The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1490 Red Butte Dr.A039-01-~~- 2735-013-02-004 A039-01 - 1490 Red Butte stream Margin Review- DRAC Sll A A/Al ED 1 S 1 *R 0 PANEEL ID: |2735-013-02004 DATERCVD: |4/17/01 # COPIES:~ -- USE NO|A039-01 CASE NAME:~1490 Red Butte Stream Margin Review and DRAC PLNR:| PROJ ADDR:|1490 Red Butte Drive CASE TYP:|Stream Margin Review, DRAC STEPS:] OWN/APP: Mari, Brown ~ ADR~34 Nassau Drive Cls[ZA ~New Orleans/LA PHN:~(561)276-4266 REP:~Galambos Architects ADR:|300 D AABC C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81612 PHN1429-2816 FEES DUE:~ 1205 D 180 E FEES RCV[)11385 STAT: ~--- REFERRALS~ REF:| r BY~ DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| PZ: BOA: CLOSED:~ BY: | DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 'D,LAT ,~$*,1,/4 1:00'Palc,6. Applicant: #IARK 'bow 4 4- 14%*t Location: Zone District: A- 30 Lot Size: 30,00(# 4 Â·9 Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NA Proposed: Number ofresidential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: ~ Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3, proposed: 5- Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: NAÂ· Allowable: @,5927 Proposed: 4,979 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 14'-00 Allowable: 16'-00 Proposed: 35'.o#, Access. bldg. height: Existing: VA- Allowable: NN Proposed: 0 k On-Site parking: Existing: 3 Required: 5 Proposed: 5 % Site coverage: Existing: t* Required: Rk Proposed: Alr % Open Space: Existing: Uk Required: NA Proposed: P k Front Setback: Existing: 14[ Required: W 4 Proposed: NA Rear Setback: Existing: Nk Required: M A proposed: d k Combined F/R: Existing: Nk Required: 14 R Proposed: pl A Side Setback: Existing: dk Required: NA Proposed: NA- Side Setback: Existing. NA Required: Nk Proposed: NA Combined Sides: Existing: #A- Required: Nk Proposed: tik Existing non-conformities or encroachments: NA Variations requested: C,/Fl-gotioN / pot/11042 - CALDE 47Â®60@ .pod,<- 1 \Ac,â€¢w.6 +01-1,/1*W 4-12- Â¥612~1~ ND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 912*rE 1%Â©u,j 'R0Â£>00.te . .tt , g.f~ pED Location: 1910 ta> 'Burtâ‚¬ 1?g,*Ct@ i Lar 2 . flocK l x Ket> D.>Tre 40+D*/ Ii,od (Indicate street address. lot & block num6er, legal description where appropriafe) 4/Ul loP=N j el 1 411Â¥ r UARUNITÂ¥ DEVELOPMENT APPUCANT: Name: 0|ALE '4*'r| f 91-Ele: 81Â£(dr Address: 34. 1 fekÂ»* _*Ky .. . 5 N.ELQELE"15 , LA Phone #: (TW) 274 - 0 44 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: *Al,7906 Ag,art/26 #Ic Address: 7*o b Apl*, Phone #: ~*A/* AgeREA,TR,1156 lo Wi OM flvok# TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use I Conceptual PUD 0 Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review E Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) C Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal D Conceptual SPA El Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment E Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) m Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption D Subdivision Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream C Subdivision Exemption (includes E Small Lodge Conversion/ Margin. Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane El Lot Split Il Temporary Use 0 Other: 7 Lot Line Adjustment C Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals, etc.) 4(A41* 4,416.1 .Rat'llk'- PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings. uses. modifications, etc.) -9*tournd oF- bug-,At Â·h'* 4 GA-e).00.1 01; pe.b 4,*g 8.lut-1 \ RA, DWEÂ® 6#*,1/~-(4(6 1 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S E Pre-Application Conference Summary 3 Attachment #1. Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form El Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents D Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents E Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application [slu L] 1Â«U U MAR-09-2001 FRI 11:28 AM FAX NO. P, 02 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: James Lindt 920.5441 DATE: 3/9/01 PROJECT: 1470 Rcd Butte Drive REPRESENTATVVE: Rich Paveek OWNER: TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1Slep.Streain Margin Review DESCRIPTION: Proposing to demolition an existing residence and building a new residence on property adjacent to the river. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review. Review by: Staff for complete application, referral agencies for technical considerations, Planning and Zoning Commission for Approval determination. Public 1Â·Icaring: No. Referral Agencies: Engineering Planning Fees: Planning Deposit 04* Referral Agency Fees: Engineering Referral *~R Total Deposit: Si,0 k /505 + 1 90:al'D'Mil To apply, submit the following information: Total Deposit for revicw of application. Applicant's name, address and tclephooÂ¢ numbur, contained within a leller signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative nuthoriwd to act on behalf of the applicant Signed fee Agreement. PrcÂ·ar}plication Conference Summoly, A site improvement survey wl Topogrophy. An 8 1/r x 11"vicinity mlip jocaring the subject parcels wit!1 In the City of Aspen. A written description oflhc proposal and n wrillen explanation of how o proposed development complici with the review standards relevant to the development aprlication. A copy of the recorded doculnents which affacts the proposed dcvclopinent. /Â¢ Proof of ownership. /TO. Additional materialg as required by spacilie review. Picascrefer tolhÂ© application packet for specific submittal requircment; or to the code seclions noted above. 11. 10 .Copies of the complete application packc[ (itcms 2-10) 10 - Ill(n (3 * 609) 31 50 PrOCe.1At Apply. ]'|amiÂ¢r reviews case for completeness and sends to Engineering for referral comments. CsÂ¢ Planner take to staff mccling for recommendalion. Case planner wriles memoofrccommendalion tothe I'lannii,& lind Zoning Commission. Planning and Zoning Commission makes final detenninalion on application. Disclaimer; The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the Alture, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The suinmary does not create a legal or vested right. 0 U>Â» a- Apr 16 01 05:13p Bri -Brown New Orleans 5048280328 p.2 ' Apr-16. 2001 3.0?PM No.0153 P 3/3 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Payment of CRY of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and '1*k _9*wi 4 *1 1* PgAT (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS. 1 APPLICANT has submirred to CITY an application for 5,1,r l 128.A -?001Â»,Ar~ - (hereinafter. THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees rhar City of Aspen Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 1999) establishes a fcc snucturc for Land Use applications and the payment or all processing fees is 3 condition precedent to a determinarion of application complereness. J, APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size. nanire or scope of tile proposed Droject. 11 is noI possible at this time to ascertain -he full extent of the costs involved in processing {he application. APPLICANT and CITY fur[her agree thar i[ 8 in ihc inicrest or- the parties rhat APPLIC.\MT make payment oi an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs [o be billed co APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by rcraining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notificanon by the CITY when they are necessary as costs art incurred. CITY agrees k will be banefired through the greater e:rtainry of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S applicarion. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree rhat ir h Impratticable for CITY sroff ro complcte processing or present sufficien[ intormalion zo the Planning Cornmission and/or Ciry Council ro anable the Plarming Commission and/or City Council co make legally required finding, for project consideration. unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. Theretore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver or irs right zo collect full feeS prior to a def9nination of applicition comple=ness. APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposir in the amount ot-3 43Â¢35. P~which !5 tor . hours of Community Development suff :ime. and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay addirional monthly billings zo CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the applicarion mentioned :tbove. including post 3ppr{wai review. Such periodic payments shall be made wirhin 30 days of rhe billing date. APPLICANT further agrees thai failure to pay such accrued cosrs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and in no case will building permics be issued until all costs assocrued with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT b.. Â©G- 30 =>Â»r- By: UALL &18%7 404 /Fiv- 445â€¢ Ann Woods diâ€¢fier 44 15|Di lommunity Development Director Date: Mailing Address: 34- NAss 6-v pe - pOo OR. Le Prt, 5 LA loo OY g:\suppon\forms\Agrpayas.doc 13/37/99 ~ Apr 16 01 05: 13p Bri-- 'Brown New Orleans 5048280328 P.1 ~ i Apr.'16. 2001 3:D?PM No.0153 P- 2/3 April 16, 2001 Mark Brown & Stem Brint 3515 South Ocean Blvd. Highland Beach, FL 33487-3301 561-276-4266 To Whom It May Concern. As the Owner of the parcel located at 1490 Red Butte Drive, I authorize John Galambos of Galambos Architects Inc., located at 300 D AABC (970-429-1286). to aet on my behalf with regards to this property. Sincerely, Mark Brown Steve Brint A u/ VurufA I V-LUM APR. 13.2001 2:34PM PITK TAI COUNTY TITLE NO. 8240 P 2 COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE , /1 _ SCHEDULE A 310 (DIG 1. Effective Date: At90*26Â·,4999--atÂ·+30Â·AM Case No. PCT14592C3 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 2,300,000.00 Premium$ 2,180.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Re-Issue STEPHEN F. BRINT and MARK BROWN (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 0,00 Premium$ 100.00 Proposed Insured: Rate: Companion Tax Certificate: $10.00 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: STEPHEN F, BRINT AND MARK BROWN 4, The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION, According to the Plat thereof recorded September 16, 1960 in Ditch Book 2A at Page 259, PITK1N COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN. CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-913-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT \\ S r- \\ 0\ ----2-_~ \1 ~) 0 6 \ g - -1 px j) ~ - 1 / ff/ \1\illl% 4 44 Ao, N \ / --3 \ 3-4-0.\ ~ i -1 It ~ c-7 1 u .;1 - //-- ,\.1, \\ 1\ \ 14% 1 Â¢11 i J\ %\ 1\ \ if f /h\\ ~ 3- * 1 . 1 0 4 i - c jill# 311 \ 6 1 ( 00 177----- *ir 11 f - /90 I 0 \\\) W 00Â»09 N 0 < /- '91\0 \4 11~ 0 0 . 4, 7< N. 0 1 Â«3 4 1 Â» , h\ 90'Â¥4 44Â£ 4 092 : 02 N F. 1 -N .. 5 gku. W d W W E 1,82 flow rry Mu 1 - 5 rte l.001?41 S!999__ a %0 04 gomiÂ· ~*' C %32 I ' 1\ - 4=Onti.,6 2 p ' ~ . ~ gi WE.t.3 .. . ir, . ...1 , . 0, 4402, 0 Â· : - -1 - .. von Creek Â¢ 4 Â»a<Â£7 gy . i h. .: ; , 7,A I - ~ .11.-- . Â·Â· f.Â·eÂ·Â·.Â·. 0 2*WN" , 1 1.-:-â€ž11 - Â·43* i '. 1 '~ . I - ~ :. .Â· -' Â·-Ul'rÂ·, 4 11 1~1-1 1 .., - . '-:r: ./.0.-!'19 ~'/' '; Â·74 '.' '12 11 . : '., 2 9 ' i. -1. ' I r. '.''i.' ': - ' ' ' ' . ' ' . ' . C ' ' ' ~ . ' '/'~., 0 1 ''*:~ 4; .,~1:il P''~ %9*h /2. -)'lsÂ»244':*:404Â·~1~ t ' ''. , e # .': I. d - -F 54 , 4 P + i.. i.ijw..7.N :. Plum . .: - 9.82 v~ly 11i . 1.11 1 .|e i. '. . j>. .fi:Â·?.i A ~ R e "' '' A;M,tll ':--Â·t - 1 .*4 ..4 9. ': 4 2//'' I - 3 tu=,0,822,2.*r r... e :~ 5.11 " : '. .."z 0 ~ â‚¬ 7,2 z~:c . ' , ... . .1 ..?'::.. : 73'. -1 718. U. Â· 4. 1.,9 9 # '. or Fei 4. t.,t:f. , 1/k I. 4 1. :1 , ..9. -96 n A 1, -a " ATTACHMENT 4 REVIEW STANDARDS: STREAM MARGIN REVIEW A. There is no development in the floodway for the proposed development. B. The proposed development is within one hundred feet of the Roaring Fork River. The development complies with all of the criteria listed below: 1. There is no development within the Special Flood Hazard Area. 2. There is no trail located on the parcel. 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented to the greatest extent possible. . 4. There is no vegetation to be removed or disturbed outside the building envelope. \ 5. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river. tv property. There will be no alteration of any water course located within the 7. There will be no alteration of any water course located within the property. ' 8. There is no work being done within the one hundred year floodplain. 1 9. There is no development being done within the required 15 feet from the top of slope. , 10. All development is outside the 15 foot setback from the top of slope and does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. 11. A landscape plan is submitted. 12. All exterior lighting complies with all design criteria. 13. Site sections have been drawn by a licensed engineer. 14. There are no wetlands located on the parcel. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: %,AAT ~ %*Ud te,%)aloi 1 - Applicant: #lAu '11,4wd 4 4Mw& '4(Bt Location: Zone District: A- 30 Lot Size: 30,0 * 4 Â·E Lot Area: 1/2 30 , 05* 5'F. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: NA Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: 1 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3, Proposed: Proposed % o f demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: NAÂ· Allowable: @,1093 Proposed: 4,979 Pdneipal bldg. he*W. Existing: 14'-00 Allowable: 16'-00 Proposed: 35'.o#, Access. bldg. height: Existing: WAÂ· Allowable: NR Proposed: 14 k On-Site parking: Existing: 3 Required: 5 Proposed: 5 % Site coverage: Existing: 1* Required: Mk Proposed: 14/r % Open Space: Existing: Uk- Required: NA Proposed: PA- Front Setback: Existing: Nk Required: W â‚¬ Proposed: g A Rear Setback: Existing: #A- Required: A A Proposed: d A- Combined F/R: Existing: Nk Required: 14 R Proposed: 14 h Side Setback: Existing: t#- Required: NA Proposed: NA- Side Setback: Existing: M& Required: Nk Proposed: NK Combined Sides: Existing: (#r Required: Nk Proposed: NAL Existing non-conformities or encroachments: NA Variations requested: WFL,50170/4 / poâ‚¬-TUE - 1/1095 47*'fa Pod,â‚¬- j V 0 w + 5 17â€¢twe@W 8 - A-- Â¥â‚¬gr ATTACHMENT 4 DRAC SUBMISSION FOR VARIANCE 1. The requested variance for inflection is due to the natural slope of the site. The adj acent property contains a one story volume on the west side of the adj acent property. The proposed design contains a form that is one story at the front of the structure and the natural slope of the hill exposes the structure and it slopes from a one story element to a two story element. The natural slope of grade is the reason for this variance. Disturbing the grade to meet the criteria for inflection is not a desirable solution for this situation. 2. The requested variance for the double wide garage door is for practical purposes. The door provides easier vehicular access and is designed to appear as two single stall garage doors. Also, the garage is side loaded with respect to the street. This will prevent the door from being viewed directly from the street fagade and will lessen the impact that the door has when viewed from the street. 3. The requested variance for windows located between 9-12 feet is for purpose of design. Since the proposed structure is reacting to the natural slope of the hill, the design has a split level appearance from the street fagade. This approach led to the window locations and helps balance the overall appearance of the street fagade. Without the windows in the proposed locations the design would appear too tall and out of balance when viewed from the street. ATTACHMENT 5 REVIEW STANDARDS B. The proposed design more effectively addresses the issue or problem a given standard or provision responds to. The variances being requested all address the problem a given standard responds to. The variance for inflection is needed due to the natural slope of the site. As drawn, the design appears to meet the criteria for inflection when viewed directly from the street. It is only when the proposed design is viewed from the side that the structure begins to appear as a two story element due to the natural slope of the grade. The design of the double stall garage door appears as two single stall doors, even though it is a double wide door. Since the garage is side loaded, the design of the door and it being perpendicular to the street both design criteria lessen the impact of the door when viewed from the street. The windows that are located between 9-12 feet address the purpose of the standard because they are located on a spilt level that changes their actual height above grade. Since the design incorporates a split level design, the windows do not appear in the same location from the exterior as they would if they were in violation on a different structure. The split level allows the windows to look as if they are in accordance with the standard because they are in the correct proportion with the massing of the structure. Jul 17, 2001 10:54AM No.0872 21 1/4 1-RECEIVED ~ ~ JUL 17 2001 | i i r n â€¢, ENGINEER ~ G FAX TRANSMITTAL GALAMBOS ARC M#TECTS INC. 70: Richard Goulding - City of Aspen Engineering Department FROM: Rich Paveek DATE: July 17, 2001 FAX #: 920-5081 RE: 1490 Red Butte Drive PAGES: 4 (incl. cover sheet) Richard, Attached are the drawings that you requested concerning 1490 Red Butte Drive. If there are any questions or you need anything further please contact mc. Thank you, Rich Pavcck Galambos Architects Inc. 300 AABC Unit D- Aspen, Colorado 81611 01 970,429,1286 I fax 970,429.1296 e-mail gainc@galambosarchi[eas.net Jul.17. 2001 10;54AM No.0872 P 2/4 1 1 * 1 1 1 1.- 1 F .4 - 1 \TO j m ill, *-1 #--,/\ .- 4 . 11 - .0 116 NU./. '1-\ u i 7- /4 - - ~ 1 l) --6- ~ - , -\ 1 '1\ ,- 1-\ ' 1 1 --I * 1 t / \â€¢ -/-17.022 1 /-1-d.-- ULL r-4-3- --l==:2===23Â»2~.,- 1-------1--*-7 - -""-'"--"-46711'U-3.tv?,\- 36-'3~03 L hj3./\Rd >1610.3 \9141*VOW \ 3. 8046Â· l9 s i 1 1 1 1 . Â£ t â€¢ t 1 1 , ; , \R \0 \R \21 1 foo ,- 11 I CLARIFICATION C 1.0 BRINT/BROWN RESIDENCE 12#A~(F ISSUED. 1490 RED BUTTE DRIVE 7- 174 Err: =.26*Paa i.1 RLP 3~t@Elitiral=-3 BALAMBOS "CMITICTS INC BLDa 200 D, AABC, AjpeN, CO .1611 (070) 429-1286 - FAX, (070) 420-1 288 NY-14 3119 -1911>192 NOTE: COO YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY 8 9 INFORMATION BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED - 3, BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS O 0 DATED 4/12/2001.ARCHITECT ASSUMES INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SURVEYOR 16 ACCURATE. f] ' .7 ic. 786 1.0 C> 143 E . I 'Â«0 0 ~i U) W '.,0 4, /L I../P :..3 014 [Eli ''j LL 38 - zin 2 0 Ocm ,,0 91 (h /44 2 2 1 U' 3.59 --~ In f 11 LOWER LEVEL = 7714.5' 100 YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY ; GRADE = 77105' SECTION 1 Al Â®ImELFIWI-12.m ~Ae 30N3D I NOTE: fOO YEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY N - INFORMATION BASED ON SURVEÂ¥ PREPARED _ 2 2 & 4 8 9 ..a- 1% BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS O E f. DATED 4/12/2001.ARCHITECT ASSUMES INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SURVEYOR IS ACCURATE. I I ..... FA 0 1\ \ 14. - W --puu u v' 41 :. 0, .< ca 33 . -i - - - -- .\../19 -- - C., m 3 4 - ... < 1.-1 - LL m i -O W \Lot - r 1 1 052 1 k=- CIC EDO 1 77 '...... 96 Al ka -Im 37 j â‚¬ N 1/ : & LOWER LEVEL = 7714.5 100 TEAR FLOOD BOUNDARY ~~ \ GRADE = 7710.9 i ./ Irti SECT/ON 2 47 11'111'Pf - - 6tl MIl If'Â· 11*Iii IMÂ· IMM 30N3 19323 NMOBEl IiFi5:| ,[Imill"-UNRmlill 44?l'/. ' 1 fR{MAN~, J hii...11Â§1 :Â·1Â· 4 RECEIVED .44 h. t JUN 2 9 2001 , ASPEN / PITKIN CONNUNIIY DEVELOPMENT GALAMBOS AF?CH ITE CT S ING. TRANSVITTAL To: Steve Clay From: Rich Paveek City of Aspen Planning Department 300 AABC, unit D Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 1490 Red Butte Drive CC: Date: July 2,2001 Steve, Attached is drawing showing the proposed change to the garage doors. Please call if you have any questions or comments. Thank you, Rich Pavcek Galambos Architects Inc. Bldg 300, Unit D AABC â€¢ Aspen. Colorado 81611 P: 970-429-1286 â€¢ F: 970-429-1296 E: gainc@galambosarchitects.net transmittal.doc . / \ /2 .hkal, 1Â° 1 Al. /2 1 11111'MIfÂ« - ~~Â·Â·4~14 , 1- liLli[4 01 a 31 kiESER' ,-'A 1 4 [1*(ID - 11@Ingr-LAU- r-Â« 3 7-7-1 ingpr .. . ing cio WEST ELEVATION 1/8" = 1'-Ox 1 -3 LIL_1 CLARIFICATION BRINT/BROWN RESIDENCE ISSUED 1490 RED BUTTE DRIVE 7-2-01 BY: RLP GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. BLDG 300 D, AABC, ASPEN, CO 8I6II (970) 429-1 286 FAX: (970) 429-1286 >0 11 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING TUESDAY, JULY 17, 2001 4:15 PM PUBLIC DISCUSSION WITH STAFF 4:30 PM SISTER CITIES MEETING ROOM I. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Public II. DECLARATION OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST III. MINUTES (07/10/01) IV. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARINGS A. MOORE FAMILY PUD AMENDMENT - BUS BARN HEIGHT, Steve Clay (continued from 7/17) B. BOOMERANG PUD AMENDMENT, Fred Jarman (continued from 7/17) V. ADJOURN Aspen Planning 3 )ning Commission Julv 10, 2001 MINUTES CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS ....................................................1 COMMISSIONER COMMENTS .................................................1 629 W. SMUGGLER LANDMARK DESIGNATION ........................2 1490 RED BUTTE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW ............................3 LOT 15, BLOCK G, ASPEN HIGHLANDS PUD AMENDMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL ADU...........................................................3 ELECTION OF OFFICERS .......................................................4 6 Aspen Planning & ing Commission Julv 10, 2001 Chairman Bob Blaich called the meeting to order at 4: 35 p.m. with members Roger Haneman, Ron Erickson, Jasmine Tygre, Eric Cohen, Steve Buettow and Ruth Kruger present. MINUTES Erickson moved to approve the minutes of June 5, 2001; seconded by Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS None were declared COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 1. Erickson asked the status of the right-of-way issues and of the Caribou encroaching in open space. Joyce Ohlson, community development department, told the Commission staff has written a letter to Harley Baldwin, owner of the Caribou, giving him 30 days to submit a land use application or to take the structure down. Ms. Ohlson said there has been an enforcement action on the real estate signs in the right-of-way on East Cooper across from City Market. If the signs are moved back into the right-of-way, owners of signs will be cited into Municipal Court. Erickson said there are more signs in the right-of-way on East Cooper Avenue farther east than City Market. Ms. Ohlson said she would have staff follow up. 2. Roger Haneman brought up the Buttermilk intersection and the lack of a 4-way stoplight. CDOT gave P&Z 8 reasons why they couldn't install a stoplight and their best argument was utility locations running through the hill right next to the road. Haneman noted that hill has been demolished and he would like to know CDOT's problem with a 4-way intersection at Buttermilk. Blaich said part of the issue is the lawsuit with Maroon Creek and the settlement for opening up old Stage Road. CDOT does not want a 4-way intersection at Buttermilk and is not willing to install it. 1 Aspen Planning 3 ming Commission Julv 10, 2001 3. Erickson asked about follow up on the trail easement in the city right-of-way behind the U. S. Post O ffice. The access has been blocked because the Post Office has chained off the back of the parking lot. Ms. Ohlson told the Board she would check into this and report back. 4. Blaich told the Commission he attended the City Council meeting last night when they discussed the floor area ratio and house sizes. Blaich noted he reported to Council the lengthy process and at least 4 public hearings P&Z went through to recommend a code amendment on house sizes to Council. Blaich said Council adopted an ordinance on 1 St reading, which takes the land use code back to what existed before Ordinance #56, 2000, was adopted. Council wants to have a work session with P&Z before adopting this ordinance. P&Z recommended July 31st at 4:30 p.m. for this joint work session with Council. 5. Blaich told the commission there was a discussion on the commercial space at the 7th and Main affordable housing project. The issue is whether the establishment can change the ordinance in order to meet the food requirement and serve delicatessen-type food. Blaich reported the tenants are going to meet with the city attorney to see what can be worked out. Erickson noted the P&Z was not in favor of the commercial space in this project from the beginning. 6. Joyce Ohlson, community development department, noted that 629 West Smuggler should be continued to 8/21/02; 1490 Red Butte Stream Margin should be continued to July 17, 2001; and Mobile Home Park Zone District Code Amendment should be closed. 7. Sven Alstrom told Council the volumetric restrictions in the house size are the problem. Beefing up the neighborhood guidelines may solve the house size issue. Alstrom said he would like to see the city promote solar access easements by height and volumes. 629 W. SMUGGLER LANDMARK DESIGNATION Erickson moved to continue 629 West Smuggler Landmark Designation to August 21, 2001; seconded by Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. 2 Aspen Planning & iing Commission Julv 10, 2001 1490 RED BUTTE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Erickson moved to continue this public hearing to July 17, 2001; seconded by Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. LOT 15, BLOCK G, ASPEN HIGHLANDS PUD AMENDMENT FOR AN ADDITIONAL ADU James Lindt, community development department, told the Commission this is a PUD amendment in order to construct and ADU at 0265 Exhibition Lane, Aspen Highlands Village. Lindt told the P&Z when the Aspen Highlands Village PUD was approved, it only allowed for 10 ADUs to be constructed on lots where the owners were given the approval from Hines Highlands. Lindt noted this would be the 11th ADU. The property owners were to be given certificates on a 1St come 1St serve basis. Lindt pointed out the city would like a PUD amendment to allow an ADU by administrative review for every lot. However, Hines will not sign off on this ADU amendment. There is a letter of support for this ADU from Hines Highlands. Lindt said 1 more ADU would not make much of an impact and ADUs do meet the guidelines of the AACP. Staff recommends approval of this ADU to be built within the dimensional requirements of the Highlands PUD and to be built according to the city' s ADU design guidelines. Buettow asked if this ADU would require a GMP exemption. Lindt said the GMP allotments have been taken care of. Lindt said Hines did not want every free market unit to have an ADU because of the additional density. Ohlson noted this applicant has a right to make this request, and it is supported by Hines Highlands. Staff does not have the right to initiate a PUD Amendment for Aspen Highlands. Blaich opened the public hearing. John McCormick, applicant, told the Commission none of the houses under construction have requested a PUD amendment for an ADU. McCormick said he supports the argument that a house this size generates a need for employees and he wants to put one in this house. Ericson asked if this unit 3 Aspen Planning 3 )ning Commission Julv 10, 2001 meets the light code. McCormick said it does. It is mostly subterranean and is behind the garage. There is no FAR bonus for this unit Blaich closed the public hearing. Tygre moved to approve Resolution #31, Series of 2001, approving the amendment to the Aspen Highlands Village PUD for the purpose of allowing an 11th ADU to be constructed pursuant to the Land Use Code Section 26.520 on lot 15, Block G, of the Aspen highlands Village PUD; seconded by Ericson. Ericson stated he is only voting for this ADU because it is voluntary and it is within the FAR for the free market structure. Erickson said he does not feel this would meet the ADU guidelines if it were for a FAR bonus. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Cohen, yes; Ericson, yes; Haneman, yes; Buettow, yes; Tygre, yes; Kruger, yes; Blaich, yes. Motion carried. Tygre said she would like staff to look into the Clarendon and whether expansion work is being done without P&Z approval. Lindt said there was an insubstantial amendment to bump out the bay windows, and he will look into this and report back. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Blaich told the Commission his term on P&Z is up in December and he does not intend to reapply for P&Z. Blaich suggested the election of officers might be changed to January so that officers are not changing the same time a new Council is being sworn in. David Hoefer, counsel to the commission, noted the Municipal Code requires election of officers in June. Erickson nominated Jasmine Tygre as Chair; seconded by Buettow. All in favor, motion carried. Erickson nominated Eric Cohen as Vice-chair; seconded by Tygre. All in favor, motion carried. 4 Aspen Planning & Iing Commission July 10, 2001 Blaich suggested P&Z members fill in some of his extra committees, like Infill, Burlingame COWOP. Ericson asked staff check to see if there has been a study done on the DEPP work. Ohlson invited P&Z members to the APA conference to be held in Aspen in September. There is a session for planning commission members and 2 excellent plenary sessions. The city will pay the registration fee for P&Z members. Tygre moved to adjourn at 5:50 p.m.; seconded by Ericson. All in favor, motion carried. Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 5 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26304.060(E) I, EMA 711(KE , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hemio'-tyÂ·-firgf-Elass postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property wirhinÂ¥[indred (300) feet of the subject property. as indicated on the attached list. Q.n-Â·the-~ day of , 200_ (which is days prior to the public hearing-ae of 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 5- day of 3 .1 , 2001, to the /O day of -1-067 . 200 / . (Must be posted for at least ten j,1,03 full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. 5- . 4 S ignature 'It, Z' , Signed before me this 5 day of J JLL 3 1 j 2001 by - 0 4â€¢ t/-3 pa itÂ·. H<_\CL-t--- -2 T'r 2. Â©t. 41. .. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 3Ii., '. ' t,4'>1â€¢. My Commission expires: \ a ~ to ~ DOC) A Â·444 .2 1 'dr Notary Public fi. i 4 4. f:Y:/.lf. 4 2.Â· 4 .1 44 ;ff..''gi,9,2374 a##29*1 0. 1[IiI A) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director JAD FROM: Steve Clay, Planner ~~00, 00---0g-= stÂ·Aft,- 7 4 AA RE: 1490 Red Butt~tream M,argin Review & Variance to Residential Design Standards, Resolution No.32_, Series of 2001. -PUBLIC HEARING. DATE: July 17,2001 1--6 APPLICANT: Neighbor to the west of ,Lit JI-,&-1 , I' . ' 1,91:*A *-1 i Mark Brown & Steve Brint proposed structure , i -- 1 1 , 46* - ille' 6. 1 .1/&1./4//4 / REPRESENTATIVE: i . |A | i 'SPE * 4 4 ..~ ~ Galambos Architects inc. 1.2 . t: Ir , 04 lili u P 'll J 31,0 /1/#I'll/'.unlit lilli - A.6 , PARCELID: - 2.11 4.k-~ .9-/.1-7 -. 2735-013-02-004 t 11 ADDRESS: ~000,0/ 1490 Red Butte Dr. i . ZONING: Existing home/structure - R-30, Low Density Residential to be demolished I CURRENT LAND USE: *6111~62&1 24+)Â·,ixs; ".614Â¢3*0:.4 ~.1.i lit. :.: *&. / Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE: '423//B~///9////~/4.~44~4fpt<,1 Â·/01*722 Â·'--0 V - I. - I . 4ential 1--1-IMPINMV/*HU '4*44-g. - -3\ < REQUESTED ACTION: ~ 3-*:' 11=,4,- -,5."616:,tutflow"li'q'TA,92/1,"Ir ,:iMI'lifilÂ£ ~ 1. Stream Margin.Reâ€¢+64 14 . 1 1 --27Â¥ariaMEETiom the Residential - Â· Neighbor to the east of 00-- , t.. ., ..4- Design Standards proposedstructure SUMMARY - The applicant is Urmosing a demolition of the existing single fan~~'residential home and the construction of a neW-ghmle-familx~aidential h~me.loc.*ted+rrmi Environmentally Sensitive Area at 1490 Red Butte Drive on the Roaring Fork River. In order to accomplish the desired design the applicant is requesting the following variances from the ResideffiINFI32RnÂ«tandards: 0 1. Inflection A 2. Double-wide garage doo~ < \ 3. Windows between 9-12/eet * The Planlingin Zoning Commission acting as the Design Review Appeals Committee may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards during a public hearing for one of the folingreasons: // 1) The pro~ty possesses an irregularity in which a waiver is clearly necessary for < ~ reasons offairl~ess; 2) The proposedl design represents a more effective manner to address the particular issue in which ~le standard is intended; or, ( 3) The proposdd design yields greater compliance with the Aspen Area Community < Plan than w*ld result with application of the particular standard. Residential Design Standards 1.) Inflection 26.410.040 (E) (2)(a) Residential design standard regarding inflection states: The following standard must be met for parcels that are 6,000 square feet or over: If a one (1) story building exists directly adja- cent to the subject site, then the new construction must //Â«\ step down to one story in IMEÂ® = 00 height along their common 111111111111,111 WILIBDUE#- Emilia lot line. Ifthere are one E EN Â°oÂ° 1 1 c==1 lon story buildings on both sides ofthe subject site, the appli- cant may choose the side towards which to inflect. If... Then. 2 A one story building shall be defined as follows: A one story building shall mean a structure, or portion of a structure, where there is only one floor of fully usable living space, at least 12 12 4 t 4 t- 5-7, m#! A'21 #12' - 1 feet wide across the street frontage. This standard shall be met by providing a one story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage and one story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adjacent building is one story. + Staff Finding The home, as proposed, appears to meet the inflection requirement when viewed from the front, or street side. It is only due to the natural slope of the hill, east to west, that creates a one-story to two-story element when viewed from the back, or river side, creating an inflection problem with the home located on the west side of the parcel. If the structure is constructed to meet the injlection standard, a substantial amount of slope disturbance could occur. The slope disturbance will have more negative impacts in relation with the river and surrounding neighbors then not meeting the inflection standard. Disturbing the grade to meet the criteria for inflection is not a desirable Â»lutionfor this situation. See Plan No.11 00 1.,04& C.0- VOJ-t=*lc /Staffs~ the request for the inflection variancefinding that; 2 61 3 4-- 21 4.1 1) The plx'perty possesses an irregularity in which a waiver is clearly necessary for re~ons offairness. 2) The pr~}posed design represents a more effective manner to address the partit#lar issue in which the standard is intended. 2.) Doublewide Garage Doors 26.410.040 (D Residential design standard states: The garage doors shall be single stall doors * 198-E X 3 > Staff Finding: The garage will be side loaded with respect to the street and will not be seen when viewed directly from the street fa~ade. Furthermore, the doublewide garage door has been designed as to appear as two single stall garage doors. There will be very little negative aesthetic impact, if any, should approval of this variance be granted. See Plan No.11 & 14 Staff supports the requestfor the doublewide garage door variancefinding that; \ A M-- 3 En U.,g ~- C.,- 1) The proposed design represents a more effective manner to address the particular issue in which the standard is intended. D,-401. 3.) Windows located in the 9'-12 , 6, No window zone" 26.410.040 (ID) 3a Residential design standard regarding windows states: Street facing windows shall not , span through the area where a second . 1 5 1 floor level would typically exist, "No window which is between nine (9) and twelve zone" feet (12) above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measure- ment will be made from the first land- ff I -~g' -- Â» ing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. > b ldP w Wl> 44 *9 u ju ~ > Staff Findings: \\,P The request for thblariance is only for the purpose of design. This is a newly constructed design; the applicant should be able to alter the plans and adhere to this standard as required. See Plan No.11 Staff does not support the variance for the windows that are located between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet finding that: 1) The property does not possess an irregularity in which a waiver is clearly necessary for reasons offairness. 2) The proposed design does not represent a more effective manner to address the particular issue in which the standard is intended. 3) The proposed design yields greater compliance with the Aspen Area Community Plan than would result with application of the particular standard. 4 trpAl Margin Review T ese are areas located within one hundred (100) feet, measur d horizontally, from the high ater line o f the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, o within the one-hundred-year fl odplain where it extends one hundred (100) feet from the hi water line of the Roaring Fork er and its tributary streams, or within a flood hazar area (stream margin). Developmen * these areas shall be subject to heighte review so as to reduce and prevent property loss by floo , and unimpeded flow of watercourses. Review shall encourage development and land uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural features. 26.435.040 C Stream Margin Review Standards states: No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and > Staff Finding: There will not be any development in the jloodway for the proposed development. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman' s Easement;" and, > Staff Finding Staff does not foresee any impacts regarding this requirement. The Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan recommendations are being met and implemented to the greatest extent possible and a.fisherman's easement granting publicfishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement," per conditions of approval, unless one already exists. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated 5 m by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 9 Staff Finding Per the submitted plans, there will not be any disturbance of vegetation outside of the building envelope. The building envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and > Staff Finding The proposed development shall not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a silt fence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review, and approval, prior to issuance of a Building Permit. No construction is proposed for the stream banks. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and 9 Staff Finding The alteration or relocation of any portion of the watercourse is not proposed. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and > Staff Finding This requirement does not apply to the proposed development because no watercourse will be altered or relocated. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain; and 9 Staff Finding The will be no development in the one-hundred-year jloodplain. 6 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability; and + Staff Finding There is no development being proposed within the required 15 feetfrom the top of slope. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020; and 9 Staff Finding All development is outside the 15-foot setback from the top of slope and does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a 45-degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope per the submitted plan. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; and > Staff Finding A landscape plan was submitted and staff does notforesee any problems related to the plan, however the applicant shall submit a landscape plan to the Parks Department for review prior to issuance of a Demolition Permit or a Building Permit 11. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150; and + Staff Finding The applicant shall comply with all exterior lighting and aH design criteria and submit a lighting plan with the Building Permit application. 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and > Staff Finding Site sections were submitted as drawn by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. that shows al[ existing and proposed site elements. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. 7 > Staff Finding There are no wetlands located on the pâ‚¬rtel Staff Recommendations 3 4/ A. Stream Margin Review: 1. Staff recommends approval for the Stream Margin Review for the proposed demolition and construction of a new single family residential structure located at 1490 Red Butte Drive; Lot 2, Block 1, Red Butte Subdivision finding that the criteria per 26.435.040 C, Stream Margin Review Standards have been met, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Â·While not required staff strongly suggests the applicant provide a "fisherman's easement" granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course. B. Variance regarding Residential Design Standards: Staff recommends approval for Inflection variance, 2) Doublewide garage door variance, finding that; 1) The property possesses an irregularity in which a waiver is clearly necessary for reasons of fairness. 2) The proposed design represents a more effective manner to address the particular issue in which the standard is intended. Staff is recommending denial of the variance for the windows located in the 9'-12', "No window zone"; finding that; none of the criteria are met. Recommended Motions I move to approve Resolution No. 31, (Series of 2001) for a Stream Margin Review and ~-Variances from the Residential Design Standards for Inflection, Doublewide Garage Doors, for a property located at 1490 Red Butte Drive, Lot 2, Blockl, Red Butte Subdivision". Dlo uo,aÂ©.3 ATTACHMENT: Galambos/Muir Architects design drawings o Plan sheets 1 -16 4 9*1 54 4 46 12 0 9 i' 4 2 8 92 AE?~Not NsoA,260 th /77'a5 ~ - 1- . 7â„¢15 6 9 19 I 77 + 1/0 0 ~0>/ 1914 . . " 1.37 44\00 I 7 19.5 4% - 4.19 S 7.0 t C A Â» 4// 0 9 j \\1 3 0 <4\ 013, i\\1 1 1 11 0 c i % 111 \4_lili \ 0 0 M 501750 -/ 1 \ \ ju A \\43 m (t/,7 1 0 00-1 1 \ 009'0291 3 E \,6 E %AtIpO~~~~/0' 31 52 99 52 23 11--1 (r)-0 1 Erik'm < :' *0-10 3. 4J D-1 (3 2\kk On 2 LN E 03-1\ 30 --10 ED >â‚¬ F b m I o st m 02 \ moo tb ED 73 ~ 1 3310 R*U3 :''fla 0%*T 4.0* :3 99 ni m E , n m zo 1.-TI (y) \] 30 [-1-1 2 00 23 b ' F (0 I. 94 0t i m -' 1 m PTL 1 1-1 P ... 1 - 80 qa m rn - E- 30 h Ul CLARIFICATION I. BRINT/BROWN RESIDENCE ISSUED: 1490 RED BUTTE DRIVE 7-5-01 BY: RLP GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. BLDG 300 D, AABC, ASPEN, CO 8 I 6 I l (970} 429-1286 FAX: (970) 429-1 286 NOTE: OF SLOPE INFOR~MA-LION ACCURATE. S RVEY 01*N306 36*3 6 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26304.060(E) I. tic# lkÂ¢(EX- , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached_hemia,--by-firgGEIass postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property withinhundred (300) feet of the subject property. as indicated on the attached list.-- day of , 200_ (which is days prior to the public he[Kieof By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the S- day of 1 Ll , 2001' to the /0 day of -tu,-7 . 200 / . (Must be posted for at least ten f>M full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature 11:4 1.71 b Signed before me this 5'~day of 3 Ldd- 2001 by 4-1 ' 9,/mxsp~::â€¢~9//M,"R#/yowÂ·-a E- , 7 1 k AL\ Â»C~- -. 3 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 4 1 ju-'. ...3,122,~91- My Commission expires: \ 0, L to i 200 33 thi. . -1 -,1.'/N- 1 *t 61 1 -' .//, mat, 8 .11 1 . j.-1~ 4 "....... Notary Public 13%:Â·Â· '.1 1 '' - ~limwil 1,02'..fc: 'k - r 149*5*Wn--7435/ *..4.1- P. ~ P 1 **p- 1 Ly 9 - 1.1 7- ' RESOLUTION NO. 32 SERIES OF 2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND VARIANCES FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS FOR a) INFLECTION AND b) DOUBLE-WIDE GARAGE DOORS FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1490 RED BUTTE DRIVE; LOT 2, BLOCK 1, RED BUTTE SUBDIVISION Parcel ID: 2735-013-02-004 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Applicant, Mark Brown & Steve Brint, represented by Galambos Architects, requesting a Stream Margin Review approval, and variances from the Residential Design Standards for the residence located at 1490 Red Butte Dr. Aspen, CO; and WHEREAS pursuant to Section 26.212, the Planning and Zoning Commission may review and approve the Stream Margin Review Application and acting in the capacity of Design Review Appeals Committee may approve the variances from the Residential Design Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Department recommends approval for 1) Stream Margin Review, and 2) Variances from the Residential Design Standards for Inflection and Double-wide garage doors, and recommends denial for the variance from the Residential Design Standards for the windows located in the 9' - 12', "No window zone"; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal for Stream Margin Review under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the Variance requests from the Residential Design Standards recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Design Review Appeals Committee, has reviewed and considered the Variance requests from the Residential Design Standards and may approve the variance request for 1) Inflection and 2) Double-wide garage doors; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a vote of six to zero (6,0) for 1) Stream Margin Review and 2) Variances from the Residential Design Standards; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 17th DAY OF JULY, 2001, THAT: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a 1) Stream Margin Review and 2) Variances from the Residential Design Standards for Inflection and Double Wide Garage Doors, subject to the following conditions: 1. No vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 2. The proposed development shall not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a silt fence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review prior to construction. 3. A written notice shall be given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 4. A Landscape Plan shall be submitted to the Parks Department for review. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the riverside to native riparian vegetation. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. 6. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the Building Permit application. 7. All foundations must be constructed about the water table; therefore the level of the water table, on the riverside, shall be determined and shown on the survey plat. 8. A statement shall be provided from a Colorado Licensed Engineer stating that the proposed development will not cause flooding in adjacent or downstream properties. Section 2 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereo f. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 17th, 2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Planning and Zoning Meeting July 17,2001 Additional Conditions Requested from the Engineering Department 1. All foundations must be constructed above the water table; therefore the level of the water table, on the riverside, shall be determined and shown on the survey plat. 2. A statement shall be provided from a Colorado Licensed Engineer stating that the proposed development will not cause flooding in adjacent or downstream properties. Planning and Zoning Meeting July 17, 2001 Additional Conditions Requested from the Engineering Department 1. All foundations must be constructed above the water table; therefore the level of the water table, on the riverside, shall be determined and shown on the survey plat. 2. A statement shall be provided from a Colorado Licensed Engineer stating that the proposed development will not cause flooding in adjacent or downstream properties. / ZZ=ZZ--iâ‚¬44 1 44 UU UU U -i l - - --- I.--I. Â·------ --- Â·Â·---Â· -- I - GIBIE EBBE ~ IEHEBIEE 6 0 11- ~ 44 j U R AR P = 4=4 1 Il I Il L--1 L Il U ?OFLU-11-It Ifltrr 64_ rin 0/EST ELEVATION I. 4 -1 ,/ CLARIFICATION BRINT/BROWN RESIDENCE 1490 RED BUTTE DRIVE 7-2-01 ISSUED: BY: RLP GALAMBOS ARCHITECTS INC. BLDG 300 D, AABC, ASPEN, CO 8 I 6 I 1 (97 0) 429-1286 FAX: (970) 429-1 286 A-Abl 8 1+ . m 0 Hsoa,Â®0 an" 2 - \-7 M 604.150 1- . 77als . ~~ 4~ 4\ 0 / 1/0 1 l + I .. 5-~-* NX I./23.~ â€¢ 7 19.5 0 / . '1 â‚¬1Â©5' mo ter - 1 I lili 0 0 ///i//- H 50'.000 I \I ' =a P li \ % \ 4-31\0 i L Al 4 I 4 M., 0 v 0 7 /// 1- . Omt, 2 â‚¬> 11 LÂ» h\\ 1 -1 -1 $ #, i TT â€ž, 1 3 3 4 . -0 c W'A 1-- o Â° ./ \4.\ 1 \ \ m Â£ ~,ttpo'*'#.C NOTE: TOP OF SLOPE INFORMATION BASED ON SURVEY PREPARED 0 h BY ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS DATED 4/12/2001. ARCHITECT ASSUMES INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SURVEYOR IS ACCURATE. /, E~ 0\\ Fw : m 0 .'r 4 W 0.: - m 04/: 57. n M 1 A.'' 11 2 Ft i i t .,1 35 1\ LOWER '' m LEVEL = 7714.5' 1 / -) 1 / 4- - fr-,1 %~ 13 -7 - 1 TOP OF SLOPE Â¢T/0 1.4/ j -/0/00 AT WORST CASE SCENARIO GRADE = 7712 12&1 1 3ON30838 NM Ob18/ Â¥ 1 1, 1 ILA 0323 06 1 MEETING DATE: July 17, 2001 NAME OF PROJECT: 1490 Red Butte CITY CLERK: Jackie Lothian STAFF: Steve Clay EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report (x) (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice (x) (Check If Applicable) 3 Model MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve Resolution #32, for the Stream Margin Review and 2 Variance requests for inflection and garage doors, deleting the request for the window variance, adding the 2 engineering department conditions for the property located at 1490 Red Butte Drive finding that the criteria have been met. Eric Cohen second. APPROVED 6-0. VOTE: YES _6_ NO _0_ ROBERT BLAICH YES x NO ERIC COHEN YES x NO ROGER HANEMAN YES x NO STEVEN BUETTOW excused from meeting JASMINE TYGRE YES x NO RON ERICKSON YES x NO BERT MYRIN excused from meeting RUTH KRUGER YES _x PZVOTE *iCEIVED APR 1 7 2001 ASPEN /PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C 4 1 2 Â£ - 447-01 - BRINT / BROWN RESIDENCE ar : r JÂ¥ N + -. LOT 2, RED BUTTE DRIVE -M ASPEN, COLORADO 4, f 4 k - E-1 14 : 14- 1 9.. 4 , - 4-: - .tr- - -5 77 GALAMBOS / MUIR ARCHITECTS ME *-6 9 1 1 7 GALAAIBOS/Mt-IR m Al ARCHITECTS, LLC 208 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 TELE: (970) 704-9750 FAX: (970) 704-0287 300 D AABC ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELE: (970) 429-1286 FAX: (970) 429-1296 HONHaISHN NAOXI I002 'LI E[INdV e.,1.- - p , 7 ....11'r >EF.S.- -1- /77- --11 [al [El IiI 1-651 1 'r= 1 k f 5 -11 4 .-.--14 IM gl Â« - *417>.2 3 - 41:,&2%44+,ni- ,L.. I.I~ts i -21 --- 2246: . E I = f /3132 1 =01 w - --1 1 - - 1 1 I-4 --r' 1-h- 11+1.---1-- frili~ 1.1. .- 4--,1-, -Z- ~- '- - -;-* 0 -2 . r - Â·Â·-2 2 =Ct t!1181 / 1 --1 - - 4 1 1 -:1 1 t ks. -- 4.2 : 5.-- 1 %474 i , W - /1 - Â¥t. I . - .4 ' , L 2/1, t.- , 2 -- 1---i - # U â€¢- - r, 1 1'| 1.-r I f. 11 AAÂ»Â» - ./' , Lf T 4 11 4 |-' 1 t.\1\\lit()â€¢ 111 11< --A , , I 1 -H . _j~64 ,â€¢ 1 9 -U , 4 .- W -~.. I - 9-1 'Aul Â¥- 4 2 1 1 1 r -F-17=TILJ 1-fr- '+ZI-" ~-2:-4 -3 ---1.- -- - -4- :-1 -U -4- 7-4 ,-. . 1 A \1<{11111{ 10.11( 1 . 4 ,-- /1 1- - 7 -0.. f AS,EN, COLORADO 11411 1 I -5:. 1 4 I = w - _ E. 1'11 -- 3- D AABC 1- 11- - i.i ,_ Et -x=r 1 4.- t 10 (970) *- -EL- Ff .-1 1 - 1 n 1.11 4 1 15-- 1% Â»,- 1- - - 0 44-lAi- 4.1 2,1 MAIN STREET lili litl -- 4- *''tÂ·-~FEN-,~-'L :-4[1; -.[~ CARIONDALE, COLORADO *1623 - 01 Af - Z: ~-1 1Â· ; -J N i MO) 714*7Â» ---= 4- fretp- - * ' -i' -~ ' -I.+ 7 '11; 1. - -- - -- ~ ~ ~'1 11 . 77 4 , 1 - 11 -1 - 1 -4 - ---27, , .r-â€¢-1----M-----A---f%- . I . 1- 1 - 1 - - lili . r * 1- - bjjl tdi -- 4 1' -IM h- - I - I f .-/I lilli I te- IE.1 . COP . - 91 <111- â€¢--- r I urm i UFFEK LEVEL CODE MA/N LEVEL 1/81=r-4 1/8* =r-9 G3221 LA'AOLE AREA LIVABLE 9.F. = 2.888 5.F. 2% |~~~| GARAGEAKEA AREA COUNTING AS PERCENrAGE , 2,687 S.F. x 43% EYOSED = 1.1555 5.F. DECK MEA = 834 S.F. (787 EXEMPT) ENABLE S.F. = 477.5 S.F. 9-,41 19/913 1-2 TOTAL AREA TO PAK. = 2,935 5.K GARAGE Sy. = 717 S.F. (319 TO F.Alt) toftÂ© ~ DECK AREA TOTAL AKEA TO FAR. = 1.952 5.F. 0 2*333% AREA AS PERCENTAGE 4441 1.11 -1+P-1Â·t. F.A.K. CALCULATIONe (ZONE R-30) SQUZE FOOTAGE ALLOWABLE: 5248 55. ALLOWABLE FAR. 250 5.F. GARAGE EXEMA, 250 5.F. COUNTED 50% ALL.0*aLE DECK = 5.240 5.F x 15% = 7875.F ....... SQUARE FOOTAGE ACTUAL. MAIN LEVEL: GARAGES.F. =70 5.F. (319 TO F.,UL) AKEA COUNT?NG AS PERCENTAGE = 2687 5.F. x 4,3% EXPOSED = 1.155.5 5.F. LIVABLE S.F.=4775 55. TOTAL AREA TO FAL = 1.952 5.F. /2 -9-1 Â¥t LOWEK LEVELÂ· AKEA COUNTING AS PERCENTAGE = 6175 S.F. x 10% EXFOSED = 62 9.F. TOrAL AKEA TO FAL = 62 S.F. - 7 4 UFFER LEVELÂ· LOWER LEVEL 2-' ' AB_ , r iiI UWMLESy. =2,888 55. 1/8" = 1-V at 1 I Ji-2. 1 41 4 144* t DECK AREA = 834 5.F. 787 EXEMPD TOTAL AREA TO FAL = 2935 5.F. i AKEA COUNTING Ae PERCENTAGE = 6175 9.F. x 101 EX,OSEP = 62 5.F. gl,224 11 .1/Â»tri'.*mL--4 TOTAL AREA TO FAR. = 625.r. TOTALS: TOT>U FAL = 1,952 + 62 + 2935 = 4.949 5.F TOTALS.F.=2888 + 2687 + 4775 + 717 + 6175 = 7,3875.F. - . I r 1- OGVHO700' EDNE[GISMIN NAJONE[/JININE[ HAING H.LI.fla 7 . f L SPIKE BY BRID LEGENDÂ·AND NOTES: 0 ' FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT AS DESCRIBED 4, SP IKE Â·SURVEY .CONTROL- SNOW. ON OROUND AT TtlE OF SURVEY I2/95 O UTILITY BOX "-20 / 9 FIRE HYDRANT 0 20 40 â€¢ â€¢ â€¢ FENCE O LIGHT Â· b /4 . Nik: 44 'pe, d.Â· LOT DOES NOT CLOSE BY 3 FEET Â».6 47 4/400, /3 POSTED ADDRESS - 1 490 TOP OF SLOPE Pum< thil. 4- 2 '1 0 - 447*2Â©â‚¬>91 4NDIVIDUAL OR CLUSTERS OF TREES 6 OR GREATER - i \ *Mb: 2244 <14Â» , TITLE INFORMATION FURNIEHED BY: 6 SPIKE IN PAVEMENT x QiÂ©Ex *- 7#34; *UtÂ» 0. : 41 . + ~ ..1.9 y. \ \-0 \* 93 .227 TOP OF SLOPE 3 lit 8 4.2 ' 0 --/ . , Â· ~376, 2Â· OFF OF LINE I , \â„¢SE / / , h - , :/arte/f . , t CERTIPICÂ»ION / 14 063 + THE UNDERS IONED~ STATES THAI THE? PRKS'?TI~89iRimerÂ¥:~:NS:5* , Â· Â·, < GARAGE "'' /74 6 - FLECD- SURVEYED Â·OURNIO' APâ‚¬ I I - Â·OF RECORal 80UNDARr L I NE CONFLICTS. ENGROACHMENTÂ¥ ASEIENTS OR .Â· Â· ~. 'THE FIEU)~EUPENetiAS' SHOWN, AND fHAT THEREÂ·ARE ]Â® DI 5CREPANCIES. , . 41 5/ RIG,45 24Â¥AÂ¥Â£ IM FIELD EVIDENCE OR .K,*WN?.TOL-MEÂ· E*CEPT AS HEREON Â· a LOT 2 ~~*~MA?g~~~461~ss:AR!1:g *Â¥9*iREA:Z:. EXCEPTEO. THISÂ·AURVEY 13 VOID UNLEDS MET ST BLOCK j ~idil . OF THE SURVEY?R BELOW . :10 j 0~2% . * , f,1*ttlt;mw~-&.k/Â·Wil L //2 1/04 D015DifARc~~,tn~'" Â·. ' Â· . ~ ; i 1 1 U VA~ 2%94714Â· 0, /1 7 2 1% 1 .// 2 . i ..#p*/ I 6. .t96.. 42# , *Alle, //8 1 . . e 36 / /2 , . S / / a \,41 4 1,4 . 1 1 --' ' o l . i I DIST~R~OR 4 1 I'l t:; 44 / ' j : . 4. a. 44 : 49.4 4 04,9 k IMPROVEMENT STREAM MARGIN REVIEW SURVEY-- ! 4' oF ~NET,&'2&ba,leot%%~TME SUBDIVISION, CITY 01= ASIÂ£N, CONTAINING 0.69 ACRES MORE OR LESS .'19 ...EPREP[Ne 87.- 4 'f-Â· ' t~ ~- Â· ..,Â·,-0 -'-6 Â·Â·...,Â· ASPENÂ·.SURVEY ENG+NEÂ¢RS.,, INC. /. -3 :.'210=Â·SOUJH 44NA STR<Ef .~Â· I - - t Â· ' Â· i .Â· ASPEN.. colzoRACe 41 61 1Â·' . PHONE/FAX'Â·(*04:925-381Â·65 /.1 116lMf *Cot#m JAS&*00 U. Y.10 1..' C....CE-Y LEG~ ' P . SHEET 1 ok 2 ..... 7..2 6'TE: - ,0.-,.~'.Â· '.~..JOB - 7 -45 4/01 - 1 15$24 ..2. . . *NM, - , . . , â€¢ ' .lÂ». ."-Â·Â·..7-y//7'0:...mÂ·:."1: k"tr 10 10 loo 100 4 U 0. 5 . 90 IAÂ¢AR' 3* ' Â· Â·~ 9 1=R 80 E SECTION D i SECTION E 1 -to- K) W 100 , 2 -. % 1 90 Â¥ 80 SECTION C 1 - 10 10 e 100 8 O - 6 . 90 u - WATER 80 SECTION B 1 - 10 10 - 1 100)-- n 90 m 1 . .Â· .20:in'pat RE -o >4*0%44 1 , f h * 80 :W ; 25947 - igi J. I .1-I - . NOTE: ALL Â·5ECT IONS LOOKING DOWNSTREAM ,~ i.4 :$14: SECTION A 1 - 10 ..tu~ . ASPEN Â·SURVEY ENGINEERS. INC. ..7 Â· 1,3 -m, -e' iT"" .. ' AS./. cÂ©LOR- Ii. 1 - 1 Â· 25324A 11=.*iw 108 1 .... c ':,~, . Â©73 19-2.:..990- 3 + FUN NOTES: r,r=.TE INFORMATION G BASED ON THE SUR,Ef PREPARED B 'SPEN /2 -X- 1 ENGINEERS DATED 04/12/2001. ARCHEECT *SSUMES INFORMATION PROADED EN SURâ‚¬fOR IS MXUREE AND ARCHITECT IS Nor RESPONS;aLE FOR mN,CUR/CIES.ERRORS OR OW,SiONS Eff SUR/EYOR. 4 SITE CONTOUR ELB,KNON 7720 EQUALS BUILDING ELEV,TION 93-0. ' ~ 1.- -1-1 - CONTRUCTOR TO TME GREAT ORE TO NOT DAMAGE EXISTING TREES SHONN ON PLAN DURING EXCA'/ION AND CONSTRUCTION. RE-SEED AREA DISTURBED 0 WORK WfTH MAINE WILDFLONER MIX. -~=373 1 - ----% (,\1.\\litt)' \11 lit \1(( lilli< j..1 It / 4/4 \1 - D AABC ASFEN, COLORADO /*11 MD) 42*-1216 4 -1 \ , . 210 MAIN STREEr 1 \ I .' CARBONDALE, COLORADO 1123 , Q10,04.919 \ \ \ 1 1 . \ ' ,1 \: 6 19% .13 -' : I _ ~131 \.Â· ' I --'- - 08%8#GE 1 \16 19*AA' E , , - , , I 9 , p ' DRAN ,-0-1 i '+0 2 1- '-r- i $ 0 . --- , \ \ A \ * > 0 \ P -30 , 1,1, --- t , \ - p Y EASEMENT .-' 4%0-1- - , 4 ' '' 1/ --* '\\0 Â«*~5 ~~ ' bl- I '' - I I ,,/ ' / 14 , %- 63 & CA , 1 , 4, i ~ 1 --1 rn i 1 1 \. I _ at 6 \Â» ' ' ' I ' , -a Ki , , \ , LD m 1 \ \ -6-Z 15 . . r- \ (' O ' 1 1 % 11 -30 - 1 0 1 - cO , 1 \3 , 1 -i. ' 11% e VIi , 1 4 \ - 1 ' STAMP DEE ' ,\ \ 01 ' CONCR r PATIO I Z EK ES / , , , 1 '2 ~:33- & A , U ,-Ul 0 PER ' , 1 145 A â€¢ ! , < N '' , m - 1110 .1720 , 1 , W :4 01 , '1 - 46 --4,---~ ' ' 1 i\ it N OO 0 1 1 ''.' PARKING . 1,1, , '' 1, i E-,4 \ -///7720 , , 11 ; : i' 00 0 1 \ / , 1 .1 1 h -1 1 1 , ' 'I , -1 ~ .77195 , 1 1 1 ' 1/ ii' 1/ iÂ· I , '1 , lili , 1 1 4713' < ~ 67-bNE WAL*wAY ,\ â€¢ , , ' 1 9 , 1 U 1 41111 1 m 1 , 1% 1, 1 1 L--1 ' ... 1 1, 1 1 11 /, , '1 1:1 '.r i , , A ' , , 9' Â» 1. tit .-T 11 1120.81981*- 3 6-: 0- --- '' , 1 , '. 't \'\ 1 -r , ---- Â· 1 , -- i.\1 \ i . TRASH/RECYCUNG TO - ~ ' -~ . ' ~ ' , , ~....4 \ ' . -/.- BE LOCATED IN GARAGE \--. , . i < 4 1 % 1, 1 I GRN EL DRNEN# --- , ' 6 1 - /0/ D.'I \ - -- - 1 1 I, 1 1 , 1 , , 1 1 i \1 1 11 1 1 . \ ADU PARKIN ELECTRIC METER LOCATION 614722 ~ ', GAS METER LOCATION ------- --- -- , ---- -- arfk:900 STONE ADDRESS ' MARKER BU1LDING ENVELOPE - TYP. - gOtfue 7.5' UTILIT*.EASEMENT STONE WALKWAY 4,L -- -- --- )2 2-pr': t- -3 â€ž11 -,n-1'kâ‚¬ 1 7 136. 11__-_- --------------I---24-W 256.2' TOP OF SLOPE .*c.=2 111 t, .=r-6 4 - , -4 1% SITE FLAN ~~__.j r=10 NORTH ~ N - r tboy ~ROUND~ 77 8 \ HONHaI 3AIH0 31108 0341 IN3~3AVd 30 3903 GENE, UN NOTE.~ - r L -- BFORMATION E E~SED ON THE SUR/EY PREPARED ef ASPEN NG#NEERS DITED 04/12/2001. ARCHITECT ASSUMES INFORMATION PROADED Br SUFNEfOR IS 'CCURgE AND ARCHITECT IS NOT S fr -2 RESPONSIBLE FOR INM,CUR,CIES.ERFORS OR OWISIONS Err SURVIVOR. 4 L 1 1 11 1 - SITE CONTOUR ELEVATION 7720 EQUALS BUILDING ELEY,#TION !00-0. 1= CONTRUCTOR TO TWE GREEAT CVE TO NOT DAM;GE EXISTING TREES SHONN ON PLAN DURING EXCAUTION AND CONSTRUCTION. RE-SEED AREA DISTURBED 0 WORK WITH NATNE WILDFLONER MIX. r j- -1/ 4 50 4 1 V 100 =A 1 -1 7 -/1 U e LEGEND , -b 61% 19/ C /% , i \ TREE TO REMAN <~- * -, \ \ 1{1 lili 1 C 1.Â· 1 1 l e ' \E \ . \ 1,\1.\\11:(1~ \11 IN \ 1 -DUBC ~~ TREE TO BE REMO/ED ,- ASPEN, COLORADO:1111 ('70) CD-UN AND X4XEGATED, -/2/9/3 \ \ 211 MAIN STBEET 4 // . CARBONDAIA COLORADO 81113 v / \ . 11 ./7 1 1 0\ 1 1 1 , \ \ 1 1 1 1 , ' 1 1 ---1- \ \ . 93 t. \ , I. 158. -5-'---- 9,0 -/' 1 \ Ill L . I. I :,4/ Z A \ Ul i '0 -13 \ ' :ing'~rr 4 -- ; 1 \ \ rn O 1 :21 --- - - 1,1, ~/299~ ,./ A W / V --1 - 0 .1 \ 'I ,-i- ' EAS E tENT 993 1- , 0,\\ in ,\ % 2 \g1 ---------STIO-r-1 -- - -- -I ~- I. /' 1 9.)..31095.-- Â·_ Â· ~ I ' \ 7\ 1 '-Gb \11 I , I . .CO .' ''\ ~ G na \M 0- '1 '.' 1% -# m 8 1 \,\. -23) 74' \\ 1~ 98 1 212]IQI.UE-Â§935293.LE{15 --4 1 , ix, Z EK 20 ..6/0 / . /1, , X M '' 51'AM ;1 \ h i , \S . ' ,co 06/ - , , , 1 i \\ ) r 2 â€¢Â· PEâ‚¬/ ' , 92 0 m Z ?3/ 0,331 Â·7121 ' 1 1 '! 1 U \ i. < \0 ST5.8â‚¬3--- - 1, : m\ , 1/ i: 30 1 .0. 1 , 1, t. 04 0'w - .- Deb , 4, , N. / A. %, 1 1' 1.11 \ 0431' 1 , , 1/ ' 1 / / -* PARKING 1 00 0 ' ' '' Iti / 1 A , 1 / 1 11 \ /- =Â«Ll ip,~1~~--3 / , , '' 111 / . , 1 \ , 1 1 1 , Ii; i 1 Â·770,6 i i , Z Â·7713 , t STONE WALKWAY ' , ' , 1, il' i .77195' 64 C i 0 , / -1 \ ' , --,h -2 , 141 \ 1 i 0 1 \1 1 1 , 1 -. â€¢ - . TRASH/RECYCLING TO --,Â·IL&(t.&- -$1 7, . f' BE LOCATED IN GARAGE \ ---, , , ~RAVEL- DRW9WAY ' x - i, ' \ mum,ro= \ 1, -- , 1 1 , 1 , \\\ \ 1, \ \ ' 1' .1/' t \ . ..1 \, , 1 -4---11.-----31 1 \ / 1 I , , \ 1 1 1 1 / 7 \ ADU PARKING, , ELECTRUC METER LOCATION - - d<L< 13&> 1 \ GAS METER LOCATION -- - - dul- __ 3 1. \ 1 '. - --Il -1 1, i ' 1 1 ~ STONE ADDRESS t BUILDING ENVELOPE -TYP. \ ------J ER' STONE WALKWAY --2;Aae-- .... \ 1 -1-- --- 1 L.---------------- - - --- 6 -=e --1 - -- 1.- 1 ,~n.r@--2- 1 ' 'W 256.2 ' 7.5' UTILITY EASEMENT I \ \I TOP OF SLOPE - r ZE __.I.*,= 1161'------------------ -- S 3 -2 -14- - 1 1--- - 1.*trIntâ€¢EM - 1 -12 At=- 4-* --- L--- 13 5/TE FLAN r = 19 1-_4 ' NORTH --41 N -1 = ii_ ~ + VAT =~r . 4 +-Tr 1 - " 1N3~3AVd 30 3903 GENER, FS: -' 4-1_ 7 6 2 -- r -1 1. AL VS ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD *T S AUS OR DCE OF STUD Kr INTERIOR WALLS OR TO CENTERUNE OF POSTS. UND =r - 4.1 1.7-N- 2. GRID UNES ARE TO OUTSIDE FXCE OF STUD AT EXTERIOR WALLS.CENTERUNE OF POSTS.CENTERUNE OF DEWINNG . W~LLS OR EXTERIOR FUCE OF CONCRETE FOUNDKT-lON.UND. 3. EXTER,OR WAUS SHIL RE 2*6 STUD FRAMING *r rf 0Â£.{UND-1 5 OWENS/ONS AT EXTER/09 DOORS AND W/NOOWS ARE ROUGH opENING M.*--.7- 4. ITERIOR W,US SHALL BE 2X4 STUD FRAMING AT MOD.{UND-1 SIZES BASED ON PELLA CORPORATION. CONTRITOR IS 1 --1 1 - RESPONSIBLE FOR AaRISTÂ·MENTS iN ROUGH OPENINGS IF KIERNATE 49â‚¬ MANUFITURER IS SELECTED.WINCON MANF TO PRaNDE SHOP DRANINGS. 1 6-4. WINDON IMF.TO PROVIDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REOUIRED 51 CODE 3'-e g-C 21'â‚¬ 6. PRWIDE SOUND ISULAIDN IN WALLS.FLDORS.AND CE!UNGS OF .r - 1 ' ALL BNHROOMS AND WECHANOL ROOMS; ALSO SURROUNDING - 5'-a .. 51-0 - -""* til. MECHMICA PIPING. 7. SEE WINDON AND DOOR SCHEDULES I PRWECT OUTUNE .1 - 5 4- GUARDRAIL PER FOR INFORMATION ON WINCONS AND DOORS. 1~-41~ 1 UBE.-TYP. 8. DAIUM ELGATION 100-{7 EQUALS SITE ELEVATION 7720 AS PREPARED - Bf ASPEN SUMEY ENGINEERS 1 (1\1.\\litt). \11 IR C O / 0 - \1((lilli{ 1Â·.lit a 7 DECK 3- D AABC r .. i 1 / / , ASPEÂ£ COLORADO 1%11 L ' MI) CD-1286 1 11 4=42 / @ i ..99 4 94 ..3.-0â€¢ ..3--060 . - ~ 0 0./ 211 MAIN 51IEET |i | rzk=:Â»31 Â»3. \Â»L (,70) 70+9730 4 - re <202). & /' ./4 1 CAEBONDALA COLORADO :1123 1 1 cp DECK /nY * <24> 1 h<*f 1,1 , 4-%~ 8 Z... 1-4 4 0~ 1~ 1 '1 / / / Â® 1 JU 41 / 5 . . Â£44 7.0 ef 1 1 1 ,It i' , 'NJ . * 4 1 . , / . . 411 1 1 .21 01 1 L-),1 T i . \1.11 , / / / Lpts APPUANCE Â«-Fe} 1 ' 1 ' ~ ' 1 1 , # N / 0/ , 1 F/REPLACE - /NSTALL PER 5 1 5 ' ' ' ' ' @ 2,, ~'1Â© ASOVE H WAN'F SPECIFICKr IONS - Â·>~ MASONRY FIREPLACE WITH , . 2'46Â· i 4'--3%Â· r VENT PER UN.C. 1 , GAS LOG KIT - INSTALL PER , 0 ,@ â€¢ , MANT SPECIFICATIONS -VENT , 4 ' . PER U.ME.- PROADE OUTSIDE , NR KIT , MASTER BEDROOM , , EAN ; GAS , . 1 . 1 BBQ ' ' DN ' , 1 , '' GREAT ROOM . DINING , DBL i ---1 /38822828*~~~ i ' ' i j ' ' ' ED 295 j , ClÂ·.'ENS 71 14 1 , 1 y . .5 412 - 1 ,/ '' ' , 1 21 5 , ''' / 1 / i 11 3 11, , 3 f a liE - , 2 KITCH /F 31 * r 5,07777:. 5 %07 3-4. ~372' ' ' 4-3 2/-544' Â®/ 1 i ~ .2-55' ~6-*i ' 0 / 4 QDÂ·' Z $ Ommumin V-\ r w.:.c. . 7 0 . , 3= zEzzEZZEZZEZEÂ§N r 2 '' JiÂ» O 60 -2.-0 t 203 i E 44 -1 1 1 j / / /,/ A i Â¢ =60 Nip -5 4 1 93 12 Ror EACH * \123> U/,-1 0/.I g. P r n , 4 3 ii Tr BREAKFAST n(41 i Â© 11 /13 5 GURDRNL PER ~ 4 | | VENT PER UNE. ~ ' 200 6 POWDER , *17 2 ~ E f e UBC- 778 - 206 OFFICE vi f G OPEN TO BELOW < YA / ' 201 SITTING Â¢Â» e /24 <0 , -- 208 0/1 f : 4 z ~ ~*--I W , D 6 77///1 MASTER BATH . C Il , ANTRY 202 - i 210 -/0/ D.- @ 1 , VENT PER UUM. 1 ~ AECN' E 19-0/4Â· 4-572' 1 ' 4 1--4 0 - Â®i - ECUk l 1@ 4-3 9 4 >r E Â® Â® 4 0 eÂ» 1-6. EQUAL & EQUAL- 6'4/2' 6'â‚¬ A 4 - ' -76' 1 Zq f-06* I , 242-3Gâ€¢i, - 15-239 2-612' 1-I - 1 55- "q/2/ sanâ‚¬t/71/fl/M- i 0 0 0 -'It-t' -1 UFFEK LEVEL FLAN \\\\/\\\\\\0 BIONE[aISE[M NAOXIE[/ININE[ RED BUTTE DRIVE OanIOTOO 'Na GENER CTES: 1. . ONS FE TO OUTSIDE FCE OF STUD /T E WALLS OR FICE OF STUD / INTERIOR WN-LS . 7-4. 1 - OR TO CENTERLINE OF POSTS. UND. - ~ - 2 GRID UNES ARE TO OUTSIDE F#CE OF STIO Z EXTERIOR .3 7 - WIGCEFERUNE OF POST-S.CENTERUNE OF DEWIZING -- 9.- - WALLS OR EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDIT-MON.UND. 1 --i. - 3. EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2XS STUD FRANING AT r-4 0Â£.allill 0 0 0 9 4. INTERIOR WAUS SHALL RE 2*4 STUD FRAMING AI r-f 0,2.(UNDi 5. DIWENS,ONS Â£ E)(rERIOR DOORS AND WINDONS ARE ROUGH OPEHING SIZES BASED ON PEUA CORPORATION. CONTRITOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR hDJUSTMENTS IN ROUGH OPENINGS IF NJERNATE 49â‚¬ MANUF#CTURER IS SELECTED.WINDON WRF TO PROVIDE SHOP DR/IGS. WINDO# MANF.TO PRWIDE TEMPERED GLâ€¢SS WHERE REQUIRED Ef CODE 30-9 gig 10-C 27Â·â‚¬ 6. PRWIDE SOUND INSULKUON IN WALLS.FLOORS.AND CE#UNGS OF Â· Al. BATHROONS AND WECHANEAL ROONS: ALSO SURROUNDING Al.1. MECHANICAL PIPING. , 8-ir IC-tr 6-9/4. b c '4/4. 1 .1. 1 -1. T f 1 (8) 7. SEE WINDON AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN PROJECT OUT-UNE FOR INFORMATION ON INDONS AND DOORS 1 K \ i \ 8. D,IUM ELEVATION lOWEOUALS WrE ELEVATION 7720 AS PREPARED - \R(lilli(1'.lit. 1 1 1 1 1 81 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS (,\1.\\11;t). \11 IR 1 1 ,,1, 'i, 4' i, li lili '11 ~i~ lili/&re I I ep (22, M 301 D AAE ,,i, 'i' , It % 1 '11 111 $ '/ ' I. ; 'i' , i 211 MAIN STIKET CARBONDAIA COLORADO :*23 \Â¥i 1 1 1 \\2 --- -- I ' 1 1Â® te 1 1 1 '' - , UP 5 Â®1 11 '-i '. '. - -2 /Â®4 $*. *Â©41 1 / \ e f / I - 2-4' .~ 4*372' .~ ~ ' " '' , ./ VEME PER UNDÂ· _11 ~ ' - '' I GAS APPUNICE FIREPUCE - 9]ZZZZI,1;11&.4/ BAâ„¢ #1/ / , 6 INSTALL PER MAN'F 6,13. i -131 r-,r"25-i - 55Â°ter f##71%1156 106 221 . SPECIFICATIONS -VENT , i ' PER UME. MAN'F SPECIFICATIONS - VENT , 3,0 \Ne / PER UMÂ£.- PRWIDE OUTSIDE 1 h AIR Krr 9Â· / GUEST BEDROOM Aiol . //VE) -----t 102 BEDROOM #1 vi 1 11 =/ 108 / ?* RECREAnON ROOM 4 -* 4 Mi . 3'-236. + UÂ£LLU---77 101 h W.I.C.\ 1 107 0 2 0 USLAS Â¢e 1 EL-94'â‚¬ 1 1 i It--- %.7 4*-8#//' OUTSIDE STORAGE Â©t/ BEDROOM t2 6 .1-2,-S. - ,-Â®0 GUEST W.I.C. k / . 103 1 4 01'31 i m 43[ . 1 hÂ· ~ m//m/////~~92~22~ i F~g I I ... . â‚¬D ~ P.4 < 2904 BATH #2 -All -Â· 0 -Trunummum,mA ~77 4 Z \E) le i IkE) / 4.Â» 1 1.3 1 1, r-/7 ,2-572. 4 1 / 4 110 4.-1 3 3- 2} 4 LÂ»oRAGE Â¢ 8 4~ - VENT PER U#.C. 55 X C /ac ,< /- 41 ~ 29 1 1 4 4,1 i 4_ h _ .----li------ O . 777 LAUNDRY 5 6 ( t I EL.99'/ 111 -------- CEID / 52 3 41_11 , ii BATH #3 ~ ~ X ~ / * T.0. SUB Â· 113 5,1 0 . -U ~46 - / 1,-1 105 39 #- 12 R or LACH VENT PER UJAC. WINE 1 1 1.1 4:33. 170) 0-1286 .1 4 me) 7044730 1 0 - % '1'' 1-1 T r 0 1 1 / -- 1 - J'' , , 93 - . ,,4 - - n / G , Gh -1 f i /L----0 DN UP. h-/I --- - 4 qtr \47 ' /1.1 ' ENTPY 10 Trp 112/ MECHANICAL 9 14-Â· 4 4 / 100 111 I/) , t e 1 -1 11 ** NX /h , 1 - I '1 '1 ./. '11 2~ |Il-33 Y ONE HOUR coNSTRUCT/ON A 1, 4.,1 111 . - THROUGHOUT- 4 * GUEST BAâ„¢ * 7//1 . 40~ ~UL" ~~ ~ ' 47 I SIDE VENT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT 10, .17,y 'Ir, 411"11'. '.4 '4 , / --8 0 4 CP 4--- . - . /-4- . -T Â®1 to $ /4-1 -=111 $ 4 -- 4 y - IC' acE k VENT PER UND. - a M K- C 1- 21 9 *Fl . E-L-~ 4 'l <P 4 -ZnMrIL~I_____*,a,al_ f.â‚¬. p 2-034Â·1.2'-//%Â· .1 2-#h'.'relâ‚¬. 6,-O*Â· 6'â‚¬ 4 4.*6 .1 C 16Â» I i i + i 9 -,1. 99 , r=-1 MATCH AT SHEET A,2.3 ~ .1 4,-6/ 4'â‚¬ 1.2-0 . 1.1 - 1 1.- 1 1 1 . 446%Â· .. 8-1' . 3'-96' . Ky-0 ..2-9 .. 9-2/i F -Rn.411 15'-236' 12-â‚¬JlM' 5-0/.' : T * i.at 4 1 8 4 1 1% MAIN LEVEL FLAN 1/4Â· .r-OÂ· HONEIGISE[M NAAON / NINEI 44**m>-1.-F . RED BUTTE DRIVE OGVHOEIOE) 'NEI \\\\N\\1\\NÂ·\*W GENER rESÂ· EF'-9- U 1,9 +r Â¥5 ARE TO OUTSIDE F+CE OF STUD AT Â· ~~ E ALLS OR FACE OF STUD Â£ INTERIOR WAIS OR TO CEWTERUNE OF POSTS. UND. 2. GRID UNES ARE TO OUTS#OE F,CE OF STUD g EXTERIOR WALLS.CENTERUNE OF POSTS.CENTERUNE oF DEMIZING WAU.S OR EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE FOUND,TIN.UNfl 3. EXTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2*6 STUD FRN,ING AT br 0Â£.(UNDJ. 4. ITERIOR VOLLS SHALL BEE 2(4 STUD FRWAING Â£ 6/ 0Â£.(UNDI 5. DIMENS;ONS AT EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDONS ARE ROUGH OPENING - 7?20 2, '~EAr./3- SIZES BASED ON PELLA CORPORATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIXE FOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ROUGH OPENINGS F N.TERNATE WANUF#CTURER IS SELECTED.WINDON MANF TO PREMISE SHOP DRAWINGS. ..7 Z â‚¬ Cti'. f 4- WINDO# MNIF.TO PROnDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED ef CODE ft : 1.9Â¢ 1 3/ 6. PROÂ¢ICE SOUND UNSULAT/ON W WALLS.FLOORS.AND CEIUNGS OF ALL BATHROONS MID WECHANICAL ROOMS, ALSO SURROUNDING ... 4 L... ALL MECHANICAL PIPING. fâ‚¬ : I Â·Â·.. ft./ 4 ..+ 5/ f. 7. SEE WINDON AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN PANECT OUTUNE ...... FOR INFORMATION ON WINDOWS NÂ¢D DOORS. hee . .1 99.4 8. DATUM ELEVATION 10(71 EQUALS SITE ELE,Â£1011 772Â£, AS PREPRED EN ASPEN SUR,Ef ENGINEERS t.\1\\lit/). \11 IN \I, 1 lilli{ 1/.11( MATCH AT SHEET A22 . 3- D AABC AS/EN. COLORADO illl (m) 429-1206 218 MAIN SnEET CARBONDALE, COLORADO 21&23 Â¢,70>704â€¢750 -4 (0 <1 4 4 4 , 13'-â‚¬ , 9â‚¬ , 4-E -.a-- - 0/ ?ty' - ./ 14) M A-z -*. _el. _11 UP - - 0 - U 11 9 C 1 Z DN + I 1 9 . , - . 1 ,-- 2 Â®/ /1 2-100/Ell %-7---#--- on. 0 8-23 / f. - MUD . . F 'e - .... 11 1 6 . 4 3.1 1 ONE HOUR x CP CONSTRUCTION THROUGHOUT- . 2% - -09- 49 -- N 2 4 MECH D------a- 6, N 0.- 802 oot 1 6 , 6 )-4. 1.3,400 .. 20-60 '. Â«0'S 4-\r Up Â· i' 1 1 / 9 2\ / 8 1, UX'F D. 1, 0 7-ASLAB ADU 1- 4 EL-90'-0' d 1, 801 .%@ b y-71/2â€¢ 3-8/2. e LU 0 te '1 0 11 6 -ZZ2ZZZ22Z Â· GARAGE /Â« 1\17 G02 -JBATH -1 1 Â©804 ~ W.I.C.' * * i n F.D. 803 b VENT PER UMÂ£. -- ' ONE HOUR CONSTRUCTION Nx lin THROUGHOUT ., 8 8 11 .. 0 - , 6'-3' 5'-35' . '~X<*D. 1----------1 9 1 4 1 0 & 1 0 E ' 6 0 0 4 1- -24----- 92 3'â‚¬ .1. 13'-0 %41 0 22-0 3'-00 25 43 0 0 50 0 - DRIMT/**INN A.D.U. FLAN /--ph GARAGE LEVEL FLAN 4 1/4.=r-9 1 i '/ - OCIVHOEIOO'NacISV ININE[ 98-K , GENER, -ES: : 1 â€ž* '- 1Â» f I. ALL DIMENS,ONS ARE TO OUTSIDE F,CE OF STUD AT EXTERIOR WALLS OR F#CE OF STUD AT INTERIOR WALLS = _F- <3-L --4 OR TO CENTERUNE OF POSTS. UNa 2. GRID UNES ARE TO OUTSIDE F#CE Of STUD *J EXTERIDI *NlS,CEETERUNE OF POSTS.CENTERUNE OF DEMIDNG WALLS OR EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATDN.UND. 3. EXTERIOR WAUS SHTLL BE 2X6 STUD FRAMING *r r-â€¢r 0Â£.W.Nm. & QUENS/OVS AT EXTER/OR DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE MOUGH OPEN/AG 4. INTERIOR WALLS SH,U BE 2*4 STUD FRAMING KT r-â€¢r 0Â£.{UNDJ. SIZES BASED ON PELLA CORPORATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIOLE FOR */ST/ENTS IN ROUGH OPENâ€žIGS E NIERN,TE 49â‚¬ WANUFXTURER IS SELECTE[1 WINDON MINF TO PROADE SHOP DRANINGS WÂ»NOON MANF.TO PAO.40â‚¬ TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE . A ya 9-e 10'-C 27'-â‚¬ 6. PACMIDE SOUND INSULATUON IN WAUS.FLOORS./D CEILINGS OF , ALL BATHROOWS ANO WECHMICAL ROOWS, ALSO SURROUNDING - - bil. MECHANICAL PIPING. - , - lk, 7. SEE WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES W PRajECT OUTUNE + FOR INFORMATION ON W/DOVS AND DOORS. 8. DATUM ELEVATION IW-{7 EQUAS STTE ELEVATION 772g AS PREPARED - Bf ASPEN SUR/Ef ENGINEERS (,\1 \\lit<)0 .\11 lit C Â£ 0 . \1{(11111(.10.1.1 C - 0 ' ' M .7.42*4281 C ASPEN, COLORADO .1611 N \7. / m ~~\ * ~ rAWRADO a148 0.-4 \1 7 (m) 704#30 f i. 4\ P < /092 10:12 ----- etx /0,/2 10:12 , 3 w 4 4/124 51 7- 1 ,- 4/ , Â°/ f -9 - - =9 T 1 1 21* MAIN STREET 91- 7 - 12 f f 0 V to R/DGE VENT DE PER UP.C.-TrP. 1, 9 - /1/ 2 =m â‚¬4.81 f m H< / 000 / , , ~ VALLEY F LASHING -TYP. \VT / . <352 - +82'2 8/2 > 4:/2 ~ \%3 64%2. tp 92, 91 -44 / 11 3 -1 4 i -1= ./. lili 4 . i - 1 1 ------------- < 0/2 10:12 ) , -C 19:12 /0,2 >- 1 1.1 1 1 4 1 1 F 1 * 1 N -7-i -1â€¢i.e..Â£- i 1 ' '- -11 1 1 - nt, AP:Â£4*1_3 /5'-25' tz-412. - 21 -* 1 UATCH' AT SHEET A,2.5 ~ a 6.,2 @: * 1 ~ )Â»Tr#11Ull,4 , 0 0 8 11 ROOF PLAN - - HONHGISHN N INEI \zg ee GENERN- Ei- ti 1. ALL S ARE TO OUTSIDE FKE OF STUD Ar . 1 . Er ALS OR FACE OF STUD Kr INTERIOR WhiLS : 5 .. :- 1 OR TO CENTERLINE OF POSTS. UND. 2 GRID ONES ARE TO OUTSIDE FACE OF STUD AT EXTERIOR WALLS.CEKERLINE OF PErS.CEKERUNE OF DEMIDE #- , 1 WAUS OR EXTEmo,9 FACE OF CONC/?ETE Fa/NDATON.U/Â£0. 3. ENERIOR W,US SHALL BE 2,(6 SrUD FR,MING AT r/02.(UNDJ. 4. INTERIOR WALLS SHALL BE 2*4 STUD FRAW}NG AT r/OCCUND.1 4 5. DIVENSIONS AT EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE ROUGH OPENING SIZES BASED ON PEUA CORPORATION. CONTR#CTOR IS RESPONS,BLE FOR A[M,STMENTS W ROUGH OPEN#NGS IF AUERNATE I MANUF#CTURER IS SELECTED. WINDON WANF TO PRO/IDE SHOP DRA~INGS. WINDO# MANF.TO PROnDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REOUIRED EW CODE & PROVIDE SOUND INSULATiON IN W~LLS. FLOORS.MO CE#UNGS OF ALL BATHROOWS RD MECHANK;AL ROOMS, ALSO SURROUNDING ALL WECHANICAL PIPING. 7. SEE WINDON AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN PROJECT OUTUNE FOR INFORMATION ON WINDOWS AND DOORS. -- 8. DAIUM EUNATION 1004 EQUALS SITE ELEVATION 7720 AS PREP,fiED 81 ASPEN SURAEY ENGINEERS {,\1 \\11;1)/ \11 IR \R(Ilill(1..]1< - D AABe MATCH AT, SHEET A2.4 , 5~ ADEM,COLORADOSMU (970)42.-1236 210 MAIN STREET CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81,23 -, 070 704.*730 \\ + -1 / .-- 0 , / 4 ----1 ---% -- ' 1 Z 0 7 6. 1 -1 t 3:12 3dz ) ' tn 111 4Â«\ - 1414Â« - E=EE=cr -, 1 L- VNIEY FLASHING -TIP. , rm 1 1 1 1 4-/ M PER USE.-TYP. , ' 1 1 4 -,i h E=*=C]1 N t 92 .."=/0/ .... 1 -- 0 ,â€¢â€¢Mrr=r i.,14/â€ž * lr.iai.=- .... I 3'-0 29-0 : Ann.17+3101 88 6 0-- *Mt#â€¢ltt- rin GARAGE KOOF PLAN 1--7 1/4.=14 1 HAnIa Hllfla amI Z 107 OaVHOEIOD 'NaÂ«;SV 2FO# mii-' NAOXIDI/ININg 5-DI H 4,4- r tr\\ . GENERAL NOTES: '4*.171%$422~ 1. Dll~ E,TERIOR DOORS /D WINDONS RE ROUGH OPENING ' ..%27 =17 9ZE ON PELLA CORPORATION. CONTR,CTOR IS 7 1 1 5 3 RES,Ovs/aLE Em ~UST/ENTS W ROUGH OPENINGS , ALTERNATE , -' ,11d-"V WANUFETURER 5 SELECTED.Â¥11DON MANFJO PR[MIED SHOP OR-INGS. 1 1 -111 WINDON MANF.TO PRO/#DE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED 81 CODE. 6 Z DIUM ELEN/ION 107IJ EOUNS SRE EUEVI,ON 7721, /S PREP/<0 Bf ASPEN SUFNEY ENSINGEERS. 1 4 -- i 3 :: 3. SEE WINDON N;D DOOR SCHEDULES W PROJECT OUTUNE FOR INFORMATION ON WINDONS /0 DOORS :: 2 1 â‚¬ ALL EXPOSED T#WEER AND BEAU ENDS TO HNE FLASHING al THE ~~*~-~-~~~~~ EXPOSED TOP- SEE WALL SECTIONS. rk TO. PLATE 1 2 u .. 1 -1.' '11 \ /2 14 - 11 -1/0 --4 ... --Vt--11 I2 --14 TD. PLATE ELÂ·~15'â‚¬ CARBONDALE. COLORADO 81623 7 0 0 8 mimical UPPER LEVEL TOPLY EL-105'â‚¬ IH 8 02 0 / ------------;5%*EVY.~ EL-940-67 8 3 4 11 NORTH ELEVATION A KEYNOTES 4 6 r r 11. 12 13 ~ CEDAR SHAKE ROOFING ~ STANDING SEAw 0 ' COPPER ROOFING ' L.11 STONE VENEER t2 -7/0 1 i B VERTICAL RECLAIWED BARNWOOD SDNG CEDAR SHINGLE SIOING A. TD.PLATE / 1 11 11 111 214 CEDAR WINOON TRIM 1 VP-EF/Eâ‚¬ ~~- 1 ' EXTERIOR POSTER I lili 1 11 ~ 1 1 ~1~11~ ~1'~ ~IL ~L L[[ E T/MBER TRUSS ~ TIMBER POST AND BEAM E WOOD RNUNG f TO. PLATE li lu 1 r--1---r-~ /2 1 '1 - 1-11 1 1 - 0 loRi - 1 . 1 -1 1 i 11 1 - UPPER LEVEL 18 IA /6 TOPLY - e 49 - - 1.- 11 1 - - Z .7 1 ,+i, -; -2421 4 -0 - I . 7 - -- I --- GARAGE LEr.+ 1- *42[r- 1 TD. SLAB 1,1 1- - 1- -- r EL-100-{7 CLLBREERInIN-~ 2 - V St 1--4 , 1 ENTRr LEVEL 1_ I 5 8 TO. SLiAB -21 SOUTH ELEVATION LOWER LEVEL- 1 _0_T.O.SLAB KG*r-6- 11 lim 1 29Â«.TO 1/3 POINT HAING 311,fl{I 3 107 0(IVHOEIÂ°1*Â«!SV HONEIGISPIN NAOMHALNIWIH 11 h GENERAL NOTES 1. Diwt EXTER,OR DOORS mO WINDONS RE ROUGH OPENING , SIZL ON PELLA CORPORKEKON. CONTRACTOR IS C D E G M REES. w...UE FOR ADJUSTMENTS IN ROUGH OPENINGS IF ATERNATE - 1' 41--37 c 1 r' 44- 1 34 MANUF#CTURER IS SELECTED. WINDO# MN,F JO PR~FIED SHOP DRININGS. WINDON WANF.TO PREWIDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED W CODE. 2. DITUM ELEVATION 101-C EOJALS STTE ELED#KTON 7729 AS PREPARED U Bf ASPEN SUPNEY ENGINGEERS. -1 1 1 1 SEE WiNDO# AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN PROJECT OUTUNE FOR jNFORMAIJON ON W/NDONS AND DOORS. 4. ALL EXPOSED TIMBER NID BEAM ENDS TO HA/E FLASHING ON THE - EXPOSED TOP- SEE WALL SECTIONS. 2 : 11 &- N (71 1 - 14. 5 -1. : 8 i2 EEDE 1 1 4 ] 1 11 ASrEN. COLORADO,1,11 7 1 12 7, MAB Er,DE,Er 1, -4 CAIBONDALE, COLORADO -23 [29 2, TO. PLATE E 1 '1 301 D AAÂ»C ':r-----2-669-4 (,737644730 10 1 1 . 'Â· - __242â‚¬E_.._0 El-408'â‚¬ UPPER LEVEL GA -0--El-----1------1- -. - D-1 FEIm FEEB rl 10 - 0 110 GARAGE LEVEL- ... 1 1 9 Â£ n _ T.0.5/ AR. ~. S 4 5 LOWER LEVEL 1 h WESTE Ta SLAB *- a3>-2---- ---- ----I-- -- -- I - - -- - - 1/4.= 1.-e 10 ~ 8 ~ 4 ~4 CLA<LCLE=.GA ~Â¥&12--A ~ ' L tÂ» Air I2 lou- I2 4n E ' 1 11 1 TO. PLATE1--+Mi Ed ---- -- -------------------------------------- - ---- ----------- -------'-.--- -Gag.- D.. Elb' 20 - 203 UPPER IEVEL - +61- 42-4/42 -.------&--- - - - 1 L MI E MER hI=-ra LOWER LEVEL rt--2- 4 -2 EL-94'-â‚¬' 1 1 _ -t# 1 -21 NORTH ELEVATION 2 4 PIDNEIGISMIN NAOXIH/.LATINg HAIHa H.LI,fl{[ aini 'Z 1.01 OCIPHOTOO'NadSV GENERAL NOTES: EXTER'OR DOORS -.0 WINDONS ARE ROUGH OPENING f. 0#hi- C D E G M RES. w.-LE FOR ADJUSTMENTS W ROUGH OPENINGS IF LIERNATE - -- Â¢ 4-XY 2 SIZE ON PELLA CORPORATION. CONTRITOR IS 2 11 MNIUFKCTURER IS SELECTED.WINOON MANFIO PRO.4ED SHOP DRMNINGS. WINDON WANF.TO PRWa TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED Br CODE. - Ft . 4 2- DATUM ELEVATION 10[7-{7 EQUALS SITE ELEVATON 7727 Â£ PREPARED | 44. t -- f T Bf ASPEN SUMEr ENGINGEERS. -IL -1 - 1 - 1 SEE WINDON AND DOOR SCHEDULES M PReECr OUT-UNE I-t~-22__, - FOR INFORMATION ON Â¥UNDONS Â»ID DOORS. 4. ALL EXPOSED TIMBER AND BEAM ENDS TO HNE FLASHING ON THE Q EXPOSED TOP- SEE WALL SECDONS. 1 2 I It 1 11 i ... -1 4 N (F) ..11 / 4 0 1 213. f ~ -=-1 9 12 -1/0 Â· 1 ---- m 28 imil EL-Eâ‚¬ , - D ALIC 11 1 1 M.) 42.2. 7 1 III 1 Ill AS/EN, COLORADO 01,11 ZE ' ' d T.O. PLATE /6 CARBONDAIACOLORADO -23 211 MAIN STIEET 10 F-182-79 (,71) 704.730 1 . 11 11 1 11 --_..ED-PLAE.f_--_~~ EL-108'â‚¬ UPPER LEVEL GA -0--00221 -_------ -4--..----------1.------------------ - n mammaia ELDS'â‚¬ '1 -[0 18 - 0 GARAGE LEVEL- U 0 E-2 TD.SLA8 8 EL-100'-1 LDNER LEVEL 4 3 1-WESTELEVATION -27.33-------------------------- -- - ---- - 1/4' = 60' - KEYNOTES ~ CEDAR SHAKE ROOFING ~ STANDING SEAN COPPER ROOFING ~ STONE VENEER 10 (9) 8 r ~ EXTER/M PLASTER 1 5 VERTICAL RECLNWED BARNWOOD SDNG , i ~ CEDAR SH/NGLE SLONG E-1 C 2.4 CEDAR W/NDOW T/?LU 00 0 i ~ ~ TWBER POST AND BEAU h A E TIMBER TRUSS 12 ' f lor- ~ WOOD RA/UNG 1 k I2 4F- ~~IÂ·2Â·_2#f~_ _~~_.*- _.- - - EL-#5'-6' EL-#4'â‚¬ n./. M 99 100 1 lei 1 20 2U 203 UPPER LEVEL - -0-39Â·PLY ------ --- -- - - EL-105'â‚¬ ..T 1- I -4--=/-*. -1 4 #.6 4/ 0 4- ubs/11& 62.8,0 86.riticok LONER LEVEL ---- -- -- -- ---- - -- -- - ----- -- --- -- - -- --- - ------- --- - - ------ ------------------------------ 1 - 1 1 - /y-h NORTH ELEVATION 2 - i -4 442 - 1 HONBIGISPIN NAOME[ HAIHa HJJ,fliI OGVHOTOO' NOTES: ~ 4 4 - 4- 77 L DOW EXTERIOR DOORS AND WINDONS RE ROUGH OPENING x - 1 SIZE ON PELLA CORPOREION. COffERKCTOR G L K J RESPONS,BLE FO? ACNSTMENTS W ROUGH OPENANGS , ALTERNATE 21% ; MMUFITURER IS SELECTED. WINDON MANFJO PRO,(IED SHOP DRANINGS - WINDOW INF.TO PROnDE TEMPERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED Br CODE. 1- - Z DITUM ELEVIT,ON 100-V EQUALS SfrE ELEVATION 7720 AS PREP,RED . ef ASPEN SUFNEY ENGINGEERS. i A 'Â·* 2 dll 3. SEE WINDOÂ¥ AND DOOR SCHEDULES IN PROJECT OUTUNE IrÂ»~ 1 FOR INFORMATION ON WINDONS AWD DOORS. 4- ALL EXPOSED TIMBER NID BEAN ENDS TO HNE FLASHING ON THE EXPOSED TOM SEE WALL SECTJONS. , 1 2 1 1 1- - - 1 - In 11 li li 11 11 1 11 1 1 1 111 300 D MBC 5 1 '']1 ~1 1 1,1 ASPEN, COLORADO.1,11 1, . . 201 MAIN KIFEET CARBONDALE. COLORADO 11*23 070) 7044750 10 UPPER LEVEL TO.PU -1 - -- -------1------ -+ u D EL-/05'â‚¬ Z Ed - 0 0 1 0 90 0 0 .4 a LONER LEVEL 4 5 ---------3033-------0- Oh EAST ELEVAT/ON ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~u...7---Gyzip- 0 g ~ KEYNOTES Z F N M ~ CEDAR SHAKE ROOFING E-1 H C.UL 01 STANDING SEAM 83 00 0 \\tt>/ 64.t COPPER ROOFING r E STONE VENEER Z ~ EXTERIOR PLASTER 5 VERT/CAL RECLA/MED ~ 5 1 BARNWOOD SIDNG I2 /or- E CEDAR Sm#GLE S/DING C I , ~ Zx4 CEDAR WINDOW TRIW 1 2 TIMBER POST AND BEAM 1 1 |2 ~ TIMBER TRUSS 4= < TD.PLATE -~7- 2-Â£485â‚¬---7 .. 1.11 ~ WOOD RNLING 11 11 1 1 1111:1 iiI 1 -Ill ... lili _0 TAPLATE - 1 U +.1 4 ELLDEâ‚¬ 7 il'i '11 -- g -f LE GARAGE LEVEL EBO- D 00 0 1 3-_ 4* T iL 4 _--4=47 P. 11,641' r r 1 ril_-EAST-GARAGEELEYATIOL_ - 1 00 000 1 -1 OGVHOE[00'NZI~ MANUFACTURER IS SELECrEAWINDO# 10â€¢FJO PRO/IED SHOP OR-UNGS. WINOON .ANF.TO PROADE TE.PERED GLASS WHERE REQUIRED 0 CODE. 1' 2. DZUâ€¢ Eled,noW,0017 EOUNS SITE ELEÂ·,Â£1011 772!NS PREPRED '1 0 ASPEN S~EY ENSINGEERS. 11 1 SEE WINDOâ€¢ AND DOOR SCHEOULES 01 PROJECT OUTUNE FOR INFORMATION ON I#NOCNIS MID DOORS 4.7 ! 1 2 1 4 "EXPOSED TWBER NIC) BEAW ENDS TO HA/E FLASHING ON THE EXPOSED TOP- SEE WALL SECTIONS. \1 2 7 0. . 1 1 /2 -3 o t2 -74 TO. PLATE < - D MIC AS,EX. COLOnADO uln M. 4--12â€¢1 311 MAIN Brnnrr n/1 0 E Â® E CARBONDAIA COLOUDO R 7 070)7â€¢4â€¢730 0 Â® k i {Coracol 3 1_-1 Â· UPPER LEVEL Al 2 1-APty % --------------------21/1-71 (1 Z 1 j\ 1 1 1 - -Mam -1 i I . l LONER LEVEL -Te..a-_.--~- -. EL-94'-60 El--2 8 3 4 - NORTH ELEVATION 1,4.r# 0 KEYNOTES--1 Q /21 0 e M.f r r 11.12 ~3~ m CEOAÂ·9 SHAKE ROOF-/NG V i 57 AONG SEAN E-1 COPPER ROOFING : ~ STONE VENEER Z /2 1 1 i ~ EXTE,9/0/? PLASTER -1/0 \ VERTICAL RECLNWED BARNWOOD SIOING ~ CEDAR SH/NGLE SOMG 1 ! i 2,4 CEDAR WINDON TRIM _ . . ... ... .-- 4+1'lul'liiI'll Il'lili 4 Ii'!WPÂ·HnÂ·, ,. 1311111111! BF 11 1 11 lilli. 1111 1111111 lilli ' 'i ilill.!ill' e TIMBER TRUSS TIMBER POST AND BEAU *11'11'11'J'111'11'11 111 1~ 1 11 11 1111111111111 11 1 D... ~2=Mg.'-Cl'- *In.PLATE 1 11llil' illilj~;Ii<'1111 411'' 11<'111'lli' 1.41 'lim~'111'1~ d 'ii 4 4 Il'| ' ipÂ¥- -- --327--0.-3-Â·i| 1 ||11 | | 1 lilli 111 1111'111 411 lifill'11 111 Ill 'll T - rr-En 1 1 !& 1111111111111 111 111 11111111111111111 1 11 1 EL-/14'-9 agg 'luBLL]E 74 - Illillill UPPER LEVEL . 18 IA PL TD.Ply ___ 03 23 GARAGE LEVEL TO. SLAB EL-109â‚¬ ENTRY LEVEL TD. SLAB 5 9 /2~1 SOUTH ELEVATION EUm-C LOWER LEVEL 79-<697â‚¬ L.- HAIHa 31.LflE[ amI Z 101 0(IVHOE[OD 'NE[qsv