HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.971 Ute Ave.0247.2017 (16).ARBKResidential Design Standards
Administrative Review
Section 26.410.020.B. of the Land Use Code requires an Administrative Review for compliance with the Residential Design Standards (RDS) for
all residential projects, unless otherwise exempted pursuant to Section 26.410.010.C. Exempt projects include:
• An addition or remodel to an existing structure that does not change the exterior of the building
• A remodel of a structure where the alterations proposed change the exterior of the building, but are not addressed by any of the RDS
• A residential unit within a mixed-use building
• A designated historic resource listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. New buildings on a historic landmark
lot are not exempt.
All applicable residential projects shall submit for RDS Administrative Review or Alternative Compliance prior to building permit submittal. An
applicant may choose to apply directly for a variation from the Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant
to Chapter 26.410.020.C. A pre-application summary will be required for a variation request.
Review Process:
The Community Development Department staff shall review an application for applicability and compliance with Chapter 26.410, Residential
Design Standards. If the application complies with all applicable standards as written, a signed Checklist and stamped plan set shall be provided
to the applicant to be included with building permit submission.
If the application does not comply with one or more applicable standards, an unsigned Checklist and redlined plan set shall be emailed to the
applicant including comments from staff on which standard(s) the application does not comply with and a description of why the standard(s) is
not compliant. The applicant shall be provided the opportunity to revise and resubmit the design in response to the comments. Staff will keep an
application open for 30 days from the date an unsigned Checklist is emailed to the applicant. If after such time no revisions are submitted, the
application will be removed from the review system.
Pursuant to 26.410.020.C, projects that do not meet the criteria for Administrative Review or Alternative Compliance (as determined by staff)
may be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission, or HPC if appropriate, at the applicant’s request. A pre-application summary will be
required for a variation request.
Page 1 of 2
City of Aspen
Received
5/11/17
Building Department
Application for RDS Administrative Review:
An application for RDS Administrative Review that IS NOT requesting Alternative Compliance shall be submitted to the Community Development
front desk on a USB drive or CD or emailed to justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Applicants shall be notified of complete/incomplete application
by email.
An application for RDS Administrative Review shall include the following documents in digital format:
• Proof of ownership (no older than 6 months from submittal date)
• Representative authorization letter from owner
• Vicinity map
• Site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor (no older than one year from submittal date)
• Site plan (scaled 24”x36”)
• Floor plans (scaled 24”x36”)
• Elevations (scaled 24”x36”)
• Complete scope of work noting all areas affected by the proposed project
• Complete RDS applicant checklist (attached) addressing how each standard is met with sheet references for each standard
Application for RDS Alternative Compliance:
An application for RDS Alternative Compliance will require a pre-application summary provided by Community Development staff, and shall
be submitted as a Land Use Application. Required application submittal items shall be outlined in the pre-application summary.
Page 2 of 2
Residential Design Standards
Administrative Review
City of Aspen
Received
5/11/17
Building Department
Residential Design Standards
Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist
Standard Complies Alternative
Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes
B.1.Articulation of Building Mass
(Non-flexible)
B.2.Building Orientation
(Flexible)
B.3.Build-to Requirement
(Flexible)
B.4.One Story Element
(Flexible)
C.1.Garage Access
(Non-flexible)
C.2.Garage Placement
(Non-flexible)
C.3.Garage Dimensions
(Flexible)
Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only
permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why
it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional
sheets/graphics may be attached.
Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the
applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review.
Address:
Parcel ID:
Zone District/PD:
Representative:
Email:
Phone:
Page 1 of 2
971 UTE AVE RYAN DOREMUS
273718295029 RYAN@THUNDERBOWLARCHITECTS.COM
R-6 970-274-1421
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
City of Aspen
Received
5/11/17
Building Department
Standard Complies Alternative
Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes
C.4.Garage Door Design
(Flexible)
D.1.Entry Connection
(Non-flexible)
D.2.Door Height
(Flexible)
D.3.Entry Porch
(Flexible)
E.1.Principle Window
(Flexible)
E.2.Window Placement
(Flexible)
E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit
(Flexible)
E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location
(Flexible)
E.5.Materials
(Flexible)
Residential Design Standards
Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist
Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the
applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review.
Page 2 of 2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4City of Aspen
Received
5/11/17
Building Department