HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.501 E Hyman Ave.0079.2018.ACBK 1
HealthSafe Inspections Inc
390 Apple Drive
Basalt CO 81621
970-920-2100
Jim Baker
CDPHE Asbestos Building Inspector, Asbestos Air Monitoring Specialist (AMS) &
Project Designer Certification #13437
CDPHE Lead-Based Paint Inspector & Lead Hazard Assessor Certification #23607
ASBESTOS REPORT
DATE
05/30/2018
CLIENT
Pitkin County
530 E Main St
Aspen CO 81611
PROJECT PROPERTY ADDRESS
The Ute City Building, 501 East Hyman Avenue, Suite #106, Aspen, Colorado 81611
CLIENT BACKGROUND
Pitkin County hired HealthSafe Inspections, Inc. (hereinafter, HealthSafe) to perform an
asbestos inspection for a limited project of returning the commercial suite #106 back to
its original condition prior to leasing the space over two years earlier. County-installed
interior walls, a ceiling in one small room, a couple internal doors and one overhead
security gate will have to be removed. Prior to submittal for a building permit, an
asbestos inspection is required. HealthSafe Inspections, Inc., the company hired
previously to inspect in 2015 prior to the changes, was chosen to perform this inspection.
07/11/18
2
Please note that this report is not intended for estimating purposes. Measurements
provided in this report are for the sole purpose of determining numbers of samples
required per suspect material. Contractors or subcontractors will have to do their own
surveys and inspections for their own estimating.
VISUAL INSPECTION & LABORATORY FINDINGS
An inspection was conducted by Jim Baker of HealthSafe on May 24, 2018 with County
election employees present during the inspection. Suspect ACM/ACBM (drywall
materials only) were identified and sampled. Samples of each homogeneous
miscellaneous material were collected in opposite diagonal corners or opposite sections
or rooms; in the case of surfacing materials, samples were collected randomly—
considering different sections of walls and ceilings and different locations where each
homogeneous material was applied and was slated to be impacted by the upcoming
changes. No two samples were collected next to the other. This inspector did his best to
get a broad representative of each homogeneous miscellaneous and surfacing material
without bias of locations.
Those materials collected and analyzed by PLM analysis are the following:
1. Flat Finish Surfacing Material/Texture: a homogeneous trowel-applied
surfacing material/texture (“level five flat finish”) [samples 1-3: 106-F-C/W-T-
1,2,3]. This surfacing material/texture is on one ceiling and newly installed walls
attached to pre-existing walls. The estimated surface area of demolition and
disposal is more than 160 sf, but less than 1,000 sf, requiring a minimum of at
least three surfacing/texture material samples. The EPA 600 method PLM
analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED.
2. Joint Compound: a homogeneous miscellaneous seam taping compound
requiring at least two samples [samples 4-5: 106-F-C/W-JC-1,2]. The PLM
analytical estimated results: NONE DETECTED.
3. Gypsum Wallboard/Drywall System: a 2015 installed homogeneous taped and
joint compounded drywall system with gypsum wallboard panels, trowel-applied
joint compound and tape (classified as a miscellaneous material as a complete
integral system) [samples 6-7: 106-F-C/W-J-1,2]; these composite layered taped
and joint compounded drywall materials are on 2015 installed ceiling and walls of
the suite with a flat-finish surfacing material/texture, but they are attached to pre-
existing walls in some locations. The estimated surface area of removal and
disposal is more than 160 sf, but less than 1,000 sf, requiring a minimum of at
least two composite core samples of all drywall layers (“…number of samples
sufficient to determine” …if asbestos is present or not). The EPA 600 method
PLM analytical estimated results: <1 % Chrysotile asbestos in sample 6 joint
compound with composite results of the entire sample at “less than” <0.25%;
NONE DETECTED in sample 7.
There were no other additional suspect asbestos building materials to sample which were
slated to be disturbed, removed or disposed of. A total of 7 suspect homogeneous
07/11/18
3
ACM/ACBM bulk samples were collected and 7 samples were analyzed. The bulk
samples were analyzed by EPA 600 PLM analytical methods by a NVLAP accredited
laboratory in accordance with Colorado State Regulation 8 for the presence of asbestos
mineral fibers.
See supporting Hayes Microbial Consulting, Inc. data report #18016155.
HEALTHSAFE CONCLUSIONS
• There is no asbestos in the applied surfacing material of the drywall materials
slated to be removed and disposed of.
• There is a trace amount of Chrysotile asbestos in one composite sample taken
from an inside corner of the wall—behind the door to the computer room, the
southwest inside corner. The analyst determined that the joint compound
contained the asbestos fibers. There is no requirement for a State permitted and
certified asbestos abatement. However, because trace amounts of asbestos have
the potential to be made friable and become airborne during the demolition,
OSHA regulations shall be adhered to regarding friable asbestos. The asbestos is
not identified in the surfacing material/texture (it is identified in the joint
compound), and as such does not fall under the regulations of OSHA Class II
Asbestos Work. However, a hazard still exists and a potential of exposure to
airborne asbestos fibers is present to the workers and surrounding building
tenants. Therefore, HealthSafe highly advises that OSHA Class II Asbestos Work
regulations be followed. See the last paragraph below under the regulation
summary section.
Sincerely Submitted,
Jim Baker
COLORADO & FEDERAL ASBESTOS REGULATIONS SUMMARY
Regulation No. 8 Part B – Asbestos of the Colorado Department of Public Health and
Environment (CDPHE), Air Quality Control Commission requires a State-certified
Asbestos Building Inspector to inspect and collect bulk samples of all suspect asbestos
containing materials (ACM) or suspect asbestos containing building materials (ACBM)
prior to their disturbance, removal or demolition and disposal. The suspect materials shall
be analyzed by a NVLAP accredited laboratory by polarized light microscopy (PLM)
using EPA 600 analytical method. A material which is estimated to contain more than 1%
asbestos is classified as ACM/ACBM and regulated by the State and Federal
governments. Any friable (able to crush or reduce to powder by finger pressure) asbestos
with trace amounts of asbestos fibers or less than 1% must be point-counted using EPA
07/11/18
4
400 analytical method to prove that it is indeed less than 1%; if not, it must be classified
as ACM/ACBM and shall be treated as a State and Federal regulated material. Any
friable asbestos containing material (greater than 1% asbestos concentration) or
ACM/ACBM that could be rendered friable during its removal or demolition and disposal
shall require an asbestos abatement by a certified asbestos abatement contractor to
remove and dispose of the material(s).
A Colorado State (CDPHE) issued asbestos abatement permit is required for the
following trigger levels of ACM/ACBM:
1. Residential buildings of four or fewer units--if more than 32 square feet of any
surface coverage (e.g., gypsum wallboard or drywall and associated applied surfacing
materials/textures, acoustic sprays, joint compounds, plaster, etc.), 50 feet of asbestos
covered or asbestos insulated pipe or any material which would fill a 55-gallon drum is
going to be disturbed, removed or disposed of, an asbestos abatement permit is required.
2. Residential complexes with more than four residential units, public access areas to a
residential building, commercial and retail buildings, public and civic buildings,
industrial buildings--if more than 160 square feet of surfacing materials, 260 linear feet
or more than 35 cubic feet (NESHAP) or 55-gallon drum (CDPHE) of suspect
ACM/ACBM is going to be disturbed, removed or disposed of, an asbestos abatement
permit is required under NESHAP and by the CDPHE. See note below on OSHA.
The regulations require an absolute minimum of 3 samples (EPA suggests 9) per
homogenous suspect surfacing and TSI materials and an absolute minimum of 2 samples
of homogenous miscellaneous materials or any number of “samples sufficient to
determine whether a material is ACM” (Reg8.IV.D.3). More samples are required based
on surface area or volume. These are minimums; the asbestos building inspector has the
field responsibility to determine homogenous materials and the number of samples to
collect per material; more than the minimum number of samples may be necessary at the
discretion of the inspector. An assessment of friability and functional space conditions of
the materials are also the inspector’s field responsibilities.
OSHA compliance is required for all employers and employees no matter the
quantity of asbestos present with strict regulations regarding 10 sf or more of TSI or
friable surfacing materials, and therefore it does not matter what the quantity or
State trigger levels are: all suspect ACM/ACBM shall be inspected and tested for
asbestos prior to their disturbance, removal and disposal for worker protection and
safety. See EPA 40 CFR 763.121 Worker Protection Rule, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.134
Respirator Protection Standard, OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001 General Industry Standard and
OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101 Construction Standard regulations when dealing with asbestos
hazards.
Note: County or City regulations may be more stringent.
07/11/18
5
07/11/18
HMC #18016155
contact@hayesmicrobial.com
http://hayesmicrobial.com/
Analysis Report prepared for
HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO. 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Name: Pitkin County Elections
501 E. Hyman Ave., #106
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Sampled: 05-24-2018
Date Analyzed: 05-30-2018
Report Date: 05-30-2018
EPA Laboratory ID# VA01419
NVLAP Lab Code: 500096-0 Asbestos License: 300435 License: #PH-0198
Page 1 of 4
07/11/18
HMC #18016155
HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
May 30, 2018
Client Job Number:
Client Job Name:Pitkin County Elections
501 E. Hyman Ave., #106
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear HealthSafe Inspections,
We would like to thank you for trusting Hayes Microbial for your analytical needs. On May 25, 2018 we received 7 samples by FedEx for the job
referenced above. 7 samples were received in good condition.
The results in this analysis pertain only to this job, collected on the stated date and should not be used in the interpretation of any other job. This report
may not be duplicated, except in full, without the written consent of Hayes Microbial Consulting, LLC.
This laboratory bears no responsibility for sample collection activities, analytical method limitations, or your use of the test results. Interpretation and
use of test results are your responsibility. Any reference to health effects or interpretation of mold levels is strictly the opinion of Hayes Microbial
Consulting. In no event, shall Hayes Microbial Consulting or any of its employees be liable for lost profits or any special, incidental or consequential
damages arising out of your use of the test results.
Steve Hayes, BSMT(ASCP)
Laboratory Director
Hayes Microbial Consulting, LLC
Page 2 of 4
07/11/18
HMC #18016155
EPA 600/R-93, M-4/82-020 (PLM)HealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
Job Number:
Collected by:
Email:
Jim Baker
healthsafeinspections@gmail.com
Job Name:Pitkin County Elections
501 E. Hyman Ave., #106
Aspen, CO 81611
Date Collected:
Date Received:
Date Reported:
05/24/2018
05/25/2018
05/30/2018
#Sample Name Description Asbestos Fibers Other Fibers Non- Fibers
1 1 106-F-C/W-T-1 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
2 2 106-F-C/W-T-2 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
3 3 106-F-C/W-T-3 Texture / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
4 4 106-F-C/W-JC-1 Brittle / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
5 5 106-F-C/W-JC-2 Brittle / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
6 6 106-F-C/W-J-1 Drywall / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
Layer 2 106-F-C/W-J-1 Joint Compound / White
<1 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Layer 3 106-F-C/W-J-1 Drywall/J.Compond / White
<0.25 % Chrysotile
(None Detected)
100 %
Notes: Composite Of Drywall & Joint Compound
7 7 106-F-C/W-J-2 Drywall / White/Brown
(None Detected)
8 % Cellulose fibers
92 %
Layer 2 106-F-C/W-J-2 Joint Compound / White
(None Detected)
(None Detected)
100 %
Signature: Date:05/30/2018 Reviewed by: Date:05/30/2018
Page 3 of 4
07/11/18
HMC #18016155
Asbestos - Additional InformationHealthSafe Inspections
390 Apple Drive
Basalt, CO 81621
Phone: 970-920-2100
All samples were received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted on the report. The Report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or
endorsement by: AIHA, NIST, NVLAP NY ELAP, or any agency. The results relate only to the items tested. The results include an inherent uncertainty of measurement associated with
estimating percentages by polarized light microscopy. Measurement uncertainty data can be provided when requested. None detected: Below the detected reporting limit of 1% unless
point counting is performed, then the detected, reporting limit is .25%. Per NY ELAP198.6 (NOB) TEM is the only reliable method to declare an NOB material as Non-Asbestos
Containing. Hayes Microbial Consulting reserves the right to dispose of all samples after a period of 60 days in compliance with state and federal guidelines.
Signature: Date:05/30/2018 Reviewed by: Date:05/30/2018
Page 4 of 4
07/11/18
07/11/18
07/11/18