The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.104 S Galena St.HPC036-002737-073-31-008 Ill LAJJ St. Mary's Final HPC HPLD-1 104 S. Galena St 86 K IAQ- 4 0 qpwj'Y' 61â‚¬/C.*.DÂ»,O 44 M 45 HM + 2/WJ POVU- PkI,e,-C.-12 Cce . 1202,4,v~- - rt- S UY- l n claceel 431 ~ 2022 1 1 CASE NUMBER HPC036-00 PARCEL ID # 2737-073-31008 CASE NAME St. Mary's Final HPC PROJECT ADDRESS 104 S. Galena PLANNER Fred Jarman CASE TYPE Final HPC OWNER/APPLICANT Micheal Glenn REPRESENTATIVE Deanna Olsen DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/20/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION HPC Reso. #57-2000 BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 1/3/01 BY J. Lindt ==Es=ze;:.: . PARCEL ID: |2737-073-31008 DATE RCVD: ~12/4/00 # COPIES:] CASE NO|HPC036-00 CASE NAME:~St. Mary's Final HPC PLNR:~ PROJ ADDR:|104 S. Galena ~ CASE TYP:|Final HPC STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Micheal Glenn ADR~104 S. Galena C/S/Z: IAspen/CO/81611 PHN:~925-7339 REP:|Deanna Olsen ADR:~117 AABC, ste 305 C/S/Z:jAspen/CO/81611 PHN1920-7651 FEES DUE:~0- Paid at Conceptual FEES RCVD:~0 STAT: F REFERRALS] I.- I. ~ REF:~ BY~ DUE: 20/ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED f I....'Ill- , wp-v-mmm,2 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~12JlotpeÂ© CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: BOA: CLOSED: 1 ~ l .6/0\ BY: ID- 4 Lit lox.T DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: imER.41*47 - -zooe> 54& 4"0,4/* 5 12 + ... ./ #wiÂ·~Â·'Â·: ./.Ill. ..1 Â·Â·Â·Â·. ~ 03*~S:.:24Â£'i: Â·Â· : -7 - Â·,~ Â· -Â·Â· ~Â·'Â·1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission (010&-M 1 THRU: Joyce Ohison, Deputy Planning Director 1* . !1 FROM: Fred Jarman. Planner Â·5~0 ~ RE: 104 S. Galena Street- Significant Development Final Review - PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 13*,2000 Et- I e. I.,PA /1 - - APPLICANT / OWNER: CURRENT LAND USE: Archdiocese of Denver Church and Rectory (Permitted Use in the CC Zone District). REPRESENTATIVE: Reverend Michael Glenn and Olsen / Kelly PROPOSED LAND USE: Architects Significant Development Final Review LOCATION: SUMMARY: Lots A-I. Block 93, City and Townsite of The applicant requests Final Review ap proval Aspen to restore some features of the original rectory building, remodel an existing addition to it to ~ CURRENT ZONING: include an accessory dwelling unit. and to Commercial Core (CC) with a Historic construct a new single-family living unit over a Overlay District three-car garage. PROJECT SUMMARY The applicant, Archdiocese of Denver, represented by Rev. Michael Glenn and Olsen / Kelly Architects, requests Final Review for a significant development for St. Mary's Church to 1) restore some features o f the original rectory building, 2) remodel an existing addition to it to include an accessory dwelling unit, and 3) to construct a new single- family living unit over a three-car garage for a property located at 104 South Galena Street. The subject property is known and described as Lots A-I. Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen located in the Commercial Core (CC) with a Historic District Overlay. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant proposes to construct a two-story single-family residence for staff housing above a three-car garage, adjacent to and slightly behind the existing St. Mary's Rectory located on the corner of South Galena and Main Street. The proposed building will maintain a total roof ridge height of 24 feet which breaches the County Courthouse view plane by 4'9". The City Council, during apublic hearing on December 18th, will be the final decision maker in allowing the breach in the view plane as the final step in the PUD process. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission have forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council to this effect. The applicant received approval for Conceptual Review from the HPC on August 23 rd~ 2000. The applicant presented a conceptual model and development proposal which included elements of the exterior remodel of the existing Rectory and variances from Residential Design Standards to the Historic Preservation Commission at a public hearing on August 23*, 2000. The HPC indicated they like the main proposal in general, gave some specific direction on the roof pitches, and will wait to see the results of the story poles and responses from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council regarding the view plane issue, before considering final architectural approval. As approved through the PUD, this project assumes all dimensional requirements of the underlying CC zone district with the exception of the following height protrusion into the view plane. Normally, a building in the CC zone district is allowed a height of 40 feet. This height is greatly reduced because of the view plane. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to modify the minimum distance between buildings of 10 feet to 5 feet. Finally, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a conditional use for two residential dwellings on this lot on October 25*,2000. In summary, Staff finds the modifications from Conceptual Review approval to Final Review to be consistent with the criteria and original representations made by the applicant with the exception of the request to convert the two original windows on the south side of the rectory with French doors as access to the garden /backyard. Staff does not support this request. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: > Approve the application as submitted; > Approve the application with conditions; > Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.); or > Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. ST AFÂ¥ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant Final Review approval for St. Mary's Church finding that the review standards have been met, with the following conditions: 1. That the HPC grants the following variances from residential design standards: 1) garage doors, 2) access from the alley. 3) street facing front entrance, 4) covered entryway, and 5) street facing principal window. The HPC finds that these variances shall be granted under Criteria B. that "the proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to;" 2. The City and St. Mary's should jointly undertake some pruning and maintenance on the lilac hedge plants before construction so that they are in their best health; 3. That a shared service line acknowledgement shall be required and obtained from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) for the existing development and a new separate service line shall be required for the new two-bedroom unit / garage addition prior to the application of building permits; 4. The St. Mary's Church complex is currently served by the public wastewater system. The addition of a two-bedroom single-family unit and the conversion of the employee unit to an accessory dwelling unit will have a minor impact upon the public wastewater system. The applicant shall pay all connection fees to the ACSD prior to the application of building permits for the project. The applicant may obtain a tap permit once detailed plans have been submitted to ACSD; 5. The satellite dishes on the rectory and church shall be removed and/or an appropriate location shall be determined by HPC; 6. That the Historic Preservation Commission denied the request by the applicant to replace two original windows on the south side of the rectory with doors; 7. That, as required by the Fire Protection District, the applicant shall provide an adequate driveway access width of at least 10 feet along Main Street. This can be achieved by trimming back the existing bushes; 8. That the applicant shall obtain a single Temporary Revocable Encroachment License from the City of Aspen Engineering Department to cover existing encroachments for the St. Mary's Church building which include: 1) a ventilation duet in the alley, 2) a roof overhang into the alley; 3) the heat melt system in the sidewalk, and 3) the front entrance of the building. This license must be obtained prior to the application of building permits; 9. That the applicant shall submit a letter certifying that there are no known problems with the existing buildings and lot drainage in order to exempt them from submitting drainage report for review by the Engineering Department; 10. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department: 11. That if the applicant decides to install a sprinkler system in the new building, the existing water system will need to be upgraded pursuant to Fire District requirements; 12. That the applicant shall enter into a common water service agreement with the City Water Department for the new building which will need to include separate meters in an accessible space; 13. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation; 14. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 15. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor; 16. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 17. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 18. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 19. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 20. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; and 21. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2000, granting Final Review approval for a significant development for the St. Mary's Catholic Church located at 104 South Galena Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen Colorado with the conditions set forth in the Resolution." ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A -- REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF FINDINGS EXHIBIT B -- FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONFORMANCE TO REPRESENTATIONS MADE DURING CONCEPTUAL REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS PLACED THEREON EXHIBIT C -- PARCEL LOCATION EXHIBIT D -- RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES 2000 EXHIBIT E -- SUPPORTING LETTER & SKETCHES EXHIBIT A REVIEW STANDARDS AND STAFF FINDINGS FOR FINAL REVIEW No approval for Significant Final Review in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards are met pursuant to Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) squarefeet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2),for detached accessory dwelling units. Staff Finding: Rectory - Existing East Wing Addition The existing east wing of the rectory, which houses the remodeled one-bedroom accessory dwelling unit, was constructed in the 1960's. The quality of some of the building materials, and the exterior brick detailing of this addition are inferior to the materials and detailing of the rectory. The proposed remodel to this addition consists of re-bricking the building, replacing existing aluminum windows with new wood windows, and replacing the existing metal shingles with wood shakes. The overall effect ofthe exterior remodel will be to improve the quality of the building materials and detailing. There are a number of areas on the east elevation where the brick color varies. Darker patches of brick contrast with lighter areas creating a haphazard /non-uniform brick detail pattern. This addition will be rebricked with brick that will closely match the size and color of the brick on the original rectory. The brick detailing will generally match that which was on the original addition. The new wood windows, replacing the existing aluminum windows, will be selected that complement the design of the historic windows in the rectory and meet current energy standards. The remodel ofthe rectory building includes replacing the metal roof shingles with wood shakes. Originally the building was constructed with wood shingles. The existing roof is in need of repair and the existing metal shingles cannot be matched. New Staff Housing Building The exterior brick on this proposed building will closely match the size of the brick on the rectory. A brick color will be selected which will harmonize with the color of the brick on the historic rectory. The general brick pattern will be a running bond. Brick detailing will consist of a header course and two soldier courses at the ground line, a horizontal soldier course over all doors and windows, and a rowlock brick course at windowsills. Window sizes were selected which match the proportions of the existing windows on the rectory. Windows are more narrow than wide. All windows on this structure will have a white clad / wood sash. In general. the detailing on this new building will complement the quality of the existing rectory. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Staff Finding: By improving the quality of the exterior materials on the existing east wing addition of the rectory, we feel that this addition will better fit the context of the historic Rectory. The proposed new garage and staff housing unit is intended to be subordinate to the rectory. The rectory is larger in scale and closer to Main and Galena Streets that the proposed new structure. The rectory will remain the most prominent residential structure on the site. The carriage house design maintains the scale and character of the neighborhood as well as respects the prominence of the rectory and church building. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the proposal does not detract from the importance of this building as one of only two 19th century churches, and the only pastor' s residence, left in Aspen. The proposed building is considered a secondary structure to the rectory. Its scale is that of a carriage house. It is designed to compliment the quality of the existing rectory and church, but not duplicate its form, nor its architectural elements. The proposed building will have a brick facade, which will compliment the existing brick on the rectory. The detailing of the brick exterior will consist of header, stretcher and soldier courses, as well as varying brick sizes, to distinguish it from the historic structure. The roof material will match the new shake roof on the rectory. The HPC has requested that the roof pitches of the new structure be steepened to reflect the roof pitches found on the rectory. The gable over the dining room area was steepened to a 12:12 roof pitch to accommodate this request. The main horizontal roof ridge was then raised to meet the dining room ridge, and the pitch of the gable over the bedrooms was steepened so that its ridge height would meet that of the main ridge. The roofheight was increased by 8", bringing the overall building height to 24 feet. The new building is located to the rear of the property, and is also set back from the rectory and church to reduce its impact on the historic site layout as seen from Main Street. The rectory and the church building will remain the most prominent structures on the site. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7 i The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detractfrom the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the modifications proposed for the east wing of the rectory include several positive improvements and that the new structure is compatible in scale, massing, design, and compatibility in its design to respect the integrity of the designated historic rectory and church. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 8 EXHIBIT B FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN CONFORMANCE TO REPRESENTATIONS MADE DURING CONCEPTUAL REVIEW AND RESPONSE TO CONDITIONS PLACED THEREON: Staff Finding: The proposed building footprint, roof shapes, and height have remained the same as presented during Conceptual Review. The main changes have occurred with respect to the exterior detailing. As required as a condition of Conceptual Review approval, the applicants were required to remove two satellite dishes. The applicants agreed that both would be removed and / or relocated to a position approved by HPC as part of this application. Other proposed alterations to the historic rectory include replacing two original windows with French doors (out of a breakfast room.) Staff continues to not support the removal of the two windows because they are original features. In addition, the HPC did not grant this approval at Conceptual Review. The applicants wish to continue to pursue this as a desired modification to the original part of the rectory. Staff maintains that this major alteration is too drastic a modification to the original structure and seriously jeopardizes the buildings historic significance simply to achieve more convenient access to the garden area. Access to the garden already exists and is available through the mudroom and views of the garden are available through the existing windows. On the existing addition to the rectory. the applicant is removing the solar panels. which is a very positive change. and is proposing to reconfigure doors and windows related to the interior remodel of the space. Staff has no concerns with these alterations. As part of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) approved by the City Council, dimensional requirements were slightly modified to better accommodate this new building. Specifically. distance between buildings was modified from 10 feet to five feet and the building height was allowed to breach the Pitkin County Courthouse view plane to a total ridge height of 24 feet. All other dimensional requirements assumed the requirements of the underling Commercial Core zone district. The design for the new structure maintains its simplicity and reflects the forms and materials of the rectory. Staff finds that there is adequate suggestion that the building is new construction because the window shapes and brick coursing will be different, and of course the three car garage on the first floor gives away that it is not a 19th century structure. Staff has no concerns with the design. At Conceptual Review, the HPC granted variances from residential design guidelines including 1) three-car garage, 2) access from the alley, 3) street facing front entrance, 4) covered entryway, and 5) street facing principal window. In addition, the HPC made the following recommendations and conditions for the project prior to returning for Final Review: > The satellite dish located on the rectory was to be removed; > The two original windows located on the south side of the rectory were to remain and not be transformed into doors; 9 > Restudy the east elevation on the rectory; and > Steepen the roof pitches on the two front facing gables of the new structure to more closely resemble the pitches on the east elevation of the rectory. Staff finds the modifications from Conceptual Review approval to Final Review to be consistent with the criteria and original representations made by the applicant with the exception of the request to convert the two original windows on the south side of the rectory with French doors as access to the garden /backyard. Staff does not support this request. HISTORIC PRESERVATION DESIGN GUIDELINES This project proposes rehabilitating an existing addition to the historic rectory and the construction of a brand new building on a historic landmark site. In addition to the analysis provided above, specific consideration was given to the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (the "Guidelines") in determining whether this project, as a whole, was consistent and compatible with adjacent structures and neighborhood in its design, scale, massing, location and orientation, and materials. Specific reference is provided below pertaining to guiding policies that are intended to better direct new development in the Commercial Core Historic Overlay, New Buildings on Landmarked Properties, and New Additions to existing historic structures. Chapter 11 of the Guidelines. New Buildings on Landmarked Properties / Historic Landmark Lot Splits, maintains a policy that: In some cases a primary structure may be constructed on a parcel that includes a landmarked structure. In such cases, it's important that the new building be compatible with the historic structure such that its integrity is maintained. Staff finds that the proposed new staff housing structure is compatible with the adjacent rectory in that it respects and maintains the integrity of the historic resource through building orientation, massing and scale, and building form. In this case, the new unit is located at the back of the lot as seen from Main Street and largely obscured from site from Galena Street. It is simple in form yet remaining in harmony in design vocabulary to the rectory in materials, and window and door elements while not deviating too much as to detract focus away from the main focal point; the rectory and the church. The new building is smaller in mass and is scaled appropriately as to not overwhelm the resources. The new building is located to the rear of the property, and is also set back from the rectory and church to reduce its impact on the historic site layout as seen from Main Street. The rectory and the church building will remain the most prominent structures on the site. The building and roof forms have been a topic of discussion with the HPC during the work session and Significant Conceptual Review. The applicant was directed to continue to study the roo f pitches prior to returning to final so that the roof forms resembled the pitches of the adjacent rectory to maintain consistency. More specifically, the HPC requested that the roof pitches of the new structure be steepened to reflect the roof pitches found on the rectory. The gable over the dining room area was steepened to a 12:12 roof pitch to accommodate this 10 request. The main horizontal roof ridge was then raised to meet the dining room ridge, and the pitch of the gable over the bedrooms was steepened so that its ridge height would meet that of the main ridge. The roof height was increased by 8", bringing the overall building height to 24 feet. It is in these ways that this project meets the intent of this policy. Chapter 13 of the Guidelines: Design in the Commercial Core Historic District, maintains a policy that states: Improvements in the Commercial Core Historic District should maintain the integrity of historic resources in the area. At the same time, compatible and creative design solutions should be encouragei The intent of this policy is to reinforce the important of alleys. open space, building setbacks, mass and scale, building form, repetition of faGade elements and detail alignment in the historic downtown commercial core area of Aspen. It is the very intent of the project to respect all these vital elements as they allows newer developments to respect the historic resources while allowing for creative departure so as not to confuse the viewer as to which structure is the historic resource. The remodel of the new addition to the rectory utilizes brick design similar to that of the rectory yet maintains window trim and soldier courses to distinguish and respectfully depart from the main house. Reconstructing the tower that once stood fixed on the rectory is a commendable in an attempt to restore more of the structure to its original integrity. This project has also considered a sensitive approach to the location ofthe new building with respect to the existing open space on the lot, which is one of its most defining features. Finally, Chapter 10 of the Guidelines focuses its attention to contemporary additions to historic structures. The directing policy maintains: If a new addition to a historic building is to be constructed, it should be designed such that the early character of the original structure is maintained. It should also be subordinate in appearance to the main building. Older additions that have taken on significance also should be considered for preservation. Clearly, the applicants intend to restore much of the rectory to a more original structure that currently exists by re-roofing with shingles that resemble the original wood shakes, reconstructing the tower, removing the solar panels and other mechanical equipment while removing or relocating a satellite dish to a less prominent location, and remodeling the newer addition to be more consistent with the rectory while maintaining its own identity so as to not confuse the casual observer. The applicant intends to remodel the existing addition in the same form it currently maintains with better materials that are more compatible to and not disrespectful ofthe historic integrity ofthe rectory. 11 EXHIBIT C PARCEL LOCATION -'"Ar UÂ«- N 2 4,4/ ar tu 0 -~f'.1-VI '~ACLE 0 00 E HOPKINS AVE EXHIBIT D RESOLUTION N0. (SERIES OF 2000) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL REVIEW OF A SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT FOR ST. MARY'S CHURCH, LOCATED AT 104 SOUTH GALENA STREET, LOTS A-I, BLOCK 93, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2737-073-31-801 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Archdiocese of Denver, represented by Reverend Michael Glenn and Olsen / Kelly Architects, for Final Review of a significant development for St. Mary's Church located at 104 South Galena Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 26.415, the Historic Preservation Commission may approve a Final Review for a significant development. during a duly noticed public hearing. and hearing comments from the general public, a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks. extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(13)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on December 181 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions byavote of to Q - j. WHEREAS, the Community Development Department reviewed the St. Mary's Church Final review for a significant development and recommended approval with conditions set forth in the Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and the applicable referral agencies. and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the review standards are met and HPC granted approval for Final Review for a significant development for St. Mary's Church to 1) restore some features ofthe original rectory building, 2) remodel an existing addition to it to include an accessory dwelling unit, and 3) to construct a new single-family living unit over a three-car garage for a property located at 104 South Galena Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the December 18th, 2000 meeting, with the following conditions: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Final Review for a significant development for St. Mary's Church located at 104 South Galena Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen is approved with the following conditions: 1. That the HPC grants the following variances from residential design standards: 1) garage doors, 2) access from the alley, 3) street facing front entrance, 4) covered entryway, and 5) street facing principal window. The HPC finds that these variances shall be granted under Criteria B, that "the proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to;" 2. The City and St. Mary's should jointly undertake some pruning and maintenance on the lilac hedge plants before construction so that they are in their best health; 3. That a shared service line acknowledgement shall be required and obtained from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) for the existing development and a 14 new separate service line shall be required for the new two-bedroom unit / garage addition prior to the application of building permits; 4. The St. Mary's Church complex is currently served by the public wastewater system. The addition of a two-bedroom single-family unit and the conversion of the employee unit to an accessory dwelling unit will have a minor impact upon the public wastewater system. The applicant shall pay all connection fees to the ACSD prior to the application of building permits for the project. The applicant may obtain a tap permit once detailed plans have been submitted to ACSD; 5. The satellite dishes on the rectory and church shall be removed and/or an appropriate location shall be determined by HPC; 6. That the Historic Preservation Commission denied the request by the applicant to replace two original windows on the south side of the rectory with doors; 7. That, as required by the Fire Protection District, the applicant shall provide an adequate driveway access width of at least 10 feet along Main Street. This can be achieved by trimming back the existing bushes; 8. That the applicant shall obtain a single Temporary Revocable Encroachment License from the City of Aspen Engineering Department to cover existing encroachments for the St. Mary' s Church building which include: 1) a ventilation duet in the alley, 2) a roof overhang into the alley; 3) the heat melt system in the sidewalk, and 3) the front entrance of the building. This license must be obtained prior to the application of building permits; 9. That the applicant shall submit a letter certifying that there are no known problems with the existing buildings and lot drainage in order to exempt them from submitting drainage report for review by the Engineering Department; 10. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department; 11. That if the applicant decides to install a sprinkler system in the new building, the existing water system will need to be upgraded pursuant to Fire District requirements; 12. That the applicant shall enter into a common water service agreement with the City Water Department for the new building which will need to include separate meters in an accessible space; 13. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation; 14. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be 15 restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 15. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor; 16. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 17. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 18. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 19. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 20. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; and 21. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Section 2: This Resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 18th day of December, 2000. 16 Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk C:\My Documents\Current Cases\St. Mary's\stmarysHPCFinalMemo.doc 17 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION December 20, 2000 REGULAR MEETING, 4:30 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON - 4:30 I. Roll call II. Public Comments III. Commission member comments and project monitoring IV. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) V. NEW BUSINESS 4:35 A. St. Mary's Church - 104 S. Galena - Final HPC Review, Public Hearing (cont'd from 12/13/2000) Reso 57 5:05 B. Corbin/Burrows - 610 W. Smuggler & 505 N. Fifth Street - Landmark, Lot Split, Public Hearing - (cont'd from 12/13/2000) Reso 58 (to be continued) 69,- /0 4,4 C. Executive Session - 213 W. Bleeker - Appeal of Historic Preservation Commission Stay of Demolition Reso 59 D. Review of Existing Historic Preservation Inventory ADJOURN 0.~13 1.3 L corti 4..6-9 2 55 --, 4 b.- 20 15- 1 A' W 6.-4 4 6:13 â€¢ clv t~t.e 46 r 9Â«... This is a public hearing to consider a resolution for a Final Review for a Significant Development by the applicant, the Archdiocese of Denver, represented by Rev. Michael Glenn and Olsen / Kelly Architects for St. Mary' s Church to 1) restore some features of the original rectory building, 2) remodel an existing addition to it to include an accessory dwelling unit, and 3) to construct a new single-family living unit over a three-car garage for a property located at 104 South Galena Street. The subject property is known and described as Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen located in the Commercial Core (CC) with a Historic District Overlay. > The applicant proposes to construct a two-story single-family residence for staff housing above a three-car garage, adjacent to and slightly behind the existing St. Mary's Rectory located on the corner of South Galena and Main Street. The proposed building will maintain a total roof ridge height of 24 feet which breaches the County Courthouse view plane by 4'9". The City Council, during a public hearing on December 18th, granted unanimous approval, allowing the breach in the view plane as the final step in the PUD process. Staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission have also forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council to this effect. > The applicant received approval for Conceptual Review from the HPC on August 23rd, 2000. The applicant presented a conceptual model and development proposal which included elements of the exterior remodel of the existing Rectory and variances from Residential Design Standards to the Historic Preservation Commission at a public hearing on August 23rd, 2000. The HPC indicated they like the main proposal in general, gave some specific direction on the roof pitches, and will wait to see the results of the story poles and responses from the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council regarding the view plane issue, before considering final architectural approval. > As approved through the PUD, this project assumes all dimensional requirements of the underlying CC zone district with the exception of the following height protrusion into the view plane. Normally, a building in the CC zone district is allowed a height of 40 feet. This height is greatly reduced because of the view plane. Additionally, the applicant is requesting to modify the minimum distance between buildings of 10 feet to 5 feet. Finally, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a conditional use for two residential dwellings on this lot on October 25th, 2000. In summary, Staff finds the modifications from Conceptual Review approval to Final Review to be consistent with the criteria and original representations made by the applicant with the exception of the request to convert the two original windows on the south side of the rectory with French Doors as access to the garden /backyard. Staff does not support this , request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: A - Staff recommends HPC grant Final Review approval for St. Mary's Church finding that the review standards have been met, with the following conditions: 1. That the HPC grants the following variances from residential design standards: 1) garage doors, 2) access from the alley, 3) street facing front entrance, 4) covered entryway, and 5) street facing principal window. The HPC finds that these variances shall be granted under Criteria B, that "the proposal more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to;" 2. The City and St. Mary's should jointly undertake some pruning and maintenance on the lilac hedge plants before construction so that they are in their best health; 3. That a shared service line acknowledgement shall be required and obtained from the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District (ACSD) for the existing development and a new separate service line shall be required for the new two-bedroom unit / garage addition prior to the application of building permits; 4. The St. Mary's Church complex is currently served by the public wastewater system. The addition of a two-bedroom single-family unit and the conversion of the employee unit to an accessory dwelling unit will have a minor impact upon the public wastewater system. The applicant shall pay all connection fees to the ACSD prior to the application of building permits for the project. The applicant may obtain a tap permit once detailed plans have been submitted to ACSD; 5. The satellite dishes on the rectory and church shall be removed and/or an appropriate location shall be determined by HPC*, 6. That the Ilistoric Preservation Commission denied the request by the applicant to replace two original windows on the south side of the rectory with doors; 7. That, as required by the Fire Protection District, the applicant shall provide an adequate driveway access width of at least 10 feet along Main Street. This can be achieved by trimming back the existing bushes; 8. That the applicant shall obtain a single Temporary Revocable Encroachment License from the City of Aspen Engineering Department to cover existing encroachments for the St. Mary's Church building which include: 1) a ventilation duet in the alley, 2) a roof overhang into the alley; 3) the heat melt system in the sidewalk, and 3) the front entrance of the building. This license must be obtained prior to the application of building permits; 9. That the applicant shall submit a letter certifying that there are no known problems with the existing buildings and lot drainage in order to exempt them from submitting drainage report for review by the Engineering Department; 10. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department; 2 11. That if the applicant decides to install a sprinkler system in the new building, the existing water system will need to be upgraded pursuant to Fire District requirements; 12. That the applicant shall enter into a common water service agreement with the City Water Department for the new building which will need to include separate meters in an accessible space; 13. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation; 14. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 15. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor; 16. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 17. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 18. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions o f approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 19. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 20. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; and 21. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2000, granting Final Review approval for a significant development for the St. Mary' s Catholic Church located at 104 South Galena Street, Lots A-I, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen Colorado with the conditions set forth in the Resolution." 3 . ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name *'F rl"IÂ©~ DA~Tel-!u Â£5+IUFC.H - PE'92:Â»ri' FÂ·IRM,sgEI- t Act:,ITIC,ht 2. Project location f,$74 4. RAL-E+Â·IA ,@F, Perew, 6Â»12Â¥5Â».CO 11Â» A-I , PL,52%12 19 (indicate street address, lot and Mock number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning A:> 4. Lot size -24,570,0, 4. F. 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number,Af,LHPIASEâ‚¬,245Â¥r PENVEEFLi FÂ¥1~,0,#Tâ€¢12 07' 12*. MIA,!401- 6,1-12141/ 194912'F,; er. 14Â·r~Â«11-lot-ks C#U~2(+1~, 1621Â· '9Â· 440'4-0~~~ Sp~/'5f~ 62>, 01 ~11 9 119Â· -7 951 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 63Â»Â»..1 + 1Â·*14- b,MITEOF> ; 117'Vmt:Â·,44Â·re: *9, A.rEJ/ GO. 0164 1 : 12,9.7~~ 1 1 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA X Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA ,< Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo X View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property)194' STFUSTU12*S, 6%1â€¢ST A--1 -nue- ngopefÂ·Â·rf ,, Â«, FrrÂ¥ gll-Wbe> 4'OF'>11 (11,030.8 4 ) 04-42 AB Fa:*F>( C 8372.1 41 ) . #Herzt;-1 1.5.- $ 41Lff WIU')104 WITH OWEÂ»F,$2216, ATC+1151/6'FFIL#* ..J CA.â€¢*6 LEVEL- . 7Â°Ffi '*A ..,121Â©f euor.44% Wil-H *4 447(171Â· 844'Fb re*I Pajil *449 - eaTH. EMIFW/FER UNIT, FRF. 121 61 rf Fi l-Es F':le. FfF"UAL*. 9. Description of development application Ajrgr.loric- F.,tor,El- 47 9: MÂ»ff FU~312>(, WHI,SH 11Â·Â·k;IWIPE* .44 E><19[1,Ja, 1-eeCÂ¥42~ IEript.'T~6 +1113 Pp BER- 24-IVEqgÂ¥0 12>,4.1 ACF ON 17.. Fasiz:Â¥W[latÂ·4 of= eo'wpl #61 #10*FIOF-'' Â»Â·PO ,+E- ,Alle'lloW Â« A NEW Bull-pit-Â·14 COH TAIHING A 2 r*OFDOM 1-+OUSI 1-44 UNI r OVEA A .6-6Â»12- <51'fAG, 0 - Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 *te 5 1* MA H + . ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Â»FOHPIDGE,5,0 d~ plablve.p- (Fla/. MIGHNEL â‚¬911-04Jhl) Address: leâ‚¬ 4. Â«P...0~1'k ef ., p.794-Â» 1 CO . Zone district: A:1'IM 01261Â»L, treglee- 2,5.z>) Lot size: 1-7,/040 4. F. Existing FAR: | 4-/ 2-09 . 6 * g Allowable FAR: 44 #Â·01 e. r. Proposed FAR: I 6/ 674-5. b *.rt Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 07 9 Proposed % of site coverage: PS. 2.,9 Existing % of open space: 795. Proposed % of open space: &7. b 90 Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: .42[1214 44'It Accesory bldg: APVE- Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 35 L o" Accessory bldg: s.+Lon . Proposed % of demolition: o Existing number of bedrooms: + Proposed number of bedrooms: P C Flelor-*f) -2. C,04512mal) Existing on-site parking spaces: 1 (4619â‚¬57 2.),, D G+J. 611-e- On-site parking spaces required: 9 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: 4445. Front: 4046 Front: k)442- Rear: R.)01-4Â£ Rear: IJAJEE Rear: 2,5'PE- Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: Fron#rear: FronUrear: Side: Hop E Side: PA-'E- Side: h&:91-1,5- Side: A'PER Side: IJOPEE Side: iJAJE- Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities or encroachments: EBUE;195Â¥k:OHMRJT INTE' MAINI .9r. Â¥..0.*1. i,( Ao,LMA 80* f#+10 JOTo pwÂ« p,C reÂ¢1~- dr câ€¢wroH, Variations requested: Â» S' VÂ»F:14Â©E- fleM -fAB 10' MIB. !215;F~NC-E-- 12Edw}FEC> Bplphaek) 6 t'El>'â‚¬;HISP MESIC>EN-~-IAL !30/1-996,6 GR 14+e- 3Â»MEE Le-. (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) 00 I â€¢1 St. Mary Catholic Church RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING (Dec. 1,2000) Final HPC Review Description of Proposal: The Archdiocese of Denver proposes to remodel the Rectory of St. Mary's Catholic Church, renovate the exterior of the building, and construct a detached two-story building slightly behind the Rectory to house a new three- car garage and two bedroom staff housing unit. The interior Rectory remodel will consist of remodeling the pastor's living quarters and existing one-bedroom employee dwelling unit. Restoration to the building exterior will include architectural restoration of the brick exterior, repairing wood trim, and replacing the metal roof shingles with wood shakes. Review Standards: 1. Effect of proposed details on the original design of the historic structure: Rector, - Existing East Wing Addition The existing east wing of the Rectory, which houses the remodeled one- bedroom accessory dwelling unit, was built in the 60's. In general, the quality of some of the building materials, and the exterior brick detailing of this addition are inferior to materials and detailing on the Rectory. The proposed remodel to this addition consists of re-bricking the building, replacing existing aluminum windows with new wood windows, and replacing the existing metal shingles with wood shakes. The overall effect of the exterior remodel will be to improve the quality of the building materials and detailing. There are a number of areas on the east elevation where the brick color varies greatly. Darker patches of brick contrast strongly with lighter areas, creating visibly haphazard and blotchy patterns. This addition will be re- bricked with brick which will closely match the size of the brick on the historic Rectory, and a brick color will be chosen which will harmonize with the color of the brick on the historical Rectory. The brick detailing will generally match that which was on the original addition. However, the quality of the detailing will be improved and be consistent on all elevations. . New wood windows will be selected which will complement the design of the historic windows in the Rectory and meet current energy standards. These windows replace existing aluminum windows. The remodel of the Rectory building includes replacing the metal roof shingles with wood shakes. Originally the building was constructed with wood shingles. The existing roof is also in need of repair and the metal shingles currently on the Rectory cannot be matched. New Staff Housing Building The exterior brick on this proposed building will closely match the size of the brick on the Rectory. A brick color will be selected which will harmonize with the color of the brick on the historic Rectory. The general brick pattern will be a running bond. Brick detailing will consist of a header course and two soldier courses at the ground line, a horizontal soldier course over all doors and windows, and a rowlock brick course at window sills. Window sizes were selected which match the proportions of the existing windows on the Rectory. Windows are narrower than they are wide. All windows on this building will have a white clad/wood sash. In general the detailing on this new building will complement the quality of the existing Rectory, but not duplicate the architectural elements. 2. Effect of proposed details on the character of the neighborhood: By Improving the quality of the exterior materials on the existing east wing addition of the Rectory, we feel that this addition will better fit the context of historic Rectory. The proposed new garage and staff housing building is intended to be subordinate to the existing Rectory structure. The Rectory is larger in scale and closer to Main and Galena Streets than the new building. The Rectory will remain the most prominent residential structure on this site, since it is the original residence and an historic structure. We feel that the carriage house quality of the proposed building preserves the scale and character of the neighborhood as well as that of the existing Rectory. 2 . 3. Final development plan conformance to representations made during conceptual review and response to conditions placed thereon: The proposed building footprint, roof shapes and height have remained the same as presented during the conceptual review. For this presentation we have evolved the exterior detailing. The recommendations and conditions placed upon the project during conceptual review were the following: that we apply for a variance on the required distance between buildings prior to returning to HPC for final review, that the satellite dish on the Rector, be removed, that we not replace the two original windows on the south side of the Rectory with doors, that we restudy the east elevation on the Rectory, that we steepen the roof pitches on the two front facing gables on the new building to more closely match the roof pitch on the east elevation of the Rectory and typical Victorian structures. 1. The application for a variance from the required distance between buildings was submitted to P&Zas part of the PUD application. 2. The satellite dish on the Rectory will be removed and relocated. We welcome the committee's recommendations for a proposed new location. 3. We are proposing that the windows on the south side of the Rectory at the breakfast room be removed and replaced with doors in order to provide a direct connection to the backyard. (Please see letter provided by Father Michael Glenn.) 4. We did restudy the east elevation of the Rectory. The french doors and the foot balconies at the new ADU unit were each replaced with pairs of large double hung windows. We feel that this solution is a better complementto the other Rectory elevations and will provide better ventilation for the ADU unit than doors. 5. We also restudied the roof on the new building. In this presentation we have raised roof pitches on the two street facing gables to a 12:12 and 10.5:12 roof pitch (see roof plan). We wish to thank the committee for this recommendation. We feel that it has greatly improved the elevation of this building. 3 *t. #tary Catitalit <41Irrli 533 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-7339 Fax (970) 925-1889 November 30,2000 Members ofthe Historic Preservation Committee c/o Fred Jarman Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Members ofthe Historical Preservation Committee: Due to previous commitments made months ago, I will be out ofthe country at the time ofthe final review ofthe Historic Rectory Renovation and StaffHousing Project of St. Mary's Catholic Church. Therefore, I wish to take the opportunity to share with you some additional thoughts on this project by means of this letter. I am delighted with the support that the people of St. Mary's and the wider community have given in regards to this project. At this time we've raised about two-thirds ofthe cost of the project and have every hope that our continued fund-raising will be successful. I am raising one final concern in regards to this project: that being our request for a set of doors leading directly from the breakfast room into the backyard. At our previous meeting, this request was denied. As you are aware, we are very committed to the historic nature of this house as shown by the thorough research and discovery that we made of the historic Victorian tower on the house and the sizeable amount of money we are willing to put forward to return this architectural feature to the house. St. Mary's has shown in the past its deep commitment to historical renovation. At the same time, I must stress to you that these projects, both the church and the rectory, first and foremost are functional buildings, which must serve the religious mission of the Catholic Church here in Aspen. While we want to preserve their history as much as possible, it is essential that they are able to function in terms of the present needs placed on these buildings. One hundred and twelve years ago when the rectory was constructed, it functioned very much as a private residence for a priest. Today, however, rectories have become Members of the Historic Preservation Committee November 30,2000 Page Two public homes where priests have many of their evening meetings and which serve as a center for community activities. Of all the rectories I've lived in, St. Mary's is perhaps the most active. This is no doubt due to the fact of its excellent location and the grounds that surround the house, most particularly, the backyard. As you may be aware, we have meetings throughout the year at the parish and in the summers, we host a number of outdoor activities, most particularly, our backyard theology program which has been enjoyed by Catholics and non-Catholics, visitors and locals. Such activities are difficult to host with the present situation ofthe house. Having the direct connection from the kitchen to the backyard creates a safer, more accessible entry into the back ofthe house. This would enable us to better host these backyard activities. I think the proposal by the architects for this door is very much in keeping with the historical arches found over the doors and windows o f St. Mary's Church itself. Additionally, the bricks salvaged from this part of the renovation would help us in our over-all restoration of the bricks around the rectory, especially those bricks which need to be replaced because o f deterioration or that were heavily gouged during the unfortunate sandblasting in the 50's or 60's. As I pointed out in our previous meeting, other buildings in this city have been allowed to have modifications to enable the community at large to meet in these buildings safely and productively. The City Council Chambers are a perfect example of this blending of modern needs with an historical edifice. I believe what is proposed for St. Mary's rectory is a modest and tasteful adaptation ofthe house that maintains its original historic spirit while serving the modern needs o f a growing congregation and community. I hope the above-listed reasons will help you in understanding why we feel that this modification is an important improvement to the existing historic structure, thus allowing it to function for the present demands ofthe people of St. Mary's and the coinmunity of Aspen. Thank you so much for your kind consideration. I regret once again that I cannot be with you for this meeting. Sincerely .7//11.0 A.7 Rev. Michael G. 61;k-' Pastor RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW CHECKLIST (To be filled out by case planner and kept in the file) SITE DESIGN BUILDING FORM Building Orientation: Secondary Mass: Build-to-Lines: Fence: PARKING, GARAGES & CARPORTS BUILDING ELEMENTS Access (i.e. alley): Windows: Garage width: Door: Garage location: Porch: Driveway cut: Principal window: Entrance width: One story element: Single stall doors? Lightwells: CONTEXT Materials: Inflection: APPLICATION MATERIALS Lighting Plan: Tree Removal Permit: ADDITIONAL NOTES: L//--- RIFERENCE /02>97 ONE - ; 1 ....KE=.CE Ft>iNT TWO 4 - coug.T LIOUSE VIEK FLAPRE - - COUNT 1-OUSE VIEN FLAME ~ 1 \ MAI[N STREET ~ 1 4-- I I.7 1 j. 1 1 Ill 1 Â»'Ad ., 07242 CONOKeETE *Al. 1 1 ..1 ...Cleerrel Ki'Â·AL~C 1- - - -___. fvrÂ».114 . . .: POUND â‚¬/64< W,/PLAS Â·Oâ€¢,17<~ -- Â·Â·-Â· -- *Â·"-Â·-Â·-- -, i. 1. '-".' --"1â€¢M -,, ~C.~â€¢...~1, 91 A- + 1,-**p.-'-I--411 ...- -1*rj , : i '- - 4 - FOUAH, CLTÂ·r MokIUMENT ,/4Bisls e, 82,10~JG < - _~~F l /17 /9 1 L 4 20]91 , k / +----1--'--N-V-~'1. }L.--1.-Â»Â·Â»~ 0 (/D F'RE NY' / 62<leTIP-431 \ h-- --4/ DI W-+ , \ Â« 13 i/:/Â«~t } j r 1-e, / 4/////// /4///94 Â· L. 3 \ A *C 4 ' /4 / 0 \ 214 / ///// 1 4 4. ,} lilli jtl I r I. 14/1 1 /l, , <N / I I 45 Â£ 1 1 1% \4 [ .~~st,/PE#(*~)~~M,fyyi:Vpy,4/f~ LLJ f 1 2. 8/10> 00../c / 1 14/ 111 r Â» .'- lilli.. l LJ-:e~.4- 9-'' 11 4 // /.// I. ~ ll'll,l 1 80/ , / 1 . 1./ 1 i Â· 9.a / ;x ~ / ~ / / -rno s,0.x .em.,c* vaost / // ' 1 \ 11 31'â‚¬,4 1 - -LAWN. - r ./ Wy *~1 + // 4,1 (Â© CG?XED 1 I ~ 3 i [Ff-Eff/Whv,12 /9Â» . ' IÂ» - I. 14 IXÂ» \ ~Eff>ft>ki3~~~5$5&49j~~ - 0 li \ 1 1 ==T -i-*'F-%%%341:,<s JILUttififtfifi ! ASPHALT .,A -WL-* 9 - , IICX I rtgra 2 ~ 11// f --.1.~ MA'Id'V'*32 . 5 2 1/ & AÂ· Â· r MEW ViALÂ·k_ 11 Â· b c - -2 {-142..~~~~ 1 8tj -11'lli'jl'lilillli,j!2 1 lilli./ fl... 9 (2:4Jd>f#<5) 4 ~ CONCIEETE IALI< (6) .we-9 1 ~05/ R i 1 // 4 4Â£1/, yri -- 1 r.-.\1/= appet-6- MULCO .-_ _ 2 1~ < ~ ~ -Â»TEELL,CALTE ST-MI-ti- 3-~ f ~E~~ _*Â¥42:E,KINZA,1- 15Â¥219 C/) 11 el 4 - 1 XY-___- fLAW'b.l~~ -64Â»Â«102'CAL-, ||1 ,\ t.\ 1 1 1 j /~jij~/~/~Ij|||1~1~j/i\ ~18 =39 . t' \ %:[3 if m *284 1 V CAL.. 2-~_ / qa Â¢41,7EA6Y 32~,~TELED-% I P Z .5 ~ ~< Pfgatlrd \ AL- BEI,2.- - ---- Â·Â·-- -------__--f:14%.i#* mil 't/'m#<Ei.ire:1;521.&1Tdi - -- -*-/...1- r Uf-,-1/.sefar..#.Lte~..1.iififEfErise/(EEEECEI:.rE#EaaiLEEE#& ' I th 8 0-9\91' - > ~ (65 kâ‚¬UFWU LIC&*06::?p, .6 9?02<1 Â· f \1\\.\\ 1 :11Â«450%i,24<041'4>4241 -5 - 1- -J f // 1,1 ' lf 1 f l il l i j f li t / 11 / f f / 10 7 - 15)4,5rtkIR Al,YEÂ·*4 -IT-Â»------- .-4...5.--4 -3. '.- - -- --4~~ -,; r~ I 1 A---------11--21 7 1/ i \*- , TICAE=Â·Fi 284 4' AT, CLLF, i 't 1 0> 0.1-0.91"mo 1 = - -- L EXPOTIUCC' - ENCLII)21.)*m r : + 12*1513#-10 C/) ~~~1~~ i rf<Â«AP&*s..'~~=~.~.~.~.,./~i~~.~/.L.,.Â£0 - 41 Mt 4 - -- ~'ENC 0 75' i q ~ - 06 . ENC 0 75,1/j TELeebâ‚¬Â»~. PED <-Ae.LE 7 vlo ....1 84692 24[ 10-TlhtÂ« CLe - --- CED 1*AaE h.116.152-t:AA:L j *ts - ALLEYÂ¤ BLOCK 93 -â€ž- MEA/U Â¥â‚¬2~.~ME CAAMILEUL Dekle,+, PULaTDKE â‚¬70*UZE- -* 03 6(<en--ECCUE- Tlkle-' 00'+NTU- _ _-4142*04*1<AL- Â·EEI-1-5, MULCU 0 i Z - _: trm<rT- 1.-16, M-r (93 -342*:CtÂ·Â·Â·AAN yeTEKErl LL.4 , *te Â·DITE- L-kE+mkb . - kawl L.LGAn.46. 19 VA-T - ~ UPPATE @EMTIFIcATE -~ cz, kED/201* ACCEL\-r NAXTUâ‚¬55#IME-ile 20* -'-- -2--- . 91 El- IZ' 1.-*IÂ·14 1.-1 AMT 2 4- 19 -IÂ·ew 1, 04/IED F. FaeR, HEF:ONrCE!91rr-TMAT ON DECEMISEK 27/ -1 M]VT-UEES. EUCAL, â‚¬9FEA:EL MOOKIE I191 I VI/\PE A VISUAL ItÂ«brECT-ION OFTNE rgorserr 3 *2-27 .,00 tu -7;*Â»tipÂ©8-W- 1 1 p SHOWN-1 HEEWOKA. NO CHARGED WEâ‚¬E FOUND EXCEfr /O -Fly-1ULES MAE- c_XE:Â£>UUID MOOUT . 20 Â« 90 GT Â£51Â·406/KI AhED 1-102.2) HEFECDH - C)Fe NT- -22 211_ . 2.0,6,6 a= SEAKINS Fel.IN, MONUMENTS AS S+IOWN SCAL. : 1 ' IC ALrIN E *Ulearn 1Â»IciDi- - ---= JAMIEâ‚¬> F. MEDIA, 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON APRIL I5,1992. A V SUAL 1 REREBY CEKT IFT -THAT THIS MAP ACCURA:TELY DEPICTS A â‚¬buROVer MAVE L.67 9!54 INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE UNDEK MrÂ· SUPEXVI SION ON AUBUST 24.1989 op LOTS A - ~ . GLON< 91> r 01!8Â¥Ere-&'1_.CAKT.lfl~CATE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND CITI 1 ASPEN . COLORAO/+ THEREON. PLANT LIST Al_PINE SURVEYS,INC. BY: ol~NmY BOTANOU AL,AUE COAWON NWE SIZE ROOT COMMENTS APRIL 17,1992 19 ALF[Kle: EUKV/6 , INC ef POPULUS ;REÂ¥(/LO/DES ASPEN 1 1/P~ CAL. B&8 TREE WRAP ~ Serle,â€¢IBEX 4, , liol L'* ~PULUS BEMULOOES ASP'Ev 2' CAL. B & B TREE IMP PINUS ARETATA BRSTLECONE PINE- C HT. B&B CORNUS STOLOUFERA REDnÂ¥#G DOGWOOD ~5 CONL 19 POTENnUA FRUTIOSA J,OCAW,f ,,â‚¬KAW, POH/7/LA #5 CONT. W~ 14/0 POIEN]71-LA RN.mCOSA *LOND#rE' MLONO#ZE POTENnUA #5 00NL rÂ»-1/ 6%Â· 9 1 APLÂ«JE w C/STEAM PURPLELEAF S~NOCHERPÂ¥ -I. 1 1 6-5 21'6" f-"fi PHYSOCARFâ€¢US OPUL#'DENUS Â»NUS' DMW?f- NINEBtRK C-1 1/Â»1413>5~c4AFe-- ,Â».jo LIÂ»trINA ttoÂ« H 'L__J Lj 111 - 1. 4 4-9 Ly,â€¢N.P.T. L x,Â·Npr FFaTECT- LTE-*a Tul.(42!kja JOISTUICE'IDN , C.1-EÂ·Â·AM - CUT EXCA\Wilad NEAR- ULACE _ EL121 PEUK.la- la*175Â£- RtÂ£271@6, WeiÂ¥' FACE- Or' Ek*VAT- CA \Un-Wi- Fal-IrEe- 'Fasmee , 12121-i> . 7 IiÂ©21<hATE- ep<RLAC- 402Â¥X-E- 70 VA,lertÂ»Â·j w hABST- 26'Or- ZokiE. __. __._ ._ _ KLV205 21-\UNTING FIXTUkiES ...6. CLU .3 ijjL U60 ULU IJÂ£ '.9,0 UUVOUIVI I'nO. 3Vt aillO .0Â¥V N, 31131 (, N 3 S 1 ~'ALI~ 133H1S WaiNAH GALENA STREET 3 OllOH1Â¥3 9,13Â¥nl 19 3 'NBdSV "19 VN31Â¥9 3 *0 [ 300\433 1301333 4% 6 6 4 \ \/ LML courr MOUSE VIEN PLANE - k/ cot-.T -eUSE VIEW PutÂ·Â·let 1 REFEIâ‚¬NCE- 1931 IT OPHICKericE MOINT TWO -1 \ \i MA]IN ~ STREET ~ 1 1,7 6 1\ f -41 1 \ \ 1 1 1 tri \ 1 CON<Z~enTe k/ALIC dMI= 449 6- - CONCLfâ‚¬e-TE . WALK 0 F...O Crer MouuMENT FOUND 33:1201AS Oâ€¢J' - ~ ~~~3 r -- - - -- - Â· 18*SIS OF 8 . / \ 09 74 0 01 Â·/1 1- r---115 N 17 --7 0 1- -1 . --- -" ON 't' PINE 1 \ 4 Flfun)**M:v.3.19 3 \ FIRE HYO. .V 0 I . 0- -1/2 \ 1 AN// , - 7/191:99 21.0 1 6 4. t- 11 1 ~ 1 / ,/6 ~ 71\h----- --- 7/~ \02---- 11 5:%. 43*f/04/ /7//////// -, ~U~e- t- -~ / u ~ // lilli 1/1 1 1 \ 3 Or-~-,i~ - 11 ////// Two 91-0.r $<10< HousE . / 1 FÂ»rl,-ct k-164 -- j ~ ~ .Lf I 1 /cf-Â«j /j ljj~ li// /1 iliclj fli Â»1Â» 1 4.---__U /// //// //// // I Ill --////// //1/ 1/////////f///341. I-rt- / ~2 ~TWO STORY ~ ~ \\ -//li/ | i.*%*A YL'// / * . - -=-~ 9 lirrotÂ»11/illilll/lirr'- - ~=4 i RSEMENT WV i * ...C I ~ 1 iÂ« 44 9 \\ 8 = \ 1 / l i J / l / / l l /1/ l j/ / l 1 /l/ /1 / leÂ«__ /1 I CON....E .ALK L- 2.1.9.-2 M._ L_ _ 2.....4 - 1 - 4- 1 - 4.- \rer 1 0 D CD \\ 4 64 -_ 1 A - -4 -- -----T -=V. 1 Ul 2 8 5%844*1442#-: f-+93105 1 - 8 : b, 9&-4.-4,-,35-acal-gu.-1.0- i 9 1 1111 1 1 f :~Cliitfi;llflifiillfiliti// 0/ jj~ \ 4 \ -9- 1 11 1 1 1 1 Ejilill'ilil l'~i lll//l'llf, t - \ k 3' G'AÂ·Â· Â·Â·Â· . - . z %*17.2 1 -3,4 -1 2---~1 1 ~[fl~ - i i t*27.)3254+A,4.;.:4 - 43.. 1 1 90*PH l ' ' "Â·.I :'*10/'i:. ~t'-IT â€¢1 N' -I. , -r .-4 r rKAS>Kl Â· I ~ l *TE*JOB4f44kMAJ -* 0 8Â·Â· MIle -1 --1 1 - E 4 V .pil ---- ENCUDSUIE 96. + / 1 .. ' ----- -----4 ;N ,$~D'|'11~ *' Zid %Ki--412 +L' uÂ»L.Lf__1_f_ f ''", 4-,/,///,/,/""/////1.~--â€ž51-- \ ENC. 0 75'â€¢ ENC 075'â€¢11 â„¢LEPAONE PEP ~C.All.EL -TV F'El %711 11 1 ALLEYÂ· BLOCK 93 UPCATE CEKnncATE ~ 1, JA}VIED K Fae,K, 1--EMEmrCEMnrrTHAT OH .0022*rie. 27, 41-Tia ct *j 391 1 VIAPE A VIDUAL INÂ©rECEOH OF THE rKOf:EMJET- 14-10,1 3862111-j-J---1-'-f---Ill'-1 2Â»1041 REFEEON. NO CHAKeeD WERE FCUH O EXCEfT /9 : I i. 20 liD 40 90 F-r eHICWN ANIC) NOm[P HambON SCALE I" Â· 10 SAS $ a= 0â‚¬,AKÂ»le MON I MONUMENTS AS SHOWN. ALrINE Â«-)19/Er'% INIC. JAMED f KEÂ©Elt, 1 HERE8Y CERTIFY THAT ON APRIL 15,1992 A VISUAL 1 HENCEST CERTIFY THAT -THIS MAP *LCURATELY OEFICTS A SU~/E>f tAAD,EL SURVEN-OR'S CERTIFICATE [3Â«11- _________--_---_--_-- L.â‚¬7,1164 INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE UNPEE MT Sljewerve SION ON AOeuST 24 , I 189 OF LOTS A - 1 , BL.061<- 9-2, . PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND C,-Tr CF AÂ·SPEN . dot_ORAcho. THEREON. ALPINE SURVEYS,INC. BY' APRIL :7,1992 1 9 ALP,kin SUIVE>rS, wNC -11 11 / SEP-TE+1BMK 6 , 181 L'* ST. MARY'S CH U RCH RECTORY REMODEL & ADDITION ASPEN. COL ORADO OLSEN + KELLEY ARCHITECTS \V 1.- 1 t 7 AABC, SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADO 970.920.7651 NO. CE Accor{h./Cle),800 :aw ,/u-us ommencean'Legall... *dupeeanydelectinlnlisurve~wim,~3 ,Â®alian.Youb,itd,scovel Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed 6 2.4 29 c c Revisions 0 29 at Â»00 v leWFLAME_52 Title Job lie 01- Pe'-7 iucndel,c! Inno~emmayan, aci#onoa,ea~ponan, le,eci,/Ir,iwiveÂ¥ Drafted i , 21 ER 4-17Â·92 Client 57 MAKY's 0405,4, 0, comme....re man ten './ .Im i. d..eol .e cenilicall../vn Post Office Box 1730 i 2 '21.99 UrDATE LOTS A-I,BLOCK 103 8.'.00 Aspen, Colorado 81612 CllÂ·r OF ASPEN, COLDKADO X., 303 925 2688 CONCRETe GALENA STREET MTINAN 1,1....)51 ~â€¢â‚¬~285Â·> . f :m 0 4 tol \\\ V 1 1 L_ -1 Ill 1 - ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 09 OLSEN *KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO r, Al,1 ri'1n 1/" it*4F 1/v~VUÂ« 65>9+WI, OFÂ»46.0- 4~-*44\, .PASÂ·** H Â«61 1 1-1-212% 1 ff h=====f P L ~~z~IE- .-1-7-1 3 - -1 U I I D 1 L 'I===1 2 T -000- 4 2 -N 11 y ir 1 i -7 LJ rÂ«r-P-- r=y==11 \911Â©-~ 31 6 2 11 9 1 1 t Â¥ Pl 1, J A < E .44 11 I:...- -1,/Me#fl-+Ilf I ./ ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ~ RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ~HITECTS~ 104 5. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO \l 1,7 i,9/ r, i,Tr- 0. Achew, 6â€¢#MAAA 01?1 1 Trj /17/1 89/1 12(1 fly 070 01(1 711 1 111%11410 1Â·Â·4Â«12 -â€¢127/601 21*1 611Â·9600!.Â·Jdy - NUÂ»aphÂ» #g.J'09 'le,â€¢41*'- -/4 F'1014 â€ž rl I / r---------7 IN /51 1 i 1 AR Â» 1 7 4 Zi O 1 f Ul i - 071 J--117-3-= U 3 1 < M 10[~flkAJL_9001 i===~ --1 -1 2 â‚¬ e-Â«- 2 3 1 /1 I I 3\ U % -- I 3 f Uns=-1 41'K- - I L___7 1 171 Imu 111Â§236 v L F a~ 1 0 O [L IÂ«--1 1-Â»46---C i i &141\\ M m /// 1 111 \ - 1/ 1 1 1 1\ /1 01/0 1 11 i. I. I. ..h\. ... I ...1 11 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OLSEN+KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ~ ARCHITECTS~ 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 1 7 AADC Cli,Tr im: iroral /ninD,an lilli m 070 070 7(91 CAY Owl OM 7401 66.64'..'' F- Iltilit'<(t' . ................ I. .... " , E-------------1 1 J rJr--------771 17 - f 1 1 lt// 1 1 <\\ T // 11 i .1 1 1 i 1/ 1 10 / ./ 1:\\ 11/ 1 -CO + - 1 1 ./ f \\ #/f .,2.221=- 1 I 9,1 1 I 4 r I ./12. 4*32 \\,/ 1- _ 1 f / 14 / 1 / 1 1 1/ I ---1 I 1 1 1 J _-_ < 12.1 1.- 17 1 l 1 ili l, 12- > N / 0-1 1 f ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH * 4 11> OLSEN ~ KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 4 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AAR,0 96 JITF 104 ACPFN 601(DRADO 81 61? TE 970 929 76&T FAX 970 920 7652 P.Â·4Â»lai' 697000\\IÂ»ra>I - irlidic:g -SIIEEP- 00Â¥30103 'N3dSÂ¥ '*19 Â¥N31Â¥9 5 PO I 1 61331(HOMV ONISAOH ddY.LS 1 13000133 ANC)1333 HOMAHO OllOHNO S,ABY\Al '15 ' il I ' 41 2 21 ilil.-t Ji 1 4 fri A W k 1 42 1 1 1 --7 3 .ms--4- 1 9- kt & 9-t 1 /1 1 'f i --~ 1 - i 1 11 1 + I 11 i ...1. .42 ' ----7 a 1 - It -1 - - ~ lilli lilli I 11 P ' 1114-{ 1 K â‚¬ 1Â·Ff- f |li . 6 'll I'll 'll ------- 1-19 111111111111.11 111 lili'111111 -- 11'k 1 1 14 1 Ill d 11' f 'lil n 1.81 i'J U i -----4 Jill 1 1 Hill; :.... 1 -1011 'Ptip 1 iiI lilli I 1 1 9 4 |4~ 6 - ~1 1! I' -allilir fi iifff iulmai- flfit: , ' -433Â» LI, ~ 1 1 . 111 | f - UNI r.t 4 .r i ' - BEEEOIZl 1 1 1 411111 1 trtÂ«Â»-1 7- 1 - 11 -1- 1 1 9 F j 1111 1~ IN ~Ft-- 41ft- f | I 111 1 111 1 2 1 4 - - j 'll i~i" 11 r '11 i ill illillbr :Â· Â·51 4~111111 11 9 KE 011Â©-4_1~~_-1 'i'111111 1 11111111111.- III lili " 1 1 1 0 1 tiony k~ 1 1 1 +VÂ»- .1 L \ -4 1 +~ 1 1 1 1 1 i.. LUIÂ«3 1 9 1 Ul --- 1% .Â« ~ CLL:irtir:20 DE~:irr:int ~ : 1 1 52 ~ -- --- - 1 Z 1 1 -- 7 4 Ft _ _ lilli 111 ~ t.--- 1 < ATI * f 44 | :111'.11 11 1 1 111 1-V T - -4 T~ 1 14Â¢41 - -'. 1 1 11111~1111111 ~1 1 --- 111 *~L YS 1 tUOIH}f. Â»431-- t.- - 1111~'Ill'~~ 1111 11'ill'I~** R 0 001* 001 '_rflit r titill~~-~ 1 ~4 4~~~ ~~4~ - ~~ B|~~-1--- ~ > ' 1 Iii- 0< t 1 â‚¬3 %441 - .4-9- 1- I 111; 1 Z M~ 974-2 +t*tuttel vI I lt-~- 1 ----1 IM--f: U r- 7- 1 E-1 1 11#- ~ 1 91& h flu 1 2 1 4 4 r.-1 -1 \ V 517: 1 1 ' L 2.- a + 4.-1 i 5 1 11 1111 i lilli 11 -1 t===1 - ..F ---EdÂ·Â· . | Art 1 h 1; 1 1 H 11 1 - i 11 1 C i- 1 I 21_4-& i f '1'1 1 & lie i r 111 di,i 4 , III lili 11 1 Â·Â·Â· +11- 11 ~11 11 till #1111 4 P f -4. L ' f 1 s j &~ i 2-1 Â£ i tit' i 22 3' --' b. 1 %1 5 - i 13 --4- 9 1- ~ N i 1 ----1 /fili ~ ~ 1 111 111 ' 1111 1 lili 111 - ~ /1 1 1 1 1 1 11 / 11 1 .11 1.11 . 1 0 f - L - B CEN 1 7 - i~ |f m==F~77--1 1 12 41 'Ll. ]L.-]_ _11 1 1 ~ 141 ULLIL -L_]1 1 1 - 1 ' 11- f f Â·44% lilli lili 1 ---11 1 -9-t:1. 1 r /- L.-1 1 1 1 Ild H . 1 - -1 11- ~ ~ 1 1 Vt 1/ 1 r-- 1111 lili 11 111 'll --â€ž 7-1 16, 1 141|~|1 *' 1 , --T + 3 +1=14 ! il 1 1 ~11111111 ~ ~111111111111'T-1 1 111 1 1 0 *11111'T-111 1 Ilf- </ 4 i I L ._ 1*h-1 -1- - _1 d t- i- 1 r i, * il. ... j r il@ Ilh..~' 1 -----1 1 + 1 1111111 1 5.% 11'~111111%14-4 r- 4 - 7 1,11411'11 ,' 11% 11: 1411'111111111Â»t- h- Â· t-lt, 2 *; . ~ il,14 iiiIiijit' T r - 1111111Â¢4 mJitVihh + H56i-t[!1-ti///7 LMI'll~IM-+ 01 : 1.111 i~11~141 4 -1 1 1- 1I -if 11}Â·t 3-1-9 Â·-1 - ..6 irt'll"I:''VA / P -4-4 ~ 1 1 91 1 1 -M! 1 -7 1 - bral 1 40 1: 1 1--- 1 11 Lt-,44 ~--/23 ~ r Lui u 10 1[-t--]h--t-ll 1 1 ~11--NES:j.H,i; i 11 EL- 41 L=L=Ul 1 -97 1-'llil ~.1-1,1 .9 t j" %114 1 + - . 1 11'l~ 14-1 1 El I 111 3 1 Qi 1 -- f f(_ 16-- 4 f 1 1 -~---= Â·809 *WAL **Â¥49 00-4,410 64 rÂ·/011Â«Ae'la .l j'-.e z.â€¢IL i 0 4 1\ lili hy-- 1 /11/ 1- 1 1 1 - 2 4 tr 9 : 9 R 0 I = 9,1 P I h -M ,-2 IÂ· Z h id -41 0. i.Â·-- . 4-81 I , 5Â£11. 3 %27 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OLSEN +KELLEY &33 3 RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 ~Air CNITr WAC Areri //AOARAL 016411 Tri 07/ OM 7Â£Al rit' 071(1M *1 - V HIÂ©1167.-1 Â·=JUâ‚¬[4â€¢ â‚¬f' *2 B..@ Ce.g:'.' ..e , ~, p.Â·, f= 3'-2 211 2777711 Vt,/8 -FÂ£6L-*; r:=.9771**Â¢ hZ- *1 /R 11 I 1.- 9/ 0 9.r-- -1 -11+ 91 b 41'./.1 =L -39 4 3 // /// ir' < m 1 3 --7 \ - / / /// 1 1 1 ~ 7 \ 1 11 Lila N. Â· 1 E / 1 1 III 1% I 1 1/.\ - 1 U.22;wr *-<2.- ~" L~':0"'A'..7~ 90>7.93 .77710.-.4'.42./1;1,7 4- 9: i. . h U 'c=9' soll E.,1.-' / 4 Le" . 31 L .11 , ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OLSEN . KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO t.v-I. \\Â«-'.-1-7 2. . '114:7~11>09....,Â»>>Â©AXÂ«'\BtÂ»Â»192Â»21Â»Â»Â» 111 -111 166 14.10=2 Â£= IL & , sLA Â»j v :.\.,\.3 k\\N\\ L. 0 , 4 â€¢ 1-=411 41\\ 1 1 ./ 1 1/0 1 1 6 374<t--- 41 jr-=- 7 1 / 1 ./.lei ID lip 1 / / f Mi: \ 19:' 4 x 1 , /4 1 19 L 1=21 V 9 + 1-8 L T 0 *A: M -T- =E N 14* "9 1 :' -r-r-r--'47~225.Â·,--rmÂ®=,te ~ 4"*i~ 'kifF 1 0 U 70 '~~~j~~~1 V-------- 44 --- - I_-_iji 114 : 04 gl Ily_ * 101 ./'+ . 1/ I Al r ..0 0Â·0,1 '. Â· ,\ . c...., 1 INN % /f L 0 1[ -P A L -0 Q U E - 1 -1 P i _-7 iN j~ 52 i' *-x . Ill , 6,0 4 3 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO A<â€žC... IL; IJA .. 7*1 CAÂ¥ 0'n o~A & 42 K'-1 1 4 3 Â£7-H G 0 A-Â»68-Â·5*-22 4 ----- -3 A 4!12* ~ 'Eli> j h/ FalÂ»E | I 1/4 R R f 1 j '2112, \ 1 1 0- \\ 1 1 41 11/ 1 2 / 1 1-/ ' I / 4 12'11 I \ / 11Â» 1 1, F o 1 f 1 9 2 I 1 -2 '& ' ~- 1 11 3 1 \ / 14 iv /-------,47-- -0/\ - 1 r 1 1 1 !2122~& 1 1 1---m------ ---------------- ----31 I & 1 le J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 p 3 4 E Fer O L SEN 4 KELLEY ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 44 LO-9 ) RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 1 031-1 / 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AARP' giiI[ m AEFIÂ·N 0010*AFHA Rl/1 TA Q/Q?8 76il [AX 970 42)0 7,liF 14*-Id 427*4 - 5?HIGFIÂ£57H U~.~~il~ ~~~~ IrFr-7-~21'~.. .4~ 094227799Â«93Â«97"~79Â«97 1.41.44 1 .- 1 - : 1 TrI-NIKIL[ - 4 - ...- .. - ..,-utti.ipitÂ»~r O *-u :-4 L 11, Aiggl:. 2-- 2.-1 -- 2-Juni]41~132[*1~.3~14Laf~11 1.-111Â· .Â·: .'reÂ·~141-YM ---+ 'Til--41-1- i ~ '11+1 rjÂ· ........ ~; :71'_1-131~--, \1 4*1~---r--4-*-"-1--L_~1+14 / ... _---- ./Â· n-m-Â·-Â·_"STIialÂ·Â·Â·Â· _ - 4 . ~ ~ |-4t-Lk* - 1 -W---- ~9 .'.9122:-- -1 - rit 1 -1 1 ---1.1-T.4.11.,4--,1 1 ------------#- \#- 1 1 1 /= 21 ~--3-2 -- Â· =J-~-Â«7*72TUL--0- â€žI :~ ~.-' -:.1-9+117-7 ~~ ~''I'-'. '----rk-7.T+3~~Ultr! 4'3 -1-4 --X - --- ~-=====ZE 1-=--1 ~- ..1- --= C.,r) ------r , i'222-1 11 ~- ---- Â«Â«Â«difff:#t _~~~~~~~~ -=2===== &11 Ll-- 4 V-Z-- -- ~--------------: 1 49% 1 F=L=C===2==t-- - .6WI~&;-- i~---- 1 -=ru- r~ounne _.. - ..- 192 172#A blri' 4 tgO@49 ---- - -- --- --- --- -*-- - - . - Air'la 1944 --; -----Â·--740 #F --W- - -- -- ---- - k- - E-Â·- ~UEâ‚¬EE~ R.1-4 22Â«-t~~.Â· 1 ~_-#F~f~=--EEE--~ -m= -= --- -- -11=+=.-= r-- c-3227 -I -= -2.--------4 U + -- --~XM ----------- -- - - + iÂ· -EU , . 1 _________~__1 % 1 1 ----_ -_ - _-- - ~~__ _ ___~_~___~~~ ~~~_--6-~ ' - -4 ---- rTTTN - 1 I 1 1 111 . , 1 0,7 1.6 E Â»Â«zA-=-----------4 ---.-0-- - ~ 1 ; por ik ! 1 4% 1 1 1 ' 1 1 263*EEd ' 1 1' 1 1 11 1 11 t====d I 1 11 1 0 1 11 1 1 Ld 11+444 1 11 1 1 9 1 Ur --- -- --I--- bon Â¥Â·auferi ---7-4 3 i 1 11 I lili I I L___1 11 11 1 1 1 L Â»40â‚¬\*rf f> 11 1 1 1 Â»li-22~ ste . 9, 0% 9 -- i, i,i , 11 I, L. ,--+ tâ€¢,_-, ..-44-6.----:â€žFF*Frs--32IS+--1------t ' *11\2 en/.*19 I M'27 )/ 2 F< 1/..~Fir.-I-.1.-- ....tf~.~z~rEEt- 7+ :T'~~ 11.... 1 1. T.r~,-T--, + . 1, , - I. 4~-Lr~'.4I*Z[*rea -*1Â»r+'r ' - '-Â«FEA -:- --I--9Â«/ 69Â» F~~~ ~~"~~~ - .>41~4-Lf-:':7-t :--'7'1'7 Â»+134. _t- i.---IIIMÂ« 1 \'1-2 -322%2IAW-U 2-'-11- 1 -i' p' ----- f--1-- Â· i I--EE--- FF MÂ» - -1 1 F.=Ii=$.=.*;==...=:O=-L __-.- M---1--~ 1 - - 4-JEO1 'i- 2-- 11 1 1 f--144Â»]Il Irk=- -' -Â«- ~ _ LL.1 - - 9.F- VIPPIWIÂ» -2- 421 + 1 0 1=LE=1!i 11 rEP Â»Pr/+44 N-~ ..trilfr:-03=,-7.---t.'-:FI~~~-Â·, 17~7..~.... tr -I .Â· . I.-%-*. .4 6-ev m _ ---- -- : 2- 1 1.- 1.2,1-2- .ce- 1 1 ---4:Iff-----1-1-kiN-)6:312 -' 44. .....I-2.Â· C.:I--fl-4 <4-~-7fa ,". 1--'.-A A z-------- - - 495-7 _ _ t- , ~ 1111~7.-1 NMa51,4-- L#$--4. Il -- ~ 589%: OK 9 1 2.5- .Â·-'i,!i,11'll'jt ;-LuÂ·t ~-- &4HY 4 9490,1 ' to--E-nz~- 7 1 -VT-- -- ~ i .- 7 1 -1 F-] 2Â«63Â»9-1 ~ -3 9 Â£ 2 373 1 9 ~tip p,~-pec, ~e,----~-- tÂ« . R--' 1-f~--11--- -9 f 4%3441 Â»Â«fÂ«-- -~1 14-2 L -Â«m ~ 2...LELLELL1!1!...a --- *,10- ..9.el- ----dil-fÂ» EÂ»]E--4 ~~FJ -39~-~ -114 it 1 1 F~ 1 - - 1 F=========Fla 11,1 - 1 L--~ :. r....-r:Al-,in; U luE- ' 1.T fl, 1 111 1 1 1 11 1 11 Eli. . r-------4 1 1 1 4 #**.n.erâ„¢ I I ' - - - 1 REâ€¢ty' 5/ 0 1 1- 1 1 4' Â«----------------- --------------4----- - --â€ž---- ---- 4 -1112% /NA - 1405-TH 8/09Â»71024 PÂ¢#- 1110 ~TEr 4 o- 1 - trif 699Â£ UCD .6 x. :994 J..0 4,1 L Lttti lilly.. ..' c..V .. .rilj,3 ..Â¥ vi HOMAHO 311OH1Â¥3 SiANV\/4 '19 ONISAOH 33Â¥19 7 13GOV\El 01333 00Â¥30103 'N3dSV "19 VN31V9 0 141 11 13 7 h 0.-4\ 1 1 2 1 V V J 9 1 X Â¥ j -1 u L_ P I 6 ' W -1 1 m W I 1 ?C 6- -1 1 1 - 1- 1 - 1 11 Bit ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH OLSEN O KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 11 i AABC, SUIT[ 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 8 970 320 7651 FAX 970 920 7652 OF~e-7/6 erÂ»up- cr-W, 07Â»0, 21 5 1 0 - L Â¥===1 1-===41 1 -1 11=:91 k=.=41 0 u 3\ 2-1 0 %\ 7 7 2/ 4 -- 2 v _ _~ 3 < 1/ 1 - I 5 - X 7 4 14 1 t t/A 0 9/= 1\ =23 r--1 4 i I 7 7 0 0 7 p L - 1-fl_n - ---Â»- __- 1 LL -9 4Â«4-Â«p--1 ~~ 1 -3 011- 1 I 1 - I 5 1 1 23 r P Â· k r- --- r-- ELI 3 i 1 ~ ST. MARY' S CATHOLIC CHURCH > i /Kcll O L S E N 6~ KELLEY 4 P N ) RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS Xhay NOV 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 717 AAE, SUITE 305, ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TE[ 970 920?651 FAX 970 920 7652 --1 rfil 'F==4 [1 3 4==d lt===4 ' \ 4 9 5 zz=9 1 1% 9 b--til ~ FE-~~~rl-~ r--1 4==11 h r----7 / 7 -9 1 -1 -1-l Â»Â· 1 9% R' ir 2 1 L_L_ \-1 A tEl- 1 r 3 1 0 1.01 +310 Â°t IL===1 It===11 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 6%?f 1/ 43 1 OLSEN'* KELLEY R y , RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO â€¢17 AAR, ill/ ini AVEN /(1 1-WAnn Refil ' 14 478 970 7,;41 FA:< 470 92,1 ifird H vl,1 4001 k '01-I % St # 11* 1 X 1-J 1 1 0 E--* 1 1 7 1 1 1 Â£322-1 y-1 4 1 1 I --~ 1 i 1 1 1_/lila 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 1 b L-_- r.. 2 81Â» 1 f 1 1% 4 ti riz &0312, \ /1 / 1 1 1 4/ 0 1 1 1 P \ 1/ Â£ P !121&-> ~ f ,/ \1 7 yj 1 1 / A 11//ft ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH IellilliAVI-7 KELLEY 4 C p' 'i j RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHI I ECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 11 7 AABC. 50!TE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 816]1 m 970 920 7651 FAX 910 920 1652 #4 Â«74 227 -21 47 hi 13 * 1 xg k 2.3/ /0 Ual A. .3. UCI//0 Ill WULO UumvIVI IN]UOV 1 / (611 1 00Â¥30100 'NBdSÂ¥ 'US VN31Â¥9 'S FO 1 91 6103ll HOBV ONISAOH HHV.LS 7 1300\AI33 13 01033 4--9-9+41 C Pfy / 1 HONAHO 3110HNO 9,13Â¥01 '19 61 1 L 31 t. 21 El 2 1 (21 &! Â£ 22' *t 1 -~- ~ L & 3- & E t I : & 41 Â·3 R P 1 I-â‚¬ 1 , 11Â£ 6 -1 1 -914- 1 1 '1 1 l L L f 123 1 1 R ~ 4 1 1, 1 1 1 11 /*~Ufvf j' i i.. 96233 1.1 i. ; J t- 111 \ - \ 1 1 ELLI 1-~ 1 1 J 1 0 .11 1 \ IZ r===LY 1 1 1 1 //lir 1 1 1 Z 1 01 ---+ i t \% 1 1 1 \ 1 3 1 L- t- 1 4 9 2 i 1 LU i 123 -1 "RE 3 -1 1 1 O k tiff R EU 1 9 : it- 11 01 Il + - r .... 1 1 \433} x 1 li-1 1 9 1 ---4- 2 11 I i f li_ 2 4 3,- i f Â¥ 51 1 & 4 tf k i A 3 1 91 1 1 4-- i L.- _ f 1 I i. / 6 1 ---1----3 j $ i -1 1--1 1 **i%2 / 1--- 91 Â¢ ' tal mi 1 1 - f & 4 " P 3 4 f7 i -- i 1 *11.1 1 1 1 f I (-111Â»UP ]126- i I 2 lili i I n--1 1,; 1 24' 1 1 1 \ ---4 1\ f ===10 1 -- 1 2- ----1 1- 1 0 3 8 4 8 r '1 (EL i I' -__fi~J ~ I ~ 1 YA l Ei m I U-/ 1 2 1 rEFill & ===*4 1 1 h 1 1 1 1 7- % - - -- -4 3 1 4111 F # 513 1 1 al, 1 2 I 4 I I - --;i & C 1 1 103 1 C Uff 1 1 1 1 --- 111 1 1 1 ----4 ... _ ....1 ' 1 4 2 91 /1 4- - %1 t) 1 5-1 1 4 4 9- -W- 1 1 OHIL&71*Â·a NOILVAâ€¢la 24 1Â»40~Â»_ - 1 21% --14 3 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 11 0 1 1 Ll~:d 'li 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 1 1 L 1 0 / 1 15 1 % R 1 VA 0 - U 0 1 - NA V 4 F---- 1 I 1 1 -1 1 - 1 0 fo 0 1 001 9 1 -I- L 1 1 1 3 1 i~ 1-1 D< 1 3: 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 \ 1 I 1 Iii 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 I 0 1 ; i 1 51 t'' 333 -~1 4 (D 1 1 1 U i \ 1 *- -Yr 7 li i T 4 3 __ i f - 7 7 1 t-Â«2 3 i 2 35 7 7 5 1 3 1 11 1 1 5-~44 5 9 5% 1 312 1 1 4 & -4 1 1 1 1 1 - 7 ; 11 ~ 1 3 3 3 1 : 0=1 -1 1 1 V ' ; I U E 1 1 V f f 1 <1 1 1 1 1 -4 1 4----; 1 0 1 1 1 f 1 t- - -- -4 m I i ~kE ~col , S i i i 1 1 1 - i I i 51 r- -- 1 1 11 1 - 1 1 !1 1 111 7--Ef 1 1 f j 1 1 1 f ! 1 inz=L.-il-I.--i----*--1--- 1 1 1 1 1 1 | / ! 1 1 1 1 T . - - 5 -5 1 1 4 0 1 1 1 1 1 it-1 2 i 4 41 !1 1 1 1 / f IIi 3 4 1 , -(as ts O -11 3 -Â£ 1. 1 r 7 i 7 . 11 1 i 1 7 *3-t--ST.-MARY'S-CATHOLICCHURCH 1 -Â«Â»-----1 RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS to |:1 ) 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970,920,7651 FAX 970.920.7652 12 0146 ---2 2 --MAMT Vvt*Met- ---- 1-ED-e 1~OLSEN-KEL_LEYI /~e--M~ --816Â«PID 7074#f- ---Â·-~ . -PITIC//T-77 )-- -F.fliv 3 1 1 - -- 2.2,21Efl* VISM#*11- - -%*- frÂ¢*A Â¢13* f., 17-414Â© M. -- Mt>-crige 3 1 -2 -2 -..ter M. - 11 \\ 11 _JILL'v\~DI-1Â«~ lopi.0 =Â·1Â© ep,Ase J --011Â·4>MITMEâ‚¬UR* f*TaÂ©, .15,1=-10- ---33/PrrTOp-Â·/-- 7- 1 1 4.PIP f. T *1 51< *P'=F- 2.1 -Â¥.Ir, 6:DPW<#49 - _--2--- j SPU P 2 -Mt. ce'* 7 1.5612. LLLE*EEEEEÂ®EEE*EÂ®El[Â®2[ELL_--__.~-____~ ~ TI ..1 i' 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1--4 Lk- - ---_ -----_---_-__ --_ --__----_ -_1_ -1 --2-2-~2 1-22-1--i -[ 1 1 (14*r) 720-- VÂ«F #AFVÂ»Ti ON Â·- FLBMot>tal-- f ------------------"--7-- ---- - --2-1967-12-10 -itaL>*Â»-TION ~ f./.-18*,Ad)128 1,--LITLE--i--2-f._-2.Ii r_27277 -3---~27/27ITT.77 ---- f-- -La- - F.4*.i:e-3--- - '\, 1,010------ . I .milip~ph .....=.....v/,~1=.4 .illillillililillillillillillimp'".p"'illir/li"F~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - 1.................. 7 0 - - - , ''~'' 7.--- A .... ............................... lilillili0::luillilliillillilimill'- ............................................ - 1 -- i -- - -1.-m.......~1 imâ€žImmâ€¢â€¢ilin'lladi 1, ..................m.............M m..5-%-I M.ilimi,â€žBEE,Bl~1~ -........1.....1....................... ...............~1- Illill'llillillilillilillillillillillillillillillill"ill'llill"IMI'llillililill Ilillillill 111111.111Â®111111.11.1.1 waimililli"~~~~~.U-"-".W-mill....~Ill....m.6.,1- I.........=.- i . 1 -Ill---= .. .1..1-1. 1.mi.1.1 ~1..............- - ...1.11=========== 11111.11../.Ill./.Ill./.Ill":/Ill.:Ill'll.~Il.:Illilill//1ll'ilillillitmi:i:ilimill:ill:i:i:imilimill:i:i:l:i:~1-I - 1-1--1 ..1- I"li""""il""""Il"""illill'll'llill'll'll'll'llillill'll'll'll'll'll'll'll'lillill'll'll'llililliumilili,11111111 lillillmlillill'Ill'Illillilluilllâ€¢limilâ€¢lilll ~11111'1111111111.1 II"IIIm11IIIIII"IIIIIIII11IIIIIIIâ€¢III"IIâ€¢I1III .h .h , . 0 0 1 .. , 9. , , . - --Ii. .-- .....~ r..miii:::r:W=im.m=.2.-81,ilimmill":mwl"Mion'Xm . m.- i IliQ"mil.//.Ill . ..ill ..11.'ll:-7 , A.r--.94"-7,6.6---'Willi ..... - __m~mEME~. .7....................6-=-/=Il . t~k .=m.ii . ........."/1-~~ ....7/*...=m.-- .2/:Url...7 0 . .~=..=...m- :-~.Ill-'ll'-I'l'-1 .......ill.. ............ 1.2.- -*inuill.":Mid"ii.WIZI'll:Im~.".iiillut.*'"'Ill:LI'l""21:iiiiiilan'll'll-flarl.- 11....11-1 -11..:11 ~ .-1 - r - - - ..............1.1 I,-----1--=-1--im :D N 1 1 ~0464 i_ - j-Â¢13 - - - - e L 14 : El ' 1_ . .*44*97 - - - 4 obtrf 'U >1*44449?2 71 i 11 11 --3-F~ -119-tr -4 --ri_$...._i.in....111-1*t- - 1 $4144 i i 10~ 61#1~ 2,1 42 444.-z_ vhll- 44.- 1 I i 1 11.1 4-~ 1496441 41Â· r JUIÂ©LIFIECIULLLA4444_Ll-4-LLÂ»4-U--,1--W+24-14_w_11UU-L*4-4-WW--1--LLUI_1_LLW_1.-WL-LI.v 4-4--1--4-L-1-Â»4-L-4=__1._u4~_4__~_~_Â«-6.-4-Â·Â·U+++-+-4-++-L-1-1-L-L_u_1-L_L_+.-+_+_4_4_4--4--U-1_L.-L-4U_1_4-W--K_L_-U_L_U_Â» 1 .h r l. 0 . . e 1II!IIIIIIIIIHI"III...IIIIIIIm~1IIIIII1IIIII11 1 .....1 I!!!!111!111!11!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!11!!11!1!1!!1!1!!!!!!!1!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!1!1!11!! ImIIIIIIl.nII 0 1.11.111111111111111111111.11111111111111.111.11111111111111111111 111111111111.11 r.=....... 21.- . -=-1 - Lilli~wilrilillifwilill:'ll:.~.Jillillillillillillillilillillill--lillillillillillimililillillilini- I.............lilillilillill - m 1.... lilli imillilim-1 lillilililillilililillililililililililililililililillillillilli~ - ,-11111111"lili-illimm 1.11!.l - ..8.,1......0.1.0.0,~~.0~m~ , =~~m::::9~.~"."~I~..~~.H='~~~~~---lili.'-MI=I=.-Ill-'ll~ - /1 ... - - li =-1.1-7--=*-I-I-LI-- - lia.6- 1.1.11~ =Im-1-1-1--IN ---1 ..9/6.--i- .~ - =2:millilliumillillimill:'ll':Ill/:ilillimillillikillillapillilmilipillilillilillillillilillilll~I....~ -1-1-m--- -1-liuma..~-billif/::-=-I -= al=~Ill.=71-- '. ...=...mi"'IN,Immiii':ilim'Mill:lullimult:"I:11/Im,Willa'll'inillill:lin~ . .h .h . 0 - 0 9. - -Ill!!RE e 1111.I111111111111111.11111.11111111111111111111111"lI Illillillillillillillimilillillmillillilillmilmillillilillillimm,Ill,Illillillm-- 1111111111~111111111111111111111111111111111111116,~ ~111-I'~INNulj,I:illl1111111111.1111111111111,m IIIIIII.lIIIlIIIIIIIIIIIâ€žI Illillilll ~11111111111~.1 11111II"1111IIIIIâ€žIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII"IIIIIIIIIIIIII 111.111.1.1.1111111 -'4miUii/ii - 1'.1.~~~~I.~I.~~~~~I.~.~Il . =Imimi=======â€¢=~Inim,mil--- '~111~~I-Iii~ --'~mill-~10.â€¢â€¢-i-li. il-- =1.1~1.1-1.1. 1.11~11.-11- l.. ......... 1....A -Ii=Ii=I==I=- ill=.. -- ..9...6......1 A.............. .1 1/////////////~/////////AV///7 .....m...... ... ............... V --- =M=Emnm~ 1 4 1 ./ 4 REFERENCE POINT ONE - ~ l (6 <1 N.EFEKE.DICE 3+. .a-ry s cOUKT MOUSE V C Eyv FLAINE. - cour<T 2-0-JSE- VIEW PLAN! E 1 r 6,:roun STREET C bur-ck 04 f' 4 1 f // 4. 0 -[ 1 \ 1 1 17 -- /= 411-ONE WALL . 61 .4 72 7.5 -" 4 - 60 N CONCRE TE STAIRS O CONC RETE 0,~_1<10 9 y ENTAT -ID - -*bE-T E WALK c L /0 494 re. . FOUkip : CLITY- MONUMEN-r FOUNDÂ·: KEBAK W/FLAS CAP ' '~ .'.4 b/ /BAS IS e>pr ZE,~WÂ¢3 \ r- --- -J/11 1 --_--- 2,0 o. A. --r .J L.9. 20191 - 1 CO FIRE NYD. â‚¬\7/U~51Â·Â· PINE Â£ L %7*iff|~|al \ 1 7-\102 /fi \ -1 1 :./ 1-41...4Â»â‚¬14 . 0 2 1 k//2 3/ 11 0 i R< 2 x.// t.1/00*t2Et /1 4 4/24/ MA '0, wa ~EgwW#bMZV H j ~r-*+ '394 : 1 TWO STORY SKIcK HOUSE // //// /r 'iÂ«K- ED 1 E fort w .WN-- , . Tr .4 i C.>< 1/47460 1/ 1/ 1 1%. 1, 7/9 h*~ 6 j W kNTE< 1 #t, 4, 1 \ 4 TWO STORY ASPHALT 1 /4 -41/11.~45+6 12 0- 1 - 1 1 \ STEPS TO <-<. \ BASEMENT + BRICK CHURCH ,/ PARK ! Ne n CE AtoVEKED . 1 ~ >L ly"U; 12.1.10/.-13> - P WOODEN 1 t; poâ‚¬Ckt ~ 03 16.0 ||-AL.0.1.6,--. - .1. / 01':,2,@tÂ¢ 1/4 7 5 1 Ill / 1 A Â· Â·Â· 722 61121~ VVA.1322 -- -in=--(4:,1,~d:>r,1-0-) h ' N ce 19/Ail < / 11 E / / / 1 Q' 7 ~ 4 CONCRETE VAL.K (6) . - ~~~U...2,8h~ - j i 1. 3 V Â·Â·-rrifi- 526'.FF/EL- I / -- - t/1 li Q '1 3 ~ 1.) 3 1 lu - I 1, I. 7- -__ '9 GAS METER ~ '1 - I ) - Capal-6. LAULCU __ % tl 1 5 i (Â©. alesia.-9Â»U+EgeÂ¥2-'06;4 f- r coNCRETE ~el -vR p 3*2Â£01<14 1 ALL - IDE*=? ~ - . 4-ht f + \ \-72El-Â·OCATE- STAILIE--i_ --- _L LAWN. 4 ~ -___--..__.-..... ~~-74}EJA WAL-KME=!f ~ - 64) AarEKLM \*' CAL-~ ~ ~ < 1 ~4 ~ / / 111Â¢I - 4 / L - - - %1*PUN \ \ 1 . 8 ---- ' ..2 -/ .2 -\,1 - IJ (10 6 \2 4% . 04- r LF,2-------* T-f*[~4 1--ldhHT-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j - C 1 3 *EFFEM r ~, CALL' 1,4 4 1/ tb 4104: I \ 1 r< 41 le*Â·frw,-1 A/N.,431r \ -A 99 --t 3. , - IN I Â·36 ' r k 6 tt 8 ON - ( 4 ---- reÂ«*r> 0 7 LA/VbC.__I>~ \ 11. P f-1 041-#-/-1Â»V)23265/606Â·1.,4: -3 < r 1 ,/ 2~--- E>415[th..14% AE:hEN _. ~~ , ~ \1 ~0 * 01-i 1 -- -"-- 4 1;â€¢~=Ga\.- npe<Trrie:sA , (2 0 8'L Pl#E r Â»----- --- -L---4 ,| Â£ 3.T+1 T- r- /T- -* 4 1 -1/' L C JL'/r, V-,hk - 112WV-44-e, C.LF, _ -- 4- *'I,P*B IP 4-rx_Extw--â€ž 1 \\ 1 guy),IA'~i,#r (/) LU i i A - EXIOT[uk-> 2 , ENCLOOL)RE a_ ' h-%41, r \ \.1 / --- ~----- 7-Â»~.... rÂ·Â·Â»L -- -~~ ~ '-- ~-2-C~~ 2*4+12-31*pUCx-,+JkfF-6 ~ 16- 01'llÂ· W 270.BG--wgiq-4;6'11 , ' ' r / / ' ~,1,~*~hiha~di~5:46Â£ '< Z'42Â£2 ' f'-.~.~~ ENC 07~* . to 06 2 2 L .3 ENC. 0Â·75'* 1 TELEPHONE Pet>. CASLE- T. V FED --_1 -V -3---12;EE.Nk. EN IÂ«flhkA 0.-FL - .-(53 1.,WAe-F NINEÂ·ENa-EL, Ate- ALLEY .BLOCK 93 - MEANâ€ž.2%14%152 4:ULWLEKL: - _ 2*kIC*, PL-64#talÂ©KIE, Â©LIAPACEI -7-- (73-82.lell-ECOUE- SplkIE-, 0/4-Â¥T-.r-* ---UL_ - - --13>F-426-UNIAL- Â·*512125,10ULCU '- - - -ADCEME 1.-,\214 -M'~ - (>T) _IAC,K:M,8.At Â¥Drl;MT-1 L.LA- 1 *te . - _ ~ Â©rrE 1--164-1Fr-1636't : -- ... ----- .- Ial 1-4 1,-14:2~ ~+11 h-160,1 -~J â‚¬--\EUTJ__V-/ ---/ UPPATE CEATI FICATE 13 9 --- Ab kil-*20,5 ACCE.krr' A ><TURG,11~24 * -20 W __2. 0223 21- 1 2 \ 7-AT,4 1-4 614*T-1 4---1 9 -Ta~v b G&*1 EÂ© Pi mirDER , E-ir]KIDT- CEMTI FT- THAT CHI .Otirh/1 tilt 2 3 -2 F=IWFUEarl. .â‚¬11ACAL , â‚¬361Â£AE- MOOKIT- 1399 0 VAPE A VIOUAL INÂ©rECTION OF-THEL Flâ‚¬OrIEKJ--T .2-7~ks.1-7 3900 54 --1-*AMâ‚¬iFOF-hAFF.. .LIL. â€ž.__ 087 ..=ir .--1 331-]OWN 1-15%5OKI . 190 (24-]A-h.GED WEAR FCUN 13 EXCEfT /\52 -83/YULE&_121.- CAEa.3!gtlfJOINUX 10 20 20 40 50 FT. 9-100/KI AKIED K,IO]1[P HfyfORI i -- O *t NE 92 +M-. EASIS OF 15EAK,11Â·46 FOUNP MONUMENTS AS SHOWN. SCALE: 1" Â· to' ALFINEâ‚¬PLEMEYÂ© INE. Dr, 341/4-F. REDER.~ 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON APRIL 15,1992 A VISUAL 1 HEREer CERT IFY -TRAT -THIS MAP ALCURATELY DE-FICTS A SURve>f MAtE SiLEVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE L.Â£57. 9 IÂ©% INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE Ublt,EK MT SUPERVI SLON ON AUGUST 24, I 989 OF LOTS A- 1 , 31-001< 96, PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND CITY OF ASPEN, COLOKA[30Â· THEREON. PLANT LIST At-PINE SURVEYS,[NC. BY: - APRIL 17,1992 LS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE ROOT COMMENTS A LF I NE S UKVErS 1 1 N C er POPULUS TREMULO/DES ASPEN 1 1/2Â» CAL. 8*B REEWRAP L. 5. t!= U SEPTEFISEK 6, (989 POPULUS mEMULOIDES ASPEN 2* CAL. 8 & 8- TREE WRAP PINUS ARISTATA BRISTLECONE PINE 8, 8 -- 1 6. - F CORNUS STOLON/FERA REDT-W/G DOGWOOD #5 CONT. j tvÂ«3Â·nUZZ.0 FAVTÂ¢2257 ..*AW:/' JACKMAN POTENTILLA #5 CONT. Â·POTENALLA FRUT/COSA *LONDIKE' KLONDIKE POTENULLA #5 CONT. -6-f 6%11 ,*fr*:r..r dZ53250 PURPLELEAF SANDCHERRY #5 CONT. PHYSOCARPUS OPUL/FOLIUS 'NANUS' DWARF NINEBARK #5 CONT. >Â»15)5447& Â»~t.jo L 14 Htf $44 11.00Â».14 -vJ 1 d, 111 -101 L 92" N.P.T. 72'NPT F>2371521--- 1-t Â»CS, DUâ‚¬1 UCt- Cals?-R:UCRCU-, 61-2-41- Corr EXCAVATICU MEAW--Ul.LACE - EL121 f20MB- EX#*292!L @0571*4-, WeAy'LPACE- D-r:~ E.**VAT) ON Vil [TWr f41-TE.2- E-Ale AKL , Det.P _ __- ---11 *214ATS- f~PÂ©1240 Zate?FACE-, 70 MAINrtiblbl Hle':5~- 20Â£5E ZOUE- . -1-_ KLV205 3211\ 64-ITINCi Fl><TU 220 1 , 13113 299L'026'016 XÂ¥:1 L99L'026'0L6 131 LL9L8 00Â¥210100 'NildSV '908 31IAS '3 8 yy Z LL CONCRETE 13(311[ 12 .11[E JLNUE GALENA STREET 00Â¥301 "IS VN31Â¥9 3 *O L IlOHiVO SiANVW *19 13C]O~A/33 *301333 4%66 0 \ \I ~ 1.1 3/ VE@tf lELa:0 R.[FilterICE. It>I NT OPIE NA /3 ler-FLKENCE Fol INT Two ~21 COURT HOUSE viEN PLAINE. - --~ , COUKT 1-DUSE VIEW FLAME *4 'A K VIE~ PLâ€¢ge u~ *1- l MAIN STREEN[\ 1 , /1 1% 19 j.â€ž,.-w EZZI~56 f ,Â«,0,4: 1.ji, .- 1 9 4 U. i , P i - - 4 . ' 072,VE 1â‚¬ALL-1.. 1 CONCRETE WALK- 11 ENTKN- - , -19 - CONCRETE WALK . ;~ 2- 7.5 -47-1 CONCRETE STA)1â‚¬S 0 -1 i 1 i . 1. 1.AN PINCE FOUND RES,AK W/FLAS.C>d'~21 , - 4 / , \ \ A / / \ 5, 75. 01 ./; 1.1 'E , fl~- --Unr---~-1 - ~ FROUND: Car MOWUMENT / /BAs, s 09 8 6 ~ ~ - FIRE HYD WV ] 7--------- - 112 I/Te.1///.a L------ 1 - IV 1 7,8.,i lilli 1 - I ' .1 1.Â»1Â»227/Â«Â«/ 1 0. 0 /0 ~ I - 10" pINE -4 ' \ i '7'kippil///// /// i \ Â»P,~4 4 1 1 -2/ - , ./ 1 ly..........A] 1 .1 -9 1 21,0 \ - F..t /1/1/1 1 %4 k 3/// 4 1 teÂ» .Â«Fl \,p ,1 m90.-71--â€¢t..w.'n 4 4 1 , 1 6 2 4 1 Lil \ 9 1 - *78.W f Fl ./ t. 1 j I '~ TWO STORY SKICK HOUSE ~/ / / +699#<bpf- . / '2 // 1 ... T 12 4 .1 1 <' l,05Â·*33 1 1 5.0 i Â» , (0Â¥191-11*) i --23-:-0-['0 2 2 TWO STORY 3 . 1 BASEMENT j ~BRICK CHURCH >1 94 5-TEyS TO : 1 (7-APT 46.1 Ill.. 1 * | ~ Fof<c H ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ If .: 1 -1 4 1 W 0 , WV b - IS.O . ~ Y 'IN6**k.-*.*Il'*I. 1 | P W I 4 - 04 1,3 21 8 , 25.8 'A: 1 Iii Â«/, /2 / ' 'r# 6=4 , . CONCRETE WALK . + U--AJH 4-42 - a 8 1. a.1 i j I . 1-1 4 2-4- . - -Â· 0 7% 1 111 k 1 CD -.- - - - -----T 1 1 It j/// ////// 1 6!45 METER lilli h a k 1 1 ,// .- ,--Â·..iL'-Â·41.U,jo:.:iktir:kt:-ij,hlir . Â·. . . f *NtÂ·.,O.1*Â·-:~t Â·23Â·131fjLkir:19~0.~>.r:4.tit,- I ... 9. 9.-'.91. .-1.. - >p'-: 28% 1 It Â£ 1 -1 k\ 2 0 4/ 11= f, 1.-f.:3.F.,{J'.....~IJF:~Â»~:f:.9~.I-vÂ·-Â·2.~ ..:)44-di26~ f .Â» - 1 2 -8 ~ = ;.Ii?630364.2.:93*75-fti?Â·-~* Â·~:: 932%*ffâ‚¬; - - 1 1, , 11; M. i.*34,4...,-4.: - - ' -e@9*0 ep>Fr-.1.*uâ‚¬4PJA ,/2~~5;2*jf(-- - 0 ' \ fi 2 1. 1 : 1 .18<45&456*rizis&Ptiat MPiaeÂ». -0 2,2$+JP*eeZE-- FlÂ»IJ .---///// -- 1:*FE Â»1Â«j K+N~lÂ«Â·A~* , It / I = U. 23" BNE : _ V 9 -4.. ~,~~~ U -- -- -- 4 TrASH ENCLODURE \\ 1 1-U I . 1 1 / / : :,14 -16.0,1.11. w 278. %1,51--4,6~~ - ~1.--ins-.r -'Â· ,Â·Â· --2 1 41 1 ~ ENC. 0.74-1NPHONE PEDÂ· GASLE TV. FEER . \2 .t Â¢ ~Â· ALLEY Â° BLOCK 93 i, UPPATE CENTI FICATE 4 JAVIED E 195*ER, HEMEmr- crgrIFT-TI-1/AT OHI DECEK/1521â‚¬. 27/ - r--3 9 17- 2//A.T.j - 1191 I M;APE A Vie)UAL INÂ©rECTIOH OFT+-IE FROff#DI- '--/ 1 :92 1736/5 - 1--4 DHOWN 1-IEEEON. NO CHAKEED WEF:.E FCUIND EXCEfT AD 0 - 5 10 20 20 40 50 FT 2*-1021~.1 Ah]E) blamID HEFL[52Â·4. 6461% oF SEAKINe , ROUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN. SCALE: 1 u . \0' - ALFINE. 1>01*rit, INC. JAMED F. MEÂ©EA/ 5 u RV EN'OfES-_-CEKIiELCATE 1Â»IE-- L.0.9164 1.HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON APRIL 15,1992 A VISUAL 1 HEREEY- CERTIFY -THAT -TH[S MAP ~CCURATEDÂ·r DEPICTS A SUIVEY MAIP E INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVIstoN OF THE (hit,EK Mr SUPERVI SION ON AUGUST 24, 1 989 OF LOTS A - 1, BLOCK 95, PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREON. NO CHANGES WERE FOUND CITY oF ASPEN , COL_01900. THEREON. ALPINE SURVEYS,INC. BY: APRIL 17,1992 LS ALPLNE SUR:vers, ING. 3â‚¬.. SEPTEMBER G , Ila 1 L.S.* ' - 9 119 11 ~IE*/ PLAA~Eb . l - ST. MARY'S CHURCH' i ..RECTORY REMODEL & ADDITION ASPEN, COLORADO , OLSEN + KELLEY ARCHITECTS 117 AABC, SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADO , . 970.920.7651 NOTICE: According to Colorado law you must commence any'legal action Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed B. 24. 8 1 6. c Revisions tole . 81 +00 V lE-W F -4Â£5) Title Job No 64 - 16-7 Â·based upon any dejectin this survey within 3 years after you first discover Drafted 1 Â· 6. 89 E.R. 4Â·17Â·92 â‚¬ 0.. such defect. In no event may any action based upon any dialect in this survey Client ST.'MArt"S 0402$-r be commenced more than ten years from the dateof the certification shown Post Office Box 1730 O 21.99 UrDATE LOTS A-I,BLOCK 13 herson, / Aspen, Colorado 81612 . ci-rr oF ASPEN, col.Â£>le~po 9 303 925 2688 -- CONCRETE GALENA S REET U 3 1 N fl H - TELEDYNE POST N02859 R> |*44*I g VImj Ft,APP â‚¬0' 40"eep'*911 I \ 1 - . 1 .- ~%4.912,27.4 : ,~ <Fi~MF~j@f>-0 2:t ka 5. - --- ' 0Â». 192Â·0% & 9 - 1 -4 41 al" 7100 - B *Ambte- =3 1 %. 701 0 7. a' . -4 1 ' 1 61 1 -- - '11 N I HIÂ»el 4 40T~ ~, Fl-1 : R970:,5:~2 ce' L,PI h.,d' ~ 4 . 6*u f_-F~kl~R/40- \,/1 f-W 1~1.Â»rk-113> A % Ill = ldp 1 15 1-1_ 1 1 ~ E.b. 7109.696' , , O/UflÂ¥+A'*F- *-------1--. --- ------*-- T-- - / 1 ~kip V'/2/.----*--*- j - 4 VIAJ V .-' ./i -- . k '4 fy~ e~F3 -I~ -- - --- -1pitd \,10'01 FlÂ»f-le- '~ 6~9 1*USI * U'JIT. Al-~/ 14':4-|~ 2- Â«25 1 0 - --* 4 Blk 21 1.2-.61- - 6,80-40-1 i 474% t, - - 5 A.0 71 10 ~ *9, 7109.11 -14 Fl-. 710ei 0 A-Poe- ' ' / 1 - k--I 1 8 1 1 .. MA<.1 4 .9-7.-m:*1.- %.< 173, ~ FM::5$'M*PE) fpel 1/PI ~451 ~ | 049 \ r n~' 'F% 7- 9Â·r 4Â·-râ€¢g... â€¢ .UU'k:.9 G~LU Apur-T>' Ale 5-0- V I e. W 71*#NE- 0 1 OCT 2 0 2000 1.1 - 101 A..N/P \0/\ 6/0 ./rÂ·c ..UN CUMMUNHY DEVELOPMENT ST. MARY'S CHURCH 9 r 4/. RECTORY REMODEL & ADDITION ASPEN, COLORADO ,Â·4.f.7 *%:42.0 Â» ''1% OLSEN + KELLEY ARCHITECTS 117 AABC, SUITE 305 ASPEN, COLORADO 970.920.7651 er 44. . t .*6.3.*:1 ,"61. 11!1*1 S - - 7- -- - - h + i I L 11 11 11 i 122 3 C ' i 1 f , 1 -- L 1- 2 1 -J *V__ -~ 5 -9 7 - 3 - U 7 <~T L ==2 44- 1 -1 1 1 L" li 1 L 0 2 - Inâ‚¬H*.__ _ -11 ILl* *El - L 2 - 41 -~ & 1 1 - 3 - % -F 1 7 I A i F ./I L= L ' ----78[9 E,Â»Â» 1- -F 4 2 11 10 1. 1 1 > 1 1110Â©1 2 1 1-- A--1 1 g -7 *---.-- Il . jm g o l -- - -~ Lute 2 4 1 1 11 i pi XE~1=9 -22Â«LL (1 7 71 1 UE - B B O 3 .3 . yÂ» r 11 9 - . 1 .Ii i > 1* (/. 1 m 11 -/ 7'-7 . 1 il 'b--= d ..3 Kn\\1 Ix\\\\\\ a 7:37 1\\\\\\\\11% \t\ \t\ \1\ 4%4 : \X\ ixi . \X. , N X\ \X\ \*\ ~ . 1 - 7 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 0 OLSEN >P KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING A R CHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO --------- - - ~ 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970,920.7652 fÂ·Â·I Â«Ll i -40 0,1 I11I:tI1!II - 11111!Illtlitilll:111111 4.49'leiÂ»Ell 626 /+g F -3-1 t.if ----- 1\\\ 1 .- 1 1 , 1 i. l' k 11 11 3- 11 - .2 1 74,2 1 ti 1 1 0 1 11,' . -...i 1 1 111 77 1 1 1 - 4 . - 4-1 {1.0-f - 1 \\\\24\. 41]CK I m 131 #-I f i Â«34*~9 E--- 1 .3* TR. 22 i V 1 - I -Tk . ir-1 n : 100 , Ir-Â» 912]- -- - - - - 1 : p. I.J' 1-5 1---- .lill.- I 1 m l 1 1 L 9--4--4 47?=,1 R. . 4 -'- 1 1.t.1 \ 1 3 1 1 A. I jil-Ii / I 4 .1 .0 lA I 1 1 5 i. U 1 N 11 1 11 L\1\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\4 h\\\\\\\\\\.: C +1 n 1 74 0 .. 00 4- 0 000 0-' 0 . . 0 94 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 20/4, OLSEN+ KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., _ASPEN. iCOLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 lilli"tU/666, 111 Ll--124 '1!)1111/1/11,%)!4'J'.,1 , / / 41,12=1 j: ' 1 f ' c '42LJ .1/IVII-161 1 1Â» 3 t V r J -0 1 U 1-- t3 2 - ? 3 3 1 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH LKELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS L =... 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970,920.7651 FAX 970,920.7652 H *12 3- h.lÂ·gl #-2 97* 69 N I lei ><-3 -- ,Gl Â«19â‚¬kl ~ ' 444 'Hs=:wkI ae,AW > 6,420, ~OLSEN -- - 0 - 3 1 11--31 1' 1 L 11 J 11 11 .. - 7 V E - 1 4 4 - * 7 93 - Â«11-1 4 -TI= 4-2 f E (dJ . L-- 4 -- m U 2 - % 7 -F - - Nx V. 1 99}---- - 111-1 1 -1 4 - fÂ» -. 1 1 C. 1 \2-1-Â«2 1! n_ 1 0 -7 2 ---1 04 V -2 3 k L 3 U 7 -5 E 7 -21- 1 k 1 1 0 1 5 ? 9 11 R" 1 ..0 724 .t.Â¢.Nir~J ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH -*9â‚¬- 2.-31 OLSEN -44 KELLEY //1 /N ARCHITECTS RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING A 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920,7652 HI 41& Arl ' 4 fu pÂ·Â·~ p 1 Â»11 4 01 â‚¬ #40,1 6*2 --t t- M 0 4.-t r:\\ 1 ------7 L. 1 1 1 1 111 11 11 11 d ------------ ---7 19 x 11 .1 11 11 1 1 t\\ \.\ rVT 1 1 11 .1 6 1 1 i H--11 --t. - X3 F 1 - L_ f 2 li 1 -- 3 1 11 -2 \1 : 1 t = 9 M I _ 1 1 T 1 1 LL I -1 T i i 4 r T--1 1 A ~4::~c 1 1; 1 -1 1 1 =17 - = <1* = 1 1-4 I Lt 1 00-9 - 4 Ij U I 11 11 11 11 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH - 1,1...9 :14 â€ž KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING 111 .1( 1 ".4 ARCH I T E .C T S 104 S. GALENA_ ST.. ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC. SUITE 305. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 ~OLSEN 1 r .... u tl 14 <6:12- 1\\ 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 3 - 1 \ X U < 7.5 + 12- I iJ i 2-,5 i 12- ?/ 1 -U 1 1 1 4 - 1 1 r\\ 1 3 Â£ 1 1. 1 1- gl \1 110 01> f \ 1 ll r,---2----- 1 B I pee- 1 1 2 1 -1 1 1 - V L--- -9.-----------7 ~ ----- -7-1.1 &932, 1 1\ 1 I ---1 4 1 1 1 / 1 1 I 0 9 12:12- > 1 5 9 1 -* 7/ Â«p 1 -~i 1 1 1 1 < 1 2 12, ---- - -#-Mp-1 .-~Ii- - -- il- Ill.--- - .Ig-W---- \ 1/ 1 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH .A: -f: 1/fer\\ OLSEN G KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920,7652 1 0.19 1-1*9=1 6007 *H LIÂ»I XE - 4 Â»11 + .* - .*. (11*1&-.-- ..--.- -. / . V 9 p ' \1 1 1 Irl 'l T. \ 46 1 1\1 1 1 .1 4 r. 0. 1- P: /lt : v Â· Ff G rt - li-, 4 - 1 1 ila ~-t 4 I. 7 4 9 30 :-- 29 ' e 3, 0 Â·a - 7, 72 i Â© , 0 71 137-* 1 , S â‚¬3 9 0- .N j..Â° S,-9 k .4 2 . 0 -o I tls It 1 4 , --2 551 1 11_. 4- * 1 ST. MARY' S CATHOLIC CHURCH OLSEN,ii KELLEY - RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 1 -----3 04-6.-GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 .._ __ hiÂ«1=1 -1-1Â·Â·Â·49*121 * __n_.--_'gts-19[1â‚¬et =Â» 0 11 21! l ' I. , -T '17'l_lIT, 1%*411 KA,04/074>20747///5 6,0/45<(A Y////////// -~r. PE 51 'amipmwp 511 41 / -1 9.4 48 //1 -1 f 5.11 11 yk , AL- L F k;==2 ~ -1 11Â¢19, 4 -- --=7=-3 1 2 - \1 1 1 - 1 I / l Â£ EllÂ«\\\ Â¤ fi -- l 1 9, +h. +-4- M+W-' 1,+ /- , 1 -1 - M 11 1 1 1 1 Â¥1 74 zz 1 ,=Willillailipil k ' |~..,U~. ''ltle-/Am 4-:. v .~MI'' .1 .. 1,;111'Itr Nunn; 1-1 i ji jiTT Ufnt*ORRAL~u. i ' , 41 1 4 I 3N ./ N, /></ /ti . IN, :. '.' Ell. . 1 + 1 - 1-/Ef 7.7 7 7 i f , / . r=01 1 11 - 71 7- - 4* , "11'11. 30- 1 * ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH 2 OLSEN ~ KELLEY RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS 104 S._ GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC. SUITE 305. ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 H Vlsi s )71 =1 -19 1 - 47 KI 1 9 n Al - 42Â«01Â» 1,141=21 -2aT 391-011 1 4- 30,1-lil 6/29: 9 LIli 125,1 ---_- 151- 1 1 \ c/D FI- 0 rk U =:t///A////2/,1 i. 7 111&, 4 '.:=--*-*.0,--:~_ I ~ *,4,0414'1 1-1-1 - 1>M //////////A t//il//In ' .0 4 %--- Mt' & *7./ p./ L - 170~14 , 4416 f, 1 1 / FL 1 1 I 21 51 V 1 v 8% / 1 1.Â»m, - &012â€ž2,-1 59--/- ~f 1 0 1- I 1,#51:-,=?m 4 1 1. I i 7 -0 ; CE 1. 1 24., 1 1-+19 % 14Â·r" 01Â» \ 1 5, 9 Fri -: 1 - b ~TH LZ = = 1 1 Al v' A 6~ -- 0 111 1 1 , f r - ..<.---' 4#*-*-. i I 1 / 1 Al, 1 1 1 1 1. 1 . < _jpl/ . lt'' 1 , /Ir - I /1 1 --1 1 0 3 -1 \ 1 / 11 4.-W 1 1111,Â»+10..1 1 1 , 1 11 i ' - LL \PINI Na I I ' i *, i i I i. LL \1/ - -21 - - - - -4 e'12:>REÂ»1 / I -'O &0444271 0 ti - 0 10/C f 1 W 2 C..) 11- kEE) 7- 24 1 1 / 1 .. R I Ill ~ -1 -BZ=411 11 - -%- -,1 11 11 1 E = 0 06 /,///A r//1////////////////74 \// //// / / /// / ///lÂ» ...: , 2~ -9 1 11 , / r |k L.-*-;9#~*1 i 4---tz. 1///////A 171111- ~K==-1 \J I I V â‚¬ Lu ELI % r CE LU <C 02 111-111 at dw 1 2Â» 0 02 3 53 0 -- 0 Ill CE (- ) 49x fF> Hz:7 LIâ‚¬>I IN # - 2000 F-L.00Â£%57K. IIL-1-FLAH Â» ~ 4.13 (A V#11 1 11-Oil i \ a \ /al /.4/ A 3113N Â·N351O 299L'026'0L6 XVI :99L'026'0L6-131 L-1918 00Â¥30-100 'N]dSV '90Â£ 311(lS '08Â¥V LI.L 121 5>12.21- \44\\ 4,,443,.~#-,34 49,1494,31\36, ONISAOH HOMAH 00Â¥30103 'N3dSV '*19 VN31Â¥9 S 299L'026'0L6 XVJ L99L'026 0L6 131 LL9L8 00*0100 'N3dSV '90Â£ 31IfiS '08Â¥y LIL 00Â¥30103 'N3dSV '*19 VN31Â¥9 'S- fO L S1031IHJNV ONISAOH 33Â¥19 9 1300\N33 13 01333 4122.Â·1 A3113NL N 3 Sl O HONAHO OllOH1Â¥3 9,13Â¥\N 19 R?P -3 1\ C Â¥ -3 E dE C f fi 3 1 9 f & 1 2 1 R 1 8 ./ '' f 11 1 1 11 1 Â£ C ---- -- ---r---- _______L ' ---t-7 1 -1 1 -A 5 - 1 1 r 1 1 1 --dial l V I 1 El 1 21 d d:& â‚¬1 6 + 18 1 - 1 61 1- 1 *-2 BE % ky=- 7 1 1 k 0 < Tingl 11:el> 3 4 2 4 & r I K d F i /41 Â«11 < , r 1 2 1 4-7 10 11 11 ma At- --- -1 .A -t liw> C 1 /1 l a 1 1/ d I 1 964|21 _ - -90=11 21 I * i 1 31 i - ..... 4-*jili EY[> 11~ 1 0 1---------- ---T---1#-------- *1 1 % 1 1 NIVEA w=-4 - 'PH'*rloR 644Â«14 110-11 - 11 4/1 I 7 0 r--------1 11 0 1 1 1 4 7% Fr- ---- 41 k I i 4- T 07[- 14 11 11-1 1 1 1 1 + 14 Â» v ' 1 1 9 /Â« - 1 1 -C: J \\.1 1 ~ < 7.5'It - -242"12 1~-~=~=c-V v I 1 Â¥ -301Â» 1 fif\\ 3/ f F 11 1 1 41% 1 1 42.5 11 1 V. 1 / 1 1 1/ 1 X f Aimp Â§2 10 10001> * Â£ -W ////7- 1 /- 1 T Â« ~'pÂ» 4 11 4r 11'L -4-L __ 0 1 - I V 1-- ----7--4 1 ./! 1 -7 - 9 1/ 1 1 1 1 -M I g C 12-1 1 1- 1 2 Ill 11 > 1 1 4/ 1 1 1 4 1 - 1 1 | <12! 12- 1 1 -------7Â©----------__--21 1 1 1 1 ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH TO.... OLSEN L KELLEY ?2Â· Â·0#.1 i RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING ARCHITECTS /3 04 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 z Hyn,=:i - do<q _ 611900\4:~1-- f '9534 F. -1 r-- 1 2 -1-.-- @m X 1/ - -97 - /1 1 ./1 1 1 1 ~\ 0 \ <9 rt t/ ST. MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH ld/~\44%1 RECTORY REMODEL & STAFF HOUSING RCHITECTS A 104 S. GALENA ST., ASPEN, COLORADO 117 AABC, SUITE 305, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TEL 970.920.7651 FAX 970.920.7652 HI'Â«61 -11-+2 U-Â·3*tia 01111(101.-42 -w - 1-4 Ut O - OrÂ»Â«/1/ trAGE 40429 1,449 drÂ»*10 *"C,0/ @Aw\, ff#9%