HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.boa.990 E Hyman Ave.009-77
AF AL TO BOARD OF ZON I NG AD.L.J Tr1EtH
. .
CITY OF ASPEN
DATE April 4. 1977
CASE NO. '71-'1
APPELLANT
Perrv Harvey
ADDRESS990 E. Hyman Ave.
OWNER
Perry Harvey
PHONE
ADDRESS
9:1'>-277:1
9:1'>-:11R:1
LOCATION OF PROPERTY Lots R & S. Block 3:1. EaRt ARpen AddiTion
Number of Subdivision Blk. & [ot No.
Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent
data must accompany this application, and will be made part of
CASE NO.
THE BOARD WILL RETURN THIS APPLICATION IF IT DOES NOT CONTAIN
ALL THE FACTS IN QUESTION.
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED EXCEPTION SHOWING JUSTIFICATIONS:
A variance is requested from setback requirements to extend a roof
overhang 1'2" feet on East side and 3'6" feet on North side to connect
the two new units into existing improvements. Please see"att~d~ *,"~,:ZO.OC
letter and exhibits.
/
/
...-
/
Will you be represented by counsel?
.Yes No
--
SIGNED: ~/1/1~
Appellant
~(/~Y
PROVISIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE BUILDING INSPECTOR
TO FORWARD THIS APPLICATION TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND' REASON
FOR NOT GRANTING:
APPLICATIOtj IS MADE FOR A BUILDING PERMIT TO BUILD
TWO-TWO BEDROOM TOWNHOUSES. The proposed building would
have a roof over hang extending 1'-2" beyond the maximum
permitted eave extension on the east side and 3'-6".beyond
the maximum permitted eave extension on the north slde.
The maximum permitted projection into a required yard for building
eaves is eighteen (18) inches.
Sec. 24 - 3.7(f) (1)
Projections into required yards.
DECISION r~
DATE IF HEARING
SECRETARY
ing
Chief Building Inspector
Status
PERMIT REJECTED, DATE
APPLICATION FILED
MAILED
DATE
..',
r
-
...'....
,""
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Case No. 77-9
BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTME~~
TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE
DESCRIBED BELOW:
Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a
public hearing will be held in the Council Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo-
rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to
consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting
authority for variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter
24, Official.Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance
are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If
you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state,
yorrviews by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance,
as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions
of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to
grant or deny the request for variance.
The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows:
Date and Time of Meeting:
Date:
Time:
May 19, 1977
4:00 PM
Name and address of Applicant for Variance:
Name:
Address:
Location
Perry Harvey
990 E. Hyman Avenue
Aspen
or description of property:
Location:
Description:
Lots R & S, Block 32, East Aspen Addition
990 E. Hyman
Variance Requested:
Application is made for a building permit to build two-two bedroom
townhouses. The proposed building would have a roof overhand extending
1'-2" beyond the maximum 'permitted eave extension on the east side and
3'~6" beyond the maximum permitted eave extension on the north side.
Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one)
T~
Permanent
THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
BY
~(U,a,t.dA ~!( rf
Chairman
~ ;Ja.)ow01A..
....-.,
-
-
"-"
TO: Board of Zoning Adjustment
FROM: Perry A. Harvey
RE: HYMAN AVENUE VICTORIANS
Dear Board Members,
Herewith I am submitting an appeal for a variance for
the HYMAN AVENUE VICTORIANS. The new evidence for your
consideration consists of the site plans showing the practical
difficulties imposed in positioning the new building because
of the existing Victorian house. There is also an explanatory
letter from Michael Erneman, the architect, describing the
reasoning behind design which requires set back variance.
Respectfully submitted,
~~~.~~ /7fMu7
,...,
'-'
""'-,
..;
EXHIBIT A: APPEAL TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF PERRY A. HARVEY
FOR HYMAN AVENUE VICTORIANS
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED VARIANCE
I propose to construct two-two bedroom townhouses on lots
R & S, Block 32, East Aspen Addition. The current improvements
consist of a Victorian house built in 1883 and remodelled this
year. Even though it is a hardship in effort and expense to
integrate the new building with the old, I have chosen to make
the townhouses architecturally and aesthetically compatible with
the Victorian house. It would have been easier to move or de-
molish the house and build a maximum density cubical structure.
It has been, and is, my desire to preserve and echo the historical
architecture of Aspen.
To integrate the two buildings according to my design, I
am requesting a variance from set-back requirements for a roof
projection of 1 foot, 2 inches on the East elevation and 3 feet,
6 inches on the North elevation. As you are aware, the roof lines
and projections of overhangs and porches are indigenous to, and the
most prominent features of, the Victorian architecture of Aspen.
If the variance is not granted then the architectural in-
tegrity of the design will be destroyed and a cubical building
should be built. If the buildings are not compatible it will,
I feel, be contrary to the duties of the board, as the code
states that you exercise your powers and duties .....in accordance
with the public interest and the most appropriate development
of the area" (Municipal Code, City of Aspen, Section 2-21)
JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED VARIANCE
I suffer in my design from a hardship because the original
house was built in 1883, pre set-back requirements, and is in
violation of current requirements. This is a special and estra-
ordinary circumstance of my property that does not apply similiarly
to other properties in the same vicinity and zone. (Municipal
Code Section 2-22, d, 2) If you notice the site plan, you will
see that the new building has been positioned with a set-back
on the West side of 8'1" from building edge to the property line.
Under permitted set-backs we could have expanded the building 3'1"
farther to the West. However, because of the proximity of the
neighboring building on the West and the position of the existing
Victorian house the new building must be closer to the East side
of the property. I am not trying to maximize the footprint of
the new buildings. I am only trying to conform the new design
to the existing Victorian structure. To do this I am not asking
to push the actual wall out to the wall of the existing building,
"...,
'-'
.~
......,;
but only to extend the roof projection.
On the North side I am requesting a variance to extend
the roof 3'6" into the set-back to fully cover the parking
area. I considered moving the new building closer to the old
or reducing the size of the new building but both of these
solutions would destroy the livibility of the units. The new
building has only a four foot walkway separating it from the
old and the total livable floor space is 400 sq. ft. on the
ground floor of the new building. To decrease the size of the
new building to allow for the roof projection within the set-
back requirements would reduce the room sizes to make them
impractical.
In addition the granting of this variance will not adversely
affect the general purpose of the comprehensive general plan.
In fact the granting of this variance will be in accordance with
the public interest and the most appropriate development of the
area, and thus will positively affect the general purpose of the
comprehensive general plan.
More specifically, I submit the following justifications:
1. The roof projection on the east elevation will be
instrumental in keeping snow off the rear and principal entrance
to the existing house and off the front and side entrances (there
are no other entrances) to the east townhouse unit. Inadeq~ate
protection over the entrances presents an unwarranted hardship
while adequate protection is important for the enjoyment of a
substantial property right.
2. The north elevation roof has a 450 north-south pitch.
Without the variance and resulting projection there will be a
constant winter threat of snow sliding onto automobiles and onto
people entering and exiting the parking area. In light of the
chronic problem in Aspen of people parking on the street, it is
in accordance with the public interest to make this parking area
as attractive as possible to insure its continuing use by the
residents.
Respectfully submitted,
~;::~r.::./7fvt7
'r
,
/"
NCYl'TCE OF rU1~LT.C l!EAVTl:C
Cm:e No. 77-9
.~_.---
BEFOlm THe CITY OF />.~)PEN J\OMm or /\1)JUSTliEI<:T
TO l,LL Pl(()I'J:nTY OViHEJZS AFFECTED BY '11m JmQUJ:~;TED ZONING OR USE VI\RH.NCE
DE;;CnTnE;) "UELOH:
PurSUuflt Lo tile OffJ,cial Code of A~pell of June 25, 1962, as @nenJcd, a
public !;cc,rinG Viill be hl,ld in the Council Room, City Holl, ,,\,pC'n, Colo-
rndo, (or at such olh(~r place ilS the lficeting rany he tIlell adjourned) to
considcr 3n 3pplic3tion filed with the said BOGrd of Adjustmcnt requesting
l~IJt110J~ity for VD~i.2ncc f~om tIle provisions of tl-1e Zonillg Ordinance, Chapter
06 (lfCJ'('J'c1 ~OG'~ (Jf' !'pnn !\l'1 J)nrvOJ.a ~fI'('0t(.(1 ~v tllC' J"J'()r)oc~cl V'lrJ'cnCn
~_"T, ~_J_ _._ ..(....l...,\.-' L: .. 'l.."" <....- . L. _,-,. Id u-~.. _..... -..' , l)../ '-,' -. u_ c:. -,'~ <....-
, . , 1 I" 1 ' . If
[l':CC lT1VL'cCU to{) uppcDr ane, f:tL1t(~ t H~lr V:LC\']S, protE~sts or O)Jcctlons.
ycn:L CiJnY):::Jt DPiJcaY pt.~'rson;J,lly <'.:It such meeting, then you Drc urgc::u to state.
YOU' v::~n!s by lettel", particularly if you b3VC objroction to such variance,
] 'r l' . ] ]' ' . d .' l' .
28 t"Je eonYG OJ: I\CLJustment \'n. _" glve .::crlOUS cons] eraL1.0n to t1e OpJ.lll,ons
of: [;u:,:ro1.mclinc; prop2rty m.:ncrs 2nd otbC1:S affectlCd in decidinG \d1'Othc~L" to
(......,~~..!- c,r d'"n" thc' '~c'ql1rJC't fO'i~ ~T0rJ' ~rll'"
b.\.-<-<U\, L, J ~. - ~,--"-J . --. ,U -,-, ~L.. f
The p~rticulars of the hlC~ring and of the rcquested variance are as follows:
n~tp cn~ Ti0c of M~etipa'
...:...-~...:.-"':':'--' ~._-~..:...- :.::".~----:,-,,:--::':"~..,.,:,:,;,-:'
]);'te:
I<ay 19, 1977
4:00 PM
rl'ine;
1.7c-L':c c:~
~! "~~'~~~~~...0J?-i~I]:2~~
for
\!C11:"i;:.lnc.C' :
Naj;'~C:2 :
Perry Ilarvey
990 E. LYDan Avenue
Aspen
LCCtr(~jor~ G}~ (lescription of ':'l,.OT)crtv:
~--"'--""'-'-'-"-----"'~--"-'~---~~"--"'---
/\ddrc'ss:
LOC;::~Iticn :
Lots R & S, Block 32, East Aspen Addition
990 E. I-:l~lnlan
Description:
V~11:i;lncp l~c(]ucst:cd:
_, _'_~~__.~...,~_ ..,_R'''"._~___''_"_
J\pplic.:>-:ltion is made for :1 building permit to build tvlo-t'V10 bedroom
~own11c~~~es. TIle proposed building HouJd have a roof overtland extending
l' _.2'1 L::':J',,:>nd the rn,JximllFl Vf;rmit ted e(lve extension on tl1e ea~--;t side and
3 I - G 11 CJncl t.he maXiITI1..1El pcrmi tte,d eave extension on the north side.
1)l..-,J"FlticYi.l of V(:n:ianc:e: (P10~ise cross out one)
r.~,:,:~1~1 ~ \~~ 2 ~.r!l;)x
PeDnmwnt
1.t'HE CI'l'Y (YF i\SI'EN 1~OA1ZD OF !\DjUS'ft1i~~NJ'
BY . .J:L{~>-(l"Je 'f~ _:~~7<>:</v;/ C ,;(;y
Chi(i):ll':,lll U
C'A.:vjuJ /l-.<._kMO'1.-1-
"""
"-"
--
-'
ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO
HYMAN AVENUE VICTORIANS
LOTS R & S, BLOCK 32
EAST ASPEN ADDITION
TO CITY OF ASPEN
TO THE NORTH:
Block 32 Lots G, H, I
Gavilon Condominiums (see attached list)
Block 32 Lots E, F
AEM Corporation
P. O. Box 301
Aspen, Colorado 81611
TO THE EAST:
Block 32 Lots P, Q
Aspen East Condominiums (see attached list)
..
TO THE SOUTH:
Block 35, Lots D, E, F, G
Frank A. & Hazel A. Loushin
P. O. Box 582
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 35 Lots H, I
Charles D. Tower
P. O. Box 3014
Aspen, Colorado 81611
TO THE WEST:
Block 33 S~ of Lots K, L, M
Edward H. & Arlene E. Brennan
P. O. Box 1965
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Block 33 N~ of Lots K, ~, M
Leonard W. & Edith Levisohn
760 Cherry
Denver, Colorado 80206
Block 34, Lot A
Leland F. & Josephine M. Bartlett
P. O. Box 936
Aspen, Colorado 81611
-
'-'
"'""I
~
GAVILON CONDOMINIUM
UNIT 1
CASSATT, Robert
1264 Washington Ave.
Washington Township
P. O. Westwood, New Jersey
07675
UNIT 2
SULLIVAN, Edward
Box 1855
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 3
PHILLIPS, Edward
Box 3050
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 4
KENNEY, Charles
% Phyllis Kenney--President
Box 4183 .
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 5
SMOTHERMAN, Frank
Box 3626
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 6
MARTIN, James & Diana
Box 10502
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 7
HIILIVIRTA, Mr. Ilmari
Box 3047
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 8
LEONDORF, Ms. Clair
Box 3G
Aspen, Colorado 81611
UNIT 9
NUVEEN, John
Box 129
Bartlett, New Hampshire 03182
UNIT 10
BECK, George
Box 1111
Aspen, Colorado 81611
% Mrs. Ellen Carter
226 Marin Ave.
Balboa Island, Calif. 92662
UNIT 11
WICKARD, Grant
6124 E. Oregon Pl.
Denver, Colorado 80202
<
UNIT 12,
FULLER, Col. & Mrs. Robert, Jr.
8501 Wolf trap Road
Vienna, Virginia 22180
c
""'\
'-"
ASPEN EAST CONDOMINIUMS
UNIT 1
GURRENTZ, Morton and Susan
GURRENTZ INTERNATIONAL CORP.
200 S. Craig St.
Pittsburgh, Pa. 15213
UNIT 2
WICHMAN, Charles and Jeanne
Box 656
Honolulu, Hawaii 96809
UNIT 3
KERN, Roy and Elizabeth(President)
Box 3969
Aspen, Colorado 8l6l1
UNIT 4
GARFIELD, Ronald
Box 8-327
Aspen, Colorado
81611
UNIT 5
ALLEN, Barbara
Box 835
Aspen, Colorado
81611
~~ ~ THE ORA~N~~O~~~~~~~~ OALLA~ts
COLORADO COUNTRY LTD.
BOX<~ ASPEN, COL.ORADO 81611 . PHONE '325-2510
M E S SAG E
TO I Aspen Board of Zoning Adjustmentl
130 South Galena Street
SUBJECT Hyman Ave. Victorian Variance
L
Aspen ,Colorado
- 81611
~
DATE
April 29th,1977
Dear Sir:
Perry Harvey has shown me the. plans of the Hyman Avenue Victorian
and has explained to me to what extent the variance he needs entails and
as I live aCDOSS the street from hi. proposed apartments and enjoy this
MoI<< IT'
particular view to the ....,1 feel the view will not be hindered in anyway
and the variance requested by him should be granted..
Jjy~
Ed Brennan
P.O. Box 1965
Aspen,Colorado - 81611
1006 East Hyman
N ~ Corner of Cleveland and Jtman Streets
BY
REPLY
DATE
,
"
,\
1:~;
I~"-e:!'"
.~>,...,.
. ~",""
:~~~. .;
":"i-
~
.
'.
'.
, :~
<
-"...
.~
o
MICHAEL ERNE MAN
'\"'~:'~' ;'-"" .,,~.,'"
"- ':", . 't~~.. ~~ If.~
,I" .,~^">'-'".;......,, ..l "~', ,,'J,;
,~ ' ,;...-,.(,,, /~.~.."_ ".;t..., :"'.
:.~ " '~"_: I'
>.~;~il~4J!:('.
o
ARCt"fITECT
April 13, 1977
Board of Zoning Adjustment
Aspen City Hall
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Hyman Street Victorian Townhouses.
Dear Members of the Board;
This letter is written in behalf of Hr. Perry Harvey with specific
regard to his appeal for zoning adjustment on the proposed
Hyman Street Victorian Townhouse project. It is intended to pro-
vide an explanation of my design approach to the project as it
pertains to the Aspen Zoning Code, and further, to present a brief
discussion of the hardships that occur as a result of existing
conditions on the project site.
Some nine months ago, when Perry Harvey first considered under-
taking the Hyman Street project, the property consisted of two
city lots, zoned R/MF, with a one story, one bedroom, turn-of-
the-century Victorian house. This existing house was in poor
structural condition, and it was located on the property such
that it extended beyond allowable setback limits along two
property lines. Moreover, it had undergone several cosmetic
renovations and remodellings over the years which resulted in
an unfortunate adulteration of what was originally an elegant
example of early Aspen Victorian or Neo-Gothic architecture.
The R/MF zoning designation would allow development of far
greater intensity on the property than the existing house alone
presented, and it would allow greater intensity than what might
be developed comfortably if the house were retained and an additional
building were erected on the property. Consequently, the initial
concept for development involved razing the existing house and
erecting a three story building to the maximum of allowable limits,
consisting of six-one bedroom condominium units. Such a concept
would be entirely consistent with every letter of the Aspen
Zoning Code, and had it been carried out, Mr. Harvey's appeal
to your board would be unnecessary.
However, this early concept was abandoned in favor of one that
included retention and restoration of the existing house and
construction of two small two bedroom condominium units within
a two story building. This new building has been designed to be
an extension or continuation of the forms and materials present
P.O. BOX 4602/ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
U.S.A.
a
., -,
,t~ '
Page Two' n
Letter' to.Me~&s
G,
~'
: ,w.~,~:' .
a .,~f;4J:i
of the Board of ZoningjiU~tifie}L, ;
.,,''', ,'-i, ,.~J,",<?:>~{, .
<t>_ .:'~-" "r,!,'-;Z'''~'t: --'1\ _ .....t.J
in the restored victorian house. It was no't~'1te~tn;~d:":'~~~t,., ' d\S.i.t~:
bla tant disr~gard for ~he let~er of the A~B.~l}.;;Z:~~jpg.,~~~1, ,.~f
but rather, lt >vas deslgned wlth very..def])I,'\.t~1ll!_nten;t;:.\?o~G. ill ",,~."
wi th t~e ,spirH :of tha~" Code. Th~s is. si1j!~}.y, t~Z,S!l-yl.l$~~~ ,~' .~~" .
retentlon~and restoratlon of an hlStor1c ~nd~~l~g~n~ stJuc~u~~~'
d h dd' t" f d' t ' 'tli~ '~'JIi"", .",-", '-M",~,lIi;",-,'l0.
an tea 1 lon 0 'an a Jacen structure'" a:t.~re'VleC.n' ~~u",:l'}U-'i'
hances tl;1at e~isti~g structure, wjli~e j~t~; ,~~~~~t~n,e~'b('1r'YI.\~r~eht-'.
a lesser physical lmpact ,than what lS lj.'l?,~~w~a,..t~p'ul'd 1;>e:iP;r.~,t\r,red
under the Intent and .I~urposes 'OL the Aslt~~.;~~lnl'L.n~>iiC~;d..e:::", ~ ':,: ... '
. ... '. .:;'I\i,; ;'tl"'~' P, ~ ~ , : - ~ }
.. .-." "'f".A ''f.';t' J'C/' ~ (.. -, ,.:; ....
Wi t~ refe~ence to t~e ~pe<e.H..i"" Hem)> ,;uP%e.fi q9:~;\!'1i;i::;r;ll:Ji:9P:..{~or
zonlng adJ us.tment, ;t t.1S requeste(;I;,t'lia tl;..!/;<~r.p,<:>1: .,.pr€l'9,!'tc,;tJl,On Il!ay
be allowed to penet'i".,at;e the allowao@e:'.p.ro;ii:~ct"j,'6jf;~~'<f~fi~~1ry"~
l' -2" on t.he Eas,t El'evat'ion, amd tha,t';:a,ri:o;t'Ij~r .rb15i:f' pfdjection may
penetrate the aMowable limits by, 3':~6,,"ori 'the'North Elevation,
. ... "'" -".', ~,:/ ','
of the propo:;;;ed'ne~ townhouse structur:e,. In botl) cases;the"
requests an! for roof penetra.t:j.?Il!ifil\!.ly ;tft9tfpr qyild'in~ mass"
penetrations that'wpuld aili19~~~~~~~~?~~~~P~~~dor.~~r~~:
. - I. .~ __ij..' :;:,~'__: >- -r . ,,,,"
The requested roof pefiet:ra1;io.n"'on'tn~' ,1'llLst .E)"'levation is. simp.1Y
an extension and continuation, of a,n, exi's,ting roof on the exist-
ing victorian house. This extension is intended to visually tie
the old and new buildings together.. thereby providin~ a, sense of
continuity between the two. Moreo,\,er, i,f'is neqessary/toc.protect
the primary entrange to the East condominium unit from the park-
ing area. Withoutr this roof over the Eas~ entry there would be
danger of falling ice and discomfort from dripping'waten.to
persons using this entrance. A hardship'exists'here in that
we are attempting to relate to and connect with the r.oof of an
existing building that was erected outsid~ of subsequently im-
posed set-back limits. Another point of. relevance is that the~ew
building is not. designed to the allowable'limi ts on,thfl West
side. It is set back 8'-0" from the property line where a 5'-0"
setback is required. ' This was done to increase privacy bet~een
an existing building on the West and to allow for the eventual
placement of an electrical transformer and utilities meters.'in 'this
8' -0" wide area. Henc;~, the buildin,g could be shifted 3 "-"0" to
the West on the site, t'hereby allowing -the desired rdof' projection
on the East Elevatdon but also necessita,tirng"tbe Qocatioh of the
transformer and utilities meters to b~ s~itted'to the Jast side
of the property, in public ,view, adjacent to Cleveland Street.
It seems doubtful tha~ the intent of the ,Zoning Code would encourage
site planning of this sort. . ~'
"
,,'
.-
The reques'ted rObf penetration on the Nqrth Elevation is a
further continuation of the roof in question~un the East Elevation.
This roof is intended ~o prov{de additional shelter over the
parking area whi'ch is on. the North. side of the proposeJf new" town-
house building adjacent to the alley.. I~ would be subj~ct to;
substantial snow and ice accumulation as well as the hazard of
falling snow and ice 'from the roo;f ab'ov.e' wi thout the requested
<:.
"
.,
"
o
.
','
..
. '
I
I
~
...'
. ~~
,;
:""
"
~...,'
'\ft~
~.
.'!;'
...',
; ;"".:.~~''fl' or ''',~ .~
":';?j(\ .~"S'
:''..:'{>'~ ",:';0 / 'It
. ~f' ~.'-~"1'~'n_-;.~ -',
i)f~L:;~:il~;t~
.r ~: .', ~~, :~~
;<::; ,"to' ", _~~; ......
."t.~I:tr. ~""" ~.v"
~: :'0{ r
';t. .~; ~;;:"r I>'~.,
~:--=:,I :<
~'~... ...
/,;'~
i~ ~-:-
".
I
I
,
I i ~'"
t. i
III..
j.
"Yt:c.~.~~~~f.o.t~::-..,..,-.- > ....- _,"'0. -'l~::..J,n
, .- (-': ';"...- ,;. -=-t; 'I~" -to r :-~
Page .Thi:\i" _ 0" ~.<t,l:'~~:,'~_ ';~", ,;~: ~t.,.,
Letter ~.~ ~~enibe'r,s::of the BbilIiM "ot,zq~ing 'it~~~..~.~'Y _~." ,~_ _ :,~,t
).- Ir .~,,-..r~-,ii.~..; -'"" -",.;r~-.,..". -' A't .
..;.... :,.<1.... ...;..f.".......'Ii.-:.'t..1..:~"'.'<,.~,..;:<>... ',..- "1..'"
~ ,", <J' '~''';'l'',~.,!:; i...~::." :,/." ..<t.!'1: ", f-i' -. . I. '-'.n: : '. " "
""". -. ~. '.w.... ~',"" ";, '1:~:-k"'''f;'~~,.. '." '~.~. ,',:i'A:.~. -,. ~-"_.q;'
roof extension. ",To relocate the ne,v~to,v'hli~HSee 4:il..a'l;~1t~n }iJ,';,/' "-
orGler ~o ~~.!:lq;lw10~a. te , c?\;,~red :park~ng ::}I'ir~~~}~. ..i~~#~;~e.';'~'1f?b2'{;' >"
extens1pn 'l's'"Cnot ,pract1qaolily feas'i'bilie. A{'l\~110,Ut;~ ' ''',a}tJ.1ing:VAit1fo,rm ,,,:
Building Code' re,guirements for ;seRara',t:j.~n~pEi1Me, n";efi_e<~,ex"i'ij~~tthg , ,
and .TJ.ew bUil,9i'ngs., He,ll'ce, a har\l.~'l}i~p'~;e~fst>~ ~~::!l.tn;€:t't!,t'~"'e'Xif'!H'I1g, ;,:)1;
bui1aing is ~o 'loc~ ted that i t 'wl'U}'J1bll"~a-l\li@'l1J~~i1,e'i'L bH.,:p'qinlg,., ' ..,,'
~iminished..J'iL~f~a~~ frpm wpa~ the:~P1l~~~~~q'?~~.~tim~~~~1j:~~k~_g~! ~:;.':.%. Ot.,'~
be, cOJ?-etruJ!.te~ w~ th ~ .p:r:~pe.r~Y'/~.2~E!*@~p.r~~}"Il~~':r:e~~;y:...I;,n.fe.mfJ.1~~h,'l:'" .
tins req~e~t lS ,:qr a -:oO'f ext'enl?~~~~<.;~'~~~~~~~!}J.}'la~I\lr,w~;~.'.i~'>i-"
area tha t"lS p,rotec ted. ,pence sa:fEY';a~'~.0Th.\le-~'lf.e~1iE;r'lience,~jU'Se;a~~ 1;>l'
by the occupants o,f ,.the 'huii~Q&nig"'~f:t~I'.'ii' Wti'~~:Ui"s3<Iif-!"'+'ll~:<Siire'e:;t,~, :
> . 't..' 0- :\ "'. ,,"-' ,':t.' ~ j~~~"lt:r1\"i"/l;ttl'..." ~~)\<~W7-~~ i' f", ...
whicll would oth"eil'wise ~be more' c'C(ti.yi1' .ilEtri1t:~ . :'7i..\",." .,""!1J r ,,' ./ .-
~ ~ I ~~, "0""':; -v.-ol uJ; I' i\' ..: i" "::;. ". "-
In summary of this .uIlinte:ticit:a'1z1,y: ~'ieng,;.hY, "i:.~'t. ,ne~s~3i~~~:;';' i.,'. ::,
corresp~:mden?p; 'I w6u~q YLl<::'e..t<b. r:.: ~ 'f:':t;~<i:ncl, '~~~'a,si.czf:~i1h~, 'fact <,' "
that th1S 'proJ~ct, wai' C<2_~P~~i,;~~~',w, . II -;& .Il.~?t-~.J~ie.~~~:,f?,r _'" "
the apparen~ values an~<'w1~~.eEj:;'9j;70 , e ,~~i"!';>feAlpep,, ~llg 'f' ",'
therefore W1 th carefuL,'C.ons:LJ:ler~t;.7" ~nl'li~nj;'; of' ,tP-'ec,Asp,en ','
Zoning Code. I am certain thatY0u~i'i~" . ,'owledge.tlid.s, and~' ,/10,
further that yo~ will rec~gl:lize 't.~e,}i\l.,9V,~~-;:ijn~ts';OIC,''''l;1a~}tshiPS,,,
tha ~ ~a ve been l~posed o~' the dev~'1.j?1?J.?3l~'~~s a .resplt . o~ 'the
'dec1s1on to reta1n and restore the' 'e~'ls15:t'lig;'mon,..'confortlllng .
. -:., . -"';" "f:r-:.;'~',: ~. ,11 ,:1
v1ctor1an hous~":'as part of the proJ~ct.. ;';$':';;' "'-' , ._.<'/.. .
" ',' ,',- i, '~.,./\l.'s.;,_,\" ~':.i' .t/f:;.:;,..,,/., .' ~~
I am most hopeful that -this let.t.er I;l1-ovi;tIe.s.som.EJ, ne~.ll.nd pe'J;-";;
ti'nent information for youriconl:iide''l'at,&l'q$W'-rend '.that'-'YQU.will
'__', ..'.5:;, _...... ',"'. '_'.' oil.
consequently be able to render.a dec.~sip~~~avorable to~r.
Harvey's requests. '",., ."
"
,
\~
. ~J
.~.
.,
.~
.
," ,-
"
Sincerely,
~.
,
-
..
i. 'J.
..~
1.:
.
..
.
'''~'.
'.
4",. ,
iii.
~I!i
,
,,-,,--j~
'.
cc; Perry Harvey
.
.r
..'
~, "
.~..
1,
c,
}~
"
'{'i~
.'
MJE :: dIn
~. " ,".
.';-;>.,:,,'1
...: ';;,\.
,,:.~ ,.;
"",-
.,
,
. ~.
,-~'~,,,,
.,
I..~~"
"~r
,
~
.c
..,
,
.,;.,.'
.
"'/,;,
~~, ".
, .
~. ~
y
,.
.-
,
^~
,I;
. ~',i,'
~ ....
f
-iA
.,
:t-
.,
"
1<.,"
.'
<.
/."~
,
,
,
~
.-(-
,
!
"
4.0{.:,
-.-
\.- .~
"
'....
c.
,
.;"~ ..
",...,
~.,.,'
"
"
..;;... .,
f :-
,
.,
, '
.;/L'
'. '~:.
~:
ie"
:~
'.
<
<. ~!
S~"..
~~i :"~';f
!'
I,"
,~>. c~.
.. ~ "
,
"
i