HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.205southmillstreet.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASE 187-13
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE
VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as
amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City
Hall, Aspen, Colorado, (or at such other place as the meeting may
be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said
Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance from the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of
Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited
to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you
cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to
state your views by letter, particularly if you have objection to
such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious
consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and
others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request
for variance.
The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are
as follows:
Date and Time of Meetinq:
Date:
Time:
December 17, 1987
4:00 p.m.
OWner for Variance:
Apoellant for Variance:
Name: Brian Sledge
Address: Aspen Photography Studio, Inc.
Brian Sledge
Location or description of prooertv:
Location: Mill Street Plaza
205 South Mill Street
Variance Requested: Applicant has no lot line frontage yet is
requesting a sign of 36 inches by 11 and 1/4 inches to be located
facing Hopkins Street. Section 24-5.10(2) The aggregate area
along anyone street shall not exceed one square foot of sign
area for each 3 feet of lot line frontage.
will applicant be represented bv counsel:
Yes:
No: X
The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611
Remo Lavagnino, Chairman Jan Carney, Deputy City Clerk
0~A/VTf;D
Date: 12-I-S'1
App,ll""" %~ ~t1!'h.j~w;;" :::::;"
Owner: 21lSfru::Y/ ~2-a_ .' .Address:
fh~r (77a 2Za
LOCf1tion c-f. Pr.op"~!'4:.y ~ e-"?t.:J~ ...:5. trJ/11
CITY OF ASPEN
,
/ Case No.: ~7-13
-<It)') AI mill if..) /1\0'/
rJc25-5"/1/
.c2{) C) ..5, m rll #-.301/7
A;nt' /7 , L~ 0 J'I b / I
(Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot No.)
Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent
dutu must accompany this application, and will be made part of
CASE NO.: ,
TilE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALL
THE FACTS IN QUESTION. '
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS
3f.,"~
Ski
'-1....-
/,'-
Foro M/'t
- to be (cLa.+~d Q-boue' 5f~ps
9o(i~ -to th~ lower /erk/
. Of th~ mill Sfreef 1J!tJ,UL
as sh~n rn P/~.
re.p./tu:u, sf!Jns..hwn In.
prcfvre thCL + IS no /enjU"
i.her~,
'13/1" leflas
Yd/ot.J Idfm~;j
JI"Ctn bUTord
Will you be represenLdd by counsel?
Yes _
No X
'~'
,~ .',
,~ =/r' '--- '.~' ..~%'?/
, "--- . "'-
- -"-, "'--
(Applicant's Signature)
~=================~~~'~=-=========.======D=a=~_==a======__====~===~=======___
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO
FORHARD T~rlIA~p~~CA'1,:ION TO ~BE(.130ARD OP AD-:.U~TM7P!. J~REASON F~R.(;.. NOT
. GRANTING:~'r~~r~~ ~~ .' '"fU'
\0 ~ ~ ~c\ 56 ~ be )(-; ~~ h<. ~ ~
~~ sT~ . ~"tu,...- 2'1-> '/0.(:1.) ~~ ~ ~~~
"3~ s~~ ~~~~~~~ ~"'3 ~
o\,v.r~~, ',t/\A...CLs.. '. ,\
Status ~
PERllIT REJECTED, DATE \L~'\ \'Y-(
APPLIC1,TIOIl FILED \'2..\ I. <:;.?)
,
HAILED
DECISION
DATE OF HEARING
SECRETARY
DATE
," "..~ ,"
..
'. ..... '."
. ......" .""""'I.,.....~..
,
,
II .z '>
,,__I ,,--~ _m
----
--
--7-"---
- I
.. j'! . ~.-.'. ..-
_7.!11.~
3&, '!
.JIll..; II
. n If &rs_ ___ _ ___ _ __
wldt h
he!} hf
J::;: ~~~d
/7~l"
~---._-_..- --. ---------"
SKI*j~ fOTO
------~---------~-
r
CITY OF ASPEN
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
DECEMBER 17, 1987
4:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 1987
IV. CASE 187-l3
Aspen Photography Studio, Inc.
V. ADJOURNMENT
.
,
....".,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
NOVEMBER l2. 1987
Chairman Remo Lavagnino called the meeting to order at 4:00 pm.
MINUTES OF OCTOBER 15. 1987
Charlie Paterson made a motion to approve the minutes of October
l5, 1987 with corrections.
Anne Austin seconded the motion with all in favor.
ROLL CALL
Answering roll call were Remo Lavagnino, Charlie Paterson,
Josephine Mann, Rick Head, Anne Austin. Ron Erickson and Francis
Whitaker were excused.
CASE 187-l2 ASPEN SKI LODGE CONDO ASSOCIATION
Property is located in the L-3 zone category. Front yard setback
is lO feet. Canopy encroaches lO feet into the front yard
setback. Sec 24-13.3 (a) prohibits the enlarging of a noncon-
forming structure.
The Affidavit of posting was presented.
Sunny Vann: The applicant is David F. Jones and the Aspen Ski
Lodge. The Aspen Ski Lodge has been proposing to undertake a
variety of physical improvements for their property this Fall in
order to basically address some public safety issues to the area.
And to enhance the opera tion of the Lodge itself. They are
proposing to reconstruct the existing fence that screens the pool
area and to make improvements to the public sidewalk in the area
and the parking area and to install additional landscaping. And
to partially enclose the existing entranceway.
If you are familiar with the Aspen Ski Lodge the little area
right next to the staircase is currently open. There is a canopy
that covers the area of the sidewalk and steps out about 2 steps
under a covered canopy and then enter the ski lodge itself.
Because of the proximity of that entrance to the sidewalk and the
fact that guests are required to unload and depart from the
sidewalk itself at the level of traffic that exists on the Main
Street we have had some safety problems in the past.
Particularly when the snowplow pile the snow directly up on the
sidewalk. David has to maintain that all the time to keep it
clear. There are problems of not being able to get the van up to
the curb itself to be able to unload passengers. The Police
Department has a problem with the location of the van blocking
the school crossing and the inability of the officers to see the
,
nonconforming section of code. The property was reconstructed.
The problem was it had to be reconstructed essentially in the
exact footprint of the previous building which was nonconforming.
So the brand new Aspen Ski Lodge, although it did get an approval
from the Board of Adjustment became both nonconforming structure
and a nonconforming use as well. Subsequent to that after the
reconstruction took place the City reassessed its position toward
nonconforming lodges and the Planning Office adopted the L-3
legislation and this property as well as most of the other lodges
which were scattered outside of the Lodge District were rezoned.
This permitted the old facilities to be torn down and recon-
structed and in some cases slightly expanded. Had that legislat-
ion been in place at the time this lodge was reconstructed he
would have been required to conform to the setbacks and the
requirements and so forth that were in place as of 1974. In fact
this particular reconstruction served as sort of a roll model to
the City on what could be done toward preserving our lodge
invent ory.
The hardship that we noted in our memorandum to you is that he
was pursuing public policy. He reconstructed his lodge pursuant
to the regulations that were in place at that time which required
him to build within the setback. The legislation subsequently
changed and other properties were not burdened by similar
constraints. As a result he has certain practical difficulties
which he cannot reasonably resolve in any other manner unless he
is granted this variance. He would like to relocate the entrance
at the corner which would enable people to load and unload off of
Garmisch Street which would remove the necessity for the vann and
the limo service along here which would resolve the police
depar tment I s problem regarding the school crossing. We would
have better landscaping and sidewalk here for the people to use.
And the enclosure itself would help to eliminate what is an
increasing problem--the noise itself. It is the minimum variance
that could be granted, in order to resolve this problem and we
believe that given the circumstances surrounding the history of
the lodge that it is a necessary for the enjoyment of the
property right as evidenced by the expenditure that has been made
to upgrade this facility in the past.
Remo: I understand that the footprint was to remain the same.
Cindy Houben: I am here from the Planning Office and Alan
Richman. He is in support of these changes because of the
history and because the applicants, at the time, were forced to
work within the footprint of the building and now that the L-3
zone district is in place they feel like this lodge is actually
put into a position where it has to work around the regulations
that have happened since the time that it was built.
Remo: I understand that the footprint was to remain the same and
3
,
higher, in terms of the traffic problems associated with the
operation of the lodge. But with respect to some of your other
points, I would have to agree.
Remo: And even beyond that--it says reconstruction of the
Smuggler served as a roll model. If it was a roll model, I am
sure you are talking in terms other than the deficiencies that we
are talking about here.
Sunny: In terms of the concept of allowing nonconforming lodges.
Remo: I don't understand the reasoning that says "Had the
regulations been in place in 1979 the applicant's problems would
not exist II .
Sunny: That's correct.
Anne: They wouldn't have had to build within the footprint.
Remo: But that is not the problem. You are still not expanding
from that footprint. That is not the problem. The problem is
you are still within the framework of the footprint. And you are
trying to alleviate problems that could have been alleviated at
the time that you had the same footprint in 1979.
Sunny: Since I didn't process the approval for the recon-
struction, I can't tell you whether they could have been allev-
iated at that time or not. Obviously air conditioning could have
been a choice they could have made at that time. But as far as
whether or not they could have moved the entrance in 1979 or
whether or not that was desireable, I really don't know.
Remo: Well, it says "These difficulties include the inability to
provide convenient and safe access to the lodge and the inability
to realistically address the ever worsening problem of traffic-
generated noise".
Aga in, you didn't have to put it on Main Street. Main Street
obviously even in 1979 was a major thoroughfare and if you wanted
to pr oj ect what was going to happen to Main Street, it wasn't
going to decrease in traffic.
Sunny: I guess all I can say, not hav ing been there, was that
the decision was an attempt to reconstruct the facility. It had
the original footprint, units and so forth and the kinds of
problems which have come up since then were not anticipa ted at
that time. And it was an uphill battle--
Remo: OK, but your argument is not in that sense.
Sunny: It was an uphill battle to obtain the ability at that
5
,.
,
we are trying to do by enclosing this and being able to relocate
the fence and relocate the entryway, to deal with that safety
problem--see what the problem with guests and my workers and me
not having to be splattered by Main street traffic and assaulted
by the noise pollution.
Sunny: I guess, Remo, had they anticipated this level of problem
and given the fact that this setback existed in 1979, they could
have requested in addition to the right to rebuild. You have to
remember that the variance that was granted was not for encroach-
ments or setbacks. It was a variance from a limitation on the
dollar amount of money. They could have asked at that time to do
this right here. This was not anticipated at that time.
Remo: I will address that later. You are gOing to reconstruct
the existing wood fence and you are also going to do something to
the sidewalk and additional landscaping. You are not here for
that. Can I ask you why you are reconstructing the fence? Is
there a sound consideration? Is it a 6 ft fence?
Dave: No it is not. It is a 4 and 1/2 feet.
Remo: Which fence is this now?
Dave: This is the Garmisch and--
Remo: I walked up to the Garmisch fence and it is above my head.
And not only that it is on a grade coming up from the sidewalk to
the bottom of the fence and then goes up 6 ft.
Sunny: The reconstruction of the fence is dictated in part by
HPC concerns. We want to move the entrance to the Garmisch side.
Originally we were going to leave the fence and enclose this
portion and have it come along here. HPC, in order to keep from
having the straight wall, asked us to--
Remo: Jog the fence--
Sunny: CCLC and the Engineering Department now want to have a
straight sidewalk.
Remo: Are they getting rid of trees then?
Sunny: No. They are relocating some trees. There are some
diseased ones that they are replacing and there is a big dip in
the sidewalk that goes down here as well. This is not safe. So
we are putting in a new sidewalk--we had to raise the grade over
here to eliminate this whole drainage and so forth so there is a
new sidewalk type put in here. We are adding to the landscaping
as well and do the fence at the same time. It is slightly higher
which will help to some extent to reduce the noise.
7
additional square footage that can be used to cover the ramp
itself although that would be desireable.
Wayne: One circumstance that I could add. It has changed since
1979 is that the curb and gutter along that portion of Main
Street has settled unevenly. And there is no consistent flow line
so you tend to get pockets of water standing all the time. This
is along the Main Street section. I am working with the
Engineering Department to try to rectify that situation but
because of the changes in the grade on Main Street, it appears
there is always going to be at least the opportunity for some
standing water. We don't have that problem on Garmisch.
Josephine: I think all my questions have been answered.
Wayne:
about 5
of your
There is a net gain of quite a few shrubs and boulders--
large Aspen Trees as a result of this. That is not part
consideration but I did want to bring it up.
Josephine: I
Main Street.
door for me to
to do it and
etc. unloading
am really glad to see you get that entrance off
I sometimes drive an old car that has this huge
open out and get out on Main Street. I don't like
I really think it is important to get those vans
and cars unloading onto Garmisch Street.
Charlie: Is this a new glass door set out from the office area?
Wayne: Yes.
Charlie: Under the canopy.
Wayne: Yes.
Charlie: And what is the reason for that?
Wayne: To create an airlock situation.
Charlie: But it is open to--
Wayne: It is a separate enclosure. It has to be clos2d from the
pool because of state regulations.
Remo: But it is not now.
Wayne: There is a fence that goes across there that separates
it.
Sunny: This entry creates a formal entryway. It creates a
partially enclosed are underneath this canopy. I believe in
subsequent improvements they made them go back to the Building
Depar tment to further enclose this area. That is basically all
they can do because of additional FAR. And since that area is
9
Remo: Well but there are lodges on your side of the street also.
But you are also in the setback.
Dave: Because of circumstances beyond my control. I would not
have built that bUilding right there. That is right but they are
not built on the setback so this never sees the sunshine.
Remo: It is incumbent upon us to give you the minimum variance
allowed. That is what we have to do. I am not an architect and
I don't know, but in order for you to alleviate the problems that
you are talking about, one is noise and one is--I would relocate
that wall in a different area which serves the same purpose. I
just did it now and it is putting that wall back 10 feet which
you don't even have to come to us actually. And lined up with
the staircase and going across before you get into the entryway.
Dave: That doesn't serve as an incentive for people pulling up
an parking here to unload.
Remo: Sure--you can still put a fence there.
Anne: But then how are you going to get in?
Remo: You get in the same way you are getting in. I am just
saying you have other alternatives. And I don't know whether you
have explored them or not but again because we do have to give a
minimum variance and I can see that possibly this might work. If
you can do what you successfully want to achieve by granting you
a lesser variance than you want and achieve the same purpose.
Sunny: What you define by putting a wall here is a more minimum
variance than putting it here?
Remo: Actually, putting it where I told you doesn't require a
variance. It meets code. You are lO feet back. You would get a
1 foot var iance. I haven I t measured it but where I drew the
line--
Sunny: We are also asking you to consider the decision which
Bill Drueding has made and that is by placing the wall there it
is increasing the degree of nonconformity. I have a real problem
understanding if the canopy is already encroaching--
Remo: I know, we have already gone through this.
Sunny: How are we increasing our degree of nonconformity?
Wayne: There is also a structural problem with the canopy which
we have not mentioned to date. Because again that is not
something that we typically deal with but the canopy itself was
not designed properly and it currently sags about 4 to 5 inches
at this end. It's self supporting theoretically but because of
11
.'
Remo: You are getting rid of it you said.
Dave: No, the stairwell has to stay.
Remo: I don't know if we are looking at the same thing. The
steps going down--
Sunny: The stairwell itself here, the staircase exits right--
here is the upstairs--
Remo: I know, I saw--
Sunny: So what it does it dumps everybody right in front of the
stair itself. You have got doors here.
Remo: We are talking about noise as one of the factors that we
were talking about before, right?
Sunny: Yes.
Dave: Your solution takes care of noise but then creates a
problem far greater for me in that it creates a safety hazard.
If I am in a fire and I have got to run out through this little
maze, I am very uncomfortable with that door there as opposed to
the door here--
Remo: Well you would have a little extra space but still have
the same problem.
Sunny: The other aspect too, Remo, is that I think that the long
range plans are since this canopy comes back here--in other words
this is all underneath--you can't do anything FAR wise because of
this nonconformity problem but he can't enclose this. I think it
is his intention at some point to come back as he makes further
improvements to enclose this area to create a more functional
lobby. And to create a way to get into this building to take
this door which is sitting right in front of the stairwell--
Remo: Well, that allows an even greater area--
Sunny: And moving it here. So if you put a wall there then you
have no ability to use this space. It is a covered space.
Remo: Well you can come this way as a covered space which you--
Sunny: You can only come back through here--this area right here
which is right in front of the stai rwell. ~lha t he needs to be
able to use is this area here. Right here is his checkin desk at
the moment. And he can enclose the space--
Remo: OK, I understand. I am going to have to defer to the
Board and have them decide how they feel about this.
13
Sunny: It says "See attached application."
Remo: We don't even have a lawyer or the Building Inspector
here.
Sunny: My instructions were, given the complexity
space, I said, "See attached application".
application. I appealed his order. He said that--
of it, in this
I wrote the
Remo: So we have to make 2 decisions here. Is that what you are
telling me?
Sunny: You could make 2 decisions.
Remo: Well, we have to if that is your appeal.
what we are--
But that's not
Sunny: He said that since the issue had come up before that I
ought to state a case for the variance itself. That is what I
did.
Remo: So then you are not appealing his decision.
Sunny: We request that--
Remo: I know. It is a misunderstanding.
Sunny: We requested that you review his decision. And then I
said "In the event that the decision stands, the rational for the
variance is as follows:" That is what is outlined on the
application. So, yes, you could take a two-step action if you
wanted to.
Wayne: One final comment which is a takeoff on something that
David said and that is that the Fire Marshal, wayne Vandemark had
requested an 8 foot clearance--we were pinched down because of a
concern of the HPC. This angle specifically creates a problem
where this is about 6 feet here. The more secure we make this
and the more conflicts with people coming out of the steps,
people coming out of the door, milling around, if you will, in an
emergency situation, the less comfortable he is going to be. He
did agree that this was acceptable. He wanted more of a
clearance here because the HPC concerns. We tried to balance
that. This becomes more of a problem with a gurney with traffic
and that sort of thing.
Remo: We haven I t taken any of those things out. We have just
relocated the door and put--the effort is to tell you that we
relocate the door and you put up--
Rick: Who is "we?"
15
~
like they had before you reach the canopy. It's OK. I am just
pointing those things out.
Charlie: I think the issue here is undoubtedly the safety and
welfare of the public and I have never been in favor of re-
designing a designer's application and I think when I look at
this I feel it is the answer to their problem in the manner which
least affects us in any way. And if you are looking for a
minimum variance I think this is a minimum variance. By moving a
wall around and creating other problems that we haven't studied
and we haven't been able to foresee such as that staircase and
people coming and going from another floor for instance, I
wouldn't be in favor of saying a minimum variance would best
serve by moving a wall to another location. I would be in favor
of granting the variance as it has been requested by the
applicant.
Rick: I agree with Charlie in principle. In my years on the
Board I am starting to notice that we are in the business of re-
designing lousy architecture. And here is another example of
that. But I am in favor of granting this variance and I am
basing my opinions on a couple of things not the least of which
is all the problems inherent with the rezoning. I think the HPC
approval and the Planning Office recommendation for approval
weighs heavily. The fact that they are not increasing FAR I
think weighs heavily as well. I share Charlie's feeling that it
is a minimum variance. I don't like the idea--I am sorry but--I
think quite often Bill in the Building Office really takes a
narrow interpretation. I take the safety factors into
consideration. I go with this variance.
Josephine: I think the hardship in this case is that they did
their reconstructing before the L-3 zoning. So they had a number
of limitations to work around. I do not see the granting of
this--the constructing of this partial enclosure as an increase
of a nonconformity.
Remo: So you are saying we are breaking this down into two--we
are going to consider that?
Josephine: Well, I would think that we could each just state our
opinion on that so I am just stating my opinion.
Remo: Would you be in favor then of look ing into that. My
problem with that is that we are getting into a precedence
setting situation here with the Building Inspector and the
Building Department in a sense that if we say that this is not
infringing on FAR or not enlarging the nonconformity--that is the
issue, right?
Rick: I don't think we are overruling his interpretation.
l7
,"
Roll call vote: Anne Austin, aye, Rick Read, aye, Josephine
Mann, aye, Charlie Paterson, aye, Remo Lavagnino, no.
Variance granted.
Charlie made a motion to adjourn the meeting.
Josephine seconded the motion with all in favor.
5:45 pm.
The time was
~ r
-~ dtt:~il-12-J:Z1~LI _
Ja . ce M. Camey, ~p",y City ~k
19
,...."
,
Aspen 1Jhotog1raphy Studio, Inc.
SKI * fOJO/ RAJt~.Ji'OTO
December 17, 1987
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Board,
I'm Brian Sledge, o~~er and operator of Ski.Foto
for eight years.
I um here to request the apDroval of a variance for
a sign. tiith the somewhat ~ique situation and
times of operation that Ski"Foto has, we feel there
U:L'e practical difficulties our customers experience
with reC5ards to locatinG our sales office for photo
viewing in the Garden level of the Mill Street Plaza.
On the mountain, Ski"Foto photographers hand to our
customers a card with times and location of the
Mill St-,'eet Plaza bUilding. (See enclosed card)
Ski.Foto is open from 9am to lOpm with the majority
of our business between 7:30 to 10pm. Once our
customers have located the building, they proceed
dov:n the walk'/Jay to a point where they then become
confused aF to what direction they must now take.
'ofe feel a sign at that point would assure them tlley
are headinG in the right direction and would provide
them the clue to continue on CfNnstairs, successfully
locating our shop. The #1 cOlillnent we hear from our
;uests is "why don't you have a sign!" Fortunately,
the success of our business does not depend on walk
in traffic, however, our customers well being, on a
snowy eveni~s, does depend on them locating us as
easily as possible. ',,'e do not v:ant to base our need
for a sign by comparing our business to others 'crith
similar hardships, however, we would ask you to
consider our need as great as any that I Dresent to
you. Ski.Foto feels there are legitimate~hardships
to our guests and our business.
We ask for your positive consideration to our request.
Thank you.
Brian Sledge
C~-(~:V~
Provided you is a list of fellow businesses supporting
our recuest.
465 Vlorth mill #4
.Aspen, rEolorado 81611
(303) 925-5711
"
..~.._.,;'
:Aspen 1Ohotog1raphy Studio, Inc.
5kI*roro/~YJTO
.
we flu unc!a;~M~ b::~i/I~~ bUO/~0) [O-pcIaJvf6
(/)V -IJ'K /1'7 i ( / SL'r<-d cP / Q-:'Y::) .:5apppzf tile !U9r'!-'(J20 f
iO\j Cl,1 ~ bfJ JIsPf/Y, ?ho t-z)fJ'~ltlp(Gj /~51a-1? 10, eLk
IkU/t, n'7t1//(j /LtfvU,c;f5 ~''() c/vu (' !f en.:; co; ,,51.( , ~ ar, 2:1(
~e/ tlU' t..,tclclt(r(")(j (t tV OCzrl) lL}UU.jd hLcp alhJ/CcL6.j
-Ilu-,,1 p(oh/en~
!ltt:{{!~? Itl,/j
~~~tOJ1\ nv{
1&d';J //;/ /
~
1 / /
/ -. yr
~
/
-iiJ:;r ("" clJ
~~ !!t~
'----:;>). / /;/~/ ~ ~/ /~~
,_~~~c-C~ ;;~
aJ"L~~
b~w{ VLu;:y;:;)
l)flj{j0~ ~k Kt-c.;:';c/4
cA~
Ift/ffi~~
c::t>-1:---/WWD;=- Z.'" -
.1
/
~~4J; ~
lnli jJ"ta
o l
.Jkc~= ~7g/~ . //0/fe:; C"
. /:h_,- /.c-<c_ 'd.cc,-: ..
E A c, ct: I::) /\/(}:5)--
465 north mill #4 .Aspen, (9olomdo 8/611 (303) 925-5711
pitkin county
506 east main street
aspen, colorado 81611
pre- L;~ah7 /JdeL</ ~;/d/~?&pi
~ <_y/ <'"'r:?S "-'-)/ /-J,:-/ .300 he -/ ",/, -de'- /"c..rp,e y
Ir;;~ 0,L T4"e $// S;::-~e... /' ~42d -4/
205 G:u/4 4; / $:h",/ ~/>7S' r~":2~d 6;
//e Y:?/L~ CLdY ft/<sseS'SC7,..26 c:>(Le.e
j{;",<O'- It /PJ77 ~ZM1 /4e .!es/ ~~6~
. / ,
//4/~/..,.4 -,4;'-./
Date:
IJ-I-31
CITY OF ASPEN
Appc 11 an t :
Address:
1 J;7C Phone:
,Address:
).4e No.: 'n-I~
') AI m ill V ~O>/?
rJc25-5"7/1
r::/{)!J ..5, m J! $.30 I fJ
/Apt'/7 , Co J'lbll
Owner:
Location cf Pcoper~y:
(Street and Number of Subdivision Block and Lot No.)
Building Permit Application and prints or any other' pertinent
duta must accompany this application, and will be made part of
CASE NO.: '
TilE BOARD WILL ~ETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ALto
THE FACTS IN QUESTION. '
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXC~PTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS
3f.,"~
- to be (oca.+d Q-boue sfeps
. 90(i~~ -to th~ lower /erJ~/
, Of tn! mill Sfred P!a-UL
as sh~n In P/~.
re.p./tu:u, sf!Jns..hwn In.
prcfvre thct+ IS no /enjU' ,
i.her~. ' '
SKI
'-1....-
/1'-
Foro /IV/'t
'1311'1 lefll!rs
ydlot.J !eff~o~;j
JI"Ctn ba.drord
Will you be represenLdd by counsel?
Yes _
No X
, r-,
~%Z' "-~.4S- _~(_ (Applicant's Signature) .
==================~~~a~===========____a~D____~_=Ba=.=_.___=_==_=Z=~=======___
, PROVISIONS OF TH~ ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRI~G THE BUILDING INSPECTOr" TO
FORWARD T~rll~::~I~A~ION '1;,0 ~HE,(BOARD OF AD,lq,..uU,~T TII1~!..l~E, ASON F~R(:'OT
GRANTING:~~ ~~r~ ~~ '. '. 'fU
\o~O- ~c\'36~b,)(-;~'-tc b<.~~ "
~~ rt-~. ~~ .2Y-~"OL:L) 1L..~ cw...- ~~~
~S~~~~~~~~~~1r,3P-
~Rk~~t ' ,'. ,.\
~
Status
PERr-tIT REJECTED, DATE \2..~'\ \r:v-(
APPLIC!,TION FILED \ "L\ \. ,~
.
rtULED
DECISION
DATE OF HEARING
SECRETARY
DATE
.-..... ..
...... .",,",".l4".-.~'.
;;; TO
,
L --+--
'.Vj\.....<:-\
DATE \ \ ~ .~}
< \ <- \ ';{,' I
tQ~>>fi&, (Av-. r..~ ' tt\ ~
\ -+ I
"A:A;. " JL '
C; ? +.
q,'v,1€ _} ~ ~ '(?, r\N\t-1 A J-,:,~,'Vv'-'~;'y-~ CI-"t '~ 01/, ,~,~
; ,./,1\)\ ,\:,") (\t-.1:>Y \^u:lAt€ ~ ,v-..."~ <;-tJLe_~Y' (gfM.-1;. ry-, ~ ~j~ +--
P\\!A^Vill')'^ 0v' (\~(.A~/Jk l;cJ\ 0. J(, 1// b1 I 1'4 ~ 'i~/"\
it;
I
III
~-
') J.
~1\Vvv-. c ,
,
u
It
H;;::~;E;;;"f";E;;m;:;m!i!!"m!::;fm;t;::;::i::":i';;:::tt';;:l:,tt::m:l:':;;;;;l~J9;;4Xi'~!!'!J.!i!!:.!i!!:7'_:!ii=";;;"::;f;;;;;::"z:",,""'':':Z:.!i!!:'I;;;;;;::''l~,"";;;;;,,;;", '. '." '.'...;;;;;;;; ,';
I' iREoiFCM'liViI.. 4S 474 PAJ~N~lrL'::SRri~:~Etl~~:,f..PlY. POLY PAK (SO SETS) .P.7.
I
I,
DEl ACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW-UP
.
"
Aspen 1Jhotog1raphy StU'dio, Inc.
SU*fOID/ RAF&J!J.vro
6-/0-8'1
r?'Ikl/7 _(fninfz/ .A55t?5S0r
5c~ b. olio'!
,-_i()('n I to 3/(;, I I
./
:70 ivl hcmu JJt mrf {'enC,D2-?I);
cJ/UoJ ~ {U /Lrf tjC9'V (ocah;-rJ~! flcfyte-</TI f
?rcpr!J tJlJners tiki Crxl?'U-. w(f~ ~;'-'oo kef
6--} ilu 'prope/~~ ~.~ i crier??II! ~rlfl-t?Lf
rJYltv})t:<- ~~~d at <:2v5' \.~'5, mIl! Sf tL-
tilt) In~ ioJ atttJ.tht?d fULJ~/(qh-frry tlu_~ ,
?rop<?/L~: ?L+ 0.105 ~, Lffu.cf:': JJ' /.J)oa.1 d Lku
-to {)blzL~n) tk /1~~y1 and, ~lJdu.)?t~) &/ tk
?rop-€It~ ~5 LrJP055/b/c" cfharlt_ !I'll,
"",j!/i1 C'//LLfj /
13~ ~/td~
Dnan ~/€~je..
465 'VIOlrt>> mill #4 flspen, C9olomdo 8/611 (303) 925-5711
o
o e3 ~~~ '7./ Lo~ ~- s
L'd/S /::- I L
~ .,LA..,?</ 1-/('&-#0/'1'....1 s-, .tfv,.is .6~vA1
2/6 /ceo
I! C/. 8'" (' /5.3(,.
U.r /';(,h;<>~i 30,,", 503C>~
t::.~/ H
,K;,---//f/d ~(S'h/';".7 .tLN~
~ '
l,\oJ,4. /
..8.;f .,2()t
dJ2",-I /.VM ~ d /4h';/'/;; 1YS/.:>
~o Is /'/, 0, /? c:;p
.&'//-ZA.i,d4' /-I ~/o"'/<'!5
I?~, de" /J
.4~e--l1 G, p/(" 1..2
L.. Is 1<; S
/j,~ hK.:J""- 4.drlf"2S 1';0
I?o. &.~ 31S,/
/?;;S;~dl C" j7/(..1..2
@ f5kcl 75 L..~ /l--s
~oh, ~-1 c...
.....,
i<,..If j:;':--/ ;Jrsoe//' kS
.200 ..$;,-,;-4-' /-~"'J S',L .
/),sjJ.J. (1" FJr;11
.!.. k ~. E. F. &. 1-/. L
//-9-/2.-'7 w b',fr.5, ~J2.
sz,-Ie... I~O
F333 U<->,9/ps &e-
..D;:r11~1 Tbr/K' 15M S
@
~-/;; ~/oci 76
L~k ;J~K S. '
C-l~<Zr' Aj G Il~ / L~'/"
@ .t3/"cj 1c" .ic~ ~ ~ ~ /'1 7'
L~k E,..c; ~ ~ .L
~4":!h~ _ Sda~J//.)""- J,..; vgs!,n,.-/! t;!Z<JvI', Zle
c~ 1!:.t",/cI /I, A']frr7tJ--, cI
fo 6 A:~ e.- ^~,
/lo/YIeuJe>"c/'; ...::: / //.-v'",j- to'/'3 ()
@ 6},c-i,po Lo,,{, #-.s
/0/ /l c/ W~ 0/ /S
d.l/AJ-s </' r;@,c ~<-vJ k,.J i.-y
;LJ o. 8fT)' ,p'o/ ~
Hs;>-eJ, (I"" FI c,,/ ;;
/ ~ /s E'l j 8 <2. {'')
,
SVE/'l -/!Cbr~J,,"j
po. .GOl< 1'l~9
~e..yl ~, F/c;,I;J.
Lo"f Ell:
C/HZ/ .f e~/~<"'F--"'e. geJ='Y.H~
"t;? o,.8o>r /~~ 5
A-,r::'~ d,. g''I(;, I a2
L"h r:: rt;.1
Sv'E/) ~q,/~,-ehr.J
I?o, bO)f /f~J
~hJI d,. FIC, 1;1
",.,"'_._,_____...._~~~~'._~~.__,_..,,'_ ,,. H_'"".__'
o
~__// A/oek --\7./
/n~/<:.
W';/'~7 .t~/or?..--/'" "'- gf'JQvr>70-/ I
Ba ^ -Ie '15
..r:;., (' f", e ~ / /-, 11 ~V/> ~ /1?.J$ (.)
L" ~ L - S;;r;'" ,"" 6/c/f LL ~
?UJ/~ [ .(,,;Jvr-J
I! 0, .tlo r ;20~ 7
4$;/,e-~f d, Y/~/..)
r
L"h H.f~
Lfi ~""n'/~I 7...;c,
60x qOIC>
&fJe-/, (1, ?It.. I:;
L&>.J- C)
.uv~e... ./ rlh<:.1,4-r.P1P J ~ 4--JS<>-,/
IUr,.. E. (!,N",':6f912 )lve
/}!,c-t>"';>r /lc/z-G--/A- cYSo;;20
, ,
L04 14>.? S
/?s/l~..-./ L3/J-.r/co""~ J ~c
/) U e. / ~-9/" e... cLy;,
/I? S,;; ,xl t, /I/' / / ,c-J
/lj) e"/, (! <', 6'/ t, 1/
@ 6~ci YI L~ ~ -1.B c,. k L, ~ <<q ~ f /2 s-.
La /-$ h: 13
A;>e J /),2('"4,/e L lei
(?~ L ~J'-;?,.,-,/ d'"",./- <::
I r If' ij d.. Sh<p" I
S:~.4 aj,/V'~h / C/7)~/;'AI;'" fo~;,
o
c,--I/. block 71
L;1<:2.
/:::-er?: <!''''(C2. </ /,-,~,::.:Je.. t5@-2 j C
/? O. 6e" .:3!r, 0
/#,/'<>"'/ C~. ;?Ic,,/,;::).
.(" /s A- L
Czy :>,0. I ,.4 h(' €.-
/:/)0,'&... ..32
//5jJM, a, S}~/~
/? , ,
Co e.;-
La J- H
C/c4-/d ,c:.~"/e-, LI/
;? () &oj{ .3.:<
/?.s;:;e~ ~ ' 8"1(;/-1
Le./.5 N.,I 0
4",? dc-l wi JYYI ,,'c (/-/e""fr?~ dl,;;:' ~
..? /</ E-rs/ htJH'A>Y' 4ve. ,
k/J"'~ c" ?/~ 1.;2
i.o~ ?f? i? s
C, l: a/ Hs~er/
@
/-3/()~j. R'J.. j",k #-5
~h.- "tJ,b, C'. <.) --n~ 1?4>,D"'~''- C,..;ci. /)1/ U-v,'k
7.0<< r?2.eo/'",e4p ,c/2ACAo"'Aj Ot'hV"'",2&'. ASd<:'.
U", , 'f /6,?
30/ E. /1,/",-,; h)ve.
/}:S:j:'e.A/! G" R7~I/
L()~ E...s t;
wI;;-ee/e/z ~",--.e /ks.oc-"', 1.-vc '
j,/5 $0. f/1o"/~i<:(,1. s;-./.,
11:r;;~.../1 Co. [/1(,//
_ ",~___'''"~~~',,''... ....".~ ,_~,~~."",_~__~"H"",""_~'_~_'_~ ...._._-~_,
@
do", V 8~t'i: >(:2-,
LD /5 /'/ ~ ,,/ /T -/'..z
C~? /h 'S';G/)7'2/';
Cj, ,! i~~ L, ~,.'/
A 0, B"J<, 22-1.3
Aj'J€,df c., ,FIC, f;(
/ /J/j
LDh S;. /'- c/ r/ -fJ.. Ils/J~ erl-?/I1~/ct'I;"J d..lcla, u.,y.;&
,
LJ I;' A-w1 L en! ~ CJ v/ /('4
p.~ s ,Lu... 0/ Z b l 6/t72-//f?Z cI -pQs/,
L/,Jo ~.! -/ ~N .s:-I
~...I, C. Plfr,l/
/"k k- S ,Jyde.-2 ~/,
c/ ~ 0/ /}.sjJ p.j
o Alock 91 L..>A:. ;i-s
L,.4 /J A (l j)
T ,
//0 /'1e- C-'9-,p';t./ G,
/5'0 S B,c~, ~e ...v"'-Y Il III cI
~' I J /l "
~I9-vS,<) '/0/ l/lJIo':::d'A 9t/tJ{'5
La Is E. F ~ /{ r
L~SS<:: / Es/,(p/?. /'4~d/,t)i-Je-
7h~ h,?s-/~/! BA-..I:. al-&;;,.../J?Z,.,clre'.j
/c:U..5 ~7je""/t>"cI ^~.
C!~d LZ-vC'~':VI C'", FISt:> 3
!.t:l~ Ie
/-II v/ /J-u;oc. '
43.) 5 (lOt:lrr::- S!.
Hrp-e---l, d _ I?/~II
---------.,-,,--.--, ~ . ~---~--_..".~-
@
~.../;I .f? lor' i ~?' f
L "h- L, rt N:'
1'1fi-7<:r,2;e Lye", kltVStJ)
qO..3 t-J",..I /1.-" /;.-<>'" S-";.
/?S/, '...;/ a, 6"/ t.. / /
Lois ~jJf?j:..?
.,.c;,,= ":;;;:-~o'.-J
Lc>) S
q. c;, / ~, O. 21 -he
;l'l.J.3 F/}/p,./ov...! I
~/I/i-:S, T--,!'-S' 75;L~)
@ .b 10(' /- if ~ k IJ-s
L6k ..44 c
)i.fl CUjicj L?'n'6~< c1,.
f!~/Y"7' /1 /fH. iJe; J
/)1'\ 11'
f:'v, /joy So
do,set Ic:4,',e ,fJ1.2J"
.!.,~ so, 2ol./-ll d, (! I vv..&'f 51",& &,,,,11, ~ 10/ .(')
S4 f, b/r/r;" / '0fbd, :L-.tc-
.,21) ? ~c"/ /. r/). 1/ s;.J,
/)s'P~N, G. F/~/2
Lois "",Ii kO'oI. q E //9/) d/ t=
/:"ulcl l Lv #e... btzeSN)z.-.
y?o, &~ ~70
ij..w.e~ l?c. ?j(o / ~
r
L, I~ ~,.,2(11 o~ F ~,.;L() I o/- E',.,rl-2S' ,,/ j~
,
71,0,"",'''''' .( /)/ (' e .s-4-R c1
I? D ,&,,.. 10&.$
j)~~--I; a, f?/&,/~
<,,__,_,~,"."'._'_k_...,.._-v'_~__'~""~'" ,.- -
o
C",;i 8/0,.) Rf"
La k ~ ~ Z
//h=/ey /? .6~;c1<.J..:.,
I '--'0>-c ~ 7,,2r:/ ~ sf
M~ y""i/ ,J~,~ .~~ / /00..)3
I
/ k L -- -r7 1,/1 ,/
Lo J:s. .,01"''-' / M(.,);' ''C,\ '_ c,4' qp ,
~e.. - ~<J",4~,C.; /"/~'?/S~f J
qoo/ C/ ~SP..v 6-'J/v cI, ;.::,,/~
6Kh. ~o,,',... O,k. 7011f'
J.r ) ",/ OcV/e?S
L".J, UrN less .J 1</'''/ /'-..1 .
cU/!-//"/< I-!p,,:p e ) ./ J2.
P(;, SC-~ /".3/
/1,;-~~..J/ (?o, F/u. /~
/"j 1'1/</'01 v/./~' <5/ 1-1
,t1~".J/____. ,L:--J k,'/,"'''S-'~/'
"'/0"1 ('/~J'e,., 81", c!
o/clAj"",,/O "?:<, Dk 7.3/IJ
/,,/ CJ ,/)vv.ke. ~-vo... -/:)// VA.l~1-
'-L---:--''Uv;le / Lc.
doy: .;2~36
,4;/''"''''r G. S::/t; I~
L~ ~f
La~'" A /1___ ~"I'
t;;/o ~/.,L!, d~v J /l. / 6- 'jJ,2USWA-y
ifl/~! /eY 75.2c f::,
i.",Js s,;, 75',J.? .ls
0' /
/::.MSOd} </ L-~s.4-'e 1-..60.-.1;
;? () 6, X /;).;2 g %
A?....J/ (J,. rY/t./ ='2
~.....~..."..~."~.~-,,_.<...--_'-'~.---'-<-~"~~.-' ......
@
{?,., -I 1. t31o~ Ie ??
I r-, r
L~k ;/.;(56/ /\<!S
L e v;.,..r/ /'J/1'7P/ ;""4 J .:;: 4,
c{, G~N/A / ~v/~, l~~ /}"
,
..:.d ;J;;1 J 6
17 dr;/l,,/ /;"'2
,,*,v ~~.,.I, /A,);,!j~,;i /CCC,,J
7
,-0<:'
f.
Ah"J- %9 ~;,f H d ~ ij E,
, f
'/0/ /1,,0'01,4
r~, /z. 7" F~',.{p L'-Ic/ r/"'<
C/O'If E6e~s),r;; g~, '7
~ / Li I
75 76 0/1 c/p.V'.. .0/1 r/~o I
6: 6e;?s/e'rYL'h'lt v/,.,,,I r:::}/2;<'I4-v!
/.6'/ s;;;, ,.;>';'",/ /9 f'6
Bl,k ~Soc
~jp r ,.-l/ \"/
uvt) ~,/7,1 ~,-.
/I-<;;f € .I! (1., , J7:Jt, 1/
L" I E /<! I c/-' <7-,
/)"1'1"/ -Je 41>/0 (!/-eJt i-/
S3 0 ~/rlLI I
/q/'P")r r1, fJ~/)
L,.I ;'//6 '.1 c..-
13o?k~o~c/ /1:.C:CC '
50)( .;JJ,,2 /
'*,Pe"Jr G. R/fpl.)
L/j d && 'of 6
I?/lle.)~ L .P~/;> /~.
1)'76/ z";;).4""(I;$
;)0, 13"" lca
/9::;/ ,;,1, r?;, g:'! (" 1.1
, .
@
(7,,,,;( Ahc k pC;
L c> I /91/0/ ,/j {I; S'':' ~,,(''':/ ~ i"0/5 )
H~",-t l ~! s ./.., i ~/,i '-~....~ .p..v~,..,.../
0/'/3 E/r"rJ /-.1;/ I~'-( /lvp
/::kj--!"" oj J ~ ,,?/G, II
d:-~,<"e.. C--, /C~cJ
PO ~ 3:5,/''7
/);r:?-, PI, r1 ' !?/ {p I ~
~ - /
- I;b~:'-q h~C
(IN';;" I ~'~
C'c./,j
II/) II '. ~~
'-.0 r ~,-: -' ~ "'--; '--'..c
.z~y{,~.,4" N:" / kt'le. (j.s" /-!
G 7.5 E/HC r CZ-"'"" "- /Ji/ e
/k,/J""'J, (1) Plt./I
. t/cf
r> ;I
Le> I ~ b. 251,,/ AI / ~/ )-- //1/2-/ ',.{ t!. - f\o....,;cr'f ;;"j A~/7f.S (()..;'J,
"kd.4, i:-OJI.s-6VicJ.sJU~'-4
41'/ E"", J /4r-..,~
~eN! a, ,5/(,1/
')
1<-11 'J>- /6 I') /'J 1'1 '<'5
J / / / I I
:Lf / C!. .:1/11 (' dl3
4~9'N A~I'M4.fJ ON' k .c? /31 1<-1, I;)J;2:2 J .:231 ..2~ ~r
Lf/I'f G. /!rr-f~
A-fJe "oj! C~L II ~ II
J"J Ic'/A-,~- v~,-) /2.:2./
;J~> \ '7,);;>
1'9s;J~I~' [>1' /;)
ct~).J ;;:,.,e - 1/01'-/ 2-;21
64'< E-;L
~d,"'>'-r~ III /p i?~, ~ f/~ 15
l?'6/ 6ICet<.Je,Z.- UN') c- /
,-/.2.3 ,?, Iv'l rv> .--/
I)sr~~.-J, (10 r ,pc,)/
r__
.--.
County of Pitkin
State of Colorado
)
) SSe
)
-'
,..
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING
OF A VARIANCE HEARING BEFORE
THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF
ADJUSTMENT (Pursuant to
Section 2-22 (c) of the Municipal
Code)
The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and say~ as
, "
follows:
, -
....,..
....
l. I , ~@YS'_.-~i'J!Je
representing an Applicant, b.efore
, being or
....
.. '..
.
the City of Aspen Board of
Adjustment, personally ce'rt'ify that the attached photograph
'.' 'l~. .
fairly and accurately represents ,the sign posted as Notice of the
,
var ia!lce hear ing on thfs matter in a conspicuous place on the
subject property (as it 'could be seen from the nearest public
way) and
from the
1-1, --
that the said sign was posted and
'7th - day of " ,DI"'f'e-rnhf';.r
day of .. -DeC',om ~~. , 19f1.
'.~ ~
C:I.
visible continuously
, 19..tl, to the
(Must be posted for
. "P'
../
IAL SEAL.
-fw'-C[ I
eu-
~N,
Fo...>ND -u:-\ \'5 AW\OAVI,
A~ ML,\ \l-\-\l\.)G-S A"-ID
rr 8E~ IN L\OJZ.
RLE.
- \~
CITY CLERK
130 5, GALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
CITY CLERK
130 5, GALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
,"~'-;::~
-'-, .---..~--'" ..---
~.~ "'-""" ---~..-.-.. --
---
(,:;.,..
SIB 13 D109ZC91 FWD
t S:n;hlr:,L. TTi1E EXPD
7.':yt ",W MTN ST
~~~~~ CO 81611-1627
% ' S{(fllil/,-"U"N TU "EN"ER .
1I7a/1-<( LJe b~/ of tva.' .5otz Y/-D(r7--/
1/3 CO/Jf +ayUlA-'<'-
~'VJJ Cp I? I~//
-;~
a v{ laL,)tUu. );;1..p'
/I n ,< ( i .<:JQ , (l
_ II"' (~L{' ) II / III ::if"
\-./ffcp::fl, (0 'if 16 II
,
: l'.liJl \
: r;~
\0 "J]O~',
,..... (...1
~]J
e~~-;:&,~":~;"\.,.'
UU<<7 .."
i,
t". ,",,/;"
I\o-t cd' ~
o.dd,u~
0\'
r;\.~_,,,-</
I "i
\ ",~ -"" ;"
~/c
CITY CLERK
130 S. GALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
ETU091-
U"'D", , i 8;~O~ L
,'~' -, ,.lt~4 j t::'. .~ ." i
- ". ~ '- -'~ <~ ,,'
'...:J o".::;,~:~< :,-""c.~t"o
""fte..l('''~i;ED
P1Rt:o
LJ11 Ii f.u' ~5S () c,
1J~ E, {~ !d
L~'Y7J Co ,%16/1
CITY CLERK
130 S. GALENA
ASPEN, CO 81611
~::;o:~~v'
ETl.J~1/t
"'0 ~6
IN 8<No<.
SUr",/f'"
...,It::-....., " .'
,""II"",I'l,~ ""
" ":"<U1il.~<&;.i
~ " ; 'c;;\"y~v.
Uhee k,- ~tL'l{Asoc, '5 "fln L
eJlS ;)0, YntJYJd/ull ,-Y
~'Y)I t~ 8'1611
Cn:, f', /'~:'-
~ :.,,' .