The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutlanduse case.boa.S20'Lot14&All15-BldgCondos.006-74 APPEAL '1'0 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTHENT CITY OF ASPEN Lt'" ill 2 881# ****10.00 DATE March 13, 1~74 CASE NO. 71-? APPELLANT Aspen Cooperative Housin~ ADDRESS P. O.Box 4509 Partnership Aspen, Colo. 81611 OWNER Roland F. Merner ADDRESS P. O. Box 67 c/o Hans of Aspen Ac:;pRTl. rnln ~lh." LOCATION OF PROPERTY of Lot 14, Numbe 0 Page 925 Building Permit Application and prints or any other pertinent data must accompany this application, and will be made a part of CASE NO. 11-1, The Board will return this application if it does not contain all the facts in question. Description of proposed exception showing justifications: The Appellant requests that the Board of Adjustment reverse the conc~pt disapproval decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission under Ordinance 19 on the Appellant'S proposed four- plex on the grounds that disapproval of the proposed project denies a substantial property right enjoyed by all other prop- erties in the same vicinity and zone. provisions of the Zoning Ordinance requiring the Building Inspector to forward this application to the Board of Adjustment and reason for not granting permit: APPLICATION IS MADE TO BUILD FOUR CONDOMIUM APARTMENT UNITS. THE PLANN- ING and Zoning Commission denied the Aspen Cooperative Housing Project under Ord.#19 conceptual review Feb. 21, 1974 for the following reasons: 1) Inadequate access, i.e., road width and grade, visibility and lot entrance C.2. (a) 2) Insuf~icient off street parking spaces on street which is presently congested. C.3. 3) Adverse impact on already existing problems of circulation and snow removal. C.4. 4) Excessive density and lot use for physical conditions of development site and immediate surroundings. C4. (a) Chief Buildina In~p~crnr Status ~~p)~r~ J.gned PERMIT REJECTED, DATE DECISION DATE APPLICATION FILED DATE OF HEARING MAILED Secretary - ,"""., ,"........ ',..,.... NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Case No. 74-6 BEFORE THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS AFFECTED BY THE REQUESTED ZONING OR USE VARIANCE DESCRIBED BELOW: Pursuant to the Official Code of Aspen of June 25, 1962, as amended, a public hearing will be held in the Council. Room, City Hall, Aspen, Colo- rado, (or at such other place as the meeting may be then adjourned) to consider an application filed with the said Board of Adjustment requesting authority for variance f~om the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 24, Official Code of Aspen. All persons affected by the proposed variance are invited to appear and state their views, protests or objections. If you cannot appear personally at such meeting, then you are urged to state. yorrviews by letter, particularly if you have objection to such variance, as the Board of Adjustment will give serious consideration to the opinions of surrounding property owners and others affected in deciding whether to grant or deny the request for variance. The particulars of the hearing and of the requested variance are as follows: Date and Time of Meeting: Date: Time: April 4, 1974 3:00 p.m. Name and address of Applicant for Variance: Name: Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership Address: P.O. Box 4509 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Location or description of property: Location: Description: South 20' of Lot 14, all of lot 15, North 10' of Lot 16, Block 1, Conners Addition, City of Aspen Variance Requested: Application is made to build four condominium apartment units. The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission denied the Aspen Cooperative Housing Pro- ject under Ordinance #19 conceptual review February 21, 1974. Duration of Variance: (Please cross out one) %HmpNr~ Permanent THE CITY OF ASPEN BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT BY -- IIJIlOA ~ ~~. p"~A.Al."'-'" ~-lo~~~ ~O~ ~ :;00' i~ M~ ~1L:hL, ~ c.c- ~ I Co. ilb'l '~i~ ~v ~, Co. ~/"I r~~~ ~ Z-1~ ~ I Co. ~f('11 U~~~~ ~ Z,~f ~ I to , ~1C.1l ~AI~~~P~ &t Igz... ~ I CtJ, <I/~' ~~.~. ~Ivtv ~ I Co 10"" ~1~ ~ I Co. <is/'ll T~~ ~ ~1.. ~ I to. ~/"" .,..................-.'"""'-..... - '-' - - " ..,. ""'"~. "." - - . ~.~.fl~ ~ (,7 ~\ CD, cgl~11 ~~~W~ 2-~U> ~4 ~ . ~ ' rJ1... G,DC.~7 . W~B. D~ I'" Ott;.L PMll ~ 1.2.(, . ur--~ 0 la~. E~~ W~ (C. F~ Lv. Pit r~ NJ'l ~ Wa-' ~l W) M~. '~/Pf I H~ w. ~, ~. lISt> M~ ~~. ~ I T~ 75'2.6' ~b.~ Zt,; ~~. ~ ~ I xU. {,oS-2.t ~OMV B, ~ ~ ~<iri . ~ \. Co , <iI'" G-~ W~ ~ 3L/ql ~ I U>I f/iPl \ . ! -- Iltt. ~~ ~ ~ I-~~It~. ~ 3707 ~ I u,. ?lftJ{f /M.,t. II~ M~ 2/ (ff) ~~ tl.AI-e.. fb1t" l-eL , tJ. J. ()7D~1 'JA. W~ 4J~ C[1f)'~, ()~ ~. ~, F~ 3~)DS ~.~~ /2, 0 p~ 1Ji\.wt Ir~ #rz. ~ p~ ~ ITr J.-~ I Ak. 6)'Isl. ~. e~ ()~ "3~ ~ ~ Ii K~ q, ;1" 6rO/ D~V;H,z.(J. (~Jf~. ~ ~3YO ~, Co, rl"l {U.,). . -l ~ vlz~ ~ { CD. i/,// ....__ _ _ . _ _ _ _. ...... ....-. ~. . r r . .. ..' ~ . .)IA.. II~ /(~ /21 ~. 8'Z~ ~ I IJAA.AJ~ (AJ,Y /h 28 ft!n,~ II : '!1' 71z;:; ~ . I I j1)~ r I A)'I_ 1tJ7),"2.- ,4{A. ~ I- ~ II J.-~~ f~JI~ I brr 9$"1, I VM1 rA.. i I I~ 'l~'13 ,! ~ ' ~. Y'/6// Mil. t-~ II~ 3s'f~ E. ~~ ~ / (J~ ~3z-~ I{/I,. w~ ~ ~7/)? ~ &.. , G~ RF/ #4 'f1~1nJ ft{4,. w~ w~ I tf7tJb 5~w-nd.-!)A. arlll) '; ~A1~,J;I(. 611001' I T,I.M~ E ztz" ;j;f 371/7 (j . ~ l CD. 1/(// .JJ.J. ~ E~ c.-r~. ~ 92. J.l~ I tfV~. 5'1~/' NA.~~ ~ 3572 ~, OJ. 9'/~11 (t?A. 6~ It~ ~ ">>.>71,4- ~(a. ?rUt I .. R. G~tU.lI~ . 4~t7 ~ ! I ~ Vr I 1JJ.Ar. ~11J1 ! MI't.~~ 1/1/ ~ ~:tt: 7A- ~, Co , 'irD 2A)~ , !~~ . . &'lSD ~~f~ T ~, O~. i I I , I : i c '1. .I MEMORANDUM TO: The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment FROM: Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership SUBJ: Case 74-6, A Proposed Fourplex on South Monarch Street DATE: April 1, 1974 1. The Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership (Partner- ship) is a partnership that has been formed by four local residents (William Wesson, Thomas Hughes, Bayard Hovdesven and Richard Ferrell) for the pur- pose of constructing four townhouse-type units near Lift 1.'1. on South Monarch Street. Each of the four resulting units will be conveyed to each of the partners after construction for use as their per- manent residences. . 2. The site is located on the west side of South Monarch Street. Adjacent to the property are the Caribou Condominiums (uphill), the Hearst Apart- ments (downhill), a lodge (to the rear), and the Dolomite Villas Condominiums (across the street). The subject property is 60' by 100', and therefore, consists of 6000 sq. ft. The legal description of the property is South 20' of Lot 14, all of Lot 15, North 10' of Lot 16, Block 1, Conners Addition, City of Aspen. A location map is attached as Exhibit A. , 3. On February 21, 1974, the Partnership presented the proposed fourplex to the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) for review under City Ordinance 19, Series of 1973. Under this Ordinance all plans for development (with certain exceptions not here rele- vant) must be submitted to P&Z for its review and approval before a building permit may be issued by the City Building Inspector. A copy of the written portion of the presentation is attached as Exhibit B. 4. On February 21, 1974, P&Z voted to disapprove the Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership under Ordin- ance 19. c '-, '-.._,,./ Memo to The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment April 1, 1974 -2- 5. On March 7, 1974, written reasons for disapproval were stated in a memorandum signed by Bruce Gillis, as Chairman of P&Z. A copy of such memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 6. On March 13, 1974, the Partnership requested an appeal to the Board of Zoning Adjustment. The Board of Zoning Adjustment is the appropriate appeal body for projects that have been denied under Ordinance 19. Section 2-21 Powers and Duties of the Board of Adjust- ment from the Aspen Municipal Code states: "To hear and decide appeals from and review any order, require- ment, decision, or determination made by any adminis- trative official charged with the enforcement of the regulations established by the zoning laws. "In this case the administrative official is P&Z and the zoning law is Ordinance 19. 7. The Partnership is appealing P&Z's decision because we feel that THERE IS NO LEGITIMATE BASIS IN FACT OR IN LAW FOR THE DISAPPROVAL OF THE PROJECT and the action of P&Z, in so doing, constitutes an abuse of discre- tion, is in excess of its jurisdiction and is arbitrary and capricious. 8. The Project, as proposed, fully complies with all re- quirements of the City's Zoning Ordinances, and the use complies with the Aspen General Land Use Plan which is part of Ordinance 19. The P&Z memo, Exhibit C, states four reasons for dis- approval: The first reason is inadequate access, i.e., road width and grade, visibility and lot entrance. The property has excellent access consisting of 60 feet of frontage on a dedicated city street. The street is not near its capacity and the additional traffic generated by four units is minimal. The lot is relatively flat (less than 10%) which poses no problem in terms of lot en- trance. South Monarch is fairly steep in certain sec- tions, but automobiles seem to easily make it to exist- ing condominium dwellings. Visibility in and out of the subject property is adequate given the traffic pattern and speed on South Monarch. o ~ ,) Memo to The City of Aspen Board of Adjustment April 1, 1974 -3- The second reason is insufficient off-street parking. Our proposed plan shows four off-street parking spaces or one space per unit as required by City Zoning Ordin- anace. It seems strange that paZ this week is consider- ing prohibiting off-street parking in the core area, but finds four spaces for four units inadequate. The third reason is adverse impact on already existing problems of circulation and snow removal. Such a small project has a very minimal incremental impact on the area's problems. The fourth reason is excessive density and lot use for physical conditions of the development site and immediate surroundings. The site is eminently develop- able. It is relatively flat (less than 10%) and is served by all municipal utilities. All surrounding property has all been developed. We committed to pre- serve the site's only tree. We are only asking to be allowed to develop the prop- erty at a density and in a manner similar to that per- mitted on all surrounding properties. 9. The Partnership believes that paz voted to disapprove the Project, not on the basis of the reasons given in Exhibit C and above, but on the basis that at some future date the Partners would sell their units to individuals who may be tourists or who may rent their property to tourists. Thus, the general City Council policy of no additional tourist growth would be violated. We feel that this consideration is beyond the scope of the police power of the City to protect the health, safety and welfare of its residents. 10. And, since ALL SURROUNDING PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED AT HIGHAR-l TYPE DENSITIES AND ARE TOURIST RELATED USES (See Exhibit A - Location map), the denial of AR-l density of 1500 sq. ft, per unit and a possible future tourist use DENIES ENJOYMENT OF A SUBSTANTIAL PROPERTY RIGHT ENJOYED BY OTHER PROPERTIES IN THE SAME VICINITY AND ZONE. Section 22-2 of the Aspen Municipal Code states that the above is a reason "to reverse any order, requirement, decision or determination of any administrative official, or to decide in favor of the applicant any matter upon which the board is required to pass, or to effect any variation in the provisions of the zoning laws of the City." o "'"", ....~ Memo to The City of As~en Board of Adjustment April 1, 1974 -4- 11. The Partnership seeks a reversal of P&Z's negative decision under the concept review section of Ordinance 19. A reversal would establish that the proposed four townhouse-type condominium units is an appropriate use and density on the subject prop- erty. The Partnership still will be required to proceed under Ordinance 19 for preliminary and final architectural review and to proceed under the Subdivision Ordinance. I 7"';-;'r . > ,'.'., ......~~-~:::..... " !..." 'I , ~ . ~ . ", ,. i c: >- .:........: ;-:=~J.'~/J ',.'i/I I i . "_. :]" ') S / r, ,,, " ,J \! ~\. " , v '. .'. .... " " , \j tJ , \-" \ '-.' \ -,> " ,. ':-',' 1..} , ." ~' ....~' 'I":~:-" I "),,~' >.,~ c ,,:! -' ,-' I iL)~-':'_1 ., ---....". C', :/" .. ..' ,\\ i\ 1,1, .1 ; iL______l , , ,.-', ;. ..... '1 c ll,':.".....;- ...... --'--._-,.~ -"-".- '.-... '- ~f r---~'\-"-'--'~ (!'-"'!j ,! " ~ \ - . . ; , .j'; \1'/; L, .~_._\)~. .{ \, I,'. i L I i , , I I ~~I: I I , ; .. l__ r ." l' -' Ii", L.__. (,1; --. '- Lj: r~~, " r~ It~! (\ C~I ecu :)1 i_;:__, \; \. , , " j i ~ \ ~, .' , ''. , [ ." , r E:KHI ~II ;.:0: , :1 ._ ... _.1 -' A :) ,:)(,0' L ,,(: J -----1 r~ --,- .....1)..... --j , -. .... .... ....--..../ ' ~----__._H_ \ t, ---\- '--',.-- ,. ,co '.' , ..0 " . "';: /' j '\, ~ i r"l ; -r ~ <;:: ;Z ..0 ;t / /....'V- .I. 'I '. . . Dolo"l17E I I .---.e:...J -. VILllt~ ~ , , ,-;r,X. I L '7fJ'P . '$,. i1~ t.QtJl>>S i ,.." " f' ~O"'frn'l~ qOEEN . ~_f ",-..' or; 2A . ~.- ~--.' " , . ., .-.1 ; i i j , I () -, f (__~----l L r-.J' ! ?i: ..J " \. 'J, L. ,.~. c '""\ ..J / ( ( _Ul-D~f_L _.f?_~_ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership SUBJ: Conceptual Review Under Ordinance 19 Jh,~'^'~ ~"~ ~ 1l.....Ju... ~F~ DATE: February 12, 1974 The Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership is a partner- ship that has been formed by four local residents to construct a four-plex near Lift lA on South Monarch. Each of the four resulting units will be conveyed to the respective partners after construction. By using this method of joint effort, we feel that we can pro- duce reasonable housing that can be afforded by each of the partners. ' The site is located on South Monarch Street downhill from the recently constructed Caribou Condominiums. To the North the property is bounded by the Hirst Apartments, and to the rear is the Skier's Chalet Lodge. It is 60' by 100' and, therefore, consists of 6,000 sq. ft. Under existing zoning and under the Aspen Proposed Land Use Map, the property can accommo- date four units (1500 sq. ft. of land each). The project that we propose would incorporate the following features: 1. Four condominium apartment units approximately 1200 sq. ft. each. two bedroom, two bath units. consisting of They shall be 2. The apartments will be in a four-plex structure with an approximate total square footage of 4800. 3. Two of the apartments will be in a two story section of the four-plex. To minimize site coverage and maximize the limited views, the other two apartments will be three stories. The three story units may require a height variance. It is envisioned that these taller units will re- late to the Caribou which is a very high building to the South. The height issue will be addressed at the Preliminary Architectural Review after we have performed detailed architectural studies. o :) ( f " Memor$ndum to Aspen P and Z Commission 4. Four on-site parking spaces will be provided. s. We will attempt to preserve the large existing cottonwood tree. RWF: j d Page 2 c :) , lbWFr IA S/(JE"R'S C.HI'H..e:, (( (( - .. _ __ _ _ _'";> 101'0 51.-OfG" 2 S1l1R.Y 1: IlCO SQ. Pr. Z $TO~V 1 I1.DO SQ.J:T. 5 mfGY t I zgo sq.Pr. .J 3 ~Ib~'( 1: IV>O Sil.!=T. ~E:~CES , ~ THE c.14-/2 J SO/J A / E'](lsrl"'G. "TRaO tV 11> & ~ER"S) H/~5'" IIf1JKTM9JI sovl}{ MONAR..c.~ STREl::T /lSYEN ccoP€RAn\IE HODS/tV&- "~HI P I Box L/SD'l/ ASPEN SCf'I1.:E:" 'P/~'l."" II ~N . , c J , "8\I1lBrr L . Il '.~ CITY ff' "l' ,\; " ,-i ...........,. ...:.\. ltSPEN box v aspen ,coR f;C:'il doL}, 61:611 . .' '4"1 -...'1J TO: Building Inspector FROM: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Aspen Cooperative Housing Project DATE: March 7, 1974 At its continued meeting of February 21, 1974, the P & Z Commission denied an application by Aspen Cooperative Housing Project under Ordinance 19 Conceptual Review for a four unit condominium development ot 655 S. Monarch. Denial was based on the following reasons: Four permanent resident to_vnhouses, which assure continual, year around use and maximize the use of private automobiles, are inappropriate at the location because of: 1. Inadequate access, i.e., road width and grade, visibility and lot entrance. C.2.(a) 2. Insufficient off street parking spaces on street wfuich is presently congested. C.3. 3. Adverse impact on already existing problems of circulation and snow removal. c.4. 4. Excessive density and lot use for physical conditions of development site and immediate surroundings. C4.(a) G~~~~ Chairman Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission CITY OF' ASPEN r:; 5- ') ~. /? J(/>-u~ P. a. 8DX v . ASPEN. CDI.ORADO 111611 MESSAGE REPLY TO I Karen And~son Fiaance Dept. I DATE Re: Aspen Cooperative Housing L ..J t:s~ ~ JZ r~~ DATE 3-8-74 Please refund $277.31 per letter of March 8th, 1974 to be attached with your check Permit was paid on Validation I 28931 of $369.75. Feb. 27,74 in the amount Thank you, ~1i~' Bldg. Dept. y SIGNED lOr:'""' DETACH AND FILE FOR FOLLOW.UP ,,, '- "i CITY OF ASPEN aspen ,coh:nrado, 81611 box v . ..l' ';j\-" March 8,1974 Aspen Cooperative Housing c/o Richard W. Ferrell PO Box 4509 Aspen, Colo. 81611 Dear Mr. Ferrell: Ordinance 19 provides that 75% of the estimated building permit fee be returned if the development is disapproved at or after the conceptual presentation to the Planning and Zoning Commission. We are therefore returning 75% cf $369.75 or $ 277.31. See enclosed letter from Planning and Zoning Commission for reason of denial. Very truly yours, \l\),- ~". } 4===:, /\ _, . ... "--, VV\, \ ,,)-v, l, /) U- \\-.,..... I:; Clayt 1) H. Meyring \ Chief Building Inspector Encl. CHM/dc c --. , CITY,<l,.' ~_~,,-Ji',j,' aspen ,co PEN hox v TO: Building Inspector FROM: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Aspen Cooperative Housing Project DATE: March 7, 1974 At its continued meeting of February 21, 1974, the P & Z Commission denied an application by Aspen Cooperative Housing Project under Ordinance 19 Conceptual Review for a four unit condominium development at 655 S. Monarch. Denial was based on the following reasons: Four permanent resident townhouses, which assure continual, year around use and maximize the use of private automobiles, are inappropriate at the location because of: 1. Inadequate access, i.e., road width and grade, visibility and lot entrance. C.2.(a) 2. Insufficient off street parking spaces on street wmich is presently congested. C.3. 3. Adverse impact on already existing problems of circulation and snow removal. c.4. 4. Excessive density and lot use for physical conditions of development site and immediate surroundings. C4. (a) G C'~L~~__ Chairman Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission (4/65) 2 . B.I. BUILDINC Q CITY OF O\SPEN INSPECTION DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF PITKIND Cr' ORADO 5 - . ,..., ". ',.,,,y" if ..~.. uo ADDRESS GENERAL 1 OF JOB 655 South Monarch CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. CLASS OF WORK: NEW,Q ADDITION 0 AL TERA nON 0 REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 WRECK 0 OWNER Partnership NAME Aspen Cooperative Housingf ADDRESS 4509 PHONE 1211 '" LICENSE LICENSE 0 NAME (AS LICENSED) CLASS NUMBER l- V INSURANCE ~ a: ADDRESS PHONE 0 I- Z 0 SUPERVISOR V FOR THIS JOB NAME DATE CERTIFIED LEGAL 520'Lot 14; all of Lot 15 DESCRIPTION LOT NO. N 10' Lot 16 BLOCK NO. 1 ADDITION Conner's Addition SURVEY ATTACHED 0 DESIGN A L1C BY BY Carr and McCaffcr" PE NO. AREA (S.F.) 2032 HEIGHT NO. TOTAL OCCUPANCY AT GRADE (fEET) ~o STORIES ?h UNITS u GROU P DIV. BASEMENT FIN 0 GARAGE SINGLE o ATTACHED 0 TOTAL TYPE I fiRE UNFIN 0 DOUBLE o DETACHED 0 ROOMS ?O CONSTR. ZONE DEPTH FIRST )IZE. SPACING SPAN AUTHORIZED BElOW AGENCY BY DATE Z GRADE FLOOR 0 '" BUILDING I- REVIEW j: EXTERIOR '" FOOTING 0 CEILING ~ SIZE ZONING 0 ... Z EXTERIOR CONe. 0 ::l FDN. WALL ROOF PARKING 11 / 0 THICKNESS MAS'V 0 ... oJV ~~~~K 0 CAISSONS 0 ROOFING PUBLIC HEALTH &GIl:.BEAMS MATERIAL MA50NR Y ABOYE ABOVE ABOVE ENGINEERIN~ fA' i EXTERlod THICKNESS 1ST FlR. 2ND FLR. 3R['I FLR. ,'y" V ~\~ cr NALL STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOYI::: f'. 8. SPACE 1ST FLR. 2ND FLR 3RD FLR. 'YY 1" v).'" "V REMARKS .~ ~~ ~, M' ~, ,+ ~ ~., .,,, /1/ ,j:7 .C ,V' l!9J To PeZ 2-27-74 NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CAll 925 - 7336 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR V ALUA TION S COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE. THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF WORK 120,000 APPLIES. SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ElECTRICAL. PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, PLAN TOTAL FEE SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES. FILED T P -0 PERMIT EXPIRfS 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. DOUBLE I CHECK 0 246.50 REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. S 123.25plck ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS PERMITTED. FEE LJ CASH D THIS BUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED 0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT vVO.'v PERMIT SUBJECT TO ~~CATlON OR ~;I VIOLATION OF ANT LAWS GOVERNING SAME. SIGNATURE !J ~Jl rJftJ. APPL?lANT: ' , I!/h.#l"": ~ APPROVAL BY DATE THIS FORM .;S A PERMIT ONLY I ,"TE (/ PERMIT NO~ LICENSE Ii RECEIPTS CLASS AMOUNT WHEN VALIDATED HERE ) ~1-1r -27-74 w274 INSPECTOR'S COpy _. (4/65) 2 8.1. BUILDINC INSPECTION DEPARTMENT D CITY O~ ASPEN - COUNTY OF PITKIND, ,-'.ORADO ADIl'~I\ESS OF JOB 655 South ?lonarch GENERAL eONSTRueTION PERMIT 1 NEW.Q ADDITION 0 ALTERATION 0 WHEN SIGNED AND VALIDATED BY BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBED BELOW. REPAIR 0 MOVE 0 WRECK 0 CLASS OF WORK: OWNER NAME Aspml Cooperat.l.ve P".rtnersn i P Housing/ ADDRESS 4509 LICENSE CLASS II/: o t- V <( II/: t- Z o V NAME (AS LICENSED) PHONE ADDRESS SUPERVISOR FOR THIS JOB NAME 520'Lot LOT NO. N 10 f Lot 1 14; all of Lot 15 16 BLOCK NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION SURVEY BY ATTACHED 0 DESIGN BY ('"..... "nn '" AREA ($.F.) AT GRADE 2032 I HEIGHT _ I (fEET) ?Q h NO. TOT At STORIES ~ UNITS SINGLE 0 ATTACHED 0 TOTAL DOUBLE 0 DETACHED D ROOMS SIZE SPACING BASEMENT FIN 0 UNFIN 0 'M GARAGE SPAN DEPTH BElOW Z GRADE 0 j:: EXTERIOR FOOTING <( SIZE C Z EXTERIOR ::J FDN, WALL 0 THICKNESS ... I~1~K 0 F1RST FLOOR '" t- ~ CEILING o ... CONe. 0 MAS'Y 0 CAISSONS 0 & GR. BEAMS ROOF ROOFING MATERIAL EXTERIOD WALL REMARKS MASONRY THICKNESS ABOVE 1ST FlR ABOVE 3R(l FlR. ABOVE 2ND FLR. ABOVE 1ST FLR. ABOVE 2NO FLR ABOVE JRD FLR STUD SIZE & SPACE Tovnhn"!Oes - n^ _ ., ,. n'~_ A..+ _ ^ ^^ ^,. To 1'&7: 2-27-74 NOTES TO APPLICANT: FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATiON CALL 925 - 73.36 FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER APPLIES. SEPARATE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED fOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND FENCES. PERMIT EXPIRfS 60 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK IS STARTED. REQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. ALL FINAL INSPECTIONS SHALL BE MADE ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY 15 PERMITTED. THIS BUilDING SHAll NOT BE OCCUPiED UNTil A CERTIFICATE Of OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN ISSUED. 0 PERMIT SUBJECT TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION FOR VIOLATION Of ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME. /'. ,- f' SIGNATURE /) l ( f, ) /. APPL~JANT: !f.:/'!:oiff;j)/; \' ;;/ 1.'/1 ' , THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED HERE :/ .. .-:.-- ,-i./,-/-i;"'j ./'i' (,/!",/;'/L....--- DATE [/ PERMIT NO. ) 1..11/ 4B-74 -27-74 CUSTOMER'S COPY PHONE 1211 LICENSE NUMBER INSURANCE o DATE CERTIFIED ADDITION Conner's Addition A Lie. PE NO OCCUPANey GROUP DIY, I FIRE ZONE TYPE CONSTR. AGENCY BUILDING REVIEW AUTHORIZED BY DATE ZONING PARKING PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING .., , \\ VALUATION OF WORK $120,000 PLAN -0 TOTAL FEE FILED T P 246 0 DOUBLE I CHECK D .5 FEE 0 I CASH 0 $ 123. 25plck BUILDING DEPARTMENT.:lO".,~ APPROVAL BY DATE LICENSE Ii RECEIPTS CLASS AMOUNT '-"I" ~;(' '~u~,_q.~"""",' ",~ t ,.....:....., ,,,,,,,,:,.,-~. ~ J.J CITY ~~,t;,s~:_ ~C'Ut~:~/ 'J~/~ll~KiHIJ: 'COC~)ti.:JO _._...,..._ ]1u;rYAL 655 South Honarch COt'STRUCTI');! PL r':l\lT :;o--,'-=,'==~_________=-_" . ";:=.=.=,-"",,-,--,::-':-~'-=-=----=-=.=-=----'-==':"-:-=='='-- _ -===~",,',-=_:::'_-'-'_- :.._-:-~_--c-~.~--~ .....t~EN SIGNE~ AND VAU:':'AHD BY t(UILDING IN::,PECTlON ()(PAR11",NT THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES THE W0i<K IJl',::'KlUED F[LOW (.. r.31 C.I. '; :~S ;: : ....; ;.~ ." (.'0 w"r,'" >,r..'{" ...,1 .11 ,1\.' ",h. 1'4~'f x,J . . ~.-_._-_._-~- . ADDITION 0 AL"l;';,,\TlON 0 r:c.PlJr,O J'.~J~'r_: [] , .,.... Partnership =.=!"",Iv\.E...~~!'.':~J:.'?~~rat.i_ve Housing! ADDf(ESS ~,JAME (AS l.ICENSEDl Q509 LICENSE CLASS PHONE Inl ._ .__ . ________u.___. __n - -- ~--- ~- .---- LICENSE NUMOER I i I ..1' ';';".', .~ I" , . -- -. .l A I.lfWESS PHONE ; ) SUI'EHVISOR FOR 1 HIS JOB NAME D,A,TE (U,.III . , ':"".' GAL :SCRIPTION JRVEY y 520'Lot 14; all of Lot 15 LOT NO. N 101 Lot 16 SLOCK UO. ATTACHED 0 DESIGN BY 1 ADDITION Conner's Addition :(A (S.F.) GRAtlE 2032 IlSlflllxJ!'< ~v. FIN. 0 UNFIN.D ttElGHT (Hn) ?R -~-_. 1'10. STORIES ~___~ SINGLE 0 ATTACHf'DO ~OUBLE 0 DETACHED [J C.<lrJ:'_ilJl.d McCafler)' TOTAL OCCUPANCY UNITS 11 GROU P A .Lle PE NO EX:ILRIOR f J,JT1NG "Ill GARAGE L Il- Iff) 1'_ CEILING C'> -. CONC 0 I MAS'Y 0 TOTAL R.OOMS 20 TYPE CONSTR. DIY. r::~:"-:l~- ------. , \SEMENT D[PTH BELOW GHADE FIRST FLOOR SIZE ')PACIf',;G SPAN AGENCY AUTHORIZED BY DA TE BUILDING REVIEW ZONING [XTERIOR ! ON VIALL HlICI<':N[SS -. lHICK 0 5LA8 "OQF PARKING CAISSONS 0 &GR.BEAM$ ROOFING MATERIAL puauc HEALTH ~TER:Or: ALL MASONRY THICKNESS ABOV[ 1ST FUt ABOVE 2ND FlR. ABOVE 3RD FLR. ENGINEERING STUD SIZE ABOVE ABOVE ABOVE .... SPACE 1sT FLR. 2ND FLR 3RD FlR. 1'olinho.us.e..s...=....condos I . . I _~ ~~~p>a=-'''-'''''_'depL~'-'~ ",(5 TO M';~I~;;~::-?7::2lf..._'"~=-~=~~~.~~~O~~_~_~ll__.__. .-.... ..- !(Ji{ 1'~:,I'IL11{lN',OH Ir-lfl!IIMA1ION CALL 91S.1JJ6 [;0:._"'__ __. f\!~ !.ll 'h(JP.K DONE Uf\(j(R THIS PERMIT HtE I'HMITHE ACCEprS fUll RESPONSllllllTY FOR ~UA TION C(,fIIPlIANCE W1TH TliE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, tHE COUNTY ZONING RfSOlLJllON OR CITY VAL .to lOlliNG OROrt~ANCf. AND All OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CiTY ORDINANCES WHICHEVER OF W__O._RK.._._\J120, 000 J\PI'LIf.". ~ ~ Sll'/d';AH P[Pt.,l',ITS MUST BE OBTAINED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING AND HEATING, SIGNS, I PLAN TOTh; S';'.'lt:.MINe; POOLS AND FENCES. T P r-\.. ' '-' PU<MIT lX,'llU" lU DAYS fltOM DAlE ISSUED UNLESS WOf{K IS SlARTED. I FILED .........., I 211f\. :11.) P(QUIR.{O INSI'f.CTlOHS SHALL BE RtQUEHED ow:: WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE. DOUrlLE Cl1lCK L.J .-. 17:,. ?~;T>: All fiNAL INSPECTlOta mAll liE MAOE: OH All ITEMS OF WOR.K BEfORE OCCUPAHCY IS PERMITTEO. FEE [1 CA'iH [] "') -- ,/11:' LUI10U"C; SHALL HOI [1(:: OCCUPllU UNTIL A CfRTIFlCATE or OCCUPANCY HAS BE[N I~SllED 0 l' BUILDING DEPAR rME~n :G(i. 7~)~ f't, MJT SULJEeT TO ~t'lOCATION OR SUSPE:~SION FOR VIOLATION OF ANY LAWS GOVEP.N1NG SAME. !':;:V,;.:L"~E /r!/ i'l;kl/ iii /' _ /J ./:-- . "U'C.'"-',. !f~ .:';.ic-LL.:j:C 'd,-,_JiI :c, %'11'" ", ", 'c.__ '"""I''' ---- -- 1 r n: 'It,IS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLy_._~.TE.:.:.. _r~".~'~-=-- .. lICEH'~_'~~'."~~~lA'.'- ",,<oUr.' w; JU~ VALIDATED HERE -,~.,---",.>. I l -27-~ '18-74 ---- -- - --.,"-'.'-'-' ~~AARl{S I ..--1 - .~1 , I I I I , /' /' ......,iI. _.,-- , - - '...",,", , MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership SUBJ: Conceptual Review Under Ordinance 19 I' ~.,,.. t.); -_:'h. 1.UIi... __-'C(. c-", J?:.,./".J. Hr.'\-.:'. ,,",'-vt. ;r 'J ~'l"'~-4- H ~}_<lo: .:.. -.. J c' ~k. r .Jl.>',^-,-~, c. DATE: February 12, 1974 - - - - - - - - The Aspen Cooperative Housing Partnership is a partner- ship that has been formed by four local residents to construct a four-plex near Lift lA on South Monarch. Each of the four resulting units will be conveyed to the respective partners after construction. By using this method of joint effort, we feel that we can pro- duce reasonable housing that can be afforded by each , of the partners. The site is located on South Monarch Street downhill from the recently constructed Caribou Condominiums. To the North the property is bounded by the Hirst Apartments, and to the rear is the Skier's Chalet Lodge. It is 60' by 100' and, therefore, consists of 6,000 sq. ft. Under existing zoning and under the Aspen Proposed Land Use Map, the property can accommo- date four units (1500 sq. ft. of land each). The project that we propose would incorporate the following features: 1. Four condominium apartment units ap'proximately 1200 sq. ft. each. two bedroom, two bath units. consisting of They shall be 2. The apartments will be in a four-plex structure with an approximate to~al square footage of 4800. 3. Two of the apartments will be in a two story section of the four-plex. To minimize site coverage and maximize the limited views, the other two apartments will be three stories. The three story units may require a height variance. It is envisioned that these taller units will re- late to the Caribou which is a very high building to the South. The height issue will be addressed at the Preliminary Architectural Review after we have performed detailed architectural studies. . ........ - - '. .'" Memorandum to Aspen P and Z Commission 4. Four on-site parking spaces will be provided. 5. We will attempt to preserve the large existing cottonwood tree. RWF: j d Page 2 S/(lt=/C;;:' 1..:-,-1 ttLt::: I . . , lbUFr JA ,,....., - .. ~_ _ _ _";> 10 or" 5l-OfE ,.." "-/ 2 S1l)R. V t 11.~ SQ.Pr. z $Tf)~Y :t \1.DO SQ.Fi. 3 STDf.-Y t I z.eo sq.Pr. 3 Si1>~'1' 1: I'ZPO sa. I="r. ~ ENlAANCe:s , ~ THf!: c.I4-RII3o/J A / E?)\IS-n~Gr \RfE; JiV 11:1 & ~ER"6D H/~sr t1ffJRTMf}// (p(/ sov~ MotJAR.c~ ~ I'<SYEN CCOPtR.lm\lE' HODS/l\JG- {>~H, P I Bo~ 1.(!;D'l, ASP9J SCl\"LE" "P/3~" - II ~N