The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20010425ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 25,2001 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS SITE VISITS - NOON - Meet at the first site. If you cannot attend, be sure to visit the properties on your own before the meeting. 311 S. First Street Hotel Jerome 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes 1-24-2001 -9- /9-49/ III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments and project monitoring V. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. OLD BUSINESS A. 515 W. Gillespie - Conceptual, Historic Landmark, Lot Split, On-site relocation, Partial Demolition, C.0.14; 10Â£~ a s, d.j 6:00 B. 735 W. Bleeker St. - Final Review, Continue Public Hearing to May 23, 2001 6:05 C. 640 N. Third Street - Historic Landmark, Conceptual, On-site relocation, Partial Demolition, Lot ~lit, variances, Public Hearing VII. NEW BUSINESS 6:50 A. 301 E. Hopkins - Minor, Public Hearing VIII. WORKSESSION 7:00 A. 311 S. First Street ...7:30 B. Hotel Jerome 8:00 VIII. ADJOURN ~~OJECT MONITORING Susan Dodington 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 930 King - No Problem Joe's 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald 330 Gillespie Ave. 232 E. Hallam St. 7a & Main Street 213 W. Bleeker 104 S. Galena St. Mary's Church Suzannah Reid 414 N. First- POLE 240 Lake Ave. 312 S. Galena * and Main 330 Lake Avenue 620 W. Bleeker Historical Society 328 Park Ave. - Lane Jeffrey Halferty 414 N. First- POLE 0 920 W. Hallam- Guthrie 212 W. Hopkins Ave. 312 S. Galena 620 W. Bleeker - Historical Society 213 W. Bleeker 200 E. Bleeker 328 Park Ave. - Lane Lisa Markalunas 939 E. Cooper- Langley (work stopped) 240 Lake Avenue- Greenberg 214 E. Bleeker- Brumder 330 Gillespie Ave. 520 E. Hyman Ave. 200 E. Bleeker 419 E. Hyman - Paragon Gilbert Sanchez 312 S. Galena 333 W. Bleeker Street 0 501 W. Main Christiania Lodge 330 Lake Ave. 121 5th & North - Ernie Frywald 200 E. Bleeker ,-Rally Dupps 419 E. Hyman - Paragon 501 W. Main Street - Christiania Lodge 129 W. Francis 435 W. Main 930 King Street 104 S. Galena St. Mary's Church Melanie Roschko 232 W. Hallam 520 E. Hyman 213 W. Bleeker 0 0 CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 34 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26,2001 35 W. Bleeker old house expires Oct. 14,2000 302 E. Hopkins- September 22,2001 HPC Legal Procedures (Submit affidavit of notice for PH - conceptual) Swear In Staff presentation Applicant presentation Board Questions and Clarifications PH opened and closed Board Comments Applicant Comments Motion 'YE A, MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Community Development Deputy Director FROM: Fred Jarman, Planner FJ. RE: 515 West Gillespie Street - Significant Conceptual Review / PUBLIC HEARING (Continued from March 14th, 2001) DATE: April 258,2001 1.<1 j~ '.T . a 1. : 1 1,Â· . r . 1,11 4 1 11 1 la. 1 1~1 1:1#14 mi GILLESPIE AVE S 1 0 1 ./. r ?%11 + It 11. f Af?PA YAVb:Z':.WIX. ' PEARL CT I 1,,A, .bIll, 11.4 l-1G Ill 1 1 r .il,11 \,f P/.233.GGa 3RTH ST C -VE :" 9 ,.-! F ift , 11 -I i ,<1 4 i i ~1 i... NA SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting Conceptual Review for the following land use approvals for a property located at 515 West Gillespie Avenue, City and Townsite of Aspen. 1. Historic Landmark Designation* 2. Historic Landmark Lot Split* 3. Partial Demolition 4. Relocation 5. 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus 6. Variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A; and a 7. Variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space, and BACKGROUND The subject property currently contains a two-story residence (pictured on front) that is listed on the City's Inventory of Historical Sites and Structures and is situated on a 9,540 square foot lot. The house was built in approximately 1887 and was originally located at 1 100 West Hopkins Avenue. It is approximately 1,681 square feet in size and is used as a single-family dwelling located in the R.-6 Zone District. The lot also contains a non- contributing garage that is not listed on the inventory. STAFF COMMENTS The applicant requests a historic landmark lot split that would result in two lots; Lot "A" having 3,608 square feet and Lot "B" having 6,000 square feet. Further, Section 26.480.030(A)(4) requires the applicant to allocate specific FAR to each newly created lot using the allowable duplex FAR for the fathering parcel. The duplex FAR. allowed for the fathering parcel is 4,093 square feet which is subsequently split between the two newly created lots: 1,580 sq. ft. to Lot A (which includes a 500 FAR sq. ft. bonus) and 3,013 sq. ft. to Lot B. The applicant has also formally requested for the FAR. bonus of 500 sq. ft., which may be awarded by the HPC if a project is considered as having significant merit. In recent developments, a neighboring property owner directly adjacent and to the west of the Beck's property, a Mr. And Mrs. Collins, questioned the accuracy ofthe lot line separating the two properties. This has remained an outstanding issue regarding this proposed develoment. Despite the potential boundary dispute, the applicant has proposed a development plan that would not be affected at all should the questionable lot line be decided in favor of the Collins. Therefore, the proposal currently before the Historic Preservation Commission has included two changes from the last continued public hearing. These changes include 1) a "proposed" new westerly lot line on Lot A, and 2) a proposed lot line adjustment to the easterly lot line of Lot B. The applicant is aware that a lot line adjustment, pursuant to the Aspen Land Use Code, cannot occur for the benefit of additional floor area (FAR) or increased density. Regardless, the applicant has proposed this lot line adjustment (a Commnity Develoment Director approval process) in order to 1) respect an existing fence separating the neighbors to the east, 2) provide a perceived greater amount of open space for the proposed two single-family units for Lot B as a result ofthe lot split, 3) straighten the lot line splitting the two lots (Lots A and B) to achieve a more traditional lot split configuration which will allow for the placement of structures on the lots to be perceived as two traditional 3,000 sq. ft. lots from the street. Staff finds this to be comemdable. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT It should be noted that the applicant has worked with the HPC in the form of a site visit, a Worksession, and two previous public hearings related to this request for conceptual approval. In addition, the applicant has provided the HPC with a conceptual level design for the newly created 6,000 sq. ft. lot which is not required by the Land Use Code review standards for lot splits or historic landmark lot splits. Staff finds that the efforts ofthe applicant to work with the HPC to make this a good project to be commendable. The applicant has worked with the HPC in great detail and good faith to show what will occur on proposed Lot B of this development. Moreover, it should be clear that the 2 request to place two single-family dwellings on Lot B is a conditional use request that is granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. In an effort to control sprawling growth and place residential development where residential development should go, the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) speficically supports the notion of the lot split. Lot splits are one of the many density incentives and prescribed in the action plan of the AACP as a practice of infill and redevelopment. Specifically, this action plan calls for possible amendments to the Code: "to allow and encourage greater residential densities within the original Aspen town site; allow easier subdivision ofproperties in the historic town site and allow for infill development." - page 40 and 49,2000 AACP Also, as listed as Action Plan number 52, the AACP calls for: " a review of the existing Historic Preservation program to see how well it is working and to maintain and add innovative ways to make preservation work in Aspen, such as the lot split, property tax relief, and to study the impacts of the FAR bonus." - Page 56,2000 AACP Pindly, uie AACP "encourages returning to higher density development within the city limits where appropriate."(page 39) Staff fmdsthalthis site and project promotes this appropriate type of increased density. FAR BONUS REQUEST Historic resources are finite and cannot be replaced, making them precious commodities and defining elements of a town's evolution. Historic resources are, in fact, slices in time, preserved to be appreciated and to help a community understand its past. This project is a strong example of how a valuable resource can be maintained and preserved with the evolution of a community. The recently adopted Historic Preservation Design Guidelines discuss specific examples / reasons that the HPC would award a project with a FAR Bonus. These include, but are not limited to: > When the parcel is larger than 9,000 square feet > When it is used to create a historic landmark lot split. > When the project shows an outstanding effort to preserve or restore the historic structure. 3 -Page 2,Historic Preservation Design Guidelines In addressing the examples stated above, Staff finds that the subject lot is larger than 9,000 square feet and the applicant is proposing a historic landmark designation in order to conduct a historic landmark lot split. Moreover, Staff strongly believes that this project demonstrates an outstanding preservation effort for several important reasons. First, the applicant is proposing to relocate the resource onto a portion of the lot that will continue to promote the prominence ofthe resource. Second, the majority of redevelopment proposals for historic resources, which make their way to the HPC, include rather large additions that obscure and mute the importance ofthe resource. The most recent of these HPC cases that received Final Approval from the HPC that also included a 500 square foot FAR bonus was that ofthe "513 West Smuggler" project designed by harry Teague. In that case, a very large and contemporary addition was approved less than a month ago before the HPC and granted a 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus. In this light regarding the size and style of that addition, the applicant has taken a very sensitive approach to the historic resource and is not requesting to place a large addition onto the resource as typically seen with many other "additions" which have occurred to some of Aspen's historic resources in the past. As a result of this approach, the applicant is proposing a very modest single-story addition to replace a non-historic addition at the very back of the house which meets all of the historic preservation design guidelines regarding additions. Lastly, the applicant is proposing very minor modifications to the rear fa~ade on the second story, which are consistent with the HPC's direction over the course of the last public hearings and work session. It is for all these reasons that Staff strongly believes this project merits a 500 square foot FAR bonus. FAR CALCULATIONS As a result of the recent changes made by the applicant as to the potential lot area reduction because of the lot line dispute, the FAR changes are as follows: Lot Split FAR Calculations Original Parent Lot Size = 9,539 sq. ft. Collins' Lot Line Dispute - 329 sq. ft. Remaining Lot Size = 9,210 sq. ft. Base Allowable FAR = 4,080 sq. ft. Lot Size Over 9,000 sq. ft. = 9,210 sq. ft.- 9,000 sq. ft. = 210 sq. ft. Additional Allowable FAR = 210 sq. ft. / 100 x 6= 13 sq. ft. Total Allowable FAR = 4,080 sq. ft. + 13 sq. ft. = 4, 093 sq. ft. FAR Totals For Each Lot Lot B Garage FAR = 500 sq. ft. - 250 sq. ft. - 125 sq. ft. = 125 sq. ft. Lot B FAR = 2 Houses (1,444 sq. ft. each) + 125 Garage = 3,013 Lot A FAR = 4,093 sq. ft. - 3,013 sq. ft. = 1,080 sq. ft. Lot A FAR with 500 sq. ft. Bonus = 1,080 sq. ft. + 500 sq. ft. = 1,580 sq. ft. 4 As a result of these changes, the FAR will be distributed as follows as a result of the lot split: Lot New Lot Area New FAR Lot A 3,608 sq. ft. 1,580 sq. ft. Lot B 6,000 sq. ft. 3,013 sq. ft. TREE REMOVAL/ RELOCATION There are several trees that the applicant proposes to either remove or relocate to another property. As required, the applicant has worked with the City of Aspen Parks Department in order to discuss the appropriate actions regarding the subject trees. The applicant received approval form the Parks Department to conduct the relocation / removal as requested. (Please see the issued permit and correspondence as Exhibit I.) BOUNDARY DISPUTE At this date, there remains to be a property boundary dispute between the Beck's (current owners) represented by the applicant and the Collins (neighbors to the west). At this point, the dispute has not officially been resolved. In any event, and as stated above, despite the potential boundary dispute, the applicant has proposed a development plan that would not be affected at all should the questionable lot line be decided in favor of the Collins. The applicant would like to move forward with the request for conceptual approval conditioned upon the boundary line determination being resolved prior to applying for final review before the HPC. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the HPC approve the requests for 1) partial demolition, 2) relocation, 3) variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'63 west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, 4) the 500 sq. ft. FAR. bonus, and 5) a variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space, and recommend City Council approve the Historic Landmark Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split for 515 West Gillespie Avenue, with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause; 2. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that any development of Lot "B" shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing; 5 3. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; 4. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district and residential design standards with the potential exception for variances to be approved by the HPC; 5. That Lots "A" and "B" are designated historic landmarks and must receive HPC approval for all development in accordance with Section 26.415 of the Municipal Code, as well at Section 26.410, the "Residential Design Standards;" 6. That the applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR for each newly created lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels, Lot "A" receiving 3,608 square feet of lot area and Lot "B" receiving 6,000 square feet of lot area. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on Lot "A" will be 1,580 s.f. (including a 500 square foot floor area bonus) and 3,013 square feet of floor area on Lot "B." The information specific to exact allocated FAR as indicated above for both lots as verified by the City Zoning Officer, shall be included on the plat, as a plat note; 7. That the applicant include, as a plat note, that the lot line adjustment, adding 398 sq. ft., was created not for the benefit of any additional FAR or increase density for the project; 8. That the applicant shall provide the Subdivision Exentption Agreement that includes the elements outlined in Section 26.480.030(A)(2) of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.480.070(E). (The Community development department can provide an example of this agreement to the applicant); 9. That the applicant agrees that prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement (if applicable) and pay the applicable recording fees; 10. The schematic design shown on the site plan presented to HPC is in no way approved or endorsed by the HPC. Any further development for the historic structure or on the lots created by this lot split shall be subject to further review as required by Section 26.415 of the Aspen Land Use Code; 6 11. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution, grants the applicant approval to allocate the FAR to be split between the two newly created lots (including the 500 sq. ft. bonus) to be 4,093 sq. ft. in total. The applicant shall appropriate this FAR in the following manner: Lot "A" as having 1,580 sq. ft. and Lot "B" as having 3,013 sq. ft. prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions (i.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). Further, these lot sizes and floor areas shall be indicated on the final plat that is recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and recorder's Office; 12. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution, grants the applicant approval to reduce the required off-street parking requirements from two spaces to one space for Lot "A"; 13. All information in regard to possible future development on the parcel shall be removed from the site plan prior to review of the historic lot split by City Council. Only the existing structures, proposed lot lines, and existing vegetation shall be represented; and 14. That the applicant shall provide the Community Development Department and Historic Preservation Commission with sufficient proof of a resolved lot line boundary dispute between the Collins and Beck's prior to the application for Final review before the Historic Preservation Commission. No action as described herein, shall proceed without acknowledged approval by the Community Development Director that this dispute has been completely resolved for all affected parties. 15. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation; 16. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 17. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor; 18. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 7 19. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 20. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 21. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 22. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; 23. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions; 24. That the applicant agrees that all brick restorations shall be reviewed by Staff and Monitor; and 25. That the applicant agrees that any restoration has to comply to the UCBC 1997 version; 26. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department; 27. That the HPC grants a 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus to be allocated to Lot A with the historic house (for a maximum floor area of 1,580 square feet). Lot B will then maintain the balance ofthe remaining FAR to be 3,013 square feet; 28. That the HPC grants the following variances: a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'63 west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, as represented by the applicant and a variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space; and 29. That the applicant shall enter into a common water service agreement with the City Water Department for the newly relocated house; 30. That the applicant, prior to Final Review before the HPC, provide the Community Development Department and HPC with a signed agreement 8 regarding the relocation of the Si Johnson Ditch and any tree relocation / mitigation issues with the City of Aspen Parks Department; and 31. That the applicant shall comply with the Universal Conservation Building Code (UCBC). RECOMMENDED MoTION "I move to approve Resolution No, 2, Series 2001, approving the requests for 1) partial demolition, 2) relocation, 3) Variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'63 west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, 4) a reduction in required off-street parking allowing one space, and 5) the 500 sq. ft. FAR- bonus and recommend City Council approve the Historic Landmark Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split for 515 West Gillespie Avenue, with the conditions stated herein." REVIEW CRITERIA AND STAFF FINDINGS EXHIBIT A - HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION EXHIBIT B - HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT EXHIBIT C - PARTIAL DEMOLITION EXHIBIT D - RELOCATION EXHIBIT E - HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES EXHIBIT F - RESOLUTION No. 2, SERIES OF 2001 EXHIBIT G - MEMORANDUM FROM PARKS DEPARTMENT EXHIBIT H - MINUTES FROM HPC MEETING JANUARY 10 AND MARCH 21, 2001 EXHIBIT I - TREE PERMIT & CORRESPONDENCE EXHIBIT J - ApPLICATION & DRAWINGS 9 EXHIBIT A HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION STANDARDS Any structure or site that meets two (2) or more of the following standards may be designated as an historic landmark. It is not the intention of the Historic Preservation Commission to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those, which are unique or have some special value to the community. A. Historical importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identijied or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Staff Finding: Staff does not have any knowledge of any significant historical events or persons associated with this structure. The structure was built by the Beck family and has been continuously resided in by their family since its original construction in 1887. B. Architectural importance. Based on the building form, use, or specimen, tile structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the 515 Gillespie structure, which was originally located at 100 West Hopkins and subsequently moved in 1971 to its current location, is an excellent example of Aspen's traditional Victorian Era architecture from before the turn of the century. This house is estimated to have been built in 1887 by Neil Beck's grandfather. A specific defining element of this architecture style includes the gable-end. This house style typically has a rectangular shape with a gable roof with the ridge running perpendicular to the street. Most, as this house does, have a porch on the gabled end and a smaller roof is attached to the shelter porch. Most tend to be wood sided and are 1 to 1 M stories; however this is an example of one which has 2 stories which is uncommon. Staff finds this criterion to be met. C. Designer. The structure is a signiJicant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Staff Finding: Staff does not have any information regarding the architect who designed this home. 10 D. Neighborhood character. The structure or site is a significant component of a historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Staff Finding: The structure is part of the historic West End of Aspen which gains its character from the prominence of historic homes such as the subject home at 515 Gillespie Avenue. Following this request for landmarking, the applicant intends to split the parent lot as result of a historic landmark lot split request. In doing so, the applicant will create two smaller, more historically sized lots typical of the west end. Staff finds this criterion to be met. E. Community character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location, and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the 515 Gillespie single-family home is a critical site for preservation as it is already established as a home on the inventory and is an important and defining historical element in Aspen's Historic West End neighborhood. This structure and site is important because of its relationship to the existing neighborhood and other similar homes in terms of size, location, and architecture. Given that this unique two-story Victorian Era gable-end home is in excellent condition and remains as an excellent example of Aspen's 1*1 century Late Victorian Age homes, it is a resource which should not be lost to demolition but rather preserved as a historic structure. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 11 EXHIBIT B HISTORICAL LANDMARK LOT SPLIT In order to conduct a Historic Landmark Lot Split, the applicant shall meet the following requirements of Aspen Land Use Code: SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS, LOT SPLIT The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met: a) The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the City Council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Staff Finding: The lot (encompassing lots 4,5, and 6) has not been previously subdivided since March 24,1969. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) No more titan two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.040(A)(1)(c). Staff Finding: Two lots are created as a result of the lot split - Lots A and B; both of which conform to the minimum lot size requirements of the R-6 zone district. An Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU), cash-in-lieu payment, or deed restriction on any new residence will be required for a proposed house on Lot B. An ADU or cash-in-lieu payment will be required on Lot A if more than 50% of the existing single-family house is demolished. The applicant may also choose to voluntarily provide an ADU on Lot A. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this chapter or a "lot spli " exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)00; and Staff Finding: Staff finds that the lot in question was not the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions of this chapter or "lot splif' exemption. Staff finds this criterion to be met. d) A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the ojfice of the 12 Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the applicant agrees that the filing of the subdivision plat, that meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, shall be submitted and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation. This shall be a condition of this approval. Staff finds this criterion to be met. e) Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the o#ice of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the applicant agrees that the plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall meet the timing requirements for recordation. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days, following approval by the City Council, shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Staff finds this criterion to be met. D In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site, which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for alot split. Staff Finding: Staff finds that the existing dwelling will not be demolished; rather, the applicant intends to relocate the historic single-family structure from Lot "B" onto Lot "A" subject to the proper application process and review by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section 26.415. Staff finds this criterion to be met. g) Maximum potential buitdout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home. Staff Finding: The applicant intends to move the historic single-family structure from Lot "B" onto Lot "A" and construct two single-family dwellings on Lot "B." The applicant is aware that 13 proposing to construct two single-family dwellings on a 6,000 square foot lot requires an application for conditional use to be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. It should be noted that the applicant has worked with the HPC in the form of a site visit, a worksession, and two previous public hearings related to this request for conceptual approval. In addition, the applicant has provided the HPC with a conceptual level design for the newly created 6,000 sq. ft. lot which is not required by the Land Use Code review standards for lot splits or historic landmark lot splits. Staff finds that the efforts of the applicant to work with the HPC to make this a good project to be commendable. The applicant has worked with the HPC in great detail and good faith to show what will occur on proposed Lot B of this development. Moreover, it should be clear that the request to place two single-family dwellings on Lot B is a conditional use request that is granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The total buildout shall not exceed three units and therefore Staff finds this criterion to be met. SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS, HISTORIC LANDMARK LoT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated historic landmark for the development of one new single-family dwelling. The Historic Landmark Lot Split shall meet the requirements of section 26.88.030(A)(2), section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), section 26.72.010(G) of this Code, and the following standards: a) The original parcel shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet in size and be located in the R-6 zone district or a minimum of 13,000 square feet and be located in the R-15A zone district. Staff Finding: The the fathering / original parcel is 9,608 sq. ft in size and is located in the R-6 zone district. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) The total FAR for both residences shaN not exceed the floor area allowed for a duplex on the original parcel The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the Subdivision Exemption Plat. Staff Finding: The duplex FAR which would have been allowed for the fathering parcel is 4,093 square feet (not including the 500 square feet FAR bonus.) The applicant has formally requested the FAR bonus award from the Historic Preservation Commission to allocate appropriate FAR to Lot A which would contain the relocated historic structure. The FAR to be split between the two newly created lots (including the 500 sq. ft. bonus) is 4,590 sq. ft. in total. The applicant wishes to appropriate this FAR in the following manner: Lot "A" as having 1,580 sq. ft. and Lot '13" as having 3,013 sq. ft. Further, these lot sizes and floor areas shall be indicated on the plat as a condition of approval once requested. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 14 c) The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district HPC variances and bonuses are only permitted on the parcel that contains a historic structure. Staff Finding: The proposed / newly created Lot A will contain the historic structure moved from Lot B. In addition, the applicant is requesting a historic landmark designation for that structure. As part of this request, the applicant is requesting two variances to be applied to the historic lot. These variances include a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A; and a parking variance to allow one off-street parking space rather than two for that garage. Any future development shall meet all dimensional requirements of the underlying R.-6 zone district. Additionally, the applicant understands that HPC variances and bonuses are only permitted on the parcel that contains a historic structure. The applicant intends to return to the HPC upon submitting an application for any further development on the newly created lots. These setback and parking variance will take place on Lot A which includes the historic resource. Staff finds this criterion to be met. GMQS EXEMPTION, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The construction of each new single-family dwelling on a lot created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split pursuant to Section 26.480.030(E). This exemption shall not be deducted from the respective annual development allotments established pursuant to Section 26.470.050 or from the Aspen Metro Area development ceilings established pursuant to Section 26.470.030. Exemption review is by the Community Development Director. This exemption shall only apply if the standards of Section 26.470.070(B)(1) or (2), as applicable, are met. Staff Finding: Staff finds that this exemption for the construction of each new single-family dwelling on a lot created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split shall not be deducted from the respective annual development allotments established pursuant to Section 26.470.050 or from the Aspen Metro Area development ceilings. Any development of Lot "B" (specifically the two proposed single-family dwellings) shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.470.060(B)(1) of the Municipal Code and shall be reflected in a plat note. 15 EXHIBIT C PARTIAL DEMOLITION No partial demolition of any structure included on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen shall be permitted unless the Historic Preservation Commission in accordance with the standards set forth in this Chapter approves the partial demolition. The applicant shall be required to address the following Standards for review of partial demolition. No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: a) The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or tile structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel, and Staff Finding The applicant has included a partial demolition plan as indicated on the site plan. The applicant is requesting approval to 1) demolish a small non-historic shed addition on the rear of the historic house, 2) demolish the non-historic subgrade level and stairs, and 2) demolish a non-historic separate detached garage currently existing at the rear of the site. This demolition will eliminate non-historic portions /additions ofthe house. It should be noted that the existing siding on the house is not historic siding original to the structure. Staff finds that the partial demolition of the rear shed addition and subgrade level and stairwell does not detract from the historic structure and the detached garage on the rear of the lot does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff finds this criterion to be met. b) The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance Of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and Staff Finding The applicant intends to remove only non-historic elements from the existing structure. In addition, the addition to be demolished is located in the rear of the house and not seen from the street and as a result, The house, in large part, will maintain its historic significance as defined by the Late Victorian Age in which it was built. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 16 f (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding The three portions of the existing home will not significantly interfere with the architectural character or integrity of the home. The existing non-historic addition to the rear of the house is not easily distinguished from the historic portion of the house. The applicant intends to replace this addition with a new addition that will be somewhat distinct and more easily distinguished from the historic structure. Again, this partial demolition and reconstruction of a new addition will occur in the rear of the historic structure and not viewed from the street. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 17 EXHIBIT D RELOCATION No on-site relocation of any strucmre included on the Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures of the City of Aspen shall be permitted unless the on-site relocation is approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. The applicant shall be required to address the following Standards for review of off-site relocation. No approval for off-site relocation shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: a) The structure cannot be rehabilitated or reused on its original site to provide for any reasonable beneficial use of the property, and Staff Finding As stated earlier, the house was built in 1887, originally located at 100 West Hopkins Street, and moved to its current location in 1971. Currently, the house is usable as a residence in its present location. The applicant intends to move the house as a result of the ability to conduct a historic landmark lot split provided the City Council grants landmark status to the property. b) The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation, and Staff Finding The new location of the historic home to Lot A will continue to maintain the front (or north facing) facade and its relationship to the street. In addition, the location will also promote exposure of the western faâ„¢le as a result of the angled position of the new adjacent house. There will be no loss of exposure of the east fagade of the house as a result of the move. Even though this fa~ade may be considered architecturally insignificant, it may be even more promoted as a result ofthe new development on Lot B. Staff finds that the move will not diminish the historic integrity ofthe house. Staff finds this criterion to be met. c) The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of tile structure proposed for relocation, and Staff Finding Bill Baily, a local house mover, originally moved the house to its current location in 1971 from 100 West Hopkins Street. He has recently restudied the house and found that the house can be moved without any damage to the structure. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 18 d) A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security approved by HPC with the engineering department, to insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair Â«f required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation, and Staff Finding The applicant, as a condition of approval, and prior to the application of building permits, shall be required to post a bond or other financial security approved by the HPC with the engineering department to ensure safe relocation of the structure. Staff finds that this will be included as a condition of approval. e) The receiving site is compatible in nature to the structure or structures proposed to be moved, the character of the receiving site's neighborhood is consistent with the architectural integrity of the structure, and the relocation of the historic structure would not diminish the integrity or character of the receiving site's neighborhood. An acceptance letter from the property owner of the receiving site shall be submitted. Staff Finding For all practical matters, the historic house will be relocated on the same lot where it currently sits. (The house will move approximately 40 feet to the west.) As a result ofthe lot split, the house actually changes lot locations; however, the nature and character ofthe lot does not drastically differ from current conditions. The receiver site is compatible in nature with the sending site and the neighborhood will not suffer from the movement of this structure. Moreover, the Aspen Area Community Plan calls for increased residential density. Staff finds that the lot split continues to be an incentive to promote this density increase while maintaining the historic lot sizes and relationships of dwellings. The receiver site will accommodate the house in accordance with all zoning provisions and the associated dimensional requirements. No letter of acceptance is required because both lots are owned by Mr. Bone. 19 EXHIBIT E HISTORIC PRESERVATION GUIDELINES 1. Lot Splits The City provides several incentives for residential property owners to divide the square footage that could be built on a landmark parcel into two separate houses in order to reduce the size of both buildings, to reduce the size of an addition made to a historic house and to reinforce the original character of many of Aspen's neighborhoods, which had small houses on 3,000 square foot lots. This section of the Historic Preservations Guidelines deal almost entirely with new development on lots that result from an historic landmark lot split. There are no development plans proposed with this current application; Staff will perform an analysis of any new development proposal on the newly created lot with using the elements in these guidelines as major tools. 2. Building Additions Many historic buildings in Aspen experienced additions over time as the need for more space occurred. In some cases, owners added a wing onto a primary structure for use as a new bedroom, or to expand a kitchen. Typically the addition was subordinate in scale and character to the main building. This tradition of adding onto buildings should continue. It is important, however, that a new addition be designed in such a manner that it preserves the historic character of the original structure. It is important, that new additions do not detract from the character of the building or obscure significant features There are a few basic principles for new additions that are prescribed by Aspen's Historic Preservation Guidelines. In general they include minimizing negative effects that may occur to the historic building fabric, the addition should not affect the perceived character of the building, and keep the size ofthe addition small in relation to the main structure. Specifically, the guidelines indicate: 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. Staff finds that the proposed new addition does not reflect the exact character of the historic house but is not too inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building. Further, the addition does not attempt to portray an earlier period than that of the primary building or imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. The proposed addition is made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. In addition, the addition maintains changes in setbacks, materials, and architectural style from the historic 20 building, that help define a change from old to new construction. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. Staff finds that this addition is lower than the height of the primary building. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. The proposed addition will be located in the rear of the historic resource. Staff maintains that the addition does not interfere with any primary facades allowing the original proportions and character to remain prominent. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Staff finds that the two roofs proposed are appropriate because they are shed roofs. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. This addition does not result in the loss or severe alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines. There is some siding that will be replaced with the west portion of the addition; however, this siding is determined not to be historic to the original structure. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. With the exception of the metal roof materials, the new materials are similar to the original materials. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. The new addition does not overhang the lower floors of the historic building in the front or on the side and the dormer on the main roof which covers the proposed doors from the upper bedroom are subordinate to the overall roof mass and remain in scale with historic roof structures and is located below the primary structure's ridgeline. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. The proposed rooftop addition will not be seen from the street so as to help preserve the original profile of the historically significant building. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 21 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. Staff finds that the rooftop shed dormer is subordinate in scale and not seen from the street so that it does not detract from the historic nature of the house as it is seen from the street. However, it appears to be a large cut into the form of the roof and significantly changes the "read" of the south elevation. Yet is not street facing so that the historic appearance is not severely adulterated. Staff finds that the proposed addition meets this guideline. 3. Building Relocation / Foundations Generally, removing a structure from the parcel with which it is historically recorded will compromise its integrity. However, there may be cases when relocation will not substantially affect the integrity of a property and its rehabilitation can be assured as a result. In this particular case, the house was originally located at 100 West Hopkins Avenue and was subsequently relocated to its current location in 1971. This application calls for demolishing the non-historic basement which serves as the current basement The Historic Preservation Guidelines contain language referring to protecting the resource prior to and during relocation. Specifically, wood panels should be mounted on the exterior of the building to protect existing openings and particularly historic glass. Further, special care should be taken to keep from damaging door and window frames and sashes in the process of covering the openings. The guidelines specifically indicate: 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. This particular request for relocation is of an individual structure rather than a structure in a historic district. In general, a relocation of this sort has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. In addition, the applicant intends to maintain the historic structure with the exception of placing an addition in the rear. In doing so, this relocated building shall be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. In addition, the applicant, as a condition of approval, shall provide a plan to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.2 Moving an existing building that contributes to the character of a historic district should be avoided. Staff has considered the significance of this house and the character of its setting and found that a relocation on an adjacent lot will not detract from its historic significance given the fact that this house once stood at 100 West Hopkins prior to 1971. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. Staff finds that this house, as proposed, will remain on the parent lot as the result of a historic landmark lot split and both newly created lots will remain in the purview of the 22 Historic Preservation Commission for any further development. Staff finds that the 0 proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. As proposed, the house will face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback as its current location. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. The applicant intends to relocate the house onto a basement similar to the basement on which it currently sits. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. The elevation heights will not be drastically changed as a result of the newly relocated house on to its new foundation thereby maintaining its current historic significance. Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. The applicant proposes two light wells in order to provide light and ventilation to the subgrade basement. Neither lightwells are on the front fagade of the house (per the Residential Design Standards). Staff finds that the proposed relocation meets this guideline. 0 0 23 EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO.41 SERIES OF 2001 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING A PARTIAL DEMOLITION, RELOCATION, VARIANCES FOR A FOUR (4) FOOT EAST SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCE AND A THREE FOOT SIX INCH (3'6") WEST SIDE SETBACK VARIANCE FOR A GARAGE ON THE REAR OF LOT A, AND OFF-STREET PARKING FOR LOT A, A 500 SQ. FT. FAR BONUS, AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 515 WEST GILLESPIE AVENUE, LOTS 4, 5, AND 6, BLOCK 99, HALLAM ADDITION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, ASPEN, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2735-121-11-007 WHEREAS, the applicant, Pamela and Neil Beck, represented by Randall Bone, requested the following land use approvals for a property located at 515 West Gillespie Avenue, Lots 4,5, and 6, Block 99, Hallam Addition, City and Townsite of Aspen: 1. Historic Landmark Designation 2. Historic Landmark Lot Split 3. Partial Demolition 4. Relocation 5. 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus 6. Variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'63 west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, and 7. Variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space; and WIIEREAS, the property is currently listed in the City of Aspen's Inventory of Historical Sites and Structures; and WHEREAS, this application for a Historic Landmark Designation, Historic Landmark Lot Split meets all of the Development Review Standards of Section 26.420.010, Section 26.480.030(A)(2), and Section 26.480.030(A)(4) in order for HPC to grant approval; WHEREAS, in a staff report dated April 25th, 2001, the Community Development Department determined the application for a historic landmark designation and historic landmark lot split met the applicable review standards indicated above, and recommended approval with conditions; and 24 WHEREAS, at a public hearing, which was legally noticed and held at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on April 25th, 2001, at which time the HPC considered and found the application to meet the review standards, and approved the Partial Demolition, Relocation, 500 sq. ft. FAR. bonus, Variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'63 west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, Variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space, and recommended City Council approve the request for Historic Landmark Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split with conditions by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission approve the requests for 1) partial demolition, 2) relocation, 3) variances for a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, 4) the 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus, and 5) a variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space, and recommends City Council approve the Historic Landmark Designation and Historic Landmark Lot Split for 515 West Gillespie Avenue, with the following conditions: 1. A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development and Engineering Departments and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of final approval by City Council. Failure to record the plat and subdivision exemption agreement within the specified time limit shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by City Council will be required for a showing of good cause; 2. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that any development of Lot "13" shall be required to mitigate for affordable housing; 3. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that the lots contained therein shall be prohibited from applying for further subdivision and any development of the lots will comply with the applicable provisions of the Land Use Code in effect at the time of application; 4. As a minimum, the subdivision plat shall contain a plat note stating that all new development on the lots will conform to the dimensional requirements of the R-6 zone district and residential design standards with the potential exception for variances to be approved by the HPC; 5. That Lots "A" and "B" are designated historic landmarks and must receive HPC approval for all development in accordance with Section 26.415 of the Municipal Code, as well at Section 26.410, the "Residential Design Standards;" 25 0 6. That the applicant shall verify with the City Zoning Officer the total allowable FAR for each newly created lot, taking into account any and all applicable lot area reductions. The property shall be subdivided into two parcels, Lot "A" receiving 3,608 square feet of lot area and Lot "B" receiving 6,000 square feet of lot area. Provided it is found by the Zoning Officer that no lot area reductions are required, the maximum allowable FAR on Lot "A" will be 1,580 s.f. (including a 500 square foot floor area bonus) and 3,013 square feet of floor area on Lot "B." The information specific to exact allocated FAR as indicated above for both lots as verified by the City Zoning Officer, shall be included on the plat, as a plat note; 7. That the applicant include, as a plat note, that the lot line adjustment, adding 398 sq. ft., was created not for the benefit of any additional FAR or increase density for the project; 8. That the applicant shall provide the Subdivision Exemption Agreement that includes the elements outlined in Section 26.480.030(A)(2) of the Aspen Municipal Code, and shall meet the recording and timing requirements described in Section 26.480.070(E). (The Community development department can provide an example ofthis agreement to the applicant); 9. That the applicant agrees that prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy on either lot, the applicant shall sign a sidewalk, curb and gutter construction agreement (if applicable) and pay the applicable recording fees; 10. The schematic design shown on the site plan presented to HPC is in no way approved or endorsed by the HPC. Any further development for the historic structure or on the lots created by this lot split shall be subject to further review as required by Section 26.415 ofthe Aspen Land Use Code; 11. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution, grants the applicant approval to allocate the FAR to be split between the two newly created lots (including the 500 sq. ft. bonus) to be 4,093 sq. ft. in total. The applicant shall appropriate this FAR in the following manner: Lot "A" as having 1,580 sq. ft. and Lot "B" as having 3,013 sq. ft. prior to consideration of potentially applicable lot area reductions O.e., slopes, access easements, etc.). Further, these lot sizes and floor areas shall be indicated on the final plat that is recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and recorder's Office; 12. That the HPC herein and pursuant to this Resolution, grants the applicant approval to reduce the required off-street parking requirements from two spaces to one space for Lot "A"; 0 13. All information in regard to possible future development on the parcel shall be removed from the site plan prior to review of the historic lot split by City 26 Council. Only the existing structures, proposed lot lines, and existing vegetation shall be represented; and 14. That the applicant shall provide the Community Development Department and Historic Preservation Commission with sufficient proof of a resolved lot line boundary dispute between the Collins and Beck's prior to the application for Final review before the Historic Preservation Commission. No action as described herein, shall proceed without acknowledged approval by the Community Development Director that this dispute has been completely resolved for all affected parties. 15. That the applicant shall submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation; 16. That the applicant shall submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating how the existing materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage; 17. That no elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist outside of approval granted by the HPC and no existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staffand monitor; 18. That the HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures; 19. That there shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor; 20. That the preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction; 21. That the applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC Resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit; 22. That the General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit; 27 23. That all representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions; 24. That the applicant agrees that all brick restorations shall be reviewed by Staff and Monitor; and 25. That the applicant agrees that any restoration has to comply to the UCBC 1997 version; 26. That the applicant shall not track mud onto City streets during demolition. A washed rock or other style mud rack must be installed during construction as a requirement of the City of Aspen Streets Department; 27. That the HPC grants a 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus to be allocated to Lot A with the historic house (for a maximum floor area of 1,580 square feet). Lot B will then maintain the balance ofthe remaining FAR to be 3,013 square feet; 28. That the HPC grants the following variances: a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance for a garage on the rear of Lot A, as represented by the applicant and a variance for a reduction in off-street parking to one space; and 29. That the applicant shall enter into a common water service agreement with the City Water Department for the newly relocated house; 30. That the applicant, prior to Final Review before the HPC, provide the Community Development Department and HPC with a signed agreement regarding the relocation of the Si Johnson Ditch and any tree relocation / mitigation issues with the City of Aspen Parks Department; and 31. That the applicant shall comply with the Universal Conservation Building Code (UCBC). APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of April, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney 28 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Deputy City Clerk C:\My Documents\Current Cases\HPC\515 W Gillespie\515WGillespie Conceptual Memo.doc 29 Ex 411.4 6 . 4 . 4 MEMORANDUM TO: ROW FROM: Tom Rubel Parks Field Supervisor DATE: 11/27/00 RE: 515 Gillespie ditch modification The applicant's representative stated that the ditch running through 515 Gillespie will be moved when the house is remodeled. They are going to move the ditch per the attached plan and add no landscaping or rocks to the ditch. This is acceptable to the Parks Department. Sincerely 1*/1 L*63: Thomas A. Rubel City ofAspen Parks Dept. Field Supervisor 0 GILLESPIE ST. I . Ill 0 00 ,~ 2..* 1 SToRY' 5'-Al O .....fil 1 ,/Â» <it 11 U L- ..:513 :: 1=1 mil=1 -1,1- Ill i 11; 1 11# I 1 STOICY 3 /01 C= . 1/ / -- PJ<ed 1- 111 - 61 61 8 :d.,r,lu.ill /,1 lili 11 l!, 2 STORY // -t/b . readetr a 70 E I It a. UNIT I //3 1 TOTAL 'wt â€¢ rptmok 1450 SP. ot ii 7: <P" it meerr- 1 STOR'r E , I 6,â€¢RAGE . // \ - 75 O/9: ---21 62:S---fi ,/0. DITGH LOCATION /0 -2<STING DITCH UOCATION LOT 'Et Â°1~OT 'A' NEW LOT HISTORIC LOT r PORCH 6000 62. 9534 5.F. 0 I STORY-j' rolea 0 / 2 STORY ----meetr 0 I STORY 0 -'1154===U ,0.-aae" -k 4-W 1\/1 O 1 STORY a.merr 7 G UNIT 2 TOTAL PAR - ,-PORCH 1 9-0. 00 \ DRIVE ! 1 NORTH C,/*) SITE PLAN FV NEM DUPLEX - 1/v= 10-Ou 4. Exul. 1- 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF. January 10. 2001 515 W. GILLESPIE - LOT SPLIT - PH Fred Jarman, planner relayed that the hearing is a conceptual review. The plan is to take the 9,039 square foot lot and conduct a lot split. The request is to move the structure over to lot A and have P&Z do a conditional use for two single family houses or a duplex. The FAR is allocated between the two lots. The total of one lot will be 3,539 square foot and 6,000 square feet for the other. The non-contributing garage is proposed to be demolished and a new garage constructed on the rear portion of Lot A. An easement will be requested for access. Fred displayed existing and proposed diagrams. The house was moved to its current location in 1971 from 100 W. Hopkins. The idea is to pick up the house and do a new foundation/basement and the later addition will be demolished and a new addition added with the extension of an upstairs bedroom. A couple of windows will be replaced on the east facade. The Si-Johnson ditch runs through the portion ofthe property and the applicant has dealt with the Parks Dept. and essentially has approval to relocate the ditch. He is also working with the Parks Dept. on the relocation o f trees. There is a boundary issue with the neighbors which have a lot to do with where the lot line is and where the FAR is allocated. Staff recommends approval of the Lot Split, designation, variances and the addition. The addition is very minor and does not compromise the historic integrity. Swearing in: Randall Bone, Charles Collins, Werner Kmurr, Goldie Kmurr, Shane Harvey - Randall relayed at the last meeting the request was to see more of the design work that meets the historic criteria, which shifts development away from the historic cottage. There are no changes to the historic windows and the addition was pulled back. The Collins' are here because of the west boundary dispute. They are still in the process of negotiating that. 11 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF. January 10. 2001 0 Lisa said with the boundary dispute they are within 7 feet of the allowable FAR on lot A which is the historic house. Lisa inquired about the dispute and FAR. Randall said if they were to loose the feet it would have a small impact on the FAR, about 10 square feet and that could easily be taken out in the garage. They would not expect a FAR bonus. Fred reiterated that the conditional use is the ability to do two single-family dwellings or one duplex on one lot. Suzannah opened the public hearing. Charles Collins said #10 should state that the FAR issue should be resolved before going to the other boards and that condition should be amended. Suzannah said the boundary issues need to be resolved before they go to P&Z. 0 Jan Collins said there is no resolution on the survey yet and does the process go on without the resolution. Randall said before we go to the next step the lot line has to be resolved. Charles relayed that the neighbors would prefer the historic to stay to the east. Staff will redo condition 6, 7 and 10 for clarification. He also had concerns whether a two-car garage would work due to the parking problems. Suzannah informed the public that there are two parking spaces required on the new lot to be off the street. Randall said one car will be in the garage and the other pulled off. Werner Kmurr, neighbor said he does not understand the favorable view of Lot Splits by the board and the 500 square foot bonus when the rest of us remodeled and strictly adhered to the guidelines. With the bonus there over 0 crowding of lots. You will not be able to see this from the street and it is 12 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINIJTES OF. , January 10. 2001 0 ridiculous. 735 W. Bleeker is crowded and was built by Randall. He feels this lot split will benefit one family. Suzannah closed the public hearing. Amy tried to clarify to the public that by right they are already allowed to have two single-family houses on this property. There is no greater development on the site than could be allowed. This board is only supporting breaking up the square footage into smaller structures, which is more historic and more appropriate. Werner Kmurr informed the board that they are setting a precedent. Commissioner Comments Lisa has concerns that there are no guarantees that we have separate structures. She also has concerns about the amount of development and number of structures as Mr. Kmurr over powering the site. She also agreed that the Gillespie house facade is compromised by the addition and has major impacts on the historic house. 0 She would rather support a carriage house structure on the south part of the lot but she understands that is not desirable by the owner. She is not in support of the bonus as the architecture is a little too extreme. It was described as being subtle and she does not find that to be the case. She is not in favor of window openings on the historic east facade of the house and the parking waivers are major concerns to that neighborhood because it is heavily impacted by the Music Tent parking. She would not support the approval of this project listed. Susan dittoed Lisa's comments. The new portion should be set back to give the old house prominence as Lisa suggested a carriage style. She supports the lot split but has concerns about not knowing what is going to be there. She would like one structure set back or two smaller ones. She has never liked this from the beginning but appreciates the change in the back of the historic house and made it smaller. The preservation of the front of the house in its entirety is commendable. The addition to the historic house in the back is appropriate. On that street the house is one ofthe most 0 13 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF. Januarv 10. 2001 0 prominent historic houses. At the work session it was discussed setting it back. She cannot support the project as presented. Jeffrey relayed that he is in support of the Lot Split as it enables designers and architects to mitigate the volume and mass that gets added onto these very important resources. He can support the conceptual as long as the dispute is settled between the two parties. He favors the ditch relocation. Jeffrey also said he has some reservation on the dormer portion as well as the form offthe rear o f the house. He would suggest going to a gabled dormer possible and not a shed for final. Continue to study that elevation. He feels the FAR should be a performance based bonus for conceptual design. He favors the improvements to the historic house and favors the garage design. There are detailing issues that need to be addressed at final concerning the new dormer into the historic roof. Suzannah supports the lot split and one ofthe problems is the irregularity of the division of the lots as opposed to rectangular lots. 1587 square feet is a reasonable size for a house. She has concerns about the design of the 0 additions and the window openings in the historic building. In particular the new double hung on the south side on the second floor. The single one has a lot of character in terms of historic and her concern is duplicating that window and make it too generic in that particular case. The light well on the east side need to be checked to see if it has the five foot setback that is required by the residential design review standards. Lisa asked the board if they would rather see venting on the sides or roof. Randall said the siding is new and he could either. The vents are small. Randall said the goal of HPC, council and the town is to pull things into town and end up with smaller units. The density is in response to feedback that he got. He does not want to do a project that in two years people say he did an injustice to town. The increased density does take away but there is no way around that. 0 They looked at the gable and that is something that can be looked at again and worked out. He also said he could change the configuration of the 14 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF. . January 10. 2001 0 window. The two non-historic windows were reconfigured due to the kitchen area, rather than making it a giant blank wall. He said the window can go in the wall if HPC feels it is appropriate. David Hoefer, city attorney said ifthe vote is 2 x 2 it would be a denial. The applicant may want to request a continuance. Suzannah relayed that the outstanding issues should be resolved before coming back to HPC. MOTION: Jeffrey moved to continue resolution #2, the public hearing and conceptual development on 515 W. Gillespie until March 14, 2000; second by Susan. Yes Vote: Jeffrey, Suzannah, Susan, Lisa Motion carried 4-0. 332 W. MAIN STREET -CONCEPTUAL -PUBLIC HEARING Sworn in were Harry Teague, David Kelleher, Jason LaPointe 0 Fred Jarman, planner informed the HPC that the request is for a partial demolition to construct a new addition, request the 500 square foot bonus and associated variances with the project. The structure was built in 1880 and is a two-story structure. It is land marked on the inventory and the lot is 4,500 square feet. The current use is office/residence. The proposal is to remove the front porch and reassemble the front porch as it looks today with pieces from the old porch. The house will be lifted and a basement put underneath. The second addition is proposed to be demolished which include a car-port and a newer addition built. The house would return to its exact footprint. - Staff supports the proposal. Access too the current car port is offthird street and at the rear of the house there is an alley and staff supports accessing off the alley. One parking space is off the alley and they are meeting the parking requirements. The board should pay particular attention to the 0 access issue. 15 THE CRY OF ASPEN Parks OfEce 920-5120 Ext&.7- I. TREE REMOVAL PERAdIT APPLICATION The following is an outline to assist in the preparation of a tree removal permit 1) Outline/Sketch/Drawing of property to include: (please attach 2 copies) a) Property address. b) Property boundaries. c) Locations ofbuildi:ags on the property. d) Location, diameter, and species oftrees on property and designate with arrows & circles which trees are.to be removed. 2) Site address 515 Cillcopic 3) List trees to be removed, species and diameter at 4.5' above grade. * 8" Willow tobbe removed * 14" Willow to be moved on site (see attached plan) * 14" Spruce to ke moved off site to Gerald Hines' house 4) Reason for Removal 0 To accommodate telocation and preservation of historib house at 515 Gillespie 5) Mitigation Plan (relocation oftrees or replacement ofcomparable worth trees as. referenced in Aspen Municipal Code Sec. 13-76, (e)). Add to.Rroperty Drawing. a) Location of replacement/relocation.trees. b) Size and species of trees to be replacei * 8" Willew r,moved to be mitigated by (at the direction of the Parks Dept.) adding additional Aspens to the site, addition of trees and shrubs to the right of way across Gillespie (next to patkligglot) or Dayment of fees.. 6) Col:opletion Date oi Project 12/01 7) Person responsible for project (applicant): Neil and Pamela Beck L ibby Thurman . D 114 jÂ»-/ Property Owner 2- Name ofArchitect or Construction Representative 515 West Gillespie Avenue Wind River Tree 963-0744 .Â· Address & Phone Number 948 9928 Company name Phone Number $ A .0 i 4 LE )77.r' waÂ· 6-(Â·C--1-- 8/25/00 Signature Date Signature Date MUST BE POSTED ON PROPERE'Y Th~following is to be com d by the City of Aspen Parks Depart t. Property/Tree Inspection: - 2, -4 ovk,bo Inspected by Date Signature Date V Comments: This historic property contains multiple examples of large, mature vegetation. Applicant has demonstrated through extensive materials provided that the transplant of this tree has a high potential degree of success. The natural resource manager has asked for an extremely detailed listing of items to ensure that this project is procedurally correct. This listing of materials is on file a the Parks Department office and is considered a portion of this approved permit. Any deviations from this agreement will not be allowed without the written permission from the natural resource manager. The following items have been provided by the applicant per the natural resource managers request: 1) Mitigation check in the amount of $1808.64 for the removal of one 8 inch Willow. 0 2) Official Letter of credit in the amount of $5538.96 which equals 1/2 the appraised value of one (1) 14 inch spruce and Z the appraised value of one (1) 14 inch willow. This letter of credit shall be returned after a period of three (3) years if the trees successfully survive the transplant process. 3) A signed contract from a horticulturist, in this case Prima Plant Services with a three year tree care plan designed to assist the tree through the transplant process. This plan has been reviewed and EDITED by the natural resource manager.. The plan is approved with these edits only. 4) A letter from the contractor describing his experience, proposed techniques, construction information, traffic routes, equipment, and multiple other facets of the transplant procedure. These procedures shall be followed only as outlined. 0 Th~'following are addi al requirements: 1) Contractor shall place tree protection fencing at the dripline of each of the trees and significant vegetation which are to remain at the construction site. This fencing shall remain in place throughout construction on the property. No excavation, storage of backfill, storage of materials, or traffic of any kind shall occur within this protection zone. 2) The contractor shall contact the natural resource manager at least 4 days in advance of the exact time and procedures relating to the . transplant. 1) (ClE@ja> / Denied Stephen Ellsperman ~a.~--~ i'Ll "100 Forester and Natural Resource Specialist, City of Aspen Signature Date Permit Valid for one year after completion date of project (line 6). 6 /0 44 l 1 '03 P'\ L- I 6Â£244 a 1/ act.-yi-+ - ~-0-62 5- 200 / ~ County ofPitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(ED I, I**bA-Â·â‚¬-4~ '~Eo A k. , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(F) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy ofwhich is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid US. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the 9 day of A-prd , 200 1 (which is 2/ days prior to the public hearing date of Ap.4 'Er-M- ). 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the Y day of Ar| , 2001, to the U--day of 410 1 , 200 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 1_ day of 44 , 200Â£. by 72--64- I WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expire*ly Commbion Bpkes August 28, 2001 Nota~ Publf l~----ifIAS~ KIM MARIE DiSAD/O Notary Pubac State of Co~rado PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 515 W. GILLESPIE LANDMARK DESIGNATION / HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT / SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 25th, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Neil and Pamela Beck requesting approval for a Landmark Designation, Historic Landmark Lot Split, Relocation, and a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance. The property is located at 515 W. Gillespie and is described as Lots 4-6, Block 99, Hallam Addition, of the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Fred Jarman at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5102, fredj@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 3, 2001 City of Aspen Account :FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z PETERSON JAMES D KAUS PETER & EVA ' Â· FAMILY 1RUST PETERSON HENSLEY R 8401 VISTA LN 433 W GILLESPIE PO BOX 1714 PRESCOTT AZ 86301 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 IJRAND LOYAL In DR & BERNICE NORTH FOURTH STREET ODOM JOHN A JR BLACK ASSOCIATES ODOM LORRIE FURA/IAN 4314 FAWN CT RT 1 C/O MIKE CONVISOR 11490 W 38TH AVE CROSS PLAINS WI 53528 PO BOX I I WHEATRIDGE CO 80033 ASPEN CO 81612 UHLFELDERNAOMI COLLINS CHARLES & JANICE S AARONSON JEFFREY C PO BOX 1165 PO BOX HH P O BOX 10131 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 SALTER JAMES BECK NEIL H & PAMELA CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH P O BOX 765 515 W GILLESPIE ST 536 NORTH ST BRIDGEHAMPTON NY 11932 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 KNURR GOLDIE P & WERNER HODGES ELAINE C O'SHANA CATHY 603 W GILLESPIE ST 2020 S MONROE #118 108 ROBBINS ST ASPEN CO 81611-1242 DENVER CO 80210 OSTERVILLE MA 02655 ELGART ALICE CLARE GOLDSMITE GOLDSMITH ANDREW LUBIN 1/3 GOLDSMITH JOHN JOSEPH 1/3 1/3 - 44 N DOHENY DR 733 25TH ST 27 E 62ND ST 6TH FL S ANGELES CA 90000 SANTA MONICA CA 90400 NEW YORK NY 10001 LUETKEMEYER JOHN A JR & ELLIOTT ELYSE A SUZANNE F MCCARTY DANIEL L 610 NORTH ST SCHREIBER EUGENE H & STANFORD PO BOX 4051 ASPEN CO 81611 17 W PENNSYLVANIA AVE ASPEN CO 81612 - TOWSON MD 21204 MCCARTY DANIEL L MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ASPEN INSTITUTE INC PO BOX 4051 2 MUSIC SCHOOL RD 1000 N 3RD ST ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611-8500 ASPEN CO 81611 STUNDA STEVEN R NITZE WILLIAM A RICHARDS ANN K 515 5TH ST 1537 28TH ST NW 1537 28TH ST NW ANNAPOLIS MD 21403 WASHINGTON DC 20007 WASHINGTON DC 20007 LEWIS ADAM HELZBERG SHIRLEY BUSH TRUSTE SMALL ALBERT H & SHIRLEY S C/O KATHLEEN HONOHAN QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE -- 16 GLENBROOK RD @NATIONAL CITY BANK TRUST HESDA MD 20814 1900 E 9TH ST LOC 2030 5805 MISSION DR CLEVELAND OH 44114 SHAW-NEE MISSION KS 66208 MUSGRAVE MARJORY M A L./1 1.U-lili . HOFFMAN JOHN L FOX MARILYN - 629 W NORTH ST 1035 W 57TH ST 7701 FORSYTH BLVD STE 600 , ' ASPEN CO 81611 KANSAS CITY MO 64113 CLAYTON MO 63105 AGREENWOOD JIM COHEN ROGER L |~035 W 57TH ST 1035 W 57TH ST -'"~ KANSAS CITY MO 64113 KANSAS CITY MO 64113 r--mi~Fl 2/tr15& Ittiott Jerem'V bernstein 670 W. XertA St. Aspeytâ€ž 60 rost 4 -0 April 5, 2001 RE: 515 W. Gillespie - Beck Application Dear HPC Members: We have been following the progress ofour neighbor's application at 515 W. Gillespie. We have not attended any meeting on this because we do not have any complaints or praises about it. While we are not excited about the prospect ofhaving a property that presently has one house on it to be split to allow three houses, we understand that this complies with City codes. We are generally supportive ofthe idea ofallowing more density in urban areas instead of rural areas. We are also very supportive of historic preservation efforts. We are NOT supportive of the plan to allow this property to have the setback variances that have been requested on the east side, west side and rear yard. We believe that the code is accommodating enough as it is. This property will already be "maxed-out" without granting it further reductions in setbacks. We understand and support the rational to allow this project to be granted approval for Landmark Designation and Historic Lot Split. There is no sound reason to allow setback reductions other that giving the new developer more PFofit. Thank-you for considering this, Elyse Elliott & Jeremy Bernstein 4 r='~~9 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVEr OF NOTICE PERS~ ~169/1 / ~ ~ } ss. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULjilL,-_--2.-.--1 State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(ED 5-964-~E-*<- U.1 9/nd. 7%, 3 I, '~Â©4*b/4.-â‚¬-c-, 764 k. , being or representing an Applicant to the City ofAspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) ofthe Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing ofnotice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet ofthe subject property, as indicated on the attached list, on the Â£1 day of A-pr,7 , 200 1 (which is 2/ days prior to the public hearing date of Apâ€¢4 22= ). 2. By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 9 day of Ar,| , 2001, to the U- day of #41** / , 200 . (Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. Signature (Attach photograph here) Signed before me this 9 day of 44 200Â£ by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My Commission expiresMy Commission B,pires August 28, 2001 KIM MARIE DISALMO Notary Pubk: State of Colorcdo PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 515 W. GILLESPIE LANDMARK DESIGNATION / HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT / SIDE AND REAR YARD SETBACK VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 25th, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Neil and Pamela Beck requesting approval for a Landmark Designation, Historic Landmark Lot Split, Relocation, and a four (4) foot east side and rear yard setback variance and a three foot six inch (3'6") west side setback variance. The property is located at 515 W. Gillespie and is described as Lots 4-6, Block 99, Hallam Addition, ofthe City and Townsite ofAspen. For further infonnation, contact Fred Jannan at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5102, fredj@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 3,2001 City ofAspen Account , FAMILY TRUST PETERSON IlENSLEY R AAUB FE.1151'l & EVA Â·rÂ£11.13.lioUN JAM.Ba U 8401 VISTA LN 433 W GILLESPIE PO BOX 1714 PRESCOTT AZ 86301 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 DURAND LOYAL m DR & BERNICE NORTH FOURTH STREET ODOM JOHN A JR BLACK ASSOCIATES ODOM LORRIE FURMAN 4314 FAWN CT RT 1 C/O MIKE CONVISOR 11490 W38THAVE CROSS PLAINS WI 53528 PO BOX I I WHEATRIDGE CO 80033 ASPEN CO 81612 UHLPELDERNAOMI COLLINS CHARLES & JANICE S AARONSON JEFFREY C PO BOX 1165 PO BOX HH P O BOX 10131 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81612 SALTER JAMES BECKNEILH&PAMELA CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH P O BOX 765 515 W GILLESPIE ST 536 NORTH ST BRIDGEHAMPTON NY 11932 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 KNURR GOLDIE P & WERNER. HODGES ELAINE C O'SHANA CATHY 603 W GILLESPIE ST 2020 S MONROE #118 108 ROBBINS ST ASPEN CO 81611-1242 DENVER CO 80210 OSTERVILLE MA 02655 GOLDSMITH ANDREW LUBIN 1/3 GOLDSMITH JOHN JOSEPH 1/3 ELGART ALICE CLARE GOLDSM 1344 NDOHENYDR ;733 25TH ST 1/3 - LOS ANGELES CA 90000 SANTA MONICA CA 90400 27 E 62ND ST 6TH EL NEW YORK NY 10001 LUETKEMEYERJOHNAJR& ELLIOTTELYSEA MCCARTY DANIELL SUZANNE F 610 NORTH ST SCHREIBER EUGENE H & STANFORD PO BOX 4051 ASPEN CO 81611 17 W PENNSYLVANIA AVE ASPEN CO 81612 - TOWSON MD 21204 MCCARTY DANIEL L MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ASPEN INSTITUTE INC PO BOX 4051 2 MUSIC SCHOOL RD 1000 N 3RD ST ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 81611-8500 ASPEN CO 81611 STUNDA STEVEN R NITZE WILLIAM A. RICHARDS ANN K 515 5'IHST 1537 28TH ST NW 1537 28TH ST NW ANNAPOLIS MD 21403 WASHINGTON DC 20007 WASHINGTON DC 20007 LEWIS ADAM HELZBERG SHIRLEY BUSH TRUSTI SMALL ALBERT H & SHIRLEY S C/O KATHLEEN HONOHAN QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE 7116 GLENBROOK RD @NATIONAL CITY BANK TRUST BETHESDA MD 20814 1900 E 9TH ST LOC 2030 5805 MISSION DR CLEVELAND OH 44114 SHAWNEE MISSION KS 66208 AaFEIV UU 51011 --- CLAYTON MO 63105 KANSAS CITY MO 64113 GREENWOOD JIM COHENROGERL 1035 W 57'IH ST 1035 W 57TH ST KANSAS CITY MO 64113 KANSASÂ·CITY MO 64113 VO i/2 F >'1-j,%Â¢7 243 47Â£ E' >,F k // i - 1/3 ; , Pjj - 1/7 1 /0 21 ~ / /3 % V.5~ /7 t,1 1 2 51 * 1 1.1 PH lilli 1 -11-11.-- ..--1 .- i 1.--f~70*#71.--, 4,1114& p LL G I LLESPIE Avi. , 11 th W 3,# i t fo 0 50 -' - 6 5-. 45Â£ Li # - a . * de I i {1 - le, 1.f 4, 17. i i, 1 5 i. 1 c - ul ?,/- * . 1 2-L~ LW, 4 1 1 , 14-2-1,45%-* Â¥ Fi 1 - â‚¬.7 97 - -1 / 1 13 j 99 1 - , 4 1- - 4 ~ ' 2 -5 11 4 2 11 .1 , 1 1 . L, F l/. ' .99. 1 ;1 j 7 45 1 1, , 'All ' PLAA,L QOUAT 2 -VA 4, 1/ Av- -- 4 .tur' - k. H 4 4- 1 -16 - i fl I . 1 ,-- . 2-J- -. IT 1 i' MA Izi mr -Afi *444 - Â£//2 -h 4 e 47=. Â¢ 21>4Â·kiL i i ./ Â° 1â‚¬ 1- l t# Ill ir j> l,1 52 :/L/9,4 / /12Â»--7-, - 42 64 , 3 4% 3' 1 Lp--- ~ 16 1 1, 41' r , Â¥ Bit 1 1 4--6.21 f - * 1 ...... 14 V -1 z f 7â‚¬Z:h-- 1 -Â·-ewâ€¢ -El 4,~,k '1*2717-,2 14 1 1- 3 N & f Â»- 7-4/ -... - - - - -- - --- -2.24 . CAVI ' . 2 1,8 4 _ 1 11-_ 1232 libil 1 0 A, --4-8 j lit .j 66 b r '- i *iF----r 4 L /1 Ulul- * 43 i.<- 1 - 1 { ~ r - I *P k 60 j' 1, '51,1 1 3 43,361 + 1 4 11 1 0.--L..4-~ Â©a l 'r .1 I 1 A- 0, 42L_ - J -12.2 1/ AjagWN blilirr--r<' 6 41 r Fte'na L 1 1 1 L.--1 i c ittl. 1 1 ; * 1 -f#ta -~--U -L) , i , 1- Â£*+Wy ---1-3 A '#Al: UÂ»-,-- G G Â£ C. -64 f ---- 9264 .21' 41~Â»Lq ~1 1 7 1 Ruetr L j J 4 l*ir *-27 ft'.4 4/ 3'6 -\5; .Â»pr~ jltz1 1,1.1.{ 7 / fÂ¥a k, L.n.> / , b 7244 / 41 . â€žL_C#j .-W - 2IL-----~----~~-- W--L- .- 4-,' ~ 4 ~' 1 0-4&~4 A ' 7 1 1 - -63 L#hk :,Pitig a 43 4991~ 1 t'%4 j-1 34- <j iN , in///4557 3- 6 p <7 At- 2 ~'*- 7 1,4 -rars - 1 14 l,1 --2744. r I ft Â¢ / / 1 1.- jli f - l>-/,2 4 / 0 1 3-1 - I o U i ---4 1 N . - 1-'00 4 l.4 ~ 1 - 1 ~ r '43 C i i r 4 ' i i P Xy ' 3 tue 4,3Â«1 Lin .14 -' 4'* IzÂ· 1 t 2-3~-9 ~- - 6&'al pl aff rÂ»-923ht -L l I ! f; A b k B v--74-J il f4/* 1 4 : *, /-27-Ph 7.3 127 ED. 1 - L I i r. 'CrieÂ¥' fif i 1 --tÂ©-I W W l--214 rullut-- A- 1,1 L.-1-- i 1 2 4., p l I #- 0 21 F-r-- J~-in 19 /4 l z- j 2 1 AD R L - 1 1 CC. - 7-- 1% â€¢*91-7 i r 1 4/ P--"W....111 , i 11 44. , 9 4-1 1 1, i PAR'.} " 1 -'' \ 0 - .- . A! ----------4.--0---------1.--I--1 :; 4% 1 ;A~ 1 .~ 7 1 - . 6 0 4 # I , i . Â£1._1 \ ./ 1 -Â«=I----Le, 1 trriIS.,t AÂ¥ 0 , . I .< 9 , =r .--.1 0 ) I 1 - 1 , 1 ~ ~ t'llts,]r 4 ' 1 t- 4 1 1 \ . 1 , 1.'-- I 11 1---- ~-~t==' 1-__.1 <fLJ-~ f.f-J~ r r * f ----31 1 6 .\L : 0 1 - . , L-7 . D , f -La=-- - .--*-*- .- -----'....... - . PEARL I Pt A+It. 4 -7 ---------- / -/ 4 . t .A~ , ' F.. 1 - 11 : 1 1 - I '' . 1 \84=ZEJ---Li M 1 : . .. i i ' .1 1 1 f ; i / A. f 1 J 1 1 1 Â£ 61 0 1 , f 1 j -_U ., % t , - ''\ r.---1 C 0 1 U /1403 & i 1 . \ - =MCI' l. ) ,-, ; : n vi) it r-Â·%- ----- i f// Â»04; 1----\: L , 1 , - ' 'i t. Â· t.# 1 - 4-*- , , .7 0 " -- , \ 1 -- * * f 340 / !1 4 '41 -F V â€ž 0 2- 4:'li* 0 ) N :: / . -1 - %- ru , An 3 -t . + 0 + D , ji # 1 al :1 - i -$ J-Â· - 4 f /\ '- th-- --- 5 , , NO %% *.2--- ; 1 / f .. 1 1 ... 1 4 4 , F 80" GOTTONMOOD NOTE: SITE PLAN TO BE VERIFIED FV NER SITE IMPROVEMENT SURVEÂ¥ ODOM FRONT YARD 14" GOTTONMOOD -a~ all_LESPIE ST. PARCEL -1 SETBACK 3 - / 1 // . . : COLLIN'S 1 - ~47 0 \ 1 1 '' 51-0,1 'e ~ 161' COTTONFNC>(~7 00 // 1\ / LOT LINE \ 0 1 1 1 PITCH LOCATION | EXISTING ~'~ r~- - - --u-~~--n 4 11 1 1 1 11 1 // 11 __ 1 1 1 ./ //- -r ' 1 -7 7 i // 1 SIDE YARD ~~~-~-I JÂ·Â·Â· 1 1 1 , SETBACK /// 1 1 1 1 1 1 // 1 1 1 UL ;, I & i il L REVISED 1 1 7---ulnz~ i1 1 DITCH LOCATION % 1 1 ./ . -3 1 14" COTTONMOOP h= 1 11 1 1 TO BE MOVED ~-Â·Â·Â·Â·-.i ~~ | / 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -- 11 1 l.j 1 1 1 1 1 EXISTINe SUBSRADE I \ FOUNDATION TO j t i 11 1 BE DEMOLISHED 1 1 1.-32 1 1 1 .es=/ 11) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~- < ~11 -/4.Tt DE MOVED i|i- 14" SPRUCE TO 1 1 1 1 1 -L.*-1 // // ~ a-(Â«r ; 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 /1 1 1 EXISTING SUBGRADE I EXTERIOR STAIRS -1 1 1 | 10" ASPEN -~ ~ 1 j TO BE DEMOLISHED 1 1 1- 1 1 &0 1----_--- 1 1 1 1 il E ..t~i \ \1 1 ---1 1 401/// // 1 3.31 -*--PREVIOUS HOUSE 1 /1 /// 29 R // 1 ~ LOCATION I IO" ASPEN h | 4 ~ ~ 1 1- L L 2 JF 1 1 1// 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 pi: 1 7/ 1 21---_---1 1 1 1 DEMOLISH NON-HISTORIC I i ':9Â» -3- --2 - % .4 , A \_ SHED ADDITION PRIOR I 1 1 I URE I p // 1 1 TO MOVINe HISTORIC 1 / | HOUSE | / 1 1 DI CH LOCATION - *....~w -- 1 1 1 1 --E ST Ne | 1 1 1 L PATIO ~ SIDE YARD | DI C LOCATION 1 1 1 ~ SETBACK I 1 /1 1 1 01 1/ 1 PATHINAY <- 1 1 1 L T lA' 1 .1 1 I j H/refORIC LOT 2 1 1 4 1 *:38~ 5.FE- -- -- -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12" COTTONMOOD ~ 1 1 1 1 ROOF ABOVE 7 1 1 1 \1 ~/- MECH. ENTRANCE r f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 8'-6"XIBLO" 1 1 1 PARKINe SPACE ~ 111)0 Â« LINE OF FOUNDATION /11 - Ill 11 4 1/1/0/ BELOM 1 1 4'-0" SIDE YARD 1 1 ~ VARIANCE LOT '5' i i ~ ~ [19 - -- 3 f NER LOT 1 1 1 1 0 1 ROOF ABOVE ~ | |~ ~ 12 o. 6000 6.F. 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 i t' 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 1 ROOF ABOVE * 3'-6" 11 1 1 1 1 SIDE YARD - 1 1 1 1 1 4'--0" REAR YARD j 1 VARIANCE 1Â»Â» /\ 1 - 1 1 1.1 1 VARIAbICE L---- ----1 1 1 1 , i.1-1 1 1 HPG SRANTED I 1- - PARKINe SPACE DEMOLISH EXISTING J 1 L_=-=-= y=-=-2=-=1 VARIANCE NON-HISTORIC. 6ARAGE 1 1 1 fo" 1 67 1 42_ 1 --1 L DRIVE - - 0-1 18.50' -- 1 NORTH -1 SITE PLAN 1/811 = 11-OIl 117.46' 12-7.661 HPC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN PACKAGE HISTORIC HOME RENOVATION 515 gillespie st. aspen, colorado , consortium 1 architects 1 P.O.B. 3662, aspen, colorado 81612 (970) 925.6797 fax (970) 925.6797 ~ e-mail rally@aspeninfo. com 04-25-2001 RENOVATION F.A.R. CALCULATIONS F.A.R. CALCULATIONS 45 BWLT HOUSE FAR: SUBGRADE FAR: EXISTINS GARAGE = 36.2' x 14.4' = 521 S.F. GROSS S.F. = 921 S.F. GARAGE EXEMPTION = 52! S.F. - 250 S.F. = 271 S.F. MALL HEIGHT = q'-Oil GARAeE REDUCTION = 271 5.F. - 125 S.F. = 146 S.F. TOTAL MALL LENGTH = 122'-21' TOTAL SUBeRADE MALL AREA= 122'-2" 4 q'-0" = 1100 S.F. SUBGRADE FAR: ABV. GRADE MALL = 5'-0" (2) = 10 S.F. EXPOSED hALL AREA = 10'-O" * 6'-O" = 60 S.F. NET S.F. = 376 S.F. % OF EXPOSED TO TOTAL AREA = bo S.F. / 1100 S.F. (100) = 5.5% MALL HEIGHT = 2,1-011 TOTAL FNALL LENGTH = 128'-6" SUBGRADE F.A.R. = 5.5% (421 S.F.) = 51 S.F. TOTAL SUBGRADE MALL AREA= 128'-6" * 6'-O" = 1028 S.F. ABV. SRADE MALL = 18'-11" + 24'-0" = 42'-11" eARAGE FAR: EXPOSED FNALL AREA = 42-11" * 6'-0" = 258 S.F. SUBGRADE GARAGE S.F. = EXEMPT % OF EXPOSED TO TOTAL AREA = 258 S.F. / 1028 S.F. (100) = 25% SARASE S.F. = 252 S.F. SUBGRADE F.A.R. = 25% (876 S.F.) = 214 S.F. GARASE EXEMPTION = 252 S.F. - 250 S.F.,2 9.F./2=I S.F. AS BUILT PORCHES $ DECKS: PORCHES = EXEMPT ABOVE GRADE FAR: DECKS = 60 B.F. (LOÂ»IERJ MAIN LEVEL DEMO FAR = 127 S.F. DECK EXEMPTION = 15% (46111 S.F.) = 643 S.F. > 60 S.F. (EXEMPT) NEPN MAIN LEVEL FAR = 147 5.F. - 127 5.F. = 20 S.F. TOTAL NEM MAIN LEVEL FAR = 865 S.F. + 20 S.F. = 405 S.F. SUBGRADE LEVEL = 219 S.F. NEW UPPER LEVEL FAR = 17 3.F. TOTAL NEA UPPER LEVEL FAR = 606 S.F. + Il S.F. = 623 S.F. GARAGE = 146 S.F. MAIN LEVEL = 885 S.F. AS BUILT PORCHES 4 DECKS: PORCHES = EXEMPT UPPER LEVEL = 606 S.F. DECKS = 60 S.F. (LOPNER,) + -TO 9.F (NEW UPPER) = 130 S.F. DECK EXEMPTION = 15% (4112 S.F.) = all S.F. > 130 S.F. (EXEMPT) TOTAL F.A.R. = 2Iq S.F. + 146 S.F. + 885 S.F. + 606 S.F. = 1856 S.F. LOT SiZE CALCULATIONS: TOTALS: REMAININe LOT SIZE = 4210 9.F. (REMINING AFTER LOT LINE DISPUTE) SUBGRADE LEVEL = 51 S.F. ODEM LOT PURCHASE = 3615 S.F. (DOES NOT COUNT TOMARDS F.A.R,) TOTAL LOT SIZE = 4608 S.F. GARAGE FAR = 1 S.F. LOT A SIZE = 3608 3.F.- ~3> 960& S.F. LOT B SIZE = 6000 52. MAIN LEVEL = 905 S.F. LOT SPLIT FAA CALCULATIONS: UPPER LEVEL = 623 S.F. ORIGINAL LOT SIZE = 45361 S.F. PORCHES $ DECKS = O 5.F. COLLINS' LOT LINE DISPUTE = - 324 S.F. REMAINING, LOT SIZE = 9210 S.F. TOTAL F.A.R. = 51 S.F. + 1 S.F. + 405 S.F. + 623 3.F. = 1580 S.F. BASE ALLOMED FAR = 4080 S.F. UNUSED F.A.R. = 1580 S.F. - 152,0 S.F. = O S.F. LOT SIZE OVER 61000 S.F. = 4210 S.F. - 4000 S.F. = 210 S.F. OTHER ALLOMED FAR = 210 5.F. / 100 *6=13 S.F. LOT A = LOT N HISTORIC HOUSE TOTAL ALLORED FAR = 4030 3.F + 13 S.F. = 4043 S.F. LOT B = NER LOT FAR TOTALS FOR EACH LOT: LOT B GARAGE FAR = 500 9.F. - 250 S.F. - 125 5.F. = 125 S.F. LOT B FAR = 1444 S.F. (HOUSE I) + 1444 (HOUSE 2) + 125 (GARAGE) = 3013 S.F. F.A.R. CALCULATIONS LOT A FAR = 40â‚¬ S.F. - BOB S.F. = 1080 S.F. 1 LOT A HFC BONUS = 500 S.F. 419 LOT A FAR A BONUS = 1060 9.F. + 500 9.7 = 152,0 9.F. ... MINDOM PROJECTION -- ABOVE . I I * 4 4 8 4 I 4/ . 4 If') f - D . e D 4 4 4 4 MINDOM , Â· 44 4 . BEDROOM -- 1 ' I d 4 . I 26925%_ ,-/' PROJECTION -1 - - 0361 . I LADDER LT. MELL ABOVE 1 1 ' 6 TUB 0 D= 227- 1 1 1<1 in a GONG. CONG. BEDROOM AREA= I47 S.F. LIGHT AREA REQUIRED= 14.7 S.F. 1 LIÂ¢31-IT AREA PROVIDED= 15.0 5-F. -. * 4 4 44] P~ BATH -_--- ARMOIRE A BATH 13381 4 2-~ O -- 1 E--11 I 1- 6,56- - -- -/2 -- o TUB 1385] /r OUP VENT LOCATION lib - FOR MECH. STAIR DOOR 7 L_ ' 1/IA 1333] - 3.2CE - 64% .. -v , STAIRS -,x A . I AEW. ,DR MESH. r fi LAUND. 9 4 18341 1 O 4 - ACCESS ~ f up : LT. RELL - EGRESS BEDROOM _ LADDER # h LADDER faa--1 , ' 3 '-2" EXCAVATE / 9 a DOÂ»IN 41-011 -~ 14 in FROM LOMER LEVEL FOR ~ Â· BEDROOM AREA= 151 5-F. 8" CONG. MALL 11 LIeHT AREA REQUIRED= 15.1 S.F. MECH. 04/ 2" RIGID INBUL. PLAYROOM C~ LITI---Iii PROVIDED= -If-Ii\1 9-- 4 -1 11 T.O. CONG. ELEV. 69'-10" 4 11 - CLOS. 1 1 STRUCTURAL /- COLUMN -<LEVEL ABOVE Â·. 44 ,. I . rf' 4. , â€¢ .' 3 L---1 NORTH 2-0 LOMER LEVEL PLAN '01 9 ai k ... HISTORIC BAY kNDA. -~ 1-- 41 "11 Ill LJ L METAL SUARDRAIL 7 HISTORIC hIDA. - PORCH ~ T.O. FIN. FLOOR \ igi-1 ELEV. 100'-O" 1 DESK)1 R - OFFICE 11 ./ 11 11 80 1 [1331 2 LIGHT MELL BELOR -7.c ~223~ ~~1 r=El - CERTIFIED IND, /~ BURNING F.P. HISTORIC EXISTINS 1 BAY PNPA. ~- ~ FLUE ABV. . 0: -\ DINING 2 3 [24-1 U Z L HISTORIC 1]W[J LF-11-4 1---1-- al ty\A _ 1 / MINDOAS BUILT-IN PANTRÂ¥ -'# - F GABS. ABV. ON | IO R. 5 1 5/8- UP 9 01 12 4 1 1 1 TR . 10" R\~0 A STAI STAIR 1 02151 ' .L 1 LISHT RELL ~L PN INE RACK STAIRS J BELOW 7 2-1" ABV. ~ PANTRÂ¥ ~ LOR ~ PORDER ~~ | ~r- NER Py INDOR i ~r TILE ~1000 MALL ~ _ [105 - 27" REF 0 11 1 l? DRAMER CABS. -- FREEZER NER MINDOM BELOR 42 IT- KITCHEN tf'~ .jt 0 /1 &1. 0 |~-~ LINE OF ADDITION m METAL 3 ~ ~ | | -4:lu CABS. 2 ,-* ola. CHAN6E BUILT-IN . SUARDRAIL / 1 BELOR - ABOVE ~ CUBBIES J 1 --1 NEMI ANDOW ~ --- T- --- ---*-- -------- ,/2 - POP-UP TV SINKI I / 4 VENTILATION _1 8 HOOD ABOVE ~ 1 11 1~ ~ \ 1. LIVING 3 [Tail FLOMER BOX -~ N yelt' MUD RM. ~ - ~- NEW AINDOM EfÂ«1 - 1 DECK 0227 1 11 i }7002-1 1 '~ ODN ~ BENCH 1- - \\\ 41- I Â» P 2 RISERS @ 8" -.--- NEÂ»[ ANDOMS FOR SOUTH \ \_ GAS LOS ELEVATION \ APPLIANCE L OUTDOOR HATCH NORTH m B MAIN LEVEL PLAN A2.1 1/4" = 1'-O" .. ROOF RESTORE ORIGINAL TUB DECK -1 ABOVE 7 HISTORIC ADM. PORCH ROOF 7 1_/- / U . W -,1-- A4 4- 44 44 44 4- 44 FF\ ~2 f| Ii| 1|1|1|1|1~1|1|1|1 1 BENCH 1 \Il l lilli 1, 0 lilli l lilli lili Â° TUB 11/ 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 lilli V 11111111111111 --*..i. 25 *.I---1. 1 lilli lilli 1 1 1 r -1 1-4- 4-1-4- 4-1-1- 4-1-k Â»41 1 1 1 1 1 1 l i l l i 1\ DASHED LINE OF ~ 1 Â»HbAER j ROOF ABOVE -Tl~ [368 1%~ ~ M. BATH ~| .p 1 BUILT-INS < - \ 1333-1 1 1 Ploo P TILE M. BEDROOM o 13341 -/ 1) l - A/6 - 1335 HISTORIC i. - \ 1 MINDOM 11 1\ 0 1 ..1 SEALED ~ ~ r ROOF ABOVE HALL 0 , DN ,!0 1 9 -1 15/~6" SAS LOS --,~ ~ ~ 9 TR @ 10" APPLIANCE I ~ ~ / ST.AIR m 1-i'=1 1 1 DIRECT - // VENT ~ f -A â€ž -11-OIl % 1 144/ 5 f --= r--r u ~34 1 li~2.-7Â£ -- CLOTHES ROD M. CLOSET | - ~ ~ 11- A/ SHELVINS I va ABOVE U 12* - 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 ~ 1 1 13ALOONÂ¥ __-- 1 1 MAIN LEVEL _j ~ ~ 1/ 133*1 BELOIN I 1 3/0 1 14 4 1 99- 1 1 A \_Â«~ r- CD T.O. FIN. FLOOR 11110-11 METAL SUTTER _[14---~ 1 12 r ELEV. Ilo'-1" ~ C ~ EDSE 1 1 rn 11 0 -12 0 1 8 11 ~ EXISTING 1 1 1 4 rl_ ,- m HISTORIC ~11 1% 191 0, Lz, I~l | MINDOR EXISTING 1/1 / 1 ' 1 NER MINDOR -, /1 -1 111 1 1 ASPHALT -1 I I L-1/_1_ / SHINSLE I [-1/ -In ./ 1 1 1 1 1 ROOFING, 1,14 1,:. | LD U v / /1 ~ '-4 SUARDRAIL -~ ~ - iIi O r 3 9) 12 NEIN PNP. -,f ...% DECKING 00 11 METAL 1 r / / Mt /1\, - FLASHING p - STANDING SEAM METAL 1 -TALROOPING CRICKET 94 //LA, 3:12 SLOPE Â»1/ METAL ROOFING NORTH 0-13 C UPPER LEVEL PLAN A2.1 1/411 = 11-OIl ra ... - - -----\.1 III/ \1 1 1 0- - -4-1--JLOPÂ·DI _- -_- SLOPE .- - -- -- EXETI NG - - EXISTING ~ ~ 1111111111111111111111111111111,2.--- - l i l i l l 1 1 1 1 1 I l l 1 1 \I---------- -1 12 U n -11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lilli 1 1 1-il 1\ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 I l i l i 1 1 wam I l l l l i l l i \ 111\ EXISTINS 1 1 1 1 1 1 ASPHALT SHINeLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 \X-i--1. lili ROOFING ,\.1 r--1 1 1 11{ 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ilili 1- \1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ' I d--4~ il ~ 1-Il il li tnff- 11 DORMER MALL _j il l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 BELOPN -\~ -~---~> ~-- METAL FLASHING 111 I 111 i 1111 _41_ __1 [__ _ _~_ _3 [_ _ _ _2 1 - x/ STAND INS SEAM ./f.... I I | | 1-11 U, -1-7 - 1-_1-~-f --1 -3- 1 -1- 1- --11 X r METAL ROOF INS -n]\4 1/---4- 4 1 11 11 1 1 9 1 P --0 1-11 UPPER LEVEL liN.. BELOM ~1 ~~ #4~1-24_LI 1_ I _1_ jz- _y j 1 1 F -;f - -- - - 1 ) 1 3 L_~1_ _l _ - -f-~25 5-1- 1- 1 F ---- 11 1 / 011 11 BALCONY 013_41_4 '~ BELOR - EXISTI 116 - ROOF BELOW 0 NORTH 1 0 ROOF iÂ°LAN A2.1 1/4" = 1'-O" C:Alt I INe BRICK CHIMNEY FLUE EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE NEM DORMER PM/ ROOFING VERT. AD. SIDINe 12 1 1 1 1 1 11 11 1 1 1 1 li 1 11 1 1 1 i I METAL 6UARDRAI L EXITINS 1 1 HISTORIC 1 ' ' 1 1 1- 5.0. BEAM @ DORMER -#1 - - - DOUBLE HUNS ELEV. IIci'-4 3/4" MINDOMS 1 1 I 11 EXISTING 111 1 1 HORIZ. AD SIDINS T.O. PLATE @ UPPER EXISTINe AD. - CLAPBOARD SIDINS , ELEV. 115'-11" -TYPICAL FOR ENTIRE BUILDING EXHAUST VENT I2 EXISTING ~_~ ASPHALT SHINSLE , 3 ' '--- ROOFIN6 1 1 T.O. F.F. @ UPPER - HISTORIC PNP. ELEV. 110<7" DETAILING 1 1 1 I T.O. PLATE @ ROOF 1 1 - I i ELEV. ioqi-8 3/8. (EXISTINe a EXISTINe HISTORIC AD. TRIM ~| | ~ i EXISTING ' ~ NEN MINDOR 1. 11 111 1 AD. DECKING ' VERT. AD. SIDINS EXETING _____ | METAL FLOMER BOX CONC.STEP METAL SIDING eiz\DE - T.O.-MÂ· @ LOAER ELEV. 100'-0" L=Al 1 1 1 1 HORIZ. AD SIDINS- \ 111 1 41 I / i TO MATCH EXISTINe EXISTING HORIZ. 1 1 +1~_ 1 1 2-3 AD. SIDING 11 1--i-,111 IN 1 1 1 /- lili-i-r NOTE: NO CHANGES ARE 11 LIli I 14 : PROPOSED FOR NORTH ELEV. METAL SUARDRAIL METAL FLASHING --~t li - LIGHTMELL - EGRESS KINDOM T.O. CONC. REST ELEVATION TAâ‚¬37-l/6-u=-48" EXITINS METAL FLASHINe BRICK NEÂ»l DORMIER PV STANDING CHIMNEÂ¥ BEAM METAL NER AINDCA ROOF INS I 1 1 EXISTING 1 DOUBLE HUNG ASPHALT SHINGLE , MINDOM ROOFINS 1 NEA DOOR 4 EXISTING TRANSCM ~ 1 1 ~ HORIZ. AD. lilli SIDING NEW DORMIER PV 1 1 1 VERT. PNP. SIDING , i i T.O. PLATE @ UPPER LINE OF HANDRAIL - -ELEv. 115'-lili MIETAL FLASHINS NER VEAp . ' ~ I i METAL CHIMNEY SIDING '1 | ' ' ' FLUE $ CAP i T.o. F.F. @ UPPER EXISTING lili I i i 1 1 ~F--Fav. No,--ti, I AD. SIDING , STANDING BE,AMI METAL ROOFINe METAL FLOMER BOX METAL SIDINe METAL F.P. ACCESS DOOR ID. DECKING METAL SUARDRAIL HISTORIC BAÂ¥ ~ BEYOND l ADA. BEYONI 1/OffÂ« 1 _ METAL METAL - - 11 -4 31 SIDING 00 SUARDRAIL <| 11 11 SRADE T.O. F.F. @ LOMER ELEV. 100'-O" SUBBRADE ~ MALL 1 11 SUBSRADE BEYOND 1 '1- -- 4 - - - - ~F MALL EVON LIGHT MELL -< LISHT MELL 1 1 i 2- 1 1 11 11 3 1 1 11 It- ELEV. Bq'-10" 2-50-UTHELEÂ»TION 0339 1/411 = 1 1-011 =1 11 1 1111 1 , BATH EXHAUST VENT 1 1 EXISTING ' ; il il; , i !*! i ASPHALT SHINSLE ASPHALT SHINGLE 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ROOF]Ne 1 1 1 1 1 It i 1 1 ROOFING AP. TRIM EXISTING STANDINe BEAM ABFHALT SHINGLE METAL ROOFINS I-m 900 FINe I2 1-11 ~ ELEV. 110'-7" 1 T.O. F.F. @ UPPER ~ 3-0. HEADER 7 ELEV. 108'-7" METAL FLUE / 1 HISTORIC DEL. HUNS AI NDOM PV CAP 11/ \ 1 HISTORIC BAY MINDOM $ TRIM METAL SIDING MECH. VENT AD. DECK L._E_ ; BEYOND 2 Te F.F. @ LOMER 2 T.O. F.F. @ LOAER 7 ELEV. IOOLOâ€ž I ELEV. 100'-0" h EGRESS AINDOM 1 ~ HOR[Z. AD SIDING / METAL ESRESS TO MATCH EXISTING | - LADDER 11 1 1 1 1 111 - SUBSRADE SUBGRADE MALL. 1 ~~ FOUNDATION BEYOND \ ~~ MALL 14 1 1 METAL FLASHINS -~ T.el-RONC- . t---1- -------3 ELEV. 54'-10" 41__--EASTELEVAI_ION 439 1/411 = 11-011 6 METAL STORASE a"- . 6" METAL SHIP'S ACCESS DOORS -~ :: ; / //r-LADDER METAL SHED E ROOF ~ ~ CONS. RET. 6" 4'-0" ~ f r f-7 13'-O. ~AIALL 1~f \ p_o" / . 1 r- 7 - 1 4 \ Â» ' 4 {13 h 1 1/ 1 V- -7] 0 F 111 0 11\ 11 111 111 11 I ./ MALLS BELOR n ll 1 E- Uff- 1 1 1 L ROOF ABV. -4-4 LINE OF t FOUNADTION BELOIN 11 ~ -~ ~ M.,5 H F ROOF ABV. 1 2 [1 11 11 1 896.xle' STAND ING r , Ar'r- JLL/1 L PARK~'6 rACE SEAM METAL -- 1 - ROOFING \ =.19 1 1- V 1-- 1 SARAGE MESH. 6- 15331 1 M-K= CESE=- 11 11 /9/ 1 1 B SLOPE 1 1 8:12 1=1 3 11 ROOF OVERHANG ~ 4 TO.FFÂ·%6MRAGE~ 4 1 2 4-___ 1_< 1 ELEV. 100'-O" 1 =-2 23 e NORTH NORTH 1 0 - 1 GARASE PLAN re GARASE ROOF PLAN 1/2411 = 11-011 STANDING EXT. LIGHTING - 3 F--- /~SS==5553--3 SEAM METAL - ROOFING --lill#---- METAL ROOF- ~ T.O. PLATE AFFE --UUÂ» 1 T.o. PLATE 1 ELEV. 108'-3" ~I ~ ELEV. 108'-8" ///-6 lilil I METAL STRUT - <.* \ GRADE n 12 VERA AID. SIDING - I f ~ T.O. CONS. @ GAR. ~\, ~ T.O. CONG.@ <SARAGE 1 64 l li llil i ELEV. 100'-c" ELEV. 1001-0. 10------PI eln Ip------------31 SUBGRADE MECH. RM. -*#~~~~-~< | | | ~ || | | | | IMETAL SHIPS - f 11 = | ~ LADDER BEYOND ~ || ~ | TO 4 T.0. FOOTER | | ~ T.O. FOOTER 1 1 1 1 -1 1 i ELEV.go'-4" 1 ELEV. 40'-4" L L Lij LI . SARASE SOUTH ELEVATION ~ SAR.AaE PNEST ELEVATION 1/411 = 1 1-011 1/4" = 1'-O" - 1,17/2 â‚¬-1â‚¬1 . 12 METAL SHED I / ROOF | 2*6 AD. FASCIA ME-AL SHED BOARD~ ROC F BEYOND VERT. 0413. SIDINS -%~~~~~ LleHT FIXTURES ~ ~ T.O. PLATE / / 1 1197=r= - METAL STRUT ELEV. 108'-8 1 / 3. \ VERT. IND. SIDINCE, ~ , ~ 1 . 1 VERT. HIP BIDINGÂ· -- METAL DOOR - METAL FLASHING n / 1 6.ONG. RET,AIMING-- GONG. RET.MALL ~ -- MALL -- 4 > 00 4-Â· - T.O. CONG. @ GAR. ~ / ~ T.O. CONS. @ SAR. 1 ELEV. 100'-0" ELEV. 100'-O" | ~----- FOOTING BEYOND- GRADE - ~ | | | | ~ SUBGRADE | | METAL SHIP'S MESHI. RM.~ LADDRER BEYOND - MECH RM. ~| || |~ ~ | ACCESS HALL - X11 11 11 11 ~ T.O. FOOTER - 1-1 ----4 1 T.O. FOOTER ~--~_ ---- , ELEV. 90'-4" ELEV. 90'-4" Dj SARAeE NORTH ELEVATION r41 SARASE EAST ELEVATION AB.1 1/411 = 11-Oil ~3.2/ 1/4" = 1'-On 1. HPC AS-BUILT PACKAGE HISTORIC HOME RENOVATION 515 gillespie st. aspen, colorado consortium 1 architects 1 P.O.B. 3662, aspen, colorado 81612 (970) 925.6797 fax (970) 925.6797 ~ e-mail rally@aspeninfo. com 04-25-200 I I I / 6 - -9 El:L > Ectols d 0 U q 4 0 0 )0 11 hi 1 r 71- --7---7 1 E 4-un . D E \Ir 1 <fQu mi FE~ k Al 1 f \,2 1 j /. M I E \.09 -4" ,/ \ 1 1 /0 E Â« 1 U 1 -r 3/ 1 , ng v rn \ 1 k.) A 4 11 W ==== O 11 n' 1 0 1 1'10 1 2 - 2 -1 - 1--LL-------------4-----1 OU 70 U 0> 0 m Ul 0 .% m Hl'NON BEDROOM ~ PORLM ROOF NV-Ict -lEAn-I &13=1=18 1-1Ing GV CLOS. El: 5/1 9 adolâ‚¬ ad016 INOOwaaâ‚¬ MO139 31VM 3NI-1 a3HG SHED LINE OF ... -lfu-=Â»[r-Â»4 111/6 - = 77 - - ---\2/ CLIPPED eABLE@ --4-4-444--0 -0 - SLOPE - ~~ ~12:12 SLOPE -TYP. 4 12:12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/111111111111 \1 1 -- - -1 -- - -- 11 -1-~1- 1/--1 -1- P--1 -1- b---1 -4- 1 -4-'i _ _ 1 -L- _ -- _ ASPHALT SHINSLE [/1 11111111 % 11--R- 1 11 : f / ROOFINa 7 1--2 ~1 1~1 1~111.11.11 1.11-__-1~I-Â·.-._ ---i ~ 1 1 1 LA 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1.\ _ _ 1-11/1 9 ~ ~ ~ # 1 1 1 1 4 g 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 '\ - 1- 11 lilli' 11[-f lili 11-1 iÂ·,-_- 1 I k.)la lili lilil.\_ .... __ 1 lili 1.Ill l.\ /4/ \-1 1 lilipll 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1\ - - \/1 It Ill 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1\ 7.1 1 11111111111111111\ -7331\1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 102-Â·-1- --+P I lili 1 1 11\.4 DASHED LINE , F 09 MALL BELOM \7 493 3139-p~-1--~71 11 - 0 U 1- "O /47(42]----LI L1-13 k= di - k) i m - ROOF RIDGE - - 7/F--i--------- -11-1-2-2--2-1- -1-41 //~~ 11 44- -- SLOPE - - -- - r ROOF BELOW - - BRICK CHIMNEY 2:12- ~ FLUE 1 1 L--1 F ROOF BELOR NORTH _ - ~ AS BUILT ROOF PLAN 117 1/4" = 1'-0" BRICK CHIMNEY FLUE 11 HISTORIC 111 11 1 1 ASPHALT SHINGLE DOUVLE HUNS i : ROOFINS MINDORS i i 1 1 1 li 1 j AD. TRIM 11 T.O. PLATE @ UPPER MODERN Â»ID. - CLAPBOARD SIPING | 7 ELEV. ilE'-11" -TrPICAL FOR ENTIRE BUILDING i i METAL ROOFINS ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFINS Â· T.O. -=. @ UPPER OETA\LlNe HISTORIC AD. ELEV. 110'-7" ' Ext-~ 'M ELEÂ« 304'-8, 8/8" T.O. F.F.@ ROOF HISTORIC AD. TRIM PNENDOPN AD. TRIM 1 NON-HISTORIC SHED ADDITION CONG. STEP '- GRADE n 7- ~ T R. F.F. @ LOPNEC T ELEV. 100'-01' 1 1 MODERN CLAPBO,ARP MODERN DOUBLE SIDINe M/ NEM TRIMI CONG. BASE HUNS AINDCA I-ASRUILT_CERTELEVAEON 1/411 = BRICK CHIMNEÂ¥ FLUES /1 11'111 1 1,1 1 lilli.11 -lilli lilli 1 1 T // Ill 11 1111~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Fli 11~'ill// 113 1 1 1 1 11 1 I lil i i 1/1 1 1\ lilli 1141 1 1 1 1 l/ :1111 MODERN AID. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lilli lilli 11 lill. CLAPBOARD SIDINS 1 1 lilli lilli 1 \ \\ -TYPICAL FOR ENTIRE 1 1 ! 1 i 1 1 '111 1 : 1 BUILDING lili 1 1 POINT OF ROOF 1 1 lili k \wi PITCH CHANGE - | I ~~1~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~111~1~~11~ 1~4// 11 1 1 I 1 lili lilli//// \\\ 1.*01 liii 1 lilli I i i /7/ i T.o. PLATE @ UPPER 1 \41. 1 1 - 7 ELEV. 115'-11" ASPHALT SHINGLE |T| ~1~I| 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 It 1 1 1 lilli 1 11 11 ROCriNG \ 1 1 1 ! 1 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 : 1 \L ii A 1 lili 1 41 1 941 1 1 : If ! 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 lili I i 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili ! 1 1 I ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili HISTORIC AD 1111 11 1,1 11 lili 1 Ill ~ T.O. F.F. @ UPPER #j1 \\\ DETAILIblce ~\~~ q~Â©~~~ i ELEV. l IO'-1" / \\ \ 1 1i1 1/l \\\ HISTORIC BAY i MINDOR 7 FEEEEE \\N 4 4 T.O. F.F.@ ROOF HISTORIC. ~ L.-1 1 2 2- L ELEV. 107'-O 1/2 - / 22 Â· NON-HISTORIC \ / - 1 - SHED ADDITION \ MODERN hID. TRIM 1\ 0 - BELOR ADA. SILL 1 \ 1 SRADE -7 fr 1 4 7.00 F.F. @ Lai/NER , ELEV 1001-Oil ry\1 AS BUILT SOUTH ELEVATION C - ) 1/411 = 11-0,1 .: BRICK CHIMNEY 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ASPHALT SHINGLE ' ROOF114(3 NER AD. TRIM ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING E---I-te-_N02O--------1 ~ METAL ROOFING ~ T.O. F.F. @ UPPER 1 p,= 7 ELEV. 110'-7" HISTORIC BAY MODERN FIXED " AINDOM MINDOW 1 - HISTORIC DOUBLE - 1 i NON-HISTORIC T | - HUNS AINDOR SHED ADDITION ~i___Lant L-_1 2 HISTORIC AD. TRIM CONG. STEP ---2 Â· MODERN AD. TRIMI BELOR ADA. SILL GRADE /-6 r=================================== 4 T.O. F.F. @ LOPNER 7 ELEV. 100'-0" BAS_RUILT_EASTELEVA-ilâ‚¬N 1/411 = 11-Oil / 1 r Â«ari-\ I Postage $ /1 4- Certified Fee c b / _ ( t'~~-i&1\., 6* Return Receipt Fee / l /3 2 1 lEi ptirrk (Endorsement Required) Restricted Deliver'y Fee 1 71/,/1\2Â»---, (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ Â¢33< 1 Lf \\9.0 Sent To 1 U*14/le S Urh~s Street, Apt,No.; or P~Box 01-, 060 L. 1, LAnia/7 kk'U<Z<-L City, State~~74424 26 gle i i 7000 1530 0006 2457 482 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece , A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. i For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee, Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested", To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement I, Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) /1 1 Postage $ /2 3 /...321 ' roth 7 Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) , \(1\ 6-Mdre 1 / Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) <i NA/) $63 \fzÂ«,Al Total Postage & Fees Sent To-7 U rwnl. A,UUÂ¢f'V-07*2 Street, Apt. ~,0r PY* 8769 City, State, ~Am, rMA Ass ki j kAL. 20 50,/< 7000 1530 0006 2457 4835 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece 1 A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. 1 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-MÂ·2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Certified Fee i /0 0 1 10< / 1 ~ < 03: <88*rk . j Return Receipt Fee 1 Here (Endorsement Required) i b - J i Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ , j'.~< / S>TRi,tersk â‚¬Â·iÂ·crn'ses-4 drl*-cakif 8760,-~QW W Oox No. - , -A / . :It . 111 7000 1530 0006 2457 4842 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ ~ ,f Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee PoA~arl< (Endorsement Required) / -1/ v ,--,1 Restricted Delivery Fee i p ni A:X (Endorsement Required) / , 1 4/ -9 ./ 1 / 1 .<21~ Total Postage & Fees 4 -.~ ~ Sent To -Bnodc-B<fa or Street, Apt. Ble.; or PO Box.119. ~ 01 6 0 C/Inerb EU- City, State;Ele+ 4 iÂ»Â®r.Co 80204- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4859 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. a Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery ". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 q g e W =0 4 - Postage $ Certified Fee 46 41611 Return Receipt Fee /0*mk 1 (Endorsement Required) 1,2 / li (0(%23(e,g Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ .Â»ru 74_34~ \529 / Sent To Abhkm Ki~+1-6- Street, Apt. No.; or PO Box No / 53.7 2% -#1 14. KW C/ty. St~~~~46u.CIâ€žÂ¥02_---13-C-I-&6<8-:j--------------- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4866 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years important Reminders: , Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. .- I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery, To obtain Returnl Receipt service, please complet& and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". 1 If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 f Postage Certified Fee 190 1 90 1 . 0- Return Receipt Fee 1 ,.= . < ,-, < C,tpoh=2 , i i (Endorsement Required) ( 3.--f> --,-1-~P\tfere ) ~ Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) It ~4/ . -2 9 Total Postage & Fees .p 0.1 1 BO+- ftlorris -r 161-A.1 16u,~-tÂ« Street, Apt.Â·Nol or PO Box No. A 1-111 K'41 Fvt â‚¬A' AremAA_ c'Mt;W'Wrimm,<6 Â· LA- 30 1 18 -61(9 7000 1530 0006 2457 6532 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece 1 A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: I Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ ~ ~ Certified Fee f Cl. 0 DE '\ 1 Return Receipt Fee 1 , /' t 1 -2 CT Pork5el (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee f L315 /.'.-1.-EL/,<f,) (Endorsement Required) 2 1 --7 4 '0410*/ Total Postage & Fees ~ j. sen~32,~R -t- /hyN-au- Rke-S Street, Apt. No.Â· or PO B 4-83 VY "Mlick4 5rn City, State, 21IP+ 4 \ A VyÂ¥71 MA 1 U d-lEal 7000 1530 0006 2457 6549 Certified Mail Provides: i A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: 1 Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. ~ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery, To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". 1 If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) 1, :3 1 7 L~_ Postage $ 4 / #02 1 1 Certified Fee /9(7 ul El )&,) t / 91 *0Â· -3\,4. u fostri~~ j Return Receipt Fee 0 1144/ (Endorsement Required) / Restricted Delivery Fee p-- -.1/ (\.tal W~~~m~em~8~~eq~~: ~ -fÂ©~- -~ ~ - 1Gkuk-1- Ariu -Rn 14.(54/Ch Strp,t, ARL No.; 0,6*Q Box No. 90*40- 5*retty.s '*a-oL- C/ty, CE+A-~Acfg,TE> 8 14 10046 --* MÂ« 7000 1530 0006 2457 6556 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. m For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". m If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) / Postage $ Certified Fee 3 92 .4 1 C sdk. / ./. /--2.<9\ 1/Â»91*k / Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) #( l/ n *lere\ ~ Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 1 4-44 1) Pn Total Postage & Fees e 1321-MW DuraÂ®el + -BerKiet@Lk_ Street, Apt. N4Â·,N)LFO Box No. 7't, State, ZIP+ ~)In ; ns W 1 566~3-â‚¬ Virâ€¢â€¢. b 7000 1530 0006 2457 6 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece ~ A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please compiete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement 'Restricted Delivery". ~ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) P0stage i 17~ Certified Fee , 10 s j r jog ) Return Receipt Fee I ,/ U i- ~ Pc~Te&rk~lj (Endorsement Required) (2;1~rstmde~~'RZI'irfd) C 9, Of 49\61-/ 20 00 83" 1--9 Total Postage & Fees ~ RU--Due-K-Fet-A-#obarry!--DfaKhtÂ®,-. Street, Apt. No.; or PO 1101 No. ~J M- W 55'th %*Â· 1518 44 CliState.ZIR+0 Al #Ai] U ark K' 4 1 cold 7000 1530 0006 2457 6570 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of internationat mail. 1 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee, Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". 1 If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service' CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) I .01Â§ 6. 1ll a.cdo' Postage $ 4.4 C /4-91 /1 . Certified Fee 1 i, 1.k 123/ iÂ®2 \ Return Receipt Fee \ 1 KJ 1,-o{ Poicr ) (Endorsement Required) , 1 11 4 GA #.4 /1 Restricted Delivery Fee i \21 9 /9, \ : /19 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ 9/3 Sent To 4+00.1 6-74(40(i-, Street, Apt No : or PO Box No.,Â· 5-15 51+ 5-tr*ur City. 8041'GMUÂ»Kl 65 Â· Mb G1453 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. N Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the arÂ·ticle and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the cterk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Deliver'y". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) . /r Postage $ f Certified Fee // 90 '11, 7/ Ioor'\ 1/9, Return Receipt Fee Hgre (Endorsement Required) fc l// 5 - ~ Â£~ Post a Restricted Delivery Fee ~~M ~~~)~-l~dy ~C (Endorsement Required) . 1 ~22 -ff* Total Postage & Fees $ ~ 9 4_- irm,+nÂ»â€ž*Â©0* *ftlietr -- f?"t To A -3 1* Cl*~State, Ziplk~<. An- 1 M #AA) A 111â€ž 7000 1530 0006 2457 4804 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. ~ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 f Postage Certified Fee //4234 43jch PoitmiFIÂ¢ Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) ./S-0 (8(E co AL- Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) 1 Total Postage & Fees ~ 9. /9/,<4*f--# Sent Ta . . Ffl 4 S AA 7601 ps S~Aft. 5; 12;Â°/tv~k, 678 408 civ,ks 2 Infi . 6* 4 1 (0\ 7000 1530 0006 2457 4798 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuabies, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested", To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 34 . 1444. Postage $ // 40 h & 4 Certified Fee 190 lur ~ 9~ Astmark). 1 Return Receipt Fee tzl\: .+Me (Endorsement Required) 2 9 Â¢ . 1 0 1 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) .......7 1/il /~.1/&/.-% . J. Total Postage & Fees $ 5/1 \r 8%Â®tioM e Maria,vt.AL- 462 r Street, Apt. Ne; or RO aox No. 1 01 K N it-ec St- 612 I 2-01 cajo, f&6 61 60/ 5%24 2._ 49.#b RUUU 1b3U UUU6 2457 4781 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Deliver'y". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 C : Postage $ ~ 4 ASA\ Certified Fee ( 101 f , 45- 3% Return Receipt Fee C u 0 (co f 52 2~Â°*nal (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees * r ~Â»151./ Sent Td26:r f 04 K AUS Street, Ant,140.; or PO BoRNA. Â·540 I V ;5 -4 1-Â·Â£+LL_ City, St,17775 CO++1 *L- 5763 0 1 7000 1530 0006 2457 4774 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: 1 Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. 1 Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuabies, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 7 U Postage $ Â£7 ~ : 41.-3.0 9. JA ' .,4 '' J OR \'..5,\\ il 11 Certified Fee C 7 ~ Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 1 4/P Meret j ' Restricted Delivery Fee . 3'41 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ Sehi19 8 0 Vt 0,4 M/lkiÂ·s k Lu~ Stree60.Apt. No., or PO Box ~lo. \< 0 ~lt Q JAA___ City, Sl!11#J'Pi i T7-ILVAA 60 9 1611 7000 1530 0006 2457 4767 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt i A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: I Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 / 1 Postage $ 9 u Certified Fee 190. AÂ»Â» a-.426-0 /9~ost4ue \04 Return Receipt Fee i'< i Hert3 1 1 (Endorsement Required) (40 Restricted Delivery Fee ~.*- (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ 3; 79 \*sps Sentk' kvt,~ le Hirl*grsttlf Street.Gpt*6Â°' irfb 44- 6-rrece City, StafkJi~ 60 8; 10 ll 7000 1530 0006 2457 4750 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. , For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 CM@fftix; Postage $ / 1 Certified Fee -(0,20'' <0 0 â‚¬910\ Return Receipt Fee 417,< Here (Endorsement Required) /1 2 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ ,re 1 BeÂ· t To Nlrth..17 51. Ass ac. f -1~*~-wc .- sir&~. Ngr or -06-86Â£-AE. 19* & Ok 11 C/*;552. Â· CLO 516 /2- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4743 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt i A unique identifier for your mailpiece 1 A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For vatuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. â€¢ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service~~~|~|~ CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) J /66-7 Postage 47 2â‚¬ APM \ Certified Fee r/4 Â¢ 0 (21 28, Return Receipt Fee 1 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ ~~4 Sent To , OAK bod-Â«e, W,C. d/O Qi iliÂ¢,v. *k Kt ttrÂ»et. Apt. No.; or PO 1301 No. Mo 60Â«91 51 7000 1530 0006 2457 4729 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery i A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) / - 39 postage * Certified Fee ~C~~ *~6~-~ 09/ aaÂ»j Return Receipt Fee / C L,,/ (Endorsement Required) 1 -,_ I ( *ere j 61 Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees Sent To =6~ts Pe Mrs af Street, Ap0*.; or 200.171,4- 103 City, State Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. Tc obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 I F.K>il. 3Â»-0 Postage $ 49 - / CO y. Certified Fee C 91(2~ Return Receipt Fee 5 79.< 13 ' Here (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) . /7 1 4 9-2 -\Â»29/ Total Postage & Fees ~ ~, X-321) Sent Tg 2-134 140 kiÂ«s LF Street, faNO.162%~11&1--:19 City, StAe._ZIP+ 4 *â‚¬2 /U AA , /0 5 16 /2- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4705 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery, To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested", To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. â€¢ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent, Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $3 4 Certified Fee 1.C{ 0 04- -<Â·%:... Return Receipt Fee *re / 5/ 4/ ''@4. 9-4/: 1 - f '<>.'~stmark (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee //- -7 W (Endorsement Required) - 44> 5 34 1 -- Total Postage & Fees 9 j. Sent To VYi i I ia .M -F,4, r Street, Apt. N~~:ft40x 1*- . rtiVIÂ·r5,-lie-0- City, State, M*4 2,~ 0,0 8 16 IN Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt a A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuab!es, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. i For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". m If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ 5 q /6.- e Certified Fee f q 0 &(4* Oostmark Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 1/.5 V -4% *94... i ,/ J Jk~/C/' Restricted Delivery Fee *- ~ ~ 4 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $311 Sent To ' 14 bert 5 -11 rud a j Street, Apt. 10~ ~ PO BM 02.x I lEi City, State, ZIAU- rUP d*Fl , gO 5 t 6 /2_ 7000 1530 0006 2457 4682 C55*Ip. Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Maii. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. m For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S. Postal Service CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Postage $ 34 Certified Fee ( tfi lÂ·i O Return Receipt Fee ~ (Endorsement Required) I IN--* 0/ *11 2%71 Restricted Delivery Fee .--- ,Â·--7 ~ "<~~~--~ (Endorsement Required) e -2 L 1- Total Postage & Fees 9 _/1 Sent T131 et,14 -FaMAJAC ~-34St- Street, Apt,~>dr PQ Bod \Al Nolorr- SÂ»+- City, State, KIll, 4 -0 00 316 1/ 7000 1530 0006 2457 4675 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery i A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: 1 Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not availabie for any class of international mail. 1 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 4 4 9 ./453-3-h\ Postage $ ~L~ /- 24 Certified Fee 1 L < ~ ~ Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) ~ d.2 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee Total Postage & Fees ~ Sent To street, Apt Nfil)LF ~~~002,1 ~ 3-- eo-----1%0 --13 Eigat~98~ ~ 60 %1856 7000 1530 0006 2457 4668 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece 1 A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 44 P-4% $ '7 - 4.(. Of,1 Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) 1% / i filte.LÂ·b Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) I 7 Total Postage & Fees * 7. 'BA c 14 64 -BroÂ¥14 fle e.san--, StrMt, tp No,Â®r Pp[Box No. 51:0 2> r-1-Pv,0*n City,At*, Zle, 4 316/I 7000 1530 0006 2457 4644 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: 1 Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. i Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. m NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. â€¢ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- de at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ - 3 4 .-. 154>\ Certified Fee (Gf) Return Receipt Fee ~ ~ ; post,g~7 (Endorsement Required) r <262 ( S Â¥Â»*518) Restricted Delivery Fee i.1,9 )0 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $' 3, 7Â¢/ CP L---:163/ e--C / SA rlt TO v VI cestbi tbrl.Li -0 uke el voitk t S~:-E-~ AU Certified Mail Provides: m A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 <* AS*X Postage $ Certified Fee [90 liELe -13/10,1 < 906Â¥Aasle-3 8 - '1 /O/ Return Receipt Fee ' (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee ~ ~ (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees $ - -4 74 SdA.1 + 106'le- Hor %40~ Stre#Apt. Ned or PO Box,No. , f-* 0 Ac 10 46 cny*15*6 . C-0 5 1 6 1L 7000 1530 0006 2457 4620 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt 1 A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. I NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. â€¢ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ 1%(/4 . b it * 93, 'jÂ· - Certified Fee 1 '~ u) #4~ Sgosh,~rk ,~ Return Receipt Fee \'..7, (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) , Total Postage & Fees Â® Sent TN Ket> Street, Apt No.: ot,Pp Box No I/0 "A re-Â£*Swlith 5-lE- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4613 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. 1 Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail, â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. 1 For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested", To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 ht \1 Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee / h (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee , (Endorsement Required) //p 7 4 \%'p?Â« Total Postage & Fees ~ DA 1 -. Sent To 1 ~#E__l AEÂ».h-.Â».~*5*.*~-- ket, Ap*110Â·; or PO.BoÂ»*Jo. 2911.C 1Â«K.dâ‚¬,4. Caw:-%ale.ZIP<i) 1 1 r jr eA, FL- .9664453 7000 1530 0006 2457 4606 Certified Mail Provides: 1 m A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery I A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. m Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". 1 If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. I f a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 U.S.~ CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) Postage $ dc~f "ASKE K. Certified Fee f / Postmark,p' , + Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) f %(966 Â· /4, Restricted Deliver'y Fee 11Â«9 (Endorsement Required) 2 /1 Total Postage & Fees ~ /i,3~ , / , -. Sent T AM ep,1 nk FFI j-tw IS Street, Apt. No.; PA.20 Box No. 1 '5- FooKS C tuo.C 207#L c/ty, staNi9,4,AA M'O'Pl . 0-5r- A-:, 9 61 7000 1530 0006 2457 4590 Certified Mail Provides: , A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery m A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail, â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". m If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 4 GlÂ»-I t.1 Postage $ ~ Certified Fee ~ 51 ~ f.>2 -Emj j l.,4 6\ 2= "' =o*#ark Return Receipt Fee \ (Endorsement Required) 1 / Are Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ ./4,1 1 Sent ~ b rO 22\Â«sen <64 . 8 50 City, StaMR,%-[377 Â· T-% 77 03 Z. 7000 1530 0006 2457 4583 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt m A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. m For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". â€¢ If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 Postage $ Certified Fee 1 10. //apt> ./ /Â·Postmark Return Receipt Fee i / Here (Endorsement Required) Restricted Deliver'y Fee *---- . / 1 C ( 615,3 (Endorsement Required) $: 9 4 \.ffk/ / Total Postage & Fees Â£ SentTo 2-m..s VYM* i Street, Apt. Neor PQBox No. P 00< 3463 City, State, *Ati~m C,0 S 16 /Z- 7000 1530 0006 2457 4736 76-4 Certified Mail Provides: â€¢ A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For vatuabies, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. â€¢ For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent, Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". 1 If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 -0 i 1 postage $ 9.1 -343~ Certified Fee flo - / ~ . / poJtÂ£\ 00~ Return Receipt Fee V. ' Here j -1 1 (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) )4 j Total Postage & Fees Seâ€¢Â©im 1-tri.-r b1.~ -fÂ«red.- )5.-- @*det, 216Â£-NE; pr Pci -802-NE. ----- r-1 71 1--M>Us-f- K O.Nedoff --,29 City, Sate,ZIP+ 4 VÂ¥1 1/1191/T-Ra \ 4 6 0-0 45 -/ 7000 1530 0006 2457 6563 Certified Mail Provides: I A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece I A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: m Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. â€¢ Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 /84 CO Postage $ Certified Fee Return Receipt Fee (Endorsement Required) -4 9 Â¢(4 Restricted Deliver'y Fee (Endorsement Required) / 2-99 43_PL' Total postage & Fees $ / 5~7 '' / 4 - 14/951'MARÂ«___ Street Apt No Â· br PA Boic No 78jaICK.1.heo /300 OrÂ¢5061.+ Ct. City,Gtatd ZIP+ 4 k ailaa Â· 141 63 4 7*21- 7000 1530 0006 2457 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt I A unique identifier for your mailpiece â€¢ A signature upon delivery â€¢ A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: I Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. I For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested".To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. 1 For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authonzed agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Delivery". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ~ (Domestic Mail Only; No Insurance Coverage Provided) f Postage $ ~ ~ ,# f-j /ASAN Certified Fee (Endorsement Required) Return Receipt Fee 5 Restricted Delivery Fee ~ -/lf\\42- / 4/0 (Endorsement Required) Total Postage & Fees ~ '~ c 1VE,apc Ast Jr- Asr- Sir@*t.* 1272Â°Â·--Â»+ j----------- City, SAa.Zipti (10 31611- 2568 RUUU JbjU UUUb /45/ 46 Certified Mail Provides: 1 A mailing receipt â€¢ A unique identifier for your mailpiece m A signature upon delivery 1 A record of delivery kept by the Postal Service for two years Important Reminders: â€¢ Certified Mail may ONLY be combined with First-Class Mail or Priority Mail. I Certified Mail is not available for any class of international mail. â€¢ NO INSURANCE COVERAGE IS PROVIDED with Certified Mail. For valuables, please consider Insured or Registered Mail. â€¢ For an additional fee, a Return Receipt may be requested to provide proof of delivery. To obtain Return Receipt service, please complete and attach a Return Receipt (PS Form 3811) to the article and add applicable postage to cover the fee. Endorse mailpiece "Return Receipt Requested". To receive a fee waiver for a duplicate return receipt, a USPS postmark on your Certified Mail receipt is required. I For an additional fee, delivery may be restricted to the addressee or addressee's authorized agent. Advise the clerk or mark the mailpiece with the endorsement "Restricted Deliver'y". I If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is desired, please present the arti- cle at the post office for postmarking. If a postmark on the Certified Mail receipt is not needed, detach and affix label with postage and mail. IMPORTANT: Save this receipt and present it when making an inquiry. PS Form 3800, May 2000 (Reverse) 102595-00-M-2004 (0((0 -k) EXHIBIT ZL li & i 1, . [7-1 County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATIONS State of Colorado } SECTION 26.304.060(E) I, Janver t)Â®rr-1Â¤4-or) , being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements pursuant to Section 26.304.060(E) of the Aspen Municipal Code in the following manner: 1. By mailing of notice, a copy of which is attached hereto, by first-class postage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property. as indicated onthe attached list, on the 18 day of A~r; 1 , 200Â£ (which is 1,2. days prior to the public hearing date of Apri 1 +14,,Â©01 1 . By posting a sign in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public way) and that the said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 13 day A ~ of Fi~r' I , 2001-4 to the 2-5 day of Apri: f , 2001-Â·(Must be posted for at least ten (10) full days before the healing date). A photograph of the posted sign is attached hereto. - Ell-' Sig~ture S*ned before me this *Dday of Af rit . *4_. by PUBLIC NOTICE PUb.ICI~TICE .112" DATE/7 ,! 2((1 DATE____ TIMEZ-TFF- TIME 5.32 8. 6-2Â¢Â£3'Kivt-- PLACE(ll , wl I PLACE(722-_ ~ ~- 0 PURPOSE ~ / PURPOSE - 2 2 r Zt <i 1.31453:3(762 E Â·'LIC _/1.t Nt,[ A:4147% Z.5,24- 2\Â¢ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL . .1..... - - My Commission expireÂ¥Â£110,2.Â·L Notary Public i \ Malc j i "r,Kxwl~!th,014 EXPmeR 44/BAT//OS 0 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 640 N. THIRD STREET - VARIANCE FROM AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT STANDARD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 25, 2001 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Jim Daggs requesting approval for a variance from the requirement that in order to receive a floor area bonus for an "accessory dwelling unit" the unit must be in a building with a footprint of no larger than 625 square feet. The applicant wishes to locate the unit in an existing structure that has a footprint of approximately 700 square feet. This request is part of the review for a historic lot split, landmark designation, and Conceptual HPC Design, also to be discussed on April 25th. The property is located at 640 N. Third Street and is legally described as Lots 4-6, Block 102, of the Hallam Addition of the City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 7,2001 City of Aspen Account - 0 0 ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL / ALTEMUS E A PARTNERSHIP LLLP 4 BART MORRIS 111 & CATHY KANTER STUDIES 620 N 3RD ST 1711 PALMER AVE / 100 PUPPY SMITH ST EN, CO 81611 . NEW ORLEANS, LA 70118-6115 4 ASPEN, CO 81611 BELL 26 LLC / BERGER BRUCE ,/ BLOCK FAMILY TRUST 44.5% INT C/O BROOKE A BLOCK QUALFD PERSONEL RES TRST 960 CHEROKEE PETERSON/KAUFMAN&PETERSON 55.5% INT DENVER, CO 80204 315 E HYMAN AVE STE 305 311 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 I / DW RINGSBY ENTERPRISES j CRAIG CAROL G / CURTIS JAMES L 1 A PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 18 300 E HYMAN AVE 1123 AURARIA PKWY. #200 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 ASPEN, CO 81611 0ENVER, CO 80204 / DURAND LOYAL 111 DR & BERNICE f DAGGS JAMES K & GAY I k DEE INVESTMENTS LTD PARTNERSHIP , BLACK 1 640 N 3RD ST 1 4 211 ROYAL PONCEANA WY 4314 FAWN CT RT 1 ~ ASPEN, CO 81611 1 PALM BEACH, FL 33480 CROSS PLAINS, WI 53528 ~ EFH HOLDINGS LP j FINKELSTEIN RICHARD & CARIA ~FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z FAMILY CAROLE C 50% TRUST P O BOX 8770 FRAZER WILLIAM R & JANE Z 9034 BURROUGHS RD ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90046-1405 TRUSTEES 433 W GILLESPIE ASPEN, CQ 81611 EENWAY NANCY R TRUST F/B/O ,,~ HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D J HERNANDEZ CECIL M & NOELLE C MEADERS DUCKWORTH & MOORE 782C N KALAHEO PO BOX 1045 051 FIFTH AVE 300 CRESCENT COURT-STE 1000 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10176 KAILUA, HI 96734 ~KAUS PETER & EVA ~ LUBAR SHELDON B ~0"LEWIS MEMRIE M LUBAR MARIANNE S 8401 VISTA LN 15 PECKSLAND RD 700 N WATER ST - STE 1200 PRESCOTT, AZ 86301 GREENWICH, CT 06831 MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-4206 - ~LUNDGREN DONNA ~ MARSHALL RONNIE PO BOX 6700 320 LAKE AVE 600 JEFFERSON STE #350 MIDDLErON RANDALL TRUST SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77002 J MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC 4 CO BROOKE PETERSON ESQUIRE , MUSTANG HOLDINGS LLC 44 NITZE WILLIAM A 2 MUSIC SCHOOL RD 1537 28TH ST NW 315 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-8500 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 ASPEN, CO 81611 RTH FOURTH STREET ASSOCIATES ~ OAK LODGE LLC ) MIKE CONVISOR C/O WILLIAM O HUNT ~ PERROS DIMITRI & DIANE 79 LOCUST RD O BOX 11 PO BOX 7951 WINNETKA, IL 60093 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PETERSON JAMES D ~ ~ PHELPS MASON ,/ PINES DAVID & ARONELLE S PETERSON HENSLEY R REVOCABUE TRUST 201 S LAKE AVE STE 408 ~O BOX 1714 403 W MICHIGAN PASADENA, CA 91101 'EN, CO 81612 URBANA, IL 61801 STARODOJ ROBERT F 50% INT ~STUNDA STEVEN R - ~ WEIL JONAS PO BOX 1121 ,/ 515 5TH ST PO BOX 7963 ASPEN, CO 81612 ANNAPOLIS, MD 21403 ASPEN, CO 81612 / WOOD DUCK REALTY CORP C/O DWORMAN DARRYL 65 W 55TH ST STE 4A NEW YORK, NY 10019 r-ERRIBI~1~~ iE c) 11-/ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 640 N. Third Street- Historic Landmark Designation, Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition On-site relocation, and Historic Landmark Lot Split- Public Hearing DATE: April 25, 2001 SUMMARY: The project involves demolishing additions to the historic structure, relocating it and an existing outbuilding on site and building a new addition. The northerly portion of the property is to be split off for future development. APPLICANT: Jim and Gae Daggs, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-121-08-002 ADDRESS: 640 N. Third Street, Lots 4,5, and 6 (less the southerly 3.2 feet of Lot 6), Block 102, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite ofAspen, Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential) CURRENT LAND USE: 11,707 sq. ft. lot containing a single-story residence, garage, and caretaker apartment LANDMARK DESIGNATION Any structure or site that meets two (2) or more of the following standards may be designated as "H," Historic Overlay District, and/or historic landmark. It is not the intention of the Historic Preservation Commission to landmark insignificant structures or sites. HPC will focus on those structures which are unique or have some special value to the community, as put forth in the standards. A. Historical importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. 1 Staff Finding: Staff and the applicant are unaware of any historical significance in connection with this site with respect to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. Staff finds this criterion is not met. B. Architectural importance. Based on the building form, use, or specimen, the structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type. Staff Finding: The original house has numerous features that are typical of 19~ century residences in Aspen, such as a decorative front porch, front gable/ porch relationship, and simple plan. The form of this building is somewhat unique in that the front gable is 1 M stories and the cross gable is 2 stories tall. Staff finds this standard is met. C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. Staff Finding: The original designer is unknown, therefore this standard is not met. D. Neighborhood character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is importantfor the maintenance of that neighborhood character. Staff Finding: The property is located in Aspen's historic West End neighborhood, along Lake Avenue. There are numerous 19th century homes in the immediately surrounding area and this building is one of four in a row. Staff finds this standard is met. E. Community character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location, and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance. Staff Finding: The house is representative of the modest scale, style, and character of homes constructed in the late 1800's, which is Aspen's primary period of historic significance. Staff finds this standard is met. 2 SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: The project is a historic landmark lot split and involves demolishing portions of the existing house, relocating it and the carriage house on the site and building a new basement and addition. A rear yard setback variance for the garage and a 500 0 square foot floor area bonus are requested. The house was remodeled in the past and has additions which have affected its integrity as a historic resource. Some of the exterior materials have been replaced. Staff views this project as an opportunity to retrieve the original character of the structure and to improve its relationship to the other remaining historic buildings along Lake Avenue. The architect has provided "as-built" drawings of the house as well as plans and elevations which represent the historic design of the building. Using the available maps of the property, staff agrees that the house is correctly represented on sheets H2.1, H2.2, and H3.1. Note that because of the previous remodels, certain walls of the historic house will need to be reconstructed to restore the building. At the February 14~~ meeting, the HPC reviewed the project and gave the following direction to the applicant: 1. Restudy the demolition plan to retain all original portions of the historic house. 2. Focus on restoration opportunities for the historic house. 3. Restudy the addition to create more separation between it and the historic structure. Lower plate and ridge heights. 0 3 4. Relocate and reduce the size of the lightwell proposed on the south side of the front porch. 5. Eliminate the deck at the northeast corner ofthe house. 6. Recalculate the floor area for the project. 7. Provide a neighborhood plan showing the house in its proposed new location. A new plan has been submitted, and the architect has responded in writing to the HPC comments. A previous owner of the home has been contacted, and photos of the house from the 1950's are included in the packet. The Planning Staff has reviewed the new information, and appreciates the thorough documentation of the history of the house. However, the design for the new project does not seem to be making progress. Specifically, the rear portions of the original building are still proposed to be demolished, new doors and windows are proposed to be added to the old portion of the house, and there is no physical separation between the new and old construction. Staff continues to be concerned with the amount of hardscape around three sides of the house, citing this guideline: Private Yard 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. â€¢ The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. The architect asserts that retaining the rear portion of the house is not feasible and that it prohibits the owners from accommodating their program on the site. One of staff s concerns is that the allocation of floor area for the project is unbalanced, with more (2,981 square feet) given to the historic house site than to the new lot (1,761 square feet.) This is the opposite of the intent of the lot split program, which aimed to reduce the pressure on historic structures and transfer most of the floor area into a new building. Regardless, it is the staff' s opinion that to truly restore the original structure, and to move towards a project that merits bonuses and variances, the rear portion of the building must be retained. It provides an ideal transition piece to the new addition and is part of the history ofthe building. The second point, to look for other restoration opportunities for the house, is not being met by the request to add flanking windows to the single window on the south side, upper floor. The HPC previously stated that this would not be appropriate. Also, staff would not recommend putting shutters back on the house. The shutters and the asphalt siding that appear in the 1950's pictures were probably installed sometime in the early part of the 20'11 century and were not original to the structure. As direction on the windows, the guidelines state: 4 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. â€¢ Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. â€¢ Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. â€¢ Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. â€¢ Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character-defining facade will negatively affect the integrity of a structure. Probably the most important issue that is not resolved by the proposed design is a physical break between the old house and new addition. The previous direction was to reduce the height of the addition, which has been accomplished by using a section of flat roof, barrel vaults, etc. The addition lands right on the back of that portion of the old house proposed to be retained. Although the addition is more narrow than the old house, staff feels that there must be a "slot" between the two elements so that they are viewed as two distinct masses. The architecture of the addition has also become less compatible with the historic house. Although the guidelines encourage contemporary solutions, these are to be contemporary interpretations of the features and characteristics of the old structure. The proposed addition does not appear to draw any references in its design from the original house. Staff finds the following guidelines are still not met by the project. New Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. â€¢ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. â€¢ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. â€¢ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. â€¢ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. â€¢ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. â€¢ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all 5 0 techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. â€¢ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. â€¢ A 1 -story connector is preferred. â€¢ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. â€¢ The connector also should be propoitional to the primary building. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. â€¢ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. â€¢ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. â€¢ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, comices and eavelines should 0 be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. â€¢ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. Â· If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. â€¢ Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. One of the issues mentioned on February 14~~1 was that because of a misinterpretation of the floor area bonus for "Accessory Dwelling Units," the project was over the allowed square footage. The requirement is that in order to have the whole unit exempted, it must be in a separate structure, at least 10 feet away from the primary building, and must be contained in a building with a footprint no greater than 625 square feet. The applicant is attempting to reuse an existing building that has a footprint of approximately 700 square 0 feet. After discussing the situation with the Planning Director, it was determined that the 6 HPC could be asked to vary the standard and allow the ADU bonus if the variance criteria were met. These criteria are discussed later in the memo. The applicant has requested the 500 square foot HPC bonus and also a rear yard setback variance. The merits of the HPC bonus will be better judged once the proposal has been amended to comply with the design guidelines. The setback variance appears to be appropriate because it creates more room to allow for a detached garage. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposedfor development, and Staff Finding: The subject property is fairly large (11,707 square feet) and would allow for a single family house of 3,822 square feet. By creating two detached homes on the site and transferring some of the FAR to a new structure, the historic house can be better preserved and the structures on the site can be consistent with the size of homes that have historically existed in that neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project can enhance the historic significance of the home by removing some inappropriate alterations that have occurred over the years. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architecturat character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The project as currently designed does not enhance the architectural character and integrity of the house to the extent possible in such a major rehabilitation project. The addition must be redesigned to be more of a distinctly separate mass and the house should be more accurately restored. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: For the most part, the areas proposed to be demolished are recent construction and do not contribute to the historic character of the building. Staff has 7 concerns that the proposal does include demolition of the rear portion of the original 0 house, which must be restudied. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: Sanborne maps do not exist for this part of town, however the Willit's map and 1893 Bird's Eye View of Aspen suggest that the proposal involves demolishing historic areas at the back of the original house. This is inappropriate because the size and form ofthe historic structure will not be correctly represented by the project. The areas to be removed step down to a one story height and could be used as the one story break between the old and new construction. ON-SITE RELOCATION No approval for on-site relocation shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation 0 Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation. Staff Finding: The house is to be moved 8.5 feet to the east (towards Lake Avenue) and 7.5 feet to the south. Since it is one of a set of historic structures, a neighborhood plan has been provided to show the relationship created between the adjacent structures and the subject home in its new location. Staff finds that the new location of the house is compatible with the adjacent structure. B. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. Staff Finding: Said report shall be a condition of approval. 0 C. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security approved by III'C with the engineering department, to 8 insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation. Staff Finding: The relocation plan and letter of credit shall be conditions of approval. HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT In order to conduct an Historic Landmark Lot Split, the applicant shall meet the following requirements of Aspen Land Use Code: Section 26.480.030(A)(2) and (4), Section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), and Section 26.72.010(G). 26.480.030(A)(2) SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS, LOT SPLIT The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met: a) The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the City Council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Staff Finding: The property was created as part ofHallam's Addition to the City ofAspen in 1888. b) No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. Any lot for which development is proposed will mitigate for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.100.040(A)(1)(c). Staff Finding: This proposal will create two lots. Lot A, which will contain the historic building, is to be 5,707 square feet, which is allowable because the minimium lot size for lots created through approval of an Historic Landmark Lot Split is 3,000 square feet. If more than 50% of the existing house is being demolished by this application, the ADU that is proposed for Lot A is mandatory, otherwise it is voluntary. Lot B, the new lot, will be 6,000 square feet and is in conformance with the zone district. An ADU or cash-in-lieu payment will be required for development of the site. The lot split will not result in any additional density. Two detached houses is a use by right on a property of this size. 9 c) The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of a subdivision exemption under the provisions qfthis chapter or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to Section 26.100.040(C)(1)(a); and Staff Finding: The land has not been subdivided previously. d) A subdivision plat which meets the terms of this chapter, and conforms to the requirements of this title, is submitted and recorded in the ojfice of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth management allocation pursuant to Chapter 26.100. Staff Finding: The subdivision plat shall be a condition of approval. It must be reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Departments for approval and recordation within 180 days of final land use action. e) Recordation. The subdivision exemption agreement and plat shall be recorded in the omce of the Pitkin County clerk and recorder. Failure on the part of the applicant to record the plat within one hundred eighty (180) days following approval by the City Council shall render the plat invalid and reconsideration of the plat by the City Council will be required for a showing of good cause. Staff Finding: The subdivision exemption agreement shall be a condition of approval. D In the case where an existing single-family dwelling occupies a site which is eligible for a lot split, the dwelling need not be demolished prior to application for a lot split. Staff Finding: No dwelling units will be demolished as part of this proposal. g) Maximum potential buitdout for the two (2) parcels created by a lot split shall not exceed three (3) units, which may be composed of a duplex and a single-family home. Staff Finding: The applicants intend to construct a single family house on Lot A. Lot B will be 0 redeveloped by another party and may contain either a single family house, a duplex, or 10 two detached homes if the necessary approvals are gained. The maximum build out will be three units. 26.480.030(A)(4) SUBDIVISION EXEMPTIONS, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The split of a lot that is a designated historic landmark for the development of one new single-family dwelling. The Historic Landmark Lot Split shall meet the requirements of section 26.88.030(A)(2), section 26.100.050(A)(2)(e), section 26.72.010(G) of this Code, and the following standards: a) The original parcel shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet in size and be located in the R-6 zone district or a minimum of 13,000 square feet and be located in the R-15A zone district. Staff Finding: The subject parcel is 11,707 square feet and is located in the R-6 zone district. b) The total FAR for both residences shall not exceed the floor area allowed for a duplex on the original parcel The total FAR for each lot shall be noted on the S ubdivision Exemption Plat. Staff Finding: The maximum floor area for a duplex on the fathering parcel is 4,242 square feet. The applicant plans to allot 2,481 square feet, plus the 500 square foot bonus to Lot A, the historic house. Lot B is to be given 1,761 square feet. These square footages must be noted on the plat. Bonus FAR for "Accessory Dwelling Units" and garages may also be applied. c) The proposed development meets all dimensional requirements of the underlying zone district. HPC variances and bonuses are only permitted on the parcel that contains a historic structure. Staff Finding: The applicant has requested a floor area bonus and setback variance for the redevelopment of the historic house. No variances may be awarded to the new lot, Lot B. 26.470.070(C) GMQS EXEMPTION, HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT The construction of each new single-family dwelling on a lot created through review and approval of an Historic Landmark Lot Split shall be exempt from the scoring and competition procedures. The exemption is to be approved by the Community Development Director, but is not to be deducted from the respective annual development allotments or from the development ceilings. 11 Staff Finding: Currently, there are no standards for reviewing exemption requests; the exemption is by right for historic landmark lot splits. VARIANCE FOR THE ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT As discussed earlier, the existing outbuilding has a footprint larger than the maximum allowed for the "Accessory Dwelling Unit" to be fully exempted from FAR. The applicant wishes to reuse this structure for cost savings. The relevant code language is as follows: "Accessory Dwelling . An Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be calculated and attributed to the allowable floor area for a parcel with the same inclusions and exclusions for calculating Floor Area as defined in this Section, unless eligible for an exemption as described below. Detached ADU Floor Area Bonus. Fifty (50) percent of the net livable square footage of an ADU which is detached from the primary residence by a distance of no less than ten (10) feet and which is housed in a structure with afootprint Of no more than 625 square feet shall be excluded from the calculation of Floor Area Mandatory Occupancy ADU Floor Area Bonus. Fifty (50) percent of the net livable square footage of an Accessory Dwelling Unit deed restricted to Mandatory Occupancy shall be excluded from the calculation of Floor Area. This mandatory occupancy restricted requires the ADU be continuously occupied by a local working residents, as defined by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, for lease periods of six months or greater. The owner shall retain the right to select a qualified renter. Combined FAR Bonuses. If an ADU is eligible for both of the Floor Area bonuses described above, one hundred (100) percent of the net livable square footage of the ADU shall be excluded,from the calculation of Floor Area. " The intention of setting a maximum building footprint of 625 square feet was to create buildings which are truly secondary in size to the primary residence. In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the HPC must make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives, and policies of the Aspen Area Community Plan and this Title; Staff Finding: The AACP promotes creating affordable housing within existing neighborhoods in the form of "Accessory Dwelling Units." In order to have the whole apartment exempted 12 0 from floor area, the unit must be detached, which provides privacy for the resident, and will have to be deed restricted to mandatory occupancy. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Staff Finding: The variance applies to an existing building, which is approximately 75 square feet larger than the allowed building footprint. Staff finds that the plan to reuse, rather than demolish and rebuild the outbuilding is reasonable. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district, and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship or practical difficulty. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a. There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure, which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or Staff Finding: 0 The building pre-dates the "Accessory Dwelling Unit" regulations. b. Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the Aspen Area Community Plan and the terms of this Title to other parcels, buildings, or structures, in the same zone district; and Staff Finding: All parcels in the zone district have the right to construct an "Accessory Dwelling Unit," therefore the applicant is receiving no special privelege. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC continue the 640 N. Third Street review with the same direction provided on February 14,2001. The project is not in compliance with the guidelines and must be restudied. 0 13 RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to continue the 640 N. Third Street application for Historic Landmark Designation, Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition On-site relocation, and Historic Landmark Lot Split to a date certain." Exhibits: A. Staffmemo dated April 25, 2001 B. Application 14 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 610 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 8I6II TEL 970.925. 5590 XECUTIVE X 970 â€¢ 925 â€¢ 5076 CHITECTURAL FAX 970 â€¢ 925 Â· 4557 WWW.CUNNIFFE.COM CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, AIA PRINCIPAL/CEO JANVER C DERRINGTON, AIA April 6, 2001 PRINCIPAL Amy Guthrie Historic Planning Officer City of Aspen 130 South Gatena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Daggs Residence Historic Landmark Development Historic Lot Split 640 North Third Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Am:y, Since the first HPC public hearing, we have obtained more specific information about the "historic resource" that the commission is concerned about preserving. Longtime Aspen resident Carol Craig was the owner of the house with her husband Bob, from 1955 to 1964. A photo thai she provided to us is attached as Exhibit J. As you can see, the roof was simply tarpaper, and it had composition siding, which is abit easierto see inthe photo marked Exhibit K. From the Exhibit J photo, it is evident that the West entrytothe kitchen wasthe most used andthe formal entry to the East was rarely used, according to Carol. Also the living room window tothe East was the same size it is now, only a double hung sash instead of fixed, as you can see in the Exhibit L photo. Carol also stated that the dormers on the front gable were alreadythere in 1955. We assume they were part of the original house. The shed roof over the kitchen was extended tb the west to create a breakfast nook, launlry and storage in 1962. The Craig's also enlarged the living room to the North and added a bath in the upper level with a dormer to the West. All of these additions can be seen in the Exhibit M photo. The entire house was re-roofed with cedar shingles and wood lap siding, much as it appears today. A skylight was added in the shed roof over the kitchen/breakfast area. From what Carol hastold me, the house thattheymoved into in 1955 wasdark andpoorly insulated. Nothing is known about the configuration or exterior materials prior to the time they started living there. It isevident that theadditions they made, and those of subsequent owners afterthey solditin 1964, have greatly enhanced its appearance, not to mention livability. However, it is stilllacking by today's standards. In Exhibit H, pages 4 and 5, we have graphically shown the chronology of the various additions from 1962 to 1972. The Daggs bought thehouse in 1978 andithas remained essentially the same to date, other than normal maintenance and repair. ARCHITECTURE â€¢ PLANNING â€¢ INTERIORS ASPEN â€¢ CARBONDALE â€¢ TELLURIDE â€¢ VAIL T. I Daggs Residence Historic Lot Split Page 2 0 The dilemma we are faced with is how far to go with the restoration of the "historic resource?" Surely the H]?C doesn't want to see tarpaper roof and composition siding. Also, in the 1965 additions, the roof was convertedto a Â«cold roof" system with cave and ridge vents to improve the ice-damming problem. Should that be taken off, and if so, what material should replace it? As to the livability of the original house in the context of a new addition, it does not lend itself to being used in a manner that is compatible with today's lifestyle. That is why we are proposing the demolition of the western portion, which includes the original kitchen, laundry, bath and closet, along with the various additions, so that the two-story element remains, as well as the originalliving room and entry. By converting the living room to a stairwell, the Â«entry" can become a more functional element of the remodeled residence. We are restoring the double hung window withdieshutters onthe West wallofthe stairway/original living room, which is the way it was in 1955. To make the new stairway more functional, we are requesting a door with transom to be added to the North wall. Carol has told me there was no window there, simply because of the heating problem in those days. We also request a new window on the west side of the two story historic element atthe upper level, north end, for more natural light in the new living room. It will not be visible from Lake Avenue. The proposed addition to the West has been reconfigured so that the roof is no higher than the original two story element, and is set back so that it is subordinate to the historic street elevation. It is now being designed as a distinctly contemporary structure with completely different materials, massing, etc., as depicted in the revised concept drawings in Exhibit H, pages 7 through 14. In Exhibit I, we have responded to all of the specific suggestions of City Staff in their memorandum dated February 14, 2001. 0 The applicant has requested adding a gas fireplace in the new living room andsubstituting an elevator forthe back stairway, which required chengingthe fenesrmtion qignifirlntly onthe South andWest elevations of the addition. We believe the revisions we have made will make the addition complimentary, but definitely different from the restored portion of the original house. We are also proposing to revise the 60's windows on the west (street) elevation of the Carriage House to more - traditional double hung wood windows. Even though the entire original house is not being restored, the spirit of tile Â«Miner Victorian" era is preserved in this proposed redevelopment andits presence ,. on the Lake Avenue streetscape maintains the historic context of the neighborhood. In light of the above, we respectfully request that the HPC directive to retain all original portions of the historic house be modified to accept this proposed redevelopment. Sincerely, Jan~ C. Derrington, AIA ~ P ' cipal/Senior Project Arch'-ect 0 CHARLES CUNNIFPE ARCHYTECTS 610 E HYMAN ASPEN CO 81611 - ELL ECUTIVE AX 970 â€¢ 925 Â· 5076 ARCIfITECIURAL FAX 970 â€¢ 925 â€¢ 4557 WWWCUNNIFFE.COM CHARLES L. CUNNIFFE, AIA PRINCIPAL/CEO JANVER C DERRINGTON, AIA PRINCIPAL April 6, 2001 Amy Guthrie Historic Planning Officer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Daggs Residence Historic Landmark Development Historic Lot Split 640 North Third Street Aspen, Colorado Applicant's Response to City Staffs Comments and Recommendations Relevant to Previous Submission Dear Amy, 1. Restudy the demolition plan to retain all portions of the original house. Response: As stated in our letter, the original house's presence in the historic context of the Lake Avenue streetscape is the most important element of this proposal. The entry, living room andtwo-story element are the significant features that will be restored. The shed-roofed element onthe back was not visible from Lake Avenue and restoring it wouldnot addto the historic character ofthe neighborhood. It also would not lend itself to incorporation into a livable residence bytoday's standards. 0, 2. Focus on restoration opportunities for the house. Response: The house as it appeared in 1955 (See Exhibit J) had tar paper roll roofing and composition siding, which are not very compatible with the nicely restored siding, trim and decorative elements of neighboring historic Victorian residences. We request that the present painted wood siding and trim and cedar shingles be preserved insteadto maintain the neighborhood character. We propose to re-introduce shutters onthe Lake Avenue fagade similarto those depicted inthe 1955 photo (Exhibit L). The existing raised deck will be demolished, along with the various additions to the house, and an at-grade patio will replace it as recommended. Exhibit I ARCHITECIURE â€¢ PLANNING â€¢ INTERIORS Page 1 of 3 ASPEN â€¢ CARBONDALE â€¢ TELLURIDE â€¢ VAIL CIA I Â£ 3. Restudy the addition to create more separation between it and the historic structure. Lower plate and ridge heights. Response: The existing two-story element of the historic structure is only 25 ft. high at the ridge in aland use zone that allows 25 ft. at the mid-point of apitched roof. Thus, it is well below the allowed height and it would be impractical to lowerthe plate height ofthe addition in alivable residence. We have lowered the ridge of the addition to be no higher that the historic structure. We have also created amore distinctly contemporary character forthe addition to distinguish it from the historic elements. The addition is narrower than the two-story element and tile closeness to the Altemus residence to the south further reduces its visibility from Lake Avenue. There will be a new residence on Lot B to the north, which will provide a similar visual screening, as well as landscaping. The requirement for separation of the ADU from the main house by 10 ft. makes it unfeasible to create a further separation ofthe addition fromthehistoric portion as recommended. We believe the proposed solution satisfies the intent andspirit ofthe historic preservation guidelines. 4. Relocate and reduce the size of the light well proposed on the south side of the front porch. Response: The light well is sized to create the light and egress required by UBC for the basement living area. It is set behind the front (street facing) facacle of the historic structure, in accordance with current Residential Design Standards and is not visible from Lake Avenue. We have deletedthe guardrail and placed a planter aroundthe light well at grade, which is compatible with the historic structure and satisfies the safety requirements of UBC. 5. Eliminate the deck at the northwest corner of the house. Response: As stated above, we have deleted the deck and substituted an at-grade patio in that area of the yard. The existing fence along Lake Avenue will remain to provide privacy. 6. Recalculate the floor area of the project. Response: We have reduced the footprint of the garage/ADU by revising the entry area from enclosed space tq an open porch/breezeway. After consulting with the City Planning Director, we are requesting a variance from the 625 sÂ¢ ft. Â«footprint" restriction onthe existing Carriage House ADU, so that the structure can be preserved. We have recalculatedthe ADU for net livable floor area andthe FAR forthe entire proposed redevelopment as depicted in revisedExhibit H, page 14. The proposed FAR for Lot A is now 2,481 sq. ft. and Lot B is now 1,761 sq. ft. 7. Provide a neighborhood plan showing the house in its proposed new location. Response: Please refer to Exhibit D, page 2, which we have added ro our proposal You will see from it and the revised site plan shown in Exhibit D, page 1, that the proposed relocation of the historic structure is actually further away from the Altemus residence by 3.5 ft. than the existing structure with its additions. Also, the proposedrelocation of the existing garage/ADU structure will be no closerto the Third Street property line than in its present location, only about 4 ft. further to the South. Exhibit I Page 2 of 3 . 1 Other Related Issues: We request that the HPC reconsiderthe Staff's suggestion to not allow the addition of two fixed windows flankingthe existing double hung window onthe south fagade, upper level of thetwo- story historic element. This isneededforrequiredlightandventilation ofthe new Living Room bycurrent UBC standards. We propose to also addawindow on the west side ofthe two-story element on the north end of the new Living Room. Similarly, the proposed new door and transom on the north fagade ofthe historic living room, now convertedto astairwell, is needed for proper functioning of the reconfigured residence space plan. It also provides more natural light into what was a poorly lit room, as Carol Craig noted. At the suggestion of City Staff, we are also proposing to revise the 60's windows of the west (street) elevation on the Carriage House to more traditional double hung wood windows. All other representations and requests made in ourprevious submission, dated December 11, 2000, remain substantially unchanged. Exhibit I Page 3 of 3 ... Â£ 11 -1':1 r 1 1.W 1 11. lili â‚¬. 41'.1 -- 6,7,2 11+ ..1 11 111 1.... , <Yl. 11. .. . 17., 11 - f -11 . r ' 1 111 0 ~ll i,~,iliHI . 11#V . .1 1 11,1 1. 1 1. 11 li 4111111:1.lilli 1.lili - ill~--11 i. * .4 1 r 1 . 79 2 . al//4841 1,i;, 11' 1,ill 1 ~1 ~11 '1 -- Wi m - . 4 10â€¢ Â·Â· "ll'mIHI ~ 0/. b '1111 V I.<4 - Iri '.'A + 9 11 4,4 2 p 1 1 ',0 11, Ii,12 1 .11. 111 1 4 , 4 1 1' ~. . '114 T 11 lili. , . , dll Â· . 4 9 d 4 ,1 1111111111~11'11~11' 6 ' aN:adz'~ i.a *4 , . ' IP 1 .11 /1 Mill,1 t. ~Â£ .. ...11.1........ 11' 1 1 -/1 Iii. 19 -11 1 1 "r'&1 -Mid ~Â· f Â· 1 11'i m-- . 1 1 4,1 !10' 1 J 11 1 1.#...'p J' 1 lk.... 1 ,..Lt V M , 1 1 /1-*...tiâ€¢~,1,4 w,1 1,11110/*Il , 1 , 1~u,i A *i , 0 1 4,1. - 111. IW,1 EXHIBIT 11.-1.1~111.~ 1.ill ,-I".'' -,Q,11.1~.11!,~ ----I/'--- rl,1.!1 .-lill-- Â·Nluiwll , J 4'P I MI/--pl 0% A ,~ "' 2"d.i, i,*ALY # 4 "1131,4/lill//1/,1 51//4 4..il.111. I'lli '7 :,d~~~kili ~. I-'-I--1-, 11-r,1 11, lili@' Pr' 4.11Â£11 81,1:41 ill'4~ 1.1, j" .61.11. 0. 4 1 1101111" /,1,1-- . '11 1 1 14 I 1 ..Ah '4111 *44 :L 4 '1<1 , 1,Â·- 1 A...~: !,11011:11,11161:1 111Â¢11( 1116-1!11'ill Â·~li'il .,1 ill ,'I~11~ i Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·1'il:' 1. ill,Â·' ' "' 1 . 0 1 11,1,1 1, 4 "'1~lili~d .~~~~~~~MW~& .Ile'-11 :1-li--Ill./.- -/,/N//4 - lili . 1 %*4:IM,1:~61Wl./.-: I Al r I -1.11 1 A.1 . 1 I mul/' . ..â€¢~.,~11â€ž11~ Â· 1 YI Â· 1,1,4.106,3~:.11.'Ir . 111% - 11:1 1 j,11~11 ' '' 1848/i:. ' i ,", ii,p *-p#'imi~li"'"I~.4,- -4'e; ""B..1111171111- 01/9' ~ / i C Â»lili Â· --- 33 4.411~1.:41 - 1 .~11,1~111 1~.11,1,1 1~.11,1,~11~11fli 1;;1:1 ''Flle- $ s 6, |||B llili Ii,i ~'~ .4"l!I~~,i. ., ';~~Â· Il l'11'11:11. L :~ . i:*le":4 /1 ~ 1 r . "~ 'll:~ 5 1 1.Â·p, i. Â·-4 1 1 1 111 111. ' I 111 . . 1, 11 1 4 ..1.4.. 11 :Ul. 1 1 Llilli' ' r . i :!: 1 1 /1 :h' 1 1,1-% , r .,1 1 1 11 'G~ 1.111~1~11.0 411111 "'-Mt '0'"'~ ";',1//r..Â· . -,Â· 1, 1 'ml,1 '.''I. :,1 11,1; q~. 1 lili 11 111111 '. 1 1 @01111~~11111111 1~0..4,~4 *liu ...1 :1: 31.11:11111111:, 1.11111~111 , 1,14. I I' . 1!1 11:MI@1%1 1. ~ ~J, 1 1 1/ i. 1.1 1.1.11 l' I I. ' Il 'll!'~||1!111*!1 ./11 111 1.11'ill,1 1 1 1/10 . 11/419 .F ''N I '11't,44/1 ./ ~14'llka JEÂ·,11~1111 i , 44.- -iÂ·i,i,Â·~~ill' 4 1- 4 11 lili.10. "Iii 111.11111 1 rl Ly *t 1 ..41 / 1 lilli ; 1 i .11) 14. , , f 'Ii, is' .1,Â· .% 1 'L i=.,1 1 lili , FS##1'11 1 1 1 I'* 4,1,11&11'' ,. 1 MU,U 1 11 111111111 1 1.@Bt,1/1/ 1,11'W~ | 19,1 -11 1 1.161â‚¬ 14 â€ž EXHIBIT 14/, 11,111 ... 111'Jall, 1 1 .1 ...11-,1.1.,â€ž%1*911,911 '11 4 r-,1,1 11,11411 111. 4 1 ,1 '1; 1, , 4 '11 1 1 4 it )il h '' 'M18*.'*. k il' ' I' L .. 'j .' *-1.4,11-1111111 1.1111 1 1 1, e. 6 Vt . 1 1 1, 1 14 m.1 1, 1 1 0 I,4.. -!1 1 -1 .1- ./ 1 1 el ~J 1 - , 11 -*- A 41 - 4 4 '||Iii- .le ' p.1,1 a 1~'~1 h: 111,11 1- - r 1 9 7 , I $ f *9./ 4# 1 ... 1, 1 1 All' 111 1 ill".4 9 '.11.. U '.1 . 1, r tihs 19 - m 11 11 i L k* 1: .Â¥1%10 . 1 1 441'k Jul 0 -- i~=Â·â€¢t * ",1 1 , 1 1.11 A d '%" - *le '1 11; 11- 1,1111 , 1.1 9/6. AL $--1- - 1 - ....6//9//10ilÂ£ r I 1 - i , . *....,11,111111; mil , 4 -- EXHIBIT L f Â· , 1 , 442,4 11''ll'11111,111 111.41 '1--111 71. 11'. Â»41' 1, 9 ~ J | 111 .~r r;,1 1 & ' I , Il M ~.. * '"f * M 1"il F 11 1 1, 1 11 + 4 9#p '' ; ~ ||~~"'0' 4 1 1.41, 41*111, 1.11.1'r 1....r,61,9 114! '1!'!.~!~Ulll~~9~r '. 4*11 1 111.111**111,111~ *'4*1111,i*~, D REVISE D b E.* 44 1 2,1T D 1 1 4 2 C . 2 3 CA 1 1 1 1 1 0 Ms#*fh. / 1 1Â«N u -'.'.'I / ~ Y~84(AP 1 1 / i\\\\\l iak* LJ - 01 4 : i\\\\,/ kn 01 Lf, W R W \ 22% '411/1 TÂ°'C'ti LiLI EE<- LOT B <6800 sa m ld.,J s FT. 4 ~ 1 . 1 7,11114,7 - 1 --------------- aUL_ - IC 1002**9+ OUTUNE OF E 'm* LL,1 EXISTING HOUSE --~ \ 1--- k 0 1 1 1 %\ 15 0 1 \ 1 }// CONCRETE E-- 1 \ 10/-0" & 3 - ~~STINGGARAGE 10f-bofflil*kfjf@ff,#03-'O~?ETE 1-- 3 0 \///1 1 h \Illl CO/ERED > - /9Â« \\ 2/SAT~SGTO~ TJ ~~<~1/1 i ENTRY \ 44 - U O N Z %3 - 111 ~- 1 ~ ~Â«1~t _ _Â«111 ~TO LAKE AVEN JE~ ~1 4 i \ L STO1 PAT4\ 0 LD 19 1 4196 Jiggl|@1|Baowl_ \41/4 1 LOT A PATIO \98 ASPEN, CO 81611 640 N. THIRD ST. DAGGS RESIDENCE i \ \1\\ \ 4 1 #A/&0 45 (50707 50. Frj Chi . 449 4922Â£f6 41Â©4 0/ 42 3:- 49- \CD(%#P L \ \\\\ = 0 .0 _ f 1- '01\1/1, - / r*8~AP O PROPOSED SITE PLAN 45'Vhtff&fED 1 7 1 JOB NO. 0009 1 DATE 3-20-01 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED LOT SPLIT SHEET NO. 1" = 20' Pl .1 SHEET OF 'Â©COP'rRIGHT OiARLES aUNNIFFE ARCHCE THIRD STREET 51331IHDMV 33:!INNAD SH-INV . 0655-5ZGOÂ£6:3131 . l1919 00 'Nl 46E9-E9frOZ 6 1131 . E Z9Â£9 00'31Â¥(]NOU . ZEZ 31.InS â€¢ 3.S . VELE-fa*026 :3131 4 5Â£*I.8 00 'HOIN[11131 . '3AV OC]V}lo-100 3 012 . 0699--9Z60Â£6 3131 . 5Â£418 00 'SC]WeAC]3 . SOZÂ¥ 316 't]Ale 30Â¥1-ll/\ SC]HVMC]3 5010 i; 11/\ - axwIBI-r . c /C / 1/ - 1 GILLESFIE E </ i 4 1 2 41 , -f 0 A I 1 ----- i 1--- --7- - ) - - ---- I- ... -i- --- --- --- , \06, 0 , /0 D 4\ m -- --- ~~ LOT ~ ---- , *. 04\ / 4 - rn - --- ------'---1, R - Ty 1 -- ---- 'r .... / 57/ - G. . 121/0 .4 . t 1,1 1 02 5- ': 6 ... \ -- -- / t '~ - --1 --- 1 -- I -1 I \ - / / I. 1 1 1 1/ i L 1 t ~ it 1, , 0 NORTH ST , NELGHBOg+19913 Pb-AN di) t" , Sol r 9- . 499Â·DOO 1 0+ 14 0 CA If '- lilli'. 11 0 DINING 21 LA/ING KITCHEN ROOM ROOM 0 PE k=d' 49>42 FOyER ~ 4-=u 3---L...y MASTER I- " BEDROOM n I 0 8 DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. THIRD ST. ' ASPEN, CO 81611 E J - 0- -Ii-----*Il-8 HISTORIC MAIN El LEVEL PLAIN JOB NO. 0009 DATE 3-20-00 HISTORIC MAIN LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. r = 10' H 2,1 SHEET OF Â©COm<Qff Q<ARIB (UNNIFE ARÂ£}+ITECO S1331!HONV 33=lINNOE) Sl-IZP 'I-ID t-0Z60Â£6 XÂ¥:1 . 0665-5Z#0Â£6 :3131 . LW!.8 03 'N3dSV . BAY NYWAH 15Â¥3 08 66[9--[960Â£6 M * â€¢6E9--E960Â£6 3131. EE9[9 03 '31Â¥(]NOHHO * ZEZ 31lfIS * 16 NIVW -9ZbbÂ£6:XÂ¥3 . QEZE-9U/0Â£6 :3131 . 5Ekle OD 'laINfll-131 * '3/\V OCIVMO-103 3 02 I bÂ¥99-96!71,Lb Â·X'e . Ubby-VÂ£41.Mb Â·3 1=11. 58,[H UJ -503Â¥M03 . SOZY 315 -0/\-18 3DVTIIA 503Â¥MC]31 5010 REV leâ‚¬O Extt i BIT H 244 0 CA BEDROO --, STORAGE -- 0 A R & U,M to - 4 11= 11 0 UBE L -1 41 Z . U C r--1 11 0 0- E 1 1 1 1 1 6 0 1 . 1 \ BEDROOM 1 -. 2 M Z O M a DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. THIRD ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 C O 1 '- L.1 0 0 -- U - 0 - [El -------2 HISTORIC UPPER 1-EVEL PLAN JOB NO. 0009 DATE 3-20-00 HISTORIC UPPER LEVEL PLAN /11 SHEET NO. 1" = 10' H2 2 SHEET OF (Â©COPYRIaff QWUES CUNNinE AROITTECTS . D6Â£9-E960Â£6 :3131 . [1919 00 '31Â¥(IN063Â¥0 . ZEZ 311nS * . WEZE-9 Et/0Â£6 :3131 * SEN.9 03 '300[11131 . '3AY O(]Â¥30100 9 022 MID, 7.71.0 .Avi . Vt}Hy-WyvIO Â·1 Ill . atilt, UJ bu./V\Ud . 3,16Â¥ 313 UAM duÂ¥ I IM SUMÂ¥/v\Ut 50 0695-5mbÂ£6 9131 . 11919 03 'NldSÂ¥ . 3AV NYWAH 15Â¥3 00 N N AD Sill*r 1-ID Â·Rew li,ED . 1 EXHIBIT H S ek-,4 11 0 ~Irrl .- Â»==3007 8~-- , 333 Eff / NORTH ELEVATION (APPROX.) C-, WEST ELEVATION (APPROX) 7 = 10' %3 <*8% %3 ~ 1 11 1 1 ./ 1 1 , 1 I i i 640 N. THIRD ST. DAGGS RESIDENCE ASPEN, CO 81611 1 R IJ-OB-NO. 0009- SHEET NO. SOUTH ELEVATION (APPROX.) C-, EAST ELEVATION (APPROX.) D1".10' â‚¬f-TU--10-' H3.1 11-1 Â©COMmen- aÂ·ARLES CUNNIFFE AROcrECTS .m U ~~~,6~*~~~~M~~1- ~*:~~,~~~M~~=~,1~fi . 0695-9167Â£6 :3111 . tt919 00 143 . #6Â£9-Â£960Â£6 :3131 . Eate 03 '31Â¥GNOR . m * WELE-91*0Z6 :3131 . SE,19 03'30[8(11131 . 3AV 0103 3 (ZE RS>/(620 EXHIBIT HÂ· 4 4 it C] C C . CA f' PORCH o X 7 ' 5.XxxxÂ»=Â« x , rt j MERE Al :1 3 2 *1 0 U 1% 1* 1~ LLI [Il - DINING LIVING Â·A- ROOM ROOM Â¥Â¥E 1 - 3 z. u -9 - rl 1Â» 1 ~_ KITCHEN~ It Â·Â· h LU e -1 \142.k'"32.140* i 1 L-,f3 1/ FOYER Â£4 1Â¥1 6 4 . E m 4 h\/ a L 4- 0 - co rn -tu f-Â«f-MASTER m n 85 Z LJ O t BEDROOM 1 U I . 0 .. I 6 111 .1 LA. 99 2 4 1/ 1 1 4 1.A -1(1 3 1,4 $1093 ' i Â« , Z .,304.- 1 1011.,. -.fl o U DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. THIRD ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 0 2-] u ------r- 0 O EXISTING MAIN Legend L.EVEL PI.AN ~,~~ FIRST ADDITION 1962 JOB NO. 0009 177] DATE 3-20-01 k\61 SECOND ADDITION 1965 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN \ SHEET NO. r = 10' A/04 THIRD ADDITION 1967 E2.1 ~~ FOURTH ADDITION 1972 SHEET OF 'Â©COP,RIGHT aÂ·WUE3 alNNIFFE .tRCHIIECTs 3 . 0659--%60Â£6 :3131 . 5/*18 00 'Â§CIMÂ¥M(]3 , SOZÂ¥ 315 "(]All 39Â¥11]A Â§<13Â¥MC]3 Solo 60Â£6 131 * 498 03'N3 . fIAY NVWAH 15Â¥3 019 1 . -3/\V OOFO1O3 3 0ZZ 3 1 .US NIVW ZOS RE-Vt*EP EXHi BIT 1-4 5-ef!4 C â€¢ CA 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 . h (71 iiEm r~ 4 L_-1 BEDROOM 1 | u & 15 1% 2 11\1111 E i iuM Z ... it -124_ STORAGE - . c--1 1-F=' ' = E--7 (C 55129% 11 e :420 . /1-/ c 4 11 0 . . I t~~ i ft..12 2====. %%E LU 1 LL- e.1 / -/4-1 4 6 8 u.- 0 \ BEDROOM -23-D U i i 1 [11111\11 \ 8 . i rk ' #L Â£*EFifv \Â· 11 1 - LL' 12 ..1 D 1 . 1 ' U 1 1 Z 3 1 1 0 g 1 1 DAGGS RESIDENCE C 640 N. THIRD ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 3 0 u ------1=t--------------6------------6--'------~ E- U EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN Legend -/ JOB NO. 0009 DATE 3-20401 EXISTING UPPER LEVEL PLAN /Th ~~~ FIRST ADDITION 1962 SHEET NO. \/ , A W = 10' RJ SECOND ADDITION /965 E2.2 SHEET OF Â©COPÂ¥KIGHT Qi,KLES aINNIFFE ARCHITECTE Â£6 Enal . SE,18 03 'SUXVMC]3 5 "C]Alil 3DynIA SCHYM(]3 SOLO 3131 0 LWW OE) 'N3dSÂ¥ . '3AV NYWAH 1.A/3 00 1 . 5Â£,19 00 '30[Mftllal * -3/\V OOVHOIO) '3 0ZZ . .1 . ---------4, 3Eil 033 --~ I~~lijl j Z' __-_____MA :a i.-44*4= 14 8 -*2-1 2--E- $21fflf~>JJ = El % 1 ---â‚¬tlE--1 3 -- rl: 3 -/ -,I- F i 9 - 344 1 3.13 3219 1 4%4 allf \ pit 1 , e ~4411 - --1 - | 2-|44 4 6 0( ~'- -0,- I - ~-5-7 -9=- 1-2~ C - t*14 L 1 E $ Ald-' i 1-f-429. - . -_ 1. B,-0 -Ill 110 6 C if)* wl I 4,11 o JJ -Fld.rt' 12 11 V F Itt' 1 -=1? 1-ve - 4 -lite - j- ~~ - - - 1 U =-4 rd-' -4 ----------/. 1411 I E--------- 1.-1 Yl - $2* I 1/,/ ~\ -t - ~' Agrgrick_fc~~:~ .- ti' Id'# ------ 1' : ,-7~ lu Fllt 1 --------* .4 ITI ====26=-:. 1.111-LND' 1 rri - A- U lilli L 1- 11/* 1- m ITI 11 -1-1:i +Ifl K 1- 4 L 411rN~11 tl J c I.1 5-*Illi,EL / 15-114-31 J1 0 -,1.Ah ~ 1 // b -1 11 i k' 1-1 1,1 L.dly 1 1- U 2.--- 1 11 tfu -=-4 // - of U , *#-7/Ill,ill'llilili A 1 LA\# 1 1 u n + C 1-11Â»HI- 4: Â· 2.13 FIEE' ' 111 RE~@ig@@= td';%*Pt joy'*- -------- -1 i 7 719 -iÂ·'UP --11 1 -Err = r~-1 ----.-- 1 1 "-41 1:2 Urid' ~ 1,l' 11.]F--IM+1.[Â¤44ip-21451]F+I ~i ~L|l~|IMri'-Ii 1 E'L'll:It EL 160%,Ii-t â‚¬:1-, Ir-4. Fl r,[~1- - L!9 rTI .vi, F[/14]6 -f r- 111't~ 1 N :4' rof-'41- 5 ........ 11 I N i\'1- dkeR i rrI < - 74!Ii'll p#1 161 21$ H..r= 'I- ------ 101 VI [*9114 1 4 ~ I~~Stbit[F;lfll-j~] 4]LVI~~ ~ 0-1 l' 1 O 0 94Â¥ -2 41[14'--4_'42{U,~81- 1 /#t~tlilli- z -: 67 1 1114*hE O 2 ' 11 'E '19ratf:i 4 9 - ~ .Jd- Z GFAr*''El 11 , rant,Â· 8 rn, /A "fi 11 Itt o ><IP ----- *LAM 1- Al x ~mird 7- IE- Wd 78 1 I 6 x rn 1 9~ %~ 11* CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS m El m r,1 z gza dz n -1 z Y. P On 0Zm OO a I 8 0 610 EAST HYMAN AVE. * ASPEN, CO 81611 * TELE: 970925-5590 â€¢ FAX: 974920-4557 rr' r. -1 502 MAIN ST. * SUITE 232 * CARBONDALE, CO 81623 * TELE: 970963-6394 * FAX: 970963-6399 220 E. COLORADO AVE. â€¢ TELLURIDE, CO 81435 â€¢ TELE: 970<728-3738 â€¢ FAX: 970*28-9567 0105 EDWARDS VILLAGE BLVD., STE A205 * EDWARDS, CO 81435' TEL.E: 974926â€ž6590 ' FAX: 9709264585 ~1 4 .J..l,31> SC)111KÂ» MNNO 5,MÂ·0 1,DQI,W RetleED ' EXHIBIT A 7 of- if 0 C Olt!% 1 2 Ofd - 4-1 4 fiA,WILI 50%44 5 Mccil. B R,#3 6Â©#2. -lk.-1.-5 UBI. ER. 11 44 L.W. L.W. 1-, 10. 12 i. L i ./'% . A V 1-41.- - Le/VER LEVEL fFLAN -fREVIâ‚¬pED PA G,Re RESIDENCE - FROPOSED .REDEVELOphAIENT- REVI *ED 8/29/0 1 RE-VieED . Ext+/INT &+ e>of/4 LOT D , , 1. . L..11 1, 4 , ., '' 4, F '. .. C - ... . -' I : I. I. 2 toN'=Ft*TE ,% 90,1~~Â·4~rr ,#.\, 21~ r 4.- r .r I ./ - .. . I *. -1-- v :v i 13 <21 y 10". 1 -- c ' P - .,7 .' _re / - Â· u-r - 46- . . ' ... SluOY ..,. r- -r 141 . . ---I.. 0-'..I .....I- .. I . p- . MUD - A . 4 . . 4. . . A . I . I 1 I 1. m .. 1 . MDRE+1 .u, 4 LDRY â€¢'.t 4 I 4 . '' I ... - :1 44. 4, - .. I - - ' 4 1 2 I. , r. , ' - 16 - 4 r 4 I 2 0 0 coh c..4 â€¢ . 4 C 9 ..1 , ./ 0 I. - PR:EWÂ¢f , 64+RAAE & 1 j"" ?Â©RÂ¢~4 Â¥ 4 S. .4 <.4-1 4. ... .. 5 4:--. i / I I I ../ 1//1/0 1 D , ..%. . I . 1 .Vt* L,W. Â¥ r - - I I - I . i .<LIL~ C L 1 FENGE,~ - . L.W. 1 L.96 i., - I ./ I ./ 4. . .. r. . I 4 - ' 0,4. = $ 2. r â€¢cr LA- . '.- I . . - . APU - '. i + -p :- f.*14 3 . 3~~4- A - 1 1.. , 766414-7, .. 4 2 - 1 4 }t. I- -*- - - C *f - A ~~~w- - ..... --1 ..e:=. - 3 r BAIN LEVEL FLAN - REVIOED /'lh PAGAs RESIDENCE - 1 l/Mlot Retle#p **3/01 -T--r-7 FROFÂ©*ED Fe-DeVELÂ©FM ENT- 1 1 1 REV l SED 4 I =*H-leiT +4 9 0%/4 DECK. - 0 K, -11 r-10 0 Ldk./tAR. Rose 4 P,â€¢, b 0 9 U ULF 1-- m A944 ROOF 2,/R, =2'r & 23' ..L-J j - PECK . -UPPEE LEVEL FLAN - BLEVIâ‚¬,ED /11 PA<46 WEel DENCE I f - -7 PROPOSED REPEWELOPMENIT- 14/ 1Kcvt SED 3/1,3/01 906* Â£ -4- B 7$ O 3 k, iii 0%0 2 10 _ 14 4.1.11 :41 J.1 -/ T Ul --- < 1.22 4 -1 1 4 '11. - 4 lit- 1 78 L - - "f- 5.9. L-14 1 4 *D Utz 5 ' 1, F)- g i *214 1 , â€¢ 'â€¢A .. 1 0 j tr 8-/B 9 Ur , i '494 4 0 Eft J , ' F 1 . {1 C ----4 1-rl 1 ./ 4-L lili : ===%=:Â¥4 1-i , - - - 6- -/-- 7 1 -7 -r 1 1 1 -- L__ a , 2 -dll - 211] hil 4--I - t 004* , . 4. 1 j ,~i,i - 5 4 - Orâ€¢...'ll' ~ L-31 tift ; 1 w â€¢I ~ i 0,1 -14Â·1 4 1.11 i Ed- 412 1 1-=lf 1 /8 0 illi - Z - 1 14.3 f 4% 4# .1 4190}) 1-41 I ~ lit =flic- 1111 4 .i 41 4- 3 1.1 4 62 - L 1-*~: Ill 1 OM M -11 1 -- 1 .. _1.NOW<:10136=ClaW al*TA* hi - IN,FiERy-11 tur?c,Â© 19261190 Â· pnw,|c rqcy# A-h' F,IA'rEP WOOD ,*40/A *1*BIAA AMFEP *AL.V. MEÂ»L FLOOFIAO, _ Red leaD e><818 17--14 11 4 14 . /NI'llt'Ji Illi[@Il ~Ii@ep-" tb ,:,fENNILI 1==1, i '.-u-. ---lid f-b . :g , tt=r, 1 I li - , , 6.,;Â·Â¥1â€žt,i'jii,;54/Ju114 1 I. 11-- ~2212:11.V r--- - FAF[J~-F- ~~~~~- - <~~#E:3Flf-,i--1Â£,"93~Tip-JIJJJlJ~i-Ji~- -.- .... -a... -â‚¬r Â·Lf-1-,7 1 /9 -4+ -Tr-1 D n 2- U 1 -- -32-7.--*1#~< -1 i-# - - 2~5. - ; 11 --Ilt,tr i T v i R-141:IN AL W;+I, -lyfrzE~14~1: A.72.1111&2-*-11_ 21 Â£411*11 (1 imig# u = Amm ~ AlÂ·/TALL-7 - 14--L.LL-2 ...V. -2714/:*t- 4 -.--rÂ·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·,r-â€¢./ - i.Â·4.-$*.--1. - - ..._1Â· I , 1.-44'.1 - -1 il 1 f i 4 )4 1 4-fEGICÂ· 44 0 4 9 6 : rADÂ¥>0*al> A-Poirlow 5,44 66%32/A42 0 00466 r -4 - 7 -4 PRO POSED Noe-rH ELEVATION - REVISED ONAG~ Â¥22*DER C.a 1 u =toi 3/19 /2>t piEÂ©FT,EP REPEVE:UDPME>J r REVÂ»ED 5<2Â¥01 . h Tt ~ 1 -- .............-m, i '1 6 EXHi Btl- 9 1-2 Of 14 REMOVE 2*4 CEPA. 54.0 COLD ROOF,444'Â¥ * n REd'W+CE. 94 N â€¢Â¥4 c elÂ»8. SPHIÂ¢*La SUPEKIN*,464â€¢113 *001'*7070.~A . ReFRIâ€¢+ Râ€¢PANT 6%,4 LAP SIP'h) 01 4 fIL 'AA f -- i - S g.EV ISEED EAST ELEV. REV t SEP EAOT- EL-S/Al Otl â‚¬-2 At"eE_Â»BE__ CrkÂ« _ANEN[14__ ___ -_ __ 1 -1-0 f tula' /1 Â· *,7/4- ROOF/Af C eKRUA â€¢ GrN.V. â€¢54+, 1 4 11,0 j'' 11 1 1 El ,-1 lilli 111 11? 1 841 NTID wp. Ah,CÂ¢K, n 6.44* * 711+44, WIRE. A RIP 0,14+RP- 1*aFl-ACE E12O, F/*EC> J . 46. Wr VVPâ€¢ POUS,-1 - .' Â£ 1 1*UN 4 WINDOW. 1 . GRD- 04*INâ€¢,6% BIP,NIc, . 1.93. Cd)12%616â€¢Â· 6,M.V, Ing>N 1 1 4!PING, Tb REPLA CeÂ¢PAL SHINALE 1 *1 ect-.W7'CING.Pli.â€¢60 1 11 FLYWP. FAâ€¢Net-* 1 Â»N 1.23 4 44 i 6 1 REÂ¥15ED WEST ELEVATION REVI SED COM F'05}TE \NES'- OF At) DITION--. . --BLEVATIEN_.iE.[52_STREELL -It( 5/ /9<01 124444 FIESIPEN OE PROPMED Re[*al--C) P,AENT REW/%ED 3/23/01 Re/let/c> E x 14 1 P r r + + .... 1* 4 14 . I .. 4 . Pt U LN 6, .7~â€ž,--,â€ž... T-7 . W .bi 4,01*1 4 11 1 1 1 ,-n ~00* *Ull_1:11 htaL_Â»EOT-lÂ©4 6.- i 11 =10, 3/19/01 13>AiGS FEDI DENce rizo PÂ®#ED RED>m:Y EA-Op/AEN T lav t emp 3/13/0 1 REVISED E><+JIBIT 14 14-4 11: FAR INFORMATION - EXISTING DEVELOPMENT . LL (A) SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE O '' SECOND FLOOR 648 SO. FT. FIRST FLOOR 1,961 SO. FE gr - 3//i///////fi '' TOTAL 2509 SO. FT. Iw~a \ 2 . --.-2.2=.t-=564 \ 1 1,1:agi I - il EWEE3 %*448#Z~~Â» .Ill cO (B) ADU. e GARAGE - 10 I \121 SO ET , SECOND FLOOR LIVING SPACE 657 SO. FT. M 1 647 SO.FT. \\1~ \ 1 EE=-z 31 Â£ fu 199>Jt~ Â»el-RAM 76 SO. FT. TOT AL 733 SO. FT. (584 sa FT. \OÂ« -Â¤-n~X \ N \~ X Net Uvable) 1 J I (C) GARAGE / STORAGE TOTAL AREA 630 SO. FT. - F AR AREA 630 SQ. FT. &*m -7H \ N.,\\1\\1\\61\1\\\1~--- -- j / 1/ ~ / 12% u U t 2%% -375 SO. FT. (EXEMPT) ~- 2 TOTAL 255 SQ. FT. Z U TOTAL EXISTING FAR C (Al 2,609 SO. FT. < (B) 733 SQ. FT. UPPER LEVEL FAR INFORMATION (c) 255 SO. FT N.T.S. 3.597 SO. FT] TOTAL FAR ALLOWED FOR Z ORIGINAL PROPERTY: 4,242 SQ. FT. Z D U FAR INFORMATION - HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT . F/RST FLOOR 1,044 SO. FT. O 0 - $1 S SECOND FLOOR 599 SO. FT. f k. TOT AL ~ 4643 SO. FT] (A) SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE FAR INFORMATION - PROPOSED LOT A DEVELOPMENT FIRST FLOOR 1.419 SO. FT. L.OWER LEVEL (2374 x 1/5) 273 SO. FT. SECOND FLOOR 1095 SQ. FT. - kil l.~1. TOTAL- 2.787 SO. FT. tit 3 2 EE (13) AD.U. o GARAGE FIRST FLOOR STOR./ MECH. 79 SO. FT. 41 M SECOND FLOOR LMING SPACE 647 SO. FT. k g NET LIVABLE 652 SQ. FT. (EXEMPT) O MAIN LEVEL FAR INFORMATION 74 SO. FT. C') U N.T.S. u w TOTAL Z U g,yf fli TOTAL AREA 495 SO. FT. (C) GARAGE f Q -375 SO. FT. (EXEMPT) TOT AL 90 SO. FT. TOTAL- FAR FAR INFORMATION (A) 2,787 SO. FT. (B) 74 SQ. FT. 2374 SO. FT. (C) 120 SO. FT. I I joi ,/1/1 l; 1 l j 2,98/ SO. FT.~ JOB NO. 0009 FAR ALOCATED TO LOT A 2281 SO. FT. DATE 3-20-01 HISTORIC BONUS -500 SO. FT. TOTAL FAR ALOCATED TO LOT A ~ 2.481 SO. FT.~ SHEET NO. REMAINING FAR ALOCATED TO LOT B FAR TOTAL FAR FOR BOTH LOTS 4242 SO. FT. TOTAL FAR ALOCATED TO LOT A -2.481 SO. FT. LOWER LEVEL FAR INFORMATION TOTAL FAR ALOCATED TO LOT B ~ 1,76i SO. FT.\ SHEET OF N. T.S. ecol./. CHARLB .,41. AR[}l,TECr5 5159-91 :Ild . 0691-91 60Â£6 :1111 . SE,Lq 03 '50*Â¥Mal . 50Zy 119 '0A19 3DVT1!A 5(]FVM(]3 . 0695-59Â£6 3131 . LL919 00 'N/dSV . *6Â£9-2940Â£6 :3131 . EZ919 00'31'Â¢[NOmfO . ZEZ 31.InS . 'IS . efZE-Â·92/0,6 :r131 . 5â‚¬,7 01 '3C]IMn1131 . JA 00'AtO100 -3 02 HlMON 0179 i~ .St-,L Ililillillillillillillililillilillilimillugpi'GMEI EXHIBIT - 17] 1- 1%2~ C 1M LU Z U 0: LLI % Z Z D U \ . 0 LU U mg . , ti I Q I E APRIL 24,2001 Z i 9% DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. TH I RD ST. ASPEN, COLORADO 12Â»~fluu,â‚¬ 6/but/ 66#42 1 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 0 3.Er 610 EAST HYMAN AVENUE * ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 * TELE: 970/925-5590 * FAX: 970/920-4557 Â©/Fl'CHT 'WAE' a/NIFFE Am,fiC,5 66â‚¬94940Z . 46[ 60Â£6 3111 . Entg 00 'EM]NOBMVJ . W 31]rs. 'l i si;26'DZ& n31 . ll919 03 'NldSÂ¥ . 'IAY Z956-9UAL6 :X'Â¢d . PEZE--BZ,XM6 :3131 . Sâ‚¬410 01 '3OIHAT131 . *BAY OavilO1O0 9 0ZZ 595+9t60Â£6 :r,g . 0659-9260Â£6 :3131 . U912 00 'SallÂ¥Mal . Son' 115'Â·0A1: 39Â¥TllA SC]Nâ„¢03 SOLO OaVMO-100 33NBGISHM SODVa 6000 # ROf 1 i o 1 \ A , 0 0 *74 - '*9 1 ifrfir i 91 128 ~~86AP-T -Â· / 1 1 \\\\\l \\\\\N BERE II3I \ 0%52 4 1 1 291 10 1\\\\/ 1 -22_ 3. 2.{111>, . E LL,1 Â¥ M * ED \ < 1 .47?11.1,~33.% CO reoo so. m Ltd 0 2 h Â£00/.aÂ»49+ OUTUNE OF 9-\ 4 7 EXISTING HOUSE --1 ..111111 -4__r -7 - 111/ 0 01\ lill I I % 0 \ 1 5 1 OUTUNE OF LAWN\ 927 ! 04 2 Ex/STING GARAGE --~ Z O 9131=4. to -4et-\ tONCRETE -/:2 CONCRETE \ A 9@# PLANTING AREA ~ . 6 31* f . \ 1/// 4 - - 8 iiI///// . # 1 LANN -91Â»i- i-i--1- 11-,-1~1 - -1 *. 9 // 1- -l-ti//U/1/-U/lf////////I/1-11A-L//1 fit 4/11111)1/111// 9 4 < W --- -- 1-~ 1 2 L \Ilj; i -ilF/-Ti/-Tymtf- # v uj///li////i/Itift/ff-ity/+*fft-/ffA-Â«Â« <28% ~ BREEZEN EBE'SAP#rOGRA' i&5i Z %@El a lÂ®*11TEI F \C 10343ELfU///~.t---1 .N.4/11/ //2420*liLttil1- ~~%IfiZf Uft,PATI=m~Y~ ~'~ 1 LW 1 Â« LAWN 1LBELow I le) 11 BELOWI ~PLANTE | LAVN \97 \\\\ ~ DAGGS RESIDENCE LOT A -\1 2*= 640 N. THIRD ST. PATIO . \ 2102 SO. FT 2 100 ASPEN, CO 81611 FA/? *.OCATION CE)Â£~*~ Â¥9,~-7. - - - PROPOSED SITE PLAN EXISTING FENCEE \ TO BE RESTORED i 7 JOB NO. 0009 i DATE 4-24-01 SITE PLAN - PROPOSED LOT SPLIT SHEET NO. r = 20' Pl .1 SHEE OF Â©COPRIC}IT OiARIES (UNNIFFE ARCHNECTS THIRD STREET . D'6Â£9-E 960Â£6 :3131 . EZ919 00 '31Va :XY:I . 0659--9ZG#Â£6 :3131 . SE),IV OD 'SONVM(13 . ----- CENTERUNE ---------- 3 NV--1 IHOMV 33=!INNAD SfilkIV . 655-526'0Â£6 3131 . LWW 00 'N3dSV E-90)26 Â·3131 . SE*9 00 9 (4 BERE 11<211 - -- U 1121 4 1.14 M . 1/ * 8 99 . / Ch LUJU L<.listggi;28#lifiwil Â»====fb====== ' ~ / Ce 03 1> 2 up It 4 ct 2 2 1 - 1 r - I FAM I LY 41 S 4 * STORAGE ~ MECHAN/CAL Ini /4 . M 2 E -D 7 8 8 i I BEDROOM #2 L - <~~0' 1 ' ' U 2 6 11 11 11 >4 40/?00/W #3 , V L L.W. A.w. /C) Iltif ----1' f 871 i Lu 1 1 ---- U \\ DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. THIRD ST. ASPEN, CO 81611 LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1" = 10' PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL PLAN JOB NO. 0009 DATE 4-24-01 SHEET NO. P2.1 SHEET OF Â©COPEIGHi CHARiES CUNNIFFE ARCHNECTS 6 'XY:1 . 0699-5160Â£6 :3131 . LWIR . '3/W NVWAH 1SV3 0L9 3131. EZ98 00 '3-MINOW . ZEZ 31!fIS . '15 NIVW ZOS 6 :)(W . 0659-9760Â£6 3131 . 5â‚¬*Ig OE) 'SC]MVMCH . 50ZV 31S "CIA-10 39Â¥TllA SCIMVMC]3 5010 'lamnl-131 . -3AY 00Â¥110100 3 0ZZ el r S\-3*4 35< 0 -7/A /1 4 c --Nze#J 1,646-- Â»T</4 7Â«?Th LOT B C . , Al ?VP,/ - CM 5/ - OIl 3 2 -01' 29'-6" 28'-53(1" ,-loGo"ipir k --347 5' ' EXISTING CARRIAGE HOUSE PROPOSED ADDITION HISTORIC RESIDENCE Cl 1 - LAWN CONCRETE WALKWAY 9 0 PLANTING AREA 1 1- -1- PATIO % - V El 5 4 m E 21~1~2=M CONCRETE WALKWAY 1 LU (4 1 0 '4/,lk PLANTING AREA ~ (k. U lif 1 \ c --m E- â€ž91 STUDY U.A- - e LU --------jil call---- I 1 1/ 00 N Wit MUD 2\Â¥AT ~' ROOM Z & 1 1 VEST/B. % -UNDRY ~1 Eli A 13 Â©terr~ m OU I Es 4 --- 3 1,= BREEZE WAY ic n ~ '31 UP . '04 0, 54E 1 * 23 1 *ER# ED L- - - TA, *El-.0.- -f-~z-3 -1- 1--./7.1![FTFI I| - Lu ~ 9 N & , 1 1- ./ E 1 X ' i L _ _ Off Le J 131 FOYER 9 TRASH MASTER -D i C m 1 0 5 8 Z 2 0 ' GARAGE BATH -11 4 --- MECH/ \ 40 - ll> 4 1 r 1 \ STORAGE ,METERS & I n Â« 7 CONC. UZO J 4 2 --i- ==aH Ist=:\\ BEDROOM L U *i m a - |>fl /7 LJ 4-7= _biL E--71_ . Â· M , M N I [I E. W. Â® L. W. j % 11'11=J.ILL - 4 3 0 1 4*9 LU 4 ,Â®KNK> *Bf - 4 LAWN 4 -P= ,/1,1111 ~11.{ -~ 37/ -0// PLANTER CE LAWN Lf-/ PLANTER Z Â£ PATIO * U, Z / 111,* b.42 \ A.O U O PARKING ' LOT A . 444 b-K....<E DAGGS RESIDENCE U *f 640 N. THIRD ST. C u- U O -0 --0----G---___~_____8 ASPEN, CO 81611 C] PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PtAN JOB NO. 0009 DATE 4-24-01 SHEET NO. 1" = 10' P2.2 SHEET OF Â©COPYG}IT O1ARLE5 CUNNIFFE ARD{ITECTS Â£551-0I60Â£6 XW . 0655-SIGO 19Â¥3 0 19 59-9 XW . 065 3 . SOLÂ¥ 315 "CIA-19 39)Â¥nIA SaNVM03 5010 OÂ¥30100 3 0ZZ 0 CA . re LO 1- 1 2 . 1 DECK U *gs ---7 LU r=====, 1, .. N 1 IE~K IT CHEN T Z ----- - t~(44%~,- - 1**1 3 1 *06 3 + U CO ** 2 I L/VING/DINING /?00/w r--1Fe}- ~ ~2 J 4 Lud t=J DAL - I I A D. U. V i. NI BE DROONI Â· =~--%=:u:Â» ar %039 -3 . 91- n 01 - 1/1 9 I DECK =r---- 7. 0 I DAGGS RESIDENCE 640 N. THIRD ST. 4 ASPEN, CO 81611 _PROFÂ©SED UPPER LEVEL PLAN JOB NO. 0009 DATE *24-01 UPPER LEVEL PLAN SHEET NO. P2.3 SHEET OF 2 COPÂ¢10GHT CHAIUES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS S ZIV 333!NNFID 53121Â¥HD Â£6 . 46Â£9â‚¬96'026 ~3131 . EZ9Lg O:) '31Â¥GNOUNVO . ZEZ 311[15 . 16 NIVW ZOS 6959-92 Â£6 :)(W . 0659-9r6O26 ~3131 . SEkLV OD 'SC]NVMC]3 . Son' 31Â§ "CA-18 39Â¥11!A Â§01Â¥M(]3 5010 Â£5St-0160Â£6:XÂ¥:1 . 065S-SZ6#Z6 :3131 . LI918 01 'NldSÂ¥ * -3AV NVWAH ISV3 0L9 ZO0Z6 :3131 * SED, OD 'laninl131 . '3/\V OCIV}!010.0 '3 0EZ : ~EXHIBITLO~ L--1 April 25, 2001 HPC Re: Daggs lot split and remodel 640 N. 3rd Street Dear Commission Members, EA Altemus partnership objections to the proposed lot split and remodel ofthe Daggs residence are as follows: 1. Moving the existing Daggs house forward by 5' feet to a new set back of 10' is not consistent with the rest of the block. Nor is it congruous with 620 N. 3rd Street house set back of 15'. 2. The proposed full basement with 3 area windows on the north side may disturb or distress the foundation of 620 N. 3rd Street house. 3. The moving ofthe garage closer to our shared property line (see plot map provided) is extremely close to the studio garden of 620 N. 3rd Street. The noise and pollution of having parking pad so close to our living space is disagreeable. 4. The change on an outsized lot in order to obtain more floor space is detrimental to our land value. 5. The change is no consistent with our "historic" neighborhood. 6. Request that the existing fence be restored to the property line, rather than the property of 620 N. 3rd Street as described as Block 102 of Hallam, all of Lot 7&8 and 3.2' oflot 6. Sincerely, EA Altemus Partnership . i. 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1a 0 [20 % U ,-27 94 . 1. lilli i LJ 9% m \ 4~ \ Â§11 c \ - -~ P 1111\l 4-1 ~ 4 * 19 4=11:/,146 U. U- 41'lv b LOT 8 . 1 1 1 \ 1 lili 92, E 2 8 t940 Z FT. F~R N.DINK]11 r lili 14 e . 43 0*34*1 *201:%,us~ -m â‚¬4 \ \\\1 1 E CUT . - 1- -*-- 1 I i *21 0\ 1 \11 i 3 \ 14 r . 4 GR NGÂ£-ivi @mwEI ' ~ r , PAT,O 1 \ I'll i 2 52 U . 6 - 3 #B r.__1____fLUL-J 1 \Mil / -21'Â¥/#///g,x- 0-x q \Nil I 9 1% ____11%03....\~ _Liey' *S~*N~T~*~ T,_7 a< 3. *W ErÂ«~f- 11 ENTRY \ imMU _C Z %3 4 U em: n -Â®[ANT\ \\ 1 ---- N. 1 ./ref l BEUM YO 64(Â£ 4/ nq-r-1 1 ---- - 1 1 L. 1 /4. Ila ~1 1, L w. ~. ,\1 r'' DAGGS RESIDENCE 4 LOT Al- A , 1 . -- n '' "" 1 ' Bst' <AGÂ° 02'3:Â°E~'~~RE)~1 - egO . . 1 v >~12 \ El-*4. dÂ¢h '10 m m Â· alm ' 1 1.1 - - W P#Â£&& 4(7* 4~ 024 4 / r-y~sil U,33 " v; 72=t---: A 24, 171-,--- -le \ \\\\ 0 9 r,#P- --- --,%? PROPOSED SITE PLANI 1; Evf/840 *- q 1' 4 Eâ€¢ INT, 4.1 . ilt,Â«;40*- GUILY 44 -cater.JÂ» - -- . i-*/AM / /Il 1 /0./.-4 . i '.15 ecla,0, ... , ./ / ., |ILÂ· 1 Â»i ~ I'lle. JOB NO. 0009 ~~ DATE 3-20-00 Â¢,1 1 Â»C Lly< i â€¢6161 1 6 [7.31 --Â·Â· Â·! '. 2--I ..1-----&*73r. r~:41.11 11 , ./r /uril SHEET NO. 3 - Â· -- i *.#-/ 3-=-4 ir#pri~z#1*.1-------Pl --- 2Â¢Â·,=14 &'*4110 '1 .#/ Â· + /V. 9106 ! I SHEET OF ~ M 416:RE. a . 1 #W..M O,iliES O.Â»-1 ./=m '*At 41'~.Id, FIUM,kuq, u , .t Â£9Sfr-1200Â£6 DY:1 :/7// . 5*,w cD len-mt. 9AY 00Â¥10101 3 THIRD STREET ., 5218: 1 91331IHE)21Â¥ 33=It 3131. EZ918 Z60 721 . 5Â£)12 03 '5Cr,WÂ£]3 . 500, 1,S "CIA]G 3OVTIIA SCINVMC 3 5010 MJ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 301 E. Hopkins Avenue, Rustique- Minor Review, Public Hearing DATE: April 25, 2001 SIJMMARY: This application affects the new structure on the Katie Reid parcel. The applicants propose to modify doors and windows. APPLICANT: Rustique LLC, Charles Dale and Rob Ittner, owners, represented by Zone Four Architecture. LOCATION: 301 E. Hopkins, Lots A, B, and C, Block 81, City and Townsite ofAspen. PARCEL ID: 2737-073-82-005 ZONING: The property is zoned "CC, Commercial Core," with a historic district overlay. MINOR DEVELOPMENT No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.B.4) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant 1 CA i i l) 1 J- A to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: The building on this site was designed to wrap around the historic resource, the Katie Reid cottage. It is contemporary in design and does not appear to draw any specific references from the historic house. Currently, the Rustique space has fixed windows and one awning window on each side. The proposal is to create a pair of awning windows and a new door on the Hopkins side, and two pairs of awning windows on the Monarch side. The new units will match existing materials. (Please be aware that the letter from the owner indicates that the windows will be double hung, which is incorrect.) Staff finds that the changes have no impact on the overall design of the building. There are similar operable windows on upper floors. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not affect the character of the neighborhood. The goal ofthe project is to enliven the restaurant space, which is beneficial to downtown. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal will not affect the significance of any designated structure. There are not direct impacts on the neighboring cottage. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposal will not impact the architectural integrity of any designated structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any ofthe following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) 2 0 â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application for 301 E. Hopkins Avenue, Rustique, as proposed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Resolution # , Series of 2001, finding that the review standards have been met." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2001 A. Staff memo dated April 25, 2001. B. Application. 0 0 3 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR MINOR DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 301 E. HOPKINS AVENUE, RUSTIQUE, LOTS A, B, AND C, BLOCK 81, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-82-005 RESOLUTION NO. - SERIES OF 2001 WHEREAS, the applicants, Rustique LLC, have requested minor development approval for the property located at 301 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lots A, B, and C, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen. The property is a designated landmark and is located in the Commercial Core Historic District; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 25, 2001, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on April 25, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That minor development for 301 E. Hopkins Avenue, Lots A, B, and C, Block 81, City and Townsite of Aspen, be approved as proposed. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 25th day of April, 2001. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name ledhnot OC )l Â£7120 2. Project location 2.16 S - no A ARL,~ (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning Cd--Â· 4. Lot size 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Glhea?S t>AruE~ ~41, ~Sll Cldâ‚¬ UL- 304' C. Hot'.4,45 - As 203 - ca X t6 I I .. ctqÂ« - OS54 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 15 i u. 7b LiÂ©C44 Â·Ale.CH/Te-r Po (14 25 DB A-'s~*u 9,6 /2- S'N- 904' 7. Type of application (check al[ that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD >< Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. _ Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization - Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 077*0Â¢60 9. Description of development application A,Trcuou 10Â· Wave you completed and attached the following? J Attachment 1 - Land use application form ~ Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 f Response to Attachment 4 9*10 \ l/\ jr if> t'lll'll , . LAND USE APPLICATION FOR RUSTIQUE BISTRO MINOR REVIEW ~ Apri16,2001 RENAISSANCE ATTACHMENT 1 8. The Katie Reid Building is located on Lot A B, C Block 81 Town Site of Aspen, Colorado 81611. The Building Envelope for this building is 22,478 s.f. TUE Al(11[MY OF FOOD The basement of the Katie Reid Building houses one space for Rustique Bistro, The Steak Pit Restaurant, the Gallery, liquor storage for Grape and Grain, two storage units for the employee housing apartments upstairs, a mechanical room, an electrical room, and two public rest rooms. The main level of the building houses the two spaces for Rustique Bistro, Grape and Grain retail, Mesa National Bank, and a small lobby with access to stairs and an elevator. The second floor of the building houses Aspen Small Works and its electrical room, as well as two employee housing units. The third level houses Aspen Small Works. The physical address of Rustique Bistro, registered with the building department is 216 South Monarch Street, Aspen, Colorado, 81611. The three retail spaces allocated to Rustique occupy 3628 s.f. The basement area houses a prep kitchen, chefs office, storage closet, private dining area seating sixteen, and a men's and women's rest room. The main level seats 90, including the bar area, and features an open kitchen. Rustique LLC is the lease holder for the three retail spaces assigned to Rustique Bistro. Charles C. Dale and Robert A. Ittner Jr. are the member/managers for Rustique LLC, and together own 100% ofthe stock. Bill Pollock, architect, will be the owners' representative during the construction phase of the project for which we are applying. 9. Rustique LLC is applying for a minor review in order to receive a permit to modify the existing commercial storefront windows on the West and North sides of the space currently occupied by Rustique Bistro. As shown in the attached architectural plans, we propose to replace four of the eight windows on the west side, facing onto Monarch Street, with double-hung windows. This will enable our diners to feel more connected to the outside while dining with us, and improve the atmosphere within the restaurant. In addition, we are applying for permission to install two double-hung windows on the North side of the building, facing onto the Katie Reid patio, as well as a door in order to service the outside dining area for which the space has been approved. All doors and windows will remain in the same context as the existing commercial storefront. They will be manufactured out of aluminum or similar metal, and be painted the same color as the rest of the trim on the building. 0 304 E. HOPKINS Â· ASPEN. CO 81611 Â· 970.925.2402 Â· FAX 970.925.6634 Â· DINE@RENAISSANCERESTAURANT.COM LAND USE APPLICATION FOR RUSTIQUE BISTRO MINOR REVIEW April 6, 2001 ATTACHMENT 3 To Whom It May Concern: 1. I the undersigned, Charles Dale, authorized by and acting on behalf of Rustique LLC, do hereby notify you of the applicant's address as: Physical Address: Rustique LLC 216 South Monarch Aspen CO 81611 Tel: 970-920-2555 Business Office: Rustique LLC 304 East Hopkins Aspen CO 81611 Tel: 970-925-7439 Contact Charles Dale or Rob Ittner 2. Lots A, B, C, Block 81, City and Town Site, Aspen, Colorado, Katie Reid Building, 301 East Hopkins Ave. 3. See attached Lease Assignment, Amendment and Consent 4. Copy of map attached 5. N/A 6. N/A 7. Rustique LLC is applying for a minor review in order to receive a permit to modify the existing commercial storefront windows on the West and North sides of the space currently occupied by Rustique Bistro. As shown in the attached architectural plans, we propose to replace four of the eight windows on the West side, facing onto Monarch Street, with double-hung windows. This will enable our diners to feel more connected to the outside while dining with us, and improve the atmosphere within the restaurant We are also applying for permission to install two double-hung windows on the North side of the building, facing onto the Katie Reid patio, as well as a door in order to service the outside dining area for which the space has been approved. All doors and windows will remain in the same context as the existing commercial storefront. They will be painted the same color as the rest of the trim on the building. Sincerely, - ZÂ·OINÂ·E 0 19 MAN DN~ ~ ~ ARCHITECTURE 1 1 I 1 .6 970.544.9041 P. O. BOX 2508 1 ASPEN CO 81812 MAIN DINING 1 KITCHEN 1 ~ Z 000 WAIT - El CE E * 1 2 \ MAIN ENT+9 / Â·~ A / \ A TBO 7 - - cir | 1 EGREBS 111 Eli 1 1 / n EXISTING CONDITION- HOPKINS AVE. rh EXISTING CONDITION- MONARCH ST. (D ZOD DOOR BAR -- BAR BEATINGÂ· DININ<1 11 11 11 1,1 1 11- LOser 4_/ SCALE: 3/16"=t'-0" 4_/ SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" ExTERIOR PATIO HOPKINS AyENUE ,/0 r-h EXISTING CONDITIONS ~ 4_/ SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" 0 (D 0 - .- 1 lEI (0 1 RA 70 Be vmecc> m, MAIN DINING ~n,Â©ow-<... 1 N 6 V r .a - 1 *Em.fl~_1 1 RÂ© rÂ© 02 -1,0 el 11 1 MAIN DINING KITCHEN 1 i 3 -4 WIT -p m 8 LJ 1 W.,710 ./6.- 1 MAIN ENT~/ 1 / \ DATE: 4/13/2001 10.851 1 19,4 1 - ; .~ EWET3 188UE: . MAtT'RE DIE / i -AACI ./.64* PA'â€¢06* ../311./ All'. U.Â©OUS- COATCHECK 1 1 REWSIONS: 9:* 1 8 \4 , PERMIT SET 7 f _ r C:11 /EO-55 --3/ 121 \ 1 POOR BAR BEATING/ 2 0% F~NCH *1YLE 00â‚¬OR// L ..0-4 'ANIM' .1~0Â· ./-.-1==t j w Lou-1 ...me *40.0, y ..<I W~01/ 06~* IA)~6. -4 -â€¢1~~LA~ â€¢,Â»gLD ~\ -MLACI ... *48 .... , ~1*T CCLM Tm*~011- =IT COLOR \ .16/ COLOR Re To - vER,=- .O 70 - ........r Te ....C..0 ./161./ . W. TO - i-,0 I. 1 .TO-- POO- U~NDOW M96krACT.mE' vE-r Th~SWOLD CO.Â©In04 -4 STTLE C,Â¢,R-f â„¢~aCMâ€¢ MUBT c<,.~ CUTDOORSEATE I'le.. ~ PROP. LAYOUT w/ AWNING WINDOWS- HOPKINS AVE. gh PROPOSED LAYOUT w/ AWNING WINDOWS- MONARCH ST. ExTERIOR /ATIO SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" DRAWN BY: DMJ ~ SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" CHECKED BY: WSP SCALE: - )&16 - E>*DO NOPKINS AvENUE N,~LD .g... 4=61# ~ PROPOSED LAYOUT w/ AWNING WINDOWS 1=1 SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0" PLANS & El-EV MONARCH STREET ONARCI-1 STREET MI 111 11'U'111 l i l i Ollsnkl 'NadSV -lig 111111111111]111