HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.600 E Main St.0229.2018 (3).ARBK 1
HealthSafe Inspections Inc
390 Apple Drive
Basalt CO 81621
970-920-2100
Jim Baker
CDPHE Asbestos Building Inspector, Asbestos Air Monitoring Specialist (AMS) &
Project Designer Certification #13437
CDPHE Lead-Based Paint Inspector & Lead Hazard Assessor Certification #23607
ASBESTOS REPORT
DATE
11/08/2018
CLIENT
Dave Wilkins
c/o Alpine Management & Planning, LLC.
Attn: Bob Long
PO Box 3801
Aspen CO 81612
PROPERTY ADDRESS
600 East Main Street, Concept Condo #309, Aspen, Colorado 81611
2
CLIENT BACKGROUND & CONCERNS
The Client, Dave Wilkins, hired Alpine Management & Planning, LLC. to act as the
general contractor for the interior remodel of the two-bedroom, two-bath condominium
addressed above. During the remodel, drywall materials, suspect asbestos containing
materials, were impacted by disturbance, demolition and disposal. This required an
asbestos inspection. Alpine Management & Planning, LLC. hired HealthSafe Inspections,
Inc. (hereinafter, HealthSafe) to perform an asbestos inspection limited to those drywall
materials impacted by the interior remodel, door and window changes.
VISUAL INSPECTION & LABORATORY FINDINGS
An inspection was conducted by Jim Baker of HealthSafe on Monday, November 5, 2018
with Bob Long of Alpine Management & Planning, LLC. present during the inspection
and sample collecting. All suspect asbestos containing materials (ACM) or suspect
asbestos containing building materials (ACBM) were identified by their respective
3
homogenous materials reflecting the same in consistency, appearance and
application/installation date(s) and sampled randomly respective to the scope of those
materials disturbed-demolished-disposed of (DDD). Those materials collected and
analyzed by EPA 600 Method PLM analysis are the following:
1. Skip-Trowel Texture, a homogeneous trowel-applied surfacing material/texture
[samples 1-3: ST-1,2,3], collected from the northwest bedroom bathroom north
wall, east wall, and the middle hallway bathroom east wall, respectively. This
skip-trowel surfacing material/texture is on ceilings and walls of the two
bathrooms which have been remodeled approximately ten years ago. The
estimated impact area of DDD is more than 10 sf, but less than 1,000 sf, requiring
a minimum of at least three surfacing/texture material samples. The PLM
analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED in samples 1 and 2; <1.0%
Chrysotile asbestos in sample 3 with EPA 400 Point Count results of <0.25%
Chrysotile asbestos. The asbestos portion according to the analyst is a trace
amount on the back side of the sample—believed to be old, original joint
compound. This material is not classified and regulated by the State of Colorado
CDPHE as ACM/ACBM. However, because it does have friable asbestos fibers at
trace amounts, OSHA regulations apply, as it is OSHA Class II Asbestos Work to
disturb this material.
2. Original Flat Finish Texture, a homogeneous trowel-applied surfacing
material/texture [samples 4-6: F-1,2,3], collected from the mid- hallway east wall,
living room north wall and NE bedroom south wall. This surfacing
material/texture is on walls of the condominium interior that still have the original
flat-finish texture. The estimated impact area of DDD is more than 10 sf, but less
than 1,000 sf, requiring a minimum of at least three surfacing/texture material
samples. The PLM analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED.
3. Skip-Troweled Drywall System Joint Compound: a homogeneous
miscellaneous seam taping compound requiring at least two samples [samples 7-
8: ST-JC-1,2], collected from the NW bedroom bathroom east side at the doorway
and the middle hallway bathroom west wall at the rounded corner metal,
respectively. This material is applied to the two more recently remodeled
bathrooms with a newer installed drywall approximately ten years ago. The PLM
analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED.
4. Original Flat-Finish Drywall System Joint Compound: a homogeneous
miscellaneous seam taping compound requiring at least two samples [samples 9-
10: F-JC-1,2], collected from the NE bedroom left upper closet corner and mid-
hallway west wall respectively. This material is applied to the original drywall
system. The PLM analytical estimated results: 2% Chrysotile asbestos. This
material is part of the original drywall system, which is composited with the entire
drywall sample of all layers in ¶ #6 below.
5. Two Bathrooms Drywall System, a homogeneous taped and joint compounded
drywall system (classified as a miscellaneous material as a complete integral
system) [samples 11: ST-J], collected from the NW bathroom NE inside corner.
These composite layered taped and joint compounded drywall materials are on
ceilings and walls of the two bathrooms with a skip-trowel applied surfacing
4
material/texture. The PLM analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED. This
material is in conjunction with the joint compound in ¶ #3 above.
6. Original Drywall System, a homogeneous taped and joint compounded drywall
system (classified as a miscellaneous material as a complete integral system)
[samples 12: F-J]; these composite layered taped and joint compounded drywall
materials are on existing walls and closet ceilings of the condo interior with a flat-
finish applied surfacing material/texture. The PLM analytical estimated results:
<1.0% Chrysotile asbestos in the joint compound of this particular sample with
composite results of <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. This drywall system is not
classified and regulated by the State CDPHE with <0.25% asbestos and none
detected in the flat-finish surfacing material/texture ¶ #2 above.
A total of 12 suspect homogeneous ACM/ACBM bulk samples were collected and 12
samples were analyzed. The bulk samples were analyzed by EPA 600 PLM analytical
methods by a NVLAP accredited laboratory in accordance with Colorado State
Regulation 8 for the presence of asbestos mineral fibers.
See supporting Hayes Microbial Consulting, Inc. data report #18041111.
HEALTHSAFE CONCLUSIONS
• There is Chrysotile asbestos in the original drywall system’s joint compound at an
estimated 2% concentration. Sample #3, a skip-trowel surfacing material/texture
was traced with asbestos at <0.25% concentration by EPA 400 Point Count
analytical method—believed to be original joint compound underneath this
particular sample rather than in the skip-trowel compound. Although not regulated
by the State CDPHE as ACM/ACBM requiring abatement at these concentrations,
friable asbestos fibers are present and require OSHA Class II Asbestos Work
regulations to be followed. See EPA 40 CFR 763.121 Worker Protection Rule,
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134 Respirator Protection Standard, OSHA 29 CFR
1910.1001 General Industry Standard and OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 Construction
Standard regulations when dealing with these asbestos hazards.
Sincerely Submitted,
Jim Baker
5
COLORADO & FEDERAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS SUMMARY
Regulation No. 8 Part B – Asbestos of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment (CDPHE), Air Quality Control Commission requires a State-certified
Asbestos Building Inspector to inspect and collect bulk samples of all suspect asbestos
containing materials (ACM) or suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACBM)
prior to their disturbance, removal or demolition and disposal. The suspect materials shall
be analyzed by a NVLAP accredited laboratory by polarized light microscopy (PLM)
using EPA 600 analytical method. A material which is estimated to contain more than 1%
asbestos is classified as ACM/ACBM and regulated by the State and Federal
governments. Any friable (able to crush or reduce to powder by finger pressure) asbestos
with trace amounts of asbestos fibers or less than 1% must be point-counted using EPA
400 analytical method to prove that it is indeed less than 1%; if not, it must be classified
as ACM/ACBM and shall be treated as a State and Federal regulated material. Any
friable asbestos containing material (greater than 1% asbestos concentration) or
ACM/ACBM that could be rendered friable during its removal or demolition and disposal
shall require an asbestos abatement by a certified asbestos abatement contractor to
remove and dispose of the material(s).
A Colorado State (CDPHE) issued asbestos abatement permit is required for the
following trigger levels of ACM/ACBM:
1. Residential buildings of four or fewer units--if more than 32 square feet of any
surface coverage (e.g., gypsum wallboard or drywall and associated applied surfacing
materials/textures, acoustic sprays, joint compounds, plaster, etc.), 50 feet of asbestos
covered or asbestos insulated pipe or any material which would fill a 55-gallon drum is
going to be disturbed, removed or disposed of, an asbestos abatement permit is required.
2. Residential complexes with more than four residential units, public access areas to a
residential building, commercial and retail buildings, public and civic buildings,
industrial buildings--if more than 160 square feet of surfacing materials, 260 linear feet
or more than 35 cubic feet (NESHAP) or 55-gallon drum (CDPHE) of suspect
ACM/ACBM is going to be disturbed, removed or disposed of, an asbestos abatement
permit is required under NESHAP and by the CDPHE. See note below on OSHA.
The regulations require an absolute minimum of 3 samples (EPA suggests 9) per
homogenous suspect surfacing and TSI materials and an absolute minimum of 2 samples
of homogenous miscellaneous materials or any number of “samples sufficient to
determine whether a material is ACM” (Reg8.IV.D.3). More samples are required based
on surface area or volume. These are minimums; the asbestos building inspector has the
field responsibility to determine homogenous materials and the number of samples to
collect per material; more than the minimum number of samples may be necessary at the
discretion of the inspector. An assessment of friability and functional space conditions of
the materials are also the inspector’s field responsibilities.
6
OSHA compliance is required for all employers and employees no matter the
quantity of asbestos present with strict regulations regarding 10 sf or more of TSI or
friable surfacing materials, and therefore it does not matter what the quantity or
State trigger levels are: all suspect ACM/ACBM shall be inspected and tested for
asbestos prior to their disturbance, removal and disposal for worker protection and
safety. See EPA 40 CFR 763.121 Worker Protection Rule, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134
Respirator Protection Standard, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 General Industry Standard and
OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 Construction Standard regulations when dealing with asbestos
hazards.
Note: County or City regulations may be more stringent.
HMC #18041111
contact@hayesmicrobial.com
http://hayesmicrobial.com/
Analysis Report prepared for
HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO. 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Name: Wilkins
600 E Main Street #309
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Sampled: 11-05-2018
Date Analyzed: 11-06-2018
Report Date: 11-06-2018
EPA Laboratory ID# VA01419
NVLAP Lab Code: 500096-0 Asbestos License: 300435 License: #PH-0198
Page 1 of 6
HMC #18041111
HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
November 6, 2018
Client Job Number:
Client Job Name:Wilkins
600 E Main Street #309
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear HealthSafe Inspections,
We would like to thank you for trusting Hayes Microbial for your analytical needs. On November 6, 2018 we received 13 samples by FedEx for the job
referenced above. 13 samples were received in good condition.
The results in this analysis pertain only to this job, collected on the stated date and should not be used in the interpretation of any other job. This report
may not be duplicated, except in full, without the written consent of Hayes Microbial Consulting, LLC.
This laboratory bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or your use of the test results. Interpretation and
use of test results are your responsibility. Any reference to health effects or interpretation of mold levels is strictly the opinion of Hayes Microbial
Consulting. In no event, shall Hayes Microbial Consulting or any of its employees be liable for lost profits or any special, incidental or consequential
damages arising out of your use of the test results.
Steve Hayes, BSMT(ASCP)
Laboratory Director
Hayes Microbial Consulting, LLC
Page 2 of 6
HMC #18041111
EPA 600/R-93, M-4/82-020 (PLM)HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Number:
Collected by:
Email:
Jim Baker
healthsafeinspections@gmail.com
Job Name:Wilkins
600 E Main Street #309
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
11/05/2018
11/06/2018
11/06/2018
#Sample Name Description Asbestos Fibers Other Fibers Non- Fibers
1 1 ST-1 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
2 2 ST-2 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
3 3 ST-3 Texture / White
<1 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
4 4 F-1 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
5 5 F-2 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
6 6 F-3 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
7 7 ST-JC-1 Brittle / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
8 8 ST-JC-2 Brittle / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
9 9 F-JC-1 Brittle / White
2 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
98 %
10 10 F-JC-2 Brittle / White
2 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
98 %
11 11 ST-J Drywall / White
(None Detected)
10 % Cellulose fibers
90 %
Signature: Date:11/06/2018 Reviewed by: Date:11/06/2018
Page 3 of 6
HMC #18041111
EPA 600/R-93, M-4/82-020 (PLM)HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Number:
Collected by:
Email:
Jim Baker
healthsafeinspections@gmail.com
Job Name:Wilkins
600 E Main Street #309
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
11/05/2018
11/06/2018
11/06/2018
#Sample Name Description Asbestos Fibers Other Fibers Non- Fibers
Layer 2 ST-J Joint Compound / White
<1 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Layer 3 ST-J Drywall/Joint Compound / White
<0.25 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Notes: Composite of Drywall and Joint Compound.
12 12 F-J Drywall / White
(None Detected)
10 % Cellulose fibers
90 %
Layer 2 F-J Joint Compound / White
<1 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Layer 3 F-J Drywall/Joint Compound / White
<0.25 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Notes: Composite of Drywall and Joint Compound.
Signature: Date:11/06/2018 Reviewed by: Date:11/06/2018
Page 4 of 6
HMC #18041111
EPA 400 Point CountHealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Number:
Collected by:
Email:
Jim Baker
healthsafeinspections@gmail.com
Job Name:Wilkins
600 E Main Street #309
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
11/05/2018
11/06/2018
11/06/2018
#Sample Name Description Asbestos Fibers Other Fibers Non- Fibers
3 3 ST-3 Texture / White
<0.25 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Notes: Asbestos Observed Not In Counting Field of View.
Signature: Date:11/06/2018 Reviewed by: Date:11/06/2018
Page 5 of 6
HMC #18041111
Asbestos - Additional InformationHealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted on the report. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or
endorsement by AIHA, NIST, NVLAP, NY ELAP, or any agency. The results relate only to the items tested. Hayes Microbial Consulting reserves the right to dispose of all samples
after a period of 60 days in compliance with state and federal guidelines.
All Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with estimating percentages by PLM. Measurement uncertainty data can be
provided when requested.
'None Detected' - Below the detected reporting limit of 1% unless point counting is performed, then the detected reporting limit is .25%.
Per NY ELAP198.6 (NOB), TEM is the only reliable method to declare an NOB material as Non-Asbestos Containing.
Any NY ELAP samples that are subcontracted to another laboratory will display the name and ELAP Lab Identification number in the report page heading of those samples. The
original report provided to Hayes Microbial Consulting is available upon request.
Signature: Date:11/06/2018 Reviewed by: Date:11/06/2018
Page 6 of 6