Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.eotc.06142018Elected Officials Transportation Committee (EOTC) Thursday, June 14, 2018- 4:00pm Location-Aspen-Council Chambers Pitkin County to Host and Chair Meeting ____________________________________________________________________________________ I. 4:00 - 4:05 REVIEW OF DECISIONS REACHED AT THE MARCH 8, 2018 MEETING John D. Krueger-City of Aspen II.4:05 - 4:15 PUBLIC COMMENT (Comments limited to three minutes per person) III.4:15 - 5:00 DESTINATION 2040 AND UPDATE ON STATEWIDE BALLOT MEASURES Ralph Trapani-Parsons, Bill Ray, Dan Blankenship-RFTA Decision Needed: None-Information Only IV.5:00 – 6:00 BUTTERMILK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING STUDY AND FUNDING REQUEST Brian Pettet-Pitkin County Decision Needed: Approval of Funding Request V. 6:00 –6:30 UPDATES-INFORMATION ONLY A. BATTERY ELECTRIC BUS PROGRAM John D. Krueger Aspen / Dan Blankenship-CEO RFTA B. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIRECTOR Brian Pettet-Pitkin County C. CASTLE CREEK BRIDGE/HALLAM STREET PROJECT Pete Rice-Aspen *Next meeting is October 19, 2018 - Aspen to Host & Chair ELECTED OFFICIALS TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (EOTC) AGREEMENTS & DECISIONS REACHED AT THE MARCH 8, 2018 MEETING Location – Snowmass Council Chambers Snowmass - Host & Chair Elected Officials in Attendance: Aspen - 4 Pitkin County - 4 Snowmass - 3 Steve Skadron Patti Clapper Bob Sirkus Bert Myrin Rachel Richards Bill Madsen Adam Frisch George Newman Tom Goode Ward Hauenstein Steve Childs Absent: Ann Mullins, Greg Poschman, Markey Butler, Alyssa Shenk ______________________________________________________________________________ Agreements & Decisions Reached REVIEW OF DECISIONS REACHED AT THE OCTOBER 19, 2017 MEETING John D. Krueger-City of Aspen No comments were made PUBLIC COMMENT • Toni Kronberg commented on the safety improvements at Smith Hill Way. • Brian Pettet updated the EOTC on the proposed safety improvements by CDOT at the Smith Hill Way intersection. • Lani Curtis commented on the Smith Hill way intersection and safety improvements. BUTTERMILK PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ANALYSIS Brian Pettet-Pitkin County Decision Reached: Approval of Funding Request $40,000 Brian presented a proposal for a request for funding of $40,000 for a Needs Analysis for the proposed Buttermilk pedestrian crossing. This was a reduced funding request from the original proposal presented at the October 19, 2017 meeting. At the October 19, 2017 meeting the EOTC directed staff to bring the request back to the EOTC in a reduced scope and cost to the March 2018 meeting. The EOTC unanimously approved the reduced funding request at the March meeting. 1 VOTE: Approved BOCC: 4-0 yes COA: 4-0 yes TOSV: 3-0 yes TOUGH MUDDER EVENT David Peckler-Snowmass Decision Reached: Approval of the use of the Brush Creek Park N Ride for the event The Tough Mudder event proposed for Snowmass on August 25-26, 2018 presented its Parking and Traffic Plan to the EOTC. The event plans on using the Brush Creek Park N Ride lot in an arrangement and manner as in previous years. The lot will be full for the two-day event. The EOTC approved the use of the lot for the event. RFTA ITSP POLLING RESULTS Dan Blankenship-RFTA CEO, Ralph Trapani-Parsons Bill Ray-Bill Ray and Associates Decision Needed: Information only The results of the public opinion survey performed in January 2018 was presented to the EOTC. The survey overview was presented including asking the public about a 3 or 5 mill levy ballot question. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNER UPDATE Brian Pettet-Pitkin County Decision Reached: Information Only Brian provided a brief verbal update on the Regional Transportation Planner position. The position was changed to Regional Transportation Director. Several people applied. An interview group from EOTC staff will interview any qualified applicants. CASTLE CREEK BRIDGE/HALLAM STREET PROJECT Pete Rice-Aspen Decision reached: Information Only Pete Rice City of Aspen engineer and project manager presented an update on the Castle Creek Bridge/Hallam Street project. The project will begin April 2, 2018 and will run through June 12. The project will take a pause during the busy summer season. The project will start back up on August 20 and continue until completion in the late fall. 2 BRUSH CREEK INTERCEPT LOT Mitch Osur-City of Aspen Decision Reached: Mitch Osur informed the EOTC of the increasing number of complaints about people living in their cars and campers at the lot. Mitch asked the EOTC for direction and permission to notify those people living at the intercept lot in campers or vehicles that they are trespassing, they will be given 48 hours to leave or their vehicles will be towed. City and County staff were directed to continue discussions and come up with some options to manage the problem. VI. UPDATES & FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS STATE-WIDE FUNDING EFFORTS FOR CDOT Rachel Richards commented on some of the proposed state-wide efforts on funding for CDOT and suggested that it be an agenda item at the next meeting. 3 2018 EOTC BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR PLAN PAGE 1 EOTC Transit Project Funding Actual Actual Budget Plan Plan Plan Plan 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 FUNDING SOURCES: a)Pitkin County 1/2% sales tax 5,106,873 5,357,764 5,355,000 5,529,000 5,709,000 5,895,000 6,087,000 less RFTA contribution (81.04% of 1/2% sales tax)4,138,610 4,341,932 4,339,692 4,480,702 4,626,574 4,777,308 4,932,905 net 1/2% sales tax funding to EOTC 968,263 1,015,832 1,015,308 1,048,298 1,082,426 1,117,692 1,154,095 b)Pitkin County 1/2% use tax 1,438,921 1,623,082 1,400,000 1,442,000 1,485,000 1,530,000 1,576,000 c)Investment income & misc.75,190 89,000 131,000 176,000 192,000 257,000 335,000 Total Funding Sources 2,482,373 2,727,914 2,546,308 2,666,298 2,759,426 2,904,692 3,065,095 FUNDING USES: Ongoing / Operational 1)Use tax collection costs 41,137 23,329 42,614 43,892 45,209 46,565 47,962 2)Administrative cost allocation & meeting costs 20,334 15,104 22,710 23,391 24,093 24,816 25,560 3)Country Inn taxi program in-lieu of bus stop safety improvements 2,389 2,494 2,494 2,494 2,494 2,494 2,494 4)X-Games transit subsidy 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 5)Brush Creek Intercept Lot operating costs 32,213 29,950 35,000 36,000 37,000 38,000 39,000 6)No-fare Aspen-Snowmass-Woody Creek bus service - year-round 621,658 615,726 650,556 728,110 816,331 849,000 883,000 7)WE-cycle operational support 100,000 100,000 100,000 8)Brush Creek BRT connecting service - spring, summer, fall (50% from Snowmass Sav)294,000 305,800 9)Regional Transportation Planner 160,000 166,400 173,100 180,000 187,200 sub-total Ongoing / Operational 832,731 901,602 1,422,374 1,521,087 1,213,227 1,255,875 1,300,216 net funding available for projects 1,649,643 1,826,312 1,123,934 1,145,211 1,546,199 1,648,817 1,764,879 Projects 10)Grand Ave Bridge construction - transit mitigation funding 335,000 11)Basalt pedestrian underpass 750,000 Projects funded from Savings for greater Aspen Area 12)Rubey Park final design, land use & permitting 3,814 13)Rubey Park construction 373,181 14)Upper Valley Mobility Study 137,947 276,044 15)Cell phone transportation data collection 70,000 16)Battery Electric Bus Program 500,000 17)Snowmass mall transit station (funded from Snowmass Village Savings Fund) 50,000 18) Variable message sign on Hwy 82 50,000 400,000 19) Buttermilk/SH82 Pedestrian Crossing Analysis 40,000 20)Brush Creek Park and Ride improvements (FLAP grant) (approved 10/20/16)3,900,000 less Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP) grant (1,900,000) Total Uses 2,097,672 1,582,646 2,062,374 3,921,087 1,213,227 1,255,875 1,300,216 EOTC ANNUAL SURPLUS/(DEFICIT)384,701 1,145,269 483,934 (1,254,789) 1,546,199 1,648,817 1,764,879 EOTC CUMULATIVE SURPLUS FUND BALANCE 7,610,019 8,755,288 9,239,222 7,984,433 9,530,632 11,179,449 12,944,328 5/30/2018 18b EOTC 4 2018 EOTC BUDGET AND MULTI-YEAR PLAN PAGE 2 - - - Actual Actual Budget Plan Plan Plan Plan 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 a)sales tax 3.6%4.9%-0.1%3.25%3.25%3.25%3.25% b)use tax -1.6%12.8%-13.7%3.0%3.0%3.0%3.0% c)investment earnings rate 0.85%1.0%1.5%1.9%2.4%2.7%3.0% DISTRIBUTION OF ANNUAL SURPLUS (excludes projects funded from savings funds)899,643 1,491,312 680,934 (1,101,889) 1,546,199 1,648,817 1,764,879 25% to Snowmass Village Savings until restored to $6,228,787 224,911 372,828 170,234 (275,472) 386,550 102,663 - remainder to Aspen Savings 674,732 1,118,484 510,701 (826,417) 1,159,649 1,546,154 1,764,879 Savings Fund for greater Snowmass Village Area plus share of annual surplus 224,911 372,828 170,234 (275,472) 386,550 102,663 - less 50% of Brush Creek BRT connecting service (147,000) (152,900) less Snowmass mall transit stop (50,000) Savings Fund for greater Snowmass Village Area ($6,228,787 max)5,821,885 6,194,713 6,167,946 5,739,574 6,126,124 6,228,787 6,228,787 Savings Fund for greater Aspen Area plus share of annual surplus 564,477 1,118,484 510,701 (826,417) 1,159,649 1,546,154 1,764,879 plus reimbursement of advance to capital pool 110,255 less Rubey Park funded from Aspen Savings (376,995) - less Upper Valley Mobility Study and cell phone data funded from Aspen Savings (137,947) (346,044) Savings Fund for greater Aspen Area 1,788,134 2,560,575 3,071,276 2,244,859 3,404,508 4,950,662 6,715,541 Revenue projections: 5/30/2018 18b EOTC 5 June 14, 2018 Elected Officials Transportation Committee 6 Agenda •Project List •Financial capacity analysis •RFTA May Board Retreat Summary •Polling Results •Next Steps •Discussion 7 Project List Updates since last time we met •Various alternatives renamed in the list for clarity •Projects grouped into three categories: •Improvements for the Environment •Improvements for Reducing Congestion and Improving Mobility •Improvements for Sustainability and Safety •Costs updated •Projects renumbered to coincide with project map 8 9 Financial Capacity Analysis •Four scenarios •Status Quo (with battery electric buses) •Sustainable Growth •Destination 2040 Stakeholder Recommendations •All-In Regional RFTA Member Projects •Project list determined for each scenario •Mill levy determined for each scenario based on cash flow, bonding, interest, inflation 10 Destination 2040 Financing Plan Scenarios All-In: 4.3 Mill Stakeholder Recs: 3.65 Mill Sustainable Growth: 3.55 Mill Status Quo (BEB): 2 Mill Alternative Service Improvement Alternative C1 A3C Service Increase, 30-minute Valley service Included Included Included Not Included C3 A3B Service Increase, Weekend BRT (Spring/Fall)Included Included Included Not Included C4 A11F I-70 Grand Hogback Service -27th Street to New Castle, 30 minute headways Included Included Included Not Included C5 A5 Expand Service in Glenwood Springs (Val to GWPNR and BRT to Downtown GWS)Included Included Included Not Included C6 A4 Better transit service connections to Snowmass Village on Brush Creek Road Included Included Included Not Included 11 All-In: 4.3 Mill Stakeholder Recs: 3.65 Mill Sustainable Growth: 3.55 Mill Status Quo (BEB): 2 Mill E5 C2 Rio Grande Trail Maintenance and Improvements Included Included Included Included C7 B4 Improvements to Highway 82 Bus Stations Included Included Included Included S6 E4 Aspen Maintenance Facility Expansion Phase 9 (Replacement of Fuel Farm)Included Included Included Included S6 E4 Aspen Maintenance Facility Expansion Phase 5 (Two Story Offices and Electric Charging)Included Included Included Included S6 E4 Aspen Maintenance Facility Expansion Phase 6 (Parts Room and Storage)Included Included Included Included S7 E2 RFTA Glenwood Springs Maintenance Facility Expansion Included Included Included Included S10 E3 Replacement of Employee Housing and Carbondale Office Space Included Included Included Included E2 A6 Bike Share Expansion Included Included Included Not Included E3 A16 Real Time Traveler Information Included Included Included Not Included C8 B3 Glenwood Springs 27 Street BRT Station Parking Expansion Included Included Included Not Included C9 B3 Willits BRT Station Parking Expansion Included Included Included Not Included C10 B3 Carbondale BRT Station Parking Expansion Included Included Included Not Included C11 B3 Aspen Junction (Basalt) PNR Expansion Included Included Included Not Included C12 B6 New Castle Park and Ride Expansion Burning Mountain Avenue Included Included Included Not Included C13 B7 Improvements to Town of Snowmass Village Transit Center Included Included Included Not Included C14 A15 Upper Valley Parking Management System Study Included Included Included Not Included C15 A15 Buttermilk Parking Management Included Included Included Not Included C16 B2 BRT Enhancements to Brush Creek Intercept Lot Included Included Included Not Included C17 B5 Micro Transit Accommodations at BRT Stations Included Included Included Not Included S1 D1 Pedestrian Crossings of 27 Street and Highway 82 in Glenwood Springs Included Included Included Not Included S6 E4 Aspen Maintenance Facility Expansion Phase 7 (Additional Indoor Bus Storage)Included Included Included Not Included S8 B1 900 Block Grand Avenue In-Line Transit Stations in Glenwood Springs Included Included Included Not Included S9 B8 New Transit Station in Glenwood Springs Included Included Included Not Included S10 E3 Expansion of Employee Housing and Carbondale Office Space Included Included Included Not Included E4 C1 LOVA Trail Construction from Glenwood Springs to New Castle Included Included Not Included Not Included S2 D5 South Bridge Highway 82 Connection in Glenwood Springs Included Included Not Included Not Included S3 D4 Pedestrian Crossing at 23 Street in Glenwood Springs Included Included Not Included Not Included S4 D2 Buttermilk Pedestrian Crossing in Pitkin County Included Included Not Included Not Included S5 D6 Enhanced Crossing of Rio Grande Trail at 14th Street in Glenwood Springs Included Included Not Included Not Included S6 E4 Aspen Maintenance Facility Expansion Phase 8 (CNG Compressor/Fueling)Included Included Not Included Not Included C18 A10 Expanded Circulators: Carbondale Included Not Included Not Included Not Included C19 A10 Expanded Circulators: Basalt Included Not Included Not Included Not Included C20 A10 Expanded Circulators: New Castle Included Not Included Not Included Not Included E6 D3 Rio Grande Trail Connectivity and Safety Improvements Included Not Included Not Included Not Included 12 RFTA MAY BOARD RETREAT SUMMARY 13 Regional Polling Results •Regional Poll •Initiated first week of June •Purpose is to recheck public support/messaging •Includes about 20 questions •Targeted 400 telephone responses •Polling Results •Summary to be provided at meeting 14 Next Steps •Summer 2018 Outreach Plans •TAC Meeting in late July •RFTA July/August Board meetings 15 QUESTIONS / DISCUSSION 16 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Dan Blankenship and Ralph Trapani FR: Bill Ray Date: June 4, 2018 RE: Update on statewide ballot measures Two statewide ballot measures have been approved by Title Board to proceed to signature collection. Below is a status update on each measure. Each initiative will require about 100,000 valid petition signatures, which means each campaign will need to collect about 150,000 signatures to meet that threshold. Initiative 153 Initiative 153 is supported by the Denver Metro Chamber of Commerce, Metro Mayors Caucus and the Colorado Contractors Association. The measure seeks to raise the statewide sales tax by 0.62 and to create a formula to share it between CDOT, local governments and transit/mobility. The transit share is 15 percent of the money and will be administered by CDOT’s Division of Transit and Rail. According to CASTA, the formula for distribution to transit agencies is still being developed. But preliminary work looks like distribution will be to Transportation Planning Regions based on vehicle miles, ridership, and needs-based riders (poverty, disability and distance to employment). Petition signatures for Initiative 153 are due on August 6. The campaign has two professional petition firms gathering signatures. The campaign committee, Coloradans for Colorado, has about $288,000 cash on hand. Initiative 167 Initiative 167 is sponsored by the Independence Institute, the conservative free-market think tank. The measure would require CDOT to issue bonds by July 1, 2019, for a max of $3.5 billion with a repayment cost of $5.2 billion over 20 years. Proceeds must be used exclusively for road and bridge expansion, construction, maintenance, and repair on 66 projects identified in the measure. Transit projects are excluded. The measure requires the principal and interest to be paid without raising taxes or fees. Petition signatures for Initiative 167 are due on August 6. The campaign has three professional petition firms gathering signatures. The Fix Our Damn Roads issue committee has about $25,000 cash on hand, but has reported nearly $100,000 in signature gathering expenses. Initiative 93 Although not transportation related, Initiative 93 proposes a statewide income tax increase for public education. The measure would create a graduated income tax rate for earners above $150,000 per year. This is a constitutional measure and has higher threshold for passage on the ballot and more stringent signature gathering requirements. The signatures are due on July 11 and only one professional firm is gathering signatures. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 MEMORANDUM TO: Elected Officials Transportation Committee (EOTC) FROM: John D. Krueger-City of Aspen-Dan Blankenship-CEO RFTA DATE OF MEMO: June 1, 2018 MEETING DATE: June 14, 2018 RE: Battery Electric Bus Program Update The goal of the Battery Electric Bus Program is to obtain eight zero emission battery electric buses for use in the Aspen and upper valley area. RFTA and City staff have been working diligently on the program. The focus has been on finalizing costs, funding and grant coordination. RFTA should receive final pricing from New Flyer by June 11 on the buses and chargers. The current estimate for the eight-bus program is about $8.5 million. RFTA has received notice of award from CDOT for FASTER and Low-No grants for the project and will also receive funding from Senate Bill 28. Other funding sources include approximately $1.8 million from RFTA, $1.8 million from the City of Aspen and $500,000 from the EOTC. The contributions from all the different funding sources should provide enough funding for the project. RFTA plans to budget the project at its July meeting. The order for the New Flyer zero emission battery electric buses will be placed soon after. Delivery of the buses will occur in about 1 year (2019). RFTA will request use of the EOTC and City funds at that time. 30 Cost Item Quantity Unit Cost Total Cost 40-foot Battery Electric Buses (BEB)8 1,031,000$ 8,248,000$ Charging Stations (two each included in cost of the bus)-$ Infrastructure Installation 1 208,000$ 208,000$ Total Estimated Cost N/A N/A 8,456,000$ Sources of Funding Committed Total Elected Officials Transportation Committee Yes 500,000$ FY18/19 Statewide FASTER Grant/SB 228 Grant/LoNo Yes 4,273,531$ RFTA FASTER Grant Local Match Yes 1,068,383$ Additional RFTA Funding 772,852$ Subtotal RFTA Funding 1,841,235$ City of Aspen 1,841,235$ Total BEB Funding 8,456,000$ Battery Electric Bus Funding Plan 31