Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20130925 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 25,2013 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO Site Visits: Please visit 201 E. Hyman and 609 W. Bleeker on your oven 5:00 INTRODUCTION A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes C. Public Comments D. Commission member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest(actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificates of No Negative Effect issued I. Submit public notice for agenda items OLD BUSINESS A. None NEW BUSINESS 5.10 A. 609 W. Bleeker Street-Parking Variance, PUBLIC HEARING 5.40 B. 201 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On- Site Relocation and Variances, PUBLIC HEARING WORKESSION A. None 7:00 ADJOURN l� TYPICAL PROCEEDING-1 HOUR,10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM.NEW BUSINESS Provide proof of legal notice(affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation.(5 minutes) Board questions and clarifications(5 minutes) Applicant presentation(20 minutes) Board questions and clarifications(5 minutes) Public comments(close public comment portion of hearing)(5 minutes) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed(5 minutes) HPC discussion(15 minutes) . Applicant rebuttal(comments)(5 minutes) Motion(5 minutes) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four(4)members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. PROJECT MONITORING- Projects in bold are currently under construction. 217 E.Bleeker-Kribs Jay Maytin 518 W. Main-Fornell 320 Lake 435 W. Main-AJCC 400 E.Hyman (Tom Thumb) 204 S. Galena 920 W.Hallam 28 Smuggler Grove Lift One Nora Berko 205 S. Spring-Hills 1102 Waters 332 W. Main 28 Smuggler Grove 1006 E. Cooper Sallie Golden 400 E.Hyman(Tom Thumb) 305 S.Mill (Above the Salt) 517 E. Hyman(Little Annie's) Jane Hills Aspen Core 605 W. Bleeker 114 Neale Willis Pember 204 S. Galena Aspen Core 514 E.Hyman Patrick Segal 204 S. Galena 623 E.Hopkins 612 W. Main Holden Marolt derrick 701 N.Third M:\city\planning\hpc project monitoring\PROJECT MONITORING.doc 9/17/2013 P1 MEMORANDUM ` TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission . FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 609 W. Bleeker-parking variance, Public Hearing DATE: September 25, 2013 SUMMARY: 609 W. Bleeker Street is a 4,500 square foot lot that was created through a historic landmark lot split in 2000. 609 W. Bleeker was the vacant lot in the subdivision. The historic house is to the east. HPC approved the design for this new house, Main House and an accessory dwelling unit located along the alley. The Board of Adjustment granted ( � z ; ` ! I i SE itD FI 04i2"'i" rear and west side yard setback variances for ` 3 S�,srao T 1 car garag the ADU so that it could be distanced from a — -= large tree in the back yard. During that process, a 'y the owner at the time offered to restrict the unit " to mandatory occupancy, which was not a .yg requirement of the Municipal Code. " The property has changed hands twice in the subsequent years. In 2012, planning staff r' ADU parking reviewed a permit for landscape work on the site and discovered that some deck and stair - , , improvements had been extended into the required parking space for the ADU. In ADU addition, it was determined that the mandatory s occupancy agreement had not been honored. "s 'u The property owner is working with Community Development to pay a mitigation Alley / fee to remove the occupancy agreement, f however the unit will still be deed restricted and, if rented, must be occupied by a full time working resident meeting housing guidelines. The property owner wishes to address the encroachment into the parking spot. It appears that, in the original 2000 approval, two stair treads sat against the east side of the ADU at the main doorway. The deck and steps were later extended and make the parking space unusable. The applicant requests that HPC waive the required space as parking is available on the street. HPC has this authority for landmark properties and can also provide the waiver through Special Review standards applicable to ADUs. I P2 As a second alternative, in preparing this review, historic preservation staff suggested the possibility of moving the ADU space into a stacked configuration with the parking for the single family house. This has since been determined to be disallowed by the land use code, unless approved by HPC as a variance based on hardship since the ADU space would not be able to meet the minimum length required by code. A third alternative is to require the applicant to remove the improvements and restore the parking spot as it was originally approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the review standards for parking waiver are not met. It is feasible to restore the parking spot to a usable condition. While this applicant does not indicate an interest in renting the unit, future users may choose to do so. APPLICANT: Rachel Kukes Schwartz and Mark Schwartz,represented by Jody Edwards. ADDRESS AND PARCEL ID: 609 W. Bleeker Street,Lot B, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-124-87-002. ZONING: R-6. PARKING VARIANCE/CASH-IN-LIEU WAIVER Accessory Dwelling units are subject to a set of design standards as described at Section 26.520.05 of the Municipal Code. Among them: One(1)parking space for the ADU or carriage house shall be provided on-site and shall remain available for the benefit of the ADU or carriage house resident. The parking space shall not be stacked with a space for the primary residence. This project met the design standard when it was originally approved by HPC. The applicant now requests a waiver, which is permitted if the following criteria are met. Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. If the property is an historic landmark, on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures or within an Historic Overlay District and the application has been authorized for consolidation pursuant to Chapter 26.304, the Historic Preservation Commission shall consider the special review. A Special Review for an ADU or Carriage House may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: 1. The proposed ADU or carriage house is designed in a manner which promotes the purpose of the ADU and carriage house program,promotes the purpose of the Zone District in which it is proposed and promotes the unit's general livability. 2 P3 2. The proposed ADU or carriage house is designed to be compatible with and subordinate in character to,the primary residence considering all dimensions, site configuration,landscaping, privacy and historical significance of the property. 3. The proposed ADU or carriage house is designed in a manner which is compatible with or enhances the character of the neighborhood considering all dimensions, density, designated view planes, operating characteristics, traffic, availability of on-. street parking, availability of transit services and walking proximity to employment and recreational opportunities. Staff Response: The surrounding neighborhood does have street parking available to accommodate the parking space proposed for waiver. However, the project was originally designed to accommodate the parking needs on site. Having a space immediately next to the unit does improve its livability for a full time resident. Staff finds that criterion 2 is not met. As mentioned, it appears that the landing and steps on the east side of the ADU are larger than they were originally. This may have been an upgrade to meet building code when the applicant performed a remodel in the ADU recently. It was not recognized by the City during permit review that the steps were being built in a required parking space. A parking space that meets code requirements must be 8 '/z' wide and 18' long. In order to restore the original parking space, the applicant will have to work with the Building Department to ensure that there is proper egress from the unit. As an alternative to the review criteria above, properties listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures may provide fewer on-site parking spaces than required if HPC finds that the review standard of Section 26.415.110.D of the Municipal Code is met, as follows: The parking reduction may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. Staff Response: The historic resource is on the adjacent lot. That property was required to provide for its parking needs on site. There is no preservation goal met by waiving an on-site parking space at 609 W. Bleeker. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or 3 P4 • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC deny the waiver of one on-site parking space and require parking-for the ADU be restored to the development approval granted through HPC Resolution#30, Series of 2000. Exhibits: Resolution# , Series of 2013 A. Application 4 P5 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) DENYING A PARKING WAIVER FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 609 W. BLEEKER STREET, LOT B,SMALL AND LARGE FRIES SUBDIVISION,BLOCK 24, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION # , SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-44-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, Rachel Kukes Schwartz and Mark Schwartz, represented by Jody Edwards, requested HPC approval to reduce the parking requirement for the property located at 609 W. Bleeker Street, Lot B, Small and Large Fries Subdivision, Block 24, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Sections 26.520.080 and 26.415.110 of the Municipal Code both provide for HPC review of a possible parking reduction for the subject property; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated September 25, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended denial; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 25; 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal to be inconsistent with the review standards by a vote of to_ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby denies the requested parking reduction requires the applicant to provide on-site parking for the ADU as approved through HPC Resolution 930, Series of 2000. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of September, 2013. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk t P7 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 201 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On-site Relocation, Variances, Public Hearing DATE: September 25, 2013 SUMMARY: 201 E. Hyman Avenue is an 8,000 square foot lot that contains a Victorian,home and an outbuilding. The property owner requests HPC approval to demolish all non-historic construction on the site, to lift the house for basement excavation, to make an addition to the house, and to move the outbuilding on the site. This home is historically important for several reasons. The estimated construction date is 1883, which is very early in Aspen's history, especially for such a nicely detailed home. Few of the remaining Aspen "miner's cottages" are from the early 1880s. The historic house is very intact. The only alteration is on the back of the house, where a one story addition was built in 1997. This was also the long-time (1923-1986) home of the Herron family, who were central to the development of the ski resort as summarized in an attached newspaper article. The subsequent owners retained the home until it was sold this year. Staff finds that the proposed project is very sensitively designed to allow the historic house and outbuilding to be the highlights of the property. Because this is a larger site than many of the miner's cottages sit on, there is ample open space around the building. The proposed new construction is simple in form and detailing. Staff supports the Conceptual approval, Demolition, On-site Relocation and variances with only one area of the project to be restudied, as discussed later in the memo. APPLICANT: 201 EH Investments LLC, represented by Guerin Glass Architects and 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-73-001. ADDRESS: 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3`d of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: MU, Mixed Use. 1 P8 CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use. Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's. conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) andlor addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review , focuses on the height, scale, massing and ' proportions of a proposal. The relevant K design guidelines are attached as "Exhibit A." } The applicant proposes to focus the new construction on the site along the east f �_ property line. The new construction attaches to the historic house along its south fagade, where the original wall has ■�` already been destroyed by the existing . =w H addition. The attachment point is a one story connector placed more than 10' back from the.front fagade of the house. The primary mass mass of the addition is 13' to the east of the 201 E. Hyman Victorian, providing substantial.separation. The bulk of the addition is a very simple gable roofed two story form with a reasonable plate height relative to the Victorian .and a compatible roof pitch. On Hyman Avenue, the gable addition is only about half the width of the Victorian. The historic outbuilding will remain completely detached from the house. Along Aspen Street, the sense of open space that currently exists on the site will be preserved. 2 P9 " ^I Staff's only concern with the new construction is along the east fagade of the Victorian. The roof eave of the connector ' J - _ cuts into the historic gable end in a manner ' U i4:K that will destroy some historic sidin g and -- -_ E encroaches on that original and very visible wall. A proposed lightwell in that area leaves _ _an original door "hanging" in the air with no ground beneath it. Staff recommends these conflicts be resolved as a condition of '� ` Conceptual approval. Arrows at the right ---- ---------- point to the areas of concern. The applicant must also restudy the large lightwell in the middle of the project for Final review. Although the lightwell will not be visible from the street, it is large L enough to cause the height of the addition to be measured from the bottom of the well, making the addition'over the height limit. The size of the lightwell will have to be reduced. DEMOLITION The applicant proposes to remove additions from the original Victorian house and to partially demolish the outbuilding. It is the intent of the historic preservation ordinance to preserve the historic and architectural resources that have demonstrated significance to the community. Consequently no demolition of properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures will be allowed unless approved by the HPC in accordance with the standards set forth in this Section. " (7 - ', .� t ; 8` .. A N ...... _ ..... 1904 Sanborn Map View of outbuilding 3 P10 HPC held a worksession to discuss this project with the architect in June. A primary area of concern at that time was total demolition of the outbuilding, which is no longer proposed. The applicant proposes to demolish all of the non-original construction, which includes an addition on the east side of the outbuilding, and an addition on the south side of the Victorian house. The HPC shall review the application, the staff report and hear evidence presented by the property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine if the standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and Additionally,for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located and b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. Staff Response: Staff agrees that the areas to be removed are not original to the property. Staff finds that no documentation exists to demonstrate that the additions have historic significance, and that demolition of these elements will not result in a loss of integrity to this building or adjacent buildings. ON-SITE RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much, of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well .as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code: 4 P11 C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The proposal is to lift the Victorian house for a basement and put it back in place.. The proposal is to move the original part of the outbuilding to the west property line. Staff does not agree with the applicant's suggestion that the outbuilding has been moved around the site. It appears to have always been at the rear of Lot B, as it is today. Nonetheless, we can support the relocation as part of the proposal to retain the building. This is a relatively large outbuilding, few of which remain in town. Moving it to the west allows it to retain a direct visual connection with the Victorian house and great visibility to the public. It will remain a free standing building, buffered from the new construction. It will be given functional use. Staff supports the proposed relocation. FAR BONUS In selected circumstances,the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction.materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; 5 P12 g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: Staff finds that the project meets all the criteria for a floor area bonus. As described above, we find that the placement and character of the new construction allow the historic resources, both the house and outbuilding, to be highlighted. SETBACK VARIANCES In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The applicant requests two setback variances that allow the Victorian to remain in the original location; a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' at the front porch, and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' at a bay window. The applicant requests a 4' west sideyard reduction for a new lightwell alongside the Victorian, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5'.west sideyard setback variance for the relocated outbuilding. Staff supports the setback variances as we find that the site planning of the project is very successful in preserving the historic character of the property. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with Residential Design Standards related to "Build-to line" or "Lightwells." The applicant requests variances. Build-to lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent(60%) of the front fayade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length. Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent (60%) standard. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street-facing facade(s) of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. All Residential Design Standard Variances, Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020(D)(2) must: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, 6 P13 or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: The project would meet the "build-to line" standard if more of the new construction was moved towards the front property line. This would be in conflict with the HPC design guidelines,which direct the new construction to be set back. The new lightwell proposed on the west side of the Victorian violates the Residential Design Standards because it projects in front of a street facing facade. (It projects forward of the historic bay window.) The lightwell is larger than the minimum required by code and could likely be reduced if HPC found a negative visual impact. Staff supports the Residential Design Standards variances finding that they are appropriate to the site constraints of this remodel to a historically designated home. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On-site Relocation, and Variances, with the condition that the applicant restudy the east fagade of the Victorian, and the size of the central lightwell for Final. Exhibits: Resolution#_, Series of 2013 A. Relevant Guidelines B. Aspen Times article C. Application 7 P14 Exhibit A 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. • When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its primary and roof materials, roof form, windows, doors and architectural details. • If a secondary structure is not historically significant, then its preservation is optional. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. ❑ Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case- by-case basis. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. • A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. • If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. • If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 8.5 Avoid moving a historic secondary structure from its original location. ❑ A secondary structure may only be repositioned on its original site to preserve its historic integrity. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. ❑ In general, relocation has less.of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. ❑ It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. ❑ Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. • A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. • Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. • The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. • In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. ❑ If a historic building straddles two lots,then it may be shifted to sit entirely on one of the lots. Both lots shall remain landmarked properties. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. ❑ It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. ❑ It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 9.6 .When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. ❑ Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. ❑ Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. ❑ In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). 8 P15 • The size of a lightwell should be minimized. • A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. • An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. .10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 9 P16 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), DEMOLITION, RELOCATION,AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS A,B AND THE WEST 2/3RD OF LOT C,BLOCK 76, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION#_, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-73-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, 201 EH Investments LLC, represented by Guerin Glass Architects and 1 Friday Design Collaborative, requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Relocation, and Variance approval for the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3 rd of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Demolition, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.080.A.4, Demolition of Designated Historic Properties; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for a floor area bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.F; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances; and WHEREAS, the HPC may approve variances to the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020.D; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 25, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the 201 E. Hyman Avenue HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 2 P17 proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Relocation and Variance approval for the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 1. HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. HPC hereby grants a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' at the front porch, and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' at a bay window, a 4' west sideyard reduction for a new lightwell alongside the Victorian, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the relocated outbuilding. 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to line"and"lightwells." 4. The applicant must restudy the east facade of the Victorian, and the size of the central lightwell for Final 5. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of September 25, 2013, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of September, 2013. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 201 E. Hyman Avenue HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 2 P19 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJ EC'r' Name: 201 EH INVESTMENTS LLC RESIDENCE Location: 201 EAST HYMAN AVENUE .ASPEN.CO.81611 LOTS A, B AND THE WEST 2/3'RDS OF LOT C, BLOCK 76,CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN (Indicate street address, lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 2735-1247-3001 APPLICANT: Name: 201 EH INVESTMENTS LLC :C/O JASON GROSFELD Address: PO BOX 7928,ASPEN,CO 81612 Phone#: 970.309.0695. Fax#: E-mail: DEREK01 FRIDAY.COM REPRESENTATIVE: Name: DEREK SKALKO,OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE Address: PO BOX 7928,ASPEN,CO 81612 Phone#: 970.309.0695 Fax#: E-mail: DEREK 01 FRIDAY.COM TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Q Historic Designation Relocation (temporary, on ❑ Certificate of No Negative Effect ❑ . or off-site) ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness (❑ Demolition(total ❑ -Minor Historic Development demolition) 0 -Major Historic Development ❑ Historic Landmark Lot Split In -Conceptual Historic Development ❑ -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment ExISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses,previous approvals,etc.) 8,000 SQ FT R-MU LOT WITH A HISTORIC SINGLE FAMILY VICTORIAN RESIDENCE& 1890'5 GARAGE CONSTRUCTION ON SI E PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) HPC MAJOR RE-DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY/NON-HISTORIC ADDITIONS PROPOSED.TO BE REMOVED FROM THE EXIS-rING CONDITIONS WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED AS INDICATED PER PLANNING CONCEPT. SHED PROPOSED TO BE RELOCATED FROM EISTING CONDITION PER PLANNING CONCEPT. LOT PROPOSED TO REMAIN AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE USE. Aspen Ilistoiic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P20 General information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO 0 Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? ■ Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? ■ Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? ■ In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits'? ■ If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) ■ If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: _ Rehabilitation.Loan Fund Conservation Easement Program ■Dimensional Variances Increased Density Iffistoric Landmark Lot Split .' Waiver of Park Dedication Fees Conditional Uses Exemption from Growth Management Quota System Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated:May 29,2007 P21 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (Item#10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project.: 201 EAST HYMAN RESIDENCE Applicant: 201 EH INVESTMENTS LLC :C/O JASON GROSFELD Project 201 EAST HYMAN AVENUE,ASPEN ,COLORADO 81611 Location.: LOTS A,B,&WEST 2/3'RDS OF LOT C,BLOCK 76,CITY&TOWNSITE OF ASPEN Zone District: MU ZONE DISTRICT Lot Size: 8,000 SQ FT Lot Area: 8,000 SQ FT (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NA Proposed: NA Number of residential units: Existing: 1 'Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 5 3,246 SQ FT ACTUAL EXISTING/761 SQ FT ACTUAL(GARAGE&SHED)PROPOSED Proposed%of demolition: FOR DEMOLITION,THEREFORE=23.4%DEMOLITION DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) 3,246 SQ FT 3,520 SQ FT 4,020 SQ FT PER FAR i'loor Area: EXI:SItng: ACTUAL/ Allowable:ALLOW F_Pr'oposed. CALCULATION(500 SQ FT 2,487 SQ FT PER PER FAR CALCUALTION HEING SOUGHT) belt it FAR CALCULATION Principal Bldg.: Existing: 21'-1/4" Allowable: 25' proposed.-W-6-1/2"(23'-6"TO ROOF MP) 13'-6" 25' 13'-6"(NO MASSING ACCeSS0y Bldg.: Existin g; Allowable: Proposed: CI IANG S PROPOSED) On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: 2 Proposed: 2 % Site coverage: Existing: NA Required: NA Proposed: NA %Open Space: Existing: NA Required: NA Proposed: NA 5'.7" 5'-7" /(4'S"OVER Front Setback: HALLAM Ixxisting' (4'-t"nyFrzlKequired: 10' Proposed' FOR HISTORICAL HOUSE) 5' 5'FOR MAIN GARAGE Rear Setback: ExlSling:—OVER R�Required: Proposed: n— (I=OTA INE FOR SHED Combined Front/Rear: PROPERTY PROPOSED) NORTH 5'-7" 10' 5'-7"FOR HISTORIC HOME Indicate N. S,E.W Existing: Required: Proposed: PORCH LOCATE 2'-6" S. O' FOR SHED Side Setback: EAST Existing: Required: Proposed: 1'4"FOR HOUSE Side Setback: WEST Existing: 4-10" Required: 5' Proposed: 5' Combined Sides: tsxistirrg: NA _Required: NA Proposed: NA Distance between Existing• 12'-7" 10' > 10' Rc yt+ir•c d: Proposed: buildings: Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: HISTORIC PORCH 5'-7" FROM FRONT YARD(HALLAM)PROPERTY LINE&EAST SIDE(ASPEN ST) BAY WINDOW 2'-6" INTO SIDE YARD SETBACK/SHED-OUTBUILDING APPDX 2'OVER PROPERTY LINE TO THE REAR(SOUTH ALLEY) Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): 5'-7" FRONT YARD SETBACK (HALLAM) REQUESTED TO ACCOMODATE HISTORIC HOUSE/PORCH LOCATE/ O'(PROPERTY LINE)VARIANCE REQUESTED ALONG SOUTH ALLEY SIDE TO ACCOMODATE SHED STRUCTURE/ 0'(PROPERTY LINE)VARIANCE REQUESTED ON EAST(ASPEN ST)SIDEYARD FOR SHED RE-LOCATE/ HISTORIC BAY WINDOW &LIGH ELL L CATED -4" FROM EAST SIDE YARD PROPERTY LINE ,pen istoric I�reservation Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: May 29,2007 P23 PO BOX 7928 Aspen,CO 81612-7928 Phone:970.309.0695 E-mail/Web:derek()1friday.com/www.lfriday.com To: Ms.Amy Guthrie; Director From: Derek Skalko, Local Representative The Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 201 East Hyman Avenue Residence E-mail: Amy.Guthrie @ci.aspen.co.us Date: September 1,2013 Phone: 970.429.2758 Pages: 9 Re: 201 East Hyman Avenue-Explanation/ CC: file Supplemental Info for Major Conceptual Approval 201 East Hyman Avenue HPC Major Development—HPC Conceptual Approval Dear Amy&Members of the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, We are approaching the commission on behalf of 201 EH Investments LLC, care of Mr. Jason Grosfeld, manager and property owner of 201 East Hyman Avenue, to seek conceptual approval from the Aspen HPC. We discussed our intentions of the 201 property via a work-session with the Aspen HPC in June of 2013. To again refresh your familiarity with 201 East Hyman,the residence is an approximate 8,000 sq ft property located just outside the defined commercial core of downtown Aspen. The property is legally defined as Lots A, B&West 2/3`d's of Lot C, Block 76 within the City and Townsite of Aspen and is, by definition,zoned a mixed-use lot according to the Aspen land use code. The main residence was initially a one story 1890's Victorian cottage to which one major time period addition of approximately.795 sq ft was added to the south and west of the main residence in 1997. In addition to the historic main residence, an 1890's alley outbuilding is located to the south alley side of the Hyman property. A secondary addition to the outbuilding was likely added sometime post 1940. Through research of the Aspen Sanborn mapping information available from 1890 to 1904,we believe the initial alley building location has been shifted multiple times in its history,while the main residence is believed to be situated within its original construction footprint. Packet Submission: The 24 x 36"drawing packet included for your review of 201 East Hyman includes the following: Sheet HPC-001:201 East Hyman title sheet Sheet HPC-002:201 Easy Hyman aerial mapping location with Aspen, and existing conditions imaging taken from East Hyman Avenue and South Aspen street perspectives. Sheet HPC-003: Existing site plan with noted structures, topography, and all property and easement setback conditions as recorded. Sheet HPC-004: The existing and proposed site plan conditions with the proposed massing removals and relocations indicated accordingly. Sheet HPC-005: The existing sub-grade, main level and roof plans of the historic Victorian main residence. Sheet HPC-006:The existing exterior elevations of the historic Victorian main residence. P24 Sheet HPC-007: Existing floor and roof plans,and exterior elevations of the 201 alley outbuilding. Sheet HPC-100: The proposed site plan for 201 East Hyman in addition to the contextual surrounding downtown core,mixed use,and R-6 neighborhoods. Sheet HPC-101: The proposed lower level (sub-grade)floor plan for the 201 main residence scaled at 1/8"=1'4'. Sheet HPC-102: The proposed main level floor plan for the 201 East Hyman main residence, outbuilding and property scaled at 1/8"=1'4'. Sheet HPC-103: The proposed second level floor plan for the 201 East Hyman main residence, roof plan for historic portion of the project and outbuilding scaled at 1/8"=1'4'. Sheet HPC-104:The proposed roof plans for the 201 East Hyman project and site scaled at 1/8"=1'4'. Sheet HPC-200: Proposed sections through the 201 East Hyman residential development scaled at 1/8"= V-0". Sheet HPC-300: Proposed north (East Hyman)and south (alley)exterior elevations scaled at 1/8" =1'- 0". Proposed material callouts provided. Sheet HPC-301: Proposed west (South Aspen) exterior elevation scaled at 1/8" =V-0". Proposed material callouts provided. Proposed Project Overview, Design Intent , Preservation, Variance Requests & Bonuses sought regarding 201 East Hyman: 201 EAST HYMAN—DESIGN INTENT: The goal of the proposed work at 201 East Hyman Avenue in Aspen's Downtown core is to preserve, restore and expand an important and beautiful example of western Victorian architecture while integrating the building with an evolving city fabric and expanding the house to accommodate a family in a contemporary manner. PRESERVATION: The existing historic resource dates to 1898 or earlier, making it an important example of the mining Victorian style, and an important piece of Aspen history. The exterior of the house itself will be preserved in its original form and location. The addition dating from post 1997 will be removed. The shed will also be preserved, and as the historic information indicates multiple locations over time, the proposal is to locate the shed closer to Aspen Street. Both structures will be raised to allow for new, expanded.foundations and will be stabilized and / or restored to true form. Exterior details will be preserved to match the historic information available, the windows upgraded but in a matching style, and the roof replaced with wooden shingles.The interiors of both structures will be modernized and the interior configurations adjusted to accommodate the expanded use. PLANNING: The planning will serve to not only showcase the existing house, but also expand its area to include spaces for entertaining, family and guest quarters, and help integrate the delicate structures with the variably scaled surroundings. The historic resource remains in its original location, with the shed relocated toward Aspen Street. The new massing volume placed will be placed at the South Eastern corner of the lot, allowing for the greatest separation between the historic and new constructions as possible.A central light well is introduced at the intersection of the new and historic structures which are linked by a delicate, enclosed breezeway. This makes the reading of the historic structure primary in focus, and helps to create a stronger edge on Aspen Street, and opens up the space within the site to allow for an enlarged yard with maximized light and open air. The existing house remains the primary entrance and expression of form on the corner of Aspen and East Hyman, and will contain a receiving room and library along with supporting areas. This will link to a contemporary volume that sits back from the East Hyman fagade approximately 26'-8"from property line to the new house feet by a light- structured,glazed breezeway.At the ground level,the new volume contains a master suite, mud room, and garage space for two cars. The upper level of this volume provides the main entertaining space, with the family kitchen, dining area and indoor and outdoor living areas. The shed is re-purposed as a habitable out-building'with support for the recreation amenity within in the yard. Extensive space is 7 _'_ T .e north e_ssi belu,j the .Y_ _ a .�•2Ctent to ahp- light�III is a large cauueu vewwr grade. IC7 the �iUlu d..., 1;CICGN 117.. 777 :tCr Suit-e- .^..nd aujal,ol7. ��� � _ � . _� family recreation space. On the south east corner are a fitness area and the prime mechanical space. Three bedrooms and a children's bunk room are distributed around the project's central interior courtyard/well. P25 MASSING&SCALE: 'The proposed form of the new volume to the south east of the restored and expanded structure supports the notation of the historic resource as a primary element and balances the scale of the Victorian structure with the surrounding area. The new volume is a simple, quietly articulated mass, pushed as far east on the site from the historic structures as possible, and.back as far as possible from East Hyman from the northern facade. The roof form matches that of the historic house and shed. While taller than the existing structure,the new volume reads as secondary due to its location upon the site,and the presence of the larger context that surrounds the property. DESIGN: While the historic structure is a highly articulated Victorian jewel,the new volume stands in contrast. It is intentionally quiet, and rendered in a slightly darker color than the existing house so as to support the idea of primary and supporting elements. The white, semi-ornate detailing of the existing house will be fully restored and recreated. The shed itself has minimal detail, and its restoration will maintain this, expressing its supporting role. The new volume further reinforces this by keeping the detailing to a minimum, presenting itself as an extremely quiet supporting structure off to the side of and behind the more vibrant house. The siding is a clean shiplap, treated wood, with openings minimized and treated according to their orientation. The street facade is covered by a uniform curtain of matching wooden louvers, creating visual privacy for the interior spaces while maintaining views, and providing a visual quiet in contrast to the more opulent historic house. The rear facade is open to the views—with similar fenestration but with_the louvers reduced or eliminated where possible. The western facade only has openings with the connecting elements so as to reinforce the notion of the new volume as backdrop to the historic resource. The linking elements are glazed on the vertical surfaces,with painted aluminum louvers on the south west facade to assist with solar control.This rendering is intended to create a clear visual and spatial distinction between the historic and new volumes. FAR BONUS REQUEST:500 SQ FT REQUESTED PER CONCEPTUAL PROPOSAL The 201 East Hyman proposed plan first intends to restore the Victorian cottage to its near-original 1890's condition. All ornamental features, detailing and material, door, and window fenestrations visible from the north (East Hyman),west(South Aspen), and south (alley) facades will be restored in full with no proposed alterations or changes to the historic aspects of the home. Additionally,the 1997 addition located to the south of the property is intended to be removed in full and the historic window and door conditions of the residence are intended to be restored according to the interior partitions and framing information that will be made available to the design team during the interior demolition phase of the project. A very minimal connection element to the east side of the building is intended; the location of this connection was one of the areas altered in the 1997 remodel of the Victorian residence, and no changes or alterations to the original and undisturbed areas of the historic home are intended. Additionally, the project is designed to integrate the existing outbuilding and rehabilitate the small structure into a functioning habitable element of the project's design planning program. Through research of the Aspen Sanborn mapping information available from 1890 to 1904,we believe the initial alley building location has been shifted multiple times in its history,while the main residence is believed to be situated within its original construction footprint: Due to this information,we believe it is not out of historical character the alley building be requested to be relocated on site the best facilitate the changing needs of the property over time. Saying this, we believe the project is an exemplary example of a conscientious and extensive historic preservation and restoration project worthy of the 500 sq ft bonus. Please note that 333 sq ft of the bonus is specific to allowing us to successfully maintain and incorporate the alley outbuilding into the overall proposed design concept of the property. REQUESTED VARIANCES FOR HPC CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL: P26 5'-7" FRONT YARD SETBACK (NORTH-EAST HYMAN) REQUESTED TO ACCOMMODATE EXISTING LOCATION OF HISTORIC HOUSE/FRONT PORCH (PORCH CURRENTLY 4-5" OVER THE REQUIRED 10' FRONT YARD SETBACK) 0' (PROPERTY LINE) SOUTH REAR YARD (ALLEY) SETBACK VARIANCE & 0' EAST SIDE YARD SETBACK (SOUTH ASPEN ST.) REQUESTED TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED NEW LOCATION OF ALLEY OUTBUILDING(EXISTING OUTBUILDING CURRENTLY 2'OVER PROPERTY BOUNDARY) NOTE: HISTORIC BAY WINDOW & PROPOSED LIGHTWELL LOCATED 14" FROM EAST SIDE YARD PROPERTY LINE We are requesting the listed variances simply to maintain the historic location of the Victorian cottage and in order to best integrate and maintain the existing outbuilding as a functioning entity of the new proposed master planning concept for 201 East Hyman. Further clarification and explanation of why these variances are important to the reworking of the property have been provided within the drawing packet information and will be explained in depth per our conceptual hearing. MATERIALS PROPOSED FOR VICTORIAN COTTAGE AND NEW CONSTRUCTION OF 201 EAST HYMAN RESIDENCE: Once again, we understand that material callouts and fenestration discussion is a topic dealt with at HPC final approval, but due to the importance of the material selections and intended window and louver details being incorporated into the project's design,we are seeking as much input as possible at the conceptual approval level in order to most productively develop the design intent of 201 East Hyman. All materials intended have been called out on the 24 x 36 plan sets provided to the HPC for more detailed reference. PROJECT COMPLIANCE TOWARDS HPC DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS PER CHAPTERS 1, 10&14: Per request of a memo via Amy Guthrie, we are responding accordingly to the specified topics of the Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines;Chapters 1, 10& 14 in the following: Fences The current 201 East Hyman property has no existing sidewalk or fences along the East Hyman Avenue location, and a solid, non-transparent wooden fence of approximately 5-6" in height exists along the South Aspen and alley locations. We acknowledge the design guidelines for fences (as copied below) and are open to working with the HPC as a monitoring item as the project develops further. A lower scaled, traditional, painted wooden picket fence direction as described per the elevation drawings provided is anticipated at this present time to comply with the visual openness requirements set forth by the Design Review Guidelines and better tie the property into the surrounding context of the existing neighborhood. 1.1 Preserve original fences. ❑ Replace only those portions that are deteriorated beyond repair. Replacement elements should match the existing fence. 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. • Any fence which is visible from a public right-of-way must be built of wood or wrought iron. Wire fences also may be considered. • A wood picket fence is an appropriate replacement in most locations. A simple wire or metal fence,similar to traditional"wrought iron," also may be considered. ❑ Chain link is prohibited and mlici "stockade" fences are only allowed in side and rear yards. 1 P27 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. • A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. • On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information,see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) ❑ A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. • Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. • Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. ❑ Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street-facing facade. ❑ This setback should be significant enough to provide a sense of open space between homes. New Additions 10.1 Preserve an older addition that has achieved historic significance in its own right. ❑ Such an addition is usually similar in character to the original building in terms of materials,finishes and design. We do not believe the existing additions to either the Victorian cottage and the alley outbuilding have achieved any historical significance, and truthfully, act as detriments to the project as a whole. The additions for both structures are intended for removal as indicated per Sheet HPC- 004. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. We do not believe the existing additions to either the Victorian cottage and the alley outbuilding have achieved any historical significance, and truthfully, act as detriments to the project as a whole. The additions for both structures are intended for removal as indicated per Sheet HPC- 004. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. P28 The proposed form of the new volume to the south east of the restored and expanded structure supports the notation of the historic resource as a primary element and balances the scale of the Victorian Structure with the surrounding area. The new volume is a simple, quietly articulated mass, pushed as far east on the site from the Historic Structures as possible,and back as far as possible from East Hyman from the northern facade. The roof form matches that of the historic house and shed. While taller than the existing structure,the new volume reads as secondary due to its location upon the site, and the presence of the larger context that surrounds the property. Planning and elevation drawings addressing this matter are provided in Sheets HPC -101 through HPC-301. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the.historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may -be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. The conceptual,proposal clearly separates the construction periods of the old versus new while quietly addressing the historical context of massing, scale, and formal relationships. The intention of the forms is directly responding to the historical nature of the site's context, while we are defining the old and new through material choices and modern detailing methods with a far less ornate and simplified aesthetic. Planning and elevation drawings addressing this matter are provided in Sheets HPC-101 through HPC-301. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. The reality is we need a second story for the program of the home to function appropriately, and have set back the massing location and plate heights accordingly to ensure the least amount of visual detection from the East Hyman and South Aspen view planes and right of ways. Please note the Victorian cottage is essentially a one story building which we are consciously responding to by pushing as far east on the site from the Historic Structures as possible, and back as far as possible from East Hyman from the northern facade. The roof form matches that of the historic house and shed. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. We have studied and worked the planning, scale and massing diligently to directly respond to the unusually small nature of the existing Victorian cottage and alley outbuilding, and feel strongly we are achieving a delicate balance between the relationship of the proposed and existing massing on not only from the East Hyman and South Aspen perspectives, but also within the context of the surrounding neighborhood, which we are significantly smaller than as a whole. Modeling and context street elevations drawings have been provided for further explanation. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. P29 ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. We have adhered to the guideline in full in addition to the 10' distance for the connector area. Per the drawings provided, we are demonstrating we absolutely have considered the Victorian cottage as the primary visual aspect of the project from both East Hyman and South Aspen street fagades. It is quite possible one will minimally see the secondary massing in any capacity from the South Aspen perspective as indicated in the provided cross elevations of the site. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically,gable,hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. The proposed roof forms are in direct contextual reference to the existing Victorian cottage and alley outbuilding structures. We are keeping the forms very pure, as to respond to the unbroken gable of the Victorian cottage. The second story deck area is intended as a flat roof for the specific purpose of minimizing the massing of the form to keep it contextually in scale with the alley outbuilding and also with the neighboring flat roofed Limelight building which it will be approximately sited within ten feet of. The design of the area is a direct response to the inflection requirements of the residential design standards additionally.. Please note the primary and majority of the roof areas are to be gable roofed massing elements. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details,cornices and eave lines should be avoided. All detailing will be maintained, repaired, or restored accordingly in regards to the Victorian cottage and alley outbuilding. The newly proposed detailing is intended to be simplified as to not compete with the historical nature of the existing structure and to clearly articulate itself as a product of its own time period while maintaining a secondary visual aesthetic to the historic resource. Color Since the HPC does not review the choice of color, these guidelines are provided to encourage the use of a paint scheme that would be similar to one used historically, as well as enhancing the structure and its character-defining features. We would like to stress to the HPC we have read and understand the desires of the provided guidelines pertaining to colour. The goal of the project is to unify the historic structures and proposed new constructions through material palettes that will articulate the"old vs. new" in a quiet and respectful manner. The intended material callouts for the proposed project can be found and referenced on the proposed elevation sheets HPC-300& HPC 301 for further reference. 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. ❑ Using one base color for the building is preferred. ❑ Using only one or two accent colors is also encouraged, except where precedent exists for using more than two colors with some architectural styles. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. P30 ❑ Using the color scheme to establish a sense of overall composition for the building is strongly encouraged. 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. ❑ Choose a base color that will link the entire building face together. For a commercial building, it can tie signs, ornamentation, awnings and entrances together. On residences, it can function similarly. It can also help your building relate better to others in the district. ❑ The complexity of the accent colors should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building. ❑ Doors may be painted a bright accent color, or they may be left a natural wood finish. Historically,many of the doors would have simply had a stain applied. ❑ Window sashes are also an excellent opportunity for accent color. ❑ Brilliant luminescent or"day-glo" colors are not appropriate. Residential Design Standards &compliance/applicability towards 201 East Hyman: A. Site Design: Per RIDS, any residence that has access to a private road or alley is required to utilize this amenity. We are proposing a design that is in accordance with RIDS Sections pertaining to Parking, Garages,and Carports. It is believed the alley outbuilding has been shifted throughout its existence at 201 East Hyman, and we are proposing to move the structure to the east property boundary and fully onto the property in the southern direction (it is currently 2' over the property line) in the concept.Additionally in this proposal,we are requesting to align the alley structure accordingly with the cardinal access directions of the lot. By allowing the move of the outbuilding, we would have the ability to create a garage access off of the intended south alley access locate, and this would bring the residence's garage.requirements into RIDS compliance and would be in accordance with the typical conditions found through the neighborhood regarding access and orientation. Our proposal of requesting the 5' shift of the property towards East Cooper additionally brings us closer to the compliance of RIDS Build to-Lines as defined in 26.410.040 by at least having the alley outbuilding structure being maintained completely upon the 201 East Hyman property. B. In discussing building elements, we believe both the proposed restoration of the historic Victorian cottage and the proposed new construction are in full compliance (with the noted question below) of all sections pertaining to Section 26.410.040, Paragraph D and Subsections. The massing inflection proposed for 1006 East Cooper is in accordance with the neighboring parcels having the primary one-story sections of the proposed residence inflect to the historic corner property situated to the direct west neighboring property. Variances from the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040: (Requesting the topic be discussed at conceptual per the integration into the design intent.) Per our design direction, we believe that we are in full accordance with the Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040 per the drawings presented. If there is a concern with the North fagade's glazing wall between the 9' and 12' heights as seen from Hyman Avenue not meeting the design criteria per the land use code, we would like to request a formal approval or variance as necessary by the HPC from this topic. We again do.want to stress the new construction massing is situated almost 25' feet back from the northernmost extrusion of the historic Victorian's front porch. Additionally, the wall is intended to be louvered as per the north elevation provided and appear much more in line with a softly illuminated form than a starkly lit glazed wall surface. We understand that material callouts and fenestration discussion is a topic dealt with at HPC final approval, but due to the P31 importance of the material selections and intended window glazing/louver detailing being incorporated into the project's design,we are seeking as much input as possible at the conceptual approval level in the best attempt of being responsive to the HPC's questions, concerns and/ or considerations as possible through this formal review process. Drawing documentation, imaging, and power point & computer rendering explanation will all be presented to further assist in demonstrating our final proposal during our scheduled hearing of September 25th. We are excited about the possibilities proposed and sincerely believe 201 East Hyman will significantly better the property from not only 201's long term desires, but also the City of Aspen's and Aspen HPC's long term interests concerning historic preservation. In closing, we would simply like to express our sincere gratitude in considering our request regarding 201 East Hyman Avenue.We look forward to presenting and discussing this concept with you further. Respectfully, Derek Skalko Local Representative,201 East Hyman Avenue EXHIBIT.? —i— AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: C1 W e vc C R 54 6. Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: �.-A 5Acts., se'lN 201 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) Z Z I (name, please print) being or representinb an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)/of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the_day of , 20 ,to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. I Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as tihey appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the o w,ners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. e The for oing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this day of , 20LZ by Q,hnA;l 4�(itA`tn PUBLIC NOTICE T 7 p 7 7� RE: 609 W.SLEEKER STREET- WITNESS T Y�D AND OFFICIAL SEAL PARKING VARIANCE YY 111 VLJJ lVl 1 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,September 25,2013, at a regular meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before M commission expires: the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission,in Y Y Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St., - Aspen. HPC will consider an application submit- ted by Rachel Kukes Schwartz and Mark Schwartz, 375 Lake Park pDdve,Birmingham,MI 48009,own- ers of the B' mail and Large Frriies Subdivision, Street,Lot B City and mail of Aspen, PID Notary Public #2735-124-87-002. The applicant requests HPC - approval to either waive one required on-site park- ing space,or to allow it to be shorter in length than required.For further information,contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Developp- ment Department,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO, (970)429-2758,amntguithdetlicityofaspen.com. - n Cn Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 5, CACHM[ENTS AS APPLICABLE: 2013. [9511830] _ • Cory vr. rtm rvjsLjL,. ATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 609 W. Bleeker Street , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Wednesday September 25 ,20 13 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, Lori Moschet (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. SaiO notice w s posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the? day of Q ��r , 20 1� , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) w �44-mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 'day of 5�p4eMbQr , 2013 , by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SIA�;tpTARy My com 'ssion expires: a a AVBLIG tary Public Or t0k,� ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 Easy Peel®labels i ® Bend along line to = Use AveryO Template 51600 1 Feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeTM j AVERY0 5160 At FAT CITY HOLDINGS LLC FELD ANNE S FERGUS ELIZABETH DAWSON 402 MIDLAND PARK PL 1700 PACIFIC AVE#4100 PO BOX 1515 ASPEN,CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN,CO 81612 FINE FREDRIC N&SONDRA FRIAS PROPERTIES OF ASPEN LLC GANT CONDO ASSOC INC 412 MARINER DR 730 E DURANT 610 S WESTEND ST JUPITER, FL 33477 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 816112142 GARMISCH LODGING LLC GOLDMAN DIANNE L H&H PROPERTIES LLLP 110 W MAIN ST PO BOX 518 807 W MORSE BLVD STE 101 ASPEN,CO 81611 FAIRFIELD,CT 06824 WINTER PARK,FL 32789-3725 i I HALPERIN ALEXANDRA&BARBARA HAYES MARY E&JAMES L FAM LP LLLP HAYMAN JULES ALAN j 52 LARKSPUR DR 209 E BLEEKER ST 9238 POTOMAC SCHOOL DR CARBONDALE,CO 81623 ASPEN,CO 81611 POTOMAC,MD 20854 j HENRY KRISTEN HY-MOUNTAIN TRANSPORTATION INC IGLEHART SANDRA K 525 W HALLAM ST 214 B AABC 617 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611-1246 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 3 JAS CAPITAL LLC JW616 LLC KARBANK NEIL D 617 W MAIN ST#E 604 W MAIN ST 604 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 KELSO DOUGLAS P LONE EAGLE TRUST LORD KAREN&COURTNEY 627 W MAIN ST 20 ISLAND AVE#1511 631 W BLEEKER ASPEN,CO 81611-1619 MIAMI BEACH,FL 33139 ASPEN,CO 81611 MOLLER DIANE T REVOCABLE TRUST MOUNTAIN RESCUE ASPEN INC MURPHY JULIANNE&WILLIAM R JR REV 5/16/2013 TRUST 342 E FIGUEROA ST 630 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 9833 SHORELINE OR , SANTA BARBARA,CA 93101 LONGMONT,CO 80504 NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP NECHADEIM REALTY LLC NEWBERGER DAVID 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD PO BOX 4950 2905 SAN GABRIEL#218 LOS ANGELES,CA 90048 ASPEN,CO 81612 AUSTIN,TX 78705 NORTH AND SOUTH ASPEN LLC P&L PROPERTIES LLC PARFET DONALD R&ANNE V 200 S ASPEN ST 101 S 3RD ST#360 11000 RIDGEWOOD LN ASPEN,CO 81611 GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 RICHLAND,MI 49083 ttiquettes faciles a peter ? A Repliez a la hachure An de= www.aveiy.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERYID 51600 1 chargement reveler le rebord Pop-upTm I 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 Easy PeelOLabels i A Bend along fine to Q A RY®51fi0� i Use AveryO Template 51600 j feed Paper expose Pop-up EdgeT+^ j j 501 WEST MAIN LLC 604 WEST LLC 605 W BLEEKER LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 604 W MAIN ST 1085 PARK AVE#14 A ASPEN,CO 81611-1818 ASPEN,CO 81611 NEW YORK,NY 10128 ADAM KARL W&VANESSA R ALLEN DOUGLAS P ALPINE BANK ASPEN 706 W MAIN 403 LACET LN ATTN ERIN WIENCEK ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ASPEN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC ASPEN GALENA LLC ASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY 137 WESTVIEW DR PO BOX 5109 620 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC INC BAILEY RYAN TANNER MCKENZIE TRST BERR LLC 617 E COOPER BAKER 611 W MAIN ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ER&HOSTETLER LLP ASPEN,CO 81611 303 E 17TH AVE#1100 DENVER,CO 80203 k BROOKS NORMAN A&LESLEE S BURKE OLSHAN ASPEN PROP LLC CARTER RICHARD P C/O ELK CREEK MGMT 16311 VENTURA BLVD#690 PO BOX 2932 ENCINO,CA 91436 255 LITTLE ELK CREEK AVE TELLURIDE,CO 81435 SNOWMASS,CO 81654-9320 CHRISTIANA ASPEN CONDOMINIUM CHRISTIANA UNIT D101 LLC CITY OF ASPEN OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 795 LAKEVIEW DR ATTN FINANCE DEPT 678 COUNTY RD 127 MIAMI BEACH,FL 33140 130 S GALENA ST GLENWOOD SRPINGS,CO 81601 ASPEN,CO 81611 CLEANER EXPRESS COCHENER CAROLINE A TRUST#5 CORONA VANESSA LOPEZ 435 E MAIN ST 7309 EAST 21ST ST#120 PO BOX 3670 ASPEN,CO 81611 WICHITA,KS 67206 ASPEN,CO 81612 CORTALE ITA COULTER G LYNNIE CUMMINS RICHARD 205 S MILL ST#112 117 N 6TH ST 1280 LITE AVE#10 ' ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DART ELIZABETH RODWELL DESTINATION RESORT MGMT INC DILLON RAY IV 633 W MAIN ST 610 S WESTEND ST PO BOX 10543 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 816112142 ASPEN,CO 81612 DUNSDON S MICHAELE EMERICK SHELLEY W FARR CHARLOTTE BORKENHAGEN DAVID A 2449 5TH ST 306 MCCORMICK AVE W MAIN ST #D AS PEN,CO 81611-1619 BOULDER,CO 80304 CAPITOLA,CA 95010 AS k1cluettes faciles h peter Sens de Repliez 6 la hachure afin de www averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY 5160 j chargement rdv6ler le rebord Pop•uWm j 1-800.60-AVERY 1 Easy Peel®labels A Bend along line to I ® AVERV 87 51600 ., Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edger" PEARSON MARK M&LEES M PERRY EMILY V REVA LLC 702 W MAIN ST 1497 ISABELLA LN PO BOX 1376 ASPEN,CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93108 ASPEN,CO 81612 RODRIGUEZ JOANN RUFUS CAMI CAMI LLC RUSSO NICK A 605 W MAIN ST#OOA 1280 LITE AVE#7 PO BOX 4743 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 SAND CANYON CORP SANDERS BARBARA SCHALL FAMILY TRUST 8/31/1998 ATTN KAREN COGBURN 634 W MAIN ST#8 3841 HAYVENHURST DR 4875 BELFORT RD#430 - ASPEN,CO 81611 - - - ENCINO,CA 91436 JACKSONVILLE,FL 32256 SMITH ANDREW C&DONNA G STERTZER ELYANE THROM DOUGLAS H 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST 605 W MAIN ST 617 W MAIN ST DALLAS,TX 75205 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 TOMS CONDO LLC TUCKER LUCY LEA ULLR CONDO LLC C/O BRANDY FEIGENBAUM PC PO BOX 1480 6450 AVENIDA CRESTA 132 MIDLAND AVE#4 ASPEN,CO 81611 LA JOLLA,CA 92037 BASALT,CO 81621 i ULLR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION UMBA ENTERPRISE LLC VES TRUST 50% 600 E HOPKINS#304 605 W MAIN ST#103 SWEENEY JOHN F TRUST 50% ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 1260 IVANHOE ST DENVER,CO 80220 WAGNER HOLDINGS CORP LLC WENDT ROBERT E II WERLIN LAURA B TRUST CIO BILL POST 81 611 350 MT HOLYOKE AVE 2279 PINE ST ASPEN,CO 81 605E MAIN PACIFIC PALISADES,CA 90272 SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94115 WHIPPLE JOHN TAGGART 121 S GALENA ST ASPEN,CO 81611 i Coquettes faciles 6 peler Repliez 6 la hachure affn de www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 Sens de reveler fe rebord Pop-up"" ' 1-800-GO-AVERY ' ,► chargement � 1 F ' s i N PUt3t1C wolIC Galt tww MIM �,, . .:,s �1 t✓>4� ,�.., as r'' v�. 30 S.`Galena ASPEN O PI"IN 3MMUNITY DEVELOPMr' ' 1"PPARTMENT EXHIBIT .spen, CO 81611 PERMIT APPLICATION 70/920-5090 Ci` 20-5448 Inspection line PITKIN COUNTY ❑ CITY OF ASPEN PERMIT No. Ct016, �? oplicant to complete numbered spaces only. -7j JOB ADDRESS ` fB 1- &0q )D LEGAL I LOT NO. y�op� BLOCK TRACT�jO��R SSUUjBDDIIVISIION (❑SE ATTACHED SHEET) CO- 2. DESC. J� I1,{1 I® DE OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3. I s "� _ 2 j- •� �'l�►� ,J XI n FD CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE SE NO 4. -r�� ��j l9► � �t°GZ try 70 � FN R HITECT ENGINEER OF RICO OD MAIL ADDRESS PHON ENSE NO M H 5. t , � 2.x.35" �,.�►� � f 9 w �c�°� nns DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO 6. RF KS OF WORK ENERGY CODE FEE USE TAX CENSUS CODE G.I.S.FEE 7. W ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑ F—/ pj (!i 8. USE OF BU�DING� d�.. ( PLAN CHECK FEES PERMIT FEE ZONING FEE VALUATION OF WORK QUARE FOOTAGE Type of Co on _ Occupancy Group Lot Area 1, Is there food service in this building ❑YES NO Size of Building No.of Stories Dec.Loa (rota,Square .) 2, Is LPG used? ❑YES ISO' 3416 rl NO.OF BEDROOMS Use Zone D [ ^ Fire Sprinklers RequlredT ❑Yes ❑N 3. Parcel I o IXIS�TING ADDED I ); !` Alarm System Required? ❑Yes ❑No 4. Remarks No.of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES Covered Uncovered njj L co v nv SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE O PARK DEDICATION ENVIRO. HEALTH PR UBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS HECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE (/J� GINEERIN 3 Q BY eY ��ID BY BY PAR O DATE��+ DATE 2" 7IDI DA� DATE O WATER TMARSHAL %CONSOL SAN.DIST� _� e (J NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING,HEATING, OTHER VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 180 DAYS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ❑ MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD 0.5%OF 25%OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AT ISSUANCE. A FINALREPORTONTOTALACTUALCOSTMUST AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED BE FILEDWITHIN9 NALRE ORTONTOTAL COMPLETION F WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT WORK AND/ORISSUANCEOFTHECERTIFICATEPL OCCUPANCY. DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PRO- VISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO ❑ EXEMPT: EXEMPT ORGANIZATION REVIEW THE APPROV D P NS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED RHAT E STRUCTURE AND/OR PROJECT IS BUILT IN ❑ RESALE: STATE&PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. CODES. ANYONE WHO USES AND/OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN S ATUR o,CON o (DATE) PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE 0.5%USE TAX. PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND/OR THE CON- SIGNATURE OF OWNER OF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITH OUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Validation n Deck Validation: Zoning Valid a'on Permit Validation o.5 se Tax Deposit Validation �l , 9 �/� WHITE-FILE COPY CANARY-APPLICANT PINK-BUILDING DEPARTMENT GOLD-ASSESSOR 5 f�► 6 ( uU u)'', !/lee �el i WEST BLEEKER STREET Loci ALL OUTDOOR LIGHTING I Mary A.Avjia F-7--= MUST COMPLY WITH i ��� m Architects,ects,P.C. THE CITY OF AS LIGHTING CODE _ __. __ 50 Rill oaks Lane i 1 SECTION 26.575.150 — — _ _ _ _ _ _ / B(970 Co.7656 (970}927.7656 1 0 mem ME ❑ I � I ISSUE: BRICK WALK 1 I O -- e \ HPG CONCEPTUAL:544-00. K 1 Roop�TEP METAL I \ I B'JILDINb PERMIT:02-06-01 TiH SNoHmeLTED AREA(46 , I SAD. . I A . 3 ®ROOF TO VENTILATE I AD. \ . . . . . . . . AT SOF3:1T ON THIS SIDE I AD. 1 TEAT TAPE E::;S•No . . . . . . . 1 METAL CURER CENTER OF ARC.__1 . . . r.o.sure To BE ROVE WHET nI TO�WT I I I MM WT NOOD SHINSLE ROOFINB I I I M 1 tl •� I I I 12:12 12:12 m I RIDGE VENT 1 I I ry 9C71.16HT I I I I D I I D SI • r.o.sure '� ,n,�. EXISTING 57RWT7JIRE I L.W.9 1 4'3 V4' 3'O' 4'-5 V4' B ADU ROOF P N w In' rq n I I I fl: A23 SCALE: 1/4°=1'-0' —9112 I # — J - _ .2 0 l ! 1�{,�A lu �( q-0 15d' J ` QQQppp. -_ I I TM " \�` •mil j �- I I 9EI ND R.00R DECK / 11 n/ 6'4 5'-II' _ I 933 S.F.SNO T I I Lu IJL S:-5. 'r Y �+ STOR ao /0�„ I // ^ I —A Ili 2�0 EXISTING ,`�'•" <' N1 > SPRrllGE TREE ONE F I B�TM I I IL V A MALL- P TYPICAL BATHROOM T.O.PLY II _ TOBE O I o a� § 9 I S � � u DL❑ I PROVIDE HOOK o q CL05Ef VPS FOR NO iBL°•NT T+ ® — '— — —— ABOVE MZM r e I I STUDIO I ❑ m•ADL.TO Be DEEP °PROJECC: 22� I "Zvmr,TEv TO SMALL d LARGE FRIES KALL ABOVE ANGr- / ALL \ LOT B DEVELOPMENT T I KITCHEN I WYU6HT ABOVE I = wJILDHIG PERMIT Y D r '1 O Asv. 'JOGUI`1ENT9 F`OR 1 //�\ ® ►I I I L J I O '4 SUBMI TTT®AT A �' - ` \s DESCRIPTION: II J I A � I APU PLANS/ELE`VATIONS J sx•.w•.ra Q CF) I ❑ ° — — — — — — I 51-=/ROOF PLAN / SHEET: 1416 V2' T v l`// 5 � 5 In' 5 V2' 24:-0. 9171:101'-0 .ARCHITE6NRAL 101'-0° n r ` ` A ADU FLOOR PLAN ' x sF. �+ C ' CJ 1�o•3 w•� LIFITY'ELI-x2:IT SP. A23 SCALE: 1/4'=I'-O' .LIGH7YiFiL :31 3P. LIGHTYLK•LL / 9EGON4' � �� I /e4 Vi q vi Ce 13 V TOTAL: 'E' ( ❑ LA -womm ---W- - _ . How �4 WAT6+tROOP MmIRAIM ti PLYWOOD yEATHI1,16 CORRWATFD V571 ATION \ ❑ WID 00*6.5 _ C*M6 Rve VENT, r 1 ❑ R-M GATT IWAL'kTION Mary A.Avjian ppRRU6ATeD V5lTILATION ONAI6L3S 1' ° } �°,�h VAPOR BARRIER - TO FUN PARALLH.TO SOISTS AT � 33 .._•„a J 2211 RAFTERS--RFi.51RWT. .. if / APXOr aRVM ROOF 16Nr I� Architects,Ctsa 1—C- PREFRllStED MRAL OF¢:.T: Ix4 WOOD SONS y FLASHING - ._ IT-O'A90.2 GRADE JO Rivec Oaks Lane FETAL 6URER .._ _ - -. __ 1/3 POIM OF ROOF Basalt:co.81621 Conq)06 SOFFIT VEN (970 TS + III'-6" _————_ r.xPUre )927.7656 Iz RS.YIOOD FASGA )Ill.,i',il ( ure• ❑ I'PIA.SOFFIT VENT n�, ,\ \( mw• ISSUE, - 5TUP10 BUILDING PERMIT:02-06-01 . Ix rwo--TIT ALL OUTDO X24 . . . . . . . . . . . MUST COMPLY WITH 4 KITCHEN CLOSET O THE CITY OF ASPEN LIGHTING COD ME o" B2?" SECTION 26.575°150 T. �•-0• . . . . . . . . A ROLLED ASPHALT SIDING it 6ALYANASTElE95 1 BINIDINb PAPER V2'PLYWOAP uFA.THIN6 1 BUILDING SECTION®6ABLE V R 19 BAIT INJSFrAIH A3.2 5GAL6 V4'=1'-O' �t1 VAPOR BARRIER BUILDIN1/SECTION AT$ARREL VAULT A32 SCALE, I/4'=1'-O' HFAD NOTES MARK 2d-- RD. CALT.140, DPER 8r. I� Wsg p41 W/1413W17N cC2449 cslrr A 24 y,'s48 Ya'. A/MUt71�1 , PLYWOOD;6EATHING CC2442 x3 CSMT. ear AIR 5PALE T.O.PLYWO. B 7254s42Yf W4, 59;','x613/16' CDH24261 D.H. Iu1-1l-AlII C MED BYVEUIR — — p9E5B1RE jREATED 2x10 103'_6" '. : D 21 W s SB Y+• I-5101 CC1818 PD® 11'4' JOISTS E l8 ii•s 16 N° ^ t I 518 BEAW-'�• � 1111 ry,.+� pvAL FLA51,11% . CAULK AT E06E5G RI610 ..I I119T.A1I04 '1 2.I REyiiR;TREATED 5WCKIt5 1 KRAFT FA, R-19 BATfS _ L...........- _ = 1„�` J-LJ 2•Rlblp INBRATION(9-10) ..__.. ._.. I1 111 I I P�I.YEXT OR GRADE=AR _ 1 -1 hFrtRPNE OVER I • I I I YRAP 31 � AND AT LEAST r c 57910 6 5EGTION®q:12 ROOF STANDING MM"-AL ROOF 1W. �I�i(114 I _ � A33 SCALE 3!4'•1'-0" HWATERPROOF PLYWOOD ROOF SWATHING -i Ix PJ I,II i ijl j 1 RRIW STRIPS ae 6' It. : O/c,-R.%paPeolut#9TO il' 1 1(�41,1 y � _ ' ? PI-Y• Z RDOF FRAHNb I .u,I"r,} ( '•�" , lal x ,•(!`(. _ I•ETAL FLa5HIN5 CLOFZ - It�, f:, •F:R pbi (� 51%p BY ROOPIN6 MAlL9=. ji .I.;y 11 . M'1 v gam- V 1 OLOSLRE 5TRIP R-35 GATT 10 LATION .. ` . VAPOR BARRIER THIS WALL TO BS M'FICLR - !�• _ RATED 4 ckvv ^ ... 5/6'TYFE'X bl4B. - - ""', - ..• 1 �- I +. i ' �, n "» _ 0 VAPOR BARRER PR R-9 GATT IR91 ATION LARC 5ND5 OPME T 5/g• 'X'6.W8.51EAAVIN6 _ ''_;_+'�_ --- - - _ - P I W LOT B DEVEL BNLDIR6 PAPcR WMWATED WAL 51PN6 ' r —_ t II I1'!Ili K L I�; n�: DESCRIPTION: h7DINi� '.• I i'1 l II ©', I I �$I' /� A.D.0 ELEV'S/SEGTION5 t (/� may; a lI ,1 I' GcALe AS NoTev p YYL,00 5H-J.THI1d5 j ,�11. I I� '� f i a• ❑ NR SPACE .. - j I ° I f I 1 d �1 '-1 I ' , LdL:T� sHEET: PPcs<lJRe TREATC'D 2210 •+ ,•._.��. _ tl t : 1 1 ..,I ?o QV/ . JoGTS leg 1 i ST A3 E'.L.BEAN-RTC. PL T.O. YWD. ... `` 5TRUOTURAL //)) ygppR@g pLP3UR5 STRIP � I . NETPL PIAJrill* , CAULK AT®bey OF RIGID ........ .. -GL�'l•IMP 4�IwX'' ; A OlA/LATION ,��x� . cl 2.PRE`f M TREATED BLOCKINS --. Tir'gT. KRAFT FAED C R-19 BATIS I I I 11-I 1 2' RIP IN5LL4T1ON(R-10) i I I I I VY EXTMOR GRADE CEDAR PLYWOOD yQpp BITU'MFJ+E K5,, a Ovm 57%ZTVOL ^# I L FIB AND AT LEAST 24•LWER WLDIN6 r7 I A3.2 Certificate of Occupancy Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department This certificate issued pursuant to the requirements of the edition of 109 section of the Uniform Building Code. It-certifies that at the date of issuance, the structure as described below was in compliance with the various resolutions and ordinances regulating building construction and use in this jurisdiction. Use Classification: SFR Building Permit: 0610.2001.ash3 Legal Description: SMALL FRIES SUBDIVISION, BLOCK 24, LOT B r Building Address: 609 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN CO 81611 Owner of Building: - E FRIES, INC. Owner Address: 1265 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR ASPEN CO 81611 Group: R-3 " Type of Construction: V-N I i Use Zone: R-6 Description: 340 SQUARE FEET STUDIO APARTMENT INCLUDES, ONE FULL BATH, ONE KITCHEN. Comments & Restrictions: Chief Building Official Dat Note: In all occupancies,except R,this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this C.O.and"subject it to revocation. k ASPEN O PITKIN COMMF INITY DEVELOPMENT DEPART T PERMIT APPLICATION PITKIN COUI ' ❑ CITY OF ASPEN n 130 South Galena 970/920-5526 970/920-5090 DOW DOG. Mou Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-5532 Inspection Line 970/920-5448 Inspection Line PERMIT NO. General Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. Permit J DDRES /+� 1• LEGAL LOT N ' BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION (❑ EE ATTACHED SHEET) CO 2. DESC. DE OWNER MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3.' FD OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT MAILADDRESS .� PHONE LICENSENO FN 4. MH CONTRACTOR MAIL A RESS PHONE LICENSE NO M S RF ARCHITECT OR ENGINEn OF RECORD MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO 6. SN CLASS OF WORK —/ ENERGY CODE FEE USE TAX - CENSUS CODE G.I.S.FEE o 7• ❑NEW ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑ REPAIR h t>G�Ci N �( N /+�' Z USE OF BUILDING SINGLE FAMILY ❑ MULTI-FAMILY PLAN CHECK FEE PERMrrFEE t/ ZONING FEE �( n $• ❑COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL ❑COMMERCIAL ❑OTHER —V;D � �V O VALUATION OF WORK EXISTING SQ.FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area m 9. � ��d� 1 0. THIS PERMIT r —^J, •0 11. Is there food service in this building ❑YES No Rota f Bularen No.of Stories Occ.Load _ Square o 12. Is LPG used? ❑YES NO m _ NQ.OF BEDROOMS �+te Fire Sprinklers Required? ❑Yes dE No 13. Parcel ID#call 920-5160 3 EXISTING I ADDED Alarm system Required? ❑Yes ❑No _ 14. Description of Work r No.of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES ♦ Covered JU SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AyjjjQBIZEDAy D TE I F•'��� ZONING r - C�j H.P.C. PARK DEDICATION ENVIRO. HEALTH PR BMrrTAL APPLICATI ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE ..,��� ENGINEERING 1 BY J BV BY _ BY �7 PARKS I J f9 DA () DATE DATE �• p DAB !!///'��j•Q NATURAL RESOURCES FIRE MARSHAL NOTICE WATER TAP C SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING,HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ASPEN CONSOL SAN.DIST. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS OTHER NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 12 MONTHS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE < MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOV- ERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD.5%OF 25%OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE AT ISSUANCE.A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- AT FILED WITH IN IN DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF STRIN OR T PE F MANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.R IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO WORK AND/OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. REV AP VE NS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEREON AND AT PROJECT IS BUILT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL P S ❑ EXEMPT EXEMPT ORGANIZATION ❑ RESALE: STATE&PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. SI ATURE OF CO o (DATE) ANYONE WHO USES AND/OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE.5%USE TAX. PRINT NAME PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND/OR THE CON- TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Fee Plan Check Fee Zoning Fee GIS Fee Permit Fee REMP Fee Use Tax Deposit Fee Other Fees -�-o 11� `°D ?off. - • � a hJ11- WHITE-FI LICANT / ALLEY 517E 101'-V •ARCHITECTURAL 101'-0" L-- t M oow �D Z n 5MAL. E LARGE FRIE5 -�m Z ry M ° 0 cs1 m v 4 7 ❑ Mary A. Avjian Architects, P.C. 50 Rivet Oaks Lane Basak,Co. 81621 (9703'927-7656 ❑ ❑ ISSUE: , . , . HPG CONCEPTUAL+ 5-24-00 . ®UILDINb PE)ZMIT+ 06-20-00. �UIt171N6 pE.RMIT: 06-23-Q5, IIVI ICI - J4-4--N u JI-J---11 C) Ulu -11 w II- w 4', ❑ ❑ PROJECT: 5MAL. E LARGE FRIE5 LOT 5 DEVELOPMENT m.e.Aa, DESCRIPTION: 51TE/ROOF PLAN ,-142.v4• ❑ ❑ SHEET: 111 . 1 ❑ ❑ o _ - GRM� 1 IUD•_- _ _ ..-.___._ -I -�- , : : DDR - dF Y ,L i 1 _� — •- •. _ •_ - �•`• �T_�� ��� �-_ - _- -_ '1•—_-4. { 1 �Rjrif-� � I - �II - � , x O __ -'_--_ - � —.__—•—_.—---..._.- �--. : : -1—.: --. _ ,SUN 2 3 2005 ASPE Bl!(t.Dl �DEPARTMENT_--•-- AL IlkJr Nr T, • j7 • 4 y 11J, -'- -- - -- t : ooE c MPAJANCE _. -- - - 5 _ LETTER OF COMPLETION City of Aspen Community Development Department Building Permit: 0060.2005.ARBU Owner,of Building,: LORAINNE HERNANDEZ Building Address: 609 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN CO 81611. Group: IRC Type of Construction: V-B ITHE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ABOVE _ DESCRIBED AND PERMITTED PROJECT HAVE BEEN I _ .I INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN 4 _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION AND FINAL INSPECTION THE WORK WAS FOUND L_1 TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE IN THE CITY WITH THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: Q Chief Buildi g Offi al Date Note: In all occupancies,except R,this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate.this letter and subject it to revocation. F 4` fti Av ``ow -\ i i Styr... � ' f �Ar i City of Aspe— General/ Buiy ',*.ng Permit Application 130 South Galena Street,Aspen, Colorado 81611 0007, 2011. 4 K g U THE CITY OF ASPEN Phone (970) 920-5090 Fax(970) 920-5440 PERMIT NO. FAdd Lot Blod< Tract orSubdivision ^ j ( Pel ID(call 920-5160) ionyYIPTl� ,�,r 7► li\0 j�i .2 "[ 0�2 Be ontac ame/Phone/Cell Phone/E-mail V trCt e---t Owner J� Address it �WQ✓ Phone N E-mail S U ie �Q r $ w'3 i- or ofe,,CQ o tf I •CON, Owner's Authorized Agent Phone No. Alternate Phone No. E-mail General Contractor -mail No. E License No. " _f"-723 .sip t- 1011-3 Architect Phone No. Alternate Phone No. E-mail .Q 7 -3Gf-TsJq Description of work: f �" Ca 1a c7S kry v�S G�t Use of Building: Ksingle Family ❑MUlti-Family ❑Commercial/Residential El Commercial ❑Other Class of Work: ❑New ❑Addition 10 Alteration ❑Repair p El move— ❑Tenant Finish El Demo El Other Valuation of Work$ Existing Sq.Ft.of Unit: Sq.Ft.This Permit: Food Service in this Building? 0.00v /•T I Aq*f 4S e-PL I ❑yes K no NOTICE: Separate permits are required for electrical,plumbing or mechanical work.This permit becomes null and void if work or construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days,or if construction or work is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. I hereby certify that I have read and examined this application and know the same to be true and correct. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work will be complied with whether specified herein or not. The granting of a permit does not presume to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of any other state or local law regulating construction or the performance of construction. It is my responsibility to review the approved plans and any comments that are contained thereon and see that the structure and/or project is built in compliance with all applicable codes. USE TAX: The General Contractor or Owner Builder is required to pay a Use Tax Deposit to both the City of Aspen(2.1%,first$100,000 is exempt)and Pitkin County(0.5%,no exemption)on the building permit at the time of issuance. All sub-permits pulled under a building permit are paid by this deposit payment and should not pay use tax. Contractor" nature Print Name Date Owner Signature(if Owner/Builder) Print Name Date Two sets of-a4L*46A drawings and one set of 11"x-17"drawings,drawn to scale,must accompany this application. FOR ONLY Permit Type: BD CO DE FD FN MH MS RF SN LAMS LOCATION# •� Census Cod Occupancy Load Occupant Group Lot Area Zone Di tri�t Deed Restricted No.of Stories No.of Dwellings Type of tru 'on: /7( C_ 6 A p v Alarm System Req. Fire S rinkler Req. Historic Property? HPC Certificate of Appro riateness Presubmittal by: ❑yes no f yes K no yes ❑no ❑yes [no . Size of Building(Total Sq.Ft.) No.of Parking Spaces No.Bedrooms added: No.Bathrooms added: Date: covered: uncovered: APPROVALS Authorized by: Date FEES ✓ Cost FEES Cost Applicafio ce ted by: Zoning P 2 1411 BUILDING FEES ZONING FEES Date: HPC Aspen San.Dist. G.I.S. Plan Chi Engineering City se Tax Date: ty /f � bQ Housing Cash-in-lieu yy Env.Health County Use Tax ` -0,E� Park Impact Approv rJ'suance by: Parks Energy Code Ped.Amenity Fee Date:I h Water Issued by� Eng.Sys.Dev. School Ded. Sanitation Permit Fee Date: ` �SZ TDM Impact All � ( 1 CMP Plan Check t �� Zoning �JD THIS IS A PERMIT ONLY V t WHEN VALIDATED.WORK Fire District REMP Other STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT Other Water Tap Other WILL BE DOUBLE FEE. RECEIPTS PLEASE CALL IN INSPECTION TO(970)920-5448 ;j' 't` /o 13 L�� fi ry�Y"v°`1.ae ;try i 4 a 4 LETTER OF COMPLETION City of Aspen . Community Development Department Building,Permit: 0007.2011.ARBU Owner of Building: MARK SCHWARTZ Building Address: 609 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 Group: IRC Type of Construction: VB INTERIOR REMODEL TO MAIN HOUSE INCLUDING REPLACE CABINETS, PLUMBING FIXTURES,FLOORS, APPLIANCES AND REPAIR TO FLOOD DAMAGED AREAS AND ROOF REPLACEMENT. it( INTERIOR REMODEL TO ADU INCLUDES REPLACE CABINETS, PLUMBING FICTURES,APPLIANCES,AND BOILER. ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR REMODEL TO ADU SIDING AND REPLACEMENT OF l WINDOWS. .A THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED AND PERMITTED PROJECT HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION AND FINAL INSPECTION THE WORK WAS FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH. ZONING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE IN THE CITY WITH THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: Jam ( a Ch' Building Official Date Note: In all occupancies,except R,this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this letter and subject it to revocation. F7 EXHIBIT I - _s-� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS QF PROPERTY. tt MCXV1 Atte L©is O. R_,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: W 04 n.esde_%�r a 6 ,20-13 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, a 11'11 CA IR 41A. (name,please print) being or representing an pplicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that T have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general-circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice,which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the_day of , 20_,to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public heaa-i.n.g. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) 4 _ _ ---- PUBLIC NOTICE ------- -- —� oai nmo ti , PUBLIC NOTICE Date: Wed., Sept. 25, 2013 Time: 5:00 p.m. Place'Council Chambers, City Hall,130 S Galena Aspen Purpose: HPC will conduct Conceptual review of an application by 201 EH Investments LLC owner of this property.Demolition of non-historic areas,basement excavation,on-site relocation of an outbuilding, construction of an addition,a floor area bonus,setback reductions and design variances are proposed For further information contact As e Planning Dept., 970-429-27 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 201 E'A� HYv O(� 3 AvMk''F- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: L � 20 i3 c � _81 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) ID (n4me, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the i d day of ' 20 13, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. �1A Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 21'0000 Signature The foregoing Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this 10 day of e-il 920 3, by 1-laVd ct e- . Toy✓LS MAMA CrTORRES WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC BTATEOFCOLORAW My commission expires: 5la NOTARY ID 20124059580 MYCOMMISSION EVIRES SEPTEMBER 27.2016 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OFMINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. X24--65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 201 E. HYMAN AVENUE- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, DEMOLITION,ON-SITE RELOCATION AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 25, 2013, at a regular meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission,in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 201 EH Investments LLC, P.O. Box 7928, Aspen, CO 81612, owner of the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3'd of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-124-73-001. The applicant requests HPC approval to demolish non-historic portions of the existing house and outbuilding, to relocate the outbuilding on the site, to temporarily lift the historic house for a new basement, and to construct a new addition. The applicant requests a 500 square foot floor area bonus. The following setback variances are requested: a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' for the historic house; a 4' west sideyard reduction for a lightwell, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the outbuilding. A waiver of the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to line" and lightwells are proposed. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.guthrie @cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Mavtin Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on September 5,2013 City of Aspen Account SB PAD HOLDINGS III LLC SCULL JAMES E SHAW ROBERT W 6262 S ROUTE 83#200 PO BOX 2051 5720 LOCKE AV WILLOWBROOK, IL 60527 ASPEN, CO 81612 FORT WORTH, TX 76107 SHENNAN MELISSA A SIMPSON JANET MARIE SIX STONES LLC 822 LANE LORRAINE 233 E COOPER AVE#205 PO BOX 626 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045-1643 ASPEN, CO 81611 PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 SMITH FRANK FORD JR&KATHARINE STETSON WILLIS J JR&SALLY W STITT ELIZABETH WILES IRREV TRUST LINDSAY 23 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR 1450 SILVERKING DR 2506 STRATFORD DR NEWTOWN SQUARE, PA 19073 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN,TX 78746 SULLIVAN JOHN B TRUST SUNNY SNOW LTD TOMLINSON JAMES 1300 E REUSCH RD PACE KENT STACEY ELIZABETH,IL 61028 308 TORCIDO DR 100 E COOPER AVE#2 SAN ANTONIO,TX 782095645 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRENTLY TRUST TRUE JAMES R VANOVER STEFANIE KAI C/O WRW CO PO BOX 2864 333 NE MIZNER BLVD TN-4 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 ASPEN, CO 81612 BOCA RATON, FL 33432 ENCINO, CA 91436 VORTEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50% WALSH WILLIAM LLOYD WEINGLASS LEONARD 3336 EAST 32ND ST#217 120 WEST THIRD ST SUITE#400 PO BOX 11509 TULSA, OK 74135 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 ASPEN, CO 81612 WHITE JALEH WHITMAN WENDALIN WHITMAN WENDALIN 152 E DURANT AVE 210 E HYMAN AVE#101 PO BOX 472 ASPEN, CO 81611-1737 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WICHMANN VICTORIA WILTGEN JOHN&KATIE HONE WINFIELD ARMS CONDO ASSOC 119 E COOPER ST#4 130 E WAYNE ST 600 E HOPKINS AVE#203 ASPEN, CO 81611 CELINA,OH 45822 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOLOFSKY MOIRA WOLPERT BILL H&WOLPERT JUDE YOUNG BARBARA A PO BOX 1026 2280 KOHLER DR 210 E HYMAN AVE#9 PALM BEACH, FL 33480 BOULDER, CO 80305 ASPEN, CO 81611 MOP LLC MORRONGIELLO LYDIA A NELSON ARLENE 5348 VEGAS DR 1178 HICKORY WY 119 E COOPER ST#6 LAS VEGAS, NV 89108 ERIE, CO 805167994 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWMAN KERRY J&RICKI R NORRIS JOAN NORTH&SOUTH ASPEN LLC 617 PRINCE DR PO BOX 12358 200 S ASPEN ST NEWBURGH, IN 47630 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBRIEN MAUREEN OFM HOLDINGS LP ORR ROBERT L 1370 MAIN ST PO BOX 541208 2700 G ROAD#12A CARBONDALE,-CO 81823 DALLAS, TX 75354 - - - - GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81506 PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC PARKER RICHARD C&KAREN S PAY ERIC GEOFFREY 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 3029 BAKER MEADOW SE 119 E COOPER AVE APT 12 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30339 ASPEN, CO 81611-1772 PAY-ASE PROPERTIES LLC PENTHOUSE ONE&TWO LLC PEONY LLC 2200 ROSS AVE#3838 PO BOX 11980 121 BARRANCA AVE DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93109 PERREAULT GEORGE C TRUST PITNER N KATHRYN POPKIN PHILIP G 7336 CAPTAIN KIDD AVE PO BOX 11930 PO BOX 7956 SARASOTA, FL 34231-5442 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PRASAD REV TRUST PRODINGER IRMA PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS 3776 W 3700 N PO BOX 1245 ASSOC DARLINGTON, ID 83255 ASPEN, CO 81612 301 E HYMAN AVE#108 ASPEN, CO 81611 PURVIS ROBERT K TRUST RACZAK JOSEPH S&JANET L RASMUSSEN DA_VID_L&RITA M PO BOX 3089 - - - - 0234 LIGHT HILL RD PO BOX 120262 ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ARLINGTON,TX 76012 RIVOLI INVESTMENTS LLC RLC ASPEN LLC ROMER MARCY&FRANK L 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FLR 12500 PARK POTOMAC AVE#207N 10204 E SHERI LN ASPEN, CO 81611 POTOMAC, MD 20854 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ROSENFELD EUGENE S&MAXINE M ROSSI ELAYNE R TRUST RUMSEY DANIEL W TRST PO BOX 7961 1325 PACIFIC HIGHWAY#1902 10601 WILSHIRE BLVD#20 EAST ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN DIEGO,CA 92101 LOS ANGELES,CA 90024 HOLYOAKE LAURENCE M&COX HONE THOMAS A&CAROL A HOSKIN REEDE HEATHER J 130 E WAYNE ST PO BOX 2478 555 E DURANT#4A CELINA,OH 45822 BASALT, CO 81621-2478 ASPEN, CO 81611 IFTNFS LLC JACARANDA ASPEN LLC JACKSON BISQUE 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR PO BOX 11980 PO BOX 9064 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 JACOBSON FAMILY TRUST JCS GARMISCH LLC JMS LLC 2168 SANTA MARGARITA DR PO BOX 11636 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR FALLBROOK, CA 92028 ALEXANDRIA, LA 71315 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C&SANDRA K JONES MICHAEL C KAISER HARRIS FAMILY TRUST 51 OVERLOOK DR PO BOX 7966 12942 CHALON RD ASPEN, CO 81611-1008 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 KAMINER NINA KAUFMAN STEVEN TRUST&HARLOW KEBER VINCENT M III 25 BROAD ST/TSF VIRGINIA TRUST 1301 WAZEE#2E NEW YORK, NY 10004 0554 ESCALANTE DENVER, CO 80204 CARBONDALE,CO 81623 KEITH JOHN III KELLY GARY KIRIANOFF PATRICIA TRUST PO BOX 4783 PO BOX 12356 PO BOX 1749 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 KNAPP MICHAEL LARKIN FRED C SPOUSAL TRUST LARRABEE DONALD C JR 1001 MEDICAL PK STE 213 ONE COVE LN 1417 POTTER DR STE 105 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BOW MAR,CO 80123 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909 LEATHERMAN ROBERT D LEDINGHAM DAVID CHARLES 16% LIMELITE REDEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 11930 124 E COOPER ST CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 C/O GENERAL MANAGEMENT 1201 GALAPAGO ST#101 DENVER, CO 80204 LOFINO MICHAEL D LORING PETER&ELIZABETH S LUBIN SHAFIGHEH 3255 SEAJAY DR LORING WOLCOTT&COOLIDGE OFFICE PO BOX 3748 DAYTON,OH 45430 230 CONGRESS ST ASPEN, CO 81612 BOSTON, MA 02110 MACDONALD VALERIE MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D MESSNER CHRISTIAN PO BOX 1681 0752 MEADOWOOD DR 119 E COOPER AVE#21 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP CRYSTAL PALACE ACQUSITIONS LLC DALTON CHARLES O IRREV TRUST 50% PO BOX 1524 2100 E MAPLE RD, STE 200 1031 S CALDWELL ST#200 BRYN MAWR, PA 19010 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 DAVIDSON DONALD W DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED DB ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 864 CEMETERY LN 215 S MONARCH#104 3400 N CAUSEWAY BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 METAIRIE, LA 70002 DE SOTO LINDA JANE LIV TRUST DOLLE NORMA L REV TRUST DUNN DAVID&POLLY 1209 MANHATTAN AVE#130 1103 HERITAGE DR 611 S UPPER BROADWAY MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 DUNTON KAY L TRUST DUPLEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50% ELLIOTT ELYSE A TRUST 210 E HYMAN AVE#7 10601 N PENNSYLVANIA AVE 610 NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 816112012 OKLAHOMA CITY,OK 73120 ASPEN, CO 81611 FEDER HAROLD L&ZETTA F FREDRICK LARRY D FTG ASPEN LLC 985 CASCADE AVE ROBERTS JANET A 6735 TELEGRAPH RD#110 BOULDER, CO 80302-7550 215 S MONARCH ST#6101 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301-3141 ASPEN, CO 81611 FUQUA ALVAH D JR&DIANNE L FYRWALD JON ERIK&GUDRUN L GEORGIEFF KATHERINE TRUSTEE 446 LAKE SHORE DR 126 EAST HICKORY ST 11 TOPPING LN SUNSET BEACH, NC 28468 HINSDALE, IL 60521 ST LOUIS, MO 63131 GIEFER PATRICK GLISMANN JOHN P GOODING RICHARD L 204 SARATOGA VEIN CT PO BOX 4999 4800 S HOLLY ST CASTLE PINE, CO 80108 ASPEN, CO 81612 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 GOOLSBY BRYAN L&MICHELLE L GORDON BRIAN S GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC 6722 WAGGONER 26985 CRESTWOOD C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC DALLAS, TX 75230 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 215 S MONARCH ST#101 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSS MONARCH LLC GUBSER NICHOLAS J GUNION JOHN F PO BOX 3377 PO BOX 870 1004 MARINA CIR BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 DAVIS,CA 95616 GUTNER KENNETH H REV TRUST HART GEORGE DAVID&SARAH C HERRON SANDRA A PO BOX 11001 PO BOX 5491 119 E COOPER AVE APT 19 ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611-1761 PO BOX 1248 u.u1°/0 GWYNA ASPEN, CO 81612 530 E MAIN ST#001 2001 SHAWNEE MISSION PKY ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66205 BARNES JACK&BONITA BARRETT STEVEN R BERNSTEIN JEREMY M PROFIT 125 E HYMAN AVE 2A C/O JP WEIGAND&SONS INC SHARING PLAN ASPEN, CO 81611 150 N MARKET 610 NORTH ST WICHITA, KS 67202 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLOEMINK BARBARA BOGIN ROBERT M BOND ANN 210 E HYMAN AVE#5 4280 S MEADOW BROOK LN 210 E HYMAN#6 ASPEN, CO 81611 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRAYMAN WALTER W&PATRICIA BRINING ROBERT BROADSCOPE PTY LTD 844 ROCKWELL LN 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 CATLOW TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2363 ASPEN, CO 81611 223 RIVERTON DR SHELLEY AUSTRALIA 6148, BROWN SHANE&KRISTINE BUSH ALAN DAVID CALLAHAN PATRICIA 3334 LA CIENEGA PL 0046 HEATHER LN 0184 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR LOS ANGELES, CA 900163117 ASPEN, CO 81611-3342 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARRIGAN RICHARD A JR CASA KESS LLC CAYTON ANDREA TRUST 25526 WILLIAMS RD PO BOX 3121 2379 EARLS CT WARRENVILLE, IL 60555 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 CHALET LISL PARTNERSHIP LTD CHRISPAT ASPEN LLC CITY OF ASPEN 100 E HYMAN AVE 1107 5TH AVE#35 ATTN FINANCE DEPT ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10128 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CLARK FAMILY TRUST CLARKS ASPEN LLC CLAUSEN FAMILY TRUST NO 1 PO BOX 362 818 SOUTH MAIN ST C/O GUNDY MGMT CO ASPEN, CO 81612 BLANDING, UT 84511 PO BOX 47 MORRIS, IL 60450 COHEN JACK DAVID COHN PETER L COOPER TWO LLC 5 WOODLAND CT PO BOX 2138 950 HILL RD SAYVILLE, NY 11782 ASPEN, CO 81612 WINNETKA, IL 60093 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC 306 S GARMISCH TOWNHOMES CONDO AJAX KABIN LLC 215 S MONARCH SUITE 104 C/O WRW&CO 25 BROAD ST APT TSF ASPEN, CO 81611 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 NEW YORK, NY 10004 ENCINO, CA 91436 ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTH ATTERBURY ANDREW L&PRENTICE