Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#landuse case.HP.602 E Hyman.0023.2013.AHPC THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0023.2013.AHPC PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273718212003 PROJECTS ADDRESS 602 E HYMAN AVE PLANNER SARA ADAMS CASE DESCRIPTION COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW HPC MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REPRESENTATIVE SUNNY VANN 970-925-6958 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11/29/2013 CLOSED BY ANGELA SCOREY ON: 12/05/13 File Edit Record Navigate Form Reports Format Tab Help Jump 1 . . t� fm Fain i Custom Fields Routing Status Fee Summary Actions Pouting History Permit type 'ahpc p n Historic Land Use Permit# 00 23200 232 013.AHPC Address'602 E HYMAN AVE Apt/S uite I o ` City ;ASPEN State O EE Zip`81611 x...i Permit Information r Master permit i Routing queue`,aslu07 Applied 08J08/2013 z t Project i Status l pending Approved Description COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW Issued. � HPC MAJOR DEVELOPMENT Closed/Final Submrtted€SUNNY VAN N 970.9256958 Clock Running Days D= Expires 08103/2014 Submitted via' Owner Last name HUNT ? First name'DANIEL 1601 ELM ST-UNITY HUNT,INC 1601 ELM ST STE 4000 Phone f 1 Address DALLAS TX 75201 Applicant F1 Owner is applicant? 0 Contractor is applicant? I Last name EB BUILDING ASPEN,LLC First name DANIEL L HUNT =1601 ELM ST ;SUITE 4000 Phone (214)4159979 C0# 29386 Address'DALLAS TX 75201 I Lender Last name First name Phone f J .,.... Address I A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AMENDING HPC RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2013 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #27, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects has requested an amendment to the Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval granted by the adoption of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Nyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, the property is a designated landmark pursuant to City Council Ordinance #10, Series of 2013 adopted on May 13, 2013; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, and approved HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 by a vote of 4 to 1; and RECEPTION#: 604072, 09/26/2013 at 12:40:47 PM, 1 OF 6, R $36.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27,Series of 2013 WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report to HPC dated September 11, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended that HPC approve the amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants an amendment to HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite o-f Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: I. The elevations attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution are hereby conceptually approved. The window and door changes and the landscape changes are subject to review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews. 2. The increased size of the southwestern deck is to be restudied for Final Review. 3. The following conditions of approval that are part of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 are satisfied: a. Condition #5: "For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fagade of the building." b. Condition #6: "For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors." c. Condition #7: "For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck." 4. The applicant shall submit a design for screening the mechanical equipment for review and approval during Final Major Development review. 5. The applicant shall submit more detailed information regarding the proposed planter boxes and landscaping for review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews 6. Conditions #1 to 4 and #8 of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 remain valid. 7. The Commercial Space represented on the second floor and illustrated in Exhibit A to the Resolution is not permitted to be used as residential space without a Land Use approval to convert the use. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of September, 2013. Cffi�s_Pember,t Vice Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 ATTEST: Kathy Str ckland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved amended elevations and plans. 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #S, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution 927, Series of 2013 n Z O N E. uj II : w a$ - a I 0 • Y r* Boa :?. U, m_a LU Wm i I , * Rv,- PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLA PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE I if i C�}'-rmw. J (0`l} BASLME NT LEVEL PLANS A300 ----- Z O N E LU O 1 z _— �. .... W 04 I JZ. /0 PRO,nEDSOUTH ELEVATION VN� 2 oaW Jon _ a - -- ------- ----------- - n ware. _.—=�T_ _ _._._ _._._ _. fie• ' ` � ' I , �I b t sevx. i i h PROPOSED ELEVATIONS ! C� P EDEASTELEVATIONISEGTION- A304 1! C � Ilydi Ilioniillii� � � '� ji — — _ w LLI -- ----------- - -- �.,.4....e., T_ WTtl � 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION- � NFU � W j . poi I b .........b....., _._.. _-� n W - o m il9�li1� I.X11 i, n t J , PROPOSED !� ELEVATIONS 1 1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A305 I: MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Skadron and Aspen City Council FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Notice of HPC approval of an Amendment to Conceptual Major Development and Commercial Design Review for 602 E.` Hyman Avenue, HPC Resolution #27, Series of 2013 MEETING DATE: September 23, 2013 BACKGROUND: On September 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approved ��� an Amendment to a previously granted Conceptual Major Development and Co mmercial Design Review f at 602 E. Hyman Avenue. 602 E. Hyman Avenue, at the corner of Hyman and Hunter Streets, was recently designated a historic landmark through the AspenModern program via City Council Ordinance # 10, Series of 2013. HPC granted Conceptual Commercial Design and Conceptual Major Development approvals for a small addition along the alley and minor exterior changes on February 27, 2013. The applicant returned to the board for an amendment that involves a larger garage, a second story atop the approved addition on the alley, deletion of a proposed new deck and stairs, and changes to the rooftop. HPC unanimously approved the Amendment. PROCEDURE: This is not a public hearing and no staff or applicant presentation will be made at the September 23rd Council meeting. If you have any questions about the project, please contact the staff planner, Amy Guthrie, 429-2758 or amy.guthrie @cityofaspen.com. Pursuant to Section 26.412.040(B), notification of this HPC approval must be placed on City Council's agenda within 30 days, or as soon thereafter as is practical under the circumstances. City Council has the option of exercising the Call Up provisions outlined in Section 26.412.040(B) within 15 days of notification on the regular agenda. City Council may vote to Call Up the project at the September 23 d or October 14`h meeting. If City Council does not exercise the Call Up provision, the HPC Resolution shall stand, and the applicant will pursue Final HPC design review. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A: Conceptual Design Exhibit B: Draft HPC Resolution 427, Series of 2013 III Z O . N k -�.- EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR 9'12 LU,STRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY REFER LO CIVIL FOR PROPOSED GRADING ELEVATIONS. 01 - ARCHITECTS L c. PAVED ALLEY PRaPERTY BQUNDARr P.O. B O X 2 5 0„ NEw a-r.r-a-2 YAR❑ �.� a DUMPSTER WILL BE ABLE TO �.�T—� :PARKING ] ASPEN O O 8 1 8 1 2 ATTACH TO FENCE? r jgz� (Rz18'MIN_) OUTLINE OF STRUCTU RE —. — — — A.ClE WWW20NE4ARCHITECTS.00M NEW FENCE TO SCREEN , �__ +'—— —— — —— L ELECTR'CAL TRANSFORMER, 2ADA OUTLINE OF PARKING,RECYCLING,AND TRASH BUILDING TROVE OUTLINE OF UTILITY EASEMENT I 'X STING RETAINING -- L'-TOREMAIN T 97'--,1/4 I WA EXPANDED LANDSCAPE --1 .O.CAR AGE=.0 (41 RECYCLE BINS, 97'-1 1(Z WILL BEA LE NEW FENCE) \ II IT STORAGE F;. CE) ` NEW PAVEMENT 5 i 2C ACCESS AISLE JNEW STEPSSLO E ' RE ELEV./ '.Qw wALL. ��N l\ RE:ELEVATION I I n ---- c^ 1920 ---- ----- NEW ACCESS RE:CIVIL p IrI`-'�RE.CIVIL RE:C V f I,' ZI —�.�—� ;HU NTER STREET ENTRY) iy I�. _ ELEV. EXPANDED IANpSCAPE—T Q a IT ROOM X PROPOSED UTILITY METERS uj Lu MEr I A Lu 0> W SIDEWALN l �OUTL:NE OF I1 r j BULDINGABOVE Z O LANDSCAPE AREAB Z v- Lu J C COMA MEgC)gL-1 E; RETAINING ! ■ ` a}(C s C 'NG.E WALL N- NEW STEPS,HANDRAIL.AND EXISTING BUILDING ° ,AN°wG PER CODE 'I�, (WITH PROPOSED ADDITION) BASEMENT W RESTROOM I III O I Lu ■ P _■ W JN NEW CASED OPENING Z a x' (EXISTING DOOR AND ?O BE REMOVED) LO d MECH I - I O NEw .r-STAIRS h _ _J L _-rr rIKST FLOOR �J Q W L OUTLINEOF EXISTING COURTYARD TO BE - W OUTLINE OF NEW CURB. \/ RENWgTEO. ,qy COURTYARD EGHBORING BUIIpING N RE.CIVIL w (SOUTHEAST) 1 \ aP - `100-0' 0 f—_OUTUNE OF / / COMMERCIAL NEIGHBORING BUILDING NEW PLANTER. E%�ISPNG COURttgRD TO BE � RENOVATED_ L _ NEBENCH -L NT y2 ER I S I S < i o I ouRTY D ry AR ) I�- i i ISOUTHWES _ I PROPOSED CORNER DESIGN i I BY CIVIL ENG�NE� R IC ON z L� \6 ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP °' NEW PLANTER \' ACCESSIBILITY \ z — — II I I 01 I 1 qa � �. )xT924 '..`f �; �' 1\.�✓.x� EXISTING TIE RETAINING BV:' REVISIONS j DATE s`9 IHPC APPLICATION 1124121 NEW PENCE FE ?923 32 REVISED HPCAPPQI_I t.3 - T— / .XI 03 PgaENDEO HPCAPP _ � STIN D t + GUGHT POST SIGN TO REMAIN 3 04 igMENCED HPC PP 08.Ot'3 92 NEW HANDRAILS AS REQUIRED.RE CIVIL EW RAMPS,RE ,IV IL 3E EAST HYMAN AVENUE 'x Drawn b AMENDED y Z4A o_ r i V 924 CONCEPTUAL a IN REVIEW $o PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN ol AUGUST,z°" O; PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROPOSED SITE/ l SCALE 118" = 1'0' -_ BASEMENT LEVEL PLANS ga A300 _ EXI51•...,nEIGHBORING EXTERIOR EICING LEGEND Z O N E BUILDING _ __ Oi PAINTED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT(GMU) - - NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN PROPOSED THIRD j FLOOR FACADE ECI.TH / REMODELED DECK WITH / RELOCATED STAIR BEYOND - j NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH CLERESTORY WINDOWS / ELEVATOR.STAIR ENLCOSURE, STUCCO SIDING ANO GUARDRAIL BEYOND - / -_ -_ --_ -__ —28-HEIGHT LIMIT O PAINTED W000 NEIGHBORING BUILDING � 610 HYMAN FRONT FACACE '�' W Q SIDING(RAINSCREEN APPLICATION) A R C H L TGE C T S EL«al 8 P,O. B O X 2 508 % / f - T O.UPR ROOF aEL 12a'-1' omPOSITE PANEL VVVVW.ZG E4ARCHHITEC,TSCOM —-—-—- -—' VERTICAL TEXTURED CONCRETE PET 11 4" j' T ROOF 2 i I I I' I llr �I I I I I � III — — - __ T.O.F.F.SECOND LEVEL -- [. EXISTINGCGURTYARDGRAOE ,i 1 uj a .- RYOND TOREMAIN I I E m a I II / REMAIN EXISTING GRADE TO Q 1" I TO F.F.FIRST LEVEL YJ ' 0 f Z C ui CONCRETE FOUNDATION \ BELOW U/ ------ - - - ----------I -• ----------- � JZ� L ------ T-T1 til � T.OiF.F.BASE^AENT LEVEL Z Q r uj ZT PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Q Q= (7 U) ZQZ DEW boa EXISTING emLDlrvc I BUILDING ADDITION m Q NEW 3'-c HIGH cross GUARDRAILS NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH GLERESTORY WINDOWS \ �� \ cn W HEIGHT LIMIT _ '3 ui \ _ 1- --- — ----- ---- ---- ----- — — --- ---- —-��--- — — - --- — --——— gl N € - g a 3r4° z \ 1 - _O:ELEVATOR „ �\ �\ \ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ - PER \ '\ - _—_—_—_—_—-—_—_— T O UPP ROOF R O _---_ _—_ -—_— — — _ j— .PEE /A > � O - - T O ET _—___— _ _— __— __— —_ _ l EL 119'-5314" -— -�T.O.ROOF _ RESIO ENTIALI I I I f _ — I • I - - L E 09' x mw ' I O.F.F.SECOND LEVE_ ELEVATOR SHAFT F BYI REVISIONS DATE _ rn 01 1 HEG APPLICATION!I 1 2612 � I e 102 REVISED HIED APPI01 - - -- 03 ENDED HPC 02•313 04 MAENDEO HPC P OB O1.1J T-�- O.F.F.FIRST LEVEL _--_- _ I_ _—_ .iFL.97'-T 114.. I \ -- _ - iC T.O.GARAGE F.F. EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN FINISH GRAD E og' - ,COMMERCIALI - 9 , I � Drawn by: Z4A -0 �w EXS INCCRADE AMENDED CONCEPTUAL ` EL.91' �_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ —-—_—_—_—_-- TO�MENT LEVEL 01 UGUSTV2073 . PROPOSED a ELEVATIONS % PAROPOSED EAST ELEVATION/ SECTION A304 _ �; —S` �BUBIIpING EXTE40R g0 G E�'END Z O N E O PAINTED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT GMU) jy NEIGHBORING BUILDING 810 HYMAN PROPOSED HEIGHT STUGCOSI.ING 5 O] PAINTED NCO. / _ /_— ——— —C 28'HEIGHT LIMIT - --- -- -- - _ --- - - - - - - - - - - - 123'8 314 O WOOp PING(RAINSCREEN APPLGATIONI A R C H I T E C T S T - AT R L L C __ -----__--___ :EL 112za 1rz' P.O. BOX 2508 - ----- —-—-—- -- COMPOSTEPANEL ASPEN CO 81612 VVVV1N.Z0NE4ARCHITECTS.00M I I � T.O.PARAPET RTICAL _ 6 VE icXTUREp CONCRETE L7 I LE17�L7Ej7 5 _ _ _ n I Li __—____ —_ EL.-109'-2'.2' 0 W SECOND LEVEL _ 111111 ICI T F 11—AIP (HANDRAL NOT DEPICTED FOR CL4RITY) I — • EXISTING RAO EL a 100.0. W T O.F.F FIRST LEVEL I 0 2' a — ll 3 T.O.STORAGE F.F. - —_—_—___ —.7 Z — -- —___ EL t91 i/4 - - T.O.GARAGE F.F. � W FOUNDATION BELOW � Q P \� PROPOSED FINISH GRADE BEYOND Z __—_ _—_—_—___—__\_—_—,<,—_—_—___ _______—_—_— -L.91'-712• r ' - - _ _ =O.F.F 9ASEMENT;EVEL Z Q r B W5o � PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Q = (02 a o (DU)U Z< 2 oWW Boa soN BUILDING ADpITION b EX STING BU LO NG rl�A' ID N NEW 3'E'HIGH �/I W O GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND - TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT AND \\ a STAIR BEYOND �, 28'HEIGHTLIMIT NEW UPPER LEVEL ROOF 28'HEIGHT LIMIT WITH CLERESTORYWINDOWS N EL+123'-8 3/4".: _ '\_ ---- -- I,�{EL a,>z_8,2• N 4 T.O.ELEVATOR ' 7.0.UPPER ROOF ELa122'1"x T.O.PARAPET --- _ 0 PARAPET ~ -—-—- —_— — —-— — U -—---—- —�0 ROO OF c I _I R EMOOELED DEC X WITH ]PHIGHAR -j r GU DRAIL 3 —_—_—_— — .109- 1 sk T.O.F .SECOND LEVEL ?: c STEELODLUMN BYHPCEAPPL11COAT ON1D126.E RELOCATED STAIR 0 REVISED HPG APP101 A 1 AS _b 23 8 _ I. O F��a FRST oa AMENDED HH PPC C 08 01 U RACE 2. a6 "e t EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN R / ` _ •/_—_— FINISH GRADE BEYOND GARAGE BEYOND / — / CONCRETE FOUNDATION BEL DfBWII bY: Z4A .F EXISTING GRADE AT / OW _o FACADE BEYOND AMENDED CONCEPTUAL ___ _ _ _ _ _ LET •91'-7 12' - PTO F.F.BASEMENT LEVEL OUTLINE OF'WINOOW BEYONp —- _ _ _ _ _—_ _ _—_ _ _ _ r �_ _ _ _ _ —_ _ _ REVIEW ' L — — — _ — — _ _ _ _ _ --- _ _ _ _ 01 AUGUST,2013 NEW HANDRAILAND LANOING g PER CODE 3 PROPOSED m ELEVATIONS /0 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION A305 N a I i A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AMENDING HPC RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2013 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #27, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects has requested an amendment to the Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval granted by the adoption of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, the property is a designated landmark pursuant to City Council Ordinance #10, Series of 2013 adopted on May 13, 2013; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, and approved HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 by a vote of 4 to 1; and 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso #5, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report to HPC dated September 11, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended that HPC approve the amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 0. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants an amendment to HPC Resolution #4, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The elevations attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution are hereby conceptually approved. The window and door changes and the landscape changes are subject to review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews. 2. The increased size of the southwestern deck is to be restudied for Final Review. 3. The following conditions of approval that are part of HPC Resolution 45, Series of 2013 are satisfied: a. Condition #5: "For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south facade of the building." b. Condition #6: "For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors." c. Condition #7: "For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck." 4. The applicant shall submit a design for screening the mechanical equipment for review and approval during Final Major Development review. 5. The applicant shall submit more detailed information regarding the proposed planter boxes and landscaping for review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews 6. Conditions #1 to 4 and #8 of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 remain valid. 7. The Commercial Space represented on the second floor and illustrated in Exhibit A to the Resolution is not permitted to be used as residential space without a Land Use approval to convert the use. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 11th day of September, 2013. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso 95, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved amended elevations and plans. 602 E. Hyman Avenue—amendment to HPC Reso 45, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution#27, Series of 2013 0 A0 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Senior Planner RE: 602 E. Hyman Avenue — Substantial Amendment to Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review (HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013) DATE: Sept. 11, 2013 SUMMARY: 602 E. Hyman Avenue, at the corner of Hyman and Hunter Streets, was constructed in at least four phases, starting in 1960. The initial use was a one story, concrete block commercial/retail space. Additions/alterations occurred in 1964, 1966 and 1968. The property was designated a historic landmark through the AspenModern program in May via City Council Ordinance# 10, Series of 2013. HPC granted Conceptual Commercial Design and Conceptual Major Development approvals for a small addition along the alley and minor exterior changes on February 27, 2013 through the adoption of Resolution #5, Series of 2013.1 N addition to addressing some of the conceptual conditions of approval, the applicant requests an amendment to the Conceptual design approvals prior to submitting a Final design review ; application. The request includes the following: a larger garage, a second story atop the approved addition on the alley, removal of an approved deck and stairs, changes to the rooftop. Window and door changes associated with the deck and site plan amendments, and new landscaping at the corner are also proposed; however Staff recommends addressing these issues during Final Review when fenestration, materials, etc. are typically discussed. BACKGROUND: A substantial portion of the existing structure was designed and/or remodeled by Ellie Brickham during the 1966 modifications. Ellie Brickham is Aspen's first known female 1 HPC Resolution#5,Series of 2013 also granted approval of a parking waiver and a variance for the Trash/Utility/Recycle area in addition to recommending landmark designation of the property to Council. 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5,Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 1 of 9 architect, arriving in town in 1951. Ms. Brickham was a close family friend to the owners of 602 E. Hyman in the 1960s, and designed their family home on McSkimming Road. She also designed the recently landmarked building immediately to the east, the offices of Charles Cunniffe Architects. Staff recommends that HPC approve the amendment with conditions. APPLICANT: EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects. PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003. ADDRESS: 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. ZONING: C-1, Commercial. AMENDMENT TO CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT A list of the relevant HPC design guidelines is attached as "Exhibit A." The City has an adopted set of guidelines, "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives"which are in addition to the HPC design guidelines. Development on this site is affected by the chapter that addresses what is known as the "Commercial Character Area." All of the Conceptual level guidelines address setback and height issues that are not generally applicable to a remodel, as opposed to a completely new building. Staff finds that no additional review for Commercial Design is needed at this time. The following discussion addresses the Conceptual Major Development review criteria for changes to a landmark. The application clearly outlines differences between the approved changes (in yellow) and the proposed changes (in green). Proposed changes are discussed below starting with the conceptual conditions of approval that the applicant has included in this amendment. CONCEPTUAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S. For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fagade of the building. Staff Response: The deck and stairs referenced above (and the associated exterior door on the second level) have been removed. The exterior stair that accesses the lower level has been relocated to the interior of the building. (Refer to sheets A300, 301 and 304). Staff finds that this condition is met. 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 2 of 9 6. For Final HNC review, restudy the proposed roofiop monitors. Staff Response: The rooftop monitors refer to the pop-ups on the roof that increased the interior floor to ceiling heights. The conceptual Staff memo explained that "Because of low ceiling heights on the upper floor (7'(4"), roof'pop ups with clerestory, windows on the sides are proposed. These "monitors-" are over 4' tall. Although the proposal is below the height limit, the height of these features may be excessive and will be visible from many, locations. The applicant should restudy the monitors. " The applicant has been able to reduce the height of these features by about 1 foot by reducing window sizes and roof structure heights. (Refer to sheet A304). Guideline 7.3 addresses rooftop pop- ups. Staff finds that, considering the short floor to ceiling heights, the reduced height of the pop-ups meets Guideline 7.3 by minimizing the height was much as possible. Staff finds that this condition is met. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. ❑ Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. ❑ A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7. For Final IIPC"review, loner the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck. Staff Response: The hot tub was originally proposed atop one of the rooftop monitors pop-ups. The applicant proposes to relocate the hot tub to a new enlarged roof deck behind one of the roof pop-ups. The roof deck is about I foot above the roof membrane to provide space for sound deadening materials, and the hot tub is on top of the roof. A glass railing is proposed around the roof deck. (Refer to sheet A302) All of the rooftop features are shown to be below the 28 ft. height limit. Staff finds that this condition is met. RECONFIGURED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION: The most significant change from the conceptual approval is the proposal for an expanded second floor atop the conceptually approved rear addition. A rendering of the approved rear addition, which included a one car garage on the first floor and circulation on the second floor, is found on sheet A306 of the application. The new amendment includes a one car garage, small maintenance room, circulation and commercial space on the second floor. Also, a new mechanical area is proposed on the roof of the amended two story addition. "The revised plans add mass to the rear of the building, but on the other hand create a more organized design for the addition. The new mass clearly reads as a product of its own time. This property is challenging in that there are very minor changes since it was designed and there is limited space for an addition. The applicant originally considered a 602 E. Hyman Amendment to 1 IPC Reso 45, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 3 of 9 third floor, but decided to pursue AspenModern and to focus on a rear addition instead. During conceptual review Staff raised concerns about the connection between the new and old architecture that were not echoed by HPC. The discussion from the February Staff memo is below and minutes from the February HPC meeting are attached. Finally, staff is concerned with the fact that the proposed rear addition entirely destroys a fagade of the Brickham designed addition. This is a difficult issue because the proposed addition is placed in the appropriate location, at the back of the structure, and the rear fagade is typically consider secondary, or less "sacred" than the street facing facades. That said, the landmark designation is tied to Ellie Brickham's work, and the addition removes a fagade that represents her work. At the 610 E. Hyman project, which had some similar issues, a courtyard between the back of the original building and the start of the new construction preserves some of the original fagade. Staff recommends restudy that in some manner moves the addition more entirely towards the northwest or north east corner, creates a more minimal attachment between the new and old construction, or otherwise protects or exposes views to more of the Brickham alley fagade. The guideline in question is: 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. HPC approved the rear addition during Conceptual Review in February and the proposed amendment does not change the amount of the original building that is destroyed. Considering these facts and that there is a valid Conceptual approval for a rear addition, Staff is supportive of the new massing and design of the proposed addition. The proposed mass and form responds to Ellie's design and distinguishes itself as a new addition. Typically a connecting element is strongly recommended for a two story addition, but the jogs in the historic building and the addition as viewed from Hunter Street create the perception of a linking element. Staff is supportive of the proposed addition and finds that the guidelines below are met. Staff recommends that screening of the mechanical equipment be reviewed during Final Review. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. Amendment to HPC Reso#5,Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 4 of 9 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. DECK CHANGES: The applicant proposes to remove the approved second story deck on the southeastern portion of the building and to retain and to enlarge the deck on the southwest portion of the building. Staff is supportive of removing the southeastern deck. A new stair is proposed to access the southwestern deck. Staff is uncertain as to the date of the existing deck. F. The staircase to the ground was added recently. Staff is supportive of the stair replacement and recommends that HPC not approve an increase to the southwestern deck size. Increasing the deck will obscure more of the historic building on a primary street facing facade which is in conflict with Guideline 10.10 above. LANDING/STAIR: The applicant proposes a small landing, handrail and steps from an existing door on the west elevation to meet Building Code requirements._ Staff_is_ supportive of the request. COURTYARD/SITE DESIGN CHANGES: The applicant proposes built-in planters with benches in the southwest courtyard (the courtyard at the corner of Hunter and Hyman Streets). The planters are represented on the site plan, but little detail about the height, etc is provided. The applicant represents that detailed landscape plans for both courtyards will be provided for discussion at Final Review. Staff is not opposed to 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 5 of 9 creating a useable space in the corner courtyard, but recommends that more information be presented for review and discussion during Final Review when landscaping is typically addressed. WINDOW/DOOR CHANGES: The applicant proposes door and window changes that are associated with reworking the second floor decks, first level patio, and addition. Windows and door changes are addressed at Final Review; however the applicant has included these changes in the application for clarity. Staff recommends that HPC address these issues during Final Review. I Photograph dated 1975 at left.Photograph taken prior to 1967 at right Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that HPC grant an amendment to HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013 with the following conditions: 1. The elevations attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution are hereby conceptually approved. The window and door changes and the landscape changes are subject to review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews. 2. The increased size of the southwestern deck is not approved. 3. The following conditions of approval that are part of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 are satisfied: a. Condition #5: "For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fagade of the building." b. Condition #6: "For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors." c. Condition #7: "For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck." 4. The applicant shall submit a design for screening the mechanical equipment for review and approval during Final Major Development review. 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 6 of 9 5. The applicant shall submit more detailed information regarding the proposed planter boxes and landscaping for review and approval during Major Development and Commerical Design Final Reviews 6. Conditions#1 to 4 and#8 of HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013 remain valid. 7. The Commercial Space represented on the second floor and illustrated in Exhibit A to the Resolution is not permitted to be used as residential space without a Land Use approval to convert the use. EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Design Guidelines Exhibit B: HPC meeting minutes, February 27, 2013 Exhibit C: HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013 Exhibit D: Application 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 7 of 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AMENDING HPC RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2013 FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE, LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION # , SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL Ill: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects has requested an amendment to the Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval granted by the adoption of HPC Resolution 45, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, the property is a designated landmark pursuant to City Council Ordinance #10, Series of 2013 adopted on May 13, 2013; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC. must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and I listoric District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on l`ebruary 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, and approved HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 by a vote of 4 to 1; and 602 F. Hyman Avenue amendment to HPC Reso 415, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution 0 , Series of 2013 WHEREAS, Sara Adams, in her staff report to []PC dated September 11, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and recommended that HPC approve the amendment with conditions, and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 11, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, by a vote of NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby grants an amendment to HPC Resolution #4, Series of 2013 for the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The elevations attached as Fxhibit A to the Resolution are hereby conceptually approved. The window and door changes and the landscape changes are subject to review and approval during Major Development and Commercial Design Final Reviews. 2. The increased size of the southwestern deck is not approved. 3. The following conditions of approval that are part of HPC Resolution #5, Series of 2013 are satisfied: a. Condition 45: "For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fayade of the building." b. Condition #6: ``For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors." c. Condition #7: "For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck." 4. The applicant shall submit a design for screening the mechanical equipment for review and approval during Final Major Development review. 5. The applicant shall submit more detailed inf-ormation regarding the proposed planter boxes and landscaping for review and approval during Major Development and Commerical Design Final Reviews 6. Conditions #1 to 4 and#8 of HPC Resolution 95, Series of 2013 remain valid. 7. The Commercial Space represented on the second floor and illustrated in Exhibit A to the Resolution is not permitted to be used as residential space without a Land Use approval to convert the use. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the I Ith day of September, 2013. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: 602 E. Hyman Avenue amendment to HPC Reso 85, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution# Series of 2013 Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk Exhibit A: Approved amended elevations and plans. 602 F. l Lyman Avenue amendment to HPC Reso 115, Series of 2013 HPC Resolution 4 . Series of 2013 "Exhibit A: Relevant HPC Design Guidelines for 602 E. Hyman , Conceptual Review" 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. ❑ Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. ❑ Retain and repair roof detailing. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. ❑ Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. ❑ A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.6 When planning a rooftop addition, preserve the overall appearance of the original roof. ❑ An addition should not interrupt the original ridgeline. See also: Chapter 10, Guidelines for Building Additions 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. ❑ An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5,Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 8 of 9 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. ❑ A 1-story connector is preferred. ❑ The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. ❑ The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. ❑ Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. ❑ Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. ❑ Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. ❑ Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. ❑ Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. ❑ For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. ❑ The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 602 E.Hyman Amendment to HPC Reso#5, Series of 2013 Sept. 11,2013 Page 9 of 9 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 Chairperson, Ann Mullins called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Willis Pember, Jamie McLeod, Patrick Sagal and Sallie Golden. Absent were Nora Berko, Jane Hills and Jay Maytin. Staff present: Deborah Quinn, Assistant City Attorney Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy City Clerk Justin Barker, Planner Debbie commented that the affidavit of posting is in order and the applicant can proceed- Exhibit I. 514 E. Hyman — Final Major Development — CommereiOesign Standards vx' Sallie cused herself. Justin B er said this property was recently designated a landmark Aspen Modern pro rty. Conceptual approval was granted''to restore, renovate and add a third flod�,I-esidential addition. After fina�ubmission the property was sold and the w owner wishes to change.,the program. They would like to replace the residential with all commerci�Lf."'_ There are very few architectural changes proposed. There wP�a residential door on the front and that would change to'b� more consistent with the original design. With the changes in the program flew variances are needed for on-site parking and HPC needs to review the utility'/Iras /recycling plan. The front plaza is a raised area and that is proposed t, e removed. Staff feels that should be re- created to be consistent with th(; ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 should be no wal on the east. Possibly have some more benches facing south. The form o e third floor windows following the original i's ja glrod design. Willis said he also agrees wi staffs recommendation The handrail is not appropriate anymore. Molny di o extensions for landscape. The original plaza did come out to the property and "cla �zn the space. This can be handled by two monitors and staff. " MOTION: Patrick moved to approyf solute #4 with the seven conditions and that the lineal lig i g strip of the it be reviewed by staff and monitor. #2 should say p r to the building perm There should be two monitors and staff. tion second by Jamie. Motion rried 4-0. Patrick, Jamie, Ann a illis. Willis and Ann e the monitors. 602 E. Hyman — AspenModern Negotiation for Voluntary Landmark Designation, Conceptual Major Development and Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver, Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area Debbie commented that the affidavit of posting is in order and the applicant can proceed- Exhibit I. Amy said the project is an Aspen Modern discussion. The same family owned the property from the mid 1960's until very recently. They have offered to voluntarily designate the building. It was a one story block building built in 1960 and in 1964 a large display window was added. In 1966 there was an addition added running from east to west which has Ellie Brickham name on it. In 1968 the second story was added. Staff feels three of the criteria are met. Ellie Brickam was the first woman architect in Aspen and regarding the criteria it scored 17 out of 20. It doesn't have many alterations. Staff supports designation. The applicant is only asking for a parking waiver and are not asking for anything beyond the normal. The addition on the alley displaces three of the four parking spaces on the alley that they need to have. They are asking that HPC waive the parking fee which is $30,000 per space. Regarding the conceptual design right now it has commercial space in the basement and on the main floor. The upper floor has two residential units. The entire upper floor will become 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 residential and leave the commercial space in place. There will be an addition in the back which is mainly circulation and elevator stairs and one enclosed parking space for the residential unit. "There isn't quite enough public amenity space on the site now but they are improving the situation and a variance is needed. There is a roof overhang on the west side upper floor and staff would like to see that removed. It doesn't appear to be original. HPC does not typically review color but the black and white color is important to that period. There is currently a second floor deck on the corner of Hyman and Hunter and it has a staircase built to the ground. They- propose to remove the stair and bring the deck a little more to its original configuration. This creates the need on the other side of the building for a new deck and a new access to the second floor and staff doesn't support that because it never existed before and it diminished the vertical nature of that facade. There are some roof monitors proposed on top of the building and they would like to bring in some more light and the monitors are over 4 feet tall and we would like to see that brought down in height. We also do not support the hot tub. The addition covers a large portion of the alley fagade and we would like to see a restudy as to how the old and new attach to each other. Maybe a lighter connection or a hallway rather than have the two collide with each other. Regarding the trash area they have proposed a design that the Environmental Health seems adequate with. Staff recommends continuation because of the design and roof monitors and how the addition connects to the historic building. Sunny Vann — Vann and Associates represented the applicant Dillon Johns, architect Sunny said the history of the project is interesting. The applicant had admired the building and had been a guest in the residential unit. He offered the owner to buy it and they accepted. At the same time the city was in the process of reducing the height in the CC zone district. We put an application together and submitted it the day before the regulations went into effect. The project got approval from P&Z for the commercial design. After closing of the property the owner decided he could fulfill his needs by just remodeling the second floor. This would be less time consuming and less expensive and less impact on a building he liked. The third floor application was withdrawn. He couldn't do what he wanted without designation and the owner has no problem with the preservation of the building. The project is under the FAR and under the maximum height. The public amenity space will increase and as a result we will have a project that is far more 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 ambitious. The applicant is requesting a modest addition to the rear of the building and modifications that would enhance the livability of the units. The parking reduction results because of an ADA accessible space in the back. The owner is requesting a parking waiver. This will be a desired example of the AspenModern movement. The unit is 1600 square feet and net livable will be 2300 square feet. We have obtained a TDR to accommodate the expanded unit upstairs. The floor area is a little larger due to the circulation elements but is less than the 3,000 square feet that the zone area allows. Dillon Johns said currently there is an interior court yard between the walls of this building and Charles Cunniff s building next door. This part of town has a significant grade change and we need to address the ADA access. We also do not want to impact the three trees along Hunter St. It is the owner's intention to preserve those trees. The trash area might have a few changes to the width. We have lost some parking by the nature of the ADA ramp. There are no changes to the lower level except an egress that is required. The elevator and stair join the existing north wall of the building. On the ground floor we are adding the elevator, stair and garage. There is some modification to the existing wall to accommodate the elevator and stair. The existing unit runs along half of the building and there is some commercial storage there. The existing deck has been pulled back. There will be a stair on the interior of the east elevation. On the west side not a lot of change. The desire is to keep the white and black color scheme. Dillon did a power point on the proposed changes. Jamie said the south stair will be moved from the west side to the east side. Sunny said there is a wrought iron fence around the courtyard and that area will be cleaned up. We could leave the stair where it is and meet our egress requirements but we have to include the stair in the courtyard below it because we need to get to the basement. The stairs do not stack. The current floor area is 5351 sq.ft. of the overall building and the proposed is 6184 square feet including the addition. The allowable floor area is $15,000 square feet. We are adding 883 square feet mostly for the stair tower and elevator. 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 Amy said with moving the stair from one side to the other the wrought iron fence might be a Francis Whitaker fence. If it is his the fence should probably stay there. Patrick asked about what is proposed on the roof. Sunny said the roof contains a hot tub and mechanical equipment. Chairperson, Ann Mullins opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. The public comment section of the agenda item was closed. Issues: Designation Restoration issues Design issues Ann commented that the board members agreed that the building should be restored and designated. Patrick said he likes the stairs on the new design on the east. The hot tub should be lowered. Sunny said they can lower the hot tub and we can come up with a better arrangement for the transformer. We can evaluate the fence for final. Jamie said she is fine with the addition in the back as it is minimal. At final we need to look at what the pop ups look like and the fenestration of them. For final you need to look at the public space vs. the private space. This is a great project and we appreciate saving the building. I am OK with cash and lieu but I don't know how much should be waived. Willis said he is fine with the waiver and cash-in-lieu. This is one of the finest buildings in downtown. The huge trees destroy the architecture and it would free up space. It would be great if you could preserve as much as possible that is there. Ann said the building is terrific and I am glad that it is not going to three stories. I support waiving the parking and the cash-in-lieu. You are underutilizing the square footage and you are under the height requirement. I feel we should move forward. 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 27, 2013 Sallie said this is a great project and she supports not having to pay the cash- in-lieu. They should get some benefit for saving the building. The addition is in the best place. I would suggest studying the pop ups for final and define what is original and what is new. MOTION: Patrick moved to approve resolution 46 with conditions: Restudy the stairs on the south and restudy the roof monitors. Approve the waiver of cash-in-lieu and we recommend to council designation of the property. The hot tub to be lowered. Motion second by Jamie. Friendly amendment Willis made the amendment to maximumize restoration and minimize the connection to the north elevation, second by Ann. Amendment died. Vote on Motion: Ann, yes; Sallie, yes; Patrick, yes; Willis, no. Motion carried 4-1. MOTION: Jamie moved to adjourn, second by Sallie. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:00 p.m. GL Kathlee nckland, Chief Deputy Clerk 8 • A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ASPENMODERN HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION F012 THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO, AND APPROVING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARD REVIEW, PARKING WAIVER AND SPECIAL REVIEW FOR UTILITY/TRASH/RECYCLING AREA RESOLUTION #5, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LL.C, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects. has requested that the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado be considered for voluntary historic designation through the AspenModern negotiation as described at Section 26.415.025 and Section 26.415.030 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applicant also requested approval for Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, a Parking waiver, and a reduction in the required utility/trash/recycling area; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;" and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.1).3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26,412.040 of the Municipal Code. "The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, HPC may grant reductions to the Utility/Trash/Recycling area based on the review standards of Section 26.575.060; and RECEPTION#: 597708, 03/14/2013 at 10:36:37 AM, 602 E. I lyman Avenue-AspenModern 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO HPC Resolution#5,Series of 2013 WHEREAS, IIPC may grant parking variances based on the review standards of Section 26.415.1 10.0 and Section 26.515.040; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated February 27, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. The staff recommendation was that the property should be designated a landmark as it meets the criteria for designation and the integrity score qualifies as the "best" category of historic resources. Staff recommended that the design review be continued for restudy of some aspects of the proposal; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria, with conditions, by a vote of 4 to 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby finds that the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado meets the designation criteria of Land Use Code Section 26.415.025 and 030. HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver and Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area with the following conditions: L IIPC finds that 602 East Hyman Avenue meets designation criteria a, c, and e, listed in §26.415.030.0.1 2. HPC finds that 602 East Hyman Avenue is a "best" example of Modern architecture. 3. HPC hereby accepts the proposed utility/trash/recycling area, with the condition that it be designed to allow the dumpster to be turned parallel to the alley for emptying. The applicant must identify options that would also allow the dumpster and recycle bins to be attached to the fence to prevent wildlife from knocking them over 4. HPC hereby waives the on-site parking requirement and cash-in-lieu fee for three parking spaces required by the redevelopment application. 5. For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south facade of the building. 6. For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors. 7. For Final IfPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck. 8. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. 602 E. Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution t#5, Series of 2013 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of February, 2013. Ann Mullins, Chair Approved as to Form: Deb ie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: n Kathy Str ckland, Chief Deputy Clerk 602 E. Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013 VANN ASSOCIATES, LLC Planning Consultants 4;}; August 5, 2013 HAND DELIVERED Ms. Amy Guthrie Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 602 East Hyman Avenue Amended Conceptual HPC Application Dear Amy: Please consider this letter an application to amend the conceptual major development and commercial design review approval for the expansion of the so-called Ellie Brickham building which is located on Lots K and L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen (see Exhibit 1, Pre-Application Conference Summary, attached hereto). The application is submitted pursuant to Sections 26.412.080.B. and 26.415.070.D.3. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations (the "Regulations") by EB Building Aspen, LLC (hereinafter "Applicant"), the owner of the property (see Exhibit 2, Title Insurance Policy). Permission for Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent the Applicant is attached as Exhibit 3. A land use application form, an application fee agreement and a list of property owners within 300 feet of the project site are attached as Exhibits 4, 5 and 6, respectively. Background On February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission adopted Resolution No. 5 which granted conceptual major development and commercial design review approval for the expansion of the existing mixed-use building located at 602 East Hyman Avenue (see Exhibit 7). In addition, the Resolution reduced the expanded building's on-site parking requirement and waived the required payment-in-lieu fee therefor; granted special review approval for its utility/trash/recycling area; and recommended that the City Council historically designate the property. Copies of the approved conceptual plans and elevations are attached as Exhibit 8. The property was historically designated on May 13, 2013 pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 10, Series of 2013 (see Exhibit 9). P.C. Box 4827 ° Basalt,Colorado 81621 . 970/925-6953 ° Fax 970/920-9310 vannassociates@comcast.net Ms. Amy Guthrie August 5, 2013 Page 2 Proposed Amendment As the attached drawings illustrate (see Exhibit 10), several changes are proposed to the project's conceptual approval. Three of the changes address specific conceptual approval conditions, and various changes to the building's fenestration, decks and courtyards are proposed to facilitate its use for residential and commercial purposes. The building's second floor addition has also been expanded to recapture unused existing commercial square footage and to enhance the addition's architecture. The proposed changes are addressed in detail below. A. Conceptual Approval Conditions 1. Condition number 5 of HPC Resolution No. 5 requires the Applicant to "... restudy the new deck and stairs on the south facade of the build- ing". While this condition was to be addressed at final HPC review, the project architect has chosen to address it in this application. More specifically, the exterior stair located in the southeast courtyard which provided additional access to the building's second floor, and the adjacent deck and master bedroom door, have been removed (see Sheet A300 and A301, Exhibit 10). In connection therewith, the exterior stair to the building's lower level, which was also located in the courtyard, has been relocated to the interior of the building (see Sheet A300, A301 and A304). The removal of these features will essentially preserve the existing appearance of both the courtyard and the building's southeast elevation. 2. Condition number 6, which also was to have been addressed at final HPC review, requires the Applicant to "... restudy the proposed rooftop monitors". The area of the rooftop pop-ups (i.e., the monitors) has been reduced (see Sheet A302) and their height has been lowered by approximately one foot. The reduction was accomplished by reducing the height of the pop-ups' windows and their roof structure (see Sheet A304). 3. Condition number 7 requires the Applicant to "...lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck". The hot tub has been relocated from the top of the master bedroom pop-up to a new enlarged rooftop deck. While lower than the pop-ups, the deck is approximately one foot higher than the actual building roof to permit the inclusion of sound deadening material between the hot tub and the master bedroom area below (see Sheet A302). v Ms. Amy Guthrie August 5, 2013 Page 3 B. Fenestration, Deck and Courtyard Revisions 1. The ground floor windows on the building's south facade within the southeast courtyard have been replaced with glass doors of a similar size to allow enhanced access to the courtyard from the interior commercial area (see Sheets A300, A301, and A304). 2. The ground floor window on the building's east facade within the southeast courtyard has been removed and the door to the south of the window has been replaced with a window (see Sheets A301 and A304). 3. The second floor entry door on the building's east facade within the southeast courtyard has been replaced with a window due to the removal of the courtyard stair and deck (see Sheets A301 and A304). 4. The ground floor window on the building's west facade within the southwest courtyard has been enlarged (see Sheets A301 and A305). 5. The existing second floor deck within the southwest courtyard has been modified and expanded to the south. A new reconfigured stair is proposed to enhance the functionality of the courtyard (see Sheets A300, A301, A304 and A305). The existing deck and stair are later additions to the original building and are not considered historic. 6. The second floor sliding door on the building's south facade within the southwest courtyard has been relocated to the west facade to accommodate the reconfigured stair. A window has been added to the south facade to replace the relocated sliding door (see Sheets A301, A304 and A304). 7. The existing landing adjacent to the ground floor entry door on the building's west facade has been removed as it does not meet building code requirements. A new landing at the same elevation as the ground floor with steps down to grade and code required handrails is proposed as a replacement (see Sheets A300, A301 and A305). 8. The garage has been enlarged slightly to facilitate access and a small maintenance storage area has been added adjacent thereto (see Sheets A301 and A305). 9. Landscape planters and seating have been added within the southwest courtyard (see Sheet A300). Detailed landscaping plans for both courtyards 11 Ms. Amy Guthrie August 5, 2013 Page 4 will be provided with the Applicant's final major development and commercial design review application. C. Expanded Second Floor Addition The prior conceptual approval included a two-story addition to the rear of the building containing a one-car enclosed garage and an elevator and stair tower which provided additional access to all building levels. While the stair and elevator tower were required to meet building code requirements, the addition arguably resulted in a discordant grouping of individual massing elements. By reallocating existing commercial space to the area above the garage, the revised design both recaptures unused commercial square footage and allows the addition to become a more cohesive architectural element that differentiates itself from the historic re- source. No increase in the building's existing net leasable area is required to accom- modate the expanded second floor addition (see Sheets A301, A302, A304 and A305). The changes described above result in minor revisions to the project's development data. While the revised floor area, net leasable/net livable area, and pedestrian amenity space calculations are not included herewith, we can easily provide the data should you wish to review them. Should you have any questions, or if I can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, j unSSOCIATES, LLC n` ann - - - - ,t SV: wv Attachments cc: Dylan Johns Daniel Hunt d:\oldc\bus\city..app\app5 89 12.hpc EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Guthrie, 970.429.2758 DATE: 6.21.13 PROJECT: 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lots K and L, Block 99 REPRESENTATIVE: Vann Associates, Zone 4 DESCRIPTION: 602 E. Hyman is a mixed use building, constructed beginning in 1960. The property has recently been designated a historic landmark through the AspenModern program. On February 27, 2013, HPC awarded a Conceptual design approval for minor changes to the original building, and a small addition along the alley. Approval was through Resolution #5, Series of 2013. The property owner has since determined that a somewhat larger rear addition is needed. Section 26.415.070.D.3.c.2 addresses changes to Conceptual approvals and states Approval of a conceptual development plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the envelope of the structure(s) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the conceptual plan application including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the final development plan unless agreed to by the applicant. If the applicant chooses to make substantial amendments to the conceptual design after it has been approved, a new conceptual development approval hearing shall be required, pursuant to Section 26.415.070.D.3. While a new hearing is required, the request is simply to amend the previous approval, not nullify it and start over. The application should provide drawings which graphically highlight the changes from the original Conceptual approval to assist HPC in their evaluation. Resolution #5 contains some conditions of approval related to design that were to be restudied for Final, but could perhaps be resolved now. Guidance on specific application contents follows. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common_Development Review Procedures 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.415 Historic Preservation, Major Development 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.575.060 Utility/trash/recycle service area 26.710.150 C-1 Zone District Review by: Staff for completeness, HPC Public Hearing: Yes, at HPC Referral Agencies: None Planning Fees: $1,300 for 4 billable hours (additional hours are billed at $325 per hour) Referral Agency Fees: None Total Deposit: $1,300 Y ❑ Proof of ownership. ❑ Signed fee agreement with payment. ❑ Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ❑ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. ❑ 10 Copies of the complete application packet and maps. ❑ An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ❑ Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part thereof, may be waived-by the Community Development Department-if the protect is determined-not to warrant a survey document.) ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. ❑ List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing ❑ Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. EXHIBIT Owneres Policy of Title insurance ® Schedule � Issued by Name and Address of Title insurance Company:Westcor Land Title Insurance Company,201 N. New York Avenue, Suite 200,Winter Park,Florida,32789 State:CO County PITKIN Address Reference:602 E.HYMAN AVE.,ASPEN, CO 81611 File No.:PCT23415W7 Policy No.`OP-6-CO1045-2752804 Amount of Insurance:$6,700,000.00 Premium:$11,060.00 Date of Policy:June 20,2012 @ 11:57 AM SimultaneousIP LP-1 3-CO 1045-2752805 Reinsurance# 12-202 1.Name of Insured:EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC,a Texas limited liability company 2.The estate or interest in the Land that is insured by this policy is: IN FEE SIMPLE 3.Title is vested in: EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC,a Texas limited liability company 4.The Land referred to in this policy is described as follows: LOTS K AND L, BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN STATE OF COLORADO Issued By Authorized Signatory SCHEDULE B-OWNERS CASE NUMBER DATE OF POLICY POLICY NUMBER PCT23415W7 June 20, 2012 @ 11:57 AM OP-6-CO1045-2752804 THIS POLICY DOES NOT INSURE AGAINST LOSS OR DAMAGE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING: 1. Any facts, rights, interests,or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession,or claiming to be in possession,thereof. 2. Easements,liens,encumbrances,or claims thereof,which are not shown by the public records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land,and that is not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien,or right to a lien, imposed by law for services, labor,or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, which lien,or right to a lien,is not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof;(c)Indian treaty or aboriginal rights, including but not limited to, easements or equitable servitudes;or,(d)water rights, claims or title to water(see additional information page regarding water rights),whether or not the matters excepted under(a), (b), (c)or(d)are shown for the public records. 6. Taxes or assessments which are not now payable or which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records 7. Any service,installation, connection,maintenance or construction charges for sewer,water,electricity, or garbage collection or disposal or other utilities unless shown as an existing lien by the public records. SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: 8. Taxes and assessments(not including condominium or homeowners association assessments or dues) for the year 2012 and subsequent years only,a lien not yet due and payable. 9. Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 113 and Book 79 at Page 11, providing as follows:"That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver,cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws 10. Mineral reservations as contained in Deeds recorded in Book 105 at Page 228 and Book 115 at Page 407. 11. Easement granted to the City of Aspen for Electric and Communication Utilities, recorded June 16, 1976 in Book 313 at Page 281 as shown on the Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers dated March 12, as Job Number 21092, 12. Deck, overhang, building encroachments as shown on Improvement Survey prepared by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated March 12 as Job No. 21092. 13. Deed of Trust from : EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC, a Texas limited liability company To the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN For the use of :TOLLESON PRIVATE BANK, a Texas banking corporation Original Amount : $5,360,000.00 Dated : June 18, 2012 Recorded :June 20, 2012 Reception No. . 589982 Assignment of Leases and Rents given in connection with the above Deed of Trust recorded June 20, 2012 as Reception No. 589983. EXCEPTIONS NUMBERED 1 THRU 7 ARE HEREBY DELETED, EXCEPT FOR SUBSECTION (d) UNDER PARAGRAPH NUMBER 5(WATER RIGHTS). EXHIBIT a November 19, 2012 Ms. Jessica Garrow Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Permission to Represent Dear Ms. Garrow: Please consider this letter authorization for Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC, Planning Consultants, to represent me in the processing of my application for Historic Designation of the existing commercial/residential building located at 602 East Hyman Avenue and such other land use approvals as may be required for the development of Lots K and L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Mr. Vann is hereby authorized to act on our behalf with respect to all matters reasonably pertain- ing to the aforementioned application. Should you have any questions, or if 1 can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. Yours truly, EB BUILDING ASPEN, LLC rj, (___ Daniel L. Hunt c/o Cristin D. Adam, Esq. Unity Hunt, Inc. 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4000 Dallas, TX 75201 (214) 415-9979 d Au1dc\bus\city.1tr\1tr58912.jg5 EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: Location: (Indicate street address,lot&block rruruber,legal description where a ro riate) Parcel ID 4(REQUIRED) Z73 7/ /0'e n4n d APPLICANT: Name: Cam/J Adch-ess: Phone#: Ise REPRESENTATIVE. Name: �° /' X �z-7 ls-g�-qcT'cv Address: -�� A/C 0/01 Phone TYPE OF APPLICATION:(please check all that apply): GMQS Excmptioii ❑ Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use ❑ GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PLUD(& P fD Aniendrneut) ❑ Texti'IbMap Ainendincnt ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA—8040 Greemline. Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(inCludes ❑ Final SPA(& SPA Mar-ill,Hallaun Lake Bluff. con(1omuiiLuruiZation) Arnendrnent) Alountain View Plane Conunercial Design Review ❑ Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion` Expansion ❑ Rcsidential Design Variance. ❑ Lot Line Adjustment � Other: ❑ Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings_ uses_previousapprovals.etc.) PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications_etc.) Have you attached the following? �mm FEES Dt?E:S_�S�� t4�fre Applicatioru Corrference Suirniauy (-:,kttacluncnt#1. Signed Fee Agrccnicnt /VC 1esponse to Attaclmient 43,Dunensional Requirements Form (Response to Attacluruent 44. Submittal Regtm-eurerits-Includiuig Written Responses to Review Starrdauds F] 3 1-1)Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5"Y 11"must be folded. A disk with an electric coPy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-1) model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if,-on must submit a 3-1) model. EXHIBIT 1 I DMA N Mel• 1 �J Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Phone No.: 214-720-1600 Owner ' EB Building Aspen, LLC (��I ): Email: accounting @unityhunt.com Address of 602 East Hyman Ave. Billing 1601 Elm Street Property: Aspen, CO 81611 Address: Suite 4000 (subject of (send bills here) application) Dallas, TX 75201 1 understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for Select Dept $0 flat fee for Select Dept $ 0 flat fee for Select Review For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for 54 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above t�sit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon Steven W. Caple Community Development Director Name: President of Hilltop Capital Holdings,LLC,its Sole Manager City Use: 0 Title: Fees Due: $ Received:$ 20 1 City of Asp 1 S. Galena St. 1 (970)9 1 1 1 Easy Peel1'Labels i Bend along line to ► EXHIBIT Use AvegOTemplate 51600 j �e Paper"'��' eVos9Pop-up9dgem. j 204 SOUTH GALENA STREET LLC 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP a SHERMAN&HOWARD LLC 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFL 201 N MILL ST#201 DENVER, CO 80218 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 ASPEN, CO 81611 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 - 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 530 HOPKINS LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 5301/2 E HOPKINS 610 E HYMAN AVE 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 633 SPRING II LLC 635 E HOPKINS LLC ALPINE BANK ASPEN 418 E COOPER AVE#207 532 E HOPKINS ATTN ERIN WIENCEK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD SPRINGS,CO 81602 ASPEN ART MUSEUM ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC 590 N MILL ST 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN PLAZA LLC AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC AVP PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1709 532 E HOPKINS AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 C/O STEVE MARCUS ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASS CAHN 601 LLC BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BAUM ROBERT E PO BOX 4060 HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1518 ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2847 STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BG SPRING LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 300 S SPRING ST#202 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 BISCHOFF JOHN C BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 10509 HUNTING CREST LN TUCSON,AZ 85716-5843 534 E COOPER AVE VIENNA,VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 BPOE ASPEN LODGE#224 CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC 210 S GALENA ST#21 630 E COOPER AVE 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 STE G ASPEN,CO 816113551 Etiquettes#acitesApeler p A Repliezi.tia-hachureafinde I viww-avery-com Utilisez le aabarit AVERY@ 5160® ,.c,5��s d- reveler fe rebord Pop-upTm ; 1-800-GO-AVERY ; Easy Peep'Labels A Bend along line to Use Avery®Template 51600 j Feed Paper expose Pop-up Edgem ®Q A�� 51600 1 'CICUREL CARY CITY OF ASPEN CJAR LLC 2615 N LAKEWOOD ATTN FINANCE DEPT 2514 LAKE MEAD DR CHICAGO, IL 60614 130 S GALENA ST LAFAYETTE,CO 80026 ASPEN, CO 81611 COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST DUNN JUDITH A REV LIV TRUST C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 3284 SURMONT DR 8051 LOCKLIN LN 418 E COOPER AVE#207 LAFAYETTE,CA 94549 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48382 ASPEN, CO 81611 EDGETTE JAMES J&PATRICIA ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR&CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% 19900 BEACH RD STE 801 PO BOX 4316 534 E HYMAN AVE JUPITER ISLAND, FL 33469 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 FERRY JAMES H III FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FURNGULF LLP BOX 166 C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 616 E HYMAN AVE GLENCOE, IL 600220166 520 E COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GELD LLC GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GONE WEST LLC C/O LOWELL MEYER 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 401 W CENTER PO BOX 1247 CHICAGO, IL 60611 SEARCY,AR 721451406 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 GOODING SEAN A 80%& RICHARD L GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC HYMAN LLC 20% PO BOX 6159 C/O PARAGON RANCH INC LOS ANGELES, BLVD#2222 SWANBOURNE WA 6010 620 E HYMAN AVE#1 E LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 AUSTRALIA, ASPEN, CO 81611 HOPKINS DEV LLC HORSEFINS LLC HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 345 PARK AVE 33RD FLR 601 E HOPKINS AVE 602 E COOPER#202 NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 JARDEN CORPORATION JENNE LLP JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR 1510 WINDSOR RD LLC BOCA RATON, FL 33431 AUSTIN,TX 77402 300 S HUNTER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 JOYCE EDWARD LCT LP TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP O BOX LLC P 1310 RITCHIE CT PO BOX 101444 PO BOX 77755 5 CHICAGO, IL 60610 ASPEN, CO 81612 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 M CUBED HOLDINGS LLC MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA PO BOX 9667 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 702 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN, CO 81611 i � e t tiquettesfasilesa0--er Aw Rtelliiezalabathtneafintle; vuw avery 0m ® 5eR5 � TM 9 Utilisez le gabarit AVERY®51600 rh�rnomcnt reveler le rebord Pop-up , 1-800-GO-AVERY � Easy Peel1'labels i A. ® Bend along line to �. � �516x® Use AveryO Template 51600 j Feedpaper�'�"' exposePop-uptdgem j - - 'MATTHEWS ZACHARY MCMURRAY WILLIAM&HELEN MORRIS ROBERT P PO BOX 10582 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 ASPEN, CO 81612 MOSMAN NSW 2088 ASPEN,CO 81611 AUSTRALIA, MYSKO ASPEN HOLDINGS NATTERER HELEN NIELSON COL STEVE&CAROL D 615 E HOPKINS AVE 67 BAYPOINT CRES 501 S FAIRFAX ASPEN,CO 81611 OTTAWA ONTARIO ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 CANADA K2G6R1, NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN OLITSKY TAMAR&STEPHEN PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81612 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 P&L PROPERTIES LLC PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% 101 S 3RD ST#360 ASSOC 534 E HYMAN AVE GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 REUSS LIGHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 NEW YORK, NY 10075 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81612 ROTHBLUM PHILIP 112 RUST TRUST RUTLEDGE REYNIE 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD#760 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR NEW YORK, NY 10075 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 SEARCY,AR 72143 SCHNITZER KENNETH L&LISA L SEVEN CONTINENTS LLC SHUMATE MARK 2100 MCKINNEY AVE#1760 601 E HYMAN AVE BLDG 421 G ABC DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STERLING TRUST COMP 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 418 E COOPER AVE#207 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 STEWART TITLE CO SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC PO BOX 669 300 S SPRING ST#301 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE HOUSTON,TX 77001 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TENNESSEE THREE TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS THOMPSON ROSS& LYNETTE PO BOX 101444 C/O J H COBLE 1502 GREYSTONE DR NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020 Etiguettesfadles A peter ; Reoliez elahachure afint e; vnvvkweryttrrtt Utilisez le aabarit AVERY®5160'D ' Sens-d, m ' 1-800-GO-AVERY' ° r�,,,.,,,,.„ ,,+ reveler le rebord Pau-up , tasy reel—Laoeis i A Bend along line to i i Use AveryO Template 51600 j FeedPaper expose Pop-up Edge*m j ® AVERY&5160® 1 TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 520 E COOPER AVE#209 5455 LANDMARKL PL#814 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 GREENWOOD VILLAGE,CO 801111955 ASPEN,CO 81611 WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W WF SWEARINGEN LLC 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE#200 PO BOX 1007 380 FOREST HILL RD DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE,GA 30655 MACON, GA 31210 WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE#2440 22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 FERNDALE,MI 48220 WOODS FRANK J III WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD PO BOX 12347 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, ASPEN, CO 81612 4tlquettes#adleSAIWef # s 1Repf►ez6fa ta—dweefinde4 VWWVV.MfYAVM 's Utilises le gabarit AVERY®5160® 1 rh=nomont reveler le rebord Pop-up'M ; 1-800-GO-AVERY ; • EXHIBIT • a e A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ASPENMODERN HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L,BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO,AND APPROVING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT, CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARD REVIEW,PARKING WAIVER AND SPECIAL REVIEW FOR UTILITY/TRASH/RECYCLING AREA RESOLUTION#S, SERIES OF 2013 PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS,the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects. has requested that the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado be considered for voluntary historic designation through the AspenModem negotiation as described at Section 26.415.025 and Section 26.415.030 of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the applicant also requested approval for Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, a Parking waiver, and a reduction in the required utility/trash/recycling area; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;"and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's conformance with the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040 of the Municipal Code. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, HPC may grant reductions to the Utility/Trash/Recycling area based on the review standards of Section 26.575.060; and RECEPTION#: 597708, 03/1412013 at 10:36:37 AM, 602 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModern 1 OF 3, R $21.00 Doc Code RESOLUTION Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO HPC Resolution#S,Series of 2013 WHEREAS, HPC may grant parking variances based on the review standards of Section 26.415.110.0 and Section 26.515.040; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report to HPC dated February 27, 2013, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards. The staff recommendation was that the property should be designated a landmark as it meets the criteria for designation and the integrity score qualifies as the "best" category of historic resources. Staff recommended that the design review be continued for restudy of some aspects of the proposal; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, including the staff recommendation, and public comments, and found the project to be consistent with the review criteria,with conditions,by a vote of 4 to 1. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby finds that the property located at 602 E. Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado meets the designation criteria of Land Use Code Section 26.415.025 and 030. HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development, Conceptual Commercial Design Review, Parking Waiver and Special Review for Utility/Trash/Recycling Area with the following conditions: 1. HPC finds that 602 East Hyman Avenue meets designation criteria a, c, and e, listed in §26.415.030.C.1 2. HPC finds that 602 East Hyman Avenue is a"best" example of Modern architecture. 3. HPC hereby accepts the proposed utility/trash/recycling area, with the condition that it be designed to allow the dumpster to be turned parallel to the alley for emptying. The applicant must identify options that would also allow the dumpster and recycle bins to be attached to the fence to prevent wildlife from knocking them over 4. HPC hereby waives the on-site parking requirement and cash-in-lieu fee for three parking spaces required by the redevelopment application. 5. For Final HPC review, restudy the new deck and stairs on the south fagade of the building. 6. For Final HPC review, restudy the proposed rooftop monitors. 7. For Final HPC review, lower the proposed hot tub to the main roof deck. 8. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1)year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30)days prior to the expiration date. 602 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution#5,Series of 2013 APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of February, 2013. Ann Mullins,Chair Approved as to Form: Deb ie Quinn,Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 602 E.Hyman Avenue—AspenModern HPC Resolution#5, Series of 2013 EXHIBIT .0 -------------- EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUETRATWE PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO CIML FOR'ROPOEED GRADING ELEVATIONG. ARC H I T E C TS NEWLANDSCAPE AREA L-L_C. RE:GML P.O. B 0 X 2508 NEW2 YARD GUNIPSTER ALLEY PROPERTYBOUNOM (Y�-7-0 '9*9' PAVED PARKING ASPENC08 1612 I w mIN.)7 WVAIV.ZONE4ARCHlTECTS.00M -—-—-—-—-—-—-—- -—-—- NEW FENCETOSCREEN �IOUTLI E OF ELECTR[CALTRANSFORMER, L EL+8-71 4" T.O.PARKING,RECYCLING,AND T GARAGE F.F. BUILDING ABOVE 0� TRASH UTLINE OF UTILITY EASENIENT -------------- ---------------- —EYJ.TING RETAINING WALL TO REMAIN (4)RECYCLE BINS ",`L-ANDED LANDSCAPE N,MGUTUNE OF PAVEMENT — V129 ACCESS AISLE — LOW WALL, RE:ELEVATION I TA ACCEW 9 S414 ---- (HUNTER REETENTRY) SLOPE RE RE:CR% ui 0 EXPANDED�NDSCAPE W I h ROOM PROPOSEDUTILITYMETERS z MECH, UJ U> _j -------- ------ z OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE a LANDSCAPE AREAS, • Lu a. z I COMMERCIAL EXISTING TIE RETAINING WALL H > Exismga BURRING U (MTH PROPOSED ADDITION) < STORAGE SEL—] LLI ■ o u RtSTRO 'T�" EMENT LLI z 4( In az L 0 w co 0. z ASED.PENIN. NEW (EXISTING DOOR TO BE RE.OvEO) m ST FLOOR ❑ cn MECH. W 0 ERXENOVni ON — L F _j OUTLINE OF Lu NEIGHBORING BUILDING o c: OUTLINE OF NEW CURB. I I COURTYARD N a NEW GUARDRAIL AND STAIRS 04 I—OUTLINE OF COMMERCIAL I NEIGHBORING BUILDING -111—T-1 RENOVATED, P L —K�NTER• Up COUM ------------- mom PROPOSED CORNER DESIGN SYCIVILENIGINEEER TO ACCOMWOATE HAK�� -------- 'C LITY. RESIM A" - ----- I�---------- 01 TRA- EXISTING TIE RETAINING A G1 I HFCAPPUCATION111,26.121 §t 2j W M REVISEDHPC APP 01.11.13 ------------------- EAST HYMAN AVENUE----------------- M_0 APP 02.13.13 3, EXISTING LIGHT PO§TAND­SIGNI-REJ' I ----------- ---------------- NEW HANDRAILS As REQUIRED,RE WL NEW RAMPS,RE CIAL Bg Drawn by: Z4A RE ---------- HISTORIC DESIGM I ION -------------- APPLICATION 13 FEBRUARY,2013 BASEMENT�LEVEL LEVEL �9��q�ED�SITE�PLAN PROPOSED SITE SCALE: BASEMENT LEVEL PLANS 5 a A300 Z O . N E �I A R C H I T E C T S D, Di L L C. Bz P.O. BOX s ASPEN CO 81612 V WW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM I r i T.O.GARAGE F.F. -- I I NEW 2 YARD DUMPSTER I NEW GARAGE ROOF BELOW (4)RECYCLE BINS al I --I ROOF ABOVE OUTALKW NNA W P! R NE OF N,EW R RE:CIVIL RE SLOPE _ G OUTLINEOFSTRUCTORE ON UP DN UP J 3 COMMERCIAL STAIR Al COMMERAL STAIR ql �' SLOPE SLOPE Sl0 STOR. i j C L R:CML E:CIVIL 9LLUM Q nr' O ui z F II VESTIBULE HALL#1 Y r O C �R Z IPESR iPROPOBEn1 c rtQa U,LOCATION ENIEX W -I ROOFABOVE LIGHTED EXR SIGN AT COMMERCIAL CLOSET Q e CEILINGABOVE W —_---— z FLOOR-TOLEIILING C NFOULECON6TRUCTION TO Z P' WINDOW CONFORIV T020EX1. Z BECTON 1027.1 EX 1. L I - E,= Z a.',0 3 D, I D, i ENTRY CLOSET Q N= s BATH Y2 0 DP COMMERCIAL SITTING r__I I KITCHEN I BEDamM Z<111 Z ? L OPEN I I = Q W BELOW-I RESID NM OULTINE OFNEW ^uj I VAULTED CEILING ABOVE J co YY +F} OL+108'-2 i/2" TT.O. SECOND FLOOR I I I (0 Y+ 3 E�._�� NEW PARTY WALL PER CODE I I NEW PARTYWALLPER CODE TT O.F.F.FIRST FLOOR I ( L NEW CUSTOM DOOR TO MATCHADJACENTWNDOM 'T -,,, , W W uj 7 I NEWDECKAHOVE NONCOM FOOWING RDO DOOR NEW SLIDING DOOR .0 SCREEN W 1 OUTLINE OF ON NEIGHBORING BUILDING I COURTYARD DECK DINNIG OUTIINEOP N I ROOM NEKiNBORINO BUILDING O � - 4�. NEW DECK WITH COURTYARD T I I 4r HIGN GUARDRAL a T.O.CONC. N L NEW DOUBLE DOOR LI PLANTER I I REPLACE BASTING SLIDING O NEW 4r HIGH GUARDRAIL TO DOOR AND GUARDRAIL MATCH EXISTING DECKABOVE _ PLANTER /I NEW BTAH2 r L COURTYARD NEW STAIRS LMNfi BELOW UP ROW GUARDRAIL 9 ON 3 ROOF ABOVE I G DUSTING BELOW TOREM i; TO REMAIN °g I I 3� �— ------------) BY REVISIONS DATE 01 HPCAPPLICATION 11.26.12 02 RIEVISEDHMAPP01.11,13 L� 03 AMENDEDHPCAPP.02.13.13 °eB yn N N H Drawn by: Z4A €€ HISTORIC DESIGNATION _ = PROPOSED FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN �T1 PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN �� APPLICATION 0 SCALE:,1R^ = r-D" 02 SCALE-1B" = r-0^ 13 FEBRUARY,2013 PROPOSED FIRST/ SECOND LEVEL a g FLOOR PLANS °} s w€ I A301 p_ E ad ii Ea {I Z O N E rAZAL r A R C H I T E C T S LLC. D2 D1 P.O. BOX 2508 3 ASPEN CO 81612 W WW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM s e NEW PARAPET 7 ON NEW TPO OR 38MILAR ROOF � 3 11 01 ELEVATOR SHAFT € UP NEW STNR u W NEW 1CHKIHGLASS U' GUARDRAILS uj NEW ROOFTOP DECK €O NEW813 HOTTUB Z ` Q r OUTLINE OF L ` NEW UPPER ROOF W C(p G'c. C _ Z IL 5.c r Q o z U) _ LINE OF 2 - VAULTEDCEILiNG BELOW W-1 co NEW CLERESTORY WNDOWS BELOW ' N 1Do i I I I U m O C Q W OUTLINEOF ; NEIGHBORING BUILDING N L COURTYARD ' BELOW N E ill I', OUTLINE OF CD ;I I; NEW UPPER ROOF co W NEWCLERESTORY NANDOW6 BELOW :I I. 'I I' i i S a3 S'= If oz �� B, BY REVISIONS DATE 01 UPC APPLICATION 11.26.12 D2 REMSED HPCAPP 01.11.13 �T 03 AMENDED HPC IPP.0113.13 0 3n g�S Drawn by: Z4A 2:€ Rd \ HISTORIC DESIGNATION W 1 PAROPOSED ROOF PLAN � 1 APPLICATION 13 FEBRUARY,2013 E "s1 g PROPOSED THIRD A-1 ROOF LEVEL FLOOR PLANS °3 e� o A302 Z ON E EXTERIOR SIDING LEGEND 41-- _!NG NEIGHBORING &AIDING O PAINTED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT(CMN NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR FACADE BEYOND WZL NEW UPPER ROOFS WffH r CLEREIITORYW7NO O2 STUCCO SIDING NEWT-6'HIG GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND 28'HEIGHT LIMR ___ ____________________ _ _ NEh3HBORING SUILDING ARCH L TC C. T 610 HUMAN FRONT FACADE Q PAINTED WOOD SIDING P.O. BOX 2508 —_ -—-—_ __ __ _ _7 q ASPEN CO 81612 7.o UPPPER ROOF WWW.ZCNE4ARCHITECTS.COM OO T,O�PARAPET _—_—_—_—_— _—_—_—_—_—_—_— _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—- _— - T.O�ROOF Tn_ _ RI FF11 NEW STAIRANO DECK 5 C 1 T.4 F.F.SECOND LEVEL 4 J \ WNEW 36-GUARDRAIL EXERTING CIXIRTYAIiDGRACE Q W / / // BEYOND TO REMAIN O 7 B / EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN ? / -U Z EL T.O�F.F.FIRST LEVEL W W �> BEFOUNDATION FOUNDATN J Q JZ� a Z Q r 3 ,DEL+s7'_�1rz" W L —_ — _———_ _ ______ _________ __—__—__ — —_—_--—_ _—_ T.O.F.F.BASEMENT LEVEL Z a 5.r G co 0 ROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION u ZQZ _ OWW Jcoa j°N to m'o NMXO HIG GLASS W 5 28'HEIGHT OMIT W NEW UPPER RGOF6 WRH > ° CLERESTORY NANDOW3 - --____ T _ _ ___ J$_ __ /�� L ---—-—- --------_—_____________y___ T.O.UPPPER ROOF •� — —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-— T.O.ELEVATOR c — ---------------- —1 — — EL-120'-1" —_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_L_ - T.O. 8'-53/4" 2 T.T. ROOF ° e I = / \ ELEVATORSHAFI / RESIDENTIAL m� � El+109'-17 3/4" �€ —� T.O.GARAGE ROOF PARAPET Ss Y T.O.F.f.SECOND LEVEL £E BY REVISIONS DATE 01 HPCAPPLICATION 11,28.12 ' COMMERCIA m'u5 02 EVISEDHPCAPP 07.11.19 { 03 AMENDED HPD APP.02.73.13 ` r_, 13 _-- --- T T.O.F.F.FIRST LEVEL Sg 1 a 9T-7 1!4" EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN p T- EF.F. g _ FINISH GRADE II _ NEW STEELSTAIRAND COMMERgAL Drawn by: Z4A a� II —r I LANDING - EXISTING GRADE HISTORIC DESIGNATION w APPLICATION _ STAIR BEYOND r. ° 9 — — I .._ _. ..... .... .. . _... _—_—_—_—___—_ AEL+s7'-712" 13 FEBRUARY,2013 a § ____________________ .: T� O.F,F,ggSEMENT LEVEL {!.. PROPOSED ° ELEVATIONS j 9 � PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION/SECTION A304 33 1. Z O . N E E,. _.G NEIGHBORING L EXTERIOR SIDING LEGEND BUI DING 1O PAINTED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT(CMU) NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN PROPOSED HEIGHT NEW 9'S XIGII GLASS TO ROPOSED EAST O STUCCO SIDING REFER TO PROPOSED EAST �VATiOH I SECTION FOR XEIGHT LNAR CONFORMANCE 28'HEIGHTLIMIT A R C H I T E C T S ———————————— — O3 PMNTEDWOOD SIDING L L C. ———————————- -— —————— A EL.+123'-11 3/4" — ---——— --—————————————— O. BOX 2508 --—— /---------------- - T.O.4 UPPER ROOF _—_—_ __ ____ _�____________ ASPEN CO 81612 EL.+123'-8 314" —�7.0.ELEVATOR NANI/J20NE4ARCHITECTS.00M .1120'-i" Y T.O.PARAPET —_—_— _—_—_—_—_—_ _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ _—_—_—_ —�EL+119'-53/4" T.O.ROOF 3 T.O.+109'-1 GARA1 3/4" GE ROOF PARAPET —_—_— — —_—_—_—_—_ _—_—_—_ _—_ — —_AEL+109'-217 T.O.F.F.SECOND LEVEL 0 €NEW RAMP W (GUARDRAIL NOT DEPICTED FOR CLARITY) W 111 EXISTING GRADE 0'_ ZT— O�F FIRST LEVEL `W F. W J/ a J Z, £ I PROPOSED FINISH GRADE BEYOND Z Q v' C —}—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— AEL.+91'-71/2" Wc T! F' BASEMENT LEVEL C{� 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Q Q= y V � Z< £ = OWW JCa o N i— mtDa NEW J'-fi'.HIGH GlAS3 GUARDRAIL BEYOND. m(� C REFER TO N I SECTION FOR W ELEVATION I SECTION FOR HEIGHT LIMIT CONFORMANCE 6 HEIGHT LIMIT W TOP OF ELEVATOR 6HAFT AND STAIR BEYOND HEW UPPER LEVEL ROOF ZY HEIGHT LIMIT ——— WITHCLERESTCRYWINDOW6 N ——————————— —————— ------------------- — ------—————— O ------------ ----- --- N m T.O.ELEVATVl —-—---—-— 8 E6.!127-8 3/4",L _ T T.O.UPPER ROOF 'A �i/ T.O.PARAPET EL*119'53/4" --------—_—_—_—_—___—_—_— _—_—_—_—_—_—_—___—_—_ _—_—_ T.O.ROOF ' FM MM GARAGE BEYOND / \ 9 B \ As ax T.O.F.F.SECOND LEVEL / / BY REVISIONS DATE >i / / 01 HPCAPPUCATK)N 11.2" / \ \ 02 REVISED HPC APP 01.11.13 \ \ 03 AMENDED HFC AFP.02.13.13 � e° FT 6.F.F.FIRST LEVEL �n TINGGRADETOREMAIN S 2° EXISTING GRADEAT ———— ————— ———————— FINISH GRADE BEYOND Drawn by: Z4A € FACADE BEYOND CONCRETE"U'DAT11H OELOW HISTORIC DESIGNATION Rag `s --- -------------------- ------ AE�L.— 1 APPLICATIONa T.O.F.F.BASEMEN LEVEL 13 FEBRUARY,2013 S 3e PROPOSED `3 a PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION ELEVATIONS ' 6CALE 3/16"= 1'-0" W° E /� `oF a A305 c. ao ?:ISheretllDatal ZC PmjMS1606 Eest HymmnlMndot`602 EHA Renptlel II-HPC.ptri z O q m v O v O y m a m _{ m O X cnx D z O 1 co m m z F cnr C 1 ;0 D m 0 0 $ S ° m g 5 602 EAST HYMAN REMODEL a N N A A O EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC m a 602 606 1608 EAST HYMAN AVENUE m ASPEN, CO 81611 z DV D N�O 0 n >ZW 2 ipO x o1 00,ro O n O 1 0 N0 N Z m m cn W m -0:0 W c nD < = < a Oz m ' ZD O 0 $ S ° m g 5 602 EAST HYMAN REMODEL a N N A A O EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC m a 602 606 1608 EAST HYMAN AVENUE m ASPEN, CO 81611 z DV D N�O 0 n >ZW 2 ipO x o1 00,ro O n O 1 0 N0 N Z m RECEPTION#: 602126, 08/0112013 at • 19:30 AM, EXHIBIT OF 4, R $26.00 Doc Code ORDINANCE • Janice K.Vos Caudill, Pitkin County,CO q a ORDINANCE#10 (Series of 2013) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO APPROVING ASPENMODERN HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE,LOTS K AND L,BLOCK 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-12-003 WHEREAS, the applicant, EB Building Aspen, LLC, represented by Vann Associates and Zone 4 Architects, submitted an application on January 11, 2013, pursuant to Aspen Municipal Code Section 26.415.025(C), _AspenModern Properties, to voluntarily participate in a ninety-day landmark designation negotiation for the property located 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO; and WHEREAS, Municipal Code Section 26.415.025.C(1)(b) states that, during the negotiation period, "the Community Development Director shall confer with the Historic Preservation Commission, during a public meeting, regarding the proposed building permit and the nature of the property. The property owner shall be provided notice of this meeting;"and WHEREAS, the property owner and representative met with the Historic Preservation Commission on February 27, 2013; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 27, 2013, the HPC considered the designation and proposed development, and found that 602 E. Hyman Avenue is a "Best" example of the Modern style in Aspen. HPC recommended City Council approval of Historic Landmark Designation; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)(d), states that, during the negotiation period, "council may negotiate directly with the property owner or. may choose to direct the Community Development Director, or other City staff as necessary, to negotiate with the property owner to reach a mutually acceptable agreement for the designation of the property"; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.025.C(1)d establishes that "as part of the mutually acceptable agreement, the City Council may, at its sole discretion, approve any land use entitlement or fee waiver permitted by the Municipal Code and may award any approval that is assigned to another Board or Commission, including variations;" and WHEREAS,the Community Development Department performed an analysis of the application for Landmark Designation and found that the review standards are met; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, Ordinance#10, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman,AspenModem Negotation Page 1 of 4 p WHEREAS,the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO,AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Historic Landmark Designation Pursuant to the procedures and*standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby approves Historic Designation for 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, subject to the conditions described herein. Upon the effective date of this ordinance, the City Clerk shall record with the real estate records of the Clerk and Recorder of the County, a certified copy of this ordinance. The location of the historic landmark property designated by this ordinance shall be indicated on the official maps of the City that are maintained by the Community Development Department. Section 2: Aspen Modern Negotiation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the City Council hereby accepts the following incentive, granted by HPC. 1. Waiver of the three parking spaces and the cash-in-lieu payment generated by the proposed remodel; and Section 3: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herein shall constitute-a site-specific development plan and a vested property right attaching to and punning with the Subject Property and shall confer upon the Applicant the right to undertake and complete the site specific development plan and use of said property under the terms and conditions of the site specific development plan including.any approved amendments thereto. The vesting period of these vested property rights shall be for three (3) years which shall not begin to run until the date of the publications required to be made as set forth below. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of§ 26.104.050, Void Permits. Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval by the Historic Preservation Commission, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders, such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Ordinance#10, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman,AspenModern Negotation Page 2 of 4 Q O Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules,regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights; or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 4: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded,whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Historic Preservation Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 5: Litigation This ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 6: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof.. The City Clerk is directed, upon the adoption of this ordinance,to record a copy of this ordinance in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 7: Public Hearin A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 13th day of May, 2013 in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same was published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. Ordinance#10, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman,AspenModern Negotation Page 3 of 4 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 11 th day of March, 2013. Michael C*Ireland,4iO r ATTEST: Kathryn Ko , City Clerk FINALLY, adopted,passed and approved this day of 013. e Michael C. Ireland, Ma x r ATTEST: *Kathryn f ty Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: James R.True, City Attorney Ordinance#10, Series of 2013 602 E. Hyman,AspenModern Negotation Page 4 of 4 ITD EXHI:BIT ] z o . N E i Ll NOTE N EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY REFER CIVIL FOR PROPOSED TO GRADING ELEVATIONS A R C H I T E C T S 01 L L C NEW 3 6'w]0 2 YARp PAVED ALLEY PROPERTY BOUNDARY 9? P.O. BOX 2508 PARKING a ASPEN C 0 8 1 6 1 2 DUMPS TER(WILL BE ABLE TO "1922 (9x IAN.) OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE W _ ATTACH TO FENCE) \/ ABOVE WINZQNE4ARCH TECTS.COM T - - _- - - - _ - NEW FENCE TO SCREEN _.t—— � - ----- — — - ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER, 2 ADA PARKING.RECYCLING,ASH fR OUTLINE OF TRASH ❑ F` r- ? EXISTING RETAINING BUILDING ABOVE OUTLINE OF UTILITY EASEMENT I WALL TO REMAIN _I Y T E O L G9A7 11 A7G1E/4 F" F 923 EXPANDED LANDSCAPE /9 (4)RECYCLE BINS, -1 _ � T.O.STORAGE F F (WILL BE ABLE TO ATTACH v TO NEW FENCE) -J _ NEWPAVEMENT —I I 5 x 20'ACCESS AISLE - ` -: NEWSTEPS \ EL`E •V UP Low—LL. STAIR#1 RE.ELEVATION = .rte. NEWACCESS RE:CIVIL 1n RE:CIVIL RE'.0 - (HUNTERSTREETENTRY) j9 ,�. Q W EXPAN DEDLANDSCAPE ` 9ry -- - - XRO X PRO POSED UTILITY METERS O LN G r z W MECH. Lu J SIDEWALK r--_ - - OUTLINE OF BUILDINGABOVE G LANDSCAPEAREAS -\ W W COMMERCIAL E—TING TE RETANN—ALL NEWSTEPS,HANDRAIL AND O LANDING PER CODE ,^ MEDIUM T�EL 91'- 2" K 7 B 1/gSEMENT R�STROOM�, p Lu w Co d SM —NEWCAGEDOPENING II A _ ry( (EXISTING DOOR AND WALL = I..t 1 TO BE REMOVEI MECH. ' ° - W m NEW sTA Rs— _� I I � --� GI/TLNEpF ui ISTING OUTLINE OF NEW CURB.— \'I RENOVATED URTYPRD TO BE --_ COURTYARD NE GHBOR NG BUILDING RE.G VIL r (SOUTHEAST) 0 c E,L T L*100.-0,. o coNC = mss= 1---OUTLINECF O - NOTE NEIGHBORING BUILDING NEW PLANTER _ = TYARD TO HE E COMMERCIAL I eENOV^TEO DR L-— NEW BENCH _ 3 4 )y25 ��--- -PLANTER I "NOTE. IsouTHwesrl -- - �1 _ PROPOSED CORNER DESIGN DN ,i BY CIVIL ENCwEEER TO ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP NEW PLANTER 7925 B 1111 II AGGESSIBILITY. ' SLOPE L- - _ ._ - - - _ _ - o - 1 �..� STING T ING F RETAIN 01 I �G L--a �` ]. 92^ \� � =!T �: ­LC BY REVISIONS DATE _ °" a93 >z — Ot HPC APPLICATION 11 26 12 n0 021REVISED HPC APP 01 1113 _ k NEWFENCE 7923 S 41 03 AMENDED HPC APP 021313 N EXISTING LIGHT POSTAND SIGN TO REMAIN a ]923 04 AMENDED HP CAP P;08.01 13• -- --- NEW HANDRAILS AS REQUIRED.RE CIVIL € -- NEW RAMPS.RE'CIVIL _ EAST HYMAN AVENUE E Drawn by. E —_-- �" 7924 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL w N N REVIEW 01 AUGUST.2013 s _ _ 18 To SCALE 1/B— 02; PROPOSED SITE PLAN BASEMENT�LEw 01 EL PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN PROPO D PLANS X4300 I o � Z O . N E dL EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY REFER TO CIVIL FOR PROPOSED GRADING ELEVATIONS. ARCHITECTS o1 L L C NEWS'-6'x]0"2 YARD PAVED ALLEY PROPERTY BOU NDARV 1 P.O. BOX 2508 __— IA INN ''3 ASPEN CO 8 1 6 1 2 GUMPSTER(WLL BE ABLE TO , 1922 (gx18 MIN.) OUTLINE OF 6TRUCTURE WVVW ZONEGARCHITECTS COM ATTACH TO FENCE) ABOVE _.4.�� _._. PARKING,RECYCLINTRA6H E E NEW FENCE TO SCREEry 2ADA ' ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER. ❑ OUTLINE OF EXISTING RETAINING ws BUILDING ABOVE „�„ � .'v'•-' WALL TO REMAIN OUTLINE OF UTILITY EASEMENT-- -_ T.O.GARAGE F.F III EXPANDED LANDSCAPE t 7'_1 (A)RECYCLE BINS , — - --j T.O.STORAGE EF (WILL BEABLETOATTACH _ }. TO NEW FENCE) — NEW PAVEMENT ' -- 5'x20'ACCESS AISLE NEWBTEPG --- i, n - k A SLOPE d,,..�} 4 u}"'. G }�•� RE.CIVIL 3�- r,�3+iii•. Ems. UP Low WALL .— �_ :<P '2s 1 h..'•' � I I 1 I x STAIR#1 RE'.ELEVATION 1,1 e NEWACCESS RE CIVIL a 92C F CIVIL RE'.CIV }„� =•'s. - _ (HUNTER STREET ENTRY) --�y 1 Z Z EXPANDED LANDSCAPE W ROOM a V~l PROPOSED UTILITY METER6 ^ r z Lu '� Lu U> MECH. J Q 61DEWALK - Y1' j Y �-—OUTLINE OF A ?k BUILDINGABOVE G LAN09CAPEAREA9— - k Ni IV 4 } 4 x�= g iF IDs w !. Z a COMMERCIAL y M ° EXISTING TIE RETAINING WALL pp__ { w NEWSTEPS,HAND RAIL.ANO 1` Q 0 0 O LANDING PER CODE i� �• � V H a .. EL 9EL 1'-_712' W Tom` O.F.F.BASEMENT W Ewa —NEWCASEDOPENI NG (EXISTING DOOR AND WALL 1L ITI TO BE REMOVED) _ FIE N ,w a W n MM r W w o MECH. _ Q NEW STAIRS - - T IN F - OU L EO I N W OUTLINE OF NEWCURB."- N ,~ ) RENOVATED RTYARD TO BE COURTYARD NEIGHBOR ING BUILDING 2` N a RE CIVIL (SOUTHEAST) 0 6 I` uP 1 EL.t 100'-0" 0 T.O.CONC. w I'—OUTLINE OF � NOTE. O - COMMERCIAL I NEIGHBORING BUILDING /F^ �\�NEW PLANTER E%ISTING DURTYARDTO BE RCN-ATE I L-— NEW BENCH P ANTER £ 92S ~� COURTYARD ;'—`1y •NOTE. (SOUTHWEST) ' PROP068D CORN ER DE SIGN III) I DN BY CIVIL ENGINEEER TO NEW PLANTER , ' ACCOMMODATE HANDICAP , - ]925 _ ' q ACCE65181LITV. SLOPE ----- So — — p h 1 t yzl �� �ti�y, Exlsnec nE REFAINING 01 11 �- L— WALL6 BYI REVISIONS DATE €� �\`\ �� ` •� �� 011.HPC APPLICATION 11.26.12 n 9 9 x^f NEWFENGE U3 PMENSD DHPC APP.02.1313 b 023 °a ----- EXISTING LIGHT POST AND SIGN TO REMAIN ao 041PMENDE-0HP APP-0&-01.13 h¢ -- - ----”" NEW HANDRAIL8 A6 REQUIRED.RE'.CIVIL � i —NEW RAMPS.RE.CIVIL I -- 3i EAST HYMAN AVENUE $ Drawn by Z4A € a _:.T __ Eo N 924 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL �F REVIEW �a 01 AUGUST,2013 E PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN(/_mj' v1 , PROPOSED SITE PLAN m PROPOSED SITE/ =o (o SCALE 1/8" 1'-0" l { �o BASEMENT LEVEL PLANS g° L A300 Z ON E I L i A R C H I T E C T S 02 01 oz °1 L L C. A3o5 P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO ESA , NNVW.ZO 4A CHHITCTC M 21ADA) __4 1 r BUILT-IN STORAGE El EN�IAL RESIII MAINTENANCE - GARAGE STORAGE NEW 2 YARD DUMPETER �_._A.. TO.GA 71/4 •eae RAGE F.F (3'b"a'I'-0') 1 STORAGE F.F. COMMERCIAL (4)RECYCLE BINS ADAACCESSAISLE -- UP ST AIR PER IBC 1009425. _"_�� HANDRAILPER IBC 1009.12 _ ROCFBELOW-- — OUTLINEOFNEWRAMP,� , WALKWAY.RE CIVIL DN SLOPE� .. L DN UP ELEV DN UP STEEL COLUMN STAIR t RE STRUCT. STAIR#1 OUTLINE OFSTRUCTUR E _SLOPE SLOPE -- W P H SLO E ...., � � LG TED EXIT 6IGN AT ABOVE RE'.CIVIL RE'.CIV Q RE'.CIVIL CEILING ABOVE DI F-11 HALL#1 O W VESTIBULE I W' N Z Lu PROPOSE D UTILITY W 6 BA E— a LOCATION ��� N ROOF ABOVE"""'"—"—-� COMMERCIAL CLOSET �� ENTRY P R EeL Y� J 6 VESTIBULE CONSTRUCTION TO Z r FLOOR-TO CEIILINO CONFORMT020091BC - Z r WINDOW SECTION ID2].1 EX &A HY3 Lu M S ER MA$E Z 01 ENTRY Q >-co ICI � 1 Q Q o — J 000 H a DN COMMERCIAL — -- — NEW LANDING AND HANDRAIL ---FIRE RATEDGLAZING BEDROOM I Q z PER CODE TCH N RESIDENTIAL _._ � �W W e co CL B �E f— OULTINEOFNEW Q +T-. { ° VAULTED CEILING ABOVE T.O F,F SECOND FLOOR, I (� NEW PARTY WALL PER CODE D NN G ( --'"NEW PARTY WALL PER CODE ML STAIRPERIBC10094.25. DN gQOm Y1 HANDRAIL PER IBC 100912 'OELEL 10�0'-0" NEWWINDOW TO REPLACE W�/N T O.FF.FIRST FLOOR/ Y N ONCONFORMING DOOR W_ AND SCREEN �1� NEIGHBORING BUILDING } ••• COURTYARD DECK N OUTLINE OF N a NEIGHBORING BUILDING 0 _ UP ESL.*1000 + EXISTING SOLDINOGDOORAND COURTYARD T O CON.. NEW SLIDING DOOR GUARDRAIL N W L PLANTER E%13TINGTREE y 4 I � PLANTER ROOM _ COURTYARD DECK ABOVE I'. BELOW £ --GUARDRAIL I 1 ( ROOF ABOVE ---- i DN EXISTING ROOF BELOWTO ICI REMAIN 02 02 �G q Oq 01 01 BYI REVISIONS DATE ' a8 01".�PC APPLICATION 1126.12 02 IR EVSED IT PC APP 01.11.13 031AMENOED HPC APP 02.1313 x. .41AMENDEO HPC APR 0601.13 - Q Ti o� Drawn Ill Z4A i w AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REVIEW € 01 AUGUST,2013 o _° PROPOSED FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN m PROPOSED SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FIRST/ o t ',O �f SCALE.1/8' = 1'0 ---_ -- — ` 7 f OL I SCALE 1/8' = V-0' SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS A301 t H I i w Z O . N E dL A R C H I T E C T S 01 L L C. 02 P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81 61 2 WW W.ZONE4A RCH ITECTS.0 OM i i I I I -OUTLINE OF AREA - - - - - DEDICATED TO MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT I 1, I li I NEW PARAPET - L -N EW TPO OR SIMILAR ROOF NEW STAIR DN JO� ~ TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT a� 3 N T.O•ROOF E wrc Q ° zp � i 1 0 Ko 3 W W io W MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT J Q NEW HOT TUB JZe- NEW ROOFTOP DECN z !. IrIIw� T.O,ROOFTOP DECK W � M� NEW 36 '-'HIGH GLASS Z a VI O 01 GUARDRAILS � /�T ° y o 5 Q I/� 0 r OUTLINEOF N U _ NEW UPPER ROOF Z 111 OUTLINE OF W W VAULTEDCEILING BELOW J co^ NEWCLERESTORV WINDOWS BELOW W r W M W III. co W�/� O Q W li OUTLINE OF W NEIGHBORING BUILDING N a BELOW N - O - NEW UPPER ROOF to W j� ----- �--- --- -- NEW CLERESTORY WINDOW$BELOW i So K? 02 € 4 � BY REVISIONS (DATE 01 HPC APPLICATION 11.26.12 I 02 REVISED HPC APPI01.1113 T° i 03 AMENDED HPC gPFT02.13 E OE AM NDED HPCHPC qPP - I iraven by: Z4A' --- o AMENDED CONCEPTUAL REVIEW 01 01 AUGUST,2013 o- PROPOSED ROOF PLAN PROPOSES THIRD X01 I � - - - - ROOF LEVEL ma FLOOR PLANS g` i A302 h0 i { 4 RUILDIING 1 LING. EXTERIOR SIDING LEGEND Z O N E (DR—TED CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT(CMU) -- - -REMODEL DDEC WTH Ll 610 HYMAN PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR FACADE BEYOND - --- REMODELED DECK WITH _ RELOCATED STAIR BEYOND - L - - — - NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH r"--�r- CLERESTORY WINDOWS --" "' -ELEVATOR,STAIR ENLCOSURE, OSTUCCO SIDING - -- - - - - - - AND HEIGHT GUARDRAIL BEYOND 1 -'"- -'-28 HEIGHT LIMIT O PAINTED WOOD - - -NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN FRONT FACADE ''. O WOOD SIDING(RAINSCREEN APPLICATION) ARCHITECTS L L C. - EL.a 122'-8 1/7' T O.UPPPER ROOF P.O. BOX 2508 -- Q s COMPOSITE PANEL ASPEN CO 8 1 6 1 2 -]I T.0{PARAPET WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM _ - _._ _—_ _ _ - ---- _._. —_ _ — _--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _— +1 -5 4" ©VERTICAL TEXTURED CONCRETE - T.O.ROOF I --� _ ___ ___ ___ EL*109'-212" I - T.O.F.F.SECOND LEVEL I I I J N a I II w EXISTING COURTYARDGRADE W III. BEYOND TO REMAIN EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN Q uj EL t 100'- - T.O.F.F.FIRST LEVEL O Z0 111 0 CONCRETE FOUNDATION 4Y BELOW 1,1 Ja - - - - - -—- - - - - _ - _ EL -�1rz Z 4 - -- T.O..F.sr F.BASEMENT LEVEL Z Q r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J Z app Lu N _ 2 02 SCALE PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION Q Q p t7y0 ?aZ 2 oW Jooa 0 EXISTING BUILDING BU ADDITION N NEW 3'-fi"HIGH GLASS _ ILDING y 7 W GUARDRAILS W III c NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH W CLERESTORY WINDOWS W Lu W - -----"-28'HEIGHT LIMIT _ W W -- -- - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - --- - O IN - - - - -T to �III,EL. 123'-83/4" Q - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - - T O+ELEVATOR OOF O L ° T.O`1PPPE R q '` • .-1. - � T O PARAPET 1 0'-1' € - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --_ _ _ - - — T.O PARAPET - EL 11 RO9'-5 3/4" _____________ • _ _ _ --�TO. OF ° • i' y RESIDENTIAL `- I II - ' O mlw a • II ao EL*109'-2 12" T O F.F.SECOND LEVEL F� - — --_ --- --' ---- -ELEVATOR SHAFT FU 30 BY REVISIONS DATE — a5 u v c n HPC A m Cl PP LICATION.p1122.163..112 __-- COMMERCIAL 02 REVISED H 01.11.13 03 AMENDED C 0 PMOEO CAPP.OB Ott3 YET LO F ST LEVEL 3 I. -k_�'Tp.GARAC,E F.F. u -- v o ---EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN N? —-- -FINISH GRADE wE E COMMERCIAL]- DI.—n 11, 14A EXISTING GRADE AMENDED CONCEPTUAL a EL.sr-Z 12° REVIEW sa g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "T B EMENT LEVEL 01 AUGUST,2013 R, PROPOSED o ELEVATIONS PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION/SECTION 01 SCALE 3/16' 1-0" A304 �o EXISTING )RING DI N G EXTERIOR SIDING LEGEND Z O N E tO PAINTED CONCRETE MASON. (CMU) =T� 1 L r_ 1- -""- ---- --'—'— '- -'NEIGHBORING BUILDING 66110 HYMAN PROPOSED HEIGHT OSTUCCO SIDING V 3O PAINTED WOOD — '--- : — --""- -"-28''EIGHT LIMIT - - - -- ----- -J--- ---- C_ _-_- - - - - - - - -- - - EL..129'A OR O WOOD GIDING(RAINSCREEN APPLICATION) A R C H I.T E C T S T.O.ELEVATOR L L C. -------- - EL.+122ER'-6 7.0. 12"ROOF P.O. BOX 2508 U PP - ------ - ---- - ----- �6 COMPOSITE PANEL ASPEN CO 81612 _ TO PARAPET WWW.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM i E «� OOF O VERTICAL TEXTURED CONCRETE L 6 TO R � TU ET 0 109'-2 SECO I _`FT F F SECOND LEVEL 1 w NEW RAMP J (HANDRAIL NOT DEPICTED FOR CLARITY) WEXISTING GRADE E e T�O F.F.FIRST LEVEL Lu EL.+97'-101/2" -_._ �� -- - J - - _ - TO STORAGE F.F. -- - - — - - --- - - --_ --- ,l EL+97'-71/4" Z �T.O GARAGE F.F. W ---- W V> -- ----CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW Q PROPOSED FINISH GRADE BEYOND J o _._ __._ _ _ _- _ _ __ .. T�O.F BASEMENT LEVEL Z Q r --- -— -- © W t0 Z a>.ao ^/ PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION Q a= \OL f SCALE.3116"= 1'0" --._- ` �I, z G N ZaZ = ow coa _BUILDING ADDITION ®EXISTING BUILDING �r0M/�(D,U)/ 3 NEW3'6"HIGH--- ---- - co W ID GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND IIIwI u TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT AND---"'--- -'-------- 28'HEIGHT LIMIT W W STAIR BEYOND --.... W NEW UPPER LEVEL ROOF I�� "c 28'HEIGHT LIMIT ---------- l WITH CLERESTORY WINDOWS WITH --- _-_- ----4- -- -- - - ----- -- - - - - - ---- - - - - - -- ---- - -- -- - ---- - ---- - ---- - --- -- 0 - EL.«123'-6 3/4":- - _-- _ --- ♦ ♦ _ EL«122'-6 12'. N OF O EL 2 1 T T .O.O.PAR APET-o, 1" T.O«PARAPET - - - - -- - _. - _-- - - - - - - - EL.+119'-5 3/4" _ T.O.ROOF _ -- -'""-- REMODELED DECK WITH 3'-D'HIGH GUARDRAIL __. --_- - - -__. __.- - - -'•�F .__- - - - - - __. z.._._� EL.«109'-212" - I s� • - i -_,____ �T.O.F F.SECOND LEVEL °< ' a STEELCOLUMN ---- -- ---- BY REVISIONS DATE EW c Ot -APPLICATION 11.26.18 �� - - - _ - RELOCATED STAIR 02 REVISED HPC APP 01.11.13 0 03 AMENDED HPC APP.02.13.13 - c LL o 0 v _ EL 10 -0" � --_-_ _ - o E � 0 EL. �T.O'F.F.FIRST LEVEL 04 AMENDED HPC APP.p8.01.13 v TOO GARS EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN r - -- ---FINISH GRADE BEYOND gGARAGE BEYOND. -- ` - - - - _ - - -. -. -� .I j Df2WN by: Z4A _ :c a -----"-'--CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW i EXISTING GRADE AT ----FACADE BEYOND — AMENDED CONCEPTUAL ww - --- - -- - - - - - --_ � - REVIEW OUTLINE OF WINDOW BEYONp - - -- - - - - - i T o9 MENTLEVEL z S 01 AUGUST,2013 I NEW HANDRAIL AND LANDING - E PER CODE E PROPOSED ELEVATIONS a m I PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION o 0 1 !� SCALE'3/16'= 1.0.. A305 6 —.1 Z O N E - I i -�r c A R C H I T E C T S L L C. ♦ P.O. BOX 2508 ASPEN CO 81612 W WVJ.ZONE4ARCHITECTS.COM A V, r6.3 W Q W € O z W W U> Z Lu Z N}pp s 04 HYMAN STREET PERSPECTIVE — VIEW TOWARDS SOUTHEAST 03 HYMAN STREET PERSPECTIVE — VIEW TOWARDS EAST F 0 � zQZ 2 oWw Jm(L b —0 H co cf) 0 . 11 W ♦ W — a N J0 I N i O € r � e S i s 3� az; �a 34 K7 `sG BY REVISIONS DATE E 01 HPC APPLICATION 11 36.13 DI REVISED HPCAPP 0111.13 �6 03 AMENDED HK APP.03.13.13 N AMENDED NPCMP 06.01.13 �¢ Drewn by: 24A �� AMENDED CONCEPTUALW REVIEW �$ 01 AUGUST,2013 " €g 3� CORNER OF HUNTER / HYMAN PERSPECTIVE —VIEW TOWARDS NORTHEAST HYMAN STREET PERSPECTIVE — VIEW TOWARDS NORTHWEST R PERSPECTIVES n `y NOTE: A306 NOT ALL PROPOSED SITE WORK IS ILLUSTRATED. k: 1: OUTLINE OF i OU BUILDINGABOVE r 8UILDINGAB VE TLINE OF I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I 1 I I I I UP — — N? i I I I STAIRiM STAIR a1 7 ELEV. ELEV. ROOM x ROOM W I F y w I I c I o MECH. ° i MECH. O �OUTLINEOF I tl:ouruNEOP BUILDINGABOVE O EUEDING ABOVE O I I I COMMERCIAL I COMMERCIAL I I STORAGE BELOW O p v r ---- ' EL sra 1R" II; $ M TY O.F.F.BASEMENT EM T.O.F.F. .ENT o I ° L — p o —U I LNEW CASED OPENING NEW casED OPENING (EXISTING DOOR TO BE REMOVED) Ar TO SE E IR AND WALL TO 8 REMOVED) I ........ .... .. .. ..... .. ........v /r FFA MECH. MECH, I I I _ I I I I I I I I I — I I 1 OUTLINE OF OUTLINE OF NEIGHBORING BUILDING I NEIGN80RING MM r COMMERCIAL I COMMERCIAL I I P 1 LEGEND Z O . N E 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING/02-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED d N IN CURRENT APPLICATION A 1 PREVIOUS LOWER LEVEL PLAN REVISED LOWER LEVEL PLAN 'V C717 O'I OB-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING O� SCALE'.31W= 1' SCALE:3HS-= T-0" AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE PREVIOUS APPLICATION ARC H I T E C T S• 0 8 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 3 EX SITING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN FOR LLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY REFER TO CIVIL FOR PROPOSED ILL STRATNE PURPOSES ONLY GRADING EIEVATIONS REFER TO CIVIL FOR PROPOSED GRADING ELEVATIONS. NEW LANDSCAPE AREA - RE CIVIL NEW 2 YARD DLNPSTER ALLEY PROPERTY BOUNDARY �'Jd PAVE ALLEY PROPERTY BOUNDARY (J-0'kT-11"1 ��YL PAVED PARNSq -Yi NEW Y-TxT-0.2 YARD PARKNG lT - WMPSTER(WILL BE ABLE TO �wt OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE .qsH• (a If YN.) ATTACH TO FENCE) n. l?" (9'x 13 MIN.) %B VE�. NEW FENCE TO SCREEN NEW FENCE TO SCREEN ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER. �'�I I - - ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER, 2 A'DA PARKING.RECYCLING.AND I I _ T.O.GARAGE F.F. I TRASH U I T _ PARKING,RECYCLING,AND I I I OUTLINE OF UTILITY EASEMENT I I L ----- OUT.RETA■SND TRASH : - 1 EXIST ING RETAINING T62] WALLTO REMAW OUTLINE OF UTILITY EASEMENT I 7923 - "-"""--'--" "- WALL TO REMAIN (AI RECYCLE BINS - EXPANOEDLANDSCAPE ��- ' EXPANDED LANDSCAPE (A)RECYCLE BINS. .O.STORAGE F.F. NEW OUTLINE OF PAVEMENT (WILL BE ABLE TO ATTACH 6'x 20'ACCESS AISLE TO NEW FENCE) �I j NEW PAVEM LOW WALL ENT RE ELEVATKXJ 6.20 ACCESS AISLE NEW STEPS I p'+ SLOPE � � SLOPE NEW ACCESS � ... - - ... .. ... --... ... .. LOW WALL - T92n (HUNTER STREET ENTRY) % SLOPE 9L ----' RE:ELEVATION - ------------ ---------- �A RE CIVIL RE.C NEWACCESS RE:CMI I RE:CIVIL RECI (HUNTER STREET ENTRY) EXPANDED LANDSCAPE EXPANDED LANDSCAPE - PROPOSED UTILITY METERS PROPOSED UTILITY METERS al h 6E)EVMUC _X-------------- --" SIDEWALK FI------"-------' LAIO■CAPEAREAB, LANDSCAPEAREAS. EXIBTIND TIE RETAMOMMLL EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING TIE RETAINING MALL (WITH PROPOSED ADDITION) (WIEISTING BUILDING ADDITION) NEWSTEPS.HAN DRAILAND ■ LANDING PER CA W E ■ ■ W W w W Lu r K � I � to � I ■ L z ■ x z x = I T� O.F.F.FIRST FLOOR 2 4�' - (p IBM (OA EXISTING COIAITYARDTO BE O IT WHOM EO. I to i �O FF FIRST FLOOR OUTLINE OF NEWSTAIRS OUTLINE OF NEW CURB. - r J NEIGHBORING BULLONq - -. OUTLINE RI XISTBKi COURTYggp TO BE NEIGHBORING BUILDING RE CML I �II��Q WTIJNE OF NEW CURB, NWATED. COURTYARD j� RE:CML. (SOUTHEAST) T.O NEW fR1ARORNLAND STAELS �'T O.CONC. fiENmsr couRTrumTOeE �¢: RENOVATED. NEW PLANTER E%ISTING COURTYARD TO BE RENOVATED. Cp�p7ypE�i � NCH PUNTER PROPOSED CORNER DES( SOIL SOUTH ST) BY CIVIL ED CORNER DESIGN BYCML ENGINEEER TC A DN EE ACCOMMODATE IIPdIDN R'; ■ X925 AG HANDK:AP 2; NEW PLANTER ACCESSIBIIITV. �Z6 mop� I % SLOPE L——— — ——J .. - E1087NDTIE RETADRNO - ..--- WALLS 792 EXISTING TIE RETAINING WALLS EAST HYMAN AVENUE -- _ .."" \ NEW FENCE 7923 .._._7926 LIOIIT PaTANDNONTORHIM1 EKISTING LIGHT POST AND9gN'T0 REMAIN I-f ""-"-"- FEWIV/CRNLBK ILEOINIIED,LIE:CR/IL _ -- ---- NEWHANORAILSASREOUIRED.RECML -"-" NEW RAMPS.Ill:CNL NEW RAMPS,RE:CIVIL EAST HYMAN AVENUE TB2A LEGEND 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 Z ON E I AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED N IN CURRENT APPLICATION A 1 0� PREVIOUS SITE PLAN 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPG APPLICATION DRAWING #,__�EVISED SITE PLAN= 1'-0" AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE PREVIOUS APPLICATION ARCH II T E C T S 0 9 . 2 6 . 2 0 3 3 --, 'f '- ---_I 2(ADA) BUILT-IN STORAGE T.O.GARAGE F.F. j I RESIDENTIAL GARA STORAGE CE I NEW 2 YARD DUMPSTER I NEW2YARDD)MPSTER I ' - ' (3'�"xT-0") —=Ij GARAGE r*a.r� _= J T.O.GARAGE F F T.O+STORAGE F.F. I I (4)RECYCLE BINS —_ (4)RECYCLE BINS --i AGAACCESSAISLE _— STAIR PER ISC 1008A.2.6, _1 HANORMI.PER IBC 1008.12 — OUTLINE OF NEW RAMP/ OUTLINE OF NEW RAMPI WALKWAY,RE:CIVIL MYLKWAY,RE:CIVIL ON I SLOPE $ RE:CML _ ---E_c-——— —I" * . N•L i DN UP •FIN ON UP OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE %l STEELwLUMN. ABOVE I x STAIR#1 RE:STRUCT. STAIR rt SLOPE I SLOPE SLOP +.: OUTLINE OF STRUCTURE RE:CIVIL RE:CIVIL RE:CIVIL - ABOVE sLOPE aLOPE SLOPE CEILIN ABOVEgN AT E:CNIL 2 L RE:CML CEILINOABDW! II l—k� VESTIBULE vaa nMw REST w PROPOSED UTILITY PROPOSED UnuTv LOCATION �L1=J� LOCATION ROOFABOVE LIGHTED EXIT SIGN AT COMMERCIAL CLOSET ROOFABOVE COMMERCIAL CLOSET CEILINGABOVE - - - - i -- - -- -- - -- - -- !--- VESTIBULE CONSTRUCTION TO I - —VEBnBULECONSTRUCTIONTO FLOOR-TO-CEIILING CONFORM TO 2009 IBC CONFORM TO 2008 IBC WINDOW SECTION 1027.1 EX 1. F<ooR.T wIxlLDOw SECTION 1027.1 EX 1. I I I I I � I I ON F COMMERCULL / UP NEW LANDING AND HANDRAIL FIRE RATEDGLAZING / ♦_OPEN COMMERCIAL PER COD' BELOW 1 I I I I NEW PARTY WALL PER CODE _V EL.+100'-D" STAIRPER IWI=.4.2.3. IIEW PARTY VKALL PER CODE TO F.F FIRST FLOOR HARORAILPERI8C100B.+x ON 13 6L I ELa7ar0 NEW DECK ABOVE I I T.O.F F FlRST FLOOR I SIGH NEIGHBORING BUILDING NEIGHBOR NG BUILDING I COURTYARD COURTYARD IN I + COURTYARD T' O.CONC. DP COURTYARD r.o.coNC. L— D PLANTER � PLANTER I DECK ABOVE— PLANTER PLANTER I NEW STAIRS UP DECKABOVE I I I I GUARDRAIL GUARDRAIL I I ROOFABOVE DN ROOFABDVE ON 13 i o I I I LEGEND L — — — — — — — — — — — 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED rA� N IN CURRENT APPLICATION A PREVIOUS MAIN LEVEL PLAN REVISED MAIN LEVEL PLAN IV C17 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING SCALE 3ne"= t'-P I AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE PREVIOUS APPLICATION ARC N 1"T E C T S 0 8 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 3 El NEW GARAGE ROOF BELOW I COMMERCIAL UP v ROOF ABOVE ROOF BELOW ,« ELEV DIN UP - EI,Ey cN uv COMMERCIAL '= STAIR#1 STAIR#1 ST BED#J r HALL#1 z ---------------------- eesx; --------- liALLfi X X W W � BATH#3 PWDR MASTER q KH ENTRY ✓1� I t.3 THII @EDffi BED#2 - - - MASTER Mgt I ENTRY CLOSET I I I - 9AIril�2 I I I I U KITCHEN I MASTER BEDROOM I BEDROOM SITTING - - I I I RESIDENTIAL I I OULTINE OF NEW RESIDENTIAL VAULTED CEILING ABOVE FL*109'-212" OULTINEOFNEW VAULTEDCEILING ABOVE T O.F F SECOND FLOOR lr T.O.F.F.SECOND FLOOR I I - NEW PARTY WALL PER CODE DINNIG I NEw vARTVVwuPER cwE L - - - RQM I I NEW CUSTOM DOOR TO I I MATCH ADJACENT WINDOWS f NEW WINDOW TO REPLACE I NEW WINDOWTO REPLACE LLl� NONCONFORMING DOOR NONCONFORMING DOOR N ANDSCREEN NEW SLIDING DOOR I, I I AND SCREEN DN OUTLINE OF DECK I DINNIG OUTLINE OF DECK I NEIGHBORING BUILDING I ROOM NEIGHBORING BUILDING ' I N WINDOWTOREPLACE NEW DECK WITH EXIS TING SLIDING DOOR AND 42"HIGH GUARDRAIL N E W SLIDING OR GUARDRAIL I NEW DOUBLE DOOR TO I I REPLACE EXISTING E LACE E S G SLIDING I NEW 42"HIGH GUARDRAIL TO I DOOR AND GUARDRAIL EXISTING TREE`- MATCH EXISTING I I NEW STAIR I I COURTYARD I couRTrARD LIVING BELOW I BELOW ROOM ISTING ROOF BELOW TO REMAIN EXISTING ROOF BELOW TO REMAIN LEGEND Z O N E 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING/02-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 I AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED d N IN CURRENT APPLICATION N 1�1 �� PREVIOUS UPPER LEVEL PLAN 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING REVISED UPPER LEVEL PLAN :3H uL SCALE:3118"= 1'-Q' J AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE L 17,� PREVIOUS APPLICATION A R C H I T E C T S — o s . 1 z o L 1 --- ------- i I I I OUTLINE OF AREA DEDICATEDTO - - - - - - - MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I NEW PARAPET -- -- -----I NEW PARAPET NEW TPO OR SIMILAR ROOF s-- D NEW TPO OR SIMILAR ROOF DN NEWSTAIR - - TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT U P E 3 ++rs yr• 3 H �j NEW STAIR =o TO,ROOT z ----------------- h y UP N X X - W W o NEW T-6"HIGH GLASS }y( 0.00E ACCESS TOR GUARDRAILS �'¢ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NEW ROOFTOP DECK NEW XOT TUB NEW 8'x8'HOT TUB NEW ROOFTOP DECK OUTLINE OF 12D4 31C NEW UPPER ROOF T.O.ROOFTOP DECK NEW Y- XIGH GLASS GUARDRAILS I I - I I ( OUTLINE OF � 1 NEW UPPER ROOF I OUTLINE OF OUTLINE OF VAULTED CEILING BELOW VAULTEOCEIIING BELOW ') I NEW CLERESTORY I NEWCLEREST R WINDOWS BELOW I I MOMS BELM I I I I OUTLINE OF OF NEIGHBORING BUILDING ;I L OUTLINE NEIGHBORING BUILDING ;I �{ I I, f I .I I COURTYARD L COURTYARD BELOW BELOW� I I 1 I I' OUTLINE OF NEW UPPER NEW UPPER ROOF ROOF ;I I I' I NEW CLERESTORY NEWCLERESTORY WINDOWS BELOW WINDOWS BELOW .I Ij I Ij LEGEND Z O N E 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING/02-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED d N IN CURRENT APPLICATION A I PREVIOUS ROOF PLAN 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING �� REVISED ROOF PLAN scALE yis•= �•.o• VL scAL-E yia•� r-o• AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE PREVIOUS APPLICATION A R C H I T E C T S 8 2 6 2 0 1 3 LEGEND 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 NEW Yd HIG GLASS - AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED GUARDRAILS 23'HEIGHTLtMIi IN CURRENT APPLICATION NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH CLERESTORY WINDOWS v G EL a 123'-11 3/4" - _—"—- -—-—'—-—- ==__- =-______=y=--- T.o.UPPPER 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 2 —- -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—1 TT—ELEVATpR AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE I PREVIOUS APPLICATION --f _— T.O.PARAPET __—_—_ _—_—_—_—_—__ _—___—_ _ ____ —_—___—_—_—_—_—_—_ L---- I I l f ., ELEVATOR BNAFT �I - e@ I RESIDENTIAL - !9 q u� A E 108'AGE TL.O♦ E RG ROOF PARAPET T.O�F.F.SECOND LEVEL t � _ _—_—___—_—_—_— T-$ O�RST LEVEL AFL.9T-7114" TAE F.F. "\ EXISTINGGRADE-REMAIN I FNS.GRADE NEW STEELSTURAND LANDING COMMERCALL Qcy • 4 - LEXISTING I � _v 4477 ExNa GRADE I .. SAR BEYOND A O 7 12S" MENT LEVEL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- I I G I ,Z PREVIOUS EAST ELEVATION/SECTION EXISTING BUILDING 81ILOI4GADDRION NEW]'-0'HIGH GRAILS GUARDRAILS NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH - CLERESTORY WINDOWS \ \ I� 2BHEIGHTLIMIT -_ ________________________ ___________ ___________ T____ _ - / �Ii ___ _ T " 7.0.ELEVATOR —-—_ Y T.O.UPPPER ROOF T.OhPARAPET �0 --------_ —_— __—_—_____—_— —_—_ _.- --___—_ --_ 1-----OT PARZiT T.OiROOF I e= M- url El RESIDENTIAL m I A EL.♦t0e'•2 T2' ___—_—_—___—_—_—_—_—__ _—_ T- O,F�,F,SECOND LEVEL I - - ELEVATOR SHAFT � I COMME m I I 1 - -- - - -— T0 O.F.F.FIRST LEVEL ,LEL 7�@7'7/q_ EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN F.F. FINISH GRADE COMMERCIAL Z O N E I 1 \ EXISTING GRADE � • I TO.F.FBMENT LEVEL dL_ _________- - q I �r r REVISED EAST ELEVATION/SECTION SCALE:3HS'= 1'0 ARCHITECTS 0 8 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 3 1/ E%IBTING�HEIGH80RIN�G UI� B LOYY3 NEIGHBORING BUILDING LEGEND 610 HYMAN PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR FACADE BEYOND NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 CLERESTORY WINDOWS NEW 3'6'HIGHGLASS AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED GUARDRAIL BEYOND IN CURRENT APPLICATION 26 HEIGHT LIMIT — — — — — — — — — — ——— — — — _ ____ ——_ _—__ _______ NEIGHBORING BUILDING 810 HYMAN FROM FACADE 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING —_ _—_—-—_—- __ -— — T.O.!UPPPER ROOF AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE �� PREVIOUS APPLICATION T.O.PARAPET —___— ___—_—_ __—_—_ _____—_—_—___—_—_ T.O•RO- F1 Ll nFl F NEW STAIR AND DECK T.0,F.F.SECOND LEVEL GUARDRAIL EXISTING COURTYARD GRADE / BEYOND TO REMAIN EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN AL FL TO?F.F.FIRST LEVEL I I I I � CONCRETE FOUNDATION I BELOW I I I I I I I I -_____ _ Tom-O_F-F.BASEMENT LEVEL PREVIOUS SOUTH ELEVATION V 1 scALE:3TTS•= 1•a' METING NEIGHBORING BUILDING NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR FACADE BEYOND REMODELED DECK WITH RELOCATED STAIR BE-NO NEW UPPER ROOFS WITH CLERESTORY WINDOW6 ELEVATOR.STAIR ENLCOSURE, AND GUARDRAIL BEYOND 28'HEIGHT LIMIT _______________________________ __________ NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN FRONT FACADE T.O.FUPPPER ROOF if O 0 O O T.OiPARAPET _—_—_—_—_______- --------—___—___—__ _ +Z T.O . OF T.O+F.F.SECOND LEVEL I I ' L _ EXISTING COURTYARD GRADE - BEYOND TO REMAIN EXISTING GRADE TO REMAIN _ h,±F.F.FRST LEVEL I I I I I CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW Z O N E %+-Fa I I I I �_-_-_ _-_-_ J TT2 MENT LEVEL dl .F BA3 RVISED SOUTH ELEVATION � I VL .CE ARCHITECTS 0 8 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 3 LEGEND I NEW 3'B HIGH 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND REFER TOPNR/�ECTONFST AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED HEIGHT LIMIT CONFORMANCE HEIGHT LIMIT IN CURRENT APPLICATION TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT AND NEW UPPER LEVEL ROOF STAIR BEYOND WITH CLERESTORY WINDOWS 29 HEIGHT LIMIT --___- - - -- ---- ------------ - �_ -- - -_ -_ - ----- ----- -- ------------ - - __ __ ---- - -- - - - 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING EL'1z3a�rA -- _—_-- ------ - -- ---- - -"-"--- _ ---- ---------" — — — — — r.o�ROOF AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE T OT O.ELEVATOR - -- PREVIOUS APPLICATION T.O.PARAP+ ET z — —_—_—___—_____—_—_—_—_—_—-—___—___ GARAGE BEYOND -----�—� - —��� -- ------- -----�---- -�- T.OfF.F.SECOND LEVEL \ \ 1 \ --—-—-—-—- TT O.F.F.FIRST LEVEL I _— I I E%ISTING ORAIJE TO REMAIN I EXISTING GRADE AT - -—-- - - - - -- - - - ------ I FINISH GRADE BEYOND FACADE BEYOND I I CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW _ A EL a 91'•7 17 —_—___—_—_—_—_—_—_—_____—_—_—_—_—_�_—_ _______—_— T.O�F.F.BMSEMENT LEVEL PREVIOUS WEST ELEVATION V 1 .CALF ins"= r-a' BUILDING ADDITION b EXISTING BUILDING I NEW 3'd'HIGH GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT AND 26 HEIGHT LIMIT STAIR BEYOND NEW UPPER LEVEL ROOF WITH CLERESTORY WINDOWS 23'HEIGHT LIMIT ——— ———— ——————— ———————————— —————— ————————————————— ————— ————————— ——4—�--------------- — T.O+IWPER ROOF 7.0.PARAPEfY— I I IL D �� _—_ - T.OiPARAPET -- AEL 1191,314" ___—_—_—_—_—_____—_—___—_ —_—_—_—_—_—___—_ _—_—_ +T.pROOF Ell ED a REMODELED DECK WRH 3'-0 HIGH GUARDRAIL _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ —_—_ _—_—_—_—_— —_—__ T.QF.F.SECOND LEVEL STEEL 001,0101 RELOCATED STAIR Or All T.OiF.F.FIRST LEVEL 7.0.GARAGE F.F. ——— — ———— _ GRADE TO REMAIN FINISH GRADE BEYOND GARAGE BEYOND CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW EXISTING GRACE AT FACADE BEYOND OUTLINE OF WINDOW BEYOND — _—___ _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_ _—_ _ —_ rI _—_— -_ _—___ A FOMENT LEVEL rA L ___-_ _ -----------'—_— - - - - - —_—_-- NEW HANDRAIL AND LANDING PER CODE 02 REVISED WEST ELEVATION I ARCHITECTS 0 8 . 2 6 . 2 0 1 3 EXISTING NEIGHBORING - BUIIINNG ' LEGEND NEIGHBORING BUILDING _610H N PROPOSED HEIGHT NEWT HIGH 02-13-2013 HPC APPLICATION DRAWING 102-27-2013 RESOLUTION 5 GLASS GUARDRAIL BEYOND. REFER TO PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION I SECTION FOR AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED OR REVISED HEIGHT LIMIT CONFORMANCE IN CURRENT APPLICATION 2 2B'HEIGHT LIMIT - - -__ - - - ------------ -- - ----- ------ -----' A EL.123'-tt 3/A• 08-01-2013 AMENDED CONCEPTUAL HPC APPLICATION DRAWING - - - ----- ----- - ---- ---- - - ------- - T- p'9 UpPERROL -- ---- -�__________________ - A EL r 123'-@3!9' -- ---- -—-—- T� AREA/DESIGN ELEMENT THAT HAS BEEN REVISED SINCE PREVIOUS APPLICATION IZ-5 3W —- -—-—-— _ —�'Et'—un'UARAPEr — — — ---—-—- — -— - -— — — — — --- --- — T •' /r" _-_. AL E 109'-i i 3/4' �T.O�CMA2G]E2ROOF PARAPET LEVEL I REVD RAMP E:--7 (GUARDRAIL NOT DEPICTED FOR CLAIM) E�xEmrw�GR-A�Oe _— —-- ------- --- IL --- --- ----- TTyp.F.P.FIRST LEVEL rI T.O.GARAGE F.F. L r - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - -%, - - - - - _ -- CONCRETEFOUNDATN]NBELOW PROPOSED FINISH GRADE BEYOND -_ _-_-_- _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- F.F.BASEMENT LEVEL PREVIOUS NORTH ELEVATION t/ CALF:3/18• EXISTING NEIGHBORING BUT NEIGHBORING BUILDING 610 HYMAN PROPOSED HEIGHT W HEIGHT UMIT --- ------ _ AEL±123 " ------------------ T TO.ELEVATOR EL+�I ROOF T.O.UPPER ROOF �A-OEL.P1A1R8p-p5E3/4" — — —_—_—_—_— —_—_—_—_ —_—_—_—_ —_—_—_—_—_ T.O.R�OOF — --------- _—_—_—_ —_—_—_—_—_ — —� T.O f.f SECOND LEVEL ' 1 OD o a NEW RAMP OO HANDRAIL NOT DEPICTED FOR CLARITY) EXISTING QGRACE ,�E ----- -- - ----- --- ---- - Tip.F,F.FIRST LEVEL ,L� t E �9 LL Y O.GARJAGkG E F.F. __ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ l- - - - - - - CONCRETE FOUNDATION BELOW O PROPOSEO FINISH GRADE BEYOND —;—_—_—_—_I—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_--_ —_—_—_— _—_—__� .a,_7 _ rAAL ^/ REVISED NORTH ELEVATION OL SCALE:3/18°= 1'-0" A R C H I T E C T S Z O N E l ARCHITECTS LLC EB BUILDING ASPEN REMODEL 09-06-2013 Deck Memo • Existing Deck Area • Deck: 173.1 sq.ft. • Deck Stair: 43.6 sq.ft. • Total: 216.7 sq.ft. • New Deck Area: • Deck: 165.5 sq.ft. • Deck Stair: 60.4 sq.ft. • Total: 225.9 sq.ft. • Net Deck&Stair Area gain from existing design to the proposed 9.2 sq ft • The stair has been relocated to the west(Hunter Street)side of the deck in order to open up the public amenity aspect of this outdoor corner space. • The only reason the deck expands to the south is to capture some of the previous deck area that was sacrificed for the additional public amenity space below when the stair moved. • By completely remodeling the deck we are customizing the design to be more appealing to overall aesthetic of the Hunter Street/Hyman Avenue corner, rather than the existing"store-bought"deck stair and guardrail that currently exists. • There is no monumental architectural element(including windows)that the new deck would screen. o Currently that area of the proposed new deck increase to the north is screened by the existing small tree that would be removed. • FYI:The new deck is pulled in from the existing deck on the west side(Hunter Street)+/3'. It expands to the north side(Hyman Ave)+/-4'-6". Existina Deck I Pers ective from H man Ave./Hunter Street Corner it I t.. Z:\Data\_Z4 Projects\606 East Hyman\Agency\HPC-Amended conceptual\2013-09-09 Deck Memo.docx 1/2 Pro Dosed New Deck Pers iv from H man Ave./Hunter Street Corner 9 k R Pro osed New Deck Pers ective from Hunter Street � ...... Z:\Data\_Z4 Projects\606 East Hyman\Agency\HPC-Amended conceptual\2013-09-09 Deck Memo.docx 2/2 EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE COD ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ry-- 0 )n Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: e r� 2.1J 4__ 1 , 20 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) cx CA%_6 4 ► n (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (3 00) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the oMIners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text arnendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged befo e me this day of , 20A,'�by ' PUBLIC NOTICE RE:602 E.HYMAN AVENUE-AMENDMENT TO CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,September 11,2013, at meeting to begin 5:00 p.m.before the As- pen Historic Preservation Commission,Council commission expires.My Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an application submitted by EB Building Aspen,Avenue,e,L Elm Street,Suite City an Dallas, TX,75201,related to the property located at 602 E Hyman Avenue,Lot K&L,Block 99,City and Town- site of Aspen,CO. The applicant proposes an r-.-�--t- amendment to Conceptual design approval grant- ed Notary by the Historic Preservation Commission ary through Resolution#5,Series of 2013. The project involves an interior remodel,an addition at the rear of the building,and minor alterations to other fa- cades and outdoor spaces on the property. For further information,contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2758 or amy.guthhe@cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin,Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission CACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on Ahst *22,2013. [9469874] "ATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060(E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: �/ AI..* '?,Vie ,Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: s t'V'rcw1Kd+2 I t ,20_13 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, _�yL• , (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice yas posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the�ay of I , 201.1, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30)days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ature The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this g-3 day of 201 , by RY pU WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL �o.�p.......Bic My comm' expires: Zt�l S JOHN A. FORSTER c/�qT OQ�o My Comm.Exp.0310312015 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGH ) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ES TAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 t \ Y l 2 WA "il.. _ •i• h ONION -4 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6;4�5;!f ,Aspen, CO SCHED.LLYD PUBLIC HEARING DATE: , 203 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pittkkin (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code ur the following inaimer: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials. which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of . 20 , to and including the date and time o I ie public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property o,,virers shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the oivners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a cops'of atnT documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 111ineral Estate Dimer Notice. By the certified mailing of notice. return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The naives and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County_ At a mininn ni, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Re_oning or test amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any sway to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation. or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (1 d r nor o the public hearing on such amendments. Sign t re The re o� n.R t�",MAf�f�idavit of Notice"was a nowledge before nne this P"day of�Y�CA�. 20 , by _ WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL TARA L. NELSON NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: 7/J Z0 STATE OF COLORADO I NOTARY D 20014030017 MY COMMISSION EXPOW"Ifflp, 1 Y i Notai, Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE Pt`BLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BYC.R..S. §24-b5.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 602 E. HYMAN AVENUE — AMENDMENT TO CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 11, 2013, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an application submitted by EB Building Aspen, LLC, 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4000, Dallas, TX, 75201, related to the property located at 602 E Hyman Avenue, Lot K&L, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO. The applicant proposes an amendment to Conceptual design approval granted by the Historic Preservation Commission through Resolution 45, Series of 2013. The project involves an interior remodel, an addition at the rear of the building, and minor alterations to other facades and outdoor spaces on the property. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2758 or amy.guthrie @cityofaspen.com. s/Jay Maytin,Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on August 22,2013 City of Aspen Account Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ Bend along line to I AVERYO 51600 t Use Avee Template 51600 1 FeedPaper exposePop-up Edger"" 204 SOUTH GALENA STREET LLC 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP SHERMAN&HOWARD LLC 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR 201 N MILL ST#201 DENVER,CO 80218 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 ASPEN, CO 81611 514 AH LLC 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 514 E HYMAN AVE 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 530 HOPKINS LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 5301/2 E HOPKINS 610 E HYMAN AVE 532 E HOPKINS AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 633 SPRING II LLC 635 E HOPKINS LLC ALPINE BANK ASPEN 418 E COOPER AVE#207 532 E HOPKINS ATTN ERIN WIENCEK ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 10000 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ASPEN ART MUSEUM ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC 590 N MILL ST 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN PLAZA LLC AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC AVP PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 1709 532 E HOPKINS AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE#25 C/O STEVE MARCUS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BASS CAHN 601 LLC BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BAUM ROBERT E PO BOX 4060 HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST PO BOX 1518 ASPEN,CO 81612 PO BOX 2847 STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92659 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BG SPRING LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 300 S SPRING ST#202 421 N BEVERLY DR#300 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90210 BISCHOFF JOHN C BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 10509 HUNTING CREST LN TUCSON,AZ 85716-5843 534 E COOPER AVE VIENNA,VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 BPOE ASPEN LODGE#224 CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC 210 S GALENA ST#21 630 E COOPER AVE 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 STE G ASPEN,CO 816113551 Nquetfes fadles A peler ® Sens de + e� lai�achure efln de w�+wv avery aom } Utilisez le aabarit AVERYO 5160 .w�...e...e.a r6veler le rebord Pop-up 1-800-GO-AVERY , Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ Bend along line to ® ® i Use Avery®Template 51600 Feed Paper�� expose Pop-up EdgeTM A�RY Q 5160 1 CICUREL CARY CITY OF ASPEN WAR LLC 2615 N LAKEWOOD ATTN FINANCE DEPT 2514 LAKE MEAD DR CHICAGO, IL 60614 130 S GALENA ST LAFAYETTE,CO 80026 ASPEN, CO 81611 COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC COX JAMES E LIVING TRUST DUNN JUDITH A REV LIV TRUST C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 3284 SURMONT DR 8051 LOCKLIN LN 418 E COOPER AVE#207 LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48382 ASPEN, CO 81611 EDGETTE JAMES J&PATRICIA ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR&CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% 19900 BEACH RD STE 801 PO BOX 4316 534 E HYMAN AVE JUPITER ISLAND, FL 33469 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 FERRY JAMES H III FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FURNGULF LLP BOX 166 C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 616 E HYMAN AVE GLENCOE, IL 600220166 520 E COOPER ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 GELD LLC GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GONE WEST LLC C/O LOWELL MEYER 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 401 W CENTER PO BOX 1247 CHICAGO, IL 60611 SEARCY,AR 721451406 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 GOODING SEAN A 80%&RICHARD L GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC HYMAN LLC 20% PO BOX 6159 C/O PARAGON RANCH INC LOS ANGELES, BLVD#2222 SWANBOURNE WA 6010 620 E HYMAN AVE#1 E LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 AUSTRALIA, ASPEN, CO 81611 HOPKINS DEV LLC HORSEFINS LLC HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 345 PARK AVE 33RD FLR 601 E HOPKINS AVE 602 E COOPER#202 NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 _ JARDEN CORPORATION JENNE LLP JOSHUA&CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR 1510 WINDSOR RD LLC BOCA RATON, FL 33431 AUSTIN,TX 77402 300 S HUNTER ST ASPEN, CO 81611 JOYCE EDWARD LCT LP LUCKYSTAR LLC 1310 RITCHIE CT TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 7755 CHICAGO, IL 60610 PO BOX 101444 ASPEN, CO 81612 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 M CUBED HOLDINGS LLC MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA PO BOX 9667 317 SIDNEY BAKER S#400 702 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 KERRVILLE,TX 78028 ASPEN,CO 81611 tliquettesfadlesApeler ; seru Re0Wz 6le�afln d'e awnnnr every M Utilisez le gabarit AVERY6 51600 rr,,,.,,,„,o„t rev6ler le rebord Pop-upTm , 1-800-GO-AVERY ; Easy Peel®Labels i A Bend along line to It AIRY®5160® i Use Avery@Template 51600 1 Feed Paper!� expose Pop-up Edgem 1 MATTHEWS ZACHARY MCMURRAY WILLIAM&HELEN MORRIS ROBERT P PO BOX 10582 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 ASPEN, CO 81612 MOSMAN NSW 2088 ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTRALIA, MYSKO ASPEN HOLDINGS NATTERER HELEN NIELSON COL STEVE&CAROL D 615 E HOPKINS AVE 67 BAYPOINT CRIES 501 S FAIRFAX ASPEN, CO 81611 OTTAWA ONTARIO ALEXANDRIA,VA 22314 CANADA K2G6R1, NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZER JORDAN OLITSKY TAMAR&STEPHEN PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 PO BOX 514 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81612 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 P& L PROPERTIES LLC PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% 101 S 3RD ST#360 ASSOC 534 E HYMAN AVE GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 517 W NORTH ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 REUSS LIGHT LLC REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A PO BOX 5000 PO BOX 1247 NEW YORK, NY 10075 SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 81615 ASPEN, CO 81612 ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 RUST TRUST RUTLEDGE REYNIE 40 E 80TH ST#PH 26A 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD#760 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR NEW YORK, NY 10075 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 SEARCY,AR 72143 SCHNITZER KENNETH L&LISA L SEVEN CONTINENTS LLC SHUMATE MARK 2100 MCKINNEY AVE#1760 601 E HYMAN AVE BLDG 421 G ABC DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC SJA ASSOCIATES LLC STERLING TRUST COMP 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 418 E COOPER AVE#207 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD DALLAS,TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 STEWART TITLE CO SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC PO BOX 669 300 S SPRING ST#301 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE HOUSTON,TX 77001 ASPEN, CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TENNESSEE THREE TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS THOMPSON ROSS&LYNETTE PO BOX 101444 C/O J H COBLE 1502 GREYSTONE DR NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020 tfqulettes fadles A pder ® 5er�u tfie tam afln d8 j �rery com Utilisez le aabarit AVERIf®5160 .w,.-......,.,. r6veler le rebord Powub 1-800.60-AVERY Easy Peel®Labels i ♦ Bend along line to i AVERY0 51600 Use Avery Template 51600 1 FeedPaper m" expose Pop-up l dgem 1 1 TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 520 E COOPER AVE#209 5455 LANDMARKL PL#814 418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN,CO 81611 GREENWOOD VILLAGE,CO 801111955 ASPEN, CO 81611 WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W WF SWEARINGEN LLC 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE#200 PO BOX 1007 380 FOREST HILL RD DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE, GA 30655 MACON, GA 31210 WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE#2440 22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 FERNDALE, MI 48220 WOODS FRANK J III WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST 51027 HWY 6&24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD PO BOX 12347 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, ASPEN,CO 81612 ftiquettaf dk%A r i �P1i 0 � r►de# �•toT1► Utillsez le gabarit AVERY®51600 1 rhnmcm�oant rev6ler le rebord Pop-upTM ; 1-80"O-AVERY ; a aspen 234 a ss ave,aspen 81671 + t 970 544 9006 v derie: 7830 blloakkee st,ste 200,deriv,,er co 80202 + t 303 308 1373 visit v .rowlandbroughton.com rowland+broughton ardritecture/urban design/interior design LETTER 11 August 2016 Ben Anderson, Planner City of Aspen Community Development RE: Victorian Square, 601 E Hyman Ave— Proposed Window Modification Beni As we discussed earlier this afternoon, we have been forced to change our window manufacturer at the last minute due to the original supplier's lack of performance. We have been very fortunate to find a second manufacturer(MBM) that can supply the windows, maintain our desired design intent, and deliver within our original schedule. Of course, it comes with a price, so we have been working with MBM to finesse details very quickly to stay on budget. Attached are our proposed changes. Our original design (Appendix A) included frameless glass, which, when built, would feature a glass-to-glass connection at the exterior without an exterior mullion cap or extrusion of any kind. Our revised design (Appendix B) still features a full glass exterior, but with larger pieces of glass. Both designs feature similar glass-to-glass detailing. Please note that all fenestration sizes remain the same as originally proposed. We are not proposing changes to overall dimensions or locations. This proposal will be submitted to the Building Department as part of a larger Change Order. Thank you for your time and efforts in reviewing this proposal on such short notice. Best regards, APPROVED AUG 12 2016 Bryanay, AIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Rowland + Broughton Architecture CITYOFASPEN Page 1 of 3 c rowland+broughton architecture/urban design/interior design APPENDIX A 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 o ooq t'r�r _— — .W'�. — = III l — io o --------------- ---few-- ---- - I 1 Previously Approved North Elevation q o 0 0._¢ 0 0 000q woo 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 - - - - - - - :;:�— _- - _ --------------- ------ — - - - -: 1. -- --------------- ------ III __._ I„ 0 0I oI1 00 d i r ... - Previously Approved East Elevation Previously Approved West Elevation r1 Page 2 of 3 o e o so s - o 0 0 o emu �II�� olf�lll�l16111!:' Pill-6091-I ;' �I Ifi� I- - ®� P�� �li�C�CG�6811�fl�11 � i!!IIC�� I, I• IIII � ° ° —� ,� �:6oIC IIViI�IuV!I'.�II��IIBGI�d ��C u��mutl!1111111119P� — _— o m o 0 o a amao oomm m o - o o a o - � .�nccssrxeua� tl24L(W%4'LLIdM yamCmgi^WrtV. .a.TtiP:u^.it. • ... -. . • ... -. - 1 , � s -' 1 1• 1 1•