HomeMy WebLinkAboutFile Documents.805 Roaring Fork Rd.0019.2018 (20).ARBK Revised 12-07-11
CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
SUFFICIENCY REVIEW REQUIREMENTS
If the project will increase impervious area (this includes adding hard surface patios, increasing the
footprint of the house, etc.), disturb >200SF of land (this includes grading, even if a structure or hard
surface is not added, as well as impervious are that is “scraped and replaced”), or add or repair snowmelt
then an engineering review will be required as part of the Building Permit Application review process.
All permit applications that must receive an engineering review are required to schedule and participate
in a Pre-Application Meeting with the Development Engineer. The sufficiency checklist below and any
necessary supporting documents should be completed prior to this meeting, as they will be reviewed
during the meeting. The Development Engineer’s signature on this checklist is required in order to
submit a Building Permit Application.
Project Address: ___________________________________________________________________
Project Name: _________________________________________________________________
Parcel ID Number: _________________________________________________________________
Owner and Phone Number: ________________________________________________________
Contact, Phone Number, and E-mail Address: __________________________________________
The following information is required for the engineer’s review. Please indicate if these documents
have been completed and are attached. If any of these documents are not applicable, please provide an
explanation in the space provided.
1. How much area will be disturbed by the proposed improvements? ________acres________sq.ft.
__________% of site __________% of existing structure(s) (Note: If < 200 SF, skip to #10)
If one acre or more is disturbed, a CDPHE Construction General Permit is required
____Yes, Notice of Coverage has been included in the CMP.
____No, A statement that Notice of Coverage is not required is included in the CMP.
2. What type of project is this – Minor or Major?_______________________________________
The project is considered “Minor” if 200 – 1000 sq.ft. of the site is disturbed and “Major” if > 1000
sq.ft. of the site is disturbed.
3. Is the project located within a stream margin, floodplain, mudflow hazard area, or 8040
Greenline review area? (state area(s)) ______________________________________________
Projects, including “Minor”, located in the stream margin review area, 8040 Greenline review area,
mudflow analysis area, or in jurisdictional or non-jurisdictional floodplains may be required to do a
more detailed drainage analysis and design.
4. If disturbance exceeds 1000 sq. ft., do you plan to detain storm events on site? ____YES ___ NO
There is an option to pay a fee in lieu of providing detention on site. Discuss with the Development
Engineer.
Sufficiency Checklist
01/22/2018
805 ROARING FORK ROAD
MOSS-COOK
2735-121-04-009
CHARLES MOSS, 212-764-7950
BRISTON PETERSON, 970-948-5597
.364 15870
82.3 100
X
Major
No
X
01/22/2018