HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20140212 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
February 12, 2014
CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM
130 S. GALENA
ASPEN, COLORADO
SITE VISITS: Please visit the sites on your own
5:00 INTRODUCTION
A. Roll call
B. Approval of minutes- Jan. 22, 2014
C. Public Comments
D. Commission member comments
E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent)
F. Project Monitoring
G. Staff comments
H. Certificates of No Negative Effect issued
I. Submit public notice for agenda items
OLD BUSINESS
5:10 A. None
NEW BUSINESS
5.10 A. Rubey Park- Conceptual Major Development and Commercial Design,
PUBLIC HEARING
WORKSESSIONS
6:10 A. 232 E. Bleeker Street
6:40 B. Mixed Use Zone District Code Amendment
7:00 ADJOURN
TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR, 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA
ITEM, NEW BUSINESS
Provide proof of legal notice(affidavit of notice for PH)
Staff presentation(5 minutes)
Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes)
Applicant presentation (20 minutes)
Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes)
Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes)
Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes)
HPC discussion (15 minutes)
Applicant rebuttal (comments) (5 minutes)
Motion (5 minutes)
*Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met.
No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least
four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present
shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All
actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than
three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting.
PROJECT MONITORING- Projects in bold are currently under construction.
Jay Maytin 518 W.Main-Fornell
320 Lake
435 W.Main-AJCC
204 S.Galena
920 W.Hallam
420 E.Cooper
Lift One
233 W. Hallam
Nora Berko 205 S.Spring-Hills
1102 Waters
332 W.Main
1006 E. Cooper
602 E.Hyman
Sallie Golden 517 E.Hyman(Little Annie's)
206 Lake
947 E.Cooper
Jane Hills Aspen Core
605 W.Bleeker
114 Neale
201 E.Hyman
507 Gillespie
Willis Pember 204 S.Galena
Aspen Core
514 E.Hyman
624 W.Francis
Patrick Segal 204 S. Galena
623 E.Hopkins
701 N.Third
612 W.Main
Holden Marolt derrick
624 W.Francis
206 Lake
John Whipple 208 E.Main
201 E.Hyman
420 E.Cooper
602 E.Hyman
Jim DeFrancia 414 E.Hyman
M:\city\planning\hpc project monitoring\PROJECT MONITORING.doc
2/4/2014
MEMORANDUM
•
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Justin Barker, Planner
THRU: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer
RE: Rubey Park - Conceptual Major Development & Commercial Design, Public
Hearing
DATE: February 12, 2014
SUMMARY: Rubey Park isEr
located on E. Durant Avenue, y
N between S. Mill Street and S.
Galena Street. The property is y "`
27,000 square feet and is
zoned Public (PUB) with a EcOpjDERAV.
Planned Development (PD)
e
Overlay. The property itself is �• e�
not designated, but is located
at the edge of the Commercial
Core Historic District. .
The proposal before HPC is Legend •
to renovate the existing Rubey Park
building, add two new
Historic Sites �
structures and connect all
y. Historic District
three with a roof Mob
Additionally, the site will be
redeveloped to accommodate a better pedestrian experience and improved bus circulation and
parking. The schematic design for this project was endorsed by City Council in December 2013.
Following HPC Conceptual review, the project will go to P&Z and City Council for Planned
Development Project review and Growth Management review. The project will then come back
to HPC for Final Major Development, Final Commercial Design Review and Planned
Development Detail review. Since the property is zoned Public, all dimensional requirements for
this site will be approved by Council through the Planned Development review process.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval.
1
PARCEL ID: 2737-182-21-851.
ADDRESS: 420 E. Durant Ave. (Rubey Park), Lots K, L, M, N, O P, Q, R and S, Block 90,
City and Townsite of Aspen.
CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW
The procedure for a Major Development Review, at the Conceptual level, is as follows Staff
reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance
with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections This report is
transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a
recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons
for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the
evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of
Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve
with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to
make a decision to approve or deny.
Major Development is a two-step process requiring approval by the HPC of a Conceptual
Development Plan, and then a Final Development Plan. Approval of a Conceptual
Development Plan shall be binding upon HPC in regards to the location and form of the
envelope of the structures) and/or addition(s) as depicted in the Conceptual Plan application
including its height, scale, massing and proportions. No changes will be made to this aspect of
the proposed development by the HPC as part of their review of the Final Development Plan
unless agreed to by the applicant.
Staff Response: Conceptual review focuses on the height, scale, massing and proportions of a
proposal.
The design guidelines for conceptual review of a new building in the Commercial Core Historic
District are all located within the "Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design
Objectives." The relevant guidelines are attached as "Exhibit A."
Most of the Commercial Core Historic District design guidelines were intended to address retail
buildings that occupy traditional lot widths facing the street. Rubey Park has a unique use and
function that is different than typical properties within the Historic District. This causes many of
the guidelines to either not apply or be inappropriate for this type of building and use. There are
also no historic building on either side of Durant Avenue or an established fagade line to take
into context. Staff has used their discretion in reviewing the design to determine which
guidelines would be appropriate for this particular use and design. Ultimately, HPC must decide
which guidelines should apply in the review of this project. Generally, staff has found that the
project meets the applicable design guidelines.
The only real structural change to the existing building is the removal of an addition
approximately 250 square feet in size from the north side of the structure, leaving a footprint of
just under 1,200 square feet. Also, the roof overhang is being removed from the east and west
2
sides of the building. The clock tower has been maintained in this design as a result of public
feedback reflecting a desire to retain this as an identifying feature. All other proposed changes
are to the materials and fenestration, which will be reviewed at HPC Final review.
New construction includes two new buildings: one to the east of the current structure and one to
the west. The west building is approximately 1,100 square feet and will be used for the RFTA
staff, mechanical space and trash/recycling. The east building is approximately 600 square feet
and will be used for the public restrooms. Outdoor seating is integrated into the walls of all three
structures. There is a proposed glass roof that will span all three structures and cover
approximately 6,200 square feet including the buildings. The roof will be approximately 12'
above grade. The new structures will both be 13' tall measured to the top of the parapet.
The addition of two new structures helps to complete the street facade along Durant Street,
similar to more of the blocks within the Commercial Core. Additionally, separating the program
apart into three structures helps to maintain smaller masses to minimize the overall impact on the
site by maintaining smaller building widths seen in the Commercial Core. Smaller buildings also
increase visual transparency and pedestrian movement across and throughout the site.
The applicant is proposing two design option for the existing structure. Option 1 retains the
existing gable roofs facing east and west. Option 2 proposes flat roofs instead of the existing
gable roofs. The applicant prefers Option 2 to create simpler geometry, reduced snow sliding and
additional environmental benefits. Option 2 satisfies the following design guideline 6.23 which
states, "Use flat roof lines as the dominant roof form." However, additional guidelines state:
6.28 Height variation should be achieved using one or more of the following:
❑ Vary the building height for the full depth of the site in accordance with traditional lot width.
❑ Set back the upper floor to vary the building fagade profile(s) and the roof forms across the
width and the depth of the building.
❑ Vary the facade (or parapet) heights at the front.
❑ Step down the rear of the building towards the alley, in conjunction with other design standards
and guidelines.
6.29 On sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths, the faVade height shall be
varied to reflect traditional lot width.
The proposed flat roofs are the same height as the new structures and creates a long expanse of
roofs that do not vary. Staff finds that Option 1 creates more height variation to satisfy the design
guidelines. However, there is an awkward connection between the gables and the proposed glass
canopy. This connection should be further studied to determine a simpler solution.
Although this project is not required to provide public amenity space, more than half the site is
dedicated as such through fixed and movable seating and waiting areas, planted areas,
newsstands and provision for bicycle parking.
The commercial design guidelines require properties adjoining alleyways to locate the
utility/trash/recycle service areas along the alleyway. The applicant has requested a variance
3
from this which has been preliminarily approved by the Environmental Health Department. The
proposed location is within the northwest corner of the new west building.
The HPC may:
• approve the application,
• approve the application with conditions,
• disapprove the application, or
• continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary
to make a decision to approve or deny.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends HPC grant Conceptual Major Development and Commercial Design approval
with the following condition:
1. Design Option 1 is approved with the condition that the connection between the east and
west gables and glass canopy be further studied.
2. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one
(1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the
Conceptual Development Plan. The Historic Preservation Commission may, at its sole
discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for
a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written
request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
Exhibits:
A. Relevant Guidelines for the Commercial Core Historic District
B. Application
C. Submittal Addendum
4
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION (HPC)
GRANTING MAJOR DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) AND COMMERCIAL
DESIGN (CONCEPTUAL) APPROVAL FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 420 E.
DURANT AVENUE, LOTS K,L,M,N, O, P, Q,R AND S, BLOCK 90, CITY AND
TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO.
RESOLUTION #, SERIES OF 2014
PARCEL ID: 2737-182-21-851
WHEREAS, the applicant, City of Aspen, represented by B1ueGreen, requested HPC Conceptual
Major Development and Commercial Design approval for the property located at 420 E. Durant
Avenue, Lots K, L, M, N, O P, Q, R and S, Block 90, City and Town-site of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, Section 26.415.070 of the Municipal Code states that "no building or structure
shall be erected, constructed, enlarged, altered, repaired, relocated or improved involving a
designated historic property or district until plans or sufficient information have been submitted
to the Community Development Director and approved in accordance with the procedures
established for their review;" and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Major Development Review, the HPC must review the application,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's
conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines per Section
26.415.070.D.3.b.2 and 3 of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC
may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain
additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, for Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the HPC must review the application,
a staff analysis report and the evidence presented at a hearing to determine the project's
conformance with the City of Aspen Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design
Objectives and Guidelines per Section 26.412.040.A.2, Commercial Design Standards Review
Procedure, of the Municipal Code and other applicable Code Sections. The HPC may approve,
disapprove, approve with conditions or continue the application to obtain additional information
necessary to make a decision to approve or deny; and
WHEREAS, Justin Barker, in his staff report to HPC dated February 12, 2014, performed an
analysis of the-application based on the standards and recommended approval with condition,
and
WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on February 12, 2014, the Historic Preservation
Commission considered the application during a duly noticed public hearing, the staff memo and
public comments, and found the proposal consistent with the review standards and granted
approval with condition by a vote of_to _.
420 E. Durant Avenue
HPC Resolution#, Series of 2014
Page 1 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That HPC hereby grants Major Development (Conceptual) and Commercial Design (Conceptual)
approval for the property located at 420 E. Durant Avenue, Lots K, L, M, N, O P, Q, R and S,
Block 90, City and Townsite of Aspen with the following condition:
1. Design Option 1 (Exhibit I) is approved with the condition that the connection between
the east and west gables and glass canopy be further studied.
2. A development application for a Final Development Plan shall be submitted within one
(1) year of the date of approval of a Conceptual Development Plan. Failure to file such an
application within this time period shall render null and void the approval of the
Conceptual Development Plan, The Historic-Preservation Commission may, at its sole - -
discretion and for good cause shown, grant a one-time extension of the expiration date for
a Conceptual Development Plan approval for up to six (6) months provided a written
request for extension is received no less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date.
APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 12th day of February,
2014.
Jay Maytin, Chair
Approved as to Form:
Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk
420 E. Durant Avenue
HPC Resolution #, Series of 2014
Page 2 of 2
m Y
x a.
I
s
r
Y k
S 6 kC} ..
ti
r e ims
ah Tons in
ON
5
a
�l
t 1z I .
Wow �I
Y 5 v
Iy cat
ow,
Ito
Y
P
F
O
�i kh
.. ,A 1 -
� R £
x
F
s
r
q
4-
\� exst�nga€ `0 aer�
EXHIBIT A
Historic Preservation Guidelines- Rubey Park
COMMERCIAL, LODGING AND HISTORIC DISTRICT DESIGN OBJECTIVES AND
GUIDELINES, COMMERCIAL CORE HISTORIC DISTRICT- CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
6.1 Maintain the established town grid in all projects.
❑ The network of streets and alleys should be retained as public circulation space and for maximum
public access.
❑ Streets and alleys should not be enclosed or closed to public access, and should remain open to the
sky.
6.2 Public walkways and through courts,when appropriate,should be designed to create access to
additional commercial space and frontage, within the walkway and/or to the rear of the site.
❑ See also: Public Amenity Space design guidelines.
6.3 Develop an alley faVade to create visual interest.
❑ Use varied building setbacks and changes in materials to create interest and reduce perceived
scale.
❑ Balconies, court yards and decks are also appropriate.
❑ Providing secondary public entrances is strongly encouraged along alleys. These should be
clearly intended for public use, but subordinate in detail to the primary street-side entrance.
6.6 A street facing amenity space shall meet all of the following requirements:
❑ Abut the public sidewalk
❑ Be level with the sidewalk
❑ Be open to the sky
❑ Be directly accessible to the public
❑ Be paved or otherwise landscaped
6.7 A street-facing public amenity space shall remain subordinate to the line of building fronts in
the Commercial Core.
❑ Any public amenity space positioned at the street edge shall respect the character of the streetscape
and ensure that street corners are well defined, with buildings placed at the sidewalk edge.
❑ Sunken spaces, which are associated with some past developments, adversely affect the street
character. Where feasible, these should be replaced with sidewalk level improvements.
6.8 Street facing amenity space shall contain features to promote and enhance its use. These
may include one or more of the following:
❑ Street furniture
❑ Public art
❑ Historical/interpretive marker
6.9 Mid-block walkways shall remain subordinate in scale to traditional lot widths.
❑ Mid-block public walkways shall be between 8 ft. and 10 ft. in width.
6.10 A mid-block walkway should provide public access to the following:
❑ Additional commercial space and frontage within the walkway
❑ Uses located at the rear of the property
6.17 Front and side yard amenity space should be considered in the context of a historic one story
residential type building.
6.18 Maintain the alignment of fagades at the sidewalk's edge.
❑ Place as much of the fagade of the building at the property line as possible.
❑ Locating an entire building front behind the established storefront line is inappropriate.
❑ A minimum of 70% of the front facade shall be at the property line.
6.19 A building may be set back from its side lot lines in accordance with design guidelines
identified in Street & Circulation Pattern and Public Amenity Space guidelines.
6.20 Orient a new building to be parallel to its lot lines, similar to that of traditional building
orientations.
❑ The front of a primary structure shall be oriented to the street.
6.21 Orient a primary entrance toward the street.
❑ Buildings should have a clearly defined primary entrance. For most commercial buildings, this
should be a recessed entry way.
❑ Do not orient a primary entrance to an interior court.
❑ Providing secondary public entrances to commercial spaces is also encouraged on larger
buildings.
6.22 Rectangular forms should be dominant on Commercial Core favades.
❑ Rectangular forms should be vertically oriented.
❑ The fagade should appear as predominantly flat, with any decorative elements and projecting or
setback "articulations" appearing to be subordinate to the dominant roof form.
6.23 Use flat roof lines as the dominant roof form.
❑ A flat roof, or one that gently slopes to the rear of a site, should be the dominant roof form.
❑ Parapets on side fayades should step down towards the rear of the building.
❑ False fronts and parapets with horizontal emphasis also may be considered.
6.24 Along a rear faVade, using building forms that step down in scale toward the alley is
encouraged.
❑ Consider using additive forms,such as sheds, stairs and decks to reduce the perceived scale. These forms
should however, remain subordinate to the primary structure.
❑ Use projecting roofs at the ground floor over entrances, decks and for separate utility structures in order
to establish a human scale that invites pedestrian activity.
6.25 Maintain the average perceived scale of two-story buildings at the sidewalk.
❑ Establish a two-story height at the sidewalk edge,or provide a horizontal design element
at this level. A change in materials, or a molding at this level are examples.
6.27 A new building or addition should reflect the range and variation in building height of the
Commercial Core.
❑ Refer to the zone district regulations to determine the maximum height limit on the subject
property.
❑ A minimum 9 ft.floor to ceiling height is to be maintained on second stories and higher.
❑ Additional height, as permitted in the zone district, may be added for one or more of the following
reasons:
❑ In order to achieve at least a two-foot variation in height with an adjacent building.
❑ The primary function of the building is civic. (i.e. the building is a Museum, Civic Building,
Performance Hall, Fire Station, etc.)
❑ Some portion of the property is affected by a height restriction due to its proximity to a historic
resource, or location within a View Plane, therefore relief in another area may be appropriate.
❑ To benefit the livability of Affordable Housing units.
❑ To make a demonstrable (to be verified by the Building Department) contribution to the building's
overall energy efficiency, for instance by providing improved day- lighting.
6.28 Height variation should be achieved using one or more of the following:
❑ Vary the building height for the full depth of the site in accordance with traditional lot width.
❑ Set back the upper floor to vary the building facade profile(s) and the roof forms across the width and
the depth of the building.
❑ Vary the fayade (or parapet) heights at the front.
❑ Step down the rear of the building towards the alley, in conjunction with other design standards and
guidelines.
6.29 On sites comprising more than two traditional lot widths, the fagade height shall be
varied to reflect traditional lot width.
❑ The facade height shall be varied to reflect traditional lot width.
❑ Height should be varied every 60 ft. minimum and preferably every 30 ft. of linear
frontage in keeping with traditional lot widths and development patterns.
❑ No more than two consecutive 30 ft. fagade modules may be three stories tall, within an individual
building.
❑ A rear portion of a third module may rise to three stories, if the front is set back a minimum of
40 feet from the street fagade. (e.g. at a minimum, the front 40 feet may be no more than two
stories in height.)
6.30 On sites comprising two or more traditional lots, a building shall be designed to reflect the
individual parcels. These methods shall be used:
❑ Variation in height of building modules across the site
❑ Variation in massing achieved through upper floor setbacks, the oofscape form and variation in
upper floor heights
❑ Variation in building fagade heights or cornice line
6.32 When adjacent to a one or two story historic building that was originally constructed for
commercial use, a new building within the same block face should not exceed 28 in height within 30
ft. of the front facade.
❑ In general, a proposed multi-story building must demonstrate that it has no negative impact on
smaller, historic structures nearby.
❑ The height and proportions of all facade components must appear to be in scale with nearby historic
buildings.
Accessibility
14.1 These standards should not prevent or inhibit compliance with accessibility laws.
❑ All new construction should comply completely with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
Owners of historic properties should comply to the fullest extent possible, while also preserving the
integrity of the character-defining features of their buildings. Special provisions for historic
buildings exist in the law that allow some alternatives in meeting the ADA standards.
Mechanical Equipment & Service Areas
14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street.
❑ When it is feasible, screen service areas from view, especially those associated with commercial and
multifamily developments.
❑ This includes locations for trash containers and loading docks.
❑Service areas should be accessed off of the alley, if one exists.
14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way.
❑ Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a
negative visual impact.
❑ Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact.
Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of
the building itself.
❑ Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges.
❑ A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not
create a negative visual impact.
❑ Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also
minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and
mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly
visible roof planes.
❑ Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their
appearance by blending with their backgrounds.
Driveways & Parking
14.17 Design a new driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact.
❑ Plan parking areas and driveways in a manner that utilizes existing curb cuts. New curb cuts are not
permitted.
❑ If an alley exists, a new driveway must be located off of it.
14.19 Use a paving material that will distinguish the driveway from the street.
❑ Using a change in material, paving pattern or texture will help to differentiate the driveway from the
street.
❑ Porous paving materials will also help to absorb potential water runoff typically associated with
impervious surfaces such as asphalt or concrete.
14.22 Driveways leading to parking areas should be located to the side or rear of a primary
structure.
❑ Locating drives away from the primary facade will maintain the visual importance the structure has
along a block.
14.23 Parking areas should not be visually obtrusive.
❑ Large parking areas should be screened from view from the street.
❑ Divide large parking lots with planting areas. (Large parking areas are those with more than five
cars.)
❑ Consider using a fence, hedge or other appropriate landscape feature.
❑ Automobile headlight illumination from parking areas should be screened from adjacent lots and the
street.
14.24 Large parking areas, especially those for commercial and multifamily uses, should not be
visually obtrusive.
❑ Locate parking areas to the rear of the property, when physical conditions permit.
❑ An alley should serve as the primary access to parking, when physical conditions permit.
❑ Parking should not be located in the front yard, except in the driveway, if it exists.
ED
I I
`fl tlerak m rkrlNo
i rsiwv�
------1----- Aa RENR CO%RAOOe stall
....frrre:y�emm
mmv
�n� m�oniONrn�MOOe°�A°"rrtm""u
ROCK 72 AILEr �e uc rm
a
ROCK 72 AILEY Lrt
\ ASPENS ASPEN —
B'
REMOVED r -----------------� PROP RTY L 1NE-\ /e'D .D.L.tvrL
1
ASPENS
GARAGE 5'REAR YARD SETBACK ---�—r-----------L———— I 1•DtA/3" I,A
I7 --------------- e'DIa.D.L. x *A aDAD.I.
j �\A N 3'O0.D.L. I
� W
HABITABLE 10' —
REAR YARD SETBACK �I
� -----———————— 8 D.L
L --- —J---- --------- — II _ 10'HABITABLE REAR YARd�3 KI
-- L--------------- J / \ / D
Property Background(232 East Bleaker-PARCEL ID:2737-073-16008):
Los R 5 S,Block 72,232 Ea et Bleaker of the City of Aspen Weal End Is zoned as a
Medium Denroiry,Residential(R-8)Nee.Per found Survey Information prepared by High
Country Engbeering,Inc.(2013),Lot size utifRed to Perron FAR Breakdowns Is \ I _
determh»tl as a Approx 5,993 9q Ft Ongtnel Lot vdth 8,000 Sgalara Feet me usable lot - / —+_9�2UCE /
size for FAR purposes Per CRY of Aspen Approved AEmif/hsetlea Order.The propartY I 16 DFA D�, / 1s DA.D.L.,-/'
eurtendy contains a shrgro family Vlclorarl reskerrce sWcture-ale elgnnbanfly modnrotl I I I SPRUCE ` �\ Y (/ I // W
1s"DIA. _j /� 1 U ` /1
Vleto on wee Victorian constructed e a added to story log each In nt of From ouch ri 1890, 2D DIA.D,L / Z
s second story 93.T en elenrem was addetl to the or%tmil
he footprints add South oriented I \ �`h iff� � \\\��T S
eUUdure.In 1 893,The Western From Spa Monarch re the s co was led In The current JII\ \\ / tQU \ I /O�
final m r.. atrvcb+re on to th accessed oR or Moner cl Street was ooIn 1904. h 1959.The U L L
final ng ga masslrg addl8on m the Vle f the roalderae occurred In a las when a Southwest I I \ ' � In
Sidayald addition to the Allay facade of drs reNtlerwe was twitt.Ths root elpnnicam
eaeratiora tD the home occurred In 19931985,when the home's from Porch and exterior / IA./3•DIa. LOT SIZE: w
entry alesal detailing were significantly moffred.The Mey Facade deddng and dstainng I \ s' A D.L.DIA. I p MAPLES I .Y 0
8'DIA 1'10'DIIIIAqqq,,,, W /01
was also added ono std floe.The new'n gi mi home's arrent f the detailing d mat it has ��--� 5,983 SQ FT V5 `DIA D.L.TOtAL I U U
significantly warred the elarlry of time., vs new"regarding are dereMng of the realderree. n N ' 1 m t
should be noted them the existing Victorian structure does appear to be wnahrtem w 1h the r— —_—,
`\
1890.1904 9enbom&Bons Mapping ime,Additionally,met has been ch tak to from the and / \ �' AD.L. u/ \\ f W C
undaretarM the hCtrseb siting and timeline.Additionally,rseeerech mart from the Aspen I I /
Historical Society archlves has also aeeSted to detarmfie the construction Unrains.The % \ ' V C) W
home Is located In be 049M ere location. ——— ——— J
^ I 6LI Q
FAR(Floor Area Redo):NOTE:8,000 1 ft Is assumed for property bate alto to be verified C6rrONWOOD uO
I I
Per City ofly—k Municipal Code 28.710.040,taws In Section D,11,Ma allowable FAR or I I /2D'DIA.D.L.TOTAL
single fenNly residence Bltetl on a 8.000 sq ft lot ro 3,240 sq R. G^I DIA. D bi
So:8,000 sq ft lot•3,240 Sq Ft FAR base ( y� Ji
The lot would additbnally be subJsct to a 500 Sq Ft Bonus via the HPC Design Review
ProLaw,wnbh ant'alaxadorre end addltlone propoeetl td a Mslorlc prop"Is eub)eat to — i�
w'itian the Clty of Papers.NOTE:Ora narn r>T ovnrxm with the 232 Bleaker Restdanos is Y—
the unknown extent to what the HPC would deem as hict"Mf y st riRlcam,since the j N
constrty of home's addRlmrs date within Ilia first 20 Years of the home's 1882
// J
City Dods exempts en alley accessed garage area of up to 250 eq It from FAR area
calculations In the R-9 Daslgnebd Zoning Arm,The fdebwlty 290 Square Past over the I I I W
250 eq R exenlpAOn is Lountabro at a n td of 1:2 or SD, All pears fd<egs sayu.. rat is
countable at a 1:1 ratio.As the property wftantiy sxlara with the garage aware o9 or
Monarch Street,fns FA R Of ma baMlmg Is WYm9tl m fiAl. -QQr9NWODD
I \
fT DA D.L.
/ \
�, cV
CONSTRUCTION TIMELINE �Z
_2 < I s ar
c I ' ZI
1883 (Original Log Home) --- --- y �i�
1883-1890 (Second Story Added) � I J Uj
COTTON'I'lOOD
F O \ Zr IA.
I / 25'DIA.D.L. /
------ --- w ��j a DIA 1891 to 1893 (Front West Addition Add) 11 _J I I � ll
10'FRONT YARD SET e'DIA.D.L O\
__I \— — — _ BACK d \ _
1894 to 1898 (No Longer Existing) FRONT YARD 10'SETBACK
F-1 \ COTTONWOOD
1959 Garage Outbuilding Added I I trrTON O
Lot rrRrr I Lot r,Srr
❑ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- / \�— PROPERTY LINE
1984 (Rear West & East Home Areas Added) / ----� / \
COTTONWOOD /3W DiA.
ew Front Entry Porch Added COTT
22 DtA D.L. COTTONWOOD
/ A
1983-1985 (Porches/ Decks Expanded #� r 28'D 45'DID.L
Non—Historic Entry—Rear Detailing Added) �T , ' L_
/ 3
J /
RM STMT � - - ----- ,,
/
BLHW Simi
I
/ I
1 EXISTING SITE/TIMELINE HISTORY - 232 East Sleeker EXISTING SITE: STRUCTURES, TREES & TOGRAPHY- 232 East Bleeker
A1.01 SCALE:1B"=1'0" 1.01 SCALE:1/8R=1'-0^
r----- LJ�
—————————————ARCH I — r
I
tlereX m ekelNp
1 AIWY"aaNll
C OLORRO
� G•1W re6a a ei
ATO� o, p pe e
ELEV�700`N' rpa w..Cierr�itler p"
rleey.e
—_ ———_— PER 1gECORDED WRVE 7.t>e
e• m
ppuMJIrFRM1 LL,0.
--------------------------- _ MmvglNivl eepeaaa MaR
— — Mla Rev DeelRv
i �r.mMiM LLG XO
372.6 SO FT EXIS71NO yaeie�uR w ra
psar '�yc a"u
L_-------- p9iwpn�nmm
XgMra
L
--------
-------------------------
_W
L�EXISTING GARAGE FLOOR PLAN - 232 East Bleek
A1.02 SCALE.va _,r•orr er
�, EXISTING GARAGE ROOF
PLAN - 232 East Bleeker ~
(n
CL
W
U
Z
O ma
L)
— i.0.PIMe W{pabb U U
ELEV-111'-73q• m X
®
715 ELE Pleb W E�Oable Q ^
uj W Q
r r.o PIe a w{Gebb N
ELEV 1074•
T.O.Pbb W-E Gable /m'�/ ^c1 O
ELEV 10TH• IX ``1
UJ
ED
W U
Lu
T.O.FF.Co Gafpe
ELEV-100'-0' I_�I L
ARCH 1D0'-0"m TOPO 7867.66
PER RECORDED SU T.O.- Fl
Fl Cono.Ga
RVEY — ET
O
ARCH 100'-0'•iOPO 7867.66 N
PER RECORDED 9URVEY W
EXISTING EAST ELEVATION (MONARCH) - 232 East Bleeker
A,.oz SCALE:114" L4�EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (YARD TOWARDS SLEEKER) N
N
A1.02 SCALE:1/4-=1'-0"
T.O.PIMA W-E Gale
ELEV-111'•73r4", i' a
11
�l.'IS 7.0,flab WE Gabe LL W
ELEV-111'-7.4 O
T.O,Pbb W{Gable O�
ELEV-10T4"
A 70 flWi V 11-1 g+ e�
ELEV y,1�T-<, pg� gF
0
0
T.O.FF.Canc.Oarape u~'
ELEV-i0pq•
ARCH 100'-0'•TOPO 789759' 0 ;
PER RECORDED SURVEY T.O.FF.Conc.Gasps
ELEV-100'-0"
ARCH 100'-0••TOPO 7887.68
PER RECORDED SURVEY
EXISTING-WEST ELEVATION (YARD) - 232 East Bleeker �V
,.02 scALE.,/ar_,r-0" y - ---�6 EATING NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) - 232 East Bleeker
A,02 SCALE-U4"-,-Orr
i
/ A T'll
nerMUS�Mnv,
\ � iareru merta u..errvlorc
��°new um"c"awn,
it
W
/
/
F-
/
CL
i------------- ---- W
�
-
i
--- Z
M-toe O
Bth-
^i '1 LI U O
ui p
Bedroom(3'Ceiling Subgnt s� _ -_------- U U
Z m
' M11�106 ° - MWroom n C
3�M.c7^t°f' FM 1047 E\------------
�__
--� Bedroom(17'-T Ridge) ''� W c'
eVili co
17 A V..F.) � I T
-11 U e•11R V.I.F.) ry N
arCV �
tweet L
D�_ I F °N 'Y1 U
S(Y.F.) W
I.F DN
L—
Khchen JJ
M-107 r---------- L-�- o L-- LL co
3 ht HW-y(S'•10•CeWng)
B 9
Batlrcoorn
NP] //)
O Gee Oven T O F F Upon Le N
————— SRengs— M'707 �ELEV-110-1 i(t(V.I.F.) V
W
M-101 O Ge Skm M
/ -----------------�-
Livlllg Room(g-1•Ceiling) Closet
M•1W M$04 B "TRldge)
e 403
J.TO FF Meld Leel
y'ELEV-100'-0'
fiBd E%13TING
ARCH 100'-0"-TDPO 7833.4(V.I.FJ I UPPER LEVEL
EFM(y TRAMnON SURVEY L--- ---- --_
1043.0 30 FT EMSTING -
M"LEVEL I-
--_
W
dd �
L_ N
)
w
0
0
EXISTING VICTORAIN MAIN FLOOR PLAN - 232 East Bleeker 2 EXISTING VICTORAIN UPPER FLOOR PLAN
03 scar 114"=, o EXISTING VICTORAIN ROOF PLAN
03
SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
1.03 SCALE:1/4"=l'-0"
act•
TC0111ADo AaPEN
:koe.arras -e
."..tlrle-y eam
----*,.0 RV RV h13 12112 Gable
ELEV•721'-3K"(yLF sm�
a T O Rkpe W-E 17!14�b t��*�uc
R.1-V.N-S 12112 G.N. M
IL
EIEV-
I � EIEV•120'-1 iR"(V.I.F.) 1A°M1O1��R
oeaan�er��vmi�.LCmn`
�
_ E V F1 1UP21orLmel o th
*mqf- 10 VF ______ ____ _ ________ W r^
E4EY-70B'-7 TA.FF.UpQm Level South
ELEV-110'•1 12"(V.I,FJ
—— ————— O
T. FF UPL LePoI NOM Q
_ ----_--- OS-112"(V.I.F.)
—— F—
° oho W
T.O.FF.00 0 Level O 0
_------- ELEV-700'-0°(V.I.F.) --_---- ------------------------ _
———————————————————————
------------ �T.O FF Meln Level 0
_—_---�--_ ARCH 100'-0".TOP07888A --------------------------- i'ELEV-IOO-0'(V I.F.) U L L
PER RECORDED SURVEY�
ENTRY TR VERIFIED IN ELEVATIONS —————_J ARCH 100'-0'-TOPO 7888,4 Y G
L---------------------------------------L T:TRRyE fTINFIELD W Q
PER RECORDED SURVEY
L------------------------------------------------J ENTRY TRANSITION:ELEVATIONS " /1
TO SE VERIFIED IN FIELD v V
Z ® I
0 y- W
l�EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION (BLEEKER) - 232 East Bleaker 2�!ELXIS�Tjl!�N�G EAST ELEVATION (MONARCH) - 232 East Bleaker 9 2
1.04 SCALE:1/4"=1'-0"
1. W N Q
co O
N
Y U
W
W
— — — ,L?.O.RWGe N-S 12/12 Gebb
J
Y ELEV-121'-314"fV.LF.1
1212(iebb N-12/12 Dege L
—�ELEV-12D'-1118"(VFI.
�ELEV-120'-11/8'(V.I.F.)
W
--- Lu
N
T.U.FF U—Level South Ll
ELEV-110'-1 1f1"(V.I.F.)
—— - 1� __A T.O.FF,UP.�N Level SOWt
— ELEV-tOP-11tT'(V.I,F.) -- ----------- 1-0 FF 1O-1 Level So
—— 1,T.O.FF.Upper Wwl Narfh
—————————————— Y�-
\ ELEV-1 W'-I lir(V.I.F.)
2
-- --- -------- T.O.FF.Mein Level
CH 1CORD DSURVEYa ----- --- -- eV
L--------J � PER RECORDED SURYEY® L_ � ------------------ ELEV-100'-0"(V.I.F.) �
———————
ENTRY TRANSITION:ELEVATIONS '�-———————————_J ARCH 100'-0--TOPO 7SSBA
L----------------- —_---_—_—__—_----_J TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PER RECtORDEDSURVEY® w
————_— ENTRY TRANSTION:ELEVA71ONS
J---------------------1---_-------------- TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD o o
L— J
o It
L�EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION (ALLEY) - 232 East Bleaker 4 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION (INTERIOR
1.04
SCALE:1/a"=11_0" ( RIOR SIDEYARD) - 232 East Bleeker
1.04 SCALE;1/4"=1'-0"
O
act•
Quoter
ac 12 MY 72 MY 72 MY °
— — OrM m .Mrlko
_ t iq Wr pEept
A Eµ,.MO faleaa
BLOWER AB B LOWER TOTAL ��SJPPEBDEGK— rrle.r.�,m
1489 SO FT 2701 50 FT A GARAGE B GARAGE B MAiN 198 SO FT/ 540 r om
474 S0 FT 328.4 FT I I (
471 S0 FT ALLOWABLE
1 I r auM
1530 EXPOSURE 413.8 S0 FT FAR 250 EXEMPT 2 EXEMpT 328.4 S FT B UPPER
232 S0 FT 224/2=112 SO FT 2 2=112 S0 FT FAR A&B UPPE TOTAL a�
1113 SO FT 1,393 SO FT TABLE
FAR F (1'VARIANCE 1,393 SO FT AR
TO ALLEY)
LOTR rY f S LLI ��1 S ��1 S W F�SO FT ALLOWABLE (�0
LOT SIZE: > >ui 1,394 SO FT�AR
5,983 SO FT 611 LOT SIZE:
I J 5,963 SO FT J
Z u I
(L B UPPER ECK -- LLJ
343 SO FT (540 Q
vr0005 F— \ ALLOWAB E) /
ALOWER �iow�u'ov� a co nnn I '^
1212 SO FT \ sDgAe.�TDtu PAN ` rrDV,iu• a VJ
QFT �'gAD.L. AL A UPPER rDnw�.iu
15%EXPOSURE \ // Z \ V 280 SO FT so'OA D.L.TqAL F"
181.8 SO FT 1425 SO FT a
I FAR 'I / I 290 SO FT \ 411
FAR �I / Z
_ Z A 8 B MAI N TOTAL � C) 'C
1753.4 SO FT HABITABLE Z
Y I 9148 SO FT GARAGE O
/ \\ 1,977.4 SO FT FAR / \\ O LQ 1 / / _Y
/ \ U 58.)
I I ® I m 5,983 SO FT \ L�1 m C
—j LOT SIZZE: z
\ cononwooD / W A PORCH 11 X I I Q ro a OT
221 SO FT ` cononwooD / c
a W �rn'D.�. J ^ ` 27DK ooD I 0) 61,1
W "—DL. / W Q
DK
\ ( 1 - - - - - - - - - J � vvi \_ - - - - - - J I \\ / W CV A
It
�ta'D1Kf%L. \ COTfON'hOOD I
r_DA` 111
D°'f°Nwo6D WJ
PROPERTY LINE --++'�L. J
\ / PROPERTY LINE
m.m. rooD / \ / PROPERTY LINE
V MA.D.L. ' / 00rrO
Dlkk D.L \ / �DA.D.L. \ gnoANwooD \
R'DA D.L / �gn"onxr000
a Da o
N D.L. \ J
ow D.L. / I / onwooD
<
D.L. I w
N
SR7E AA:TRARITR11B9 SIRE B:bI1�Bl RlNkiiR21
1OR91 LOW: �
1212 RRB Si FT 115Y,MM=1f11.RfAR IS WW SOFT 115X EAT =282 3o FT FAR
TOTAL 191191:2781311 FT 1413,11 fM
MR m1m.
14RARTfA>RE 30 fT 11425 SQ FT FAR 32 RARITAN SOFT 1 328:4 NTT FAA
PORM�IQFRAC1 InzS$fTfAB IM 474 SO FT ONlil12RFTFAR
TEAL W1753 31 FT WITARLE 1 848 SO FT Offig 1211 ,
R"FT POW=1977.4 Sri FT FAR -
D
9m% pm:
288 SO FTIIAWAN I2N!SOFT FBI 1113 SO FT MAWANE 1111334 FT FAR
TOTAL PM:1393 Si FT RANIANE 1 541 SO FT BECK(15%
OF 3888 NWARE=549)113H SUT FAR
•
TOTAL NRT A:1991.83o FT FAR RIT B:1785.4 3O FT FAR
2117 SO FT F ITME 1474 OAR9iE 1221 SO fl Na j:7�M4-XfTRAVA&/474&W"M 1 541 SB FT RE191
Mm TOTAL WE CN41R®):9,714?SO FT FAR
WA SOFT RANITAR9190 WE 1 541 Mg 1211
FOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
FROM: Sara Adams, Senior Planner
RE: Potential changes to the Mixed Use Zone District, referral comments
DATE: February 12, 2014
SUMMARY: One of City Council's Top Ten Goals for 2014 is "By August 31, 2014 help
ensure the livability of Aspen for future generations by identifying strategies to expand business
diversity and enhance business sustainability." In response to this goal Planning Staff proposes
to amend the Mixed Use Zone District to allow retail and restaurant uses in all buildings.
Currently, only landmark properties are permitted to have retail or restaurant uses. Expanding
the permitted location of retail/restaurant uses may encourage different rental rates and in turn
allow different types of businesses to
operate in Aspen.
The Mixed Use Zone District is
located in four areas: the Main Street is
rF -
Historic District; a small area east of P
the Commercial Core from Main to
F
Hyman and Spring to Original; a
small area that includes two lots
behind the Hotel Jerome and the
Community Bank across Mill Street;
and the old Poppy's Restaurant on
Hallam Street. (See the maps y
provided at right and below.) The
only historic landmark in the small
area east of downtown is the Aspen
Athletic Club. The old Poppy's
restaurant is a landmark. t ;�,'
The Mixed Use Zone District was
The Mixed Use Zone is in light pink, east of downtown. Aspen
established in 2005 (as it was Athletic Club is outlined in white.
formerly known as the Office Zone
District) at which time the ability to have retail/restaurant was permitted as a by right use only to
landmarks. Prior to 2005 landmarks were allowed specific uses not offered to other properties
through a conditional use review.
There are 3 landmarks in the Main Street Historic District that have retail/restaurant uses: the
Main Street Bakery, Explore Booksellers, and 02 has some retail that is accessory to the yoga
studio. The Hickory House is a non-conforming use that was established prior to the
Mixed Use Zone District referral comments
2/12/14
Page 1
requirement that retail/restaurant be located in a historic landmark. The map below shows the
Historic District in green and the landmarks in white.
4i; C
Main Street Historic District is outlined in green. Landmarks are in white.
Planning Staff requests HPC's comments on the impact of allowing retail/restaurant for all
buildings in the Mixed Use Zone District. In Staff's opinion amending the Mixed Use Zone
District will not affect the viability of the historic landmarks. The only landmarks that are
currently operating retail/restaurant uses are located close to the Commercial Core and have been
established businesses for many decades. Restricting retail/restaurant to landmarks does not
seem to offer much of a benefit or there would be more retail/restaurant uses along Main Street.
While the uses along Main Street will probably not drastically change with this amendment,
Staff believes that retail/restaurant uses in the pocket of Mixed Use east of the Commercial Core
and the area behind the Hotel Jerome will further Council's goal to expand business diversity
and enhance business sustainability. The Hyman Avenue corridor is undergoing many changes
that will draw visitors and locals east of the Commercial Core - allowing retail/restaurant in this
location will offer new opportunities for new and old businesses. The area behind the Jerome is
currently under construction with a new mixed use building that could offer prime areas for
retail/restaurant spaces along Mill Street that is are a little off the beaten track.
Staff has received split feedback from some commercial brokers. Some brokers are concerned
about eroding the commercial core area by allowing retail/restaurant to creep into other areas and
do not think there will be a significant change to rental rates or business diversity by allowing
retail/restaurant in these areas. Other brokers are supportive of the idea and do not see the
amendment causing any adverse impacts.
Mixed Use Zone District referral comments
2/12/14
Page 2
Staff is looking for feedback from HPC: Does HPC think there will be a negative impact to the
Historic District and historic landmarks by amending the zone district?
Next Steps: Staff will propose a policy resolution to City Council to amend the Mixed Use
Zone District.
Mixed Use Zone District referral comments
2/12/14
Page 3
EXHIBIT
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060(E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen,CO AL16-ti
J�
.4 5�o SST
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 2U I�}
ray 12 —
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
(name,please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen,
Colorado, hereby personally
certify that 1 have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
XPosting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six
(26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in
height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15)days prior to the public hearing
on the 17 day of ."1 lfl-R.`I
20A to and including the date and time
of the public hearing. A photograph of-the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
XMailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen(15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred(300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
Neighborhood outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach,
summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing
as outreach. A copy of the
required in Section 26.304 035tnlludi�
neighborhood outreach sir ry, ng the method of public notification and
a copy of arty documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto.
(continued on next page)
Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt
requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the
date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development.
The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current
tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that
create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially
Planned Areas,are subject to this notice requirement.
Rezoning or text anaendinent. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any
way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this
Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be
made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or
otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal
description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of
real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the
proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning
agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing
on such amendments.
Signature
tom.
The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this�day
Of 1204,by
MICHELLE T ALLMON WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires:
NOTARY ID 19994008969
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 13,2015
Notary ub 'c
ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE:
• COPYOF THE PUBLICATION
• PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGA9
• LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERIVMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED
BYMAIL
• APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE
AS REQUIRED BY CRS. X24-65.3-103.3
1.
I
4w
Pu
I I I
S
7y ps
M -
I
f
Wednesday, J n , 29
1 AM -
PM
City Hall
Light Lunch & Refreshments Provided
Constructed over 30 years ago, Rubey
Park has served over four million
local, valley-wide and skier transit
passengers each year! a
sr
The City of Aspen and their consultant
team, led by Studio B, appreciate ,
your continued involvement with the
Rubey Park project.
�f
xi
i
THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen
3
Name Email ~-
Phone � '
j f
�n�'f G� i�•�,�f Ar, i J-2 6 c,,V
J
e i�z # �,cuj ('Loa iu ST
r
blE, c � r
to John Krueger& Lynn Rumbaugh (COA Transportation Department)
meeting date 29 January 2014
meeting time 11:30am - 01:0opm
location Aspen City Hall - Council Chambers
project Rubey Park Remodel - Final Design
attendees John Krueger— City of Aspen Transportation Department
Lynn Rumbaugh — City of Aspen Transportation Department
Justin Barker— City of Aspen Community Development
Gilbert Sanchez — Studio B Architects
Sheri Sanzone — Bluegreen
Tyler Nielsen — Bluegreen
from Tyler Nielsen
date 04 February 2014
cc Eric Sechrist— Studio B Architects
Katie Tabor— Bluegreen
The following notes are a summary of the information acquired during the January 29t'open house for
the Rubey Park Remodel - Final Design project. Please inform Bluegreen should you identify any
inaccuracies or omissions and the memo will be corrected and redistributed.
Public Attendees
Stephen Young Jennifer Speck Thomas Buckingham
Elcena Standish David Bentley B Young
John Standish
Outreach Feedback/ Comments
• "Bike racks are very important for the locals."
• "The covered seating areas are great."
• "The improvements to the Transit Center are going to be great for downtown Aspen."
• "The design team should look at splitting the bus routes between Rubey Park and the Rio Grande/
Galena Plaza,"
p. 1 of 2 www,bluegreenaspen.com
"Sight lines to the clock tower are important."
•• "The Transit Center's signage needs to be improved."
• "The bus routes need to be designated consistently (e.g. Valley bus vs. Local Bus)."
• "Signage at the Transit Center needs to communicate'next leaving'bus not the next arriving'
bus."
• "Improved restrooms at the Transit Center are a must."
• "There should be some form of public art at the Transit Center."
• "The improvements proposed are much needed."
p.2 of 2 www,bluegreenaspon.com
315 EAST DEAN ASSOC INC
150 E 58TH ST 4 SKIERS LP 434 EAST COOPER AVENUE LLC
14TH FLR 1108 NORFLEET DR 2001 N HALSTED STE 304
NEW YORK, NY 10155 NASHVILLE,TN 372201412 CHICAGO, IL 60614
450 SOUTH GALENA ST INVESTORS LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC AGRUSA LISA ANN
450 S GALENA ST#202 402 MIDLAND PARK 4761 W BAY BLVD#1704
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ESTERO, FL 33928
AJAX MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES LLC AP RT 29 LLC ASHKENAZY ASPEN COMMERCIAL LLC
520 E DURANT ST#207 418 E COOPER AVE#207 150 E 58TH ST
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PENTHOUSE
NEW YORK, NY 10155
ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES LLP ASPEN RESIDENCE CLUB& HOTEL
51027 HWY 6&24#100 CONDO ASSOC INC ASPEN RETREAT LLC
GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 C/O SVO ASSOCIATION MANAGEMENT 6536 E GAINSBOROUGH
9002 SAN MARCO COURT SCOTTSDALE,AZ 85251
ORLANDO, FL 32819
ASPENHOF CONDO ASSOC
COMMON AREA AV STEIN LLC 19.08% AVH ONION VENTURES II LLC 8.208%
520 E COOPER AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611
BACSANYI ERNEST A TRUST BAKER HUGH LEE JR 50% BARNETT-FYRWALD HOLDINGS INC
PO BOX 89 555 E DURANT AVE STE 2K 2222 COTTONDALE LN#200
HIGGINS LAKE, MI 48627-0089 ASPEN, CO 81611 LITTLE ROCK,AR 722022017
BASH GAIL TRUST BASTIL DEAN D BECKER ASPEN 4A LLC
2070 WOODSTOCK RD 4460 CHEROKEE DR 555 E DURANT
GATES MILLS, OH 44040 BROOKFIELD,WI 53045 ASPEN, CO 81611
BELL 26 LLC BICKERS EVERETT E BLACK HAWK ASPEN LLC
125 W CENTRAL AVE#218 6031 GEORGETOWN GREENVILLE RD ROECLIFFE COTTAGE JOE MOORES LN
BENTONVILLE,AR 72712 GREENVILLE, IN 471249622 WOODHOUSE EAVES
LEICESTERSHIRE LE12 8TF ENGLAND,
BOURQUARD RICHARD E BRADEN PAMELA J TRUST C513 LLC
10859 WINTERSONG WAY 80 M ST SE#600 2907 SHADOW CREEK DRIVE#104
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80126 WASHINGTON, DC 20003 BOULDER, CO 80303
CARELLA RICHARD J&JOAN CHISHOLM REVOCABLE TRUST CITY OF ASPEN
555 E DURANT AVE#31 3725 N GRANDVIEW DR ATTN FINANCE DEPT
ASPEN, CO 81611 FLAGSTAFF,AZ 86004-1603 130 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO 81611
s
COASTAL MOUNTAIN INVESTMENTS COASTAL MTN PROPERTIES LLC COOBAC DEAN P TRUST#1
LLC 2639 MC CORMICK DR 4468 JUNIPER DR
2519 N MCMULLEN BOOTH RD#510-307 CLEARWATER, FL 33759 KEWADIN, MI 94648
CLEARWATER, FL 33761
COOBAC SANDRA L TRUST#1 90 COOPER 4TH NORTH OF NELL CONDOS LLC COOPER 1E HYMAN ET COMPANY ST 4468 JUNIPER DR ASPEN, CO 81611
KEWADIN, MI 94648 ROGERS,AR 72756-9615
COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC DALY JACQUELYN TRUST DALY NOAH THOMAS IRREVOCABLE
C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 249 HEATHER LN 249 HEATHER LN
418 E COOPER AVE#207 ASPEN, CO 81611-3347 ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN, CO 81611
DCGB LLC DEXTER ASPEN LLC
DALY THOMAS J &JUDITH J ATT GIORGIO RIGHETTI CFO 1417 W 10TH ST
1590 HOMESTAKE DR 610 WEST 52 ST AUSTIN,TX 78703
ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10019
C/ PROPERTIES LLC
DURANT GALENA CONDOS
DURWARD QUENTIN J TRUST C/O AEROCAPE LIMITED
COMMON AREA 702 E SAWGRASS TR 230 S MILL ST
500 E DURANT AVE DAKOTA DUNES, SD 57049 ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN, CO 81611
FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD FORD ANN MICHIE
FARVER JOAN LIVING TRUST C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC 216 WAPITI WAY
617 FRANKLIN PL#200 520 E COOPER BASALT, CO 81621
PELLA, IA 50219 ASPEN, CO 81611
GA RESORT CONDO ASSOC
FRAZIER FAMILY DEC TRUST G A RESORT CONDO ASSOC INC C/O VIC GIANNELLI
624 E BLACKWELL AVE 1000 S MILL ST 415 E DEAN ST
BLACKWELL, OK 74631 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611-3800
GALENA COOPER LLC GERARDOT J REVOCABLE TRUST GLENROY PARTNERS 2.9%
601 E HYMAN 5526 HOPKINTON DR PO BOX 2157
ASPEN, CO 81611 FORT WAYNE, IN 46804 SANTA CRUZ,CA 95063
GOLDEN HORN BUILDING CONDO GONE WEST LLC GOODWIN WILLIAM N
ASSOC 401 W CENTER 418 6TH AVE#1200
COMMON AREA SEARCY,AR 721451406 DES MOINES, IA 50309
400 E COOPER AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611
GORDON DAVID F&LETICIA LLC GORSUCH COOPER LLC GRAND ASPEN LODGING LLC
C/O JOE RACZAK/NORTH OF NELL MGT 263 E GORE CREEK DR PO BOX S
555 E DURANT VAIL, CO 81657 ASPEN,CO 81612-7420
ASPEN,CO 81611
GREEN JUDE TRUST GRENKO PROPERTIES LTD GROSSE EDWIN J&ADELINE M REV
425 N MAPLE DR#205 PO BOX 2327 TRUST
BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 816022327 555 E DURANT
ASPEN, CO 81611
GUIDOS SWISS INN LLC HAMMER DRU RESIDENTIAL TRUST HOPPES DIANA
23655 TWO RIVERS RD 2828 HOOD ST#1602 5400 VERNON AVE#106
BASALT, CO 81621 DALLAS,TX 75219 EDIA, MN 55436
HUDSON KAREN DAY HYATT GRAND ASPEN HYMAN BARBARA TRUST
409 E COOPER AVE 415 E DEAN ST 150 BRADLEY PL#405
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 PALM BEACH, FL 33480
INDEPENDENCE PARTNERS INDEPENDENCE SQUARE UNITS LLC INDY UNIT 312 LLC
602 E COOPER AVE#202 400 E MAIN ST#2 PO BOX 11627
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612
JACKSON JERRY&SHARON JENNE LLP JMJMK LLC
4320 HOUSE OF YORK#2 1510 WINDSOR RD 620 STONEGATE TERRACE
AUSTIN,TX 78730 AUSTIN,TX 77402 GLENCOE, IL 60022
K&W PROPERTIES INC KEENE KAREN M KOOSH ENTERPRISES LLC
728 W CANAL ST 1700 BASSETT ST#503 2070 WOODSTOCK RD
NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 32168 DENVER, CO 80202 GATES MILLS, OH 44040
KOVAL BARBARA W 2012 QPR TRUST KRISTAL ASPEN LLC LCT LP
555 E DURANT ST#2C 1417 WEST 10TH ST TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ASPEN, CO 81611 AUSTIN, TX 787034816 PO BOX 101444
NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444
LEFFERS JEFFREY J TRUSTEE LYSTER BARBARA MAIERSPERGER RENELL
5526 HOPKINTON DR 37 OCEAN HTS DR 404 S GALENA
FORT WAYNE, IN 46804 NEWPORT COAST, CA 92657 ASPEN, CO 81611
MARCUS DURANT GALENA LLC MAYFAIR INVESTMENTS NON LLC MCDONALDS CORPORATION 05/152
C/O STEPHEN J MARCUS 7 DOVER ST PAUL NELSON
PO BOX 1709 RICHMOND VIC 3121 142 TANAGER DR
ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTRALIA, GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601
MEYER BUSINESS BUILDING LLC MILLER MARK EDWARD&LISA
23655 TWO RIVERS RD WEATHERBY MORRIS ROBERT P
BASALT, CO 81621 3595 TUXEDO CT 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304
ATLANTA, GA 30305 ASPEN, CO 81611
MOUNTAIN CHALET ENTERPRISES INC NAYLOR IRVIN S NH ONION VENTURES II LLC 16.918%
333 E DURANT AVE 100 BOXWOOD LN STE#2 601 E HYMAN AVE
ASPEN, CO 81611 YORK, PA 17402 ASPEN, CO 81611
NJ STEIN LLC 52.98% NN LLC NORTH OF NELL CONDO ASSOC
COOPER #207 PO BOX 411144 555 E DURANT AVE
418 E CO
ASPEN, O R AVE A CHICAGO, IL 60641 ASPEN, CO 81611
PARAGON BUILDING CONDO ASSOC
OSHAUGHNESSY JANE A P&L PROPERTIES LLC COMMON AREA
2492 E TERRARIDGE DR 101 S 3RD ST#360 419 E HYMAN AVE
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80126 GRAND JUNCTION,CO 81501 ASPEN, CO 81611
PARK PLACE CONDO ASSOC PAULUS REV FAMILY TRUST PEYTON MARI
COMMON AREA 555 E DURANT 409 E COOPER#4
408 S MILL ST ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN, CO 81611
LLC PUCHY SHIRLEY RANKMORE KEVIN L&JASMINE
PH 006 555 E DURANT PO BOX 168
555E LLC
ASPEN,DURANT ST ST#3J ASPEN, CO 81611 WELLINGTON NSW 2820 AUSTRALIA,
RED ONION INVESTORS LLC 65.784% RESIDENCES AT LITTLE NELL DEV LLC RESIDENCES
ASSOC INC E LITTLE NELL
150 E 58TH ST
418 E COOPER ST#207 PENTHOUSE 501 DEAN ST
ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10155 ASPEN, CO 81611
RG COOPER ST 4.83% RG ONION VENTURES II LLC 6.9%
RESNICK EDITH L TRUST C/O RONALD GARFIELD 601 E HYMAN AVE
2245 CAMEO LAKE DR 601 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48302 ASPEN, CO 81611
RLN REAL PROPERTIES LLC RONCHETTO LYNN A ROSS BARBARA REVOCABLE TRUST
1375 ENCLAVE PKWY 320 E 42ND ST#101 PO BOX 594
HOUSTON,TX 77077 NEW YORK, NY 10017 HANALEI, HI 96714
ROSS ROGER A REVOCABLE TRUST RUTHERFORD GROUP RUTLEDGE REYNIE
4720 WAILAPA RD 5514 CALUMET AVE 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR
KILAUEA, HI 96754 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 SEARCY,AR 72143
SALTON PROPERTY LLC SCHROEDER FAMILY TRUST SCHULTZE DANIEL G
221 VALLEY RD 4 GREENWOOD CT 404 S GALENA ST#210
ITHACA, NY 14850-6152 ORINDA, CA 94563 ASPEN, CO 81611
SEGUIN MICHAEL SEVEN CONTINENTS LLC SH ONION VENTURES II LLC 2.19%
793 601 E HYMAN AVE 601 E HYMAN AVE
793 CEMTERY LN ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN, CO 81611
SHAPIRO EUGENE B& MARLENE R STEIN BUILDING LLC 23.11% STEPHENS ROSS DAVID
6301 E NAUMANN DR 3-E 601 E HYMAN AVE 1337 B DANIELSON RD
PARADISE VALLEY,AZ 85253 ASPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108
SWENERG JAMES&SANDRA L TENNESSEE THREE TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS
2660 ROCK REST RD PO BOX 101444 C/O J H COBLE
PITTSBORO, NC 27312 NASHVILLE,TN 37224-1444 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD
NASHVILLE,TN 37218-4020
TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST VALLEY INVESTMENTS LLC VBS LLC
520 E COOPER AVE#209 602 E COOPER#202 7138 MEADOWCREEK DR
ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS,TX 75214
WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEINGLASS LEONARD WF SWEARINGEN LLC
512 1/2 E GRAND AVE#200 PO BOX 11509 450 CONWAY MANOR DR NW
DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 ASPEN, CO 81612 ATLANTA, GA 30327
WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WORCHESIK JILL 25% WORCHESIK SHANNON 25%
22750 WOODWARD AVE#204 202 4TH ST 202 4TH ST
FERNDALE, MI 48220 CROSBY,TX 77532 CROSBY,TX 77532
ZEFF DANIEL ZEFF ELEANOR E&ROBERT H
C/O NORTH OF NELL 555 E DURANT AVE#4C
555 E DURANT AVE STE 4K ASPEN, CO 81611
ASPEN, CO 81611
PUBLIC NOTICE
Date : Wednesday, Feb. 12 , 2014
Time : 5 : 0o P . M .
Place : City Hall , 130 S . Galena
Street. Aspen
Purpose :
HPC will consider an application bv
the City of Aspen Transportation
Department, affecting this property
The applicant proposes to remodel
the existing structure and site and
construct two new additions with a
connecting roof. The review is
Conceptual M ' Development and
. Commercial Design . For further
information contact Aspen Planning
Dept. at 970-429-2797.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: RUBEY PARK—CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, February 12,
2014, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in
Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. HPC will consider an application
submitted by the City of Aspen Transportation Department, represented by BlueGreen, related to
their property located at 450 E. Durant Street, Lots K, L, M, N, O, P, Q, R and S, Block 90, City
and Townsite of Aspen, CO, Parcel ID #2737-182-21-851. The applicant requests Conceptual
Major Development and Commercial Design approval. The applicant proposes to remodel the
existing structure and site and construct two new additions, one on each side of the existing
structure, and a roof connecting all three structures. For further information, contact Justin Barker
at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970)
429-2797,justin.barker @cityofaspen.com.
s/Jay Maytin
Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on January 23, 2014
City of Aspen Account
c�
U
fS7 g:
4
w
E
E - i
CL
O e .
07 project descriptionand response to historic
p preservation guidelines
C:
c
project description
Rubey Park (Transit Center) is centrally situated in Aspen's commercial core and is
0. the southernmost terminus for the Roaring Fork Transportation Authority's (RFTA)
regional bus system. The site is flanked on the west by Mill Street and Wagner
a Park, and on the east by Galena Street.
0
E When the Transit Center was designed and constructed thirty years ago, no
imagined that it would serve as the Grand Central Station of he valley. It its ankey
landmark and directional tool, as well as the first experience many visitors have
within the historical urban core of Aspen. As more and more people have chosen
ss
to ride the bus, both to and from Aspen on RFTA's regional bus routes and within
Aspen on the city's local bus routes, use has grown to over 4 million passengers
per year. Typically about 30% of the work force in Aspen arrives by transit each
day. In the Winter RFTA moves thousands of skiers between Aspen and the other
three ski resorts.
The site is functionally inadequate and is physically deteriorating beyond repair.
Over the past ten years, increased demand and limited improvements (beyond
annual maintenance) has resulted in functional, safety and maintenance
deficiencies that include:
• Tripping and slipping hazards due to cracked and uneven pavement and
icing from overhangs and brick pavers.
• Congestion from undersized driver break rooms, inefficient indoor
passenger waiting areas and under-designed bathrooms that require
constant attention.
• Inadequate space and circulation for buses that results in conflicts
between buses, pedestrians, bicyclists, and private vehicles.
• Limited lighting and deteriorating concrete walls that pose safety risks.
Functionally, the Transit Center cannot adequately accommodate and safely
support bus, rider or transit operation needs. Buses often need to utilize adjacent
and remote parking locations that require additional turning movements in a
congested, tourist oriented area. The drivers are frequently forced to unload their
passengers in a staging area designated for another bus. Consequently, arriving
buses often find all twelve staging areas occupied and are forced to unload
passengers in unsafe areas, wait in travel lanes, stage in unauthorized areas
and/or circulate through the City until space is available. They mix with other
traffic—including hotel shuttle vans, delivery trucks, taxis and cars and often travel
in circles through downtown waiting until a staging space is available. Sometimes
buses are sent out of town to wait at the Brush Creek Intercept Lot, approximately
7 miles away.
The design for the remodel was created through an extensive process. The
process provided a vision for the Transit Center that carefully integrated
transportation planning efforts, community ownership and buy-in, economic
viability and functional and artful spaces that respect the historical character of the
riry
rubey park remodel I-IPC conceptual major development submittal package 1 7-1
�e 1
Iq
W,
CIL
`i -
. r y 21 C.
LU
ISE
zi ,,.
alley way --
4W�'
i
JS
25
o 1 °
.��3 2 ii
6❑ „
12 9 0 I ”
b" \
2 1 3A I� f
' ��
— «
A
o
E�
rte .-= i3'G-.....,...e... 'L.�e�..�..- y t`�.e.�M CZ �r 1 . Qj
tn durant avenue
CU
ro
��.
may, "
a
_ � a
"AN""n t r a -
� ;> s
XR
l- - �
" R
VO
dean street
4
_'o,p� '
key
1 waiting room 11 equipment storage 21 commercial loading/unloading zone 31 recycling receptacles __ direction of vehicular travel
2 women's restroom 12 recycling receptacles-operations 22 planting area 32 bike racks
3 men's restroom 13 bus sawtooth berth 23 stormwater treatment area 33 wecycle station
4 staff restroom 14 bus linear berth 24 pedestrian walking zones 34 ski racks
5 vestibule 15 bus layover berth 25 bus rider waiting zones 35 newspaper kiosks
6 tickets&information 16 taxi/shuttle parking 26 pedestrian seating (covered) 36 exterior real-time bus signage
7 RFTA office 17 flexible parking 27 pedestrian seating (uncovered) 37 bus signage
8 RFTA operations 18 flexible parking 28 table seating 38 route map/schedule
9 driver's lounge 19 ADA parking 29 aspen tap station 39 amenity map
10 mechanical room 20 public metered parking 30 trash receptacles
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
: - -- =-
I ' ji
I
7 T
0
Y
— — — I Q
— - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � o
J
O
WZ
Lu
(2: ROOF PLAN j aa-
SCALE:1/8'=1'-0" N (n
I V
182'-13
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ — — — — _ — — _ — — — — — — — — — -- 25— _ n m
2g-11"
O � /
U U A A O 0 Q I q _-
- - - -
I
I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Rat,:
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — HPC CONCEPTUAL 12.12.13
"® (1)MAIN eLEVEL PLAN
SCAL-
C°nsLUCtlon NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Issue tlaie:
o�°wlnq Title:
PLANS
sneetx
A2.1
.. �. i4 �` I I xw axc mwrwa wsuwu
ea�aysxssn s ��
ti
4
1 SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE:118'=1'-0"
0- 0
0 } O
Wz
xswexc xcorwc w
wPaxers � h � �
2 NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE:118"=1'-0"
m
1`k`( swc.vswsrn � _
4 EAST ELEVATION RUBEY 5 EAST ELEVATION RFTA
3 EAST ELEVATION BATHROOMS SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"
SCALE:1/8"=1'-0' Rev. ate:
HPC CONCEPTUAL
SCALE:118"=1'-0"
I2. .
ConsWCtlon NOTPORCONSTRUCTION
w vu�sis _ _ Issue tlata:
— — — — Drarvin9 Title:
— — ELEVATIONS
ti
7 WEST ELEVATION RUBEY 8 WEST ELEVATION BETA
6 WEST ELEVATION BATHROOMS SCALE:118=T-0"
SCALE:1/8"=1'-0"
SCALE:118"=1'-0"
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:
WJ:�) I� L_ , �, , Aspen, CO
SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATt:
W� k1 y57,�;- 20
l
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
(name, please print)
being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally
certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060
(E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:
V/ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official
paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15)
days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto.
Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the
Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof
materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six
(26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in
height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing
on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time
of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto.
Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community
Development Department, which contains the information described in Section
26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to
the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage
prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the
property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of
property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they
appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A
copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.
Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach,
suimnanzed and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as
required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the
neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and
a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto.
(continued 077 next page)
Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt
requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the
date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development.
The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current
tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that
create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially
Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement.
Rez072i77g or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any
way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this
Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be
made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or
otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal
description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of
real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the
proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning
agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing
on such amendments.
r I
Si a e
The fo e om "Affidavit of Not' " was acknowledged be ore me this day
of , 20�,by C U�Ly fC L
i
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE:RUBEY PARK-CONCEPTUAL MAJOR DE-
VELOPMENT WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing
will be held on Wednesday,February 12,2014,at
a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen
Historic Preservation Commission,in Council M ,GOrT11111SSlOn eXplreS: !C(` ?CV-
Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen. Y
HPC will consider an application submitted by the
City of Aspen Transportation Department,repre-
sented by BlueGreen,related to their property lo-
cated at 450 E.Durant Street,Lots K,L,M,N,0,
P,Q,R and S,Block 90,City and Townsite of As.
pen,CO,Parcel ID#2737-182-21-851.The appli-
cant requests Conceptual Conceptual Major Development and of Public 'SKY P,
Commercial Design approval. The applicant pro- �j �.........e
poses to remodel the existing structure and site v�;
and construct two new additions,one on each side
of the existing structure,and a roof connecting all o'
three structures. For further information,contact : LINDA INA, .^
Justin Barker at the City of Aspen Community De- e a
veopmen epartment,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen, }�F�„ jj=„� e
C O ( 9 7 0 ) 4 2 9 - 2 7 9 7 e
justin.barker @cityofaspen.com. ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: .Ni.;.•�
s/Jay Maytin
Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission [�THE PUBLICATION
23b12i014. [987707]en Times Weekly on January GRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN)
fN�'C�i�lti`s�r+v t � i:+c.0 i�Jr4yi�v l�
• LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES 96TICED ,:
BY MAIL
• APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE
AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3
j
i
3
to Justin Barker
from Tyler Nielsen
date 02/12/2014
project name Rubey Park Remodel Final Design
subject HPC Affidavit Submittal
copy to Project Files
method ❑ mail ❑ courier M hand delivery ❑ other
HPC Affidavit Submittal Contents:
• Signed ¬arized affidavit
• Image of public posting
• Advertisement, sign-in sheet, and meeting record of neighborhood outreach
• Mailing list of property owners within 300 feet of the Transit Center
• Mailer contents
P. www.bluegreenaspen.com