Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.council.worksession.202011091 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 9, 2020 4:00 PM, City Council Chambers 130 S Galena Street, Aspen WEBEX Go to: www.webex.com Click "Join" at the top right-hand corner Enter Meeting Number 126 170 1049 Password provided 81611 Click "Join Meeting" OR Join by phone Call: 1-408-418-9388 Meeting number (access code): 126 170 1049 # I.WORK SESSION I.A.Nordic Council/Trails and Open Space – Request for Cross Country Ski on Rio Grande Trail I.B.Winter Response Planning for Downtown Retail I.C.2021 Recommended Budget Review -- 491 & 492 Truscott & Marolt Funds; Smuggler, TII, ACI 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Chris Petersen – Nordic Coordinator THROUGH: Matt Kuhn – Interim Parks and Open Space Director MEMO DATE: November 5, 2020 MEETING DATE: November 9, 2020 RE: Rio Grande Trail winter maintenance REQUEST OF COUNCIL: The Aspen Snowmass Nordic Council has requested that City staff discontinue the plowing of the paved portion of the Rio Grande Trail from the Aspen Post Office to Cemetery Lane during the winter season, and that the Rio Grande Trail be groomed to provide a better trail experience for both Nordic skiers and other trail users. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND: The Rio Grande Trail (RGT) from Stein Park to the Aspen Post Office is a wonderful, year-round amenity for Aspen residents and visitors. This section of trail is the up-valley terminus of the Nordic Trail alignment running from Emma to Aspen, helping to fulfil the Aspen Snowmass Nordic Trail System (ASNTS) concept of connecting our communities to one another through ski trails. This section of the RGT was originally left in its natural snow-covered state during the winter until 2008 when a plan was put in place to groom half, and plow half to facilitate an alternate bicycle commuter corridor. At the January 28th, 2020, regular City Council meeting, representatives of the Aspen Snowmass Nordic Council spoke during public comment, requesting the City to consider discontinuing the plowing of this section of the Rio Grande Trail, in order to provide for a better experience for all trail users. DISCUSSION: The idea of changing our current winter maintenance plan for this section of the RGT has been under consideration for several seasons. o Almost all commuter bike traffic in the winter utilizes the ABC trail and the Castle Creek and Marolt pedestrian bridges. o ASNTS grooming operators have had many difficult and dangerous experiences grooming this section of trail. The raised, narrow nature of the compacted snow trail allows for snowmobile grooming only, causing a steep drop on either side. Machinery has been damaged multiple times while grooming this section. 2 o There are numerous utility vault covers along the trail alignment that cause the surrounding snow to melt creating a “well effect” in the middle of the trail. This is not only dangerous for the grooming operator but for skiers using the trail causing equipment damage for skiers and machinery. o Due to the narrow nature of this trail, there is only room for a set of classic ski tracks, reducing the ability for skate skiers to enjoy this section of the Nordic trail system. o Due to melting of the adjacent snow, black ice regularly forms on the plowed portion of the trail creating a dangerous slip hazard for the hard-surface trail users. The Aspen Snowmass Nordic Council, along with staff, began looking at alternatives to the current RGT winter maintenance plan. The proposed plan follows the trend of other snow- covered multi-use trails. There are currently four snow covered, multi-use trails within our Nordic trail system: Marolt Trail, Labrador Lane at Snowmass, Bernese Boulevard on the Aspen Golf Course, and the Rio Grande Trail. These trails are arguably some of our most used trail sections, where people ski or walk on these dog-friendly trails, and can ride a fat bike on the Marolt and RGT. We have watched as The Town of Snowmass Village has successfully shifted from plowing trails to leaving them as a groomed, packed-snow surface, helping to reduce the slip and fall factor related to ice. By grooming the Aspen section of the RGT and providing a packed trail surface we accomplish several things: Provide a safer multi-use surface for trail users Provide a safer work environment for grooming operators and their equipment Provide a higher quality Nordic skiing experience with a seamless connection of the full- length, full-width groomed Nordic trail from Emma to Aspen Provide another section of trail for fat bike use A survey was initiated in March to gauge the response of trail users to the proposed changes but was cut short due to Covid-19. Initial conversations indicated a broad spectrum of feelings from “No, don’t change” to “Yes, this sounds great.” Unfortunately, it was a very small sample size. FINANCIAL IMPACTS: By shifting to a trail wide packed snow platform, the Parks Department would decrease total man hours needed to maintain the trail by eliminating the hours spent on snow removal. The Nordic program already has budget approval for equipment capable of maintaining the packed snow platform. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Fuel consumption will likely be reduced by shifting to one piece of machinery. 3 ALTERNATIVES: 1. Continue to maintain the trail as we are currently with a 50/50 split between plowed trail surface and Nordic groomed surface. 2. Use Nordic grooming techniques to provide a firmly packed snow surface across the full width of the trail. 3. Eliminate the Nordic grooming and plow the trail down to the asphalt across the full width of the trail after each snowstorm. RECOMMENDATIONS: Nordic staff recommend leaving snow on the RGT beginning December 1st with the understanding that this is a season-long trial. Staff do not recommend that a shorter trial be considered due to uncertainty on snow depths and the time associated with developing a compacted surface. Snow will be groomed regularly and after each snow event to provide a multi-use packed snow surface for trail users. Staff will evaluate trail conditions and monitor trail use as the season progresses to determine if any alterations need to be made. We will continue to groom the snowpacked trail if it is practical, plowing the trail to asphalt around April 1st. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: 4 MEMORANDUM TO:Mayor and City Council FROM:Mitch Osur, Director of Parking and Downtown Services Tish Aragon, P.E. City Engineer THRU: Scott Miller, Public Works Director DATE OF MEMO: November 5, 2020 MEETING DATE: November 9, 2020 RE:Retail Activation in the Right of Way REQUEST OF COUNCIL: Provide the City Council with an update regarding retail activation in the Right of Way for the winter season and seek City Council consensus to allow additional warming stations, paid by retailers to occupancy space on the street. BACKGROUND: In early June City Council approved activation on the city streets for both retailers and restaurants. This activation was in effect from early June through November 1, 2020 and has helped local businesses navigate through the initial economic impact caused by the COVID 19 Pandemic. As part of this program eleven (11) restaurants were permitted to activate in the street and seven (7) restaurants activated on the sidewalk utilizing 30 parking spaces. The experience of these restaurants was very positive from both a business and visitor perspective. Based on what was learned during the summer, the WAV Team presented a plan to allow restaurants to activate in a similar fashion during the winter season. On October 7th City Council agreed with the staff recommendation. Also, as part of the program there were nine (9) retailers that activated in the street using 17 parking spaces. In contrast to the restaurants the experiences with the retailers was not as well received. From a staff perspective, the majority of retailers took advantage of the situation and violated the spirt of the plan. For example, many of the retailers only activated two or three days 5 a week. Some retailers actually rented their outdoor space to another business. Conflicts were created when a retailer was placed on the street which interfered with other businesses on the street level. The summer experience for retail businesses informed the WAV Team to recommend that no retail be placed in the public Right of Way this winter. City Council suggested that staff consider retail use of the public Right of Way on a short-term basis to promote events such as a winter market, sidewalk sales, etc. Staff agrees this is possible on the sidewalk under certain circumstances. However, the planning and execution of short-term activation in the street Right of Way may be cost prohibited. The logistics of moving parked vehicles and setting up protective barriers in the short term is labor intensive and can be inhibited by weather events. Through the public engagement efforts of the City and ACRA, it was discovered that many retailers with small floor areas and high-end merchandise are concerned about limits to the number of customers who can occupy the retail space. Staff would like to accommodate these requests as long as public safety can be maintained. Staff is recommending a creative solution that preserves public safety, is cost neutral to the City, and provides a warm waiting area for potential consumers. This solution entails allowing retailers to construct warming stations, which would be open to the public, built at their own expense. For example, Kemo Sabe presented a proposal to construct a warming station in front of their business, occupying the parking spaces they utilized this summer. This warming station would be constructed at the owner’s expense with no City funds involved. As a condition of approval, any member of the public would be allowed to use this space. The schematic of this proposal is attached. FINANCIAL/BUDGET IMPACTS: None, no city funds would be involved. RECOMMENDED ACTION: The WAV team recommends that additional warming stations, paid for by a retail establishment and open to the general public, be permitted to occupy the Right of Way in strategic locations throughout the Downtown Core. ALTERNATIVES: 1.Allow retail in the public Right of Way throughout the Downtown Core this winter. 2.Permit retail to fund additional warming stations open to the general public in the Downtown Core. 3.Do nothing ATTACHMENTS: Schematic drawing of Kemo Sabe proposal Winter Activation Map 6 . 7 STRUCTURAL DIMENSIONS: 26’ X 12’ OUR ORIGINAL PLANS FOR THE OUTDOOR SPACE WE CURRENTLY HAVE ARE 4’ FROM THE NORTHERLY PARKIKNG SPACE AND 2’ FROM THE SOUTHERLY ALLEY –LATERALLY WE ARE 18” FROM THE CURB I MEASURED THE INTERIOR OF THE HAY (WHICH IS APPROXIMATELY 20” WIDE) TO GIVE US SOME ROOM FOR THE JERSEY BARRIER –IT LOOKS LIKE THE STANDARD BASE WIDTH IS 24” SO WE CAN BRING IN THE DIMENSIONS SOME FOR THIS IF NEEDED. BENCH SEATING WILL GO ALONG THE INTERIOR WALL WITH 6’ DISTANCE BETWEEN EACH –WITH SMALL COFFEE TABLES IN EACH SEATING AREA 8 9 2021 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Smuggler, Truscott II, Aspen Country Inn 10 Changes to Original 2021 Proposed Budget 2 •Proposed Council Salary Changes Worked in for 2021 o $29,000 from General Fund –75% in Year 1 + Taxes •Increase Payment to APCHA for City’s Share of Subsidy o $70,450 increase in 150 Housing Development Fund •Adjust Property Management Costs Paid to APCHA o $20,090 increase in Truscott I Fund o $30,000 decrease in Marolt Fund •Updated CIRSA Premium o $15,720 Increase Citywide (most funds •Tobacco Tax Funding to Aspen School District o $250,000 increase to General Fund •2021 Projected Opening Balances (Increased $76K) 11 2020 Orig. Budget 2021 Budget $ Change % Change Revenues $151,495,585 $136,886,998 ($14,608,587)(9.6%) Base Operating: On-Going $75,985,910 $74,884,300 ($1,101,610)(1.4%) Base Operating: One-Time $891,000 N/A ($891,000)N/A Supplementals N/A $1,329,240 $1,329,240 N/A Reductions $0 ($1,975,410)($1,975,410)N/A Total Operating $76,876,910 $74,238,130 ($2,638,780)(3.4%) Capital Outlay $28,660,750 $59,426,280 $30,765,530 107.3% Debt Service $7,408,320 $7,294,958 ($113,362)(1.5%) Net Appropriations $112,945,980 $140,959,368 $28,013,388 24.8% Transfers $34,501,270 $27,054,440 ($7,446,830)(21.6%) Total Appropriations $147,447,250 $168,013,808 $20,566,558 13.9% Ending Fund Balance $127,354,152 $129,640,748 $2,286,596 1.8% Adoption Meetings 3 •Tues. Nov 10: o 1st Reading of Fee Ordinance & Investment Policies Resolutions •Tues. Nov 24: o 2nd Reading of Fee Ordinance, Budget Resolutions, & Mill Levy Resolution 12 2021 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Smuggler Housing Fund (622 Fund) NOVEMBER 9, 2020Cindy Christensen / Andrew Kramer 13 The Property 5 •11 Low Income Units 14 Revenues and Expenditures 6 $75,134 $78,530 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues Expenditures 15 Fund Balance 7 $397,434 $9,816 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Funds Available 12.5% Uses Reserve Low Operating and No Capital = Low Target Reserve 16 Revenues Sources 8 $130 $2,004 $73,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 Other Revenues Investment Income Rental Income - Permanent 17 Expenditures by Program 9 $3,000 $8,760 $9,360 $15,320 $42,090 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000 $45,000 GF Overhead Property Management General Administration Capital Property Maintenance 0.17 FTE 18 2021 Capital Projects 10 $1,620 $4,400 $4,600 $4,700 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 Individual Hot Water Heater Replacement Carpet & Vinyl Replacement Appliance Replacement Asphalt Seal Coat 19 11 Questions? 20 2021 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Truscott II Housing Fund (641 Fund) NOVEMBER 9, 2020Cindy Christensen/ Andrew Kramer 21 The Property 13 •87 Long-Term Units •Previously Funded Tax Credit Project 22 On The Horizon 14 •Structural Concerns @ 200 & 300 Buildings •LURA Restrictions Through 2032 •Redevelopment Opportunity & Outstanding CHFA Loan •Partnership Structure 23 Revenues & Expenditures 15 $1,162,180 $1,328,880 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues Expenditures 24 Fund Balance 16 $368,304 $166,110 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Funds Available 12.5% Uses Reserve Building Reserves for Future Capital Projects 25 Revenue Sources 17 $3,800 $7,000 $29,380 $1,122,000 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $900,000 $1,200,000 Investment Income Section 8 Housing Assistance Other Revenues Rental Income - Permanent 26 Expenditures By Program 18 $83,280 $134,760 $313,900 $396,940 $400,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 General Administration Property Management Property Maintenance Debt Service Capital 27 2021 Capital Projects 19 $400,000 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 Painting 10-70 and 200-300 Buildings 28 20 Questions? 29 2021 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Aspen Country Inn Housing Fund (642 Fund) NOVEMBER 9, 2020Cindy Christensen/ Andrew Kramer 30 The Property 22 •40 Long-Term Units with Senior Priority •Tax Credit Project (2019 Final Payment Received) 31 Revenues & Expenditures 23 $373,020 $359,810 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 $500,000 $600,000 $700,000 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Revenues Expenditures 32 Fund Balance 24 Works Differently from Other City Funds •Required Operating Reserve of $122,190 •Increasing Replacement Reserve of $14,000 / Yr.Fully Funded Additional Operating Revenues •Deferred Developer Fee: $60K •City Loan ($2.583M) 33 Revenue Sources 25 $2,650 $4,650 $10,380 $355,340 $0 $100,000 $200,000 $300,000 $400,000 Other Revenues Laundry Section 8 Housing Assistance Rental Income - Permanent 34 Expenditures By Program 26 $27,260 $42,740 $138,270 $151,540 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 General Administration Property Management Debt Service Property Maintenance 35 27 Questions? 36