HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.202101271
AGENDA
ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
January 27, 2021
4:30 PM,
WEBEX
Go to: www.webex.com Click "Join" at the top right-hand corner
Enter Meeting Number 126 857 8223
Password provided 81611
Click "Join Meeting"
OR
Join by phone
Call: 1-408-418-9388
Meeting number (access code): 126 857 8223#
I.SITE VISIT
II.ROLL CALL
III.MINUTES
III.A.Minutes 1/13/21
minutes.hpc.20210113.pdf
IV.PUBLIC COMMENTS
V.COMMISSIONER MEMBER COMMENTS
VI.DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
VII.PROJECT MONITORING
VIII.STAFF COMMENTS
IX.CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT ISSUED
X.CALL UP REPORTS
XI.SUBMIT PUBLIC NOTICE FOR AGENDA ITEMS
XII.OLD BUSINESS
1
2
XII.A.925 King Street - Minor Subdivision Lot Split, Demolition, Historic Designation
Boundary Line Amendment, Establishment of TDRs, CONTINUED FROM
DECEMBER 16, 2020
925_King_Memo_2021_01_27.pdf
925_King_Resolution_2021_01_27.pdf
ExhibitA.1_HistoricDesignation.pdf
ExhibitA.2_Demolition.pdf
ExhibitA.3_TDRCriteria.pdf
ExhibitB_ReferralComments.pdf
ExhibitC_Letters by past owners.pdf
ExhibitD_Application_2021_01_27.pdf
XIII.NEW BUSINESS
XIV.ADJOURN
XV.NEXT RESOLUTION NUMBER
Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings
1)Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda)
2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH)
3) Staff presentation
4) Board questions and clarifications of staff
5) Applicant presentation
6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant
7) Public comments
8)Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments
9) Close public comment portion of bearing
10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment
11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification
End of fact finding.
Deliberation by the commission commences.
No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public
12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners.
13) Discussion between commissioners*
14) Motion*
*Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met.
Revised April 2, 2014
2
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
Vice Chairperson Thompson opened the meeting at 4:30 p.m.
Commissioners in attendance: Kara Thompson, Scott Kendrick, Roger Moyer, Jeff Halferty,
Sherri Sanzone.
Commissioners not in attendance: -
Staff present:
Amy Simon, Interim Planning Director/Historic Preservation Officer
Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
Jim True, City Attorney
Kate Johnson, Assistant City Attorney
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ms. Thompson stated that there needed to be an edit to page 8 to
read “does not set a good precedent”. Mr. Halferty moved to approve the minutes; Mr. Kendrick
seconded. All in favor, motion carries.
PUBLIC COMMENT: None
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer asked about the upcoming Saving Places
conference.
Ms. Simon stated that it will be virtual and if any commissioners are interested she will forward
the information along.
DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT: Ms. Sanzone has a conflict with 1020 W. Cooper.
PROJECT MONITORING: Ms. Simon said that communication is ongoing with project
monitors.
Ms. Yoon said that she will be reaching out to her monitors about new details.
CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT: None
CALL UPS: Ms. Simon stated that the City Council approved the voluntary AspenModern
designation of 211 West Hopkins.
Ms. Thompson asked if Ms. Greenwood's project monitoring would be reassigned.
Ms. Simon stated that the reassignment is being worked out.
Notices: Mr. True said that he and Ms. Johnson reviewed them and they are appropriate.
Ms. Sanzone left the meeting.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS: 1020 E. Cooper Avenue – Conceptual Major Development, Relocation,
Demolition, Growth Management, Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits, Transportation
and Parking Management. Owner James DeFrancia, Sara Adams of BendonAdams.
Ms. Simon stated that this property has been in front of HPC in the past however there is a new
property owner and a new proposed project that is a 100% affordable housing project. She said
that there will be 5 units in addition to the historic resource.
Mr. DeFrancia said that he has been active in the development community and has served on a
few of the citizen boards and has always had a concern about affordable housing in the Aspen
area. He said that it has been proven that one can build an all affordable housing project for
profit like Mr. Fornell has done in the past.
Ms. Adams stated that the applicant will be seeking HPC conceptual review, relocation of the
historic resource, demolition of rear sheds, growth management, transportation and parking, and
establishment of affordable housing credits. She said that no variations are being requested and
3
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
that this project meets 100% of the code. Ms. Adams gave a brief history of the property stating
that there is limited information about the property because it was outside the boundaries of the
Sanborn fire insurance map. Ms. Adams pointed out that the two sheds that sit on the rear of the
property are not shown on any historic map and are slated for demolition. She said that this is a
unique opportunity that they can inspect the interior of the historic structure. She explained that
they discovered the structure is two buildings stitched together. Ms. Adams stated that the plan
will be to keep the historic structure as is and preserve what is truly historic. She said that there is
evidence that there was once an open porch and they plan to reopen. Ms. Adams showed maps of
the property that highlight the district and other affordable housing projects. She highlighted the
Residential Multi-Family (RMF) district and pointed out that this project is well within this
district. Ms. Adams showed photos of the high-density neighborhood that has a mix of single-
family homes and multifamily homes and then showed a rendering of the proposed project. She
pointed out that they are proposing lifting the resource and relocating towards Cooper St. to the
5’ setback. She explained that this will give the historic resource and new addition a nice buffer
and they are not attached. Ms. Adams reiterated that they will not be seeking any variations and
that this project is 100% code compliant, she said that this project is well under the floor area and
just under the height limit. Ms. Adams stated that there will be 4 on-site parking spaces provided
and cash in lieu for the 5th spot. She showed a rendering of the proposed footprint that outlines
the parking, garbage, and preserved tree. Ms. Adams said that the two storage units that are
shown on the west side of the resource have been taken out of the plan to address staff concerns.
She said that there is a plan to address transportation needs with the Transportation Department.
She explained that the tenants will receive a year membership to the Car-To-Go and We-Cycle
program. She further explained that every tenant when moving in will receive a packet of
alternative available transpiration options. Ms. Adams stated that there will be five units total,
two in the historic resource with subgrade bedrooms and 3 in the new addition. Ms. Adams
discussed the breakdown of the affordable housing units and the square footage and stated that
they all meet the requirements. She stated that this project would generate 12.75 Affordable
Housing Credits. Ms. Adams said that the new addition will relate to the resource in L shape
form and gable roof. She said that the material that is being proposed is an unpainted wood finish
to relate to the historic cabin a bit more. Ms. Adams stated that the fenestration is a bit more
contemporary but keeping with the landmark. Ms. Adams showed a rendering of the proposed
plan of breaking up the form and mass to give it more depth and architectural interest. Ms.
Adamas stated that they are very proud of the communication efforts with the neighbors and this
project. She explained that there is a project website with up to date information, a FAQ
resource, decanted email campaign, and online neighborhood meetings where comments and
concerns can be shared.
Mr. Moyer asked if this was a three-unit project would it be economically feasible or even four
units.
Jean Coulter stated that five units is the breakeven mark because of the cost of the new addition.
Mr. Kendrick asked if this project needs historic designation or would it work better without it.
Ms. Simon stated that it does need the designation. That was a decision made in the 70s that it
was appropriate to protect this as one of the community’s Victorian-era resources. The
designated property is allowed to be developed with any use that can be permitted in this district
if the designation were removed it might be limited to only development as a single-family home
because the property is smaller than the minimum.
4
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
Mr. Kendrick asked if the adverse possession been addressed and if the distance between the
neighboring buildings meets the fire code.
Ms. Adams said that the adverse possession has been addressed and a letter has been sent to the
City of Aspen Attorney‘s office for review. She addressed the fire code question and explained
that the Building Dept. has reviewed the project plans and has signed off that they have met code
and the buildings will have a sprinkler system.
Mr. Kendrick stated that the neighbors to the west were very vocal about the last project. He
asked if there was communication with them this go around.
Ms. Adams stated that they have attended the zoom meetings and received emails through the
designated email.
Mr. Halferty asked if the shutters on the windows are for visual or sound or both.
Ms. Adams stated that they wanted to add visual interest to the building and took in comments
that were made about the last proposed project about blank walls.
STAFF COMMENTS: Ms. Simon stated that the relocation proposal is to pick up historic
resource and move it 12’ forward and 2’ west. She said that staff finds it appropriate that the
resource will remain a free-standing structure with a good relation to the street. Ms. Simon
explained that unlike the previous proposed plans keeping the stitched addition and persevering
the resource as a whole was ideal and staff supports the relocation of the whole structure. Ms.
Simon stated that the sheds in the rear lot do not appear on any historic documentation, staff
supports the removal of the sheds, and doing so allows for a new structure. Ms. Simon said that it
is exceptional that the guaranteed outcome will be a free-standing historic resource, and that this
is not very common in Aspen. Ms. Simon stated that there are very small conditions listed in the
attached resolution. She explained that there are light wells that will be serving the new basement
and staff wants to make sure they are designed appropriately with grates and curb height. She
stated staff appreciates the removal of the storage closest that were proposed to touch the most
historic aspects of the structure. Ms. Simon said that the new structure will sit 10’ back from the
cabin and that the fact that they are detached makes a big difference in the interpretation of HPC
guidelines. Ms. Simon stated that there are development rights permitted here and they are
working with the applicant to balance the two structures. She said that staff finds the design
guidelines have been met and in terms of relocation and demolition staff approves.
Mr. Rayes stated that the applicant is seeking 100% Affordable Housing Credits. He explained
that 3 units will be 2.25 FTEs and 2 units will be 3.00 FTEs equaling 12.75 FTEs. Mr. Rayes
showed renderings of each floor plan, unit storage plan, and square footage of each unit. He
showed a rendering of the outside amenities that included a private front porch, a common area,
large windows, and private balconies. Mr. Rayes stated that there were some concerns that ADA
requirements have not been met however, he pointed out that all ADA requirements have been
met. He said that each unit will have a washer and dryer. Mr. Rayes stated that staff finds the
criteria related to growth management and certificate for affordable housing has been met. He
said staff is recommending approval for the full 12.75 FTEs. Mr. Rayes stated that this project
requires one parking spot per unit. The applicant will be providing four parking spaces, one will
be ADA if needed, and cash in lieu for the fifth spot. He pointed out that there are alternative
transpiration opportunities that are offered. He explained the car share program, bike program,
Bus line, and the physical distance of the property to the core of Aspen. Mr. Rayes stated that
staff finds the transportation and park mitigation requirements have been met. He said that staff
recommends that HPC approves the project with the listed conditions.
5
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
Mr. Moyer said that the alley is very wide and there was a comment that there were only 12' to
turn around.
Ms. Simon stated that Mr. Moyer is referring to a letter that was received raising concerns about
not enough turning radius for a car to enter the new proposed parking area. She explained that
the individual who raised this question appears to be parking on the alley and not private
property themselves. Ms. Simon further explains that the alley is a 20’ right way which is the
standard and staff does not find any reason that the parking would not function as proposed.
Mr. Moyer asked if there were any plans for the ally to be paved and if this is even in HPC
prevue.
Ms. Simon stated that this is in the prevue of the Engineering Dept.
PUBLIC COMMENT:
Merry Elisabeth Geiger with Garfield and Hecht representing the Riverside Condos 1024 E.
Cooper and Cooper Ave Victorian Condo Association 1012 E. Cooper. Ms. Geiger stated that
HPC’s mission is to preserve historic properties and review proposals that affect the properties to
ensure compliance with the guidelines. Ms. Geiger raised concern about mass and scale and
stated that her clients are not opposed to affordable housing. She said there is concern about the
relocation of the resource to the front of the lot, that there is significant importance for the front
yard. Ms. Geiger said that if you look at the renderings there will not be a lot of natural light for
the back units there is only 10’ between the properties. She stated she would like the commission
to realize this is a small lot and the mass and scale dwarfs the historic resource.
Baron Concors stated that the main issue is the same as last time, the mass and scale. He said that
one could see the passion for this project just by the neighborhood participation in this meeting.
Mr. Concors said that this is a small lot and that the project overwhelms the lot.
Julie Peters 1015 E Hyman back neighbor. Ms. Peters stated that she has a designated parking
spot along the alley and is concerned about getting hit with added parking. She added that there
was a dumpster fire at some point and fire engines have to fit down the alley.
Buck Carlton stated that he is surprised that the previous project was pulled. He said that all they
had to do would be drop the roofline and give up some square footage. Mr. Carlton stated that
the project that is being presented has so many rules and guidelines that are being broken. He
raised concern about the challenges of height, functionality, livability. Mr. Carlton warned about
the legal landscape and financial burden this will cause.
Dennis Moon 1000 W. Hyman stated that parking will be an issue and the alley is very narrow.
Kristi Gilliam stated that the pictures that are being shown are deceptive and not showing the
true property. Ms. Gilliam explained that the tree is actually on the neighboring property and
rubs up on a unit and is very tight. She raised concerns about the max occupancy allowing 24+
individuals to live there. Ms. Gilliam said that trash will be an issue with that many individuals.
She said that there has been no conversation about smoking in the units. She said that parking
will be a major issue, there is no parking on this side of town.
Leisha John stated that her main concern is the mass and scale for the size of that lot. Ms. John
also raised concerns about parking.
Lou Stover stated that she is concerned about the mass and scale stating that this is way too big.
Ms. Stover also said that the traffic in the alley and snow removal will be an issue. She said she
is very discouraged about this project.
Michael Smith 1012 E. Cooper. Mr. Smith stated that this sounds like an Affordable Housing
Commission and not HPC. He said the only merit he can find is that the developer will be fixing
up the cabin, but that does not outweigh the detriments. Mr. Smith stated that this project will
6
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
destroy the open space that is there now. Mr. Smith listed the guidelines he felt that this project
did not meet them. He said that the last project was sent back to HPC from City Council for
similar issues and the project that is being presented is even bigger. Mr. Smith showed concern
about overcrowding of occupants and parking. Mr. Smith stated what is being asked for is far too
much for the site.
Stephen Abelman 1012 E. Cooper stated that he supports affordable housing, but this project has
the opportunity for overcrowding.
Tiffany Smith 1012 E Cooper stated that she has concerns about mass and scale. She said that
this project will not honor the historic resource or the value of living in Aspen. Ms. Smith stated
that this is not a project to help the affordable housing issue rather than a money-making scheme
for the developer. She said that even though this neighborhood is zoned MFR every lot does not
need to be, do not turn the east side of Aspen into Brooklyn. Ms. Smith urged for a scale-down
of size.
Chris Bryan with Garfield and Hecht representing the Riverside Condos 1024 E. Cooper and
Cooper Ave Victorian Condo Association 1012 E. Cooper. Mr. Bryan stated that it is astonishing
that there has not been one call in for support of this project. He said that this project should be
similar to scale and proportion according to the guidelines. Mr. Bryan explained that the project
is currently too large in scale referencing the guidelines. He stated that the previous project had
issues with mass and scale and City Council had issues with it, now this project is even worse.
He explained that the mass is almost doubled the livable area compared to the historic resource.
Mr. Bryan stated that it would be arbitrary and capricious to approve this project when having
problems with the previous project. Mr. Bryan said if this project is approved the City will be
exposed to legal challenges and that it is in no one’s best interest. He said that HPC’s job is not
to make affordable housing rather it is bound to preserve historic structures. Mr. Bryan suggested
denying the application as it stands or continues the project so the applicant can come back with
a more appropriate sized project.
Ms. Simon summarized written letters that were submitted. Letters attached.
Will McDonald stated that he wants to reiterate what his neighbors stated about mass and scale
and the parking situation.
Ms. Adams stated that they appreciate all the public participation during the meeting and the
zoom calls they have held. Ms. Adams said that the land-use code has been met and they are not
cherry-picking sections, this project is under the floor area and meeting all requirements in the
RMF zone district. She said that the community is asking for affordable housing and that is what
is being delivered and that HPC is being asked to wear more than one hat. Ms. Adams stated that
HPC has to review all aspects of the code when dealing with preservation. She said that the
guidelines are not standards and can be worked with. She stated that a reduction in units will
hinder the whole project and the community is asking for more affordable housing.
Mr. Moyer asked if the restriction of smoking and pets are in the purview of HPC.
Ms. Johnson stated that this is outside of HPC’s purview.
Mr. True said that a request can be made to the applicant but that is up to the applicant to adopt.
Mr. Kendrick asked about the qualifications to win a unit.
Mr. Rayes stated that these will be rental units and a lottery is usually not assisted in choosing.
He explained that assuming that the ownership stays with the developer, they will have the right
to choose.
COMMISSION COMMENTS: Mr. Moyer stated that the mass and scale is way too large and
will not fit into the neighborhood. He said he lives in a multi-building on Park Circle and that the
7
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
concerns brought up are issues that his building deals with all the time. Mr. Moyer said that all
the comments were wonderful and if this project went to City Council as is, it would be a no. He
stated that he can not allow it to move forward, it is too big.
Ms. Thompson asked Mr. Moyer if there is a difference the mass and scale since this is a
separate structure and there is no connecting element.
Mr. Moyer stated that design-wise and relocation is ok and legal, but it is just too big and HPC
will mess up the neighborhood. He said when you have 15 neighbors adamantly opposed we are
not doing our job. He reiterated that he can not support it.
Mr. Halferty stated that there is always a bit of push and pull when trying to preserve. He said as
the project is presented the mass and scale is too large. Mr. Halferty said that the points that were
brought up by neighbors all touched on great points. He stated that the fact the applicant is not
asking for any variations is great however, the historic resource is very small. Mr. Halferty said
that the restoration efforts have been done well and the position of the cabin is good. He further
said that the new addition is just too tall. He posed the question would a two-story building with
subgrade units be better. Mr. Halferty said that this is a difficult situation with the historic
building already sandwiched between two large buildings. Mr. Halferty stated that he would vote
to continue this project.
Mr. Kendrick motioned to extend the meeting until 7:30 PM; Mr. Moyer seconded. All in favor.
Motion passed.
Mr. Kendrick stated that there are a lot of competing elements to this project. He said he is a big
proponent of affordable housing, however; we are here for historic preservation. Mr. Kendrick
stated that he agrees with fellow board members that the mass and scale is too large. He said he
has a problem with the resource being moved that close to the street while eliminating all open
space on the lot. Mr. Kendrick stated that this is a difficult situation, on one hand, you have two
large multi-family buildings and a new structure would fit in and on the other hand, the new
structure is too overwhelming on the historic resource. He said he would need to see the scale
come down of the mass before fully supporting the project.
Ms. Thompson stated that this is a difficult situation. She said she agrees that the massing and
scale are a bit overwhelming and HPC needs to balance what is reasonable to the site. Ms.
Thompson said that she apricates the 10’ separation between the resource and addition. Ms.
Thompson asked the board what specific feedback would you give to the applicant to develop
the project further.
Mr. Halferty stated that he believes it would be the relationship between the resource and
addition. He said that the plate height, the number of levels, to respond apparently to the
resource.
Mr. Moyer stated that he agrees. He said that the resource is little, and the structure is too wide
and too tall. Mr. Moyer stated that maybe one way to fix this is by making this a 2 or 3 unit
project. He said he is not in favor of the relocation of the resource, the removal of the sheds no
objection.
Ms. Thompson stated that she could be a proponent for the stepping back of the upper story of
the new addition more. She said that the addition needs to relate to the surroundings as well as
the resource while creating more variation of the façade. Ms. Thompson stated that she is
struggling with the idea of the project being one story shorter. She said that she has no objection
to the relocation of the resource, this will allow for more distance between the addition and
cabin. Ms. Thompson stated that parking is an issue all over and apricate that the applicant has
designated space on the property. She stated that she is in favor of the transportation
8
REGULAR MEETING HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION January 13 2021
requirements for this project and that it is not appropriate for HPC to dictate how many
individuals live in one unit.
Mr. Kendrick stated that he agrees that HPC cannot dictate how many individuals live in a unit
however the mass of the building allows for more people to live there. He said that if the mass is
reduced the burden of infrastructure will not be as much.
Ms. Thompson asked the board if they would be in favor of a continuance so they can see a
reduction in mass.
Mr. Kendrick stated that the plan calls for 5 affordable housing units and asked if that needs to
be addressed now or at the continued meeting. Mr. Kendrick reiterated his concern about the
relocation of the resource.
Ms. Adams summarized the direction HPC is wanting the project to go in.
Mr. Kendrick said that he liked Ms. Thompson’s idea of some setbacks to help reduce the visual
of the mass. He said losing some of the buffer space between the cabin and the new addition will
be ok.
Ms. Thompson stated that the distance between the structures is fire code, and cannot be any
closer.
Ms. Adams asked if the board would be ok with a restudy of the roof form.
Mr. Moyer stated he would be fine with a restudy.
Ms. Thompson said that she would be fine with a restudy.
Mr. Kendrick stated he would support the restudy and that neighbor buy-in will be important.
Mr. Moyer said that there are still too many units.
Ms. Adams asked Mr. Moyer if they come back with five units would he oppose the project.
Mr. Moyer said yes.
Ms. Simon stated that the board needs to be careful and not operate outside their purview and if
the project has met code take that into one's findings.
Mr. Moyer moved to continue 1020 E. Cooper Avenue to February 10, 2021; Ms. Thompson
seconded.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Halfery, Yes; Ms. Thompson, Yes; Mr. Kendrick, Yes; Mr. Moyer, Yes.
NEW BUSINESS: Election of Chair and Vice-Chair.
Mr. Moyer nominated Ms. Thompson for Chair.
Ms. Thompson accepted the nomination.
Mr. Moyer nominated Mr. Halferty as Vice-Chair.
Mr. Halferty accepted the nomination.
Mr. Moyer moved to approve Ms. Thompson as Chair and Mr. Halferty as Vice-Chair for the
Historic Preservation Commission, Ms. Sanzone seconded.
ROLL CALL: Mr. Halfery, Yes; Ms. Thompson, Yes; Mr. Kendrick, Yes; Mr. Moyer, Yes; Ms.
Sanzone, Yes
Adjourn: All in favor
_________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy Clerk
9
Page 1 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
Memorandum
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Sarah Yoon, Historic Preservation Planner
THROUGH: Amy Simon, Planning Director
MEETING DATE: January 27, 2021
RE: 925 King Street – Demolition and recommendation on the adjustment of
the boundaries of the Historic Designation and the Establishment of TDRs,
PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICANT /OWNER:
King Street Com LLC, c/o John
Belkin
REPRESENTATIVE:
BendonAdams LLC
LOCATION:
Street Address:
925 King Street
Legal Description:
Parcel 2 of the Boundary
Agreement Plat recorded April 29,
1983 in Plat Book 13 at Page 35
as Reception No. 240935, City
and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado
Parcel Identification Number:
PID# 2737-074-00-022
CURRENT ZONING & USE
R-15A (Moderate-Density
Residential); Multiple residential
structures and accessory
buildings, some viewed to be
illegally established residential
units.
PROPOSED ZONING & USE:
No change to zoning. One newly
created lot will be vacant and the
other will contain two detached
residential units.
SUMMARY: The applicant requests a Minor Subdivision – Lot Split
approval by City Council to create two separate fee simple lots
where one lot would contain historic structures and be historically
designated and the other lot will be vacant and not designated.
While HPC has no formal role in the Subdivision review, the
applicant requests the following: approval to demolish existing non-
historic structures, a recommendation to Council to amend the
historic designation boundary to exclude the newly created vacant
lot, and a recommendation to Council to establish two TDRs from
the historic lot.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the application in general
but recommends discussion of the size of the lot containing the
historic resources to ensure adequate room for appropriate
expansion of the resources when proposed at a future date.
Site Locator Map – 925 King Street
925
10
Page 2 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
BACKGROUND:
925 King Street, historically known as 935 King Street, is approximately 34,547 sf in size and
located in the R-15A zone district. The lot contains a Victorian era miner’s cabin and several other
structures, two of which appear to be Victorian era historic resources, although further analysis of
their history and architectural integrity is needed. The entire property is historically designated via
Ordinance #34, Series of 1992.
Over the years, the Victorian miner’s cabin on the site has been covered with contemporary
building materials, but it appears to roughly occupy the same location as depicted in the 1896
Willit’s Map. According to a written account from a previous owner, alterations to the historic
resource and construction/alteration of other buildings on the property occurred in the late 1960s.
Building permits can be found for the following addresses but fail to provide significant clarity: 925
King Street, 935 King Street, and 932 Queen Street.
REQUEST OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals:
• Demolition (Section 26.415.080) for the demolition of existing structures dispersed across
the entire parcel which all fall within the current boundaries of the historic designation. The
historic miner’s cabin (building #7) and two outbuildings identified as buildings #5 and #8
are not part of the demolition request.
• Amendment to the boundaries of the Historic Designation (Section 26.415.030) if Minor
Subdivision – Lot Split is granted by City Council the historic designation boundary line is
requested to be amended to include only the upper lot containing the historically significant
structures.
• Transferable Development Rights TDRs (Section 26.415.110.L) to establish two TDRs by
removing development rights in increments of 250 sf from the proposed newly defined
historic landmark property identified as the upper lot.
The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) is the final review authority for granting demolition.
This determination is subject to City Council Call-up Notice.
The commission will provide recommendations to City Council for the request to amend the
designation boundary and to establish two TDRs. Final determination on these topics will be by
City Council, in addition to Minor Subdivision – Lot Split.
PROJECT SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to maintain the historic miner’s cabin (building #7 in the application), along
with buildings #8 and #5 in their current location, while the remaining five detached structures are
proposed to be demolished. A Minor Subdivision – Lot Split is requested from City Council to
create two separate lots. The lot containing the historic structures will be the lot accessed from
King Street and the newly created lot along Queen Street will be vacant. If the Lot Split request is
granted, the applicant requests the historic designation boundary line be adjusted to include just
the lot containing the historic structures. No new development is proposed on either lot at this
time. The applicant requests approval to remove 500 sf of developable floor area from the historic
lot through the establishment of two Transferable Development Rights (TDRs).
11
Page 3 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
STAFF COMMENTS:
1. Historic Designation Boundary Line Adjustment:
City Council will be the review authority for the Minor
Subdivision – Lot Split request where Parcel 2B has
a gross lot area of 15,001 sf and retains three existing
structures while Parcel 2A has a gross lot area of
21,045 sf and is vacant. The proposed location of the
boundary line bisecting the property was drawn to
keep buildings #5, #7 and #8 on the historic lot and
maintain the existing spatial relationships between
structures that may have historical significance. The
proposed parcels are compliant with underlying
zoning.
The applicant requests approval to amend the
boundary lines of the designation following the lot
split. Unlike the neighboring historic lots to the west,
this property is an interior lot where there is limited
public benefit to retain HPC development review over
the bench below the historic structures. The topography of the property prevents the
development on the upper and lower lots from having a strong visual relationship to each other.
For these reasons, staff supports the request for the historic designation to remain only around
the lot containing the resources following the lot split. However, staff does recommend
discussion to ensure that the historic resources are adequately buffered from the future
downhill development and that the newly defined historic lot provides an appropriate envelope
for the approximately 3-4,000 square feet of development likely to be proposed there in the
future, while simultaneously preserving up to three historic resources.
2. Demolition of Existing Structures: There are a total of eight individual structures that have
been identified on the current “fathering” lot. Of the eight structures, the miner’s cabin is clearly
Victorian era construction and buildings #5 and #8 may have historic integrity worth preserving.
It is difficult to fully evaluate the latter two structures at this time due to the incomplete nature
of the historic records, however, the applicant proposes to retain them until further review by
HPC, and to design the upper lot to accommodate the buildings in their current locations. Both
the applicant and staff have examined permit files, maps, aerial photos, letters to the City
written by previous property owners and undertaken physical inspection of the property to
reach the recommended conclusions as to which buildings are appropriate for demolition
within this application.
Staff supports the applicant’s request to demolish the remaining five detached structures
because they were constructed after the period of significance.
Figure 1 – Proposed Lot Split
12
Page 4 of 4
130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611-1975 | P: 970.920.5197 | cityofaspen.com
3. Transferable Development Rights (TDRs): The proposed lot split configuration provides the
historic lot a net size of 13,712 sf. According to the floor area calculations in the application,
the allowable floor area for this lot would be approximately 4,830 sf. If buildings #5, #7, and #8
stay on the historic lot, the remaining allowable floor area is approximately 3,087.50 sf. The
applicant requests 500 sf of developable floor area be removed from the historic lot by
establishing two TDRs. Staff supports the removal of developable floor area from the historic
lot to reduce future development pressure.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The application was referred out to other City departments who have requirements that will
significantly affect the permit review. Please see Exhibit B for full comments. The comments are
all applicable to the subdivision review and plat development and are not pertinent to HPC’s
discussion.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) approve the requested demolition
and recommend Council support the adjustment to the historic designation boundary and the
establishment of two TDRs after further discussion of the dimensions of the upper lot to ensure
adequate room for appropriate future development on the site. In addition to this evaluation, staff
recommends a condition of approval that Floor Area calculations for the TDR request must be
verified by the Zoning Department prior to the City Council review.
ATTACHMENTS:
Resolution # __, Series of 2021
Exhibit A.1 – Historic Designation / Staff Findings
Exhibit A.2 – Demolition / Staff Findings
Exhibit A.3 – Transferable Development Rights (TDR) / Staff Findings
Exhibit B – Referral Comments
Exhibit C – Letters regarding the history of the property written by past owners
Exhibit D – Application
13
HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2021
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2021
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING DEMOLITION FOR SPECIFIC STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY, AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL TO ADJUST THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE HISTORIC DESIGNATION AND FOR THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF TWO TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) FOR
THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 925 KING STREET, PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY
AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS
RECEPTION NO. 240935, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO
PARCEL ID: 2737-074-00-022
WHEREAS, the applicant, King Street Com LLC, c/o John Belkin, represented by
BendonAdams LLC, has requested HPC approval for Demolition, and for recommendations on
the adjustment of the boundaries of the Historic Designation and the establishment of
Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) for the property located at 925 King Street, Parcel 2 of
the Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983 in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception
No. 240935, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that “no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted
to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures
established for their review;” and
WHEREAS, for approval of Demolition, the application shall meet the requirements of
Municipal Code Section 26.415.080, Demolition of a Designated Property; and
WHEREAS, for approval of the boundaries of a Historic Designation, HPC makes a
recommendation to City Council based on the requirements of Municipal Code Section
26.415.030, Designation of Historic Properties; and
WHEREAS, for the approval of TDRs, HPC makes a recommendation to City Council based on
the requirements of Municipal Code Section 26.535.070; and
WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for
compliance with applicable review standards and recommended approval with conditions; and
WHEREAS, on January 27, 2021. HPC considered the application, the staff memo and public
comment, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted approval with
conditions by a vote of __-__.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby approves Demolition, and recommends Council approval of the proposed
boundaries for the Historic Designation of the subject property and the creation of up to two (2)
14
HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2021
Page 2 of 3
TDRs for 925 King Street, Parcel 2 of the Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983 in Plat
Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception No. 240935, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado as follows:
Section 1: Demolition
HPC hereby approves Demolition as represented in the application, allowing the total demolition of
the buildings identified as 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6.
Section 2: Boundaries of the Historic Designation and Transferable Development Rights
Pursuant to the findings set forth above, the Historic Preservation Commission does hereby
recommend the adjustment to the boundaries of the Historic Designation as depicted in the
application and the establishment of up to two (2) TDRs for 925 King Street with the following
condition:
1.) Floor Area calculations for the TDR request must be verified by the Zoning Department
prior to the City Council review.
Section 3: Material Representations
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the
development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation
presented before the Community Development Department, the Historic Preservation
Commission, or the Aspen City Council are hereby incorporated in such plan development
approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by
other specific conditions or an authorized authority.
Section 4: Existing Litigation
This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of
any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended
as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances.
Section 5: Severability
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be
deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions thereof.
Section 6: Vested Rights
The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan
vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However,
any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in
the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to
properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180
days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said
vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section
26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development
plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right.
15
HPC Resolution #__, Series of 2021
Page 3 of 3
No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to
obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be
published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of
Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan
and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in
the following form:
Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan,
and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the
Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes,
pertaining to the following described property: 925 King Street.
Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and
approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of
Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval.
The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the
period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the
date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section
26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado
Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 27th day of January, 2021.
Approved as to Form: Approved as to Content:
________________________________ ______________________________
Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Kara Thompson, Chair
ATTEST:
______________________________
Wes Graham, Deputy City Clerk
16
Page 1 of 2
Exhibit A.1
Historic Designation – Boundary Line Amendment
Staff Findings
Section 26.415.030 – Designation of Historic Properties:
The designation of properties to an official list, that is known as the Aspen Inventory of Historic
Landmark Sites and Structures which is maintained by the City, is intended to provide a systematic
public process to determine what buildings, areas and features of the historic built environment
are of value to the community. Designation provides a means of deciding and communicating, in
advance of specific issues or conflicts, what properties are in the public interest to protect.
B. Aspen Victorian:
1. Criteria. To be eligible for designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark
Sites and Structures as an example of Aspen Victorian, an individual building, site,
structure or object or a collection of buildings, sites, structures or objects must have a
demonstrated quality of significance. The quality of significance of properties shall be
evaluated according to the criteria described below. When designating a historic district,
the majority of the contributing resources in the district shall meet the criteria described
below:
a) The property or district is deemed significant for its antiquity, in that it contains
structures which can be documented as built during the 19th century, and
b) The property or district possesses an appropriate degree of integrity of location,
setting, design, materials, workmanship and association, given its age. The City
Council shall adopt and make available to the public score sheets and other devices
which shall be used by the Council and Historic Preservation Commission to apply
this criterion.
26.415.030 - Designation of Historic Properties - Aspen Victorian: To be eligible for
designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures as an example of
Aspen Victorian, an individual building, site, structure or object or a collection of buildings, sites,
structures or objects must have a demonstrated quality of significance. The quality of significance
of properties shall be evaluated according to the criteria described below. When designating a
historic district, the majority of the contributing resources in the district shall meet the criteria
described below:
MET NOT MET DOES NOT
APPLY
a. The property or district is deemed significant for its antiquity, in that it contains structures which
can be documented as built during the 19th century, and
b. The property or district possesses an appropriate degree of integrity of location, setting, design,
materials, workmanship and association, given its age. The City Council shall adopt and make
available to the public score sheets and other devices which shall be used by the Council and
Historic Preservation Commission to apply this criterion.
.N/A
MET
Review Criteria for 925 King Street
Following the approval of a subdivision-lot split, an amendment to the
historic designation boundary is requested. Integrity scoring is not
necessary because this is not a request for a new designation.
Summary of Review Criteria for Historic Designation (Amend Boundary)
17
Page 2 of 2
Staff Findings: The property was designated in 1992 due to the presence of development
associated with the Victorian era. Constructed during the period of significance, the historic
miner’s cabin is a contributing landmark that embodies the mining era of Aspen. Although exterior
alterations have been made, the overall form and significant architectural features remain intact.
Two other structures on the site may have been constructed in a similar time period.
The subject property is large and has a significant grade change from north to south. As part of
this application, the applicant requests to amend the designation boundary to be limited to a
proposed newly defined upper lot that contains the historically significant structures. If the lot split
request is approved by City Council, the second lot will not contain any resources nor have a
spatial relationship with the lot that contains the landmarks because of the grade change on the
property. This property is also an interior lot that offers no views of how the lots relate visually.
Staff finds the request to amend the boundary lines of the designation is generally
appropriate but recommends discussion to ensure the lot layout supports future
development in a manner that is sympathetic to the historic resources.
18
Page 1 of 3
Exhibit A.2
Demolition Criteria
Staff Findings
Section 26.415.080 – Demolition of Designated Historic Properties:
It is the intent of this Chapter to preserve the historic and architectural resources that have
demonstrated significance to the community. Consequently, no demolition of properties
designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures or properties within
a Historic District will be allowed unless approved by the HPC in accordance with the standards
set forth in this Section.
4) The HPC shall review the application, the staff report and hear evidence presented by
the property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine
if the standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if
it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria:
a) The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public
safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely
manner;
b) The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to
properly maintain the structure;
c) The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen;
or
d) No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic,
architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance; and
Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met:
a) The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District
in which it is located:
b) The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of
the Historic District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent
designated properties; and
c) Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs
of the area.
19
Page 2 of 3
Staff Findings: A total of eight structures are located on this lot. As documented in the application,
building #7 is the Victorian era historic miner’s cabin that has been altered over time but was built
in the period of significance and must remain. Two additional structures (building #8 and #5)
appear to be Victorian era structures that are also proposed to remain at this time.
Building # 8 is a one-story cabin facing King Street. According to a written account provided by a
previous owner, a log cabin was moved to this site around the mid-1960s. The photographs in the
application show architectural detailing that is a mixture of modern cladding and exposed wooden
logs. When on site, staff observed exterior alterations to the structure, however, it was unclear
how much original material remains behind the exterior cladding. The applicant is currently
investigating the structure by removing exterior siding to expose the existing conditions. For this
application the applicant proposes to keep this building in its current location.
Building #5 has a rectangular footprint that was documented in earlier surveys of the property.
The exact history of this structure is unclear, but the applicant believes that this may have been
where the historic chicken coop was located. The structure has been altered over time with add-
ons and new materials, but staff finds that there may be a level of material integrity worth
preserving. The applicant proposes to keep this structure in its current location and maintain the
relationship it currently has with the Victorian home. With the available information, staff is in
support of keeping this structure.
26.415.080 - Demolition. It is the intent of this Chapter to preserve the historic and architectural
resources that have demonstrated significance to the community. Consequently, no demolition of
properties designated on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures or
properties within a Historic District will be allowed unless approved by the HPC in accordance with
the standards set forth in this Section. Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the
application meets any one of the following criteria:
MET NOT MET DOES NOT
APPLY
a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the
owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner;N/A
b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly
maintain the structure;.N/A
c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen; or N/A
d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural,
archaeological, engineering or cultural significance; and
Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met:MET NOT MET DOES NOT
APPLY
a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District in which it is
located:
b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the Historic
District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties; and
c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area.MET
MET
MET
Review Criteria for 925 King Street
The applicant proposes to demolish five structures with the exception
of the Victorian miner's cabin, building #8 and building #5.
Summary of Review Criteria for Demolition Request
MET
20
Page 3 of 3
Building #4 is a one-story outbuilding that has a simple gable roof but an irregular footprint. This
structure was not represented in the older property survey and the origins of this structure is also
unknown. The existing structure is a combination of historic building materials and modern
materials, but the use and construction techniques of this structure is confusing. Since this
structure has no clear correlation of being built during the period of significance, the applicant
proposes to demolish this structure and staff is in support.
Buildings #1, 2, 3, and 6 are clearly constructed with modern building materials and do not
demonstrate historical significance of the Victorian era or the Modern Movement. These structures
do not contribute to the historic inventory and are considered bandit units constructed without a
permit.
Staff finds all criteria are met to demolish the five structures on the property constructed
outside of the period of significance.
21
Page 1 of 3
Exhibit A.3
Transferable Development Rights Criteria
Staff Findings
Section 26.535.070
A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to adoption
of an ordinance, finds all the following standards met:
A. The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or
duplex residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. Properties
on which such development is a conditional use shall not be eligible.
Staff Findings: 925 King Street is a designated historic landmark that is an eligible
sending site that can establish and sever transferable development rights (TDRs).
Single-family residential and duplex development are permitted uses in the R-15A
zone district.
B. It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for either
a single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) square
feet of floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates requested.
Staff Findings: Floor area calculations have been provided using the proposed lot
configurations. According to the applicant’s calculations, the historic lot has an
allowable floor area of 3,087 sf after subtracting the floor area of the three structures
that are proposed to remain. Two TDRs equaling 250 sf each may be established,
and final floor area calculations will be verified by the Zoning Department prior to
the issuance of a TDR. If the lot configuration is to change, new floor area
calculations will need to be provided and verified.
C. It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a
nonconformity. In cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not increase
the specific nonconformity.
Staff Findings: The creation of a TDR will not create or increase a nonconformity.
D. The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built development,
any approved development order, the allowable development right prescribed by zoning
for a single-family or duplex residence, and shall not include the potential of the sending
site to gain floor area bonuses, exemptions or similar potential development incentives.
Properties in the MU Zone District which do not currently contain a single-family home or
duplex established prior to the adoption of Ordinance #7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted
to base the calculation of TDRs on 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized
lot in the R-6 zone district. This is only for the purpose of creating TDRs and does not
22
Page 2 of 3
permit the on-site development of 100% of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized
lot in the R-6 zone district. If the additional 20% of allowable floor area exceeds 500 square
feet, the applicant may not request a floor area bonus from HPC at any time in the future.
Any development order to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to
the property after establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void.
Staff Findings: The allowable floor area for a detached single-family residence on a
13,712 sf lot in the R-15A zone district is approximately 4,830 sf. Unbuilt floor area
is available to convert to TDRs.
E. The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the
property (the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for a
single-family or duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor
area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates established.
For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed uses,
the maximum development of the property, independent of the established property
use, shall be the floor area of a single-family or duplex residence (whichever is
permitted) minus two hundred fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplies by the
number of historic TDR certificates established.
The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a
square footage reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex
residence, as may be amended from time to time. The sending site shall remain eligible
for certain floor area incentives and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City
Land Use Code, as may be amended from time to time. The form of the deed restriction
shall be acceptable to the City Attorney.
Staff Findings: At the point of issuing a TDR certificate, the applicant will be required
to file a deed restriction that will permanently reduce the allowable floor area by 250
sf. All documents shall be reviewed by the City Attorney prior to execution.
F. A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant
requirements, the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR
certificates to the sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute and
deliver a deed restriction lessening the available development right of the subject property
together with the appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the County Clerk
and Recorder's office.
Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue.
23
Page 3 of 3
G. It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans
and a zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community Development
Director. Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of built floor area.
Staff Findings: The applicant has provided detailed floor area calculations as part of
the proposal. Final calculations shall be reviewed by The City prior to the issuance
of the TDR certificate.
H. The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of transferable
development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records of the Pitkin
County Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the City of Aspen
Community Development Department within five (5) days of such transfer. The report of
such transfer shall disclose the certificate number, the grantor, the grantee and the total
value of the consideration paid for the certificate. Failure to timely or accurately report such
transfer shall not render the transferable development right certificate void.
Staff Findings: This is a mandatory process that the applicant must pursue.
I. TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner.
Staff Findings: N/A
J. City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution for the
affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall provide
Council with a recommendation.
Staff Findings: The applicant is requesting HPC recommend in favor of establishing
two (2) TDRs with this application. HPC is a recommending body and City Council
is the final authority for granting the TDR request.
24
Exhibit B - Referral Comments
HP Project: 925 King Street
Engineering Department Comments Summary (detailed comments with references attached):
Hailey Guglielmo, hailey.guglielmo@cityofaspen.com
1. Finalized use agreement needs to be made regarding the ditch. Engineering
cannot approve the lot split request until this is resolved.
2.A deck appears to encroach onto the neighbor’s property. This needs to be
show on all survey plats for consistency, with the proper easements
recorded.
3.Easements with a 20’ width centered on the existing ditch that runs through
the property needs to be established.
4.All utility lines, including but not limited to water lines and electricity,
providing service to buildings slated for demolition must be abandoned
according to the City of Aspen standards.
5.Any revocable property use licenses, Right-of-Way or access easements
must be clarified and cleaned up as best as possible. All transformers
require an easement.
6.Existing curb cuts providing access to the south of the property shall be
removed with the buildings. Only one curb cut is allowed on each property.
7.Clarify water rights for the property including the water source for the water
features on the lot. Unpermitted features must be removed, and municipal
water needs to be abandoned along the buildings that are to be demolished.
8.A sidewalk will be required since Parcel 2B is not located in a sidewalk
deferred area.
9.More documentation is needed for determining historic contours to
determine the proposals appropriateness.
Zoning Department Comments:
Sophie Varga, sophie.varga@cityofaspen.com
1.The upper lot (with the landmarked parcel) meets the gross lot area as
well as net lot area per dwelling unit. Please note if this was not a
landmarked parcel it would be substandard in size.
2.It would be preferred from a Zoning standpoint that all non-conformities
are legalized through the HPC process. (Existing historic structures project
into setbacks.)
25
From:Hailey Guglielmo
To:Kurt Peterson; Buie Fox
Cc:Sarah Yoon; Robert Covington
Subject:925 King St - Ditch Water Use Agreement
Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 4:51:00 PM
Attachments:image001.png
Kurt and Buie,
I just spoke with Rob Covington with the Water Department. He informed me the City has been
working to get a use agreement for the ditch from the current owner of 925 King St. I want to check
you or someone on the project team is aware of the necessity of the use agreement and is working
towards a finalized agreement.
Because of the importance of this, Engineering cannot approve the lot split until it is resolved. Sarah
any resolution for HPC should make note of this requirement as well.
I have cc’d Rob here for further discussion.
Thanks.
Hailey Guglielmo, PE
Project Manager
Engineering Department
201 N Mill St. Ste 203
Aspen, CO 81611
c: 970.309.0771
p: 970.429.2751
www.cityofaspen.com
Pitkin County’s Recovery Plan for COVID-19 to make Aspen safer and healthier means we all must
follow the five commitments of containment:
1. I will maintain six feet of distance from anyone not in my household
2. I will wash my hands often
3. I will cover my face in public
4. I will stay home when I’m sick
5. I will seek testing immediately and self-report if I experience symptoms
More at https://covid19.pitkincounty.com/
26
Engineering1 - 925 King St - LPA-20-118 - 20201204
Page: 1
File Name: E Existing conditions.pdf This deck is not shown on the
survey plat
E Existing conditions.pdf (1)
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
The document titled E Existing
conditions shows a deck
encroachment from the
neighboring property in this
vicinity. This survey doesn't
show it. If there is a deck
encroachment it needs to be
shown on the plat.
N 20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf (12)
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
An easement needs to be
established for the existing ditch.
The easement shall meet
dimensions called out in Section
2.5.2. The easement shall be 20'
in width centered on the ditch.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Show all water service lines.
How are the existing buildings
served?
A condition within the Resolution
shall be that any water service
lines that serve the structures
which are to be demolished will
be abandoned along with the
building demolitions.
Water service line
abandonments must follow COA
Distribution Standards and must
be abandoned at the main.
Refer to
Detail (A)
38.1'
5.4'
This deck is not shown on the
survey plat
SPA
BO
WA
79
79
2
0
7
T81 T
T121
HISTORIC LO
SPLIT
ARE
The document titled E Existing
conditions shows a deck
encroachment from the
neighboring property in this
vicinity. This survey doesn't
show it. If there is a deck
encroachment it needs to be
shown on the plat.
X
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947
FENCE
(TYP.)7930FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 28375
T101
T102
T103 T104
T105
T106
T1
T2
N 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMP
I/O: 7925.8
BOX CULVERT
TO 18" CMP
I/O: 7929.37'ASPHALTDRIVEWAYADJACENTDRIVEWAY
36,045.6
0.83 AC
LOT 1
114 NEALE/17
QUEEN
HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT
An easement needs to be
established for the existing
ditch. The easement shall meet
dimensions called out in
Section 2.5.2. The easement
shall be 20' in width centered
on the ditch.
Show all water service lines. How are the existing
buildings served?
A condition within the Resolution shall be that any water
service lines that serve the structures which are to be
demolished will be abandoned along with the building
demolitions.
Water service line abandonments must follow COA
Distribution Standards and must be abandoned at the
main.
27
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
This portion of the driveway
highlighted in purple is located in
a revocable property use license
from the neighboring property.
A condition of the building
demolitions is this west driveway
shall also be demolished. When
development happens on Parcel
2A a driveway shall be
constructed that accesses the
property from the ROW or the
access easements established
in Bk 13 Pg 35. No portion of the
new driveway shall be located
on the neighboring parcel.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Preserved Cabin #7.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
The overhead electric that
serves the existing buildings
needs to be abandoned along
with the demolition of the
buildings.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Preserved relocated structure #4
D
E
G
E
G
TELE.
PED.
ELEC.
METERS
STORM DRAIN
RIM 7901.64'
INV 7898.14'
BOTT 7887.75'GAS
METERCONCRE
XFENC
(TYP
CONC
DRIV
G
GW WELECTRIC ADJOI LEV
F.F.
7903.6'
STORM DRAIN
RIM 7902.00'
BOTT 7889.12'
T55
T51
T54OE
T114
T1
T116
T1 ADJOINER ADUD.N This portion of the driveway
highlighted in purple is located
in a revocable property use
license from the neighboring
property.
A condition of the building
demolitions is this west
driveway shall also be
demolished. When
development happens on
Parcel 2A a driveway shall be
constructed that accesses the
property from the ROW or the
access easements established
in Bk 13 Pg 35. No portion of
the new driveway shall be
located on the neighboring
parcel.
E
T19
T25
T24
T23
T22
T21
T20
T18
2'12.5'2.8'
OO
D
CK
ELECTRI
METER X
BOULDER
RETAINING
WALL
20
.
5
9
'
LOT 1
ASTOR SUB.S 34°59'08" W 94.17' FIELDS 34°45'00" W 93.75' REC.Preserved Cabin #7.ERH
G
XFENCE
(TYP.)
CON
C
R
E
T
E
DRIV
E
W
A
Y
T55 T56
T57T51
T
T54
T114
T115
ADJOINER ADU20.
9
'LDC.OE
OE
OE
O
DYH
BUILDING
ENCROACHMENT
EASEMENT PER
BK 704 PG 818
SHADED AREAOVERHEADELEC. (TYP.)D
EE
G
TELE.
PED.
ELEC.
METERS
INV 7898.14'
BOTT 7887.75'GAS
METER
QUEEN STREET - ASPHALT
R-O-W WIDTH VARIESXFENCE
(TYP.)
CONC
R
E
T
E
DRIV
E
W
A
Y
WV
STONE
WALL
(TYP.)
WATER
FEATURE
CO
DRI
S
SS
SS SS SS SS SS SS
SS100' OFFSET FROM
ORDINARY HIGH WATER
WATERLINE EASEMENT
PER BK 340 PG 1
EX
-
U
E
TC
T
V
W
21006
7910.814
IO 8I IP UNDER ROCK
7
9
1
0
7910FND #5 REBAR &
PLASTIC CAP
PLS ILLEGIBLE
E
T44
T43
T55 T56
T57
T53
T52
T51 T58
T59
T45T46T47
T48
T49
T50
1.8'
4.
4
'
1.8'
16
.
3
'
8.
2
'
3.
8
'5.
15
.
9
'
8.
0
'1.7'
1.6'
W
STONE
WALK
(TYP.)
HOUSE
932 QUEEN ST
UNIT B
ONE STORY
HOUSE
932 QUEEN S
UNIT AT54OE
OE
OE OEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEAD
8" IRON
PIPE
SANITARY
SEWER LINE 26.84'20.
9
'
ACCESS EASEMENT
PER PLAT BK 13
PG 35 AND LICENSE
PER NO. 498801
PARCEL 7
N 84°59'50" W 121.31'
F
I
E
L
D
N 85°22'00" W 121.36'
R
E
C
.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.5' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PER BK 425 PG 774
The overhead electric that
serves the existing buildings
needs to be abandoned along
with the demolition of the
buildings.
7930
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 2376
T34
T35
T3 T112
XXT113
18.1'
6'
.7'6.5'4.4'16.5'BRIDGE
HED 3.29
'
S 63°
4
5'
4
3
"
W
8
4.
2
6'
F
I
E
L
D
S 62°
1
8'
3
0
"
E
8
3.
9
2'
R
E
C.
Preserved relocated structure
#4
28
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
What feeds this water feature?
If it is raw water the property
needs to demonstrate it has
proper water rights.
If it is municipal water it needs to
be abandoned along with the
buildings. A water service line
cannot stay online to serve just
this water feature.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
A condition of the demolition of
932 Queen St building is that
this east driveway shall also be
demolished. When
redevelopment of Parcel 2A
happens the property will be
permitted one curb cut per
section 4.1.3 of the Eng Design
Standards.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Is the pond legally established?
If not legally established the
pond needs to be abandoned,
filled in and the ditch returned to
a single channel.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: N
20103-925King-ISPTopo-24X36-Color-11-05-20.pdf
Document Rec 498801 does not
seem to reference anything
other than the revocable license
for the driveway entrance. What
is this call out referencing?
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
Parcel 2B is not located in a
sidewalk deferred zone. When
the lot is redeveloped a sidewalk
will be required.
O 20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf (6)
OEOVERH ELEC. (T
PED.
QUEEN STREET - ASPH
R-O-W WIDTH VARI
WATER
FEATURE
S
S
S
SS SS SS S SSWATERLINE EASEMENT
PER BK 340 PG 1
EX
-
U
E
TC
T
V
W
21006
7910.81
IO 8I IP
7
9
1
0
FND #5 REBAR &
PLASTIC CAP
PLS ILLEGIBLE
T53
T52
T4
T48
T49
T50
W
OE
OE OEOE
OE
8" IR
PIPE
SANITARY
SEWER LINE
ACCESS EASEMENT
PER PLAT BK 13
PG 35 AND LICENSE
PER NO. 498801
PARCEL 7N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC
What feeds this water feature?
If it is raw water the property
needs to demonstrate it has
proper water rights.
If it is municipal water it needs
to be abandoned along with the
buildings. A water service line
cannot stay online to serve just
this water feature.
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEDYH
BUILDING
ENCROACHMENT
EASEMENT PER
BK 704 PG 818
SHADED AREA
EN STREET - ASPHALT
O-W WIDTH VARIES
WV
MAIL BOX
STONE
WALL
(TYP.)
CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY
S
SS SS SS SS
SEWER MAN
RIM EL=7912
100' OFFSET FROM
ORDINARY HIGH WATER
MARK OF ROARING
FORK RIVER ACCORDING
ATERLINE EASEMENT
ER BK 340 PG 1 7910T45T46T47
12.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29126.84'ADJ
A
C
E
N
T
BUI
L
DI
N
G
PARCEL 7
N 84°59'50" W 121.3
1
'
F
I
E
L
D
N 85°22'00" W 121.3
6
'
R
E
C
.
TY
ENT
425 PG 774
A condition of the demolition of
932 Queen St building is that
this east driveway shall also be
demolished. When
redevelopment of Parcel 2A
happens the property will be
permitted one curb cut per
section 4.1.3 of the Eng Design
Standards.
E
I
X
X
X
BOULDER
(TYP.)
0.40' STONE
FASCIA (TYP.)
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947 BEARS
S29°31'02"W 3.46'
FENCE
(TYP.)
LOT 1
AI
N
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
D
AREA
DRAIN
T97
T100
T91 T92
T93 T94
T95
T96
T99
T98
T101
T102
T103 T104
T105
T106
POND
8" GATE
VALVEN 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMP
I/O: 792
TO 18" CMP
I/O: 7929.37'ASPHALTDRIVEWAYWA
55.88'
36,045
0.83
LOT 1
114 NEALE/17
QUEEN
HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT
Is the pond legally established?
If not legally established the
pond needs to be abandoned,
filled in and the ditch returned to
a single channel.
PA TIE
BOULDER
WALL (TYP.)
791
5
7
9
2
0
792
5
G
G
E
T62
T64
T65
T71
T69
T60
T61
T63
T81 T82
T83 T67T84
T86
T70
T68T66
9'2
4
.
2
'
1.0'9.2'3.4'5.
4
'13.0'0.
4
'3.0'1.
7
'8.1'1.
5
'4.6'24
.
8
'4.7'9.
3
'4.7'20.3'36
.
1
'
3'4'4.2'
1
2
.
2
'8.2'20
.
0
'
4.9'
SHED
905 KING ST.
WOOD
DECK
COVERED
PATIO
WOOD
DECK
RAILROAD
TIE PLANTER
G
E
STONE PAT
OE
OE
E
T121
20
WO
O
D
D
E
C
K
STONE
PATIO
37.
9
6
'
53
AREA SUBJECT
TO PROPERTY
USE LICENSE
REC. NO. 498801
Document Rec 498801 does
not seem to reference anything
other than the revocable license
for the driveway entrance. What
is this call out referencing?
FND #5 REBA
RE
E
T
-
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
WI
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
MS 5310
SUNSET LODE
EL
D
C.
Parcel 2B is not located in a
sidewalk deferred zone. When
the lot is redeveloped a
sidewalk will be required.
29
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
Ditches and creeks easements
shall be a minimum of 20 feet in
width: ten (10) feet on either side
of the waterway’s centerline.
Depending on topography, wider
easements may be required to
ensure there is enough space to
perform maintenance activities.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
Per section 2.5.2 of the COA
Eng Design Standards provide
standard lot line utility
easements. Easements shall be
10' in width on rear of lot line and
5 feet in width on each side.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
Encroachment from the
neighbors deck needs to be
shown on the new plat if it is
allowed to remain. An
encroachment needs to be
recorded.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
There is a transformer on this
corner on the neighboring
property. All transformers require
easements to provide 3'
clearances on the sides and 10'
clearances on the front. If any
portion of this required easement
falls on Parcel 2B it needs to be
recorded as an easement within
this lot split.
Page: [1] 24x36
File Name: O
20103-925KingStLotSplit-Prelim-24X36-BW-11-06-20.pdf
Show the ditch on the plat.
Establish proper easement per
section 2.5.2 of the Eng Design
Standards.
BUILDING
ENCROACHMENTEASEMENT PERBK 704 PG 818SHADED AREA
#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947 BEARSS29°31'02"W 3.46'
QUEEN STREET - ASPHALT
CONCR
E
T
E
SI
DE
W
AL
K
CONCR
E
TE
C
UR
B
&
G
U
T
T
E
R
WATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1
STEELPOST
FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375
FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375
FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 2376
FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 23875
KIN
G
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
R-O-
W
W
I
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
SANITARY
SEWER LINE
12.5 ACCESS EASEMENT
PER PLAT BK.13 PG.35
BK 204 PG 291
PARCEL 2A
21,045 S.F.±
ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13PG 35 AND LICENSEPER NO. 498801
LOT 2114 NEALE/17QUEEN
HISTORIC LOTSPLIT
MS 5310SUNSET LODE
LOT 1ASTOR SUB.
PARCEL 7
PARCEL 3
LOT 1
114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLIT
N 84°59'50" W 121.31' FIE
L
D
N 85°22'00" W 121.36' REC
.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.S 65°
0
5
'
5
4
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
F
I
E
L
D
S 65°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
1
6
3
.
2
8
'
R
E
C
.
S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELD
S 34°59'08" W 94.17' FI
E
L
D
S 34°45'00"
W 93.75' RE
C.
S 66°
0
6
'
5
5
"
E
4
2
.
3
1
'
F
I
E
L
D
S 66°2
1
'
0
0
"
E
4
2
.
1
2
'
R
E
C
.
S 63°45'
4
3
"
W
8
4.
2
6'
F
I
E
L
D
S 62°18'
3
0
"
E
8
3.
9
2'
R
E
C
.S 22°50'57" W 68.39' FIELDS 22°46'00" W 68.06' REC.
5' UTILITYEASEMENTPER BK 425 PG 774
BASIS OF
BEARINGSN30°51'03"E
12.5 ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK.13 PG.35
BK 204 PG 291N 16°04'29" E 96.88'N 30°17'00" E 132.20'PARCEL 2B15,001 S.F.±
HISTORIC
S 76°09'42"
E
39.77'
S 61
°
3
9
'
3
6
"
E
9
3
.
7
4
'
PARCEL 6
PARCEL 8 128.74'3.46'
NEW
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
L
I
N
E
E
S
W 90
120
150
180
210
240
270 PeaI
nc.020 20 40 8010
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL:
THE APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SET FORTH IN THIS KING LOT SPLIT PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWEDAND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN LANDUSE CODE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS ________ DAY OF__________________, 2020, TO THE EXTENT THAT ANYTHING IN THIS PLAT/MAP IS INCONSISTENT OR IN
CONFLICT WITH ANY CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT ORDERS RELATING TO THIS LOT SPLIT OR ANYOTHER PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OTHER APPLICABLELAND USE REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES, SUCH OTHER DEVELOPMENT ORDERS ORAPPLICABLE LAWS SHALL CONTROL.
BY: ______________________________ JESSICA GARROW
AS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
TITLE EXAMINER'S CERTIFICATE:
I, _____________________________, AS TITLE EXAMINER OF ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OFASPEN, LLC, DO CERTIFY THAT ON OR BEFORE _____________________, I HAVE CAUSED AN
EXAMINATION TO BE MADE OF TITLE TO THE KING STREET LOT SPLIT, AND EXCEPT FOR THE DEEDOF TRUST FOR__________________________________________, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO._______________, SAID PROPERTY IS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL OTHER MONETARY LIENS ANDENCUMBRANCES.
DATED: _______________________________
BY:____________________________________
____________________________________, TITLE EXAMINER
ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC
PREL
I
M
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:
THIS PLAT OF THE KING STREET LOT SPLIT WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON THIS ________ DAY OF __________________, 2020 BY ORDINANCE NO. _______OF SERIES __________ RECORDED AND RECEPTION NO. _________________, OF THE PITKIN COUNTY
RECORDS.
BY:________________________________________________
AS: CITY OF ASPEN MAYOR
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:
I, JASON R. NEIL, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAN UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS PLAT IS
COMPLETE KING LOT SPLIT PLAT, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATEDTHAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAIDUNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AN LOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS AS THE SAME ARE STAKED U COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUB PREFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 38, ARTICLE 51, C.R.S. 1973 A
TO TIME.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS _______ A.D., 2020.
BY: ________________________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
PEAK SURVEYING, INC.
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
PARCEL NO. 2737-074-00-022
NOTES:
1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN
THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.
2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.
3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THESOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUNDIN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTICCAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.
4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THE
SMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 ANDTHE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDEDMAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'SOFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.
7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPENADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OFTHE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATETHAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ISBELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPEN
ADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NO
DEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.
Ditches and creeks easements shall be
a minimum of 20 feet in width: ten (10)
feet on either side of the waterway’scenterline. Depending on topography,
wider easements may be required toensure there is enough space to
perform maintenance activities.
LOT 1
ASTOR SUB.
S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.
S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELD
FIELD3.75' REC.Per section 2.5.2 of the COA
Eng Design Standards provide
standard lot line utility
easements. Easements shall be
10' in width on rear of lot line
and 5 feet in width on each
side.
LOT 2
114 NEALE/17
QUEEN
HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT
17'00" E 132.20'128.74'Encroachment from
the neighbors deck
needs to be shown
on the new plat if it is
allowed to remain.
An encroachment
needs to be
recorded.
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 28375
S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.
S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELD
There is a transformer on this
corner on the neighboring
property. All transformers
require easements to provide 3'
clearances on the sides and 10'
clearances on the front. If any
portion of this required
easement falls on Parcel 2B it
needs to be recorded as an
easement within this lot split.
R &
TIC
8375
KI
N
G
S
T
R
R-
O
-
W
W
I
S 6
5
°
0
5
'
5
4
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
F
I
E
S 6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
1
6
3
.
2
8
'
R
E
C
96.88'Show the ditch on
the plat. Establish
proper easement per
section 2.5.2 of the
Eng Design
Standards.
30
Page: 1
File Name: P 2020-11-19_932 Queen_Net Lot Area and Floor
Area.pdf
For Engineering to make a
determination on the
appropriatenesses of the historic
contours please overlap existing
with historic contours and show
how the contours tie in to the
surrounding area.
Also provide documentation on
how the historic contours were
determined. Utilize historic aerial
imagery and any historic contour
maps.
P 2020-11-19_932 Queen_Net Lot Area and Floor Area.pdf (1)
For Engineering to make a determination on the appropriatenesses of the historic contours please overlap
existing with historic contours and show how the contours tie in to the surrounding area.
Also provide documentation on how the historic contours were determined. Utilize historic aerial imagery
and any historic contour maps.
31
(S16°58'23"W 4.40')
S65°31'54"E 42.31'
S35°34'09"W 94.17'
(S34°45'00"W 93.75')
N53
°
3
2'
2
1
"
E
E
D
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
D
SS
HYD
D
E
G
G
G
E
N16°39'30"E 96.88'S23°25'57"W 68.39'S64°20'43"W 84.26'
N84°24'49
"
W
1
2
1
.
3
1
'
S
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
S17°48'05"W 4.49'
(S
6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
1
6
3
.
2
8
'
)
(S66°21'00"E 42.12')
(S63°18'30"W 83.92')
(N85°22'00"
W
1
2
1
.
3
6
'
)
(N30°17'00"E 132.20')
(N15°24'00"E 96.70')(S22°46'00"W 68.06')BASIS OF BEARINGSS
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
N30°52'01"E 132.20'
12.5' ACCESS
EASEMENTS
REC. NO.240935
(EXCEPTION # 18)
REC. NO.113866
(EXCEPTION # 14)
REC.NO. 125845
(EXCEPTION #16)
Refer to
Detail (A)18" CMP
(N02°37'05"W 49.64')
N01°25'15"W 49.69'
1 ST. FRAME
CABIN
1 STORY DUPLEX
CABIN POSTED: 932
W
O
O
D
E
N
S
H
E
D
1 STORY
CABIN
22.1'
41.6'
18.3'
56.8'
27.3'
52.3'
E
CONCRETE
FOOT BRIDGE
CPP
10" (IN)DECKOED
G
38.1'
39.6'
9.8'
12.0'
29.8'
19.2'
POSTED: 905
0.7'NEIGHBOR'SDECK1.7'
5.4'
5.5'
5.4'
1 ST
O
R
Y
WOOD
E
N
SHED
POND S17°48'05"W 4.49'
BAY
WINDOW
1 STORY
FRAME
BUILDING
13.8'
4.1'
8.4'
POSTED:925 12
1 STORY CABIN
PLA
N
T
E
R
ASPEN DITCHOE
GM
GM
E
E
OE
OE
OE
E
LE
A
N
T
O
POSTED: 935
PO
R
C
H
E
1 STORY
CABIN
POSTED:
925
E
SHED
3.6'X4.0'
ED
G
E
O
F
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
TB
C
CPP
10" (OUT)
G
EDGE OF
WATER
S
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
5
4
.
3
3
'
(S
6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
5
4
.
5
1
'
)
A
B
LOT AREA
36,046 SQ. FT. +/-
0.82 ACRES LINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYPROPERTY USE LICENSE
(REVOCABLE)
RECEPTION NO. 498801
EXCEPTION # 24
ACCESS EASEMENT
BOOK 13, PAGE 35
(4.37')
1 ST1.0' WIDE
CONCTRETE
WALL
M
.
S
.
5
3
1
0
S
U
N
S
E
T
L
O
D
E
N16°39'30"E 96.88'
(N15°24'00"E 96.70') 320.
8
2'
12.5' WATERLINE
EASEMENT
BOOK 425, PAGE 759
BOOK 204, PAGE 291
(EXCEPTION # 19)
5 FT UTILITY
EASEMENT
BOOK 425, PAGE 774
BOOK 204, PAGE 291
(EXCEPTION # 20)
(NOMINAL) QUE
E
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
RIGHT-OF-WAY &
UTILITY
EASEMENT
(EXCEPTION #21)
20.0'(EXCEPTION #23)(EXCEPTION #22)Corner No. 11 - Tract 40
Aspen Townsite
ANNE
X
A
TI
O
N
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
(EXCE
P
TI
O
N
#
1
7)
KI
N
G
S
T
R
E
E
T
N30°52'01"E 132.20'N16°39'30"E 96.88'(N15°24'00"E 96.70')(N30°17'00"E 132.20')1 inch = ft.
(IN U.S. SURVEY FEET)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0020 10 20 40 80
20 BYNO.DATEBYPROJECT NO.REVISIONHIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.PHONE (970) 945-8676 - FAX (970) 945-2555www.hceng.comdrawn by:checked by:date:file:1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601SHEET NUMBERS -T -R-C-2201683
1 of 3ROCKY MOUNTAIN PROPERTY II, LLCPITKIN COUNTYIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT925 KING STREETASPEN, COLORADO 81611DMCBB09/15/2020190.10.2020See Note #9BWAB29.14.2020Updated Title CommitmentBWAB710S84WPitkinNOTES
1.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 03, 2020,
2.ALL BEARINGS ARE GRID BEARINGS OF THE COLORADO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE,
NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983. THE REFERENCE BEARING BETWEEN "A" (A FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25"
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 2376) AND "B" (A FOUND #5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 16129)
WITH A BEARING OF S23°25'57"W. ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES BASED ON A COMBINED SCALE
FACTOR.
3.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE BOUNDARY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE:
A) OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND
B) COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS
C) RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL.
4.FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY
ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 20004521 ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 13, 2020. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
5.THE CLIENT DID NOT REQUEST ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS BE
RESEARCHED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
6.ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESES, WHICH
DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF LOT 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT
RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO.
7.BUILDING MEASUREMENTS ARE AT LOWEST PRACTICABLE POINT ON VENEER.
8.ACCESS EASEMENT PER PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 35 AS SHOWN HEREON.
9. THE PLATTED LOTS, BLOCKS AND STREETS RECORDED AS THE HUGHES ADDITION TO THE ASPEN TOWNSITE,
RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 108453 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, AS
SHOWN HEREON, APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN EXTINGUISHED BY THAT INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION
NUMBER 113059 (BOOK 197 - PAGE 170) AND THAT QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER
240949 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE SAID COUNTY, AND ARE SHOWN HEREON FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
10. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION
BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
11. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR
EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES
OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE
PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED,
REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS
EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE
BOUNDARY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. THIS PLAT IS RESTRICTED TO THE INTENT
OF TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101, 5 (a) AND (b) C.R.S.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT
A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
TOWN OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Parcel 2 of the Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983, in Plat
Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception number 240935, Pitkin County, Colorado.
SET #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 23875
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 2376
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 16129
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED A.S.E.I. L.S. NO. (ILLEGIBLE)
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED ALPINE L.S. NO. (ILLEGIBLE)
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALUMINUM CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
WIRE FENCE LINEXX
EASEMENT LINE
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
BOUNDARY OR LOT LINE
ADJOINER LINE
WOOD FENCE LINE
FLOW LINE
ASPHALT
BUILDING LINE HATCH
CONCRETE
FLAGSTONE
ROCK RETAINING WALL
WATER
WOOD DECK
LAND SURVEY PLAT DEPOSIT
CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND
RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2019, PLAT BOOK _____, PAGE
______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________.
TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101 C.R.S. (5)(a) PLATS SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
SECTION FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RECORDING INFORMATION ON SURVEYING MONUMENTATION IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE SURVEY DATA FOR SUBSEQUENT LAND SURVEYS AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED
TO AFFECT, IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, THE DESCRIPTION OF A SUBDIVISION, LINE, OR CORNER
CONTAINED IN THE OFFICIAL PLATS AND FIELD NOTES FILED AND OF RECORD OR TO SUBDIVIDE
BOUNDARY. (b) NO PLAT DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION SHALL CONSTITUTE NOTICE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 38-35-109 CRS.
IN THE EVENT THIS SURVEY CANNOT BE DEPOSITED, THIS IS YOUR NOTICE THAT
THIS IS NOT A RECORDABLE DOCUMENT.
______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER
BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
I, BILL W.A. BAKER, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO (#23875) DO BY
THESE PRESENTS CERTIFY TO PALM FAMILY INVESTMENTS, ROCKY MOUNTAIN PROPERTY II, LLC AND FIRST
AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT THE DRAWING SHOWN HEREON, WITH NOTES ATTACHED HERETO AND
MADE A PART HEREOF, REPRESENTS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF SAID SURVEY IS
RENDERED BY THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE, IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES
WITH TITLE 38-51-102, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.
BILL W.A. BAKER, COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #23875
CERTIFIED FEDERAL SURVEYOR #1699
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 9184 (WITNESS CORNER)
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 25947 (CONFLICTING)
DETAIL (A)
SCALE 1" = 5.0'
MONUMENT LEGEND
STORM SEWER MANHOLE
CURB INLET
GAS METER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
FIRE HYDRANT
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRICAL METER
MAIL BOX
E
D
G
HYD
E
SANITARY MANHOLESS
4" STOVE PIPE
ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERE
LIGHT POLE
LANDSCAPING
LINE LEGEND
LEGEND
FOUND 1.5" REBAR NO CAP
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OE
ROCK RETAINING WALL
FOUND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BRASS CAP STAMPED 1954
First American Title Insurance Company - Commitment Number 20004521 - Dated 13 August, 2020
Items No. 1-9 are standard exceptions.
10. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the instrument dated June 24, 1955,
and recorded October 21, 1955, in Book 180 at Page 454, as Reception No. 103078. - 1889 PATENT IN TITLE CHAIN
11. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as described in the United
States Patent dated August 21, 1958, and recorded August 29, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69, as Reception No.
106874. - VESTING DEED IN TITLE CHAIN
12. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2 at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956. - CADASTRAL SURVEY OF EAST ASPEN
ADDITION
13. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Plat of East Aspen Addition, recorded August 24,
1959, in Plat Book 2 at Page 252, as Reception No. 108453 and the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2A at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956. - PLAT OF ENTRY EAST ASPEN
ADDITION AND HUGHES ADDITION - NOT DEPICTED
14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated July 12, 1962,
and recorded July 12, 1962 in Book 198 at Page 239 as Reception No. 113658; and the Deed dated August 17,
1962, and recorded August 17, 1962, in Book 198 at Page 543 as Reception No. 113866. - SALE AGREEMENT AND
VESTING DEED IN TITLE CHAIN - 25ft ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATION - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution, dated February 7,
1963, and recorded February 8, 1963, in Book 201 at Page 145, as Reception No. 114903. - RATIFICATION OF TOWN OF
ASPEN BOUNDARIES - NOT DEPICTED
16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed, dated November
7, 1966, and recorded November 7, 1966, in Book 223 at Page 562, as Reception No. 125845. - ENCUMBERS PARCELS
4 & 5 OF THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT PLAT - APPURTENANT EASEMENT TO SUBJECT PARCEL 3
17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under an ordinance annexing certain
unincorporated territory to the City of Aspen, Colorado, recorded June 27, 1979, in Book 371 at Page 450, as
Reception No. 215764, and any and all notes, encroachments and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Smuggler
Enclave annexation recorded June 27, 1979, in Plat Book 8 at Page 13, as Reception No. 215765. - EASTERLY
BOUNDARY LINE OF PARCEL 2 PLOTTED AS SHOWN DELINEATES ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
18. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Boundary Agreement Plat, recorded April
29, 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 35, as Reception No. 240935. - INITIATING INSTRUMENT SUBJECT PARCEL -
PARCEL 2 BOUNDARY PLOTTED AS SHOWN
19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated October 14, 1963,
and recorded October 15, 1963, in Book 204 at Page 291, as Reception Number 116413, and Agreement dated September
25, 1981, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 759 as Reception No. 240936. - UTILITY ENCROACHMENT
LICENCE AGREEMENT - APPURTENANT EASEMENT TO SUBJECT PARCEL 2 PLOTTED AS SHOWN
20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Deed dated April 29,
1982, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 774 as Reception No. 240940.- APPURTENANT UTILITY
EASEMENT - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
21. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29,
1982, in Book 425 at Page 781, as Reception No. 240944, and in the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29, 1982, in
Book 425 at Page 791, as Reception No. 240949, and in the Quit Claim Deed, dated April 29, 1982, and recorded
April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 783, as Reception No. 240945. - INSTRUMENTS IN TITLE CHAIN - RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND EASEMENT PLOTTED AS SHOWN
22. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Decree and Order, recorded
September 6, 1990, in Book 628 at Page 893, as Reception No. 325947.- EXISTING LOCATION OF ASPEN DITCH -
PLOTTED AS SHOWN
23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded January
2, 1990, in Book 634 at Page 942, as Reception No. 328344 and Quit Claim Deed, recorded January 15, 1992, in
Book 666 at Page 780, as Reception No. 340555. - EXISTING LOCATION OF ASPEN DITCH - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
24. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Property Use License, recorded
June 18, 2004, as Reception No. 498801. NOTE: This License was not perpetual and expired upon previous conveyance of
the land. - ENCROACHMENT PLOTTED AS SHOWN
25. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed and Assignment
dated December 31, 2012, and recorded January 9, 2013, as Reception No. 596026. - NOT PLOTTABLE
32
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEDYH59.88'BUILDINGENCROACHMENTEASEMENT PERBK 704 PG 818SHADED AREAOVERHEADELEC. (TYP.)DEGEGEIXXXBOULDER(TYP.)WINDOWWELL CONCRETEPATIOSPATELE.PED.ELEC.METERSSTORM DRAINRIM 7901.64'INV 7898.14'BOTT 7887.75'GASMETER0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947 BEARSS29°31'02"W 3.46'FLAGSTONE WALKCOVEREDFLAGSTONEENTRANCECONCRETE WALK WINDOWWELLQUEEN STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIESX FENCE(TYP.)FENCE(TYP.)LOT 1TIE RETAINING WALLCONCRETEDRIVEWAYLOT 215,160 S.F.±0.348 AC.±MULTI LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT17 QUEEN STREET110 NEALE AVENUEELEC.OUTLETCONCRETE SIDEWALKWVMAIL BOXSTONEWALL(TYP.)WATERFEATURECONCRETEDRIVEWAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEWER MANHOLERIM EL=7912.50'100' OFFSET FROMORDINARY HIGH WATERMARK OF ROARINGFORK RIVER ACCORDINGTO RIVER RESTORATIONWATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1GGEX-UETCTVWWELECTRICTIE RETAINING WALLADJOINER UPPERLEVEL DECK BOULDERWALL (TYP.)IRR.CONTROLDRIDGE7936.0'F.F.7903.6'F.F.7908.8'WSTEELPOSTSTORM DRAINRIM 7902.00'BOTT 7889.12'AREADRAIN210067910.814IO 8I IP UNDER ROCKX7910791579207925 79307930793079307925792079157910
SLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.000%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%10000.000%COLORAREA29050.84 S.F.±1386.15 S.F.±5608.66 S.F.±EFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 2376TBM EL=7929.25'FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 23875GGEGGGEET44T43T55T56T57T53T52T51T62T80T79T64T65T97T100T12T71T69T78T19T38T37T39T58T59T40T41T42T45T46T47T48T49T60T61T63T81T82T83T67T84T85T86T87T88T89T90T91T92T93T94T95T96T99T98T101T102T103T104T105T106T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T13T14T109T108T107T110T73T74T75T76T77T29T28T30T31T32T33T34T35T27T26T25T24T23T22T21T20T18T17T15T70T72T111T68T50T66T36T161.8'4.4'1.8'23.9'24.2'36.3'20.4'16.3'POND1.0'P9.2'8.2'8" GATEVALVE3.8'3.4'5.4'5.8'15.9'6.0'ELECTRICPEDESTAL ONCONCRETE PADT1128.0'1.7'1.6'EDLEAN TOWEEEEN 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMPI/O: 7925.82'BOX CULVERTTO 18" CMPI/O: 7929.37'STONEWALK(TYP.)XXXT11318.1'14.3'18.1'14.3'19.6'11.3'16.7'6.5'4.4'16.5'13.0'0.4'3.0'1.7'8.1'1.5'4.6'24.8'4.7'9.3'4.7'20.3'36.1'11.7'8.2'4.4'4.1'3.3'5.2'6.0'7.5'4.9'4.8'11.7'8.4'15.1'18.3'33.5'13.2'2.1'14.2'12.5
'2.8'4.3'6.3'14.7
'
15.7'20.4'12.2'1.2'30.4'8.8'4.9'8.9'22.0'4.0'4.0'3.6'4.0'3.3'2.5'4.4'27.4'4.2'12.2'8.2'20.0'4.9'BRIDGEBRIDGEASPHALTDRIVEWAY ADJACENTDRIVEWAYGRAVEL DRIVEWAYSHED3.6'8.3'SHEDSHEDSHEDONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE936 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.GBRIDGE905 KING ST.WALKWAYONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT BONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT AWOODDECKCOVEREDPATIOWOODDECKRAILROADTIE PLANTERPLANTERCEMENTPATIOPLANTERPLANTER
WOODDECKW
A
L
K
W
A
Y
MAILBOXESELECTRICMETER X 4BOULDERRETAININGWALLCURB EDGERETAININGWALLSTONEPATHWO
O
D
DE
C
KRETAININGWALLSTONE PATHFENCE(TYP.)KING STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIES18.77'
39.
6
2
'20.59'55.88'T54OEOEOEOE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEEEASPEN DITCH0.6'POSSIBLE LEAN TOENCROACHMENTT114T121T119T118T117T116T115T120ADJOINER ADU COVEREDWOOD DECKWOOD DECKSTONEPATIOCEMENTSIDEWALKRAMPCEMENTPATIOBENCH8" IRONPIPESANITARYSEWER LINEBRIDGESTEPS(TYP.)8" CPP12.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29112.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 291 26.84'20.9'37.96'29.7'43.29'52.01'ZONING: HISTORICZONING: R-15A53.21'25' ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13 PG 35AND BK 198 PG 543 36,045.6 SQ. FT.0.83 ACRES ±ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13PG 35 AND LICENSEPER NO. 498801ADJACENTBUILDING LOT 2114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITMS 5310SUNSET LODELOT 1ASTOR SUB.PARCEL 7PARCEL 3LOT 1114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITN 84°59'50" W 121.31' FIELDN 85°22'00" W 121.36' REC.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.N 30°17'00" E 132.20'S 65°05'54" E 163.03' FIELDS 65°21'00" E 163.28' REC.S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELDS
3
4
°
5
9
'
0
8
"
W
9
4
.
1
7
'
F
I
E
L
D
S
3
4
°
4
5
'
0
0
"
W
9
3
.
7
5
'
R
E
C
.S 66°06'55" E 42.31' FIELDS 66°21'00" E 42.12' REC.S 63°45
'43"
W
84
.26
'
F
IELDS 62°18
'30"
E
83
.92
'
REC
.
S 22°50'57" W 68.39' FIELDS 22°46'00" W 68.06' REC.5' UTILITYEASEMENTPER BK 425 PG 774AREA SUBJECTTO PROPERTYUSE LICENSEREC. NO. 498801BASIS OFBEARINGSN30°51'03"ENOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTIONBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRSTDISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT INTHIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THECERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Est. 2007201031 OF 1KING STREET COM, LLC.CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEYPARCEL 2, BDRY LINE ADJ.925 KING STREETJGJRNNOV. 05, 2020103IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDEDAPRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935, PITKIN, COUNTY, COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THESOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUNDIN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTICCAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THESMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 ANDTHE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDEDMAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'SOFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERNCOLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF7929.25' ON THE EASTERLY ANGLE POINT OF PARCEL 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPENADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OFTHE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATETHAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ISBELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPENADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NODEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.8) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:FRONT YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'REAR YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENTPRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.NESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e a k
S
urveying, Inc.02020408010SUBJECTPROPERTYVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO KING STREET COM, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITEDLIABILITY COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAIDOUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY ORWARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WASMADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON OCTOBER 8 - 23, 2020; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THISIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BYATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020;THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS,RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REALPROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEINGSHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: NOVEMBER 05, 2020 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.HATCH LEGENDBOUNDARYLINE TYPE LEGENDSTORM SEWERELECTRICEASEMENTASPHALTCONCRETESYMBOL LEGENDEDGE OF ROAD100YR FLOODPLAINPVC DRAIN LINETELEPHONECABLE TVGASLINEFIBER OPTICTELEPHONEADJ. BOUNDARYSTONE WALLSEWER LINEWATER LINESODPGEEDWDYH STREET SIGN - "NO PARKING"GAS METERELECTRIC METERWATER METERELECTRIC MANHOLESTORM DRAINLIGHT POLEPOWER POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTBOULDERWVC.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS36°10'09"W 379.76'C.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS49°22'11"W 454.56'COL
O
R
ADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND
S
U
RVEYOR
JAS
O
N R. NEIL3793533
It should be noted that SectionT-7o9 of the Aspen Municipal Code, "Establishment of
inventory of historic sites and structures," says, "It is not the intention of the HPC to
include insigniftcant structures or sites," "HPC will focus on those which are unique or
have some special value. . . " and the list includes all structures over 50 years of age
" and which have historic value. "
The data form for 925 KingStreet describes the building as being of "questionable datel
period" and having "little historical significance." That sounds like the definition of an
;,insignificant structure" that, according to code, should not be on the HPC inventory.
935 King Street, according to its data form, says, "The significance of this residential
structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this
structure is representative of Aspen's Mining Era. This structure is of historical impor-
tance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen in
Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry."
This does not sound like the definition of a structure which is "unique" or has "some
special value" if the architecture nor anything else about it is significant nor unique. Part
og *rr building may be over 50 years of age, but the historical information on the data
form seems to admit there is little, if any, historical value'
The municipal code also says structures would be evaluated "by the HPC as to their
current architectural integnty, historic significance and community and neighborhood
influence . . ." Again, thcdata form admits there is no significance in the architecture and
what the data form says makes it important cannot be considered according to the
municpal code. Its significance as being "illustrative" or "representative of a lifestyle" is
not a consideration under municipal code. As it is not architecturally significant nor
historically significant nor of any influence to the community, it, too, should not be on the
HPC list.
/4,, a-,.- L Ln- Svantvrc'
Br{ fitt ZZ c4o;) z 7A -1O (3 4
Ail/l,rf , ,{'{T 5?/05
EXHIBIT C - LETTERS REGARDING THE HISTORY
OF THE PROPERTY WRITTEN BY PAST OWNERS
34
BARN (Laundry room and storage)
Part of the tool room of the old sawmill in Lenado and part cabin that was
sitting below the #1 lift of Aspen Mountain.
Junior Flogus, former owner of the sawmill, still lives in the area.
Calvin, backhoe operator for Gerbaz, backed it in for me on one of their
flatbed ffailers. The barn is still sitting on the beams on which I raised it
and moved it.
Fothergill was living in Isaac's house when I moved it in, and Isaac was
living there when I put the roof on a few years later.
The south and north walls were out. I covered the north wall with metal
and the south with a salvaged window, wood, and metal door.
LITTLE SHED
Was part chicken coop and coal storage for the Sparovic house.
935 KING STREET
No question about it, part of it was here in the last century. A Victorian it
isn'iinspite of I turned posts that partly hold up the porch. It doesn't have
wooden siding-it is metal siding and has been ever since I remember
(over 30 years).
The back part was open porch at one time, later closed in for bathroom
and storage setup. The kitchen part of the house was also added on in later
years as well as the front porch to original two-room cabin'
The light casement windows in back (south) I salvaged from around town
and put them in for a double up of what was there. (We couldn't afford to
buy new stuff, believe me, otherwise that house wouldn't be there as is for
many years.)
If I ever can afford to build, I don't want to live in old trash. I'm tired of it
for too many years. It will be modern-period. It doesn't show how
people usedtolive, it's an example of how poor folks have to live in this
town.
By the way, my mother was born in the last century and is still walking the
streets of Aspen. Nobody seems to want to consider her historic
35
To Whom It May Concern:
We, Louis and Minnie Sparovic, sold the property containing the cabin now
known as9?5 King Street. The cabin was moved onto the propefby us in the year
1965 or L966.At the time of sale, the cabin was sitting on a foundation of rocks on the
south side and logs on the north side. The other structures erected by * in the mid-
sixties were 905 King Street and 932 Queen Street which were included in the sale to
Ernst Kappeli in the fall of L967.
I
Dated / h Lsss.
Notary
IWIABY Pt BLIC &r tt. Etatc oftffi
Besidiry at Bllhg,,WU,
36
To Whom It May Concern:
We, Louis and Minnie Sparovic, sold the property containing the house now
known as 935 King Street. This house, the Sparovic residence, was altered and changed
over the years and added on to. The metal siding was installed in the mid'sixties before
the sale to Emst Kappeli nL967. The only structure on that property before the mid-
sixties in addition to the 935 King Street residence, was one old small chicken cooP
along the east property line. The other structures erected by us in the mid-sixties were
905 King Street andgS2Queen Street which were included in the sale to Ernst Kappeli
in the fall of L967.
I
Dated tflo ,-h /C, Lsss.
\
O2-?4t9,
Sparovic
usJl* &-Notary l/
$OIARYPUBIXC tuOD Etato of MonEr
Beddbg &Bufu5lrf,q.gl',
37
.ilJ.i r, '
STATE OF COI,ORADO
COUNTY OF FITKIN
upon
:..'
AFFIDAVIT))ss
)
1.
2.
IIANS R, GRAIIIGER, of lawful fl9€r being firEt duly sworn' .
oath dePosee and EaYE that :
I regide at ?6? WeEt Hopkins Avenue adjacent to the
cttyandTowngiteofAe-penandthq!_mymailingaddressi;-i,olsoi # 67, AEpen, cororado. 81612-0o57i
x first moved to Aspen in the year of Lg57 and on 'septetnber
Z3rdn 1gS7, i p"""r.iEea roii n- ana I ' in Block !20 , 1n and
to the cttv ""[ r"i*ii[" of Aspent-lg evidenced fY-the re-
;d;d ;;;a iii-eooi Lsl, ar_pale ??9, neception * 105637'
recorded on October 3f tgit, Ln the'recorfis for PitkLn
CountYr Coloradoi
r,purchasedanold-rggcabininoctober.orNovemberof
L957 from rr"r*-ina-if,ri"itne sparovicr $tltl.water Eaet
"i-espen on nigtrii + 8? and moved it to the lots on
Wateri Avenqe i.in Aspen;
r .reetored the floor of the. cabin ylriqtt.had fallen out
during the m'o'iri6-.ngiltl;;, insdal_led electrlc service
and plurnb.fng-and-initattea it** roofing consistLng of
iipr,lri- shiigleg;
on october 21, 1958r r.sold the above referred propeqty
inctuding tfrE'fog-c;bil to George Vagneur as per deed
recorded, on tlot"f,u"r L7, igser- it go6k 186r at-Page 56'
i;;6ti""-* lotiis,- of itre pitkin cor:nty Records;
3.
'4.
5.
6.Ito the best of ny recoltect'ion ltr'
ueri"g of 1959, sold the log cabin
iiorn fh" p"operty to tttake room for
George Vagneur in thein oider I'o be removed
a spec-home;
The log cabin was bought by-Louie end Minnie Lee (nspankyn)
;;;;;i"-r"fro r"rra it-to iiS-ffng qtreet, AsPen, Colorado',lt
8.ieii=ii'"E*i[tI"t (srnati ]and ti1'ga. Titp?lil-YlE^: ::flT:"tI hane been. contacted by the present owners/occupants of
i3:alliifr";;-H; irrlJ""r"gi;"r historl- of this los cabin
r-- i- -€ &ha#" fi lJ*#e-nil-6ilril1:ti -*"
TYY : "il:"::l v-. !?,, o f ^ :l:;;i;i;; frrat thiE los'cabin ,s
Aspen rColorado
Octobar .3lr 1995'
IBSD AND SNPRN TO BE 'ORE
Commiselon exPiresl
:'
azizl 965T/TAlTT
l-***1h
TB IgVd
My
VSN03 NSdSV H39IhIVH9
ME
LgZL946EL6
38
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
November 9, 2020
Updated November 23, 2020 and January 8, 2021
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: 925 King Street Minor Subdivision – Lot Split and Transferrable Development Right
Certificates
Dear Community Development, City Council and Historic Preservation Commission,
Please accept this application to divide the lot located at 925 King Street into two fee simple lots
through a Minor Subdivision - Lot Split review process. The property is located outside the Aspen
infill area and within the R-15A Zone District. The Minor Subdivision – Lot Split includes a request
to demolish non-historic buildings, and to amend a historically inaccurate historic designation
boundary to follow the newly created lot line. A request to sever two transferrable development
right certificates (TDRs), equal to 500 sf of floor area, from the newly created historic lot is
requested.
A portion of the property is
designated to the Aspen Inventory of
Historic Landmark Sites and
Structures – a 19th century miner’s
cabin is located at 935 King Street and
may be shown on the 1896 Willits
Map in Figure 1.
Based on a review of building permit
records (Exhibit D), there are multiple
bandit units on the property which is
considered a non-conforming use that
will be rectified in this application.
Exhibit E outlines the location,
address, and appearance of each
building on the property. It is clear in
the available records that the multiple
buildings on the property were not
permitted or approved by the City of
Aspen and should be removed to bring
the property into conformance with
the R-15A zone district. Figure 1: 1896 Willits Map.
39
Page 2 of 4
January 8, 2021
The City of Aspen GIS department depicts the landmark designation boundary across the middle of
the subject property and the legal description included in the historic designation ordinance does
not align with existing lot lines. This application proposed to clean up the inaccurate historic
designation by aligning the new designation boundary with the newly created historic lot fronting
King Street. Future development on the historic lot will be subject to review by the Historic
Preservation Commission. New development on the non-historic lot will be subject to Land Use
Code requirements for non-historic properties. The entire property is on a slope with King Street
on the high side as the topography drops down toward Queen Street and the Roaring Fork River.
Because of these natural slopes, the newly created non-historic lot fronting Queen Street is not
visible from King Street - there are no visual impacts on the historic lot.
As demonstrated in Exhibits O and P, the newly created lots comply with assigned R-15A Zone
District. Buildings that are clearly non-historic are proposed to be demolished. There are three
buildings with potential historic integrity that need to be further investigated as part of a historic
preservation application. The three buildings to remain are the historic 19th century miner’s cabin
at 935 King Street, the remnants of a log cabin at 925 King Street, and an old shed that may have
been a chicken coop at one time. All three buildings are proposed to remain in place on the newly
created landmark property until a formal determination can be made regarding the integrity of 925
King and the shed by the HPC.
Figure 2: 935 King Street, designated 19th century miner’s cabin.
40
Page 3 of 4
January 8, 2021
Figure 3: 925 King Street with some wood logs exposed.
Figure 4: Shed that was potentially a chicken coop at one time.
41
Page 4 of 4
January 8, 2021
A request to sever two TDRs, equal to 500 sf of floor area, from Parcel 2B will remove development
pressure from the historic resources and reduce the impact of new construction on the historic
character of the neighborhood.
We are working closely with the Engineering Department and the City Attorney’s office to address
water right and ditch easement questions. We respectfully request the resolution of these items
to be included as a condition of approval that is addressed at City Council during the Lot Split review.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this project which cleans up the historic designation
boundary for one of Aspen’s vernacular miner’s cabins, brings a non-conforming property into
compliance with the Land Use Code, and clarifies property boundaries and review jurisdiction for
future development.
Kind Regards,
Sara Adams, AICP
BendonAdams, LLC
Attachments:
A – Lot Split Review Criteria
B – Designation boundary adjustment
B.1 - Demolition of non-historic buildings
B.2 – 1977 survey showing existing properties, 1995 letters from past property owners
C – TDR Review Criteria
C.1 – Acknowledgement of TDR
C.2 – Draft Deed Restriction
D – City of Aspen building permit records
E – Existing conditions photographs and map
F - Land Use Application
G – Pre-application Summary
H – Proof of ownership
I - Authorization to represent
J – HOA Form
K – Agreement to Pay
L – Vicinity Map
M – Mailing List
N - Survey
O – Proposed lot split plat
P – Zoning Compliance plat
42
Exhibit A
Minor Lot Split Review Criteria
Exhibit A – Minor Lot Split Subdivision
Section 26.480.040. - General subdivision review standards.
All subdivisions shall be required to conform to the following general standards and limitations in addition
to the specific standards applicable to each type of subdivision:
(a) Guaranteed Access to a Public Way. All subdivided lots must have perpetual unobstructed legal
vehicular access to a public way. A proposed subdivision shall not eliminate or obstruct legal
vehicular access from a public way to an adjacent property. All streets in a Subdivision retained
under private ownership shall be dedicated to public use to ensure adequate public and
emergency access. Security/privacy gates across access points and driveways are prohibited.
Response – Access is not proposed to change with the proposed lot split. Access for the King Street parcel is
off King Street, and access for the Queen Street parcel is off Queen Street.
(b) Alignment with Original Townsite Plat.
The proposed lot lines shall
approximate, to the extent practical, the
platting of the Original Aspen Townsite,
and additions thereto, as applicable to
the subject land. Minor deviations from
the original platting lines to
accommodate significant features of the
site may be approved.
Response – This area of Aspen was formerly a
hodge podge of mining claims and streets, as
shown on the Willits Map (Figure 1). The proposed
lot line splits the parcel in the middle, which aligns
with adjacent property lot lines (Figure 2).
(c) Zoning Conformance. All new lots shall
conform to the requirements of the zone
district in which the property is situated,
including variations and variances
approved pursuant to this Title. A single
lot shall not be located in more than one
zone district unless unique
circumstances dictate. A rezoning
application may be considered
concurrently with subdivision review.
Figure 1: 1896 Willits Map.
Figure 2: Aspen GIS Map. Note the parcel boundaries. The historic designation
(orange boundary) is inaccurate on the subject parcel.
43
Exhibit A
Minor Lot Split Review Criteria
Response – The new lots conform with zone district requirements- Parcel 2A is proposed to be 21,045sf of
gross lot area and Parcel 2B is proposed to be 15,001sf of gross lot area. The location of the historic miner’s
cabin and woodshed on Parcel 2B conform with required R-15A setbacks and floor area based on the net lot
area of the newly created lot.
(d) Existing Structures, Uses, and Non-Conformities. A subdivision shall not create or increase the
non-conformity of a use, structure or parcel. A rezoning application or other mechanism to
correct the non-conforming nature of a use, structure, or parcel may be considered concurrently.
In the case where an existing structure or use occupies a site eligible for subdivision, the structure
need not be demolished and the use need not be discontinued prior to application for subdivision.
If approval of a subdivision creates a non-conforming structure or use, including a structure spanning
a parcel boundary, such structure or use may continue until recordation of the subdivision plat.
Alternatively, the City may accept certain assurance that the non-conformities will be remedied after
recordation of the subdivision plat. Such assurances shall be reflected in a development agreement or
other legal mechanism acceptable to the City Attorney and may be time-bound or secured with a
financial surety.
Response - All structures, with the exception of the 19th century historic cabin, potential log cabin and
potential woodshed, are proposed to be demolished as a condition of approval for the Minor Lot Split.
Sec. 26.480.060. - Minor subdivisions.
The following types of subdivision may be approved by the City Council, pursuant to the provisions of
Section 26.480.030—Procedures for Review, and the standards and limitations of each type of subdivision,
described below:
(a) Lot Split. The subdivision of a lot for the purpose of creating one additional development parcel
shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied by the City Council, pursuant to Section
26.480.030—Procedures for Review, according to the following standards:
(1) The request complies with the requirements of Section 26.480.040, General Subdivision
Review Standards.
(2) No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split. No more than one (1) lot split shall
occur on any one (1) fathering parcel.
(3) The Lot Split Plat shall be reviewed and recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder, pursuant to Chapter 26.490—Approval Documents. No subdivision agreement
need be prepared or entered into between the applicant and the City unless the Community
Development Director determines such an agreement is necessary.
Response - Compliance with Section 26.480.040 is demonstrated on page 1 of this exhibit. Only two lots are
proposed in this lot split application. A draft lot split plat is included in the application (Exhibit O) for the
City’s review and comment.
44
Exhibit B
Historic Designation Boundary Adjustment
Exhibit B – Designation Boundary Adjustment
Section 26.415.030. - Designation of historic properties.
The designation of properties to an official list, that is known as the Aspen Inventory of Historic
Landmark Sites and Structures which is maintained by the City, is intended to provide a systematic public
process to determine what buildings, areas and features of the historic built environment are of value to
the community. Designation provides a means of deciding and communicating, in advance of specific
issues or conflicts, what properties are in the public interest to protect.
(a) Establishment of the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures. The Aspen
Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures has been established by City Council to
formally recognize those districts, buildings, structures, sites and objects located in Aspen that
have special significance to the United States, Colorado or Aspen history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering or culture. The location of properties listed on the inventory shall be
indicated on maps on file in the Community Development Department.
(b) Aspen Victorian.
(1) Criteria. To be eligible for designation on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites
and Structures as an example of Aspen Victorian, an individual building, site, structure or
object or a collection of buildings, sites, structures or objects must have a demonstrated
quality of significance. The quality of significance of properties shall be evaluated according
to the criteria described below. When designating a historic district, the majority of the
contributing resources in the district shall meet the criteria described below:
a. The property or district is deemed significant for its antiquity, in that it contains structures
which can be documented as built during the 19th century, and
b. The property or district possesses an appropriate degree of integrity of location, setting,
design, materials, workmanship and association, given its age. The City Council shall adopt
and make available to the public score sheets and other devices which shall be used by the
Council and Historic Preservation Commission to apply this criterion.
Response – A boundary adjustment to clean up and align the historic designation border is proposed. The
Land Use Code does not have a specific review process to amend a historic boundary, so a rescinding and
reassignment of the historic boundary is required. We strongly recommend that the historic boundary be
limited to the parcel that contains the historic structures. The lower parcel, 2A, will be vacant and is
significantly lower in elevation than the upper parcel on King Street that contains the historic resources.
There will be no visual link between the lower and upper parcels, and these properties do not share street
frontage.
45
Exhibit B
Historic Designation Boundary Adjustment
The 19th century historic cabin, pictured above, is proposed to remain unchanged in this application. It
appears to be in its current location with minor alterations. This building represents Aspen’s vernacular
miner’s cabin from the turn of the century. It is a one story L-shaped building with an open front porch,
street facing gable end, and double hung windows. Some decorative elements and turned columns are
found on the front porch; however closer inspection is needed to verify if they are original. There are no
changes proposed to the landmark at this time. The property is significant for its antiquity and association
with Aspen’s mining history. The miner’s cabin has a high level of integrity and is proposed to remain on
Aspen’s Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures.
A potentially significant log cabin and woodshed sit on the proposed landmark property, Parcel 2B. We
propose to address the historic significance and integrity of Buildings 5 and 8 at a later date as part of the
application to redevelop the historic property.
Figure 1: 935 King Street, September 2020.
46
Exhibit B
Historic Designation Boundary Adjustment
Figures 2 - 4: East elevation (top left), west elevation (top
right), and south elevation (bottom) of historic building. Small
lean to additions, typical to a miner’s cabin, are located at the
rear of the landmark. September and November, 2020.
47
Exhibit B
Historic Designation Boundary Adjustment
Figures 5 – 7: Top left shows Building 5, a potential old
shed. Top right and bottom show Building 8, the potential
log cabin.
48
Exhibit B
Demolition Review Criteria
Exhibit B.1 – Demolition
Sec. 26.415.080. - Demolition of designated historic properties or properties within a historic district.
It is the intent of this Chapter to preserve the historic and architectural resources that have demonstrated
significance to the community. Consequently no demolition of properties designated on the Aspen
Inventory of Historic Landmark Site and Structures or properties within a Historic District will be allowed
unless approved by the HPC in accordance with the standards set forth in this Section.
(4) The HPC shall review the application, the staff report and hear evidence presented by the
property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine if the
standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if it is
demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria:
a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety
and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner;
b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly
maintain the structure;
c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen; or
d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic,
architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance; and
Additionally, for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met:
a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or Historic District in which
it is located;
b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the
Historic District or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated
properties; and
c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the
area.
Response – Buildings 1,2,3,4 and 6 depicted on Exhibit E are proposed for demolition. These are all clearly
not 19th century buildings and meet the criteria for demolition. Building 5 appears to potentially be an old
outbuilding that was noted in a 1995 letter on file with the City and shown on a 1969 site plan and a 1977
property survey. Building 4 is not shown on any of the documents on file with the City or the County. Building
7 is the historic landmark and Building 8 may potentially be a log cabin. We request the ability to discuss
the historic integrity of Building 5 and Building 8 when an application for redevelopment is submitted in the
future for the historic property.
Building 4, shown below and on Exhibit E, has a gable roof form and siding seem typical to an old accessory
building; however, the building appears to have been rebuilt using old materials. It is not shown on the 1896
Willit’s Map and was not shown on the 1969 site plan or the 1977 survey.
49
Exhibit B
Demolition Review Criteria
Figure 1: East Elevation, Building 4,
September 2020.
Figure 3: Southeast corner, Building 4, November 2020.
Figure 2: 1896 Willits Map. Arrow points to 935 King Street miner’s cabin.
50
Exhibit C – TDRs
Exhibit C
TDR Review Criteria
Sec. 26.535.070. - Review criteria for establishment of a historic transferable development right.
A historic TDR certificate may be established by the Mayor if the City Council, pursuant to adoption of an
ordinance, finds all the following standards met.
(a) The sending site is a historic landmark on which the development of a single-family or duplex
residence is a permitted use, pursuant to Chapter 26.710, Zone Districts. Properties on which such
development is a conditional use shall not be eligible.
Response – 925 King Street is a historic landmark site and single family or duplex are permitted uses in
the R-15A zone district.
(b) It is demonstrated that the sending site has permitted unbuilt development rights, for either a
single-family or duplex home, equaling or exceeding two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of
floor area multiplied by the number of historic TDR certificates requested.
Response – The allowable floor area for two detached homes on the newly created Parcel 2B is
4,829.84 sf
(c) It is demonstrated that the establishment of TDR certificates will not create a nonconformity. In
cases where a nonconformity already exists, the action shall not increase the specific
nonconformity.
Response – A nonconformity is not created or increased as part of this request.
(d) The analysis of unbuilt development right shall only include the actual built development, any
approved development order, the allowable development right prescribed by zoning for a single-
family or duplex residence, and shall not include the potential of the sending site to gain floor area
bonuses, exemptions or similar potential development incentives. Properties in the MU Zone
District which do not currently contain a single-family home or duplex established prior to the
adoption of Ordinance #7, Series of 2005, shall be permitted to base the calculation of TDRs on
one hundred percent (100%) of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6 zone
district. This is only for the purpose of creating TDRs and does not permit the on-site development
of one hundred percent (100%) of the allowable floor area on an equivalent-sized lot in the R-6
zone district. If the additional twenty percent (20%) of allowable floor area exceeds five hundred
(500) square feet, the applicant may not request a floor area bonus from HPC at any time in the
future. Any development order to develop floor area, beyond that remaining legally connected to
the property after establishment of TDR Certificates, shall be considered null and void.
Response - The allowable floor area for two detached homes on the subject property is 4,829.84 sf
and a total of 1,742.5 sf of floor area will exist after demolition of non-historic structures. 3,087.34 sf
of allowable floor area is unused on the subject property. Two TDRs equal to 500 sf of floor area is
requested which, if severed, will leave 2,587.34 sf of available unbuilt floor area on the subject parcel.
(e) The proposed deed restriction permanently restricts the maximum development of the property
(the sending site) to an allowable floor area not exceeding the allowance for a single-family or
duplex residence minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplied by the
number of historic TDR certificates established.
For properties with multiple or unlimited floor areas for certain types of allowed uses, the
maximum development of the property, independent of the established property use, shall be
the floor area of a single-family or duplex residence (whichever is permitted) minus two hundred
51
Exhibit C – TDRs
Exhibit C
TDR Review Criteria
fifty (250) square feet of floor area multiplies by the number of historic TDR certificates
established.
The deed restriction shall not stipulate an absolute floor area, but shall stipulate a square footage
reduction from the allowable floor area for a single-family or duplex residence, as may be
amended from time to time. The sending site shall remain eligible for certain floor area incentives
and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Land Use Code, as may be amended from
time to time. The form of the deed restriction shall be acceptable to the City Attorney.
Response – A draft deed restriction is included in the application for review. It is understood that the
property owner may elect to sever up to two TDR certificates and is not obligated to sever both TDRs.
It is also understood that floor area equal to the number of TDRs issued is permanently severed from
the property upon the recordation of the deed restriction, and not upon approval of an ordinance.
(f) A real estate closing has been scheduled at which, upon satisfaction of all relevant
requirements, the City shall execute and deliver the applicable number of historic TDR certificates
to the sending site property owner and that property owner shall execute and deliver a deed
restriction lessening the available development right of the subject property together with the
appropriate fee for recording the deed restriction with the County Clerk and Recorder's office.
Response – n/a.
(g) It shall be the responsibility of the sending site property owner to provide building plans and a
zoning analysis of the sending site to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director.
Certain review fees may be required for the confirmation of built floor area.
Response – Please refer to Exhibit P for a zoning analysis.
(h) The sale, assignment, conveyance or other transfer or change in ownership of transferable
development rights certificates shall be recorded in the real estate records of the Pitkin County
Clerk and Recorder and must be reported by the grantor to the City of Aspen Community
Development Department within five (5) days of such transfer. The report of such transfer shall
disclose the certificate number, the grantor, the grantee and the total value of the consideration
paid for the certificate. Failure to timely or accurately report such transfer shall not render the
transferable development right certificate void.
Response – n/a.
(i) TDR certificates may be issued at the pace preferred by the property owner.
Response – It is understood that the property owner may elect to sever up to two TDR certificates and
is not obligated to sever both TDRs. It is also understood that floor area equal to the number of TDRs
issued is permanently severed from the property upon the recordation of the deed restriction, and not
upon approval of an ordinance.
(j) City Council may find that the creation of TDRs is not the best preservation solution for the
affected historic resource and deny the application to create TDRs. HPC shall provide Council with
a recommendation.
Response – n/a.
52
53
1
DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF A
HISTORIC TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT
PURSUANT TO ASPEN CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE #___ , SERIES OF 20__
THIS DEED RESTRICTION AND AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _____ day of
______________, 20__, by 925 King Street Com LLC, (hereinafter referred to as “Owner”),
whose address is 925 King Street, legally described as Parcel 2 of the Boundary Agreement Plat
recorded April 29, 1983 in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception No. 240935, Pitkin County, Colorado,
Parcel ID 2737-074-00-022, and The City of Aspen, a body politic and corporate pursuant to its
Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of Colorado, acting through its City Council,
(hereinafter the “City”);
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, Owner owns real property more specifically described as; Parcel 2 of the
Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983 in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception No. 240935,
Pitkin County, Colorado (hereinafter referred to as “Real Property”), which Real Property is
designated as a Historic Site, as such are defined in the City of Aspen Land Use Code (“City
Code”); and
WHEREAS, City Council has approved a lot split and subsequent plat which has been
recorded as Reception No. _________ to create Parcels 2A and 2B of the King Street Lot Split, of
which Parcel 2A is not a Historic Site and Parcel 2B is designated as a Historic Site and is the
“Sending Site”; and
WHEREAS, Owner has submitted an affidavit, duly notarized, in compliance with Section
26.535.090.A.2 of the City Code, and supplied the necessary application materials identified in
Section 26.535.090 showing compliance with the criteria set forth in Section 26.535.070 of the
City Code; and
WHEREAS, The Community Development Department has reviewed Owner’s application
according to the review standards identified in 26.535.070 of the City Code, and has
recommended approval of the application and the establishment of up to two (2) approved
Historic TDR Certificates as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance #____, Series of 20___ (the “Ordinance”) was
approved on ___(date)__________, establishing the above referenced Historic TDR Certificates,
and requiring that a Deed Restriction be recorded in real property records of Pitkin County,
designating the Real Property as a Sending Site and permanently restricting the development of
the Real Property (the Sending Site) to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for a
single-family residence or duplex if allowed, minus two hundred and fifty (250) square feet of
Floor Area multiplied by the number of Historic TDR Certificates established; and
54
2
WHEREAS, in consideration of the establishment of one (1) or two (2) Historic TDR
Certificates pursuant to the Ordinance and City Code, Owner agrees to restrict the Real Property
as set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and obligations contained
herein, Owner and the City hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. Development of the Real Property (the Sending Site) is hereby permanently
restricted to an allowable Floor Area not exceeding the allowance for a single-
family residence or duplex as otherwise permitted by the City Code on the Real
Property, minus any deductions resulting from previous issuance of TDR
certificate(s) and minus 250 square feet, that being two hundred fifty (250)
square feet of Floor Area multiplied by the one (1) Historic TDR Certificate hereby
established.
2. The property owner may elect to sever up to two (2) TDR certificates from the
property and is not required by Ordinance # ___, Series of 2021 to sever both TDR
certificates. The property owner, at their sole discretion, may elect to sever no
TDRs, one (1) TDR or two (2) TDRs fom the property.
3. In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to the City Code and the
Ordinance, the City shall cause the issuance of one (1) Historic TDR Certificate,
executed by the Mayor, allowing the transfer of development rights to a Receiver
Site to be determined pursuant to the City Code. This Historic TDR Certificate may
be sold, assigned, transferred, or conveyed. Transfer of title shall be evidenced by
an assignment of ownership on the actual certificate document. Upon transfer,
the new owner may request the City re-issue the certificate acknowledging the
new owner. Reissuance shall not require adoption of a new ordinance. The
market for such Historic TDR Certificates shall remain unrestricted and the City
shall not prescribe or guarantee the monetary value of any Historic TDR
Certificates.
4. This deed restriction shall not be construed to stipulate an absolute Floor Area on
the Real Property, but only a square footage reduction from the allowable Floor
Area, as that allowable Floor Area may be amended from time to time.
5. The Real Property (Sending Site) shall remain eligible for Floor Area incentives
and/or exemptions as may be authorized by the City Code, as it may be amended
from time to time.
6. This restriction may be modified only in a writing signed by both the Owner and
the City.
55
3
7. Unless modified as stated above, this Agreement shall constitute a covenant
running with the Real Property as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall
be specifically enforceable by, the City Council of the City of Aspen by any
appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction or abatement.
[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGES]
56
4
IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument on the date and
year above first written.
OWNER:
By:___________________________
King Street Com LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ________ day of
______________, 20___, by ___________
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:___________________
_____________________________
Notary Public
57
5
APPROVAL OF CITY ATTORNEY
By:___________________________
James R. True, City Attorney
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
a body politic and corporate pursuant to
its Home-Rule Charter and the Constitution of the State of Colorado
By:____________________________ Date:______________
Torre, Mayor
STATE OF COLORADO )
)ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _____ day of
_________________, 20__, by_____________, as Mayor of the City of Aspen, Colorado.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:___________________
_____________________________
Notary Public
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
(S16°58'23"W 4.40')
S65°31'54"E 42.31'
S35°34'09"W 94.17'
(S34°45'00"W 93.75')
N53
°
3
2'
2
1
"
E
E
D
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
D
SS
HYD
D
E
G
G
G
E
N16°39'30"E 96.88'S23°25'57"W 68.39'S64°20'43"W 84.26'
N84°24'49
"
W
1
2
1
.
3
1
'
S
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
S17°48'05"W 4.49'
(S
6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
1
6
3
.
2
8
'
)
(S66°21'00"E 42.12')
(S63°18'30"W 83.92')
(N85°22'00"
W
1
2
1
.
3
6
'
)
(N30°17'00"E 132.20')
(N15°24'00"E 96.70')(S22°46'00"W 68.06')BASIS OF BEARINGSS
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
N30°52'01"E 132.20'
12.5' ACCESS
EASEMENTS
REC. NO.240935
(EXCEPTION # 18)
REC. NO.113866
(EXCEPTION # 14)
REC.NO. 125845
(EXCEPTION #16)
Refer to
Detail (A)18" CMP
(N02°37'05"W 49.64')
N01°25'15"W 49.69'
1 ST. FRAME
CABIN
1 STORY DUPLEX
CABIN POSTED: 932
W
O
O
D
E
N
S
H
E
D
1 STORY
CABIN
22.1'
41.6'
18.3'
56.8'
27.3'
52.3'
E
CONCRETE
FOOT BRIDGE
CPP
10" (IN)DECKOED
G
38.1'
39.6'
9.8'
12.0'
29.8'
19.2'
POSTED: 905
0.7'NEIGHBOR'SDECK1.7'
5.4'
5.5'
5.4'
1 ST
O
R
Y
WOOD
E
N
SHED
POND S17°48'05"W 4.49'
BAY
WINDOW
1 STORY
FRAME
BUILDING
13.8'
4.1'
8.4'
POSTED:925 12
1 STORY CABIN
PLA
N
T
E
R
ASPEN DITCHOE
GM
GM
E
E
OE
OE
OE
E
LE
A
N
T
O
POSTED: 935
PO
R
C
H
E
1 STORY
CABIN
POSTED:
925
E
SHED
3.6'X4.0'
ED
G
E
O
F
P
A
V
E
M
E
N
T
TB
C
CPP
10" (OUT)
G
EDGE OF
WATER
S
6
4
°
3
0
'
5
3
"
E
5
4
.
3
3
'
(S
6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
5
4
.
5
1
'
)
A
B
LOT AREA
36,046 SQ. FT. +/-
0.82 ACRES LINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYLINE REPRESENTSHISTORIC DESIGNATIONBOUNDARYPROPERTY USE LICENSE
(REVOCABLE)
RECEPTION NO. 498801
EXCEPTION # 24
ACCESS EASEMENT
BOOK 13, PAGE 35
(4.37')
1 ST1.0' WIDE
CONCTRETE
WALL
M
.
S
.
5
3
1
0
S
U
N
S
E
T
L
O
D
E
N16°39'30"E 96.88'
(N15°24'00"E 96.70') 320.
8
2'
12.5' WATERLINE
EASEMENT
BOOK 425, PAGE 759
BOOK 204, PAGE 291
(EXCEPTION # 19)
5 FT UTILITY
EASEMENT
BOOK 425, PAGE 774
BOOK 204, PAGE 291
(EXCEPTION # 20)
(NOMINAL) QUE
E
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
RIGHT-OF-WAY &
UTILITY
EASEMENT
(EXCEPTION #21)
20.0'(EXCEPTION #23)(EXCEPTION #22)Corner No. 11 - Tract 40
Aspen Townsite
ANNE
X
A
TI
O
N
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
(EXCE
P
TI
O
N
#
1
7)
KI
N
G
S
T
R
E
E
T
N30°52'01"E 132.20'N16°39'30"E 96.88'(N15°24'00"E 96.70')(N30°17'00"E 132.20')1 inch = ft.
(IN U.S. SURVEY FEET)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0020 10 20 40 80
20 BYNO.DATEBYPROJECT NO.REVISIONHIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC.PHONE (970) 945-8676 - FAX (970) 945-2555www.hceng.comdrawn by:checked by:date:file:1517 BLAKE AVENUE, STE 101, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601SHEET NUMBERS -T -R-C-2201683
1 of 3ROCKY MOUNTAIN PROPERTY II, LLCPITKIN COUNTYIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT925 KING STREETASPEN, COLORADO 81611DMCBB09/15/2020190.10.2020See Note #9BWAB29.14.2020Updated Title CommitmentBWAB710S84WPitkinNOTES
1.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY: SEPTEMBER 03, 2020,
2.ALL BEARINGS ARE GRID BEARINGS OF THE COLORADO STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, CENTRAL ZONE,
NORTH AMERICAN DATUM 1983. THE REFERENCE BEARING BETWEEN "A" (A FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25"
YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 2376) AND "B" (A FOUND #5 REBAR WITH RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 16129)
WITH A BEARING OF S23°25'57"W. ALL DISTANCES ARE GROUND DISTANCES BASED ON A COMBINED SCALE
FACTOR.
3.THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR OF THE BOUNDARY SHOWN AND
DESCRIBED HEREON TO DETERMINE:
A) OWNERSHIP OF THE TRACT OF LAND
B) COMPATIBILITY OF THIS DESCRIPTION WITH THOSE OF ADJOINERS
C) RIGHTS-OF-WAY, EASEMENTS AND ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AFFECTING THIS PARCEL.
4.FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENT, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR TITLE OF RECORD, HIGH COUNTRY
ENGINEERING, INC. RELIED UPON TITLE COMMITMENT NO. 20004521 ISSUED BY FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 13, 2020. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO ALL CONDITIONS
AND RESTRICTIONS CONTAINED THEREIN.
5.THE CLIENT DID NOT REQUEST ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND/OR IMPROVEMENTS BE
RESEARCHED OR SHOWN ON THIS PLAT.
6.ALL DIMENSIONS AND COURSES ARE AS MEASURED IN THE FIELD UNLESS DENOTED IN PARENTHESES, WHICH
DENOTE THE BOUNDARIES OF RECORD ON THE ORIGINAL PLAT OF LOT 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT
RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO.
7.BUILDING MEASUREMENTS ARE AT LOWEST PRACTICABLE POINT ON VENEER.
8.ACCESS EASEMENT PER PLAT BOOK 13, PAGE 35 AS SHOWN HEREON.
9. THE PLATTED LOTS, BLOCKS AND STREETS RECORDED AS THE HUGHES ADDITION TO THE ASPEN TOWNSITE,
RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 108453 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, AS
SHOWN HEREON, APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN EXTINGUISHED BY THAT INSTRUMENT RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION
NUMBER 113059 (BOOK 197 - PAGE 170) AND THAT QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER
240949 IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE SAID COUNTY, AND ARE SHOWN HEREON FOR REFERENCE ONLY.
10. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION
BASED ON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
11. NOTICE: THIS PLAT AND THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR
EXTENDED PURPOSE BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES
OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. THIS DOCUMENT AND THE WORK IT REPRESENTS IS THE
PROPERTY OF HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. NO PART OF THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE STORED,
REPRODUCED, DISTRIBUTED OR USED TO PREPARE DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN
PERMISSION. AN ORIGINAL SEAL AND ORIGINAL SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED TO VALIDATE THIS DOCUMENT AND IS
EXCLUSIVE TO HIGH COUNTRY ENGINEERING, INC. AND THE OWNER(S) OF RECORD AS OF THIS DATE, OF THE
BOUNDARY DELINEATED HEREON AND THE SUBJECT OF THE SURVEY. THIS PLAT IS RESTRICTED TO THE INTENT
OF TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101, 5 (a) AND (b) C.R.S.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT
A TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN
SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
TOWN OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
CHAIN LINK FENCE LINE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
Parcel 2 of the Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983, in Plat
Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception number 240935, Pitkin County, Colorado.
SET #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 23875
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 2376
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 16129
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP STAMPED A.S.E.I. L.S. NO. (ILLEGIBLE)
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED ALPINE L.S. NO. (ILLEGIBLE)
FOUND 1.5" IRON PIPE
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.5" ALUMINUM CAP (ILLEGIBLE)
WIRE FENCE LINEXX
EASEMENT LINE
BUILDING SETBACK LINE
BOUNDARY OR LOT LINE
ADJOINER LINE
WOOD FENCE LINE
FLOW LINE
ASPHALT
BUILDING LINE HATCH
CONCRETE
FLAGSTONE
ROCK RETAINING WALL
WATER
WOOD DECK
LAND SURVEY PLAT DEPOSIT
CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FOR DEPOSIT IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND
RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2019, PLAT BOOK _____, PAGE
______, AS RECEPTION NO.________________.
TITLE 38, ARTICLE 50, §101 C.R.S. (5)(a) PLATS SHALL BE DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS
SECTION FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF RECORDING INFORMATION ON SURVEYING MONUMENTATION IN
ORDER TO PROVIDE SURVEY DATA FOR SUBSEQUENT LAND SURVEYS AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED
TO AFFECT, IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER, THE DESCRIPTION OF A SUBDIVISION, LINE, OR CORNER
CONTAINED IN THE OFFICIAL PLATS AND FIELD NOTES FILED AND OF RECORD OR TO SUBDIVIDE
BOUNDARY. (b) NO PLAT DEPOSITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION SHALL CONSTITUTE NOTICE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 38-35-109 CRS.
IN THE EVENT THIS SURVEY CANNOT BE DEPOSITED, THIS IS YOUR NOTICE THAT
THIS IS NOT A RECORDABLE DOCUMENT.
______________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDER
BY:____________________________________ DEPUTY
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION
I, BILL W.A. BAKER, A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO (#23875) DO BY
THESE PRESENTS CERTIFY TO PALM FAMILY INVESTMENTS, ROCKY MOUNTAIN PROPERTY II, LLC AND FIRST
AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT THE DRAWING SHOWN HEREON, WITH NOTES ATTACHED HERETO AND
MADE A PART HEREOF, REPRESENTS A MONUMENTED LAND SURVEY MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF SAID SURVEY IS
RENDERED BY THIS PLAT. THIS SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF
PRACTICE, IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS SURVEY PLAT COMPLIES
WITH TITLE 38-51-102, COLORADO REVISED STATUTES.
BILL W.A. BAKER, COLORADO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #23875
CERTIFIED FEDERAL SURVEYOR #1699
FOUND #5 REBAR WITH 1.25" YELLOW PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 9184 (WITNESS CORNER)
FOUND #4 REBAR WITH 1.0" RED PLASTIC CAP L.S. NO. 25947 (CONFLICTING)
DETAIL (A)
SCALE 1" = 5.0'
MONUMENT LEGEND
STORM SEWER MANHOLE
CURB INLET
GAS METER
TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
FIRE HYDRANT
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
ELECTRICAL METER
MAIL BOX
E
D
G
HYD
E
SANITARY MANHOLESS
4" STOVE PIPE
ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERE
LIGHT POLE
LANDSCAPING
LINE LEGEND
LEGEND
FOUND 1.5" REBAR NO CAP
OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE OE
ROCK RETAINING WALL
FOUND BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT BRASS CAP STAMPED 1954
First American Title Insurance Company - Commitment Number 20004521 - Dated 13 August, 2020
Items No. 1-9 are standard exceptions.
10. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the instrument dated June 24, 1955,
and recorded October 21, 1955, in Book 180 at Page 454, as Reception No. 103078. - 1889 PATENT IN TITLE CHAIN
11. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as described in the United
States Patent dated August 21, 1958, and recorded August 29, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69, as Reception No.
106874. - VESTING DEED IN TITLE CHAIN
12. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2 at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956. - CADASTRAL SURVEY OF EAST ASPEN
ADDITION
13. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Plat of East Aspen Addition, recorded August 24,
1959, in Plat Book 2 at Page 252, as Reception No. 108453 and the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2A at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956. - PLAT OF ENTRY EAST ASPEN
ADDITION AND HUGHES ADDITION - NOT DEPICTED
14. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated July 12, 1962,
and recorded July 12, 1962 in Book 198 at Page 239 as Reception No. 113658; and the Deed dated August 17,
1962, and recorded August 17, 1962, in Book 198 at Page 543 as Reception No. 113866. - SALE AGREEMENT AND
VESTING DEED IN TITLE CHAIN - 25ft ACCESS EASEMENT DEDICATION - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
15. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution, dated February 7,
1963, and recorded February 8, 1963, in Book 201 at Page 145, as Reception No. 114903. - RATIFICATION OF TOWN OF
ASPEN BOUNDARIES - NOT DEPICTED
16. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed, dated November
7, 1966, and recorded November 7, 1966, in Book 223 at Page 562, as Reception No. 125845. - ENCUMBERS PARCELS
4 & 5 OF THE BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT PLAT - APPURTENANT EASEMENT TO SUBJECT PARCEL 3
17. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under an ordinance annexing certain
unincorporated territory to the City of Aspen, Colorado, recorded June 27, 1979, in Book 371 at Page 450, as
Reception No. 215764, and any and all notes, encroachments and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Smuggler
Enclave annexation recorded June 27, 1979, in Plat Book 8 at Page 13, as Reception No. 215765. - EASTERLY
BOUNDARY LINE OF PARCEL 2 PLOTTED AS SHOWN DELINEATES ANNEXATION BOUNDARY
18. Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Boundary Agreement Plat, recorded April
29, 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 35, as Reception No. 240935. - INITIATING INSTRUMENT SUBJECT PARCEL -
PARCEL 2 BOUNDARY PLOTTED AS SHOWN
19. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated October 14, 1963,
and recorded October 15, 1963, in Book 204 at Page 291, as Reception Number 116413, and Agreement dated September
25, 1981, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 759 as Reception No. 240936. - UTILITY ENCROACHMENT
LICENCE AGREEMENT - APPURTENANT EASEMENT TO SUBJECT PARCEL 2 PLOTTED AS SHOWN
20. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Deed dated April 29,
1982, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 774 as Reception No. 240940.- APPURTENANT UTILITY
EASEMENT - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
21. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29,
1982, in Book 425 at Page 781, as Reception No. 240944, and in the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29, 1982, in
Book 425 at Page 791, as Reception No. 240949, and in the Quit Claim Deed, dated April 29, 1982, and recorded
April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 783, as Reception No. 240945. - INSTRUMENTS IN TITLE CHAIN - RIGHT-OF-WAY
AND EASEMENT PLOTTED AS SHOWN
22. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Decree and Order, recorded
September 6, 1990, in Book 628 at Page 893, as Reception No. 325947.- EXISTING LOCATION OF ASPEN DITCH -
PLOTTED AS SHOWN
23. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded January
2, 1990, in Book 634 at Page 942, as Reception No. 328344 and Quit Claim Deed, recorded January 15, 1992, in
Book 666 at Page 780, as Reception No. 340555. - EXISTING LOCATION OF ASPEN DITCH - PLOTTED AS SHOWN
24. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Property Use License, recorded
June 18, 2004, as Reception No. 498801. NOTE: This License was not perpetual and expired upon previous conveyance of
the land. - ENCROACHMENT PLOTTED AS SHOWN
25. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed and Assignment
dated December 31, 2012, and recorded January 9, 2013, as Reception No. 596026. - NOT PLOTTABLE
72
73
74
November 2017 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
LAND USE APPLICATION
Project Name and Address:_________________________________________________________________________
Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) _____________________________
APPLICANT:
Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________________
Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone #: ___________________________ email: __________________________________
REPRESENTIVATIVE:
Name: _________________________________________________________________________________________________
Address:________________________________________________________________________________________________
Phone#: _____________________________ email:___________________________________
Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions
Review: Administrative or Board Review
Have you included the following?FEES DUE: $ ______________
Pre-Application Conference Summary
Signed Fee Agreement
HOA Compliance form
All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary
Required Land Use Review(s):
Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields:
Net Leasable square footage _________ Lodge Pillows______ Free Market dwelling units ______
Affordable Housing dwelling units_____ Essential Public Facility square footage ________
1
4,225
75
PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY
PLANNER: Sarah Yoon, sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com
DATE: October 15, 2020
PROJECT LOCATION: 925 King Street
REQUEST: Minor Subdivision – Lot Split
DESCRIPTION: 925 King Street (historically known as 935 King Street) is a historic property that is
approximately 34,848 sf in size and located in the R-15A zone district. There appears to be at least 4 detached
dwelling units on this property including the historic miner’s cabin and a log cabin that was relocated to this
property in the 1960s. The following three addresses are associated with this lot and the existing building
permit files do not provide clarity regarding the existing structures on site: 925 King Street, 935 King Street,
932 Queen Street. Although the historic designation boundary line for the property is not accurately portrayed
on the City’s GIS map, the entire lot is historically designated via Ordinance #34, Series of 1992.
The applicant would like to divide the subject site into two separate lots through the Minor Subdivision – Lot
Split process and amend the historic designation boundary line to the lot that contains the historic resource.
Amending the extent of the designated area will be processed as a rescinding of the designation, but in this
case it will be an amendment or reduction of the designated area, not a complete de-listing. No new
development is proposed but the demolition of existing structures may be required for the Lot Split. As a
landmark property, the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) will review the request for rescinding of the
designation and will make a recommendation to City Council. HPC will be the final review authority on any
demolition of structures but their decision will be subject to Notice of Call-Up to City Council. City Council will
be the final review authority on Notice of Call-Up, the changes to the historic designation and Lot Split request
at a public hearing.
No record of a previous lot split has been found but will be confirmed during the land use process. The
minimum gross lot area is 15,000 sf in the R-15A zone district. Newly created lots must comply with underlying
zoning requirements.
The Minor Subdivision – Lot Split request requires Neighborhood Outreach prior to the public hearing in
accordance with the Land Use Code Section 26.304.035. Staff recommends the applicant provide enhanced
public information according to Section 26.304.035.C.3. Staff recommends additional information on the
application be provided in both the mailing notice and the posting on site. The additional information included
in the mailing should include a proposed site plan and description of the proposal. A poster showing the
proposed lot split should also be posted on site. The poster should include the site plan, description, and
contact information for the applicant.
RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS:
Section Number Section Title
26.304 Common Development Review Procedures
26.304.035 Neighborhood Outreach
26.415.030.B Aspen Victorian
26.415.050 Rescinding (Amending) Historic Designation
26.415.080 Demolition of Designated Historic Property
26.415.120 .B Notice to City Council
26.480.030.B Procedures for Review – Minor Subdivision
26.480.040 General Subdivision Review Standards
26.480.060.A Lot Split
76
26.490 Approval Documents – For Plat Requirements
26.757.050 Calculations & Measurements
26.710.060 Moderate-Density Residential (R-15A)
For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below:
Land Use Application Land Use Code
REVIEW BY: - Staff for completeness review of application.
- Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) for the demolition of
structures on the historic lot and recommendation to City Council about
the adjustments to the designation boundary lines.
- City Council for Notice of Call-Up and final decision on lot split and
designation.
PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, HPC and City Council
PLANNING FEES: $3,250 for 10 hours of staff time
REFERRAL FEES: Engineering Department: $325/hour
Parks Department: $650 flat fee
TOTAL DEPOSIT: $4,225 (Additional/fewer hours billed/refunded at $325 per hour)
APPLICATION CHECKLIST:
(Please submit a digital copy of the application to the planner listed on the preapplication.)
Completed Land Use Application, HOA Compliance Form, and signed Fee Agreement.
Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).
Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur,
consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an
ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing
the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts
and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the
Development Application. The purpose of this requirement is to show that the Applicant has the
authority to apply for a Land Use Case.
Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states
the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the
applicant.
A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography, existing
structures, and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land
surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado.
A written description of the proposal and written explanation of how the request complies with the
review standards/criteria relevant to the application: Historic Designation (26.415.030.B),
Demolition (26.415.080), and Minor Subdivision – Lot Split (26.480.060).
Photographs and/or other graphic materials that document the physical characteristics of the
historic structure and site boundary map.
77
Draft Subdivision Plat meeting the standards of Section 26.490.
Depending on further review of the case, additional items may be requested. Once the application
is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:
Total deposit for review of the application.
Disclaimer:
The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is
based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations
that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right.
78
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 1 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Commitment
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
Issued By
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOTICE
IMPORTANT—READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE
INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE
CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT.
THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION,
OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY
THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION,
ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY,
AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED.
THE COMPANY’S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED
IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT.
THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY
OTHER PERSON.
COMMITMENT TO ISSUE POLICY
Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and the Commitment
Conditions,First American Title Insurance Company, a Colorado Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the
Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment
Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A
both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured.
If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within six months after the Commitment Date, this
Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
First American Title Insurance Company
If this jacket was created electronically, it constitutes an original document.
79
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 2 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
COMMITMENT CONDITIONS
1.DEFINITIONS
(a) "Knowledge" or "Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public
Records.
(b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that by law constitute real property. The
term "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title,
interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does
not modify or limit the extent that a right of access to and from the Land is to be insured by the Policy.
(c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means
authorized by law.
(d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to
be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment.
(e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued
pursuant to this Commitment.
(f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each
Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment.
(g) "Public Records": Records established under state statutes at the Commitment Date for the purpose of imparting
constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge.
(h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A.
2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment
to Issue Policy, this Commitment terminates and the Company’s liability and obligation end.
3. The Company’s liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without:
(a) the Notice;
(b) the Commitment to Issue Policy;
(c) the Commitment Conditions;
(d) Schedule A;
(e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
(f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; and
(g) a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
4.COMPANY’S RIGHT TO AMEND
The Company may amend this Commitment at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect,
lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any
liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other
amendment to this Commitment.
5.LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY
(a) The Company’s liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured’s actual expense
incurred in the interval between the Company’s delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the
delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured’s good faith reliance to:
(i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements;
(ii) eliminate, with the Company’s written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or
(iii) acquire the Title or create the Mortgage covered by this Commitment.
(b) The Company shall not be liable under Commitment Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the
amendment or had Knowledge of the matter and did not notify the Company about it in writing.
(c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have
incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commitment was first delivered to
the Proposed Insured.
80
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are
prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5030000 (1-31-17)Page 3 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
(d) The Company’s liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured’s actual expense incurred in good faith
and described in Commitment Conditions 5(a)(i) through 5(a)(iii) or the Proposed Policy Amount.
(e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any.
(f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Commitment unless all of the
Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company.
(g) In any event, the Company’s liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy.
6.LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT
(a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this
Commitment.
(b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terms and provisions of this Commitment.
(c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the
parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations,
representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject
matter of this Commitment.
(d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation
to provide coverage beyond the terms and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy.
(e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized
by the Company.
(f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company’s only
liability will be under the Policy.
7.IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT
The issuing agent is the Company’s agent only for the limited purpose of issuing title insurance commitments and
policies. The issuing agent is not the Company’s agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services.
8.PRO-FORMA POLICY
The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro-forma policy illustrating the coverage that the
Company may provide. A pro-forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro-forma policy is
delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure.
9.ARBITRATION
The Policy contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Proposed Policy Amount is $2,000,000 or
less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Proposed Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties. A Proposed Insured may review a copy of the arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org/arbitration.
81
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited.
Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 4 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
Colorado - Schedule A
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule A
Transaction Identification Data for reference only:
Issuing Agent:Winter VanAlstine Issuing Office:Attorneys Title Insurance Agency
of Aspen, LLC
Issuing Office's ALTA® Registry ID: 1019587 Loan ID No.:
Commitment No.:20004521 Issuing Office File No.:20004521
Property Address:925 King Street, Aspen, CO 81611
SCHEDULE A
1. Commitment Date: August 13, 2020 at 07:45 AM
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount Premium
A.ALTA Owners Policy (06/17/06)$19,000,000.00 $26,670.00
Proposed Insured:Palm Family Investments LLC, a __________limited liability company
Certificate of Taxes Due $25.00
Endorsements:
CO-110.1 (Delete 1, 2, 3, 4)$75.00
Additional Charges:$0
Total $26,770.00
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee simple.
4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in:
Rocky Mtn. Property II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
5. The land referred to in the Commitment is described as follows:
SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO
For informational purposes only, the property address is: 925 King Street, Aspen, CO 81611.
82
SCHEDULE A
(Continued)
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited.
Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5033708-A (4-9-18)Page 5 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
Colorado - Schedule A
Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC
By:
Winter VanAlstine
Authorized Officer or Agent
FOR INFORMATION PURPOSED OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THIS COMMITMENT, CONTACT: Attorneys
Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC,715 West Main Street, Suite 202, Aspen, CO 81611, Phone: 970 925-7328, Fax:
970 925-7348.
83
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited.
Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 6 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
Colorado - Schedule BI & BII
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI & BII
Commitment No: 20004521
SCHEDULE B, PART I
Requirements
All of the following Requirements must be met:
1.The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this
Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then
make additional Requirements or Exceptions.
2.Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured.
3.Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company.
4.Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must
be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records.
5.Payment of all taxes and assessments now due and payable as shown on a certificate of taxes due from the
County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's Authorized Agent.
6.Evidence that all assessments for common expenses, if any, have been paid.
7.Final Affidavit and Agreement executed by Owners and/or Purchasers must be provided to the Company
8.Special Warranty Deed must be sufficient to convey the fee simple estate or interest in the land described or
referred to herein, from Rocky Mtn. Property II, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, to Palm Family
Investments LLC, a ________ limited liability company, the proposed insured, Schedule A, item 2A. NOTE: C.R.S.
Section 38-35-109(2) requires that a notation of the purchaser's legal address, (not necessarily the same as the
property address) be included on the face of the Deed to be recorded.
9.Full disclosure from Seller, of any monetary liens and open Deeds of Trust of record. If you have any knowledge of
an outstanding obligation secured by the subject property, you must contact us immediately for further review prior
to closing.
10.A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Rocky Mtn. Property II, a Colorado
limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review.
11.Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Rocky Mtn. Property II, LLC, a Colorado
limited liability company.
84
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI & BII (Cont.)
Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 7 of 17 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15)
Colorado
12.Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Rocky Mtn. Property II, LLC, a
Colorado limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to
execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172.
13.A copy of the properly signed and executed Operating Agreement if written, for Palm Family Investments LLC, a
____ limited liability company, to be submitted to the Company for review.
14.Certificate of Good Standing from the Colorado Secretary of State for Palm Family Investments LLC, a ___ limited
liability company.
15.Record a Statement of Authority to provide prima facie evidence of existence of Palm Family Investments LLC, a
_____limited liability company, an entity capable of holding property, and the name of the person authorized to
execute instruments affecting title to real property as authorized by C.R.S. Section 38-30-172.
16.Receipt by the Company of the appropriate Lease Affidavit indemnifying the Company against any existing leases
or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees.
17.Improvement Survey Plat sufficient in form, content and certification acceptable to the Company. Exception will be
taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby.
18.This Title Commitment is subject to underwriter approval.
85
This page is only a part of a 2016 ALTA® Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company. This Commitment is not
valid without the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Policy; the Commitment Conditions; Schedule A; Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; Schedule B,
Part II—Exceptions; and a counter-signature by the Company or its issuing agent that may be in electronic form.
Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved.
The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and
ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited.
Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.
Form 5030008-BI&BII (5-18-17)Page 8 of 17 ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance (8-1-16)
Colorado - Schedule BI & BII
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI & BII (Cont.)
Commitment No.: 20004521
SCHEDULE B, PART II
Exceptions
THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION
CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC
COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE,
COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR
NATIONAL ORIGIN.
The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement
identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company:
1.Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records, but which could be ascertained
by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
2.Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the Public Records.
3.Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct land
survey and inspection of the Land would disclose, and which are not shown by the Public Records.
4.Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not
shown in the Public Records.
5.Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records
or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B,
Part I—Requirements are met.
Note: Exception number 5. will be removed from the policy provided the Company conducts the closing and
settlement service for the transaction identified in the commitment
6.Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales.
NOTE: This exception will not appear on the final title policy upon payments of taxes and premiums.
7.Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof.
8.Any water rights, claims of title to water, in, on or under the Land.
9.Taxes and assessments for the year 2020, and subsequent years, a lien not yet due or payable.
86
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI & BII (Cont.)
Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 9 of 17 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15)
Colorado
10.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the instrument dated June 24, 1955,
and recorded October 21, 1955, in Book 180 at Page 454, as Reception No. 103078.
11.Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States, as described in the United
States Patent dated August 21, 1958, and recorded August 29, 1958, in Book 185 at Page 69, as Reception No.
106874.
12.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2 at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956.
13.Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the Plat of East Aspen Addition, recorded August 24,
1959, in Plat Book 2 at Page 252, as Reception No. 108453 and the East Aspen Addition Plat, recorded
September 16, 1958, in Ditch Book 2A at Page 247, as Reception No. 106956.
14.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Agreement dated July 12, 1962,
and recorded July 12, 1962 in Book 198 at Page 239 as Reception No. 113658; and the Deed dated August 17,
1962, and recorded August 17, 1962, in Book 198 at Page 543 as Reception No. 113866.
15.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Resolution, dated February 7,
1963, and recorded February 8, 1963, in Book 201 at Page 145, as Reception No. 114903.
16.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed, dated November
7, 1966, and recorded November 7, 1966, in Book 223 at Page 562, as Reception No. 125845.
17.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under An Ordinance Annexing Certain
Unincorporated Territory to the City of Aspen, Colorado, recorded June 27, 1979, in Book 371 at Page 450, as
Reception No. 215764, and any and all notes, encroachments and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Smuggler
Enclave Annexation recorded June 27, 1979, in Plat Book 8 at Page 13, as Reception No. 215765.
18.Any and all notes, easements and recitals as disclosed on the recorded Boundary Agreement Plat, recorded April
29, 1982, in Plat Book 13 at Page 35, as Reception No. 240935.
19.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Warranty Deed dated October 14,
1963, and recorded October 15, 1963, in Book 204 at Page 291, as Reception No. 116413, and Agreement dated
September 25, 1981, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 759 as Reception No. 240936.
20.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Easement Deed dated April 29,
1982, and recorded April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 774 as Reception No. 240940.
21.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29,
1982, in Book 425 at Page 781, as Reception No. 240944, and in the Quit Claim Deed, recorded April 29, 1982, in
Book 425 at Page 791, as Reception No. 240949, and in the Quit Claim Deed, dated April 29, 1982, and recorded
April 29, 1982, in Book 425 at Page 783, as Reception No. 240945.
22.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Decree and Order, recorded
September 6, 1990, in Book 628 at Page 893, as Reception No. 325947.
23.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed, recorded January
2, 1990, in Book 634 at Page 942, as Reception No. 328344 and Quit Claim Deed, recorded January 15, 1992, in
Book 666 at Page 780, as Reception No. 340555.
87
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Schedule BI & BII (Cont.)
Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 10 of 17 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15)
Colorado
24.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Property Use License, recorded
June 18, 2004, as Reception No. 498801.
NOTE: This License was not perpertual and expired upon previous conveyance of the land.
25.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations specified under the Quit Claim Deed and Assignment
dated December 31, 2012, and recorded January 9, 2013, as Reception No. 596026.
26.Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees.
NOTE: Upon receipt of a Lease Affidavit from Seller, this exception will not appear on the final title policy.
88
Form 5000000-EX (7-1-14)Page 11 of 17 Exhibit A
ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance
ISSUED BY
First American Title Insurance Company
Exhibit A
File No.: 20004521
The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and is described as follows:
Parcel 2 of the Boundary Agreement Plat recorded April 29, 1983 in Plat Book 13 at Page 35 as Reception No. 240935,
Pitkin, County, Colorado.
89
Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 12 of 17 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15)
Colorado
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Pursuant to C.R.S. 30-10-406(3)(a) all documents received for recording or filing in the Clerk and Recorder’s office shall contain
a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The Clerk and Recorder will
refuse to record or file any document that does not conform to the requirements of this section.
NOTE: If this transaction includes a sale of the property and the price exceeds $100,000.00, the seller must comply with the
disclosure/withholding provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident withholding).
NOTE: Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2 requires that “Every title insurance company shall be responsible to
the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title commitment, other than the effective date of the title
commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its
agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owner’s policy of title insurance
and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed.
Pursuant to C.R.S. 10-11-122, the company will not issue its owner’s policy or owner’s policies of title insurance contemplated
by this commitment until it has been provided a Certificate of Taxes due or other equivalent documentation from the County
Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent; or until the Proposed Insured has notified or instructed the company in
writing to the contrary.
The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. A Certificate of Taxes due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be
obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer’s authorized agent. Information regarding special districts and the
boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder, or the
County Assessor.
NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-11-123, notice is hereby given:
This notice applies to owner’s policy commitments containing a mineral severance instrument exception, or
exceptions, in Schedule B, Section 2.
A. That there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed from the
surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas,
other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and
B. That such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner’s
permission.
NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-2, Affirmative mechanic’s lien protection for the
Owner may be available (typically by deletion of Exception no. 4 of Schedule B, Section 2 of the Commitment from the
Owner’s Policy to be issued) upon compliance with the following conditions:
A. The land described in Schedule A of this commitment must be a single family residence which includes a
condominium or townhouse unit.
B. No labor or materials have been furnished by mechanics or material-men for purposes of construction on the
land described in Schedule A of this Commitment within the past 6 months.
C. The Company must receive an appropriate affidavit indemnifying the Company against un-filed mechanic’s and
material-men’s liens.
D. The Company must receive payment of the appropriate premium.
E. If there has been construction, improvements or major repairs undertaken on the property to be purchased
within six months prior to the Date of the Commitment, the requirements to obtain coverage for unrecorded
liens will include: disclosure of certain construction information; financial information as to the seller, the
builder and or the contractor; payment of the appropriate premium, fully executed Indemnity Agreements
satisfactory to the company, and, any additional requirements as may be necessary after an examination of the
aforesaid information by the Company.
No coverage will be given under any circumstances for labor or material for which the insured has contracted for or
agreed to pay.
90
Form 50-CO-Disclosure (4-1-16)Page 13 of 17 Disclosure Statement (5-1-15)
Colorado
NOTE: Pursuant to C.R.S. 38-35-125(2) no person or entity that provides closing and settlement services for a real estate
transaction shall disburse funds as a part of such services until those funds have been received and are available for immediate
withdrawal as a matter of right.
NOTE: C.R.S. 39-14-102 requires that a real property transfer declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for
recordation in the State of Colorado. Said declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee.
NOTE: Pursuant to CRS 10-1-128(6)(a), It is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete, or misleading facts or
information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties
may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an
insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or
claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement
or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the
department of regulatory agencies.
NOTE: Pursuant to Colorado Division of Insurance Regulations 8-1-3, notice is hereby given of the availability of an ALTA
Closing Protection Letter which may, upon request, be provided to certain parties to the transaction identified in the commitment.
Nothing herein contained will be deemed to obligate the company to provide any of the coverages referred to herein unless the
above conditions are fully satisfied.
91
TELEPHONE 970 925-7328 FACSIMILE 970 925-7348
ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC
715 West Main Street, Suite 202
Aspen, CO 81611
Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC
Privacy Policy Notice
PURPOSE OF THIS NOTICE
Title V. of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) generally prohibits any financial institution, directly or through it affiliates,
from sharing non-public personal information about you with a nonaffiliated third party unless the institution provides you
with a notice of its privacy policies and practices, such as the type of information that it collects about you and the
categories of persons or entities to whom it may be disclosed. In compliance with the GLBA, we are providing you with
this document, which notifies you of the privacy policies and practices of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen,
LLC.
We may collect nonpublic personal information about you from the following sources:
Information we receive from you, such as on application or other forms.
Information about your transactions we secure from out files, or from our affiliates or others.
Information we receive from a consumer reporting agency.
Information that we receive from others involved in your transaction, such as the real estate agent or lender.
Unless it is specifically stated otherwise in an amended Privacy Policy Notice, no additional nonpublic personal information
will be collected about you.
We may disclose any of the above information that we collect about our customers or former customer to our affiliates or
to nonaffiliated third parties as permitted by law.
We also may disclose this information about our customers or former customers to the following types of nonaffiliated
companies that perform marketing services on our behalf or with whom we have joint marketing agreements:
Financial service providers such as companies engaged in banking, consumer finance, securities and insurance.
Non-financial companies such as envelope stuffers and other fulfillment service providers.
WE DO NOT DISCLOSE ANY NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT YOU WITH ANYONE FOR ANY
PURPOSE THAT IS NOT SPECIFICALLY PERMITTED BY LAW.
We restrict access to nonpublic personal information about you to those employees who need to know that information in
order to provide products or services to you. We maintain physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards that comply with
federal regulations to guard your nonpublic personal information.
92
93
94
95
ASPEN OFFICE
625 East Hyman Avenue, Suite 201
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Telephone (970) 925-1936
Facsimile (970) 925-3008
GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Since 1975
www.garfieldhecht.com
November 30, 2020
VIA E-MAIL DELIVERY
Ms. Sarah Yoon
Community Development Department
Historic Preservation Planner
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
E-mail: sarah.yoon@cityofaspen.com
John D. Belkin, Esq.
Aspen Office
E-mail: jbelkin@garfieldhecht.com
Mobile: (303) 888-1812
Re: Completeness Review: 925 King Street (LPA-20-118)
Dear Ms. Yoon:
This Firm represents King Street Com, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, the vested title
owner of the above-referenced real property (the “Property”). Attached in this regard is the vesting deed.
Also attached is the most recent title commitment for the Property (the “Title Commitment”).
The final title policy has not yet been issued by First American Title and Attorneys Title Insurance
Agency of Aspen, LLC but should be issued in the coming weeks and we can provide a copy of that to
you once the same is issued by the title company. There are no mortgages, liens, judgments or other
encumbrances respecting the Property, other than those listed as being of recorded in Schedule B-2 of the
Title Commitment. Please call me if you have any questions in this regard.
Sincerely,
GARFIELD & HECHT, P.C.
/s/John D. Belkin
John D. Belkin
JB:jh
Encls./2
Ec: Sara Adams (sara@bendonadams.com)
96
97
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
October 6, 2020
Phillip Supino, AICP
Community Development Director
City of Aspen
130 So. Galena St.
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: 925 King Street; Aspen, CO.
Mr. Supino:
Please accept this letter authorizing BendonAdams LLC to represent our ownership interests in 925
King Street and act on our behalf on matters reasonably associated in securing land use approvals
for the property. If there are any questions about the foregoing or if I can assist, please do not
hesitate to contact me. Property – 925 King Street; Aspen, CO 81611
Legal Description –
MINING CLAIM Section: 7 Township: 10 Range: 84 TRACT OF LAND IN SEC 7-10-84 &
BEING A PART OF TR 40 EAST ASPEN ADDN & THE SUNSET LODE USMS 5310 & ALSO
SOMETIMES DESC AS PART OF LOTS 1 2 & 3 BLK 5 & PART OF LOTS 3 & 4 BLK 6 & A PART
OF QUEEN ST HUGHES ADDN DESC AS FOLLOWS CONT 35,077 SQ FT BK 230 PG 2 NOW
KNOWN AS PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT BK 13 P
Parcel ID – 2737-074-00-022
Owner – King Street Com, LLC
Kind Regards,
/s/John D. Belkin
John D. Belkin, Authorized Signatory for King Street Com, LLC
jbelkin@garfieldhecht.com
970-925-1936 x215
Garfield & Hecht PC
625 East Hyman Ave., Suite 201
Aspen, CO 81611
98
300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611
970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM
99
100
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
November 2017 City of Aspen | 130 S. Galena St. | (970) 920-5090
Homeowner Association Compliance Policy
All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association
Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies
with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by
the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner.
Property
Owner (“I”):
Name:
Email: Phone No.:
Address of
Property:
(subject of
application)
I certify as follows: (pick one)
□This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant.
□This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements
proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or
covenant beneficiary.
□This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements
proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or
covenant beneficiary.
I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the
applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I
understand that this document is a public document.
Owner signature: _________________________ date:___________
Owner printed name: _________________________
or,
Attorney signature: _________________________ date:___________
Attorney printed name: _________________________
11/6/20
John Belkin
925 King Street
Aspen, CO 81611
970-925-1936jbelkin@garfieldhecht.com
King Street Com LLC
DocuSign Envelope ID: 33A14EF9-357E-4141-9EC2-AFE053ECB74F
101
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
November 2017 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and
I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use applications and
payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property
owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are
non-refundable.
$.___________flat fee for __________________. $.____________ flat fee for _____________________________
$.___________ flat fee for __________________. $._____________ flat fee for _____________________________
For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not
possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that addit ional
costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete
processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project
consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to
the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of
an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay
the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not
render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I
agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly
rates hereinafter stated.
$________________ deposit for_____________ hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
$________________ deposit for _____________ hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the
deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
City of Aspen:
________________________________
Jessica Garrow, AICP
Community Development Director
Signature: _________________________________________
PRINT Name: _______________________________________
Title: ______________________________________________City Use:
Fees Due: $_______Received $_______
Case #___________________________
Please type or print in all caps
Address of Property: ______________________________________________
Property Owner Name: __________________________ Representative Name (if different from Property Owner)_______________________
Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to:
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contact info for billing: e-mail: _______________________________________ Phone: __________________________
650 PARKS
3250 10
325 1
Forum Phi, 715 W Main Street, #204, Aspen CO 81611
kpeterson@forumphi.com 303-884-7756
DocuSign Envelope ID: CE6435B7-C472-4083-850A-1550CB38DF49
Authorized Signatory
John Belkin
John BelkinKing Street Com, LLC
925 King Street, Aspen, CO 81611
102
900
900
916
900
900
916916900
916
916
900
900
916
916
936
926
962 1024
1028
1020 1024
970
10201020
980
1024
1020
982
1000
1020
1024 1024
1024
972
1020
1024
1024
1020
1020 1020
1024
992
329
325
317
119
409
407
407
409
407
409
415
996
1040
403
1040
403
407
403403
401
1050
1050
940
920
927
930
950
932
333
403
990
403
990
341
990
403
980
990
345
980
979
935
990
931
977
935
920
981
905
981 1/2
988
925
955 1/2
975
995
936
985
930
955
993
998
982
938
980
117
109
973
115
113
111
114
110
932
PD
PD
PD
PD
R-15
R-3
R-6
R-15A
R-15
R-6
R-6
P
R-15
R-6
PARK AVEPARK AVEPARK
CI
RGIBSON AVEPAR
K
A
V
E
MATCHL
E
S
S
D
R
QUEEN STNEALE AVEKI
N
G
S
TNEALE AVEDate: 9/17/2020
Geographic Information Systems
This map/drawing/image is a graphical
representation of the features
depicted and is not a legal representation.
The accuracy may change
depending on the enlargement or reduction.
Copyright 2020 City of Aspen GIS
0 0.01 0.030.01
mi
When printed at 8.5"x11"
4
Legend
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)
Emissions Inventory Boundary
(EIB)
City of Aspen
Greenline 8040
Stream Margin
Hallam Bluff ESA
Historic Sites
Historic Districts
Parcels
Zone Overlay
DRAINAGE
LP PD
DRAIN/TRANS
GCS PD
L PD
LP
PD
Zoning
R-3 High Density Residential
AH Affordable Housing
R/MF Residential/Multi-Family
R/MFA Residential/Multi-Family
R-6 Medium Density Residential
R-15 Moderate Density
Residential
R-15-A Moderate Density
Residential
R-15B Moderate Density
Residential
R-30 Low Density Residential
RR Rural Residential
L Lodge
CL Commercial Lodge
CC Commercial Core
C-1 Commercial
SCI Service Commercial
Industrial
NC Neighborhood Commercial
MU Mixed Use
SKI Ski Area Base
C Conservation
OS Open Space
P Park
Scale: 1:1,681
925/935 King Street/
932 Queen Street
Vicinity Map
103
Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius
Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web
site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to
ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic
system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral
estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County
does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners.
Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning
the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this
site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and
reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the
user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and
liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or
data obtained on this web site.
This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be
printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to
page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the
margins such that they no longer line up on the labels
sheet. Print actual size.
From Parcel: 273707400022 on 11/06/2020
Instructions:
Disclaimer:
http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com
104
WEIGAND NESTOR R JR
WICHITA, KS 67202
150 N MARKET ST
QUEEN VICTORIA CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
916 E HOPKINS AVE
CUNNINGHAM P
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11717
TROUSDALE MARGARET OB
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80121
7 ALEXANDER LN
ASPEN LOVE STORY LLC
ABINGDON, VA 24210
PO BOX 337
GOLDMAN KAREN TRUST 2016
SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
1803 CALIFORNIA AVE
LDRAM 2 LLC
PARADISE VALLEY, AZ 85253
3900 E BETHANY HOME RD
KALNITSKY LINDA BUDIN TRUST
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
1701 S FLAGLER DR #1601
SMITH CHARLES C III & LYNN
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70118-6039
6030 GARFIELD ST
GIBSON MATCHLESS LLC
ATLANTA, GA 30324
1924 PIEDMONT CIR NE
RAPIDS TOWNHOMES CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
E HOPKINS AVE
ROTH LEWIS
MIAMI, FL 33155
6230 SW 44TH ST
BLEEKER STREET REV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 22
GOODROE SHIRLEY A
CAMP HILL , PA 17011
3503 MARGO RD
PRINCE ALBERT ON HOPKINS LLC
SHREVEPORT, LA 71101
330 MARSHALL ST #640
WILSON BRIAN M & CATHY J REVOCABLE TRUST
HEALDSBURG, CA 95448
235 APPALOOSA TR
CUNNINGHAM DAPHNE HOCH
EVANSTON, IL 60201
228 GREENWOOD
BAK HOLDINGS LLC
BASALT, CO 81621
439 JODY LN
GIEFER PATRICK
DENVER, CO 80209
950 S JOSEPHINE ST
KELLY JESSIE M LTD PARTNERSHIP #1
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111
6295 GREENWOD PLAZA BLVD
HATANAKA HOWARD I
ASPEN, CO 81611
980 KING ST
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
LEILA KING LLC
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
4 EMBARCADERO CTR # 1900
RIVERVIEW CONDO 26 LLC
BOULDER, CO 80301
1630 A 30TH ST PMB #387
MJJ 2020 LLC
DALLAS, TX 75229
10244 EPPING LN
KENNEDY WILLIAM W FAMILY TRST
BARRINGTON HILLS, IL 60010
218 STEEPLECHASE RD
HERRON HERINK REAL ESTATE LLC
NORTH LIBERTY, IA 52317
3886 LOCUST RIDGE RD
MORGAN RIVER M
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 1460
PAGANO JOSEPH A
ASPEN, CO 81611
1020 E HOPKINS #2
MCCAFFERTY PEGGY
ASPEN, CO 81611
900 E HOPKINS #6
105
NJH CENTENNIAL LLC
ASPEN, CO 816112154
625 E MAIN ST #1028
BLATT ROBERT M REV TRUST
CINCINNATI, OH 45242
10925 REED HARTMAN HWY #200
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
NEARY DENNIS R & NANCY CENTLIVRE
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46236
8282 BOWLINE CT
ARAPAHOE LLC
ST PAUL, MN 55110
1201 N BIRCH LAKE BLVD
LAWRENCE LARRY S QPR TRUST
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
8560 RUETTE MONTE CARLO
KELLY JESSIE M LP #1
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111
6295 GREENWOOD PLAZA BLVD
ALVIS MARCI L
HOUSTON, TX 77040
8827 W SAM HOUSTON PKWY N #200
BEIT SIMCHA LLC
DALLAS, TX 75240
13101 PRESTON RD #200
CALLAHAN MARY MAUREEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
830 E HOPKINS AVE #101
RIVER HOUSE LLC
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
915 S DIXIE HWY
975 KING LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
312 AABC STE D
CARLSON KERRY Y
ASPEN, CO 81611
982 E HOPKINS # 3
DECRAY MARCELLA TRUST
SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
1528 HILL ST
P L & A INC
OMAHA, NE 68124
9727 SPRING ST
990 KING ST UNIT #4 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
1295 RIVERSIDE DR
RICH VICTORIA
CREVE COEUR, MO 63141
455 RIDGECORDE
MOLITOR PROPERTIES I LLC
MATTAWAN, MI 49071
53196 N MAIN ST
WEISBARD MARK W
WILMETTE, IL 60091
1706 CENTRAL AVE
MOUNTAIN RIVER MANOR CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
900 E HOPKINS AVE
ZORRITO LLC
SARASOTA, FL 34239
1901 FLOYD ST
LINHART FAMILY TRUST
PHOENIX, AZ 85018
5110 N 40TH ST #254
CROCKETT RUFUS
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3837
GIRVIN LINDA A
ASPEN, CO 81611
414 N MILL ST
981 KING STREET LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3123
KRIGEL SANFORD P TRUST
KANSAS CITY, MO 64111
4520 MAIN ST
FREER KATHLEEN WOODS REV TRUST
BLUFFTON, SC 29910
51 CUMBERLAND DR
WOODS NANCY P
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262
10602 E PALO BREA DR
MASINI ALDA TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
830 E HOPKINS #201
KAWAII DOG LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
729 E BLEEKER ST
106
WAGAR RICHARD H
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 9063
KRIGEL SCOTT W TRUST
KANSAS CITY, MO 64111
4520 MAIN ST
CROCKETT RUFUS
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3837
KENNEDY WILLIAM W REV LVG TRUST
BARRINGTON, IL 60010
218 STEEPLECHASE RD
NA DEVELOPMENT LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
625 E HYMAN #201
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
FREER KATHLEEN WOODS REV TRUST
BLUFFTON, SC 29910
51 CUMBERLAND DR
BLUE SKYE DAISY BROOKE PARTNERSHIP LLLP
ASPEN, CO 81611
1024 E HOPKINS #17
BECK JEFFREY L & JANET SUE
DALLAS, TX 75254
6211 RAINTREE CT
898 E HOPKINS LLC
CHICAGO, IL 60642
805 N MILWAUKEE AVE #301
WEISMAN FAMILY LP
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416
2701 DEAN PKWY
SCHROEDER PATRICIA A REV TRUST
PINE RIVER, MN 56474
36261 SPRUCE TR
KARST REBECCA
MIAMI, FL 33155
6230 SW 44TH ST
1000 EAST HOPKINS HOA
ASPEN, CO 81611
972 E HOPKINS AVE
BYARD ANNE/MORRIS JAMES LIV TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
860 GIBSON AVE
SHORT/ASPEN LLC
DALLAS, TX 75201
1918 OLIVE ST #1901
ROTH JOSEPH R & ELIANNE V
MIAMI, FL 33131
848 BRICKELL KEY DR #4504
SHOAF JEFFREY S
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3123
WESTERMAN JEFF & TERI
ENCINO, CA 91316
5130 SHOSHONE AVE
OCONNELL SARA G
MIAMI, FL 33149
PO BOX 491167
LA JUST1 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 3737
HARRIS DAVID E & PATRICIA
ASPEN, CO 81611
117 NEALE AVE
AUVIL PAUL R JR TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
1024 E HOPKINS AVE #14
MAPLE CHARLES A & BRYCE M
ASPEN, CO 81611
1250 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR
990 KING ST UNIT #2 LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
1295 RIVERSIDE DR
2013 WOLFOND FAMILY TRUST
TORONTO ONTARIO M2L 1G7 CANADA,
49 HIGHLAND CRESCENT
STEINMAN DAN P TRUST
CHICAGO, IL 60614
2314 N LINCOLN PARK WEST #21
DIBELLO JACQUELINE
ASPEN, CO 81611
990 KING ST # 1
GDL HOPKINS LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
916 E HOPKINS AVE #203
17 QUEEN LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
1315 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR
107
PETERSON SARAH
ASPEN, CO 81611
962 E HOPKINS AVE
MASINI ALDA
ASPEN, CO 81611
830 E HOPKINS #201
PICKARD NANCY S
ASPEN, CO 81611
1020 E HOPKINS AVE #4
KENNEDY WILLIAM W CHILDRENS TRST
BARRINGTON HILLS, IL 60010
218 STEEPLECHASE RD
SCHULTZ E
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 11717
ARNDT BRICE & KRISTINE
WORMLEYSBURG, PA 17043
83 GREENWOOD CIR
BMH INVESTMENTS LTD
HOUSTON, TX 77002
1001 FANNIN ST # 3850
WOODS NANCY P
SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85262
10602 E PALO BREA DR
PATRICIA CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
980 KING ST
ZWART JEFFREY & TERRI
CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
220 HELIOTROPE AVE
WILLIAMSON ROBERT E
ASPEN, CO 81611
982 E HOPKINS # 3
622 OCEAN LLC
ISLE OF PALMS, SC 29451
PO BOX 522
DECRAY MARCELLA IRREV PROPERTY TRUST
SANTA MONICA, CA 90405
1528 HILL ST
J2C LLC
1130 VIENNA AUSTRIA ,
PACASSISTRASSE 62
AUVIL CAROL A TRUST
ASPEN, CO 81611
1024 E HOPKINS AVE #14
LAWRENCE MARA B QPR TRUST
LA JOLLA, CA 92037
8560 RUETTE MONTE CARLO
CARDWELL ROBERT A
LAGUNA BEACH, CA 92651
1672 LOUISE ST
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
SURVIVORS TRUST
ALAMEDA, CA 94501
1352 BAY ST
BENNETT ELEANOR
BASALT, CO 81621
2211 EAST SOPRIS CREEK RD
CENTENNIAL PARK CONDO
ASPEN, CO 81611
824 E HOPKINS AVE
URBAN BLIGHT CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
925 GIBSON AVE
KALNITSKY EUGENE TRUST
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
1701 S FLAGLER DR #1601
PAUL REV FAMILY TRUST
RANCHO SANTA FE, CA 92067-1801
PO BOX 1801
MEADOWS JEAN R & STANLEY H
HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035
538 HILLSIDE DR
GOLDSTEIN GARY L LVG TRUST NO 1
ASPEN, CO 816114109
1020 E HOPKINS AVE #7
LYNCH MICHAEL
ASPEN, CO 81611
962 E HOPKINS AVE
EVANS ROY D JR & JENNIFER E
ASPEN, CO 81611
972 E HOPKINS AVE
SHERMAN ASPEN LLC
SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
555 VALLEY CLUB RD
108
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
KANG NOBUKO
ASPEN, CO 81611
916 E HOPKINS AVE #101
BLATT ROBERT M REV TRUST
CINCINNATI, OH 45242
10925 REED HARTMAN HWY #200
FUENTE DAVID & SHEILA
BOCA RATON, FL 33431
701 TERN POINT CIR
ARGENT 2010 TRUST
MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90266
504 4TH ST
RAPIDS EAST ASPEN LLC
DALLAS, TX 75225
6247 PRESTONSHIRE LN
BUFORD RC & ELIZABETH B
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78209
12 ELMCOURT ST
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
SNOW ORCHID LLC
MENLO PARK, CA 94025
1125 SAN MATEO DR
GLUCK STACY E
ASPEN, CO 81611-2089
916 E HOPKINS AVE #304
MORGAN RIVER
ASPEN, CO 81611
900 E HOPKINS #16
MOUNTAINJAY LLC
ASPEN, CO 81611
1008 E HOPKINS AVE
VARE DARLENE DESEDLE TRUST
SANTA MONICA, CA 90403
1024 19TH ST #7
GIEFER PATRICK C
DENVER, CO 80209
950 S JOSEPHINE ST
ELLIS ROBERT RUSSELL & YVONNE MARIE
NEW CASTLE , CO 81647
912 CLUBHOUSE DR
RIVERVIEW CONDO ASSOC
ASPEN, CO 81611
COMMON AREA
GUPTA ARJUN
ASPEN, CO 81611
400 E MAIN ST #2
LIPSEY WILLIAM S
ASPEN, CO 81611
955 KING ST
KENNEDY PATRICIA ANN REV LIV TRUST
BARRINGTON, IL 60010
218 STEEPLECHASE RD
CITY OF ASPEN
ASPEN, CO 81611
130 S GALENA ST
GREENWOOD WILLIAM S
ASPEN, CO 81612
PO BOX 4778
SMUGGLER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
ASPEN, CO 81611
OAK LN, COTTONWOOD LN, MAPLE LN
BELINDA BEE CONDO
ASPEN, CO 81611
990 KING ST
109
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEDYH59.88'BUILDINGENCROACHMENTEASEMENT PERBK 704 PG 818SHADED AREAOVERHEADELEC. (TYP.)DEGEGEIXXXBOULDER(TYP.)WINDOWWELL CONCRETEPATIOSPATELE.PED.ELEC.METERSSTORM DRAINRIM 7901.64'INV 7898.14'BOTT 7887.75'GASMETER0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947 BEARSS29°31'02"W 3.46'FLAGSTONE WALKCOVEREDFLAGSTONEENTRANCECONCRETE WALK WINDOWWELLQUEEN STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIESX FENCE(TYP.)FENCE(TYP.)LOT 1TIE RETAINING WALLCONCRETEDRIVEWAYLOT 215,160 S.F.±0.348 AC.±MULTI LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT17 QUEEN STREET110 NEALE AVENUEELEC.OUTLETCONCRETE SIDEWALKWVMAIL BOXSTONEWALL(TYP.)WATERFEATURECONCRETEDRIVEWAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEWER MANHOLERIM EL=7912.50'100' OFFSET FROMORDINARY HIGH WATERMARK OF ROARINGFORK RIVER ACCORDINGTO RIVER RESTORATIONWATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1GGEX-UETCTVWWELECTRICTIE RETAINING WALLADJOINER UPPERLEVEL DECK BOULDERWALL (TYP.)IRR.CONTROLDRIDGE7936.0'F.F.7903.6'F.F.7908.8'WSTEELPOSTSTORM DRAINRIM 7902.00'BOTT 7889.12'AREADRAIN210067910.814IO 8I IP UNDER ROCKX7910791579207925 79307930793079307925792079157910
SLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.000%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%10000.000%COLORAREA29050.84 S.F.±1386.15 S.F.±5608.66 S.F.±EFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 2376TBM EL=7929.25'FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 23875GGEGGGEET44T43T55T56T57T53T52T51T62T80T79T64T65T97T100T12T71T69T78T19T38T37T39T58T59T40T41T42T45T46T47T48T49T60T61T63T81T82T83T67T84T85T86T87T88T89T90T91T92T93T94T95T96T99T98T101T102T103T104T105T106T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T13T14T109T108T107T110T73T74T75T76T77T29T28T30T31T32T33T34T35T27T26T25T24T23T22T21T20T18T17T15T70T72T111T68T50T66T36T161.8'4.4'1.8'23.9'24.2'20.4'36.3'16.3'POND1.0'P9.2'8.2'8" GATEVALVE3.8'3.4'5.4'5.8'15.9'6.0'ELECTRICPEDESTAL ONCONCRETE PADT1128.0'1.7'1.6'EDLEAN TOWEEEEN 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMPI/O: 7925.82'BOX CULVERTTO 18" CMPI/O: 7929.37'STONEWALK(TYP.)XXXT11318.1'14.3'18.1'14.3'19.6'11.3'16.7'6.5'4.4'16.5'13.0'0.4'3.0'1.7'8.1'1.5'4.6'24.8'4.7'9.3'4.7'20.3'36.1'11.7'8.2'4.4'4.1'3.3'5.2'6.0'7.5'4.9'4.8'11.7'8.4'15.1'18.3'33.5'13.2'2.1'14.2'12.5
'2.8'4.3'6.3'14.7
'
15.7'20.4'12.2'1.2'30.4'8.8'4.9'8.9'22.0'4.0'4.0'3.6'4.0'3.3'2.5'4.4'27.4'4.2'12.2'8.2'20.0'4.9'BRIDGEBRIDGEASPHALTDRIVEWAY ADJACENTDRIVEWAYGRAVEL DRIVEWAYSHED3.6'8.3'SHEDSHEDSHEDONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE936 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.GBRIDGE905 KING ST.WALKWAYONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT BONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT AWOODDECKCOVEREDPATIOWOODDECKRAILROADTIE PLANTERPLANTERCEMENTPATIOPLANTERPLANTER
WOODDECKW
A
L
K
W
A
Y
MAILBOXESELECTRICMETER X 4BOULDERRETAININGWALLCURB EDGERETAININGWALLSTONEPATHWO
O
D
DE
C
KRETAININGWALLSTONE PATHFENCE(TYP.)KING STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIES18.77'
39.
6
2
'20.59'55.88'T54OEOEOEOE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEEEASPEN DITCH0.6'POSSIBLE LEAN TOENCROACHMENTT114T121T119T118T117T116T115T120ADJOINER ADU COVEREDWOOD DECKWOOD DECKSTONEPATIOCEMENTSIDEWALKRAMPCEMENTPATIOBENCH8" IRONPIPESANITARYSEWER LINEBRIDGESTEPS(TYP.)8" CPP12.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29112.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 291 26.84'20.9'37.96'29.7'43.29'52.01'53.21'25' ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13 PG 35AND BK 198 PG 543 36,045.6 SQ. FT.0.83 ACRES ±ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13PG 35 AND LICENSEPER NO. 498801ADJACENTBUILDING LOT 2114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITMS 5310SUNSET LODELOT 1ASTOR SUB.PARCEL 7PARCEL 3LOT 1114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITN 84°59'50" W 121.31' FIELDN 85°22'00" W 121.36' REC.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.N 30°17'00" E 132.20'S 65°05'54" E 163.03' FIELDS 65°21'00" E 163.28' REC.S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELDS
3
4
°
5
9
'
0
8
"
W
9
4
.
1
7
'
F
I
E
L
D
S
3
4
°
4
5
'
0
0
"
W
9
3
.
7
5
'
R
E
C
.S 66°06'55" E 42.31' FIELDS 66°21'00" E 42.12' REC.S 63°45
'43"
W
84
.26
'
F
IELDS 62°18
'30"
E
83
.92
'
REC
.
S 22°50'57" W 68.39' FIELDS 22°46'00" W 68.06' REC.5' UTILITYEASEMENTPER BK 425 PG 774BASIS OFBEARINGSN30°51'03"EHISTORICDESIGNATIONBOUNDARY OFSUNSET LODE MS5310HISTORICDESIGNATIONBOUNDARY OFSUNSET LODE MS5310X X X
SLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.000%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%10000.000%COLORAREA29050.84 S.F.±1386.15 S.F.±5608.66 S.F.±NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTIONBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRSTDISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT INTHIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THECERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Est. 2007201031 OF 1KING STREET COM, LLC.CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEYPARCEL 2, BDRY LINE ADJ.925 KING STREETJGJRNNOV. 05, 2020103112/10/20UPDATE SURVEYJRN212/11/20REMOVE HISTORIC SITE PER GISJRN301/06/21UPDATE SURVEYJRNIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDEDAPRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935, PITKIN, COUNTY, COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THESOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUNDIN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTICCAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THESMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 ANDTHE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDEDMAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'SOFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERNCOLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF7929.25' ON THE EASTERLY ANGLE POINT OF PARCEL 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPENADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OFTHE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATETHAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ISBELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPENADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NODEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.8) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:FRONT YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'REAR YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENTPRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.NESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e a k
S
urveying, Inc.02020408010SUBJECTPROPERTYVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO KING STREET COM, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITEDLIABILITY COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAIDOUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY ORWARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WASMADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON OCTOBER 8 - 23, 2020; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THISIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BYATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020;THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS,RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REALPROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEINGSHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: JANUARY 06, 2021 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.HATCH LEGENDBOUNDARYLINE TYPE LEGENDSTORM SEWERELECTRICEASEMENTASPHALTCONCRETESYMBOL LEGENDEDGE OF ROAD100YR FLOODPLAINPVC DRAIN LINETELEPHONECABLE TVGASLINEFIBER OPTICTELEPHONEADJ. BOUNDARYSTONE WALLSEWER LINEWATER LINESODPGEEDWDYH STREET SIGN - "NO PARKING"GAS METERELECTRIC METERWATER METERELECTRIC MANHOLESTORM DRAINLIGHT POLEPOWER POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTBOULDERWVC.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS36°10'09"W 379.76'C.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS49°22'11"W 454.56'COL
O
R
ADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND
S
U
RVEYOR
JAS
O
N R. NEIL37935110
OEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEOEDYH59.88'BUILDINGENCROACHMENTEASEMENT PERBK 704 PG 818SHADED AREAOVERHEADELEC. (TYP.)DEGEGEIXXXBOULDER(TYP.)WINDOWWELL CONCRETEPATIOSPATELE.PED.ELEC.METERSSTORM DRAINRIM 7901.64'INV 7898.14'BOTT 7887.75'GASMETER0.40' STONEFASCIA (TYP.)#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947 BEARSS29°31'02"W 3.46'FLAGSTONE WALKCOVEREDFLAGSTONEENTRANCECONCRETE WALK WINDOWWELLQUEEN STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIESX FENCE(TYP.)FENCE(TYP.)LOT 1TIE RETAINING WALLCONCRETEDRIVEWAYLOT 215,160 S.F.±0.348 AC.±MULTI LEVEL WOOD& STONE FRAME HOUSEWITH BASEMENT17 QUEEN STREET110 NEALE AVENUEELEC.OUTLETCONCRETE SIDEWALKWVMAIL BOXSTONEWALL(TYP.)WATERFEATURECONCRETEDRIVEWAYSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEWER MANHOLERIM EL=7912.50'100' OFFSET FROMORDINARY HIGH WATERMARK OF ROARINGFORK RIVER ACCORDINGTO RIVER RESTORATIONWATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1GGEX-UETCTVWWELECTRICTIE RETAINING WALLADJOINER UPPERLEVEL DECK BOULDERWALL (TYP.)IRR.CONTROLDRIDGE7936.0'F.F.7903.6'F.F.7908.8'WSTEELPOSTSTORM DRAINRIM 7902.00'BOTT 7889.12'AREADRAIN210067910.814IO 8I IP UNDER ROCKX7910791579207925 79307930793079307925792079157910
SLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.000%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%10000.000%COLORAREA29050.84 S.F.±1386.15 S.F.±5608.66 S.F.±EFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 2376TBM EL=7929.25'FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 23875GGEGGGEET44T43T55T56T57T53T52T51T62T80T79T64T65T97T100T12T71T69T78T19T38T37T39T58T59T40T41T42T45T46T47T48T49T60T61T63T81T82T83T67T84T85T86T87T88T89T90T91T92T93T94T95T96T99T98T101T102T103T104T105T106T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T13T14T109T108T107T110T73T74T75T76T77T29T28T30T31T32T33T34T35T27T26T25T24T23T22T21T20T18T17T15T70T72T111T68T50T66T36T161.8'4.4'1.8'23.9'24.2'20.4'36.3'16.3'POND1.0'P9.2'8.2'8" GATEVALVE3.8'3.4'5.4'5.8'15.9'6.0'ELECTRICPEDESTAL ONCONCRETE PADT1128.0'1.7'1.6'EDLEAN TOWEEEEN 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMPI/O: 7925.82'BOX CULVERTTO 18" CMPI/O: 7929.37'STONEWALK(TYP.)XXXT11318.1'14.3'18.1'14.3'19.6'11.3'16.7'6.5'4.4'16.5'13.0'0.4'3.0'1.7'8.1'1.5'4.6'24.8'4.7'9.3'4.7'20.3'36.1'11.7'8.2'4.4'4.1'3.3'5.2'6.0'7.5'4.9'4.8'11.7'8.4'15.1'18.3'33.5'13.2'2.1'14.2'12.5
'2.8'4.3'6.3'14.7
'
15.7'20.4'12.2'1.2'30.4'8.8'4.9'8.9'22.0'4.0'4.0'3.6'4.0'3.3'2.5'4.4'27.4'4.2'12.2'8.2'20.0'4.9'BRIDGEBRIDGEASPHALTDRIVEWAY ADJACENTDRIVEWAYGRAVEL DRIVEWAYSHED3.6'8.3'SHEDSHEDSHEDONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE936 KING ST.ONE-STORYWOOD HOUSE925 KING ST.GBRIDGE905 KING ST.WALKWAYONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT BONE STORYHOUSE932 QUEEN STUNIT AWOODDECKCOVEREDPATIOWOODDECKRAILROADTIE PLANTERPLANTERCEMENTPATIOPLANTERPLANTER
WOODDECKW
A
L
K
W
A
Y
MAILBOXESELECTRICMETER X 4BOULDERRETAININGWALLCURB EDGERETAININGWALLSTONEPATHWO
O
D
DE
C
KRETAININGWALLSTONE PATHFENCE(TYP.)KING STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIES18.77'
39.
6
2
'20.59'55.88'T54OEOEOEOE OE OEOEOEOEOEOEOE OEOEEEASPEN DITCH0.6'POSSIBLE LEAN TOENCROACHMENTT114T121T119T118T117T116T115T120ADJOINER ADU COVEREDWOOD DECKWOOD DECKSTONEPATIOCEMENTSIDEWALKRAMPCEMENTPATIOBENCH8" IRONPIPESANITARYSEWER LINEBRIDGESTEPS(TYP.)8" CPP12.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29112.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 291 26.84'20.9'37.96'29.7'43.29'52.01'53.21'25' ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13 PG 35AND BK 198 PG 543 36,045.6 SQ. FT.0.83 ACRES ±ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13PG 35 AND LICENSEPER NO. 498801ADJACENTBUILDING LOT 2114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITMS 5310SUNSET LODELOT 1ASTOR SUB.PARCEL 7PARCEL 3LOT 1114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITN 84°59'50" W 121.31' FIELDN 85°22'00" W 121.36' REC.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.N 30°17'00" E 132.20'S 65°05'54" E 163.03' FIELDS 65°21'00" E 163.28' REC.S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELDS
3
4
°
5
9
'
0
8
"
W
9
4
.
1
7
'
F
I
E
L
D
S
3
4
°
4
5
'
0
0
"
W
9
3
.
7
5
'
R
E
C
.S 66°06'55" E 42.31' FIELDS 66°21'00" E 42.12' REC.S 63°45
'43"
W
84
.26
'
F
IELDS 62°18
'30"
E
83
.92
'
REC
.
S 22°50'57" W 68.39' FIELDS 22°46'00" W 68.06' REC.5' UTILITYEASEMENTPER BK 425 PG 774BASIS OFBEARINGSN30°51'03"EHISTORICDESIGNATIONBOUNDARY OFSUNSET LODE MS5310HISTORICDESIGNATIONBOUNDARY OFSUNSET LODE MS5310X X X
SLOPE TABLENUMBER123MIN. SLOPE0.000%20.000%30.000%MAX. SLOPE20.000%30.000%10000.000%COLORAREA29050.84 S.F.±1386.15 S.F.±5608.66 S.F.±NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTIONBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRSTDISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT INTHIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THECERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Est. 2007201031 OF 1KING STREET COM, LLC.CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOIMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEYPARCEL 2, BDRY LINE ADJ.925 KING STREETJGJRNNOV. 05, 2020103112/10/20UPDATE SURVEYJRN212/11/20REMOVE HISTORIC SITE PER GISJRN301/06/21UPDATE SURVEYJRNIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDEDAPRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935, PITKIN, COUNTY, COLORADO.NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THESOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUNDIN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTICCAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THESMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 ANDTHE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDEDMAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'SOFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.6) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERNCOLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF7929.25' ON THE EASTERLY ANGLE POINT OF PARCEL 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPENADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OFTHE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATETHAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ISBELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPENADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NODEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.8) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:FRONT YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'REAR YARD SETBACKRESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENTPRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.NESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e a k
S
urveying, Inc.02020408010SUBJECTPROPERTYVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENTI, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO KING STREET COM, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITEDLIABILITY COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THELAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE,CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAIDOUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY ORWARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WASMADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME ORUNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON OCTOBER 8 - 23, 2020; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THISIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BYATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICANTITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020;THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS,RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REALPROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEINGSHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF ANIMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9). DATED: JANUARY 06, 2021 BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.HATCH LEGENDBOUNDARYLINE TYPE LEGENDSTORM SEWERELECTRICEASEMENTASPHALTCONCRETESYMBOL LEGENDEDGE OF ROAD100YR FLOODPLAINPVC DRAIN LINETELEPHONECABLE TVGASLINEFIBER OPTICTELEPHONEADJ. BOUNDARYSTONE WALLSEWER LINEWATER LINESODPGEEDWDYH STREET SIGN - "NO PARKING"GAS METERELECTRIC METERWATER METERELECTRIC MANHOLESTORM DRAINLIGHT POLEPOWER POLEWATER VALVEFIRE HYDRANTBOULDERWVC.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS36°10'09"W 379.76'C.O.A. CONTROL#4 BEARSS49°22'11"W 454.56'COL
O
R
ADO LICENSEDPROFESSIONAL LAND
S
U
RVEYOR
JAS
O
N R. NEIL37935111
BUILDINGENCROACHMENTEASEMENT PERBK 704 PG 818SHADED AREA#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947#5 REBAR & CAPL.S. #25947 BEARSS29°31'02"W 3.46'QUEEN STREET - ASPHALTCONCRETE SIDEWALKCONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
WATERLINE EASEMENTPER BK 340 PG 1STEELPOSTFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 28375FND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &PLASTIC CAPPLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 2376FND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS ILLEGIBLEFND #5 REBAR &YELLOW PLASTICCAP PLS 23875KING STREET - ASPHALTR-O-W WIDTH VARIESSANITARYSEWER LINE12.5 ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 291PARCEL 2A932 QUEEN STREET21,045 S.F.±ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK 13PG 35 AND LICENSEPER NO. 498801LOT 2114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITMS 5310SUNSET LODELOT 1ASTOR SUB.PARCEL 7PARCEL 3LOT 1114 NEALE/17QUEENHISTORIC LOTSPLITN 84°59'50" W 121.31' FIELDN 85°22'00" W 121.36' REC.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.S 65°05'54" E 163.03' FIELDS 65°21'00" E 163.28' REC.S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELDS
3
4
°
5
9
'
0
8
"
W
9
4
.
1
7
'
F
I
E
L
D
S
3
4
°
4
5
'
0
0
"
W
9
3
.
7
5
'
R
E
C
.S 66°06'55" E 42.31' FIELDS 66°21'00" E 42.12' REC.S 63°45
'43"
W
84
.26
'
F
IELDS 62°18
'30"
E
83
.92
'
REC
.
S 2
2
°
5
0
'
5
7
"
W
6
8
.
3
9
'
F
I
E
L
D
S 2
2
°
4
6
'
0
0
"
W
6
8
.
0
6
'
R
E
C
.5' UTILITYEASEMENTPER BK 425 PG 774BASIS OFBEARINGSN30°51'03"E12.5 ACCESS EASEMENTPER PLAT BK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 291N 16°
0
4
'
2
9
"
E
9
6
.
8
8
'
N 30°17'
0
0
"
E
1
3
2
.
2
0
'PARCEL 2B925/935 KING STREET15,001 S.F.±HISTORICS 61°41'38" E 86.83'PARCEL 6PARCEL 812
8
.
7
4
'NEW BOUNDARY LINEL1L2
L3L4L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L10
L11
L12
L13
L14L15
L16
L17
5' UT
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
CRE
A
T
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T5'10'
10'10' UTILITY EASEMENTCREATED BY THIS PLATBUILDING SETBACK5'
U
T
I
L
I
T
Y
E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C
R
E
A
T
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T5'5'
UT
IL
ITY
EASEMENTCREATED BY
TH
IS
PLAT5'5' UTILITY E
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
C
R
E
A
T
E
D
B
Y
T
H
I
S
P
L
A
T
5'ELECTRICPEDESTAL ONCONCRETE PADL18L19L20
L21PORTION OF 8'X11'TRANSFORMEREASEMENT CREATEDBY THIS PLAT12 S.F.±20' DITCH EASEMENTCREATED BY THISPLATCENTERLINE OFEXISTING ASPENDITCH18" CMPTIETIETIE
TIE
S 12°34'4
5
"
E
8
0
.
7
9
'BUILDING SETBACK10' UTILITY EASEMENT CREATED BY THIS PLAT10
'
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K10'83
.
6
7
'
44.57'10'BUILDING SETBACKN 85°22'00" W 118.17'B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
T
B
A
C
K
10'9.10'
33.
9
5
'10'17.39'18.26
'BUILDING SETBACKLINE TABLELINE #L1L2L3L4L5L6L7L8L9L10L11L12L13L14L15L16L17L18L19L20L21BEARINGS16°04'29"WS29°31'34"ES22°47'46"ES20°22'47"ES14°24'18"ES12°02'06"ES12°51'49"ES03°12'33"WS15°07'02"ES18°54'55"ES11°50'35"ES08°31'02"ES11°11'02"ES09°06'03"ES10°41'09"ES17°46'08"EN22°50'57"EN65°05'54"WS23°35'46"WS66°24'14"EN34°59'08"EDISTANCE14.45'4.07'20.53'11.29'27.37'15.78'28.06'4.05'21.93'5.62'19.79'7.50'22.70'10.13'8.39'7.53'18.20'1.95'5.40'2.27'0.91'NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTIONBASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRSTDISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT INTHIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THECERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.ByNO.DateProject NO.RevisionDrawn By:Checked By:Date:Computer File:P.O. Box 1746Rifle, CO 81650Phone (970) 625-1954Fax (970) 579-7150www.peaksurveyinginc.comSNWEPeak Surveying, Inc.Est. 2007201031 OF 1KING STREET COM, LLC.CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADOKING LOT SPLIT PLATPARCEL 2, BDRY LINE ADJ.925 KING STREETJRNJRNJANUARY 11, 2021103-PLATNESW0306090120150180210240270300330P e ak Surveying, Inc.02020408010SUBJECTPROPERTYVICINITY MAPSCALE: 1" = 2000'COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL:THE APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SET FORTH IN THIS KING LOT SPLIT PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWEDAND APPROVED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE CITY OF ASPEN LANDUSE CODE BY THE CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THIS ________ DAY OF__________________, 2021, TO THE EXTENT THAT ANYTHING IN THIS PLAT/MAP IS INCONSISTENT OR INCONFLICT WITH ANY CITY OF ASPEN DEVELOPMENT ORDERS RELATING TO THIS LOT SPLIT OR ANYOTHER PROVISIONS OF APPLICABLE LAW, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OTHER APPLICABLELAND USE REGULATIONS AND BUILDING CODES, SUCH OTHER DEVELOPMENT ORDERS ORAPPLICABLE LAWS SHALL CONTROL.BY: ______________________________ JESSICA GARROWAS: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTORTITLE EXAMINER'S CERTIFICATE:I, _____________________________, AS TITLE EXAMINER OF ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OFASPEN, LLC, DO CERTIFY THAT ON OR BEFORE _____________________, I HAVE CAUSED ANEXAMINATION TO BE MADE OF TITLE TO THE KING STREET LOT SPLIT, AND EXCEPT FOR THE DEEDOF TRUST FOR__________________________________________, RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO._______________, SAID PROPERTY IS FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL OTHER MONETARY LIENS ANDENCUMBRANCES.DATED: _______________________________BY:____________________________________ ____________________________________, TITLE EXAMINER ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLCPRELIMCITY COUNCIL APPROVAL:THIS PLAT OF THE KING STREET LOT SPLIT WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF ASPEN ON THIS ________ DAY OF __________________, 2021 BY ORDINANCE NO. _______OF SERIES __________ RECORDED AND RECEPTION NO. _________________, OF THE PITKIN COUNTYRECORDS.BY:________________________________________________AS: CITY OF ASPEN MAYORCLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE:THIS KING LOT SPLIT PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK ANDRECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, AT ___________ O'CLOCK ____.M., ON THE_________ DAY OF _______________, 2021, AND IS DULY RECORDED IN BOOK ___________,PAGE ___________, AS RECEPTION NO. __________________.BY:________________________________ CLERK AND RECORDERBY: ____________________________ DEPUTYCITY OF ASPEN ENGINEER'S REVIEW:THIS KING LOT SPLIT PLAT WAS REVIEWED FOR THE DEPICTION OF THE ENGINEERINGDEPARTMENT SURVEY REQUIREMENTS. THIS ________ DAY OF __________________, 2021.BY:________________________________________________ TRICIA ARAGON, P.E.AS: CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERCERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP:KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT KING STREET COM, LLC., BEING THE SOLEOWNER IN FEE SIMPLE OF ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN, AND BEINGMORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OFCOLORADO, CONTAINING 36,046 SQUARE FEET MORE OR LESS.HAS BY THESE PRESENTS LAID OUT, PLATTED AND DESCRIBED THE SAME AS SHOWNHEREON.CITY OF ASPENCOUNTY OF PITKINSTATE OF COLORADOEXECUTED THIS ____________ DAY OF __________, A.D., 2021.OWNER: KING STREET COM, LLC.BY: ___________________________________________, NAME:_____________________________________ TITLE:_____________________________________STATE OF ___________ ) )SS.COUNTY OF _________ )THE FOREGOING OWNER'S CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS ______DAY OF __________, 2021 BY ___________________________ AS_____________________________OF KING STREET COM, LLC.WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: ___________________________________________________________NOTARY PUBLICSURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE:I, JASON R. NEIL, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSEDUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, THAT THIS PLAT IS A TRUE, CORRECT ANDCOMPLETE KING LOT SPLIT PLAT, AS LAID OUT, PLATTED, DEDICATED AND SHOWN HEREON,THAT SUCH PLAT WAS MADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF SAID PROPERTY BY ME, ORUNDER MY SUPERVISION, AND CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THELOTS, EASEMENTS AND STREETS AS THE SAME ARE STAKED UPON THE GROUND INCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND ANDPREFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 38, ARTICLE 51, C.R.S. 1973 AS AMENDED FORM TIMETO TIME.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE SET MY HAND AND SEAL THIS ________ DAY OF ____________,A.D., 2021.BY: ________________________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 FOR AND ON BEHALF OF PEAK SURVEYING, INC.KING STREET LOT SPLITPARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDEDAPRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOPARCEL NO. 2737-074-00-022NOTES:1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDINGSETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN INTHE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THESOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUNDIN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTICCAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THESMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 ANDTHE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDEDMAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'SOFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPENADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OFTHE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATETHAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT ISBELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPENADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NODEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.112
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OEDYH59.88'BUILDING
ENCROACHMENT
EASEMENT PER
BK 704 PG 818
SHADED AREAOVERHEADELEC. (TYP.)D
E
G
E
G
E
I
X
X
X
BOULDER
(TYP.)
WINDO
W
WELL
CONCRETE
PATIO
SPA
TELE.
PED.
ELEC.
METERS
STORM DRAIN
RIM 7901.64'
INV 7898.14'
BOTT 7887.75'GAS
METER
0.40' STONE
FASCIA (TYP.)
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947
#5 REBAR & CAP
L.S. #25947 BEARS
S29°31'02"W 3.46'
F
L
A
G
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
K COVEREDFLAGSTONEENTRANCECONCRETE WALK
WINDO
W
WELL
QUEEN STREET - ASPH
A
L
T
R-O-W WIDTH VARIESXFENCE
(TYP.)
FENCE
(TYP.)
LOT 1
TIE RETAINING WALLCON
C
R
E
T
E
DRIV
E
W
A
Y
LOT 2
15,160 S.F.±
0.348 AC.±
MULTI LEVEL WOOD
& STONE FRAME HOUSE
WITH BASEMENT
17 QUEEN STREET
110 NEALE AVENUE
ELEC.
OUTLETCONCRETE SIDEWALK
WV
MAIL BOX
STONE
WALL
(TYP.)
WATER
FEATURE
CONCRETE
DRIVEWAY
S
S
S
S
SS SS SS SS SS SS
SSSEWER MANHOLE
RIM EL=7912.50'
100' OFFSET FROM
ORDINARY HIGH WATER
MARK OF ROARING
FORK RIVER ACCORDING
TO RIVER RESTORATION
WATERLINE EASEMENT
PER BK 340 PG 1
G
G
EX
-
U
E
TC
T
VW WELECTRIC
T
I
E
R
E
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
W
A
L
L
ADJOINER UPPERLEVEL DECKBOULDER
WALL (TYP.)
IRR.
CONTROL
D
RIDGE
7936.0'
F.F.
7903.6'
F.F.
7908.8'
W
STEEL
POST
STORM DRAIN
RIM 7902.00'
BOTT 7889.12'
AREA
DRAIN
21006
7910.814
IO 8I IP UNDER ROCK X7
9
1
0
791
5
7
9
2
0
79
2
5 79307930
7930
7930
7925792079157910SLOPE TABLE
NUMBER
1
2
3
MIN. SLOPE
0.000%
20.000%
30.000%
MAX. SLOPE
20.000%
30.000%
10000.000%
COLOR AREA
29050.84 S.F.±
1386.15 S.F.±
5608.66 S.F.±
E
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 28375
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 28375
FND #5 REBAR &
PLASTIC CAP
PLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &
PLASTIC CAP
PLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 2376
TBM EL=7929.25'
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS ILLEGIBLE
FND #5 REBAR &
YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP PLS 23875
G
GE
G
G
G
E
E
T44
T43
T55 T56
T57
T53
T52
T51
T62
T80
T79
T64
T65
T97
T100
T12
T71
T69
T78
T19
T38
T37T39
T58
T59
T40
T41
T42
T45T46T47
T48
T49
T60
T61
T63
T81 T82
T83 T67T84
T85
T86
T87
T88
T89
T90
T91 T92
T93 T94
T95
T96
T99
T98
T101
T102
T103 T104
T105
T106
T1
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
T7
T8
T9 T10 T11 T13 T14
T109T108
T107
T110
T73
T74
T75
T76
T77
T29
T28
T30
T31
T32
T33T34
T35
T27 T26
T25
T24
T23
T22
T21
T20
T18
T17
T15
T70
T72
T111
T68
T50
T66
T36
T16
1.8'
4.
4
'
1.8'23.9'2
4
.
2
'
2
0
.
4
'36.3'1
6
.
3
'
POND
1.0'
P
9.2'8.
2
'
8" GATE
VALVE
3.
8
'3.4'5.
4
'5.8'1
5
.
9
'6.0'ELECTRIC
PEDESTAL ON
CONCRETE PAD
T112
8.
0
'1.7'
1.6'
E
D
LEA
N
T
O
W
EEEEN 16°04'29" E 96.88'18" CMP
I/O: 7925.82'
BOX CULVERT
TO 18" CMP
I/O: 7929.37'
STONE
WALK
(TYP.)XXXT113
18.1'14.3'18.1'14.3'19.6'11.3'16.7'6.5'4.4'16.5'13.0'0.
4
'3.0'1.
7
'8.1'1.
5
'4.6'24
.
8
'4.7'9.
3
'4.7'20.3'36
.
1
'11.7
'
8.2'4.4'4.1'3.
3
'
5.2'6.0'7.5
'4.9'4.8'11.7
'
8.4'15.1
'
18.
3
'33.5'13.
2
'2.1'14.
2
'12.5'2.8'4.3'6.3'14.7'15.7'20.
4
'12.2'1.2'30.4'8.8'4.9'8.9'22.0'4.0'
4.0'3.6'4.0'
3.
3
'2.5'4.4
'27.4'4.2'
1
2
.
2
'8.2'2
0
.
0
'
4.9'
BRIDGE
BRIDGEASPHALTDRIVEWAYADJACENTDRIVEWAYGRAVEL DRIVEWAYSHED3.6'8.3'
SHED
SHED
SHED
ONE-STORY
WOOD HOUSE
925 KING ST.
ONE-STORY
WOOD HOUSE
936 KING ST.
ONE-STORY
WOOD HOUSE
925 KING ST.
G
BRIDGE
905 KING ST.WALKWAYONE STORY
HOUSE
932 QUEEN ST
UNIT B
ONE STORY
HOUSE
932 QUEEN ST
UNIT A
WOOD
DECK
COVERED
PATIO
WOOD
DECK
RAILROAD
TIE PLANTER
PLANTERCEMENTPATIOPLANTERPL
A
N
T
E
R
W
O
O
D
DE
C
KWALKWAY MAIL
BOXES
ELECTRIC
METER X 4
BOULDER
RETAINING
WALL
C
U
R
B
E
D
G
E
RETAINING
WALL
STONE
PATH
WOODDECKRETAINING
WALL STONE PATHFENCE
(TYP.)
KI
N
G
S
T
R
E
E
T
-
A
S
P
H
A
L
T
R-
O
-
W
W
I
D
T
H
V
A
R
I
E
S
18.77'39.62'20
.
5
9
'
55.88'
T54OE
OE
OE OEOEOEOE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
E
E
ASPEN DITCH0.6'POSSIBLE LEAN TO
ENCROACHMENT
T114
T121
T119
T118
T117
T116
T115
T120
ADJOINER ADUCOVERED
WOOD DECK
WO
O
D
D
E
C
K
STONE
PATIO
CEMENT
SIDEWALK
RAMP
CEMENT
PATIO
BENCH
8" IRON
PIPE
SANITARY
SEWER LINE
BRIDGE
STEPS
(TYP.)
8" CPP
12.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29112.5 ACCESSEASEMENTPER PLATBK.13 PG.35BK 204 PG 29126.84'20.
9
'
37.
9
6
'
29.7'43.29
'
52.0
1
'
5
3
.
2
1
'25' ACCESS E
ASE
ME
NT
PER PL
AT
B
K 13 P
G 35
AND
B
K 198 P
G 543
36,045.6 SQ. FT.
0.83 ACRES ±
ACCESS EASEMENT
PER PLAT BK 13
PG 35 AND LICENSE
PER NO. 498801
ADJ
A
C
E
N
T
BUI
L
DI
N
G
LOT 2
114 NEALE/17
QUEEN
HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT
MS 5310
SUNSET LODE
LOT 1
ASTOR SUB.
PARCEL 7
PARCEL 3
LOT 1
114 NEALE/17
QUEEN
HISTORIC LOT
SPLIT
N 84°59'50" W 121.
3
1
'
F
I
E
L
D
N 85°22'00" W 121
.
3
6
'
R
E
C
.N 02°00'15" W 49.69' FIELDN 02°37'05" W 49.64' REC.N 30°17'00" E 132.20'S 6
5
°
0
5
'
5
4
"
E
1
6
3
.
0
3
'
F
I
E
L
D
S 6
5
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
1
6
3
.
2
8
'
R
E
C
.
S16°58'23"W 4.50' REC.
S17°13'04"W 4.49' FIELD
S 34°59'08" W 94.17' FIELDS 34°45'00" W 93.75' REC.S 6
6
°
0
6
'
5
5
"
E
4
2
.
3
1
'
F
I
E
L
D
S 6
6
°
2
1
'
0
0
"
E
4
2
.
1
2
'
R
E
C
.
S 63°
4
5'
4
3
"
W
8
4.
2
6'
F
I
E
L
D
S 62°
1
8'
3
0
"
E
8
3.
9
2'
R
E
C.S 22°50'57" W 68.39' FIELDS 22°46'00" W 68.06' REC.5' UTILITY
EASEMENT
PER BK 425 PG 774
BASIS OF
BEARINGS
N30°51'03"E
HISTORIC
DESIGNATION
BOUNDARY OF
SUNSET LODE MS
5310
HISTORIC
DESIGNATION
BOUNDARY OF
SUNSET LODE MS
5310XXX SLOPE TABLE
NUMBER
1
2
3
MIN. SLOPE
0.000%
20.000%
30.000%
MAX. SLOPE
20.000%
30.000%
10000.000%
COLOR AREA
29050.84 S.F.±
1386.15 S.F.±
5608.66 S.F.±
NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION
BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST
DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN
THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE
CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By:
Checked By:
Date:
Computer File:
P.O. Box 1746
Rifle, CO 81650
Phone (970) 625-1954
Fax (970) 579-7150
www.peaksurveyinginc.com
SNW
E
P e a k S u r v ey i ng, Inc.
Es t . 2 0 0 7
20103
1 OF 1
KING STREET COM, LLC.
CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO
IMPROVEMENT & TOPO SURVEY
PARCEL 2, BDRY LINE ADJ.
925 KING STREET
JG
JRN
NOV. 05, 2020
103
1 12/10/20 UPDATE SURVEY JRN
2 12/11/20 REMOVE HISTORIC SITE PER GIS JRN
3 01/06/21 UPDATE SURVEY JRN
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY
PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED
APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935
CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 2 OF THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983 IN PLAT BOOK 13
AT PAGE 35 AS RECEPTION NO. 240935, PITKIN, COUNTY, COLORADO.
NOTES:
1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING
SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN
THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN,
LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO.
20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020.
2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS OCTOBER 8-23, 2020.
3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF N30°51'03"E BETWEEN THE
SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & PLASTIC CAP P.L.S. # ILLEGIBLE FOUND
IN PLACE AND THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2, A #5 REBAR & YELLOW PLASTIC
CAP P.L.S. #28375 FOUND IN PLACE.
4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET.
5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED APRIL 29, 1983
IN PLAT BOOK 13 AT PAGE 35, RECORDED AUGUST 24, 1959 IN PLAT BOOK 2 AT PAGE 252, THE
SMUGGLER ENCLAVE ANNEXATION RECORDED JUNE 27, 1979 IN PLAT BOOK 8 AT PAGE 13 AND
THE SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION PLAT FOR 114 NEALE/17 QUEEN HISTORIC LOT SPLIT RECORDED
MAY 29, 1998 IN PLAT BOOK 45 AT PAGE 17 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S
OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE.
6) ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN
COLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ONSITE ELEVATION OF
7929.25' ON THE EASTERLY ANGLE POINT OF PARCEL 2. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT.
7) THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED EAST ASPEN
ADDITION PLAT OVERLAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NORTH OF THE CURRENT LOCATION OF
THE DRIVEABLE SURFACE OF QUEEN STREET. SUBSEQUENT PLATS LISTED ABOVE INDICATE
THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTS SOUTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. IT IS
BELIEVED BY PSI THAT THE QUEEN STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON SAID EAST ASPEN
ADDITION IS NOT THE CURRENT OR CORRECT LOCATION OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THAT NO
DEDICATION OR ACCEPTANCE WAS FOUND TO CONFIRM OTHERWISE.
8) BUILDING SETBACKS ACCORDING TO THE CITY OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE FOR R-15A
26.710.060 ARE AS FOLLOWS:
FRONT YARD SETBACK
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 25'
ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 30'
SIDE YARD SETBACK = 10'
REAR YARD SETBACK
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING = 10'
ACCESSORY AND ALL OTHER BUILDINGS = 5'
BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED WITH THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ANY PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION.
N
E
S
W
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
Peak Su r v e y i n
g
,
I
nc.020 20 40 8010
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
VICINITY MAP
SCALE: 1" = 2000'
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT
I, JASON R. NEIL, HEREBY CERTIFY TO KING STREET COM, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY, THAT I AM A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICENSED UNDER THE
LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS TRUE,
CORRECT AND COMPLETE BASED ON MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF AS LAID
OUT AND SHOWN HEREON; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT IS NOT A GUARANTY OR
WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED; THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT WAS
MADE BY ME FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY OF THE REAL PROPERTY PERFORMED BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ON OCTOBER 8 - 23, 2020; THAT, IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT, I RELIED UPON THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY
ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC., AS AGENT FOR FIRST AMERICAN
TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 20004521, DATED EFFECTIVE AUGUST 29, 2020;
THAT THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BUILDINGS, IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS,
RIGHTS OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY OR ON THE REAL
PROPERTY AND MATTERS REFERENCED IN SAID TITLE COMMITMENT CAPABLE OF BEING
SHOWN ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN, AND THAT THIS PLAT IS IN ACCORDANCE OF AN
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT AS SET FORTH IN C.R.S. §38-51-102(9).
DATED: JANUARY 06, 2021
BY:___________________________________
JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF
PEAK SURVEYING, INC.
HATCH LEGEND
BOUNDARY
LINE TYPE LEGEND
STORM SEWER
ELECTRIC
EASEMENT
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
SYMBOL LEGEND
EDGE OF ROAD
100YR FLOODPLAIN
PVC DRAIN LINE
TELEPHONE
CABLE TV
GASLINE
FIBER OPTIC
TELEPHONE
ADJ. BOUNDARYSTONE WALL
SEWER LINE
WATER LINE
SOD
P
G
E
E
D
W
DYH
STREET SIGN - "NO PARKING"
GAS METER
ELECTRIC METER
WATER METER
ELECTRIC MANHOLE
STORM DRAIN
LIGHT POLE
POWER POLE
WATER VALVE
FIRE HYDRANT
BOULDER
WV
C.O.A. CONTROL
#4 BEARS
S36°10'09"W 379.76'
C.O.A. CONTROL
#4 BEARS
S49°22'11"W 454.56'COLORA D O L I CE
N
S
E
DPROF
E
S
SIONAL L A N D SURVEYORJASON R . N
EI
L37935
113
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-004
NET LOT AREA PLANS
1/11/21
KP, BF
2026.00
Aspen CO 81611
932 QUEEN ST
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
NET LOT AREA LEGEND
AREA OF 30%+ SLOPE
AREA OF DEDUCTIBLE EASEMENT
AREA OF 20% - 30% SLOPE
AREA OF 0% - 20% SLOPE
1,498.75 sq ftACCESS EASEMENT REF: SURVEY
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L IN E
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE932 QUEEN STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 36,046 SF
1,498.75 sq ft1,498.75 sq ft
ACCESS EASEMENT REF: SURVEY
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L IN E
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINE
REAR YARD SETBACK
SIDE YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKREAR YARD SETBACK
925 / 935 KING STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 15,001 SF
932 QUEEN STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 21,045 SF
SIDE YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKNET LOT AREA - ALLOWABLE DENSITY
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 36046.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)1498.75 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)27656.19 27656.19
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (100% Countable)1303.40 1303.40
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (100% Countable)5587.66 5587.66
Gross Lot Area 36046.00
Total Deductions 1498.75
Net Lot Area - Allowable Density 34547.25
Note: Net Lot Area Sufficient for
Standard Lot Split
UPPER PARCEL - NET LOT AREA AND ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 15001.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)0.00 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)13627.50 13627.50
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (50% Countable)169.00 84.50
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (0% Countable)1204.40 0.00
Total Deductions 1289.00
Net Lot Area 13712.00
Allowable Floor Area On Upper Parcel (Duplex)Per Sec. 26.710.060:
(4500)+((4712.00/100)(7))4829.84
UPPER PARCEL - FLOOR AREA TO REMAIN FOLLOWING DEMO AREA (SQUARE FEET)
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #7)
Countable Interior Floor Area 748.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)84.75
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)69.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #7 748.25
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #8)
Countable Interior Floor Area 750.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)42.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #8 750.25
HISTORIC WOOD SHED (BUILDING #5)
Countable Interior Floor Area 244.00
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)0.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #5 244.00
Total Allowable Floor Area on Upper Parcel 4829.84
Total Proposed Floor Area on Upper Parcel 1742.50
N
0 10'20'40'SCALE: 1" = 20'1 NET LOT AREA - DENSITY
0 10'20'40'SCALE: 1" = 20'2 NET LOT AREA - FLOOR AREA
114
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-005
ZONING COMPLIANCE
PLAN - ENLARGED
1/11/21
KP, BF
2026.00
Aspen CO 81611
932 QUEEN ST
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
ZONING COMPLIANCE LEGEND
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN (WOOD
SHED TO BE RELOCATED)
EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED
10'-0"
10'-0"
10'-0"25'-0"1 0 '-0 "
1 0 '-0 "25'-0"30'-0"10'-0"
1 0 '-0 "
5 '-0 "
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINE
REAR YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACK
FRONT YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKREAR YARD SETBACK
ACCESS EASEMENT REF: SURVEY
PROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L IN E
PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEEXISTING POND LINE OF DITCHKING STREET
SURFACE PARKING(TWO SPACES)HISTORIC CABIN TO REMAIN
WOOD SHED TO
REMAIN
925 / 935 KING STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 15,001.00 SF
932 QUEEN STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 21,045 SF
110 NEALE AVENUE
114 NEALE AVENUE
FRONT YARD ACCESSORY SETBACKDITCH SETBACKNEALE AVENUEQUEEN STREET
955 KING STREET
975 KING STREET
HISTORIC CABIN
TO REMAIN
REAR YARD ACCESSORY SETBACK
NET LOT AREA - ALLOWABLE DENSITY
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 36046.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)1498.75 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)27656.19 27656.19
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (100% Countable)1303.40 1303.40
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (100% Countable)5587.66 5587.66
Gross Lot Area 36046.00
Total Deductions 1498.75
Net Lot Area - Allowable Density 34547.25
Note: Net Lot Area Sufficient for
Standard Lot Split
UPPER PARCEL - NET LOT AREA AND ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 15001.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)0.00 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)13627.50 13627.50
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (50% Countable)169.00 84.50
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (0% Countable)1204.40 0.00
Total Deductions 1289.00
Net Lot Area 13712.00
Allowable Floor Area On Upper Parcel (Duplex)Per Sec. 26.710.060:
(4500)+((4712.00/100)(7))4829.84
UPPER PARCEL - FLOOR AREA TO REMAIN FOLLOWING DEMO AREA (SQUARE FEET)
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #7)
Countable Interior Floor Area 748.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)84.75
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)69.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #7 748.25
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #8)
Countable Interior Floor Area 750.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)42.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #8 750.25
HISTORIC WOOD SHED (BUILDING #5)
Countable Interior Floor Area 244.00
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)0.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #5 244.00
Total Allowable Floor Area on Upper Parcel 4829.84
Total Proposed Floor Area on Upper Parcel 1742.50
N
0 10'20'40'SCALE: 1" = 20'1 ZONING COMPLIANCE PLAN
115
COPYRIGHT
PROJECT NO:
DRAWN BY:
FORUM PHI LLC
DATE OF PUBLICATION
Z-006
UPPER LOT FLOOR AREA
1/11/21
KP, BF
2026.00
Aspen CO 81611
932 QUEEN ST
FOR UMPHI
Aspen:
715 West Main Street, #204
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Carbondale:
36 N. 4th St.
Carbondale, CO 81623
forumphi.com
p: 970.279.4157
f: 866.770.5585
NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
FRONT PORCH
42.00 sq ft
5 '-0 "
1 0 '-0 "
10'-0"25'-0"10'-0"30'-0"1 0 '-0 "
1 0 '-0 "
5 0 '-3 "12'-13/8"4 0 '-3 1 /4 "16'-11"5 '-1 0 1 /4 "32'-2"1 2 '-7 1 /4 "19'-71/2"25'-51/2"21'-0"18'-6"39'-51/8"BUILDING #7
COUNTABLE INTERIOR AREA
748.25 sq ft
FRONT PORCH
84.75 sq ft
DECK
69.00 sq ft
BUILDING #8
COUNTABLE INTERIOR AREA
750.25 sq ft
BUILDING #5
COUNTABLE INTERIOR AREA
244.00 sq ftPROPOSED SUBDIVISION LINEREAR YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKSIDE YARD SETBACKFRONT YARD SETBACK
REAR YARD SETBACKPROPERTY LINE
PROPERTY LINEP R O P E R T Y L IN EPROPERTY LINEEXISTING POND LINE OF DITCHKING STREET
SURFACE PARKING(TWO SPACES)925 / 935 KING STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 15,001.00 SF
932 QUEEN STREET
GROSS LOT AREA: 21,045 SF
FRONT YARD ACCESSORY SETBACK
REAR YARD ACCESSORY SETBACKDITCH SETBACK955 KING STREET
LINE OF DITCHDITCH SETBACKCOUNTABLE
FAR PLAN LEGEND
DECK
GARAGE
EXEMPT - OPEN TO BELOW
EXEMPT - FRONT PORCH
NET LOT AREA - ALLOWABLE DENSITY
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 36046.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)1498.75 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)27656.19 27656.19
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (100% Countable)1303.40 1303.40
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (100% Countable)5587.66 5587.66
Gross Lot Area 36046.00
Total Deductions 1498.75
Net Lot Area - Allowable Density 34547.25
Note: Net Lot Area Sufficient for
Standard Lot Split
UPPER PARCEL - NET LOT AREA AND ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA
AREA BEFORE REDUCTIONS AREA AFTER REDUCTIONS (SF)
Gross Lot Area 15001.00 -
Area of Deductible Easements (0% Countable)0.00 0.00
Area Outside of Easements in 0-20% Slope (100% Countable)13627.50 13627.50
Area Outside of Easements in 20-30% Slope (50% Countable)169.00 84.50
Area Outside of Easements over 30% Slope (0% Countable)1204.40 0.00
Total Deductions 1289.00
Net Lot Area 13712.00
Allowable Floor Area On Upper Parcel (Duplex)Per Sec. 26.710.060:
(4500)+((4712.00/100)(7))4829.84
UPPER PARCEL - FLOOR AREA TO REMAIN FOLLOWING DEMO AREA (SQUARE FEET)
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #7)
Countable Interior Floor Area 748.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)84.75
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)69.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #7 748.25
HISTORIC CABIN (BUILDING #8)
Countable Interior Floor Area 750.25
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)42.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #8 750.25
HISTORIC WOOD SHED (BUILDING #5)
Countable Interior Floor Area 244.00
Front Porch Area (Exempt)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(5)0.00
Deck Area (Exempt to 724.50 SF Of Total Aggregate Deck)Per Sec. 26.525.020(d)(4)0.00
Total Countable Floor Area - Building #5 244.00
Total Allowable Floor Area on Upper Parcel 4829.84
Total Proposed Floor Area on Upper Parcel 1742.50
N
0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"1 UPPER LOT - FLOOR AREA
116