Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.Pitkin Reserve Subd.004-89 CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Date: January 27, 1989 Case No.: 01-,-/ Appellant: Location of pitkin Way, (street Property: Lot 2, Pitkin Aspen, Colorado and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot Number) Address: Phone: (L"'~"'I Address:c/o Austill, Jordan, Young & PeirCE 600 East Hopkins Avenue, Suite 205, Aspen CO 81611 Reserve Subdivision, 0064 925-2600 Owner: Mr. iUlcJ Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer and the D.LT. Trust Building Permit must accompany NO. : Application and prints or any other pertinent data this application, and will be made part of CASE THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL FACTS IN QUESTION. USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF MORE SPACE IS NEEDED. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS The Dittmers' request for a variance is to construct a pergola on the south and east sides of their residence. See attached Variance Request. Yes X No (Applicant's Signature) PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON FOR NOT GRANTING: Variance Requested: Property is located in the R-30 PUD ' category and falls d' zonlng 24-3 7 (E) (I) Th ~n er ~he preVlOUS definition of FAR. Sec maxi'mum FAR 'and :t ~~se lS ,Purported to be at its allowable consider this pergOlal aSs maxl!'lum allow,able 15% of decks. I an lncrease ln FAR The appl' t appears to be asking for relief of this. d " lcan undetermined amount. eC1Slon by an ~t~l,~ Signed Status -10 :&1 PERMIT REJECTED, DATE ~ APPLICATION FILED L. \ \ . MAILED ;),jfU!11 \' \ DECISION DATE DATE OF HEARING SECRETARY NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case 189-4 Mr. & Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. Particulars of the hearing and requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of MeetinQ: Date: March 16, 1989 Time: 4:00 p.m. OWner for Variance: Appellant for Variance: Name: Mr. & Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer Ted. D. Gardenswartz and the D.I.T. Trust Address: c/o Austin, Jordan, Young & Peirce 600 East Hopkins Ave., Suite 205, Aspen, CO. 81611 Location or description of property: Location: Lot 2, Pitkin Reserve Subdivision 0064 Pitkin Way, Aspen, CO. 81611 Variance Requested: Property is located in the R-30 PUD zoning category and falls under the previous definition of FAR. Sec 24- 3.7 (E) (I). The house is purported to be at its allowable maximum FAR and at its maximum allowable 15% of decks. I consider this pergola as an increase in FAR. The applicant appears to be aSking for relief of this decision by an undetermined amount. will applicant be represented bv counsel: Yes: X No: The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment 130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado81611 Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk SUMMARY The Dittmers variance should be granted for the following reasons: 1. The pergola is similar to an uncbvered porch that is not restricted; 2. The pergola does not add "bulk" to the residence; 3. The pergola will improve the aesthetics of the residence; 4. The pergola will improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood; 5. The pergola will assist in energy conservation; and 6. The request is essentially a landscaping request and granting the variance is consistent with the Code. DITTMER\Sum.msc:aja CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Variance Request Mr. and Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer and the D.I.T. Trust (the "Dittmers") hereby request a variance from the City of Aspen Board of Adjustment. The variance is necessary so that the Dittmers may erect a "pergola" on the south and east sides of the existing house located at Lot 2, Pitkin Reserve Subdivision, 0064 Pitkin Way, Aspen, Colorado (the "residence"). A pergola is very similar to a trellis in that it is an open framed structure used as a support for climbing plants. In essence, the Dittmers' desire to erect certain columns around the south and east sides of the residence with open rafters, which will create a place for vines and other vegetation. The attached improvement survey dated, June 16, 1987, illustrates the location of the proposed pergola. Because the pergola extends slightly beyond the building envelope on portions of the south and east sides of the residence and because the Building Department took the position that the request increased the floor space of the residence beyond the allowable FAR, the Building Department denied the Dittmers' request for a building permit on the property. However, as will be discussed in detail below and as stated in letters submitted by Steve Hansen of Hansen Construction and Michael Lipkin, the pergola does not add "bulk" to the residence. Moreover, because the pergola is similar to an uncovered porch, its construction may not be restricted. Finally, the pergola will accomplish the following: (1) improve the aesthetics of the residence; (2) improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood; (3) assist in energy conservation; and (4) the granting of the Dittmers' request is consistent with the zoning laws and the spirit and intent of the Aspen Municipal Code (the "Code") concerning applications for variances. The actual plans for the pergola are included with this request. You will note that the pergola is an open, airy addition to the house. It is not a dwelling area. It is, in essence, an uncovered porch, slab or patio, which is not restricted pursuant to Code Section 24-3.7(f). The reason that the pergola is akin to an uncovered porch is because the pergola does not offer any protection from the elements (i.e. rain or snow). In short, the pergola is a landscaping addition that will be used to support plants. Therefore, because of its close association with an uncovered porch, erection of the pergola should not be restricted. The pergola will give the residence a much more aesthetic appearance. Mr. Lipkin's comments and urging that the Board grant the Dittmers' request is noteworthy from the perspective that Mr. Lipkin owns the residence to the east of the Dittmers (as well as the vacant lot to the west), which is the only direction in which the pergola extends toward another residence, and if anyone possibly could be concerned that the pergola extends too close to the neighboring residence, it would be Mr. Lipkin. Furthermore, Mr. Lipkin notes that the pergola will not alter or destroy the community plan. This is an important factor when considering a variance. See, Greenwalt v. Zoninq Board, 345 N.W.2d 537 (Iowa 1984). See also, Steve Hansen's letter regarding the aesthetic improvement to be gained from the pergola. The Dittmers are cognizant of the admonishment in the zoning board appeal information that the Board "rarely" finds practical difficulties or unnecessary hardship where the appeal is a matter of aesthetics or design or economics, and in this regard, the Dittmers submit that their request is more than aesthetics. However, it should be remembered that aesthetics are worthy of consideration by the Board. After all, as stated in Connor v. Universitv Park, 142 S.W.2d 706 (Tex App. 1940), harmonious appearance, appropriateness, good taste and beauty displayed in a neighborhood tend to conserve value of property as well as fostering contentment and happiness among landowners. Because of the proposed height of the pergola, it does not fall within the strict or literal definition of a fence, as that term is defined by the Code. In this regard, other than Mr. Lipkin, the neighbor to the east, the only other persons who could even see the pergola would be passersby on the Rio Grande trail. First, it is noteworthy that the Rio Grande trail is approximately 95 feet from the pergola, at its closest point. Second, the pergola is some 30 feet closer to the residence than the "flagstone patio" to the south of the residence, it encompasses a much smaller area than the flagstone patio and most of the pergola overlaps with the flagstone patio, which is already in place. Third, when viewed from the Rio Grande trail, which is at a much lower elevation than the Dittmer residence, the pergola will appear to be nothing more than a vine fence. Finally, when viewed from the Rio Grande trail, the pergola does not appear to add any visible bulk to the residence. In short, the Dittmers submit that if the Board does not consider the pergola to be an uncovered porch (which is not restricted by the Code) certainly the pergola is more like a fence than a dwelling area and given this fact, the variance should be granted in order to satisfy the spirit and the intent of the Code. 2 In the summertime, aside from its aesthetic value, it is the Dittmers' belief that the pergola will create some relief from the heat of the southern exposure. See also, letters from Steve Hansen and Michael Lipkin. This translates into energy conservation, which is an important goal of our zoning and land use laws. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the width of exterior walls may be subtracted from the floor area, under certain circumstances, if the walls are used for energy conservation. Also, the Pitkin County Land Use Code excludes certain solar energy devices from the definition of FAR, therefore, implying that energy conservation devices should not be included in FAR. Consequently, because of the energy conservation value of the pergola, denying the Dittmers' request would constitute an unnecessary hardship and undermine the purpose and intent of the Code. As stated in Ames v. Pasadena, 334 P.2d 653 (Cal. App. 1959) variances should be granted when they are not detrimental to public welfare and convenience, are necessary for the enjoyment of a property right and are not detrimental to the property or improvements of others. The Dittmers truly believe that this improvement will add to the aesthetics of the area particularly from the Rio Grande trail. It certainly will not be a detriment to the public welfare. The natural foliage which the Dittmers plan to grow on the pergola will add to the overall beauty and nature of the area. Certainly, no one can argue with the fact that one of the purposes of the Code is to maintain the natural beauty of Aspen. Finally, the pergola is not detrimental to the property or improvements of others. See, letter from Mr. Lipkin. Consequently, the variance should be granted. The extension of the pergola beyond the building envelope is minimal and it does not add FAR from the perspective that it will not increase the dwelling area of the house. This is, after all, an open landscaping structure or an uncovered porch which may not even be restricted pursuant to the Code. In this regard, members of the Board are encouraged to contact, Michael Lipkin, Steve Hansen or Ted Gardenswartz to view the property at their leisure and to see the actual location of the pergola from all of the surrounding areas. Including the pergola within the FAR requirements would deprive the Dittmers of the opportunity to make their home (l) more energy efficient; (2) more enjoyable; and (3) more aesthetically pleasing to the public. As noted above, because of the open porch nature of the pergola and its energy conversation benefits, the pergola does not even fall within the scope of FAR. Moreover, although there are some structures involved, as can be 3 seen from the survey and the attached plans, this request is essentially a landscaping request that will enhance the goals and policies of the City of Aspen. Accordingly, the Dittmers' request that the Board of Adjustment grant them the requested variance to bui~d.a/~ergola. Dated this)1 --day of January, 1989. Re~fUl~Y 'Ubmi"e:, By \.00 €'-1.Q"L - . Ted D. Gardenswactz '--. DITTMER\Var.msc:aja 4 CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Case No. 89-4 Dittmer Variance Request AFFIDAVIT I, &AA.j ~ ~II follows: , under oath, swear and depose as 1. That I posted the from the Zoning Code on Lot Pitkin Way, Aspen, Colorado Notice of Application for a Variance 2, Pit~serve Subdivision, 0064 on It:/J /~ / "f.Bq . 2. That the Notice was posted during the ten (10) day period prior to the March 16, 1989 hearing. 3. That I checked at various intervals during the ten (10) day period to see that the Notice was posted continuously. Further affiant sayeth not. 1:e ~<l7:'" , Ide!-. , STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN / / t1~,- The f~g~~g instrument was acknowledged b~re me this /0 of ~.?G , 1989 by J!j1Jlt/IJ I. ,1!2vt;/<n , day WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: DITTMER\Aff-V.msc:aja ~p 4Jf :71)0/ ~{' ,eo J/ti/.:? January 4, 1989 To whom it may concern: I have been advised of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer's request for a variance to enable them to build a pergola on the south and east sides of the residence located at Lot 2, Pitkin Reserve Subdivision, 0064 Pitkin Way, Aspen, Colorado. Hansen Construction Inc. was the general contractor during the construction of the residence. After reviewing the June 16, 1987 improvement survey which illustrates the location of the proposed pergola and the plans for the proposed pergola, it is my opinion that the proposed pergola will create a more aesthetic appearance. This is especially true from the Rio Grande trail. Also, from the vantage point of the Rio Grande trail, the pergola will not add any appreciable bulk to the appearance of the residence. In this regard, it seems to me that during the winter the pergola will appear to be nothing more than a fence and during the summer the pergola will be a place for plants and vegetation and it will assist in energy conservation. This will provide much needed shade from the southern exposure and it will allow the house to blend in with the natural surroundings. In short, I strongly encourage the Board to grant the Dittmers' variance request. Sincerely, HANSEN CONSTRUCTION, INC. BY'~ St ven Ha sen . January 18, 1989 To whom it may concern: I have been advised of Mr. and Mrs. Thomas H. Dittmer's request for a variance to build a pergola on the south and east sides of the residence located at Lot 2, Pitkin Reserve Subdivision, 0064 Pitkin Way, Aspen, Colorado. My company was the architect for the original construction. Accordingly, I am aware that with the addition of the proposed pergola, technically the residence slightly may exceed the allowable FAR. However, it is my opinion that the pergola is more akin to a landscaping addition than conventional FAR dwelling space and that the pergola should not be restricted because, in essence, it is an uncovered and unprotected porch. Furthermore, I do not believe that the pergola adds any "bulk" to the house. I say this not only in my professional capacity as an architect, but also as the adjacent landowner to the property. I am the architect for the house on the east side of the Dittmers' residence and I have discussed the requested variance with my clients and they support the Dittmers' request. In addition, I personally am not opposed to the pergola. In fact, I welcome the addition of the pergola from an aesthetic point of view as well as a privacy point of view. I believe that during the spring and summer, the natural plants and vegetation on the pergola will provide the Dittmers with additional privacy and will beautify their home and, consequently, our neighborhood. In this regard, I believe that the pergola is consistent with the community plan. Finally, as an architect, I am keenly aware of the Code's efforts to encourage energy conservation. I believe that the southern exposure of the Dittmers' residence in the summer makes this portion of the house uncomfortably hot and the pergola will rectify this situation and result in an energy savings by the Dittmers. In short, I enthusiastically support the pergola and I urge the Board to grant the Dittmers' variance request. S'ncerel , l Michael Lipki List of Prooertv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Property Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 8l6l2 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Property Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Prooertv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Prooertv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Prooertv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A, Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Proper tv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 8l6l2 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Propertv Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja List of Property Owners Within a 300 Foot Radius Re: Dittmer Variance Request William A. Levin 16 East 34th Street New York, New York 10016 William A. Levin Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin Associates II Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Helen E. Barr 1 John's Island Drive Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Pitkin Reserve Partners No. 5 c/o Jeff Rhodes 2121 Avenue of the Stars Suite 2950 Los Angeles, California 90067 City of Aspen c/o Frederick Gannett, Esq. 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin Reserve Homeowners' Association Post Office Box 3004 Aspen, Colorado 81612 Pitkin County c/o Thomas F. Smith, Esq. 530 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Pitkin County c/o Board of Pitkin County Commissioners 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Andrew V. Hecht, Esq. Garfield & Hecht, P.C. 601 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 8l6ll Walter P. Paepcke Life Insurance c/o Julius Lewis, Esq. Sonnenschein, Carlin, Nath & Rosenthal 8000 Sears Tower 233 South Wacker Chicago, Illinois 60606 DITTMER\Prp300.lst:aja m-.' . ~)f~"J/~C~ ~J?~ , \.~~tS ~? J-GCcJZzJ '-'~ -tLQ R -s 6 fu D sec:J8-3.IL.'~.)~j'~ 0I1oY:L~'";1~~\.~ "'if-.. ~ ~\Jc)JJvO lA-V\clX-/L o--r-~~'?A---=~ ~.v--.:-., 1..1l r "',' R.. ~ ~vf' L-- ~ ~~J ~ ~ ,(' __~ ~~ .~. l~~ VJ . ~1.6 ~-<Ji~(~ ~6 ~ :1^~"-~'V<- ~ cufr--.~ .. cJJ~evl~ ~"- ~ F 14 rc ~ , .~ ~ /YL~vvf~ o.11A-rvu ~ :1 \ <;. ~ o~ ~u~ _ ~ C('~~d2Vl-tt<-0= p-e/lcl v'{ot ] <3..-:J c~ l/lA.. GU c/vO.J<.. L,~ t;-JA. ,rz , :.nt", ~~ (~evv-t.' cffltc:u~ ~ t~ ~ k'-7 ; I~~\ ltki (\'~1-= ~ t~l 0----. 'I l, ,-,V\.J;..t--.JJ1/n~ Q/V1A-{..xvi'1 t-:- , 'I Dr !~, 6/l , ., , 1 ~ ~-to ~af ~l , i! i , i i I I I 1 :1 :1 , .1 :1 ii "