Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
resolution.hpc.027-2013
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AMENDING HPC RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2013 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION#27, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects has requested an amendment to the Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval granted by the adoption of HPC Resolution 45, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, the property is a designated landmark pursuant to City Council Ordinance #10, Series of 2013 adopted on May 13, 2013; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, and approved HPC Resolution 45, Series of 2013 by a vote of 4 to 1; and RECEPTION#: 604072, 09/26/2013 at 12:40:47 PM, 1 OF 6, R $36.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report to HPC dated September 11, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended that HPC approve the amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants an amendment to HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The elevations attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution are hereby conceptually approved. The window and door changes and the landscape changes are subject to review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews. 2. The increased size of the southwestern deck is to be restudied for Final Review. 3. The following conditions of approval that are part of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 are satisfied: a. Condition #5: "For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fagade of the building." b. Condition #6: "For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors." c. Condition#7: "For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck." 4. The applicant shall submit a design for screening the mechanical equipment for review and approval during Final Major Development review. 5. The applicant shall submit more detailed information regarding the proposed planter boxes and landscaping for review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews 6. Conditions #1 to 4 and #8 of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 remain valid. 7. The Commercial Space represented on the second floor and illustrated in Exhibit A to the Resolution is not permitted to be used as residential space without a Land Use approval to convert the use. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of September, 2013. CliiLsPaemLber, V Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved amended elevations and plans. 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 1 e Z O . N E-- L-f ®J L 1. lA 0H 1T CE CTS ALLEY '=� P.O. C O 12 _ WI//:ZM'E NrtEC1eGGA _t__ __i �am.e< ❑❑ .� - 1�1. _—_ I am.v<aymrtrvsrrur � I M .._ '"?.:S". +.«o.<w.w-•O I W Gw ° *lu Lu 0> = LLI — y� Z 11 , �vuAnwo .m.�.aw.e N 1 N m i CD f '� aY aE.„sloa: w,E \`_ •EAST HYMAN AVENUE AMENCED CONCEPTUAL �K REV,, ! PROPOSED SITE PLAN a j PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLA 02 PROPOSED SITE/fl 1 BASEMENT LEVEL PLANS a A300 j: �i Z O N E - __ --- _ - .:F` .,.imwrvo-r nuae �.aw.oweur,c.o...awc.roro ARCH Ii eE C T 8 P.O. Ro% —.. LU W ILI .,a a Li J Z' Z 0 3 /OZ PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION ¢=N 0 } ZQZ CWW J.6 F— m tO a U) m� f lo f u UJI------------ ________________ ________ N -- - -- -- —'-----'--- -- - - -----'------- y CO —.— -' --' � I el �� M-0 ; � I F 6 am i7- --T -- - 4ikePs.�a m a I � ----- \- AMENOEO CONGEPNAI i ----- ----- 3 � PROPOSED ¢ ELEVATIONS O,� PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION!SECTION �r A304 a I! I g ® _ O vovm.-vaceu ARCHiT ECTS --- - —-— — --- O. BOX 2508 a.ma,m AP S-.-- —.— --.— — __. - 1+�,o,YOFC ©«r,wn„•..<, ZONE.UICO 81612 --------- — ------ ---- — 3 irz lllill li! �1 111111 Y 3 u> �Z, _ —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — =— o t F z IL>� PROPOSED NORTi1 ELEVATION a Q= { z ow 1 2 oww �roa 7yN i W � f ________ _ ___ ______________ CD I lid =1- - Elm- ® ,111P11[II( I 1 LI - �I T'' - � - i�. I iI� Itll�i L- II L—.II -- � �.? — — � I��'-- I - �-�--�il; ,.,.a•...a.,.. �F T I ------' --------- <.nrw o,�ua MIEN NCEPTUPL j� «� 4E _ yS 1 �REVIE --------�—'------- —�- PROPOSED X11 E ELEVATIONS j{ 3 �� PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A305 {§ a � 9s 8: