The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFile Documents.120 Red Mountain Rd.0087.2019.ARBK►�1 RECEPTION#: 651283, R: $28.00, D. $0.00 4.. DOC CODE: APPROVAL Pg 1 of 4,10/1712018 at 01:49:19 PM Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO CITYOFASPEN NOTICE OF APPROVAL APPROVAL FOR AN ALTERATION TO A LANDMARK PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 120 RED MOUNTAIN ROAD, LEGALLY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A Parcel ID NO. 2737-072-00-028 APPLICANT: EEC EHC, LLC. REPRESENTATIVE: Kim Raymond Architects SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: Administrative review of a landmark single-family dwelling subject to Stream Margin Exemption, Residential Design Standards Exemption, and Certificate of No Negative Effect. The applicant is requesting approval pursuant to Land Use Code Sections: • 26.410.o1o.0 Residential Design Standards, Exemptions • 26.415.070.13 Certificate of No Negative Effect • 26.435.040.13 Stream Margin Review, Exemptions SUMMARY: The subject property contains a landmark, mid- century single-family dwelling. The property owner proposes to construct a new exterior stair, leading from an existing elevated deck to an existing at - grade patio. Due to its proximity to Hunter Creek, a portion of the dwelling is subject to Stream Margin Review. The proposed stair sits within a building envelope that was approved in 2014. Location within the envelope means that the stair is not subject to the height and placement restrictions encompassed in Stream Margin Review. Design approval is pursuant to administrative review for Stream Margin Exemption, RDS Exemption and the issuance of a Certificate of No Negative Effect. Page I 1 130South Galena St,ee; Aspen, CO 816111975 P, 970920.50001 F 970920.51971 utyofaspen. com RECEPTION#: 651283, 1 011 712 01 8 at 01:49:19 PM, Pgs 2 of 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO STAFF EVALUATION: Staff finds that the request meets the requirements of administrative review based on the following criteria: • Land Use Code Section 26.410.010.C.4, Residential Design Standards, Exemptions: The existing single-family dwelling is a designated historic resource listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures. The alterations proposed in the remodel qualify for an RDS Exemption. • Land Use Code Section 26.415.070.6, Certificate of No Negative Effect: Staff finds that the proposed project will not diminish, eliminate or adversely affect the significant architectural character of the property and that the design guidelines applicable to this remodel are met with no conditions. The proposed project qualifies for a Certificate of No Negative Effect. • Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.6, Stream Margin Review, Exemptions: The proposed project sits within a building envelope that was approved in 2014 and does not require the removal of any trees. No portion of the remodel will be any closertothe high-water line, it will not change current drainage patterns, nor will it increase ground coverage. The existing floor area is approximately 4,041 square feet. The proposed floor area is approximately 4,071. This represents a o.8 percent increase in floor area, well below the 10 percent maximum allowance. The proposed project qualifies for a Stream Margin Exemption. DECISION: The Community Development Director approves the design of the proposed project subject to the following conditions: • If any portion of work occurs within 15 -ft. of the top of slope, the proposed project shall be completed with hand tools only. No machinery will be permitted. • The proposed staircase will consist of pervious materials so as not to alter current drainage patterns nor increase ground coverage. APPROVED BY: essica Garrow Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A- Legal Description (Recorded) Exhibit B- Amended Stream Margin Review Plan (Recorded) Exhibit C- Application (Not recorded) 00 Z10(9) Date Page 12 RECEPTION#: 651283, 1 011 712 01 8 at 01:49:19 PM, Pgs 3 of 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO Exhibit A: Legal Description Section: 7 Township: io Range: 84 A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE SW4NW4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP ioS, RANGE 84W OF THE 6TH PM, BEING DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE W OTR CORNER OF SECTION 7, A BLM BRASS CAP IN PLACE THENCE N87°27'o8"E A DIST OF 2287.32 FT TO THE SE CORNER OF 2ND AMENDED LOT 2 OF 2ND AMENDEMENT TO ODEN STREAM MARGIN REVIEW & LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT RECORDED IN PLAT BK 63/PG 68 IN THE PITKIN CNTY CLERK & RECORDERS OFFICE, THE POB; THENCE Noo°oo'oo"E ALONG THE ETLY BOUNDARY OF 2ND AMENDED LOT 2, A DIST OF 82.94 FT'; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID ETLY BOUNDARY N6o°54'25"E A DIST OF 37.65 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG ETLY BOUNDARY N29°0545"W A DIST OF 6.00 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG ETLY BOUNDARY N22002'27"W A DIST OF 237.58 FT TO THE CENTERLINE OF HUNTER CREEK; THENCE LEAVING SAID ETLY BOUNDARY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF HUNTER CREEK S46°32'oo"E A DIST OF 5745 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S33022'oo"E A DIST OF 98.28 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S85°25'oo"E A DISTANCE OF 68.68 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CENTERLINE S25°02'oo"E A DIST OF 82.76 FT TO THE NTLY MOST CORNER OF LOT OF RUBEY SUB AS RECORDED IN PLAT BK5/PG42IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PITKIN CNTY CLERK & RECORDERS OFFICE; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE OF HUNTER CREEK ALONG THE WTLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 7, S25°2o'oo"W A DIST OF 75.60 FT TO THE SWTLY CORNER OF LOT 7; THENCE LEAVING SAID WTLY BOUNDARY ALONG THE STLY BOUNDARY OF LOT 7 Ngo°oo'oo"E A DIST OF 40.38 FT TO THE NTLY BOUNDARY OF THE CONDO MAP OF COMMON GROUND HOUSING SUB AT INDEPENDENCE PLACE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BK35/PG32 IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PITKIN CNTY CLERK & RECORDERS OFFICE; THENCE LEAVING SAID STLY BOUNDARY ALONG SAID NTLY BOUNDARY S75029'oo"W A DIST OF 9.37 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NTLY BOUNDARY Ngo°oo'oo"W A DIST OF 80.02 FT; THENCE LEAVING SAID NTLY BOUNDARY N74°32'oo"W A DIST OF 75.00 FT TO A PT ON THE NTLY BOUNDARY OF SAID CONDO MAP OF COMMON GROUND HOUSING SUB AT INDEPENDENCE PLACE; THENCE Sgo'oo'oo"W ALONG SAID NTLY BOUNDARY A DIST OF 24.00 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NTLY BOUNDARY Noo°oo'oo"W A DIST OF 26 FT; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NTLY BOUNDARY S go°oo'oo"W A DISTANCE OF 48.00 FT TO THE POB. TOGETHER WITH INGRESS & EGRESS CONTAINED IN DOCUMENTS RECORDED MAY 22, 2g621N BK 294/PG249 & AS DESCRIBED & SHOWN ON PLAT RECORDED 7/23/02 IN PLAT BK 62/PG28 & RECORDED 8/16/76 IN BK32S/PG422 AS REC 286292 & THE AMENDMENTTO GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN BK325/PG422 AS REC 286292 & GRANT OF RECIPROCAL ACCESS EASEMENT RECORDED 8/2/23 AS REC 602204 & THE 2ND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT RECORDED 7/2o/25 AS REC 622420 & 3RD AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT RECORDED 9/2/25 AS REC 622890 & 4TH AMENDMENT RECORDED 2/22/16 AS REC 627225. LEGAL PER SURVEY BK222/PGo76. eana*651283, 10117120e_e e m Pgs ,«¢Janice r Vos Caudill, in County, CO T . j �\—.d �� ----/ »: � §S ] I\ _�2_�_.. , HIGHCO NTRY ENGINEERING, `s � �2 / % | |§§) / {«^~ § , § |§ . , a ] I\ _�2_�_.. , HIGHCO NTRY ENGINEERING, `s �