Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20131113 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 13,2013 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO Site Visits: None 5:00 INTRODUCTION A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes- Oct. 9, 2013 and Oct. 23, 2013 C. Public Comments D. Commission member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificates of No Negative Effect issued I. Submit public notice for agenda items OLD BUSINESS 5.15 A. 549 Race Alley and Lots 4 and 6 of Fox Crossing Subdivision- Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Setback Variance, Parking Waiver and Floor Area Bonus, CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING NEW BUSINESS 6:15 A. 201 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On-Site Relocation and Variances, PUBLIC HEARING B. 947 E. Cooper Avenue- Minor, CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING TO DEC. 11TH WORKESSION A. None 7:00 ADJOURN TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM,NEW BUSINESS Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation (5 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Applicant presentation (20 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes) HPC discussion (15 minutes) Applicant rebuttal (comments) (5 minutes) Motion (5 minutes) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. PROJECT MONITORING- Projects in bold are currently under construction. 217 E. Bleeker-Kribs Jay Maytin 518 W. Main-Fornell 320 Lake 435 W. Main-AJCC 400 E. Hyman(Tom Thumb) 204 S. Galena 920 W.Hallam 28 Smuggler Grove Lift One Nora Berko 205 S. Spring-Hills 1102 Waters 332 W.Main 28 Smuggler Grove 1006 E. Cooper Sallie Golden 400 E.Hyman(Tom Thumb) 305 S. Mill (Above the Salt) 517 E. Hyman (Little Annie's) 206 Lake Jane Hills Aspen Core 605 W. Bleeker 114 Neale Willis Pember 204 S. Galena Aspen Core 514 E. Hyman 624 W. Francis Patrick Segal 204 S. Galena 623 E. Hopkins 701 N.Third 612 W. Main Holden Marolt derrick 624 W. Francis 206 Lake John Whipple 208 E. Main M:\city\planning\hpc project monitoring\PROJECT MONITORING.doc 11/8/2013 P1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 549 Race Alley, Lot 5, Fox Crossing Subdivision- Conceptual Major Development, Relocation, Setback Variance, Parking Waiver And Floor Area Bonus,.CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Lots 4 And 6, Fox Crossing Subdivision- Relocation Review, PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 13, 2013 SUMMARY: 549 Race Alley is a ;` _' 6,016 square foot lot that contains a v , , r �f, , Victorian home in very unaltered, � s ': F but also very deteriorated, condition According to Planning Office files, the house has been vacant for rE=a '; �� � approximately 50 years, possibly g v « ,� er. a p � longer. { This Victorian was one of the few buildings on the property that was t ; assembled to develop the Fox Crossing Subdivision beginning " approximately 10 years ago. x Construction of new homes on the {• ,- vacant lots in the subdivision took , priority, and the economic downturn left the developer unable to complete an approved restoration and remodel - - of this house. Staff required stabilization and protection efforts be undertaken in 2006, due to concerns with "demolition by neglect." The building was studied and documented by a wood scientist who specializes in historic structures. A temporary roof was built spanning overtop of the house, along with other measures to secure the building. Preservation staff and the Chief Building Official have visited the house several times over the last few years. The property is under contract to a buyer who wishes to lift the Victorian, set it on a new basement, rehabilitate the building and construct an addition. HPC conducted a Conceptual review hearing regarding this proposal on Oct. 11`h. The hearing was continued for design restudy, and so that a new public notice could be issued regarding building relocations related to this project. 1 P2 Re-noticing was required in order to address the plan to temporarily place the Victorian house partially on Lot 4 of the Fox Crossing Subdivision, until the new basement is prepared. Re-noticing was also required in order to address two other historically designated structures affected by this project. Currently, there is a 1950s era log cabin sitting at the rear of the Victorian house. The log cabin is intended to be moved to the south, onto Lot 6 of the Fox Crossing Subdivision, where it's "twin" currently sits. Both log cabins will have to be placed on temporary beams, awaiting rehab as part of a separately approved HPC project. There is currently no timeframe for that work to move forward. HPC is asked to grant approval of Conceptual design, variances, and the proposed relocation activities. Staff recommends the project be continued for restudy, due to concerns with the extent to which the proposed addition removes portions of the historic house. APPLICANT: Lot 5: Race Alley LLC, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects. Lots 4 and 6: Fox Crossing Properties, LLC, represented by Neiley and Alder Attorneys. PARCEL ID: Lot 4: 2737-073-92-004, Lot 5: 2737-073-92-005, Lot 6: 2737-073-92-006. ADDRESS: 549 Race Alley, Lot 5, Fox Crossing Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado and Lots 4 and 6, Fox Crossing Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6. CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structures) andlor addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a proposal. The relevant design guidelines are attached as "Exhibit A." 2 P3 The applicant has provided site plans, floor plans, elevations and perspective views describing the proposed project on Lot 5. The Victorian house is proposed to be shifted approximately 5' directly northward on the site. The applicant proposes to make a small addition on the north side of the historic house, to extend the kitchen space. A connector element is to attach to the east side of the kitchen addition and historic house, leading to a new two story addition. A basement is proposed under the entire structure. There are a few challenging aspects of the property that affect how the new house is designed. First, the original front facades of the historic structures in the Fox Crossing Subdivision face south, and were once accessed on that side from Walnut Street. In the subdivision layout, they have no street access from the south and now face a park and pedestrian path. Race_Alley, at the back of the buildings, is the vehicular access, and the building addresses are Race Alley. This confuses the entry into the homes. The 549 Race Alley site slopes so that the Victorian is on the low end of the property and the addition is on the high end, which has the potential to aggravate the height change between the two parts of the house. As mentioned, the project does include the one story connector element between "new and old" that is a standard requirement in a preservation project like this. The proposed connector is almost twice as long as normally required. There is no deck space proposed on top of it, eliminating a typical HPC concern with eroding the buffer behind the old structure. r„e The addition has a similar footprint to the Victorian house, in terms of length and width. Staff finds the plan form of the project to be generally successful, however, at the October 9th meeting, we recommended that the small addition on the side of the Victorian be removed. A view of the north-fayade that would be impacted by the proposed addition is seen above. The -proposed- - - - kitchen extension will overframe the area. Since October 91h, the applicant has studied (1) moving the kitchen area into a wider connector, and (2) keeping the addition on the north side of the Victorian, but smaller than originally proposed. The applicant had decided that the only plan they wish to pursue includes the kitchen addition on the Victorian. Based on guidelines 10.3 and 10.10, we do not support demolishing this original wall of the house and infilling this corner to extend the kitchen. The program can be accommodated in the 3 P4 new construction. This unaltered miner's cottage is significant within the collection of Aspen landmarks. New construction should remove as little historic fabric as possible. There is a floor area bonus requested for this project, which would also argue against an addition that removes or affects approximately 25% of the perimeter of the house. Staff finds that the guidelines are not met and recommends restudy of the project. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. • A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. • An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. At the last HPC meeting, there was also a discussion about roof forms on the new addition. Staff was concerned that the proposed addition read a bit like a two story version of the miner's cottage, overwhelming the original building. Roof forms have since been simplified, and staff finds that the guidelines are met in this regard. RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code: C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4 P5 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not. adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The proposal includes permanently moving the Victorian approximately 5' north of its current location. Because the historic setting of the property has changed greatly, maintaining the Victorian in its exact original location may not be critical. Staff recommends that HPC allow the permanent relocation of the building. The Victorian will be temporarily stored partially on Lot 4 of the subdivision, while the basement is excavated on Lot 5. Staff recommends the typical conditions for temporary storage of a building during active construction. The applicant must provide a $30,000 letter of credit, cashier's check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house. A relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted with the building permit application, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the home and the relationship of the foundation to grade in the building permit application. HPC is also asked to approve mothballing the two log cabins on Lot 6, until the remodel of those buildings (HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2009) moves forward at some undetermined date. These buildings are both to be raised onto beams, supported by cribbing. It is unknown whether the cabins will be moved with their existing floor system intact or not. The applicant represents that the cabins will be kept watertight and inspected periodically. Staff is concerned with the length of time that the cabins-on-Lot 6 may be "moth-balled." Work - - - on the Victorian has been delayed 8 years since the Fox Crossing project was approved. In order to avoid potential deterioration issues, potential vandalism/attractive nuisance issues, or potential negative visual impacts on the neighborhood that may result from long-term storage of these cabins, staff recommends a larger financial security for their safe relocation, repair and preservation. Staff recommends that the application for a permit to relocate one or both of the cabins must include a letter of credit, cashier's check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney in an amount that is twice as much as would be required to construct a slab on grade foundation onto which the two cabins may be set down on Lot 6. Should the HPC approved redevelopment plan not be initiated through the issuance of a building permit within three years from the date that the log cabin relocation permit is issued, City Council will annually review the 5 P6 effect of the building storage and determine whether or not to employ the funds to build the slab and set the buildings on it. FAR BONUS In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: The allowable floor area for the project is 2,772 square feet, per the Subdivision approval. The applicant is requesting a 500 square foot floor area bonus, which would be applied to the remodel, along with 2,022 square feet of the base allowable floor area. The remaining 750 square feet of base allowable floor area is proposed to be converted into 3 TDRs and sold, if approved by City Council. The applicant held a worksession with HPC over the summer, which is a requirement of any floor area bonus request. The Victorian house is in very poor repair and will require special effort to restore the original features. The wood report written for this house should guide the work. There will certainly be some elements that are beyond repair. Staff would be generally supportive of the applicant's bonus, request, given that they are inheriting a long overdue restoration problem. The majority of the exterior materials will need to be preserved and this should be a clear requirement of the floor area bonus. At this time, staff cannot support the bonus due to the demolition proposed as part of the kitchen expansion. Staff has recommended restudy of the project. SETBACK VARIANCES In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. 6 P7 Staff Response: This area of the R-6 zone district has a greater sideyard setback requirement than the West End, where most R-6 lots are located. The minimum sideyard here is 10' on each side, 20' combined. The proposal encroaches into the north sideyard by 5', and does not meet the combined requirements by 5'. Staff finds that setback variances in this case can help mitigate adverse impacts on the historic structure. PARKING VARIANCE Properties listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures may provide fewer on- site parking spaces than required if the standard below, found at Section 26.415.110.0 of the Municipal Code, is met. 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. Staff Response: The applicant is required to provide two on-site spaces. One space is proposed in the garage. The second space was originally proposed to be waived, however, the applicant has since decided to create an uncovered parking spot on the property, along the south sideyard. No variance is needed. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with Residential Design Standards related to "Street-Oriented Entrance." Street oriented entrance and principal window. All single-family homes and duplexes, except as outlined in Subsection 26.410.010.13.4 shall have a street-oriented entrance and a street facing principal window. a) The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten(10) feet back from the front- most wall of the building. b) A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6) feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. All Residential Design Standard Variances, Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020(D)(2) must: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, 7 P8 b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: In HPC's view, the front of the house is the front of the original building. Since this fayade does not face a street now, application of the Residential Design Standards is challenging. The location of the original front door and the design of the original front porch should not be changed to meet these guidelines for new construction. Staff recommends a waiver. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC continue the public hearing for restudy of the project. Staff does not support any demolition to the historic resource other than where the connector meets the east facing gable end of the Victorian. Exhibits: Resolution #_, Series of 2013 A. Relevant Guidelines B. Application Exhibit A, Conceptual Guidelines, 549 Race Alley 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. • Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. • Retain and repair roof detailing. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. • In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. • It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. • Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. • A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. • Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. ❑ The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. ❑ In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 8 P9 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. ❑ It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. ❑ It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. 9 P10 ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10 f_ _ F i : l v Tv- Til ,jI i - -- rr''Iy ©0 549 RACE ALLEY SCHEMATIC DESIGN UPDATES CHARLES CUNNIFFE 1 1 1 ARCHITECTS 1 I I N SPACE PLANNING EVOLUTION f `r I PLAN FROM 10-9-13 MEETING I� HOUSE NOT FUNCTIONAL WITH r--- ; SEPARATE LIVING AND KITCHEN AREAS STAIR STAIR 7LIVING ITCHEN " DINING LIVING KITCHEN GARAGE GARAGE '-^ ENTRY MUD �- ENTRY MUD LAYOUT WITH KITCHEN �pp, LAYOUT WITH KITCHEN & LIVING ADDED TO VICTORIAN SEPARATED BY HALL SMALL ADDITION THAT PRESERVES THE CORNER OF THE VICTORIAN - ✓ STAIR i A'CNEP� DININ ..... - GARAGE GREAT/FAMILY __ --- '-' ROOM L--i . r . OR r �- B- ST \ ENTRY NOOK MUDROOM ©� SMALL ADDITON TO VICTORIAN TO CHARLES ARCH?CCUNNIFFE 11,13.13 ALLOW LIVING AND KITCHEN SPACES TO INTERACT THE NARROW CONNECTOR BETWEEN THE VICTORIAN AND THE ADDITION FORCES A SEPARATION OF THE LIVING, KITCHEN AND DINING AREAS. THESE LOCATIONS CREATE A FLOOR PLAN THAT DOES NOT FUNCTION THE WAY A FAMILY LIVES. WE STRONGLY FEEL THAT THE KITCHEN AND LIVING AREAS NEED A DIRECT RELATIONSHIP FOR THE PLAN TO FUNCTION, THEREFORE WE ARE REQUESTING APPROVAL OF PLAN A. - _--- - -- -- -.. STAIR ._-LL r- KITCHEN i GARAGE GREAT/FAMILY - I LAC ROOM .. ._...ENTRY 1� 3 PU MUD ^ROO MI � i opMAIN LEVEL PLAN B- NO RELATION BETWEEN LIVING, KITCHEN, OR DINING CHARLES CUNNIFFE 1/8" - I 1-01 ARCHITECTS w -v .p STAIR _ MASTER BEDROOM CLOS. I� FLAT ROOF 1 MASTER BATH DECK Q C� s 1 A UPPER LEVEL PLAN ----� STAIR 3 m� f DINING GARAGE GREAT/FAMILY I KII-TCC—HEEN� - - ROOM n B-FAST ENTRY NOOK MUD ROOM I >a 0o MAIN LEVEL PLAN if CHARLES CUNNIFFE 1/8" - _o ARCHITECTS LAUND. , STG. BED 4 1 BED 3 BED 1 ENTERTAINMENT - BATH BED 2 BATH 1 2 BATH BATH 3 4 LOWER LEVEL PLAN SQUARE FOOTAGE LOWER LEVEL: 2481 SF (x.13% = 322 SF FARE MAIN LEVEL: 1553 SF UPPER LEVEL: 631.5 SF GARAGE: 380- 375 EXEMPT = 5 SF GROSS SF TOTAL: 5045.5 SF 0� FAR TOTAL : 2511.5 SF (ALLOWED: 2522 SF) CHARLES CLINNIFFE ARCHITECTS CTI rn r SOUTH ELEVATION- ENTRY - WEST ELEVATION I ©� 549 RACE ALLEY SCHEMATIC DESIGN wESTSECTION/ELEVATION CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS 1 1,13.13 1/8" = V-0" _ NORTH ELEVATION -'- EAST- GARAGE ELEVATION EAST SECTION 00 549 RACE ALLEY SCHEMATIC DESIGN 1 1 .13.13 1/81, = 1 -0 CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS J 00 549 Race Alley Victorian and Cabin Relocation Plan HPC Conceptual Review November 13, 2013 { q [7F rt a a� M s i are LOT 4, 5, 6 VICTORIAN & CABINS co Oct 16 13 04:01p SheridanAlii,LLC +1(925)838-8160 p.1 'G N O FOX CROSSING PROPERTIES,LLC 3000-F Danville Blvd.,#500 Alamo,CA 94507-1572 October 16,2013 VIA HAND DELIVERY Amy Guthrie,Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen Community Development Department L30 South Galena Aspen,CO 81611 RE: Fox Crossing Subdivision—Lots 4,5 and 6 Dear Ms.Guthrie: Please accept this letter as authorization of Fox Crossing Properties,LLC,the owner of record of the above-referenced lots,for Karen Woods, Charles Cunniffe, and Charles Cunniffe Architects to process applications submitted to the City of Aspen Community Development Department and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission in connection with development matters related to the referenced real property. in addition,Richard Y.Neilcy,Jr.and Neiley&Alder Attorneys are hereby authorized to represent Fox Crossing Properties, LLC in connection with such applications and, specifically but without limitation,with respect to the provision of such financial security as may be required by the City of Aspen related to the improvements on the referenced real property. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Very truly yours, FOX CROSSTNG PROPF.RTTF,S.1,1.0 Date: October 18,2013 To: The City of Aspen Re: Lot 6 Fox Crossing Subdivision From: Bailey House Movers 3149 B Road Grand Junction,CO 81503 970-216-8141 Amy Guthrie, I have inspected the two cabins located on Lot 5 and Lot 6 of the Fox Crossing Subdivision. The two buildings are sound enough to be moved onto Lot 6. Each building will be set onto four cross braces and two main beams and moved directly south next to each other. Both cabins can withstand the physical move. The cabins will be stored on the cribbing and beams until construction. I have also inspected the Victorian house on Lot 5 and can move the house out of the way of the construction and then back onto a new foundation. The moving method will be the microlam method. The interior walls will be supported by microlams with cross beams under the microlams and main beams under the cross beams. Sincerely, r Bill Bailey N N N CABINS & VICTORIAN RELOCATION & PROTECTION Cabin#1 (south cabin) Cabin#2 (north cabin) RELOCATION All utilities to both cabins will be disconnected prior to the moving. A clean and level area will be provided where the cabins will be moved. Cabin#1 will be moved to the south remaining on Lot 6. Cabin#2 will be moved off of Lot 5 to the south onto Lot 6. Both cabins will be positioned next to each other on Lot 6 until construction starts. The cabin porches on the west side will be braced to stay in place during the moving. STORED AND PROTECTED While being stored all bearing points will transfer down to solid cribbing, or be shored with structural lumber. While being stored both cabins will remain water tight. Cabins will be checked periodically until construction begins for water tightness and pests. Existing roofs of both cabins will remain in place. Victorian RELOCATION The construction trailer and materials will be removed from Lot 4. The Victorian will be moved to the north-east from Lot 5 onto Lot 4 while the foundation is being installed for Lot 5. 2 X 10 microlams will be attached to all studs, and OSB sheathing will be installed on the corners for shear bracing during moving. The house will be stored on cribbing and bracing until it moves back onto the new foundation. STORED AND PROTECTED The Victorian has been kept in a protected condition while construction at Fox Crossing has progressed. The inside bearing walls are shored down to solid blocking at the floor. This shoring will remain in place until the Victorian is rolled back onto the new foundation. The roof has a separate installed sheathing and roof protection above the existing roof that has been in place for the last four years. This year the roof protection (roll roofing)was replaced to ensure water tightness integrity. This roof protection will stay in place during the moving and storing of the house. The wood bracing holding the roof up will be altered to stay in place. Care will be taken to maintain and keep all architectural elements on the Victorian exterior and catalogue their locations in the event of their removal during this process. Eric Rewinkel Blue River Construction Management 3275 County Road 100, Suite 100 Carbondale, CO 81623 Historic Preservation license#5763 N W N °P �q 4$c�l amn(o�a I,oa7 ol ° O 95 Q O,n — m� R L 6 LOT 5 96 fi 5msq ft - _ e 5 Lora I I I I I I CABIN 3) I TO BE 1E RELOG-TEO TED I I I CABIN(LINE S"'1) CABIN(LINE 5lUCK 2) NEW LOCATION NEW LOCATION �B6 99� ° �66 100 m S00'40'DO'W 48.90' RACE ALLEY RACE ALLEY P^ (ONE WAY) (ONE WAY) DIAGRAM OF POSSIBLE TEMPORARY CABIN RELOCATION THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS TO PROVIDE ASKETCH plan North 7 THAT CAN BE USED TO DEMONSTRATE THE POSSIBLE _ RELOCATION FOR LINE SHACK 1 AND 2/CABINS OCTOBER 17,2013 1 I _OT 4 i II, I i r - - - I LOT � i I ————_——_.— ADDITION OUTLINE TO sARASe i SHOW SHE.L LOCATION I I I--__— s -NOT FINAL DESIGN- FOR FOOfPRINT ONLY I jLJ : b — rrr i r i.1.l1 '_ �— - - - 1 I M J L_—` .� J �^.NTLIP:F FFOtAYDATION •—__—. YVA!!SH�LOYi _—_. —_- __— r,r f OUTLINE OF ExiST'N6 t J O L AN eKO f ! OGATI ATiON J f 1 lofl J J FOX GR0551NB MEADoA t+ 11 j I JJJ r,r/ r I If I This site plan shows the existing location of the NORTH victorian house with the proposed shift in location. U LOT 5 HOUSE J SITE PLAN N LOT 4 7 _ K ►� T 111, A/ 549 ALLEY SITE PLAN _ IBM CHARLES CUNNIFFE �yq� y � _,re's ���f"�� ' �� t.a+�r�+ � ♦� ��/�� rLi�.� .. 7Bt�e' GiplPw � �y i. • sI 4. N 11-13-13 ARCHITECTS P27 WQL404 A4 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 201 E. Hyman Avenue- Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On-site Relocation, Variances, Public Hearing DATE: November 13, 2013 SUMMARY: 201 E. Hyman Avenue is an 8,000 square foot lot that contains a Victorian home and an outbuilding. The property owner requests HPC approval to demolish all non-historic construction on the site, to lift the house for basement excavation, to make an addition to the house, and to move the outbuilding on the site. This home is historically important for several reasons. The estimated construction date is 1883, which is very early in Aspen's history, especially for such a nicely detailed home. Few of the remaining Aspen "miner's cottages" are from the early 1880s. The historic house is very intact. The only alteration is on the back of the house, where a one story addition was built in 1997. This was also the long-time (1923-1986) home of the Herron family, who were central to the development of the ski resort as summarized in an attached newspaper article. The subsequent owners retained the home until it was sold this year. Staff finds that the proposed project is very sensitively designed to allow the historic house and outbuilding to be the highlights of the property. Because this is a larger site than many of the miner's cottages sit on, there is ample open space around the building. The proposed new construction is simple in form and detailing. Staff supports the Conceptual approval, Demolition, On-site Relocation and variances with only one area of the project to be restudied, as discussed later in the memo. APPLICANT: 201 EH Investments LLC, represented by Guerin Glass Architects and 1 Friday Design Collaborative. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-73-001. ADDRESS: 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3 rd of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen. ZONING: MU, Mixed Use. 1 P28 CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows. Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan unless agreed to by the applicant. Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and ` proportions of a proposal. The relevant design guidelines are attached as "Exhibit , ► `,. A." The applicant proposes to place the new _ F construction on the site along the east ? property line. The new construction attaches to the historic house along its , ^ i south fagade, where the original wall has already been destroyed by the existing addition. The attachment point is a one story connector placed more than 10' back from the front fagade of the house. The primary mass of the addition is 13' to the east of the 201 E. Hyman Victorian, providing substantial separation. The bulk of the addition is a very simple gable roofed two story form with a reasonable plate height relative to the Victorian and a compatible roof pitch. On Hyman Avenue, the gable addition is only about half the width of the Victorian. The historic outbuilding will remain completely detached from the house. Along Aspen Street, the sense of open space that currently exists on the site will be preserved. 2 29 Staffs only concern with the new construction is along the east fagade of the i I Victorian. The roof eave of the connector cuts into the historic gable end in a manner ""F" - that will destro y g some historic siding and LAZ WOW- . J encroaches on that original and very visible wall. A proposed lightwell in that area leaves an original door "hanging" in the air with no Fps KSr`a� � ground beneath it. Staff recommends these , ' „WF -- conflicts be resolved as a condition of ''`�'�'` f .�5: Conceptual approval. Arrows at the right ' ____ __________ point to the areas of concern. The applicant must also restudy the large lightwell in the middle of the project for Final review. Although the lightwell will not be visible from the street, it is large enough to cause the height of the addition to be measured from the bottom of the well, making the addition over the height limit. The size of the lightwell will have to be reduced, or the applicant must seek a height variance from City Council. DEMOLITION The applicant proposes to remove additions from the original Victorian house and to partially demolish the outbuilding. It is the intent of the historic preservation ordinance to preserve the historic and architectural resources that have demonstrated significance to the community. Consequently no demolition of properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures will be allowed unless approved by the HPC in accordance with the standards set forth in this Section. 309 )(7 J(72 OO Z ; x A)9 d / _..._ 1904 Sanborn Map View of outbuilding 3 P30 HPC held a worksession to discuss this project with the architect in June. A primary area of concern at that time was total demolition of the outbuilding, which is no longer proposed. The applicant proposes to demolish all of the non-original construction, which includes an addition on the east side of the outbuilding, and an addition on the south side of the Victorian house. The HPC shall review the application, the staff report and hear evidence presented by the property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine if the standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen or d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance and Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located and b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and C. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. Staff Response: Staff agrees that the areas to be removed are not original to the property. Staff finds that no documentation exists to demonstrate that the additions have historic significance, and that demolition of these elements will not result in a loss of integrity to this building or adjacent buildings. ON-SITE RELOCATION The intent of this Chapter is to preserve designated historic properties in their original locations as much of their significance is embodied in their setting and physical relationship to their surroundings as well as their association with events and people with ties to particular site. However, it is recognized that occasionally the relocation of a property may be appropriate as it provides an alternative to demolition or because it only has a limited impact on the attributes that make it significant. The following standards apply for relocating a historic property as per Section 26.415.090.0 of the Municipal Code: 4 P31 C. Standards for the Relocation of Designated Properties Relocation for a building, structure or object will be approved if it is determined that it meets any one of the following standards: 1. It is considered a non-contributing element of a historic district and its relocation will not affect the character of the historic district; or 2. It does not contribute to the overall character of the historic district or parcel on which it is located and its relocation will not have an adverse impact on the historic district or property; or 3. The owner has obtained a Certificate of Economic Hardship; or 4. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be an acceptable preservation method given the character and integrity of the building, structure or object and its move will not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district in which it was originally located or diminish the historic, architectural or aesthetic relationships of adjacent designated properties; and Additionally, for approval to relocate all of the following criteria must be met: 1. It has been determined that the building, structure or object is capable of withstanding the physical impacts of relocation; and 2. An appropriate receiving site has been identified; and 3. An acceptable plan has been submitted providing for the safe relocation, repair and preservation of the building, structure or object including the provision of the necessary financial security. Staff Response: The proposal is to lift the Victorian house for a basement and put it back in place. The proposal is to move the original part of the outbuilding to the west property line. Staff does not agree with the applicant's suggestion that the outbuilding has been moved around the site. It appears to have always been at the rear of Lot B, as it is today. Nonetheless, we can support the relocation as part of the proposal to retain the building. This is a relatively large outbuilding, few of which remain in town. Moving it to the west allows it to retain a direct visual connection with the Victorian house and great visibility to the public. It will remain a free standing building, buffered from the new construction. It will be given functional use. Staff supports the proposed relocation, with standard conditions for building protection. FAR BONUS In selected circumstances, the HPC may grant up to five hundred (500) additional square feet of allowable floor area for projects involving designated historic properties. To be considered for the bonus, it must be demonstrated that: a. The design of the project meets all applicable design guidelines; b. The historic building is the key element of the property and the addition is incorporated in a manner that maintains the visual integrity of the historic building; c. The work restores the existing portion of the building to its historic appearance; d. The new construction is reflective of the proportional patterns found in the historic building's form, materials or openings; e. The construction materials are of the highest quality; f. An appropriate transition defines the old and new portions of the building; 5 P32 g. The project retains a historic outbuilding; and/or h. Notable historic site and landscape features are retained. Staff Response: Staff finds that the project meets all the criteria for a floor area bonus. As described above, we find that the placement and character of the new construction allow the historic resources, both the house and outbuilding,to be highlighted. SETBACK VARIANCES In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: The applicant requests two setback variances that allow the Victorian to remain in the original location; a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' at the front porch, and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' at a bay window. The applicant requests a 4' west sideyard reduction for a new lightwell alongside the Victorian, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the relocated outbuilding. Staff supports the setback variances as we find that the site planning of the project is very successful in preserving the historic character of the property. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS The project does not comply with Residential Design Standards related to "Build-to line" or "Lightwells." The applicant requests variances. Build-to lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent(60%) of the front fayade shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites,this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length. Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent(60%) standard. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street-facing facade(s) of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. All Residential Design Standard Variances, Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.410.020(D)(2) must: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, 6 P33 or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or, b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: The project would meet the "build-to line" standard if more of the new construction was moved towards the front property line. This would be in conflict with the HPC design guidelines, which direct the new construction to be set back. The new lightwell proposed on the west side of the Victorian violates the Residential Design Standards because it projects in front of a street facing fagade. (It projects forward of the historic bay window.) The lightwell is larger than the minimum required by code and could likely be reduced if HPC found a negative visual impact. Staff supports the Residential Design Standards variances finding that they are appropriate to the site constraints of this remodel to a historically designated home. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant Conceptual Major Development, Demolition, On-site Relocation, and Variances, with the conditions outlined in the attached resolution. Exhibits: Resolution# , Series of 2013 A. Relevant Guidelines B. Aspen Times article C. Application 7 P34 Exhibit A 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. ❑ When treating a historic secondary building, respect its character-defining features. These include its primary and roof materials, roof form, windows, doors and architectural details. ❑ If a secondary structure is not historically significant, then its preservation is optional. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. ❑ Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case- by-case basis. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. ❑ A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. ❑ If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. ❑ If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 8.5 Avoid moving a historic secondary structure from its original location. ❑ A secondary structure may only be repositioned on its original site to preserve its historic integrity. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. ❑ In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. ❑ It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. ❑ Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. ❑ A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. ❑ Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. ❑ The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. ❑ In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. ❑ If a historic building straddles two lots,then it may be shifted to sit entirely on one of the lots. Both lots shall remain landmarked properties. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. ❑ It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. ❑ It may not, for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. • Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. • Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. ❑ In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). 8 -p a - • The size of a lightwell should be minimized. • A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 9 P36 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL), DEMOLITION, RELOCATION,AND VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 201 E.HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS A,B AND THE WEST 2/31iD OF LOT C,BLOCK 76, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO RESOLUTION#_, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-73-001 WHEREAS,the applicant, 201 EH Investments LLC, represented by Guerin Glass Architects and 1 Friday Design Collaborative, requested HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Relocation, and Variance approval for the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3`d of Lot C,Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for approval of Demolition, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.080.A.4, Demolition of Designated Historic Properties; and WHEREAS, for approval of Relocation, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.090.C, Relocation of a Designated Property; and WHEREAS, in order to receive approval for a floor area bonus, the application shall meet the requirements of Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.110.F; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve setback variances according to Section 26.415.110.C.La, Variances; and WHEREAS,the HPC may approve variances to the Residential Design Standards according to Section 26.410.020.D; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on November 13, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the 201 E. Hyman Avenue HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 1 of 2 P37 proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of to NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants HPC Major Development (Conceptual), Demolition, Relocation and Variance approval for the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue with the following conditions: 1. HPC hereby grants a 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. HPC hereby grants a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' at the front porch, and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' at a bay window, a 4' west sideyard reduction for a new lightwell alongside the Victorian, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the relocated outbuilding. 3. HPC hereby grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to line" and grants a waiver from the Residential Design Standards related to "lightwells" for the lightwell on the west side of the Victorian house. 4. At building permit submission, provide a $45,000 letter of credit, cashier's check, or other form acceptable to the City Attorney to insure the safe relocation of the house and outbuilding. A relocation plan detailing how and where the buildings will be stored and protected during construction must be submitted, and the applicant shall include documentation of the existing elevation of the buildings and the relationship of the foundation to grade. 5. For Final review, the applicant must restudy the east facade of the Victorian related to the connector and the lightwell below the historic door. The applicant must also restudy the size of the central lightwell, or pursue a height variance. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of November 13, 2013, the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty(30) days prior to the expiration date. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 13th day of November, 2013. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 201 E. Hyman Avenue HPC Resolution#_, Series of 2013 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: l Aspen, CO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING DA E: �-J Yagg& 20_�3 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, Ad� `°' (name, please print) being or represe ing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I hav complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. a' Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the _ day of , 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. 1il o�' Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in an way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ,Signature The fo goin "Affidavit of Notice" was ackn ledge .before me this 2`lf ay of , 201 by 1 0 — TARA L. NELSON WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC r STATE OF COLORADO PC I Z<j I I NOTARY ID 20014030017 My commission expires: t MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09/25/2017 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 The Aspen Times 10/29/2013 Copy Reduced to%d%%from original to fit letter page The Aspen Times I Tuesday October 29 2013 1 All WORLD & NATION SYRIA From page A16 seized.In Raqqa,militants set fires in two - churches and knocked the crosses off them Thousands who fled Maaloula have replacing them with the group's black t found refuge in the al-Qpssaa and other Islamic banner.Jihadis also torched an Christian districts of Damascus.Maaloula Armenian church in the northern town of '�Y was a major tourist attraction before the Tel Abyad on Sunday,according to the Bri t- F, P civil war,home to two of the oldest surviv- ain-based Syrian Observatory for Human ing monasteries in Syria.Some of the res- Rights,an anti-Assad group that tracks the idents still speak a version of Aramaic,the war through a network of activists on the language of biblical times believed to have ground. been used by Jesus. The apparent deliberate campaign Youssef Naame and his wife Norma,an against Christians and other minorities elderly Christian couple from Maaloula, have stoked worries in Washington and described how bearded extremist Islamists many European capitals'over providing ad- stormed the northeastern village early last vanced weaponry to the mainstream oppo- month chanting,"God is Great!" sition Free Syria Army,amid fears the arms "The jihadis shouted:Convert to Islam, will end up in the hands of extremists. or you will be crucified like Jesus,"Youssef Christians in Damascus are convinced said with a shaky voice in his daughter's that extremists are deliberately targeting al-Qassaa apartment. their neighborhoods as rebels battle gov- He said they were trapped with other ernment forces trying to uproot them from Christians for three days in a small house the towns they control outside the capital. next to the town church,without food or Al-Qassaa is close to besieged rebel-held electricity. suburbs where Muslim residents have "There were snipers shooting every- pleaded for international help to save them where;we were not able to move;'he from starvation and constant government recalled."We were so scared.I lost my Al speech:' bombardment. Women stand during a service in an Armenian Orthodox church in Damascus,Syria,on Syrian Church leaders fear that Assail's "Recently I noticed that every Sunday Sunday.Attacks on Christian districts of the capitals and on Christian villages elsewhere fall would lead to an Islamist state that they launch more than 15 mortars a day," have fueled fears among Syria's religious minorities about the growing role of Islamic would spell the end to the centuries-old Amir said."They are targeting specifically extremists among the armed rebels fighting against President Bashar Assad's rule. existence of Christians on Syrian soil. Christian areas" The most recent shells in al-Qassaa hit a]- "We are not taking any sides in the con- Thursday on the doorstep of a fashion into neighboring Lebanon.Nationwide, er1200,000 have Hours ed the northern city of alc Orthodox Church,deputy d at his h adq ar- clothing shop and next,to a wall of a local some 450,000 Christians have fled their Aleppo,both battleground cities.When tern in the historic Damascus Old Town. hospital,killing three young men and homes,part of an exodus of some 7 million insurgents occupied the strategic central "We are standing alongside the country damaging a church and several cars,which during the 2t/�a-year civil war,according to town of Qusair in 2012,about 7,000 Cath- because this country is ours;'he said."If were left riddled by shrapnel. Church officials. olics were forced out and their homes were the country is gone,we have nothing left. Hundreds of Christians have fled Almost all the 50,000 Christians in the looted, Nothing will remain of us." Will V w• r a. a � y � r 1 1 �• 1 PUBLIC NOTICE ---1 RE:549 RACE ALLEY,LOT 5,FOX CROSSING SUBDIVISION,CONCEPTUAL MAJOR i? DEVELOPMENT,RELOCATION,SETBACK VARIANCE,PARKING WAIVER AND FLOOR AREA BONUS;AND LOTS 4 AND 6,FOX CROSSING SUBDIVISION,RELOCATION I REVIEW ONLY " THEWESTIN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,November 13, $NOWMAS$ 2013,at a meeting to begin at 5.00 p.m before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, NOW H�tING Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St..Aspen to consider an application submitted by RESORT j John Murton,6316 Mercer Street,I Inuston,TX,77005,affecting the property located at 549 Race ALL EOCT�-IO*r� Alley,Lot 5,Fox Crossing Sebd.v n,City and Townsite of Aspen,Colorado.The applicant A L POSITIONS 77 propu.aell to lid the Victorian house,construct o basement,and set the house and build r addition. PAY AND BENEFITS INVIGORATING HNC will conduct design review and is asked m grant sideyard setback variances,waiver of one parking space and a floor area bonus.'The applicant also requests approval to move two existing Competitive pay and benefit packages OPPORTUNITIES log cabins fully onto an adjacent lot,Lot 6 of the Fox Crossing Subdivision,and to temporarily place the Victorian at 549 Race Alley on Lot 4,during construction of the proposed addition to available.SKI PASS benefit for all FT available for all experience that building.The owner of Lots 4 and 6 of Fox Crossing Subdivision,Fox Crossing properties Associates. levels in all departments of The LLC,3000-F Danville Blvd.,#500,Alamo,CA 94507-1572,is a participant in the application. Westin Snowmass and Wildwood For further information,contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development APPLY NOW Snowmass Resorts, Department,130 S Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2758 or arny.guthrie @city fa p t com www.westinjobs/snowmass s/Jay Historic Preservation Thew r s s pp nandwldw,ud Aspen Historic Preservation Commtsson QUESTIONS sn,wm. cq I opp,nuniry Published in the Aspen 7 imes on October 29,2013 Fmploy AVFN/D Jennyrose.booth @westin.com wemqure--mr,pre-employment drag THE On or ASPEN 970.923.8241 e n°gf,ra11 s All contents @ Copyright 2006 The Aspen Times and aspentimes.com October 29,2013 11:21 pm/Powered by TECNAVIA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 54q Wor-_AWZ\/ I,oT q, L-ol-5 ! Lyfi (o , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: NOV 13 , 20 13 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I' K6Rr� .] WOOD-S (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 23 day of OGZbpjii2— , 20 13, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) ' H 'w .. ,. . JIM W, ,. 0A t it ,'sue h rm PUBLIC of 6011, �d g a � �NOTICE Lot 4 during construction of the proposed 8�dttion, The owner• r;- i jo a° Subdivision, Fox Crossing Esc SWd­0500,Aiamo.CA I is a parlIcIpant in the aVP1 Cal, Por further infOirnlatforr contact Aspen ilk OF +� x e f b . " p .y z'T n . 44� r � y a M lM 3 µ a b 7, s s e a a '. 3 y - " , W x < y PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 549 RACE ALLEY, LOT 5, FOX CROSSING SUBDIVISION, CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT,RELOCATION, SETBACK VARIANCE, PARKING WAIVER AND FLOOR AREA BONUS; AND LOTS 4 AND 6, FOX CROSSING SUBDIVISION, RELOCATION REVIEW ONLY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 13, 2013, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by John Morton, 6346 Mercer Street, Houston, TX, 77005, affecting the property located at 549 Race Alley, Lot 5, Fox Crossing Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The applicant proposes to lift the Victorian house, construct a basement, restore the house and build an addition. HPC will conduct design review and is asked to grant sideyard setback variances, waiver of one parking space and a floor area bonus. The applicant also requests approval to move two existing log cabins fully onto an adjacent lot, Lot 6 of the Fox Crossing Subdivision, and to temporarily place the Victorian at 549 Race Alley on Lot 4, during construction of the proposed addition to that building. The owner of Lots 4 and 6 of Fox Crossing Subdivision, Fox Crossing Properties LLC, 3000-F Danville Blvd., #500, Alamo, CA 94507-1572, is a participant in the application. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2758 or amy.guthrie@cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on October 29, 2013 PUBLIC NOTICE Date : Wed . , November 13, 2013 Time : 5: 0o p. m . Place : Council Chambers, City Hall 130 S Galena, Aspen Purpose : HPC will conduct Conceptual review of an application submitted bv the owner of Lot 5, John Morton , 6346 Mercer Street, Houston , TX, 77005 - The Victorian is to be lifted & moved on site with a new basement & addition . HPC is asked to grant variances & floor area bonus. Two Igg cabins are to move entirely onto Lot 6, and the Victorian will be stored on PUBLIC NOTICE Lot 4, during construction of the proposed addition . The owner of Lots 4 and 6 of Fox Crossing Subdivision , Fox Crossing Properties LLC, 3000-F Danville Blvd . , #500, Alamo, CA 94507- 1572 , is a participant in the application . For further information contact Aspen Planning Dept. at 970-429-2758. 1025 HUNTER CREEK LLC 1127 VINE STREET CORP 565 RACE STREET LLC 21121 TELEGRAPH RD PO BOX 1730 67 BAL BAY DR SOUTHFIELD, MI 48033 VERO BEACH, FL 32961 SURFSIDE, FL 33154 ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ASPEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1 RE AUGELLO MICHAEL&GLADYS M 0235 HIGH SCHOOL RD 100 PUPPY SMITH ST 782 HOLLAND HILLS RD ATTN KATIE SCHWOERER ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTER-STEIN M LEAH BAEHR LYNNE BAKER JAMES A SR PO BOX 7963 1132 VINE ST 1052 VINE ST ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BELL MARTIN W 1/3 BERKMAN KATHY K&ANDREW E BERNARD SUSAN 5217 18TH AVE NE 3706 SUNSET BLVD PO BOX 8908 SEATTLE,WA 98105 HOUSTON,TX 77005 ASPEN, CO 81612 BETTIO JACK A BITTNER SHIRLEY MARIE BOLTON LANCE 2985 ROUTE 547 123 VINE ST PO BOX 2762 MANCHESTER, NJ 08759 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BOOKBINDER FISHDANCE&DELANEY BROOKES EDWARD ALAN REV LIV LLC TRUST BUNEVICH PETER&BRIGITTE 164 LITTLE PARK RD PO BOX 5764 5301 CRACKER BARREL GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81503 PLAYA DEL REY, CA 90296 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80917 BURROWS ARTHUR&COLLEEN BURTIN JORGE&ROSALBA FAMILY COLLINS TRUST BUSCH JON LOWELL 410 N MILL ST#B-11 2543 MONACO DR 548 RACE ST ASPEN, CO 81611 LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651 ASPEN, CO 81611 PATRICIA B REV TRUST 1244 A RBOR RD CARDAMONE JAMES M&MICHELE W CARDER FAMILY LLC 1244 A N L 0104 VAGNEUR BOX 536 BASALT 1100 S RACE ST , N R WINSTON SALEM, NC 27104 DENVER, CO 80210 CENTENNIAL ASPEN II LP CHAPMAN HARVEY G JR&RUTH J CITY OF ASPEN 2320 POMONA AVE 717 KUPULAU DR ATTN FINANCE DEPT MARTINEZ, CA 94553 KIHEI, HI 96753-9349 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CLEAVER CHRISTIN CLARK COATES M A TRUST 11/05 COATES MARY ANN TRUST 512 SPRUCE ST PO BOX 25277 12664 VAL VERDE DR ASPEN, CO 81611 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73125 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73142 DOWELL RONALD R CROWLEY ELAINE C DELISE DONALD LEE DOWELL MARSHA S 1124 VINE ST PO BOX 345 35 WEST BIGHORN COURT ASPEN, CO 81611-1550 WOODY CREEK, CO 81656 SEDONA,AZ 86351 ELLIS CHRISTOPHER&AUDREY ERSPAMER JOHN FABER JOHN A PO BOX 8386 534 SPRUCE ST#1 2809 LOFTVIEW SQ ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 303394931 FITZGERALD JACKSON FAMILY TRUST FOX CROSSING AH LLC FOX CROSSING LOT 11 LLC 30% PO BOX 4068 601 E HOPKINS AVE#202 35 WINDSHIP AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 FOX CROSSING PROPERTIES LLC FOXY LLC FREI MURIEL J REV TRUST 3000-F DANVILLE BLVD#500 15280 ADDISON RD#301 PO BOX 2171 ALAMO, CA 945071572 ADDISON,TX 75001 ASPEN, CO 81612 GAGLIANO MICHAEL A GD ASPEN PARTNERSHIP GENDELS STACEY A 2240 E ATHENS AVE 6250 N RIVER RD#11-100 NEW ROCHE#20 NY 108017270 ORANGE, CA 92867 ROSEMONT, IL 60018 GEREB BARRY GREENWALD ALAN GREENWOOD GRETCHEN 931 VINE ST 500 E 77TH ST APT 1708 210 S GALENA ST#30 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10162-0017 ASPEN, CO 816111957 HAJENGA STAN HARRIS DAVID G REV TRUST 50% HAUENSTEIN WARD&ELIZABETH 192 RIVER RIDGE DR 533 SPRUCE ST 535 SPRUCE ST GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HUNTER CREEK 1045 PARTNERSHIP HUNTER CREEK LLC HEGARTY THOMAS A MINNESOTA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 350 NORTH LASALLE ST#800 PO BOX 1475 4428 YORK AVE SOUTH CHICAGO, IL 60654 ASPEN, CO 81612 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410 HUNTER CREEK REALTY LLC HYDE ARTHUR C JR ILICH MARK 30 WILLETT POND DR PO BOXT 1132 VINE ST WESTWOOD, MA 02090 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 JABLIN ROBERT C&VARDA KAHNWELER DAVID REV TRUST ANTE MARC LUCIE BLVD 7894 DUNVAGEN CT 6250 N RIVER RD#1100 BOCA RATON, FL 33496 DES PLAINES, IL 60018 STUART, FL 34996 KAUFMAN STEPHEN M TRUST KERR MICHAEL KRIS LIVING TRUST KLEPPINGER KENT 5120 WOODWAY#6002 1006 LAUREN LN 1047 VINE ST HOUSTON, TX 77056 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81611 KLUG WARREN E&KATHLEEN M LAI RICHARD TSENG-YU AND LARSON WENDY L 100 N 8TH ST#3 4574 FAIRWAY DR 71 WAPITI WY ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ALAMOS, NM 87544 BASALT, CO 81621 LEONARD LINDA SCHIERSE LEVIN RONALD LEWIN JOHN R JR 2665 JUILLIARD ST 230 N DEERE PK DR 906 VINE ST BOULDER, CO 80305 HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOEWENBERG 2007 TRUST LOWENSTEIN ADAM& 225 N COLUMBUS DR#100 MUSSON ELIZABETH FAM TRST LUU CAM THU CHICAGO, IL 60601 835 FLORA VISTA DR PO BOX 5399 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93109 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 LUU TONY MACK EDWARD E TRUST MALTER MARCI A REV TRUST PO BOX 795 321 N CLARK ST#1000 1754 W SURF ST ASPEN, CO 81612 CHICAGO, IL 60654 CHICAGO, IL 60657 MANIE MICHAEL B MANNING SARAH E MCDONAGH THOMAS G PO BOX 11373 PO BOX 10665 542 MAIN ST#200 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW ROCHELLE, NY 108017270 MCF 2008 TRUST MCGUIRE MARY MENDELSON MEL 1 3535 MILITARY TRAIL#101 37 HOOK ST 1 LMU DRIVE STE 8145 JUPITER, FL 33458 SOUTHBRIDGE, MA 01550 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LOS ANGELES, CA 90045 MINERS MOUNTAIN HOUSE LLC MLT PROPERTIES LLC MOORE THOMAS P&TERRY L 2/3 5107 HIGHPOINT DR 309 AABC#G 802 KESTRIL CT TOLEDO, OH 43615 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621 MORDECAI BRIAN MULTIN STEVEN J REVOCABLE TRUST MUSSO PAMELA LYONS 1126 VINE ST NO 1 COLORADO MUSSO RICHARD L ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 10509 319 LOCUST ST ASPEN, CO 81612 DENVER, CO 80220 NCM ACQUISITIONS LLC NEWELL GEORGE S NUGENT KATHRYN M LIVING TRUST 3736 BEE CAVES RD#1 - 180 PO BOX 2179 501 VIA CASITAS APT 106 AUSTIN,TX 78746 BOULDER, CO 80306 GREENBRAE, CA 94904 OHAGAN KEVIN M&KATHRYN G PARKER STEPHEN 0&WYCOFF ANN PO ULS NE STLLIAM T 6225 WAKEFALLS DR ASPEN, E 816113271 WAKE FOREST, NC 27587-6261 ASPEN,CO 81611 PETTUS KRISTINA&WYATT PORTER SUZANNE T&BARRY G POUTOUS SPRUCE RCIIA 1600 RANDY DR 480 E JETER RD GRAHAM,TX 76450 ARGYLE,TX 76226 ASPEN, CO 81611 PRIMIANI MARC S PRYMAK WILLIAM RAM PROPERTIES LLC 11100 SANTA MONICA BLVD#600 1530 W 10TH AVE PO BOX 7107 LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 BROOMFIELD, CO 80020 WILMINGTON, DE 19803 RAUCHENBERGER CARL TRUST REPPLINGER WILLIAM M RESTAINO-BECKER TRUST 7/27/2007 11644 WEMBLEY DR 1125 VINE ST 72 ALDER AVE HUNTLEY, IL 601426310 ASPEN, CO 81611 SAN ANSELMO, CA 94960 RIDLING JERRY B&MURIEL M ROSENFIELD ANITA ROSIN RICHARD&DRITA 1110 STONYBROOK DR 250 RAINTRAIL RD PO BOX 2416 NAPA, CA 94558 SEDONA,AZ 86351 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48012 ROTHCHILD JOHN H TRUST 50% SANDERS RICHARD ALLEN SANDS FAMILY TRUST ROTHCHILD SUSAN BERNS TRST 50% 2041 BROOK HIGHLAND RIDGE 3426 SERRA RD 5 ISLAND AVE#11J BIRMINGHAM,AL 35242 MALIBU, CA 90265 MIAMI BEACH, FL 331391327 SARNO JOHN J JR 2001 REV TRUST SHERMAN FAMILY TRUST 70% SHERMAN YONEKO SUZUKI 6 EUSTIS ST 38 MILLER AV PMB#109 1001 VINE ST STONEHAM, MA 02180 MILL VALLEY, CA 94941 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHOSTAC DAVID SKADRON STEVEN J SMITH NANCY ROSS SHOSTAC ALEXES 1022 VINE ST 315 J WILLRICH CIR 2509 AIKEN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611-3272 FOREST HILL, MD 21050 LOS ANGELES, CA 90052 SPEER CHRISTINE REV TRUST STANLEY NANCY C STITT KENDRA LEIGH IRREV TRUST PO BOX 2734 8918 BURTON WY#4 1450 SILVER KING DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211 ASPEN, CO 81611 TASSE JEFF THIEMER FRED TOWNSEND R JAMES 37 HOOK ST 1051 VINE ST 1112 VINE ST SOUTHBRIDGE, MA 01550 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRAN HONG HUONG VAUGHAN PATRICK WALKER ROBERT J 814 W BLEEKER ST#C1 908 VINE ST 3917 CANTERBURY RD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BALTIMORE, MD 212181704 WALLE GABRIELE WARLOP ELIZABETH F WEIL JONAS PO BOX 1588 21 3RD ST 12826 WETHERSFIELD RD ASPEN, CO 81612 BROOKLYN, NY 11231-4805 SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85259 WENZEL KAREN M WICHMANN VICTORIA WIENER WILLIAM B JR 1125 VINE ST PO BOX 4388 333 TEXAS ST#2290 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 ZUPANCIS ROBERT L PO BOX 9609 ASPEN, CO 81612 ACCOUNTNO OWNERNAME ADDRESS1 CITY STATE ZIPCODE R009363 B&Z 2010 REV TRUST 50% 728 E FRANCIS ASPEN CO 81611 R014624 DRISKELL DOUGLAS 200 COTTONWOOD LN ASPEN CO 81611 R014722 HAUER MINEKO 202 COTTONWOOD LN ASPEN CO 81611 R021356 JUST HAVE FUN LLC 450 NEWPORT CENTER DR ST E 570 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 R021357 PALMER ROBERT B 4305 ARCADY AVE DALLAS TX 75205 R009363 Z&B 2010 REV TRUST 50% 728 E FRANCIS ASPEN CO 81611 EXHIB� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060(E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ' i K?W%AQ '— ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: wME" -e I W VFV-U3ET< t 3-*,20 t-3 STATE OF COLORADO } County of Pitkin ss. lease print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereb certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice. By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing on the215rday of Cae-rcr?. , 20 1`3, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Development Department, which contains the information describe Community 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A COPY of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of`any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) s. keep it real I�> Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours fi)r fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this �"day of c•ro(3 LA„ 20_a, by i7 E e2t t< MA'1'1'fV4 S�E"!o n sit Robiuji WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Nor Ptdft stasedCotomdo My commission expires: _� r , �6 K! NCO" 20124 T My cammhwon EX04M ocftw m PMa No Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. X524-65.5-103.3 !% keen it real yu E e ;i > Yj X� �� Notification as of October 21 st, 2013 wed",Now 43, t33 •Galt° Mrr�er ca �' Smol� man ISO c fi, 7 y 4#7 r u &1 G�/ R �� s / L � 3 C ♦i keep it real E n. { v .x 3 Jim of the Aspen Post Office Accepting Mailing Notifications on October 21 st, 2013 W keep it real PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 201 E. HYMAN AVENUE- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, DEMOLITION, ON-SITE RELOCATION AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 13, 2013, at a regular meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 201 EH Investments LLC, P.O. Box 7928, Aspen, CO 81612, owner of the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3`d of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-124-73-001. The applicant requests HPC approval to demolish non-historic portions of the existing house and outbuilding, to relocate the outbuilding on the site, to temporarily lift the historic house for a new basement, and to construct a new addition. The applicant requests a 500 square foot floor area bonus. The following setback variances are requested: a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' for the historic house; a 4' west sideyard reduction for a lightwell, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the outbuilding. A waiver of the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to line" and lightwells are proposed. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on October 24, 2013 City of Aspen Account 1000 EAST HOPKINS LLC 306 S GARMISCH TOWNHOMES CONDO AJAX KABIN LLC 215 S MONARCH SUITE 104 C/O WRW&CO 25 BROAD ST APT TSF ASPEN, CO 81611 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 ENCINO, CA 91436 NEW YORK, NY 10004 ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTH ATTERBURY ANDREW L& PRENTICE PO BOX 1248 0.01% GWYN A ASPEN, CO 81612 530 E MAIN ST#001 2001 SHAWNEE MISSION PKY ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66205 BARNES JACK& BONITA BARRETT STEVEN R BERNSTEIN JEREMY M PROFIT 125 E HYMAN AVE 2A C/O JP WEIGAND&SONS INC SHARING PLAN ASPEN, CO 81611 150 N MARKET 610 NORTH ST WICHITA, KS 67202 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLOEMINK BARBARA BOGIN ROBERT M BOND ANN 210 E HYMAN AVE#5 4280 S MEADOW BROOK LN 210 E HYMAN#6 ASPEN, CO 81611 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRAYMAN WALTER W& PATRICIA BRINING ROBERT BROADSCOPE PTY LTD 844 ROCKWELL LN 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 CATLOW TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2363 ASPEN, CO 81611 223 RIVERTON DR SHELLEY AUSTRALIA 6148, BROWN SHANE & KRISTINE BUSH ALAN DAVID CALLAHAN PATRICIA 3334 LA CIENEGA PL 0046 HEATHER LN 0184 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR LOS ANGELES, CA 900163117 ASPEN, CO 81611-3342 ASPEN, CO 81611 CARRIGAN RICHARD A JR CASA KESS LLC CAYTON ANDREA TRUST 25526 WILLIAMS RD PO BOX 3121 2379 EARLS CT WARRENVILLE, IL 60555 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 CHALET LISL PARTNERSHIP LTD CHRISPAT ASPEN LLC CITY OF ASPEN 100 E HYMAN_AVE 1107 5TH AVE#35 ATTN FINANCE DEPT ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10128 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CLARK FAMILY TRUST CLARKS ASPEN LLC CLAUSEN FAMILY TRUST NO 1 PO BOX 362 818 SOUTH MAIN ST C/O GUNDY MGMT CO ASPEN, CO 81612 BLANDING, UT 84511 PO BOX 47 MORRIS, IL 60450 COHEN JACK DAVID COHN PETER L COOPER TWO LLC 5 WOODLAND CT PO BOX 2138 950 HILL RD SAYVILLE, NY 11782 ASPEN, CO 81612 WINNETKA, IL 60093 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP CRYSTAL PALACE ACQUSITIONS LLC DALTON CHARLES 0 IRREV TRUST 50% PO BOX 1524 2100 E MAPLE RD, STE 200 1031 S CALDWELL ST#200 BRYN MAWR, PA 19010 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 DAVIDSON DONALD W DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED DB ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 864 CEMETERY LN 215 S MONARCH#104 3400 N CAUSEWAY BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 METAIRIE, LA 70002 DE SOTO LINDA JANE LIV TRUST DOLLE NORMA L REV TRUST DUNN DAVID& POLLY 1209 MANHATTAN AVE#130 1103 HERITAGE DR 611 S UPPER BROADWAY MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 DUNTON KAY L TRUST DUPLEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50% ELLIOTT ELYSE A TRUST 210 E HYMAN AVE#7 10601 N PENNSYLVANIA AVE 610 NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 816112012 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73120 ASPEN, CO 81611 FEDER HAROLD L&ZETTA F FREDRICK LARRY D FTG ASPEN LLC 985 CASCADE AVE ROBERTS JANET A 6735 TELEGRAPH RD#110 ASPEN, CO 81611 1 BOULDER, CO 80302-7550 215 S MONARCH #G101 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301-3141 FUQUA ALVAH D JR&DIANNE L FYRWALD JON ERIK&GUDRUN L GEORGIEFF KATHERINE TRUSTEE 446 LAKE SHORE DR 126 EAST HICKORY ST 11 TOPPING LN SUNSET BEACH, NC 28468 HINSDALE, IL 60521 ST LOUIS, MO 63131 GIEFER PATRICK GLISMANN JOHN P GOODING RICHARD L 204 SARATOGA VEIN CT PO BOX 4999 4800 S HOLLY ST CASTLE PINE, CO 80108 ASPEN, CO 81612 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 GOOLSBY BRYAN L&MICHELLE L GORDON BRIAN S GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC 6722 WAGGONER 26985 CRESTWOOD C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC DALLAS, TX 75230 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 215 S MONARCH ST#101 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSS MONARCH LLC GUBSER NICHOLAS J GUNION JOHN F PO BOX 3377 PO BOX 870 1004 MARINA CIR BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 DAVIS, CA 95616 GUTNER KENNETH H REV TRUST HART GEORGE DAVID&SARAH C HERRON SANDRA A PO BOX 11001 PO BOX 5491 119 E COOPER AVE APT 19 ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611-1761 HE LAURENCE M& COX HEATHER EATHER J HONE THOMAS A&CAROL A HOSKIN REEDE 555 E DURANT#4A 130 E WAYNE ST CELINA PO BOX 2478 , OH 45822 ASPEN, CO 81611 BASALT, CO 81621-2478 IFTNFS LLC JACARANDA ASPEN LLC JACKSON BISQUE 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR PO BOX 11980 PO BOX 9064 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 JACOBSON FAMILY TRUST JCS GARMISCH LLC JMS LLC 2168 SANTA MARGARITA DR PO BOX 11636 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR FALLBROOK, CA 92028 ALEXANDRIA, LA 71315 ASPEN, CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C& SANDRA K JONES MICHAEL C KAISER HARRIS FAMILY TRUST 51 OVERLOOK DR PO BOX 7966 12942 CHALON RD ASPEN, CO 81611-1008 ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 KAMINER NINA KAUFMAN STEVEN TRUST& HARLOW KEBER VINCENT M III 25 BROAD ST/TSF VIRGINIA TRUST 1301 WAZ NEW YORK, NY 10004 0554 ESCALANTE DENVER, EE EE#2E CARBONDALE, CO 81623 KEITH JOHN III KELLY GARY KIRIANOFF PATRICIA TRUST PO BOX 4783 PO BOX 12356 PO BOX 1749 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 KNAPP MICHAEL LARKIN FRED C SPOUSAL TRUST LARRABEE DONALD C JR 1001 MEDICAL PK STE 213 ONE COVE LN 1417 POTTER DR STE 105 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BOW MAR, CO 80123 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909 LEATHERMAN ROBERT D LEDINGHAM DAVID CHARLES 16% LIMELITE REDEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 11930 124 E COOPER ST CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 C/O GENERAL MANAGEMENT 1201 GALAPAGO ST#101 DENVER, CO 80204 LOFINO MICHAEL D LORING PETER&ELIZABETH S BIN SHAFIGHEH 3255 SEAJAY DR LORING WOLCOTT&COOLIDGE OFFICE LU LU BOX 3748 DAYTON, OH 45430 230 CONGRESS ST ASPEN, CO 81612 BOSTON, MA 02110 MACDONALD VALERIE MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D MESSNER CHRISTIAN PO BOX 1681 0752 MEADOWOOD DR 119 E COOPER AVE#21 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MOP LLC MORRONGIELLO LYDIA A NELSON ARLENE 5348 VEGAS DR 1178 HICKORY WY 119 E COOPER ST#6 LAS VEGAS, NV 89108 ERIE, CO 805167994 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWMAN KERRY J & RICKI R NORRIS JOAN NORTH&SOUTH ASPEN LLC 617 PRINCE DR PO BOX 12358 200 S ASPEN ST NEWBURGH, IN 47630 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 OBRIEN MAUREEN OFM HOLDINGS LP ORR ROBERT L 1370 MAIN ST PO BOX 541208 2700 G ROAD#12A CARBONDALE, CO 81623 DALLAS, TX 75354 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC PARKER RICHARD C & KAREN S PAY ERIC GEOFFREY 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 3029 BAKER MEADOW SE 119 E COOPER AVE APT 12 ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30339 ASPEN, CO 81611-1772 PAY-ASE PROPERTIES LLC PENTHOUSE ONE&TWO LLC PEONY LLC 2200 ROSS AVE#3838 PO BOX 11980 121 BARRANCA AVE DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93109 PERREAULT GEORGE C TRUST PITNER N KATHRYN POPKIN PHILIP G 7336 CAPTAIN KIDD AVE PO BOX 11930 PO BOX 7956 SARASOTA, FL 34231-5442 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PRASAD REV TRUST PRODINGER IRMA PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS 3776 W 3700 N PO BOX 1245 ASSOC DARLINGTON, ID 83255 ASPEN, CO 81612 301 E HYMAN AVE#108 ASPEN, CO 81611 PURVIS ROBERT K TRUST RACZAK JOSEPH S&JANET L RASMUSSEN DAVID L&RITA M PO BOX 3089 0234 LIGHT HILL RD PO BOX 120262 ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 ARLINGTON, TX 76012 RIVOLI INVESTMENTS LLC RLC ASPEN LLC ROMER MARCY& FRANK L 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FLR 12500 PARK POTOMAC AVE#207N 10204 E SHERI LN ASPEN, CO 81611 POTOMAC, MD 20854 ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ROSENFELD EUGENE S&MAXINE M TRST ROSS] ELAYNE R TRUST RUMSEY DANIEL W 10601 WILSHIRE BLVD#20 EAST PO BOX 7961 1325 PACIFIC HIGHWAY#1902 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 SB PAD HOLDINGS III LLC SCULL JAMES E SHAW ROBERT W 6262 S ROUTE 83#200 PO BOX 2051 5720 LOCKE AV WILLOWBROOK, IL 60527 ASPEN, CO 81612 FORT WORTH, TX 76107 SHENNAN MELISSA A SIMPSON JANET MARIE SIX STONES LLC 822 LANE LORRAINE 233 E COOPER AVE#205 PO BOX 626 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045-1643 ASPEN, CO 81611 PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 SMITH FRANK FORD JR&KATHARINE STETSON WILLIS J JR&SALLY W STITT ELIZABETH WILES IRREV TRUST LINDSAY 23 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR 1450 SILVERKING DR 2506 STRATFORD DR NEWTOWN SQUARE, PA 19073 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 78746 SULLIVAN JOHN B TRUST SUNNY SNOW LTD TOMLINSON JAMES 1300 E REUSCH RD PACE KENT STACEY ELIZABETH, IL 61028 308 TORCIDO DR 100 E COOPER AVE#2 SAN ANTONIO, TX 782095645 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRENTLY TRUST TRUE JAMES R VANOVER STEFANIE KAI C/O WRW CO PO BOX 2864 333 NE MIZNER BLVD TN-4 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 ASPEN, CO 81612 BOCA RATON, FL 33432 ENCINO, CA 91436 VORTEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50% WALSH WILLIAM LLOYD WEINGLASS LEONARD 3336 EAST 32ND ST#217 120 WEST THIRD ST SUITE#400 PO BOX 11509 TULSA, OK 74135 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 ASPEN, CO 81612 WHITE JALEH WHITMAN WENDALIN WHITMAN WENDALIN 152 E DURANT AVE 210 E HYMAN AVE#101 PO BOX 472 ASPEN, CO 81611-1737 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 WICHMANN VICTORIA WILTGEN JOHN &KATIE HONE WINFIELD ARMS CONDO ASSOC 119 E COOPER ST#4 130 E WAYNE ST 600 E HOPKINS AVE#203 ASPEN, CO 81611 CELINA, OH 45822 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOLOFSKY MOIRA WOLPERT BILL H &WOLPERT JUDE YOUNG BARBARA A PO BOX 1026 2280 KOHLER DR 210 E HYMAN AVE#9 PALM BEACH, FL 33480 BOULDER, CO 80305 ASPEN, CO 81611 i EXHIBIT Page 1 of 1 Derek Skalko � J I vVl _:!�cv�� From: Derek Skalko [derek cLD1 friday.com] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:42 PM To: 'jim scull' oJ�c i Cc: 'Derek Skalko' cnA—) Subject: RE: 201 East Hyman Avenue- Information Per Request Good Monday Afternoon Jim, First off, thank you very much for your contact e-mail, and please find attached a full issuance of the proposed project regarding 201 East Hyman that we encourage you to forward to all Board members should you wish. And, yes Jim, I am happy to set up a meeting regarding the architectural specifics of the project if anyone has concerns or comments. We want to be as open as possible with our neighbors and hopefully, everyone will feel we are being sensitive to the overall nature of the site and surrounding location. I know you are aware of this, but if it could also be stressed to your Board we will be maintaining the lot as a single family residence vs. the mixed use option the site legally is permitted to pursue. This essentially reduces the project's allowable above grade floor area by almost 9,000 sq ft and limits the site's parking to two cars vs. a potential of seven. We really do feel we are doing choosing the best strategy for everyone's benefit! Jim, thank you once again for reaching out, and please feel free to phone or e-mail me should you have questions or would be interested in setting up a meeting. I am happy to do so! Also, we have no idea of the timeline for City Council or HPC's final hearing dates, but when those become known, I will additionally e-mail you to keep you as informed as possible. Thank you, Derek Skalko 970.309.0695 -----Original Message----- From:jim scull [mailto:zgjscull @gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2013 2:17 PM To: derek @lfriday.com Subject: Derek: It was fortuitous "running into you" on Friday. I welcome your sharing plans for the Hartman house with 210 Cooper residents. I will forward all material you email me to the Board and they in turn can follow up. I will make them aware that you are willing to meet regarding architectural details. Thanks Jim 11/5/2013 -Derek Skalko From: Derek Skalko[derek@1friday.com] city oi= Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 11:09 AM To: Amy Guthrie itild Cc: Debbie Quinn; Chris Bendon; Skalko Derek Subject: Re: 201 E. Hyman Avenue Response � ( KJ 0-Tl(--=A CATIaoj Good Morning Amy, Debbie & Chris: We have internally discussed this matter and would like to proceed with the November 13th re-presentation of 201 East Hyman. We are very sincerely apologetic that this concern has arisen, and we thank the city for being willing to remedy this in as timely and efficient a manner as possible. In saying this, we do have an expressed concern within our team that there is really no legally binding evidence supporting the neighbor -representing attorney's claim other than a "he said, she said" methodology. We find it equally remarkable that between the printing of the notification via the city, the public signage notification placed on 201 for the 15 days prior, the physical and notarized issuance of the mailers via us first class service, and additional neighborhood outreach efforts on our behalf not one neighbor claims knowledge of the conceptual hearing event. I should have you know the signage was physically ripped down and replaced twice during the 15 day tenure which does constitute a criminal trespass action towards the 201 property as well. Perhaps some neighbors simply like the idea of nothing happening to 201 East Hyman more than they are stating. What's done is done, and we simply want to move forward as smoothly as possible. We look forward to being heard again on November 13th by the HPC and then by Council on the 25th following. I will get moving on all of the re-noticing information as soon as available via the City of Aspen. Respectfully, Derek Skalko Sent from my iPhone On Oct 8, 2013, at 1:00 PM, Amy Guthrie <amy.guthrie @cityofaspen.com> wrote: • Hi Derek- yesterday, the Community Development Department and the City • Attorney's office received a complaint of defective notice from neighbors of the 201 E. Hyman project. The complaint is attached. > The City Attorney's office has determined that we are obligated to > repeat the Conceptual review hearing to clear up any concerns about due process, as something appears to have gone wrong with the mailing. Even parties other than those who live in the adjacent 210 E. Cooper property have indicated that they did not receive a letter. • The only way to keep the project moving in the timeframe that was • planned is this: • Wednesday, November 13th, Conceptual review with new notice. This is • already a full agenda. Ideally, approximately 30 minutes would be • adequate to hold the hearing and allow the public and HPC to make any > comments. • Monday, November 25th, Council- Call-up of HPC review (This is • standard, required procedure. Council may remand the decision back to • HPC if they do not agree with it. ) > Monday, November 25th, Council review of height variance request. (I I > dill be sending you a pre-app summary for this. I will give you a >' deadline to apply to secure this Council date. ) • Tuesday, November 26th, Community Development can accept your • application for Final HPC review. We are not allowed to accept your Final review application until after Council call -up is complete. I shouldn't have allowed your current Final application to come in already since I hadn't taken care of Council Call-up yet. I will be returning it to you. If you wish to hold the Final review hearing on Dec. 11th, as previously discussed, you will have to do posting and mailing on this day since Nov. 26th is exactly 15 days before Dec. 11th. Public notice for HPC Final review must also be published in the newspaper on this day. Community Development typically does this, but we cannot because our deadline to place a legal ad would be Nov. 18th, which is sooner than we can take your application in. If you are able to arrange for newspaper notice that complies with Section 26.304.060.E.3.a of the Municipal Code to run in the Aspen Times on November 26th, that will be fine. Otherwise we will schedule Final review for January 8th. > Wednesday, December 11th, HPC Final review if noticing is accomplished > as required, otherwise January 8th. • All of this is subject to change depending on the outcome of the • review steps and the timing of your application submittals. • One other thing, when completing affidavits of notice, please make • sure that you are only representing that you have completed posting • and mailing. Those are the only forms of notice you are asked to db • unless we tell you otherwise. No public outreach was required for • this project. If you want to voluntarily do open houses, etc., that • is terrific, but you should not check that box on the affidavit. The • open houses you do may not meet the requirements of the public • outreach that is sometimes required of large projects of • community-wide importance. You also checked the publication of notice • box. The City does that notice, not the applicant. Just want to make • sure that the affidavit is accurately completed in the future. • Please let me know any questions. As I said, I'll send you the height • variance pre-app shortly. > Amy Guthrie > City of Aspen Historic Preservation > 130 S. Galena Street > Aspen, CO 81611 > 970-429-2758 > www.aspenpitkin.com > Notice and Disclaimer: > This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it > is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and > exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the > intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received > the message in error and then delete it. Further, the information or > opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are > not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable, the information and > opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning, which is > subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that > may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained • herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of • detrimental reliance. 2 Page 1 of 1 Derek Skalko From: Derek Skalko [derek @1friday.com] _ Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 5:06 PML- To: taddune@compuserve.com Cc: 'Derek Skalko'; 'Amy Guthrie'; chris.bendon @cityofaspen.com; 'Debbie Quinn' Subject: 201 East Hyman Response- Update 10-14-2013 VPVwk� Attn: Mr. Paul J Taddune, P.C. Re:201 East Hyman Residence —�— ��p � �- CC: Mr. Chris Bendon, Ms.Amy Simon (Guthrie), Ms. Debbie Quinn Good Afternoon Paul, This is Derek Skalko writing on behalf of 201 East Hyman, and I simply wanted to reach out and express my own apologies for the frustrations of your representative clients from 210 East Cooper.All legally required steps were taken, and I'm equally baffled, as I've never experienced an issue of this sort in my fourteen years and sixty-plus projects I've been involved with regarding the HPC. I learned of this matter late last week while traveling in Minnesota and received your formal letter as of this afternoon via PO Box 7928. 1 want to let you know we are proactively working with the City of Aspen to remedy this situation so there is no confusion moving forward. Per conversation with the Aspen HPC multiple times last week, it is our current understanding we will be rescheduled for a conceptual hearing on Wednesday, November 131h of 2013. 1 felt it important to inform you of this likely hearing date in order for you to communicate this information back to your representative client roster. Additionally Paul, please find attached a PDF of the Proposed Conceptual project for your reference and for the benefit of your clients following: The Jacobsen Family Trust Donald Larabee Robert Leatherman Peter Loring Kerry&Riki Newman Kathryn Pittner James Scull Melissa Sheenan I am guessing you have electronic access to the above named entities or individuals, and if you feel it helpful to forward along the attached PDF regarding 201,we welcome you to provide this for your clients. I should note for the record, Mr. James Scull already has been issued this information directly from me the week following September 25th via a direct email correspondence/request. James and I have also spoken at Aspen City Hall on the matter on September 26th. As I have expressed to James, should you or any of your clients have concerns or questions, I am more than happy to meet with you or anyone else to walk them through the p roj e ct. We are maintaining 201 as a single family residence, and are very excited about developing the property in this direction rather than a much larger Mixed Use alternative route,which we are legally allowed to do on the property as designated per the lot's zoning and Aspen's Land Use Code. Paul, I thank you for your time, and welcome any comments or concerns that you may have. Please feel free to reach me either via phone (970) 309-0695 or email: Derek0_1 friday com. Thank you, Derek Skalko 11/5/2013 Page 1 of 1 Derek Skalko 10---Za-- 13 From: Derek Skalko[derek@1 friday.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 3:46 AM Y /� [ To: 'chris.bendon @cityofaspen.com' Subject: FW.201 East Hyman Notifications Mailed/Signage Posted 10-21-2013 iE-H NO�J Attn: Mr. Paul J Taddune, P.C. j T HQC Re:201 East Hyman Residence CC: Mr. Chris Bendon, Ms.Amy Simon (Formerly Guthrie), Ms. Debbie Quinn Hello Again Paul, Please be informed all mailing notifications regarding the 201 East Hyman Aspen HPC Conceptual Hearing (scheduled for Wednesday, November 13tH 5pm) have been sent as of 10-21-2013 via US first class mail to each individual (except for Australia- international first class issue) on the attached PDF listing. Additionally, you've been noticed Paul, and you should expect you to receive notice by Wednesday of this week at the latest. The required signage for the November 13th meeting has also been posted accordingly on the 201 East Hyman Avenue property. Please inform your listed clients notification has been issued. The Jacobsen Family Trust Donald Larabee Robert Leatherman Peter Loring Kerry&Riki Newman Kathryn Pittner James Scull Melissa Sheenan A copy of the notarized affidavit is attached for your records in addition to images taken from 201 East Hyman and the Aspen Post Office on 10-21-2013. Jim says hello to each of you. Thank you all, and we'll see you on November 13tH Derek Skalko 11/5/2013 Page lmf2 ' �T{t� Derek Skalko From: Derek 8ka|ko[darek@1friday.com] } / `O'—^ Sent: Tuesday, November O5. 2O135:58PK8 To: 'Office' Cc: 'Lydia K8orrmngie||o'; Y\m/yGinmon'; 'Derek Sko|ko' Subject: RE: Hartmann Property(2O1 East Hymmn) Construction Response 11-5-2013 wVlnd*rmnN / ymm (4~nv �/nonn C/�Yo/�s�enPbnnin'o /H��� Cnp|��) Pei,vow r at 251 Eas� HVm�n /�v�nue �he Ha�nlon Fx}�e�yi andam h@r�V10 diy�u�m msd{mnsbhh� �h +nre nnmy*� /«v y000Aou/dYou A�1hks �mo�ontiirn� �ehovenarro�edourconlroo1oroskaotiontofourne�uiabkzor�anizVUOnaaUwi�hskJni Can1 ����OmncmonA�s�o�ca� Pro!�n�� ao� hiQA �onmin�nt �Ueawdh)nLhaoiiyofAs�en V\� anUoi�a1eha��n cor�nycbors e|e04nU by Januan/ u/ih� torninQ y�8r. and w/0uid b� hs��y�o sh dovvn wdh your H�A at�h�tmur t �u��mrchoou�� your�oAs�ruoL�on ounoen�m F|ee5e knnvv me ana stU| au�ieut �o � /�th�rymOg�hy o��romm ;«ne»o and cm|K��q psnndpromsmm. �o m eU nc�|istio �no�a�iU�Y. cona1m81�onwiM notha�penon UhopropertV u/mnx000xacnznmoumn�r�U}4 ~ vSooner | ��� mm0tfdmfonnyouihaiwevvU| �� su�o��|overVmh�1oonS1 ' ^ / manaOenleni/a�enn�in1ena/�ce �m|ioi�awie1hepmnnhbnAp/momooanduc1oa! oonwtrucbon �d� /«czmn �wperu�ion�nuV�cbona �omth� d�� of�s�en �|euaeknmaw�wjUmdhena1o�h� �nbd�s3oasdfod� bythmo�y yuurreqwest. w/am%y �e �x�nab eZ u �him |fy�ucouhUfuMherexp! a inwha 1eio—ci�oeUyyou are momt co/��rn�o vv/�n |nt�nnyu[ '' wnnous es��c1� Of�he cnn��ru�tiun �/Uu�ss as�eciaNVconotruoUond�bris^ 6�evrU� oe a very modeut uonmtruct|on �nnia(� in cmnhs0n vvi1�fhn Uke s nf1he'Lio1efi�h1 ne deveb�nx�ni sev� . | K. �u1wedouod�r:�and �ons�n��|[onatanyaoa(e /� o�ns��uoiion AAain w�'H !�a�mn1uan oa Vmons inthespirit ofbeing � �o�dnekJh�or h�u|� s�oVo�nLou1theHa�maoPro�e�� �stob� ne1aiuedasasiAQ/etamDymnsi�anca �0� 1hGbu/kmf !h newcona1mc1�onmi|/ ohuithaeaa1mk1eVfthaoro,peAy !ooa�Jn�a ioN� Lim�|k�htLmd�e |fyou |Ue A�maykav���wa�kLhmu�hth� �ru�a�o� dmve|o�m�n� �dor$th� �ovmm��r ��'nHF�� m�otin� f �mmo/e �h kap0ytose tmnnn,th|nq- u- anjo/ e�x J in �heproposm| for�Aaproy��yeCoord�nOh� �iorn|y �� nlekn�w � a» 'sthec�aabyio�mmb�, Ar'' ' '''� = uou �aopecMvUy. OenokS��1ko 07O3O9O895 -----Original Message----- From: Office [nlaifto:cffice@ natjonnlanagenlent.con� � Sent: Tu� ay, N0verDberOS, 30133:3OP[� '^ To: Denek@1Fhday.com Cc: Lydia MorrongieUo Subject: Hartmann Property Construction Hello Derek, I'm writing on behalf of the Park Central West Homeowners Association President. /n light cf the upcoming construction to the Hartmann Property, PCVfeo/othattheirproperty will bn affected byvahou000pe�oof�h e pn�e�.mnpm�aUyuonoburbondebhn. ll/5/20l3 Page 2 of 2 The HOA President is curious about who we would need to contact about requesting funds for extra cleaning services required at PCW as well as information about whether or not being present at either of the scheduled hearings would be beneficial for them. I'll look forward to hearing from you soon. Best Regards, Winter Bledsoe 720 E.Durant#E3 Aspen,CO 81611 ph:970-925-1416 fax:970-544-2518 I--11 - 2013 -- O N s �`ice' i✓�.�� �-� w� {mil L m r 20 I IFH n- Q VV?27JA v Nov 077-4 77-4 (LD ! I : 30 A✓IJ -M 1C v55 �v dcy4JS �'a'2oc "SSA P)QOJ(-=-CT' S e� --n vti E-L!�1 -1f-- Gcs�U Cam" 5 T�Esc Kile Smith Preside n - .. 0. 970.925.1416 C. 231.590.6333 f. 970.544.2518 kile @ajaxdestinationmanagement.com masonmorse.com 720 East Durant Avenue,Suite E3,Aspen,Colorado 81611 Blllkt,-All—:v,M­, t -h rHf fndeper ie �Can-ntd i lPeiated 11/5/2013 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: :Co I F,6�, , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: l u er7N F=r' r' ) NO yC ►3.7V,20 l_3 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitidn 1, I N -5rvP+ 5 ` (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on thealsrday of Oc-TOP*-�Y'` , 201-�,, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this V'b day Of—P 5-Ty f3&Q 201Z, by i7 ZR L.t e, MAITWq,(,.) S.g-4 L–" Ksnnetn Scott R WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL Notary Pubft State of 0124o Colorado My commission expires: —LQ�t3� Notary ID 20124066934 .�_ Nty Commission oMW 12.gore No Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE 0WNERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYAWL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. X24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 201 E. HYMAN AVENUE- CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, DEMOLITION,ON-SITE RELOCATION AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, November 13, 2013,at a regular meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application submitted by 201 EH Investments LLC, P.O. Box 7928,Aspen, CO 81612, owner of the property located at 201 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots A, B and the west 2/3`d of Lot C, Block 76, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID #2735-124-73-001. The applicant requests HPC approval to demolish non-historic portions of the existing house and outbuilding, to relocate the outbuilding on the site, to temporarily lift the historic house for a new basement, and to construct a new addition. The applicant requests a 500 square foot floor area bonus. The following setback variances are requested: a front yard setback reduction of up to 5' and a west sideyard setback reduction of 3' for the historic house; a 4' west sideyard reduction for a lightwell, a 5' rear yard setback variance and 5' west sideyard setback variance for the outbuilding. A waiver of the Residential Design Standards related to "build-to line" and lightwells are proposed. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429-2758, ainy.simon@cityoflispen.com. Way Mavtin Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on October 24,2013 City of Aspen Account �W- — .- PUBLIC Daea PNCe P11r W:> Y PUBLIC-NO Notification as of October 21st, 2013 Date: wed., NOV. 13. 2013 Time: 5:00 P.M. Place:Council Chambers, City Hail_130 S. Galena,-A Purpose: HPC will conduct Conceptual review_ o_f an ap iication ty 201 EH Investments LLC owner of this - - --- prope�._Demolition of non-historic areas,basement excavation,on-site relocation.of an outbuilding,_ ____ construction of an addition,a floor rea b -nus,setback reductions and _esign variances areoroposed, For further information_contact Awn . Planning Dept., 970-429-2758. _ keep it real • 1 Jim of the Aspen Post Office Accepting Mailing Notifications on October 21st, 2013 keep it 1000 lEAST HOPKINS LLC 306 S GARMISCH TOWNHOMES CONDO 215 S MONARCH SUITE 104 C/O WRW&CO AJAX KABIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 25 BROAD ST APT TSF ENCINO, CA 91436 NEW YORK, NY 10004 ASPEN SKIING COMPANY LLC ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTH ATTERBURY ANDREW L&PRENTICE PO BOX 1248 0.01% GWYN A ASPEN, CO 81612 530 E MAIN ST#001 2001 SHAWNEE MISSION PKY ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAWNEE MISSION, KS 66205 BARNES JACK&BONITA BARRETT STEVEN R BERNSTEIN JEREMY M PROFIT 125 E HYMAN AVE 2A C/O JP WEIGAND&SONS INC SHARING PLAN ASPEN, CO 81611 150 N MARKET 610 NORTH ST WICHITA, KS 67202 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLOEMINK BARBARA BOGIN ROBERT M 210 E HYMAN AVE#5 4280 S MEADOW BROOK LN BOND ANN ASPEN, CO 81611 EVERGREEN, CO 80439 210 E HYMAN#6 ASPEN, CO 81611 BRAYMAN WALTER W&PATRICIA BRINING ROBERT BROADSCOPE PTY LTD 844 ROCKWELL LN 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 CATLOW TRUST KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2363 ASPEN, CO 81611 223 RIVERTON DR SHELLEY AUSTRALIA 6148, BROWN SHANE&KRISTINE BUSH ALAN DAVID 3334 LA CIENEGA PL 0046 HEATHER LN 0184 MO N PATRICIA LOS ANGELES, CA 900163117 ASPEN, CO 81611-3342 0184 MOUNTAIN LAUREL DR ASPEN, CO 81611 CARRIGAN RICHARD A JR CASA KESS LLC 2S526 WILLIAMS RD PO BOX 3121 CAYTON ANDREA TRUST WARRENVILLE, IL 60555 2379 EARLS CT ASPEN, CO 81612 LOS ANGELES, CA 90077 CHALET LISL PARTNERSHIP LTD CHRISPAT ASPEN LLC CITY OF ASPEN 100 E HYMAN AVE 1107 5TH AVE#35 ATTN FINANCE DEPT ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10128 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN, CO 81611 CLARK FAMILY TRUST CLARKS ASPEN LLC CLAUSEN FAMILY TRUST NO 1 PO BOX 362 818 SOUTH MAIN ST C/O GUNDY MGMT CO ASPEN, CO 81612 BLANDING, UT 84511 PO BOX 47 MORRIS, IL 60450 COHEN JACK DAVID COHN PETER L 5 WOODLAND CT PO BOX 2138 COOPER TWO LLC SAYVILLE, NY 11782 ASPEN, CO 81612 950 HILL RD WINNETKA, IL 60093 CRETE ASSOCIATES LP CRYSTAL PALACE ACQUSITIONS LLC PO BOX 1524 2100 E MAPLE RD, STE 200 DALTON CHARLES O IRREV TRUST 50% BRYN MAWR, PA 19010 1031 S CALDWELL ST#200 BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009 CHARLOTTE, NC 28203 DAVIDSON DONALD W DAVIS HORN INCORPORATED DB ASPEN HOLDINGS LLC 864 CEMETERY LN 215 S MONARCH#104 CAUSEWAY BLVD N ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 3400 3400 N IE, LA 70002 DE SOTO LINDA JANE LIV TRUST DOLLE NORMA L REV TRUST 1209 MANHATTAN AVE#130 DUNN DAVID&POLLY MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266 1103 HERITAGE DR 611 S UPPER BROADWAY CARBONDALE, CO 81623 CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78401 DUNTON KAY L TRUST DUPLEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50°rb 210 E HYMAN AVE#7 10601 N PENNSYLVANIA AVE ELLIOTT ELYSE A TRUST ASPEN, CO 816112012 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73120 610 NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 FEDER HAROLD L&ZETTA F FREDRICK LARRY D 985 CASCADE AVE ROBERTS JANET A FTG ASPEN LLC BOULDER, CO 80302-7550 215 S MONARCH ST#6101 6735 TELEGRAPH RD#110 ASPEN, CO 81611 BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48301-3141 FUQUA ALVAH D JR&DIANNE L FYRWALD JON ERIK&GUDRUN L GEORGIEFF KATHERINE TRUSTEE 446 LAKE SHORE DR 126 EAST HICKORY ST SUNSET BEACH, NC 28468 HINSDALE, IL 60521 11 TOPPING LN ST LOUIS, MO 63131 GIEFER PATRICK GLISMANN JOHN P GOODING RICHARD L 204 SARATOGA VEIN CT PO BOX 4999 CASTLE PINE, CO 80108 ASPEN, CO 81612 4800 S HOLLY ST ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 GOOLSBY BRYAN L&MICHELLE L GORDON BRIAN S 6722 WAGGONER 26985 CRESTWOOD GRAND SLAM HOLDINGS LLC DALLAS, TX 75230 FRANKLIN, MI 48025 C/O CARL B LINNECKE CPA PC 215 S MONARCH ST#101 ASPEN, CO 81611 GSS MONARCH LLC GUBSER NICHOLAS J PO BOX 3377 PO BOX 870 GUNION JOHN F BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN, CO 81612 1004 MARINA CIR DAVIS, CA 95616 GUTNER KENNETH H REV TRUST HART GEORGE DAVID&SARAH C HERRON SANDRA A PO BOX 11001 PO BOX 5491 ASPEN, CO 81612 119 E COOPER AVE APT 19 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81611-1761 HOLYOAKE LAURENCE M&COX HONE THOMAS A&CAROL A HOSKIN REEDE HEATHER J 130 E WAYNE ST PO BOX 2478 555 E DURANT#4A CELINA, OH 45822 BASALT, CO 81621-2478 ASPEN, CO 81611 IFTNFS LLC JACARANDA ASPEN LLC 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR PO BOX 11980 JACKSON BISQUE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9064 ASPEN, CO 81612 JACOBSON FAMILY TRUST JCS GARMISCH LLC 2168 SANTA MARGARITA DR PO BOX 11636 JMS LLC FALLBROOK, CA 92028 ALEXANDRIA, LA 71315 0115 GLEN EAGLES DR ASPEN, CO 81611 JOHNSON PETER C&SANDRA K JONES MICHAEL C 51 OVERLOOK DR PO BOX 66 KAISER HARRIS FAMILY TRUST 79 ASPEN, CO 81611-1008 ASPEN, 79 81612 12942 CHALON RD LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 KAMINER NINA 25 BROAD ST/TSF KAUFMAN STEVEN TRUST&HARLOW KEBER VINCENT M III NEW YORK, NY 10004 VIRGINIA TRUST 1301 WAZEE#2E 0554 ESCALANTE DENVER, CO 80204 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 KEITH JOHN III KELLY GARY PO BOX 4783 PO BOX 356 KIRIANOFF PATRICIA TRUST 12 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, 12 81612 PO BOX 1749 ASPEN, CO 81612 KNAPP MICHAEL LARKIN FRED C SPOUSAL TRUST 1001 MEDICAL PK STE 213 ONE COVE LN 1417 LARRABEE DONALD C 0 GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49546 BOW MAR, CO 80123 1417 POTTER DR STE 105 COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80909 LEATHERMAN ROBERT D LEDINGHAM DAVID CHARLES 16% LIMELITE REDEVELOPMENT LLC PO BOX 11930 124 E COOPER ST CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 C/O GENERAL MANAGEMENT 1201 GALAPAGO ST#101 DENVER, CO 80204 LOFINO MICHAEL D 3255 SEAJAY DR LORING PETER&ELIZABETH S LUBIN SHAFIGHEH DAYTON,OH 45430 LORING WOLCOTT&COOLIDGE OFFICE PO BOX 3748 230 CONGRESS ST ASPEN, CO 81612 BOSTON, MA 02110 MACDONALD VALERIE MEEKER RICHARD J AND ALLISON D MESSNER CHRISTIAN PO BOX 1681 0752 MEADOWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 119E COOPER #21 ASPEN, CO 81611 11 MOP LLC MORRONGIELLO LYDIA A 5348 VEGAS DR 1178 HICKORY WY NELSON ARLENE LAS VEGAS, NV 89108 ERIE, CO 805167994 119 E COOPER ST#6 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWMAN KERRY J&RICKI R NORRIS JOAN 617 PRINCE DR PO BOX 358 NORTH&SOUTH ASPEN LLC 12 NEWBURGH, IN 47630 ASPEN, 12 81612 200 S ASPEN ST ASPEN, CO 81611 OBRIEN MAUREEN OFM HOLDINGS LP 1370 MAIN ST PO BOX 541208 ORR ROBERT L CARBONDALE, CO 81623 DALLAS, TX 75354 2700 G ROAD#12A GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 PARK CENTRAL CONDO ASSOC PARKER RICHARD C&KAREN S 215 S MONARCH ST STE 203 3029 BAKER MEADOW SE PAY ERIC GEOFFREY ASPEN, CO 81611 ATLANTA, GA 30339 119 E COOPER AVE APT 12 ASPEN, CO 81611-1772 PAY-ASE PROPERTIES LLC PENTHOUSE ONE&TWO LLC 2200 ROSS AVE#3838 PO BOX 11980 PEONY LLC DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 121 BARRANCA AVE SANTA BARBARA, CA 93109 PERREAULT GEORGE C TRUST PITNER N KATHRYN 7336 CAPTAIN KIDD AVE PO BOX 11930 POPKIN PHILIP G SARASOTA, FL 34231-5442 PO BOX 7956 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 PRASAD REV TRUST PRODINGER IRMA 3776 W 3700 N PO BOX 1245 PROSPECTOR FRACTIONAL OWNERS DARLINGTON, ID 83255 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASSOC 301 E HYMAN AVE#108 ASPEN, CO 81611 PURVIS ROBERT K TRUST RACZAK JOSEPH S&JANET L PO BOX 3089 0234 LIGHT HILL RD RASMUSSEN DAVID L&RITA M ASPEN, CO 81612 SNOWMASS, CO 81654 PO BOX 120262 ARLINGTON, TX 76012 RIVOLI INVESTMENTS LLC RLC ASPEN LLC 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FLR 12500 PARK POTOMAC AVE#207N ASPEN, CO 81611 ROMER MARCY&FRANK L POTOMAC, MD 20854 10204 E SHERI LN ENGLEWOOD, CO 80111 ROSENFELD EUGENE S&MAXINE M TRST ROSSI ELAYNE R TRUST RUMSEY DANIEL W 10601 WILSHIRE BLVD#20 EAST PO BOX 7961 1325 PACIFIC HIGHWAY#1902 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 ASPEN, CO 81612 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 SB PAD HOLDINGS III LLC SCULL JAMES E 6262 S ROUTE 83#200 PO BOX 2051 SHAW ROBERT W WILLOWBROOK, IL 60527 ASPEN, CO 81612 5720 LOCKE AV FORT WORTH, TX 76107 SHENNAN MELISSA A SIMPSON JANET MARIE 822 LANE LORRAINE 233 E COOPER AVE#205 SIX STONES LLC LAKE FOREST, IL 60045-1643 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 626 PEBBLE BEACH, CA 93953 SMITH FRANK FORD JR&KATHARINE STETSON WILLIS J JR&SALLY W STITT ELIZABETH WILES IRREV TRUST LINDSAY 23 SLEEPY HOLLOW DR 1450 SILVERKING DR 2506 STRATFORD-DR- - - - NEWTOWN SQUARE, PA 19073 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 78746 SULLIVAN JOHN B TRUST SUNNY SNOW LTD TOMLINSON JAMES 1300 E REUSCH RD PACE KENT STACEY ELIZABETH, IL 61028 308 TORCIDO DR 100 E COOPER AVE#2 SAN ANTONIO, TX 782095645 ASPEN, CO 81611 TRENTLY TRUST TRUE JAMES R VANOVER STEFANIE KAI C/O WRW CO PO BOX 2864 333 NE MIZNER BLVD TN-4 16130 VENTURA BLVD#320 ASPEN, CO 81612 BOCA RATON, FL 33432 ENCINO, CA 91436 VORTEX INVESTMENTS LLC 50% WALSH WILLIAM LLOYD 3336 EAST 32ND ST#217 120 WEST THIRD ST SUITE#400 WEINGLASS LEONARD TULSA, OK 74135 FORT WORTH, TX 76102 PO BOX 11509 ASPEN, CO 81612 WHITE JALEH WHITMAN WENDALIN 152 E DURANT AVE 210 E HYMAN AVE#101 WHITMAN WENDALIN ASPEN, CO 81611-1737 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 472 ASPEN, CO 81612 WICHMANN VICTORIA WILTGEN JOHN&KATIE HONE 600 E WINFIELD S AVE DO ASSOC MS CONDO DO 119 E COOPER ST#4 130 E WAYNE ST ELD AR ASPEN, CO 81611 CELINA, OH 45822 ASPEN, CO 81611 WOLOFSKY MOIRA WOLPERT BILL H&WOLPERT JUDE PO BOX 1026 2280 KOHLER DR YOUNG BARBARA A PALM BEACH, FL 33480 BOULDER, CO 80305 210 E HYMAN AVE#9 ASPEN, CO 81611 Page 1 of 1 Derek Skalko ,-'2013 From: Derek Skalko[derek @1 friday.com] � Q�rAW-F-- /OJ-n� ,.R Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 10:19 AM To: scottsinta@gmail.com Cc: 'Derek Skalko' rvVj'QAC.EY2 N�►IZT►-1S"P�t� Subject: 201 East Hyman Information Attached S 19445T Good Morning Scott, C MD -R _ 1 It's always way too long between our paths crossing, but I'm hopeful we can amend this with at least a couple of ski days this season Scott! Thank you for taking my call yesterday, and per our conversation Scott, please find attached a simple written description with imaging of the proposed project for 201 East Hyman Avenue. Please feel free to distribute this information accordingly to your HOA should you wish. The site is actually designated for Mixed Use, but the owner has chosen to maintain the property as a single family residence,which will essentially keep the house intact to the surrounding neighborhood with about as minimal massing and scale increase as possible. We are currently in the review and approval process at the city level, and don't anticipate having a buildable project any sooner than middle summer of 2014. Again, as items near, I am happy to sit down with you and discuss any and all construction concerns that you may have regarding impact both to the Hearthstone and 205 East Hyman (the building you represent directly across the street to the west of 201). If I have titled this building in error, please let me know Scott. We want to be good neighbors during the adaptation the 201 EH home, and please do not ever hesitate to contact me should you have concerns or questions Scott. Thank you again, and I'll hope see you on the slopes come this weekend! Kindly, Derek 970.309.0695 Co Coxvc* 125 E: -f- 76 5 11/13/2013 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF P OPERTY: Aspen, CO SC EDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 20 i -� STATE OF COLORADO ) } ss. County of Pitkin ) �`2 �— ' (name, please print) being or represe4rib iW 4.p licant to idle: it<y of Aspen, Colorado,hereby pAfsonally certify that 7 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public,hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six .(26)inches high,and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the_day of , 20 ,to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (".sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2):of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signat6re The foregoing " ffid vit of Notice"was ac owledge before me this day of VL , 201�by X11 PUBLIC NQTlCE RE: OR E.VELOP AVENUE-CONCEPTUAL WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT,DEMOLITION,ON- SIT£RELOCATION AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN II ut t-.is hearing oil r.r �/ N I NOTICE 1 ,den e.IV tdu e r 'be 7 3 let 1,al (//i✓�► IY a reVu�r meet nc7 t LeGI.. al 5.r0 p i. eeio a the My commission expires: Aare i N aiur=c Frk»e.vdLr r.CDrtuu.SSicrr,ia,C w, &GraT Vo-rs,C y nail 30 S Ca ei S Aspo-n. S I I,1NIIr m�rt)+ of y,mn ys fr_dof roy E. FH I v Amer s k LG P J B n y & Aspen CU hii a pA er)4 the a;�,W I eC It t%at 2 of IIyi I1tA 8r rte lu A H,n dIIe N5y;23q�eEl et (' Block u.G4 sAr"3 Toanai e ot Asper F is Notary Public av :d a ti The 2 nlr,r eU.o'.6 HPC ��� oden list r -� Ir„r of _, cflx o�,�e Wn sa a t�l bu'I r 9 1 r ld tg a e logt the r,5Ic,r,c t� TARA L. NELSON rvuscs t or D 1101111 ba innera,an d ca artl a rev NOTARY PUBLIC ho , ' STATE OF COLORADO tic l e'3 horni5 Tre rijptiy rp n 3C$y9r%i F,n.a e eUs41.G a I m`pa"', azk reoLCi,on Uf t,p NOTARY 10 20014030017 lG 5 al(j aYJC41 idey3+rj YE'IQe1CK E R!(:(!Jn at 3 for the i5t��r nor tic,•,vast de i,ec icr.•n to, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 09/25/2017 alight eC_a ea-yard setback arsar d west adoyarl eatb.cx va,,ar,ce „ !Br the oul7u�lding. A W t ve v� *Rt+ GC tldi Ot` yr S[ar(�rJ 111d bald-t 1e and lighlwalis are p apes 'HMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Fpr€r Rtpr inlor na rN.rrm.ryct Aa.,�Slrn.,u al the CJy of Aepas L rrmun by Oe elwa _-it Doparl- $ CO Asper.Ca,l:73; ION a23 2 tl,arse�rreiYytaspat;cq^,ti • PH, OSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Chair,Aspen Nistartc Preservation Cowwasion • LIS PvN>Shed,n tne As ea Tunes`A,eekl, cxl er vD GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MuL • APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 EXHIBIT 210 Cooper Condominium Association Aspen, Colorado November 12, 2013 Honorable Steven Skadron Mayor,Aspen City Council Subject: Proposed Development of Hartmann House Lot 201 E. Hyman Avenue The 21 condominium owners in the 210 Cooper condominium building share the block bordered by Cooper, Aspen, Monarch and Hyman streets with the proposed Hartmann House lot development and the Limelight Lodge. The 210 Cooper Condo Board of Directors wishes to go on record that it generally favors the Hartmann property owners proposal to develop the property as a single family dwelling and is willing to cooperate with the owners to assist in moving the project expeditiously along. However, we have several concerns that need to be addressed. We request a minimum five feet setback of any development along the alley immediately behind the 210 Cooper building adjacent to the Hartmann House lot in order that the project does not impinge upon the 210 owner's use of the parking spaces accessed through this alley. Compounding the problem is that this alley is presently also extensively used by the Limelight Lodge with large recycle and trash truck pickups that require ample space to maneuver in addition to 210 Cooper owners parking use. The alley was once a thoroughfare between Aspen and Monarch Streets and the 210 Cooper owners acceded to the City's request to permit it to vacate a large portion of the thoroughfare, creating a dead- end alley, so that the Limelight developers could use the vacated land for building. In view of our cooperation in that instance, we respectfully request continued city cooperation to preserve the alley parking spaces immediately to the rear of the 210 Cooper building. Additionally,the 210 Cooper Board has concerns about the height, parking and lot density variances being requested by the Hartmann House developers. These concerns will be more fully presented by 210 Cooper representatives at the City Council meeting on November 18, 2013. We ask that the City Council urge the developers to work closely with the 210 Cooper Condominium Association Board in order that its concerns in this respect may have some positive bearing on the development. Respectfully, Robert Leatherman, Secretary Board of Directors 210 Cooper Condominium Association 1 ........... ..,rv, 22 0i,_,i s u r-�yr' "'*cvy.MrrW,,,,•*• '+ �/ ut ttl ,1 i jS'till t v 11 1liitiit:iil►1}ii-Mill _ ijisylitsl�{l,i{ilsl�i s'�E �� � �� �� ��� -�1�11� ©� � ��4� �� �z�� ¢ e 1 EEXHIBMI-1 _ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060(E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE AD SS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 201_� STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) ss. �UZSqD;;7Ee being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado(name,reby pe onally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section echo, of an official Pape r or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing on thelfday of A/dP 20J3, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice(sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) t Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30)days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas,are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district ma is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The ffoor�ping,Affidavit of Notice"was�ac�k�now� edged before me this day y�2 '20�, by—ZZ ww ?0� Y.Pve n WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL o ssion expires:R . My MANNING % '�CQ '��pFCS got y Public My Commission Ezpkes 0312912014 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGA9 •LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYAWL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S.§24--65.5-103.3 as `,(a lilt � '4N5 OW II Aft I�Si" r 1 NO,, r Q v , ; �- a F. P--90-Pl.970-4292758 .. _S ` �'is;>'-:.