HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.boa.19930805 �V
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AUGUST 5, 1993
Chairman Remo Lavagnino called meeting to order at 4: 00 P.M.
Answering roll call were Howard DeLuca, Ron Erickson, Rick Head,
Charlie Paterson and Remo Lavagnino. Bill Martin was excused.
CASE #93-7
- - - - STRYKER - - - - - - - -
(Continued from July 15, 1993)
Marti Pickett, Attorney for applicant handed memo to each member.
(attached in record)
After discussion:
MEMBER COMMENTS:
Ron: I have some problems granting this variance. However, I
think that the applicant, although I might not personally like an
addition to the historically significant building, I think HPC has
handed them a hardship in telling them they would deny the use of
FAR that they are allowed. So I think by eliminating that square
footage they are creating a hardship and I, in all good conscience
would have to grant a variance in this case.
Howard: I have to agree with Ron that to restrict them down to 131
square feet there is no possible way for them to build anything.
If we decide they don't get a variance they are really--they have
no options. And if they don't get to use their FAR under the
circumstances, yes, I think they have been put into a hardship
situation. So I would give them the variance based on that.
Charlie: Yes, I feel there is a hardship there. Also the fact
that the lot is larger and that there is not that much impact on
the neighborhood. I think it is a minimum variance.
Rick: I am in favor of granting this variance.
Remo: It is my feeling that HPC has really taken away their
leverage of their potential FAR to use as a tradeoff for working
with us. And I really do believe HPC has not allowed them to use
their legitimate FAR. And by taking that away from them I think
they have created a hardship and I don't find any problems with
granting this variance.
At this point Ron read into the record a letter from Joseph A.
Amato at 222 East Hallam stating his support of this application
for a variance. (attached in record)
BAM8.5.93
MOTION
Ron: I make a motion that we grant a variance in this case #93-
7 of 1.48% in site coverage or 289. 3 square feet of site coverage
with the proviso that the accessory dwelling unit or duplex unit
being created will be deed restricted under provision of City
Ordinance #90-60 as a resident occupied unit.
Rick seconded the motion.
DISCUSSION
Remo: I would like to have in the motion that no second story ever
be built on this property as a condition modifying this motion.
Ron: I amend my motion to include that no second story will be
permitted on this building in the future.
Rick accepted this condition to his second of the motion.
Roll call vote: Howard, yes, Rick, yes, Ron, yes, Charlie, yes,
Remo, yes.
Variance granted.
Drueding: Do they have to record any of this other than the deed
restriction? Or is this part of the record and is no going to be
a part of the title search?
?: If you want it to run with the land, you better record it.
Drueding: (to Marti Pickett) Will you record this that--write it
up for the City Attorney to sign.
Pickett: Sure. The only clarification I would make on the second
floor; you said "on this property" . You said "on this building" .
I am assuming it is on the building. Should it ever be razed for
some reason, I just want to make sure.
Remo: The motion is "on the building" .
There being no further business--
Charlie made a motion to adjourn.
Ron seconded the motion with all in favor. Time was 4:40 P.M.
Ja &-M. -Car ey, City ep y Clerk
2