The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.HPC.202007221 AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION July 22, 2020 4:30 PM, WEBEX Go to: www.webex.com Click "Join" at the top right-hand corner Enter Meeting Number 126 651 6551 Password provided 81611 Click "Join Meeting" OR Join by phone Call: 1-408-418-9388 Meeting number (access code): 126 651 6551 Meeting password: 81611 I.SITE VISIT- NONE 4:30 INTRODUCTION II.ROLL CALL III.MINUTES Minutes July 8th minutes.hpc.20200708.pdf IV.PUBLIC COMMENTS V.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS VI.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VII.PROJECT MONITORING VIII.STAFF COMMENTS IX.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED X.CALL UP REPORTS 1 2 XI.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS XII.OLD BUSINESS 4:40 pm. 110 Neale Avenue - Conceptual Major Development, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 24TH 110Neale_Memo_07.22.20.pdf 110Neale_Resolution_07.22.20.pdf ExhibitA.1_HPGuidelinesCriteria.pdf ExhibitA.2_RDS_Review.pdf ExhibitB_ReferralComments.pdf ExhibitC_RevisedApplication.pdf 5:10 pm. 500 W. Main Street – Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards Review- PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 10TH 500 W Main_Memo.pdf 500 W Main_Reso.pdf Exhibit A_HPGuidelinesCriteria.pdf Exhibit B_Residential Design Standards Criteria.pdf Exhibit C_Application.pdf Exhibit D_Public Comment.pdf XIII.NEW BUSINESS None XIV.ADJOURN 6:10 PM XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER #15 Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1)Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8)Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. 2 3 Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised April 2, 2014 3 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 8, 2020 Chairperson Greenwood opened the meeting at 4:30 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Jeffrey Halferty, Kara Thompson, Scott Kendrick, Gretchen Greenwood. Commissioners not in attendance: Bob Blaich, Roger Moyer, Sherri Sanzone Staff present: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Halferty moved to approve the minutes from June 24th,2020. Ms. Thompson seconded. All in favor. Motion carried 4-0. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: None CONFLICTS: None STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that there is no navigate effect nor call ups. She said that she and Ms. Greenwood will be doing a site visit on a new development in the Hyman mall. Ms. Simon stated that the first item of business tonight is to continue 611 W. Main Street to September 9th, 2020. Ms. Simon pointed out that Erica D. from History Colorado was joining and observing the meeting. OLD BUSINESS: 611 W. Main Street- Conceptual Major Development. Mr. Halferty moved to continue this haring to September 9th, 2020. Mr. Kendrick seconded. Mr. Halferty, Mr. Kendrick, and Ms. Greenwood were in favor, Ms. Thompson unstained. Motion carried 3-0-1. NEW BUSINESS: 234 W. Francis Street - Final Major Development Review. Sara Adams from BendonAdams representing owners. Ms. Greenwood stated that a revised resolution was sent out to the board earlier in the day. Ms. Adams stated that this meeting is for the final major development review with two additional requests. Ms. Adams stated this first additional request is after reviewing the cabin chimney, the findings found that the chimney is not original and hangs over the property line. Ms. Adams said that HPC needs to memorialize the setback variations for the existing original location of the original cabin. Ms. Adams further explained that they plan to dig deeper to connect the basement that was originally approved. She said that in a worst-case scenario the cabin would be lifted temporally then placed back. Ms. Adams showed an aerial rendering of the final project and reviewed the approvals that HPC had passed. Ms. Adams said that there was a condition for review at the final review about the overhang above the secondary entrance. Ms. Adams showed a rendering that shows the overhang has been pulled in and is not connected to the resource or garage. Ms. Adams stated that the garage has been raised six inches for better livability in the bedroom while well under the height of the landmark. Ms. Adams showed photos of the current 4 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 8, 2020 chimney and the lot line that it crosses. Ms. Adams said after reviewing the Sanborn maps of the property they discovered that there was a stovepipe in that location. She prosed the removal of the nonhistorical chimney and replacement with a stove pipe. Ms. Adams outlined all the material that will be used. Ms. Adams explained they plan to repair where they can with staff and monitor. Ms. Adams reminded HPC that there are solar panels on the roof that will be hidden behind a parapet. Ms. Adams stated that the secondary walkway will be a straight shout and will use stone pavers to help read as a secondary walkway. Ms. Adams said there will be an 18-inch maintenance edge that will wrap the resource. Ms. Adams outlined the landscaping proposal ranging from sod leading into perineal beds with a verity of vegetation. Ms. Adams outlined the conditions that are in the updated resolution that is attached. Ms. Thompson asked about the design of the new stove pipe vs. the chimney that is shown. Ms. Adams reiterated that the chimney is not historic and will be replaced with a stove copper pipe. Mr. Halferty asked about the path connector element and the materials that will be used. Ms. Adams stated that it will be a grey basalt stone making up a standard pattern with grass elements throughout. STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Yoon reviewed the project and stated that relocation has been triggered by the underpinning of the historic resource and setback variations are in response to making sure the resource remains in their location. Ms. Yoon state that staff had concerns with the presents of the secondary walkway reading as a primary entrance. Ms. Yoon said with the sod pavers and grass elements this meets the concerns of the staff. Ms. Yoon stated that staff is supportive to see the sod pulled back with a perennial bed barrier. Ms. Yoon said the canopy that hangs over the secondary entrance meets the requirements and staff is satisfied. Ms. Yoon stated in the revised resolution the dimensions for the setback have been cleaned up. Ms. Yoon reiterated that the revised resolution that was submitted omits points five and seven while revising the dimensions point thirteen in reference to the setback variation. Ms. Yoon stated that the staff is in support of this project. Ms. Greenwood asked if the applicant would be adding gutters and downspouts and the purpose of the gravel border around the historic resource. Ms. Yoon stated that the information regarding the gutters and downspouts can be found in the packet that was provided. Ms. Yoon explained that the gravel border is there to separate vegetation and water penetration. Ms. Adams stated that gutters will be added to the addition and cabin. She added that the gravel border will help with irrigation spray against the historic resource. PUBLIC COMMENTS: NONE COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Halferty stated that he agrees with the applicant's landscaping proposal. Mr. Kendrick stated that he agrees with Mr. Halferty and agrees with the applicant's landscape plan. Mr. Kendrick stated he would like to see this move forward. Ms. Thompson stated that she missed the February meeting. She would like to see more detail on the landscaping plan and feels that can be handled with staff and monitor. Ms. Greenwood stated that she agrees with the applicant on landscape design. She said that this is a successful project and believes it should be passed. 5 REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JULY 8, 2020 Ms. Thompson moved to approve Resolution #14-2020. Mr. Halferty second. ROLL CALL: Mr. Halferty, Yes; Ms. Thompson, Yes; Mr. Kendrick Yes; Ms. Greenwood, Yes. All in favor, Motion carried 4-0. Mr. Moyer joined the meeting. OTHER BUSINESS: Erica D. from History Colorado stated that every four years she audits the HPC meeting and evaluates the quasi-judicial board. She said a line of communication is always open if board members have questions. ADJOURN: Ms. Thompson moved to adjourn. Mr. Kendrick seconded. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0. 6 Page 1 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner THROUGH: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer MEETING DATE: July 22, 2020 RE: 110 Neale Avenue – Conceptual Major Development Review, PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 24TH APPLICANT /OWNER: 17 Queen LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Forum Phi Architecture, LLC LOCATION: Street Address: 110 Neale Avenue Legal Description: Lot 2, As shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2737-073-83-002 CURRENT ZONING & USE R-15A (Moderate-Density Residential); Residential Use PROPOSED USE: No change SUMMARY: In June, HPC reviewed an application for Conceptual Major Development and recommended the applicant restudy the mass and scale of the proposed cross-gable roof form. The revised design takes this comment into consideration by reducing the overall height of this feature. The applicant requests approval for Conceptual Major Development to remodel the existing home on a lot created through a historic landmark lot split. Changes to building mass, footprint, and exterior building materials are proposed. This project is subject to Residential Design Standards (RDS), to be reviewed and approved by staff unless the application includes variances. The revised design meets the required RDS standards and no further action by HPC is needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the project and recommends approval with conditions listed on page 4 of this memo. Site Locator Map – 110 Neale Avenue 110 7 Page 2 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com BACKGROUND: 110 Neale Avenue is a 15,160 sf lot created through a Historic Landmark Lot Split in 1998 (Ordinance #16, Series of 1998). The historic miner’s cabin is located on Lot 1 (114 Neale Avenue), and a new single-family residential building was approved on Lot 2 (110 Neale Avenue) in 2005. This structure is considered an existing non-conforming structure when it comes to the subgrade level and the floor area. The property faces both Neale Avenue and Queen Street. There is an existing detached Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) on the site that is approximately 500 sf. The applicant will engage in an administrative process to remove the deed restricted ADU (Reception # 490883) and provide cash-in-lieu mitigation to be used by the City in the construction of affordable housing in another location. REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) to remodel the existing non-historic single- family home. Changes to massing, footprint and exterior building materials are proposed. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority, however, this project is subject to Call-up Notice by City Council. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to remodel the existing single-family home by reconfiguring the building footprint, specifically around the garage and detached accessory dwelling unit (ADU), and the building form/mass as perceived from Neale Avenue. Changes are proposed to the entry features, exterior building materials and fenestration, with the exception of the gable roofed structure closest to the historic resource on 114 Neale Avenue. New decks and a larger subgrade level are proposed with this design. STAFF COMMENTS: As an existing detached non-historic structure on a steep slope, staff recognizes the site conditions make it difficult to create a strong visual relationship between the two properties. Staff supports the proposed changes related to the reconfiguration of the garage and finds the design changes made to the entry allows for better compliance with the Residential Design Standards. In response to HPC comments from the last hearing, the applicant has reduced the height of the proposed cross-gable form north of the proposed hip gabled feature, which breaks up the massing and reduces the overall scale of the addition as perceived from the northwest elevation. Staff recommends approval of the project with the revised design. Figure 1 – 110 Neale, 2020 8 Page 3 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Mass & Scale: A level of design compatibility between the new building and the historic structure is required but there is more flexibility when it comes to detached structures. The uphill portion of the home closest to the adjacent historic property was originally designed to be similar in mass and scale to the historic cabin. This part of the house is left unaltered in this project. As the building moves further away from the historic resource, the massing of the home begins to respond to the context of Queen Street. The design presented in June created an imposing cross-gable spanning over most of the living area. From Neale Avenue, this design read as an uninterrupted singular mass of increased scale unrelated to the historic resource (Figure 1). The revised design reduces the roof mass at the center of the structure. (Figure 2). This design change creates a more appropriately scaled transition connecting the side of the home that relates to the historic resource with the side of the house that relates to Queen Street. Staff finds the revised design meets Design Guideline 11.3 which calls for a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion to the historic building. Figure 1 – Proposed Northwest Elevation as presented in June (View from Neale Avenue) Figure 2 – Revised Northwest Elevation (View from Neale Avenue) 9 Page 4 of 4 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will significantly affect the permit review. Please see Exhibit B for full comments. Engineering Department: 1. Existing 2-hour parking space on Queen Street needs to remain and Engineering supports a head in parking configuration. Associated details including curb and gutter, landscape buffer, and sidewalk need to meet requirements. 2. Drywells need to meet today’s standards. 3. Clarify and update utility and water service lines. 4. Easement required for new transformer with appropriate clearances. Zoning Department: 1. Any new subgrade area expansion must be clearly shown and conform with the maximum depth of 15’, including lightwells. 2. Clarify easement and slopes reduction impacts to floor area calculations. 3. Clarify deck exemption calculations. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approve this application with the following conditions: 1.) Continue to work with all relevant City Departments including Engineering, Parks, and Zoning to ensure all requirements are met, including but not limited to the proposed right- of-way configuration. 2.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2020 Exhibit A.1 – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria / Staff Findings Exhibit A.2 – Residential Design Standards (RDS) / Administrative Approval Exhibit B – Referral Comments Exhibit C – Revised Application 10 HPC Resolution __, Series of 2020 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 NEALE AVENUE, LOT 2 AS SHOWN ON THE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT OF 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-073-83-002 WHEREAS, the applicant, 17 Queen LLC, represented by Forum Phi Architecture, LLC, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development for the property located at 110 Neale Avenue, Lot 2 as shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The project has received administrative approval of compliance with the Residential Design Standards; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on June 24th, 2020 and July 22nd, 2020. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of ___ - ___. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development for 110 Neale Avenue, Lot 2, as shown on the Subdivision Exemption Plat of 114 Neale/17 Queen Historic Lot Split, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO as follows: Section 1: Conceptual Major Development Review HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development as proposed with the following conditions: 1.) Continue to work with all relevant City Departments including Engineering, Parks, and Zoning to ensure all requirements are met, including but not limited to the proposed right-of-way configuration. 11 HPC Resolution __, Series of 2020 Page 2 of 2 2.) A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the ____day of ______, 2020. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: ______________________________ ______________________________ Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair ATTEST: ______________________________ Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk 12 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit A.1 Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings NOTE: Staff responses begin on page 4 of this exhibit, following the list of applicable guidelines. 26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 3. Conceptual Development Plan Review b) The procedures for the review of conceptual development plans for major development projects are as follows: 1) The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for conceptual or final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. 2) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3) The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 4) A resolution of the HPC action shall be forwarded to the City Council in accordance with Section 26.415.120 - Appeals, notice to City Council, and call-up. No applications for Final Development Plan shall be accepted by the City and no associated permits shall be issued until the City Council takes action as described in said section. 13 Page 2 of 4 Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least Chapter 1: Site Planning & Landscape Design MET NOT MET 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. Chapter 9: New Construction - Excavation, Building Relocation & Foundations MET NOT MET 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. Chapter 11: New Buildings on Landmarked Properties MET NOT MET 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. 11.5 The intent of the historic landmark lot split is to remove most of the development potential from the historic resource and place it in the new structure(s). 11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time. 11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Review Criteria for 110 Neale The applicant is requesting Conceptual Major Development review for this project. The proposed design must meet applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. MET CONDITION MET CONDITION MET MET MET MET MET MET 14 Page 3 of 4 a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 9.6 Minimize the visual impact of lightwells. • The size of any lightwell that faces a street should be minimized. • Lightwells must be placed so that they are not immediately adjacent to character defining features, such as front porches. • Lightwells must be protected with a flat grate, rather than a railing or may not be visible from a street. • Lightwells that face a street must abut the building foundation and generally may not “float” in the landscape except where they are screened, or on an AspenModern site. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. • The front porch shall be functional, and used as the means of access to the front door. • A new porch must be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel. • Subdivide larger masses into smaller “modules” that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. • Reflect the heights and proportions that characterize the historic resource. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. • The primary plane of the front shall not appear taller than the historic structure. 11.5 The intent of the historic landmark lot split is to remove most of the development potential from the historic resource and place it in the new structure(s). • This should be kept in mind when determining how floor area will be allocated between structures proposed as part of a lot split. 11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time. • Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic resource. • When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale 15 Page 4 of 4 • When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic resource. 11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. • This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. • Overall, details shall be modest in character. Staff Finding: The applicable sections of the design guidelines are as follows: site planning and new buildings on landmark properties. Design Guidelines 1.8 addresses stormwater mitigation, site grading, and the construction of new retaining walls. As part of this scope of work, the applicant has submitted a drainage plan and preliminary stormwater mitigation plan. The applicant will need to continue to work with all relevant City Departments including Engineering, Parks, and Zoning to ensure all requirements are met, and all stormwater features must achieve minimal visual impact. Design Guidelines 9.6 refers to the visual impact of lightwells. As an existing non-conforming subgrade structure, new lightwells must meet the dimensional requirements regarding depth that is specified in the Municipal Code. In order to reduce the visual impact of lightwells, flat grates rather than a railing are recommended. Residential Design Standards also specify that features such as lightwells may not be forward of the front most street-facing façade. Staff will be issuing an administrative finding that the Residential Design Standards are met by this project. Design Guidelines 11.3 focuses on mass and scale of a detached new building on a lot that is considered historic. The portion of the structure closest to the historic resource remains unchanged and most closely relates to the size and scale of the historic property on 114 Neale Avenue. The redesigned portion of the home extending southwards maintains a building height that is compatible with the structure that best relates to the historic property. As the structure moves further away from the historic resource, the mass and scale of the home begins to relate to Queen Street. Staff finds this guideline has been met with the revised design. In summary, staff recommends approval with conditions listed in the memo and draft resolution. 16 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Does Not Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Approved: (Approved plans/elevations attached) 17171 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Doesn’t Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Approved: 18172 Exhibit B - Referral Comments HP Project: 110 Neale Avenue Engineering Department Comments: Hailey Guglielmo, hailey.guglielmo@cityofaspen.com Addressed with the HPC Review: 1. Adjacent to the house on Queen St there is 2 hour Park use parking. This head in parking needs to remain. Head in parking is supported instead of parallel parking because cars need the space to turn around. The applicant needs to propose a street section that allows head in parking, curb and gutter, a 5’ landscape buffer, and a 5’ sidewalk. If there is not available width to meet the standards the applicant will need to work with the Engineering Department on the street section. Resolved prior to Building Permit Submittal: 1. Engineering Standards require a detached sidewalk. Due to the existing vegetation the sidewalk on Neale Ave will be permitted to remain attached. On Queen St the sidewalk needs to be detached. 2. The condition of the sidewalk and curb and gutter adjacent to the property will be determined at building permit if it needs to be replaced. 3. All drywells need to be modified in some way to provide pretreatment to meet today’s standard. The two chamber standard drywell is an example of pretreatment. At building permit either the two chamber approach or some other pretreatment retrofit will need to be proposed. 4. The existing utilities show multiple water service lines. Maybe one to the main house and one to the ADU? As shown on the plans. At building permit all lines will need to be abandoned and just one service line will supply the building. 5. An easement will need to be put in place for the new transformer prior to building permit approval. There must be 3’ clear on the sides and back of the transformer. Zoning Department Comments: Jim Pomeroy, jim.pomeroy@cityofaspen.com Bob Narracci, bob.narracci@cityofaspen.com 1. New lightwell abutting the existing non-conforming basement not to exceed 15’ in depth. 2. Any expansion of the subgrade area must clearly be shown to conform with the maximum 15’ depth restriction. With the building permit application, detailed information will be required confirming that the 19 proposed basement expansion area satisfies the maximum depth land use code language. 3. On the survey there is access easement across the property. This does not have square footage from the surveyor – it needs to have that. This area along with steep slopes will get reduced from gross FA. 4. Existing FA does not show the 15% deck exemption taken out of the total. Therefore, the total existing FA number is smaller than what is shown. 20 forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Aspen CO 81611 July 8, 2020 Dear Members of the Historic Preservation Commission, On May 5, 2020, Forum Phi submitted an application for Major Development Review of an addition to the existing residence at 110 Neale Avenue in Aspen. On June 24, 2020, members of the HPC voted to continue Conceptual Review of the application pending restudy of the roof massing over the dining room. Specifically, the Commission argued that the proposed addition did not comply with Section 11.3 of the HPC Design Guidelines. Section 11.3, under the Mass and Scale heading, requires that new buildings, or in this case additions to existing buildings, “appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel.” The commission argued that the continuation of the ridge from the living room through the dining room created a massing condition that was incompatible with the historic resource at 114 Neale, regardless of how that mass might be modulated through depth. The elevation below identifies the area of concern. Forum Phi has redeveloped the roof massing in this zone to limit the ridge height and to further modulate the Neale Avenue elevation. Instead of continuing the ridge height across the living spaces, the design reconsiders the dining room as a connecting element between the master bedroom wing nearest to the historic resource and the living wing on the downhill side of the lot. 21 forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 The proposed design has been considered in accordance with applicable Residential Design Standards. These standards serve as a guide for design within our context, encouraging design at a human scale, requiring consideration of appropriate building materials, and promoting a healthy relationship between building and street. The change in roof massing has not resulted in any changes to the way the design addresses RDS requirements. Significant (but not historic) landscape improvements exist on the site. The project will to the greatest extent practicable retain all trees on the site and does not propose to remove any trees between the house at 110 Neale and the historic resource at 114 Neale or between the house at 110 Neale and Neale Avenue. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to addressing your comments. Best regards, Kurt Peterson, Project Manager 22 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: Location: (Indicate street address, lot & block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)___________________________________________________________ Applicant: Name: Address: Phone #: _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:_______________________________________________ REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Address: Phone #: _______________________Fax#:___________________E-mail:________________________________________________ TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Historic Designation Certificate of No Negative Effect Certificate of Appropriateness -Minor Historic Development -Major Historic Development -Conceptual Historic Development -Final Historic Development -Substantial Amendment Relocation (temporary, on or off-site) Demolition (total demolition) Historic Landmark Lot Split EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 110 Neale Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 Forum Phi Architecture, LLC C/O Kurt Peterson 715 W MAIN ST, STE 204 ASPEN CO 81611 (303) 884-7756 kpeterson@forumphi.com x The client is seeking approval for a renovation to the existing residence. 110 Neale Ave contains two structures: one single family residence and one ADU. 273707383002 110 Neale Ave 17 Queen LLC 110 Neale AvenueAspen, CO 81611 Exhibit A X 23 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO  Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions, new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration?  Does the work you are planning include interior work, including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration?   Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time?   In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places Property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits?  If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in Conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.)  If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use:  Rehabilitation Loan Fund  Conservation Easement Program  Dimensional Variances  Increased Density  Historic Landmark Lot Split  Waiver of Park Dedication Fees  Conditional Uses  Tax Credits  Exemption from Growth Management Quota System X X X X Exhibit A 24 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 ATTACHMENT 3 - Dimensional Requirements Form (Item #10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: Applicant: Project Location: Zone District: Lot Size: Lot Area: (For the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing:__________Proposed:_________________ Number of residential units: Existing:__________Proposed:_________________ Proposed % of demolition: __________ DIMENSIONS: (write N/A where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Height Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Principal Bldg.: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ Accessory Bldg.: Existing:_________Allowable:__________Proposed:________ On-Site parking: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Site coverage: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ % Open Space: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Front Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Rear Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined Front/Rear: Indicate N, S, E, W Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Side Setback: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Combined Sides: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Distance between buildings: Existing:_________Required:___________Proposed:________ Existing non-conformities or encroachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued: _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ Variations requested (identify the exact variances needed): ______________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 17 Queen LLC 110 Neale AvenueAspen, CO 81611 R-15A 15,160 11,425.47 NA NA 2 1 33.87% 4,336.07 Existing Nonconforming 4,335.19 22'-4"25'22'-4" 12'1"25'NA 3 2 4 NA NA NA 25'-9"25'25'-6" 20'-2"10 20'-2" 26.6%26.4%<30% 110 Neale Ave Exhibit L25 City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet City of Aspen|130 S. Galena Street.| (970) 920 5090 Historic Land Use Application Requirements, Updated: March 2016 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Property Phone No.: Owner (“I”): Email: Address of Billing Property: Address: (Subject of (send bills here) application) I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $___________flat fee for ____________________ $____________ flat fee for ____________________________________ $___________ flat fee for ___________________ $_____________ flat fee for____________________________________ For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $________________ deposit for_____________ hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $________________ deposit for _____________ hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: ________________________________ _______________________________________________ Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director Name: _______________________________________________ Title: ____________________________________________________ City Use: Fees Due: $____Received $_______ Exhibit B26 Exhibit D 27 28 29 30 Leslie Miller Saiontz Exhibit E 31 Exhibit F 32 7910OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEDYHWVWVWVDDDEGEGEIIOSWOSWXXXXXXD2. 0 '17.1'2 1 . 6 '4.6'1 0 . 4 '16.6'8. 1 '0.7'5. 3 '0.7'4. 0 '1.6'2 7 . 6 '19.8'2 1 . 2 '22.3'2 1 . 5 '4.8'9. 2 '4.6'1 8 . 4 '11.3'8. 2 '1.5'1 0 . 3 '10.3'1. 6 '3.7'1 0 . 5 '20.5'1 4 . 5 '2.0'7. 2 '14.5'2. 0 '4.2'1 3 . 1 '22.4'1 3 . 1 '7.8'9. 6 '13.1'9. 6 '1.5'14.5'2 0 . 3 '23'10.9'N 39°14'20" E 96.58' N 3 7 ° 2 6 ' 5 1 " E 6 2 . 0 9 'S 50°20'03" E84.49'S 3 0 ° 1 7 ' 0 0 " W 16 1 . 1 7 'N 50°07'30" W107.64'BOULDER(TYP.)WI N D OWWE L L CONCRETEPATIOCONCRETEPATIOSTEPSS T O N E W A L L ( T Y P . )SPAUPPER LEVELCONCRETEDECKWINDOWWELLBOULDERWALL (TYP.)BELOWELEC.TRANS.TELE.PED.ELEC.METERSSTORM DRAINRIM 7901.64'INV 7898.14'BOTT 7887.75'#5 REBAR - TBMEL=7903.71'WATERSERVICE(TYP.)SIGN(TYP.)FIREHYD.WATERVALVE (TYP.)STORMDRAIN (TYP.)CONCRETEDRIVEWAYFLAGSTONEWALKGASMETERGASMETER0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)IRRIGATIONCONTROL (TYP.)#4 REBAR#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947FLAGSTONE WALKC O V E R E D F L A G S T O N E E N T R A N C E S T U C C O W A L L C O N C R E T E W A L K WI N D OWWE L LBOULDERWALL (TYP.)QUEEN STREETR-O-W WIDTH VARIESASPHALTNEALE AVENUER-O-W WIDTH VARIESASPHALT ASPHALTDRIVEWAY X XFENCE(TYP.)FENCE(TYP.)LOT 1TI E R E T A I N I N G W A L LACCESS EASEMENT PER PLAT BK 13 PG 35AND LICENSE PER REC. NO. 498801MAILBOXMAILBOXA D J O I N E R S H E DCONCRETEDRIVEWAYGRAVELPARKING LOT 215,160 S.F.±0.348 AC.±MULTI LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT17 QUEEN STREET110 NEALE AVENUEPARCEL 2PLAT BK 13 PG 35PARCEL 9HERRON PARKPLAT BK 13 PG 35SINGLE LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME ADUELEC.OUTLETC O N C R E T E S I D EW A L K CONC R E T E C U R B & G U T T E RFLAGSTONEWALK STONEWALL(TYP.)POWERPOLEWATERFEATUREGRAVELCONCRETEDRIVEWAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSGASLINESEWERLINETTCONCRETE SIDEWALK SIGN(TYP.)COMM.MANHOLESCONCRETE BOXINV EL=7896.20'IRRIGATIONCONTROLGRAVELPARKINGPARCEL 2PROJECT AREA12' SEWERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 250 PG 477 &PLAT BK 13 PG 3512'WATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1G G G G GGGGG G G G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UETTTCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVW W W W W WWWWWWWWEX-UEE X - U E E X - U E EX-UEEX-UEEX-UEEX-UETT T G G G GWATERLINEGASLINE ELECTRICCATVTELEPHONEOVERHEAD ELECTRICTIE RETAINING WALLU P P E R L E V E L W O O D D E C KBOULDERWALL (TYP.)BOULDERWALL (TYP.)IRR.CONTROLDDDF.F.7914.6'RIDGE7933.9'RIDGE7936.0'CHIMNEY7940.0'F.F.7903.6'F.F.7908.8'F.F.7904.1'RIDGE7918.4'WWWWWWWWWWWW STEELPOSTT1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16T17T18T19T20T21T22T23T24T25T26T27T28T29T30T31T32T33T34T35T36T37T38T39T40T41T42T43T44T45T46T47T48T49T50T51T52T53T54T55T56T57T58T59T60T61T62T63T64T65T66T67T68T69T70T71T72T73T74T75T76T77T78STORM DRAINRIM 7902.00'BOTT 7889.12'AREADRAINAREADRAINC.O.A. CONTROLQ-159 BEARSN77°07'51"W 1359.26'C.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS32°07'00"W 387.54'7920 7923 79 2 0 7915790579107903 AREASLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.001%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%+COLOR10437.851975.242746.91ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Since 200716029B1 OF 117 QUEEN, LLCCITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEYLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT- 110 NEALE AVE.JRNJRNSEPT 27, 2018029-IMPTOPO110/19/18UPDATE SLOPE TABLEJRN210/22/18UPDATE SLOPE TABLEJRN305/12/20UPDATE SURVEYJRNNESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e a k Surveying, Inc.0101020405COL O R ADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND S U RVEYOR JAS O N R. NEIL37935IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT& TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLITACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLOT 2, 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED MAY 29,1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLCAND FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO. INC. COMMITMENT NO. 16003515, DATEDEFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 2016.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS APRIL 27, 2016, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 AND MAY 05, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S50°20'03"E BETWEEN THENORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THENORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE 114 NEALE/17QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISIONEXEMPTION PLAT RECORDED MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 AND THE BOUNDARYAGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1982 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 IN THE PITKINCOUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:FRONT YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'REAR YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENTPRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.7) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERNCOLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF7903.71' ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.8) ACCORDING TO FEMA PANEL NO. 08097C0204C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 THE SUBJECT PROPERTYIN NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN.9) AT THE TIME OF THE MAY 05, 2020 FIELD VISIT MISC. EXTERIOR WORK WAS BEINGPERFORMED AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION FENCES EXISTED.NORTHVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'SUBJECTPROPERTYIMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO 17 QUEEN LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITYCOMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE, CORRECT ANDCOMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID OUT AND SHOWNHEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY,EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS MADE BY MEFROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR UNDER MYDIRECT SUPERVISION ON APRIL 27, 2016, SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 AND MAY 05, 2020; THAT, IN THEPREPARATION OF THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENTPREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC AND FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE CO. INC. COMMITMENT NO. 16003515, DATED EFFECTIVE APRIL 20, 2016; THATTHE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OFWAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL PROPERTYAND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEING SHOWN AREACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF AN IMPROVEMENTSURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: MAY 12, 2020 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.33 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACKEXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA TO BE RECONFIGURED EXISTING PATIO AND RETAINING WALLS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING PATIO TO BE REMOVED AND ENCLOSED EXISTING FRONT PORCH TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EXISTING ROOF DECK EXISTING ROOF DECK EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK TO BE REFINISHED ACCESS EASEMENT TO ADJACENT PARCEL TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL TERRACED PLANTING WALLS TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING SIDEWALK ENDS AT CORNER OF NEALE AVE AND QUEEN ST TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL 7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 ' 7 9 1 8 ' 7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901' 7904' 7904' 7 9 2 1 'PROPERTY LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK NEALE AVENUE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E 7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913'QUEEN STREETEXISTING ADU TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE SOME WALLS TO REMAIN EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND NSCALE: 1:901EXISTING SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-001X EXISTING SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 34 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10' REAR YARD SETBACK 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 122'-23/4" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 119'-93/4" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-51/2" EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK TO BE REFINISHED ACCESS EASEMENT TO ADJACENT PARCEL EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL TO REMAIN TERRACED PLANTING WALLS TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING FENCE AT 114 NEALE AVE EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL EXISTING PAVED DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA TO BE RECONFIGURED EXISTING PATIO TO BE REMOVED AND ENCLOSED EXISTING FRONT PORCH TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED EXISTING ROOF DECK EXISTING ROOF DECK TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS. TREES TO REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE. SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK EXISTING PATIO AND RETAINING WALLS TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAINEXISTING DRYWELLS TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN TREES IN ZONE TO BE REMOVED DUE TO ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS. TREES TO REMAIN WHERE POSSIBLE. PROPERTY LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK NEALE AVENUE EXISTING SIDEWALK NO PROPOSED CHANGES, TO BE COORDINATED WITH COA S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E QUEEN STREET7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 ' 7 9 1 8 ' 7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901' 7904' 7904' 7 9 2 1 '7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913' 7904' 7904' T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-51/2" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 123'-1" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 125'-5" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 119'-93/4" EXISTING ADU TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE SOME WALLS TO REMAIN EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE NSCALE: 1:901EXISTING SITE PLAN AT ROOF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-002X EXISTING SITE PLAN AT ROOF 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 35 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND 25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACKT.O. ENTRY PORCH 94'-33/4" T.O. DECK 100'-3" T.O. WALL 102'-3" T.O. WALL 102'-11" T.O. WALL 103'-11" T.O. WALL 103'-11" T.O. DECK 100'-3" T.O. PATIO 99'-9" T.O. PATIO 100'-3" EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK TO BE REFINISHED ACCESS EASEMENT TO ADJACENT PARCEL TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL SHED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY ENCROACHES INTO SETBACK TERRACED PLANTING WALLS TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SIDEWALK ALONG QUEEN STREET, TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPT STONE PLANTER WITHIN 30" OF GRADE IN SETBACK STONE PLANTER WITHIN 30" OF GRADE IN SETBACK PROPOSED LANDSCAPE TREADS EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN 4343 4343 43 43 43 EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL 32 LINE OF SHADE STRUCTURE ABOVE 4343 4343 43 43 32 32 7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 ' 7 9 1 8 ' 7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901' 7904' 7904' 7 9 2 1 'PROPERTY LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK NEALE AVENUE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E 7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913' 110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL ID: 273707383002 PROJECT 100' = 7914.35' PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM PATIO PROPOSED ROOF DECK UNDER TRELLIS RECONFIGURED DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA PROPOSED ROOF DECK 110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL ID: 273707383002 PROJECT 100' = 7914.35'QUEEN STREETPROPOSED PATIO AND MOVABLE OUTDOOR KITCHEN NEW FRONT PORCH EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND NSCALE: 1:901PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT MAIN LEVEL 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 36 10' REAR YARD SETBACK 10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK10'-0"SIDE YARDSETBACK25'-0" FRONT YARD SETBACK T.O. RIDGE 122'-23/4" T.O. RIDGE 119'-93/4" T.O. RIDGE 118'-51/2" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-51/2" T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE 101'-73/4" T.O. AUTOCOURT PORCH ROOF AT EDGE 98'-11"T.O. RIDGE 116'-31/4" EXISTING FLAGSTONE WALK TO BE REFINISHED ACCESS EASEMENT TO ADJACENT PARCEL EXISTING TRANSFORMER AND ELECTRICAL PANEL TO REMAIN TERRACED PLANTING WALLS TO BE REVISED BY LANDSCAPE ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN PROPOSED EXTENSION OF SIDEWALK ALONG QUEEN STREET, TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPT. STREET PARKING TO BE MAINTAINED STONE PLANTER WITHIN 30" OF GRADE IN SETBACK STONE PLANTER WITHIN 30" OF GRADE IN SETBACK EXISTING FENCE AT 114 NEALE AVE EDGE OF PAVED DRIVEWAY SERVING ADJACENT PARCEL EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAIN EXISTING DRYWELL TO REMAINEXISTING DRYWELLS TO REMAIN ZONE OF HEAVY PLANTING, UNDERSTORY TO BE REVISED, TREES TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINE SIDE YARD SETBACK NEALE AVENUE EXISTING SIDEWALK NO PROPOSED CHANGES, TO BE COORDINATED WITH COA S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E PROPOSED MASTER BEDROOM PATIO PROPOSED ROOF DECK UNDER PERGOLA RECONFIGURED DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA PROPOSED ROOF DECK QUEEN STREET7901'7902'7903'7 9 0 4 '7 9 0 5 '7 9 0 6 '7 9 0 7 '7908'7909'7910'7911'7912'7 9 1 3 '7 9 1 4 '7 9 1 5 '7 9 1 7 ' 7 9 1 8 ' 7 9 1 9 '7920'7 9 2 2 '7 9 2 3 '7 9 2 4 '7 9 1 6 '7901' 7904' 7904' 7 9 2 1 '7903'7904'7905'7906'7907'7908'7909'7910'7921'7911'7912'7913' 7904' 7904' T.O. RIDGE 119'-93/4" T.O. RIDGE 118'-51/2" LINE OF PERGOLA PROPOSED PATIO AND MOVABLE OUTDOOR KITCHEN PROPOSED FRONT PORCH ROOF 110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 PARCEL ID: 273707383002 PROJECT 100' = 7914.35' T.O. STONE CAP 113'-11/4" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 123'-1" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 125'-5" EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE NSCALE: 1:901PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT ROOF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-002 PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT ROOF 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 37 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-006 BASEMENT WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft 126.00 sq ft 123.75 sq ft 21.75 sq ft 154.75 sq ft 189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft 164.50 sq ft 15.75 sq ft 118.50 sq ft 209.00 sq ft 205.75 sq ft 211.50 sq ft 219.75 sq ft 77.75 sq ft 52.00 sq ft 16.50 sq ft 51.00 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft 13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft 28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft 16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft 26.25 sq ft 72.50 sq ft 22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft 61.00 sq ft 29.50 sq ft 120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft 388.50 sq ft 197.75 sq ft 114.25 sq ft 183.00 sq ft 16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft 182.00 sq ft 83.50 sq ft 180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft 64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft 89.00 sq ft 106.75 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft 8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft 38.25 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 22.75 sq ft 145.25 sq ft W1 W2 W3 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W32 W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40 AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8 205.75 sq ft 24.00 sq ft 6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft 9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft 26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft 15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft 10.50 sq ft 9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND 9 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 BASEMENT LEVEL DEMO PLAN NO COUNTABLE WALL DEMO AREA AT BASEMENT LEVEL 38 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-007 GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft 126.00 sq ft 123.75 sq ft 21.75 sq ft 154.75 sq ft 189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft 164.50 sq ft 15.75 sq ft 118.50 sq ft 209.00 sq ft 205.75 sq ft 211.50 sq ft 219.75 sq ft 77.75 sq ft 52.00 sq ft 16.50 sq ft 51.00 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft 13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft 28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft 16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft 26.25 sq ft 72.50 sq ft 22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft 61.00 sq ft 29.50 sq ft 120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft 388.50 sq ft 197.75 sq ft 114.25 sq ft 183.00 sq ft 16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft 182.00 sq ft 83.50 sq ft 180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft 64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft 89.00 sq ft 106.75 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft 8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft 38.25 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 22.75 sq ft 145.25 sq ft W1 W2 W3 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W32 W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40 AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8 205.75 sq ft 24.00 sq ft 6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft 9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft 26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft 15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft 10.50 sq ft 9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND W1W2W3 AW2W40 W39W38 W37W36 W34 AW4AW3 AW1 AW8AW5 AW6AW7 9 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL DEMO PLAN 39 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-008 MAIN LEVEL WALL DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20192.00 sq ft66.50 sq ft 126.00 sq ft 123.75 sq ft 21.75 sq ft 154.75 sq ft 189.75 sq ft 38.50 sq ft 164.50 sq ft 15.75 sq ft 118.50 sq ft 209.00 sq ft 205.75 sq ft 211.50 sq ft 219.75 sq ft 77.75 sq ft 52.00 sq ft 16.50 sq ft 51.00 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 25.75 sq ft 6.25 sq ft 15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft15.00 sq ft62.50 sq ft 19.75 sq ft7.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.25 sq ft8.75 sq ft25.75 sq ft16.75 sq ft 13.75 sq ft13.75 sq ft33.50 sq ft 28.00 sq ft29.25 sq ft 35.25 sq ft 22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft22.25 sq ft7.75 sq ft72.75 sq ft 72.75 sq ft 22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft22.50 sq ft15.25 sq ft15.25 sq ft28.75 sq ft14.25 sq ft29.50 sq ft13.75 sq ft7.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft23.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft26.25 sq ft 16.25 sq ft16.25 sq ft 26.25 sq ft 72.50 sq ft 22.25 sq ft43.25 sq ft 61.00 sq ft 29.50 sq ft 120.00 sq ft170.00 sq ft 388.50 sq ft 197.75 sq ft 114.25 sq ft 183.00 sq ft 16.25 sq ft87.25 sq ft 12.25 sq ft31.25 sq ft 12.00 sq ft150.75 sq ft 182.00 sq ft 83.50 sq ft 180.00 sq ft130.50 sq ft118.75 sq ft 64.25 sq ft162.75 sq ft 152.50 sq ft18.25 sq ft96.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft29.75 sq ft93.75 sq ft 89.00 sq ft 106.75 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 81.25 sq ft101.00 sq ft 8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft 38.25 sq ft 59.75 sq ft 22.75 sq ft 145.25 sq ft W1 W2 W3 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15 W16 W17 W18 W19 W20 W21 W22 W23 W24 W25 W26 W27 W28 W29 W30 W31 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W32 W34 W35 W36 W37 W39W38W33 W40 AW1 AW2 AW3 AW4 AW5 AW6 AW7 AW8 205.75 sq ft 24.00 sq ft 6.50 sq ft9.00 sq ft48.75 sq ft 9.00 sq ft7.75 sq ft76.75 sq ft 26.25 sq ft26.25 sq ft9.25 sq ft25.50 sq ft13.50 sq ft22.25 sq ft 15.50 sq ft15.50 sq ft 10.50 sq ft 9.00 sq ft207.75 sq ft EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9W10W11W12W13W14W15W16W17W18W19W20W21W22W23W24W25 W26W27 W28W29 W30W31 W329 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I RXX RXX RXX RXX RXX RXX Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 MAIN LEVEL DEMO PLAN 40 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-009 ROOF DEMOLITION CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 68.00 sq ft 18.25 sq ft18.25 sq ft 98.00 sq ft 29.75 sq ft 58.25 sq ft 78.00 sq ft 77.25 sq ft 225.00 sq ft 101.25 sq ft 23.50 sq ft 23.50 sq ft 214.50 sq ft 590.00 sq ft 289.00 sq ft 630.00 sq ft 139.00 sq ft 44.50 sq ft 554.50 sq ft 71.75 sq ft 88.00 sq ft 220.25 sq ft 42.25 sq ft42.25 sq ft 178.00 sq ft 306.00 sq ft 176.25 sq ft 79.50 sq ft 85.75 sq ft 54.50 sq ft 88.50 sq ft 53.00 sq ft 113.00 sq ft 134.50 sq ft 170.25 sq ft 255.00 sq ft 18.50 sq ft 61.00 sq ft 61.75 sq ft 19.50 sq ft 219.50 sq ft39.75 sq ft 4.25 sq ft105.50 sq ft105.50 sq ft R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R15 R14 R16 R17 R18 R20 R21 R19 R22 R23 R25 R24 R26 R27 R28 R29 R30 R32 AR1 AR2 AR3 AR4 AR5 R33 R34 R31 R3554.50 sq ft20.75 sq ft EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED AREA REDUCED FOR FENSTRATION DEMO CALC FILL LEGEND EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND R26 R27 R29 R28 R30 R33 R35 R34 R25R21 R20 R22 R24 R19 R18 R17 R15 R14 R13 R11 R12 R16 R9 R5 R4 9 9 R6 R7 R8 R10 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I R31 R32 AR1 AR2 AR3 AR4 AR5R23 R3 R2 R1 Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% Existing Demolition Calculations - Walls Existing Demolition Calculations - Roof 110 Neale Ave 110 Neale Ave Demolition Demolition Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)Wall/Roof Label Individual Area (Sq Ft) Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft) Area to be Removed (Sq Ft) AW1 81.25 25.50 55.75 AR1 255.00 0.00 255.00 AW2 66.50 13.75 52.75 AR2 170.25 0.00 170.25 AW3 133.00 27.75 0.00 AR3 134.50 0.00 134.50 AW4 179.00 6.75 0.00 AR4 113.00 0.00 113.00 AW5 101.00 0.00 0.00 AR5 53.00 0.00 53.00 AW6 8.00 0.00 8.00 AW7 64.00 0.00 64.00 R1 88.50 0.00 0.00 AW8 126.00 9.00 70.00 R2 85.75 0.00 0.00 R3 54.50 0.00 0.00 W1 388.50 91.50 157.50 R4 79.50 0.00 0.00 W2 197.75 0.00 51.50 R5 176.25 0.00 0.00 W3 114.25 19.75 38.25 R6 178.00 0.00 4.25 W4 18.25 0.00 18.25 R7 220.25 0.00 0.00 W5 123.75 45.00 21.75 R8 42.25 0.00 0.00 W6 96.75 45.00 51.75 R9 306.00 0.00 147.75 W7 12.75 0.00 12.75 R10 42.25 0.00 0.00 W8 29.75 0.00 29.75 R11 71.75 0.00 71.75 W9 93.75 62.50 31.25 R12 88.00 0.00 0.00 W10 237.25 6.50 22.25 R13 61.00 0.00 61.00 W11 214.50 19.75 0.00 R14 61.75 0.00 61.75 W12 47.25 0.00 0.00 R15 18.50 0.00 18.50 W13 59.75 7.00 0.00 R16 139.00 0.00 39.75 W14 87.25 7.75 0.00 R17 19.50 0.00 19.50 W15 12.25 0.00 0.00 R18 44.50 0.00 44.50 W16 31.25 0.00 0.00 R19 554.50 0.00 219.50 W17 12.00 0.00 0.00 R20 18.25 0.00 18.25 W18 164.25 24.75 0.00 R21 630.00 0.00 160.00 W19 205.75 66.75 22.25 R22 68.00 0.00 68.00 W20 89.00 0.00 0.00 R23 289.00 0.00 0.00 W21 106.75 34.50 0.00 R24 18.25 0.00 18.25 W22 150.75 16.75 0.00 R25 590.00 0.00 105.50 W23 182.00 27.50 0.00 R26 225.00 0.00 0.00 W24 83.50 33.50 0.00 R27 214.50 0.00 0.00 W25 180.00 170.00 0.00 R28 98.00 0.00 0.00 W26 130.50 120.00 0.00 R29 101.25 0.00 0.00 W27 178.50 0.00 0.00 R30 29.75 0.00 0.00 W28 87.00 0.00 0.00 R31 23.50 0.00 0.00 W29 145.25 66.75 61.00 R32 23.50 0.00 0.00 W30 207.75 107.50 63.25 R33 58.25 0.00 0.00 W31 162.75 90.00 0.00 R34 76.50 0.00 48.75 W32 152.50 14.25 44.25 R35 78.00 0.00 78.00 W33 15.75 0.00 0.00 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,599.25 W34 118.50 0.00 0.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)0.00 W35 209.00 92.50 0.00 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,910.75 W36 205.75 15.50 190.25 W37 211.50 145.50 66.00 W38 219.75 59.25 160.50 W39 52.00 29.50 22.50 W40 77.75 9.25 43.25 Wall Surface Area Total (Sq Ft)5,872.00 Area Reduced for Fenestration (Sq Ft)1511.25 Wall Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)1,358.75 Demolition Totals Roof + Wall Area Used for Demo Calculation (Sq Ft)9,960.00 Surface Area to be Removed (Sq Ft)3,269.50 Total 32.83% 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 WALL DEMO AREA 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 ROOF LEVEL DEMO PLAN 41 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-010X FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 85.25 sq ft 63.00 sq ft 27.75 sq ft 153.75 sq ft 100.50 sq ft 80.00 sq ft 8.25 sq ft66.00 sq ft 389.25 sq ft 249.50 sq ft 418.00 sq ft 80.00 sq ft 144.50 sq ft 9.50 sq ft39.50 sq ft XB1 XB2 XB3 XB4 XB5 XB6 XB9 XB10 XB11 XB7 XB8 XB12 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO 2,064.75 sq ft XB1XB2XB3 XB12XB11XB6XB4XB5 CRAWL SPACE 9 9XB10XB9XB8XB7 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 110 Neale Avenue Existing Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Existing Lower Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00 Existing Main Level Floor Area Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25 Front Portch (Exempt)66.00 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50 Existing "ADU" Floor Area ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 Front Portch (Exempt)30.25 Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XB1 153.75 0.00 XB2 100.50 0.00 XB3 80.00 0.00 XB4 8.25 0.00 XB5 66.00 0.00 XB6 389.25 0.00 XB7 144.50 0.00 XB8 9.50 0.00 XB9 249.50 0.00 XB10 418.00 85.25 XB11 80.00 63.00 XB12 39.50 31.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32% Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 10.32% Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XL1 84.25 0.00 XL2 103.00 57.00 XL3 80.75 54.50 XL4 8.00 5.25 XL5 82.25 18.75 XL6 8.00 1.00 XL7 86.75 6.00 XL8 224.75 0.00 XL9 101.00 0.00 XL10 150.50 0.00 XL11 148.75 0.00 XL12 12.75 0.00 XL13 253.75 89.50 XL14 177.25 177.25 XL15 201.25 201.25 XL16 200.25 200.25 XL17 201.25 201.25 XL18 43.25 43.25 XL19 82.75 82.75 XL20 19.25 19.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99% Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 50.99% Existing Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XM1 368.00 368.00 XM2 124.25 124.25 XM3 73.25 73.25 XM4 8.50 8.50 XM5 73.50 73.50 XM6 73.50 73.50 XM7 8.75 8.75 XM8 36.00 36.00 XM9 98.00 98.00 XM10 181.75 181.75 XM11 167.50 165.75 XM12 14.50 12.50 XM13 66.25 51.75 XM14 118.50 82.00 XM15 14.50 9.75 XM16 51.75 35.50 XM17 14.50 9.75 XM18 211.25 156.75 XM19 243.00 184.50 XM20 40.50 39.00 XM21 100.00 99.00 XM22 151.00 151.00 XM23 151.50 151.50 XM24 76.75 76.75 XM25 175.50 175.50 XM26 125.50 125.50 XM27 29.00 29.00 XM28 14.00 14.00 XM29 140.50 140.50 XM30 194.25 194.25 XM31 175.50 175.50 XM32 171.25 171.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39% Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25 Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.39% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50 Existing ADU Wall Calculations ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XA1 81.25 81.25 XA2 66.50 66.50 XA3 106.50 106.50 XA4 190.00 179.00 XA5 106.50 74.75 XA6 9.75 8.00 XA7 81.25 64.00 XA8 105.50 100.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03% Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 ADU Area x Percent Exposed @ 91.03% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57 Existing Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA 42 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-011X FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO40.00 sq ft 6.50 sq ft19.00 sq ft 1.25 sq ft2.50 sq ft64.25 sq ft 89.50 sq ft 84.25 sq ft 103.00 sq ft 80.75 sq ft 8.00 sq ft82.25 sq ft 8.00 sq ft86.75 sq ft 224.75 sq ft 101.00 sq ft 150.50 sq ft 148.75 sq ft 12.75 sq ft253.75 sq ft 177.25 sq ft 204.25 sq ft 200.25 sq ft 204.25 sq ft 43.25 sq ft 82.75 sq ft 19.25 sq ft XL1 XL2 XL3 XL4 XL5 XL6 XL7 XL8 XL9 XL10 XL11 XL12 XL13 XL14 XL15 XL16 XL17 XL18 XL19 XL20 190.00 sq ft 106.50 sq ft 9.75 sq ft81.25 sq ft 109.75 sq ft 81.25 sq ft 62.00 sq ft 106.50 sq ft 179.00 sq ft 74.75 sq ft 8.00 sq ft64.00 sq ft 104.75 sq ft XA1 XA2 XA3 XA4 XA5 XA6 XA7 XA8 110 Neale Avenue Existing Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Existing Lower Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00 Existing Main Level Floor Area Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25 Front Portch (Exempt)66.00 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50 Existing "ADU" Floor Area ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 Front Portch (Exempt)30.25 Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XB1 153.75 0.00 XB2 100.50 0.00 XB3 80.00 0.00 XB4 8.25 0.00 XB5 66.00 0.00 XB6 389.25 0.00 XB7 144.50 0.00 XB8 9.50 0.00 XB9 249.50 0.00 XB10 418.00 85.25 XB11 80.00 63.00 XB12 39.50 31.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32% Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 10.32% Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XL1 84.25 0.00 XL2 103.00 57.00 XL3 80.75 54.50 XL4 8.00 5.25 XL5 82.25 18.75 XL6 8.00 1.00 XL7 86.75 6.00 XL8 224.75 0.00 XL9 101.00 0.00 XL10 150.50 0.00 XL11 148.75 0.00 XL12 12.75 0.00 XL13 253.75 89.50 XL14 177.25 177.25 XL15 201.25 201.25 XL16 200.25 200.25 XL17 201.25 201.25 XL18 43.25 43.25 XL19 82.75 82.75 XL20 19.25 19.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99% Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 50.99% Existing Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XM1 368.00 368.00 XM2 124.25 124.25 XM3 73.25 73.25 XM4 8.50 8.50 XM5 73.50 73.50 XM6 73.50 73.50 XM7 8.75 8.75 XM8 36.00 36.00 XM9 98.00 98.00 XM10 181.75 181.75 XM11 167.50 165.75 XM12 14.50 12.50 XM13 66.25 51.75 XM14 118.50 82.00 XM15 14.50 9.75 XM16 51.75 35.50 XM17 14.50 9.75 XM18 211.25 156.75 XM19 243.00 184.50 XM20 40.50 39.00 XM21 100.00 99.00 XM22 151.00 151.00 XM23 151.50 151.50 XM24 76.75 76.75 XM25 175.50 175.50 XM26 125.50 125.50 XM27 29.00 29.00 XM28 14.00 14.00 XM29 140.50 140.50 XM30 194.25 194.25 XM31 175.50 175.50 XM32 171.25 171.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39% Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25 Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.39% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50 Existing ADU Wall Calculations ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XA1 81.25 81.25 XA2 66.50 66.50 XA3 106.50 106.50 XA4 190.00 179.00 XA5 106.50 74.75 XA6 9.75 8.00 XA7 81.25 64.00 XA8 105.50 100.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03% Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 ADU Area x Percent Exposed @ 91.03% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57 Existing Floor Area Calculations 483.00 sq ft 405.50 sq ft XL1XL2XL3XL4XL5XL6XL7XL8XL9XL10XL11XL12 XL13 XL14XL15 XL16XL17 XL18XL19 XL20XA1 XA2XA3XA4XA5 XA6XA7 XA8CRAWL SPACE 9 9 2,347.75 sq ft 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING ADU EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL FLOOR AREA 43 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-012X FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO 14.50 sq ft51.75 sq ft14.50 sq ft118.50 sq ft66.25 sq ft 14.50 sq ft164.50 sq ft238.50 sq ft203.00 sq ft 149.50 sq ft 217.00 sq ft 178.50 sq ft 363.75 sq ft 181.25 sq ft 80.00 sq ft 162.50 sq ft 12.75 sq ft53.25 sq ft 83.00 sq ft 10.00 sq ft35.50 sq ft 9.75 sq ft38.00 sq ft 103.50 sq ft 151.00 sq ft 151.50 sq ft 75.75 sq ft 188.50 sq ft 134.75 sq ft 31.25 sq ft15.00 sq ft151.00 sq ft 188.50 sq ft 181.25 sq ft9.75 sq ft85.50 sq ft 85.50 sq ft 9.75 sq ft35.25 sq ft103.50 sq ft 181.75 sq ft XM1 XM2 XM3 XM11 XM12 XM13 XM14 XM15 XM16 XM17 XM18 XM19 XM20 XM21 XM22 XM23 XM24 XM25 XM26 XM27 XM28 XM29 XM30 XM31 XM32 XM4 XM5 XM6 XM7 XM8 XM9 XM10 65.00 sq ft 189.00 sq ft 288.25 sq ft 134.25 sq ft FF 129.25 sq ft XM1XM2XM3XM4XM5XM6XM7XM8XM9XM10XM11XM12XM13XM14XM15XM16XM17XM18XM19XM20XM21XM22XM23XM24XM25 XM26XM27 XM28XM29 XM30XM31 XM3260.50 sq ft 9 9RG4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 2,756.50 sq ft 42.25 sq ft 110 Neale Avenue Existing Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Existing Lower Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)483.00 Existing Main Level Floor Area Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)110.25 Front Portch (Exempt)66.00 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)780.50 Existing "ADU" Floor Area ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 Front Portch (Exempt)30.25 Existing Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XB1 153.75 0.00 XB2 100.50 0.00 XB3 80.00 0.00 XB4 8.25 0.00 XB5 66.00 0.00 XB6 389.25 0.00 XB7 144.50 0.00 XB8 9.50 0.00 XB9 249.50 0.00 XB10 418.00 85.25 XB11 80.00 63.00 XB12 39.50 31.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)1,738.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)179.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)10.32% Existing Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,064.75 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 10.32% Existing Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XL1 84.25 0.00 XL2 103.00 57.00 XL3 80.75 54.50 XL4 8.00 5.25 XL5 82.25 18.75 XL6 8.00 1.00 XL7 86.75 6.00 XL8 224.75 0.00 XL9 101.00 0.00 XL10 150.50 0.00 XL11 148.75 0.00 XL12 12.75 0.00 XL13 253.75 89.50 XL14 177.25 177.25 XL15 201.25 201.25 XL16 200.25 200.25 XL17 201.25 201.25 XL18 43.25 43.25 XL19 82.75 82.75 XL20 19.25 19.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,269.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,157.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)50.99% Existing Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,347.00 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)483.00 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)116.50 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,463.50 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 50.99% Existing Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XM1 368.00 368.00 XM2 124.25 124.25 XM3 73.25 73.25 XM4 8.50 8.50 XM5 73.50 73.50 XM6 73.50 73.50 XM7 8.75 8.75 XM8 36.00 36.00 XM9 98.00 98.00 XM10 181.75 181.75 XM11 167.50 165.75 XM12 14.50 12.50 XM13 66.25 51.75 XM14 118.50 82.00 XM15 14.50 9.75 XM16 51.75 35.50 XM17 14.50 9.75 XM18 211.25 156.75 XM19 243.00 184.50 XM20 40.50 39.00 XM21 100.00 99.00 XM22 151.00 151.00 XM23 151.50 151.50 XM24 76.75 76.75 XM25 175.50 175.50 XM26 125.50 125.50 XM27 29.00 29.00 XM28 14.00 14.00 XM29 140.50 140.50 XM30 194.25 194.25 XM31 175.50 175.50 XM32 171.25 171.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,492.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,296.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.39% Existing Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,756.50 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)110.25 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,646.25 2756.50-110.25 Main Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.39% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)66.00 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)780.50 Existing ADU Wall Calculations ADU Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) XA1 81.25 81.25 XA2 66.50 66.50 XA3 106.50 106.50 XA4 190.00 179.00 XA5 106.50 74.75 XA6 9.75 8.00 XA7 81.25 64.00 XA8 105.50 100.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)747.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)680.25 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)91.03% Existing ADU Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)405.50 ADU Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 ADU Area x Percent Exposed @ 91.03% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)30.25 Exempt Front Porch Total Exsiting Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% of Allowable FAR 0.00 3,965.97 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Total Existing Floor Area 5,116.57 Existing Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 44 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-010 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO 248.00 sq ft 47.50 sq ft 146.50 sq ft 77.25 sq ft 176.50 sq ft 114.75 sq ft 153.75 sq ft 378.25 sq ft 147.50 sq ft 12.50 sq ft198.25 sq ft 564.25 sq ft 421.00 sq ft 40.50 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ft17.25 sq ftB1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B11 B12 B13 B14 B8 B9 B10 Proposed Floor Area Calculations 110 Neale Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Prposed Garage Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50 Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25 Front Portch (Exempt)228.75 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50 Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Front Portch (Exempt)0.00 FAR Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PB1 176.50 0.00 PB2 114.75 0.00 PB3 153.75 17.25 PB4 378.25 0.00 PB5 147.50 0.00 PB6 12.50 0.00 PB7 248.00 17.25 PB8 47.50 17.25 PB9 146.50 0.00 PB10 77.25 0.00 PB11 198.25 17.25 PB12 564.25 0.00 PB13 421.00 34.50 PB14 40.50 0.00 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 3.8% Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PL1 85.50 0.00 PL2 54.25 0.00 PL3 262.25 75.25 PL4 221.75 0.00 PL5 103.00 17.00 PL6 148.25 17.00 PL7 146.75 0.00 PL8 12.50 0.00 PL9 391.50 199.50 PL10 136.50 109.00 PL11 190.25 136.25 PL12 188.00 174.75 PL13 190.25 190.25 PL14 17.25 17.25 PL15 44.50 44.50 PL16 367.00 367.00 PL17 108.00 105.00 PL18 43.25 38.75 PL19 60.50 48.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56% Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 55.56% Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PM1 297.75 297.75 PM2 177.25 177.25 PM3 244.25 244.25 PM4 53.50 53.50 PM5 47.75 47.75 PM6 15.50 15.50 PM7 167.50 165.75 PM8 15.50 13.75 PM9 65.00 51.75 PM10 116.00 80.50 PM11 14.25 9.75 PM12 50.25 34.00 PM13 14.25 9.75 PM14 211.25 157.25 PM15 236.25 176.50 PM16 36.50 36.50 PM17 99.00 99.00 PM18 151.00 151.00 PM19 149.00 149.00 PM20 85.00 85.00 PM21 185.25 185.25 PM22 132.50 132.50 PM23 30.50 30.50 PM24 14.75 14.75 PM25 149.00 149.00 PM26 201.50 201.50 PM27 170.00 170.00 PM28 82.50 82.50 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05% Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25 Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.05% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50 Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) B1B2B3B4B5B6 B12B11 B10B9 B8B7 B13B14CRAWL SPACE 9 9 4,149.50 sq ft 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA 45 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-011 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO 199.50 sq ft 127.50 sq ft 190.25 sq ft 84.50 sq ft 54.25 sq ft 262.25 sq ft 72.25 sq ft 221.75 sq ft 103.00 sq ft 148.25 sq ft 146.75 sq ft 12.50 sq ft109.00 sq ft 188.00 sq ft 190.25 sq ft 367.00 sq ft 17.00 sq ft17.00 sq ft108.00 sq ft 43.25 sq ft60.50 sq ft44.50 sq ft48.25 sq ft L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 L9 L10 L11 L12 L13 L16 L17 L18 L19L14L15 257.25 sq ft L1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8 L9 L10L11 L12L13L14 L15 L16L17L18 L19 CRAWL SPACE 491.75 sq ft 2,801.75 sq ft 9 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L Proposed Floor Area Calculations 110 Neale Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Prposed Garage Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50 Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25 Front Portch (Exempt)228.75 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50 Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Front Portch (Exempt)0.00 FAR Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PB1 176.50 0.00 PB2 114.75 0.00 PB3 153.75 17.25 PB4 378.25 0.00 PB5 147.50 0.00 PB6 12.50 0.00 PB7 248.00 17.25 PB8 47.50 17.25 PB9 146.50 0.00 PB10 77.25 0.00 PB11 198.25 17.25 PB12 564.25 0.00 PB13 421.00 34.50 PB14 40.50 0.00 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 3.8% Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PL1 85.50 0.00 PL2 54.25 0.00 PL3 262.25 75.25 PL4 221.75 0.00 PL5 103.00 17.00 PL6 148.25 17.00 PL7 146.75 0.00 PL8 12.50 0.00 PL9 391.50 199.50 PL10 136.50 109.00 PL11 190.25 136.25 PL12 188.00 174.75 PL13 190.25 190.25 PL14 17.25 17.25 PL15 44.50 44.50 PL16 367.00 367.00 PL17 108.00 105.00 PL18 43.25 38.75 PL19 60.50 48.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56% Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 55.56% Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PM1 297.75 297.75 PM2 177.25 177.25 PM3 244.25 244.25 PM4 53.50 53.50 PM5 47.75 47.75 PM6 15.50 15.50 PM7 167.50 165.75 PM8 15.50 13.75 PM9 65.00 51.75 PM10 116.00 80.50 PM11 14.25 9.75 PM12 50.25 34.00 PM13 14.25 9.75 PM14 211.25 157.25 PM15 236.25 176.50 PM16 36.50 36.50 PM17 99.00 99.00 PM18 151.00 151.00 PM19 149.00 149.00 PM20 85.00 85.00 PM21 185.25 185.25 PM22 132.50 132.50 PM23 30.50 30.50 PM24 14.75 14.75 PM25 149.00 149.00 PM26 201.50 201.50 PM27 170.00 170.00 PM28 82.50 82.50 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05% Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25 Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.05% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50 Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR AREA 46 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION Z-012 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 COUNTABLE FAR PLAN LEGEND DECK GARAGE EXEMPT - T.O. CIRCULATION OR OPEN TO BELOW EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH EXEMPT - ON-GRADE PATIO15.50 sq ft13.00 sq ft297.75 sq ft 170.00 sq ft 177.25 sq ft 244.25 sq ft 49.50 sq ft 44.25 sq ft 15.50 sq ft167.50 sq ft163.00 sq ft 65.00 sq ft 116.00 sq ft 14.25 sq ft50.25 sq ft 14.00 sq ft211.25 sq ft 236.25 sq ft 36.50 sq ft 99.00 sq ft 151.00 sq ft 149.00 sq ft 85.00 sq ft 185.25 sq ft 132.50 sq ft 30.50 sq ft14.75 sq ft149.00 sq ft 201.50 sq ft 82.50 sq ft 176.50 sq ft PM1 PM2 PM3 PM4 PM5 PM6 PM7 PM8 PM9 PM10 PM11 PM12 PM13 PM14 PM15 PM16 PM17 PM18 PM19 PM20 PM21 PM22 PM23 PM24 PM25 PM26 PM27 PM28 48.00 sq ft 74.00 sq ft 9.00 sq ft31.25 sq ft 8.50 sq ft149.75 sq ft FF 2,890.75 sq ft M1M2M3M4M5M6M7M8M9M10M11M12M13M14M15M16M17M18M19M20M21 M22M23 M24M25 M26M27 M28778.50 sq ft 416.50 sq ft 46.75 sq ft 210.50 sq ft 228.75 sq ft 9 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L RGProposed Floor Area Calculations 110 Neale Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Basement Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Prposed Garage Level Floor Area Lower Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (OTB / T.O. Circ)0.00 Garage Level Patio (Exempt)257,25 Garage Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)491.75 Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (T.O. Circ)210.50 Main Level Patio (Exempt)463.25 Front Portch (Exempt)228.75 Main Level Deck Floor Area without Exemptions (Sq Ft)778.50 Proposed "ADU" Floor Area Calculations ADU Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Front Portch (Exempt)0.00 FAR Proposed Basement Level Wall Calculations Basement Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PB1 176.50 0.00 PB2 114.75 0.00 PB3 153.75 17.25 PB4 378.25 0.00 PB5 147.50 0.00 PB6 12.50 0.00 PB7 248.00 17.25 PB8 47.50 17.25 PB9 146.50 0.00 PB10 77.25 0.00 PB11 198.25 17.25 PB12 564.25 0.00 PB13 421.00 34.50 PB14 40.50 0.00 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,726.50 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)103.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)3.80% Proposed Basement Level Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,149.50 Basement Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Basement Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 3.8% Proposed Lower Level Wall Calculations Lower Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PL1 85.50 0.00 PL2 54.25 0.00 PL3 262.25 75.25 PL4 221.75 0.00 PL5 103.00 17.00 PL6 148.25 17.00 PL7 146.75 0.00 PL8 12.50 0.00 PL9 391.50 199.50 PL10 136.50 109.00 PL11 190.25 136.25 PL12 188.00 174.75 PL13 190.25 190.25 PL14 17.25 17.25 PL15 44.50 44.50 PL16 367.00 367.00 PL17 108.00 105.00 PL18 43.25 38.75 PL19 60.50 48.25 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)2,771.25 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)1,539.75 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)55.56% Proposed Lower Level Floor Area Calculations Lower Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,801.75 Lower Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)0.00 Garage Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)491.75 Garage after Exemption (0-250 @ 0% 250-500 @ 50%)120.88 (500-250)/2 Lower Level & Garage Floor Area After Exemptions 2,922.63 Lower Level Countable Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Lower Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 55.56% Proposed Main Level Wall Calculations Main Level Wall Label Total Wall Area (Sq Ft)Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft) PM1 297.75 297.75 PM2 177.25 177.25 PM3 244.25 244.25 PM4 53.50 53.50 PM5 47.75 47.75 PM6 15.50 15.50 PM7 167.50 165.75 PM8 15.50 13.75 PM9 65.00 51.75 PM10 116.00 80.50 PM11 14.25 9.75 PM12 50.25 34.00 PM13 14.25 9.75 PM14 211.25 157.25 PM15 236.25 176.50 PM16 36.50 36.50 PM17 99.00 99.00 PM18 151.00 151.00 PM19 149.00 149.00 PM20 85.00 85.00 PM21 185.25 185.25 PM22 132.50 132.50 PM23 30.50 30.50 PM24 14.75 14.75 PM25 149.00 149.00 PM26 201.50 201.50 PM27 170.00 170.00 PM28 82.50 82.50 Overall Total Wall Areas (Sq Ft)3,212.75 Exposed Wall Area (Sq Ft)3,021.50 % of Exposed Wall (Exposed / Total)94.05% Proposed Main Level Floor Area Calculations Main Level Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,890.75 Main Level Exempt (Open to Below / T.O. Circulation)210.50 Main Level After Exemptions (Sq Ft)2,680.25 2720.50-119.25 Main Level Countable Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 Main Level Area x Percent Exposed @ 94.05% Front Porch Gross Floor Area (Sq Ft)228.75 Exempt Front Porch Main Deck Gross Floor Area ( Sq Ft)778.50 Main Level Patio Floor Area (Sq Ft)461.00 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.07 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)213.15 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,256.03 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,497.74 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)369.14 Total Existing Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,336.07 Total Existing Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)780.50 Exempt Deck Area based on 15% Allowable FAR (NA)0.00 3,966.92 x 0.15 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Existing Countable Floor Area 4,336.07 Basement Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)157.52 Lower Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)1,623.86 Main Level Floor Area (Sq Ft)2,520.70 ADU Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Interior Floor Area (Sq Ft)4,302.08 Total Proposed Deck Area Calculations Main Level Deck Area (Sq Ft)778.50 Exempt Deck Area based on Existing Countable Deck 780.50 Countable Deck Floor Area (Sq Ft)0.00 Total Proposed Floor Area 4,302.08 Total Proposed Floor Area Calculations NOTE: The structure exists as a legally permitted nonconformity. Proposed house to retain current measured floor area per the plans. Total Existing Floor Area Calculations W/ ADU (TOTAL ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA) 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL EXPOSURE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA 47 EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND 2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"2'-0"6'-6"3'-6"16'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"2'-0"4'-0"T.O. FF 79'-0" T.O. SLAB 78'-9" SIDE YARD SETBACK S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E MECH HALL BATH CLO. BEDROOM 5 BATH BEDROOM 6 CRAWL SPACE 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-2029 9 EXISTING EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EXISTING EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED BEDROOM 4 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-102X EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 48 EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND 2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"T.O. FF 89'-7" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL PATIO (VIF) 89'-4" T.O. DRIVEWAY AT GARAGE (VIF) 89'-4" FRONT PORCH ABOVE PATIO ABOVE EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EGRESS WELL TO BE RECONFIGURED UP DN SIDE YARD SETBACK S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E GARAGE MUD GALLERY STUDY / BEDROOM MEDIA VESTIBULELAUNDRY GUEST MASTERBATH BATH CRAWL SPACE 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-2029 9 NOTE: ALL INTERIOR WALLS INDICATED THIS LEVEL TO BE RECONFIGURED TO NEW LAYOUT THAT MEETS CURRENT EGRESS REQUIREMENTS EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED SITE WALL TO BE REMOVED 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-103X EXISTING GARAGE LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 49 EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND FF 2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"28'-0"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"2'-0"6'-6"3'-6"16'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"2'-0"4'-0"T.O. FINISH FLOOR 100'-3" T.O. PLY 100'-0"T.O. DECK (VIF) 100'-2" T.O. DECK 100'-2"T.O. PATIO (VIF) 100'-2" T.O. PATIO (VIF) 100'-2" T.O. FINISH FLOOR 94'-8" T.O. FRONT PORCH (VIF) 94'-6" 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-202EXISTING ROOF AND WALLS SURROUNDING EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED, EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED AND ENCLOSED GARAGE ROOF APRON TO BE REMOVED EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED EGRESS WELL TO BE RECONFIGURED DN DN SIDE YARD SETBACK S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E PWDER MASTER BATH 202 CLOSET 203 CLOSET 204 DINING ROOM 201 FAMILY ROOM 208 GREAT ROOM 209 ENTRY 210 MASTER BEDROOM 205 GREAT ROOM 209 9 9RG4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I EXISTING PATIO TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECK TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING DECK TO BE REMOVED FRONT PORCH TO BE RECONFIGURED EXISTING ADU TO BE REPLACED BY NEW GARAGE SOME WALLS TO REMAIN EGRESS WELL TO BE REMOVED AND RELOCATED KITCHEN 207 N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-104X EXISTING MAIN LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 50 PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 122'-23/4" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-93/4" T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-51/2" EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED EXISTING ROOFS AT THE CURRENT DINING AND EXTERIOR DECK AREA TO BE REMOVED 13:1213:12 10:1210:124:128:12 13:1213:1210:12SIDE YARD SETBACK S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E 9 9 T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 118'-51/2" 4 4 6 6 7 7 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I T.O. RIDGE (VIF) 119'-93/4" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 125'-5" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 123'-1" EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 10:1210:1210:1210:1213:12N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING ROOF PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-105X EXISTING ROOF PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 51 EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND 2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"T.O. FF 79'-0" T.O. SLAB 78'-9" 43 4343 43 43 NEW ELEVATOR UP PROPOSED ADDITIONPROPOSED RENOVATION STAIR 001 STAIR 001 GYM 002 BATH 003 MECH 004 GAME ROOM 006 BEDROOM 008 BATH 005 BATH 017 BEDROOM 018 BEDROOM 020 BATH 021 HALL 022 POWDER 023 BATH 011 BEDROOM 007 VESTIBULE 019 CRAWL SPACE CLO. 010 HALL 009 BATH 012 BATH 011 BEDROOM 014 LAUNDRY 015 MECH 016 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-2029 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-102 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 52 4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2" T.O. FF 89'-7" T.O. PLY 89'-4" T.O. ENTRY PATIO 89'-7" T.O. GARAGE SLAB 89'-4" 43 43 4343 1643 1643 PROPOSED ELEVATOR UP PROPOSED ADDITIONPROPOSED RENOVATION FRONT PORCH ABOVE PATIO ABOVE STAIR 101 REC ROOM 102 BEDROOM 103 BATHROOM 104 NANNY ROOM 108 BATHROOM 107 BEDROOM 110 MUDROOM 115 BATH 112 BEDROOM 113 POWDER 117 BEDROOM 119 WET ROOM 105 WC 106 BATH 111 ENTRY 118 GARAGE 120 CLOSET 114VESTIBULE 109 GARAGE 116 CLO. 120 BATH 121 CRAWL SPACE 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-2029 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED GARAGE (MIDDLE) LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-103 PROPOSED GARAGE LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 53 FF 2'-0"5'-6"13'-6"4'-111/2"23'-01/2"18'-0"9'-2"8'-10"5'-0"22'-41/2"4'-0"2'-0"5'-6"8'-0"5'-6"16'-0"3'-6"6'-6"2'-0"3'-101/2"8'-101/2"T.O. FF 100'-3" T.O. PLY 100'-0" T.O. PORCH FINISH 94'-33/4" T.O. ROOF DECK FINISH 100'-3" T.O. PROPOSED PATIO 99'-9" T.O. PATIO 100'-3" 1 A-2012A-2013 A-202 4A-2024343 4343 43 43 43 32 PROPOSED ROOF OVER AUTO COURT ENTRY MOVABLE OUTDOOR KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PLANTER AT EDGE OF AUTO COURT, BELOW FRONT PORCH PER RDS PROPOSED PATIO TO BE WITHIN 30" OF FINISHED GRADE 4343 4343 43 43 32 32 PROPOSED ROOF OVER AUTO COURT ENTRY MOVABLE OUTDOOR KITCHEN EQUIPMENT PLANTER AT EDGE OF AUTO COURT, BELOW FRONT PORCH PER RDS PROPOSED PATIO TO BE WITHIN 30" OF FINISHED GRADE PROPOSED PATIO PROPOSED ROOF DECK DW AUTOCOURT BELOW PROPOSED PATIO PROPOSED PATIO PROPOSED ROOF DECK DW AUTOCOURT BELOW DN PROPOSED PATIO 9 9 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L RGPLANTER AT ROOF DECKPLANTER AT ROOF DECK KITCHEN 212 BREAKFAST 213 LIVING ROOM 214 DINING ROOM 202 MASTER BEDROOM 209 MASTER BATH 205 CLOSET 208 CLOSET 207 WC 206 LAUNDRY 204 STAIR 201 POWDER 203 PANTRY 211 EXISTING TO REMAIN TO BE DEMOLISHED NEW WALL WALL LEGEND N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-104 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 54 T.O. RIDGE 122'-23/4" T.O. RIDGE 119'-93/4" T.O. RIDGE 118'-51/2" T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE 101'-73/4" T.O. PORCH ROOF AT EDGE 98'-11" T.O. RIDGE 116'-31/4" 13:1213:12 10:1210:128:12 13:1213:1210:122:122:12 2:12 2:122:12 6:126:12SIDE YARD SETBACK S I D E Y A R D S E T B A C K REAR YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L I N E T.O. RIDGE 119'-93/4" 9 9 T.O. RIDGE 118'-51/2" 4 4 6 6 7 7 10 10 5 5 8 8 1 1 C C B B A A D D E E F F G G H H J J 2 2 3 3 I I 11 11 K K L L T.O. PERGOLA 111'-21/2" T.O. CHIMNEY CAP 123'-6" T.O. STONE CAP (VIF) 123'-1" T.O. STONE CAP 113'-11/4" EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 10:1210:1210:1210:1213:12PROPOSED FRONT PORCH ROOF PROPOSED HIP ROOF PROPOSED ROOF EXTENSION PROPOSED STANDING SEAM ROOF EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE EXISTING SHAKE ROOF TO BE REFINISHED EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REFINISHED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF MATERIAL LEGEND PROPOSED SINGLE PLY SELF ADHERING WATERPROOF MEMBRANE N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-105 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 55 6 7 948123 28'-1"VIF10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9"FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR TO THE RIGHT OF THE DASHED LINE RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" 12 10 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 J I H G F E D C B A 15'-71/2"VIF10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"7'-81/2"3'-91/4"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 118'-5 1/2" T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9" 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NORTHWEST ELEVATION 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-201X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 56 8 69 4 3 2 17 10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED ADU TO BE REMOVED, SOME WALLS TO REMAIN ROOF FINISH TO BE REPLACED WITH STANDING SEAM METAL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS TO ACCESS NEW PATIO AT GRADE 21 20 21 18 T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9"FRONT SETBACK12 10 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR TO THE LEFT OF THE DASHED LINE RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" A B C D E F G H I J 10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"32'-103/4"VIFT.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9" RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" 12 10 12 10 12 10 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-202X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 57 5 6 7 94 108123 11 10'-7"4'-93/4"5'-101/4"10'-9"5'-61/4"3'-61/2"2'-5"7'-0"ENTRY DOOR HEIGHT14'-111/2"28'-1"VIF17 21 19 20 EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED 56 23 15 13 14 56 23 12 10 11 48 35 36 09 08 20 21 18 RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. PLY AT MAIN LEVEL 100'-0" T.O. PLY AT GARAGE LEVEL 89'-4" T.O. SLAB AT BASEMENT 78'-9"FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR TO THE RIGHT OF THE DASHED LINE T.O. SLAB AT FRONT PORCH 94'-13/4" 12 13 12 10 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 2 12 2 RIDGE HEIGHT 113'-31/4" L K J I H G F E D C B A 10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"7'-81/2"3'-91/4"21 20 17 23 19 21 23 EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9" RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 118'-51/2" 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED NORTHWEST ELEVATION 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED NORTHEAST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-201 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 58 8 611109 5 4 3 2 17 2'-6"3'-2"10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"5'-61/4"2'-21/4"1'-41/4"2'-5"17 21 19 20 EXISTING MASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, STONE AND ROOF FINISHES TO BE REPLACED 56 23 53 STEEL SHADE STRUCTURE, > 50% OPEN TO ABOVE NEW EXTERIOR DOORS TO ACCESS NEW PATIO AT GRADE 21 20 21 3131 20 18 T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9"FRONT SETBACKRIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 118'-51/2"12 10 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13 12 13FRONT SETBACKMASTER BEDROOM WING TO REMAIN, EXTERIOR FINISHES TO BE REPLACED ALL STRUCTURAL CHANGES TO OCCUR TO THE LEFT OF THE DASHED LINE RIDGE HEIGHT 116'-31/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" A B C D E F G H I J K L 10'-7"10'-8"10'-9"9'-03/4"2'-5"8'-0"30'-23/4"2'-5"13 14 15 17 21 19 20 23 3131 48 23 53 35 49 36 36 08 20 21 36 T.O. PLATE 110'-9" T.O. MAIN LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 100'-0" T.O. GARAGE LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 89'-4" T.O. BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR STRUCTURE 78'-9" RIDGE HEIGHT 122'-23/4" RIDGE HEIGHT 119'-83/4" 12 10 12 10 12 10 12 10 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED SOUTHEAST ELEVATION 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED SOUTHWEST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 DRIVEWAY PER CITY ORD 66 SECTION 1 NEW CITY DRAINAGE PIPE PER CIVIL ENG SLOPE TO BE RE-VEGETATED PER RESOLUTION NO 12 SERIES OF 2013 UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k SITE RETAINING WALL <30" ABOVE GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g PRINCIPAL WINDOW PER RDS 26.410.030.E.1.D.1 WINDOW PLACEMENT PER RDS 26.410.030.E.2.C R-6 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' CHIMNEY PROJECTION <10' FROM HEIGHT OF BUILDING CONNECTION PER 26.575.020.F.4.a EXTERIOR LIGHTING TBD 1/3 POINT FROM EAVE TO RIDGE FLAT ROOF, SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE NEW STONE COLUMN BASE INTERPOLATED SLOPE USED FOR HEIGHT CALCULATION FULL WIDTH STONE VENEER TBD WOOD RAINSCREEN TBD WINDOW TRIM TBD CLASS B MASONRY ROOF SHINGLE PER ARCH MECHANICAL PROJECTIONS <5' ABOVE HEIGHT OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.4.e EXISTING GAS FIREPLACE APPLIANCE TO REMAIN NON-COMBUSTIBLE FRAMING, TYP LIGHTWELL PER IRC 310.2 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE + SAFETY WOOD HEADER + MASONRY SILL PER ARCH LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW AC UNITS GAS + ELECTRIC METERS NEW TIMBER COLUMN HANDRAIL PER IRC 312.2 MIN HEIGHT 34" GLASS GUARD SAFETY GLAZED PER 308.4 + SUPPORT POINT LOAD PER 301.5 EXISTING CHIMNEY TO BE REFINISHED BUT REMAIN WINDOW WELL PANEL TO BE NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE AND REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN; TYP GARAGE / DWELLING FIRE SEPARATION PER IRC R302.6; TYP SLOPE 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE ROOF OVERHANG SEWAGE EJECTOR ACCESS LOCATION ELECTRICAL PANEL LOCATION EGRESS SILL 3'-6" AFF BUILT-IN MILLWORK RADON VENT PIPE SNOW STOPS / SNOW FENCE DOWNSPOUT EXHAUST FLUE VENT; TYP GUTTER EXISTING GRADE STONE CHIMNEY CAP STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF ROOF DECK MATERIAL TBD EXTERIOR RAILING MATERIAL TBD PATIO MATERIAL TBD DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD DECORATIVE STEEL, PER STRUCT SIDE-LOADED GARAGE PER RDS 26.410.030.C.2.D.2 GARAGE DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.C.4.D.2 OPEN FRONT PORCH PER RDS 26.410.030.D.1.D.2 FRONT DOOR PER RDS 26.410.030.D.2.C ENTRY PORCH HEIGHT PER RDS 26.410.030.D.3.C NON-ORTHOGONAL WINDOW PER 26.410.030.E.3.C LIGHT WELL PER RDS 26.410.030.E.4.C BUILDING MATERIALS PER RDS 26.410.030.E.5.C LINE OF FOUNDATION WALL BELOW PROPOSED GRADE STUCCO TBD RETAINING WALL EXTERIOR GUARDRAIL PER R311.7.7 LINE OF EXISTING FOUNDATION LINE OF ROOF ABOVE MECH / FIREPLACE CHASE PATIO SNOWMELT PER IBC 1140.1 INFLECTION CODE RDS.E.2 WILDLIFE-RESISTANT TRASH ENCLOSURE PER 26.575.020.E.5.t STONE PLANTER COPYRIGHT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION A-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 7/7/20 FOR UMPHI KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 05/01/20 07/07/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 59 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION A-203 STREETSCAPE ELEVATIONS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 56'-3"15'-3"6'-9"5'-51/8"15'-103/4"78'-3" HISTORIC RESOURCE 114 NEALE AVE INTERSECTION OFPROPERTY LINE AT STREETALL ABOVE GRADE WORK TOOCCUR TO THE RIGHT OF THE RED LINEPROJECT SITE 110 NEALE AVE 25' HEIGHT LIMIT 56'-3"15'-3"6'-11"7'-33/4"6'-55/8" 78'-3"INTERSECTION OFPROPERTY LINE AT STREETHISTORIC RESOURCE 114 NEALE AVE PROJECT SITE 110 NEALE AVE 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED NEALE AVE ELEVATION 0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING NEALE AVE ELEVATION 60 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION A-204 PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR VIEWS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 1 NEALE STREET ELEVATION 61 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION A-205 PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR VIEWS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 1 NORTH VIEW 2 EAST VIEW 62 COPYRIGHT PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC DATE OF PUBLICATION A-206 PERSPECTIVE EXTERIOR VIEWS 7/7/20 KP, BF 1911.00 ASPEN, CO 81611 110 NEALE AVE 17 QUEEN LLC FOR UMPHI Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Carbondale: 36 N. 4th St. Carbondale, CO 81623 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID NAME ISSUED DATE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PRE-APP SUBMITTAL 01/13/20 CONCEPTUAL HPC SUBMITTAL 05/01/20 HPC CONTINUANCE SUBMITTAL 07/07/20 1 WEST VIEW 2 SOUTH VIEW 63 Drainage Report 110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 May 27, 2020 Prepared by Richard Goulding, P.E. Roaring Fork Engineering 592 Highway 133 Carbondale, CO 81623 64 Drainage Report 110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO 81611 I HEREBY AFFIRM THAT THIS REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS AT 110 NEALE AVENUE WAS PREPARED BY ME FOR THE OWNERS THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CITY OF ASPEN AND APPROVED VARIANCES AND EXCEPTIONS LISTED THERETO. I UNDERSTAND THAT IT IS THE POLICY OF THE CITY OF ASPEN THAT ASPEN DOES NOT AND WILL NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES DESIGNED BY OTHERS. RICHARD GOULDING, P.E. RFE Project # 2020-13 65 Table of Contents 1.0 General ................................................................................................................................. 4 1.1 Existing Site ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Proposed Site .................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Previous Drainage Studies ............................................................................................... 5 1.4 Offsite Drainage ............................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Drainage Basins and Sub-basins .......................................................................................... 5 2.1 Drainage Basins................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Peak Discharge Calculations ............................................................................................ 6 3.0 Low Impact Site Design....................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Principles .......................................................................................................................... 7 4.0 Hydrological Criteria ........................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Storm Recurrence and Rainfall ........................................................................................ 8 4.2 Storage Volumes Methodology ........................................................................................ 8 5.0 Hydraulic Criteria ................................................................................................................ 9 6.0 Proposed Facilities ............................................................................................................... 9 6.1 Drywell ............................................................................................................................. 9 7.0 Operation and Maintenance ................................................................................................. 9 7.1 Inlets and Piping ............................................................................................................... 9 7.2 Drywell ........................................................................................................................... 10 8.0 Appendices ......................................................................................................................... 10 8.1 Drainage Basin Map ....................................................................................................... 10 8.2 Previous Drainage Study by Boundaries Unlimited ...................................................... 10 66 4 1.0 General 1.1 Existing Site The following report is an evaluation of the proposed redevelopment of the existing residence at 110 Neale Avenue in Aspen, Colorado, parcel number 273707383002. The property is located at the Southeast corner of the intersection at Neale Avenue and Queen Street, and is surrounded by other residential lots and open space to the south. The site contains a single-family residence with an approximate footprint of 1,220 square feet. The site has extensive flagstone hardscaping, large existing cottonwoods and maple trees, and an access driveway accessing Queen Street. There are neighboring properties with single-family residences located to the east and north, with street right of way to the south and west. The existing topography is sloped with an average 10% grade from the north to the south, following Neale Avenue. An existing conditions sheet has been included in the submitted drawings. Figure 1: Pitkin County GIS vicinity view. Parcel 273707383002 shown in red. 1.2 Proposed Site This project is classified as a ‘Major Project’ per Table 1.1. of the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). The proposed development is over 1,000 square feet and disturbs an area that exceeds 25% of the entire site. The intent of this report is to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the URMP. The Low Impact Design (LID) Principles in the introduction of the manual were used as a guide throughout the design process. Onsite storm infrastructure has been sized to convey runoff for a 100-year storm event. 67 5 The proposed project will be a comprehensive remodel of the entire site. The existing residence foundation will remain in its existing location, but the basement will be expanded below the structure. A new garage structure, above grade additions to the residence and new roofs will be constructed. Landscaping, patios, and walkways are proposed around the site, and the driveway will be removed and replaced with landscaping. The proposed drainage infrastructure includes downspouts from roof structures, trench drains within hardscaped areas, and area drains surrounding the site capture on-site flows before they reach the adjacent properties and Aspen right-of-way. All onsite drainage is captured from impervious areas and is routed through an onsite pipe system that connects to an existing drywell system. Per previous drainage studies, the drywell system is sufficient for the proposed design. All existing drainage structures will be inspected before building permit submittal. Improvements will be made to the right of way, including new sidewalk and curb and gutter along Queen Street. All updates are in regards to meeting the City of Aspen Engineering Design Standards. 1.3 Previous Drainage Studies The City of Aspen updated their URMP in 2001 and the property is within the boundaries of the study. The study indicates that the property is not within a Mudflow area. A previous drainage report prepared by Boundaries Unlimited in 2005 for the existing residence is included in this report. 1.4 Offsite Drainage No offsite basins affect the site, so no analysis was required. 2.0 Drainage Basins and Sub-basins The development on the parcel is proposed as one large onsite basin. This basin will be subdivided into smaller sub-basins and analyzed to aid with design of the storm water infrastructure for the permit submittal. Basin delineation is shown on sheet C3 of the HPC submittal. This sheet lists impervious area, runoff coefficients, peak flows, and the required volume of runoff to be detained. 2.1 Drainage Basins Basin 1 is a major basin within the parcel and consists of the developed area of the residence, including the concrete driveway, impervious walkways, pervious walkways, and the roof. The basin has a total area of 12,990 square feet and is 60% impervious. The remaining pervious areas of the basin include several landscaped areas surrounding the residence. Runoff from the basin is collected through trench drains, area drains, and downspouts from the roof. The captured runoff is then conveyed through the piping system to an existing drywell system to the south of the site that is sized for full detention. This system will be examined before permit submittal. 68 6 2.2 Peak Discharge Calculations The peak flows were calculated for the Major Onsite Basin for the 5-year and 100-year storm event using the Rational Method. The Rational Method is an acceptable method to calculate runoff for this basin as the area is under 90 acres. Rainfall intensity was calculated using a Time of Concentration (Td) of 5 minutes. The actual time of concentration for this site is less than 5 minutes, but according to the City of Aspen URMP, equations used to calculate rainfall intensity are only valid for a time of concentration of 5 minutes or greater, so the smallest valid time of concentration value was used. The 1-hour Rainfall depths (P1) used for these calculations were taken from Table 2.2 of the URMP and are equal to 0.64 inches for the 5-year event and 1.23 inches for the 100-year event. Equation 2.1 was referenced when solving for the Rainfall Intensity (I). 𝑰𝑰= 𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖.𝟖𝟖 𝑷𝑷𝟏𝟏(𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏+𝑻𝑻𝒅𝒅)𝟏𝟏.𝟏𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 (𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸.2.1) Runoff Coefficients (C), a function of the Soil Group (in this case B for the basins) and the percentage of impervious area were developed using Figure 3.3. The Runoff Coefficient (C) was then multiplied by the Rainfall Intensity (I) and the area of the calculated basin (A, in acres) to determine the peak discharge. 𝑸𝑸𝒑𝒑=𝑪𝑪𝑰𝑰𝑪𝑪 𝑄𝑄𝑝𝑝=𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷ℎ𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑃𝑃 (𝐷𝐷𝑐𝑐𝐷𝐷) 𝐶𝐶=𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 𝐶𝐶𝑅𝑅𝑃𝑃𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝑃𝑃𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶 𝐼𝐼=𝑅𝑅𝑃𝑃𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅𝑐𝑐𝑃𝑃𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅 𝐼𝐼𝑅𝑅𝐶𝐶𝑃𝑃𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐷𝐶𝐶𝐼𝐼 (𝐷𝐷𝑅𝑅𝐷𝐷ℎ𝑃𝑃𝐷𝐷 𝑝𝑝𝑃𝑃𝑎𝑎 ℎ𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑎𝑎) 𝐴𝐴=𝐴𝐴𝑎𝑎𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 (𝑃𝑃𝐷𝐷𝑎𝑎𝑃𝑃𝐷𝐷) These peak flow values were used to calculate the size of the proposed detention and conveyance structures, such as the drywell, inlets and pipes. The tables below contain the peak flows for developed and undeveloped conditions for 5-year and 100-year storm events for the major basin, and the 100-year peak flow rate for the sub basins. 5 Year Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 Hour(P 1)0.64 Return Period 5 Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Max See(D1)(ft2)(ft2)(%)From Table (Td)I=88.8P1/(10+Td)1.052 (ft3/sec) 1 12990.00 7856.00 60.48%0.410 5 3.29 0.40 5 Year Peak Discharge Pre Development Calculations 1 Hour(P 1)0.64 Return Period 5 Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Max See(D1)(ft2)(ft2)(%)From Table (Td)I=88.8P1/(10+Td)1.052 (ft3/sec) 1 12990.00 0.00 0.00%0.080 5 3.29 0.08 69 7 3.0 Low Impact Site Design Low Impact Development (LID) aims to mimic the natural pre-development hydrologic pattern. The goal is to manage storm water as close to its source as is possible. This entire developed site is approximately 58% impervious. The treatment train approach is used on all runoff to increase water quality and infiltration. 3.1 Principles Principle 1: Consider storm water quality needs early in the design process. The grading and drainage design was coordinated between the architect and civil engineering teams throughout the design process and water quality requirements were discussed early on. Site visits ensured proper understanding of existing conflicts and opportunities to improve existing drainage patterns. Principle 2: Use the entire site when planning for storm water quality treatment. Storm water quality was considered in the design of every part of the site that is being affected by the proposed construction. Existing infrastructure will be used to the maximum extent possible. Principle 3: Avoid unnecessary impervious area. The total impervious area on the site was kept to a minimum while meeting the architectural design goals. Principle 4: Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. All runoff from impervious surfaces on the property is collected and routed to BMP structures. The infrastructure has been sized to capture the 100-year detention volume water quality capture volume. The drywell is designed to infiltrate storage capacity into the surrounding earth. Principle 5: Integrate storm water quality management and flood control. 100 Year Peak Discharge Developed Calculations 1 Hour(P 1)1.23 Return Period 100 Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Max See(D1)(ft2)(ft2)(%)From Table (Td)I=88.8P 1/(10+Td)1.052 (ft3/sec) 1 12990.00 7856.00 60.48%0.570 5 6.33 1.08 100 Year Peak Discharge Pre Development Calculations 1 Hour(P 1)1.23 Return Period 100 Basin ID Total Area Imp. Area Impervious C Value Time of C Intensity Q Max See(D1)(ft2)(ft2)(%)From Table (Td)I=88.8P 1/(10+Td)1.052 (ft3/sec) 1 12990.00 0.00 0.00%0.350 5 6.33 0.66 70 8 The proposed drywell will capture and treat runoff for water quality, and the drywell will infiltrate the runoff into the soils, eliminating runoff from the site. Principle 6: Develop storm water quality facilities that enhance the site, the community and the environment. The design is proposing using existing infrastructure for full detention for all stormwater, meaning no runoff will be leaving the site, with no additional concrete stormwater structures on sit. Principle 7: Use treatment train approach. The design implements sheetflow across landscaping, pervious pavers, and sumps in the pipe network to ensure treatment throughout the system. Principle 8: Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. Inlets and piping will be vacuumed or flushed periodically to maintain adequate flow. Proper grading reduces dangerous slopes. Cleanouts are located where necessary to ensure the lifetime of the drainage infrastructure. Principle 9: Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. The proposed design for driveway and walkways reduces ice buildup and dangerous conditions. All grading was done with safety in mind, and no steep slopes occur on site. 4.0 Hydrological Criteria 4.1 Storm Recurrence and Rainfall The property is not in the commercial core and is served by any city curb and gutter so this property classifies as a “Sub-urban area served by public storm sewer”. However, due to limitations on the site, the curb and gutter cannot be utilized, so the site cannot disperse into the curb and gutter. Due to this, the 5-year and 100-year events were analyzed. The 1-hour Rainfall depth (P1) is given in Table 2.2 as 0.64 inches for the 5-year event and 1.23 inches for the 100-year event. The Intensity in inches per hour for different storm duration (Td) was calculated using Equation 2.1 from the City of Aspen URMP. 4.2 Storage Volumes Methodology The storage requirements for this site were calculated using the total impervious area along with the historic and developed peak runoff rates that were established in section 2.2. The proposed storm drainage system is designed to discharge into existing drywells for full detention of a 100- year storm event. The existing drywells were inspected and dipped for storage depths. The drywells will be inspected further for functionality prior to permit submittal. The full detention calculations are shown in the following table. 71 9 5.0 Hydraulic Criteria This property is not connected to the COA’s storm water infrastructure. All hydraulics are sized for onsite infrastructure. The storm system was designed to route all impervious surfaces to the drywell located in the garage. Inlet and pipe sizing have not been performed but will be completed for the permit submittal. Pipe sizes will be tested for hydraulic capacity at 80 percent of their full flowrate for the permit submittal. Design charts giving Qdesign / Q full were downloaded from FHWA and the equations in Section 4.8.4 will be used as the basis for these calculations. Calculated pipe sizes and depth of flow for onsite pipes will be shown for permit submittal. 6.0 Proposed Facilities This property is not connected to the COA’s storm water infrastructure, and the existing drywell system is sized for full detention, as clarified in section 2.2 of this report. Below are the analyses for the individual detention structure’s capacity and infiltration. A previous drainage report for the drywell system is included in this report. 6.1 Drywell Below is a table that shows the existing drywell system meeting the capacity required for full detention of Basin 1. All drywells will be inspected prior to permit submittal. If drywells are no longer functioning, new drywells shall be installed or alternative infiltration methods will be used onsite. A drawdown test will be conducted to determine the performance of the existing drywells. 7.0 Operation and Maintenance 7.1 Inlets and Piping The piping must be maintained periodically to ensure proper operation. Minimum inspection and maintenance requirements include the following: Full Detention Storage Basin Total Area Impervious Area Impervious Full Detention Depth Factor of Safety Required Storage BMP (ft2)(ft2)(%)(in)F.O.S.(ft3) 1 12990.00 7856.00 60.48%1.23 1 805 EX DRYWELL SYSTEM Drywell Storage Drywell Basins Diameter Storage Depth Perforated Depth Internal Volume External (18" of Screened Rock) Volume Total Capacity Required Capacity (Name)(#)D (ft)H (ft)P (ft)π*H*(D/2)2) (ft3)0.3*π*P*((D/2)+1.5)2 - (D/2)2) (ft3)(ft3)(ft3) EX 1 1 6 10 4 283 42 325 273 EX 2 1 6 10 4 283 42 325 273 EX 3 1 6 10 4 283 42 325 273 EX 4 1 6 10 4 283 42 325 273 72 10 • During the first year draw down should be checked for every event exceeding 0.25” of precipitation to ensure no significant backups are occurring. • Piping systems and sumps should be checked during and after storms routinely. • After the first year, the system should be cleaned out at least once a year and more if the first-year inspection proves more maintenance is required. • More frequent cleaning reduces the amount of debris entering the system and reduces the need for more intense maintenance. • Clean the inside of any perforated pipes with a pipe cleaner accessed through cleanouts. This should be done yearly, or as necessary if the system is not infiltrating properly or if the system has become contaminated. • Ensure heat tape is functioning before colder months to prevent damage to piping. If the storm system is not maintained properly, replacement of parts or of the entire system may be necessary. 7.2 Drywell Drywells must be inspected and maintained quarterly to remove sediment and debris that has washed into them. A maintenance plan shall be submitted to the City in the Drainage Report describing the maintenance schedule that will be undertaken by the owners of the new residence or building. Minimum inspection and maintenance requirements include the following: • Inspect drywells at least four times a year and after every storm exceeding 0.5 inches. • Dispose of sediment, debris/trash, and any other waste material removed from a drywell at suitable disposal sites and in compliance with local, State, and Federal waste regulations. • Routinely evaluate the drain-down time of the drywell to ensure the maximum time of 24 hours is not being exceeded. If drain-down times are exceeding the maximum, drain the drywell via pumping and clean out the percolation area (the percolation barrel may be jetted to remove sediment accumulated in perforations. If slow drainage persists, the system may need to be replaced. 8.0 Appendices 8.1 Drainage Basin Map 8.2 Previous Drainage Study by Boundaries Unlimited 73 C3DRAINAGE BASINSROARING FORK ENGINEERING592 HIGHWAY 133CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTIONDATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTIONDRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUEASPEN, COHPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/202074 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 C0COVER SHEET110 NEALE AVENUEASPEN, COROARING FORK ENGINEERING 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO HPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/2020 HPC SUBMITTAL5.27.2020112 113 GGEGEGC1SITE PLANROARING FORK ENGINEERING 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO HPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/2020 114 GGEGEGC2GRADING & DRAINAGEROARING FORK ENGINEERING 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO HPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/2020 115 C3DRAINAGE BASINSROARING FORK ENGINEERING 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO HPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/2020 116 GGEGEGC4UTILITY PLANROARING FORK ENGINEERING 592 HIGHWAY 133 CARBONDALE COLORADO, 81623 PH: (970)340-4130 F:(866)876-5873CHECKED BY:#DESCRIPTION DATE DRAWN BYCONSTRUCTION DRAWN BY:JOB #:Of 52020-13NOT FORADWRBG110 NEALE AVENUE ASPEN, CO HPC SUBMITTAL 05/27/2020 117 Page 1 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com Memorandum TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer MEETING DATE: July 22, 2020 RE: 500 W. Main Street – Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards Review- PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED FROM JUNE 10TH APPLICANT /OWNER: 500 West Main Street, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Rowland + Broughton LOCATION: Street Address: 500 W. Main Street (address of new home TBD) Legal Description: Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado Parcel Identification Number: PID# 2735-124-43-008 CURRENT ZONING & USE MU (Mixed Use) Vacant, used as a garden PROPOSED ZONING & USE: MU (Mixed Use) Single-family home SUMMARY: The applicant requests approval for Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards Review for a new home on a lot created through a historic landmark lot split. The property is currently used as a garden, associated with Rowland+Broughton’s office. While approval was granted to remove all development rights from the site via Transferable Development Rights, the applicant is not required to do so and has elected to build a home on the site instead. A hearing was initially scheduled for this project on June 10th, but the applicant requested a continuance. HPC did not conduct any review at that meeting. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the project, with the condition that for Final Review, a minor restudy of the front porch/second floor deck, and the garage door design be undertaken to comply fully with the Residential Design Standards. Site Locator Map – 500 W. Main Street, Lot R 118 Page 2 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals: • Major Development (Section 26.415.070.D) for Conceptual design approval. • Residential Design Standards Variations (26.410.020.D Variation Review Standards) related to Articulation of Building Mass, One-story Element and Garage Door Design. Please note that while properties containing historic resources are exempt from Residential Design Standards review, development of this vacant lot requires compliance or variations. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority, however this project is subject to Call-up Notice to City Council. STAFF COMMENTS: Staff finds that the historic preservation design guidelines are all met by this project, and the proposed building is a good fit for the context. Staff supports a variation from the Articulation of Building Mass standard in the interest of restricting the project to a one-story mass near the adjacent miner’s cottage. Staff recommends the project be adjusted to meet the One-story Element and Garage Door Design standards. Please see Exhibits A, B and C for more detail. REFERRAL COMMENTS: The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will significantly affect the permit review. Relevant conditions of approval are included in the recommendation. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission grant Conceptual Major Development, Relocation and Residential Design Standards approval with the following conditions: 1. A variation from the Building Articulation requirement of the Residential Design Standards is granted. 2. The project must be adjusted to comply with the One-story Element and Garage Door Design requirements of the Residential Design Standards. 3. Coordination with the Engineering Department is needed on the following topics: • If the sidewalk curb in gutter in front of the site are not new, the property will be required to replace them per City of Aspen standards. • In order for the drywell on Lot S to be used to treat stormwater from Lot R, drainage easements, maintenance agreements and access to the infrastructure will need to be addressed. 4. Coordination with the Building Department is needed on the following topics: 119 Page 3 of 3 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com • Due to the proximity of the house to the egress stair on the west side of the office structure, the east wall of the new house must have a 1 hour fire rating on both sides of the wall. • Windows on this wall may need to be fire-rated, or a sprinkler system installed. • Additional fire-proof construction may be needed adjacent to the transformer in the northwest corner of the site. 5. Coordination with the Parks Department is needed on the following topics: • During construction, to protect the cottonwood street trees, the front yard, up to the 10’ setback, must be barricaded with a 6’ fence with an attached fabric liner. A mulch bedding may be required. • The water line will need to be located as far east as possible to protect the street trees. • Parks will need to consult on sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement, if they are to occur. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2020 Exhibit A – Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria /Staff Findings Exhibit B – Residential Design Standards Criteria /Staff Findings Exhibit C – Application Exhibit D – Public Comment 120 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2020 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC) GRANTING CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 500 WEST MAIN STREET, LOT R, MESA SUBDIVISION, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2735-124-43-008 WHEREAS, the applicant, 500 West Main Street, LLC, represented by Rowland+Broughton, has requested HPC approval for Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards review for the property located at 500 West Main Street, Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review;” and WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application, a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project’s conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section 26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Residential Design Standards review is administrative, except for any Variations. Variations are reviewed by a board, in this case HPC, and must be found to be in conformance with Section 26.410.020.D of the Municipal Code, Variation Review Standards. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, HPC reviewed the project on July 22nd, 2020. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with conditions by a vote of __ to __. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC hereby approves Conceptual Major Development and Residential Design Standards review for the property located at 500 West Main Street, Lot R, Mesa Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado as follows. 121 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2020 Page 2 of 3 Section 1: The approval is subject to these conditions: 1. A variation from the Building Articulation requirement of the Residential Design Standards is granted. 2. The project must be adjusted to comply with the One-story Element and Garage Door Design requirements of the Residential Design Standards. 3. Coordination with the Engineering Department is needed on the following topics: • If the sidewalk curb in gutter in front of the site are not new, the property will be required to replace them per City of Aspen standards. • In order for the drywell on Lot S to be used to treat stormwater from Lot R, drainage easements, maintenance agreements and access to the infrastructure will need to be addressed. 4. Coordination with the Building Department is needed on the following topics: • Due to the proximity of the house to the egress stair on the west side of the office structure, the east wall of the new house must have a 1 hour fire rating on both sides of the wall. • Windows on this wall may need to be fire-rated, or a sprinkler system installed. • Additional fire-proof construction may be needed adjacent to the transformer in the northwest corner of the site. 5. Coordination with the Parks Department is needed on the following topics: • During construction, to protect the cottonwood street trees, the front yard, up to the 10’ setback, must be barricaded with a 6’ fence with an attached fabric liner. A mulch bedding may be required. • The water line will need to be located as far east as possible to protect the street trees. • Parks will need to consult on sidewalk, curb and gutter replacement, if they are to occur. 6. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one (1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. Section 2: Material Representations All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. 122 HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2020 Page 3 of 3 Section 3: Existing Litigation This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Severability If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at a special meeting on the 10th day of June 2020. Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content: _______________________________ _______________________________ Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Gretchen Greenwood, Chair ATTEST: _________________________________________________________________ Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk 123 Page 1 of 4 Exhibit A Historic Preservation Design Guidelines Criteria Staff Findings 26.415.070.D Major Development. No building, structure or landscape shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a designated historic property or a property located within a Historic District until plans or sufficient information have been submitted to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures established for their review. An application for a building permit cannot be submitted without a development order. 3. Conceptual Development Plan Review b) The procedures for the review of conceptual development plans for major development projects are as follows: 1) The Community Development Director shall review the application materials submitted for conceptual or final development plan approval. If they are determined to be complete, the applicant will be notified in writing of this and a public hearing before the HPC shall be scheduled. Notice of the hearing shall be provided pursuant to Section 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. 2) Staff shall review the submittal material and prepare a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code sections. This report will be transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. 3) The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. 4) A resolution of the HPC action shall be forwarded to the City Council in accordance with Section 26.415.120 - Appeals, notice to City Council, and call-up. No applications for Final Development Plan shall be accepted by the City and no associated permits shall be issued until the City Council takes action as described in said section. Relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: 1.1 All projects shall respect the historic development pattern or context of the block, neighborhood or district. • Building footprint and location should reinforce the traditional patterns of the neighborhood. 124 Page 2 of 4 • Allow for some porosity on a site. In a residential project, setback to setback development is typically uncharacteristic of the historic context. Do not design a project which leaves no useful open space visible from the street. 1.5 Maintain the historic hierarchy of spaces. • Reflect the established progression of public to private spaces from the public sidewalk to a semi-public walkway, to a semi private entry feature, to private spaces. 1.6 Provide a simple walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry on residential projects. • Meandering walkways are not allowed, except where it is needed to avoid a tree or is typical of the period of significance. • Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style and install them in the manner that they would have been used historically. For example on an Aspen Victorian landmark set flagstone pavers in sand, rather than in concrete. Light grey concrete, brick or red sandstone are appropriate private walkway materials for most landmarks. • The width of a new entry sidewalk should generally be three feet or less for residential properties. A wider sidewalk may be appropriate for an AspenModern property. 1.7 Provide positive open space within a project site. • Ensure that open space on site is meaningful and consolidated into a few large spaces rather than many small unusable areas. • Open space should be designed to support and complement the historic building. 1.8 Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. • When included in the initial planning for a project, stormwater quality facilities can be better integrated into the proposal. All landscape plans presented for HPC review must include at least a preliminary representation of the stormwater design. A more detailed design must be reviewed and approved by Planning and Engineering prior to building permit submittal. • Site designs and stormwater management should provide positive drainage away from the historic landmark, preserve the use of natural drainage and treatment systems of the site, reduce the generation of additional stormwater runoff, and increase infiltration into the ground. Stormwater facilities and conveyances located in front of a landmark should have minimal visual impact when viewed from the public right of way. • Refer to City Engineering for additional guidance and requirements. 125 Page 3 of 4 11.1 Orient the new building to the street. • Aspen Victorian buildings should be arranged parallel to the lot lines, maintaining the traditional grid pattern. • AspenModern alignments shall be handled case-by-case. • Generally, do not set the new structure forward of the historic resource. Alignment of their front setbacks is preferred. An exception may be made on a corner lot or where a recessed siting for the new structure is a better preservation outcome. 11.2 In a residential context, clearly define the primary entrance to a new building by using a front porch. • The front porch shall be functional, and used as the means of access to the front door. • A new porch must be similar in size and shape to those seen traditionally. 11.3 Construct a new building to appear similar in scale and proportion with the historic buildings on a parcel. • Subdivide larger masses into smaller “modules” that are similar in size to the historic buildings on the original site. • Reflect the heights and proportions that characterize the historic resource. 11.4 Design a front elevation to be similar in scale to the historic building. • The primary plane of the front shall not appear taller than the historic structure. 11.6 Design a new structure to be recognized as a product of its time. • Consider these three aspects of a new building; form, materials, and fenestration. A project must relate strongly to the historic resource in at least two of these elements. Departing from the historic resource in one of these categories allows for creativity and a contemporary design response. • When choosing to relate to building form, use forms that are similar to the historic resource. • When choosing to relate to materials, use materials that appear similar in scale and finish to those used historically on the site and use building materials that contribute to a traditional sense of human scale • When choosing to relate to fenestration, use windows and doors that are similar in size and shape to those of the historic resource. 126 Page 4 of 4 11.7 The imitation of older historic styles is discouraged. • This blurs the distinction between old and new buildings. • Overall, details shall be modest in character. Staff Finding: The applicable chapters of the design guidelines are as follows: Site Planning and Landscape Design, and New Buildings on Landmarked Properties. Staff finds that the guidelines are all met. The new home sits between two historic resources; on the east is the substantial false-front building that houses the applicant’s architecture firm and on the west is a miner’s cottage which is part of an affordable housing development. The architect has designed the new home to align with the face of the miner’s cottage. The landscaped front yard is appropriate to the residential context on this end of Main Street. Stormwater needs are proposed to be addressed through an existing drywell developed for the office building. The new house meets the setback requirements and includes the two required on-site parking spaces. The first floor plate aligns with the adjacent buildings, and the front porches create a strong relationship between the buildings. The second floor of the new home is recessed slightly to reduce the two story form’s presence next to the one story miner’s cottage. The house features a gable roof, like the surrounding buildings and the ridge height is lower than theirs. The preliminary material palette includes lap siding, typical of the neighborhood. Staff finds that the design guidelines are met and the proposed building is a good fit for the context. 127 Page 1 of 5 Exhibit B Residential Design Standards Criteria Staff Findings 26.410.020.D Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The proposed design would require variations from the Articulation of Building Mass, One-story Element and Garage standards listed below. B. Location and Massing. 1. Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible). a) Applicability. This standard shall apply to all lots except: (1) Lots outside of the Aspen Infill Area. b) Intent. This standard seeks to reduce the overall perceived mass and bulk of buildings on a property as viewed from all sides. Designs should promote light and air access between adjacent properties. Designs should articulate building walls by utilizing multiple forms to break up large expansive wall planes. Buildings should include massing and articulation that convey forms that are similar in massing to historic Aspen residential buildings. This standard is critical in the Infill Area where small lots, small side and front setbacks, alleys and historic Aspen building forms are prevalent. Designs should change the plane of a building’s sidewall, step a primary building’s height down to one-story in the rear portion or limit the overall depth of the structure. c) Standard. A principal building shall articulate building mass to reduce bulk and mass and create building forms that are similar in scale to those seen in historic Aspen residential buildings. d) Options. Fulfilling at least one of the following options shall satisfy this standard: 1. Maximum Sidewall Depth. A principal building shall be no greater than fifty (50) feet in depth, as measured from the front-most wall of the front façade to the rear wall. An accessory building that is completely separated from the main building is permitted. 128 Page 2 of 5 Garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for an accessory building. See Figure 5. 2. Off-set with One-Story Ground Level Connector. A principal building shall provide a portion of its mass as a subordinate one-story, ground floor connecting element. The connecting element shall be at least ten (10) feet in length and shall be setback at least an additional five (5) feet from the sidewall on both sides of the building. The connecting element shall occur at a maximum of forty-five (45) feet in depth, as measured from the front-most wall of the front façade to the rear wall. Accessible outdoor space over the connecting element (e.g. a deck) is permitted but may not be covered or enclosed. Any railing for an accessible outdoor space over a connecting element must be the minimum reasonably necessary to provide adequate safety and building code compliance and the railing must be 50% or more transparent. See Figure 6. 129 Page 3 of 5 3. Increased Side Setbacks at Rear and Step Down. A principal building shall provide increased side setbacks at the rear of the building. If the principal building is two stories, it shall step down to one story in the rear. The increased side setbacks and one story step down shall occur at a maximum of forty-five (45) feet, as measured from the front-most wall toward the rear wall. The increased side setbacks shall be at least five (5) feet greater than the side setbacks at the front of the building. See Figure 7. 4. One-story Element (Flexible). a. Applicability. This standard shall apply to all lots except: 1. Lots with a required front yard setback of at least ten (10) vertical feet above or below street grade. b. Intent. This standard seeks to establish human scale building features as perceived from the street and express lower and upper floors on front façades to reduce perceived mass. Designs should utilize street-facing architectural elements, such as porches, that imitate those of historic Aspen residential buildings. Buildings should provide visual evidence or demarcation of the stories of a building to relate to pedestrians. This standard is important in all areas of the city. Front porches or portions of the front-most wall of the front façade should clearly express a one-story scale as perceived from the street. Changes in material or color can also be incorporated into these elements to help to strengthen the establishment of a one- story scale. 130 Page 4 of 5 c. Standard. A principal building shall incorporate a one-story element on the front façade. Duplexes in a side-by-side configuration are required to have a one-story element per dwelling unit. d. Options. 1. Projecting One-Story Element. The front façade of the principal building shall have a one-story street-facing element that projects at least six (6) feet from the front façade and has a width equivalent to at least twenty percent (20%) of the building's (or unit’s) overall width. This one story element may be enclosed living space or a front porch that is open on three sides. This one story element shall be a minimum of 50 square feet in area. Accessible space (whether it is a deck, porch or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the first story element; however, accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the front façade shall not be precluded. See Figure 10. 2. Loggia. The front façade of the principal building shall have an open loggia that is recessed at least six (6) feet but no more than ten (10) feet from the front façade, and has a width equivalent to at least twenty percent (20%) of the building’s (or unit’s) overall width. The loggia shall be open on at least two (2) sides and face the street. This one story element shall be a minimum of 50 square feet in area. See Figure 11. C. Garages. 4. Garage Door Design (Flexible). a) Applicability. This standard applies to all residential development in the city that is subject to the Residential Design Standards. b) Intent. This standard seeks to promote a streetscape that maximizes visual interest by minimizing unarticulated expanses of garage doors. Garage doors that utilize increased articulation, changes in façade depth and profile of materials, windows and other features to break up the garage door should be prioritized. This standard is critical for any property where garage doors are visible from the street. Figure 10 Figure 11 131 Page 5 of 5 c) Standard. A garage door that is visible from a street or alley shall utilize an articulation technique to break up its façade. d) Options. Fulfilling one of the following options shall satisfy this standard: (1) Two Separate Doors. A two-car garage door shall be constructed as two separate doors. See Figure 18. (2) Appearance of Two Separate Doors. A two-car garage door shall be constructed with one door that is designed to appear as two separate doors by incorporating a vertical separating element that is at least one (1) foot in width. Staff Finding: The house is a rectangular footprint that occupies the entire building envelope. The second floor of the building has reduced mass at the front and rear of the building. The design does not create a break in the sidewalls in the manner required to meet the Articulation of Building Mass standard, but it does meet the intent of the standard by maintaining a one story height at the ends of the building where the structure interfaces with the public. Staff finds that the upper floor setback as designed is a successful response to the adjacent miner’s cottage. If the upper floor was brought forward, the design would come close to meeting the option to have an unbroken mass that is no more than 50’ in length as measured from the frontmost wall (it would be 52’ in length), but again, staff finds that would be counterproductive to creating a sympathetic relationship to the one adjacent story historic building. In this case, any one-story step down is best located at the front of the structure. Staff supports a variation to this standard. Regarding the requirement for a One-story Element, the project features a porch, which is appropriate, but some of the usable deck space on top of the porch makes it non-compliant with the language of this design standard. The applicant could pull their usable deck back approximately 1’, and/or reconfigure it so that it does not sit on any part of the required width (20% of the front façade), depth (6’) or minimum square footage (50 square feet) of the porch below it. Staff recommends the applicant adjust the design to comply with this standard. The proposed design does not meet the Garage Door Design standard, which requires that a two stall door be designed to at least appear to be a pair of single stall doors. Staff recommends the applicant adjust the design to comply with this standard. Figure 18 132 Page 1 of 3 MEMORANDUM Project: Mesa Store, 500 W. Main Street – Residential Design Standards, Insubstantial Amendment, Trash Storage, Major Development Subject: Project Description Date: 6 July 2020 500 West Main Street, LLC is requesting review and approval of a new single-family home for the lot adjacent to the Mesa building, located at 500 W. Main Street, Aspen, Colorado. Land Use Summary: • Floor Area: o Allowed FA for Single-Family Residence for 3,000 SF Lot, with Lot Area Adjustments: 1,862 SF o Proposed FA: 1,862 SF • Residential Design Standard Variations Requested: o Articulation of Building Mass (non-flexible) o Non-Orthogonal Window Limit (flexible) • Administrative Approvals: o Trash and recycling o Parking easement Responses to Review Criteria: • 12.10.030 Space Required for Trash and Recycling o The existing Commercial building, the Mesa Building, will have the trash and recycling relocated from Lot R to the rear of the building, fac ing the alley. The space provided is a minimum of twenty (20) linear f eet adjacent to the alleyway must be reserved for trash and recycling facilities. The required area shall have a minimum vertical clearance of ten (10) feet and a minimum depth of ten (10) feet at ground level is provided. • 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures o The project will follow the Common Development Review Procedure requirements. • 26.410 Residential Design Standards o The new residence will create a bridge between the Mesa Store building to its east and the single-story historic residence to its west. Historically, a single-story, false-front storefront occupied the site. See the historic image below. o Location and Massing (non-flexible): ▪ We believe that the proposed residence meets the intent of the RDS by reducing the overall perceived mass and bulk of the building by creating a single-story element on Main Street. ▪ The design is meeting the intent of the RDS by: • Breaking the massing on the second floor at both Main Street and the alley. • The use of material articulation between the first and second floor break the 2-story massing up. 133 Page 2 of 3 ▪ We are requesting a variation from this standard by extending the side wall depth beyond the 45’-0” + linking element. We do not believe this RDS requirement works with the density of this block. The prominence of the Mesa Building, and the singularity of the side wall depth, led us to this design solution. The two buildings are unified in the site relationship, with the residence reduced in mass and scale. o Non-orthogonal Window Limit (flexible): ▪ The façade requiring this variation is setback 21’-0” from the property line with a wall of glass doors and windows. Since this is a gable form, there are more than one non-orthogonal windows. • 26.415.070.d Historic Preservation – Major Development o This application is for a new single-family home located between two historic resources. o The design intent is to relate and reference the commercial and residential neighbors, while being of this time. o The building materials proposed include: ▪ Painted Wood or Hardi -Board – Color TBD ▪ Exposed Steel Structure ▪ Wood Windows and Doors ▪ Metal Standing Seam Roof 134 Page 3 of 3 o The building form is a simple gable with single story elements on Main Street and the Alley. ▪ We believe this is the respectful solution for the single st ory residence to the west, while allowing an opportunity to reveal and deconstruct the concept of the false store-front, which as you can see from the image above is a gable with a vertical face to the street. ▪ By simplifying the building mass and reducing the scale from the street, we believe we have achieved a solution most appropriate for the con text. • 26.480.080.b Insubstantial Subdivision Amendment o The project will follow the Common Development Review Procedure requirements found in Section 26.304.030 • 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements o Lot Area: 3,000 SF, with reduction: 2,910 SF (3,000 SF - 90 SF (5’x18’ parking easement). o Floor Area, allowable: 1,862 SF (3,000 SF Lot – (Parking Easement Reduction: (5’x18’ (90 SF) = 2,910 SF 80 SF of FA per 100 SF of Lot Area = 2,328 SF @ 80% = 1,862 SF o Building Height: 22’-11” proposed • 26.710.180 Mixed Use Zone District o The character of Main Street includes a mix of commercial, residential and lodging. The block of our project is primarily residential with the high-profile Mesa Store commercial building anchoring one corner. o Free-market residential is a permitted use. o All applicable setbacks and dimensional requirements are met. No variations requested. 135 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 136 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1) Number of Units 2) Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4) Floor Area (square feet) 4) Maximum Height 5) Front Setback 6) Rear Setback Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition 7) Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Free Market Residential(square feet) 4) Front setback 5) Rear setback 6) Side setbacks 7) Off-Street Parking Spaces 8) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 137 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. □ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. □ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: 138 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner) Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: 139 Page 1 of 1 28 May 2020 Amy Simon City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Mesa Lot R – 500 W. Main Street – Residential Design Standards, Insubstantial Subdivision Amendment, Trash Storage, Major Development Dear Amy, As the property owner of 500 W. Main Street Lot R we submit this Land Use Application for review of Residential Design Standards, Insubstantial Subdivision Amendment, Trash Storage, Major Development, located within the Main Street Historic District. Rowland+Broughton Architecture’s employees are authorized to act on behalf of 500 West Main Street, LLC. Thank you. Sincerely, John Rowland, AIA Rowland+Broughton Architecture / Urban Design / Interior Design 500 West Main Street, LLC 500 W. Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 970-544-9006 140 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com DATE: April 20, 2020 PROJECT LOCATION: 500 W. Main Street, Lot R, Mesa Subdivision REQUEST: Residential Design Standards, Insubstantial Subdivision Amendment, Trash Storage, Major Development DESCRIPTION: Lot R, Mesa Subdivision is a 3,000 square foot lot located in the Mixed Use zone district and the Main Street Historic District. The property was created through a historic landmark lot split and is currently developed with a garden, plus parking and trash storage related to the adjacent office building. At the time of the historic landmark lot split, the property owner received approval to sever Transferable Development Rights from the site, but has decided to develop a single-family home instead. The maximum floor area is 1,920 square feet. The development is not eligible for any dimensional variations from HPC, other than those that may be requested through a determination of hardship, which would be difficult to establish. To accommodate the house and two required on-site parking spaces within the dimensional requirements the applicant needs to pursue two Administrative approvals; approval from Environmental Health to move the trash storage area that sits on Lot R but serves the commercial use on Lot S, and approval by the Community Development Director to shift a parking easement that is currently on Lot R but serves Lot S so that it straddles the common lot line. The project must comply with the Residential Design Standards, or receive approval for any variations. It is anticipated that the applicant will request relief from Articulation of Building Mass and Non-orthogonal window limit. The Administrative Residential Design Standards Checklist is to be submitted as part of the application. This will allow the RDS review to either be approved if the home is compliant or will allow for any guideline exceptions that are necessary to be folded into the HPC review. HPC review will be a two step process. Conceptual Design review will consider mass, scale and site plan. Following Conceptual, staff will inform City Council of the HPC decision, allowing them the opportunity to uphold HPC’s decision or to “Call Up” aspects of the approval for further discussion. This is a standard practice for all significant projects. Following Call Up, HPC will conduct Final Design review to consider landscape, lighting and materials. HPC will use the Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the Land Use Code Sections that are applicable to this project to assist with their determinations. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: Section Number Section Title 12.10 Space Allotment for Trash and Recycling Storage 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Residential Design Standards 141 26.415.070.d Historic Preservation – Major Development 26/480.080.b Insubstantial Subdivision Amendment 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.180 Mixed Use Zone District For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code Historic District Design Guidelines Review by: Staff for completeness of application, for determinations on Residential Design Standards, Trash Storage and Subdivision Amendment, and for recommendations to HPC on Residential Design Standards Variances and Major Development Review HPC for decisions on Residential Design Standards Variances and Major Development Public Hearing: Yes Neighborhood Outreach: No Referrals: Staff will seek referral comments from the Building Department, Zoning, Engineering and Parks regarding any relevant code requirements or considerations. There will be no Development Review Committee meeting or referral fees for these contacts. Staff will refer the application to Environmental Health for review of the relocated trash area serving the commercial use on the adjacent lot. Planning Fees: $1,950 for 6 billable hours of staff time. (Additional/ lesser hours will be billed/ refunded at a rate of $325 per hour.) This fee will be due at Conceptual and Final submittal. Referral Agencies Fee: $650 flat fee, Environmental Health, billed one time, at Conceptual. Total Deposit: $2,600 at Conceptual; $1,950 at Final. APPLICATION CHECKLIST: Below is a list of submittal requirements. Please email the entire application as one pdf to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com. The fee will be requested after the application is determined to be complete.  Land Use Application and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. 142  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  List of adjacent property owners for both properties within 300’ for public hearing.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado.  A completed Residential Design Standards Administrative Review checklist.  A proposed site plan.  Scaled drawings of all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations.  Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property including photographs and other exhibits, as needed, to accurately depict location and extent of proposed work.  A written description of the proposal and written explanation of how the proposed development complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application.  A Draft Plat meeting the plat requirements of Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents For Conceptual, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:  Graphics identifying preliminary selection of primary exterior building materials.  A preliminary stormwater design. For Final Review, the following items will need to be submitted in addition to the items listed above:  Drawings of the street facing facades must be provided at ¼” scale.  Final selection of all exterior materials, and samples or clearly illustrated photographs. Samples are preferred for the presentation to HPC.  A lighting plan and landscape plan, including any visible stormwater mitigation features. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 143 144 145 An Employee-Owned Company 1517 Blake Avenue, Suite 101 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 Telephone (970) 945-8676 Fax (970) 945-2555 Land Surveying Civil Engineering May 4, 2020 TO: Rowland + Broughton Architecture/Urban Design/Interior Design 500 West Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 FROM: High Country Engineering, Inc. 1517 Blake Avenue Glenwood Springs, Colorado RE: Lot R Drainage in Mesa Subdivision High Country Engineering, Inc. has reviewed the potential development of Lot R of the Mesa Subdivision and utilizing the existing stormwater infrastructure of Lot S. Lot R and S were evaluated together with the drainage report submitted for the remodel to the historic Mesa Store, as part of the proposed construction included Lot R. The drainage infrastructure designed and installed for the Mesa Store project should allow additional Lot R drainage to be feasibly incorporated into Lot S. The existing drywell, which already receives a small portion of Lot R drainage, should have capacity for both lots because the drywell was sized to meet the City of Aspen’s minimum requirements. If Lot R and Lot S were almost completely (95%+) impervious, the existing drywell capacity should be adequate to meet the City of Aspen water quality standards, assuming the stormwater from Lot R can be conveyed to the drywell. HCE has provided this document regarding the Lot R development to provide a preliminary review into combining Lot R and Lot S drainage. We believe the existing drainage infrastructure of Lot S can receive Lot R drainage while meeting the City of Aspen stormwater management plan. Incorporating the two Lots into one system would alleviate the impact of installing unnecessary stormwater infrastructure and still provide sufficient stormwater treatment. Please let me know if you have questions or comments. Feel free to contact me if you require any additional information. Sincerely, Roger Neal, P.E. Principal 146 147 148 149 150 151 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512443007 on 05/12/2020 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 152 ALPINE BANK GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 2200 GRAND AVE SCOTT BUILDING CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 400 W HOPKINS AVE GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 501 MAIN ASPEN LLC GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49503 ALDRICH PL #200 OTTAWA AVE NW ALPINE BANK ASPEN GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 2200 GRAND AVE 433 W BLEEKER LLC CHICAGO, IL 60654 300 N LASALLE #5600 430 WEST HOPKINS CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 432 W HOPKINS AVE ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 MCCOY CARLTON ST HELENA , CA 94574 500 TAPLIN RD FORNELL CLARITY ELISE ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN #B-206 SCHULMAN WILLIAM PAUL CHARLEVOIX, MI 49720 301 MERCER BLVD JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER CHABAD OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81612 435 W MAIN ST BLEEKER STREET LLC CORAL GABLES, FL 33156 5299 HAMMOCK DR KARBANK 430 LLC MISSION, KS 66205 2000 SHAWNEE MISSION PKWY #400 PERRY IAN MICHAEL ASPEN, CO 81611 426 E HYMAN AVE SAMUEL JOSHUA MOSES DILLON, CO 80435 PO BOX 756 WAGNER HOLDINGS CORP LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 E MAIN ST JOHNSTON FAMILY TRUST COSTA MESA, CA 92626 2018 PHALAROPE BLEEKER STREET PROP LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 PO BOX 491246 LHG HOLDING LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 TOMS CONDO LLC ERWINNA , PA 18920 6 SHULL FARM RD 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 ASPEN FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 137 WESTVIEW DR SLONE MICHAEL DAVID II FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703 4476 WATERSIDE CT CHRISTIANA A105 LLC MENLO PARK, CA 94026 PO BOX 4132 FORNELL CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST HY-MOUNTAIN TRANSPORT INC ASPEN, CO 81611 214 B AABC GANT CONDO ASSC ASPEN, CO 816112142 610 S WESTEND ST 153 CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST HILLMAN TATNALL L REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 504 W BLEEKER ST 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 SGSG ASPEN CONDO LLC DENVER, CO 80237 8100 E UNION AVE #2303 DUNKELBERG AMBER & KEVIN SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 PO BOX 5804 501 WEST MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 816111818 532 E HOPKINS AVE KATZMAN LORI ANN CHARLEVOIX, MI 49720 301 MERCER BLVD HORNE CHRISTOPHER & BRANDI AUSTIN, TX 78746 5214 BUCKMAN MTN RD FELER LAURIE & CLAUDIO CARBONDALE, CO 81623 550 FOX RUN MARSHALL TRACEY CAUSEY LIV TRUST AUSTIN, TX 78746 3107 WESTLAKE DR GANT CONDO ASSOC INC ASPEN, CO 816112142 610 S WESTEND ST ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER CARINTHIA CORP ASPEN, CO 81611 45 E LUPINE DR SMITH ANDREW C & DONNA G DALLAS, TX 75205 3622 SPRINGBROOK ST ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER LHG HOLDING LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL 400 W HOPKINS CONDO LLC DALLAS, TX 75209 5403 NEOLA DR WERLIN LAURA B TRUST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 2279 PINE ST MACDONALD BETTE S TRUST ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 15 BLACKMER RD HOPKINS & FOURTH LLC CHICAGO, IL 60614 2001 N HALSTED ST #304 LEADINGHAM CAROLINE ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #A-102 REECE MARK ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #A-102 STUART DANIEL S & TAMARA B ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 3274 GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 NATIONWIDE THEATRES CORP LOS ANGELES , CA 90048 120 N ROBERTSON BLVD 3RD FL GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 HARRIS ANGELA ASPEN, CO 816111618 518 W MAIN ST #C107 WENDT ROBERT E II PACIFIC PALISADES, CA 90272 350 MT HOLYOKE AVE ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER DENBY SAMUEL ROBERT WASHINGTON, DC 20016 4861 INDIAN LN NW 154 BLOCKER LAURA G ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9213 HAVANDJIAN GASTON MATIAS ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #B205 FISCHER SISTIE ASPEN, CO 81611 442 W BLEEKER 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 EYXEFC2 LLC ARVADA, CO 80002 7310 W 52ND AVE #A129 GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 401 WEST BLEEKER LLC MIAMI, FL 33131 777 BRICKELL AVE 10TH FLR PHILLIPS SHAUN E ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #8105 CLEANER EXPRESS ASPEN, CO 81611 435 E MAIN ST TUCKER LUCY LEA ASPEN, CO 81611 PO BOX 1480 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 SEAL MARK ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9213 LINDAUER REBECCA F AUSTIN, TX 78703 1115 ELM ST MAUPIN KENNETH ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #C-207 NORTHWAY CONDO OWNERS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 420 W MAIN ST GARMISCH LODGING LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 605 W MAIN ST #2 DAHL W ROBERT & LESLIE A GREENWICH , CT 06831 83 PECKSLAND RD HESSIAN ASPEN LLC WINTER PARK, FL 327894881 1470 GENE ST #B DJORDJEVIC VLADAN ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9566 FRIAS PROPERTIES OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 730 E DURANT FRIAS PROPERTIES OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 730 E DURANT 420 W MAIN LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 424 PARK CIR #TH5 BONETTI MARYSUE ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 569 ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER FERGUS ELIZABETH REV TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 1515 LHG HOLDING LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 11777 SAN VICENTE BLVD 9TH FL ALPINE BANK GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 2200 GRAND AVE CHRISTIANA UNIT D101 LLC ASPEN , CO 81612 PO BOX 4937 RAINBOW CONNECTION PROPERTIES LLC MORRISON, CO 80465 151 SUMMER ST #771 DAY JEROD ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #B203 155 ULLR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 520 W MAIN ST PROMISE LAND LLC ENGLEWOOD, CO 801114628 6412 S QUEBEC ST 400 W HOPKINS CONDO LLC DALLAS, TX 75209 5403 NEOLA DR 604 WEST LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 604 W MAIN ST BLEEKER STREET PROP LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 PO BOX 491246 ALPINE BANK ASPEN GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 2200 GRAND AVE MCGUIRE JENNIFER ERIN ASPEN, CO 81611 501 E DEAN ST ASPEN SQUARE CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 617 E COOPER HILLMAN DORA B TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 504 W BLEEKER SCHALL FAMILY TRUST ENCINO, CA 91436 3841 HAYVENHURST DR ULLR HOMEOWNERS ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 520 W MAIN ST CONNERFAMILY LLC PALISADE, CO 81526 PO BOX 38 WELLES PETER S & SONDRA T CARBONDALE, CO 81623 5343 CR 100 ALPINE BANK GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 2200 GRAND AVE PROMISE LAND LLC ENGLEWOOD, CO 801114628 6412 S QUEBEC ST KARBANK 430 LLC MISSION, KS 66205 2000 SHAWNEE MISSION PKWY #400 GOLDENBERG STEPHEN R ASPEN, CO 81611 430 W HOPKINS #2 FAVORITE PRATHUAN ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 9566 STERTZER ELIANE C NEW YORK, NY 10065 160 E 65TH ST #23E HUERGO DELFINA ASPEN, CO 81611 518 W MAIN ST #A101 156 Residential Design Standards Administrative Review Section 26.410.020.B. of the Land Use Code requires an Administrative Review for compliance with the Residential Design Standards (RDS) for all residential projects, unless otherwise exempted pursuant to Section 26.410.010.C. All residential projects affecting the exterior of the building shall submit for RDS Administrative Review prior to building permit submittal. If exterior work is proposed, and the scope of work meets one of the exemptions listed above, staff shall provide a signed exemption form to be included in the building permit application. Review Process: The Community Development Department staff shall review an application for applicability and compliance with Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. If the application complies with all applicable standards as written, a signed Checklist and stamped plan set shall be provided to the applicant to be included with building permit submission. If the application does not comply with one or more applicable standards, an unsigned Checklist and redlined plan set shall be emailed to the applicant including comments from staff on which standard(s) the application does not comply with and a description of why the standard(s) is not compliant. The applicant shall be provided the opportunity to revise and resubmit the design in response to the comments. Staff will keep an application open for 30 days from the date an unsigned Checklist is emailed to the applicant. If after such time no revisions are submitted, the application will expire. Application for RDS Administrative Review: An application for RDS Administrative Review that DOES NOT require Alternative Compliance (see Page 2) shall be submitted to the Community Development front desk on a USB drive or emailed to planneroftheday@gmail.com. Applicants will be notified of received application by email and if additional documents are required. Certain application requirements may be waived by staff depending on the scope of work. An application for RDS Administrative Review shall include the following documents in digital format: • Site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor (no older than one year from submittal date) • Proposed Site plan (scaled 24”x36”) • Proposed Floor plans (scaled 24”x36”) • Proposed Elevations (scaled 24”x36”) • Existing Elevations if a remodel (scaled 24”x36”) • Complete scope of work noting all exterior areas affected by the proposed project • Complete RDS applicant checklist (attached) addressing how each standard is met with sheet references for each standard Page 1 of 2 157 Alternative Compliance or Variation: Pursuant to 26.410.020.C, projects that do not meet the criteria for Administrative Review or Alternative Compliance (as determined by staff) may be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission, or HPC if appropriate, at the applicant’s request. An applicant may choose to apply directly for a Variation from the Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.410.020.C. A pre-application summary will be required for an Alternative Compliance or Variation request. Application for Alternative Compliance or Variation: An application for Alternative Compliance or a Variation will require a pre-application summary provided by Community Development staff, and shall be submitted as a Land Use Application. Required application submittal items shall be outlined in the pre-application summary. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Review 158 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 159 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex 160 VICINITY MAP HIGHLAN D S DOWNT O W N north - 3 - MESA LOT R 161 162 X SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEE E E E E E E E E E E E E SS SS SS SS SS SS SS G G G G G G G WWW W W W W W W W W W W WGGGGGGGGG G SSSSSSSSSSSS UEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEUEE EN 15°44'11" ES 7 4 ° 1 5 ' 1 6 " E 3 0 . 0 0 'S 15°44'15" W 100.00'(N 14°50'49" E(S 7 5 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 3 0 . 0 0 ' )(S 14°50'49" W 100.00')FOURTH STREETMAIN S T R E E T CO 100.01'100.00')FOUND No.5 REBAR, BENT (S 7 5 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " E 3 0 . 0 0 ' ) S 7 4 ° 1 5 ' 2 3 " E 3 0 . 0 0 ' SET No.5 REBAR w/YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS38215 SET No.5 REBAR w/1.25in. YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS23875 SET No.5 REBAR w/ORANGE PLASTIC CAP LS38215 30.00' W.C. N 7 4 ° 1 5 ' 5 2 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' (N 7 5 ° 0 9 ' 1 1 " W 6 0 . 0 0 ' ) SET 1in. BRASS TACK LS38215 SITE BENCHMARK ELEV:7918.44 (S 14°50'49" W 100.00')S 15°44'08" W 100.00'A B Parcel No. 2735-124-43-008 3,000 Sq. Ft. 3,000 Sq. Ft. LOT R LOT S 1 inch = ft. (IN U.S. SURVEY FEET) GRAPHIC SCALE 0010 5 10 20 40 10 VICINITY MAP BYNO.DATEBYPROJECT NO.REVISIONHIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.PHONE (970) 945-8676 - FAX (970) 945-2555www.hceng.comdrawn by:checked by:date:file:1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601SHEET NUMBERSECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE -2201026 1 of 1Rowland+Broughton500 West Main StreetImprovement Survey PlatMesa SubdivisionCity of Aspen, ColoradoGEBBWAB05.19.20201210S84WNOTES 1.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 7, 2018, MARCH 1, 2019 AND MAY 5, 2020. 2.THE ASSUMED BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S74°15'23"E ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN "A" A SET REBAR AND YELLOW PLASTIC CAP LS 23875 AND "B" THE NORTHEAST CORNER A FOUND REBAR AS SHOWN HEREON. ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES BASED ON A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR. 3.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE BOUNDARY SHOWN AND DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE: A) OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND B) COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS C) RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL. 4.DUE TO INSUFFICIENT PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF SURVEY MONUMENTATION CONTROLLING THE BOUNDARY LOCATIONS OF THE SUBJECT PARCEL OF LAND, A GRANT BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT WAS UTILIZED CONFORMING TO THE EXISTING RECOVERED AND VALIDATED SURVEY MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON AND PRESERVING THE GEOMETRY OF THE ORIGINAL LOTTED PARCEL. 5.FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. PCT24641W ISSUED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE: DECEMBER 28, 2016 AT 8:00 AM. THIS BOUNDARY IS SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 6.THE CLIENT DID NOT REQUEST ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS BE RESEARCHED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 7.ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESES, WHICH DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF ASPEN TOWNSITE IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO. 8.ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD 88). SITE BENCHMARK OF 1-INCH BRASS TACK HAVING AN ELEVATION OF 7918.44. 9.CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 10.ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. 11.NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 12.NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED, REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE BOUNDARY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. THIS PLAT IS RESTRICTED TO THE INTENT OF TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101, 5 (a) AND (b) C.R.S. IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT A PARCEL OF LAND COMPRISED OF LOTS R AND S, BLOCK 30, CITY OF ASPEN TOWNSITE BEING A PART OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION I, BILL W.A. BAKER, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO (#23875) DO BY THESE PRESENTS CERTIFY THAT THE DRAWING SHOWN HEREON, WITH NOTES ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF, REPRESENTS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF SAID SURVEY IS RENDERED BY THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES WITH TITLE 38-51-102, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. BILL W.A. BAKER, COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #23875 CERTIFIED FEDERAL SURVEYOR #1699OSWGG E E UE UE UE G G G SS SS SS W W W CO LEGEND Site Location 163 DNUP DN UP UP UP DN DN PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULATIONS WALL LABEL EXPOSED WALL AREA (SFTOTAL WALL AREA (SF) 1 - EAST WALL PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF) GARAGE GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF) GARAGE FLOOR AREA EXEMPTION (SF) MAIN LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF) 1,388 412 331 1,057 412 - 250 = 162 = (976+81) TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS BASEMENT FLOOR AREA (SF) UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF) MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF) 30 768 1057 TOTAL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA (SF) 1,862 DECK/PORCH AREA CALCULATIONS TOTAL DECK/PORCH AREA (SF) MAIN LEVEL ENTRY PATIO (SF) 286 279 < 279 SF ALLOWABLE < 1,862 SF ALLOWABLE PROPOSED AREA CONSTRAINTS LOT AREA (SF) MAX ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA (SF) MAX ALLOWABLE DECK AREA (SF) 3,000 1,862 279 15% * 1,862 DECK/PORCH FLOOR AREA (SF)7 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS ROOF DECK BONUS (SF) 7 2 - NORTH WALL 3 - SOUTH WALL 4 - WEST WALL 787.50 0 194.25 0 194.25 0 787.50 44 OVERALL TOTAL WALL AREA (SF) 1,963.50 EXPOSED WALL AREA (SF)44 % OF EXPOSED WALL (EXPOSED/TOTAL) 2.24% BASEMENT TOTALS PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS BASEMENT GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF) BASEMENT COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF) 1,326 30 1,326 * 2.24% (162 @ 50%) = 81+250= 331 PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS UPPER LEVEL GROSS FLOOR AREA (SF) UPPER LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF) 768 768 81GARAGE COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SF)= 412 - 331 ROOF DECK FAR (SF) 0 = (976+412) MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (SF)976 = (976+81) = (279-286) 976 SF FLOOR AREA GARAGE 412 GSF 81 CSF COVERED ENTRY PORCH768 SF FLOOR AREA 175 SF DECK AREA 111 SF DECK AREA STAIR EXEMPT RAISED PLANTER RAISED PLANTERFLOOR AREA 1326 GSF 30 CSF EGRESS WINDOW WELL WALL AREA - 44 SF EGRESS WINDOW WELL WALL AREA - 44 SF TOTAL WALL AREA: 194.25 SFTOTAL WALL AREA: 787.50 SF TOTAL WALL AREA: 787.50 SF TOTAL WALL AREA: 194.25 SF1218 SF NET LIVABLE AREA 909 SF NET LIVABLE AREA GARAGE EXEMPT COVERED ENTRY PORCH696 SF NET LIVABLE AREA RAISED PLANTER RAISED PLANTERDECK DECK Consultants: Issuances and Revisions: COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. SCALE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design 500 w. main st. aspen, co 81611 970.544.9006 1830 blake st. denver, co 80202 303.308.1373 C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:14 PMAs indicated LU0.6 22014.00 MESA LOT R 500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R ASPEN, CO 81611 FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 LEVEL 1 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 LEVEL 2 PROPOSED FLOOR AREA SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 BASEMENT LEVEL PROPOSED FLOOR AREA SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 BASEMENT LEVEL - NET LIVABLE SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 5 LEVEL 1 - NET LIVABLE SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU0.6 1/8" = 1'-0" 6 LEVEL 2 - NET LIVABLE 05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION 07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1 164 T DNUP LU4.2 2 LU4.1 1 LU4.1 2 LU4.2 1 PROPERTY LINE (E) FENCE (E) TRANSFORMER WILL REQUIRE UTILITY EASEMENT 500 W MAIN STREET SETBACK 5' - 0" SETBACK 10' - 0"SETBACK5' - 0"SETBACK5' - 0"PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINECOVERED PORCH EGRESS WINDOW WELL EGRESS WINDOW WELL 2 CAR GARAGE 16' - 0"81' - 8" LINE OF DECK ABOVE CONCRETE WALK (E) LILAC WEST MAIN STN 4TH STREET 8' - 6"NEW LANDSCAPING NEW LANDSCAPING (E) TREE (E) TREE(E) TREE(E) TREE (E) TREE -ROOTS TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (E) SIDEWALKROOF ABOVE ALLEY PARKING EASEMENT FOR 500 W MAIN STREET 18' - 0" ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESSIBLE AISLE 3' - 0"RELOCATED TRASH AREA19' - 1 1/2"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE11' - 1"52' - 9"17' - 11 1/4"19' - 7 1/2"RAISED PLANTER DECK RAISED PLANTER DECK 10" / 1'-0"STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFSOLAR PANEL QUANTITY AND LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED 10" / 1'-0"Consultants: Issuances and Revisions: COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. SCALE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design 500 w. main st. aspen, co 81611 970.544.9006 1830 blake st. denver, co 80202 303.308.1373 C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:15 PM1/8" = 1'-0" LU1.1 22014.00 MESA LOT R 500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R ASPEN, CO 81611 SITE PLAN SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU1.1 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 SITE PLAN 05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION 07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1 SCALE: PLAN NORTH TRUE NORTH LU1.1 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 ROOF PLAN 165 BASEMENT LEVEL 89' -6" T.O. SLAB LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. PLY LEVEL 2 110' -6" T.O. PLY RIDGE 128' -3 1/2" T.O. LEVEL 2 PLATE 119' -6 7/8" T.O. STEEL CHANNEL DECK SUPPORT METAL PANEL WOOD SLIDING DOOR METAL AND GLASS WINDOW 9' - 0 7/8"8' - 0"8' - 8"8' - 8"7' - 2 11/16"0' - 10 5/8"10" 1'-0" 10" 1'-0"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY22' - 1 BUILDING HEIGHT 10/12 PITCH EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"4' - 0"4' - 0" WOOD SIDING WOOD AND GLASS ENTRY DOOR STEEL COLUMN METAL AND GLASS WINDOW SOLID PANEL OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BASEMENT BASEMENT LEVEL 89' -6" T.O. SLAB LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. PLY LEVEL 2 110' -6" T.O. PLY RIDGE 128' -3 1/2" T.O. LEVEL 2 PLATE 119' -6 7/8" T.O. WOOD SIDING STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL 5' - 0"2' - 6"2' - 6"10' - 0" STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF STEEL CHANNEL DECK SUPPORT METAL AND GLASS WINDOW 2' - 6"5' - 0"PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPOSED CHANGES OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BASEMENT OUTLINE OF WINDOW WELL 10' - 6"10' - 6"9' - 0 7/8"8' - 8 5/8"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"WOOD TRIMWOOD TRIM Consultants: Issuances and Revisions: COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. SCALE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design 500 w. main st. aspen, co 81611 970.544.9006 1830 blake st. denver, co 80202 303.308.1373 C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:19 PM1/4" = 1'-0" LU4.1 22014.00 MESA LOT R 500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R ASPEN, CO 81611 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE:LU4.1 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH ELEVATION_LU SCALE:LU4.1 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 WEST ELEVATION_LU 05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION 07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1 166 BASEMENT LEVEL 89' -6" T.O. SLAB LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. PLY LEVEL 2 110' -6" T.O. PLY RIDGE 128' -3 1/2" T.O. LEVEL 2 PLATE 119' -6 7/8" T.O. 2' - 6"5' - 0"10' - 0"2' - 6"2' - 6"5' - 0"WOOD SIDING METAL AND GLASS WINDOW STANDING SEAM METAL PANEL STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF STEEL CHANNEL DECK SUPPORT PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEWOOD TRIM 10' - 6"8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"WOOD TRIM STEEL COLUMN OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BASEMENT BASEMENT LEVEL 89' -6" T.O. SLAB LEVEL 1 100' -0" T.O. PLY LEVEL 2 110' -6" T.O. PLY RIDGE 128' -3 1/2" T.O. LEVEL 2 PLATE 119' -6 7/8" T.O.PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEWOOD GARAGE DOOR WOOD SIDING WOOD TRIM 8' - 0"16' - 0" METAL AND GLASS WINDOW METAL PANEL OUTLINE OF PROPOSED BASEMENT 10" 1'-0" 10" 1'-0" PROPOSED7' - 2 11/16"0' - 10 5/8"8' - 0"8' - 8"8' - 8" BUILDING HEIGHT 10/12 PITCH 22' - 1 EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY EXISTING STRUCTURE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY 8' - 8 5/8"9' - 0 7/8"10' - 6"10' - 6"19' - 6 7/8"28' - 3 1/2"Consultants: Issuances and Revisions: COPYRIGHT 2020 ROWLAND + BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN THE INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN. ROWLAND+BROUGHTON ARCHITECTURE AND URBAN DESIGN SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO. SCALE: SHEET TITLE: PROJECT NO:File Path:Plot Date:FOR CITY OF ASPEN rowland+broughton architecture / urban design / interior design 500 w. main st. aspen, co 81611 970.544.9006 1830 blake st. denver, co 80202 303.308.1373 C:\Users\sharris\Documents\22014.00_MESA JARDIN_CENTRAL_steve.harris5Z5U7.rvt7/6/2020 2:21:20 PM1/4" = 1'-0" LU4.2 22014.00 MESA LOT R 500 W MAIN STREET - LOT R ASPEN, CO 81611 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SCALE:LU4.2 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 EAST ELEVATION_LU SCALE:LU4.2 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH ELEVATION_LU 05.07.2020 LAND USE APPLICATION 07.06.2020 LAND USE REVISION #1 167 From:Chris Horne To:Amy Simon Cc:john@rowlandbroughton.com; sarah@rowlandbroughton.com Subject:500 W. Main Development Letter of Support Date:Wednesday, May 27, 2020 9:28:13 PM Good evening Amy, My wife I own a unit at the Christiana condominiums across Main St. from the proposed development. Our unit is on the corner and overlooks the subject property. We received the applicants proposal and are writing in support of their project. We believe its design intent compliments the Mesa building and surrounding buildings, and is also a complimentary use for the area. We support the project moving forward and hope to see it come to fruition. Best regards, Chris Horne 168 From:Kevin Dunkelberg To:Amy Simon Subject:500 W Main Proposal -Fornell Condo"s view Date:Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:11:34 AM Dear Amy, I am a resident at the Fornell Condominiums at 518 W Main St., next to the historic Mesa Store (500 W Main). I will not be able to attend today's meeting but want you to know how we are feeling next door. In 2017 I wrote you and city council members supporting Rowland and Broughton in their effort to not develop the lot next to the Mesa Store building so there could be a nice park. Now just three years later they are proposing to build a single family home on the same lot, which most likely will be larger than the original proposed structure. We at the Fornell Condo's are quite let down by this sudden change in plans. I feel a bit used after supporting their 2017 park plan, which I now see was part of a larger plan (bait and switch). R&B are arguing that due to the current economic conditions that they need to do this. I argue that they financially overextended themselves, which is no argument to approve development. We are disappointed. I know we have no ability to stop development on that lot, but certainly believe there should be absolutely no variances given on this project, if approved. Please share this with any relevant parties as I am not sure who is on this review board. Thank you for your time and hard work, Kevin Dunkelberg Secretary/Treasurer Fornell Condominiums 518 W Main St 169 From:Mark Reece To:Amy Simon Subject:500 West Main. Date:Monday, June 22, 2020 9:42:15 AM Amy, My name is Mark Reece, I reside in the Fornell A102 with my Fiancée Caroline and our 3 year old Perry. I am writing this Email because I will not be able to attend the meeting concerning the development proposal by Rowland & Broughton. I have a few comments that I believe should be strongly considered when making a decision. 1. Rowland & Broughton claim in their letter that they “ had not intended to move so quickly on the idea” but as a result of the economic climate they are moving forward. First, you must agree by their own admission that this was their plan all along when they asked for the original change of plans in 2017, one which the Fornell fully supported for the community. I, along with every owner at the Fornell feel dooped! Moreover, if your decision making process on this matter is based or weighted on economic conditions ; then would the Fornell be allowed to change over from Infinity Cable and get the Dish Network that will require satellite dishes on our roofs? A number of changes that affect the historic protection of our property could save us a lot of money during these hard times. I think you see my point. 2. The area, particularly because the city took away the east side of 5th street parking for a pedestrian walkway, is already overcrowded with vehicles. The argument that a single family home won’t impact parking is not true. R&W have 5 dedicated spaces behind their building that are not utilized over the street parking they promised not to impact. I would expect a worse parking scenario for the the area when their number is diminished to 3 spaces and a single family home is added. That was not ever in their deal! 3. R&W made a calculated decision to bait and switch all of us, the last thing that should be done is to look the other way and reward them with an oversized single family dwelling on a very undersized lot. Variances should be closely adhered to if not minimized if you allow this project to move forward. Thank you, Mark Reece Fornell A102 Sent from my iPhone 170 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Does Not Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Approved: (Approved plans/elevations attached) 17171 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Doesn’t Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Approved: 18172