The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.1210 Red Butte Dr.A040-01-. A040-01 - 1210 Red Butte Drive Stream Margin- - Review 61 AAJ Â£313 ~200 2_ ~ U3 rs 1 M 1 1 Â· t ..K \ W ADI4 /_-6-137 -/4 49 9 r 4 -A X 113 Â»fj 9 CASE NUMBER A040-01 PARCEL ID # 2735-013-16005 CASE NAME 1210 Red Butte Drive Stream Margin Review PROJECT ADDRESS 1210 Red Butte Drive PLANNER Steve Clay/Sarah Oates CASE TYPE Stream Margin Review OWNER/APPLICANT Brian Hazen REPRESENTATIVE Jack Palamino DATE OF FINAL ACTION 11/20/01 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION Reso. 47-2001 ADMIN ACTION Approved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 1/4/02 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID:~2735-013-16005 DATE RCVD: |4/17/01 #COPIES:~ - CASE NO~A040-01 CASE NAME:~ 1210 Red Butte Drive Stream Margin Review PLNR:~Steve Clay/Sarah O PROJ ADDR:|1210 Red Butte Drive CASE TYP:~Stream Margin Review STEPS] OWN/APP: Brian Hazen ADR11210 Red Butte Drive C/S/Z: ~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:~925-1400 REP:~Jack Palamino ADR:~PO Box 301 C/S/Z: ~Basalt/CO/81621 PHN]927-9976 FEES DUE:~ 1205 D 180 E FEES RCVD:~ 1385 STAT: r- REFERRALS| REF:~ BY~ DUE: ~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED | DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~11/20/01 CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS~ PZ: Reso. 47-2001 BOA: CLOSED:~ 1/4/02 BY: ~J. Lindt DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):~ ADMIN: Approved MEMORANDUM To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Director-j*<D FROM: Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer - RE: 1210 Red Butte Dr. Stream Margin Review, Resolution No. AF-Ekeries of 2001-PUBLIC HEAR*NG Meek ~~'- -r-7 DATE: November 20,2001 APPLICANT Brian L. Hazen REPRESENTATIVE Jack Palomino/ Palomino Barth Architects PARCEL & LEGAL ID 2735-013-16005 Lot 5, Gaylord Subdivision ADDRESS 1210 Red Butte Dr. Aspen, Co ZONING R-30 PUD CURRENT LAND USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE Single Family Residential REQUESTED ACTION Stream Margin Review SUMMARY The property is located at 1210 Red Butte Drive in an Environmentally Sensitive Area along the Roaring Fork River. The applicant is proposing additions to an existing single-family dwelling. In 1999, this property received a Stream Margin Exemption for a small addition to the dwelling unit, but is now subject to Stream Margin Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission due to the extent of the addition. STAFF COMMENTS Development located within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one-hundred-year floodplain where it extends one hundred (100) feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within a flood hazard area are subject to heightened review so as to reduce and prevent property loss by flood while ensuring the natural and unimpeded flow of watercourses. Review shall encourage development and land uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural features. 26.435.040 C Stream Margin Review Standards states: No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and + Staff Finding: Per the submitted plans, there is no proposed development in the floodway. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman' s Easement;" and, > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans staff does not foresee any impacts regarding this requirement. The Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan recommendations are being met and implemented to the greatest extent possible and a fisherman's easement granting public listing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement" per the conditions of approval 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, 2 excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 9 Staff Finding Per the submitted plans, there will not be any disturbance of vegetation outside of the building envelope. The building envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricade shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and > Staff Finding The proposed development will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a silt fence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review, and approval, prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and + Staff Finding Per the submitted plans no development is proposed that will require written notification to the Colorado water conservation board due to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and + Staff Finding No development is proposed which will alter or relocate any existing water courses. If the water course is altered, a guarantee is provided and applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the Jlood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. 3 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain; and > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans, no development is proposed which will require federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-yearfloodplain. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability; and 9 Staff Finding Per the submitted plans there will not be any development within the required 15 feet from the top of slope. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020; and + Staff Finding AN development is outside the 15-foot setback from the top of slope and does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a 45-degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside o f the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; and > Staff Finding A landscape plan was submitted and no new plantings are proposed outside of the designated building envelope on the riverside. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150; and > Staff Finding The applicant shall comply with all exterior lighting and design criteria and submit a lighting plan with the Building Permit application. 4 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and + Staff Finding Site sections were submitted as drawn by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. that shows all existing and proposed site elements. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. 9 Staff Finding A site plan has been submitted that identifies the riparian zone. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval for the Stream Margin Review for the proposed alterations and additions to the existing single-family dwelling finding that the criteria per Section 26.435.040 C, Stream Margin Review Standards has been met, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution No. ~~ (Series of 2001) for a Stream Margin Review for a property located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area at 1210 Red Butte Drive Lot 5, of the Gaylord Subdivision along the Roaring Fork River." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A-Referral Comments Exhibit B-Application 5 RESOLUTION 30. fe, SERIES OF 2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE; LOT 5, GAYLORD SUBDIVISION Parcel ID: 2735-013-16005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Applicant, Brian L. Hazen represented by Jack Palomino/Palomino Barth Architects, requesting a Stream Margin Review approval, for the residence located at 1210 Red Butte Dr. Aspen, CO; and WHEREAS pursuant to Section 26.212, the Planning and Zoning Commission may review and approve the Stream Margin Review Application; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Department recommends approval for the Stream Margin Review; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on November 20, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval o f the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a vote of to (_-_) the Stream Margin Review; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 2(,t~ DAY OF NOVEMBER 2001, THAT: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: 1. No vegetation shall be removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricade shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 2. The proposed development shall not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a silt fence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review prior to construction. 3. A written notice shall be given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 4. The landscape plan shalllimit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the riverside to native riparian vegetation. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit application. 6. Prior to construction, the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department as required. 7. If the newly enclosed area plus the area of the exiting structure exceeds 5,000 square feet, the newly enclosed area may be required to be sprinkled. The plans will be reviewed with the Fire Marshall at the time of application for a building permit. 8. The site plan submitted with the building permit application shall clearly delineate the top of slope. Section 2 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on November 20, 2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 0 - ASPEN PLANNINg J ZONING COMMISSION-lk_ ites -November 20, 2001 COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 2 MINUTES 2 DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST 2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CODE AMENDMENTS 2 LOT 12A CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SPECIAL REVIEW TO VARY ADU DESIGN STANDARDS 2 1210 RED BUTTE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW 4 1 ASPEN PLANNINa J ZONING COMMISSION-lkuites -November 20, 2001 Jasmine Tygre, Chairperson, opened the regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting in the Sister Cities meeting room at 4:40 p.m. Ron Erickson, Roger Haneman, Eric Cohen, Ruth Kruger and Jasmine Tygre were present. Bob Blaich, Steven Buettow and Bert Myrin were excused. Staff in attendance were: Fred Jarman, Sarah Oates, Joyce Ohlson, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Ron Erickson inquired about the Caribou Alley violations. Sarah Oates said that she reminded Joe Wells about the doors being in violation. Erickson said that the Aspen Board of Realtors sent out information on the placement of signs. Joyce Ohlson reminded the commissioners about the Boards and Commissions party at the Wheeler on November 29th. Ohlson suggested not meeting until the 15111 of January and then again on the 29th. MINUTES MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve the minutes from 11/06/01. Ruth Kruger seconded. APPROVED 5-0 DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST None. PUBLIC HEARING: HISTORIC PRESERVATION CODE AMENDMENTS Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing for the Historic Preservation Code Amendments. The applicant requested continuance to December 11 th. MOTION: Roger Haneman moved continue the Historic Preservation Code Amendments to December 11th. Ron Erickson seconded. APPROVED 5-0. PUBLIC HEARING: LOT 12A CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SPECIAL REVIEW TO VARY ADU DESIGN STANDARDS Jasmine Tygre opened the public hearing on Lot12A Callahan Subdivision to vary the ADU Design Standards. Alice Davis provided the proof of notice. Fred Jarman explained that the request was to convert and existing unit into an ADU, which was larger than what was normally allowed by code. Davis stated that long time local employees occupied the unit and the applicant wanted these tenants to remain. Davis stated that this was free-market housing that would now be converted to an ADU and asked that the interior stairs be kept and not removed. 2 ' ASPEN PLANNINg & ZONING COMMISSION-f . 1 Ill utes -November 20, 2001 Ron Erickson asked i f this apartment would be used as mitigation for the new residence. Erickson stated that the concern was to prevent abuses of ADUs; he asked i f the applicant would accept the Housing Authority placement of the tenants. Davis replied the ADU was in the guesthouse and has been utilized this way for years not using the stairwell, which was locked off. Davis said that they met the intent o f the ADU. Erickson stated that his concern was for future ownership and that the staircase between the units could be used and no longer functioned as an ADU. Davis said that because o f the cost they would prefer not to tear out the staircase but rather leave it blocked off. Eric Cohen asked the size ofthe main house and guesthouse total. Davis responded that the main house was being built now at about 6,000 square feet and the guesthouse was a total of 3,275 square feet on 3 floors. Cohen stated that there was mitigation needed for the main house and the ADU standards were clear. Cohen said that the cost to tear out the stairs was not very significant in comparison to the relative cost of the new residence being built. Cohen said that the fact that the unit was larger was great but not to leave the stairs in place. Roger Haneman said that it appeared to be a detached duplex; he stated that he agreed with Eric on the costs of knocking out the stairs in comparison. Ruth Kruger agreed with Eric and Roger also. Jasmine Tygre summed up the commissioners concerns about the staircase issue because the cost was not much in comparison to what the cash-in-lieu or replacement unit would cost. Tygre stated that the ADU land use standards were specific about the ADU being separate and requested that the approval include the removal o f the staircase. Davis answered that there could be a wall placed to block off the staircase dividing the unit, making it smaller to solve the problem. Tygre responded that would negate all the good will of making this a larger more desirable ADU and keeping the current tenants. No public comments. MOTION: Ruth Kruger moved to approve P&Z Resolution #01-48 for a Special Request for an enlarged ADU on LotIZA of the Callahan Subdivision with the conditions as follows: 1.) The Applicant shall register this ADU with the Housing Authority and the property shall be deed restricted in accordance with Section 26.520.070 Deed Restrictions. 2.) In the event that the Applicant wishes to remodel the structure, the ADU will be required to comply with the current ADU standards in effect at the time. 3.) The Applicant shall structurally remove the stairwell between the two existing units in the guesthouse thereby disconnecting the unit's interior entrance from the upstairs unit which shall be verified by the City Zoning officer in a site visit prior to the filing for a deed restriction with the Housing Authority. Ron Erickson seconded. Roll call vote: Collen, yes; Haneman, yes; Erickson, yes; Kruger, yes; Tygre, yes. APPROVED 5-0. 3 4 ASPEN PLANNINg J ZONING COMMISSION-kuutes -November 20, 2001 PUBLIC MEETING: 1210 RED BUTTE STREAM MARGIN REVIEW Jasmine Tygre opened the continued public meeting for the 1210 Red Butte Stream Margin Review. No notice was necessary. Sarah Oates introduced Jack Palomino the representative for the owner Brain Hazen. Oates explained the Stream Margin Review was for an addition of under 1,700 square feet ofFAR located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. Oates said that the top of slope coincided with the 100-year flood plane, 15 feet below the top of slope. The bridge went to the master bedroom and garage rather than an ADU. Oates added a condition, which would reflect the 15-foot setback from the top of slope on the site plan prior to building permit issuance. MOTION: Ron Erickson moved to approve P&Z Resolution #01-47 for the Stream Margin Review at 1210 Red Butte Drive with the conditions plus condition #8 which would reflect the 15-foot setback from the top of slope on the site plan prior to building permit issuance. Eric Cohen seconded. Roll call vote: Kruger, yes; Erickson, yes; Haneman, yes; Cohen, yes; Tygre, yes. APPROVED 5-0. Meeting adjourned at 5:30 p.m. Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk 4 transmittal palominobartharchitects PC arrhiteetuir 1 E 1 pi.uining intence Date: ~'~1'B Dates To: Company: (36*+Pal im#&,4Phone: Project Name: -Â¤01*Fl ttyâ‚¬o )91 *<djecnob t. Regarding: 7% vitul d.u* fr // /22)-kar jk, Shipped Via: ~ Enclosure: [ fl-t _ 149< 3,(t,~ din~S ,) Cov-e r ; Al. 0, tud ; Al. 1 1 Al, 1 Alitte),1 1 Abli : 44-,1~ Ata_ driftÂ£ 4//01 Â¥*rriAN)%)Fls kiet - //*1-1 i& tl,Â«ta-~: of- %*-1-7"ljifiid ab/. JQVL FLite 4 Gu v\Ce,i 4 991-t Te chÂ»t.r beA *Wore(W 1 4 *N ,A Mwit Fhc)36*Luth r Worot 644'. kkhoiu j Af<Lit e l-JA. pio*u ,-6 06 l, ft #g. }greviÂ»s 4 +0Â»1i#ra Rva. a/4 46-q~, t'thod +AiR)41 7* An Â¥09-e,9.opt,4 H-ftte (1-. Vari-00(-Â£ f* -fk oiN-Uu rl/wa-. (1)(fak-Â· @dl Â»I't rÂ· l/1Ma- (AAA~, (-apyl,WAQ.*,73_ dr (ferfre.8\. ~ 6*,1,)16 U CO {bâ‚¬(U/l +I Blout~u ~( j set 2Â¢ *%(& via oinf) post office box 301 180 fiou lane suite 201 basalt colorado 81621 p 970 927 9976 f 970 927 9676 palominobarthcom 1.6-Â·t; . tr Â· 1 06 0 ,4'Aill October 18,2001 ASPEN Â· PITKIN COMPLLITY DEVELOPMEXT DEF.\RT\!ENT Bnan Hazen 720 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 RE: Stream NIargin Review Application for 1210 Red Butte Drive Dear Brian: Due to the recent confusion regarding the Stream Margin Review application for 1210 Red Butte Drive, the purpose o f this letter is to let you know what elements o f the application are still missing. Based on a July 16, 2001 memo from the Engineering Department the following clarifications need to be made with regards to determining the top of slope for the lot: > Section C, Paragraph 12 requires the top o f slope to be shown accurately on the drawing. On this survey the top o f slope cannot be in front o f the 100 year flood plane > A section ofboth B and C is required on drawing Al.1, which was submitted with the application, to illustrate that the proposed structure falls within the 45 degree plane line The City Engineer working on this project, Richard Goulding, has confirmed with me he has not received this information. If someone would follow up with me once this has been done then I can make sure Richard gets me comments in a timely manner. The second issue with the application is the request to be exempt from the definition of "linked pavilion" as it relates to the Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU). There is no process in the Land Use Code which allows for such an exemption. The ADU either needs to be detached, as defined in our Code, or comply with the allowable FAR. The Planning and Zoning Commission has no authority to grant a FAR bonus for a proposal that does not comply with the ADU standards. Please notify staff how you would like to amend thik aspect o f the application. We recommend that a letter to that effect be sent to me to withdraw the proposal. We ask that the above matters be taken care o f by November 1 so that this case can proceed on November 22,2001. The case will not be kept on this agenda date if submittals are not received by November 1,2001. 130 *LTE! GAI EN.\ S I'RFET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-[975 PHONE 970.920.5090 FAx 970.920.5439 I'Â·oted on 14'j '!ed I''Ter 01 Please call me at (970) 920-5441 with any questions. Regards, Â«43 Sarah Oates, Zoning Officer City of Aspen ec: Jack Palomino, Applicant's Representative Richard Goulding, City Engineering Dept. MAY 08 2001 2:19AM HP LASERJET 3200 P.2 Lalvu Wot APFUCAIION PROJECT: Ajiffrovt Â¥ A-Ara#7Â»13 N=&. gria-e l. Hq<be,;4 ResidÂ£,tu,Â£17.a * 13#a.ppi-yavitw U=HonÂ·- /2/0 Ad-gatit Drive 6,- 1 6 Â£49 00146rd 464,Â·vis)*r 1 (Indicate street address, lot & block number. legal description wher@ appropriate) APPLICANT: Netâ„¢-- 8'7'0 A C . t-6 -2 tyL Adates--/2/0 Ad-*dh- 12Â»i vt- 6 .7*.1. G 8/6/1 1 Phone #: 94 .r./400 0 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: rlatk Al.Â·,M i b /Alâ€¢m A ba,*A 4-4 ih ch Address: pO8 30/ #râ‚¬M )1--,02 64, i j Phone#:970 727Â·9170 TÂ¥PE OF APPUCATION: (please check all that apply): Â£ Conditional Use O Conceptual PUD I Conceptual Hisroric Devt. Q Special Review C Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) ~ Final Historic Development 0 Design Review Appeal O Conceptual SPA E Minor Historic Devt. 1 Q GMQS Allotment O Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) C Historic Demolition 0 GMQS Exemption Â£ Subdivision m Historic Designation ~ ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream O Subdivision Exemption (includes E Small Lodge Conversion/' : MaÂ® Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumizarion) Expansion Mountain View Plane Il Lot Split Â£ Temporary Use C Other: Â£ Lot Line Adjustment C Text/Map Amendment ~ EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals. etc.) 868*>,7 06 -3*71, 'Ud.Pt"*1 4,uuâ€¢.e a.61*NAÂ·Â·u-4.). F,ev#.# /919 f JE.-ph,M h> Rka.4 *laps, /2wtew/7/1a aurjrpx of lul Ht*M. h'L# **1 c,jijin yl ilit,+0)'-1t - PZOPOSAL: (description ofproposed bultaings, uses, modifications. etc.) AUihMa#da litra-tie.f A an ex/Â»79 3-1)75{z kw/A dme/4>m -&, P.â„¢st/kr a YaritÂ»(tio * doutked AA, 44Â»8761 aNow,>0 4 Â»R imnuf * r *tt q #a dud. ADU. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S %9/0. "- IM pre-Appacation Conferencesumm=, fitay,lic(dion w/ji,nestiedt- feld'M wrihen stly.marg 1~ Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement g Response to Attachment #2, Dimensional Requirements Form gr Response to Attachment #3, Minimum Submission Contents 54 Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents 2 Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application ATTACHMENT 1 ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen Development Application Fee Policy The City of Aspen. pursuant to Ordinance 45 (Series of 1999), has established a fee structure for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. Referral fees for other City departments reviewing the application will also be collected when necessary. One check including the deposit for Planning and referrai agency fees mUSI be submitted with each land use appiication. made payable to the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department. Applications will nor be accepted for processing without the required application fee. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for Administrative Approvals which normaily take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. The fee is not refundable. A deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. as hours are likely to vary substantially from one application to another. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Several different staff members may charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Staff time is logged to the case and Staff can provide a summary report of hours spent at the appiicant's request. After the deposit has been expended. the applicant will be billed monthly based on actual staff hours. Applicants may accrue and be billed additional expenses for a planner's time spent on the case following any hearing or approvals. up until the applicant applies for a building permit. Current billings must be paid within 30 days or processing of the application will be suspended. If an applicant has previously failed to pay application fees as required. no new or additional applications will be accepted for processing until the outstanding fees are paid. In no case will Building Permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. When the case planner determines that the case is completed (whether approved or not approved), the case is considered closed and any remaining balance from the deposit will be refunded to the applicant. Applications which require a deposit must include an Agreement for Payment of Development Application Fees. The Agreement establishes the applicant as being responsible for payment of all costs associated with processing the application. The Agreement must be signed by the party responsible for payment and submitted with the application and fee in order for a land use case to be opened. The current complete fee schedule for land use applications is listed on the reverse side. ATTACHMENT 2 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ALL DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 1. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address. and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 2. The street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur. 3. A disclosure of ownership ofthe parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company. or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners ofthe property, and all mortgages. judgments, liens. easements. contracts and agreements affecting the parcel. and demonstrating the owners right to apply for the Development Application. 4. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 5. A site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor. licensed in the State of Colorado. (This requirement. or any part thereof, may be waived by the Community Development Department if the project is determined not to warrant a survey document.) palominobartharchi tects PC April 17, 2001 arc hitect.. Aspen/Pitkin Community Development plann:rÂ· 2 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 . Re: Brian L. Hazen Residence int.Â·/.O 1210 Red Butte Drive Aspen, CO 81611 970-927- Subject: Representative Authorization To Whom It May Concern, I hereby authorize Jack Palomino of Palomino Barth Architects P.C., P.O. Box 301, Basalt Co., 970-927-9976 to act as my representative for the Stream Margin Review process of the above mentioned property. Please call me if you have any questions or comments regarding this authorization for representation in this matter. Sincerely, 541 443(~ Brian L. Hazen O BNB/bnb 01-110 13 post office box 301 174 midland avenue suite 205 basalt colorado 81621 p 970 927 9976 f 970 927 9676 palominobarth. com 1 ATTACHMENT 3 SPECIFIC SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS STREAM MARGIN REVIEW A. A plan ofthe proposed development, which shall depict at a minimum the following information: 1. The boundary of the property for which development is requested. , Existing and proposed improvements. 3. Significant natural features, including natural hazards and trees. B. The plan shall also depict: 1. the 100 year floodplain line and the high water line. 2. Existing and proposed grades as two foot contours. with five foot intervals for grades over ten (10) percent. 3. When development is proposed in a special flood hazard area: Accurate elevations (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest tloor. including basement. of all new or substantially improved structures: a verification and recordation of the actual elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure is constructed; a demonstration that all new construction or substantial improvements will be anchored to prevent flotation. collapse or lateral movement of any structure to be constructed or improved; a demonstration that the structure will have the lowest tloor, including basement. elevated to at least two (2) feet above the base flood elevation. all as certified by a registered professional engineer or architect. 4. A description of proposed construction techniques to be used. ATTACHMENT 4 REV[EW STANDARDS: STREAM MARGIN REVIEW (26.68.040) A. No development shall be permitted within the floodway. with the exception of bridges or structures for irrigation. drainage, flood control or water diversion, which may be permitted by the City Engineer. provided plans and specifications are submitted to demonstrate that the structure is engineered to prevent blockage of drainage channels during peak flows and the Commission determines the proposed structure complies, to the extent practical. with all the standards set forth below. B. No development shall be permitted within one hundred (100) feet. measured horizontally. from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams. or within the Special Flood Hazard Area where it extends beyond one hundred (100) feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, unless the Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all the standards set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised. including, but not limited to. proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development: and 2. Any trail on the parcel designated on the Aspen Area Community Plan. Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan map, or areas of historic public use or access are dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. Dedications are necessitated by development's increased impacts to the City's recreation and trail facilities including public fishing access; and 3. The recommendations of the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable: and 4. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 5. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope: and 6. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course. and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and 7. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated. that applies to the developer and his heirs. successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and 8. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain; and 9. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline. whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. If any development is essential within this area, it may only be approved by special review pursuant to Section 26.64.040(D) (refer to Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes); and 10. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Zoning Officer utilizing that definition set forth at Section 26.04.100 (refer to Figure "A" below for illustrative purposes); and 11, A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees. shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; and 12. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope; and 13. Site sections drawn by a registered architect. landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements. the top of slope. and pertinent elevations above sea level: and 14. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. palominobartharchitects PC April 17, 2001 architec,ur. UNX....6 Hazen Residence Addition and Alterations 1210 Red Butte Drive planning Aspen, CO 81611 Architect's Job No. 01-110 intenit Response to: Attachment 4 Review Standards: Stream Margin Review (code section 26.68.040) Item A: No development is proposed within the floodway. Item B (1): No development is proposed within the special flood hazard area. Item B (2): No development is proposed within on which will adversely affect the existing public use or access of any or all public dedicated easements. Item B (3): No development is proposed which will violate the recommendations of the Rearing Fork River Greenway plan. Item B (4): No development is proposed which will remove vegetation; damage vegetation; or require slope grade changes (cut or fill) outside of the defined building envelope. Item B (5): No development is proposed which will pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river including erosion 1/3 and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on site drainage shall be accommodated with in the parcel to prevent entry into the river or unto its banks. Pools or hot tubs are not proposed for this development. Item B (6): No development is proposed which will require written notification to the Colorado water conservation board due to any alteration or relocation of a water course. Item B (7): No development is proposed which will alter or relocate any or all existing water courses. In the extent a water course is altered, a guarantee is provided and applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Item B (8): No development is proposed which require federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain. Item B (9): No development is proposed which will require planting of material other the approved native vegetation below the top of the slope or within fifteen post office box 301 174 midland avenue suite 205 basalt colorado 81621 p 970 927 9976 r 970 937 9676 palominobarth.com 1 --7Â£:r- U I Â·2- 49. (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. Item B (10): No development is proposed which outside the fifteen (15) setback from the top of the slope will exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of the slope. Item B (11): A landscape plan is submitted as a part of this development application. No new plantings are proposed outside of the design noted building envelope on the river side. In the event planting is provided in this area, new plantings will be limited to native riparian vegetation. Item B (12): All lighting on the exterior of the proposed development shall be low wattage; downcast; and with no lighting directed toward the river or located down the slope. Item B (13): Site sections are submitted as a part of the development application. Item B (14): A site plan is submitted as a part of this application identifying the riparain zone. rpljp 01-110 L2 Encl. 7. . ATTACHMENT 5 One Step Review by Planning Commission 1. Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2. Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should respond to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. 3. Determination of Completeness. Within five working days ofthe date of your submission. staff will review the application. and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request. and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. 4. Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is deemed complete. the review by the Commission will be scheduled on the first available agenda given the requirements for public notice. Staffwill refer the application to other agencies for comments. The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. The Planner Will prepare a review memo which addresses the proposal's compliance with the Land Use Code and incorporates the referral comments. The Planner will recommend approval. denial or tabling of the application and recommend appropriate conditions to this action. You will be called to pick up a copy of the memo and the agenda at the end ofthe week before your hearing, or we can mail it to you if you so request. 5. Planning Commission Review of Development Application. Your project will be presented to the Commission at a regularly scheduled meeting. The typical meeting includes a presentation by staff. a presentation by you or your representative, questions and comments by the review body and the public. and an action on the staff recommendation, unless additional information is requested by the review body. Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document. such as a plat agreement or deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions. We suggest that you not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staffhas determined that your application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption. Any document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement. will need to be reviewed and recorded before a Building Permit is submitted. 6. Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received final approval of your development application, you may submit a building permit. Your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform Building Code and will be checked for compliance with applicable provisions o f the Land Use Regulations which were not reviewed in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios. setbacks. parking, open space and the like). Fees for water. sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due. . April 17, 2001 Hazen Residence Physical Address: 1210 Red Butte Drive Aspen, CO 81611 Legal Description: Lot 5, Gaylord Subdivision, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado 1 i LÂ»\ 4-r- 9 ~ ASPEN h 7 1 \0 1/ HS 1 ~*211â€¢9?=81_ \S // 9 0 )4 8% 4 hee-4* 40Â« , .H.123Â¥ok Mamon Cnek *9 + 1 -Â£ 0/ \\Flt Golf Course ~ 4 ~4*%14 Â». 5 'l Aâ€¢pe~ot 11. 44 0 Du Coune *9 244&55 t 47' -=r #Ft,4 Plum 82 r-,F4 -*:w 67 C *il h, r 21 kaluu,1 Ulee. ria -2.k-, - 1 lr- 0--G 6 -1 win ./ 2 12 f/-/ 4 1%~ 1 â€ž. . 24 C /% 1.- /1 1 i 4 1 .orÂ·-b,- 74 1--NX. 2 nook 1*2 16--: 4._ prwn{-rkl:i\ Vicinity Map 1.*m- Veud M ,-0 irt,f42:n.â€ž Â¥37 44**4 - APR, 16. 2001-10:2?AM------CAATES REID WALDRON- --- ----- NO. 170-P. j MAY 08 20,0 11 2:ISAM HP FERJET 3200 ,.. ASPEN/PrnaN COMMUNDY DEVELOPMENT DEPARâ„¢INT AEr,eme,le lb, hym- oraer of A,De= Develonmeat Aptiention Feu crtvof An,nuÂ».=amrcrrn.â€¢ 19/0 4 L Â· Hâ€¢ atâ€¢t (hrminan:r APPUCANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: i -APPWCANT h. submitted. CITY an ragiket/nsid-11 Mddboy, Â¥ p:==%Â».i , sh-â€¢â€¢ moo,>14,.\e,u (herel...er. THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT undirmnds nd agrees Â·:he City of Aiper, Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 199g) emablisheâ€¢ a ke =ucturâ€¢ for L=Id Uic opplicatiom end ele pgymm of all pr==Ing fc= is a condition precedent m a dmminalion of Wlication compleeaess. 3. APPLICANT ud CITY agne :hor bec,use of the size. nature or scope of the propofed projecc k is not poiliblâ€¢ m this time m a=min mc aill exent of the Gons involved in processin: die application. APPLICANT and CtTY Airther :,ive thar it is in che Inaieg of the part- thot APPLICANT make payment of an initill deposk zod w diereaAer pennit /didonal com re h billad to APPLICANT on a monchly buis. APPLICANT agrees additigaal com rn,y *irrue following their heirialt =Id/or appravaIL APPLICANT agrres he will be ber,efi- by. Muining gre=r -ti fiquidiry Ed wll[ ma# additional payments upon notification b, the CITY when they= n==ary -Gost; arc ingurred. CrlY agrees k will be benemed through the greater cerrainry ofrecoverin; fts full com to proc- APPLICANTS pplicuton 4. CITY =!d APPLICANT further ogree *or ic ts impracticable for CITY frati to complete prvcessing or pre:ent 8ufficient kerm,tion to rhe Plammg Commusion and/or City Council to enable rae Plannbt g Commistion andfor City Council m makâ€¢ lagally riquired finding: R,r pmjec r ceasiderarion, unleit currear billk,*s are paid in fUU prior m decision. 5. Thenfbre. APPLICANT Verem thar in conside:ton of the CITY's waiver of Its filht ro collect Aill hg prior (a a decerminalion of opplicaion gompl=nes:, APPLICANT shaiI pey m initial deposic in dle amountors 1 6/0 -hiah is iN _Zg Noun of Community Development mfT time. ad if sental Beocri,d com 1=eed the inmal depost APPLICANT shal] my addidonal mon:hly billing; to CITY to nimbune the CITY for the processing of the applic=ion mentioned above. [actudb: post approval miew. Such petioair payments shall be m.de within 30 days of the billing dole. APPLICANT 61â€¢her â€¢cree that tbilure te p.v such accrued coma shall be grounds (bral:pengion of proces:inâ€ž and to no cme will building permiu be vauod until all cosm agocatcd with case proc=ins have been paid CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT Dr. C~~L d l~ t~~t- _ - 4+ Nizi Wood, Â»m--ily Di-lopiumt DIFecmr D.. _ 4,/4. at Mailing Address tz!O biad. bath ~rJ vt A,- co enni 2:Waipporatbrm~*ir,om.doc igrm' T â€¢ al 9L9GL2G0L6 6,00;rulouw49Â·JeROUTUIO'[ed ghS:80 LO SI 'c:.&12 HAZEN RESIDENCE ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS LOT 5, GAYLORD SUBDIVISION 1210 R-ED BUTTE DRIVE Aspen, Colorado paiominobarth. PO. BOX 301 |.;.3 174 A [IDL.AND AVENIJE SUI-IE 203 ..ds&&1; BASALI'. COL( )RADO 8162] , ..... *41.t, PHONE (970) 927-9976 dijalt: FAX (970) 927-9676 'Al_ palomi nobarth,Usopli s net ABBREVIATIONS: SYMBOL LIBRARY: ' MATERIALS: 4=11 4-Ed. ,â‚¬OVE FINISH FLOOR AFF SHEET INDEX: 4%- Â·Â·.725Â· 91 ACÂ·COUSTICAL CEILIN<S TILE ACT. BUILDNB DETAIL EARTH METAL -92=40 3 AD_l,STABLE +DI. SECTION NLIASER ALTERNATE ALT. COV ER 2 'A "0 19 1/1 11 ANCHOR E3OLTS Ae ARCHITECTURAL +8.CÂ·'A. SHEET AHERE UNDISTURBED STEEL Al.O INFO AT . LOCATED SURVEY BEAM BM kNALL DETAIL NUMBER R,4 34=11 Al.1 STREAM MARGIN SITE PLAN INSULATION BEAM POCKET SM. PKT SECTk:24 BEARINS BRO, MILL Al.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN BLOOKING BLKÂ·6. BOTTOM BOT. SHEET VYHERE39 SATT BOTTOM Of' FOOTING Br. LOCATED FAR FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS BUILIPIN6 aLi:26. Â· BY OPNER 8.0 A:2.1 PROPOSED LOPNER LEVEL PLAN PETAll pET,NL NUMBER-~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~A~1 RIGID MARK A:2.2 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN CASNET C+B CLE!UNG CLe FINISHES GENTERLINE SHEET AHERE 6RAÂ·,i'ELL AB.1 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CER.AMIC TILE CT LOCATED /- -IN 1::.. ..1 AS.1 PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CLEAR CLR . \ MASONRY COLUMN COL. 1 7 6YPSUM BOARD CONCRETE CONG, I [44Â©4Â«1 CONNECTION C<PNN ; / /8,4.1 SITE SECTION DETAIL DETNL \ / BLOCME A4.2 SITE SECTION CONTINUOUS CONT. REFERENCE NLMBER- / *--/ 1. 1 A' i â€¢ PETAN L DTL. FLASTER E.V DOUBLE [EL F 1 1 DOrÂ·EL DriL SHEET RHERE - LOCATED BRCK EACH FNAY E.hi, O/1/10 ELEVATION ELEV OR.EL GIERAMIC TILE EXISTIN6 EXIST. ROOF SLOPE ~ EXTER]OR iEXT. RISE ~2- ! RUN STONE 11 1 FLOOR FLR. i: FOOTIN6 FT*. FOUNDATION F'NO. ELEVATION ~ T, GONG. p=73731 STONE MARK Msip"ALT 6AU6E GA 1004-0 619-LAM 6.L. 1 111,11111,1'Ill i GYUM FNALL BOARD ey'l B 1Â» 1 CARPET DOOR HEIGHT HT. Sâ„¢BOL CONCRETE HOOK H. NNOCEÂ¥1 ROOD MISC HORIZONTAL. HORIZ SYMBOL O HOT nATER HEATER INH LO/'/'79-1 k><>0061 Z INFORMAT1ON INFO. FINISH OVERFRAMNG INSULATION INISUL. INTERIOR DETAL IlmÂ·Leeâ€¢l~* | ID><C | < - 230 CW JO tel- -ST. ELEVATION MARK ROUeH 4 E-1 05 0 LINEAR FEET L.F. UVE LOAD L.L El== LONGITUDINAL LON6NT 1-1 NOT IN CONTRACT NIC BLOCKINE , C =8 ON CENTER 00 OPPOSITE CN9 NORTH ARROM 1 /// 1 OvER 0/ i.-r' 1 PL77,1000 PAINTED FTD 2 + PERPORATED PERP PLATE PL. FLÂ·fr,OOD per, SE[E_PAIA GOD>EIS: PROPERTY LINE PROP LINE UBCÂ· 1997 RENPORCEMENT REINP UFC 19<F-7 REI:Â¥DOC) 12-DYO PROPERTY ADDRESS: 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE UMC 1 clq-7 RteÂ·OUIRED REG'P Ups 1997 RESIUENT RESIL. REVISED REV, LE(DAL DESCRIFT-ION: LOT 5, GAYLCRD SUBDIVISION, CITY OF 016PEN, SHEET METAL- S.M PITKIN COUNTY-, COLORADO SIMILAR SIM ASSES-OFES PARCEL NO. 2735-013-16005 SQUARE FEET S P. OR Sa. FT. 9-TMÂ·\DARD srp. STEEL STL. ZONING: 9-30 PUD STUDS Slips. LOT AREA: O.el ACRES (42,265.0 S.F.) THICK THK TOILET- TLT. TOP OF PLATEE T.P OCCUPANCY 6ROUP K.-3 TOP OP LEDGE T.L. TOP OP FNALL T.K. CONSTRUCTION TrPE: Th'PE V TOTAL Tar. TOr'EL BAR T.B. 71KANSVERSE TRANSV TYPICAL AREA: (SEE FAR SHEET) EST. QEHQ. UNLESS NOTED OTHERVVSE UN O PROPOSEDÂ· ICIAL VERIFY IN FELIP 4\F BASEMENT LEVEL VERTICAL VERT ENTRY LEVEL - SS. FT - 50. Fl- - ea. FT - 60. FT vINÂ¥L ZIALL_ COVERING vric UPPER LEVEL - EC. 1 T. - 9(2. FT. - SG FT - Se. FT - 50. FT. - SG. FT. - 50. FT. - Sa. FT KNATER CLOSET PI.C. . Sa. FT. - ea. FT - sa FT CLERESTORY WTERPROCF rte hATER RESISTANT Fl R TOTAL - Sa. FT - 50. r. - Sa. FT. - 962. FT. ret DO)'41 y*AD Flâ„¢ YV yÂ©OD re. MAX ALLOVNABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR):15,000 S.F. EXISTING MAX. HEIGHT: PRINCIPAL BL[26. -" E- -LE MAX. HE16HT: FFEINCIPAL BLDG. -" PROPOSED MAX. HEIGHT: F'RINGPAL BLDS. di EXISTIN<5 % OF SITE COVERAeE: N/A 3 = PROF'OeED 96 OF SITE COVERADE N/A 0, 2 0 Ill PRPOPOSED % OF DEMOLITION 0% E><15Tlble NUMBER OF BEENOOMS N/A 01 ~ % 19LM' PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEOROOMS: N/A EXISTINe ON-BITE PARKING *PACES: 't4/ A ON-SITE PARKINe SPACES RECD. 111 8 Bil PROPOSED ON-SITE PARKINe BFACES: N/A I ] 1.60 %128&62: I EXISINQ: ALL-21613LE: 0502295[2. Al.O FRONTÂ· -1,+ FRONT ' FRONT REAR: REAA REAR: SIDE: 91=E Spe - + MAJOR ROAD BETBACK: -"+ MAJOFE ROAD SETBACK -Â· HA-29 FCAD SETBACK -"+ 01-llc .10 SNOILL V ND[ZVH U**~N ~2~10Â¥31-LNOD 4-tg@J Â·01*p 10aU,+08Â¥ aH.L HerIOh,Hl Ca.1.0321,1 gO ClnOHIG Gahllf'Â©NI -t-N, 9 11.LUVEI O f N .1 ~ RA O FOUND SURVEY AOIUMENT REEAR N TH CAP AS NOTI ,*924 Tia F.f ~APPARE~ ~ ' wle//Ve , SP KE OR P K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL 643.-4.0. Â·Â·F: POSTED ADDRESS I S Â· 1210Â· .y77 -lah.-1/ M---119 1 i . D un tTy BOX . , - li- r.f 7% 94~1~_1 -- - 1 4 . 41 GAS hETER Â© ELEC., TV. 8 TEL SERVt CE /0 k e COTTONWOOD TH IZE AS NOTED i 1 1- --2.- -----rf.740-- '0 \\ e 04 92*0~ / , 2<\462 p?#v f. i 10 + ..9 0 4 + M= AsoEN TREE gE .6 ~T~ . ll/ - St\ ~/4* ~-AS.Im C-OrRINTEINA.51 FOOT . -1 1.*kkt=f=-=. ,/ -~ SPRUCE TREE 9ZE AS NOTE) 7 1 - ELEVATION DATLN IS A~ITRARY BASED UPON - + 1 -Â£ .~ 7,35 I - 3*<. CO TITLE INFOIAATION FLRNS}ED BYÂ· cOKIITheir NO ' DATED 2 11 I 2,074 EQ1 / 3- \ 4 SEES}ET 1 FORIMPROVDENT SLRVEY - Â© -30 --3- 9---Â»949-3 - + ill SEE SHEET 3 FOR CROSS SECTICÂ»IS 83 %: R l rEA: Â«-bi- 4 44, 2# 4, / i . i# . j & 4. 1 1 4 /X - 'COYEARPLOODPLAINFROMTHElâ€¢ .100 SCALE FLOOD PLAIN MAPS SHOWING FLOOD PLNNS & FLOODWAY 5 f Â§ F 3 1 943* f\ 04,4 'bO ,Â© FURNSHED BY nE CITY OF ASPEN DONEEING DEPT, 4â‚¬93 \<> lit ./ . 10 ED. i = '4/2 OPEN SPACE ~' '*" i#F= 48% 1 -Â» \\\ Â« 4/4 14 7--~4*\\\\\\ 9 -X~ -* MEAN APPARANT IGH WATER LI 0-U UJ- 2 / 0/ --. 94* 1 \0440\\\ 44 ~ Ed E ZX - All Mi ~~Al -flu. 0 & 1 0 bi 1 \42 \ 1 1 - rÂ« e /// L \1 2 -ft \\It t'\4 / / , 6/ 1 / 1 LO. Z 1 , 'PPOPOSE&4 7>\1 % i i / ~ l<lift j f , I. :. AN / \ / 42 0 W 1 1 /If/ 1 42\ 1 17'r -\ 2% 39 / Â»4 / W - ho // rery 2 \ f #1 04 <~~rl~ , 41>\\1\ 6 e X / b... E-OF \ V / f .U i -1*Et \ f// i // I. 2 Ed ' , 1 941 SET SAKE' ~ TE. -772 Â¥ r / 7 1. I YEL CAP ~ 1464 /1 /~~~' -"wri~ 1 2 rlooll . Ij DECK ISLAND X 4 7/*N .P , 1 EXISTING RESIDENCE : L 9 -4. 4 2 STORY 18Â©2 \74 /AN ft tÂ« 469 1 1 / HOUSE 77391 ANSH FLOOR VIOOD FRAC - 1 1% 7 \,2.9. / - i \Â«1 PONO /...../ 9 6 , f v .9,2- 0 PAVED 47 7 f // 2Â» / PAR/NG /1j ./4 I 1 / . I 4/ 4/ // Iff 04 4 \ m 25 /. l 1, 9 YEL CAP *1 1 . 1 r- 1 / / \ 1,/1 1/ 12707 1 . - / C 0 \ ( 35 DECK i . f / O.- --, GARAGE _~___91 1 1 \. ./~ s \ f ~; A) T~ >7 .~~7 V 1 \ ' tu 41 3 \ \IL // 1 IN, 9 /3 1 A~ , 7,- 119, /--,/ / 2.4 A 1 , \ l,/ , \ 4/6 2/4 4/ f f ..OR \ OVERHANfi i , A LOT 17 \ 1\/ / 2 / 1 46 / \4 v : //,1 *79 /\N\ , 1 X " LOT 4 ~ X \ // 1 1 0 1 '41Â§': 1/1 4 .k 2 ," , /1 18. ' 941* 1 n ./.1 (3/ / 1 1 / ~_ /// CULVERT BLACK Bl RCH \ \Â· S E "AGE fl / /0 4 i-SYS'TE' \ W , /--- M.OLES 1 8 1 . . i E 3tij \ L. / 7/:/1 LOT 5 -' 4/ -J U | AREA . 0 9703 AC â€¢i- 1 Â¥ 1 1 42.265 SQ ET Â· 'â€¢EÂ» OR]\'CALAN - NOTE: PROPOSED ADDITIONS *HOEN ARE ADDITIONS ~~ ~ TO THE BUILCINe FOOTPRINT ONLY r Al.1 ~ 20151 01-110 Al 1 YEL CAP Ch SITE PLAN SHEET 2 <-~ el".10'-O ''t,l'41.reqou o d %Â°*7 SNOIJIVHS[1'IV NJIZVH _ 1 N ; 1 ' 1:uÂ·suclog@queqoultuop,d OCIVMOHOD 'NE[dSV to/9 I/) Poluid 01â€¢p ' ~ 1t xxx :xqp@,peqo 9Â£96-10Â£6 (066) XVA El AING aliAS (IHM 01 31 %0 Kq./.4 - . r | 9Â£66-LZ6(0Â£6) 3NOHd NOI~LIaaV (INV Ott-to Ouqo[ 0 12918 OCIVEO'!03'11Â¥SVH N[Vld 32715(NV~I 2 1 02 lilins '21 Vl nou 081 Guo!6!/41 knil 10-11 I , 2 ' Â· 1 73 11!,1 4 41mqou![110[ed 10[XOH Od SNOI.LUIHI'IV NEIZVH ...* -n * . Od !11.NVE ONI}NO'TVd 1HDIHAdCO g..1Ugl ..P : 1Â§ 1 1. 11 2 2% El dE zse fl: / 11 2 /%O i "el im: f ,- 29 F @ W em 55 2 W & 955 \~N \.1 Â® 04@34 e .0 + 2 + 1 I 1 4 1 \ 9 I.11 W %9. ----. 8 1 f /1 i j \ i /(i \ is'Â»0~Y: - 612 \D 1 /}1 - e D 4\ /4/4 ILfi,k~ 4.â‚¬3; WE !}][1 i / 45 /- /7 9-/ 1 r & 3.-4 I / i st// ~I ZK- 1. \Â» . 1-75:> . .0 -0 -/7 -< -,\- -- ----+--9.- I ...\ 1 1/ fil ./0 I // / :/3 // f / 0 /9 --1 1 / y.1, ./ . / 49/C /1 / 41% / // 4 - i. 2% / 1 9 *%2</1:Â·7 > / ..4 PA...I ~ 1 // h '111 A /11 // ff\4\\\\\\ I./rfri 1 / ,1 'IN.::V -44 1 1 11\.1 4 4 1 1 1 1 11 111 1 , 11 ' .CA \ ..: i ..41:. \ . I / . / .1 -14 4,4 / PO / f Â»U .: 7/ 1 1 fi/,/< 4 1 ' 9 36 11,9 1 U. 0 1 /1 / A. .43 f f.97 9 1 / // 7 /1 6 1. / 1 1 1111*J -I O 47/ ./ 3 6 \ 1,1 1 1 a \ * . c 9 ) / /\7 / /4 9 1 1 // /jiti 1 1 1 1 14/3 / 111 1.1 1 1 --3 / / f B 11 / 1 1 1 1 1 %%67 ,/ 7 l .Mt, ..1 1 , #.L. 226 -'/ / t./ / . l 9 -*- - -1.-- ./.1 O FOUND SURVEY MONUMENT REBAR N TH CAP AS NOTE SPIKE OR P- K NAI L SURVEY CONTROL LEC , Tv, & TEL SERVI CE ARBITRARY BASED UPON StÂ©WN CONTOUR INÂ·rERVAL IS 1 FOOT 109 SCALE POSTED ADDRESS IS '1210' ENGINEEANG (>Â¥TCNWOOD TREE SIZE AS ITED 3 FOR CROSS MEAN ApPAR,UfT HGH W ATER LIE LI TY 80/ GAS /ETER ASPEN UEE IZE AS NOTED SPRUCE TREE IZE AS NOTED NV-ld EdÂ¥0249-10 6â‚¬3392 Ghrusks -1 LOT AREA SUMMARY: Gross Lot Area 42,265.0 gsf Reductions: Lot Area Under Water - 4300.0 sf Slopes in Access of 30% - 4170.0 sf Slopes Between 20%-30% - 2135.0 sf x 50% = 1067.5 sf Subtotal - 9537.5 sf Net Lot Area 42,265.0 - 9537.5 = 32,727.5 sf Max. Allowable FAR: 4500.0 sf for the first 15,000.0 sf of net lot area plus 6.0 sf of floor area for each additional 100.0 sf of net lot area 32,727.5 - 15,000.0 = 17,727.5/100.0 = 177.275 x 6.0 = 1063.65 Total Allowable FAR = 5563.65 sf FLOOR AREA SUMMARY: Maximum Allowable FAR = 5564.0 sf Existing FAR (per Mathis Drawings 1999) = 3999.0 sf (126.0 sf addition at Master not built) therefore Existing FAR = 3873.0 sf Remaining FAR = 5564.0 - 3873.0 = I691.0 sf PROPOSED ADDITIONS: Bridge Addition: 65.6 sf Guest Master Addition: 573.2 sf Garage Addition: 589.1 sf Master Sitting Room Addition: 124.0 sf Master Closet Addition: 120.3 sf Master Office Addition: 218.7 sf Subtotal 1690.9 sf 1691.0 sf (Remaining FAR) is greater than ] 690.9 sf (Proposed Additional FAR) 024 3 .arU &:z . palontinobarth . I P.O. BOX 301 174 MIDLAND AL'ENUE SUITE 205 I 41-17-01 Steam Manwn Review dmwn by BR HAZEN ALTERATIONS Jobno 01-1 to a 4,1 -14 BAS ALT, COLORADO 81621 11-!-01 FAR Revigons checked bv XXX 0 110; UL PHONE (970) 927-9976 FAX (970) 927-9676 1210 RED BITTE DRIVE CALCUALTIONS i : palomtnobarth o sopns.net ASPEN,COLORADO COPYRIGHT PALL,JUNOBARTH PC | - 01-110 FAR 1. DO NOT SCALE D~rl#465 - CONTKT AacHrrECT GENERAL NOTES OR ENGINEER CONCERNING DISCREPENCES OFE MISSING INFORMATION. 2. COMPLY nITH ALL AFFLIC,â€¢BLE BUILDING CODES AND CONFORM VNFI,4 MATERFL AND ECUPMENT MANUF=<TURERS- RECOMMENDATIONS. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS TO FWLE OF FRAMNG UNLESS NOTED OTHERF,lISE. 4 EXTER'OR FIALLS TO BE 2.Xe . 16. O.C. UNLESS c , NOTED OTHERFNEE REFER TO STRUCTURAL ORANINGS L= CJ p/4 NOTED OTHERFNISE. REFER TO STRUCTURAL ORAININGS 5. INTERIOR rlAL_LS TO BE ex4 0 18 0.6. UNLESS e. CRO,NN ALL STUDS, JOISTS, ANIP RAFTERS, CROr*4 JOBTS AND RAFTERS UP. 7. COORDINATE JOIST PLACEMENT r,UTH PLUMBING FIXTURE LAYOUT, 8. HOLD ALL PLUMBNG TRAPS Aa HIGH AS POSSIBLE. COORDINATE FNUTH GABNET ACCESSORES 4 NO VENT OR PLUMBINS STACKS ARE TO BE / LOCATED IN PARTY INALLS 10. THE UPPER LEVEL PLUMBNG STKKS ARE TO BE 1 11. THE PURPOSE OF THESE DRAAINeS IS ONLY TO CAST RON UNTIL THEY RE,~H THE GRArt SPKE. GRAFÂ°HICALLÂ¥ PEPET THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE CONFRMING DMENSIONS A+O SELECTNe FABRICATION PORK. THE CONTR<.TOR 19 RESPONSBLE FOR 1 ARC+JITECT AND/OR ENGNEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF PROCESSES AND TECHNIGUES OF CONSTRUCTION THE ANY VARIATION FROM DIMENSIONS 012 CONDITIONS SHOF+1 IN THE OleANINGS. k T. EXIST. PLY #-- 1 U L L 22'-6' - u.~ 7-01/2- OPEN STAIR- 9-00Â¥ #BOVE 1 1 9 <11 1 NER STORAE LINE OF -n , TO - BRIDGE Aev til - 1 PEBR" 4 E-*abar-- 2 -91 0\ 1â‚¬FN GARAGE 12*r Â£T.-249. ~ 101'-11-* v.1.P â€¢ '.r 14.- 1 .. FLE / 16080 6AR. DR. 1 .1 10'-2Â· i 0/ 1.-8 . 11. (E) GAR. PR. 0 0 O 0 J * - 74 PROPOSED LOMER LEVEL PLAN 0 1/4"= 1'-0 024 8 patommobarth I date re~â„¢~rks 174 JUDI.,&~~ AV~I~ SUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS I 4'POI PERMISUBMIT drawn by BR m Jobno 01.110 BAS.\1- r. COL.ORAD<) 81621 11Â·1-01 FAR Revisons checked by XXX ~ date pnnted 10Â¢31/01 FI IONE (970) 927-9976 AND ADDITION PROPOSED LOWER A2.1 FAX (970) 927-9676 i 1 1210 RED Bt.TTE DRIVE ~ LEVEL PLAN patorni nobarth a Nopri s.net .\SPEN, COLORADO 01-110 421 COPYRIGHT PALOMING BARTH PC >SmÂ£Â»---4 - eENESAL-b -3 13Â·-5 1/2- 1. DO NOT SCALE ORAÂ»4 -36 - CONTACT ARCHRECT ' ~ OR ENGINEER CONCERNING OISCAREPENCES OR MISSING NFORMATION 2. COMPLY MTH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES AND CONFORM YVITH MATERAL AND EGUPMENT MANLIFKTURERS' RECOMMENPATIONS - NIFY GAS FIREPL-ACE NOTED OTHERFWSE. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS TO F*DE OF FRAMNe UNLESS 4. EXTERIOR F'IALLS TO BE 2,<6 0 16 0.6. UNLESS JO 01 - NOTED OTHERRISE. REFER TO STRUCTURAL OPARINGS /71/ 5. INTERIOR FV.LLS TO BE 234 0 16- OC. UNLESS '\ NOTED OTHERMNISE. REFER TO STRUCTURAL PITAPKINGS. 7Â» 6. CRO~N ALL STUDS, JOESTS, AND RAF-ERS. CROPYI JOISTS AND RAFTERS UP. 1. COOPOINATE JOIST PLACEMENT INIT-H PLUMBING FD<TURE LAYOUT. l h-7- 4 4 8. HOLD ALL PLUMBING TRAPS AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE NEY, s\TTINS COGRONATE niâ„¢ CABNET KLESSORES 4. NO VENT OR AUMBING STACKS ARE TO BE SQQki -EXISTING DECK - ADD LANDING - / LOCATED IN PARTY ~ALLS / LEE: / 10. THE UPPER LEVEL PLUHIB"6 STACKS ARE TO BE le . PLY / 0 $ CAST IRON UNTIL THEY REACH THE GRAPNL SPACE. ED<ST KINDCM REMOVE --2- _ L~ MATO+1 EXIST ~ -T GRAPHICALLY DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE 11. THE PURPOSE OF THESE ORAININGS 15 ONLY TO *HIP NFILL ,6122~~~~ZI:IrrmILII]~ 1 i; ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ EXIST, LIVING ZEXISTIN<5 DECK -27 gz:==Â£:Et===2#153%2=MIT' INORK. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSBLE FOR 11 TO REMAIN I .ARCHITECT AND/CR ENSNEER SHALL BE NOTINED OF 9 N ~\ M \ \-â„¢EyN HALF ~NALL / ANY VARIATION FROM DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS EQCM SHOPW IN THE DRAAINGS. 11 / I. 11 . 1 L - -4 / Â· 22Â·-0 / a / EXIST DOORS 1 -4==22 / / C -HODEN DOOR ./ NEn IRCN HANDRAIL 4/ / 7. L3 / UP 2R WAST. MASTER TO- Ii<LÂ« E F-~~ -#7 EXISTNG PEPROOM /-- CECIl -NEr! SPI~L_ STAIR TO --l PROPOSED M+61Â·ER *7 /4*\ h# OFFICE UPSTAIRS EXIST ,/ OPEN STAIR-~~ 4Ert'ORM,GER- - ~ / ~l v , ENJEE i /-- - + -1. 31 1 3 ///// 0 --1Â· 4 STOKâ€¢BE CAB . I NE~Al )900VN v Y .1/ A.STORASE ABV 1 EXIST. DINING ROOM ' - ~ -=P# l Â»r,--ril l FE-- i â€¢ .L' -L I -\07-1 / F .11 th I I. , ,/ / 'kn . lin . : 91 ,RT. FLY ' 7/ ,â€¢~ / /' /2 3 - t 7 /4 / / /1/ /1 1.L.: 1 1 F L----- -------------- 9- 0/ 4 , ~ M h 1NSA WEST 1Â»STER - ---------------------- - -'=2!gORM 15'-0' L LOCATON OF NEY41 MbeTER OFFICE ~ EXI51-6 ~NE>OVe TO REMRN = 0 629%-88555EhaI k /- 11 1 - t\. iNf i EX]SI...ELIC,HEN EQ,201- / ReeM 9 0812*2 ~ , \ , 13'-3 1 '0 1 T. PLY // - --__- . 4 T. EXIST. PLY. \ ~=EXT A' -- ------1 \L- 1 110 q 1/21 VIF 1 I . 1123 all t3 9 - h, . t--Ul--C-1 --------- 5 - - 4 4 ~ ' ~ 2-pÂ·-.L==4 ' ~~======~ 0! / ~ NER MASTER '~ ~~ ~ ~~1~1 1 'Buri ~ h 1 1 24.11 - BATH 3 b I i t. PLY 1------- V.IF C *-RIS 2 --- 7...../ IEEBEE1 I 65"=f=e====L.=Â« 6-0. 4-0- 5'.6- 3--6- 14Â·-O- ,, =ROPOSEE) PARTIAL UPPER LEVEL PLAIN i PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN 0 1/4"= 1'-0 <237 02 4 3 . 2.4 palommobarth. P.O. BOX 301 (Late TemasU 174 MIDLAND .AVENUE SUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS 477/01 PERMIT SUBMIT drawn by BR Jobno 01-110 BASALI'. COLORADO 81621 11-1 -01 FAR Revions checked by XXX ~ date pnnted ]0/31j01 PHONE (970) 927-9976 AND ADDITION PROPOSED MAIN A2.2 FAX (970) 927-9676 1210 RED BITTE DRIVE LEVEL PLAN 1 - L-44 paiormnobarth a solin,.net ASPEN, COLOR.ADO COPYRIGHT PALOMINO BARTH PC' 01-110 A21 GENERAL NOTES 1 DO NOT SCALE DRAFYNGS - CONTACT ARCHITECT OR 6462â€¢[EER CONCERNING DISCREFENCIE OR M 96146 INFORMATION. MAKFACTURERSÂ· REGOMMENDATIONS 2 COMPLY T/TH ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING GODES AND CONFORM ~TH MATERAL AND EGUIFHENT MCPOZED M,45TER OFF=CE AODITION 3 ALL DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF FRAMIN6 UNLESS â€¢AINE ROOF OVER MeTER BATH AREA 3Â·-0Â·Â· - \ 1 4 EXTERIOIT LLS TO BE 2Xe 0 16Â· O C. UNLESe NOTED OTHERPEE -1Â«ff-i--- NOTED OTHERYIEE. REFER TO STRUCTURAL. DR,-N65 5 INTERIOR rt~L.LS TO eE 2/4 / 16Â· O.C UNLE59 8 CATOF~.1 ALL 5TUDS. JOISTS, AND RAFTERS CROr*4 NOTED 0-THERyEE. REFER TO STRUCTURAL IPRAÂ»IN69 305TS AMI) RAFTERS UP 0/ ....4--WI-L-,-'... --- ... 11 7 COORDINATE JOST Fl-.â€¢CEMENT ~TH PLUMBING FIXTURE LAYOUT = 8 HOLD ALL- FLUMeIN6 â„¢Ape AS H16H AV POSNE,LE COORDINATEr,â„¢ CABINETACCESSORIES Â£ . 9 NO VENT OR PLUMBES 5TACKS ARIE TO BE LOCATED IN PieT-f Â¥*tlS 10 THE UFPER LEVEL PLUMBIN6 STACKS ARETOBE 5/ 4. 1 -2\\ - i. 1 CAST IRON UNTIL THEY REACH THEE CRA,4- SPACÂ·E - ~ T PL - 11. -THE PURPOSE OF'rHESE ORAMNGS IS ONLY TO PÂ©POSED I. - - 526Â£~UR - -UPFUL- - -= - - " \~ FURIA THE CONâ„¢,â€¢CTOR 5 RESPONSIBLE FOR 6RAFHICALLÂ¥ DEPICT THE GENERAL NATURE OF THE 1 1 --22 - El-1 Â£ E CONFIRMIH6 DFAIENSIONS AMI> eELECâ„¢6 FABRICATION - NOE' NO PROF'Ce ADEMIC,45 IN THIS .AREA Dâ‚¬REFORE - PROCESSES *ID TEDÂ·INIGUES OF CONSTRUCTION. THE NO MINOR CHANGES SHOAN FOR CLNQ,Th' 1 ~RC+4[TECT AND/OR 5461NEER SHALL BE NOTIFE) OF LIn.2 Ll-1 -- N ANY VAFIIATION FROM DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS 1 SHOW IN â„¢E PRAPâ€¢â€¢INGS I n __I - _ _ ~ --4-Â«~~~01_1==Â»-71 - ~AH I \ A T. per. j______U- 1 - -/ 1 1 JU 1,-"4 - 14Â»=*=9==Al -4 FL-5 // 0 -l. L-/ r~~-7 'LU'-4 m 1- f uu~ ~~AZE820 -FL-, 11 ALCg::~-F '1 I - '0 -44==jÂ«931 -4Er r==3 --I Â«-2 \ A T PLY. LLW.- - [Â¥ EXIBTIN6 0 FNEST ELEVATION 0 1/4"-1'-0- RABE RACI O,ER HASTER IED AREA 3-0 -.- PROF'OeED MASTER OFFlee ACaTION -3~ ~ PRO>O.ED â‚¬A*25T MAS-rEN. eiD.Gf.1 Kng.ki 1 4"'02Â£0 6ARASE ACOIT]ON --7 // / /1\\\ /- F'POF'CSED BRC>*E /30,1-,CN -- /// i \ Ip- .-11.1...LLi.. - .L. \1 1---- -- -- -1 ---N,- -1 /_-6-1-2--L-_.1- -- , a. .\ 11.~ -+ L_ - u~ lu-_4_ ._1 ---L---11-_L//il I . 46.- . il._1-2 \Al Â·-4--Lil...1. u--rr--4Â·, ~ n, ,* -,/ / ___ 1_1_L_i_.L 1 1.2.11=_-i.-4-2 -12.1.;-11 i.i - _, Y~. _ 21....... ....hu...2-- - --7/ / / , -4 ill , 1 A 4%36Â¤0 1 1 1 1 1 '. ---7-7...0 --L -- / 4 // 7 ---- ' i 1 1 \ I , T PL,L u~ 0-7-1~43 -_i-v m ~Â·Â·. _ - __f -- - - 11/OF<Jec MF ___ 2=22.- --- -- 1 -12.-_.---' --._ - --1-i--_ _- _ -----1 , _ __ Lld[ / .- E r>\41 1 1 -- -- --,0 1 1-2-1 -'AsS \04\ 1 - 1 LI LI 1-1017110 ~~ --- -~ - - - NO HINCR C>4AH6Ee eHONN FCR GL- ITY' 1 L.Â¥-1-Â«R=:6 'L-23==ckll '07-3-1.A< 4- i h- Â»-1 - N(Ort- NO *CPOSED ACE T,ote Il Til /REA T'Equ=CORE n FÂ« 1 -ev--1 ry-,1 4 1 T ri_-hâ€¢*Â· r -=- -_ -- - - - - -- -nÂ·k==y=T-Tl 7.14. -ri:=9Â·Â·--Â·MuL*27~~u KI- In.- -11 lo 'll M ht-6-1 C 7-1 <\ 1-u L.-71-11 1 - _U- En. U T PLY A A TelÂ¥. niÂ·JU . I -:_ - E __ _ A -7 ' 7 420*020 24 Cf-1.1[~ ltÂ¥--r~L_~ >..84-,4 -W %.6.r *r..4 1-4~..1.,4 - -- - ~=:tza~~-3__~=CRj -i-- \40Â»LL-Â«2==f 0-=:63/tric_:--81/Elk~Go --- -U-%Â«Â»72==Â«fpt -- j N 115322-13~~ I = 1 Er-33 \11 1 1-f A U 4- -2 -7 Â·i - \3 '. M -- =27,- 1?44 *1 ht_.9.cfvÂ· -L 43-1- -CL~Â» ~ - -; 4/ '- 04 - 1/-/pL:2 1 . Lur //32 4\ " 1/ \ /0 /4 .1 e=-iM 1 6Â«==d/LM#L-kErp-22-Irh=LES,ILI-6.--Ir---- ' 1 1 ~d . 1 z-L 6 T. PLY p EXISâ„¢16 ~7 > - F~ ElBTIN,5 -n21=---"-~ ~ ,41* Â¢ Z- r-h SOUTH ELEVATION ~ 0 1/4"= 1-0 -*4 !polominobarth Â· 1 PO BOX 301 di*e. r,zma~3: jobno 01-10 174 ANDLAND AVE>RJE SIFT'IIi 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS 4/17 01 PERMIT SUBMIT dmwn by B R A BASALT. COLC'RAIX! 81621 11+01 FAR Revlmi :*cked by XXX ' '15 1 dme p,lnted- to/31A)1 : PHONE (9-111 92--41-16 AND ADDITION EXTERIOR FAX{9-A92.--96'6 1210 RED BUTTE DRIT'E ELEVATIONS ./01 ---.- pal/minobarllÂ¥/sopm net ASPEN, COLORADO 02- 3 COPYRIGHT PALOMINO BARTH Pe 1(-0- V.I.F. 6 -0- 4 A.f. . 'O-0- Ill. . -O" ViI. .'IA .O,9 /Â£ 6ENERAL_N<ZIES CPOSEC; ST MABTER BE&*.CIN %)l=Ch ___~~ OR ENGINEER Cok:ERNNG DISCREFENCES OR 1 170 NOT SCALE DRA~N65 - CONTACT M<GHITECT PROMISED 6*RAGE,EXPr[-04 -~ -m1 j/~' ~N .MANIFACTURERS' REELYIMENDATIONS MISSING INFORMATION 2. COMPLY FMITH ALL ,â€¢PPUCABLE BUILDING OCCES -- i AND CCNFORM MTH MATERIAL AND EGUIPMENT 3. ALL DIMENEIONS TO F,CE OF FRAMING UNLESS \ NOTED OPERATE 4 EXTERIER FNAL.le TO BE 2%6 0 16 O.C. UNLESS NOTED OTHERYISE REFER TO STRUCTURAL DR.Ar,Nee _2_ - 5 INTERIOR FNALLS TO E)! 2/4 /18- O C. UNLESS NOTED OTHERree. REFER TO STNUCTURAL DR //-/N69 6 CROrN ALL STUDS. JOISTS, AND RAFTERS CROrN 7 COORDINATE JOIST PLACE~ENT MTH PLUMBIN6 JOSTS AND RAFTE,e UP - --- -----...*.-. .. . ..- . --.~.1 .. . ..L*--.. -"2.JNLUILL__ FD<TURE LAÂ¥OUÂ·T 8. HOLD ALL PLUMBIN6 TRAPS *5 H*H AS POSSIBLE. GOORD\NATE ,Â«TH C,â€¢BNET ,â€¢CCESSONES. 4. NO VENT OR PLUMBIN6 STACKS ARE TO BE LOCATED MP,4/TYLLS 10 THE UPPER LEVEL PU.MBIN6 ST,oe *72 TO BE CAST FRON UNnt REÂ¥ REACH THE C.RAyi SFACE E- . - ___ fE 7 11. THE PURPOSE OF THME DRAPVN65 15 ONLY TO i -- - 6RAPHICALLY DEFICT THE 6!NERAL NATURE OF THE AORK THE CONTRACTOR 6 REePONSIBLE FOR - Â· - - CONFEMING DMENSIONS Â»[D SELECTING FABRICATION 4 -- - - ~ PROCESSES AND TECHNIGUES OF CONSTIWOT!ON THE --- ,â€¢RCHITECT AND/OR ENGINEER SHALL BENOTIFED OF ---- RNY VARIATION FROM DIMENSIONS OR CONDITIONS 4 .k T PLY y' --- 1 SHO- IN THE DRAVIN65 7-Iiepmae. -2 4-r- I =4922-nu_- 1 1 I . -- - I ff--* 1 ' - ------ - - - - ------- R .- 1 > 'BE- Ne;rE:NOPR,=F,05ED,OCITIC>eN â„¢15= L ~ A REA mE~EFC'PE be ,-CR )*IES -1 ' 2212-~231+-2 1 k_ -~ ~ Â·~I- 4 4 94(*=5~ CLAR]Tr 1=-31 --- I U_ i T. SLAS j -7 1 - r Fl EAST ELEVATION ~ jo 1/4"-1'-0 FROPOTD BRIDGE AE)[PITVIN .~ -O2CaE> 60EE MASTER 0017101.1 *OFOZED MASTER OFFICE ACUION ----X R)ED GARME *001118-7 W-. i P,el RCOF ~/ER MASTER PED AREA 3 4 - 2/ MCPOSED MASTER STTING WOOM /00!rCH fÂ«\-\Â«\\-\ \\ -1-1.1.1--L-=11__-1- - - -L.LL./---111..=-uLL.- -+- ---- - -w - - - -- --- -- /1 - . --W--.-11-2-1'Â· .-f..1--/I-.-2-PI:.3. 174..c_ - I , - W- j. I Lg .#lf - _-- _- .1-L-_12-1-i_1_---1-:-~ T. PL OÂ£ L 1 - . . -- - U CE' .-1] 1 1 1 1 .L.L.-i-1 -a_~_..i. ~-2.-~~_Li-Ll NOTE: NO PIEOP[> .ADOille,5 N THS /*REA THE*EFORE 1 --p.-6-21:32-,- -1.-1.-1-0213-71-NiliffILL .-2-220 2-17-7.1-77221---- 0 NO ./INOR ....O/5 5/C-1 FC' CL.ARITI I r i r 11 - - 1 ------ I E- 1 11 - - -- - -- - 1 4 *ti .. 9-1 ; 1 T. PLÂ¥. /6 -4- Cn NORTH ELEVATION ~ :Â·Â·4~; Pdom,nobarth P.O BOX 301 ~ d,IIÂ·n b, BR 1 HAZEN ALTERATIONS 185Â¥FFEEArr l job,> 01.110 | .he,lod t,v XXX . BASALT. COLORADO 81621 ~ ld,2- 100..1 1 . 1 ...At, 1 i .4, 233* 1 PH NE,9-0)927-9976 AND ADDITION - Bl{Â§241 4 I r . . FAX [970) 927-9676 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE - ~ pdo.muiobalt~a,soprÂ·ls net ~ ASPEN, COLORADO ' L_ELEVATIONS___ ' I XPYRIGHT PALOMINO BARTH PC I - 01-110 AD.1 "TA -O-,Ol N NOTE: PLAN ELEVATION 94-11"= GTE ELEVATION 1139.1 T. PL. 114'-31/2 4 T PLY HT-3 1/2 MMIES DIH Ir T. PLÂ¥.rk 102-31/2 Â¥ - r OR SITE 7741475' 7740 TOP OF SLOPE --1 ~ 7735 HI(311 WATER GRADE AT LEVEL PORTION OF LOT - \X _- -- _- I ~320-f~~ L\ME MID-POINT -i 324&. 7730 _- WATER 7725 ~ CROSS SECTION E * 1/4Â·'= 1Â·-O 024 5 1,%,4, palominobarth ' Po BOX 301 dEKe- ren=rks joblk) 01-110 -4 % :4 1 74 MIDLAND AVENRJE SUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS 4-17-01 Stream Mal,in Renew ~ drawn byÂ· BR fltif ; BASALT. COLORADO Ht 621 11-141 FAR RmmoN ckked byÂ· XXX AND ADDITION I I BuLDINGi srrE A4. 1 d/e plinted 10/31/01 PHONE {9701 927-9976 FAX (91)1 927-9676 1210 RED BLITI'E DRIVE 1 1 SECTION ,)al<,minobarthr,rsoprm ret ASPEN, COLORADO , COPYRIGHT PALOMINO BARTH PO JÂ·-Â·3 1- 1 EEC+-342' T. PL. A M'-11 7 6[:212 9=11 T. Per k 109Â· -11 7 6/ \ _9 r- HIGH WATER LINE -- 1 7745 -ENE --1 . CONG.,6 - ---1----------- r--TOP OF SLOPE e 7740 ---- -1 GRADE AT LEVEL PORTION OF LOT 7735 1 PONDAREA< -~ -- 108- -- -1- --,%& --------- 3-2-- WATER ' MID-POINf_~_ 7730 7725 ~ CROSS SECTION D 01/4'= 1'-0" 0 2 5 -4-4 patominobarth, PO BOX 301 HAZEN ALTERATIONS ~74 1 Stre~~,rl Reviewv dnawn by BR Cf; : 174 MIDLAND AVENUE SINTE 235 job=:01.110 ~ BASALT. COLORADO 81621 11-1-01FARL-// Ehecked by XXX I AND ADDITION BULDING/ SITE Jc pante,4 1031 91 PHONE t970 i 927-99-6 /1 1 itil 'm . 1.-1 FAX 4 9-0,92--9676 1210 RED Bt.FITE DRIVE SECTION h L.* 1 tialotnux#>~th:d'sopris â„¢t -ASPEN, COI.,ORADO COPYRIGHT PALOMINO BARTH PC 01-110 A-1 1 EEC'Ecia HAZEN RESIDENCE ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS LOT 5, GAYLORD SUBDIVISION 1210 RED BE['TE DRIVE Aspen, Colorado PO BOX 301 174 MODLAND A\SUE SUITE 205 BASALT. COI.ORADO 81621 PHONE l9-tn 92--991'6 .*El FAX (9701 927-96'6 paicrn inobMÂ«d"Bu na â€¢'12S -- r , REVIATIONS: MARY: MK[EIRIALS: @-~11'll~-1 #f PINIDâ€¢ FLOOR Al='. SHEELINCEK: a=ammig *CCOUDTICAL <a.INe Ti.2 ACT. a,11-31/6 *016-*eli ~Â©.1 Se< noN 195.->Ch EARTH METAL ALTEMNATE KT. COVER mem/-111 A~<HOR BOLTS A a AND & Vt // \ ,RCHITECT-â€¢. eÂ»â‚¬Er neRE../'~ l.,013710â€¢eED STEEL Al.0 INFO AT . 1-GE.ATED SURVEY INSULATION BEAM BM. aN.J. DETAIL N.I.<BER- Al.1 STREAM MARGIN SITE PLAN me,Â·M POCKET BM FICT. SECTION BEARINS eis Â»21 BATT Al.2 LANCSCAPE PLAN m,-COUNS &56 1 Dor-toÂ·,1 SCT. 922 ket *f LOGATECT--- v - FAR FLOOR AREA CALa,LATONS SOT-TO. 0/ leonie B. R 3 BUILD//5 5-06. SC} '1111] BY One, B.O. lable A2.1 PROPOSED MAIN/UPPER LEVEL PLAN Â¥ J 3 5 M./. -1 0, C.â‚¬4'ET 08. X.6 CEJUNe CL-6 DET/6 , ..... 1 FINISHES AS.1 PROPOSED EXTERIOFE ELEVATIONS C =1 Ce'TER UNE Cl eâ€¢â€¢EET PÂ»IBEE 6*'kAVEL A3.1 PROF'OSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CEEN,â€¢//to TILE CT LCCATED .- -0. 1. i::i: :.: . 11 1 cull cut . I MASONRY Cal'IN Câ‚¬X. / \ 6Â¥PSUM BOMID A,4.1 SITE SECTION RÂ®9991 - CO*,Elt CLMC. C A,4.2 SITE SECTION 00-ECTION CONN. CDETAIL - I. / 0- CONTIh UCUS COAT. feENENCE 1. DEr/4\. C'TL PLASTER d f 1 DELDLE DEL Ked#1 DOâ€¢â‚¬L D". SWEET -ERE- - 2- L LLCATIP e,to< c - Eâ€¢041... tA -410 TLE - 52 ZI ELE'iÂ·AnON ELEV. 0. EL. - ./ I 7 =. 1 E E,0511N6 E.'der. .CXP'. StÂ·C-E 1 Â» EXTE'./. bc. R.Â»4 STONE PLCOR PL'/ '00'Ne '76. 5TOhE r(UvDATION 'NIP. ELEVAION A T GONG. M.I. 7 10>V *MIALT Â¢â€¢AÂ· U12;111 6U>-INA eL 6"9" 6.-4. DOARD 6115. | 1 C.â€¢NtPET DOOR beleâ€¢â€¢T wr. 5-BOL 0 CONCRETE riOOD MISC WORIZCÂ»â€¢[TAL -Z. MOT KITE, HCATER ./ V//cr\ 1â‚¬22222 INFORMATION INPO F.SH OVERFRA/INS NS.LADON *e.'L INTâ„¢loâ€¢ DETAIL )40Â»48Â£1- 1-1 .OST -ZT. ELEVATION MARK RCUSH L.INVA FEET LP. ~E li UVE LOAD U- 5611N319 LONOITION/4. L.~0*â€¢IT, NOT IN CONâ„¢ACT .0.El 12*J ON CENTER 0.0 OP/OSITE 7. hORTW ARROrt ovt,~ to:/3 )/TED re FE/la'IP ~EMP. PLATÂ·E .1- FLâ€¢rÂ»OOP PLY. CODES: /ROIER-rr Litâ‚¬ riei/. UNE 51IE..2/,IA ued 1 44-7 REINFORCEMENT *)/. UFC 19â‚¬1 MtcvÂ©OP .Dyâ‚¬) PROPERrf ADDRESS: 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE UMS 19'rl â€¢ER)'RED â€¢Sm. Lip c 19,?1 RESILIENT RESL RE'Â·leED ltv'. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: L.OT 5. SAYLORD SUBDIVISION, CITV OF ASPEN, *te MET k S M PITKN COUNTY. COLORADO I ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 2755-013-16005 20.-E FILET S.F. O, SO- r-. ITAâ‚¬P.AMP STD. STEEL STL. ZONIA<S: R-30 FUP en..Ce 51Â·05. ~ LOT AREA: 0.91 AERES (42,265.0 SF.) â„¢ICK TH< TOILET 7 ~ 11 TOP O"LATE OCCUPANCY OROUP: R-3 17 or UDeE Tor OF Â¢*LL 1.A CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V 'Crr... Tar. TCâ€¢El- BAR 7.2. 1 TRANSVERIC 1./'15/. -rf-CAL AREA (SEE FAR. SHEET) STE. :=Mt=- emQEQ22. WIN.- Lit.[55 NOTED OTIVI"SE U>4.0. vERJPÂ·r IN FE.12 V.LP. BASEMENT LEVEL VERTGAL- VERT ENTRÂ¥ LEVEL - 9,2. FT - Sa FT - sa FT - Sa. FT VINVL FNALL COVEM]hMS VAC. UPPER LEVEL - sa. rr - SO. FT. - sa. trr. -Sa. FT - sa. FT. - sa. VT. - sa. KT - Sa. FT RATER CL.OSET Ac. CLEREST<DRY - sa VT - sa. FT. - sa FT - 1 IA TE~PROOF - RATEV RESISTANT TOTAL - 51 rr. - so. FT - SO. FT - sa. 'T I.â€¢20/ IhIP. .TH K.73 .CS. MAX ALi.OVYABLE FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR)Â·15,000 6.F 0 E.>CSTNS MAX HEIGHT: PRNCFAL 81-26 -' ALLOPiABLE MAX. HEESHT PRNCPAt BLDG. 2 PROPOSED MAX. HEIGHT PRNC,IPAL 91-06. - -- El m = EX]STNe 96 OF SITE COVERASE. WA i :.2/ PROPOSED % OF S,TE COVERAGE: N/* 11.1 PRPOFOSED % OF PEMOLmON: O% m E>CSTIN6 NLMBER OF BEDROOMS: N/A PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDKOOMS N/A 2 ,;81 EX]ST1N{S ON-BITE PARKING, SPASES: 14/A N1,1i ON-SrTE PARKING SPAGES REGO. VA PROPOSED ONENTE PARK#le SPALES N/A 1.g11 SCI,&,6&: I t,Kion.ti AU-Â¢21:16@LE 28= â‚¬ A1.0 FRONT-Â· F=FL7NT: - FRONT: - + REAR ' REARÂ· ; Scott: SCE: -Â· SIDE. MAJCR ROAD SETBACKÂ· --â€¢ MAfOR 'ROAD SETBACK: 2 MAJOR. ROAD SETS,â€¢CK --â€¢ 2%+114 AN) INFO .. - 09~'Â° S,NOIJI~V 1/IV ND[ZVH 34 Hlliyg 0148%01Â¥4 122)121/03 ;r,7~Â·~~~~i~Y~~~1~~~.la Â¥ p 3AING 31LnEI GEIN 192.1.IHOWÂ¢ 241 HerO-1 02.1.73h,â‚¬1 39 enrIOHS SE,IWED,1 -TH 1 hf Â© ELEC.. U. & rEL SERVI CE Â® GIS I TER Â·L R OAR I NG r 5 COTIONADOOWEINZ!*3~OTED 1 Â«ft fir lop - #2 Ph,k * -I}TED A~EN TREES,ZE AS NOTE -9/K Ap *n~.DAn-TRmY~EDL~ON -0 3 li - ~- - ~ SET't-8940-4.C~*~(OAâ€žraN-,SÂ·~ feel 1 :=2 7735 , 4.k COIMTâ€¢â‚¬NT NO. ;ig CO TI,LE.OF.linCâ€¢ FlelS,ED BYÂ· ' NTED: 200' 4,6 4/ 44 - .-/ \\ Â» 430 440 SEE SHEET 1 FOR â€¢-OVEIâ‚¬NY SJRâ‚¬f 2Â£ SHEET 9 toR cl~OSS SECTICNS 1 X 1 12151*404 42 - =20 Ef i -- 100 Â¥EAR FLOOD R./N RADâ€¢Â»â‚¬ 1.- lee SCALE FLOOD PLAIN 04â€¢PS SHOAMNG FLOCO PL.â€¢1â€¢5 8 FLOCEWAY 3- 9 Fl,aSHED EÂ¥ RE an OF ASPEN EN,4*Â£-3 ceT â€ž-0 22 Â¥ 8/4 1 e 0 - W Â§ f - WEIN //ARANT â€¢IGH WATER LiE -4 2 2 0 OPEN SPACE e/ . 1 ..4 0 \2X . /)\0 4- 1 befhj + EN i \ 10024 <P p, 1 5 4340.n ~ lâ€¢CER WATER 42 Z 7 9 0 2* wOOD \ \\ \\ , 1r i ~ DECK ~ .3#- AP li / / PROPÂ©&61 7-\ ~ 1 APPITION. 24 -\ \\ B.10 1 lw// \ <-Zo // /1 04 m 53 e e Â®\ 2 h \ \\ / - \ i Wat~ 1 p~,0;,ogzbÂ·1 . ~> ,~4Â¢~ Â»POITION 74 41 V 9\\20. 4 4 SE. i &4?, ' 1 Acm,0 -/ r \ / if 71 - x ' , MA. ID<161'ING RESIDENCE 11 /1 4.. 94\,t, /0 , tlÂ«'Â« <~*Â« 3,9 - 11Â«1 4\4 z EF 44% W 71Â· /9 Â» i \. 1 4 9/ 1/ 7 1 .el j ? f 0 + PA/D CARING 1\ l A 4 3 9 c l. )/It f / YEL Cu i i f// /9<: /11 12707 21 p - 4 \ u j I t 1 1 /6 404 \04 0/ 7.,6. / - - - / LOT 17 1"ROPDBED 1 4:.14.1,6 \\th \ 1/7 4/' e - 77011 ' BLACK BIRCH LOT 4 ~ ~~i ~ ~~~<~~<~ i<f 18â€¢ f l cuL/Ell 1 f 4 4 3 % 1 0// 1 2 , E -*. /\4 2 / f/ & 5 3,5, O, I 4 / 9-=-Z-=- LOT 5 .fl 1 14 I / AREA. 0 9703 AC .' 2 ./. ORIVEr/ - 1 -t\.tr /2/,/ 42.265 SC FT..,- Al.1 Â¥E L CAP 11 / 2015t NOTE: PROPOSED ADD[TIONS SHOIAN ARE ADDITIONS TO THE BUILDING FOOTPRNT ONLÂ¥ 1 0-0 Al., ~ SITE PLAN . 1.â€¢ 101-0. ril.*pft . .:,1,1111.tt 'uÂ·,pdo:*0,piqou.mopd 10,91/.....Pd lip 00Â¥H0100'NNdSÂ¥ xxx 44 Pnceâ€¢P Mt,â€¢ru~Id 9L9616 (OU) XV,I 3AING 31.LnEI (lmi 01ZI .8 14 -,P Â¢9 9Â£66-Â£16(0Â£61 3NC*Id NOILIac[V aNV O".10.401 0 .....1/pir - 1 ' IDIR OGYMO'100 '17Â¥SVE Nnd adVOS(INV1 ~ o 01 IOZ B.UnS 'aN'rl nOW OIl v ~ 2,1 + 1831,Vqoâ€¢!med 10Â£ XO0 0 4 SNOILVWIa.LEIV NJ[ZVH -p...ank -005 toll-. 1 KLiNE ON)~01Â¥.11}E)1*A.100 m-- -P 3 . 6 . 2,1 1# 1 & P A 5: 5 1/ Al 1 81 -18 I m W g ./ 4 1 8 3 6 i 1 3 2 22 9** 9 2 935 3 1 1 , 01 l. 2/ 1 3/6 1 1%2 #Im t: 0 00.0 1 1 8 0,41 4\1\* 41 1 at -9 0 '.1 /kle-Â»1341-4 . 0 /---,16.-041*.1 . IN\\\ .,EN@r:Â·1*N e / 957Â· 1 .... 4%111% . .... 3. *itid:il?; N 91 1 1?4,1!R) \ a 'i/ 0 - il i 0- r,4421;r 1 +129 1 \ h 11,!'- / t. , t /9., I lk. Â·Â· Â· 0 4*MI:lly \ \ // Nty\, 14#IBIL ~!.11;Â£417 \ Â·N.'&!ilk!]lit, Â· ak'411, / 111 Ir, Y . 41%.- AL 941 1 0 91 4 *Â° 061--u / ~ 4 9!4' 1 0 . i. 1 1 e e f t\\47\11\ff l 1 r l 4- 2 11 XEU ee l Â» 1 7 1 L / -3 --- -- - - i 1 C., 7. & TEL SERVI CE KETER NV-lcd 3=MO F=: 9Ni<InG */219 ONY *1014 Crk, 3/~LerN ILIM 9/3 a=â€¢40..... 01 .... LOT AREA SUMMARY: Gross Lot Area 42,265.0 gsf Reductions: Lot Area Under Water - 4300.0 sf Slopes in Access of 30% - 4170.0 sf Slopes Between 20%-30% - 2135.0 sf x 50% = 1067.5 sf Subtotal - 9537.5 sf Net Lot Area 42,265.0 - 9537.5 - 32,727.5 sf Max. Allowable FAR~. sf for the first 15,000.0 sf of net lot area plus 6.0 sf of floor area for each additional 100.0 sf of net lot area 32,727.5 - 15,000.0 = 17,727.5/100.0 = 177.275 x 6.0 = 1063.65 Total Allowable FAR = 5563.65 sf FLOOR AREA SUMMARY: Maximum Allowable FAR = 5564.0 sf Existing FAR (per Mathis Drawings 1999) = 3999.0 sf (126.0 sf addition at Master not built) therefore Existing FAR = 3873.0 sf Remaining FAR = 5564.0 - 3873.0 = 1691.0 sf FAR Bonus for ADU = 625.0 sf/2 = 312.5 sf Total Remaining FAR = 1691.0 sf + 312.5 sf = 2003.5 sf PROPOSED ADDITIONS: A.D.U. (and Bridge): 695.0 sf Garage Addition: 625.0 sf Dining Room Addition: 169.0 sf Master Sitting Room Addition: 126.0 sf Master Closet Addition: 120.0 sf Master Office Addition: 244.5 sf Subtotal 1979.0 sf 2003.5 sf (Remaining FAR) is greater than 1919.0 sf (Proposed Additional FAR) - Me rub Fbno 01-110 -by- BR 4.17-01 S t=01 MIr= Review E~ f. patominobarth.:Â· :.t.Â·Â·Â·t. v P.O. BOX 301 1 74 MIDLAND AVENUE SUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS J*ked byÂ· XXX BASALT. COLORADO 8162! d- p.1.ed 4/12'01 PHONE 49-01 927.$976 AND ADDITION FLOOR AREA FAR FAX (9701 927-96-6 1210 RED BUITE DRIVE CALCUALTIONS ASPEN, COLORADO CCFYRIGHT PALOMINO BAR.TH PC 01410 VAR patomunob,t!<4â€¢cipri net 1-2{.. CAH 1 1 2,1 j 1 i 612_ _10132. 1 DO NOT SCAZ 0/U/1465 - 00:,t,Ct WL#Mt(X OR m46,Â·e# COICÂ·eRND,6 DISCÂ·ReFENGÂ·C5 OR Ilse,6 IN'ORMATION 2 COÂ»,4,9.â€¢r ,Â¢TH ALL_ Alâ€¢,LJOâ€¢IDLE BU,-I,46 CODES - Â»43 CCNPORM FITH /Alâ„¢IAL- All) Ea,FMENT MAN,PACTUIRmt, RECOHMeNDATONS 3. ALL D,ele,OHS TO r,<2 OP FRÂ»Â·1*46 \ItESS 'â€¢ 1~1~ TO 2 2,0.- ac UNUSS NOTED Cmellyet RereR 70 STMUCm.,K,L OR.â€¢â€¢râ€¢ M62~ 5 D.[TB=* -â€¢US TO BE 2,4 0 16- O.0 UNLESS NOTED On,ER,192 REP'51 TO STM,ICTURAL ORN,Â¥463 Am'~ ANDâ€¢wTee. C.Or,1 1 LU 7 COORDNATE JOIST PLA<,D,ENT ,Â·1-TH PUMB,46 ruglâ€¢KE 1,Â·ram 6Â£~POSel.LE JxN~ sâ„¢:,e Ale To Be 10. TWIL UPP99 L.evm. PUâ€¢18,46 STAO<S ARE TO BE C.eT IR,IN UNTL THEÂ¥ REALH THE C.HAr, SP.hee. 11 The /V,"092 01â€¢ THESE I,U,11â€¢65 IS OILI TO - aN'-Ble 01Â·1549!ONS Ne Se.ECT,0 FABRICATICN SR,PHICALLY DE,ICT I'le 6ENCNAL NA11.IRE Of THE FÂ©RK THE C,ONDOCTOR $ RESPONâ‚¬e.E FOR PROC25925 AND TECHN#aleS Or CONSTRUCTION THE ARGH[ECT AMD/OR E,46,42~ SHALL BE NOTIMED OF A NY Â¥,R,4710Â»7 PROM 01,48181(WES OR CONDIT~NES SHOr,4 IN THE DRAr*45 5 1\ J -44-~T.,PLY 9 / d 1 , - Â£ 74 1,7 0-TA.\ 2 1 MOOF ABOVE-\ li 4 'CiL/\ - : 1 1 1 1 Pil<2*1-4 i Egfital ; .. 1 1 *01 FE/*. t _Zi ArrUT- - I.%. -1 1 , . il-Â£~~ ieoao e. ==-- 1/ 0 /0 1 - (E) SAR- Pâ‚¬. 10 -O- 20 -C 1 12 -6- 0 01 10 01- MAN. PROPOSED LOINER LEVEL PLAN â€¢ 1/4Â·- 1 -<3, 1- PO. BOX 301 ~ ~. patominobarth.2..ra. 174 MIDLAND AVENUE SUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS SURM~~rr di-n by- BR jobm. 01.110 BASALT, COLORADO 8 ) 621 clecked b>: XXX dit Fc,led 4/1 201 PHONE (970~ 927-9976 AND ADDITION PROPOSED LOWER A2.1 FAX (9-0) 93%9676 1210 RED BUITE DRIVE LEVEL PLAN palominob,11*opnâ€¢.i,et ASPEN, COLORADO COPYRIGHT PALONCNO BARTH PC - 51-110 42.1 #40.1 "494' .W. 611 6ENERAL NOTES , 1 Dowâ€ž 9Â£.KEDâ€¢.D,Ots- Gar,)<T MI//A 1 i Â· 1 CCMFLY MTH ALL A-FLIC/BLE BULD,46 COOB ANI, CCNPOITM TITH MITDKIAL.ANI) EGa,râ€¢MBT 8-8 v= MNa,FACTZRBKS RECOAe,DATOIS 3. ~Ll. D,ee,Obe TO rAC2 Or PRÂ»4,46 VILESS ~I~m TO 81 2- â€¢ 16' O.C. UNLESS NOTED Onâ‚¬RreE REFÂ·~ TO .114,CTUR,~L PRA,069 5 DITERIOR ,-15 TO / 214 / 18' DC. IÂ»,LESS /NEn 6* MREPL,â€¢CE NOTED OTI~ REPS TO STRUCTURAL OR.â€¢r,hkSS 1~~~ ..c, â€¢~me. cMc..4 -7 COORD,LATE JOIST rLACe.eNT r,TH PUâ€¢18,46 MXTURE LAIOUT c.â€¢ST IRON ,Â»111- 71,2, IUr~i~, 7,41 Câ€¢Art- sPKE. 8. HOLD,â€¢U FLLÂ»48016 TRAPS M *16+4 M POSSIBILE c.00,0,#ATe râ‚¬T,4 C,e,ET ,â€¢cceSSOM=. 4 NO VENT OR PL.-5,46 ST,hae â€¢4EE TO Be C LOCATED H FARTY RALL.S 10. THE 0Â¥ER LEveL PUÂ»Â·18816 STACKS A RE TO Be %2Â£22Na ~ 11 THE Fâ€¢URPOSE OF THESE DRAI-469 5 ONLY TO 5QQM ,â€¢6 REARRED AT TEn POOR CONPR-46 D,leNS,Ole,ND Sa_ECT,16 FACRICATION EnellhkS DECK - ADD LAheNS E,CST. â€¢~POIA RE)â€¢OVE 7 MAI GH ber (Â«f/-- Lt 6RAP,Â«C~.L.Â·r DOâ€¢/T THE eeN~.1. N.m.2 OF THE MORK THE CONTR,CTOR 5 RESPCÂ»eeLE POR PROM MASTER *11-nNe fOOM ~ ANÂ¥ VALATION -0,4 AMeâ€¢SICNS OR CO,omale FROCESSISAND TECHHIGIES OF CONSâ„¢UCÂ·nON THE A T. Per . I,ID,rrECT AND/OR 546,42, SHALL BE NOTIFED OF AND INFLL 45 REGP 040114 N THE DRA-46& 9.- EKal-UMNQ 6Â£221 FHALF *L- EeT. pooRs 7 . A A :=:-:i:-=:=:====12:-Gn---------~---- ~HÂ«ZE' DC)OR I her, IRON HÂ»,;RAU.7 .r.=~,2 *.* U,6/Llywt/OUK TO REMAIN W 7, 1 Sk 1 1 - .1.- 7 t,0571,8 -1/1.-k*--*.I'--CEETIL J / .F==1 BEREQB 220& / e-#,291.(.17 - -MER 8-AL STAIR To - Eks- py</0/.,195 MeTER 1 223[i W I VEN ST-~ I V 1 '-4 OFFICE UP.TAI,e /fi'.3244-242. Ill'./9-/2..Ill/-. 10 MÂ¤N-2NNe-EQ21 E- heN .ARCHAAÂ¥ Tly. h~,~,~~~ ~.....1 he. râ€¢INCPO~ , AL AILWQI'~E<,igge,.M i / /< LL / A j 31101 ~ &/2/ky/Â£_8010/1 , i ..JZIVA./../1 - 1 ~~~ Â·1 44 I i y Fv i IN -Â·4Â·&2#6,- 1 -bl\J.113 1 fj-AL ~ 4 744- 1 4 0: D 4 8 L LOGATO' 0,2 'el MAST!DR OFFkCE ~~ f 4-J 11 222ffi-/glk,Ofil 07 13-5, r./ 8221 L J. T. EXIST. PLY 1 - ~~.~~~ REF '~~~ , F--irly- Â¥ 77 It h, 11 0 11 - * 1 In mis) 9 Â·Â· 11 . . 94 ,====1 B ....il n.1.0. ./ f / . 2 ME11-MAZIER M A am <) T ..1 11 1. A T. PLY 9 V L., _ 1, 81 <74 4 -0- 1 5., 3'-6 1 1':r-c- 3'-O- 15Â·-C PROPOSED PARTIAL UPPER LEVEL PLAN 1 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL PLAN â€¢ 1/4â€¢ 1 -0 2/ 0 1/4â€¢ 1 -0 024 5 - â‚¬12: reaâ€ž*. job w 01- 110 ~~2~~palominob=Â·th:Â·i.â€ž:t:Â·c: 3.Â· P.O BOX 301 ~ 17Â·,MULANDAVENUESUITE 205 HAZEN ALTERATIONS 4/ 17/01 PERACIT SUBMIT dr-n by BR cl~ckal byÂ· XXX BASALT. COLORADO 81621 Niz muled 4/12/01 AND ADDITION ~~~~~11 '~ PHONE 1970"927-9776 PROPOSED #4IN X2.2 < FAX (rO) 92*-9676 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE LEVEL PLAN / pell.unohard<Abopris net ASPEN, COLORADO COPYRJGHT PAIOMINOBARTH PC 01-110 Ai., . ... .. I . .. - I . .. -- --- . AA - -*. .. .....B,).................................. ... . 1-Il . 2 - : ...il.lililimailillialli . .,. airilim . - W ..... il~ .1=1 2 ..2 - .. . .... - 1- . . I .. . :L .~mih.- ...............6 --- ..,:.=gge,zez,=i.:=fri,Â£6741#E#ir#Â£.624!614'-'0~.~ar*.'--=-- -.--.---.---..........ditifififitif~~ili~FRA:: ....1.1,11".11*J'-filimpillialip""919'=1",-ip-~11,MIF"0::14 mmaitzes,zeze,emi"Ii:'081'mi,imm:*- 1 N.** . liallimililli""MI'll"Il[*Ill 1 ./IMI'llwal.lami lilli -mmezezezemem.~ ....... 1.1.1.1.11= ------------~-~--~ . . 0 2,",1,11:en::I'll'Il':4:27'1:--r'"Ilim:ilig.i:I:'01:2ili&'illaili~ -..... -mot./IM imilii/IMMI---.illillillilll - 4.1 .:.-k-/.Imi . . --,1,11~:lili~ -6.re~ miilimillillillllilllilluillilliilllillimilill 2. I - ... , A Pals:'..10 â€¢ ari c.m . ID. . Â¥%0#hE . 1.11 0 .1. A , 0 ..... . Â· Â· Â·Â· .. ..: 1 4. 4 4 â‚¬ b -4 - A/07- 5 eâ€¢1/Att MEMORANDUM f To: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Appl) canAl THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 41-kda,un Joyce Ohison, Deputy Director..j40 FROM: Steve Clay, Planner gj RE: 1210 Red Butte Dr. Stream Margin Review, Resolution No. ?3, Series of 2001. -PUBLIC HEARING DATE: July 17,2001 APPLICANT Brian L. Hazen REPRESENTATIVE Jack Palomino/ Palomino Barth Architectes PARCEL & LEGAL ID 2735-013-16005 Lot 5, Gaylord Subdivision ADDRESS 1210 Red Butte Dr. Aspen, Co ZONING R30 PUD CURRENT LAND USE Single Family Residential PROPOSED LAND USE Single Family Residential REQUESTED ACTION > Stream Margin Review SUMMARY: The property is located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area at 1210 Red Butte Drive along the Roaring Fork River. The applicant is requesting approval of a Stream Margin Review. The applicant is proposing an accessory dwelling unit (ADU), alterations and additions to the existing single-family dwelling. See attached plans Furthermore, the applicant requests an exemption from the definition of a linked pavilion to achieve a FAR bonus for the ADU. There is no process in the Land Use Code to allow an exemption from a definition. Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission not act upon this and the applicant should follow the proper procedure, which is to request an official interpretation by the Community Development Director. Floor Area Summary (Based on the applicants submittal) Total allowable FAR = 5563.65 Maximum Allowable FAR = 5563.65 sf Existing FAR = 3873.0 sf Remaining FAR = 1691.0 sf FAR Bonus for ADU *(pending approval) = 625.0 sf/2 = 312.5 sf Total Remaining FAR w/bonus = 2003.5 sf Proposed Additions: ADU (and Bridge): 695.0 sf Garage Addition: 625.0 sf Dining Room Addition: 169.0 sf Master Sitting Room Addition: 126.0 sf Master Closet Addition: 120.0 sf Master Office Addition: 244.5 sf Subtotal 1979.5 sf The proposed ADU, above the garage, will be attached to the existing single-family structure by a bridge: See attachment page A3.1. The applicant states that an employee of theirs will be living in the additional dwelling unit and will need to have direct access to the existing structure. Also, the applicant is willing to make this a lock-off unit if necessary. The proposed ADU, by definition per Section 26.575.010 (7), is a linked pavilion as stated below: Linked Pavilion: Any element linking the principal structure to an accessory structure shall not be included in the calculation offloor area provided that the linking structure is no more than one (1) story tall, six (6) feet wide and ten (10) feet long. Areas of linking structures in excess of ten feet in length shall be counted in floor area. The applicant requests to be exempt from the definition of a linked pavilion. Approval of that exemption, as noted above, could then make it a detached ADU allowing a Floor Area Bonus per the definition of the Detached ADU FAR Bonus, Land Use Code Section 26.575.010 (6) b as stated below: Detached ADU Floor Area Bonus Fifty (50) percent of the net livable square footage of an ADU which is detached from the primary residence by a distance of no less than ten (10) feet and which is housed in a structure with a footprint of no more than 625 square feet shall be excluded from the calculation Of Floor Area. 2 000000 00000 The ADU includes a door leading to a "bridge" on the 2nd floor door of the main house. Staff feels this is inappropriate because a main door to the ADU is provided via the 1St floor with a stairway up to the ADU. The process for a connecting door to the main house is handled by Special Review. This hearing was not legally noticed for such action. Stream Margin Review Areas located within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one-hundred-year floodplain where it extends one hundred (100) feet from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within a flood hazard area (stream margin). Development in these areas shall be subject to heightened review so as to reduce and prevent property loss by flood while ensuring the natural and unimpeded flow of watercourses. Review shall encourage development and land uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural features. 26.435.040 C Stream Margin Review Standards states: No development shall be permitted within the Stream Margin unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development, which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area, will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and 9 Staff Finding: Per the submitted plans, there will not be any development in thejloodway for the proposed development. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Rearing Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and, + Staff Finding Per the submitted plans staff does not foresee any impacts regarding this requirement. The Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan recommendations are being met and implemented to the greatest extent possible and a fisherman's easement granting public Jishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course 3 shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement," per the conditions of approval. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barrieaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans, there will not be any disturbance of vegetation outside of the building envelope. The building envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certijicate of Occupancy. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and > Staff Finding The proposed development will not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a sittfence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review, and approval, prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans no development is proposed that will require written notijication to the Colorado water conservation board due to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and 9 Staff Finding No development is proposed which will alter or relocate any or all existing water courses. In the extent a watercourse is altered, a guarantee is provided and applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. 4 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain; and > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans, no development is proposed which will require federal and state permits relating to work within the one-hundred-year floodplain. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability; and > Staff Finding Per the submitted plans there will not be any development within the required 15 feet from the top of slope. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020; and > Staff Finding All development is outside the 15-foot setback from the top of slope and does not exceed the height delineated by a line drawn at a 45-degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. 10. A landscape plan is submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side to native riparian vegetation; and > Staff Finding A landscape plan was submitted and no new plantings are proposed outside of the design noted building envelope on the riverside. 11. All exterior lighting is low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150; and 9 Staff Finding The applicant shall comply with all exterior lighting and all design criteria and submit a lighting plan with the Building Permit application. 5 12. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer are submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level; and 9 Staff Finding Site sections were submitted as drawn by Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. that shows all existing and proposed site elements. 13. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. > Staff Finding A site plan has been submitted that identifies the riparian zone. Staff Recommendations Staff recommends approval for the Stream Margin Review for the proposed alterations and additions to the existing single-family dwelling finding that the criteria per Section 26.435.040 C, Stream Margin Review Standards has been met, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. Recommended Motions "I move to approve Resolution No. 32 , (Series of 2001) for a Stream Margin Review for a property located in an Environmentally Sensitive Area at 1210 Red Butte Drive Lot 5, of the Gaylord Subdivision along the Roaring Fork River." ATTACHMENTS: PalominoBarth Architects design drawings: Al.0 - Information sheet Al.1 - Site Plan Al.2 - Landscape Plan FAR - Floor Area Calculation A2.1 - Proposed Lower Level Plan A2.2 - Proposed Main Level Plan A3.1 - Exterior Elevations 6 0000000 RESOLUTION NO. ~ ~ , SERIES OF 2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A REQUEST FOR A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1210 RED BUTTE DRIVE; LOT 5, GAYLORD SUBDIVISION Parcel ID: 2735-013-16005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Applicant, Brian L. Hazen represented by Jack Palomino/Palomino Barth Architects, requesting a Stream Margin Review approval, for the residence located at 1210 Red Butte Dr. Aspen, CO; and WHEREAS pursuant to Section 26.212, the Planning and Zoning Commission may review and approve the Stream Margin Review Application; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Department recommends approval for the Stream Margin Review; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on July 17,2001; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved, by a vote of to (, ) for the Stream Margin Review; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this - ---- Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO ON THE 17th DAY OF JULY, 2001, THAT: Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Stream Margin Review subject to the following conditions: 1. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman' s Easement;" unless one already exists; and 2. No vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be barricaded prior to issuance of any demolition, excavation or building permits. The barricades shall remain in place until the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy; and 3. The proposed development shall not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction and a silt fence shall be placed along the riverside of the building envelope. A drainage plan shall be submitted to the engineering department for review prior to construction. 4. A written notice shall be given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and a copy of said notice shall be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. 5. A Landscape plan shall submitted with all development applications to the Parks Department for review. Such plan shall limit new plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the riverside to native riparian vegetation. 6. All exterior lighting shall be low and downeast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26.575.150. 7. A lighting plan shall be submitted with the Building Permit application. Section 2 All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Approved by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 17th, 2001. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: City Attorney Jasmine Tygre, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk DRC Stream Margin Review Ref: 1210 Red Butte Drive, Aspen Date: July 16, 2001 Reference Document: 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 1) Section C, Paragraph 12 requires the Top of Slope to be shown accurately on the drawing. On this survey the top of slope cannot be in front of the 100 year flood plane. 2) A section of both B and C is required on drawing NO Al.1 to illustrate that that the proposed structure fall s within the 45 degree plane line 1 (30