The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.616 E Hyman Ave.0012.2013.ASLUF \=/ 0012.2013. ASLU 616 HyMAN AVE f GMQS - COMM DESIGN REVIEW FINAL 2737 182 12 005 f 03Â» 9-9-4 R THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0012.2013.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBERS 273718212005 PROJECTS ADDRESS 616 E HYMAN PLANNER JENNIFER PHELAN CASE DESCRIPTION GMQS FINAL COMM DESIGN REVIEW REPRESENTATIVE HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC DATE OF FINAL ACTION 4.11.13 CLOSED BY DJAMA MARTIN ON: 03/11/2014 2-73-7- 15,2- /2-000 06 12Â· 20 1 6 Â· 45 L,Li~ - 9-J u Peffnits I z.= : E~ 1-LS",1 ~ fi'e Edit Record Navigate FQrm Repons Format Iab Help ~ ~ i m :g K + U 4 {-4 ~ M 4 + 3 2 0 . B i 0 81 lump 1 1~ liu',01 ~ ' 11 41 2 J -91 3 +013 4 t I : Routing Status Feei Fee Summarl ~*Actions Attachments Routing History Yaluation Arch/Eng Custom Fields Sub j ? ) 1 Permit type aslu Aspen Land Use Permit # 0012 2013.ASLU Address 616 E HYMAN AVE Apt/Suite City ASPEN State ~CO ~ Zip 81611 w Permit Information D Master permit Routing queue aslu07 Applied 02/15./2013 C t F Projed Statlls pending -Approved Z 0:% :% m Description APPLICATION FOR THE GULFCO BUILDING - GMQS ALLOTMENT COMMERCIAL Issued /0 DESIGN REVIEW FINAL Closed/Final 1 .1 1 Submitted |HAAS LAND PLANNING. LLC ~ Clock ~Running | Days ~-0~ Expires |02,;10/2014 LI ~ : Last name FURNGULF LTD FIrst name 616 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN CO 81611 Phone (} - Address 2 Applicant E Contractor is applicant? , Â® Owneris applicant? Â» i i Last name FURNGULF LTD First name 1 616 E HYMAN AVE ~ i ~ ASPEN CO 81611 1 Phone li ) - |Cust# |25194 1 Addrpx = ' 1 Last name ~ First name 1 ~ Phone |< 1 - Address 4 W AspenGoldS (server) angeles 1 Oil. ..:F 02- 42 4/65 Â«03<.fÂ¥EK A-v~N*.4- To g 05,70 0 Â·00 * 0114. r2â‚¬.-a-pk 3 3 fi L oqloo..1_| ~ sdnolo Clt@_I_~ ---" " -: 1 DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, 'Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. Furngulf LLP., 616 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots N and O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, commonly known as 616 E. Hyman Ave. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Review approvals to expand and remodel a mixed-use building containing one residential dwelling unit and net leasable commercial space. . Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Resolution No. 9 (series of 2018), P&Z Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 11,2013 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) April 12.2016 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 11 th day of April, 2013, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. 42 Chris Bendon, Community Development Director fi AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: wrE 9 4 0 buy-6 44 Aspen, CO b Ib G . 0/klk d STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) L\34,&_U EL/6 A-RAEABRO-1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) or Section 26.306.010 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: l/~ publication ofilotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 'f<toR,1 6 .-9,ic),AUL il h The fWegoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this ~2 day of >'Vt'*lioU/9 , 1OIi, by ~ Â»(14(4 919Â£) 4 Â«-5 4640-1 . 0 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE My commission expires: O.lcd l IP Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and Log-k #14 9.b.-63Â¥-- - the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City 01 Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- Notary Public ing to the following described property: Lots N and 0, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen and more commonly known as 616 E. Hyman Ave, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, by order of the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 2, 2013 via Resolu- lion 9 (Series of 2013). For further information contact Jennifer Phelan, at the City of Aspen ATTACHMENTS: Community Development Dept. 130 S. Gatena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. s/ City of Aspen COPY OF THE PUBLICATION Publish in The Aspen Times on January 16, 2014. [98709041 D dpet 03 4-5*ct lo/c 4LL ASPa 42 hz>t- a -*P RESOLUTION NO. 9 (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION CONSISTING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 616 E HYMAN AVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS N & O, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 273718212005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP. represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Conceptual Commercial Design Review to remodel the existing building and add a third floor addition for a project that will include a mix of commercial space and free-market residential; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended the Applicant amend the proposal to better comply with the Commercial Design Standards with regard to height and for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 16, 2012 and th continued to October 30 , the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012, by a six to one (6 -1) vote, approving Conceptual Commercial Design Review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Final Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Reviews for the previously described project; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended to approve the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, RECEPTION#: 599325, 05/08/2013 at 11:21:18 AM, Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 1 OF 23, R $121.00 Doc Code Page 1 of 7 RESOLUTION Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the following land use reviews with conditions: A. Final Commercial Design Review. Any building permit application for the redevelopment of the site shall be for a building that substantially duplicates the representations made before the Planning and Zoning Commission and included as Exhibit 1 of this resolution. All underlying dimensional requirements, except for height and trash/utility/recycling areas, shall be met and verified at building permit submission per Exhibit 2. Prior to building permit application, applicant shall amend the floor plans to include an airlock entry for each tenant space entry (but not a common entry) or provide a comparable measure for heat loss prevention acceptable to the Building Department. Roof mechanical shall be grouped and screened together on the roof. B. Special Review. A reduction in size of the trash/utility/recycling is permitted to be reduced to the dimensions and layout shown in Exhibit 3 of this resolution. The area shall solely be used for trash and recycling purposes. C. Growth Management Reviews. The growth management reviews for Expansion or New Commercial Development, New Free-Market Residential Units within a Multi-family or Mixed-use Project, and Affordable Housing are approved. This permits an increase of net leasable commercial and office space on site, not to exceed 580 sq. ft., and the development of one free-market residential unit of up to 2,500 sq. ft. of net livable area. The proposed net livable size of the residential dwelling of over 2,000 sq. ft. requires the extinguishment of a historic TDR prior to the issuance of a building permit These approvals permit the remodel and redevelopment of a three story mixed-use building containing net leasable commercial and office space and one free-market residential unit with a maximum building height of 38 feet and a 430 sq. ft public amenity space. Section 2: Building Permit Application Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 2 0 f 7 The Applicant, the Applicant's General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission requirements, the requirements of this Resolution, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following as applicable: A. A copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission resolutions approving the project. B. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. C. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. D. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. E. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. F. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. G. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. H. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 3: Affordable Housing. As represented, the proposal expands the net leasable commercial and office space by 580 sq. ft. and creates a new free-market residential unit (represented at 2,479 sq. ft of net livable area). Based upon these numbers, the affordable housing mitigation required for this project is 2.71 FTEs at a Category 4 level, which are approved to be mitigated with Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. The applicant may mitigate at a lower Category level by converting the category designation of the credit pursuant to the Land Use Code. Final net leasable and net livable numbers, as well as the mitigation required, shall be verified at building permit Certificates of Affordable Housing shall be extinguished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the subject project. Section 4: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 3 of 7 Section 5: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Section 6: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City o f Aspen standards. Section 7: Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru an oil and sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to building permit. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area of concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). Any glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines and within 3 feet vertically below an ACSD main sewer line. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 4 of 7 Section 8: Environmental Health ' The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regards to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements and noise abatement. Wildlife protection/enclosures for the trash and recycle area is required. Section 9: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City' s Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 10: Parks Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW - requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. Parks is concerned with any improvements to the sidewalk area. The applicant has indicated that the existing street tree planting is to remain in place. Careful consideration to the location and installation o f utilities will determine the success of this desire. Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal, the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20, this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the refiew of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan Â· indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage o f construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in ChÂ®ter 13.20 Section 11: Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. Section 12: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to this resolution shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the development order. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 5 of 7 No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this resolution, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots N and O, City and Townsite of Aspen and commonly known as 616 E. Hyman. Section 13: Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are appended hereto and are, by references made to them, incorporated into this resolution as if fully set forth herein: â€¢ Exhibit 1 - Schematie elevations, square footages and floor plans â€¢ Exhibit 2 - C-1 Zone district standards â€¢ Exhibit 3 - Approved trash and utility area Section 14: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 15: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the resolutions repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior Resolutions. Section 16: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional iii a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd day of April, 2013. Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 6 of 7 APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: 7 1 /9 / -/ AC, o A f - Â» t.ljÂ»j p- - .,.0-- T- 1 ~.j Â£- Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney U Erdpamer, Chair Â£-,In Wztter sekelol, \/1 co Cheri r ATTEST: <4-.44%20 24 ?X724$~ Uckie Lothian, Deputy City CIerk U Resolution No. 9, Series 2013 Page 7 of 7 NOIE: ALL EXISTING ON-SITE VEGETATION IS TO REMAIN NOTE: ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ASSOCIATED LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND/ OR REPLACED TO THE EXTENT AND IN THE MANNER , 22 -2 14" , REQUIRED BY THE PARKS AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ' 1 - 4%>sÂ·<It W / 1 \0499 *AA:h 24\~\~t~~~4~4 .. k< I \ Â«Â«\\ PROPOSED b 1 \ I \ PARKING | - EXISTING h SPACE (HC) 1 - PLANIER IPUBLIC AMENITY \114\44~ Z b Â» 1 iliÂ·,i:~'I Il 41\\444~~huv.il.%49491 Â» 11111111'i:. 11.1- - 11 ?:i,i '!1 it--1 I ' iii 1.- i 4 Â«040~~1419Â»44 ~ ~ '' 1__' l.'i; _.. , -4--499Â«96Â» \0\\\\ 1\ N\ 14\ \ IN . .4 l. * 4 > li ' . / 1 RAMP j SLOPE: 1 TO 12 hA#A:*3.0 :6 7 ..i . 9943Â« ' ~. N \\t~ \ \1944 1 1.\\44\ \ 1\ \46 41.-2\ZA~ ~#44~~~*~431~1.,MA4p~.1.,. \NÂ»Â»19Â«\Â«\ \\ 4 \\ 1 \ #4:V.1 k Â» 3Â§)Â«4 0\ \ PROPO ; = %21 . \ \A 3. I 3 4 1 - 1 LILI : \ \ 1 49Â». I - \6 \I\ SERVICE YARD ~ 0 1 60 < 9 :. i \ --1----- ~0<FF*~<,4*~1 xÂ»i~RddA~&124,4.<~ - 7-9- 1 \ 44\ 4 N.\\ OAN\,% 1 . h \ \\\04 111 -' 14#*LS**:b#Tee#AUILDING,\1 FPRINT <>Â« 4 ilÂ«**pri Â»4661 . Â»Â«2404 INÂ¢i:ciAANd#'FROUÂ».**~~ ~ 61\ 1 \2\ \ \ 4\ 1 EXISTINGTORROP.OSED) 1 PROPOSED , -1499Â«99Â«44Â«99Â«Â»44Â« BULDING I 91\91 4 9\ 1 / \I PARKING 20 ABOVE} 6 1 1 11 446\864 . 6 PROPOSED 1 04 4 PARKING I Ex:) SPECES T.BD 1 I :pxÂ«Â»444>jgq**4*34#A/M:$~T+C~/ #34Â«F-~ Â« ~ PROPOSED I PARKING I - 41 1~11 : - \\41~~#p*~~~~AftÂ»~\. \\:\\NaÂ© 1 1.61\44Â«Â»~Â«\Â«Â«Â«~Â».14\4~\Â»11: I 13 PROPERTY LINE -I- , 17-7 1/7 & 7' -41/2' â€ž~- PROPERTY LINE 20 0 4 51 100' - 0" / 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 8161 I poss Â©2012 IigN. 2/15/2013 A5 SCHEMA TIC DESIGN: SITE PLAN 16 GO5 â€žâ€ž .AlÂ» STRE[T eo~DRA Do .1.1, 6-0.' 1 N wv , *L- 49.9 HYMAN AVENUE PROPOSED: NEW WALLS SHOWN IN GRAY) PV 1 PROPOSED NEW ELEVATOR \ 2 4 11 , / 222232+242jt/_ L 1- E--------- ----1 ~ 1/ 1 EXISING 1 1 ATRIUM I OPEN TO ABOVE) 1 EXISTING Â® COMMERCIAL 1 1 1 - - PROPOSED: NEW CORRIDOR/ SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS 1 53 00 mi liu EXISTING ' COMMON BANWROOM 1Â« 7 IL 1 1 EXISTING COMMON BATHROOM JmÂ®CI 4 EXISTING/NEW MECHANICAL 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE A5PEN. COLORADO 8 T 611 poss i'-: I Â·~~ '. ' ' '''r '' Â£'5 ._ , 1 . -u..'=I SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL 077= 0,12 2/15/2013 A6 603 EAST MAIN ST~EET A&~EN. COtORADO MI 16 " "G/926 41,3 (. 97."" 2.30 ) PROPOSED: NEW WALLS (SHOWN IN GRAY) ~ PROPOSED NEW ELEVATOR ---- / - 9 1 UP----------f/Â«ON Ll '/ ELEV. EQUIP, \ PROPOSED I i ROOM PARKING 2 . 1 . (MC) r \. 1 Eff PROPOSED i N EXISTING'' ~ 1 I PLANTER ATRIUM {OPEN TO ABOVE (PUBLIC AMENITY 1 ~7*ID BELOW] | \ COMMERCIAL 71-Al lili [i )14'j' uNHNI[th TE ill-1 H IN 1-:IN~!-ill Ild! 2 37 1 1 - i:,1 ID!.: 1 1,4 1~111Â§'.Ill *LIt: 01 .... in cm n RAMP SLOPE: m 1 N 1:!2 , Un=/1121% PROPOSED NEW CORRIDOR/ 1 SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS ~ / I 1 L J 1--- 1 -Â· i T ALLEY ' SERVICE AREA 1 - b 1 20 PROPOSED â€¢ PROPOSED ; COMMON i COMMON I - RESTROOM 5 RESTROOM .1.~ r Ii" 1 r MECH SHAFT 1 41-3 1 PARKING , 3 a 8 Â® 0 1 j C~E~L , 4 42 1 ~ PROPOSED | . PARINIG 1 C.1 1 1 30 1 11- 1 1 PROPOSED | FIRING I Â£ :10 1 1 & - - PROPOSED: NEW WINDOW j 01 li * 616 E. HYMAN RED~ELOPMENT 616 E HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 ' S CHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSED LEVEL 1 voss .1 ,./ i , 37-f--1 2 Â© 2017 Z~%1 2/15/2013 A7 t8LOR,Co 81 16 PROPOSEDÂ· NEW ELEVATOR 1 PROPOSED. NEW WALLS PROPOSED: ENTRY VEST;BRE < (SHOWN IN GRAY) m ~ & STAJR TO RESIDENCE 1 11 'EXISTING / ATRIUM /- (OPEN TO BELOW) / 1 1 - \ - JANITOR PROPOSED CLOSET COMMERCIAL - 4---1 7 1-~11 3 -/ 1 / \ FL PROPOSED: NEWCORRIDOR/ ~-- ~ hs sEcoN~-~~~soFEGRESS 1 I 3 PROPOSED PROPOSED Of - ALLCY RESTROOM RESTROOM - PEZE==2 13 - MECH. SHAFT / COMMERCIAL 9 Â® PROPOSED Â® I --- 1 1 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN COLORADO 816lt SCHEMAT!C DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSEDLEVEL 2 poss 0 7-1--n 1 0 2012 =&=6 2/15/2013 A8 t 0~DaA00 8,611 16 'C (T} 970"" 47SS " I 970/970 20&~ H Z r--- PROPOSED: NEW ELEVATOR W/ PRIVATE L ~ KEY CODE ACCESS TO PENTHOUSE / 11 1 0 11. 0/ 40 11 3/4" Â· - I : '-- 16' - 5 3/4 Ro; ) 8'-6 I I 7'-41/T , 4 1 1 t b- DN GLASS GUARDRAIL - 1 0 I lIT- /-SCREENED WALL DN 4 IND ROOF) 13-0 13'-113/4" | , 4 4- 1 1 ---/ 0 4 JE 0 PROPOSED Â¤ PROPOSED F MECHANICAL Â¤ RESIDENTIAL 0 - )1 0 ---1 - O 1---1-- 1==I j PROPOSED:SCREEN ,- -. - -.-.-- , . 11>4\- CANOPYABOVE 1.,IECH. SHAR . ,/ 5 0 , 7' - 4 5/2 ~, (SUPPORT COLUMNS SHOWN) -.-:=~Â· ~.. 2 --,-_ __ -_ Â·- ~~ - --- PRC,POSED---- 6 [ECK . =7 1 ,:71 141- - U -1----- 1 \. 1 / GLASS GUARDRAI 0 0 | ROOF/ PLANTER ~ 1 1 1 , 13'- 0' 13' - 11 31 r 4 , , 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81 61 1 SCHEMA TIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSED LEVEL 3 poss Mile-it /20tZ E=== 2/15/20 i 3 A9 0 4 8 16 Bo! EAST MAIN :Tâ€žâ€ž *M C010nA00 .1811 7 4/./Â» i 1 %1~11'111 ' 11 1~. ~,1~11~ .11 F 445\V><CRy >9 ' V. . L.b. >i>Â«,6. 24>90' -Â·.2.* fifft<Â·44~rf'tfÂ»9~~28.xuf 4t9*,w,i'T'*T ~ ~ >CY., 2%Â»004 X> 7 7. A>. 0 7 'A, /AA /~ A /7 >'24 V>,X><1>4><><90 " .><./.>1Â» jiti, >Â·'*PRX<~c><Â»Â».V>0<X>0 7>11,1210$341Ltlp,)i,Ji / , >ffÂ«Â·Â» 4141 1 x **ty,AX*<424 7<2 INfERIOR CEILING.19 /1\/-~ \- jif>> th. ': 1!I '1111,111' y./ 4~11 43/ 20> ~HEIGAT 11'3632.3 /4\29 u, X<>02 4 j'l!111'111' / 7 'A .3.2. X , 1 â€ž 1 ~27.44 ,\,4, -SCREENCANOPY AkÂ» I. 92Â·Ox/, Â·>8?4' >0~2 .>~A X.>L y/>56 :3<... ,:'Aj '|!'1,1 1,11.1' i / ...//9 y 9 ..P#.5 . ; 3#r//6Â« ~' 2.L )3 1! ~111 1111 '1 /: / 1 2 / A 't>t\ f.><>4>73<41\/ /Ftit/1>99~:/1,43~ '1 i. .. .234362 /2:Xoil<+14'Y, B EQUIP. 1, SPACE ' ~ ./ lilli ~ ~4.4 </,Â·3?,<42x . 7..9*: xxÂ·, Â«,\, 111,11111 lilli 11 HYMAN AVENUE & ALLE>( Y ~~ ' /1 1 1 Â»f'~j 2 ./ t. i#Â»1411< 0 li Â· ::!m.,1:!~~ill -DECK RAILING 1 1 \ XI 11 lili lilli 1, /1 170. 1* :: IN U ' 1 11 11 1 1 hi Pri. . .111 /fl EiGHT: O'-0' / / 1 1/ // %1\16 / ./ // /7 / . 1 If 11 /1 1 Il 1 1,?111 1 -2_ __LILI ~ ROOF PLAN LA107 "..le 100'Â·or 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 j ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Â© SCHEMATIC DESIGN : ROOF PLAN A10 0 201, mmM'Nigi,I 2/15/2013 NORTH <3~ -CHIMNE.(BEYONDI -SCREENCANOPY -6....LING - 1 7/ I TO PARAP' A TO PARAP. 6 H J 'P EL 136B 1 11 / ~Ulao f 'li ~ PARAPET I e 1 *, E M - STOREFRONT AWNINGS :a . / HYMAN AVENUE ALLEY - .G 12 gi - A. n.lie~ ~L~1~~ ...41 -L-:ff,h-f:11:115 11 -1 ,-fl bg Â¥=inm T- -- -472*,li-~LÂ« 3~/4-dia)=4*rm*40*CÂ»Â«14 4 FS-4./.-- I- i -,21-1' 94 1 -111-454 1=IÂ©-1 -17--lp /h BUILDING SECTION i A 1 1 , '.8.-1 . 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DOSS ARCHITECTUREÂ·I PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS Al 1 mm j "3 47"m 970 ' "U ~180 . 2013 IL.W.u/. 2/15/2013 SCREENCANOPY -CHIMNEY'EYOND) 0 0- . '01.... E-GLASSRAIL.. I EL ] 38,0 BIL 1 . ./ 2 1 PARAPET h /1 19 IM M - STOREFRONT AWNINGS i i. / HYMAN AVENUE ALLEY Â· 4 g 1 0 r F LE'Fl 1 EL. looe 1.1 -- -1 /11 Â£ 6 1*~4.11. |,13,-9=-1*fl/3 -- 1 -Â· 3*IRk: -[-T I' - Ir -ll=rit ir.,1 I 11= 11,4 4 ,=(851'h" i U J R I 04Â£'~ .0 %2*1= R M 1- I.dill il-+41 ITT--2-,i 1 Th/Il; i~~4*4 REM Il- --' '., ' ,' ,Â·. i -IiÂ»i,77'i 'DI=mve/-2/Uâ€¢, 'V T'-â€¢1-'Â·r94-i ,: ,]L,i.,L*-._~21-;:F~'~I-:i, ~~,~~~~~~~ '~:.I~-L'#~-" ' ~9*4 iR~*Etki*i ~ 11'., 'i' Le'Â«-rE' '47-,A=grv,-.i ,I l, ~,~~~~ , ' '''l 1~27.-,U~'~41 - 1 2 -i r F iT .li.p~'7 trI t ( ~(**LT; i 'â€ž'4b' 6 'i,1'-Â» J= F,' 13' Wi= '1 I,-2'ui: '.ELÂ¥a ,:,Il~-IL~ 1-$,1:,ml.-~lf|.16 "i-' i,=~GJÂ©I~~~9~~~i~|='Â·~it-'i~FA*fts-~4~1-JI: ,~'~~4~~~4~-=~IItAF',I~-li,~,~~<h*44Â®'llipp-J~tkff4*P~Fk~*t[-Â«4,4 ~~t#*it I'~,~i~I li I ~~,~4=aF,F* F ~Â©1'~r~~r ,~-1 y ~-1=fl':23.T ~~~AI'~ 5il, 1-, IU:411'llUES,( ~;~~Pl'Ir~ ~,fi,~I,~.~~~~3~~I,~~~~~,~tijJkh-' 11 ,'-t~,f~ ~-1n+0I~~~Â¤~;_t~I~~~~~ ~~T~--d~*Â®~111'~PJ,-S,li"~~E-~ti â€ž--'u~r-f--4kg 4*u#r lii~ii,i':i~ 0~~btrl6 *'Ste?4-~19.-1 - 1- 1- I,Tze---,Ilk, r :~ 'i[Â¥*,' I - - -1- 19-4.-,1 1116-*41.- 19*4-flq'' 4!trER :*td'PT 111.-IN#1 =imT~-iZA"ir-', - 1- 1-1-1 -1--14831.il',i~t.,4~-'- 1~Â·-~'=,2,- - I. It 't#-1--i,0~11- ' #4Â·. 3, -' -' i. liz-1--LU-Z=23Â» rn BUILDING SECTION / All j --I' 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E.HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN,COLORAD081611 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS A12 â‚¬) 200 122~5Â°~~04./ 2/15/2013 ..1 (DNUSIX3I EXISTING OutDING 610 E. HYMAN p 1 + TO ~ | ir 1 EL,1380 i .0...r ' EL. '35.0' Cp -EXISTiNG ....ING 1 620 E HYMAN ) 49 an 6 1 i i /3 t% - ~Winin, 3 TE 1.~ - Â© ; 3..4: Â· 1 i 006 -QF-*-trit 560 r.lill'-'I -I , WMEN 744'!h=1 4' %4-1-1:2- 2 -mr-m'-m-% < 1â‚¬I.,1:-r-- -'IL 'ILI 9. -iZER .44*,fj~**a,%-I1iF~3,1=*fkE'#9'-i~'1-d,-TaT'm,1,~l,Li~FL~~,7,T.I,.'~2?BypEE ~1~0-211,*ir''Â·Â·=1'~W"Or:~2*34*4c -,59[~|m:,||I 11, ilÂ·61 1-F=T'=r-- A"F* t:41=-1 ='Â«4[4*w-Ll 41&94# IT 12=172,1 - 0- 641- %~1_Â»YJirnd[r ; idwfpEL~ 07-'i -- -6-m -r -,11=Lr,ie 1 /Th BUILDING SECTION ' '13 j ".1'I 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~OSS ARCHITECTURE 4 PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONSA13 I /3 wmitn.T:*lic 2/15/2013 I.I.I. 10 N . .... N I 1 0 4,5 Â· . 1 li . 1 f.ilili~1--1 . ..h ' , 54./t: 9 : 1.,14 â€¢ 9 , + & 1~Â»- n... I .f 11 ---- .' */V'*f 41.01 L *1,7 1 1 4 1 4-2-,1, ,+ 1 - .,9Â¥ k 2/ C.;40 "4 6 . f. . . P. 1. 41 31. 1,11 ~ I . r , b ' 41Â· F .7 4 RA 1 , 1 1 .49> 13 ;1 41'p 7 2, 4% â€¢ Â· . I , . -kh. Fr. ~ kitm .; p - 0 ta-, = . ...Fe . ../ *44 UN . JIC:. 11 1 . '.. I f -t "1 . 4.0 3 ., R , 1, 0 f,1 - , .- er .... - ....l. W ..16-1 4 -, d. m 2 4 1 ' 1 > -171.1 + 9 e . 14 d M t 4 <A?N E 4 4:.w..11 1 11 24 I . ..: 1 I 9 :4. .-0 4 , 4 0- 3 . le: I t~w.*..Iike: ** * .-21 5. f t...Pr~ r. -%...M., ..... -4 1 it/ - 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. 11'(MAN AVENUF ASPEN, ColoRADO 816I 1 poss :ri#â€¢cu"rr. 2/15/2013 A14 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: RENDERING D I. ..L-'=111,1 ASPEMr CO~ORA0O lilli ) - ELEVATOR OVERRUN SCREEN CANOPY --ME #mt 17> 6.0 P ----- urf- pr T.O. PARAPET , 38 A T.O. PARAPET. 1 7 136-6 b., , â€¢ I.,61:...r.1 HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS . fit f 'f.%.1 1-Y,~.I 7-1. WOOD TIMBER SIDING BUILDING OUTLINE - STONE VENEER BUILDING , It 11 F.F. LEVEL 3 1 I - ililli -:1#9 - - - - - - HEAVYTIMBER 123' --Â¥7- BEAMS/COLUMNS 17 - 4.12 7 ... - STOREFRONT AWNINGS 1r . k. i: fy :j.= , - - - _F.F. LE~~E-V Â¢ 4 I j ALUMINUM DOOR SYSTEM :, 1 r41 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT r ,Â·, . SYSTEM i.# C L f., :-,4 1 4 Â¢ i. 9, u.* - - - - _EL '-~fEL~1 4 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT I6 E HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 816 I 1 pOSS SCH EMATI C DES I GN: ELEVATION - SOUTH 0"#&5-14 2/15/2013 A15 0 4 8 16 . AS,IN. ..... m. r- CHIMNEY BEYOND - ELEVATOR OVERRUN 1 BEYOND rii,144 f /1.>P 62'.' 1 b : 1.5.iÂ¥ 9 -~- 1 T.O-PARAPET 43...:ith::i~2 1~ f 1 :$11..;.ki Il'".- f '4'llill'll'IMISIIIIII~'IMMAW Â·Â·flm F,79':Finf,1. 1 - WOOD SIDING / PARAPET w/ WOOD i / 4 1 SIDING ;â„¢EL: 1 .MAC I ' i . BUILDING OUTLINE 2 FOR NEIGHBORING - L )//// 1 3//// =ilil:, z BUILDING - SERVICE YARD g --1Â§/i 1"14: i z- WiA 1 01" dc ;:'' F.F. LEVEL 2 1 -blttl'JE' m%%t '2. -7.1.- ..1111. 112'- 0' V- Â¢ -- PKNTED WOOD SIDING 1 Li - PAINTED STEEL COLUMN 29 O -3 - - ELFÂ· t'%,EL_J. 4 . 1 i 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E HYMAN AVENUE A5PEN. COLORADO 1 6jl poss 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION-NORTH i Â®,on &=al=t. 2/15/2013 A16 0 4 8 16 I e. -ST MAIN STNEET As,EN. Colo~â€¢0â€¢ .1.11 {T,9,0," 478 3 (..,O,2.29Â§0 Exhibit 2 26.710.150. Commercial (C-1) Zone District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District is to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor and opportunities for affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the commercial core and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the commercial core, the ability to occupy the ground floor with offices, and a separate chapter in the commercial design guidelines. B. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted as of right in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District: 1. Uses allowed on upper floors: Lodging, affordable multi-family housing, free-market multi-family housing and home occupations. 2. Uses allowed on all building levels: Retail and restaurant uses, neighborhood commercial uses, service uses, office uses, arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center, bed and breakfast, accessory uses and structures, uses and building elements necessary and incidental to uses on other floors, including parking accessory to a permitted use, storage accessory to a permitted use, farmers' market, provided that a vending agreement is obtained pursuant to Section 15.04.350(b). Parking shall not be allowed as the sole use of the ground floor. C. Conditional uses. The following uses are permitted as conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District, subject to the standards and procedures established in Chapter 26.425: 1. Lodging, affordable multi-family housing, free-market multi-family housing or home occupations on the ground floor. 2. Commercial parking facility, pursuant to Section 26.515. 3. For historic landmark properties: Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings and duplex dwelling. D. Dimensional requirements. The following dimensional requirements shall apply to all permitted and conditional uses in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District: 1. Minimum Gross Lot Area (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: 3,000. b. All other uses: No requirement. 2. Minimum Net Lot Area per dwelling unit (square feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 3. Minimum lot width (feet): Page 1 of 3 a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 4. Minimum front yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 5. Minimum side yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 6. Minimum rear yard setback (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 7. Minimum utility/trash/reevele area: Pursuant to Section 26.575.060. 8. Maximum height: a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: twenty-eight (28) feet for two-story elements of a building. Thirty-six (36) feet for three-story elements of a building, which may be increased to forty (40) feet through commercial design review. See Chapter 26.412. 9. Minimum distance between buildings on the lot (feet): a. Detached residential dwelling, two (2) detached residential dwellings, duplex dwelling and bed and breakfast: Same as R-6 Zone District. b. All other uses: No requirement. 10. Public amenity space: Pursuant to Section 26.575.030. 11. Floor area ratio (FAR): The following FAR schedule applies to uses cumulatively up to a total maximum FAR of 2.5:1. Achieving the maximum floor area ratio is subject to compliance with applicable design standards, view plane requirements, public amenity requirements and other dimensional standards. Accordingly, the maximum FAR is not an entitlement and is not achievable in all situations. a. Commercial uses: 1.5:1. b. Arts, cultural and civic uses, public uses, recreational uses, academic uses, child care center and similar uses: 2.5:1. c. Affordable multi-family housing: No limitation. d. Lodging: .5:1, which may be increased to 1.5:1 if the individual lodge units on the parcel average five hundred (500) net livable square feet or less, which may be comprised of lock-off units. Page 2 of 3 e. Free-market multi-family housing: .5:1, which may be increased to .75:1 if affordable housing equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the free-market residential floor area is developed on the same parcel. f. Detached residential dwellings, duplex dwellings and bed and breakfast (as the sole use of parcel and not cumulative with other uses): Eighty percent (80%) of allowable floor area of a same-sized lot located in the R-6 Zone District. (See R-6 Zone District.) Extinguishment of historic TDRs shall not permit additional FAR for single-family or duplex development. 12. Maximum multi-family residential dwelling unit size (square feet): 2,000 square feet of net livable area. a. The property owner may increase individual multi-family unit size by extinguishing historic transferable development right certificates ("certificate" or "certificates"), subject to the following: 1. The transfer ratio is five hundred (500) square feet of net livable area for each certificate that is purchased. 2. The additional square footage accrued may be applied to multiple units. However, the maximum individual unit size attainable by transferring development rights is two thousand five hundred (2,500) square feet of net livable area (i.e., no more than five hundred [500] additional square feet may be applied per unit). 3. This incentive applies only to individual unit size. Transferring development rights does not allow an increase in the FAR of the lot. Commentary: Refer to Chapter 26.535 for the procedures for extinguishing certificates. 13. Maximum lodge unit size (square feet): 1,500. When units are comprised of lock-off units, this maximum shall apply to the largest possible combination of units. 14. Commercial/residential ratio: The total lodging and free-market residential net livable area shall be no greater than the total above-grade floor area associated with the uses described in Subparagraphs 26.710.150.D. 11.a. and b. combined on the same parcel. (Ord. No. 56-2000, Â§Â§7 [part], 12, 15; Ord. No. 25-2001, Â§5 [part]; Ord. No. 1-2002, Â§20; Ord. No. 28b-2004, Â§1; Ord. No. 12-2006, Â§11; Ord. No. 11,2007, Â§2; Ord. No. 27-2010, Â§4) Page 3 of 3 RAMP SLOPE: - f 1-12 13 Â«2=- UP r- 7 1 - 0 0 CO' - 4" 6 - 0" ~~ 13' - 11" f \.> .N..91 & 1 -E SERVICE AREA - 53DÂ· A Â«1 INOTE: PER OWNER AGREEMENT 99 \Â».\-- w/ 610 E. HYMAN, ADDITIONAL ~ ~ ~LLEY iÂ·,Â·Â· PROPOSED RECYCLING STORAGE IS LOCATED AT 610 E. HYMAN * COMMON . .Ki- Alt RESTROOM - N..,4 - 0 9 - 1 - 'Â· 1 5' r- te: 4 PROPOSED I -*23Â·BA :T.... wrok Â·< T?. FULL WIDTH GATES ~ - MECH. SHAFT PARKING I 00 - 11 1 1 - 1 e M I EX) 1 1 T 1 1 DRAWING NOT TO SCALE EÂ«WT S â€ž0 - 09 Regular City Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes April 02,2013 Jennifer said the Growth Management Reviews were approving what was in the box in the building; the free market unit has 2500 square feet net livable space right now and is over the 2000 square foot limit so a Transferable Development Right will be landed to get up to the 2500 and is a condition in the resolution and the applicant is asking to use affordable housing credits for employee mitigation. The employee mitigation calculates to 2.71 full time equivalent FTEs and APCHA is supportive of the credits; the applicant wishes to mitigate at a lower affordable housing category to 4 or below. Cliff asked what changes came from Council. Jennifer replied that Council had some comments on the materials and that might have changed the final pallet of materials also some concern about the amount of glass. Ryan asked based on other projects and the airlocks were based on the sizes of the space being occupied. Jennifer answered the design guidelines actually require airlocks and she will be asking for a change in the resolution to say that prior to building permit application the applicant shall amend the floor plans to include an airlock entry for each tenants space entry but not the common atrium entry or to provide a comparable measure for heat loss prevention. Stan said there were 2 issues that were of concern in the conceptual that were the awning/canopy and the actual height o f the building; he asked i f any changes in that happened in that. Jennifer responded that the roo f plan looks the same with 3 different heights and only one portion is up to 38 feet and it was granted at conceptual. Mitch Haas introduced Les Rosenstein, Andy Wisnowski and Bill Poss. Mitch utilized power point to show where we are today and what was happening in the trash recycling area. Mitch said they do not have any real issues with the staff recommendation or the conditions of approval even as being modified with the handout. The client wanted something a little more reminiscent of old Aspen, a little more of Aspen as a whole and not so different than everything around it. Mitch said the first floor has less glass, the awning looking more like a storefront and general softening of the materials pallet. Mitch said the storefront has been pulled back a little and the 2nd floor cantilevers over; right now they don't know if it will be 1 tenant or 2 tenants so that is why there are not drawn in airlocks. 4 Regular Citv Planning & Zoning Meeting - Minutes April 02, 2013 Mitch said the trash recycle area is at the rear of the property and also parking, egress out of the building and general needs of the tenants o f the building. The trash recycle area is 20 feet in depth and 9 feet wide with gates for wildlife protection. Mitch said the owner of the building was Marty Flug and wanted something more tradition and has already purchased affordable housing credits. Cliff said he was trying to understand the whole trash area. Jennifer said on page 29 0 f the packet was a better drawing and what was approved by Environmental Health. Cliff asked if there were 2 heights in October. Jennifer replied there were 3 heights just like we started with. No public comments. Commissioner Comments: Jim said it looks good; they did a good job and he supports the project. Jim asked Jennifer if the rooftop mechanical will be grouped and located towards the rear of the building. Jennifer said that this would be in the resolution. MOTION: Jim DeFrancia moved to approve Resolution 009, 2013 approving the Final Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Reviews for the project located at 616 East Hyman incorporating in the Resolution the change Jennifer circulated; seconded by Jasmine Tygre. Roll call vote: Keith Goode, yes; Clilf Weiss, yes; Bert Myrin, no; Stan Gibbs, yes; Jasmine Tygre, yes, Jim DeFrancia, yes; Ryan Walterscheid, yes. APPROVED 6-1. Discussion prior to vote: Bert asked if the Resolution has the language that Mitch put forth for the agreement with the neighbors for sharing recycles. Jennifer replied it doesn't have the agreement. Bert asked i f we should include that. Stan said that they have made representations in the meeting and in the drawings. Jim said it seems to be inherent. Bert said his concern from the last meeting was the trash and said that this would go under special review at final commercial and environmental health supports this and he asked i f we could do a code change to do this and would like to have things consistent. Bert said he didn't believe in a special review for one project and we should change it for everyone. Jennifer replied that there are some changes being looked at in the code for trash and utility. Jennifer said there will still be some problems with unique properties. Other Business: Code Amendment check-in 5 1] 9 A ' I ' I' 4..- r ...-,1 - I. VI 2. j f..')â€¢14'41â€¢ 1'1 '~' b tb.i.,".d 13: 3. GALEN,ASTREET . Equality FOREVER f Fr"" s Â£13 (37 â€¢'BA , 'tf, Rerch~1, te"A OK,4 r , 4 ' I '24 HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 205 S MIl-L ST #301A i ASPEN,CO 81A11 ANK / 0- 1 *4 04/07/13 NiXIE R (72 - 13 r, 1 '.#I -Â·r r. r - I ir.r. 7: ~ RE,une. Ig ..3 -â€¢NWL,1. ATTE MP -T ED - N OT F NEW :d 13 N ABLE 10 FOR W .Â·' 4,1 1 -7 n _ rÂ» a .1, 0 7 .- n Up . 3 m . , BL: 81611190238 b : 4 L 4. L. ., U 0 1 & 9.2 ' ab, 4 81611@1902 Ji'1:11:tiltilsilill,~i,fl:hili'iÂ·+411*Naa'th'*/11':t.:,1 .,. -**11'met-/7.--:I - ' . ;Il ~ Â»i,0, '.. .- .r-, 7 *' p * '4' GRANU JUNL; 11.01\1 C.L. bib ,â€¢0 ="-4/"E â€¢flÂ«*/ rf..../.-4/1.'#I- 1 52 MA k '3(01-9 Prd 1. 7 ./-,14Â· .,m"hÂ» ... .'*t},1 '3'-'*, 'Ill# - .,n .pi.~;4.1'Twor.W=' nrIVE....,.If 1 Justice 130 13. GALEAASTREET FOREVER g 4 ASPEN, CO 8Â·iC.Â·11 JOYCE EDWARD 1310 RETCHIE CT CHICAGO, IL 60610 02 03/24/13 30 1- Â·W T c 6 4 1 n A = 1 U U U -,t L .2. , 4 r -1- , i "*1 -ir C 1 60â€¢ f; 5;J fu- L D r t. : (2 4-, -- ,â€¢ â€¢Â· k,2,1 M ' : 3, s. :Â·1Â· 1Â·,1-AF'. 1 RE.. PU 6,1 3 1 in,2.30 91 47 9-out uu- 1 r,--4-4 : 606103#0~21@1902 tilii:,AlitlitttilititillillilitillillitÂ·:731*11;litilitibitti : j Pl MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Directo/T RE: 616 E Hyman - Final Commercial Design Review, Growth Management Review Resolution No. , Series of 2013 MEETING DATE: April 2,2013 APPLICANT /OWNER: 11+4 Furngulf LLP t.*31'* 2 k.,4 i'>Ri7 ~ ' I t. lili â€¢. 0.â€ž,9- REPRESENTATIVE: r . '. 4.' F . 1.V,4i@1~r.ft3~ Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning 24 V 9% I .MA . ... I LOCATION: -' â‚¬,4.9': 4 - . , ..41Â»4.-A: 1 616 E Hyman Ave. Lots N & O, Block 99, City and 40.n fownsite of Aspen , f. ./ CURRENT ZONING: ~~2.620:2*ic 3.Â· 2 C-1, Commercial zone ,~6.-1 district '.P rÂ·,7-~Â· M/"EM SUMMARY: .4 I M 9.g - 4-f. ..2 '':eli The Applicant requests final , *. - 2,&.- ,= M 1 + . N commercial design review, , 4., r. 2.- P --- 4 11* and two growth management reviews for a remodel and f 3 addition of the building at S e , ,*0 '*K~ 4Â·.4 1 -3 616 E Hyman. ..f '' - 7 2 -2*",-!~7 ....9 ~41 .4 G. 1~ . ,4 .- , tu ~ -=/ 6, STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 6,Â·. c .7.r . .4 Approval with conditions. ? , .- 00 '9. .- . f.1 Z . 1 m:1 - . ''m. .~:.~: Â· 9 ' i 7...1 1, I , 2 93*'e Â·.... 3. 4, 11 ~ --/ fÂ·'1.0.-4 r. t . 41) , a. 3 2 4 â‚¬ 4014<2 . ill. & - u .u:21 h.=r -4 - : Â·Â·Â·' A. 2.Â· ' p.*2 ;Â·74#n Photo: 616 E Hyman building and location. 616 E. Hyman Ave -Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 1 of 5 P2 i REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission to redevelop the site: â€¢ Growth Management Review for Expansion/New Commercial, Lodge, or Mixed-Use Development in the development of a new mixed-use building pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.040 C.2.(The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority, who may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal). â€¢ Growth Management Review for Free-Market Residential Units within a Mixed-Use Project in the development of new free-market residential units within a mixed-use project pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.040 C.6. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority, who may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal). â€¢ Growth Management Review for Affordable Housing pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.470.040 C.7. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority, who may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal). â€¢ Final Commercial Design Review for development involving commercial uses, pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.412.050, Commercial Review, and pursuant to the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to remodel and expand an existing two story building and add a recessed third floor at 616 E Hyman. The lot is 6,000 square feet and is located approximately at the center of the north side of the block face of Hyman, between Hunter and Spring Streets. Existing Conditions: The existing structure includes one entrance with commercial space in the basement, ground and second floors. There is a second floor deck on the building, head-in parking along the alley, and a planted public amenity space along the front fagade at the southwest corner. The building currently includes 9,046 sq. ft. of existing net leasable divided among the three levels. The existing Floor Area is 7,396 sq. ft. The maximum allowed Floor Area for the Site is 15,000 sq. ft. The trash/utility area is located along the building, in the alley, but is not clearly dedicated and consists of a trash dumpster. There are currently six (6) marked off-street parking spaces located along the alley that are compromised by existing doorways out of the building and the trash dumpster. Approximately 7% of the parcel (430.68 sq. ft.) presently meets the Public Amenity requirements. The Court House View Plane No. 1 crosses a small portion of the site at the far southwest corner of the property. However, it crosses at a height well above the allowed 36 - 40 foot height limit of the zone district and therefore does not limit the height of the development. 616 E. Hyman Ave -Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 2 of 5 . P3 Proposed Development: The applicant proposes to remodel and expand the existing building. The building would include commercial space on the basement, ground, and second levels and a free-market residential unit on the third floor. Specifically, the footprint will stay the same on the ground level, expands towards the property lines on the second level (replacing a street facing deck and cantilevering over the current parking area), and adds a new, recessed, third level with an accessory deck along the front faQade. The proposal would bring the building to approximately 11,875 sq. ft. of floor area, with 2,465 sq. ft. of free-market residential net livable space and 9,626 sq. ft. of commercial net leasable space. The applicant is proposing to use a TDR to enable an increase above the 2,000 sq. ft. unit size cap for the free-market unit. Four parking spaces are proposed with the application, and the existing Public Amenity' s size and location is unchanged. The proposed third story addition will result in an overall height of 38 feet to the parapet, on select portions of the third story, as approved via Conceptual Commercial Design Review. STAFF COMMENTS: FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW: The project is required to comply with the standards set forth in section 26.412.060, Commercial Design Standards, as well as the Final Review Guidelines of the Commercial section of the Commercial, Lodging, and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines. The project must comply with standards in three main areas: Building Design & Articulation, Architectural Materials, Paving and Landscaping. Building Design and Articulation: As noted in the guidelines, form and scale of a building is further articulated by the expression of traditional lot widths, fai:ade articulation and streetÂ·level character. Since the building's footprint already exists, the expressed two modules do not reflect the traditional 30 feet lot width but does break the building due to the varying front yard setback. With regard to street level character the design guidelines emphasize that the building should "respect the height of traditional building design" with distinguishable differences in levels of the buildings. As proposed, the building provides a typical street front 1St story, with the facade being predominately transparent glass and minimum amounts of opaque materials. It also incorporates retail entrances. The second story is more opaque in nature as suggested in the guidelines, with windows being smaller, transparent openings in the solid facade. Third stories are recommended to be minimized with a minimum set back of 15 feet from the street fagade and the roofscape should be designed as a secondary elevation that is visible (from above). Architectural Materials: The guidelines recommend that durable, quality materials be used in the development of new buildings and that "all facades of a building should reflect, complement and enhance the evolving form and character of the center city." The building' s first floor's transparent, glass famde uses a typical material seen within the downtown, while the second and third floors provide opaque wood upon the second. and third story, with masonry accents. Although not 616 E. Hyman Ave -Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 3 of 5 P4 traditional materials to the Victorian era, these materials are a throwback to old Aspen after skiing started in town. Paving and Landscaping: The guidelines encourage paving and landscaping that enhances the immediate setting of the project. In this case, the public amenity is adjacent to the street right of way within a courtyard. Existing street trees are proposed to be maintained with no changes to the sidewalk as both meet city standards. Staff supports the materials represented but recommends that the roof plan more clearly outline where roof top mechanical will be located to encourage grouping of the mechanical and location towards the rear of the roof area. SPECIAL REVIEW (FOR UTILITY/TRASH/RECYCLE AREA) : The project proposes a variation from the Trash / Utility / Recycle area requirements of the code. The current configuration is a dumpster located along the alley faQa(le of the building within a striped parking space that does not currently meet the requirements of the Land Use Code. The Land Use Code requires 20 linear feet with a minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet and a minimum depth of 10 feet. As noted in Exhibit F of this application, the modified design of an approximate area that is 14'- 6" wide by 20' deep is adequate for trash service. The Environmental Health department supports the reductions in size as long as the design is constructed and functions as represented by the Applicant' s representative. Staff supports the size reduction. GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW The project proposes to develop a new free market residential unit and additional commercial net leasable space and the applicant proposes to mitigate the affordable housing by using Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits (Credits). By using credits, the sum of the employees generated for both the residential unit and the increase in net leasable area required to be mitigated. The Applicant is proposing to purchase Credits to mitigate for the .85 FTE generated by commercial development and 1.86 FTEs generated by the residential development. A total of 2.71 FTEs (Category 4) are required to be mitigated. The Applicant may mitigate at a lower category level by converting the category designation of a Credit. Staff supports the use of Credits to provide mitigation for the proposed development. PARKING As presented, the existing building provides four code compliant parking spaces. The applicant is permitted to maintain an existing deficit of parking for the existing net leasable. With the redevelopment' s increase in net leasable area and development of a residential unit, the parking requirement is .58 of a space for the net leasable and no requirement for the residential unit. The Applicant intends to pay cash-in-lieu for the fraction of a space, which is permitted by code. RECOMMENDATION: Overall, Staff supports the changes in materials that have been presented since Conceptual Design Review. The materials and treatment of them provides 616 E. Hyman Ave -Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 4 of 5 P5 features that are more akin to the design guidelines and are a throwback to old Aspen after skiing started in town. Staff recommends approval of the project, with the following conditions: â€¢ Require that the roof plan more clearly outline where roof top mechanical will be located to encourage grouping of the mechanical and location towards the rear of the roof area. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2013, approving Final Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Reviews for the project located at 616 E Hyman Ave." Attachments: Exhibit A - Staff Findings, Final Commercial Design Review Criteria Exhibit B - Staff Findings, Final Commercial Design Guidelines Exhibit C - Special Review Exhibit D - Growth Management Review Commercial and Residential Development Exhibit E - Growth Management Review, Affordable Housing Exhibit F - Environmental Health email on trash/utility/recycling area Exhibit G - DRC comments Exhibit H - Application Exhibit I - Application, drawings . ht.T&41 e 616 E. Hyman Ave -Final Commercial Design P&Z Memo Page 5 of 5 P6 RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW, SPECIAL REVIEW AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS FOR A REMODEL AND ADDITION CONSISTING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 616 E HYMAN AVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS N & O, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 273718212005 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Conceptual Commercial Design Review to remodel the existing building and add a third floor addition for a project that will include a mix of commercial space and free-market residential; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended the Applicant amend the proposal to better comply with the Commercial Design Standards with regard to height and for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 16, 2012 and continued to October 30% the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012, by a six to one (6 -1) vote, approving Conceptual Commercial Design Review; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Final Commercial Design Review, Special Review and Growth Management Reviews for the previously described project; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended to approve the application with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 1 of 7 i Pl WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the following land use reviews with conditions: A. Final Commercial Design Review. Any building permit application for the redevelopment of the site shall be for a building that substantially duplicates the representations made before the Planning and Zoning Commission and included as Exhibit 1 of this resolution. All underlying dimensional requirements, except for height and trash/utility/recycling areas, shall be met and verified at building permit submission per Exhibit 2. --AFA-c-*C X :Sd>Â«â‚¬-t'"40 B. Special Review. A reduction in size of the trash/utility/recycling is permitted to be reduced to the dimensions and layout shown in Exhibit 3 of this resolution. The area shall solely be used for trash and recycling purposes. C. Growth Management Reviews. The growth management reviews for Expansion or New Commercial Development, New Free-Market Residential Units within a Multi-family or Mixed-use Project, and Affordable Housing are approved. This permits an increase of net leasable commercial and office space on site, not to exceed 580 sq. ft., and the development of one free-market residential unit of up to 2,500 sq. ft. of net livable area. The proposed net livable size of the residential dwelling of over 2,000 sq. ft. requires the extinguishment of a historic TDR prior to the issuance of a building permit These approvals permit the remodel and redevelopment of a three story mixed-use building containing net leasable commercial and office space and one free-market residential unit with a maximum building height of 38 feet and a 430 sq. ft public amenity space. Section 2: Building Permit Application The Applicant, the Applicant' s General Contractor, the Architect that produced the construction drawings, and representatives from the Building Department, Community Development Department and any other person deemed necessary by the City shall attend a meeting prior to the submission of any type of Building Permit for the Subject Property. The purpose of the meeting shall be to ensure clarity relative to the submission Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 2 of 7 P8 requirements, the requirements of this Ordinance, timeframes for processing Building Permits, and any other issues raised by any party. The building permit application shall include the following as applicable: A. A copy of the Planning and Zoning Commission resolutions approving the project. B. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page ofthe building permit set. C. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. D. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which meets adopted City standards. E. An excavation stabilization plan, construction management plan (CMP), and drainage and soils reports pursuant to the Building Department's requirements. F. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department. G. A detailed excavation plan for review and approval by the City Engineer. H. Accessibility and ADA requirements shall be addressed to satisfactorily meet adopted building codes. Section 3: Affordable HousinlZÂ· As represented, the proposal expands the net leasable commercial and grieelpace by /224. 41\ . I 580 sq. ft. and creates a new free-market residential unit (representeÂ¢*21479 sq. ft of net 4.64 livable area). Based upon these numbers, the affordable housipg'Rlitigation required for 9- this project is 2.71 FTEs at a Category 4 level, which ~,aljifroved to be mitigated with Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. The~pplicant may mitigate at a lower 7 ~n/~ Category level by converting the category desiggation of the credit pursuant to the Land V>' ~Ifv Use Code. Final net leasable and net livable pdinbers, as well as the mitigation required, shall be verified at building permit review./Certificates of Affordable Housing shall be extinguished prior to the issuance of a building permit for the subject project. Section 4: Engineering The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. The Applicant design shall also be compliant with the Urban Runoff Management Plan. Section 5: Fire Mitigation All codes adopted by the Aspen Fire Protection District shall be met per building permit. This includes but is not limited to access (International Fire Code (IFC), 2003 Edition, Section 503), approved fire sprinkler and fire alarm systems (IFC, as amended, Section 903 and 907). Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 3 of 7 P9 Section 6: Utilities The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, with Title 25, and with the applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City of Aspen Water Department. Utility placement and design shall meet adopted City of Aspen standards. Section 7: Sanitation District Requirements Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, at the time of construction, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Elevator shafts drains must flow thru an oil and sand interceptor. Plans for interceptors, separators and containment facilities require submittal by the applicant and approval prior to building permit. Below grade development may require installation of a pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit Where additional development would produce flows that would overwhelm the planned capacity of the existing collection system and or treatment facility, the development will be assessed fees to cover the costs of replacing the entire portion of the system that would be overwhelmed. The District would fund the costs of constructing reserve capacity in the area o f concern (only for the material cost difference for larger line). Any glycol heating and snow melt system must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines and within 3 feet vertically below an ACSD main sewer line. Section 8: Environmental Health The state of Colorado mandates specific mitigation requirements with regards to asbestos. Additionally, code requirements to be aware of when filing a building permit include: a Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 4 of 7 P10 , prohibition on engine idling, regulation of fireplaces, fugitive dust requirements and noise abatement. Wildlife protection/enclosures for the trash and recycle area is required. Section 9: Exterior Lighting All exterior lighting shall meet the requirements of the City's Outdoor Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor lighting. Section 10: Parks Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. Parks is concerned with any improvements to the sidewalk area. The applicant has indicated that the existing street tree planting is to remain in place. Careful consideration to the location and installation of utilities will determine the success of this desire. Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal, the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20, this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 Section 11: Impact Fees and School Lands Dedication Fee-in-Lieu The Applicant shall pay all impact fees and the school lands dedication fee-in-lieu assessed at the time of building permit application submittal and paid at building permit issuance. Section 12: Vested Rights The development approvals granted pursuant to this resolution shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 5 of 7 P11 site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots N and O, City and Townsite of Aspen and commonly known as 616 E. Hyman. Section 13: Exhibits. The exhibits listed below are appended hereto and are, by references made to them, incorporated into this Ordinance as if fully set forth herein: â€¢ Exhibit 1 - Schematic elevations, square footages and floor plans â€¢ Exhibit 2 - C-1 Zone district standards â€¢ Exhibit 3 - Approved trash and utility area Section 14: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein .awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 15: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 16: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 2nd day of April, 2013. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney LJ Erspamer, Chair Resolution No. --, Series 2013 Page 6 of 7 P12 ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Resolution No. ---, Series 2013 Page 7 of 7 P13 Exhibit A Commercial Design Review - Land Use Code Review Criteria See. 26.412.050. Review criteria. An application for commercial design review may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following criteria: A. The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, or any deviation from the standards provides a more appealing pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. Unique site constraints can justify a deviation from the standards. Compliance with Section 26.412.070, Suggested design elements, is not required but may be used to justify a deviation from the standards. Staff Finding: The proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060 of the Land Use Code. The applicant's proposal for public amenity space, as it is an existing space, is slightly under what the code requires for demolition and redevelopment but is considered legally existing. The amenity space is located so that it can contribute to the pedestrian environment. The applicant is requesting a minor variation in the location and size of the trash/utility standards. Stafffinds the criterion is met. B. For proposed development converting an existing structure to commercial use, the proposed development meets the requirements of Section 26.412.060, Commercial design standards, to the greatest extent practical. Changes to the faGade of the building may be required to comply with this Section. Staff Finding: Staff finds this criterion to be non-applicable. The building currently contains commercial space and will contain commercial space after the remodel and addition. C. The application shall comply with the guidelines within the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines as determined by the appropriate Commission. The guidelines set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The City shall determine when a proposal is in compliance with the criteria, standards and guidelines. Although these criteria, standards and guidelines are relatively comprehensive, there may be circumstances where alternative ways of meeting the intent of the policy objectives might be identified. In such a case, the City must determine that the intent of the guideline is still met, albeit through alternative means. (Ord. No. 13,2007,Â§1) Staff Finding: The proposed development is submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for Final Commercial Design Review. Stafffinds most applicable guidelines are met or can be met with a conditioned approval. Sta#finds the criterion is met. See. 26.412.060. Commercial design standards. The following design standards, in addition to the commercial, lodging and historic district design objectives and guidelines, shall apply to commercial, lodging and mixed-use development: Exhibit A - Commercial Design Review - Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 1 of 4 P14 , ' A. Public amenity space. Creative, well-designed public places and settings contribute to an attractive, exciting and vital downtown retail district and a pleasant pedestrian shopping and entertainment atmosphere. Public amenity can take the form of physical or operational improvements to public rights-of-way or private property within commercial areas. On parcels required to provide public amenity, pursuant to Section 26.575.030, Public amenity, the following standards shall apply to the provision of such amenity. Acceptance of the method or combination of methods of providing the public amenity shall be at the option of the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, according to the procedures herein and according to the following standards: 1. The dimensions of any proposed on-site public amenity sufficiently allow for a variety of uses and activities to occur, considering any expected tenant and future potential tenants and uses. Staff Finding: The existing size of the public amenity space is 430 sq. ft. and is located on the southwest corner of the property. The requirement according to the Land Use Code is to allow for 25% of the developable parcel to be used as public amenity space, but in cases of redevelopment where less than 25% exists, the same amount must be replaced not to be lower than 10%. The site currently contains 7% public amenity space and the applicant is not proposing demolition of the site so the existing area is permitted to be maintained. Stajffinds this criterion is met. 2. The public amenity contributes to an active street vitality. To accomplish this characteristic, public seating, outdoor restaurant seating or similar active uses, shade trees, solar access, view orientation and simple at-grade relationships with adjacent rights-of-way are encouraged. Staff Finding: The existing courtyard remains on site as public amenity space. The at-grade space contains a tree and landscaped plantings contributing to a varied streetscape. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 3. The public amenity and the design and operating characteristics of adjacent structures, rights- of-way and uses contribute to an inviting pedestrian environment. Staff Finding: The existing courtyard remains on site as public amenity space. The at-grade space contains a tree and landscaped plantings contributing to a varied streetscape. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 4. The proposed amenity does not duplicate existing pedestrian space created by malls, sidewalks or adjacent property, or such duplication does not detract from the pedestrian environment. Staff Finding: The proposed amenity does not duplicate space, but enhances the pedestrian environment. Staffjinds the criterion is met. Exhibit A - Commercial Design Review - Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 2 of 4 P15 5. Any variation to the design and operational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F., promotes the purpose of the public amenity requirements. Staff Finding: The proposed public amenity space will not deviate from the design and operational standards for public amenity, Subsection 26.575.030.F. Stafffinds the criterion is met. B. Utility, delivery and trash service provision. When the necessary logistical elements of a commercial building are well designed, the building can better contribute to the overall success of the district. Poor logistics of one (1) building can detract from the quality of surrounding properties. Efficient delivery and trash areas are important to the function of alleyways. The following standards shall apply: 1. A utility, trash and recycle service area shall be accommodated along the alley meeting the minimum standards established by Section 26.575.060, Utility/trash/recycle service areas, unless otherwise established according to said Section. Staff Finding: The applicant is requesting to modify the orientation and dimensions of the trash and utility area. It does not meet the dimensional standards outlined in 26.575.060, which is 20 linear feet with a 10 foot depth but the applicant is requesting a size that is close to the required dimensions. The change in orientation is reasonable to accommodate on-site parking for the property and the Environmental Health department supports the request. Staifinds the criterion is met. 2. All utility service pedestals shall be located on private property and along the alley. Easements shall allow for service provider access. Encroachments into the alleyway shall be minimized to the extent practical and should only be necessary when existing site conditions, such as an historic resource, dictate such encroachment. All encroachments shall be properly licensed. Staff Finding: The existing service pedestals located on the alley will remain. If any upgrades in service are required (such as a ne-w transformer) then adequate space and easements shall be provided. Stafffinds the criterion is met. 3. Delivery service areas shall be incorporated along the alley. Any truck loading facility shall be an integral component of the building. Shared facilities are highly encouraged. Staff Finding: Delivery service is accessible off of the alley. An accessible ramp provides easy access to the building. Sta#finds the criterion is met. 4. Mechanical exhaust, including parking garage ventilation, shall be vented through the roof. The exhaust equipment shall be located as far away from the street as practical. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes all mechanical exhaust to be vented through the roof and screened from the street. The proposed project does not include plans for a garage. Stafffinds the criterion to be met. Exhibit A - Commercial Design Review - Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 3 of 4 P16 5. Mechanical ventilation equipment and dueting shall be accommodated internally within the building and/or located on the roof, minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. New buildings shall reserve adequate space for future ventilation and ducting needs. (Ord. No. 13,2007, Â§1) Staff Finding: Mechanical ventilation equipment and ducting will be accommodated internally within the building and located on the roof It will be minimized to the extent practical and recessed behind a parapet wall or other screening device such that it shall not be visible from a public right-of-way at a pedestrian level. Staff recommends that the applicant clearly indicate where mechanical will be located as part of this approval. Sec. 26.412.070. Suggested design elements. The following guidelines are building practices suggested by the City, but are not mandatory. In many circumstances, compliance with these practices may not produce the most desired development, and project designers should use their best judgment. A. Signage. Signage should be integrated with the building to the extent possible. Integrated signage areas already meeting the City's requirements for size, etc., may minimize new tenant signage compliance issues. Common tenant listing areas also serves a public way-finding function, especially for office uses. Signs should not block design details of the building on which they are placed. Compliance with the City's sign code is mandatory. B. Display windows. Display windows provide pedestrian interest and can contribute to the success of the retail space. Providing windows that reveal inside activity of the store can provide this pedestrian interest. C. Lighting. Well-lit (meaning quality, not quantity) display windows along the first f[oor create pedestrian interest after business hours. Dynamic lighting methods designed to catch attention can cheapen the quality of the downtown retail environment. Illuminating certain important building elements can provide an interesting effect. Significant light trespass should be avoided. Illuminating the entire building should be avoided. Compliance with the City's Outdoor lighting code, Section 26.575.150 of this Title, is mandatory. Staff Finding: Any signage and outdoor lighting will be regulated via building permit review and issuance. The current building includes large windows on the ground level which can contribute to a potential retail environment. Sta#jinds this criterion is met. Exhibit A - Commercial Design Review - Land Use Code Review Criteria Page 4 of 4 4 P17 Exhibit B Commercial Design Guidelines -Final Design Review Guidelines for the Commercial Character Area Commercial Character Area Design Objectives: These are key design objectives for the Commercial Area. The City must find that any new work will help to meet them: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. Staff Finding: The Commercial Character Area is adjacent to the Commercial Core Historic District. The mixed use proposal relates to the uses seen in both character areas. The project is to remodel an existing building with the addition of a new third story, which relates to the historic district without replicating it. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. Staff Finding: The proposed development increases the existing commercial square footage and maintains commercial uses along the ground floor street edge. Sta#finds this criterion is met. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. Designs should seek creative new solutions that convey the community's continuing interest in exploring innovations. At the same time, the fundamental principles of traditional design must be respected. This means that each project should strike a balance in the design variables that are presented in the following pages. Staff Finding: The proposed remodel and addition maintains the basic form of the current building with a third story addition that is recessed to minimize its presence. The primary entrance is along Hyman Ave, with additional entries being proposed along Hyman. Traditional forms such as storefront windows are interpreted in a contemporary fashion. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. The intent is to more clearly establish a strongly defined street wall, but with some greater variety than in the Commercial Core IIistoric District since the historic building edge is not as defined. A stronger street ftwade definition should be achieved while at the same time recognizing the value of public dining and landscaped space. Staff Finding: As proposed the development will have a well-defined street wall oriented to-wards Hyman that is accented with an existing Public Amenity space. Staff finds this criterion is met. 5. Reflect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. It is important that a range and variation in building height and scale in the Commercial Area be recognized in future developments. Larger buildings should be varied in height and reflect original lot widths. Exhibit B - Commercial Design Review - Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 1 of 5 P18 Stajf Finding: The Applicant proposes variation in building heights with a mix of 2 and 3 story elements. The proposed two story fagade's height is differentiated from adjacent structures. Stafffinds this criterion is met. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. Providing space in association with individual buildings remains important, but should be balanced with much greater building street presence and corner definition. Staff Finding: The existing public amenity space is an accent to the established street wall that exists and is maintained. Sta#finds this criterion is met. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. Display cases, architectural details and landscaping are among the design elements that should be used. Staff Finding: The applicant proposes variety in the project's street level experience with landscaped public amenity, storefront style -windows and additional entries along the facade. Stafffinds this criterion is met. Exhibit B - Commercial Design Review - Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 2 of 5 P19 Commercial Character Area Final Review Design Guidelines Building Design and Articulation Staff Finding: As noted in the guidelines, form and scale of a building is further articulated by the expression of traditional lot widths, fagade articulation and street level character. Since the building's footprint exists the expression of traditional lot widths does not reflect the traditional 30 feet lot width but does break the building up into two modules due to the varying front yard setback. With regard to street level character the design guidelines emphasize that the building should "respect the height of traditional building design" with distinguishable differences in levels of the buildings. As proposed, the building provides a typical street front 1St story, with the facade being predominately transparent glass and minimum amounts of opaque materials. It should also incorporate retail entrances. The second story is more opaque in nature as suggested in the guidelines, with windows being smaller, transparent openings in the solid facade. Third stories are recommended to be minimized with a minimum set back of 15 feet from the street fagade and the roofscape should be designed as a secondary elevation that is visible (from above). Staff recommends that the any rooftop mechanical be identified where it will be located, otherwise stafffinds this criterion met. Stafffinds the following Guidelines are met: 1.30 The detailed design of the building fa~ade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. This should be achieved using: â€¢ The fenestration grouping â€¢ The modeling of the faced â€¢ The design framework for the first floor storefront â€¢ Variation in architectural detail/or the palette of faced materials 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the fagade. â€¢ The design and definition of the traditionally tall first floor â€¢ The vertical proportions of the upper level fenestration pattern and ratio of solid wall to window area. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street faQade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on all floors. 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tall third floor. Exhibit B - Commercial Design Review - Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 3 of 5 P20 1.37 The first floor fÂ®ade should be designed to concentrate interest on the first level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at sidewalk level. 1.40 Window area along the first floor shall be a minimum of 60% of exterior street facade area when facing a principal street(s). 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail. 1.42 Design of the first floor storefront should include particular attention to the following: â€¢ The basic element and proportions of storefront design. 1.44 A large building should reflect the traditional lot width in form and variation of its roof. This should be achieved through the following: â€¢ A set back of the top floor from the front favade Stafffinds the following Guidelines are not applicable: 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: â€¢ Variation in height at internal lot lines â€¢ Variation in the plane o f the front fagade â€¢ Street facade composition â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level frontage. 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the street frontage adjusted for the scale of space Sta#finds the following Guideline is not met: 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures 1.45 The roofseape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building Architectural Materials Staff Finding: The guidelines recommend that durable, quality materials be used in the development of new buildings and that "allfacades of a building should reflect, complement and enhance the evolving form and character of the center city." The first transparent, glass fagade uses a typical material seen within the downtown, provides opaque wood upon the second and Exhibit B - Commercial Design Review - Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 4 of 5 P21 third story, with masonry accents. Although not traditional materials to the Victorian era, these materials are a throwback to old Aspen after skiing started in town. Stafffinds the following Guidelines are met: 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. 1.47 Building materials should have these features: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally. â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale of the building and enhance visual interest if the faGade. â€¢ Covey a human scale. â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate. 1.48 A building or addition should reflect the quality and variation in material seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are use they shall be: â€¢ High quality durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette Paving and Landscaping Staff Finding: The guidelines encourage paving and landscaping that enhances the immediate setting of the project. In this case, the public amenity is adjacent to the street right of way within a courtyard. Existing street trees are proposed to be maintained with no changes to the sidewalk as both meet city standards. Stafffinds the following Guideline is met: 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building area. Exhibit B - Commercial Design Review - Commercial Design Guidelines, Commercial Character Area Page 5 of 5 P22 Exhibit C Special Review for a Reduction to the Utility/Trash/Recycle Area, per section 26.575.060 B. B. Review standards for reduction of dimensions. The Planning and Zoning Commission may reduce the dimensions of a utility/trash/recycle service area by following special review procedures set forth at Chapter 26.430 if: 1. There is a demonstration that, given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash/recycle service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. 2. Access to the utility/trash/recycle service area is adequate. 3. Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and making them easily movable by trash personnel. 4. When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and measures are taken to encourage trash compaction by other development in the block. 5. The area for public utility placement and maintenance is adequate and safe for the placement of utilities. 6. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area. Staff Finding: Since the February 15, 2013 submission of this land use application, the applicant has been modifying the design of utility/trash/recycle area with input from the Environmental Health department. As noted in Exhibit E of this application, the modified design of an approximate area that is 14'-6 wide by 20' deep is adequate for trash service. The Environmental Health department supports the reductions in size as long as the design is constructed and functions as represented by the Applicant's representative. Staff finds the criteria met to support the size reduction. Exhibit C - Special Review Page 1 of 1 P23 Exhibit D Growth Management Review Criteria for Expansion or new Commercial Development and New free-market residential units within a multi-family or mixed-use project, per Section 26.470.080(1)and(2). 1. Expansion or new commercial development. The expansion of an existing commercial building or commercial portion of a mixed-use building or the development of a new commercial building or commercial portion of a mixed-use building shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050. 2. New free-market residential units within a multi-family or mixed-use project. The development o f new free-market residential units within a multi- family or mixed-use proj eet shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the general requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050 above. B. General requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Sta# Finding. The Applicant requested 1 free-market residential development allotment from the 2013 calendar year and 580 sq. ft. of ne-w net leasable commercial space. The allotments are available. Sta#finds this criterion met. 2. The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Staff Finding. The proposed development of a mixed-use building reflects the mix of development within the area which includes a number of buildings that contain a mix of residential and commercial uses within them. Stafffinds this criterion met. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Staff Finding: The proposed design appears to meet the requirements of the Commercial zone district. Final design detail may require slight changes to the building but conformity of the design with the underlying zone district requirements shall be verified at building permit review. Sta#finds this criterion met. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval, as applicable. Exhibit D - Growth Management Review for Commercial and Residential development Page 1 of 3 P24 Staff Finding: The design is consistent with the conceptual approval granted with regard to height, massing andfootprint of the building. Stafffinds this criterion met. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. Staff Finding: The applicant is proposing to develop an additional 580 sq. ft. of commercial net leasable space. A credit is provided for the existing net leasable of 9,046 sq. ft. Within the Commercial zone district, 4.1 full time Equivalents (FTEs) are generated per 1,000 square feet of net leasable area. For commercial uses, the basement and upper floor employee generation rate is reduced by twenty-five (25) percent or 3.075 FTEs per 1,000 squarefeet of net leasable area. The existing building contains 3,261 sq. ft. of first floor net leasable and 5,785 square feet of upper and lower floor net leasable. The net leasable area generates 8.02 FTEs [(3,261 sq. ft./1,000 sq. ft.) x 4.1 x.61 on the first floor, and 10.67 FTEs [(5,785 sq. ft./1,000 sq. ft.) x 3.075 x .61 on the second floor. In sum, the existing building generates 18.69 FTEs. The proposed building will contain an expected total of 9,626 sq. ft. of net leasable area, with 2,910 sq. ft. of first floor net leasable and 6,716 square feet of upper floor or basement net leasable. The ne-w net leasable area generates 17.15 FTEs f(2,910 sq. ft./1,000 sq. ft.) x 4,1 x ,61 on thefirst floor, and 12.39 FTEs I(6,716 sq. ft./1,000 sq. ft.) x 3.075 x .61 on the second floor. In sum, the existing building generates 18.69 FTEs while the proposed building generates 19.54 FTEs. The difference between the two numbers equals .85 ofa FTE. The Applicant is proposing to purchase Affordable Housing Credits to mitigate for the .85 FTE generated by commercial development. Stajffinds this criterion met. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide Exhibit D - Growth Management Review for Commercial and Residential development Page 2 of 3 P25 mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. staff Finding: The applicant is proposing to develop one free-market unit containing 2,479 sq. ft. of net livable square feet. The underlying zone district caps the unit size to 2,000 sq. ft. and 2,500 sq. ft. if a Historic Transferable Development Right (TDR) is extinguished, The applicant is below the 2,500 net livable cap and will be required to land a TDR to develop the unit as proposed. With a unit size of 2,479 sq. ft. ofnet livable area, mitigation is required at 30% of the new net livable developed or 743 sq. ft. (2,479*.30=743). To determine the number of Full Time Equivalents (FTEs) to be mitigated the conversion of sq. ft. to FTEs is as follows: 1FTE=400 sq. ft. of net livable area. 743 sq. ft./400 sq. ft. -1.86 FTEs The Applicant is proposing to purchase Alfordable Housing Credits to mitigate for the 1.86 FTEs generated by the residential development. Stafffinds this criterion met. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Staff Finding: The property is being developed in an area f town that is adequately served by public infrastructure. Stalffins this criterion to be met. Exhibit D - Growth Management Review for Commercial and Residential development Page 3 of 3 P26 Exhibit E 4. Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. Staff Finding: The Applicant is proposing to meet their affordable housing mitigation via the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits. APCHA has noted the mitigation that would be required for the project as proposed. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. If the mitigation requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a cash-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one (1) or more units, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these m Staff Finding: The Applicant is proposing to meet their affordable housing mitigation via the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits. APCHA has noted the mitigation that would be required for the project as proposed. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Staff Finding: The criterion is not applicable. As the applicant is propping the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits. d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages Exhibit E - Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing Page 1 of 2 P27 Exhibit E affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability ofthe lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. Staff Finding: The criterion is not applicable. As the applicant is propping the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits. e. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. Staff Finding: The criterion is not applicable as mitigation is required for this project and on-site housing is not being proposed. Exhibit E - Growth Management Review - Affordable Housing Page 2 of 2 P28 Ewthe>il- F Jennifer Phelan From: Ashley Perl Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 10:44 AM 1 . To: Jennifer Phelan CC: Mitch Haas Subject: FW: 616 Service Yard Revised 3.19.13 Attachments: 616 Hyman Revised Service Yard Plan Enlarged N.T.S. 3.19.13.pdf; 616 Hyman Revised Service Yard Plan 3.19.13.pdf Based on the updated Trash/Recycle area attached and described below, the Environmental Health Department believes the proposed development includes adequate space for trash and recycling. Ashley (970) 429-1798 From: Mitch Haas [mailto:mitch@hlpaspen.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 5:42 PM To: Ashley Perl; Jennifer Phelan Cc: Chris Dwyer; Les Rosenstein Subject: Fwd: 616 Service Yard Revised 3.19.13 Hi- Ashley. Please have a look at the attached plans, which include several revisions from the previously submitted version. As Chris notes in the email below, the revisions include removal of the wing walls at the alley, the addition of full-width gates at the alley, and moving the separation wall between the dumpster area and the service area back toward the building effectively increasing the size of the dumpster area so as to accommodate the placement of some recycling bins therein. Any additional recycling area needs will be met on the 610 E Hyman property under the terms of the shared use agreement between this applicant and Charles Cunniffe. In addition, the open doorway from the walkway area into/out from the service yard area has been widened to more easily allow bins and other items to be moved through. We were unable to reverse the swing o f the egress door from the building due to building code issues that would then have resulted in our having to decrease the overall width and, thus, ai,â€¢eo*the service paces. The result of all this is that we now have a trash/recycle/service area size that i(14'-6",kide by approximately 20' deep, where the depth is broken into a 13'-11" deep trash dumpster and recksle-bins area and a 6' deep service and overflow recycling area, all supplemented by the ability to bring recyclables over to Charles Cunniffe's space next door. Given grades on the property, the trash area is lower in elevation than the service area behind it; thus the need for the wall 1 separating the two so as to eliminate the need for an actual step. It is our hope that these revisions adequately satisfy all anticipated needs and will meet with your approval. Please let me know if you have any questions and, also, what your general thoughts are on this plan. Also, please let me know if printed plans are needed and, if so, how many and at what size. Best regards, Mitch Â· Mitch Haa$ Haa$ Land Planning, LLC 201 N. Mill Street, Suite 108 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Fax: (970) 925-7395 1 CD -4 6. i.37 1 1- RAMP SLOPE: M 1:12 f -v~'DN -7- UP - 7 1 16 1 0 0 CO' - 4" 1 1 0 6 -0\ V. 13'-11" 2%, 4 Â£ SERVICE AREA NEL-/ - 9 r X NOTE: PER OWNER AGREEMENT Â«- w/ 610 E. HYMAN, ADDITIONAL ~ ) >ALLEY .i<it; 24 PROPOSED RECYCLING STORAGE IS LOCATED -4..trz. tfit COMMON AT 610 E. HYMAN 9? RESTROOM -- Eli 7 - Iii\3 PROPOSED I i FULL WIDTH GATES ~----1 - -';3 .Â·~ . A~('7-1Â·' 4?424Â·449*5**44#*Â·0 - MECH. SHAFT PARKING I bo 1 - \ le M 1 bo 1 1 1 **Meâ€¢****001**Me*%*53*~14**7* *~* i i T 1 1 DRAWING NOT TO SCALE 0\No) 9/ 0 - ,09 PROPOSED: NEW WALLS (SHOMN M IRAN) _ ~~ , f L PROPOSED: NEw ELEWATOR .0-*:,6 4 9 t UP----------1 1-IN f * M liN t. / 1, 1 ROOM PRKING ~ 1 PROPOSED 1 ELEV. EQUIP. i EXISTING ~ /' = (Hcl : PLANTER â€¢EXISTING ' ATRIUM L (PUBLIC AMENITY ./ (OPEN 10 MOVE ~ ~ ~ . , AND BELOW). : SPACE) ' '~ PROPOSED b ' COMMERCIAL 2- 1 Eli ' 0 3 1 RAMP SLOPE 1Â·12 i PROPOSED NEW CORRIDOR/ SECOND MEAN' OF EGRESS h \3 ULL=n'3121,/ M 6' - 0" 13Â·-it" N , 1 SERVICE AREA ~ :1 3 ~ '4 2%21==.A==TE[} 1 h\ALLEY ; NOTE PER OWNER AGREEMENT <--~ b pRoposED 6 PROPOSED - ) AT 610 E HYMAN COMMON *f> COMMON ~ ~-r--1 RESTROOM % RESTROOM t.% *4 L -1 . I 4 PROPOSED & MECH. SHAFT PARKING Full WIDTH GATES -~ - . 4 E E .. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL ' PROPOSED â€¢ PARKING 3 - PROPOSED I PARKING 1 - 14'1: 3 -- PROPOSED: NEWINDOW Â®1 I I I 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss 0=2 95~ 03/19 A71 S C H EMATI C DES I GN: REVISED SERVICE YARD PLAN ,es â€žâ€ž MA~ STRE[T Ail Cokeâ€¢â€¢00 1,5,1 't/.,0â€ž5, 47:1{.,70.$762'50 P30 P31 Exhibit G APCHA ISSUE: The applicant is proposing a remodel of the Gulfco Building, located at 616 East Hyman Avenue. BACKGROUND: The applicant is proposing to extend the second level closer to the rear property line on the alley side of the building and enclose the existing second floor south-facing deck to create additional commercial space. A third floor addition containing one free-market residential unit is also proposed. The commercial component currently generates 31.159 FTE's. The remodel and addition generates a total of 32.83 FTE's; therefore, the commercial component will generate an additional 1.424 (32.83 - 31.159) F'Irs, of which 60% is required for mitigation purposes (1.424 X 60% =.854 FTE) Currently, there does not exist a free-market component; therefore, the entire 2,479 proposed is additional. The Code requires mitigation to be provided in an amount equal to 30% of the additional free- market residential Net Livable area; therefore, 743.7 square feet of above-grade net livable affordable housing space is required (2,479 X 30%). At 400 square feet per FTE as stated in the Code, this equates to l.859 FTE to be mitigated. The proposal does not include any on-site affordable housing. The applicant is requesting to mitigate by purchasing Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits. The required mitigation for the redevelopment of 616 East Hyman Avenue is 2.713 Category 4 FTE's, per the Land Use Code. The Certificates available are designated as Category 2; therefore, based on Section 26.540.110, Converting category designation Of an affordable housing certificate. the conversion from Category 2 credits to Category 4 mitigation requirement equates to 1.59 FTE credit requirements (2.713 FTE X $141.268 [the Category 4 fee] = $383,260; $383,260 / $241,538 [the Category 2 fee] = 1.59 Category 2 FTE. The applicant is in the process of purchasing 1.63 FTE's of the Certificates of Affordable Housing Credits to extinguish the mitigation for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the Land Use Code, the 1.63 FTE Category 2 Certificates would mitigate for the required 1.859 FTE's generated by the proposed development. ACSD Requirements-616 East Hyman Ave. Redevelopment Service is contingent upon compliance with the District's rules, regulations, and specifications, which are on file at the District office. ACSD will review the approved Drainage plans to assure that clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter, patio drains) are not connected to the sanitary sewer system. On-site utility plans require approval by ACSD. Oil and Grease interceptors (NOT traps) are required for all food processing establishment. Locations of food processing shall be identified prior to building permit. Even though the commercial space is tenet finish, interceptors will be required at this time if food processing establishments are anticipated for this project. ACSD will not approve service to food processing establishments retrolitted for this use by small under counter TRA-PS at a later date. Oil and Sand separators are required for parking garages and vehicle maintenance establishments. Driveway entrance drains must drain to drywells. Elevator shaft drains must flow thru 0/s interceptor Old service lines must be excavated and abandoned at the main sanitary sewer line according to specific ACSD requirements. Exhibit G - DRC Comments Page 1 of 4 P32 Below grade development may require installation ofa pumping system. One tap is allowed for each building. Shared service line agreements may be required where more than one unit is served by a single service line. Permanent improvements are prohibited in sewer easements or right of ways. Landscaping plans will require approval by ACSD where soft and hard landscaping may impact public ROW or easements to be dedicated to the district. All ACSD fees must be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. Peg in our office can develop an estimate for this project once detailed plans have been made available to the district. Where additional development would produce flows that would exceed the planned reserve capacity of the existing system (collection system and or treatment system) an additional proportionate fee will be assessed to eliminate the downstream collection system or treatment capacity constraint. Additional proportionate fees would be collected over time from all development in the area of concern in order to fund the improvements needed. Glycol heating and snow melt systems must be designed to prohibit and discharge of glycol to any portion of the public and private sanitary sewer system. The glycol storage areas must have approved containment facilities. Soil Nails are not allowed in the public ROW above ASCD main sewer lines and within 3 feet vertically below an ACSD main sewer line. We can comment on this application in greater detail once detailed plans have been submitted to the District Parks Department Landscaping and Sidewalk Landscaped area: Landscaping in the public right of way will be subject to landscaping in the ROW requirements, Chapter 21.20. There shall be no plantings within the City ROW which are not approved by the City Parks Department and the Engineering Department. Parks is concerned with any improvements to the sidewalk area. The applicant has indicated that the existing street tree planting is to remain in place. Careful consideration to the location and installation of utilities will determine the success of this desire. Tree Permit: If a tree(s) is requested for removal, the applicant will be required to receive an approved tree removal permit per City Code 13.20, this includes impacts under the drip line of the tree. Parks is requiring that the tree permit be approved prior to approval of building permits. If a permit is necessary, contact the City Forester at 920-5120. Mitigation for removals will be paid cash in lieu or on site per City Code 13.20. Parks will approve a final landscape plan during the review of the tree removal permit based on the landscape estimates. Tree Protection: 1) A vegetation protection fence shall be erected at the drip line of each individual tree or groupings of trees remaining on site and their represented drip lines. A formal plan indicating the location of the tree protection will be required for the bldg permit set. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the drip line of any tree remaining on site. This fence must be inspected by the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. As referenced in Chapter 13.20 Exhibit G - DRC Comments Page 2 of 4 P33 Zoning observations and concerns with regard to zoning compliance: 1. height of chimney: not provided. The exception to height is for, "the minimum necessary for the chimney" which does not seem to be the case as the chimney appears wider than the elevator overrun. See Sheet A10, A12. 2. The location and width of the chimney changes from sheet A-9 to A-10. 3. height ofmechanical: not provided 4. height of mechanical screen: not provided. See sheet A-9 and A-16 5. mechanical shaft is clad as a chimney: exception to height not intended for faux chimney which is really a mechanical shaft. See, A6-A9 and A 15- 17 6. height of elevator overrun: not provided see A-10. 7. Stair towers: height not pFOVided 8. Height of building provided from finishes floor level; should be from most restrictive grade. See sheet All 9. deck... the deck provides enforcement or use issues. The intent is to comply the actual use may differ. Planter box is illustrated and have not been included in deck exemption total. Planter boxes are included in the size of the deck. See A-9 and A-24. 10. Screen canopy third level, is illustrated from the chimney on the East faQade all the way to the West faâ„¢le see sheet A10. Which is different on sheet A15. 11. Commercial store front: the South fagade is pulled back from the property line for the commercial space. Is the fagade of the South elevation commercial space going to be pulled back or not? Sheet A7 12. Please note there is no exception for veneer beyond the property. Sheet A8 and Ali 13. Existing floor area: not correct as the calculation includes stairs on every level. See sheet A22 14. Sheet A7 indicates posts and roof over service area and parking spaces: carports are exempt but does the covered service area count as non-unit or deck exemption? The service area has walls but the space does not appear to be conditioned. How tall are the walls? 15. Length of parking spaces: what is the length ofthe parking spaces? Sheet A7 16. The allocation of non-unit space: totals add up. Allocated by level; the basement the non-unit was not added to totals. Engineering Department These comments are not intended to be exclusive, but an initial response to the project packet submitted for purpose of the DRC meeting. Drainage: General note: The design for the site must meet tlie Urban Runoff Management Plan Requirements. Staff was not able to determine whether or not the site will meet these requirements. A full review will be completed when there is enough information to review. A compliant drainage plan must be submitted with a building permit application. This includes detaining and providing water quality for the entire site. If the site chooses fee-in-lieu of detention (FIL), it can only be applied to existing impervious areas all new areas will need to discharge at historic rates. Any Exhibit G - DRC Comments Page 3 of 4 RAVAL ~A_K-It '75 fitl- grj~ Clus a i- detention requirements covered under the FIL option must discharge directly to the City's stormwater infrastructure. Staff was unable to determine whether or not the site is able to meet all the Drainage Principals: 1. Consider stormwater quality needs early in the design process. 2. Use the entire site when planning for stormwater quality treatment. 3. Avoid unnecessary impervious area. 4. Reduce runoff rates and volumes to more closely match natural conditions. 5. Integrate stormwater quality management and flood control. 6. Develop stormwater quality facilities that enhance the site, the community, and the environment. 7. Use a treatment train approach. 8. Design sustainable facilities that can be safely maintained. 9. Design and maintain facilities with public safety in mind. Sidewalk and Curb and Gutter: General note: All sidewalk, curb and gutter must meet the Engineering Standards as outlined in Title 21. As of March 13, 2013, the sidewalk curb and gutter were in acceptable condition and did not require replacement. Should the sidewalk, curb or gutter be damaged as a result of construction activities, it will be the property owner's responsibility to repair the damage as described in Title 21. Construction Management - Engineering is concerned about the Construction Impacts of this site. The plan shall describe mitigation for: parking, staging/encroachments, and truck traffic. Note that the current code does not allow for any encroachments during the on-seasons (November 1 - April 15 and June 1 - Labor Day). Excavation Stabilization - Due to the proximity of the neighboring property, the City will require an excavation stabilization plan prior for any excavation. The plan should be submitted with the building permit submittal. Fee in Lieu -This project is considered a Major project and can opt to pay the Fee in Lieu for a portion of the detention requirements. Please refer to Section 2.12.140 of the Municipal Code. Building The comments are intended to provide the applicant with corrections or concerns that may require further development or be re drawn to show compliance. We are available to schedule a meeting to discuss these items at your earliest convenience. Please either email me at Denis.Murray@cityofaspen.com or call at 970-429-2761. 1) Identify the building type of construction will allow a residential use on the third level. 2) Verify the exits have the required separation of at least one third the diagonal of the area served. ( Sprinklered Building) 3) We will need to discuss the floor openings at the entry which connect three levels not permitted by code. There may be an exception to permit this situation. 4) The rear exit enclosure is required to open directly to the public way or provide a protected path to the public way by way of an exit passageway. 5) An accessible route to the trash and recycle area is required by chapter 11 from within the site. 6) The trellis at the upper level may be required to have a fire resistive construction for projections. Exhibit G - DRC Comments Page 4 of 4 1. Ta *37* 00 l2Â·2016.AS Lli RECENED FEB 132013 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 616 Ea*t Hy,Ma*Ave,ue - 149: '44 AN APPLICATION FOR: GMQS 'Re~leuu, FRal, Co,*IN,1Â£,cial, 'De*0*Revaw, wwi SpeÂ©0(*'Revte~ for'Redudren, {AN â‚¬he,Uratty (TraLIA#Reqde Area, SUBMITTED 8y HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC 201 N. MILL 57*EET, SUITE 108 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (970) 925-7819 fam (970) 925-7395 mitch@hlpa.speruce#v February 15, 2013 PID No. 2737-182-12-005 AN APPLICATION FOR GMQS REVIEW, FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEFF AND SPECIAL REVIEVV FOR REDUCTION IN THE UTILITY/TRASH/RECYCLE AREA FOR 616 EAST HYMAN AVENUE Submitted by: Furngulf, LLP 616 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-2496 Prepared by: HAAS LAND PLANNING, LLC Planning Consultant 201 North Mill Street Suite 108 Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: (970) 925-7819 Fax: (970) 925-7395 Email: mitch@hlpaspen.com PID# 2737-182-12-005 616 East Hyman Avenue Redevelopment TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION... II. PROJECT SITE & NEIGHBORHOOD (EXISTING CONDITIONS)............3 III. PROPOSAL...................................................................................4 IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 5 A. GMQS Community Objective Scoring Criteria..................................5 B. GMQS General Requirements............ C. GMQS Review for Affordable Housing........................................11 D. GMQS Expansion for Expansion of Commercial Development..........13 E. GMQS Exemption for New Free-Market Residential in a Mixed Use Building.............................................Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· Â· Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· .13 F. Final Commercial Design Review .............................................13 G. Special Review for Reduction in the Utility/Trash/ Recycle Area......18 H. Off-Street Parking...................................................................20 Exhibits Exhibit 1: Land Use Application Exhibit 2: Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 3: Proof of Ownership Exhibit 4: Letter of Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC, Foss Architecture and Planning and Schlumberger Construction to Represent the Applicant Exhibit 5: Dimensional Requirements of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District Exhibit 6: Planning and Zoning (P&Z) Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012 Exhibit 7: Executed Fee Agreement Exhibit 8: Mailing Addresses of Record of Property Owners Within 300' (to be provided no more than 60 days prior to the P&Z hearing) PID# 2737-182-12-005 I. INTRODUCTION: This application seeks approvals for the redevelopment of the Gulfco Building located at 616 East Hyman Avenue. The property is legally described as Lots N & O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen (Parcel Identification Number 2737-182-12-005). It is a 6,000 square foot lot in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District. The Vicinity Map below indicates the property's general location relative to the surrounding area. MAPQUESI 9 4 1 600 ft izuu m 2.7 t, 00 0 210 I a GÂ·or.29 90 & C 47 919 Z 0 2 Fed V 4 .. ll' i.,1" 6.4'C~ % <O 3 -2,1 81 ~ 1/ <4 - I Aspen 0 -9 w. Paeocf Pard k fE Ma,n St A-1. Henon 9,, Pe P/,i, i.wle: I Pal 1 t21 Â·D fJ JO Lin p, E Coor, 4,9 6 i. Â£,~.,p.~f| ~L'D j.â€¢,~ 46 S;Or, h Waters A... HO': 21. - As c,ele 13Â·21Â·Â·e m :e.,2,6.1 12 - 7 - 1 ! 43 /1 Â®2010 M apQuest Portions Â®2010 NAVIEO Vicinity Map - 616 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen The applicant intends to complete a remodel that will extend the second level closer to the rear property line on the alley side of the building (cantilevered over the existing parking area) and enclose the existing second floor south-facing deck to create additional commercial space. A third floor addition containing one free-market residential unit will also be made. Common areas and circulation routes inside the building will be remodeled as necessary to provide efficiency and compliance with applicable building codes. The applicant has received Conceptual Commercial Design Review (CCDR) approval from the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) pursuant to Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012 (attached to this application as Exhibit 6). While the proposed use mix and exterior design of the building has been modified from that included in the CCDR application, the height, scale, massing, bulk, proportions and site plan of the proposal remains fully consistent with the CCDR approvals. 616 E. Hyman Avenue - GMQS & Final Design Review Application Page 1 -49 .1 .7 14007 r 1, This application is seeking Growth Management Allotments (for one free-market residence and 580 square feet of additional commercial net leasable space) pursuant to Aspen Land Use Code Sections 26.304, 26.470.070(4), 26.470.080(1) and (2), 26.470.100, 26.470.110, 26.470.120, 26.515, 26.540 and 27.710.150. Per the Code, Growth Management Allotment applications must be submitted on either February 15th or August 15th. This application also seeks Final Commercial Design Review approval pursuant to Sections 26.412.040.A(4) and 26.412.050 of the Code and Special Review approval to memorialize the P&Z's decision to allow for a reduction in the dimensions of the Utility/Trash/Recycle Area pursuant to Sections 26.430.040.E and 26.575.060 of the Code. This application is divided into four sections, beginning with this brief introduction to the application. Section II describes the existing conditions of the project site and environs. Section III outlines the applicant' s proposed development, and Section IV addresses the proposed development's compliance with the applicable review criteria of the Code. For the reviewer' s convenience, all pertinent supporting documents are provided in the various exhibits to the application, which include: Exhibit 1: Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Forms; Exhibit 2: Proof ofthe Applicant's Ownership; Exhibit 3: Pre-Application Conference Summary; Exhibit 4: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP), Poss Architecture and Planning (Poss), and Schlumberger Construction (SC) to represent the applicant; Exhibit 5: Dimensional Requirements ofthe Commercial (C-1) Zone District; Exhibit 6: P&Z Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012; Exhibit 7: An executed application fee agreement; and, Exhibit 8: Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within three-hundred feet o f the subject property (to be provided no more than sixty (60) days prior to the scheduled P&Z hearing). In addition, architectural plans and area calculations for the existing and proposed conditions have been prepared by Poss Architecture and Planning and accompany this application. While the applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Code, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application, questions may arise which require further information and/or clarification. Upon request, the applicant' s representative will provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the review. 616 E. Hyman Avenue -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 2 II. PROJECT SITE & SURROUNDING AREA (Existing Conditions): The building at 616 East Hyman Avenue is a 2-story, commercial building on a 6,000 square foot lot, situated on the north side of East Hyman Avenue between Hunter and Spring Streets. The subject property is legally described as Lots N and O, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen, and is owned by Furngulf LLP (the applicant). The existing structure was built in 1969 (per County Assessor's records) and features , moss stone on the first level in three sections that are split by glass and awnings. This tall, one-story part of the building that is at the property line abutting the sidewalk features a deck above, and the moss stone rises to a height allowing it to serve as the deck railings. Also on the street level at the southwest corner of the property is a landscaped garden and walkway (the existing public amenity space of approximately 22.2'D x 19.4'W, or 430.68 square feet) that leads to the main entrance of the building, which is setback approximately 22.2 feet from the property line. This setback part of the building also features large glass windows. The second level of the building is skinned in 1970's style stucco and dark, heavy wood and is setback entirely behind the pedestrian amenity space. The roof is flat and defined by a thick soffit line behind which a synthetic shingle roof slopes up to another, slightly higher (approximately 4 feet) flat roof. Three "bubble" skylights and what appears to be a chimney project from the upper roof and are visible from the street. Concrete wing walls project above the roof on both sides ofthe building. On the alley side of the building there are six numbered parking spaces; however, only four can be considered legitimate parking because one contains a trash dumpster while another blocks the back entrance to/egress from the building. There are also utility meters and wires scattered throughout the backside of the building giving this area an unfinished and utilitarian appearance. Upon entering the front of the building, there are stairs and decking wrapped around the perimeter of an atrium to provide access to the basement level and second floor. The basement level is comprised of two commercial spaces, one of which is currently unoccupied and the other houses Aspen Sports Medicine, as well common circulation areas and a shared bathroom. The street level contains commercial spaces that are either vacant or currently occupied by the Aspen Valley Foundation. The second floor contains the offices of Gulfco Ltd. The current commercial net leasable space is 9,046sf, of which 3,331 sf are on the basement level, 3,261 sf are on the main level, and 2,454sf are on the second level. The total commercial Floor Area is approximately 7,396sf (1.233:1), while current codes establish an allowable commercial floor area limit of 9,000sf (1.5:1). There is currently no residential use on the property. See also Exhibits 5 and 6 hereto. 616 E. Hyman Avenue - GMQS & Final Design Review Application 3 III. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: The proposal maintains the footprint of the existing building, while remodeling the building such that the second level will extend closer to the property line on the alley side (above the existing parking area), adding additional commercial space to this part of the building. Commercial space will also be extended out over the existing south-facing deck on the second floor. The additional commercial net leasable space above that existing amounts to 580 square feet. This will generate a requirement for 0.58 additional off-street parking spaces, which will be mitigated by a cash-in-lieu payment. A third floor addition that is more or less centered on the building will contain one free- market residential unit with 2,479 square feet of net livable area (of which 124sf are on the second floor). One transferable development right (TDR-) from a historic property will be utilized to enable the increase from 2,000sf to 2,479sf o f net livable area while the overall free-market residential Floor Area will remain within the 0.5:1 (3,000sf) limit. A TDR will be extinguished prior to building permit issuance. The overall height of the building is approved for thirty-eight (38) feet, which the Planning and Zoning Commission granted as part of the Conceptual Commercial Design Review (see Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012 attached to this application as Exhibit 7). P&Z also approved the Public Amenity Space at 430 square feet. All other underlying dimensional requirements, with the exception of the proposed utility/trash/recycle area, must be met during this Final Commercial Design Review. The 8,995sf of above grade commercial floor area that will result from this project greatly exceeds the proposed free market residential net livable square footage. The applicant is under contract to purchase the required Certificates of Affordable Ilousing Credit as mitigation for the additional employees generated by the proposed development. The configuration of the Utility/Trash/Recycle (U/T/R) area does not meet the letter of the required dimensions in the Code; therefore, Special Review approval is needed to slightly reduce the dimensions and alter the configuration. The proposed design and dimensions of the U/T/R area were represented and discussed with the P&Z during the project's Conceptual hearings, and the P&Z supported this approval; however, the public notice was not properly completed (it failed to include the special review request) and, as a result, this application needs to include the same Special Review request. The Code requires an area measuring 20'W x 10'D, or a total of 200 square feet, for the U/T/R area while the proposed area measures approximately 9'W x 20'D, or approximately 180 square feet. The proposed area provides almost the same amount of space as that required, but in a different, more efficient configuration that does not eliminate the space needed for off-street parking. That is, the entire alley frontage of the property measures only sixty (60) lineal feet and, given the off-street parking requirements, it would be wasteful to use one-third of this alley frontage on an inefficiently laid out U/T/R service area. Additionally, there is an access/walkway directly adjacent to the proposed U/T/R area that is not counted toward that space but aides in the area's functionality. Moreover, this building has never had any functional U/T/R service area and the proposed redevelopment only adds 580 square feet of 616 E. Hyman Avenue -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 4 - commercial NLA and one residential unit. In the end, the proposed U/T/R service area will be more than adequate to service the commercial/office and residential uses in the building without unnecessarily sacrificing the area needed to accommodate off-street parking. In fact, during the conceptual review, the Environmental Health Department noted that the proposed area and configuration will be adequate since it is dedicated to just trash and service needs. The basic design of the building is the same as that approved during Conceptual Commercial Design review; however the materials palette and architectural details have been refined to better reflect the context and Aspen as a whole. The proposed design provides a successful and current interpretation of traditional Aspen commercial architecture. Please refer to the submitted plan sets for details and renderings of the proposed designs. Please also refer to Exhibit 5 for details about consistency with the C- 1 Zone District requirements. IV. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: Growth management review is necessary to obtain allocations for the free-market residential unit and for the additional commercial space that is proposed to be included within the project. Given this requirement for GMQS approvals, it is necessary to first be reviewed by staff against the Community Objectives Scoring Criteria. The P&Z then conducts their review of the proposal's consistency with the GMQS general requirements, the affordable housing standards, the rules applicable to expansion or new commercial development, and the use of Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. This application is also seeking Final Commercial Design Review approval as well as Special Review approval to reduce the dimensions of the Utility/Trash/Recycle area. Accordingly, this section of the application addresses Aspen Land Use Code Sections: 26.470.120, Community Objectives Scoring Criteria; 26.470.050(B), General Requirements; 26.470.070(4), Affordable Housing; 26.540, Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit; 26.470.080(1), Expansion or New Commercial Development; 26.470.080(2), New Free Market Residential Units Within a Multi-Family or Mixed-Use Project; 26.412.040.A(4) and 26.412.050, Final Commercial Design Review; 26.430.040.E and 26.575.060, Special Review for Reduction of Utility/Trash/Recycle Area; and 26.515.030, Off-Street Parking. The following portions of this application address the applicable review standards of the Code in the order of the Sections just listed. A. Communitv Objective Scorinj: Criteria, Section 26.470.120 All applications for a Major Planning and Zoning Commission Growth Management Review are to be assigned a Community Objectives score by the Community Development Director (the CDD), pursuant to Section 26.470.120 of the Code. The assigned scores are to be used to establish the review order and sequence by which applications may be granted growth management allocations. The following provides 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 5 each of the Community Objectives Scoring Criteria (in italicized and indented print) followed by a recommended score and its rationale/justification. Community Objectives Scoring Criterion #1 - Workforce Housing The community desires a balance between Aspen - the Community and Aspen - the Resort. Both the social fabric of the community and the long-term economic well-being of the resort are reliant on a resource of housing opportunities for local working residents. The Community Development Director shall assign a score to each project for this objective based on following point schedule: Points for tile Number of Employees Housed. One (1) point shall be assigned for each one (1) percent by which a proposal exceeds the minimum affordable housing requirements of this Chapter, as applicable to the particular type of development, with actual housing units on-site or offsite. Depending upon the type of development, affordable housing requirements are either expressed as a number of units, number of employees to be housed, or as a square footage of housing to be provided and the score shall be a reflection of the applicable requirement. In circumstances where a project's affordable housing requirements are a combination of requirements, the average percent by which a proposal exceeds each requirement shall be used. In no case shall cash-in-lieu be used to obtain points for this criterion. With regard to the project's commercial component, Section 26.470.080(1) of the Code directs an applicant to the requirements of Section 26.470.050. Therefore, sixty (60) percent of the employees generated by the additional commercial development, according to Section 26.470.100(A), Employee Generation Rates, are to be mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The codified Employee Generation Rates provide that development in the C-1 zone district generates 4.1 full-time equivalent employees (FTE) per thousand square feet of net leasable first-floor area, and 3.075 FTE per thousand square feet of upper and lower level net leasable area (NLA). The standard above, explains that the mitigation is required only for the employees generated by " additional" commercial development. Given these Code provisions, in order to determine the mitigation requirement, one must calculate the employee generation of street and other levels of commercial NLA in both the existing structure and the proposed structure, and then calculate the difference. The difference is the number of employees generated by the redevelopment. Category 4 housing must be provided for 60% of the employees generated, and mitigation must be provided in a manner consistent with the requirements of Sections 26.470.050(B)(5) and (6), and 26.470.070(4) of the Code. The existing development contains 3,261 square feet of first floor NLA and 5,785 square feet of lower and upper floor NLA. Therefore, the existing first floor NLA generates 13.370 FTE ([3,261 sf/1,000sf] x 4.1), and the existing lower and upper floors' NLA generates 17.789 FTE ([5,785sf/1,000sf] x 3.075). In total, then, the existing structure generates 31.159 FTE (13.370 + 17.789). 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 6 The remodel and addition plan includes 2,910 square feet of first floor NLA, generating 11.931 FTE ([2,910sf/1,000sf] x 4.1). The project also includes a combined total of 6,716 square feet of NLA on the basement level and the second floor, generating 20.652 FTE ([6,716sf/1,000sfI x 3.075). Therefore, the commercial component generates a total of 32.583 FTE (11.931 + 20.652). The 31.159 FTE credit from the existing building is now applied, bringing the total "additional" employee generation to 1.424 FTE (32.583 - 31.159). Since 60% of the incremental increase in employee generation must be mitigated, the end mitigationyequirement attributable to the commercial component of the redevelopment is~0.854 F~E (1.424 x 0.6). With regard to the project' s free market residential component, Section 26.470.050(B)(6) of the Code explains that, 'tt#brdable housing Net Livable Area, for which the finished floor level is at or above Natural or Finished Grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty (30) percent of the additional free-market residential Net Livable Area, for which the finished floor level is at or above Natural or Finished Grade, whichever is higher." The existing structure does not contain any residential square footage; thus, all free market net livable area in the proposal is "additional." The proposed development includes 2,479 net livable square feet of free market residential space, all of which is above natural and finished grade. Therefore 743.7 square feet of above-grade net livable affordable housing space (2,479 x 30%) is required. At 400 square feet per FTE, this equates t~1.839~TE to be mitigated. Since the proposal does not include on-site provision of affordable housing (with actual units), the cumulative affordable housing requirement is 2.713 (0.854 + 1.859) FTE to be mitigated at the Category 4 level. The applicant has Category 2 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit under contract, and will use such for mitigation as authorized in Sections 26.470.070.4(b) and 26.540.080 of the Code and based on the formula outlined in Ordinance 32, Series of 2012. The 2.713 Category 4 FTE converts/equates to 1.59 Category 2 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit as follows: 2.713 FTE x $141,268 (the Category 4 fee) = $383,260; $383,260 / $241,538 (the Category 2 fee) == 1.59 Category 2 FTE. The applicant has put 1.63 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit under contract and will provide that amount to the City to extinguish as mitigation for this project. Extinguishing 1.63 credits where only 1.59 are necessary exceeds the requirement by approximately 3%, thereby generating three (3) points under part one of the Workforce Housing Criterion. Points for the Size of Affordable Housing Units. One (1) point shall be assigned for each one (1) percent by which proposed affordable housing units exceed the minimum square footage requirements of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. In no case shall cash-in-lieu be used to obtain points for this criterion. No points are possible under this criterion when using Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit. 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 7 Minimum Threshold Requirement: Proposals with less than the minimum required affordable housing requirement, as requirement pursuant to this Chapter according to the particular type of development, shall receive a failing score for this criterion and shall be denied by the Community Development Director. The minimum requirement may be a combination of on-site units, off-site units, or cash-in-lieu thereof as such methods are permitted by this Chapter. The proposal for the free-market residential unit and the additional commercial space includes the purchase of 1.63 Category 2 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit as permitted under Sections 26.470.070.4(b) and 26.540.080 of the Code. The proposed project meets all requirements for Workforce Housing mitigation and earns three (3) points under Community Objectives Scoring Criterion #1 - Workforce Housing. Community Objective Scoring Criterion #2 - Energy Conservation The community desires development that minimizes its impact on the natural environment and to maintain a leadership role in energy conservation and production strategies, ejficient building techniques, and use of materials. The Community Development Director shall assign a score to each project for this objective based on following point schedule and the most recent version of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) standards of the US Green Building Council: Points for LEED Certified projects. LEED Bronze level projects = 10 points. LEED Silver level projects = 20 points. LEED Gold level projects = 30 points. LEED Platinum level projects = 50 points. In order for proposals to obtain points for this criterion, an applicant must demonstrate credible progress towards certification as determined sufficient by the Community Development Director. It shall not be considered sujficient to merely state a certifcation level without evidence supporting progress towards actual certification by the US Green Building Council. In no event shall a project be relieved of the adopted energy efficiency requirements of the City of Aspen that are applicable to all development projects. The applicant will follow the applicable energy efficiency requirements of the City of Aspen, but does not intend to have the building LEED certified. Therefore, this application will not receive any points under this criterion. 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 8 Community Objective Scoring Criterion #3 - Small Lodges This criterion applies only to development proposals involving tourist accommodations. Therefore, this criterion is not applicable and no points are possible hereunder. In summary, the proposed mixed-use development meets all applicable Code requirements and earns three (3) points in the Community Objectives Scoring. It should be noted that no points are needed in order to receive the requested GMQS allotment provided sufficient allotments remain available. The number of points applicants score simply determines the order in which all submitted and complete GMQS applications will be reviewed. B. General Requirements, Section 26.470.050(B) Pursuant to Section 26.470.050(B) of the Code, all development applications for growth management review must comply with the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development (the generally applicable criteria are provided below in indented and italicized text with each followed by a response demonstrating consistency and/or compliance therewith, as applicable): 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Section 26.470.030.D. Applications for Multi-Year Development Allotment, pursuant to 26.470.090.1, shall not be required to meet this standard. The proposed mixed-use development consists of commercial net leasable area (NILA), and one free market residential unit. The annual growth management allotment available for commercial space is 33,300 net leasable square feet. This application is only seeking 580 square feet of additional commercial net leasable space. There are also eighteen (18) free market residential growth management allotments available for the February 15, 2013 submittal deadline and this application requests only one (1) such allotment. Therefore, there are sufficient growth management allotments available to accommodate the proposed development. A multi-year allotment is not requested or required. 2. The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. The proposed development will create a mixed-use building which is fully compatible with existing, proposed and approved land uses in the surrounding area. Almost every property in the immediate vicinity is developed/developing with either commercial or mixed-use buildings. This is no applicable adopted regulatory master plan. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations Of the zone district. 616 E. Hyman Avenite -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 9 The proposed development is completely consistent with the requirements and limitations of the underlying Commercial (C-1) Zone District (see Exhibit 5). 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval, and the Conceptual Planed Unit Development approval, as applicable. The proposed development is fully consistent with the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approvals granted pursuant to P&Z Resolution Number 20, Series of 2012 (see Exhibit 6). 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty (60) percent ofthe employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according Section 26.470.100.A, Employee Generation Rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Section 26.470.070.4, Affordable Housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower Category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.090 Criteria for Extinguishment of the Certificate. As explained above, in response to the Community Objective Scoring Criteria, the applicant will be using Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit to fully satisfy (and exceed) all employee mitigation requirements. 6. Affordable housing Net Livable Area, for which thefinishedfloor level is at or above Natural or Finished Grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty (30) percent Of the additional free-market residential Net Livable Area, for which the finished floor level is at or above Natural or Finished Grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Section 26.470.070.4, Affordable Housing, and be restricted to Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lo-wer Category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed restricted at any level of affordability, including Residential Occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.090 Criteria for Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. 616 E. Hyman Avenue- GMQS & Final Design Review Application 10 The existing structure does not contain any residential square footage; thus, all free market net livable area in the proposal is "additional." The proposed development includes 2,479 net livable square feet of free market residential space, all of which is above natural and finished grade. Therefore 743.7 square feet of above-grade net livable affordable housing space (2,479 x 30%) are required. As mentioned above, the applicant will utilize Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit to fully satisfy all employee mitigation requirements. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking, and road and transit services. The project site benefits from readily available, existing infrastructure. The existing structure is served with City water and electric, ACSD sewer facilities, and existing communication utilities. Being centrally located in the Commercial (C-1) zone, police, emergency and fire protection services as well as parking, road and transit services are all readily available. Storm water will be handled according to current City regulations, resulting in less discharge than is now the case. The remodeled building will be upgraded to comply with today's far more stringent codes. C. Affordable Housing, Section 26.470.070(4) and Chapter 26.540 The development of affordable housing deed restricted in accordance with the APCHA Guidelines requires review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the criteria below. Each criterion is provided in indented and italicized text, and each is followed by a response demonstrating consistency and/or compliance therewith, as applicable a) The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. As mentioned throughout this application, no units are proposed; instead, the applicant will purchase and extinguish Certificates of Affordable Housing credit to fully satisfy (and exceed) all employee mitigation requirements. b) Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form Of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Offsite units shall be provided within the City of Aspen city limits. Units outside the city limits maybe accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to 26.470.090.2. If the 616 E. Hyman Avenue - GMQS & Final Design Review Application 11 mitigation requirement is less than one full unit a cash-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one or more units, a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Section 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Director, pursuant to Chapter Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. c) Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level offifty (50) percent or more of the unit's Net Livable Area is at or above Natural or Finished Grade whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review, pursuant to Chapter 26.430. d) The proposed units shall be deed restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City of Aspen to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or non-profit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability ofthe lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, or other similar governmental or quasi-governmental agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. As previously explained, the applicant will extinguish Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit to satisfy approximately 103% of the cumulative affordable housing requirements. e) Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a- d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. This section is not applicable since the applicant is utilizing Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit for mitigation. 616 E. Hyman Avenue -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 12 Chapter 26.540 of the Code describes the process for establishing, transferring and extinguishing a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be sold, assigned, transferred or conveyed in whole or in part, in increments no less than one-one-hundredths (.01), pursuant to Ordinance No. 32, Series of 2012, which amended Chapter 26.540 of the Code. The applicant has put 1.63 Category 2 Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit under contract and will extinguish these in order to satisfy approximately 103% of the cumulative affordable housing mitigation requirements associated with the proposed development. This purchase is expected to have closed prior to the P&Z hearing. D. Expansion or New Commercial Development, Section 26.470.080(1) Section 26.470.080(1) of the Code explains that the expansion of an existing commercial building or commercial portion of a mixed-use building is to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the General Requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050 of the Code. The proposal's consistency with the General Requirements of Section 26.470.050(B) has been addressed above. E. New Free-Market Residential Units within a Multi-FamilÂ¥ or Mixed-Use Project, Section 26.470.080(2) Section 26.470.080(2) of the Code explains that development of new free-market residential units within a mixed-use project is to be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the General Requirements outlined in Section 26.470.050 of the Code. The proposal's consistency with the General Requirements of Section 26.470.050(B) has been addressed above. F. Final Commercial Design Review, Sections 26.412.040.AH) and 26.412.050 Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines: The Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guidelines (the "Commercial Guidelines") set forth design review criteria, standards and guidelines that are to be used in making determinations of appropriateness. The Commercial Guidelines are organized to address the different design contexts that exist in the City. These distinct settings are defined as "Character Areas," within which variations exist among the physical features that define each area. The proposed development is located in the Commercial (C-1) Zone District and the Commercial Character Area, one block east of the Commercial Core. Per the Commercial Guidelines, all development projects should achieve the following design objectives: 616 E. Hynian Avenite-GMQS & Final Design Revie,v Application 13 0 Promote an interconnected circulation system that invites pedestrian use, including a continuous street and alley system and a respect for the natural topography; o Promote a system of public places that support activities, including public amenity spaces, compatible landscaping and paving, and unobtrusive off-street parking; and 0 Assure that buildings fit together to create a vibrant street edge that reinforces a sense Of appropriate scale. According to the Commercial Guidelines: the Commercial Zone District (C-1) forms the immediate fringe of much of the Commercial Core Historic District (CC); building heights and materials in this zone vary; storefront design and display is a less dominant characteristic in the C-1 zone than in the CC area, diminishing the pedestrian experience in some places; the street wall is less defined than in the CC; and building facades are sometimes set back or include front yard space, which weakens the edge. The purpose of the Commercial (C-1) zone district is enumerated in Section 26.710.150(A) of the Code as follows: "to provide for the establishment of mixed-use buildings with commercial uses on the ground floor, opportunities for affordable and free-market residential density. A transition between the CC and surrounding residential neighborhoods has been implemented [emphasis added] through a slight reduction in allowable floor area as compared to the Commercial Core, the ability to occupy the Ground Floor with offices, and a separate Chapter in the Commercial Design Guidelines. " As provided in the above-cited, codified "Purpose" statement, by complying with the zoning and associated dimensional requirements, this proposal has already succeeded in transitioning from the CC to the residential areas further to the east. The key design objectives in the Commercial Character Area district are as follows: 1. Strengthen the sense of relatedness with the Commercial Core Historic District. 2. Maintain a retail orientation. 3. Promote creative, contemporary design. 4. Encourage a well-defined street wall. 5. Rejlect the variety in building heights seen traditionally. 6. Accommodate outdoor public spaces while establishing a clear definition to the street edge. 7. Promote variety in the street level experience. The remodeled building's unique and innovative design will enhance the street vitality. The proposed renovation will greatly enhance the building's retail orientation with large, storefront windows that feature awnings which help separate the first floor from the upper levels. A 430 square foot public amenity space has been approved where the existing garden now resides, which combines with the rest of the building' s clearly established street edge to promote variety in the street level experience. 6 ]6 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 14 Outlined below are the Commercial Character Area's Final Review Design Guidelines in italicized print, with each followed by a description of the proposal's compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. The portions in bold are the standards and the bullet points are guidelines. 1.29 A new building shall reflect the traditional lot width (30 ft.) as expressed by two or more of the following: e Variation in height at internal lot lines. â€¢ Variation in the plane ofthefrontfagade. 0 Street favade composition. â€¢ Variation in architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the building module. The new building is maintaining the same footprint as the existing building but also uses new architectural detailing and materials to emphasize the front most building module, including vertical siding, storefront windows and entries, and awnings. 1.30 The detailed design of the building farade should reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. The proposed development involves the renovation of the existing building with a third floor addition set far back from the front faQade. Maintenance of the existing character and form will reflect the traditional scale and rhythm of the block. 1.31 A building should reflect the architectural hierarchy and articulation inherent in the composition of the streetfaÂ¢ade. 1.32 A building should reflect the three-dimensional characteristics of the street faqade in the strength and depth of modeling, fenestration and architectural detail. This building will primarily maintain the existing footprint and will undergo a remodel. The front street-level fagade of the building has been pulled in slightly but maintains the street level retail frontage. The overall design of the building will be similar to what currently exists; however, the second level that is currently set back from the first floor will be at the street edge and the third floor addition will be set significantly back so as to minimize visibility from the sidewalks below. The composition of the street faga(le will be reflected in the architectural hierarchy and articulation. In essence, the design successfully provides a current interpretation of traditional Aspen design. 1.33 Any new building shall be designed to maintain a minimum of 9 feet from floor to ceiling on allfloors This is not a new building but rather a remodel and addition. Nevertheless, appropriately scaled floor-to-ceiling heights are provided as all levels maintain at least 9 feet from floor to ceiling. The perceived height of the street level is increased through the high placement of awnings above the storefront windows and entrances. 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 15 1.34 Maintain the distinction between the street level and upper floors. The awnings, ground floor storefront setback and the vertical siding on the second floor will aid in clearly maintaining distinction between the street level and upper floors. The awnings will increase the perceived height and relative scale of the ground floor. The third floor is set significantly back from all facades to minimize its visibility from the street level. 1.35 A new building should be designed to maintain the stature of traditional street level retail frontage. As mentioned above, this is not a new building. Nevertheless, the remodel will not only maintain but also greatly enhance the stature of its street level retail frontage. 1.36 Minimize the appearance of a tail thirdjloor. As the P&Z agreed during its Conceptual approval hearings, the substantial setback of the proposed third level from the floors below minimizes its appearance from the street. 1.37 The first floor faÂ¢ade should be designed to concentrate interest at the street level, using the highest quality of design, detailing and materials. The first floor fa~ade has been designed to concentrate interest at the street level with large storefront windows and awnings that help to create a distinction from the upper floors. Only the highest quality of design, details and materials will be employed. 1.38 The retail entrance should be at the sidewalk level. The retail entrances are at the sidewalk level. 1.39 Incorporate an airlock entry into the plan for all new structures. This is not a new structure, but the remodel plans incorporate airlock functions. 1.40 Window area along the Jirst floor shaN be a minimum of 60% of exterior street faqade area when facing principal street(s). The window area along the first floor is more than 60% of the exterior street facing faÂ¢ade. 1.41 Where appropriate a building shall be designed to maintain the character and transparency of the traditional street level retailfrontage. The building has been designed to maintain and enhance the character and transparency of the traditional street level retail frontage. In essence, the design successfully provides a current interpretation of traditional Aspen design. 616 E. Hynian Avenue -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 16 1.42 Design of the Jirst floor storefront should include particular attention to the foilowing â€¢ The basic elements and proportions of storefront design ~ Depth and strength of modeling 0 The palette of materials and Jinishes used in both the structural framework and the storefront window 0 The concentration of architectural detail to ensure a rich visual experience o The complementary use of signage and lettering to enhance the retail and downtown character 0 The use of lighting to accentuate visual presence As previously mentioned, this is a building remodel. That said, the traditional first floor design features of this building are being remodeled in a manner fully consistent with this guideline, whereas the existing structure truly falls short of this goal. 1.43 Retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys should follow similar design principles to the streetfrontage, adjustedfor the scale of the space. There is no retail frontage facing onto side courts or rear alleys. 1.44 A larger building should reflect the traditional lot width in the form and variation of its roof. 1.45 The roofscape should be designed with the same design attention as the secondary elevations of the building. The third floor is set approximately twenty-seven (27) feet back from the front faQade, while the 2nd floor' s "roof' will be maintained and reflects the traditional lot width. Roof form variation is achieved in its height, as part of the third floor will measure 38 feet while the remainder of the roof stops at 36 feet tall. All sides of the building, including its roofscape, have been designed with equal attention to detail. 1.46 High quality, durable materials should be employed. 1.47 Building materials should have thesefeatures: â€¢ Convey the quality and range of materials seen traditionally â€¢ Reduce the perceived scale ofthe building and enhance visual interest ofthe facade â€¢ Convey a human scale â€¢ Have proven durability and weathering characteristics within Aspen's climate 1.48 A building or additions should reflect the quality and variation in materials seen traditionally. 1.49 Where contemporary materials are used they shall be: â€¢ High quality in durability and finish â€¢ Detailed to convey a human scale â€¢ Compatible with a traditional masonry palette 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 17 Only high quality, durable materials will be employed, with the vast majority of surfaces being either stone, wood, or glass. The proposed materials are included in the plan set provided with this application and samples will be presented at the hearing. 1.50 Materials used for third floor accommodation set back from the street fagade(s) should be more subdued than the primary fagades. As mentioned earlier in this application, the materials proposed for the third floor, as well as its design and setbacks, will help the building to visually recede from the street. The third floor setbacks coupled with the second floor parapets will minimize visibility of the third floor from the street/sidewalks, effectively subduing its materials. 1.51 Paving and landscaping should be designed to complement and enhance the immediate setting of the building and area. Please see the proposed Site Plan and Landscape Plan included with this application, which set out to and succeed in achieving the goals enumerated in this guideline. G. Special Review to Reduce the Utilitv/Trash/Recvcle Area, Sections 26.430.040.E and 26.575.060 Pursuant to Section 26.430.040.E of the Code, whenever a special review is conducted to determine a change in any Utility/Trash/Recycle (U/T/R) service area requirements, it shall be considered in accordance with the standards set forth at Section 26.575.060, which state, A. General. The following provisions shall apply to all utility/trash/recycle service areas: 1. If the property adjoins an alleyway, the utility/trash/recycle service area shall be along and accessed from the alleyway. Unless entirely located on an alleyway, all utility/trash/recycle service areas shall be fenced so as not to be visible from the street, and such fences shall be six (6) feet high from grade. All fences shall be of sound construction and shall be no less than ninety percent (90%) opaque. 2. Whenever this Title shall require that a utility/trash/recycle service area be provided abutting an alley, buildings may extend to the rear propert'y line if otherwise allowed by this Title, provided that an open area is provided which shall be accessible to the alley and which meets the dimensional requirements of this Section. 3. A minimum of twenty (20) linear feet of the utility/trash/recycle service area shall be reserved for box storage, utility transformers or equipment, building access and trash and recycling facilities. For properties with thirty (30) feet or less of alley frontage, this requirement shall be fifteen (15) linear feet. For properties with no alley access, no requirement shall apply. The required area shall have a minimum vertical clearance of ten (10) feet and a minimum depth of 616 E. Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 18 ten (10) feet at ground level. The required area shall not be used for required parking or as vehicular access to a parking area. 4. The Planning and Zoning Commission may reduce the required dimensions of this area by special review (see Chapter 26.430) and in accordance with the standards set forth below at Subsection 26.575.060.B. The standards of Subsection B that must be met are enumerated below in italicized text and each is followed by a response demonstrating compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. The Planning and Zoning Commission may reduce the dimensions of a utility/trash/recycle service area by following special review procedures set forth at Chapter 26.430 if: 1. There is a demonstration that, given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash/recycle service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. The Code requires an area measuring 20'W x 10'D, or a total of 200 square feet, for the U/T/R. service area while the proposed area measures approximately 9'W x 20'D, or approximately 180 square feet. The proposed area provides almost the same amount of space as that required, but in a different, more efficient configuration that does not eliminate the space needed for the off-street parking. That is, the entire alley frontage of the property measures only sixty (60) lineal feet and, given the off-street parking requirements, it would be wasteful to use one-third of this alley frontage on an inefficiently laid out U/T/R service area. Additionally, there is an access/walkway directly adj acent to the proposed U/T/R area that is not counted toward that space but which directly contributes to the area's functionality. Moreover, this building has never has any functional U/T/R service area and the proposed redevelopment only adds 580 square feet of commercial NLA and one residential unit. In the end, the proposed U/T/R service area will be more than adequate to service the commercial/office and residential uses in the building without unnecessarily saerificing the area needed to accommodate off-street parking. In fact, during the conceptual review, the Environmental Health Department noted that the proposed area and configuration will be adequate since it is dedicated to just trash and service needs. 2. Access to the utility/trash/recycle service area is adequate. Appropriate, adequate and convenient access to the Utility/Trash/Recycle area is provided from the rear exit o f the building and the alley. 3. Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and making them easily morable by trash personnel. 616 E, Hyman Avenue-GMQS & Final Design Review Application 19 The trash facility (an enclosed5 bear-resistant dumpster) will be on wheels and will abut the alley, making it easily movable by and accessible to trash personnel. 4. When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and measures are taken to encourage trash compaction by other development in the block. If trash compaction can be accommodated and proves necessary, arrangements with the trash collection company will be made to enable such. 5. The areaforpublic utility placement and maintenance is adequate and safefor the placement ofutilities. The proposed area includes accessibility along its entire depth (from rear egress of the building to the alley). As such, the utility meters/pedestals located closer to the building will be accessible to service providers. 6. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area. The entire parking, access and U/T/R area will be developed simultaneously with the rest of the building. Adequate provisions will be incorporated to ensure construction of the access area and such will be demonstrated at the time of building permit application submittal. H. Off-street Parking, Section 26.515.030 This redevelopment entails only 580 net additional square feet of leasable commercial space. Per the Code, this will generate the need for 0.58 additional off-street parking spaces. The Code does not require any off-street parking for a free-market residential unit in a mixed-use building the C-1 Zone District. As permitted under Section 26.515.030, the applicant will pay $17,400 in-lieu of the 0.58 parking spaces required (0.58 spaces x $30,000/space). 616 E. Hyman Avenue -GMQS & Final Design Review Application 20 EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Land Use Application Exhibit 2: Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 3: Proof of Ownership Exhibit 4: Letter of Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC to Represent the Applicant Exhibit 5: Dimensional Requirements of the Commercial (C-1) Zone District Exhibit 6: Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012 Exhibit 7: Executed Fee Agreement Exhibit 8: Mailing Addresses of Record of Property Owners Within 300' PID# 2737-182-12-005 RECEIVEP co 12 - 2 013 Â· 9 EXHIBIT FEB 1 5 2013 El CITY OF ASPU~TACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN, Name: (1Â·16 -2 -Â®roon dve (6 ul--An -boddinj) Location: 616 6 14 Awn f)w, Aquan (Lo-1.5 j\I-t o, 810(.C 99 1(,41,01-0*nsi~kt of (Indicate street 4ddress, lot & block nulber, legal description where appropriate) Abpe. rh Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 2-7 33 -1 9 3.- 1 1-(10<r APPLICANT: Name: FO r n ciolf L Lf Address: 6{6 014-101(fo Ae,/ A~soen, 00 316// V Phone #: (9303 934- 6-4 94 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Â·+10 66 Ulne| 2/ann,>Â·Â®:, LL O Address: 101 N . Mill %-t , Sjj ,44.~ 103 Asop.,n (0 FIC< C / Phone #: (9-70)415 -7 y/1 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption El Conceptual PuD U Temporary Use GMQS Allotment C Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Text/Map Amendment Special Review U/T/4 atea_ U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream ~ Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane }21 Commercial Design Review U Lot Split ~ Small Lodge Conversiord 11 not I Expansion U Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment U Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, ete.) 2 -Â·s--por-u) cony>nercicd bu0,/dins - se-e Fwiptj ,+PIR/3% PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) *,modell Actilitun - (30}dinc. Comrne (cla.1 spro 0,4 ong. +Ire-Â· Arl<4(tel- rsidence., 0 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 537 9 0 91 Pre-Application Conference Summary 8 Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement ~ Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form 81 Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards Â£ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. UNG E ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM project: 6 1 6 6 kjymoin A-e- Applicant: fi,1 (in~ul-F l. L..2 Location: G j 0 6 1-4 r-nco /1.EOUT , /)9003 V Zone District: 0.- 1 -' Lot Size: 09 j 000 Lot Area: - (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing. 9; 04 6 c,f Proposed: ~\(01-(c, st Number of residential units: Existing: h Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 0 Proposed: -1-Kb Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): */A DIMENSIONS: C41 1 (017)/11&2 i ri~ ,Â·* 5 ,1~45,ab â‚¬4 7 1 1 5-4 (c 03;r~713 noor Area: Existing:1,396 4 Allowable: ob Propased: 113% O 9-f (900) Principal bldg. height: Existing: 14) A Allowable:~;ui,~t~A Proposed: 36'-ofer-DEd 01 00-blk Access. bldg. height: Existing: AP\ Allowable: N/A Proposed:R/Â·A On-Site parking: Existing: 4 Required: 4.93 Proposed: L.-~ Â°/o Site coverage: Existing: A/A Required: M /A Proposed: M/k Â°/o Open Space: Existing: --7-1'h Required: /070 Proposed: 7.190 ~)*'64 61 94) Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: t~ A Rear Setback: Existing: ~ Required: 1 Proposed: j Combined F/R: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: Side Setback: Existing: \ Required: Proposed: \P Combined Sides: Existing: ~ Required: Proposed: Distance Between Existing N/il Required: Aj/A Proposed: f\*A Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: MOAA Variations requested: NO 1/0 r/ O-6 Ca S 01)r-tenflu rer<(16?1 040( 40han U-\ , ),4-7 Mroishil?ecult,\(_ #f kld< 09 03j-oidi (bft -ird fe. uick)3 3 C EXHIBIT PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: April 20, 2012 at 8:00 AM Case No. PCT22283P2 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: FURNGULF, LTD., A COLORADO JOINT VENTURE 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: Lots N & O, Block 99, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: Â»Â«=p 4--=- - Â· SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED Fog INFpRMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE COI*TRIDED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERyES tHE RIGHTPTO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT. OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORTBY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE,Al)ID CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT/1?ROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSÂ®FUNCE THIS.COMMITMENT IS Fl#NISH#D FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ESUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENTA PROPOSED INÂ®REI:Â¢S NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMA'*IONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ISACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE. SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. Â· 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Exceptions and Mineral Reservations as contained in the Patent to Aspen Townsite recorded March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216. MaN to: Secretary Of Sta' For office use only Corporations Section Pleage Include a typed 1560 Broadway, Sultâ€¢ 200 self-addressed envolopâ€¢ Dmvir. CO 80202 (303) 89+2251 MUST BE TYPED Fax (303) 894-p242 971005650 C $50.00 SUBMIT ORIGINAL FILING FEE: *50,00 SECRETARY OF STATE 01-14-97 10:52 REGISTRAMON STATEMENT FOR REGISTRAnON AS A REGISTERED UMITED UABIUTY PARTNERSHIP OR A REGISTERED UMITED UABIUTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Pursuant to section 7-60-144, Colorado Revised Statutes, the undersigned partnership* has approved this registration statement In the manner provided In its partnershtpagreementor, If not so provided, such statement has been approved by all of its general partners as follows: The name of the partnership~ is Furnoulf LLP If different, the name which It proposes to register and under which it proposet to transact business in Colorado Is sanne The jurisdiction of its formation (lf other than Colorado) Is n/a The street address of Its principal office Is 616 E. Hvman Avenue. Asoen. Colorado 81611 i If the principal office of a general partnership or a foreign limited liability partnership is not In Colorado, the name and street address ol its Colorado registered agent for service of process on such general or foreign partnership la n/a Last Name of an Individual or full name of an entity First and middle name of an individual n/a Street address of registered agent named above-*-.41-- /1:urnoulf LLP .,0 O~77~N / ~ Narne of patz*(Dhip# V / /7 //1.nA/1 \ sy M v - N 2-7 Geners!.Partrier - *As used In this statement, partnership refers to a general partnership or a limited partnership formed In Colorado or a foreign limited liability partnership or limited liability Ilmlted partnership formed and registered In a lurlsdiction other than Colorado. If formed In Colorado, a limited partnership must first or simultaneously file a Certificate of Limited Partnership, and if formed elsewhere, [t must also file an Application for Registration as a foreign limited partnership pit#Kthe Coforado Secretary of State. .AP j 07 0544@03.1-*PS.1 Â· \~0~0/beteber 22. 1996 3:31,71 l OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLOR-ADO CERTIFICATE I, Scott Gessler, as tile Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records ofthis office, FURNGULF LLP is a Limited Liability Partnership formed or registered on 01/14/1997 under the law of Colorado, has complied with all applicable requirements of this office, amt-isin gond standing with this offige. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 19971005656. This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 04/25/2012 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 04/26/2012 @ 14:27:09. I have affixed hereto tile Great Seal ofthe State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, authenticated, issued, delivered and communicated this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 04/26/2012 @ 14:27:09 pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 8230964. >iii- Secretary of State of the State ofColorado **********************************6********** End of Certificate ******************************************** Notice: A cerlificate issued electronicallr from the Colorado Secretan, of State's Web site is fillv and immediat elv valid and effective. However, as an option. the issitance and validily of a cer:vicate obtained electronically maybeestablished by visiting the Certificate Confirmation page of the Secretary of State's Web site, htlp~/Annu.sos.state.co.ils/biz/CertificaleSearcherileria.do enterilig the certiffcate's colilitinatio,t nul}tber displa.red on the ce,10â‚¬ate. and following the inscructions dispia>Â·ed. Confirming the issicance of a cer{ificate is merely oplional mid is not necessew to f he valid and efrective issuance ofa certificate. For more information, visit our Web site, htiv:/twww.sos.stale.co.us/click Business Center and select "Frequently Asked Questions." CERT_GS_D Rerised 08/20/2008 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF FURNGULF LLP THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of the 32 day of October, 1996 by and between MARTIN FLUG and JEREMY J. FLUG (together, the It Partners t,) . RECITALS A. The Partners are parties to the Joint Venture Agreement dated as of the loth day of April, 1984 (the " Partnership Agreement "), and currently are all the partners of the partnership established under the Partnership Agreement (the "Partnership") . The Partnership is-a partnership formed pursuant to the Uniform Partnership Law of Colorado. B. The Partners desire to amend the Partnership Agreement to provide for the registration of the Partnership as a Colorado registered limited liability partnership and to adopt certain other changes. AMENDMENT The Partnership Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 1. Each occurrence of the terms "Joint Venturen, "Venturer" and "Venturers" shall be replaced by the terms tIPartnership", ']Partner" and "Partners", respectively. Â·Â· Â· 2. Section 1.2 is amended to read as follows: "1.2 The name of the Partnership shall be "Furngulf LLP". 2. New Sections 1.6 and 1.7 shall be added and shall read as follows: '11.6 Registration as Limited Liability Partnership. The Partnership shall register with the secretary of State of the State of Colorado as a registered limited liability partnership pursuant to section 7-60-144, Colorado Revised Statutes (RCRS"). The Partnership shall make such limited liability partnership reports as required by section 7-60-149, CRS. In accordance with section 7-60-144(5), CRS, the Partnership shall be for all purposes the same entity that existed before it registered as a registered limited liability partnership. u 111.7 Limited Liability of Partners. Except as expressly provided herein, the liability of the G.WATA\PUBULNE.[\D546040.1 00<obs 22.1995 525pm partners for debts, obligations and liabilities of, or chargeable to, the Partnership shall be limited to the fullest extent permitted by section 7-60-115(2), CRS." 3. Section 2.4 shall be amended to read as follows: '12.4 Capital Accounts Deficits. Upon termination of the Partnership, no Partner shall be obligated to restore the amount of a deficit in such Partner's capital account." 4. A new Section 4.2 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: "4.2 Limitation on Distributions. A partner may not receive distributions from the Partnership in excess of those permitted by section 7-60-146, CRS. R 5. A new Section 6.12 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: "6.12 Indemnification of Partners, Emolovees and Agents. The Partnership shall indemnify any person made a party to any proceeding because such person is or was a partner of the Partnership against liability incurred in any such proceeding, and shall advance expenses incurred in such proceeding to such person, to the fullest extent permitted under law, except with respect to acts not performed in good faith or not consistent with this Agreement. The Partnership may indemnify and advance expenses to an employee or agent 0 of the Partnetship to the same extent as a partner or to a greater extent if consistent with law. " 6. A new Section 6.13 shall be added to the Partnership Agreement, and shall read as follows: "6.13 Third Partv Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not benefit or create any right or cause of action in or on behalf of any person other than the Partners." Except as amended by this First Amendment, all provisions of the original Partnership Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed thig Amendment, to be effective as of the day and year first aboyd written, notwithstanding the actual date Â·of executton.--77h / -7 A it \ bc- //7 / Ln / : t-I' i E. /2.2 /4 C Date of Execution 9*il=i~ Flug --7~Te / Yfi v j Ut ,/f/to- Date of Execution JaÂ¥?ny to. 'Fhad' l -3- JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of -&2 day of April, 1984 Â· by and betwee.n' Martin Flugr Victoria F. Aybar and Jeremy J. Flugr hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Venturers" and indi- vidually as a "Venturer". I. FORMATION. 1.1 Formation: The Venturers do hereby form a Joint - Venture pursuant to the Uniform Partnership Law of Colorado. 1.2 Name: The name of the Joint Venture shall be Furngulf, Ltd. 1.3 Character of Business: The Joint Venture shall carry on the business of investing in real property and other investment activities as it may deem appropriate. The Joint Venture may transact such other business as may be necesbary and incidental to its principal business or businesses. 1.4 Principal Place of Business: The principal place of business and the principal office of the Joint Venture shall be located at 616 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611. The Joint Venture may also maintain such other offices at: such other places as the Venturers may deem advisable. 1.5 Joint Venture Property: The Joint Venture's prop- erty shall be held in the name of the Joint Venture; II. CAPITAL. 2.1 Capital Account: An individual capital account shall be maintained for each Venturer. Contemporaneously with ' the execution of this Agreement, the Venturers shall contribute to the capital of the Joint Venture the assets set forth opposite their names on Schedule A, attached hereto. The Venturers agree that the fair market value of the assets so contributed, as -of the day of such contribution, are as set forth on Schedule A. 2.2 Interest: No interest shall be paid on any capital contribution of any Venturer. 2.3 Additional Capital: Additional capital may, from time to time be contributed to the Joint Venture by. the Venturers in such total amounts and proportions as shall be unanimously agreed upon by the Venturers. 2.4 Negative Capital Accounts: Upon termination of the Joint Venture, if any Venturer. has a negative balance in his capital account, such balance shall be a debt Â£Ebm the Venturer to the Joint Venture and the Venturer shall be obligated to make additional contributions to the Joint Venture capital to restore his capital account to zero. - III. ALLOCATION OF JOINT VENTURE GAINS, INCOME, EXPENSE, DEDUCTIONS AND LOSSES. 3.1 Allocation of Gain: Gain on the sale of Joint Venture property shall be allocated to each of the Venturers in proportion to their capital accounts as computed on the first day of the taxable year to which such income, expense, loss or deduc- tion is properly allocable. 3.2 Other Items of Income, Expense, Loss or. Deduction: All other items of income, expense, loss or deduction shall be allocated to each of the Venturers in proportion to their capital accounts as computed on - the first day of the- taxable year to which such income, expense, loss or deduction is properly alloca- ble. IV. SALARIES AND DRAWINGS. 4.1 Salaries and Drawings: The Venturers shall have such salaries, drawings hud expense accounts as may be unani- mously agreed upon by them. V. DISSOLUTION AND TERMINATION. 5.1 Dissolution: The Joint Venture shall dissolve upon the occurrence of the earliest 6f the following events: (a) TheÂ· death or disability of a Venturer, provided, however, that the remaining Venturers may agree to continue the Joint Venture. -2- (b} The voluntary filibg of any petition in bankruptcy by a Venturer or involuntary adjudication of a Venturer as bankrupt or insolvent, or the application by a Venturer for, or his consent to, the appointment of a receiver, trustee or liquidator of all or- a substantial part of his assets, or any v substantially similar action on the part of a partner, provided, however, that the remaining Venturers may agree to continue the Joint Venture. (c) The sale of all or substantially all of the property of the.Joint Venture, unless the Venturers unanimdusly 4 decide to purchase or otherwise acquire additional properties with the proceeds of such sale. i (d) The withdrawal of any Venturer, provided, however, that the remaining Venturers may agree to continue the Joint Venture. 5.2 Termination: In the event of dissolutior;, unless the Venturers agree to continue the Joint Venture as provided in . I Section 5.1, the Venturers shall wind up the affairs of the Joint Venture and the Joint Venture shall be terminated as provided herein. (a) In the event of a termination of the Joint Venture the Venturers shall sell or otherwise liquidate all of the Joint Venture assets as promptly as is consistent with obtaining a , reasonable value therefor under the circumstances (except to the extent that the Venturers determine to distribute any assets of the ' Joint Venture to a partner or Venturers in kind), shall allocate the proceeds of such sales to the Venturers' capital accounts pursuant to Sections 3.1 and 3.2, and shall discharge all liabilities of the Joint Venture in the order of priority provided 1 by law, including .all costs relating to the dissolution, winding up, liquidation and distribution of assets, and shall distribute I the remaining assets in the order set forth in Section 5.2(b) below. -3- (b) After providing for all other liabilities of the Joint Venture, any liabilities of the'JointÂ·Venture to the Venturers, other than on account of their interests in Joint Venture capital or profits, shall be satisfied. The remaining assets of the Joint Venture shall then be distributed as follows: (i) In the event. any assets of the Joint Venture - are to be distributed to the Venturers in kind, the net fair mar- - ket value of such assets 'as of the date of dissolution shall be determined by independent appraisal or by agreement among the Venturers, and the Venturers' capital accounts shall be adjusted in the same manner and proportions as if the assets had been sold for such fair market value and the proceeds allocated to the Venturers; capital accounts. (il) Subj.eat to the provisions of Section 2.4 with respect to negative capital accounts, the amount of each Venturer's capital account as determined under Section 5.2(b)(i) shall be distributed to such partner. (c) Upon completion of the winding up, liquidation and distribution of assets, the Joint Venture shall be deemed termi- nated. IV. MISCELLANEOUS. Â· 6.1 Accounting: The Joint Venture shall keep its books and records on the cash method of accounting and shall adopt the calendar year as its taxable year. 6.2 Banking: All funds of the Joint Venture shall be deposited in its name in such checking or savings account or . accounts As shall be designated by the Venturers and all with- drawals therefrom shall be made upon checks, drafts or wire transfers signed by any Venturer. 6.3 Records: At all times during the.continuance of the Joint Venture, the Venturers shall keep or cause to be kept full and true books and records of account. All such books and records of account shall at all times be opened to inspection by the venturers during normal business hours. -4- 6.4 .Employees: The Joint Venture may employ such firms, corporations, or persons as the Venturers deem advisable for the operation of the Joint Venture- business. 6.5 Assignment; Successor in Interest: No Ventuter may assign, pledge, hypothecate, or in. any manner, transfer his ; interest in the Joint Venture without.the consent of the other Venturers, provided, however, that nothing shall prevent the interest of any Venturer from being assigned, pledged, encumbered, or otherwise hypothecated to any other Venturer herein, to a member of a Venturer's immediate family, or to a lineal descendant of a Venturer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any Venturer shall, without the consent of. any other Venturer, have the right to appoint a successor in interest to succeed to his interest in the Joint Venture upon his death. If the surviving Venturers agree to continue the Joint Venture as provided in Section 5.1(a), such V successor in interest shall become a Venturer and shall be bound by all of the terms of this Joint Venture Agreement. 6.6 No Election from Subchapter K: Each party herdto agrees with respect to this Joint Venture Agreement not to elect to be excluded from the application of Subchapter K of Chapter 1 of Subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended. 6.7 Governing Law: This Joint Venture Agreement shall be governed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colotado. 6.8 Successors and Assigns: This Joint Venture Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties signatory hereto, their heirs, successors, transferees, personal representatives and assigns. 6.9 Entire Agceement: This Joint Venture Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes any prior understanding and/or written or oral agreement. All representations and agreements, whether oral or written, are contained herein. -5- . 6.10 Severability: Should any provision hereof be held to be invalid, the same shall not affect in any respect the va- 4 lidity of the remainder of this Joint Venture Agreement. 6.11 Headings: The headings contained in this Joint Venture Agreement are for reference only and shall not be con- v strued as part hereof, nor shall they affect in any way the mean- ing or interpretation hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first stated above. /tÂ» Martin Flug , â‚¬r-- 24Â«u~fl~,Le- Victoria F. Aybar 065 250. 9 A -7'+41Â£ ,/ h Ghtehz 1. Pfult CA- U.\ i -6- SCHEDULE A Venturer Capital Contribution Martin Plug Victoria F. Aybar Jeremy J. Flug - . . . 1 f RECEIVE- EXHIBIT FEB 1 5 2013 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION SUMMARY CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNER: Claude Salter, 429-2752 DATE: 1.14.13 PROJECT: 616 East Hyman Avenue, Victorian Square Condominiums REPRESENTATIVE: Mitch Haas, Haas Land Planning, 925-7819 DESCRIPTION: The applicant has obtained Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval for the remodel and addition to an existing two story commercial building at 616 East Hyman. The proposed project includes the remodel and expansion of the existing building as well as the addition of a third floor. The project will include a mix of commercial space, and free-market residential. The applicant had proposed to include affordable housing on site but would now like to mitigate through the purchase of affordable housing credits. The applicant is requesting GMQS allotment for the residential unit and for the additional commercial space. Final Commercial Design review is also being requested as well as Special Review to approve the proposed trash and utility area The expansion of the existing commercial building with an increase in commercial net leasable and the development of new free-market residential unit within a mixed-use project is considered a Major Planning and Zoning Commission Application and requires growth management review by the P & Z. Expansion or new commercial development and new free-market residential units within a mixed use proiect compete for growth management allotments as a Major Planning and Zoning application reviewed by the P&Z. Major growth management applications are only accepted on February 15th and August 1501. The Community Scoring Objectives are used by Planning Staff to establish application review order. The applicant has requested mitigating for affordable housing through the housing credit program. With a certificate, the amount of mitigation is memorialized through growth management review for Affordable Housing. If the applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. Impact fees are triggered by the addition of new let livable residential space and new net leasable commercial space. These fees are calculated at the time of building permit issuance. As the applicant has already received approval of Conceptual Commercial Design Review, the remaining review processes are as follows (all steps require public hearings): â€¢ P&Z for Major Growth Management **submit on Feb 15th or Aug. 15th City Council for â€¢ P&Z for Final Commercial Design Review. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Commercial Design Review 26.430 Special Review 26.470 Growth Management 26.470.050, General Requirements 26.470.080, Major Planning and Zoning applications (expansion of commercial development and new free-market residential units within a mixed use project) 26.470.110, Growth Management Review Procedures 26.540. Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit 26.610 Impact Fees 26.620 School Land Dedication 26.710.150 Commercial (C-1) Zone District A link to the Land Use Code is here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community- Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ A link to the Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Objectives and Guideline is here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-DevelopmenUPIanning.and.Zoning/Current.Planning/ A link to the Land Use Application is here: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Developmentiplanning.and-Zoning/Applications.and- Peesl Review by: Staff for complete application P&Z Public Hearing: At P&Z Planning Fees: $4,550 for 14 hours at $325 per hour Engineering: $265 per hour Housing: $975 flat fee. Total Deposit: $5790.00 Total Number of Application Copies: 12 To apply, submit the following information: 1. Total Deposit for review of application. 2. Applicant's name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 3. Proof of ownership.Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. 4. Completed Land Use Application. 5. Signed fee agreement. 6. Pre-application Conference Summary. 7. An 8 1/2" x 11" vicinity map locating the subject parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Existing and proposed elevation drawings and site plan that include proposed dimensional requirements as well as landscaping plan. 9. A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application. Please include existing conditions as well as proposed. 11. All other materials required pursuant to the specific submittal requirements. 13. List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing 14. Applications shall be provided in paper format (number of copies noted above) as well as the text and line drawings on a CD. u EXHIBIT 1 1 1, . . I 1 . I, Martin Flug, general partner, hereby authorize permission to Hess Land Planning, Poss Architecture and Schlumberger Construction to represent Fumgulf LLP in the plaiming submittal for 616 East Hyman Avenue in Aspen. Colorado. Martin Plug General Partner Furngulf LLP 616 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Furngulf LLP 616 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 t May 3,2012 City of Aspen Cominimity Development Center 130 Galina Street Aspen, Co. 81611 To whom it may concern, I, Jeremy Flug, partner in Furngulf LLP (the "Partnership"), do hereby state and declare that Martin Flug, General Partner of the Partnership, has all requisite authority and power to act on belialfof the Partnership in allÂ·niatters brought before the City of Aspen and Pitkin County, State of Colorado. lincerely, Jeremy Flug Partiier Furngulf LLP -â€žm EXHIBIT '- Dimensional Requirements ofthe Commercial (C-1) Zone District. Section 26.710.150 â€¢ Minimum Gross Lot Area: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Net Lot Area Per Dwelling Unit: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Lot Width: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Front Yard: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Rear Yard: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Side Yard: No requirement. â€¢ Minimum Utility/Trash/Recycle Area: Pursuant to Section 26.575.060.A.3: 20'W x 10'D x 10'H. - Existing Condition: N/A. - Proposed: 9'XN x 20'D x 10'H (see plans and application text.) â€¢ Maximum Height: - C-1 Zoning: 28 feet for two-story elements of a building. 36 feet for three-story elements of a building, which may be increased to 40 feet through Commercial Design Review. - Existing Conditiont NIA - Proposed: 38 feet, which was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) during the Conceptual Commercial Design Review. â€¢ Minimum Distance between Detached Buildings: No requirement. â€¢ Public Amenity Space: P&Z also approved the Public Amenity Space at 430 square feet during the CCDR. â€¢ Floor Area Ratio (FAR): - C-1 Zoning: Maximum of 2.5:1 or 15,000sf where Commercial Uses are limited to 1.5:1 (9,000sf) and Free-Market Multi-Family Housing is limited to 0.5:1 (3,000sf)). - Existing Condition: 7,396sf of Commercial FAR. - Proposed: 8,995sf of Commercial FAR (1.5:1); and 2,880sf of Free- Market Residential FAR (0.48: 1); cumulative FAR of 11,875sf (1.98: 1). â€¢ Maximum Multi-Family Residential Unit Size: - C-1 Zoning: 2,000 square feet of net livable area. This can be increased to 2,500 square feet through use of a Historic TDR. - Existing Condition: N/A - Proposed: 2,479 square feet of net livable area (with use of one TDR). â€¢ Maximum Lodge Unit Size: Not applicable. â€¢ Commercial/Residential Ratio: C-1 Zoning: Total free-market net livable area cannot exceed above grade floor area of the commercial space. - Existing Condition: No free-market residential - Proposed: 2,479sf of free-market net livable area; 8,995sf of above-grade commercial FAR (plus 4,187sf of subgrade commercial space). EXHIBIT RESOLUTION N0.20 (SERIES OF 2012) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING CONCEPTUAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW FO11 A REMODEL AND ADDITION CONSISTING OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 616 E HYMAN AVE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS N & O, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Furngulf LLP, represented by Mitch Haas, Haas Land Plan'ling LLC requesting of the Planning and Zoning Commission approval of Conceptua< Commercial Design Review to remodel the existing building and add a third floor additip for a project that will include a mix of commercial space, affordable housing, and free-market residential; and, WHEREAS, upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended the Applicant amend the proposal to better comply with the Commercial Design Standards with regard to height and for the Planning and Zoning Commission to approve the application with conditions; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 16, 2012 and continued to October 30th, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. 20, Series of 2012, by a six to one (6 -1) vote, approving Conceptual Commercial Design Review; and, ,WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Conimission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Cominunity Development Director, the applicable refenal agencies, and has taken and considered public continent; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval ofthe development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this lesolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safely, and welfare. Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page I of3 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves Conceptual Commercial Design Review with the following conditions: A. The Subdivision and Final Commercial Design Application shall include a third story addition not to exceed 38 feet in height, as represented iii the attached exhibit. B. All other underlying dimensional requirements, except for height, shall be met at Final Commercial Design Application, C. The existing Public Ameiiity space is approved at 430 sq. ft. Drawings illustrating the Conceptual Commercial Design Review are attached as Exhibit A to the Resolution. Section 2: Engineering The applicant shall address compliance with the City's Urban Runoff Management Plan as part of the Subdivision and Final Commercial Design Review. Section 3: Parks Any changes to the Public Amenity, shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Department as part of the Final Commercial Design Application. Section 4: General The applicant shall comply with all applicable City of Aspen Codes. Nothing in this conceptual approval negates the Applicant's requirements to meet other sections and requirements of the Municipal Code. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as ati abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page 2 0 f 3 Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional iii a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 30th day of October, 2012. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Deb Quinn, Assistant City Attorney LJ Erspanier, Chair ATTEST: Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk Exhibit A: Resolution No. 20, Series 2012 Page 3 of 3 l EXHIBIT J-CO Â£ u Lulj S CITY OF ASPEN C V :21, AÂ©]Ireement to Pay Appllacati~on Ikees '22, An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Propert K Furngulf, LLP (970) 925-2496 IPhone No.' Owner ("r) Email: Address of 616 East Hyman Ave Address: Billing 616 East Hyman Avenue Properly (subject of Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen, CO 81611 (send bills here) application) I understand thattl-ie City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to delermining application completeness. I understand that as tlie property owner thai I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application For flal fees and referral fees. I agree to pay the following fees tor the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. e975 APCI-IA (1-lousing) 0 Select Dept flat fee for . $ tlat fee for - 0 0 Select Review $ flat fee for Select Dept $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand thal because of tile sizet nature or scope of the proposed projecl, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposil may acct-LIe. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally lequired findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. 'The City and I understand ariel agree that invoices mailed by the Cily to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to ren-lit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to tile Land Use IReview Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hollis of staff time. I understand thal payment of a deposit does nol render an application coi-nplete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application al the hourly rates liereinaftei stated. 4 550 14 $__Lt_.. _- -_ deposil for hours of Community Developrnent Department slafF lit-ne. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. 6265 deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit 1 amount will be billed at $265 per how 9 City ot Aspen: Prope,ty OwnerÂ« (104 1/ v Chris Rendon Community Developmenl Director Name: Martin Flug . General Partner City l)50: 5'790 -"-~------~- - "--~ Fees Ime: 4 Â·- __ Received: $ ... *Whp, 30)11.0 (Â¢kifli~ wn'.(*iRÂ©i, 11 11 fÂ®) Â®, Â©kiÂ®*,1 %'i~ 11 ~9401))â‚¬30)4*930] i I.Â·5 :3#:/ | _ EXHIBIT ~ If Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property will be provided under separate cover within 60 days of the first scheduled public hearing date and/or with the affidavit of pubic notice. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 616 6. H-9 An BA Av-r n\,1 e , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: J-40 r il 1 , 2013 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin . ) I, -- JOA / JAe 08.604 (name, please print) being or r&presenting al{ Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: v/~ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. v Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said potice was ppated at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the /716ay of />~XY.1-1 , 20 43, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. J 44\ -1, ~ *Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. 00,15 Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, fRic,Â£--10 summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as CC,mip,014equired in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the f#91â‚¬~ neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and VMP#Â·@Q> a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) h~+~( Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. B IA Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ~oc- 4-64-Â« Eignature ~ The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 2 day of Apr-i l , 20 13, by 3-orti JAcobson, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL CAITLIN STROTHER DOYLE | NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: S e pt. 9 1201 (0 STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20124057288 ~ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 4, 2016, ~oficU~ 4- 0*rjlnt*JÂ»tÂ° Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: C. 16 E 'Ut.5 0/~fA.- ,~'7$2 , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -Ru# Ar, 7- 2(Dig e. 4-t gof'~200-- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, (name, please print) 49â‚¬G Â»-9\, being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify rhat I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: U" Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials 5 which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment: Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. .dAL- Signal,ke The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this /4 day of /1/la~OM , 200 by,4~,6:- S'c-~---~ Â· WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL "5<,2lk *~ My commission expires: -6-2 9 -to\Ll 0 f LINDAM. i i. MANNING i UA - E~kk(44 - 14'hipa JÂ¥O Â°Fccor- Notary Public My Commission Expires 03/29/2014 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: * COPY OF THE PUBLICATION * PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) * LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENT AGENGIES NOTIED BY MAIL * APPLICANT CERTICICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 6 21 4 E &-d; .93 =6 @EgÂ·: i /882%12 *%*UR 1 ng 12-239-Â§213153--3 -0-,2-g+3-85-,1*11% 1~ 3256,;;~5Â·reg=Z >E.90@%%529@gi -5.0.2.-=2- .t I 5~S E'Zze]&9Â§-fa-2:4 ~'~ Efrao~~~~fâ‚¬ 81 / A wi .2 - = O<m ev 3 2 ~2: 122 1 2% 48 g# @12 32~ 1 r 02â‚¬P-@2?*29-5231 -m-~91-*-22*BRiaÂ« 2.Ii Â§28, I z*.5 EEa~L co=mE.EE8 52:,22223*443, NE drill. PUBLIC NOTICE E. HYMAN AVENUE UOISSIWWOO 401eIN uo 'AlleaM '057-742' PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW AND ASSOCIATED LAND USE REVIEWS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 2, 2013, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, in the Sister Cities meeting room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO, to review the proposal submitted by Furngulf LLP., 616 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, CO 81611, for the property commonly known as 616 E. Hyman Avenue and legally described as Lots N and 0, Block 99, City and Townsite of Aspen. Applicant seeks to develop a third floor on the existing building as well as remodel it, resulting in a mixed use building housing both residential and commercial uses. In order to gain approval for the development proposal, Applicant seeks approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission for Final Commercial Design Review, Growth Management Quota System review for the expansion of commercial development and development of a new free-market residential unit within the building. Special Review is also requested for a proposed reduction in the utility/trash/recycle area of the building. For further information, contact Jennifer Phelan at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5090, Jennifer.Phelan@cityofaspen.com S/LI Erspamer, Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission 6,/6 2 1/w/11 4 0 2012 TRUST FBI RHODA ISRAEL 85% 308 HUNTER LLC 4 SKIERS LP 708 3RD AVE 490 WILLIAMS ST 1108 NORFLEET DR NEW YORK, NY 10017 DENVER, CO 80218 NASHVILLE, TN 372201412 517 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE LLC 520 EAST COOPER PTNRS LLC 530 HOPKINS LLC 517 E HOPKINS AVE 402 MIDLAND PARK 5301/2 E HOPKINS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 610 EAST HYMAN LLC 630 EAST HYMAN LLC 633 SPRING 11 LLC C/O CHARLES CUNNIFFE 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 610 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ALPINE BANK ASPEN 635 E HOPKINS LLC ASPEN ART MUSEUM ATTN ERIN WIENCEK 532 E HOPKINS 590 N MILL ST PO BOX 10000 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81602 ASPEN PLAZA LLC ASPEN BLOCK 99 LLC ASPEN CORE VENTURES LLC PO BOX 1709 532 E HOPKINS AVE 418 E COOPER AVE #207 C/O STEVE MARCUS ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTIN LAWRENCE CONNER LLC AVP PROPERTIES LLC BASS CAHN 601 LLC 532 E HOPKINS AVE 630 E HYMAN AVE #25 PO BOX 4060 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 BATTLE GERALD LIVING TRUST BELL MOUNTAIN QUALIFIED BAUM ROBERT E HIXON BURT LIVING TRUST RESIDENCES PO BOX 1518 PO BOX 2847 CONDO ASSOCIATION LLC STOCKBRIDGE, MA 01262 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 320 S SPRING ST ASPEN, CO 81611 BERN FAMILY ASPEN PROPERTY LLC BG SPRING LLC BIG HOPKINS LLC 65 FIRST NECK LN 300 S SPRING ST #202 421 N BEVERLY DR #300 SOUTHAMPTON, NY 11968 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 BOOGIES BUILDING OF ASPEN LLC BISCHOFF JOHN C BORGIOTTI CLAUDIO C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 502 S VIA GOLONDRINA 10509 HUNTING CREST LN 534 E COOPER AVE TUCSON, AZ 85716-5843 VIENNA, VA 22192 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHATEAU ASPEN UNIT 21-A LLC CARVER RUTH A & MARTIN G CHATEAU ASPEN CONDO ASSOC 421 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CTR 10 BYRON LN 630 E COOPER AVE STE G MUSCATINE, IA 52761 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 816113551 CICUREL CARY CJAR LLC COOPER SPRINGS LLC 2615 N LAKEWOOD 2514 LAKE MEAD DR 4 EASTON OVAL CHICAGO, IL 60614 LAFAYETTE, CO 80026 COLUMBUS, OH 43219 COOPER STREET DEVELOPMENT LLC DRESNER MILTON H REV LVG TRST DUNN JUDITH A REV LIV TRUST C/O PYRAMID PROPERTY ADVISORS 28777 NORTHWESTERN HWY 8051 LOCKLIN LN 418 E COOPER AVE #207 SOUTHFIELD, MI 48034 COMMERCE TOWNSHIP, MI 48382 ASPEN, CO 81611 EB BUILDING ASPEN LLC EDGE OF AJAX INC EDGETTE JAMES J & PATRICIA 1601 ELM ST #4000 201 E SILVER ST 19900 BEACH RD STE 801 DALLAS, TX 75201 MARBLE, CO 81623 JUPITER ISLAND, FL 33469 ERGAS VENESSA BLAIR & CLAUDE EXELCEDAR INC 20% FERRY JAMES H 111 PO BOX 4316 534 E HYMAN AVE BOX 167 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 GLENCOE, IL 60022-0167 FITZGERALD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP LTD GELD LLC GLAUSER STEVEN JERRY & BARBARA C/O PITKIN COUNTY DRY GOODS LLC C/O LOWELL MEYER 460 ST PAUL ST 520 E COOPER PO BOX 1247 DENVER, CO 80206 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612-1247 GOODING SEAN A 80% & RICHARD L GOFEN ETHEL CARO TRUSTEE GONE WEST LLC 20% 455 CITY FRONT PLAZA 401 W CENTER C/O PARAGON RANCH INC CHICAGO, IL 60611 SEARCY, AR 721451406 620 E HYMAN AVE #1 E ASPEN, CO 81611 HIMAN LLC GREENWAY COMPANY INC GROSFELD ASPEN PROP PART LLC PO BOX 6159 666 TRAVIS ST #100 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD #2222 SWANBOURNE WA 6010 SHREVEPORT, LA 71101 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 AUSTRALIA, HOPKINS DEV LLC HORSEFINS LLC HUNTER PLAZA ASSOCIATES LLP 345 PARK AVE 33RD FLR 601 E HOPKINS AVE 205 SMILLST#301A NEW YORK, NY 10154 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HURST FERN K IDS PARTNERS LLC INDY HOUSE LLC 1060 5TH AVE PO BOX 642 605 OCEAN BLVD NEW YORK CITY, NY 10128 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 ISRAEL KENNETH 25% JARDEN CORPORATION JENNE LLP 615 OCEAN BLVD 2381 EXECUTIVE CENTER DR 1510 WINDSOR RD GOLDEN BEACH, FL 33160 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 AUSTIN, TX 77402 JOSHUA & CO REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LCT LP JOYCE EDWARD LLC TENNESSEE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1310 RITCHIE CT 300 S HUNTER ST PO BOX 101444 CHICAGO, IL 60610 ASPEN, CO 81611 NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 LUCKYSTAR LLC MALLARD ENTERPRISES LP MARTELL BARBARA PO BOX 7755 317 SIDNEY BAKER S #400 702 E HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 KERRVILLE, TX 78028 ASPEN, CO 81611 MCMURRAY WILLIAM & HELEN MATTHEWS ZACHARY MONTANARO JOHN & SUSAN TRUST 29 MIDDLE HEAD RD PO BOX 10582 PO BOX 457 MOSMAN NSW 2088 ASPEN, CO 81612 MALIBU, CA 90265 AUSTRALIA, NATTERER HELEN MORRIS ROBERT P MYSKO BOHDAN D 67 BAYPOINT CRES 600 E HOPKINS AVE STE 304 615 E HOPKINS OTTAWA ONTARIO ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 CANADA K2G6R1, NIELSON COL STEVE & CAROL D NONNIE LLC OBERHOLTZERJORDAN 501 S FAIRFAX PO BOX 565 PO BOX 10582 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81612 OLITSKY TAMAR & STEPHEN P & L PROPERTIES LLC PACIFIC WEST INVESTMENTS LLC PO BOX 514 101 S 3RD ST #360 320 MARTIN ST #100 GWYNEDD VALLEY, PA 19437 GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81501 BIRMINGHAM, MI 480091485 PITKIN CENTER CONDO OWNERS PT HOLDINGS 11 LLC PITKIN COUNTY BANK 80% ASSOC MIDLAND PROPERTIES INC 534 E HYMAN AVE 517 W NORTH ST 2001 SHAWNEE MISSION PKWY #200 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MISSION, KS 66205 QTIP MARITAL TRUST 1/2 QUARRY INTERESTS LTD REUSS GARRETT 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A 9932 LAKEWAY CT PO BOX 5000 NEW YORK, NY 10075 DALLAS, TX 75230 SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615 REVOLUTION PARTNERS LLC ROTHBLUM PHILIP 1/2 RUST TRUST PO BOX 1247 40 E 80TH ST #PH 26A 9401 WILSHIRE BLVD #760 ASPEN, CO 81612 NEW YORK, NY 10075 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 RUTLEDGE REYNIE SALET PHILIP S REV TRUST SCHNITZER KENNETH L & LISA L 51 COUNTRY CLUB CIR PO BOX 4897 2100 MCKINNEY AVE #1760 SEARCY, AR 72143 ASPEN, CO 81612 DALLAS, TX 75201 SHUMATE MARK SILVER DIP EQUITY VENTURE LLC SJA ASSOCIATES LLC BLDG 421 G ABC 2100 MCKINNEY STE 1760 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 DALLAS, TX 75201 ASPEN, CO 81611 STERLING TRUST COMP STEWART TITLE CO SUITE 300 OFFICE LLC 2091 MANDEVILLE CYN RD PO BOX 936 567 SAN NICOLAS DR PENTHOUSE LOS ANGELES, CA 90049 TAYLORSVILLE, NC 28681 NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TENNESSEE THREE RENTALS TENNESSEE THREE THOMPSON ROSS & LYNETTE C/O J H COBLE PO BOX 101444 1502 GREYSTONE DR 5033 OLD HICKORY BLVD NASHVILLE, TN 37224-1444 CARBONDALE, CO 81623 NASHVILLE, TN 37218-4020 TOMKINS FAMILY TRUST TREUER CHRISTIN L VICTORIAN SQUARE LLC 520 E COOPER AVE #209 981 E BRIARWOOD CIR N 418 E COOPER AVE #207 ASPEN, CO 81611 LITTLETON, CO 80122 ASPEN, CO 81611 WAVO PROPERTIES LP WEIDEL LAWRENCE W WF SWEARINGEN LLC 512 1/2 E GRAND AVE #200 PO BOX 1007 380 FOREST HILL RD DES MOINES, IA 50309-1942 MONROE, GA 30655 MACON, GA 31210 WILLIAMS CRAIG & LEE FAM PTNRSHP WISE JOSEPH WM SNOWMASS LLC 5577 CEDAR CREEK 1320 HODGES ST 500 FIFTH AVE #2440 HOUSTON, TX 77056 RALEIGH, NC 27604-1414 NEW YORK, NY 10110 WOLF LAWRENCE G TRUSTEE WOODS FRANK J 111 WRIGHT CHRISTOPHER N 22750 WOODWARD AVE #204 51027 HWY 6 & 24 STE 100 13 BRAMLEY RD FERNDALE, MI 48220 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, CO 81601 LONDON W10 6SP UK, YERAMIAN CHARLES REV TRUST PO BOX 12347 ASPEN, CO 81612 -r - --...a.-044 , L ? C . 40 >f.~ t,+4tut. , V *. .r'. If '0: 2 . 1 , h3Â§ / - f ': , - . t. 1 - . 1 ' 44 X03 I 11: 311 ~ 47 4- **Â§. 7 4,11 4 PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTIC Date- T, me Place: 4 - 1. Purpose. 1 1 4. p 4.- t. '-1 ' * j. 4Â¢ THE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: February 24.2012 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number and name assigned to this property is 0012.2013.ASLU - 616 E. Hyman Ave. The planner assigned to this case is myself. 61 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. ~ Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. Thank You, U â€ž ~ i CrEw 0 FACN,/1 V U - jennifer 68*n, DepGy Director City o f Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Only: Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New SPA New PUD Yes No Subdivision, SPA, or PUD (creating more than 1 additional lot) GMQS Allotments Residential 34 Affordable Housing Yes X No Commercial .>C E.P.F. 041$ rrIZ 616 EAST GMQS/FINAL COMMERCIAL DE~IGN REVIEW FEBRUARY 15, 2013 RECEivtL FEB 1 5 2013 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN1 71'421/,flIA "'LS..Ii:,I,&i #Ef WIki.15-' ,-*/9...7.,Ia,I,-Awmin- /2, 4,9 Ii=-.ili. 31%,1//61'~ 9.: t.. %kill . 1 ..3 4 -,- SITE 40 4,10 .. Vicinity Map 4 Â· . 014.1 r NTS 1 .,Â· "1 2 '4 1 I f. 17 'it 1 -- ' & i 1 -I . 1 . li n- p 0 - SHEET LIST 4 1 , COVER SHEET 1 3 1 Al - EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL r . I. .: 1 I , A2 - EXISTING LEVEL 1 4' ~ 2 134 4 . * i 2.. I .<1 A3 - EXISTING LEVEL 2 Â¢ 4/ 2â‚¬~f Â¥ 1 '6# 4.- . al. 411 -1 A4 - EXISTING ELEVATIONS . At 0 -,41.4 -1 g.Â« 1 ' 39 - ' A5 - SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN ,-' 1 A6-PROPOSED BASEMENT 4 .0 - . t. A7 - PROPOSED LEVEL 1 . 3 , Â· A8 -PROPOSED LEVEL 2 .24 , ' I. A9 - PROPOSED LEVEL 3 1,1 1, , f iÂ· Alo - PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1 '40 All -PROPOSED SECTION . e.m. A12 - PROPOSED SECTION . b" t I . S 46 Â· A14 - EXTERIOR RENDERING ..b . A13 - PROPOSED SECTION 4 a t * 9,44 , 4 /8 W I 1 4. 4 t A15 -PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 12:9 I.-- .r . . 0 - 1 A16 -PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION -3Â¥Ii, V L f ' 4 I- 811*, , - . - - * A17 - PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION te *7 A18 - PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 1 .1 1 ... % 4 -4 ; -91 A19 - HYMAN COMPOSITE STREET ELEVATION M A20 - EXAMPLE IMAGES OF EXTERIOR FINISHES A21 - EXISTING NET LEASABLE AREA ~ ' ~~~ afit. r ~~ A22 - EXISTING F.A.R. CALCULATIONS A23 - PROPOSED NET LEASABLUNET LIVABLE CALCULATIONS A24 - PROPOSED NON-UNIT CALCULATIONS A25 - F.A.R., NET LEASABLE, AND NET LIVABLE CALCULATION SHEET ~OSS ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING ,~ of 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81Â§11 V; 25 (T) 970/925 47 55 (F) 970/920 2950 UP 1 1 1 1 El 1 1 1 1 1-1 W 1 - CuP =, 1 1 3 Â® Â® Â® 1 9 , 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 p o s s + A l ti I RE ('.T i j R E Â·1Â·Â· P L Al i W I N (, i i i i SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN- EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL Â© 2012 Blu POSSAI'~ASSOCIATES 0 4 8 16 ARCHIECTUREN,DPU,~1116 2/15/2013 ~~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 , PC (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 u LL MI .- UP' Vil t.=24- L t) U U r E 1 1 ' PLANTER ' 8 1 1 r- p OPEN TO , BELOW L N j 2 1 -%- r ~ -- J 2 w 4 1 1 r [N . .UP - 11 --- -~- 1 131\1~ ~~ 1 --= -- PARKING ALLEY 1 4 - 6 A- ~2-1 1 IL 1 1 LE' M - Lict - 1 NOU 3-7-Â«\ 1 0 -1 1 1 4 1 1 11 616 E. HYMAN REDEV~LOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 poss , R c , H 1 1 1- c p i I H E r~ LA i;\11\111\1 (j i i i SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN- EXISTING LEVEL 1 ARCHnECTU-N#Â£ 0 4 8 16 0 2012 gILLP055 AICA550CiATES 2/15/2013 A2 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PC (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 1 1 ' '1 X | OPENTO - | BELOW ~ ~ Z 1 J <[F : A 11 2 In--1 1 I L I ' 1 -fl 1 1 2 P---- 103 31 1 1 t[ x ' PATIO Dd N I / 1 1 1 - 2 - 1 1 -21 1 -4-Â«14--44--J 1 1 1 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss ,\RCHITECTURE-,Â· PLANNING ~ 8IU--A~ATES SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-EXISTINGLEVEL 2 1 1 1 1 0 4 8 16 0 2012 ARCHIETJ~Al'DPLNNING 2/15/2013 A3 605 EAST MAIN STREET AS P E N. COLORADO 81611 PC (T)970/9 254755 (F) 970/9202950 f,4 I - ''1'1'i,3 I'l'a, i~,ILI~I '-I -1_ /_1 Â£'~t~ Iuitil'itilli I'!';'1,111'111'111'lll'lilll'lil 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 l i l i 1 1 1 l il li l i ll i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.-l il i 1 1 llllllll.Illl!lllllllllllillllllllliIlllll 1,11111 1.111.1 1 11111.11!11.1.1 1 111|1111 1,~111111,1111111111111111111111111,1, ILL 1 1 11 6 T. O. FINISH 1 EL_ 112'-0' A TO. FINISH 9 EL 100, 4 I - /Th EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1,8'=1' e 7- -7 7 '-1 -7 7 i -7 -1- 1 1 ' 1 ' I ' I ' 1 ' 1 ' I ' I ' .' I ' I ' I 11'1~1~1~6 1~1#1~1 10/ 1 1 1 1~1~1~1011'J 1 1~1111 1 1 11'ilt'ill ' I ! 1 -1 1-1 11 1 L ' LAL 1 -- - 1 A TO FINISH I L 9 11 112'0â€¢ 1=1 4 TO FINISH 1 EL 100'4 /2'\ EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 1/8'=1'. 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss SCHEMATIC DESIGN : EXISTING ELEVATIONS A4 Â© 2013 5603&~~*f#&16.pc 02/15/2013 OTE: ALL EXISTING ON-SITE VEGETATION IS T AAI N ' 1 - 1 i NOTE: ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ASSOCIATED , LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND/ ~ OR REPLACED TO THE EXTENT AND IN THE MANNER 22' - 21/4 REQUIRED BY THE PARKS AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ..4. PROPOSED PARKING 1 3 CHC) 1 4- EXISTING PLANTER I , (PUBLIC AMENITY , 1 1 SPACE) 1 1/3 1 L- 0 1,11Â·Â·11Â· .) 1 1!1 'll .4.- 11,11,111 1 1 .'b 1 1 I LAI I I RAMP j SLOPE: 1 TO 12 Ill . \11\1% 7 1 1 W ,< b...1. 10 1 1 tri) PROPOSED , SERVICE YARD b 1 D 1 9 GROUND-LEVEL N N 011 1%\\ 1:\ 1 BUILDING FOOTPRINT 9 i 1 (NO CHANGE FROM PROPOSED EXISTING TO PROPOSED) . . PARKING 1 00 BUILDING I (ABOVE) 1 - 1 ..1 0 1 - 5 PARKING I 1 80 ~ PROPOSED I 01 1 0 SPECIES T.B.D. 1 PROPOSED I PARKING i , I I I . PROPERTY LINE -$ , 12' -71/2" ~ 7'-41/2"|~- PROPERTY LINE 20' - 0" 10 - 01 / . 55 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss 4 0 p SCHEMATIC DESIGN: SITE PLAN BIUPOSSANDASSXIATES 2/15/2013 A5 0 4 8 16 0 2012 ARCHITECTUREA~Pt#N~NG 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN COLORADO 81611 PC (T)970/925 4755(f)970/920 2950 / jit 9 - s < .*l L \L - 2 HYMAN AVENUE A311V 1 1 4. - , - PROPOSED: NEW WALLS (SHOWN IN GRAY) - PROPOSED: NEW ELEVATOR 1 1 1 UP .1 - --f y / 1 1 /4 1 E------ 1 1 1/4 1 1 1 4/4 1 EXQSTING 1 1 ATR I UM I EXISTING ~ COPEN TO ABOVE) I Â® COMMERCIAL ' 1 1 L _________-___J i SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS , -- PROPOSED: NEW CORRIDOR/ 1 9 . 7 - 00 - 1 21 1 1 n 1 -Cld ff 1 C, 11 'pi> ...?.*Â¥4421Â»122: + 1 c LP r, EXISTING -- COMMON BATHROOM - . IL Â«L--331 - Il , ff A I ' 1 ExiSTIN< COMMON ' BATHROOM ~ 3 Â® Â® EXISTING/NEW MECHANICAL ~ 1 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 1 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 pOs S Â·41-? CHI [ECIURE I PLANNING ~ SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN -PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL 1 1 1 Â©2012 BILLPO~~ASSEICES 0 4 8 16 2/15/2013 ~ MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 8 161 1 PC (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 1 1 - PROPOSED: NEW WALLS (SHOWN IN GRAY} - PROPOSED: NEW ELEVATOR I i i 9\ F le \ UP c f i t 1-_1_ i_i_ -l _f DN Ll , M 1 1 1 1 -.I -I- I 'l \ ELEV. EQUIP. PROPOSED I 2 / ROOM , 1 ~ PARKING , 1 . - (PIC) \ \ EXISTING x EXISTING i J PLANTER ATRIUM I (PUBLIC AMENITY (oPEN TO ABOVE , SPACE) ~ AND BELOW) . i PROPOSED = ' \ COMMERCIAL ! L -- -- I 1 1 -1. 1 . ~+~~ 651~10' rar ... , ri ~|A 1 ; 4. ' 'Â·Ni . *. 4 4 19 -3 1 \ RAMP SLOPE: ~0 1:12 ' 'A PROPOSED: NEW CORRIDOR/ SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS , --17-- C N .9- UP _- 1 r 7 1 . 1 1 -1-1 1 - LO , 1 " 1 4 - SERVICE AREA 1 - -. \Â·14 ~ 'T ALLEY 4 1 PROPOSED ~ PROPOSED - -- ~~--1~ 1 P ~ COMMON 4 COMMON --1 ~ 2 I - RESTROOM - RESTROOM Eli 4 1 1.1 P - MECH. SHAFT i i 'N PROPOSED ~ PARKING m 1 / b 1 U M W Â® 1 4 PROPOSED COMMERCIAL ~ ' C 1 PROPOSED 1 PARKING I 01 1 1 20 1. 1 1 I 1 PROPOSED | fil PARKING I -1 2 PROPOSED: NEW WINDOW ' 1 rl ~ 1 01 . I i 616 E. HYMAN RED~VELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING ~ SCHEMATIC DESIGNI: PLANI-PROPOSED LEVEL 1 91 1 1 1 1 81UP=-A=XWES 0 4 8 16 0 20L2 ARCI,rECIURE NÂ® Pl,1,~C 2/15/2013 ~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PC (T)970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 1 1 ~-- PROPOSED: NEW ELEVATOR PROPOSED: NEW WALLS / - PROPOSED: ENTRY VESTIBULE (SHOWN IN GRAY) - & STAIR TO RESIDENCE L \ 1 1, 1 I 'llilll -1 1 . 1 1 T 1111 0 EN 0 /4 1 1 1 / 1,- 1 E %78 EXISTING -/~ - - , ATRIUM 1 (OPEN TO BELOW) i JANITOR PROPOSED , , CLOSET COMMERCIAL i r) i 1 - PROPOSED: NEW CORRIDOR/ 1 - 311 \ SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS ~ 2â‚¬ 04. i ... .4 r .... I . 2*/El.., 1 !.lili ' 2-< 17 7 t i PROPOSED ~ PROPOSED ' - COMMON COMMON %= 1 RESTROOM RESTROOM ALLEY 4 1 ; ' 1 - MECH. SHAFT ~ Â® Â® PROPOSED Â® . , COMMERCIAL f ' 1 ill 21 - 1 1 . 1 . 5 *41 1 +21%*94 4).'..44.'*,-& . 616 E. HYMAN RED,VELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss i 1Â·7 p Â¢-4 11 E C 1 111Â·~ L FLA NNING 1 1 1 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSEDLEVEL 2 e 0 4 8 16 â‚¬)2012 ~~1 2/15/2013 A8 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 - PROPOSED: NEW ELEVATOR W/ PRIVATE 1 KEY CODE ACCESS TO PENTHOUSE ~~~ \ /1 r------- 9 2 4 1 1 14, f ' + 1 0 40' - 11 31 4 f Lk~ ~ 1 | ROOF | 13' - 0" 16' - 5 3/4" I / 1 A. 1 2 + i 8 -3" 7'-41/2 -1 GLASS GUARDRAIL- , PO I 2 1 DN 1 1 -1- 1 Â· -a 1 - 0- SCREENED WALL 13' - 0" 13'-113/4" 1 DN (NO ROOF) 1 / 11 3 1 1 - 1--9 - F /==0==9 1 Ir 0 1 8 1 - 1 0 0 1 PROPOSED 9 PROPOSED 7 0 MECHANICAL Â¤ | RESIDENTIAL , ~ + + 1 0 11 1 - 0 IKETÂ» 1 0 - -1 - 1 -4 -t-- J L %#2** 2 - PROPOSED. SCREEN -1 1- 4 - 1 CANOPY ABOVE ~ ~ f - 041 6'-0 7' -41/2" ' (SUPPORT COLUMNS SHOWN) --~ MECH. SHAFT 8/ / 11 f PROPOSED --1 7 ~ DECK 1 1 -Â»4__i i 0 80 / A.iÂ«flt.41 5 P i I ---UL- 1 3 4 2 -- -- . Wl GLASS GUARDRAIL 1,-,Â· ~- , 'W 0 0 ROOF / PLANTER 1 1 1 E. 1 2 - - - - - - - - - - - -1 1 13' - 0" 13' - 11 3/4' / 1 * 616 E. HYMAN RED~VELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss -lilli .1-f ~ i L ;41\11\11 hi\ SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PLAN-PROPOSEDLEVEL 3 1 1 1 1 Â©2012 Blupom-ASSOCIATES 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 0 4 8 16 ARCHOECTU/~P#. 2/15/2013 A9 (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 1 , Il n. 1! 111 1< 1!/ 1 I r ~ |D ! | ; ,~ | T~, , | 1| i :4E l:t I;' '| "f 11 : 11 - j~11 hi 5 IL, 4,1{1 11! 1-4 1 , 1,111 ' j 1 1 10111.12 11 1 -rE,1 N bill 1 lilli 1 1 1 I 1 d lie I I :11 4==6==1 4 1 A.n Â£ tul E i 1 1 l'jitilillilll J - 1 1 1 I ' .478'l-' / L v. I 11 ' I ,Â·.14 1,1 :0'23 'i lit 40 +1-- 1 1 . / / bh~EL !! 411'1 1 1 j 1 lilli IlkI I lilli . INTERIOR CEILING , 11 1%11~ 111 ~1: 1 '1: .4 --!i :--'1' . Â·Â· HEIGHT: 11'-6" 1 i 1, 1% 1.01 SCREEN CANOPY i 1 U lilli J ' 1 I Jill'11 El I /1 Fill 11 1 111,/ A'./ . 1 11 1, \ i Illit' 1 '11 '1 1 i EQUIP. 111 1,0,1 1 ' 1 lilli 11 11 1 ALLEY | SPACE ' ~ '~ 4 Iii 111,11 ;r Il l | HYMAN AVENUE J m >IN.j d~ Il . I 1 11111,1 1 11]1 41 11,1 1 .f '1 1 11 -DECK RAILING | INTERIOR CEILING 1 :11'ifl 1 1 11'ijll/ 1 i, ..Ihi + 11..1!t~ ILl HEIGHT: 10'-O" .1,11 11 1 113 1 1 1 f 1 1 0 1 7+4 4 -4-4: kelli[ 1 1 11 111 11 1 1,11111,11 1 H.I-\ 1 1 1 11 ! 1111'111 b \ 1 21 -1- --[ - 14 1 -111 *li \ ' 1 1 '6 .6 1 1 11 1 11 1 14 - INTERIOR CEILING . i 1 P 10 ir li Il I 1//\ HEIGHT: 9'-0" ~ *'0 AF -Â·=r =4Â·4+ \ \ \. 1 1 11 1 1 / 1 P /. / 1 1 rn ROOF PLAN 1/8'=1 0 - 100'-0 I * 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DOSS ARCHITECTURE 4 PLANNING Â© SCHEMATIC DESIGN : ROOF PLAN A10 ~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 Â® 2,13 AlonECTURIAN'pl#IMI,pC (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2850 NORTH U. .LPOSSANDASSOCIATEA 2/15/2013 1 4 1 . 1 -CHIMNEY{BEYOND) - SCREEN CANOPY -GLASS RAILING 1 1 PARAPET -DECK / A TO. PARAPET t1 Â¢ ILI ~~PET fal 9 / -------------------- -EL,-136,5 Â· 2, Il 9 - ~-PA-~RAPET . 7- Â·Â·Â·Â·t:Fl~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ & 1 - :.... I + aia& . : .. 1 14-1.1 i l.- 1111 I n. 411 -"rle" .t 82:i< 4? 1%... . ... 24.-Sif~ 3?Â· ~-.~ . 7:32..... .4,6z,94< 44,1 2,Â·.b<Ax ...6 41:, ....,.4,// *p 9 46 . 0 M - STOREFRONT AWNINGS 41 . . ..te:Z r * 7/94 6-0- ..i, ALLEY HYMAN AVENUE + 0 6 5 OZ RG M 6 F F. LEVEL 1 k . f,Le >R - Â· ~-J.,%09â€ž ~ %*20* Â· 9692*: . Â·-w", :- *1 lei 7 EL. 1000 3.9 : 6 la~li~ i â‚¬L- ~ I~ ~~ ' 1~ Â· -. 9-fl , 428 1 z.it . , 'Â·42**F fi" 41~Â£24* II I Elli= - 9 i-FL_ 1 16: .Errmr E 11 1 3\ L : 86 E 11&*fliit iL--1 1 B .11 211'Ell ~4=i-6 ~33@~ . *11+2 Â£ **M-- Â»19*=-W - - Â·â€¢~tu 1.. 1 Â«1~3"'14~~~Ct*%4% mit s s 63&3 --Â·'%-:J~ * py'liallIEII E ~~~~ *ilf~,'="="'==gu-/ ~ = i =~O~~~Il- ~~I! 4,21]~6-% â€ž- -Lm-I22ji-gi-=dd--~72 llc=41--- 1-7- i Â·I i:' F. I:=I -'F&%61%-A=R i'll=-Â·-=- =--~a- ---=l;ili,= Â·_ _ _IL _ , 1 2- 21--=-2=.-='f '= -3 =:Im~~1~ ~~41 111 1-=111 =- - EL=b 11'-1 1 2,111Â· I -- EEi rEDE El IE El Ellal EllE== 1='El '. '=.fl_, - I i 1 --Â· - Elf- I - -_ i:~~, -~ !_' Â·14 1- 3 I -11-E E.. dE 1 1-11./1 -- -r 1 MIRIÂ® =1. -172>1~~ly -~Lit--.Â£11Ii,2,21 - ~ &2L "-- ~ i IZIT[ IlE '. *: |'Â¥2~alk-1 -- - 1-1 1-1 j'Ullgaa 111 1 111218112 - --rr-- - r.-_r __22_..11- 24 tlk/il2-6-24~~4:p-- =111*5 1.1 ilit I IE 7- /7\ BUILDING SECTION 1/8'=1' 0 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 DOSS ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONS All ~ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 BILL PCeS AND ~SOC~ATE (T) 970/925 4755 (F) 070/020 2950 Â© 2013 ,~C,IrT,~TUR[ ANG P~ANMz Pa 2/15/2013 CON IlSIX[3) (9NllSIX3) - CHIMNEY (BEYOND) - SCREEN CANOPY -IDECK - GLASS RAILING PARAPET ~i; 1-0. PARAPET 9 EL. 138.0 3.ive f :-ff' 1. . "9 .A " . ~-- PARAPET 2 91 CO :i Â· ~:;,Â·.Â·.tÂ·:.'*392.14.. 4Â¥2 7-~7:iÂ· . A . 21 IM 4 74943/. . .neÂ·fial. 61.-'â€ž . Â·~4- Â·~ Â·Â·.Â·Â·:.56-4, -:. 2 5 - . 'c':*I , Â·, 8~~~ . 441 4 0 - STOREFRONTAWN INGS *1 0: 9 14,Â· 9 N -*i .+ 1\V - 4 ... , ...te ALLEY HYMAN AVENUE 0% NG RG w . FF LEVEL 1 & 4/I- Â«329. .:9,4:,rÂ¥, E-g 149 44%4 . 17 %34 ~bt ..R $ i Ue> v ' ~ EL loGo - = 11 11 '1-â‚¬1112111=1 =dIE= -1 1==111=Edlk 2. " 91!18 8Eli FE: BilE I Eli El E F--1!FL IE-rE 1 - LIli--1 I i Ell'~L -- --4 1 19 110 E--LL.2 1223 . 48 . 66 6,"wari=14 - .i- ~ } 800 3 : iii'", W ~a U = --- - I Ii:Ii- LEI a m --__ __-_---r |-v,Il-Il.-Ill- I-ILI!,4 ilili ..am**a~*ku . 49~~~4* r./g., /0* | LITHmE-=i,= = =-*Tallfâ€ž_L- - -' - -" 44 -<TM~r... Â»tri- . 9,I~frs,--LL!--t 0 --1 -4.- . 2 My--1-20114=u=9<-p *3322-0"lt*46 ,Â·624_Â·;i ~12-~-34* u --ELE.-GE ~ 2-Lm.r-LL-_m- 718%118' 43Â·-7--441,~C~-,-Â·-----ru?n~J- ~r-Jawl '-1 -:1117 1-111 1 1 - -r - 1Â·'PIE=. Im f- 5~ .1 ! 11111'4: 1-1 1 ~ E'IN-- â€ž~+ .1 L.E@ :6 E |~~~'Pl~~ 2A L ~L.~ ; It. ~7 511~1~ 1.... Â¥ ..2 31-i6ia JiiL--: ---t ,-:E E,~~::El'!E L,i~al Akiihf' !lili'll - 1!~"%~ i-i 2~"RI~'Uii*- '~116 ia L :4 9 --rlt i =- 1 -'i ~i -'ilimJ -i+I~--~-Â«=i id- i 9% Fi_fl[~41=-%"~ ' 1-Â· ~. ~44-~ - !I]~-17-3 ..1- Â«LF =It~L~ ~_- 1313JÂ·. ~p~*14~*-(~'*.~p.~~~~ ~~~i z--}L-z--~~~.*p"Ir..c~~~j;.i -~Er p~~F mama~ = =mEiia2~Â« 1-3! 7:1 1-2 1- 149] lip - . - 1-ELLE_1 1 ! 315_â€ž_ L,727Â¤ 7-= 7|'FA#42'<B/=-MVIILIC 42.31 | 7Ss- _-2-iCi i _3*1-1 7MlIE _i-_EL.E~r-Elll /Th BUILDING SECTION '/841'-0 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, C0L0RAD081611 pOss EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ARCHITECTURE + PLANNING SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTIONSA12 {T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 $ 2013 1'61~rtl~,~~L~ING PC 2/15/2013 [9NllSIX3) (9NllSIX3) (DNI1SIX3) 1143 EXISTING BUILDING ; TO. PARAPET 610 E. HYMAN Â¥ EL 138.0 *3 77$~A 6 TO. PARAPET .-, *vit .~P ...~1~:.4 Â¥ EL 135.0' 11 -6 A b.Â·1.1,4 . 2Â·Ne#. -3 4 6. EXISTING BUILDING ET jit 4'9 I :- 4#'*#.4//*34' 1/0 * 40 2 le{*9 . -'/5/0 1Â·" . - '*r O 8 1411 ..tY..~ 1 9 a 0 4 -I- I & J,J- 11' '1 'Â·'. â€¢t'J'tb- Â·...L. N 4 I 9 azz . 42,3.14"4: I - ,*Ji_-1. : . /0 1. & I -1 7-- ./ 1 91= '4 1-11 - i 1 11 11 3-1 11- i 1 8. 11 = 117 = la~: ~ dII-172-Vt: ' ~11 < Ti_Ii-[p.,;Upt ~ 0 W i -il,LE i UO #E-2 g 1 '-==%Â»- 111- . kE 12 I F a di=4 112= I -, 711 4 2 -111 -- =1 i -iii-m i-Ii-m iii m m iii lie - - a~~I.~----M"1,-1-*11ia amap imr Â· i -IR~la %'IMM-~,2 -1 mr--ah,IETIN-'M-=i'l=" 3 E R 11 11 .1, 'ii i E-LE - li 1~ YE~EmE,-dfift>'-3~ 'I "' ~ - u -' d E=E~* E~EEE l.1 1- = 111 ill 729-, ~" 10 -I::13--1=417= -2-- -r il==i =r ='======.. =-ir ,ill-'i- -'i- - -Ti' --4 ~r Il-|| ~' -'~ ~'~'I'~~~Ell-391%' ' 4%~2 =~~MI 1 ==rk 1= =1'FE'=11[' 1 1 ~I ~~ ~,I~-â€žI ---fi-1%,--~,7 ,-- fi'%"'2=3 - T' 'lli-22=0=313 -<~~ 2-47*0= - -1: I~I~blth-=993â‚¬%644 -M. 0 1 m+11= Elle liEÂ»Elll :-~'F-EL'.5 -~7:/ .17.-11111=91Â» - 'Câ‚¬-rer=i--1,~ -7-III-~, -1- 12111-111*1115 1-7 - 1117= 2.Hafrilliffdoilea E~TLYL! -pj i, 1 14=: -y_! =3171 3=11!EE#*.1-'.Immme* ~ I -Ii/~ ~11_-_-1 1 _ - 1" /Th BUILDING SECTION 1/8'=1' 0 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ~~ U-IN HITY CRNREDRA~ IAH N MG SCHEMATIC DESIGN : SECTI0NSA13 8!LLP02%=% {T) 970/925 4755 (F) 970/920 2950 Â© 2013 ARCH[TECTUREAMDPLANN*,PC 2/15/2013 CONUSIXJ) [9NllSIX3) (DN IlSIX]11 (9NllSIX3) UNO- I /+ .0-,DI ' Xa~ 4 ... . be . *W A ~Tt~ 4- .li .1 t,G+ , .1 1 9 1 4, I ,,11 ~'<~ .d k. ' ' S '~ 5 Pe.112. 1. - p .,A 1,4 jr. -4 - 1 ... 4, , 1 1 - .2 041 .. trf, 7,411:*3: aUt t'*, 4 f .8 â€¢Wl 1 0, 1, Ed .9 I. I t -- -L 4 6% ''r: . L--r 1. - -2,Â· ' - i * 11 T...,I 1 1 L 11 UL -r,1..... ).. .. : 0,~ J41 /0, I ./ - . Ill 1 ~52. . -1 4 9 r imal. J . .0 1 47â€¢42 .* iÂ· . ~r y 1. 1 1.4 7 * - t . 1 40'A --a /././././.. : 21/ 1 i . 1 * 1 . 4 9 1 Â· lie 11 / 9 ---6-7-- j L|.* 9 ./ , 1 U il-40/0-7 , 7 76.4. E 7 : 4. 9 . 1 4. , + i %g 43 '. . 0%1 . . -1 4 '05 1 1.- 4 4 1 ;4 7 ..........c vat . I *~tl - , 1 - .. . 0?5 ..El .- 1 .- 1.-** , 1 1 1 . -Ii- t -~ 0 1 f 11 -,Â·t .. . - Â· . , 1, , /1327fgill//15 -4*1â‚¬.: 1//61&, ''~ .. ' . 1 . 0 - + )11 4 4 .1/r.'ll.1/6 4 pr, .4 V * .. 12 . A ) ...W :- t...1 Wt'-1. /// /84/A.4/6 Â· 7,1 f -1 -tr - 1 . ..t,Â¥Â¥=.1,7 . . -r. '3 *.. 1 .2 I . , Â· 4 1,1 , 1% r .6 24*4 ... 40 i -=rl *?: . /1 h.,1 ' 4% , Â· 4 I. 4 ' - â€¢ ,~ Â· 4 1- 19 - j A . N i '././.. Miz,4. S.. - I k -I-.6 --: 10 1/: 4 : f . '/ I :11 0-- Tri -4 f 4 % , ..1 3 1 41'r< 4 f U *444Â· Â· 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss SCHEMATIC DESIGN: RENDERING 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 0 2012 Q~,N-- 2/15/2013 A14 (T)970/925 4755(f)970/9202950 ELEVATOR OVERRUN SCREEN CANOPY CHIMNEY *22, Me-,2-77;Z 2102 *4 4'IU,-'41.4 77're.1 ela-Ci D T.O. PARAPET J 4 4: A I.0674.7.:.48 u.2. *L - - - - 1 T.O. PARAPET 138' - 0" 1 . . I 7 136' - 6 HEAVY TIMBER COLUMNS 4 ./ I WOOD TIMBER SIDING $4 *'. . .r .44 4 6- .. . BUILDING OUTLINE -- STONE VENEER FOR NEIGHBORING ~ BUILDING r :44 > 1114- 'i 4 f F.F, LEVEL 3 1 HEAVY TIMBER '4 Ill".RE BEAMS/COLUMNS :t.7 I. T 1 I -''tu - STOREFRONT AWNINGS -I. . _F. F. LEVEL 2 1 -1 - 1 1 f ALUMINUM DOOR 112' - 0" ~ SYSTEM /9 0 fh ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM i /,$. 4-7 t. ': ilm F.F. LEVEL 1 100' - 0" ~ 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss Pc HITFi r'161! 1 1 1 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION-SOUTH HILLPOSS~'DASSjCIATES 0 4 8 16 Â©2012 ARCHIECTul~ AlÂ® Puil#liNG 2/15/2013 A15 605 EAST MA1N STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 'C (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 2. f / â‚¬ '.1/1. f - CHIMNEY BEYOND 4/ .9 ' $11 - & L E AAVAL L.' 3 - ELEVATOR OVERRUN 92,(.1 v BEYOND 1 T,0._PARAPET .1*â€¢1 3,7,9151 IRGb ~Â£:,Â·,ilt:â€¢.,u. 11~ - ,//Ers,!K#. 2't iMM* 7--1-38' - 0" - =..... 72....9. g. 194. . I 1//hely... t r" ...4 1,1 b 1,11. 1 11 135' - 0" T 1./.1 'll'Hoh 1--r~p<9--p 7//Ir , 1 A.1 ... -WOOD SIDING -t - / PARAPET w/ WOOD ~ ' ~ - SIDING 5 / '11 1 H 1 al', , F.F, LEVEL 3 BUILDING OUTLINE li '' i 1 5 123'-0" ~ j â€¢ '4 FOR NEIGHBORING ~ d , It i - BUILDING i ![~ .' %;1 11! 1 - SERVICE YARD 41 + , m. 1 F.F. LEVEL 2 1 ...8 'i ;1. f Â· ,1?M ' i 1- 11,91:; ' ' TI'll/4/ {*;>*; i f 1Â·1*~* : lt?-1.1%1111:iltrt ---- 112'-O"7 1. I - PAINTED WOOD SIDING -LU - PAINTED STEEL COLUMN -/ 1- ? F.F. LEVEL 1 0 --I 100' - 0" I I 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss ,Ki,MITECTURE+PLANNING i i i i SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION- NORTH 0 4 8 16 02012 =====. 2/15/2013 A16 PC 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755 IF)970/9202950 38'-211/16" - ELEVATOR OVERRUN - STONE VENEER SCREEN CANOPY LINE OF PROPOSED DEVELOPEMENT f I HIDDEN FROM VIEW \ T.O. PARAPET ~ --&*fite. Fir. ,.34< *-':f,4-4.*11,1 738' - 0" r-- - - - 74*,t :Â»7Â«'P '/ STONE VENEER 1 -6 %/41. , HEAVY TIMBER 1 '2*'?:.4511/5(/5.9: 2 T.O. PARAPET 1 L Ul!,2297:'7-6. T 126' - 6" 1 1 b, 45< ra,Fipt'i / F.F. LEVEL 3 1 - --I.----Ill-- 123' - 0" ~ I *4411 70 1 ...m/00 E-- STOREFRONT AWNINGS ......5/%21-,C-,07 Ill'll'll/12.1:/2-~5fl ---- 5.,2, 2:,1-1 .At/1 4. _ F.F. LEVEL 2 44 : f i . - 112' - 0" ~ L------7 1 BUILDING OUTLINE ?20.11, ALLEY FOR NEIGHBORING BUILDING 40),41:,4 - ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 44*72- SYSTEM - EAST HYMAN AVE. 7.rill,# b ...1 F.F. LEVEL 1 - -1-00' - o" ~ 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss Hll t-{ 1 oRE-j- PLANNINO 1 1 1 1 SCH EMATIC DESI GN: ELEVATION - WEST 0 4 8 16 0 2012 9â€ž1;,98. 2/15/2013 A17 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 8 1 " 1 Pc (T)970/925 4755(F)970/9202950 . FIREPLACE CHIMNEY . ) .,-. 41(. 'fllw'' \ 0 SCREEN CANOPY 0. C & 4 STONE VENEER -l,â‚¬(1+C>Â¥ ./ It. f"-3/.D f.~.~ARM;Â·/2.,4 R & 1.WI2, 1 T.O. PARAPET _ ~ - .CIP: '74+2.~;1* I . 1- m "': 4 0 , f A.4 T.O. PARAPET 1 7 138'-0" tÂ·*3)P' k.:..iÂ· 4 Â· - 137' - 0" 1 ,_, lu:2%; &08 , P,f v *3 ' ' Cl WOOD SIDING -6,ki: t . ..9"4- 1 4 9 I .,02- < /- f r I rli_h . i - â€¢ --ma. .r , 14442#19*Â·2'-4,/*W//////,2 A .301; 1 T.0. PARAPET : a }â€¢ 1*92 U.int,LÂ·j:..? k.:01'll//3, 44.<F 7 126'-6" 14.f,4 ''1? .. ABLe. y ...r F.F. LEVEL 3 ~ - 123' - 0" 2%31 STONE VENEER A'. -,6. 49 STOREFRONT 1444â‚¬1 F.F-LEVEL 2 (1 AWNINGS - -1, ''4- 4... 112' - 0" EAST HYMAN AVE. pÂ«46# ALLEY 4 11: 4 BUILDING OUTLINE FOR NEIGHBORING BUILDING - ffi#,E M- EXI F.F-LEVEL 1 ~ 100'-0" 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT , 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss Al i ' 1-1 IRL t PLANNING i i i i SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION- EAST Â© 2012 BILLPOmAI,D ASSDCIATES 0 4 8 16 ARCHfmCTU,~AP~PLANNG 2/15/2013 A18 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 pc (T>970/9254755(F)970/9202950 r .9 11111.111~~ 11 4 Iii 41| , |Il 4 .IN' 11 i . i ..t AL - -U HUNTERSTREET ~ - SPRING STREET 1 .......//Â£/ill -1 1-- . z _2 1 1 1 616 E. HYMAN AVE. I I 60'-0 600 BLOCK 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ~OSS ARL HI I k C I URL r PLAN NING SCHEMATIC DESIGN: ELEVATION - HYMAN AVE 0 15 30 60 COMPOSITE Â©2012 ====04/30/2012 A1"9 605 EAST MAII STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PC (T)970/925 4755(F) 970/9202950 - STONE r- WOOD TIMBER SIDING - CHANNEL .j j / La'f-- 7.8. - WOOD COLUMN 5-Fliv.Fll E - - =Vkt,4~4.122211-3-1* ...-~~7 - 12 1....~ 41 :Â·* 7<7 3 - â€ž 1. .,i. .79. .A- 94' b-*---4 - '.,41 ... T .4 - 4 61/5/=-r:Â·1/."*-4, 'iâ€žr~. 1 , .....a -41 1 EXTERIOR BULDING MATERIALS ELEVATION EXTERIOR STONE FACE OF WA~ WOOD TIMBER SIDING 1 1.1 f l. - 9 4 191.-4 4 1; 9 J L 3, STONE WOOD COLUMN - -h EXTERIOR BULDING MATERIALS PLAN y . 1 METAL CHANNEL ' WOOD SAMPLE: COLOR RANGE EXAMPLE IMAGE: METAL- WINDOW SYSTEM 14, -- r,-Â£- F /57 . 0 P. 9 a- 1 ---Ii.~ EXAMPLE IMAGE: SCREEN CANOPY 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss 41 ' L i Q k i-ANN SCHEMATIC DESIGN: EXT. BUILDING MATERIALS Â© 2012 ellipMA~ASSOCIATES RCHilECTUE*P- 2/15/2013 A20 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 pc (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 Am STING NET LEASABLE: EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL TOTAL 3,331 S.F. EXISTING LEVEL 1 TOTAL 3,261 S.F. EXISTING LEVEL 2 TOTAL 2,454 S.F. TOTAL EXISTING NET LEASABLE 9,046 S.F. ALLEY 7.----------------7---- PARKING H--1 IF:=~ 9 0 21 1 \ ~.AN ---- af 1 1 [/7 1--: 9 \-4-9 I 1 4 ., 47 8 - 0 34\*Re 11 2 =b OPEN TO 43 U 1< =42 ABOVE & ~ BELOW ' ~ '~~~I ~- OPEN TO 0 Hrof BELOW \64 \Â» \ 1 . I PATI 1 - PLANTER - ~~ -1----lim 1'~ rt===41- EXISTING LEASABLE BASEMENT EXISTING LEASABLE LEVEL 1 EXISTING LEASABLE LEVEL 2 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 poss A k l i 1 11 IRI_ P Lt-i 1\111 I lk . SCHEMATIC DESIGN: EXISTINGNETLEASABLEAREA ARCHITECTUREAND- 2/15/2013 A21 1 1 1 1 0 8 16 32 CALCULATIONS 02012 HILLPOSSANDASSOCÂ£ 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 (T)970/925 4755(F) 970/920 2950 1\%%\%1 + EXISTING F.A.R. CALCULATIONS: DECKS EXISTING BASEMENT LEVEL BASEMENT LEVEL (N/A - NO EXPOSURE) 4,437 S.F. EXISTING LEVEL 1 LEVEL 1 FLOOR AREA 4,203 S.F. LEVEL 1 DECKS OS.F. EXISTING LEVEL 2 LEVEL 2 FLOOR AREA 3,193 S.F. LEVEL 2 DECKS 907 S.F. TOTAL GROSS EXISTING 11,833 S.F. 907 S.F. TOTAL EXEMPT BASEMENT 4,437 S.F. ACTUAL F.A.R. 7,396 S.F. ALLEY 7-----------------7 PARKING w-,Trmr --- J hl' ]EFITÂ·1 *19-11 12-4 41 4-Ill-3 "Ph 11 1 l i l l i 11 11 flfÂ®-in Ill \111 lillii' 11 X 1 11 11 .=aJ .al. 3-9 d ~J L 9,129-/ F f 2 S = 2 f*21- f W 1 1 1 m 4 -16 11 1 1 L n 5-14_/Ul L :11=~ 11 F 7 ' 11 L f Â® 4 Il 13/1 Eli 0 4- R %=2 1 EL ~ 1,7 OPEN TO IL_- ,--/ Ltd BELOW U L C \ A 01 - "' -C 3 --- 5 ===22 L K DECK PLANTER ~ 907 S.F. /71z r*==~~-L-_ I I ri E---- EXISTING F.A.R. BASEMENT EXISTING F.A.R. LEVEL 1 EXISTING F.A.R. LEVEL 2 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 SS PL.,.111Vlili. SCHEMATIC DESIGN: EXISTING F.A.R. CALCULATIONS A22 0 0 8 16 32 0 2012 mUPOSSAND~SOCIATES EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ,RCHI~CmREANDPU.NS 2/15/2013 970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 ROPOSED NET LEASABLE: PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL 3,001 S.F. . PROPOSED LEVEL 1 2,910 S.F. PROPOSED LEVEL 2 3,715 S.F. 9 t/4 4,â€ž0'- PROPOSED LEVEL 3 0 S.F. CA TOTAL PROPOSED NET LEASABLE 9,626 S.F. PROPOSED NET LIVABLE NON-UNITSPACE PROPOSED NET BASEMENT 0 S.F. PROPOSED NET RESIDENTIAL (LVL. 2 & 31 2,479 S.F. PROPOSED NET LEASABLE PROPOSED NET DECK SPACE (LVL. 3) 448 S.F. TOTAL NET LIVABLE 2,927 S.F. PROPOSED NET LIVABLE RESIDENTIAL TOTAL NET (LEASABLE & LIVABLE) 12,553 S.F. PROPOSED NET DECK SPACE -1.- -[7- ------------I;---------------------__ __~ ___ ___ ___ ___ __ % 1 222-1 ---------0 I I.% ~ 1 1" !' , - CZEZZIED-----CI~.ZZ]-- UZZIEZZIZE]----Â·--CZZ>--------Â·-CZ~~ M, I U I Â· w ' MECH. SHAFT L N 2 Â· . C F ROOM ~ .Eft-]CH ~ ~11111111- 1-L~ 1 W.11'11'1111 ~ . 1 4 7 1-1 <2<f ..x / 1 60 . 9 1 . ~ - - E 23 - -7---E * I IN I r a PROPOSED NET RESIDENTIAL: 2.355 S.F. Â®11 EN n 9 FE - 1 fl SECOND LEVEL E Nk /' NET LEASABLE: . ~ ROOF / = -' ~_PLANTER 3,715 S.F. DN 1 |9 m 'H .2 mi-LIN I I. ..4# I 1 W. I 2 911 \ PROPOSED NE[, 1 BASEMENT NET LEASABLE: FIRST LEVEL NET LEASABLE RESIDENTIAL: 124 S.F. & . - - - 2,910 S.F. r ' 3,001 S.F. 3- n 2 C b i .11 1 1 1._L ~ . M : . : -1 - PROPOSED NET DECK SPACE I @THIRD LEVEL: 1 ' 448 S.F. ' 1 2-----2 : 1 I m - 1 7- 1 01 m a Ir L_-_._. ~-4 1 . ..Ii'i...HI' E- ------ U--- Â® -== 04 44 W==40 PROPOSED NET LEASABLE - BASEMENT PROPOSED NET LEASABLE - LEVEL 1 PROPOSED NET LEASABLE & NEW LIVABLE- LEVEL 2 PROPOSED NET LIVABLE RESIDENTIAL & DECK SPACE - LEVEL 3 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss 21. r t" O il.Ii 1 1 1 1 SCHEMATIC DESIGN: PROPOSED NET LEASABLE & LIVABLE 0 8 16 32 AREA CALCULATIONS ARCHITECTRA-PLAINI. 2/15/2013 A23 605 EAST MA1N STREET ASPEN, COLORADO B1611 (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 L #14] Hit] J NON-UNITAREAS: BASEMENT COMMERCIAL F64 3,350 S.F. BASEMENT NON-UNIT 1,087 S.F. LEVEL 1 COMMERCIAL 3,055 S.F. LEVEL 1 NON-UNIT 1,720 S.F. LEVEL 2 COMMERCIAL 3,932 S.F. 04Â» NON-UNITSPACE LEVEL 2 FREE MARKET 143 S.F. LEVEL 2 NON-UNIT 782 S.F. LEVEL 3 RESIDENTIAL 2,478 S.F. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL UNIT SPACE LEVEL 3 DECKS 450 S.F. LEVEL 3 NON-UNIT 15 S.F. p PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL UNIT SPACE NON-UNIT TOTAL 3,604 S.F. PROPOSED DECK SPACE r (PARKING/SERVICE AREA: 810 S.F.) =-ri.-- - - -----~ ----------- --- - = 4~ -1--- - -1----- - - 1 1 E-- MECH. SHAFT | NON-UNIT 799 , 1 .. ~T~-15 S.F. --I 401 -1 1 4~ ......... MECH. SHAFT Al\\\\\\ .1 \ 1 -35*A \ - \ he MECH. SHAF : EQUIP. 1 \ \Alk\\\X\I\\IN . ~ /21 2 1 ~ SPACE 1 rp UTtle- I \ \ 10 . I ~MECH., 1 (\IN\AN Af 41 4-Â®1 M ROOM 1% 1%\ E 111411% IN (/113661 1 in,i~L~~ Â« . - L \U 'll I l'N I \-Ful -tllxl Jil Ill 1,1 [SPACE 2 AREA: NQN-UNIT:~ ~ ~ ...N\. %* 509 S.F.) -X - -------- : f x imivi - iri=ri -2 4 -HINT O .b . /4 . I I ' RESIDENTIAL: ~Â· Â·1'' ' 1-2/ 20 \ 019\\\ -TITTIT J ' 2478 SF -- 1 . 1 IV-9711 4-1 - - -- -- -- ~~\~\NAN-~NIT -DTAL:' \7\ \ 1 720 S.FÂ·-J- .. T k XIII h . 1. .....1 m \11 .0 1 . .. .. -- -3 =69 NON-Â·UNIT: 1 \ . IN .=.1 8 ,4# FREE MARKET: 56-\ 1,087 S.F. J \ X \ 143 S.F. \ 32Â«4 11 COMMERCIAL. COMMERCIAL TOTAL: pl COMMERCIAL TOTAL: 3,055 S.F. i 3,932 S.F. ~ i ROOF / | 3.350 S.F. \~ 1~ '910 S.F.)\ \1 9=11 PLANTER INTERIORNON-UNI TOT,1: #\ I I ..61 . . b, , U ..06\ , or. 0. 4134=le ~ ~ | DECK SPACE ~ Â£ 1, \ â€ž @ THIRD LEVEL: 450 S.F. m -----J (SPACE 1 AREA: ; 2,546 S.F.) I - , â€¢ I"Â·I "1 . 14 2= 1 1 7 UU 1 1 ./ r---i __~_~1 T - - , n r, a .m -_ _ L _-_. ....,s - - -- _L. ---- -144--------,-422222~-r--L--En~-~ BASEMENT LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss k SCHEMATIC DESIGN: NON-UNITSPACE viti, i Â© 2012 BILLPOSSA~ASSOCiATES 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81 6 1 ARCH~URLA= 2/15/2013 A24 (T)970/925 4755(F)970/920 2950 616 E. Hyman Proposed Floor Area Date: 2/8/13 Gross Gross Unit Space Gross Non-Unit Space Floor Area Commerical Free Market Total Commerical Free Market Total Total Area Deck Area 79.77% 20.23% Basement 3,350.00 3,350.00 867.13 219.87 1,087.00 4,437 Level 1+( Carport & Service Yard) 3,055.00 3,055.00 1,372.10 347.90 1,720.00 4,775 Level 2 3,932.00 143.00 4,075.00 623.83 158.17 782.00 4,857 Level 3 2,478.00 2,478.00 11.97 3.03 15.00 2,493 450 Roof 0.00 0.00 0 Total 10,337.00 2,621.00 12,958.00 2,007.89 509.11 3,604 16,562 450 Commerical Floor Area Total Floor Area (Less exempt Bsm't ) 6,987.00 2,007.89 8,995 Allowable Floor Area (1.5:1) . Moo Free Market Floor Area Sub- Total Floor Area (Less basm't space) 2,621.00 509.11 3,130 Exempt carport 250.00 250 Total free market floor area 2,880 Allowable Floor Area (0.5:1) 3,000 - Building Area Sum 12,958.00 3,604.00 16,562 Carport / Service (Included in Gross Floor Area) 0 Sub-Total 16,562 Sub-total Basement Below Grade Exemption 4,437 Carport Exemption 250 Sub-Total 4,687 Sub-total Total Building Floor Area 11,875 Total / Allowable Total Floor Area (2:1) Site 6,000 12,000 Allowable Deck Area (3000 x 15%) 450 / Commerical Free Market Net Leasable / Livable Basement 3,001.00 Level 1 2,910.00 Level 2 3,715.00 124.00 Level 3 2,355.00 Total 9,626.00 2,479.00 616 E. HYMAN REDEVELOPMENT 616 E. HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 poss ARCHITE-l,Il.IKE+FLAININING SCH EMATI C DESI GN: F.A.R., NET LEASABLE, AND NET LIVABLE CALCULATIONSa:-02/15/2013 A25 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO BIlli (T )970/9254755 (F) 970/9202950