HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.617W-Main-No.Case.#
r.-....""
APPEACWTO BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTHtNT
CITY OF ASPEN
DATE f/V.rcJ CASE NO.
APPELLANT 6/7 t.J, H/I/N S7As<</~s- ADDRESS % ;(:lr/,.}-.;{CY)(,;iI,!/ SI;A)p~ '
PHONE %R(c//v f,;r;- k7jj
OWNER ~;17'Y7~ ADDRESSS{M~
LOCATION OF PROPERTY /dti (?r~ h/oPkdr/C-Z; o-l'As:&.d
, r
b/7 W- !j,/N S~
I Street & Number of Subdivision Blk. & lot No.
Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent
data must accompany this application, and will be made part of
.
CASE NO.
THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS.APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN
ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOHING JUSTIFICATIntIS:
.~~~ 4Mr/~ //r~ ~CU~GA/1
.
Will you be represented by counsel?
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING rHE BUILDING INSPECTOR
TO FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND REASON
FOR NOT GRANTING: Application is made for a variance to permit an
office building to exceed the height limit. The proposed office
building will be 30 feet high whereas the maximum permitted height
is 25 feet. Sec. 24-3.4 Area and Bulk Reg~~o~~nts 0 Office district.
and Sec. 24-3.7 (g) Height pro-COUNTY TR~ ." visions.
~..
1[ r" ~.. " .
/--.",:",".- 'j
~: :i cl___ ..u3C~2['
, : L AUG .0 198(; 1/0 0 ()
. "'j ~ ,. ~ ...\.. '
ASPEN. COLORADO 8 t ~-; :~.:J
Status
~ .
~ "
Signed " ~~
.
.
PERMIT REJECTED, DATE
APPLICATION FILED
DECISION
DATE IF HEARING
SECRETARY
DATE
MAILE9..
- "
"""-' JI"
APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
To:
From:
Re:
City of Aspen Board of Adjustment
617 West Main Street Associates (Applicant)
Real property located at Lots C and D, Block 25,
City and Townsite of Aspen
July 25, 1980
Date:
Dear Members of the Board of Adjustment
The Applicant hereby appeals from the decision of the
City of Aspen Building Inspector concerning the interpre-
tation of the character of the roof to be constructed on a
building for which a building permit has issued, to be
located on the above-described real property. In the al-
ternative, in the event the Board of Adjustment affirms the
interpretation of the City Building Inspector concerning
said roof design, the Applicant requests a variance to
exceed the present twenty-five foot height limitation by an
additional five feet. The property is located in the 0 -
Office Zone which has a twenty-five foot height limitation.
According to Section 24-3.7(g) "Height Provisions", the
height of a building with a flat or Mansard roof is measured
from the natural undisturbed ground slope of the property to
the top of the flat or Mansard roof. If a roof has a
gable, hip, gambrel or similar pitched roof, the height is
measured from the natural undistrubed ground slope to the
midpoint between the eaves and ridge of such pitched roofs,
provided that the peak of such pitched roofs may not exceed
five feet above the specified maximum height limitation.
The Applicant and the Building Inspector agree that the roof
for which a building permit was issued is a pitched roof and
therefore that the height of the roof from natural ground
slope to top of the ridge is lawfully thirty feet. However,
the placement of skylights within and below the ridge of the
roof, according to the Building Inspector, changes the
nature of the roof from a pitched roof to a flat or Mansard
roof and therfore the Building Inspector has determined that
the skylight placement requested by the Applicant would
cause the building to unlawfully exceed the twenty-five foot
height limitation. It is the Applicant's position that the
placement of the skylights which are below the ridge line of
the roof and not visable from public view does not change
the character of the roof from that of a pitched roof entitled
to exceed the twenty-five foot limitation by an additional
five feet. Attached as exhibits are building plans for the
roof. Exhibit A is a copy of the plan sheet for the roof
which was approved by the Building Inspector as a pitched
roof and for which a permit has been issued. Attached at
Exhibit B is a copy of the roof plan preferred by the
Applicant but which is interpreted by the Building Inspector
as creating a flat or Mansard roof and therefore not able to
exceed the twenty-five foot height limitation.
The plan preferred by the Building Inspector has
skylights approximately three and one-half feet below the
ridge line of the roof and angled into the center ceiling
joists of the building in a manner which will certainly
create water leakage and drainage problems as well as
additional expense for elaborate framing and drain detailing.
This creates a functional hardship to the Applicant as well
as very poor construction design. The plan shown at Ex-
hibit B would have the skylights recessed approximately one
, .
-'"
'Io._~..
.....,
and one-half feet below the pitch of the roof and only
slightly angled to mitigate drainage problems. There is
absolutely no difference in the exterior elevations of the
building between Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
Unfortunately, there is no specific guidance given in
the zoning code other than that set forth at 24-3.7(g). The
Building Inspector is not applying guidelines or standards
for his determination and in that regard his decision is
arbitrary and not supported by provisions of the zoning
code. For these reasons the Applicant presents its appeal
to the Board of Adjustment. It is clear that the roof
itself, as viewed from its exterior elevations is considered
by the Building Inspector to be a pitched roof. Therefore,
without citation to some provision of the zoning code to the
contrary, a pitched roof does not become a flat roof merely
by the placement of skylights below the ridge line of the
roof and on a visually screened and slightly angled hori-
zontal plane.
Therefore, the Applicant respectfully requests that the
Board of Adjustment reverse the decision of the Building
Inspector that placement of the skylights as shown on
Exhibit B attached hereto changes the roof shown on Ex-
hibit A attached hereto from a pitched roof to a flat roof
and thus, determine, to the Applicant's benefit, that the
roof shown on Exhibit B is, in fact, a pitched roof for
purposes of the height provisions set forth at Section 24-
3.7 (g).
In the alternative, if the Board finds that the Building
Inspector's determination that the roofline shown at Ex-
hibit B is, in fact, a flat roof, then, the Applicant re-
spectfully requests the Board of Adjustment to grant a
variance from the twenty-five foot limitation to permit
Applicant to exceed said height limitation by an additional
five feet. As the facts in the first section of this request
indicate, the twenty-five foot height limitation creates
practical difficulties and unnecessary hardships on the
Applicant due to the unique and functionally impractical
roof design required by the Building Inspector for his
determination the roof is a pitched roof. The Applicant
would be required to either adopt the difficult and non-
functional roof design shown on Exhibit A attached hereto,
or reduce the building height by five feet. Due to the
small size of the Townsite lots on which this building is to
be placed, the various parking requirements and other
setback and floor area ratio restrictions, this additional
requirement of lowering the height of the roof line will
deprive the Applicant of his substantial property rights
enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone
but denied this property because of the arbitrary deter-
mination by the Building Inspector concerning the character
of the roof line. In addition, the Applicant would be
required to seek Historic Preservation Committee approval
for a lower roof line and, would be subject to the present
moratorium on Historic Preservation Committee approvals in
the Main Street area. This creates an extreme hardship on
the Applicant whose construction is already underway. The
granting of the variance will not adversely affect the
general purpose of the comprehensive general plan, impact
the character and quality of the neighborhood or violate any
provisions of the zoning ordinance or the Historic Preser-
vation Committee approvals previously obtained.
-2-
,(11'-""
'""'
.' "
.,<.....,
For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant respectfully
requests the Board of Adjustment to grant the variance
requested to exceed the present twenty-five foot limitation
by an additional five feet.
Respectfully submitted,
SACHS, KLEIN & SEIGLE
By
/.
o
/ /// /
/ ,/~/" //"'/ //
/...c / /~; ./''/..i';t:-----.
~,/)/
Herbert" S. Klein
Attorney for Applicant
201 N. Mill, Suite 201
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-8700
-3-
.
"
";},;'.I':'-,
. .<':ri~,:)i,
, -'>:tJ~. .-
.:,~,.j,
, ..
t<\
~ - ,
, t.. '-t,J"
. ".,.< . .~.'.
't.'
.....
w"....
'-
',;'<I(:.~- .
~--.
,
,.. .....
,"
',i
IN -; ".c.. Ar L- 'ct YV( R
~ C ~\'Nt> ~'~(." c...RII3.
l.!:: __
- --
-... -.- -.--
. -- ---
' ---, =='---
......, --- ~
- I
Ii,
'. \.i JJtt:. .
PI'-C
-----._-~-
I
-(Il
" .
.. 5',
.p.
2 )
..<
..
r.
;
I ~
I ~
~
I .
---.,
..--
I \ri .-
.,
"
-1--
{.-J
'.:}
-:-j
I
I:
),<'
';
'V:, ,
")>.,
..1..\
"., .J
- 1
0"
"
I
;
11
I
I,'
I~
'~
~
~r'~
.'.J
. 'l
~~~.
~t~
.~.
"I
I
'-.\,
>~\~:
':..0'. i__~'._~:l
"T
i
J
_.._,.._"._~
f~f~1=.~.~__~;'~-~:-=.
.-..--.-..-,--------. ~----_._...
.--.. ~_.-.~,~.__.~_._.
--..-........---..--..
_.....-----,~--_. ....-,....
j
I
I
. --
:r' I
:1 I
" I
'I I
~ !
.!Ij .
:1
II ,
'("
:t:'
I
i
I
I
--t.! ~
- - .-, .;A'I
I,
, I
I
I
~
~
4.l
'.
--- -- --'.'-'. ._--.-.._._~
-.---"-.
:::-:::.:;:::::j.":::'::~~-
.~'
-_.._~..,.....,-....-.,_. -...
~..~ -~. .~. --. ..'
1----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
, I
I
- "., ",..' ",or ~.~
j
I
I
1'.."
'"
,-,,'
---...-,.- .. - ------.--
,J ~
H S\ N I:::, <\::l~N'~d.>":..
----.--. .-- ~-
--
.:1'OOM
~"y '"?NI tt ~"d -,:j,-'1:' .)<> '",
O~?oj N>J^ ~ ~.,j: "-.
s:-;a'"!~Nl\-1""
~"'Q:il-:> ":I.....;.L...
.1
-4--.--.-.--,,--
-------;-
i
---
I
""'_.~------~----------- -'-
J-,/'~'
,- I '--- -'---
I
1902J
,,1011, x .--.:,{s.(
II
I 1
-.. J.. +____
-,-- , - -1----;
I 1/ o.
I
. ,,'w
~/
~):IO~ ~"'-'cJ
o.J,. .J.~Ocl .. '%'.l
S\N'V3e 3/..J.
r
I
I
j
r"-' -.--- -
J r
I
f 1
L ---
/,
i"',_,~ ...
'."\,~<;r,._';...-t
, ":~,,,'.t,'4~-~:_:,
'''-:f"'!!:--'~ ~
'.,,",
- -'--".
-,
,
r
--,
1
:-:;J.HCC)II."....S
".:iJ"""'V";!3.jO ,I>- "', V
.'
).----- -
------- --.
'-~._-
....- .-------.-- ---i'"
...._u. __'''-.._ ___'.'___
'- -- --
L
I
;
i
I
I
~
>-
~
,
i-
'I'~
- '-,-- -- ---, -"- ",-,.., '"m_._ ...___ '__... __"'___. __,__.. ..___
-~- ---~"1t~1l
-....--..,.
\' :
. j
-----~
C~~,
.--
----I ~rJJ
- '.'- - ",~
---~
,.....,
'''-' ..-
/....
..-
--1
>~
'"
.,
'~
"
/
~l[J]
W:::-~J,
~tI - '__.~.
, .
-~ :::.o.:;:.c.....;.:.:...::::,;.,.::.___
",'.
--rTTl
.' I ~
I I I I
I I I I
.___:.. I L.:.:::::--
r-
::...:.::..~~.__.-
~.---:--::--
----=--~
-~
J1 ~ ~
~
1- q ,
~:
...
, J a i-.
.- -11- - --, ..();;)
~
--J~ II " ' ~'
--. i~ w
I- ~
~
':::_.:...- It~
11 ,-
~ .~-...
I
V
f
II
-\ 'l'l
,..~
l~ ,.,.
!'l',~
,~ !'C
':.i'" _
'Z
f
t , ,
.t....
't .~' _'
f,
I
I
J
1", '
f)
\,---,
o
'i...,-'
.J-
~'~
, I
f._~ '
,
L'..,
;(.~
': .
~.r:l
i
........--,...--..---- _._--,_._~--- - ---.'--.'- .
i -
')
,;..,._,------
~l
--... .......---f~._.--
I
N'1T~
,.... I I't!
1.t.;S()~._'\r't! ~Ewt!?~
~ 1" ., , " b >.. '.4' <.. ;!. ,d ,.... \ ,
. .
.._r.
'":','
)
,) /1...
..... >.'.
J,;-'
(
,.
(J7 r
i 0
o -l
r VI
1 r
IV t
III TJ
/',
1/
l"'~ ~~--~:-
~
,
~ ,r>,
',"(J" FE..NC.C.'
,
(
, ;
/'Y'.'
,
L
._- ......~
'l
I,
,
1
,
,
i
---..
i
I
i
i
I
I
I
j
Q\
~
~.
"
t.
~~
-- '. --.- .-.- ,. .,-
....-.--__,_. n._.__.<'....,_~
--..----._..._ _4" ."________'_".'
r
,-,~-,._~~
, '
, I
I,
, ,
, t
I
I
/
/d' "
I'
I
,
i
~
"e....,
.
'. ./
$
--------"-------_. ....
-
t1 ",',
7J ~
"7 ..
I"
1
..j
"
.. ,--,--,
--
/<
..--
. - - ;/..Ll; --- --~-
--~/ I! //
/ + II
r
i
,
----~---.------___t-.~
.,
~'
I
,
....- - - -+
t
I
~-'e'
f'-~'
/ i [ '"
,I I '"
/ ;.- "''-." "
"'-r-~n_.-_- .-!r---------------.:.c~~~--I ,
"
'-,
f
~~,~-~--~
l
I -
j''-..,
'"
",
['I'
o ~
'""-
Z
i"1 W X
~ '"
~.ii
)< '"
,0 .'
" ....
"
~. -,
7i
V ['1
Q "
(' '" IJl
l't '\
;r,
I >
0 ~
,.
\] ('.,
}> P
'1. }]
, -<:
r
1'1 , ,
'1
-<:iJI
:'Jr;
., L,
-<( I
r I
!
'> I
i
'" I
~ I
I
r;
JU
,. ..
t
r~
~
~
~.
....'
'1--
~
~"
I
/
//
.....-~--
--..-...
L
..
1 ~:..~ --: I
,-.--~~ t
,
___..._____-J
---,
,.--_~__..lc.,..."..___=-____~"" --,7~.. _
'"'h"-'-~~_ --.~ . ,,11
r...-:=--~:::.~-.~---". ~:J ,.
I
,
-' -.,
.
.........'
.
-~I
----- I,.
.~.."--- .
, I
'~-=-- II
, I
-----j I.----~'
-'1 i I
J:I_ --'
---=-JJ
1-r["'Jil
~_-_ ~~jr
'"
,
t.:_
,
,
'I
r
i ~,f I
i ,ll
II[f;
I .'1
Illll
I
~ll
!I
, .__..J I
hO-J
,/ ",
/.. . "
.'
,
"
/
,
,
"-",-/ ~ I
-,
,.~~~-
"
,
! I
, ,
. ,
, I
l.L_
I T-
, I
____m_ '9lF" .-
_..-...- -- IIII
11
-j- - -,
~
,
~
t
i ~
I." ~
II
q
]' )1
c ()
,J. I
--
It'