HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.135 E Cooper Ave.0134.2019 (2).ARBK
Property Address
135 E. Cooper
Aspen, CO 81611
Element Environmental Project#:
Eigelberger 060719 Garage
Client Job Name
Garage
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 - Scope of Work
2.0 - Sampling Requirements
3.0 - Sampling Methodology
4.0 - Laboratory
5.0 - Suspect Materials Sampled
6.0 - Table of Results
7.0 - Description of Sampling Area
8.0 - Conclusion
9.0 - Lab Report
10.0 - Certificates
Asbestos Samples Analyzed: 4
Positive Asbestos Samples: 0
___________________________________________________ ASBESTOS LEAD HAZMAT RESTORATION www.elementconsults.com Asbestos Sampling Report
Date: 06/11/2019
Date of Inspection: 06/07/2019
Client:
Eigelberger Architecture and Design
350 Market St. Suite 309
Basalt, CO 81621
Attn:
Natacha Denis
Building Inspector:
Ellen Johnson
CDPHE #23799
Joshua Johnson
CDPHE #18401
189 County Rd. 135
Glenwood Springs, CO 81601
josh@elementconsults.com
(970) 274-3139
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
2
1.0- This was an inspection for suspect ACM (Asbestos Containing Material) for a complete
demolition. Element Environmental conducted an inspection for materials that would be
impacted during the demolition. This inspection was a full inspection for demolition of
the building. If other suspect materials become visible/apparent during demolition or
construction activities, work in that area should be halted and more sampling/testing
must take place, per Colorado regulations. Any suspect materials that were not tested
are to be assumed to contain asbestos.
2.0- A limited bulk sampling of from all suspect materials was conducted in accordance with
Colorado State Requirements. The minimum number of samples per homogenous areas
are as follows:
2.1- Surfacing Materials- <1,000 sq.ft.- Minimum of 3 samples
1,000 sq.ft.- 5,000sq.ft.- Minimum of 5 samples
>5,000 sq.ft. Minimum of 7 samples
2.2- Miscellaneous materials- Minimum of 2 samples
2.3- Thermal Systems Insulation (TSI)- Minimum of 3 samples
3.0- The purpose of the inspection is to identify materials that are homogenous. A
homogeneous area is defined as one which shares suspect material, texture, color,
location, and/or apparent time of construction. The materials are segregated into
separate homogenous areas. The size is determined and then samples are taken. The
materials are touched to determine friability. Friable ACM is material that can be
crushed or reduced to powder by hand pressure. The samples are taken in a random
numerical sequence.
4.0- Ellen Johnson, a Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment certified building
inspector, certification number: 23799, performed the inspection. The findings were
reviewed by Josh Johnson, a Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment
certified building inspector, certification number: 18401. Samples taken were sent to
CEI Labs in Cary, North Carolina. The samples were analyzed by PLM (Polarized Light
Microscopy) analysis. Per the CDPHE Regulation any sample that is found by a lab to be
trace, or <1% asbestos, is considered to be ACM material. This material would still be a
regulated material by CDPHE. The sample must have an additional “point count”
performed to be considered less than 1% and not be regulated by the CDPHE. The lab’s
documents with analyses and findings are found below.
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
3
5.0- SUSPECT MATERIALS SAMPLES
• Roofing Material
• Exterior Caulk
6.0- TABLE OF RESULTS
HOMOGENOUS
AREA
DESCRIPTION OF AREA ACM CATEGORY NUMBER
OF
SAMPLES
APPROXIMATE
SQ.FT.*
ACM ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES
% AND TYPE OF
ASBESTOS FOUND
(A) Tar Moisture Barrier under Wood
Shingles Miscellaneous
2 ~500 sq.ft. Non-Friable Non ACM No Asbestos Detected
(B) Exterior Caulking on Door and
Siding Miscellaneous
2 ~2 sq.ft. Non-Friable Non ACM No Asbestos Detected
Key:
ACM Assessment Categories:
1- Damaged or significantly damaged Thermal Systems Insulation
(TSI) ACM
2- Damaged friable surfacing ACM
3- Significantly damaged friable Surfacing ACM
4- Damaged or significantly damaged friable Miscellaneous ACM
5- ACM with potential for damage
6- ACM with potential for significant damage
7- Friable ACM with low potential for damage
Other- ACM not classified in the above Assessment Categories
N/A- Not Applicable
* Square footage is estimated and not for bidding purposes
7.0- DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLING AREA
• The Tar Moisture Barrier material under the wood shingles
• Caulking materials
8.0- CONCLUSION.
No Asbestos was detected in any of the samples tested.
Sincerely,
Ellen Johnson
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
4
9.0- LAB REPORT
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
5
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
6
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
7
06/13/2019
Project #-Eigelberger 060719 Garage
8
10.0- CERTIFICATES
06/13/2019