HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.rz.128 E Main St.005A-85
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
') DATE RECEIVED: Z/,q!S5 -il1&5YV{p!r~v.z CASE NO. CXJ5A,s5
DATE RECEIVED ~MPLETE: . , {lirr::.FF:.. Go WJ;
PROJ,Ecr N~E: jo,r~ Hdose ..c."~il,rlLJ C~
APPL ICANT: D, \,Ji - i, Ivle h
Appl icant AddresS/Phone: 0<,~C- G-0.u!-dtJ4' .5_V././iN';: u,Au~<4.,., ^ _/ (..,{lc'{J 2.-
REPRESENTATIVE: 1.J!l/kL~-0'^77Vh....b 'HA~ (Up/V\{ -T O.<tv-,...( 0e'/4V\ 0
Representative Address/ hone:
,-,;..
, ;~
r
. 0 fj 4 i/l~r\ ~.~k1
...---
~~
~~,ap
~
Type of Application:
I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
Conceptual Submission
- Preliminary Plat
_ Final Plat
($2,730.00)
($1,640.00)
($ 820.00)
- II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
Conceptual Submission
_ Preliminary Plat
_ Final Plat
III. EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step)
L IV. SPECIAL REV IEW (1 'step)
($1,900.00)
($1,220.00)
($ 820.00)
($1,490.00)
($ 680.00)vfd',
Special Review
Use Determination ./'
iL- Condi ti onal Use " J
Other: J/~l
::~<::<<:::::;:-:::::<<<<~:;:<<<.::::::.~:::::;:-<(;:'~<<::<
____________!:A::__~~~~R_~~~~_~I~~~_____!~_:r_:A_~_~_~~_______________
--------------------------------------------------~------------------
REF9RALS:
-"//City Atty
~ City Engineer
~ Housing Dir.
~ Aspen Water
~ City Electric
-.U.- Envir. Hlth.
_ Aspen Consolo S.D.
_ Mtn. Bell
_ Par ks Dept.
_ Holy Cross Electric
_ Fire Marshall
_ Fire Chief
_ School District
- Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
- StateHwy Dept (Glel1W'd)
_StateHWYDept (Gr.Jtn)
_ Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn
_ Other:
;;~~=;~;;;~~~================;~;~=;~;;~;~=1:~~i;,t;~~===;~;;;~~~=~~
i_City Atty City Engineer ~ BUild~-ng Dept.
I
~bther: S1du.u./ ~ _ Other:
FIL E STATUS AND ,LOCAT ION: -l~ l.l...t~
R~ ~y t-ioUt~e 10 <:) I DfficE.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
.
,..."
i:.<,.l
r-"
CAspen P,~_L)
f; -}I, ,
i(.,." 'J n !i ,,/',' " , ",ii""
, ,,-.~,.....r '-", ".." ! I :. V.
.' (\
O I 0"
.. ,Vf-1-'1 r -... -- \..-t") . ......--- (~, .....::... .~-:
"\ f ;'
'1 ''4-'-" 'i"
" \_y-
Ci ty Council
".f
i
"U
\
i'~_ )
,b..,,,
<-;'
/ ) ,</ j.1 \,!
/i '.
\c. )
0(" ,,-I I
, i _" ,.'_
/\ ,
'-/" I
/7 I, . ).,.'"'
,'-, "
, ,
.',f '''..'
! jJ'
f.,lJ-
~ r ',,~_
I
,\ 0.. ,
l'i .
" flt;-.-1/t_) ': ~/'. 'i
/' '1
Rezoning of the south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H and I trom ;(-0
to 0 - Office must be accomplished before a permit is issued
for construction on these lots. I-':"P -_",,',_'}I."//C "CI'";';',>>-
The facility must be a licensed food ser/ice establishment ("J
and must comply with the Rules and Regulations Governing the
Sanitation of Food Service Establishments in the State of
Colorado.
The City's Air Pollution Ordinance must be met.
Construction noise, dust and mud carry-out must be minimized
and Chapter 16 of the Code complied with.
Trash storage and removal must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
Removal and relocation of the two (2) fruit trees must be
done in accordance with Section l3-7~ of the Code.
Revie\qed By:
Aspen P&Z
Ci ty Council
.
r";
"....,
;~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City CoUncil
FROM:
t? ,-:t---
Hal Schilling, City Manager ~
Steve Burstein, Planning Office ,~
THRU:
RE:
Sardy House Property Rezoning
August 6, 1985
DATE:
----~--~-----------------------~---------~-----------~---------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Planning Office and Planning Commission recommend
approval of the request to rezone the south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H,
and I, Block 66 (Sardy House Property) from R-6 Residential to 0-
Office Zone District. The proposlfd zoning map amendment would bring
the zoning of these partial lots into conformance with the rest of the
property's zoning.
PRINIOUS COUNCIL AND PI.ANNIlIG COMMISSION ACl'ION: City Council approve
First Reading of the Sardy Housing Rezoning on August 12, 1985. On
April 2, 1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission granted conditional
use approval to renovate the Sardy House and to build new structures,
all to be used as a Bed and Breakfast LOdge. One of the conditions of
approval was the rezoning of the area presently under consideration.
On June 18, 1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public
hearing and passed a motion recommending apptoval of the rezoning
request. Also, on June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission reconsider-
ed the prior Conditional Use Permit and added two more conditions to
the Conditional Use approval.
BACKGROUND: In the course of pursuing the Sardy House proj ect the
applicant has taken the proposal through several review and approval
cycles including:
1. Conditional use approval from the Planning and Zoning
Commission for the Bed and Breakfast use,
2.
Historic Preservation Commission review of exterior changes
to the structures and site,
3. Rezoning of the rear area now under consideration,
I
I
~;,j
d
4. Board of Adj ustments approval of variances to height and
set-back limitations.
The first action on the proj ect was the review for conditional use
approval as mentioned above, the conditional use was approved by P&Z.
The HPC granted final approval of renovation and addition to the Sardy
House July 2, 1985. The Board of Adjustment granted variances for the
~
,.-,
height of the north-south addition and the setback of the swimming
pool on July 25, 1985.
The rezoning of the subj ect portion of property would:
1. Bring the entire property which is under one ownership into
a single zone district and,
2. Allow for the Bed and Breakfast use intended for the back
portion of the property to be a conditional use in the
Office Zone. It is neither a permitted nor conditional use
in the current R-6 zone district.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Section 24-12.5 (d). identifies the criteria for
evaluating rezoning applications as follows:
1. Compatibil ity of the rez oning proposal with the surrounding
zone districts and land use in the vicinity of the site,
2.
Impacts of the rezoning upon expected traffic generation
road safety, availability of on-and off-street parking
ability to provide utility service in the vicinity of
site, including an assessment of the fiscal impact upon
community of the proposed rezoning.
3. Impacts of the rezoning Upon expected air and water quality
in the vicinity of the site.
and
and
the
the
4. Analysis of the community need for the proposed rezoning and
an aSSesSment of the relationship of the rezoning proposal
to the goal of overall community balance.
5. Compatibility of the proposed rezoning with the Aspen Area
General Plan of 1966, as amended.
6. Whether the proposed rezoning will promote the health,
safety and general welfare of the residents and visitors to
the City of Aspen.
The Planning Office notes that:
1. The rez oning proposal would be compat ibl e with the sur-
rounding zones. The Office Zone is the predominant zone on
Main Street; and the intended use of the bed and breakfast
is not in conflict with the surrounding uses. The Library,
Mountain Bell Building and Gracy's Thrift Shop across the
street would not be adversely effected.
2. Impacts on traffic and utility service should be minimal
from this rezoning, and have been adequately addressed
within the conditional use review.
2
"*"
1""'\
3. The proposed rezoning would meet three recognized community
needs:
a. It allows reuse of a designated excellent historical
structure without destroying its architectural integ-
rity,
b. Four employee units would be provided even though not
required by the Municipal Code, and
c. The proposed small, high quality lodge is the type of
tourist accommodation that would help support Aspen's
intimate, small town quality.
4. The intent of the Aspen Area General Plan of 1966 to
discourage strip commercial development on Main Street and
to protect the West End neighborhood from encroachments is
being met by this proposed rezoning.
ADVISORY COMMrTTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission recom-
mended unanimously in favor of this rezoning on June 18, 1985.
RECOMMENDATION:
"Move to approve Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1985 on second
reading."
SB.16
3
~
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mayor and City Council
Hal Schilling, City Manage~
Steve Burstein, Planning Office
M
THRU:
FROM:
RE:
Sardy House Property Rezoning
DATE:
July 8, 1985
=============================:=========== ====================== =======
SUIIMARY: The Planning Office and Planning Commission recommend
approval of the request to rezone the south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H,
and I, Block 66 (Sardy House Property) from R-6 Residential to 0-
Office Zone District. The proposed zoning map amendment would bring
the zoning of these partial lots into conformance with the rest of the
property's zoning.
PRE.VIOUS COUNCIL AND PLANNnC COMMISSION ACTION: On April 2, 1985 the
Planning and Zoning Commission granted conditional use approval to
renovate the Sardy House and to build new structures, all to be used
as a Bed and Breakfast Lodge. One of the conditions of approval was
the rez oning of the area presently under consideration. On June 18,
1985 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and
passed a motion recommending approval of the rez oning request.
Also on June 18, 1985 the Planning Commission reconsidered the prior
Conditional Use Permit and added two more conditions to the Con-
ditional Use approval.
BACKGROUND: In the course of pursuing the Sardy House proj ect the
applicant has taken the proposal through several review and approval
cycles including:
1. Conditional use approval from the Planning and Zoning
Commission for the Bed and Breakfast use,
2. Historic Preservation Commission review of exterior changes
to the structures and site,
3. Rezoning of the rear area now under consideration,
4. Board of Adj ustments approval of variances to height and
set-back limitations.
The fi r st acti on on the proj ect was the review for conditional use
approval. As mentioned above, the conditional use was approved by
P&Z. The HPC granted final approval of renovation and addition to the
Sardy House July 2, 1985; and the Board of Adjustments is expected to
hear a request for variances in the near future.
r'\
1""\
The rezoning of the subject portion of property would:
1. Bring the entire property which is under one ownership into
a single z one district and,
2. Allow for the Bed and Breakfast use intended for the back
portion of the property to be a conditional use in the
Office Zone. It is neither a permitted nor conditional use
in the current R-6 zone district.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: Section 24-12.5 (d) identifies the criteria for
evaluating rezoning applications as follows:
1. Compatibility of the rezoning proposal with the surrounding
zone districts and land use in the vicinity of the site,
2.
Impacts of the, rezoning upon expected traffic generation
road safety, availability of on-and off-street parking
ability to provide utility service in the vicinity of
site, including an assessment of the fiscal impact upon
community of the proposed rezoning.
3. Impacts of the rezoning upon expected air and water quality
in the vicinity of the site.
and
and
the
the
4. Analysis of the community need for the proposed rezoning and
an assessment of the relationship of the rez oning proposal
to the goal of overall community balance.
5. Compatibility of the proposed rez oning with the Aspen' Area
General Plan of 1966, as amended.
6. Whether the proposed rezoning will promote the health,
safety and general welfare of the residents and visitors to
the City of Aspen.
The Planning Office notes that:
1. The rezoning proposal would be compatible with the sur-
rounding zones. The Office Zone is the predominant zone on
Main Street; and the intended use of the bed and breakfast
is not in conflict with the surrounding uses. The Library,
Mountain Bell Building and Gracy's Thrift Shop across the
street would not be adversely effected.
2. Impacts on traffic and utility service should be minimal
f rom this rez oning, and have been adequately addressed
within the conditional use review.
3. The proposed rez oning would meet three recogniz ed community
needs:
2
,f')
^
a. It allows reuse of a designated excellent historical
structure without destroying its architectural integ-
rity,
b. Four employee units would be provided even though not
required by the Municipal Code, and
c. The proposed small, high quality lodge is the type of
tourist accommodation that would help support Aspen's
intimate. small town quality.
4. The intent of the Aspen Area General Plan of 1966 to
discourage strip commercial development on Main Street and
to protect the West End neighborhood from encroachments is
being met by this proposed rez oning.
5. It should be noted that the L-3 zone district was created
specifically for this type of lodge facility. On re-
flection, it probably would have been most appropriate to
rezone this entire p~operty L-3. However, it does not
appear that the Office Zone district would create a situa-
tion where inappropriate uses would occur, and it does
accommodate the use proposal by the applicant.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE VOTE: The Planning and Zoning Commission recom-
mended unanimously in favor of this rezoning on June 18, 1985.
RECOMMENDATION:
"Move to read Ordinance No.
, Series of 1985"
"Move to approve Ordinance No.
reading"
, Series of 1985 on first
SB.16
3
'........
t"'j
RESOLt1l'ION OP THE HISTORIC PRESEWATION COMMITTEE
RECOMM);:NDUG THAT THE BOARD OF ADJOSTMENr GRAm
VARIANCE APPRO/AL POR THE SARDY HOOSE
2)~)
WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee (HPC) has
reviewed the plans for renovation and additions to the Sardy House;
and
WHEREAS, the HPC granted final approval to the proposed changes
on July 2, 1985, including the additions on the eXisting structure and
the annex located at the rear of the property; and
WHEREAS, it is the position of the Committee that the roof on
the additions running north-south should be at a height that would be
compatible with and complimentary to the ridge line of the roof of the
existing building; and
WHEREAS, it would be inappropriate to place a swimming pool in
the front part of the proj ect, visible from Main St reet.
NOW, THEREPORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Historic Preservation
Committee recommends approval by the BOard of Adj ustment for the
applicant · s request for a 7 foot six inch height variance for the roof
running north-south attached to the existing Sardy House structure and
a ten foot rear setback variance to place a swimming pool in a
location not visible from Main Street.
'..
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMITTEE
ATTEST:
aJ~~'/
Pam Osburn, Deputy City Clerk
-,
.'
,,,."~
f'j ,~
(HOtEL LE~DO)
May 7, 1985
Mr. Alan Richman
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Director
110 Galena Street
Asper., CO 81611
R~' Rezonin9 of south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H ~ I, Blo~k 66
(Sardy Property) from R-6 to 0
Dear. Alan:
Please consider this letter a formal application by North L South
Aspen Associates, Ltd., owner af the above-described property,
for rezoning of the property to 0, under the sponsorship of the
Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously recorded at the Com-
mission's meeting April 2nd.
The bed & breakfast use proposed for the site is quite clearly
compatible with surrounding land uses in every respect. Architect
Harry Teague's plans for the site have been received enthusi-
astically by both the Historic Preservation Committee and the
Planning & Zoning Commission. Provision for on-site parking has
been deemed adequ.ate by the Engineering Office, and the Housing
Director has complimented the applicant for recognition of the
need to supply employee housin9. Finally, it should be noted that
presently sited on the north 65 feet of the lots in question is a
non-conforming office use topped by a non-conforming communica-
tions devise. The building we propose will effectively screen
that non-conformance from Main Street.
Sincerely yours,
(/
l)~/p
Daniel Delano
General Partner,
North ~ South Aspen Associates, Ltd.
I
I
I
i
!
,
200 SOlJIHASPEN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303925-6246
I~' 't
( 6,j..,.,il'!)v/,p
<'V;,"j,4~
pJ") Jill" b.tv>.
/f(?fl'~"~ ,,~tl
br{:;i.;l~ ti~II>L.,
e\J'~~!f el[M:~lt UN ~1.
~
~
(HotEL LE~DO)
August 2J., 1985
M~ Steve Bu~stEin
Aspen/Pitkin Planning'Offic~
130 South G~lene. St~
,t.\SpE'i""I ~ CO 81611
Re: SarQY House - Final Plans
Dear- Steve:
Thank you for attending our meeting with Bill Dreuding at the
Bui lding DE:'par-tment ~~ar.l iei"tnisnaf-ternoon. ACr.::offlpanying t.his
letter- is a set of the final flDO~ plans of the Sardy House for
review by your office. As I understand it, Bill asks that the
Planning Office sign off on this set of plans with respect to
provision for employee housing and number of guest units and
bear-coms ~
In our- Drisinal conditicn"lal use appl ication 5ubHdtteo to your.
office in ea~ly March it was noted that cur plans at that time
were "preliminary~ in nature. OU~ stated plans at that time were
to bllild four employee units and an indefinite number of guest
units. At our hearing before P&Z on April 2nd it was represented
that we would build twenty guest units, including on~ suite, and
th~ee employee units, with a total of four bedrooms_ It was
understood at that time and specifically stated by Colette Penne
at that hearing that technically we would not be required to
provide any employee housing_ Prior to that time I }lad explained
to Anne Bowman of the Housing Office that it was unlikely cur
empJoyeB housing would m2et her office's guidelines as to size
and that we would not be deed-restricting any units. It was
understood between us that this po~nt was moot as it was not her
office's province to formally review our plans.
Be all tha.t a.s it may, our. final plans ShDIfJ; 20 guest urdts,
including 4 suites - a total of 21 guest bedrooms -and 4 employee
bedr'ooms~ 2 employee kitchens, and leulployee lounge - Dr some-
thing very like 2 1/2 "units.~ I believe this is clearly very
close to the mark of our original qpreliminary~ representations.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. You can be
assured that Fran~ Peters and I will do cur time-pressed best to
see that the completed Sardy Hause project outshines our best
r.epr'esentat ion5"
~j:~r~l"
~L)~
Dan;el D"2li'U'If:'~'i3.1 Pal,t;::r'''f'
Na~th ~ South Aspen Associates, Ltd.
200 SOUTH ASPEN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 303 925-6246
---
~~
CITY OF ASPEN"
MEMO FROM STEVE BURSTEIN 6- 21'0S'"
(k t;A,J'l lio":,.:
Ann J
/Vvt $ i..+d;" pJvMj ii/:k,1Ut "k-J~M j'fI~t. :
I , ~ iiJ ~'-t/~( 1-d ~/4 &j'iflr",~'
.t.(.tIl~ ~ ~r" +lv.tll"byl"<- IbVnj< ;.0 "7'33 ~
;; ,
+1 # L' J ro 4>
Ai ~/.4't-< ,uv.~ Lb
r@ ~~h~; ~ ~j :tJv ~:J-~'~fo.t,1 ~
Jvh, ~~'r>vv 1 J1.t.l.1) Q1y'fi5' #PJ'tI
cJ.c_" totJ i I a 2 D 4>,
~. ~ /: em!o~ t4~ . ~ tl ~*'(J 1 fl, t1lrt~.
d. ru('lfr'4t Ub:;~~ f. b.t rL ~ut14~ U;,j:~~""
Uf Wit-1.!.di{ .~ ~J;k -Ii. ~ ~ f/.,c~n<<T,~'~ tl/A6t~
t,tL~~.
JI/Ilf ~J ,:" wtiv ~~ P'>'Jkdj ,,4 i~wt.4 ~ '
'-.~-_..-
,.---0-::-__..,__
, .
.,
" .
---- .---:'"...,...._.J.~,..
. ,
.' ,.,' ....,
..::::...,.---.-.....:........:: .'
'~:,;~!-.,.:.l:~f:-~-7:-.;~-\' '
:'::.{ ,
-
-
;..,(
'~-'~""""
[C.&:: ~
n
.r.:'-
-
3~gq
=-D i'-':~
..:..~-qn.
--- "'I"-,=i~-'r?- '
-:--~"-L...-r-t-
' "" . '-I . !. L':...,
. I . "-
._;.....;.. ~..~+-j~~~,~
, 'I'-' ,
-
e?~ z: II
.-- -....-
. I."...,.,
-.:--~---.:..,,~ ~~,:.. .
k.-,' ':'.
. : . . . .
---'-. '....'P ..~
(l
l Jj
,
An}'{'A.c<-tre.P'~ ;
fj A,. S-
" c::ro i :.~: ?""!,P-r::
. .;-, ,
.-,'.' .',
..,......." .
. . '. ,....... ' .. . ',~".<>. ., ,:;...;:,i
,,;ili~fjl1~~!:;:r;Z::!!. '.. .. · ';: .'. . .
:,~.<;'"
'. ,.:. . \. .
.". .,<
,
f ,.
!;~
I
, q12osq, )
. - ,~... ::...-..-....
",'...'- ,'.
-'~--~---
."
.-1""')
f, .,
^
. ,
PRISCILLA SADLER
P.O. Box 2989
Aspen, Colorado 81612
(303) 925-3128
July 22, 1985
HAND DELIVERY
City of Aspen
Board of Adjustment
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: Case No. 85-17
Sardy House
Dear Sirs:
I am the owner of a home located at 126 East Bleeker Street.
We are one block North of the Sardy House Property, with the
Telephone Building between us and the Sardy House.
If the height variations being requested at the July 25,
1985 hearing is granted, it will block out some o~ our mountain
view. This view was one of the major cOJ:)siderations that caused
our purchase of our property in 1965. We do not think it is fair
to grant height variations when they impact property owners such
as ourselves.
At the same time we recognize the economic and architectural
considerations of the property. If the allowed variations are no
more than those specified in the application and if the City
building inspector will insure that the actual construction
heights are within the specifications, we will not object of the
stated variation request.
Very truly yours,
~~
Priscilla Sadler
PS:psb:5
,
'-.^d.
t"')
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Steve Burstein, Planning Office
RE:
Sardy House Rezoning
DATE:
June 18, 1985
=====================================================================
LOCATION: 128 E. Main Street, southerly 25 feet of Lots F, G, Hand
I, Block 66. (Also included wi thin this ownership are Lots P, Q, R
and S, Block 66 and the vacated alley, which are already zoned 0 _ reAr
Office.) J.)"'x~'
SURROUNDIR; LAND USES: To the west of the Sardy House is the Lib-
rary. The Mountain Bell Building is located to the north, di rectly
adjacent to the area proposed for rezoning. Across the street to the
east is Gracy's Thrift Shop.
CURRENT ZONIR;: R-6 (H)
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a rezoning of this
portion of his property from R-6 to 0 in order, to bring into confor-
mance these partial lots with the rest of the property's zoning.
BACKGROUND: The applicant received conditional use approval from the s{'vfr<1 Mil
Planing and Zoning Commission on April 2, 1985 to renovate the Sardy "1/
House and to build new structures, all to be used as a Bed and "'J
Breakfast 10d<1e.One of the conditions of approval was the rezoningv
of the area presently unde.r consideration. It should be noted thai"
the largest new structure is proposed to be located on this 25 foot
wide rear portion of the property.
The Historic Preservation Commission rHPC1 and the Board of Adjustment
are expected to soon be processing applications related to the Sardy
House project. HPC is expected to hold a public hearing on the Sardy
House renovation and additions on June 24, 1985. Staff for the Board
of Adjustment has identified the need for a pUblic hearing to conside~lIj"';iJ..",
a variance for setbacks of the rear structure, although no such PUbliclk\,o.II'.,j
hearing has yet been scheduled ye-t;. ~I ;,<rb.,!(,f..
APPLICABLE SECTIONS OF ZONING CODE: Section 24-12.2 states tha~';::"';"'Jrl!
"Amendments to the zoning district map may be initiated by th~'~"<./,d
Council, the City Planning and Zoning Commission, or by a real\""h"
property owner in the area to be included in the proposed amend-i L"br"7' i
ments." This establishes the right of the applicant to request a -------,1
zoning change.
Section 24-12.5 (d) identifies the criteria for evaluating rezoning
applications as follows:
"(1) Compatibility of the rezoning proposal with the surrounding
zone districts and land use in the vicinity of the site, con-
sidering the existing neighborhood Characteristics, the appli-
cable area and bulk requirements, and the sUitability of the site
for development in terms of on-site characteristics.
="'.~"'N'
(2) Impacts of the rezoning upon expected traffic generation and
road safety, availability of on- and Off-street parking and
ability to provide utility service in the vicinity of the Site,
including an assessment of the fiscal impact upon the community
of the proposed rezoning.
(3) Impacts of the rezoning upon expected air and water quality
in the vicinity of the site.
(4) Analysis of the community need for the proposed rezoning and
-'....
f*";
,
r"'j'
an assessment of the relationship of the rezoning proposal to the
goal of overall community balance.
(5) Compatibility of the proposed rezoning with the Aspen Area
General Plan of 1966, as amended.
(6) Whether the proposed rezoning will promote the health, safety
and general welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of
Aspen.
MAJOR ISSUES AND CONCE~S
A. REPERRAL JIG ENCY COMMENT'S:
1. Engineering Office - In a memo dated May 22, ]985, the
Engineering' Office pointed out that approval was given to
the use of the vacated alley for parking with the caution
that the level of restoration required of utility companies
is low and that the property owner would need to bear part
of any restoration costs for work done by utilities in a
vacated alley which has been upgraded beyond a minimum of an
asphalt or sodded surface.
B. STAPP COMMENTS: Many of the points evaluating the appropriate-
ness of this rezoning were addressed in the Sardy House Condi-
tional Use Review previously conducted by the Planning and Zoning
Commission. However, the Municipal Code requires the Planning
and Zoning Commission to follow the above cited criteria in
evaluating this rezoning request.
The rezoning proposal would be conrpatibre with the surrounding
zones. The Office zone district is the predominant zone on Main
Street and the existing zoning of the main portion of the
property to the south of this strip. The Office zone district
and the intended use of a bed and breakfast is not in conflict
with the zoning of the Library as Public to the west. Mountain
Bell's building is a non-conforming commercial/Office use in the
R-6 zone, and it would appear the Office zone district and
the proposed structure would help reduce the visual impact of
that facili ty. The commercial use of Gracy's across the street
would also not be adversely affected by this proposal. Finally,
the fact that both Gracy's and the Sardy House are historical
structures creates a complimentary relationship.
Impacts on traffic and utility service should be minimal from
this rezoning. Eight off-street parking spaces would be created,
six of which would be covered beneath the new bUilding. Addi-
tional vehicles can be parked in the "mews" area of vacated
alley. Existing wires will be buried. The Aspen Water Depart-
ment has reported that sufficient water is available to the site,
and any enlargements or changes in use should be reviewed (March
13, ]985, memorandum regarding Conditional Use application).
I
The proposed rezoning meets three recognized community neees: (1)
it allows the reuse of Cl designated excellent historical struc-
ture without destroying its architectural integrity; (2) the
applicant intends to provide four employee units even though not
required to do so under the Municipal Code; and (3) the proposed
small, high quality bed and breakfast is the t~<:r.f tourist
accommodation that has received public support for helping to
retain an intimate, small town quality in Aspen.
Wi th regard to the last point, it should be noted that the L-3
zone district was created specifically for this type of lodge
facility. And on reflection, it probably would have been most
appropriate to rezone this entire property L-3. However, it does
not appear that the Office zone district proposed would create a
situation where inappropriate uses would OCcur.
The Aspen Area General Plan of ]966, as amended, shows a general
2
~_. \ - ~
r-..
f""\
land use category of single-family residential for the property
under consideration. This category would appear to exclude
office and lodge uses, however, it is evident that the intent is
to discourage strip commercial Uses which would clearly be
incompatible with the residential neighborhood north of Main
Street intended to be protected.
Even though the HPC and Board of Adjustment will Soon be review-
ing this proj ect for architectural and setback cd ter ia respec-
tively, it is felt that it is appropriate for the Planning and
Zoning Commission to act on the matter of rezoning regardless of
the results of these other reviews. '
Finally, it should be noted that the conditional use for the
Sardy House was approved with six specific conditions, all of
which would apply to the use of this rezoned property.
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Office recommends that the Planning and
Zoning Commission recommend approval of this rezoning request with
the fOllowing conditions being add"ed to the previously approved
conditional use permit:
1. The property owner shall bear the restoration costs beyond the
normal costs of restoring asphalt or sodded Surface for work
ft nj;q,+ f';"t,J;ff~,1 +e;ce~~ ~:l:,:,J~~~~~'~}~':k 1?!~ku1~:a~,t j~1v ~~j f~~a~,~<.:M;r,~~~4' aIftv
2. Any enlargements or other changes in the water system shall be /-;'''''''4-
reviewed by the Water Department prior to issuance of a building
permit.
3.
The conditions attached to the Conditional Use approval granted
on April 2, 1985, by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be
adhered to as they apply to this portion of the Sardy House
property.
SB.2
~11'Y"tf-y (eL{/h~iJ{,^+4 G,~;/~I VJl{t~)hvJ~gwv J
~ i~ j f't'(llf^iJ'~1 {,,, H
lJ)'AiVJ('l " J
.J-~f.{vl/;0:~ C/lj1)J;ly>;::;h/lI/JxtJ/R,/ ~ )1-
J~ ClO"'iJ ffi W,t ~ Ab,^
3
,-" ^
rtOlYl So,.Jy H1)iI~e- CO>lJ,f-ion4IU~t Re~~w Memo h Pd-7. I J/l.t(d lip...,'! ~ 11'1'65'
'\
to the criteria of Section 24-12.5. ShoUld you concur with this
analysis, a Commission member should sponsor the rezoning. However,
until the rezoning procedure is accomplished, the Conditional Use
permit for the entire site cannot be granted.
Returning to our review of the criteria for Conditional Use permits,
the use should be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Ft is
si tUated at a very busy intersection and has public and commercial
uses surrounding it. The clinic and library are to the west, Mt. Bell's
offices are to the nOrth and Gracy'S is to the east. The northWest
corner of Block 66 is occupied by a mul ti-f amily str uct u re and the
orientation of the Sardy property is toward the south and east. To
the northeast is the rectory for the Community Church.
The proposal incl udes both a parking sol ution and an employee hOUSing
solution. Eight (8) parking spaces are to be provided and the Engineer-
ing Department finds that number to be adequate for this project. The
spaCes will be provided as six (6) ground level covered spaces beneath
the new bUilding and two (2) spaces at the west end of the vacated
alley. The employee generation is expected to be twelve (12) persons
in the summer and winter seasons and six (6) on a year-round basis.
Employee hOUSing units to be prOvided include one (1) studio, one
Cl) one-bedroom unit, and one (1) tWO-bedroom unit. The Housing
Authority does not specifically review this application because of its
exemption from GMP and Change in Use, but through the referral process,
they complimented the applicant for addressing the need.
The Historic Preservation Committee has reviewed the plans on a
preliminary basis and they were enthusiastic about the concept and the
plans. RemOval of the existing garage and additions of "carriage
house" type structures were solutions they found to be compatible.
They will be reviewing the plans further as they progress in detail.
PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION: The PI ann ing Off i ce recommends
approval and the granting of a Conditional Use permit for a Bed and
Breakfast boarding house use in the Sardy House, as presented, with the
fOllowing conditions:
1. Rezoning of the south 25 feet of Lots F, G, Hand r from R-6
to 0 - Office must be accomplished before a permit is issued
for construction on these lots.
I
q
,...J
"
2. The facility must be a licensed food service establishment
and must comply with the Rules and RegUlations Governing the
Sanitation of Food Service Establisbments in the State of
Colorado.
3. The City's Air Pollution Ordinance must be met.
4. Construction noise, dust and mud carry-out must be minimized
and Chapter 16 of the Code compl ied wi tho
5. Trash storage and removal must be approved by the Engineering
Department.
6. Removal and relocation of the two (2) fruit trees must be
done in accordance with Section 13-76 of the Code.
3
f""'\,
f.1Er'TOR21HDUI1.
TO:
Planning Office
FROEI:
Chuc;'~ Poth, Engincc:rinSj DG~,?(:!.rt:n(:'nt (;,'fC,.
D".:-:-,~~
J.;...!,..".
nay 22, 1035
TIS:
Sll2DY EDU.sS - F:.B?;O~.D:nG
-~.~~. -. .".-.,. -'~._._..- ~_...- "..0,." ".. .... __......_~__.,~...._~ _.". _~ _. _. r...., .~.._..,._ __ __.___.~.~. _~ __... "_.~._ ___..__,_..... _.".,. __ ____~"... _~ _'_..~..
------.----------.-.--------.---.---------.-----.,.-----------------------------
Raving reViC\lCd the ~bove applic2tion
inspGctio11, the Bngirlcering DGpart!Jent has
-:0.""".,.'
c,.. ~....,
having Dade a site
fOlloHin; COf~;L1en-l:s:
-;::1<:;:
1. ~;he Ci.tr ~on:tn~] Ea:c) (:02S not rc~;.:lc~ct tl'~o.t '1:~1:.Et f;tructure Iv.::.;
a National Historic designation. Th.1;:; might: be apE)ropriato as 2.
condi tion of ;:r!)pro",,7al.
2. not~ '1.:ha'c tbc~ photo co~)i;::;d pc:ges
")/-'" r:<P-/ ~V"....... '1Q-'-'- ~-1--::-r.:. cnv.r~:.o;-~'.L." r~(~\71' .r:_-: on,.
.t:..... .!..J..Jr '--i.J...... 1 L. t...u.... .....j.. .....~ _ ~ .
1: ro:~;
t.he
r:;:uni Code,
:S,~ction
-3. It appears that cne repreSGlltation @ade in ~ue ap?lication
that Section 2<1-.13.6 (d) applies 'to this property is corr2C:-c ana
that there is a raappin9 error here ~1hich led 'co a single parcel
being divided by a zone district line... if said parcels \'1.2re undGr
COI:1L10n o\'n1crship at "[:1;-1(:: tir:1(~ of 'zoning f: r:'iapping.
4. Perha~x;' it should be pointed out that' the re are a f!llL:ber oE
items diicussea in the ~pplication which are not subject to
approval by a rezoning application,' sucb as parking and 'Ehe.:
bric1ge height. The utilities are capable of handli.ng increased
load demands represented by the proposed zoning cha.nge, and any
traffic flO1-1 changes liould be negligible and acceptable. The]
Eng~l?eering ~epartraent has not giv,:,n. any appr_ov:~ls for on-sit~
DarKlng prov~slon. Tle ho.ve approved 'che use 0::: -cne vacated allev
for parking ~li th the cautio-n that the level of restoratio~
required of utility conpanies is lOvl and that the property O\-\1ner
I'loula need to bear part of any restoration costs for Iwrl: done by
utilities in a vcc~ted al~.;Y whi<;.h has been upgraded beyond a
niniE1un of an asphal1.: or soqa.ed sur:cace.
en.! CO/ SardyIIouscRezoni.ng
NI::.
r'\
t""'I
'J
ME/oIORANDUM
TO:
Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Jay Hammond, City Engineer
Bill Drueding, Zoning Official
FR01,):
Nancy Crelli. Planning Office
R!'\'.
~ .
Sardy House - Rezoning
D}l~TE :
nay 13, 1985
---- --- - -- - - --~. --- --.----------. -.-- - ----.-- - ---- -------....-. .-----.--------------
------------------------.-------------------------------------------------
l,ttached for yot:r review and comments is an application submitted by
Daniel DeL:no on behalf of the Sardy House. The applicant proposes
rezoning of the rear portion of the site fron R-6 to o. p&Z sponsored
this rezoning so that it is not subject to the annual submission
limits, but it should otherwise be reviewed as a private submittal.
Please revievJ this material and return your comments to the Planning
Office no later than May 22, 1985 in order for this office to have
adequate time to prepcne for its presentation before P&Z on June.4, 1985.
IS
Thank you.
/1 D.DEI\l.DlLtll :
SA RD V
1J~E:R.TY
'KE.Z-CNIN G
A pPt...1 cArtoN
t""'\
\ J
(
,,....~-~...
.,-...:...../
'-j
I
1
I
;
I
'j
;j
~
1
':~
;1
'"
J
Sec. 24-13.6. Nonconforming lots of record.
(n) Where, at the effective date of the adoption of this ?r
any code or amendment hereto, a lot of record was In
separate ownership and cannot meet the minimum. require-
ments for area or width, a single-family dwelling and
customary accessory buildings may be erected on any single
lot of record provided:
(1) Such lot is in separate ownership and not of
continuous frontage \vith other lots in the same
ownership;
(2) This provision shall apply even though such lot fails
to meet the requirements for area or width, or both,
that are generally applicable in the district, provided
that yard dimensions and requirements other than
those applying to area or width, or both, of the lot
shall confonn to the regulations for the district in
which the lot is located. Variances of yard require-
Supp. No. 23
1520
ments shall be obtained ody through action of the
board of adjustment.
(b) In residential district where two-family or multiple-fam.
ily dwellings are permitted, the requirement for square
footage of lot area required per dwelling unit shall be strictly
interpreted with no credit' given for fractional portions of the
required minimu.'U as a basis for const.ructing additional
dwelling units, except in the R-6 residential district where a
two.family dwelling may be erected on such a lot containing
a minimum of eight thousand (8,000) square feet.
(c) In any district, no hotel or lodge shall be constructed
on a lot rionconfonning as to minimum lot area for the,
district.
(d) If two (2) or more lots or c()mbinationsof lots and
portions of lots with continuous frontage in single owner-
ship (including husband and wife as in all caScs a single
owner) are of record at the effective date of adoption or
amendInent of this zoning code, regardless of diverse timcs
of acquisitiOn, and if all or part of the lots do not meet the
requirements established for lot width and area, the landa
involved shall be considered to be an undivided parcel for
the purposes oJ this code, and no portion of said parcel shall
be used or occupied which d~s not meet the width and area
requirem.ents established by this code. COrd. No. 11.1975, ~
1; Ord. No. 16.1980, ~ 3)
'j
The above-quoted, high Ii 9hted sec.t i on of the zoni rIg code
,would clea~l~'appear to apply to the Sa~dy Property, whic~ parcel
of, land. - lncluding that 25, x 120 fC)ot por.tion cur'rently zoned, R-
6 -,.'as under. single o",nership at the time of adoption of the
code. Accordingly, that smaller portion of' the property, being of
substandard area and width, is at present legplly unusable for
any purpose. At the same time~ as it is stated in the pertinent
regulation that s~ch lands "shall be considered to .be an.~ndi-
~ided parcel for the purposes of this code'!, it would follow that
l~ is not ,the inte~t of ,the code that zoning district bbundary
ll~es shouJ.d div'ide such pa,rcels, a.nd th?-t- ther-efore t't is appro-
prlat~ and in keeping with the 'letter and spirit'of the code that-
the zoning district, boundary line dividing the parcel in question
be, naw redrawn to include the smaller. pdrtion of the lands in-
volved .together- With the lar-ger- por:tion, tall of a-usable piece
u.nder- single.o\"Jner-sh.ip, ffi the. Office zone district~
, "/
,.",.: .\ ....
,
/(j
"(
e::.::.
~~
V)
ci
z:
:..~ 0
fE~
~(f '~
L~ ~-::L
(" l-I'J
.- LU~'
-'- Co!:.. "-
:'': ~...
':.) L'J
I-
',," c
c5
"
Recorded at "---('"'r--' o'clock__,M, '---------,--(~---"---Il'Ot; ')'7"
Reception No. __~_,,___,.__.____,.__~._._...~-,--,.._,.~----~~---_.,-----.:. '--,-.gOQ~ec~u P;~GE.:-, J
"
__"0',
'_"_'~'-'~'-'--"'''~
;':;::;',::':;::'~;=:;:'::':::::;;-:':J:
I,
:1
"
"
"
T. J. Sardy and Alice Rachel Sardy
".,.
-"
;ooJ
.......,
en
-0
--<.-
~o
:=-::0
o:=:
-i~
:'>
::rJ ::0
rn ~.-
0=
oz
::Orn
0,",
,.,-,
:;0
,::ni!
011
w!:
"
il
f:
Ii
1'0
:i
mil
~ii
whose address is P. O. Box 1065, Aspen, CO 81612
""
.I:'
l.D
-0
=
-
=
c..r1
County of
Pitkin
, State of
Colorado , for the consideration of Ten
and other valuable consideration
dollars, In hand paid, hereby sell(s) and convey(s) to
North and SOuth Aspen Associates, Ltd.,
a Limited Partnership
whose legal add""ss is 200 South Aspen, Aspen, CO 81611
Ii
County of I'
"
:i
the following real property in the Ii
Ii
I!
t:J- '
-8
Q
fY)
'-
, and State of
, and State of Colorado, to wit: 'I
i ~
"
il
"
11
I:
"
I'
Ii
Ii
It
"
II
!i
II
II
Ii
ii
,I
"
"
"
[I
ii
H
Ii
"
II
II
11
with all its appurtenances, and warrant(s) tpe title to the same, subject to general real estate II i
taxes f= 1985; and those reservations, exceptions, easements and restrictions I
set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto.
II
"
II
I,
i
i
I
,
i
I
,
,
I
!
County of
pitkin
All of lots P, Q, R, and S, and lots F, G, H, and I less
the Northerly 75 feet thereof and that part of the vacated
alley bounded by the extension of the Easterly lot lines
of Lots I and S and the Westerly lot lines of Lots F and P,
all in Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen.
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
$
/l,PR 2 6 ~
""'0 rf)
Jc. .v U
'i
i
I
,:
,
,
"
,<
also known as street and number
128 E. Main St., A.<;pen, CO 81611
tls7fl
day of /!(?rl,'~(~l'- <\ ,1/98,5.
~. ." . '.' . /
/ ,,' / 'a_/1.-6!ft:' .
___~.____"_._._~.,.J_" _._..;........_._~.,"-.,_..______.____,__"_
T. J. Sardy -,
Signed this
STATE OF COLORADO,
} ~e~r~(i-,~:d~~~,:-~~=~
55. .
County of pitkin
The
day of
for;r~ing. instrument was acknowledged before me this ,RS ~
Alfft-v{ ,1985, by T. J. Sardy and Alice Rachel
Sardy_
;\'Iy commission expires 9 - I (-y7
Witness my hand and official seal.
- ", 'J"'.' J
"
(.: ~
~v '_, '
"
(jiJ~~~,
"
".,~! : .
"
'-,
'H
I
"
'-, ~ ..; ..,
. -,~ ,)': /)
. .._~.._~.__-,/.~ ____~,,~S:<
...J N(}t\r.x Public:
riO :1
./'.
, t'
, "
"" '" !. ~ t~ \',
,.,".'"
~o, a9';, \Yarranty Df'ed.-.Shorl Fonn Br.,.,fford P ;:-Ij,~ill~. 'l:C~ \\. 61r. .'\\ ~ . L~'_kew,i,)d. co ~('~1....- (.<')1.) ~3,"""('('-n!2 81
t"\
.~
L
r"\
()
ROOK 485 PAGE276
EXHIBIT A TO GENERAL WARRANTY DEED
FROM T. J. SARDY AND ALICE RACHEL SARDY
TO NORTH AND SOUTH ASPEN ASSOCIATES, LTD.,
A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
1. ' Exceptlons and Mineral Reservations as contained in Patent to Aspen
Townsite recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception
No. 60156.
2. Easements and rights of way for underground and overhead public
utilities as reserved in Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1961
[vacating the alley in Block 66]) recorded May 1, 1961 in Book 194
at Page 7 as Reception No. 111309.
3. Rights to power and sewer easements across the South 25 feet of
Lots F, G, H, and I, granted to The Mountain States Telephone
and Telegraph Company as set forth in Warranty Deed recorded
January 31, 1961 in Book 193 at Page 89 as Reception No. 110893.
4. Terms, conditions and restrictions of Ordinance No. 60 (Series
of 1976) designating a part of the subject property as an
Historic District recorded December 9, 1976 in Book 321 at Page
51 as Rece~tion No. 189906.
,.... ,-~
Ametican Land. Title AssociationC;ommitment. MOd~10!73
,.." '.. '! n
.~~,,~ ~-~",~6""'~""""".>-"'~"" ",? ~.-!'-~., ~~~",-":~~ ~......,., ~ ~ ".Jl...,~ .......,."........ ~"'-.,+~~...~ "'~.;: ~., "'......:~t',~~.:..^S ~.. +~~., ~~~~~~
,~g;:~L >~:::'T~E~Tf~B T1~L: 'NS~R~N~E" : ~ y: : - ~ ~
i'i.;4~ ISSUED BY Wi,jJ~~:
<~;:? ;t~ i& .'.t
~.y~ ~. ,'!'t
?}~~ STEWART TITLE ~1\i;1
~....,;r..% ~'t ,y?
~'!V~'i GUARANTY COMPANY ~~I'I
"~;,'~ t };p,'" ' ~~ ( ~
~~~J p~
~~;~ ~ t'~
Sf~~1 ~',~:",t
....., ',<'1.1 "'",\0'
~~ ~,
~~'~ r~
~ff "M,~
,\.":' , , '\"f^'i!l1,,"
~ 0gt.l-
;r"3. ".' .."i~' .
,;i;;"\'\i STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for,b;~
~,it',';:~ valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in ~~~t>;;
~..,,~~ Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured name? i[lSchedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate ~;~.;~
'0?t<j!> or interest covered hereby in the land describedpr~referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the ,WP~'
~~ ~~~~~~:I:~i~~~~;r~so~~erefor; all subjectto theP:;,r:l;~ions::Zchedules A and B and to the Conditions ~_
ii, ;~;:h;o;;~::m:;'p::~::,~::"~;;:',";:; ;:,o~If;!~lo;~~:,;;~:;,:'",;d h~~::~'::~::~O:;:';'~~~ I
~',~!f0~".~ either at the time of the issuance of this :ommit~~:'::r~~*~hbS~qUent endorsement. 0",'1,.,,0
~~;;~ This Commitment is preliminary to theissyance bfsuchpolicy or policies of title insurance and all ll~
~,",f,:"~",,,,),,"'t:,~,t,.,: liability and obligations hereunder shall ,cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof ~i.',.;',*'.,'~:',:lt',':"e,,'
~ ~. or when the policy or policies committed for shall issuei,whichever first occurs, provided that the %,''''1;
J~ ~t
~q:;) failure to issue such policy or policies is not: the fatll\: of the Company. This Commitment shall not be ~~~
~':R~ valid or binding until countersigned by an authoriz~~'t~ffiGer or agent, , ~~;;i~
~I ~~c:~:~~~dS w~~; ~;u~~~r:~~e~0~P:~~u~~~r1i~~giff~~~~ ~~~~:~:~~e t~ob~p~~~~~llai~d a~~~~edd;n~~ q
II wh" ;,,8,-,,= Th;'Comm;'m'~;:::'.~~J,!~~~t:,:t; ;0 Sohooo"A " "Effre,;" D.",_" .
~l~,'~,'~ ~ ~ ''7_~~ G)Ji%:t,J~~rrt$:ANY n-~l#~~ ff.lj~
'1""') t::)(:t"f'~-, rY{... -v'" .""-..., ... .,.1>...... \(:7/'" -" ~Of q",'g,
~7~'~ .~;w. Chairman of the Board ";::lI/ <-t)~POIi4;'."'-1;;,\ President ~ t,;~
;>i~,;~" ' uJ{~ ~*-'~1..(~. ~~,~
~:t~ 1;;.':.. ,1908 ./ti."$' ~.'1t':"~
3'(~~) ;....' ~.. . >~ l' ~1f:~
.t:i:',',',',tt r'.x:i:s 1\\\\\' ~t;$~
~,",,~,~t,,~ ~,~,;~,',',,),
~ .
~- ~
~:'lt~ S,no, 'iry ,'I (,,,,,,,. i~
ft ·
c'''j;,M': yr'~l
~'l\~ ,~,.t
.f,.~,",r.~f~,,!i,,' '~"~
. '. 'J...~~j~
~" ',.,~,!..~
:,,~,:,~,;,:,~,~"I)'."'~";' ~
" "F~,'
~ ~
~>;':,,( i;:::~~
I! "...,."_~ ..1 r-:~~
~~;~:\\~:!j!::~~~~~~;;:'~NO --C"--1---'-60"-:1'-'-'~-3---::7"-~4--'-4X-8"-"---E~~<.~~~~~T"i~~~:~~~'i
I,,/':'/:~..i';'-""''''''':'''''~~~'''''~~''?I;;:..... _."",_ " . - ~ o.:~~~~~~~~~,!..\..jl'.'1""
~'/'"'_"~"~'':~:'':_~' ,'-'i-<~.~.Y'S"',; "-7';; "\f,;;."iO~~':,<<1r..'.,;:'-:~/..,;~i4.::-;,.~~ ,f;;i if--- _' ...'..'____._._''._ _.._.___._____~___....,_"____~._...____,,.._____y;.:.~;:.;.-Y;~.:v..;.j. ~~'SJ'?':;'.};;:;:;'i.'~;.'-;;.~/>~>;'s~,i".,.,.;~~__-__:::_:..J
165 25M 284
RW/kk
"...."
[ ]
r'")
SCHEDULE A
Order Number:
13069 Commitment Number:
1. Effective date:
April 03, 1985 At 8:00 A.M.
A. ALTA Owner's Policy
Proposed Insured:
Lake Forest Renovators
s
Amount of Insurance
1,000,000.00
Premium
$2013.30
2. Policy or Policies to be issued:
B. AL TA Loan Policy
Proposed Insured:
Thomas J. Sardy and Alice Rachel
Sardy
s
Ti;lX Cert. ' $
500,000.00 $
5.00
50.00
c,
s
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof
vested in:
T.J. Sardy and Alice Rachel Sardy
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as fo:lows:
All of Lots P, Q, R, and S, and Lots F, G, H, and I less the
Northerly 75 feet thereof and that part of the vacated alley
bounded by the extension of the Easterly lot lines of Lots I
and S and the Westerly lot lines of Lots F and P, all in
Block 66, City and Townsite of Aspen.
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado
j) / ,i/ I // ;/
k-~d,,-d/ I~~
Authorized COeJnterSlgnature
Page 2
S'l'E'WAR'l' 'l'I'l'LE
(~CAH:A:-;TY CO;\IP.\.SY
1652 (20M 984)
'.
~
()
SCHEDULE B - Section 1
Order Number:
'Commitment Number:
13069
Requirements
The following are the requirements to be ,complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors. of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating ihe estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly tiled for record,
to wit:
1. Evidence satisfactory to Stewart Title Guaranty Company,
furnished by the Office of the Director of Finance, City of
Aspen, that the real estate transfer tax pursuant to City
Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979), has been paid or that
conveyance is exempt from said tax.
2. We must be provided with information as to what type entity
(corporation, partnership, joint venture, etc.) the name Lake
Forest Renovators represents and will make requirements for the
appropriate documentation at that time.
3. Deed from vested owner, vesting fee simple title in
purchaser( S) .
4. Deed of Trust from the Borrower to the Public Trustee for the
use,of the proposed lender to secure the loan.
1653 (25M 6/84)
Page 3
STE'WAR'I" 'I"I'l'LI'.:
GUARANTY COMPANY
"
,~
r)
SCHEDULE B - Section 2
Exceptions
Order Number:
13069
Commitment Number:
The policy or pOlicies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, confliCts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts Which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but pri?r to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment~
6. Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any unredeemed
tax sales.
7. The effect of inclusions in any general or specific water
conservancy, fire protection, soil conservation or other
district or inclusion in any water service or street
improvement area.
8. Exceptions and Mineral Reservations as contained in Patent to Aspen
Townsite recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216 as Reception
No. 60156.
9. Easements and rights of way for underground and overhead public
utilities as reserved in Ordinance No. 2 (Series of 1961
[vacating the alley in Block 66]) recorded May 1, 1961 in Book 194
at Page .7 as Reception No. 111309.
10. Rights to power and sewer easements across the South 25 feet of
Lots F, G, H, and I, granted to The Mountain States Telephone
and Telegraph Company as set forth in Warranty Deed recorded
January 31, 1961 in Book 193 at Page 89 as Reception No. 110893.
11. Terms , conditions and restrictions of Ordinance No . 60 (Series
of 1976) designating a part of the subject property as an
Historic District recorded December 9, 1976 in Book 321 at Page
51 as Reception No. 189906.
Exceptions numbered
are hereby omitted.
Page 4
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
1654 {25M 3"-8.3l
r;
rJ
~~I
-.
~"
.
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or '
other security instrument.
2. If the proposed I nsured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in
writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage
resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced
by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed I nsured shall disclose such
knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual
knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,
the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment
accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named
proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the
form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in
reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith lal to comply with the requirements
hereof, or (bl to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or
create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In
no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and
the Conditions and Stipulations and the exclusions from coverage of the form of
policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as
expressly modified herein.
4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises
out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured
mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to
the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment.
STEWART "rITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Page 5
<
r'i
()
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged, LAKE FOREST RENOVATORS, INC., as
Assignor, does hereby transfer, assign and convey to NORTH
AND SOUTH ASPEN ASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, as
Assignee, all of Assignor's right, title and interest in and
to that certain Residential Contract to BUy and Sell Real
Estate dated January 7, 1985 between'Assignor, as Purchaser,
and THOMAS J. SARDY AND ALICE RACHEL SARDY, as Sellers, with
respect to the following described real property:
All of Lots p,' Q, R, and S, and Lots, F, G, H, and
I less the Northerly 75 feet thereof and that part
of the vacated alley bounded by the extension of
the Easterly lot lines of Lots I and S and the
Westerly lot lines of Lots F and P, all in Block
66, City and Townsite of Aspen.
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
Dated: April 2&, , 1985.
LAKE FOREST RENOVATORS, INC.
B~~ N\ a~~~/~
,
Its IJt:eS/l'EN-r:
~-.~
-------
-'-,..'"
OI-INER'S LIST
r
I
BLOCK 65
LOTK
LOTS L & M
BLOCK 65
BLOCK 65
LOTS 0, P & West
part of Q
!lLOCK 65
East 15.49' of LOT Q
West 15 feet of LOT R
BLOCK 6S
East l, of Lot R
All of LOT S
BLOCK 66
LOTS A & B
BLOCK 66
LOTS C, D & E
A
r.,
I
54
73
8573029
Adeline M. Grosse
Edwin J. Grosse
34135 Hunters Row
Farmington Hills, Michigan 48018
Wilson V. Garrett
Janella H. Wilson
7158 Hillgreen
Dallas, TX 75116
HOGUET CONDOS.
Unit 1
Robert L. Hoguet
#1 East 66th Street
New York, New York
loon
Unit 2
Constance Hoguet
333 E. 68th Street
New York, New York
Priscilla Anne Sadler
P.O. Box 2928
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Ron & Yvonne Hammond
!lox 280
Evergreen, Colorado 80439
BLEEKER HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM
c/o Larry Saliterman
2240 Lee Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Mountain Bell
Corporate Headquarters
Attn: James B. Walts
931 14th Street
Denver, CO 80202
8
)
)
.
Owner's List
Page 2
BLOCK 66
LOTS F, G, H & I
BLOCK 66
LOTS M, N & 0
BLOCK 66
LOTS P, Q, R & S
BLOCK 72
LOTS K, L & M
BLOCK 73
LOTS A & B
BLOCK 73
LOTS C & D
BLOCK 73
LOTS E, F & G
BLOCK 73
LOT K
BLOCK 73
LOTS L & M
t'")
~as J. S,,:~
Alic~~~el Sardy
Box H)
~n, CO 612
pitkin County Library
120 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
~omas J. sarr
Ailee Racbael Sardy
Box 1065'~hl? '
~Asp:e~, CO -~
Aspen community Church
200 North Aspen
Aspen, CO 81611
Aspen Community Church
Minister's Residence
200 North Aspen
Aspen, CO 81611
Mary Esbaugh Hayes
Trustee under Hayes Trust
Box 497
Aspen, CO 81612
Ewald Crosby
Rosa Gettman
325 South Forest Street
Denver, CO 80222
~
f
0.~-th..... :::crtL A~ j ,
9..00 So ,I A re", 1\:'<;O<'I..t~'S
A oc.{"l'h Sf"'" 9- I
sF"''''' C.O %\" II
L+~.
tJ.. "th + s;, I A A' I I
....t-" -Sf"'" S$6<"cd-",o; L+-t
-:2..0<:9 s~ A n I
A sf"'.... .::><r
sfe.", Co '61 bit .
John David
Kitty Sherwin
154 Masshill Road
Jamaica Plains
Boston, Massachusetts 02130
Terese Louise David
202 East Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
~,
,."
n
r}
o-.....ners List
Page 3
BLOCK 73
LarS N & 0
Ethel McCabe
Fred Pearce
Box 53J.
Aspen, Colorado 81612
BLOCK 73
LarS P & Q
O. Louis Willie
Frances Lynett Willie
200 West Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
BLOCK 74
LarS A, B & C
Claude M. Conner
Claudine M. Conner
Box 345
Aspen, CO 816J.2
PAEPCKE PARK - THE CITY OF ASPEN
ill.~
[ill
]]~
ill~
illz
w.
! .llWJJJJ! .
L.....
wnuw-OJilllW ,~
t:J~ r.;:>> fH ~l (.~
. [[[[[[I]
.
.
:H l
.
.
BLEEKER
ST.
J'.--_..........j
I
:r
'-'
!:2
::;
0:
Z 1 ~! f---P BirD zm
I ......'.
1__1 (H) Or! l3 }---~------I
n l PAEPCKE ! ill
----- -1 P PARK r-[[-r
t; G I (D,T,H\ I ~
,VE"'-j R-6 ,__J rl t----------l----
l1J~111 I- J ~. Ill~r.Y!'
l I ~ 1S a 1 v e PI) I I ~T !'l.~'l
I 8 "-" I M\ I r I
r---- I-ITI,; I t~~.:::~~~:----rTITrffiT1,~-J -rD-~
:'(f) ,Vii ~ I ~ WJ11~ll I I"
· I I J R ~fl I j"
I-W.-HYMAN - AVE. -'---------- I ,- IV'] ~ .-.......-1
i R :r 1m'
I .. g I H.
i :;: I L I !
cc: -- -r--:-.......;
~ I~ITI
~ I .
--. ~ rlj,'
u:' ill
. _ _'_ _...J
I-LLD-.ITI
ill
---_._---
m
JlJ
]]:
]]~
o
z
o
----~-
(f)
MAIN
r.;~
---
'---
.
~
'"
(f)
z
I ,
.~i!',
,
--- ----
I .11 ~ i
ll:
!; I
-.-. I .
; /""tI
-....- . -
I
1ST.
I
tiR\
[[
~[[
t:;'
~OI
y.-;
1""'\
t""':\
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on this? day of })~ '
19867 a true and correct copy of the attached Notice 0 P ic Hearing
was deool"ited in the United States mail. fir",t-~lal"s nostaop. orp.naid.
to the- auj acent property owners as indicated on the attached -11st of
adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Plannaing Office by
the applicant in regard to the case named on the public notice.
Nancy
I
i
,
_ i
i
I
,
i
I
I
,
,~'"
'"
~
~
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: SARDY HOUSE - REZONING
NOTICE IS HEREB~ GIVEN that a public hearing ,will be held on June 18,
1985 at a meeting to be held at 5:00 P.M., before the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission, City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, Co
to consider a private application requesting the rezoning of the
south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H & I, Block 66 (Sardy House) from
R-6 to 0, to permit the renovation of the structure as a bed and
breakfast lodge.
For further information, contact the Aspen/pitkin Planning Office,
130 S. Galena, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 925-202, ext. 225.
s/perry Harvey
Chairman, Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission
====================================================================
Published in the Aspen Times on May ~ 1985
City of Aspen Account. 3
.
,~\
f"""1
PUBLIC NOTICE
D m@mDW~~
MAY 3 0 1985 i~
{
RE: SARDY HOUSE - REZONING
NOTICE IS HEREB~ GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on June 18,
1985 at a meeting to be held at 5:00 P.M., before the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission, City Council Chambers, 130 S. Galena, Aspen, Co
to consider a private application requesting the rezoning of the
south 25 feet of Lots F, G, H & I, Block 66 (Sardy House) from
R-6 to 0, to permit the renovation of the structure as a bed and
breakfast lodge.
For further information, contact the Aspen/pitkin Planning Office,
130 S. Galena, Aspen, CO 81611 (303) 925-202, ext. 225.
s/Perry Harvey
Chairman, Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission
~===================================================================
Published in the Aspen Times on May 21, 1985
City of Aspen Account.
r
,......
r""\
130
asp
t,
.
:~~ASPEN
CITY I
.22.
MEMORANDUM
"-'""1
DATE: May 22, 1985
TO: Planning Office
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Sardy House - Rezoning
We have no comment at this time but are aware of this matter and
will attend the June.4' meeting.
BDE/mc l~ ,tvl$lSHfj 'i--SU
:
�
Chuck Roth
City of Aspen Engineering Dept.
130 South Galena
Aspen, Co. 31611
Dear Chuck
Ercicsed please find the cost breakdown for the bond to
restore the SarJy property rear yard in the event that the rear
+eEt e.:jaLer.| to the Telepkane Company property fail to be
rezoned. We have agreed with Paul Taddune that we will proceed
with the North foundation at 2ur own risk, and will post the
«bove mentioned bond to secure the work to restore this area,
s hauld it b*zcme necessary.
�.2 you note on the enclosed plans 1 have designated
three areas of this foundation to be filled, covered with
toPssll and reseeded. The area under the four parking spaces to
ihe west is full basement covered with a structural deck for
perking. The restoration plan calls for filling the stairwell
exd west tenement core, leaving only the allowed parking above,
There is oc basement under the eastern two parking spaces, and
these would also be allowed, rezoning notwithstanding. The
miscellaneous topsoil and seed in the estimate is for restoring
any yard surfaces damaged by excavation equipment.
I hope you find this estimate adequate to cover the work,
and make the appropriate recommmeodaiioo to the city attorneys
office.
Sincerely
Frank Peters
tAP
�~^����
~~ -� � �
OR OtiaL
COST BREAKDOWN TO RESTORE SARDY PROPERTY NORTH FOUNDATION AREAS
Foundation Areas Length Width Depth Volume
Area 1 16.5 ft. 19.0 ft. 9.0 ft. 2821.50
Area 2 8.0 ft. 19.0 ft. 9.0 ft. 1368.00
Area 3 16.5 ft. 19.0 ft. 9.0 ft. 2821.50
Total Volurne /cu.ft. 7011.00
Total Volume; cu. yds 259.66
TrL.cks,12 cu yd/ rk. 21.63
Truck tit;:.- _,2hr.!load 43.27
Truck cost,$45Ihr. 1947.50
Topsoil to cover
Area 1 16.5 it. 19.0 ft. 4.0 in. 104.50
Area 2 8.0 ft. 19.0 ft. 4.0 in. 50.66
Area 3 16.5 ft. 19.0 ft. 4.0 ft. 104.50
Total volurne,cu.ft. 259.66
Total volume,cu.yds. 9.61
Add,misc. surface
damage, cu yd topsoil`. 38
Total topsoil,cu yd. 15.00
Cost, X12 /cu. yd.
delivered 180.00
Backhoe to grade
$75 /hr. /Stirs. 600.00
Grass seed, perennial
rye, 1000 sq. ft. 9.29
Labor to seed, 1 mart
4 hrs. at &7 /hr. 28.00
Total cost 2764.79
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation Distrrict
565 North Mill Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tele. (303) 925 -3601 Tele. (303) 925 -2537
June 6, 1985 R E c
City of Aspen
Jay Hammond 1' , / % /A, O
Engineering Department
130 S. Galena St. r '�Y
Aspen, Co. 81611
Dear Mr. Hammond,
This letter is to confirm that we have inspected the drawings for the
Cantilevers out into the alley at the old Sardy house that is going
to be remodeled and do not see a problem with the encroachment into
our utility easement.
Sincerely ice
L_
G'^- -
Heiko Kuhn, Manager
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
0132 ATLANTIC AVE. • ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE (303) 925 -2323
���
c 1. ,‘: s
M of
ttIG
Dear Mr. Hammond
In reference to Frank Peters proposal for a bridge over the
alley between the Sardy House and the Sardy House annex on
block 66 in Aspen. This construction would not interfere
with our lines and we see no problem with the bridge being
buiilt.
y. e
Wi lard Clapp
Manager
Aspen District
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
565 North Mill Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Tele. (303) 925 -3601 Tele. (303) 925 -2537
ci"\\
May 13, 1985
Jay Hammond
Engineering Dept.
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Co 81611
Dear Mr. Hammond,
In regards to Tom Sardy's old house on Main St., the request
by the developer for a bridge over the alley does not seem to
interfere with the district's sewer line. The proposed bridge
is high enoughand only 8 ft. wide so that in case of an emergency
we will still be able to move in equipment to dig up the line.
Sincerely
d, _', 4;zzt_
Heiko Kuhn, Manager
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation Dist.
_ • -
•
MEMORANDUM
To: Laura Mattson, Finance Department
From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department ag
Date: September 25, 1985
Re: Sardy House /Frank Peters Bond
The Sardy House did receive the rezoning on the property on the
north side of the alley. They have commenced construction on
that portion of their project. Therefore the intent of the
posted bond has been met, and the $2700 may be released to Frank
Peters.
•