.~.,. ;:
",
,'.
,
,
. ~
A~~r
---<-
PATTILLO ASSOCIATES
STRUCTURAL CONSULTANTS
...'....J
~2pmhEl:Cii2-20-H>?>1~~
: ~'" -\. .
Nasser Sadeghi
415 East Hyman, Suite 303
Aspen, Colorado _ 81611
RE: HEARST DUPLEX (THE CASCADES)
Gilbert and Monarch Streets
Dear Nasser:
As a matter of clarification regarding the reframing of the south
wall of the third floor, I submit the following.
In order to conform with the permit plans, the south wall of, the
,t,h~J;..d~U.9.o,:t: ,was-" ~e,qui.red., to.. be.,rebuHL,t8....iliclie.s... to.-.,the...-n~,
a.long_the.setbac~Hrre~"'A ne\~ tube' steel-beam' 'system was required
'to support the glass greenhouse roof framing. He provided this
information on our drawing 5-5, revised on November 15, 1989. ~e
"fi n", w.aJ..IJi.. \fl],i.ch ,?xtend on lines 6, 7, and, 9 ' (on the.west..5~&-or
the, building) ,a,re...r,eq,115,r~cLs..tr.uc.tural,ly-,.to- support-:tIl~"",_I,''''!f'""1:'ttllle
.beams....from, the.. third,..f.lOor' beams..be-lo..... Also,- the,..refr,amed-...,SOIMh
1Il<l..L.l.,."c>n.::,:Iin~.,B,,~i:s::..:. r_eqliired.:.to~,la,t,eral,L'y,...~r,a<;,~" t:tii!';':;~pu.l:TI~~
~l:.U!!l!'!tand.:.:t~i'l.llsLe.r.:.::sheClr,_I.oads::.. to"" the,,,,19~I,e&....1.~v!;!,,l, .
I hope this serves to explain the framing conditions in this area.
If you have any questions, please contact' me.
Sincerely,
t::t~tillo,'
RMP/kmk
P.E.
~\\\II\l"HUIlIl""11
,~~ \lI~lHEW p}//~.
~~, ....... "'''''''"''Y.
~L\..4J ~~G\$TEIi;.. '?;~
~'!S'..'C' ()-. ~ ~
fjt:e: '... .,.....0 ~
::: -b .. a:- ~
~*:~ 16794 ~:*~
%(j')\~.~ ,.?;o~
':;; ",.. -I.S'; ..:"!..""." ~-
~ .." -..r/O 'f:.'.- ~~
~ )-~.. NAL....t"1..'r-~
. ~ '...0..... o,.~ .
"oq"t, F co\. ~~~ '
, :,' ~"I"I'mnllllllll\~, <:, ..' ~;>',..
..\. -.
... .
"".."
~
>
I
..
,f
,.,,.., 0.-..... ~= ~ . ,-, 1"':...... ~ .,....,..........-. ~......,."... ,......~ ............., ............................... c......... . ,,,,....-,, <:"I....<=_Q~Qc:::
MAY 03 '90 12:42
l-
I
. 9\1 (".';Ii
p
Aprtl 29, 1990
City 6f A8~...
Bo,rd Df ArlJ unmant
130 ~, C,len& Str~.t
"'opo.., co 81611
, ~-.
P,2/2
1210:
.2
. :~ ..;, . .....,.....
'~,~
'~
"~
~tf. 90- ~
R.R: Canr;r\.~p Fene~ r.-l.ll Vdt'h,ne:* ~F!'1W:'st
Contl....,,: :!te.-
r Am 'the ne.... .jo1iI1~r ut A.i:pe~ MO'..l:r.toi.11\ TClW1\t,ouse """. l!f:d fl..li.ly $u?port A;>~lie4fJt
V4r!.nc.lequ41ilt':. O\.l.t un!t h .cro~s Gl1hp.TP: ~1:rQo.t. !r-01U t:}:~$~'bj$CC and as SUCh.
primarily "ffocted.
R..p..tfully 'ubmltted,
'o1khon
, .n'~u'r.nn
'l1I4 P..oo D.1 Oeo.o
L. Jolla, CA 92037
~T-'
.Ir..
J
~.""'-_...
"ITKIN COUNTY TITLE, Inc.
4fo
-~
Vincent J, Higens
President
Title Insurance Company
601 E, Hopkins, Aspen. Colorado 81611
(303) 925-1766' (303) 925-6527 FAX
Christina M, Davis'
Vice President
ADJACENT OWNER'S STATEMENT
Pitkin County Title, Inc., a duly licensed Title Insurance Agent in the State of
,
Colorado hereby certifies the following list is a current list of adjacent property
owner's within three hundred feet of S 4' LOT 12, ALL OF LOT 13, EAMES ADDITION, as
obtained from the most current Pitkin County Assessors Tax Rolls.
NAMES AND ADRESSES
8RIEF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE REFER TO LIST ATTACHED HERETO AND HADE A PART HEREOF.
"
A-~ ' "-
AUTHORIZED SIGNATUR
'f") ,',.1 ( , ,
\ r I
(\i I 11'\ \_r ry \.
,
,
700 MONARCH CONDO ASSOC' ION
IOo)~4v 5X I
~~r---/Ccec 9'Ib((
A.R. SANCHEZ JR.
P.O. BOX 2986
LAREDO
TX
78041
ALAN J. VIERGUTZ
JET CARGO INTERNATIONAL
M-28, 80X 020010
t'lIA~II FL
33102
ALEF CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 3333
ASPEN
CO
81612
ALEXANDER L. & LEE M. BIEL
381 LOVELL AVENUE
MILL VALLEY
CA
94941
COMMON AREA
UNIT 2, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
UNIT 18, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UNIT 3, DOLOMITE VILLAS
UNIT 21, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
"
ALLAN 0, CHLOWITZ UNIT 208, 700 MONARCH CONDO
MICHAEL KASTNER CPA
SUITE 207, 315 SO. BEVERLY DR.
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212
ARNO 0, SCHEFLER
212 EAST 72ND STREET
t,EW YOI,K CITY NY 10021
ARNOLD R. MEYER
APT. 122A-B NORTH
19707 TURNBERRY ISLE
MIAMI BEACH
FL
33180
ASPEN SKIING CORPORATION
P.O. 1248
ASPEN
CO
81612
ASPEN SKIING CORPORATION
P,O. BO>: 1248
ASPEN
CO
81612
ASPEN-DOLOMITE CONDO ASSOC
650 SOUTH MONARCH
,':SPEN
CO
81611
UNIT 5, CARIBOU CONDOMINIUMS
UNIT 103, 700 MONARCH CONDO
,
LOTS 1-14, BLK 10, EAMES
LOTS 1-7 BLOCK 12, EAMES
UNIT 6, DOLOMITE VILLAS
h
AZTEC CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION COMMON AREA
MARY & MAC BOELENS
P.O. BOX 827
AS?EI~ CO 81612
,,.--........
BARTON J & NANCY M. LEVI\.,
585 SUNSET RIDGE ROAD
NORTHFIELD IL
BEN J. FORTSON
60093
3000 FORT WORTH NATIONAL BANK BLDG
FORT WORTH TX 76102
BRIAN W. ANDERSON
213 RAYNOR STREET
ISELIN
NJ
BRUCE G. AND GLADE B. HANSEN
P.O. BOX 8110
ASPEN
CO
BRUCE J. ANDERSON
P.O. BOX 8136
ASPEI~
CO
CARIBOU CONDO ASSOCIATION
1030 CEMETARY LANE
ASPEN CO
CHERYL TOWNING
23 WELLINGTON SQUARE
CHELSEA, LONDON
Et~GLAND SW3
CITY OF ASPEN
130 SOUTH GALENA
ASPEN
CO
CITY 0:' ASPEI~
130 SOUTH GALENA
ASPEt~
CO
CITY Or ASPEN
130 SOUTH GALENA
ASPEN
CO
CLAIRE L. & BETTY LOU ERICKSON
1231 INOUSTRIAL ROAD
HUDSON WI
CONNIE CHRISTINE WHEELER AND
GERARD MC CALLION
149 EAST 18TH PH
NEW YORK CITY NY
08830
81612
81612
81611
81611
81611
81611
54016
10003
UNIT 6, CARIBOU CON 'INIUM
UNIT 14, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
UNIT 13, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UNIT 3-A, ASPEN INN APTS
UNIT 207, 700 MONARCH CONDO
"
COMMON AREA
UNIT 4, CARIBOU CONDOMINIUMS
LOTS 1-11, BLOCK 8, EAMES
,
LOTS 1-14, BLOCK 7, EAMES
LOTS 3,4,11 & 12, BLK 9, EAMES
UNIT 205, 700 MONARCH CONDO
~
UNIT 107, 700 MONARCH CONDO
,
"-
CUSTOM BlDRS CORPORATION
HAROLD C. MC GINNIS
P.O. BOX 2217
MARYLAND HEIGHTS MO
63043
DANIEL B. VENTURES,
GRAY, PLANT MOOTY &
3400 CITY CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS
JR
BENNETT, P.A.
MN 55402
",,";
UNIT 10, DC,OMITE VIllAS, BlDG 2
UNIT 17, SHADOW MTN VlG CONDO
DAVID G. & VIRGINIA STRINGER UNIT 3, CARIBOU CoNoOMINIU~
841 BISHOP STREET SUITE 2201
HONOLULU HI 96813
DAVID G. ELMORE UNIT 3-B, ASPEN INN APARTMENTS
1433 NORTH 3Ro. AVENUE
PHOENIX AZ 85003
DAVID PYLES
ROUTE 1, BOX 224
EASTON
Mo
21601
DOLOMITE CONDO ASSOCIATION
650 SOUTH MONARCH
ASPEN
CO
81611
DOROTHY WILDMAN
2920 NORTH COMMONWEALTH
CHICAGO Il
60606
EFFIE M. ECKLUND LERNER
BRIAN RIORDAN, CONTINENTAL BANK
30 NORTH lA SAllE STREET
CHICAGO Il 60697
ELIZABETH H. RYAN AND
RICHARD G. & NANCY M. COPE
216 SOUTH GARFIELD AVENUE
JANES~'IlLE WI ,
53545
EQUIPMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
P,O. BOX 188
lEWISTON
MO
63452
FRANCES AUSTIN & PC KlINGSMITH
810 WEST HIGHWAY 50
GUI'HHSOi~ CO 81230
FRED G. St1ITH
P.O. BOX 1388
ASPEN
CO
81612
",
UNIT 13, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
COMMON AREA
UNIT 2, CARIBOU CONDOMINIUM
UNIT 3, TElEMARK CONDOMINIUMS
,
UNIT 19, SHADOW MTN VlG CONDO
UNIT 5, DOLOMITE VIllAS
lOTS 3 - 6, BLOCK 11, EAMES AOD
^
UNIT I, AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
,
FREE FIELD ASSOCIATES
GREENWELL-GOETZ INVESTMENTS
133 LEWIS WHARF
BOSTON MA
GENTRY REAL ESTATE CORP
310 ELLIS BLVD
JEFFERSON CITY
MO
GEOFFREY WILLIAMS AND
DR. R.C. & MARGARET TUCKER
1437 NORTH COURTHOUSE ROAD
ARLINGTON VA
GEORGE MEAD HEMMETER
4587 COACHMAN CIRCLE
LAS VEGAS NV
GEORGE STRAWBRIDGE JR.
BUILDING B-I00
3801 KENNETT PIKE BUILDING
WILMINGTDN DE
GLENN L. & AYLEENE J. FELLNER
840 SHERIDAN ROAD
GLENCOE
IL
HANG TEN ADVENTURE
P.O. BOX 1088
GRAND JUNCTION
02110
65101
22201
89109
19807
60022
CO 81502
HERBERT M. KALLMANN
BEl BIER-IMPRT GWBH
SAECHSISCHESTR. 70
WEST GERMANY
1 BERLIN 1J
HERBERT SItlON
8765 PINE RIDGE DRIVE
INDIANAPOLIS IN I
46260
UNIT 12, DOLOMITE VILLAS, BLDG 2
UNIT 6, AZTEC CONDOMINIUM
UNIT 14, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UNITS 301 & 302, 700 MONARCH
..,
UNIT 1, CARIBOU CONDOMINIUM
UNIT 203, 700 MONARCH CONDD
UNIT 2, SHADDW MTN VLG CONDD
UNIT 202, 700 MONARC~ CqNDO
,
UNITS 10 & 11, MTN QUEEN CONDO
HOLLAND HOUSE SKI LODGE, INC. LOTS 1,2,13 & 14, BLOCK 9, EAMES
720 SOUTH ASPEN STREET
AS [EM cr 81611
HOWARD B. AWREY
P.O. BOX 248
ASPEN
CO
HOWARD B. AWREY
P.O. BOX 248
ASPEN
CO
81612
81612
LOTS 12-14, BLOCK 8, EAMES
~
PT LOT 4, ALL LOTS 5-10, BLK 9,
,
-.~--,-
JAMES BYRON ELLIS
17 1/2 FLEET
t1ARINA DEL REY
UNIT 7, SHADOW M' ILG CONDO
CA
90292
JAMES C. EAST
UNIT 6, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
5800 "R" STREET
LITTLE ROCK
AK
72207
JEFFREY S. SAIKHDN
UNIT C, ASPEN MTN TOWNHOUSES
8314 PASEO DEL OCASO
LA JOLLA CA 92037
JERRY D. FULTS UNIT 2, DOLOMITE VILLAS
12TH FL. 300 CRESCENT COURT
DALLAS TX 75201
".
JOAN ELIZABETH ROOKE UNIT 5, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
330 TYNEBROOK LANE
HOUSTOf, TX 77024
JOHI, & FRANK DOLINSEK JR. LOTS 6-10, BLOCK 1, CONNORS
P.O. BOX 275
ASPEN CO Bl612
JOHN C. AND SHELLEY W. EMERICK UNIT 3, AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
P.O. BOX 265
BOULDER CO 80306
JOH;, P. f;LEIi~ER UNIT 6, TELEMARK CONDOMIIHUHS
55 SECOND STREET
COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80906 .
JOHN R. MOLYNEUt AND UNIT 101, 700 MONARCH CONDO
EVE MARIA HEATON MOLYNEUX
11 HOLBROOK AVENUE, KIRRIBILLI,
N. S. .1, , AUSTRILIA
JOHN W, & ISABEL D. MOORE
UNIT 9, MOUNTAIN QUEEN
10426 WHITERIDGE LANE
5T, LOUIS MO 63141
KA8ERT INDUSTRIES, INC. UNIT 4, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
321 WEST STREET, CHARLES ROAD
VILLA PARK Il 60181
KENNETH R. & JEANNETTE CHIATE UNIT 304, SILVER SHADOW CONDO
20628 ROCKCROFT
i1ALIBU
,
CA
90265
L & R COMPANY
HAROLD C. LYMAN, PRESIDENT
20430 LAKEVIEW AVENUE
EXCELSIOR MN
UNIT 9, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
55331
LAWRENCE A. ROSENFIELD ANO
LARRY MYLES SALITERMAN
2240 LEE AVE NORTH
GOLDEN VALLEY MN
UNIT 105, 700 MONARCH CONDO
55427
LELAND W. & MARILYN J. HENRY UNIT 201, 700 MONARCH CONDO
4480 RAVINE DRIVE
WESTERVILLE OH 43081
LESTER O. SPEYER UNIT 12, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
TENNSCO CORPORATION
P.O. BOX 606
DICKSON TN 37055
\
\
",
LEWIS AND MICHELLE SCHAINUCK UNIT 3, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDOS
VOM REAL ESTATE CONSULTANTS
11140 EXCELSIOR DRIVE
NORWALK CA 90650
LIFT ONE PARTNERSHIP
UNIT 9, DOLOMITE VILLAS, SLOG 2
334 WEST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN CO
81612
M. MARK & GRACE A. MENDEL AND UNIT 16, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
EDWARD SILVERMAN AND ALLEN FINGOLD
1620 LOCUST STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19103
MARGERY A. KLEINER lnUT 5, TELEMARK CONDOMLNIUMS
.
P _ 0 _ BOX 4191
ASPEN
CO
81612
MARRION M. & MARJORIE KORRELL
UNIT 3, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
9 N. 23RD, AVE
riEL ROSE PARK
IL '
60160
MAUREE:~ 0' GRIEi'~
UNIT 1, AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
611 SOUTH MONARCH STREET
ASPEN CO
81611
MICHAEL S. & JANE K. MAURER
UNIT 102, 700 MONARCH CONDO
^
2 EAST 106TH. STREET
INDIANOPOLIS IN
46206
MICHAEL S. & JANE K. MAURER
UNIT,108, 700 MONARCH CONDO
10585 N. MEREDIAN ~101
INDIANAPOLIS IN 46290
MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO ASSOC
~OO? ~5J-
~1~~I(..f,
NELLY GUNDRUM
ANNI JACOBI
615 PAGE STREET
KEWANEE
IL
61443
NICK O. AND ROSA PETROVICH
STIRLING HOMES
600 EAST MAIN STREET
ASPEN CO
B1611
PATRICK A. SMITH
P.O. BOX 6B8
BLOOMFIELD HILLS
MI
48013
COMMON AREA
UNIT 4, DOLOMITE VILLAS
UNIT 305, 700 MONARCH CONDO
UNIT 5, AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
,'.
PATRICK PODSAID UNIT 5, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
2701 SOUTH BAY SHORE DRIVE
SUITE 315, COCONUT GROVE BUILDING
MIAMI FL 33133
PAUL TRIPP UNIT 3-C, ASPEN INN APARTMENTS
231 MARGARET STREET
KEY WEST FL 33040
PERLMAN PROPERTIES OF CALIF
9200 SUNSET BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES
CA
90069
PETER H. CANTRUP
P.O. BOX 1812
EXPANOLA
NM
87532
PHOENIX LEASING, INC.
P.O. BOX 200B
sr1N RAFAel
CA
94912
PRESTON H. & CLAUDIA R. HILL
119 SOUTH LAFAYETTE STREET
GEt-IVER CO 80209
R. RIGGS AND YVONNE KLIKA
32415 BURL WOOD DRIVE
;OLON OH 44139
UNIT 4, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
PT LOT 12 & 13, EAMES,~~B
UNIT 12, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
LOTS 4 & 5, GLOCK 1 CONNORS
UNIT 11, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
,
R.A.R, STEAKHOUSES, INC., UNIT; A & B, ASPEN MTN TWNHSF
KAUFMAN LAW OFFICES
STE 305, 315 EAST HUMAN AVENUE
(,SPEN CO 81611
RAnES!,: rIEf,RA
766 THACKERAY
7t)6 THACKERAY
HTGHl..ANil PARI<
IL
60035
UNIT 1, DOLOMITE VILLAS
.',
RAMESH MEHRA
766 THACKERAY
HIGHLAND PARK
IL
60035
RAYMONO & CAROLYN MARCHUK
62 HIGHVIEW DRIVE
WOODBRIDGE
NJ
07095
RAYMOND E. & EMILY LOCHHEAD
1018 RUSSELL 8L.
ST. LOUIS
MO
63104
RICHARD L. & KAREN L. CYS
5301 CHAMBERLIN AVENUE
CHEVY CHASE MD
20815
RICHARD M. FINKLESTEIN
2736 CARMAT DRIVE
NEW CANAAt~
CT
06840
RICHARC p, & JO MORING VERNE
300 EAST 56TH STREET
NEW YORK CITY NY 10022
R08ERT & ANN KONSTAM
1212 MILLSBORO ROAD
t1ANSFIELD OH
44906
ROBERT E. SEIDENGLANZ
809 CAKUENGA BOULEVARD
HOLL YWOOD CA
90038
ROBERT IRA GREEN
SUITE 701A
2875 N. E. 191 STREET
N. tHAi:! BEACH FL
33180
S. C. JOHNSON AND SON, INC.
TAX CEPARTMENT-012
1525 HOWN STREET
Rr<CINE WI
53403
SAVAHAN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SUITE 1100, 1300 NORTH 17TH ST.
ROSSL YN VA 22209
UNIT 106, 700 MONARCH CONDO
UNIT 8, DOLOMITE VILLAS BLDG 2
UNIT 4, AZTEC CONDOMINIUMS
UNIT 4, TELEMARK CONDOMINIUMS
"
UNIT 2-C, ASPEN INN APARTMENTS
UNIT 6, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UNIT 20, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UIHT 15, MOUNTAIN QUEE"l tONDO
UNIT 404, SILVER SHADOW CONDO
UNITS 7 & 8, MOUNTAIN QUEEN COND
LOTS 1-12, BLOCK 91, ASPEN
-,
SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOTS'1-4, CONNORS ADDITION
STE 1100, 1300 NORTH 17TH. ST.
RO';SL Yi, VA 22209
SAUANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOTS 7 - 12, EAMES ADDITION
SUITE J 100
1300 NORTH 17TH STREET
ROSSL Vi; VA 22209
SAVANAH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SUITE 1100
1300 NORTH 17TH. STREET
ROSSL YN VA
SHADOW MOUNTAIN CONDO ASSOC
COATES, REID & WALDRON
720 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN CO
SHADOW MOUNTAIN VILLAGE
CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
1212 MILLSBORO ROAD
11ANSCIELD OH
SHADOW MOUNTAIN, INC. AND
KING SALMON, IN.
P.O. 80)( 300037
DENtlER CO
SILVER SHADOW CONDO ASSOC
(;"/0 '~'F,,'~
P!~ WQ(;U,-t.r ~ ,
W6'&J-~
~, c.cfb gtCod
511-15
WILLIAM SEELBACH
~500 SOUTH WOODLAND
CHAGRIN FALLS OH
STEPi~EN J. NARDI
~100 MADISON STREET
HILLSIDe: IL
STEVEN S, & ALAN D. BUSH
22209
81611
44906
80203
~4022
60162
17, 210 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
ASPEN CD 81611
STE!.IART BaST
P.O. BOX 2359
ASPEN
CO
STUART SPIKERMAN
SKY SUPPLY, INC.
ROOM 209, JFK BUILDING 263
JAt1AIU, NY
SlJZANNE liDNIGMAN
512 HANI~A
BIRMIt~GHA~1
MO
TELEMAR~ CONDOMINIUM ASSOC.
1.1' 2-f frir 'B C-
~~u...... ,LeL, g-l G.l \
81612
11430
48009
UNIT l-C, ASPEN INN APARTMENT
UNIT I, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
COMMON AREA
UNIT 104, 700 MONARCH CONDO
",
COMMON AREA
UNIT IS, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
UNIT 204, 700 MONARCH CONDO
UNIT 104, SILVER SHADOW CONDO
, ,
UNITS I-A & I-B, ASPEN INN APTS
UNIT 2-8, ASPEN INN APARTMENTS
UNIT 20~, SILVER SHADOW CONDO
.,
COMt1(jN AREA
,../,"-"
THOMAS AND AMY KWEI
UNIT 306, 700 MONARCH CONDO
30 LAKE ONIAD DRIVE
WAPPINGERS FALLS NY
12590
THOMAS H. FRIEDKIN
UNIT 1, MOUNTAIN QUEEN CONDO
STE 600, 7701 WILSHIRE PLACE ,DR.
HOUSTON TX 77040
THORNTON E. ANDERSON
UNIT 2-A, ASPEN INN APARTMENTS
STE 414, 200 EAST 1ST. STREET
WICHITA KS 67202
"
TOMAS t1. KflNN UNIT 8, SHADOW MTN VLG CONDO
730 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK CITY NY 10021
TOPEKA AIRCRAFT SALES AND WHT 11, DOLOMITE VILLAS, BLDG 2
SERVICE, INC.
3600 SARDOW
TOPEKA KS 66616
WELLS T. AND tlARY M. LOVETT UNIT 206, 700 MONARCH CONDO
18 STONE CREEK PK
OWENSBORO KY 42303
WELLS T. AI,D t1ARY M. LOVETT UNIT 206, 700 MONARCH CONDO
18 STONE CREEK PK .
OI~ENScORO KY 42303
,