The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFile Documents.1419 Crystal Lake Rd.0009.2017 (4).ARBK0009.2017.ARBK_Zoning_2 Page: [1] A-201 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 9'-1 3/8" Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf (75) Page: [2] A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: [2] A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 20'-3 7/16" Page: [2] A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 9'-1 13/32" Page: [2] A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 20.3981 sf Page: 1 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Zoning will require at least a zoning site plan showing setbacks. Page: A-103-D Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If a wall is being removed here, than it should show up in your elevations and your demo calcs drawings. Currently it does not. Please reconcile. TOP OF FF @ MAIN BASEMENT+89'-10" TOP OF FF @ MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" TOP OF FF @ LIVING ROOM 98'-6"9'-1 3/8"9 107A T 2'-10"T 75 B C D 28 "T T T EXISTING RO HEIGHTS OF MANSARD H 20'-3 7/16" EXIST TOPO 9'-1 13/32"T 2'-10"20.39813 sf Zoning will require at least a zoning site plan showing setbacks. BATHROOM 4 207 BEDROOM 4 206 If a wall is being removed here, than it should show up in your elevations and your demo calcs drawings. Currently it does not. Please reconcile. Please see sheet A001 - Proposed Site Plan for property setback information This is an existing window that is being removed. No wall area at this location is to be removed. We have updated this plan to more accurately show that only the window is being removed.09/29/2017 Page: A-104 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 23'-8 1/16" Page: A-104-D Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This demo plan for the roof does not quite match up with your elevations. The elevations show the ends of many rafter tails being cut off, but that does not show up here or in your demo calcs. Please clarify, and revise your drawings to be consistent. Page: A-104-X Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 23'-8 1/16" Page: C6 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This wall can be no taller than 42" (3' - 6") and will be checked at CO. Page: HVAC 3 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Where is all of the new HAVAC equipment being located? Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf to Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf . LEVEL LKWAY 1/8":1'23'-8 1/16" This demo plan for the roof does not quite match up with your elevations. The elevations show the ends of many rafter tails being cut off, but that does not show up here or in your demo calcs. Please clarify, and revise your drawings to be consistent.1/8":1'23'-8 1/16" This wall can be notaller than 42" (3' - 6")and will be checked at CO. Where is all of the new HAVAC equipment being located? We have revised our drawings to be consistent. We are only reducing the dimension of roofs where it is shown as demo on the demo plans. Ok All of the exterior equipment will be located on the roof. This includes condensing units and air handlers that will all be under 6' including pad. This equipment will be screened as necessary. Spec sheets of this equipment has been included. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf . Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 274.1 Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf As per Sheet Z-004, the existing and proposed basement FA is not the same Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 25,618.85 Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf _ Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 19,567.85 Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 4,774.1 274.1 As per Sheet Z-004,the existing andproposed basementFA is not the same 25,618.85 19,567.85 4,774.1 We have updated Z-001 to match the calculations on Z-004 - which shows that the lower level existing and proposed FAR numbers are not the same. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf _ Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Same note as before!! You only revert to 25% if the steep slopes reduce your FA by more than 25% - not if the sq. ft. of your steep slope reduction is more than 25%. Therefore your steep slope reduction should be 3,725.15+7,698.6 = 11,423.75. Page: Z-001 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf _ Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Same note as before!! You only revert to 25% if thesteep slopes reduce your FA by more than 25% - notif the sq. ft. of your steep slope reduction is more than25%. Therefore your steep slope reduction should be3,725.15+7,698.6 = 11,423.75. 12 17 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. 14 17 18 19 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. 17 20 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. We have updated this information on Z-001 accordingly and provided two cells showing the 2 different ways to calculate this information. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf New Header being installed per S2.4 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Looking at your elevations, there is no fenestration here. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 1 " = 1'-0" 1 15 16 20 22 New Header being installed per S2.4 12 13 8 Looking at your elevations, there is no fenestration here. 20 21 22 23 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. 20 This area is currently being counted as demo. This area is shown as existing wall area to remain. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf New Header being installed per S2.4 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf See A-103-D at grid line 3.5. Plus S2.4 specifically says that this column will be replaced. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. 16 New Header being installed per S2.4 11 15 16 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. 43 5 9 See A-103-D at grid line 3.5. Plus S2.4 specifically says that this column will be replaced. There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. 10 14 18 19 There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. In this instance we are not removing the upper column and have adjusted structural drawing S2.4 accordingly. The proposed new header is shown as demo on sheet Z002. Some of this header overlaps the existing door opening - so only part of the surface area of this new header counts towards demo. We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf New Header being installed per S2.4 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf New Header being installed per S2.4 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This entire wall is being demolished because the entire wall is moving forward. Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. EX 1/16" 1 Z-002 New Header being installed per S2.4 2 TING LOWER LEVEL 0 8 Scale: There is no exception for a built in parapet wall, and the Code treats this as part of the exterior wall. 11 New Header being installed per S2.4 15 16 22 This entire wall is being demolished because the entire wall is moving forward. 20 22 21 23 W 3/3 4 Z-002 If the log holding up the log is removed, then the log's structural support has been demolished and therefore it has been demolished. We have added this entire wall to the demo calcs and shown accordingly on Z002 As discussed - and clarified via email - if a log holding up a log is removed then the upper log will only be counted as demolished if that log is also removed. In this instance we are not removing the upper log and this can be seen on sheet S2.4. Header is now shown as demoed. The proposed new header is located above the existing wall, and in line with the roof. The roof is being shown as demolished, therefore the new header does not require additional demo in elevation. We have revised our structural solution for this existing parapet wall at the garage and plan on keeping all garage walls unless noted otherwise. Please see an updated detail within the structural set. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-002 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf See note #9 about removing all exiting structural log beams and columns Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Demolition for new duct and pipe openings? Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Demolition for new duct and pipe openings? Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 18 19 14 19 7 10 9 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 11 223.83 sq ft t 172.86 sq ft 83.3 sq ft 181.20 sq ft 131.39 sq ft 96.0 sq ft 111.13 sq ft 74.61sq ft 164.39 sq ft 2.04 sq ft 576.60 sq ft 2819.03 sq ft See note #9 aboutremoving all exiting structural log beamsand columns 15 18 19 20 16 96.0 sq ft 111.13 sq ft 177.04 sq ft 74.61 sq ft 164.39 sq ft 2.04 sq ft 19.05 sq ft 5 5 sq ft Demolition for new duct and pipe openings? 2 3 6 272.29 sq ft 31.74 sq ft 169.16 sq ft Demolition for new duct and pipe openings? 3 272.29 sq ft We are removing an existing column in this area as shown on sheet S2.4. We are also cutting the existing glulam beam at this location to receive the new column. The existing column's plan view area has been accounted for in this section of roof 14 shown by the small rectangle that corresponds to this area. All new ducts and pipe openings will take place in roof areas that will be demoed. All new ducts and pipe openings will take place in roof areas that will be demoed. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 23'-8" Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf See note #9 about removing all exiting structural log beams and columns Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Check your elevations. It appears that all of your eaves are being cut down. Please add that work to your demo total Page: Z-003 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Page: Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf As you can see on sheet A-201, the bottom of the first story floor structure is above the new finished grade. Therefore, at least a portion of this wall will be exposed. Page: Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf ? Page: Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Both tables seem to be missing a column for exposed wall. 22 23 32.0 42.29 sq ft 2.15 sq ft 23'-8" 2 3 5 6 14 15 16 11 24 21 22 23 272.29 sq ft 16.3 sq ft 31.74sq ft 1312.02 sq ft 169.16 sq ft 96.0 sq ft 111.13 sq ft 177.04 s 32.08 sq ft42.29 sq ft 82.15 sq ft 576.60sq ft 25875.75 sq ft 26867.93 sq ft See note #9 aboutremoving all exitingstructural log beamsand columns 6 2 3 5 6 10 14 15 17 18 19 2016 11 24 21 22 23 272.29 sq ft sq ft 16.3 sq ft 31.74sq ft 1312.02 sq ft 169.16sq ft 172.86 sq ft 131.39 sq ft 96.0 sq ft 111.13 sq ft 177.04 sq ft 74.61sq ft 164.39sq ft 2.04sq ft 19.05sq ft 32.08 sq ft42.29 sq ft 82.15 sq ft 576.60sq ft 25875.75 sq ft 26867.93 sq ft ROOF DEMO Check yourelevations. It appearsthat all of your eavesare being cut down. Please add that workto your demo total 1 A 2 3 1.5 1A-301-- 2 3 5 68'-6"8'-0"8'-0"19'-6 7/8"18'-11 1/8" 4'-8"26'-3 11/32" 37.33 sq ft 213.49 sq ft 41 sq ft 166.37 sq ft As you can see on sheet A-201, the bottom of the first story floor structure is above the new finished grade. Therefore, at least a portion of this wall will be exposed. ? 1 A A 2 3 4 5 6 4.5 3.5 1.5 A.5 A.5 2A-301-- 1A-302-- 1A-301-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30'-10 7/8" 8'-6" 3'-6 7/8"8'-6"8'-6"8'-6"8'-6"8'-0"8'-0" 8'-6"8'-0"8'-0" 14'-8 3/4" 19'-6 7/8"18'-11 1/8"35'-10 1/4" 38'-6"4'-8"26'-3 11/32" 46'-11 1/4" 327.25 sq ft 37.33 sq ft213.49 sq ft 286.83 sq ft 151.41 sq ft 166.37 sq ft 262.71 sq ft 390.91 sq ft 30.37 sq ft 125.20 sq ft 125.20 sq ft30.37sq ft262.71 sq ft 8.05 sq ft 1 A A 2 3 4 5 6 4.5 3.5 1.5 A.5 A.5 2A-301-- 1A-302-- 1A-301-- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 30'-10 7/8"8'-6"3'-6 7/8" 8'-6"8'-6" 8'-6" 8'-6"8'-0"8'-0" 8'-6"8'-0"8'-0" 14'-8 3/4" 19'-6 7/8"18'-11 1/8"35'-10 1/4" 38'-6"4'-8"26'-3 11/32" 46'-11 1/4" 327.25 sq ft 37.33 sq ft213.49 sq ft 286.83 sq ft 151.41 sq ft 166.37 sq ft 262.71 sq ft 398.97 sq ft 30.37 sq ft125.20 sq ft 46.53 sq ft 125.20 sq ft30.37sq ft262.71 sq ft 22.28 sq ft Both tables seem tobe missing a columnfor exposed wall. We have revised our drawings to be consistent. We are only reducing the dimension of roofs where it is shown as demo on the demo plans. We have re-imported these charts to include that column We have updated the main level wall calcs to match the sections and elevations. Per our discussion we will be taking the grade line shown in elevation adjacent to the building We are not removing any structural roof log beam and columns within this area. This can be shown on S2.4. 09/29/2017 Page: Z-004 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf This does not appear to be the right amount of exposed wall. Please see Sheet A-202. I have preformed an area measurement based on the height of the space shown in the sections. The resultant area is closer to 20sq. ft rather than 8. Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 2'-8 19/32" Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 18'-11 7/32" Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Add the calculation for the garage FA Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf According to both the Civil and Landscaping drawings, the stairs down to the path are being restored. Please add them to your proposed deck total. Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Add the calculation for the garage FA Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 18'-7 5/16" A 5 6 4.5 1A-302-- 7 8 9 10 30'-10 7/8"3'-6 7/8"14'-8 3/4" 46'-11 1/4" 0.91 sq ft 8.05 sq ft This does not appear to be the right amount of exposed wall. Please see Sheet A-202. I have preformed an area measurement based on the height of the space shown in the sections. The resultant area is closer to 20sq. ft rather than 8.12'-0"246.20 sq ft2'-8 19/32"18'-11 7/8" 5/8" 7 267.25 sq ft 183.73 sq ft 18'-11 7/32" Add the calculation for the garage FA A 6 A.5 1A-302-- According to both the Civil and Landscaping drawings, the stairs down to the path are being restored. Please add them to your proposed deck total. Add the calculation for the garage FA 12'-0"37'-1 7/8" 417.96 sq ft 8 246.20 sq ft 18'-7 5/16" We have updated the lower level wall calcs to match the sections and elevations. These stairs will only be stones set in earth and will therefore not be structured and therefore would not count towards FAR This is shown on Z001 but we have also included it on Z005 This is shown on Z001 but we have also included it on Z005 09/29/2017 Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Based on the measurements of the buried wall, this exposed area should be smaller. Please fix and adjust the amount of counting FA. Page: Z-005 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf 2'-9 27/32" Page: Z-006 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf For this area to be exempt from deck totals, we will require this detail to show up in both the floor plan and structural drawings as well as the elevations. Page: Z-006 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Please add a chart here showing total Existing FA Page: Z-006 Checkmark: Unchecked Author: jimp File Name: Rd1 Revised Plans.pdf Please add a chart here showing total proposed FA8'-0"43 347.42 sq ft 239.2 10'-6"12'-0"37'-1 7/ 445.88 sq ft 417.96 sq 8 10'-6"246.20 sq ft Based on themeasurements of theburied wall, this exposed area should be smaller. Please fix and adjust the amount of countingFA. 2 1.5 2'-9 27/32"HDEFG 3.5 5 6 4.5 4 E.5 DECK SPACE 772.46 sq ft 2498.43 sq ft INTERIOR SPACE L Planter at 30" above deck surface PROJEC SCALE UPPER LEV FLOOR AR CALCULA 3/32" = 16019.0 Z-0 DATE PERMIT 05.26.2 For this area to be exempt from deck totals, we will require this detail to show up in both the floor plan and structural drawings as well as the elevations. Please add a chart here showing total Existing FA Please add a chart here showing total proposed FA We have updated our floor plans, elevations, and structural drawings to show this planter. We have included a section from the summary sheet on this page. We have included a section from the summary sheet on this page. We have adjusted the amount of counting FA. 09/29/2017