Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.hpc.20140409 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING April 9, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROOM 130 S. GALENA ASPEN, COLORADO 12:00 SITE VISIT: Meet at 834 W. Hallam 5:00 INTRODUCTION A. Roll call B. Approval of minutes C. Public Comments D. Commission member comments E. Disclosure of conflict of interest (actual and apparent) F. Project Monitoring G. Staff comments H. Certificates of No Negative Effect issued- Cantina and Elks Building I. Submit public notice for agenda items OLD BUSINESS 5:10 A. 420 E. Hyman Avenue- Final Major Development and Commercial Design Review, Public Hearing continued from 3/26, continue again to 4/23 B. 135 E. Cooper- Minor, Public Hearing continued from 1/22, continue again to 6/25 NEW BUSINESS 5:15 A. 212 Lake Avenue, Minor Development and Hallam Lake Bluff Review, PUBLIC HEARING WORKSESSIONS 6:15 A. 834 W. Hallam 6:45 B. Select Annual Awards,to be presented at May 12th City Council meeting 7:10 ADJOURN TYPICAL PROCEEDING- 1 HOUR, 10 MINUTES FOR MAJOR AGENDA ITEM, NEW BUSINESS Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) Staff presentation (5 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Applicant presentation (20 minutes) Board questions and clarifications (5 minutes) Public comments (close public comment portion of hearing) (5 minutes) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed (5 minutes) HPC discussion(15 minutes) Applicant rebuttal (comments) (5 minutes) Motion (5 minutes) *Make sure the motion includes what criteria are met or not met. No meeting of the HPC shall be called to order without a quorum consisting of at least four (4) members being present. No meeting at which less than a quorum shall be present shall conduct any business other than to continue the agenda items to a date certain. All actions shall require the concurring vote of a simple majority, but in no event less than three (3) concurring votes of the members of the commission then present and voting. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Historic Preservation Officer Hillary Seminick, Planner Technician RE: 212 Lake Avenue — HPC Minor Redevelopment and Hallam Lake Bluff Review DATE: April 9, 2014 SUMMARY: 212 Lake Avenue is located in the R-6, Medium Density residential zone district. The subject property contains a duplex, which is an 1888 Victorian era home with an extensive rear addition. The property has a driveway off of Lake Avenue because there is no alley in this area. The original structure was expanded in 1980, at a time of limited HPC purview and a decade before protections for the Hallam Lake Bluff were adopted into the Land Use Code (November, 1990). The existing development exceeds the maximum floor area, encroaches into today's sideyard setback requirements, and encroaches into the current Hallam Lake Bluff setback area and its progressive height limit, but the construction is permitted to remain in place as a non-conformity, legally established under past regulations. A new owner wishes to remodel the exterior of the structure, including restoration work on the Victorian and simplification of forms and details on the non-historic construction. Overall, the floor area of the building will be slightly reduced and the conflicts with Hallam Lake Bluff will be minimized. APPLICANT: Owner, Aspen River Rendezvous LLC, 186 Vail Ln. North Salem, NY 10560; represented by Mitch Haas of Haas Land Planning, 420 E. Main St. Suite 10-B, Aspen, CO 81611. PARCEL ID:2735-124-89-004(Unit A) and 2735-124-89-005 (Unit B) Page 1 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review ADDRESS: 212 Lake Avenue, Units A and B of the 212 Lake Avenue Condominiums, Aspen. ZONING: R-6, Medium Density Residential, Historic Landmark MINOR DEVELOPMENT The procedure for HPC Minor Development Review is as follows Staff reviews the submittal materials and prepares a report that analyzes the project's conformance with the design guidelines and other applicable Land Use Code Sections. This report is transmitted to the HPC with relevant information on the proposed project and a recommendation to continue, approve, disapprove or approve with conditions and the reasons for the recommendation. The HPC will review the application, the staff analysis report and the evidence presented at the hearing to determine the project's conformance with the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The HPC may approve, disapprove, approve with conditions, or continue the application to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. If the application is approved, the HPC shall issue a Certificate of Appropriateness and the Community Development Director shall issue a Development Order. The HPC decision shall be final unless appealed by the applicant or a landowner within three hundred(300)feet of the subject property in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 26.316. Staff finding: The Victorian on this property is one of only a few brick one story 19th century homes in Aspen. There have been minorr alterations to the front and sides of the building. However, the 1980 expansion to the rear overwhelms r the historic structure and lands - directly on the roof of the original house. r ' This application proposes several restoration efforts, including . replacing the window on the front of the house to match the historic condition, seen at right. The applicant will also remove 1980s era replacement windows that were ; installed in the Victorian and will r E. restore the openings to their original height, including re-inserting stone sills that were removed. "Scars"in the masonry show where changes were made on the building. Non-historic decorative trim will be removed, a large chimney attached to the north fagade will be taken down, original brickwork will be repaired, and perhaps most importantly, the ridgeline Page 2 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review of the addition that encroaches most onto the MUM historic resource is going to be dropped to the height of the Victorian building. „ Overall, the project is greatly improving the character and integrity of the historic building. The photo on the previous page is the best photo that has been located showing the building prior to alterations. The original front porch of the house was removed by 1980. The existing is not exactly accurate, but at least it is simply detailed. The original porch had an - applied column attached to the masonry at the front. The porch may have looked more like the example found at 311 S. First Street, pictured at right. The applicant may want to consider rebuilding the porch at 212 Lake. In addition to work on the Victorian portion of the duplex, the applicant plans exterior changes on all sides of the 1980s addition, all meant to simplify the architecture. At the rear of the site, an existing gable roof form is to be changed to a flat roofed deck. This area of the project will be discussed further in the memo as part of the Hallam Lake Bluff review. The project is a Minor HPC review. No changes in footprint will occur. The structure does not comply with many areas of current HPC guidelines or the Residential Design Standards, but this condition is permitted to continue. Staff has a concern with the HPC guidelines related to the new fence. The applicant has proposed a wood fence at the front of the site that is a very good replica of the style that was found in Aspen during the Victorian era. A few examples still exist in town. Staff recommends that the proposed new fence, perhaps just the piers, be simplified slightly so that the fence does not appear to be built in the 1800s. Regarding exterior lighting, a pendant is proposed at the front porch of the Victorian. A wall sconce might be a more accurate fixture type for the era. Relative to HPC design guideline 14.6, staff recommends restudy of this light, for review and approval by staff and monitor. Details for the masonry repair work, and cut sheets for the new windows and door will be required. SETBACK VARIANCES AND SITE COVERAGE VARIANCE The applicant is not proposing any footprint changes to the existing building, however because the house does not meet current setback requirements, particularly along the north side of the site, variances are requested in order to formally allow the building placement as-is. Page 3 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a. Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district; and/or b. Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Staff Response: Staff recommends that HPC not grant setback variances or a site coverage variance for the project. Variances are not technically necessary because building permits were properly issued for this building, which was in conformance with the requirements of the time. The location of the non-historic construction on this site does not enhance the historic resource or create development that is in character with the historic building, therefore staff finds that the criteria are not met. The applicant will still be able to proceed with their remodel, so long as they don't increase any current setback encroachment or site coverage. PARKING VARIANCE Properties listed on the Aspen Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures may provide fewer on- site parking spaces than required if the standards below are met. 1. The parking needs of the residents, customers, guests and employees of the project have been met, taking into account potential uses of the parcel, the projected traffic generation of the project, any shared parking opportunities, expected schedule of parking demands, the projected impacts on the on-street parking of the neighborhood, the proximity to mass transit routes and the downtown area and any special services, such as vans, provided for residents, guests and employees. 2. An on-site parking solution meeting the requirement is practically difficult or results in an undesirable development scenario. 3. Existing or planned on-site or off-site parking facilities adequately serve the needs of the development, including the availability of street parking. And HPC must also find that: 1. The parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees may be approved upon a finding by the HPC that it will enhance or mitigate an adverse impact on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property, an adjoining designated property or a historic district. Page 4of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Staff Response: The property contains a duplex. Each unit should have two parking spaces, but instead has one. 212 Lake Avenue shares a driveway easement with the adjacent home. There are limitations on being able to accommodate formal parking spaces in the driveway. Staff finds that there is a practical difficulty in providing the necessary on-site parking and supports a waiver of two parking spaces; one per unit. HALLAM LAKE BLUFF ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA The purpose of Hallam Lake Bluff Review is to protect the ecological, environmental and scenic significance of Hallam Lake through a heightened review process for new development. Development within the Hallam Lake Bluff review area is subject to a more stringent review to reduce noise and visual impacts on the nature preserve, protect against slope erosion and landslide, minimize impacts on surface runoff, maintain views to and from the nature preserve and ensure the aesthetic and historical integrity of Hallam Lake and the nature preserve. The City Engineer and Parks Department have reviewed the proposed application. Their comments are attached as Exhibit B and are incorporated into the following staff recommendations and proposed conditions of approval where appropriate. h Y Location map of subject parcel, marked with a star. The Hallam Lake Bluff is indicated with yellow shading. Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. No development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA unless the Historic Preservation Commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements: Page 5of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Staff finding: The proposed project will remove and replace non-native vegetation within the Hallam Bluff Lake ESA. The applicant will coordinate with the City Parks Department and Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) to ensure sensitive timing and methods are employed. No additional activities are proposed below the top of slope. Staff finds this criterion is met. 2. All development within the fifteen-foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen-foot setback shall not be approved unless the Historic Preservation Commission determines that the following conditions can be met: a) A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top-of-slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. b) Any intrusion into the top-of-slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. c) Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top- of-slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. d) Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adjoining properties. Staff finding: The duplex was developed prior to the establishment of the Hallam Lake Bluff ESA. Existing development within the 15-foot setback area includes covered and uncovered outdoor patios, a sunken courtyard/area well, the gable-end side of the residence over a living room space, and a second-story deck space. Pursuant to Section 26.312.020 (A), nonconforming uses of land or structures may continue in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 26.312,Nonconformities. Staff finds criterion 2(a)met. The proposed project will decrease the height, volume, and total amount of development within the setback area; however, not all development within the setback will be eliminated. The second-story deck will be removed. There is a new second story deck proposed; however, the feature is not within the 15-foot setback. There are no proposed changes to the elevation or footprint of the existing patio; however, the applicant proposes to replace the existing light blocks over a non-conforming "light well" with bricks to match the existing patio. The two-story living room, which currently encroaches into the 15-foot setback will be demolished and remodeled into a single-story space with a roof monitor. Staff would prefer the roof monitor not encroach within the Hallam Lake Bluff layback. The existing mass, height, volume and total amount of development within the setback area will be reduced 26%. Staff finds criterion 2(b)met. The existing stair landing will be reconfigured into a master bedroom and deck. The master bedroom will be closer to the setback; however, this change will allow for a reduction of the existing mass within the setback. Staff finds criterion 2(c) met. Page 6of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Mature vegetation, including trees, shrubs, and herbaceous ground cover is adjacent to the structure and along the Hallam Lake Bluff. Due to the timing of the application, a comprehensive vegetation survey within the setback area was not possible due to snow cover. The applicant proposes removal of non-native vegetation with native species within the setback area pursuant to a plan approved by both the City of Aspen Parks Department and the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) Staff. The applicant has coordinated with both Chris Forman (City of Aspen) and Jim Kravitz (ACES) regarding the vegetation to be removed, replacement vegetation, methods of removal and replacement, and timing of implementation to ensure the greatest success rates. This can be confirmed when a final landscape plan is prepared for review and approval by Parks Department and Engineering. The approved plan will be incorporated into the building permit application. 3. All development outside the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five-degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.104.100 and the method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. Staff finding: The existing development intrudes into the 45 degree "layback" limits. The proposed changes will not eliminate all development that is out of compliance with current standards; however, the height and mass which exceeds the 45 degree line will be reduced. Staff finds the proposal is an improvement over current conditions. Staff finds that criterion 3 is met. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty percent (50%) of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Staff finding: The applicant proposes to improve the rear portion of the property by removing and replacing non-native vegetation with native vegetation within the Hallam Lake Bluff area. No detailed plan for landscape improvements is provided due to winter conditions, therefore staff cannot determine that native vegetative screening of at least 50% of the rear of the parcel is achieved. This can be confirmed when a final landscape plan is prepared for review and approval by Parks Department and Engineering. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. Staff finding: The applicant proposes new light fixtures, both bollards and sconces, be installed within the 15' setback from top of slope. No new development is allowed in this area, therefore the lighting plan must be revised. The approved lighting plan shall be submitted with the building permit. Page 7of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Staff finding: No fill materials or debris will be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates will be maintained. Full drainage and erosion control plans will be provided as part of the building permit application as required. No pool or hot tubs are currently present on the property and none are proposed. Staff finds criterion 6 is met. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope and pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff finding: The applicant submitted site selection drawings that were prepared, signed and stamped by a registered architect. The drawings show all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and all pertinent elevations above sea level. Staff finds this criterion to be met. The HPC may: • approve the application, • approve the application with conditions, • disapprove the application, or • continue the application to a date certain to obtain additional information necessary to make a decision to approve or deny. RECOMMENDATION: Regarding HPC Minor Development review, staff recommends approval with conditions listed below. Regarding Hallam Lake Bluff Review, staff is supportive of the proposal to bring the property into closer conformance with the Hallam Lake Bluff review standards. Considering the scope of the remodel project and the current configuration of the residence, Staff finds that the intent of the review standards is met with the application. Numerous conditions are included in the draft resolution related to the remodel of Unit B and the removal and replacement of non-native vegetation of the area to ensure the project is successful and preserves the existing natural vegetation and slope. Engineering requires the applicant is to limit noise and visual impact to environmentally sensitive areas and provide a plan for such with the building permit construction management plan. Furthermore, Hallam Lake Bluff should be protected from erosion and runoff during construction. Page 8of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Recommended conditions are: • HPC hereby requires only one parking space for each unit; A and B. • Simplify the fence piers to reinforce that the fence is new, not Victorian era, for review and approval by staff and monitor. • Propose a sconce for the front porch of the Victorian, for review and approval by staff and monitor. • Provide details for the masonry repair work, and provide cut sheets for the new windows and door on the Victorian, for review and approval by staff and monitor. • A final landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by Parks Department and Engineering. The approved plan shall be incorporated in the building permit application. • Limit noise and visual impact to environmentally sensitive areas and provide a plan for such with the building permit construction management plan. • An erosion and runoff protection plan is to be implemented during construction to protect the Hallam Lake Bluff. • Revise the lighting plan to eliminate any exterior fixtures within the 15' setback from top of slope. The approved plan shall be incorporated in the building permit application. Exhibits: Resolution# , Series of 2014 A. Relevant HPC design guidelines B. Parks and Engineering Departments Comments C. Application Page 9of13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Exhibit A.Relevant Design Guidelines 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. ❑ Any fence which is visible from a public right-of-way must be built of wood or wrought iron. Wire fences also may be considered. ❑ A wood picket fence is an appropriate replacement in most locations. A simple wire or metal fence, similar to traditional "wrought iron," also may be considered. ❑ Chain link is prohibited and solid "stockade" fences are only allowed in side and rear yards. 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. ❑ A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. ❑ On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) ❑ A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. ❑ Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. ❑ Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. ❑ Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. ❑ This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. ❑ Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. ❑ Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. ❑ The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. ❑ Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. ❑ Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. Page 10 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review ❑ Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. ❑ Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. ❑ Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws.and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. ❑ Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration of the brick itself. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. ❑ If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. ❑ Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. ❑ If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double-hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. ❑ Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. ❑ Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. ❑ Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. ❑ Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. ❑ A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's casing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. ❑ A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. ❑ A historic door from a similar building also may be considered. ❑ Simple paneled doors were typical. ❑ Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. Page 11 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. ❑ Use materials that appear similar to the original. ❑ While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. ❑ Where no evidence of the hppearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. ❑ When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. ❑ The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. ❑ The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. ❑ Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. ❑ Retain and repair roof detailing. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. ❑ A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. ❑ An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. ❑ An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. ❑ An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. ❑ A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. ❑ The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. ❑ All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. ❑ Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. Page 12 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review ❑ Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. ❑ Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. ❑ Do not wash an entire building facade in light. ❑ Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. ❑ Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. ❑ Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. ❑ Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. ❑ Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges. ❑ A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. ❑ Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly visible roof planes. ❑ Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. 14.16 Locate standpipes, meters and other service equipment such that they will not damage historic facade materials. ❑ Cutting channels into historic facade materials damages the historic building fabric and is inappropriate. Do not locate equipment on the front facade. ❑ If a channel must be cut, either locate it on a secondary facade, or place it low on the wall. Page 13 of 13 212 Lake Avenue HPC Minor and Hallam Lake Bluff Review A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW FOR 212 LAKE AVENUE, UNITS A AND B OF THE 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #_, SERIES OF 2014 PARCEL ID: 2735-124-89-004(Unit A) and 2735-124-89-005 (Unit B) WHEREAS, the applicant, Aspen River Rendezvous LLC, represented by Haas Land Planning, submitted an application requesting Minor Development review and Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the property located at 212 Lake Avenue, legally described as Units A and B of the 212 Lake Avenue Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, 212 Lake Avenue is a designated landmark; and WHEREAS, Community Development Department staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of Minor Development review and approval of Hallam Lake Bluff review with conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on April 9, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Commission finds that the development proposal meet either applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS,the Historic Preservation Commission approves the requests with conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC grant Minor Development approval and Hallam Lake Bluff Review for the property located at 212 Lake Avenue, with the following conditions: 1. HPC hereby requires only one parking space for each unit; A and B. 2. Simplify the fence piers to reinforce that the fence is new, not Victorian era, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 3. Propose a sconce for the front porch of the Victorian, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 4. Provide details for the masonry repair work, and provide cut sheets for the new windows and door on the Victorian, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 5. A final landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by Parks Department and Engineering. The approved plan shall be incorporated in the building permit application. 6. Limit noise and visual impact to environmentally sensitive areas and provide a plan for such with the building permit construction management plan. 7. An erosion and runoff protection plan is to be implemented during construction to protect the Hallam Lake Bluff. 8. Revise the lighting plan to eliminate any exterior fixtures within the 15' setback from top of slope. The approved plan shall be incorporated in the building permit application. 9. The development approvals granted herein shall constitute a site-specific development plan vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of a development order. However, any failure to abide by any of the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights. Unless otherwise exempted or extended, failure to properly record all plats and agreements required to be recorded, as specified herein, within 180 days of the effective date of the development order shall also result in the forfeiture of said vested property rights and shall render the development order void within the meaning of Section 26.104.050 (Void permits). Zoning that is not part of the approved site-specific development plan shall not result in the creation of a vested property right. No later than fourteen (14) days following final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this Ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of three (3) years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 212 Lake Avenue, legally described as Units A and B of the 212 Lake Avenue Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the development order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this approval of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this approval. The approval granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review; the period of time permitted by law for the exercise of such rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as required under Section 26.304.070(A). The rights of referendum shall be limited as set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 91h day of April, 2014. Jay Maytin, Chair Approved as to Form: Debbie Quinn, Assistant City Attorney ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk vL � Hillary Seminick From: Josh Rice Sent: Wednesday, April 2, 2014 2:39 PM To: Hillary Seminick Cc: Amy Simon Subject: RE: 212 Lake Ave I I i larw, We gave this an extensive review earlier this month and we did have a few comments in addition to our boilerplate I ail eua:re: I. Follow the Engineering Department Design Standards and Urban Runoff Management Plan. 2. Limit noise and visual impact to environmentally sensitive areas and provide a plan to do so within the building Permit CMI'. Protect Hallam Blufffrorn erosion and runoff during construction. 4. It non-conforming patio is anyway altered it should be removed and the area replanted 1.0 meet the municipal/land use code. No. 4 may give you or Amy heartburn, so let.me know if we need to discuss. Thanks, Josh Rice, P.E.. CFM Development Engineer I A S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 8 161 1 (970)429-2750 Josh.rice(u)cityofaspen.com "Tire mission of the Engineering Department is to enrich Aspen's distinctive character so that it remains one ojthe world's premier mountain conurrrruitie.s hr protecting;the natural environment,improving water qualim,enhancing the pedestrian experience and ininitnizin.,construction impacts Jor the enjo,i'nrent q/residents and guests alike." From: Hillary Seminick Sent:Wednesday, April 02, 2014 9:53 AM To:Josh Rice Cc:Amy Simon Subject: RE: 212 Lake Ave Hi Josh, Did you have any comment regarding the proposed project? Thanks! Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner Technician Community Development Department City of Aspen 1 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2763 www.aspenpitkin.corn Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning,which is subject to change in the future,and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. From: Hillary Seminick Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:59 PM To: David Radeck;Josh Rice Cc:Amy Simon; Chris Forman Subject: 212 Lake Ave Dave &Josh: I am helping Amy Simon on the Hallam Lake Bluff review portion of this project. She forwarded the referral packet on February 281h and comments area due March 311t. She asked that I forward you both the following summary regarding the proposed changes within the bluff area. The applicant wishes to remove and replace the non-native vegetation within the Hallam Bluff Area.The applicant representative, Mitch Hass,went out to the property with Chris Forman of the Parks Department and then with Jim Kravitz of ACES. Both looked around the HLB hillside and agreed that the type of removals and restoration we want to complete would be a good thing and can definitely be coordinated. Both also agreed, however,that due to the deep snow cover,they cannot yet properly identify the non-native plants. The applicant did not want to wait until the spring snowmelt to submit this application, nor do we want to have to go back through any kind of additional Hallam Lake Bluff review later, after they are able to identify each non-native plant just for this part of the request. The applicant is seeking approval of"sensitive in manner and selective removal of non-native vegetation on the property's HLB hillside, including such areas located below the top of slope, provided all removals and plantings are done pursuant to a plan approved by both the City of Aspen Parks Department and the ACES staff, and which plan also addresses timing for implementation." Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner Technician Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2763 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: 2 This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient,please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning,which is subject to change in the future,and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. 3 Hillary Seminick From: David Radeck Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 10:10 AM To: Hillary Seminick Subject: RE: 212 Lake Ave Thanks Hillary.We are fine with it. Dave From: Hillary Seminick Sent:Tuesday,April 1, 2014 10:09 AM To: David Radeck Cc:Amy Simon Subject: RE: 212 Lake Ave Hi Dave, There isn't a building permit on this activity yet.The intent of the referral was to allow you to raise any concerns before the applicant submits for a building permit. My understanding, based on our conversation yesterday, is that you do not have any concerns at this time. Let me know if you have any additional questions!! Thanks! Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner Technician Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2763 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning,which is subject to change in the future:and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. From: Hillary Seminick Sent:Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:59 PM To: David Radeck;Josh Rice 1 Cc: Amy Simon; Chris Forman Subject: 212 Lake Ave Dave &Josh: I am helping Amy Simon on the Hallam Lake Bluff review portion of this project. She forwarded the referral packet on February 281h and comments area due March 311t. She asked that I forward you both the following summary regarding the proposed changes within the bluff area. The applicant wishes to remove and replace the non-native vegetation within the Hallam Bluff Area.The applicant representative, Mitch Hass, went out to the property with Chris Forman of the Parks Department and then with Jim Kravitz of ACES. Both looked around the HLB hillside and agreed that the type of removals and restoration we want to complete would be a good thing and can definitely be coordinated. Both also agreed, however, that due to the deep snow cover,they cannot yet properly identify the non-native plants. The applicant did not want to wait until the spring snowmelt to submit this application, nor do we want to have to go back through any kind of additional Hallam Lake Bluff review later, after they are able to identify each non-native plant just for this part of the request. The applicant is seeking approval of"sensitive in manner and selective removal of non-native vegetation on the property's HLB hillside, including such areas located below the top of slope, provided all removals and plantings are done pursuant to a plan approved by both the City of Aspen Parks Department and the ACES staff, and which plan also addresses timing for implementation." Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! Hillary Hillary Seminick Planner Technician Community Development Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 970-429-2763 www.aspenpitkin.com Notice and Disclaimer: This message is intended only for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential and exempt from disclosure pursuant to applicable law. if you are not the intended recipient,please reply to the sender that you have received the message in error and then delete it. Further,the information or opinions contained in this email are advisory in nature only and are not binding on the City of Aspen. If applicable,the information and opinions contain in the email are based on current zoning,which is subject to change in the future,and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The opinions and information contained herein do not create a legal or vested right or any claim of detrimental reliance. 2 4---------------------------------- I I I — I I I I � I I 4e. I I I � � I � I I I I I r I r - Current.Zoning Submission Shows existing condition (without stone si//J. r ---------------------------------- ' Lj 7 I I II I I I I I � I I I I I / I I I - I I I I � I I I I --1 Proposed Revision Provide stone sill to motch front window r�oxmcz3 of Il IL,�S�A�1�IIIlbIl� MMT MJ BM. JOHN B.MURRAY 03/19/14 �j ''`R CH wry itc nspM Colorado Scala ���l�° [48WEST37MRM lolh FLOOR �rHL>3�or>E 212-242-MM�s Street(Elevation ®f »mwn reBFAx:z>z-z4z-s6o> mst®471cal mIlIIllcII°°s cottage RTyg ®4A Y� s 1 � f t f r .Existing /merge: Shows stone .5ill removed and brick patchwork under window. Proposed: Bring back original window height, repair and key brick below window and in.51011 new stone sill to match existing on front of house. M OMCE OF ll �Ad�Ilbu� n.im SHEU UMBE : JOHN H MURRAY 03/19/14 �° �T�'.lJ.c aspen,Colorado 48 WEST 37 SntM lqh FLOOR TELEPHONE 212-2424"10018 Street Elevation of n,a" (04B TELEFAX 212-242-1601 Historical Miner's Cottage RTM - -i , Fxisling Image: Shows sfone sill removed and brick palchwork under window. Proposed: Bring back original window heighf, repair and key brick below window and insla/l new sfone sill to match exisling on front of house. M OMCM of ll IC.�flC�t��I�IIlll4ll6 0"° slur NUMBER: JOHN B.MURRAY 03/19/14 ARCfBTB r.UC Aspen,Colorado Sale �° 48 WEST 37 S7RE8r 10th FLOOR MWYOMMWYORX Hom.212-242-860018 Street Elevation of nmvn rE1BFAx:z12-us-a6o1 Historical Mine s Cottage RTM 04C i x 3 w _ 4 Fxisling Image Shows .5/one sill o/front window.. TRB oFF1cE of ��� �������� �°` SI">F.�'1'x[lt�»e: J®�IIN B. WT,LLC 03/19/14 ° �T�'.isc Aspen.Colorado 1I1�'� 48 WEST 37 STREET loth FLOOR }, ¶ RT �} TTEMMOM212.24y86001B �UJtI�,���ll��'6TlIWl®� ®� Dawn TELEFAX:212-242-8601 Hist®nical Miner's Cottage RTM ®4� Y . I i Itl y l 4QV , a �L j Exisfing Image Shows stone sill of fronf window.. TM OMce or e°'�Il� ]L��Ad��u� n sir rR.►,MER: JOHN R.MURRAY 03/19/14 ARCMTECr,LLC Aspen,Colorado SJ..L]�I = II���J\J 48 WFS'r 37 S7REBT 10th FLAOR MWYOMNMYORK TELMP ON&212-242-M 18 Street Elevation of Dimm Historical Minces cComge RTM 041E HAAS LAND PLANNING9 LLD I February 19, 2014 IVED Amy Simon 9 2014 City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 South Galena Street �� I Y 4ZASPEN Aspen, CO 81611 C(�AAi'�I LOPAIE1T RE:HPC Minor Development and Hallam Lake Bluff Review Application for 212 Lake Avenue,Aspen (Units A and B,212 Lake Avenue Condominiums; a/k/a Lot 18,Block 103,Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen) Dear Amy: Please consider this letter and the accompanying plans set to constitute a formal request by the applicant, Aspen River Rendezvous, LLC, for Minor Development approval to allow the restoration and remodeling of the historic home located at 212 Lake Avenue. Approvals for Hallam Lake Bluff Review and certain variances from the R-6 Zone District dimensional requirements to accommodate existing conditions and proposed changes thereto are also requested as part of this application. As a legally developed duplex consisting of Units A & B, its Parcel Identification Numbers are 2735-124-89-004 and -005, respectively. The lot is approximately 11,102 square feet in size and sits in the Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone district. It is a designated Historic Landmark and borders the ACES Hallam Lake Preserve. A vicinity map (not to scale) showing the location of the subject property is provided below. _w�•a Lo t5 II '�.-: a33 _,r-' d05;� 710; 31f, I ^300.•.` 1 - I�,-^ - _ L! Fsnmas FYttn•rtMp la1&•t 11111 , 434 a°',.._:-ut• __ I1t�'+111'''1J—J 't,-�__ -t-� / PPAfWC7 phi 8yn tot -�--7 H•�nr / 4k� _i• 6t9.',�-r 1116,�,.__ Huttt•ld Sp4t ! ❑3w. au, - _ +YO+�r++sr l ' waae•n La S01 2723 T10S R85W ,� HOM L•t• 41-5.alt. \ f 7 2a0; < Sill, 901`� yr 230 •x+��, � y. "F `e,:.,i saw oa 2twvW Joni va"We r ass, ..- f, 6'G `. Esc,tnl$j4wi &r__ Vicinity Map-212 Lake Avenue,Aspen • 420 E. MAIN STREET, SUITE 10-B ASPEN, COLORADO 8161 1 • • PHONE: (970) 925-7819 MITCH@HLPASPEN.COM - This application is submitted pursuant to the following sections of the Aspen Land Use Code (hereinafter the Code): 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures, including 26.304.060(B)(1), Combined Reviews; 26.412, Residential Design Standards; 26.415.070(C), Minor Historic Development; 26.415.110 Benefits to Historic Properties; 26.435.060, Hallam Lake Bluff Review; and 26.710.040, Medium-Density Residential (R-6). For the reviewer's convenience all pertinent supporting documents relating to the project are provided in the various exhibits to the application, as follows: • Exhibit 1: Land Use Application and Dimensional Requirements Forms; • Exhibit 2: Pre-Application Conference Summary prepared by Amy Simon; • Exhibit 3: Proof of the Applicant's Ownership; • Exhibit 4: Authorization for Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP)to represent the applicant; • Exhibit 5: Copies of applicable building permits, letters of completion and Certificates of Occupancy demonstrating that all existing improvements were legally constructed. • Exhibit 6: An executed application fee agreement; and, • Exhibit 7: Mailing addresses of record for all property owners located within three hundred (300) feet of the subject property (to be provided under separate cover with an Affidavit of Notice prior to the first scheduled public hearing date). In addition, a full and exceptionally detailed set of architectural plans prepared by John B. Murray Architect, LLC accompany this application. While the applicant has attempted to address all relevant provisions of the Code, and to provide sufficient information to enable a thorough evaluation of the application, questions may arise which require further information and/or clarification. Upon request, Haas Land Planning, LLC will provide such additional information as may be required in the course of the review. Existing Conditions The historic portion of the home (Unit A) was built in the 1880s and designated to the Aspen Inventory of Historic Landmark Sites and Structures (the Inventory) in 1980, pursuant to Ordinance No. 17 (Series of 1980). The Architectural Inventory Form describes the home as representative of Aspen's early mining era and it was considered to be of historical significance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle(s) of the average citizen during Aspen's silver mining days. An atypical feature of the original portion of the home is its brick construction as brick is a more costly material than wood. Over the years, there have been many modifications to the original structure, including the addition of a chimney, the raised ridgeline of the primary cross-gable roof, changed windows, the solarium room addition, the garage and a substantial two-story addition to the rear. The metal roof and the 4-foot wrought iron fence at the front of the 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 2 home are not original. Essentially all of Unit B is non-historic newer construction that was legally completed without Hallam Lake Bluff Review (HLBR) and long before the City adopted its Historic Preservation Design Guidelines. The existing development is non-conforming with regard to the current R-6 zoning provisions in several ways, including but not necessarily limited to floor area, individual and combined side-yard setbacks, site coverage, and parking. Additionally, the development encroaches into the Hallam Lake Bluff setback area and its progressive height limit, but these improvements were built before the HLBR regulations were adopted. All of the non-conforming conditions were legally established, as demonstrated by the copies of applicable building permits, letters of completion and Certificates of Occupancy, all contained in Exhibit 5 hereto. Finally, for whatever reason, the City's mapped top of slope for the Roaring Fork River (relative to Stream Margin Review) runs through the back of this property. However, all of ACES and Hallam Lake are between the river and this property. The provisions of Stream Margin Review apply to all development within 100 feet, measured horizontally, from the high water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams and to all development within the Flood Hazard Area, also known as the 100-year flood plain (Code Section 26.435.040). Since 212 Lake Avenue is not within 100 feet of the high water line or within the flood plain, Stream Margin Review is clearly not applicable to this property or the proposed remodel. The Proposal As mentioned above, the property is located in the City's R-6, Medium-Density Residential, Zone District. The proposed changes and development are all clearly depicted on the accompanying plans set provided by John B. Murray Architect, LLC. Highlights of the proposal are also described below but the plans set should be closely reviewed and referenced while reading through the narratives contained herein. The applicant proposes to remove inappropriate, non-historic features and details from portions of the historic structure, and restore it to its original, historic appearance. This development will require significant effort to restore historic integrity and return the original portion of the home to its true, original appearance, and better distinguish the later-built part of the home from the original. The restoration efforts to be undertaken include: • All non-historic trusses (ornamental bracketing) will be removed. • The non-original large, double-hung window (not of Victorian proportions) will be replaced with a pair of appropriately sized and scaled double-hung windows without changing the opening or original surrounding brick work. • The non-historic chimney that confuses the historic integrity of the home will be removed. A set of double-hung windows that match the front of the home will be 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 3 added to the west side, in the area where the chimney will be removed. The brickwork above these windows will match the historic brickwork on the home. • Along the west elevation of the home, the scalloped shingles (fish scales) will only be maintained on the Victorian portion of the structure and will be removed from all portions of the non-historic construction. • The front porch area will be restored, including replacement of the existing door that is not in character with the historic nature of the property with a door that matches the Victorian character of the home's street front. • The unoriginal transom window above the front door will be removed and replaced with traditional brickwork that matches the two historic examples that still exist. • Several large cracks throughout the brickwork will be repaired. • The metal fencing will be removed and replaced with simpler and more appropriate painted wood picket fencing. • All skylights will be removed. • In general and throughout, window patterns, dormers, and roof forms will be simplified. • A small double-hung window that is traditional in scale and design will be added upstairs on the east-facing end of the cross gable. • The solarium-like addition will be removed and the new/replacement wall will be moved far enough back so as to restore and reveal the historic corner of the building. • The ridgeline of the primary cross-gable will be restored to its original height, scale and proportions,which involves lowering it in height by more than seven(7) feet. Additional remodeling efforts will be undertaken on the non-historic portion of the duplex, including the following: • The neo-modern columns, palladium windows, dormers and fake Victorian accents will all be removed. • The forms will be simplified to better complement the historic portion of the building while making a clear distinction between the historic and non-historic portions of the home. • The ornamental truss bracketing will be removed and the Non-Victorian windows and palladium windows will all be replaced with more appropriate and less complicated windows and doors. • On the north elevation (the side that faces Hallam Lake), all of the existing 2nd floor deck space, as well as the dormers, the palladium windows and the neo- Victorian fish-scale detailing will be removed and replaced with a less complicated and further set back second story that will encroach far less than the existing structure does upon the Hallam Lake Bluff setback and its associated progressive height limit. This will feature detailing and window forms that are clearly a product of their own time and will not be confused with the historic portion of the home. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 4 • The roof form facing Hallam Lake will be greatly simplified and the covered patio area will be eliminated. • There are currently four sets of double French doors on the Hallam Lake Bluff side of the home and these will be replaced with four single doors, thereby continuing the theme of simplification. • The western elevation (which is barely visible given the 6.2 foot setback, tall and densely planted trees, and proximity of the adjacent home to the west) will be greatly simplified so as to eliminate confusion between the old and the new. • In addition, the faux Victorian fencing that fronts Lake Avenue will be removed and replaced with a more basic and appropriate fence. Finally, the applicant would like to sensitively and selectively remove all non-native vegetation in the Hallam Lake Bluff area of the property and replace these with native vegetation. Any such work will be done in consultation with ACES staff and with as little site disturbance as practicable. The at- or near-grade patio areas on the back and side of the home will not be enlarged or expanded any closer to Hallam Lake. The amount of building mass that exists within the Hallam Lake Bluff area will be greatly reduced, and the total volume of structure protruding beyond the top of slope setback and its progressive height limit will be reduced by 26%. The applicant's representative has met and conferred with ACES staff about all of these plans and believes to have their support. Access to the property will continue to come from the shared driveway and curb cut on Lake Avenue. This shared access serves the subject duplex as well as the home immediately to the southeast. Review Requirements Given the above-described proposal and the direction provided in the attached Pre- Application Conference Summary (see Exhibit 2), approvals are needed for Minor Development, (Partial) Demolition, Variances, and Hallam Lake Bluff Review. Minor Historic Development Review, Section 26.415.070(0) Section 26.415.070(C)(1) of the Code states that, The review and decision on the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness for minor development shall begin with a determination by the Community Development Director that the proposed project constitutes a minor development. Minor development work includes... b) Alterations to a building fagade, windows, doors, roof planes or material, exterior wall materials, dormer porch, exterior staircase, balcony or ornamental trim when three (3) or fewer elements are affected and the work does not qualify for a certificate of no negative effect. 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 5 As evidenced by the attached Pre-Application Conference Summary (Exhibit 2) the Community Development Director has determined that the proposal made herein qualifies for minor development review by HPC. As such, the applicant has addressed the Residential Design Standards and the City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines (hereinafter"the Guidelines"), below. The Guidelines include fourteen (14) chapters addressing the following: Streetscapes and Lot Features (Chapter 1); Rehabilitation of Historic Structures (Chapters 2-10), including historic building materials, windows, doors, porches, architectural details, roofs, secondary structures, building relocation and foundations, and building additions; New Construction (Chapters 11-13); and, General Guidelines (Chapter 14). This proposed development is consistent with predominance of applicable HPC Design Guidelines (Chapters 1 though 10 and Chapter 14), and the applicant is not requesting a floor area bonus. The relevant guidelines from Chapters 1 through 10, as well as those from Chapter 14, are outlined below in italicized bold text and each is followed by a response demonstrating compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. 1.1 Preserve original fences. 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a transparent quality allowing views into the yard from the street. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. 1.5 A side yard fence which extends between two homes should be set back from the street facing fafade. 1.6 Replacement of new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historical context. The existing fencing that is inappropriate and not historic will be replaced. The more appropriate replacement fence will use traditional materials (painted wood pickets) with a "transparent" quality, and be of a scale (no taller than 42") that allows views into the yard. (See Plan Sheets Z-012 and Z-303.) 1.7 Preserve original retaining walls. 1.8 Maintain the historic height of a retaining wall. Not applicable. No such retaining walls exist on the property. 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public to private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 6 The established progression of public to private spaces will be returned to its original form and enhanced by a replacement walkway to the front door of the resource with a simple and straight path, consistent with this Guideline. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. The front yard does not contain any historic elements that should be preserved. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. Mature landscaping on the site will be preserved and maintained, including the large cottonwood tree near the southeast corner of the resource. A small conifer at the front corner of the property will be removed, but this tree was planted only a few years ago. The only other tree removal proposed involves the removal of a pair of conjoined and twisted aspen trees adjacent to the existing solarium addition, and these removals are proposed pursuant to the recommendation of Chris Forman, Aspen City Forester. Finally, the applicant would like to sensitively and selectively remove all non-native vegetation in the Hallam Lake Bluff area at the rear of the property and replace any such removals with native vegetation. Any and all such work will be done in consultation with ACES staff and with as little site disturbance as practicable. 1.12 Preserve and maintain historically significant planting designs. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with historic context of the site. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. 1.15 Minimize visual impacts of site lighting. 1.16 Preserve historically significant landscape designs and features. The proposed design is intentionally and fully compatible with the historic context of the property while accentuating the distinction between the "new and old" of the property. Very little is proposed in the way of new plantings. The visual impacts of site lighting are minimized. (See Plan Sheets Z300-Z301.) 2.1 Preserve original building materials. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. 2.4 Brick or stone that was not painted historically should not be painted. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for primary building materials. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 7 29 Covering original building materials with new materials is inappropriate. 2.10 Consider removing later covering materials that have not achieved historic significance. In accordance with this chapter, historic building materials are being maintained and preserved in place to the maximum extent reasonably practicable. Limited replacement to match original materials either in existence or as documented in historic photographs will be done. Where non-historic features are to be removed, the affected areas will be appropriately in-filled with materials to match original materials remaining in place. The non-historic chimney will be removed and the roof form will be returned to its original height and design. The solarium-like addition will be removed and the replacement wall will be moved back to restore and reveal the historic corner of the original structure. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. 3.3 Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a facade. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than to replace a historic window. The large, double-hung window on the front fagade of the home is not original and not of Victorian proportions. It will be replaced with a pair of appropriately sized and scaled double-hung windows without changing the opening or surrounding brickwork. A set of appropriately proportioned double-hung windows that match the front of the home will be added to the west side of the home, in the area where the chimney will be removed. The transom window above the front door is not original and will be removed for replacement with brickwork matching that found above the resource's original fenestration. A small double-hung window that is traditional in scale and design will be added upstairs, on the east-facing end of the cross gable. In general and throughout, the window patterns will be simplified. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. 4.3 When a historic door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. 4.4 If a new screen door is used, it should be in character with the primary door. 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. 4.6 If energy conservation and heat loss are concerns, consider using a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 8 The character-defining features of the historic front door, and its distinctive materials and placement will be restored and preserved, thereby ensuring consistency with Chapter 4 of the Guidelines. The existing door is not historic and is not in character with historic nature of the property. The replacement door will match the Victorian character of the home's street fronting facade. The unoriginal transom window above the front door will be removed and replaced with traditional brickwork to compliment the resource. 5.1 Preserve an original porch. 5.2 Avoid removing or covering historic materials and details on a porch . 5.3 Avoid enclosing a historic front porch. 5.4 The use of a porch on a residential building in a single-family context is strongly encouraged. 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form or detail. As dictated by Chapter 5, the front porch will be restored to its original and long-since compromised character. As such, the front porch features will undergo brick and mortar repair work, roof stabilization, transom removal, and front door replacement. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features should be based on original designs. 6.5 Do not guess at "historic"designs for replacement parts. 6.6 Replacement of missing elements may be included in repair activities. Consistent with the approach taken by the applicant and his architects throughout this planning process and proposal, great care will be taken to preserve the architectural detailing found on the resource. All such work will be carried out in accordance with Chapter 6 Guidelines and policies, and under the supervision of staff and the HPC monitor. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. 7.4A new chimney should be the-same scale as those used historically. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. 7.6 When planning a rooftop addition,preserve the overall appearance of the original roof. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 9 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detractfrom the historic appearance of the building. 7.11 Avoid using conjectural features on a roof. Chapter 7 provides that the character of a historical roof should be preserved, including its form and materials. While the original roof form has already been greatly compromised and cannot be "preserved" per se, the applicant is proposing to undertake a tremendous effort to restore the roof to its historic form. This roof form restoration effort includes the removal of the non-historic chimney and the lowering of the cross-gable ridge height by more than seven(7) feet. Although the affected portion of the roof on the house will need to be replaced, the historical form and materials will be replicated to convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally and those seen on historic photographs of the house. Eave depths, ridge and eave heights (except where the roof is being lowered to match its original height and scale), and roof pitches will all be maintained. Inappropriate and non-historic skylights will be removed. No rooftop additions or any new skylights are proposed. 8.1 If an existing secondary structure is historically significant, then it must be preserved. 8.2 If an existing secondary structure is beyond repair, then replacing it is encouraged. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. 8.5 Avoid moving a historic secondary structure from its original location. There are no historically significant secondary structures on the property. In fact, there are no secondary structures whatsoever on the property. The existing side-loaded and single-stall garages are already attached to the structure and will be maintained. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis 9.2 Moving an existing building that contributes to the character of a historic district should be avoided. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. No buildings will be relocated. 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. 9.7A lightwell may be used to permit light into below grade living space. The building will remain at its current elevation above grade. No new lightwells will be added to the development. 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 10 10.1 Preserve an older addition that has achieved historic significance if? its own right. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. None of the existing additions have achieved historic significance. The historic portion of the home will be restored to its original appearance while the non-historic area will be appropriately remodeled to be less complicated and better compliment the resource. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. No new additions are being proposed. The existing addition will be remodeled and be more recognizable as a product of its own time through the removal of inappropriate neo- Victorian features and forms. Furthermore, non-historic additions that covered historically significant features, such as the solarium-like addition at the east fagade, will be removed to restore and reveal such historic features. 10.7If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. As mentioned above, the non-historic addition will be remodeled. No new additions are being proposed. Nevertheless, the addition is at the rear of the historic portion of the home. There is no existing "connector" link and City regulations establishing a 40% demolition threshold render the creation/insertion of such a link impractical and infeasible. 10.12 When constructing a rooftop addition, keep the mass and scale subordinate to that of a historic building. 10.13 Set a rooftop addition back from the front of the building. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. No rooftop additions are proposed. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and -005) Page 11 14.1 These standards should not prevent or inhibit compliance with accessibility laws. 14.2 Generally, a solution that is independent from the historic building and does not alter its historic characteristics is encouraged. Accessibility laws and requirements for compliance therewith have not resulted in altering historic characteristics. 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. Although the HPC does not review color choices, these guidelines are provided to encourage appropriate paint schemes. These guidelines are understood by the applicant, as reflected in the accompanying plans set and renderings. The color scheme is kept simple and based in earth tones, while the historic brick structure will remain unpainted. The color schemes for all of the fagade elements will be closely coordinated while providing for complimentary but clear differentiation between the two parts of the structure. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. The applicant understands the exterior lighting standards. Any visual impacts will be minimized. The proposed development also complies with the outdoor lighting requirements for Hallam Lake Bluff Review. (See Plan Sheets Z300 and Z301.) 14.9 Use the gentlest means possible to clean the surface of materials and features. 14.10 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. 14.11 Plan repainting carefully. 14.12 Provide a weather protective finish to wood surfaces. 14.13 Leave natural masonry colors unpainted where feasible. The applicant understands these guidelines and care will be taken to ensure they are followed. Any related questions that may arise during construction will be reviewed with the assigned HPC staff and monitor. 14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street. 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. 212 Lake Avenue(PID4 2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 12 14.16 Locate standpipes, meters and other service equipment such that they will not damage historic facade materials. Any visual impacts of service areas have been minimized. Mechanical equipment will not be seen from the public ways and will not create a negative visual impact. No service equipment will be located on the front fagade and none will damage any historic facade materials. The existing wildlife resistant trash enclosure at the back end of the shared driveway will be maintained and the location of existing utility pedestals/equipment will be unaltered. 14.18 Garages should not dominate the street scene. The garages are located on the east side of the home and they are accessed from a shared driveway where a single curb-cut serves the two residences of the subject property as well as the single-family home immediately to the east. Both garage doors are on the non-historic portion of the building, they are of the single-stall variety, and the garages are side-loaded, thereby minimizing their affect on the street scene. Demolition, Section 26.415.080(A)(4) Section 26.415.080(A)(4) of the Code provides that the HPC shall review the application, staff report and hear evidence presented by the property owners, parties of interest and members of the general public to determine if the standards for demolition approval have been met. Demolition shall be approved if it is demonstrated that the application meets any one of the following criteria: a. The property has been determined by the City to be an imminent hazard to public safety and the owner/applicant is unable to make the needed repairs in a timely manner, b. The structure is not structurally sound despite evidence of the owner's efforts to properly maintain the structure, c. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen, or d. No documentation exists to support or demonstrate that the property has historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance, and Additionally,for approval to demolish, all of the following criteria must be met: a. The structure does not contribute to the significance of the parcel or historic district in which it is located, and b. The loss of the building, structure or object would not adversely affect the integrity of the historic district or its historic, architectural or aesthetic relationship to adjacent designated properties and c. Demolition of the structure will be inconsequential to the historic preservation needs of the area. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 13 The applicant proposes demolition of only unoriginal, non-historic and inappropriate additions and alterations to the home. The structure cannot practically be moved to another appropriate location in Aspen, and there is no documentation to support or demonstrate that the building portions to be demolished have historic, architectural, archaeological, engineering or cultural significance. In fact, old photographs show the original roofline and other elements being different from that existing today and, notwithstanding the tremendous cost and effort required, the applicant intends to complete a good deal of demolition work so as to enable proper restoration of original forms and details. Precise demolition plans and calculations are provided on Sheets Z013 and Z014 of the JBMA plans set. Residential Design Standards, Section 26.410.040 Section 26.410.040 of the Code contains the Residential Design Standards (RDS). Each of these standards is provided below in italicized text and followed by a response demonstrating compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable. Also, please refer to the provided plans set and, in particular, Sheet Number Z-009. It is noted that, in general, the existing structure does not comply with many of the RDS but it was legally built before the City had adopted its RDS provisions. As less than 40% of the structure is being demolished, the structure will not and need not be brought into compliance with many of the otherwise applicable standards. As such, many of the RDS are not realistically applicable, but should it be determined that any RDS variances are necessary, such variances are hereby requested due to the practical difficulty of compliance. A. Site design. The intent of these design standards is to encourage residential buildings that address the street in a manner which creates a consistent 'facade line" and defines the public and semi-public realms. In addition, where fences or dense landscaping exist or are proposed, it is intended that they be used to define the boundaries of private property without eliminating the visibility of the house and front yard from the street. 1. Building orientation. The front facades of all principal structures shall be parallel to the street. On corner lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. On curvilinear streets, the front facade of all structures shall be parallel to the tangent of the midpoint of the arc of the street. Parcels as outlined in Subsection 26410.010.B.4 shall be exempt from this requirement. One (1) element, such as a bay window or dormer, placed at a front corner of the building may be on a diagonal from the street if desired. The front fagade of the home is parallel to Lake Avenue and its orientation is not being altered. 2. Build-to lines. On parcels or lots of less than fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet, at least sixty percent (60016) of the front facade shall be within five (S)feet 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 14 of the minimum front yard setback line. On corner sites, this standard shall be met on the frontage with the longest block length. Porches may be used to meet the sixty percent (60%) standard. The location of the historic residence and its front yard setback are not being changed. The cottage maintains a 30' front yard setback where only 10' are required. The applicant will not be relocating the historic resource. 3. Fences. Fences, hedgerows and planter boxes shall not be more than forty-two (42) inches high, measured from natural grade, in all areas forward of the front facade of the house. Man-made berms are prohibited in the front yard setback. All front yard fencing will be visually permeable and 42 inches or less in height. No berms are proposed. B. Building form. The intent of the following building form standards is to respect the scale of Aspen's historical homes by creating new homes which are more similar in their massing, by promoting the development of accessory units off of the City alleys and by preserving solar access. 1. Secondary mass. All new single-family and duplex structures shall locate at least ten percent (10%) of their total square footage above grade in a mass which is completely detached from the principal building or linked to it by a subordinate linking element. This standard shall only apply to parcels within the Aspen infill area pursuant to Subsection 26410.010.B.2. Accessory buildings such as garages, sheds and accessory dwelling units are examples of appropriate uses for the secondary mass. The existing structure does not comply with this standard and it was legally built before the City adopted its residential design standards. Since less than 40% of the structure is being demolished, the structure cannot and need not be brought into compliance with the standard. As such, it is the applicant's position that this standard should not be applicable to the proposed development. However, should it be determined that a variance is necessary, such variance is hereby requested as a practical difficulty. C. Parking, garages and carports. The intent of the following parking, garages and carport standards is to minimize the potential for conflicts between pedestrian and automobile traffic by placing parking, garages and carports on alleys or to minimize the presence of garages and carports as a lifeless part of the streetscape where alleys do not exist. 1. For all residential uses that have access from an alley or private road, the following standards shall apply: a. Parking, garages and carports shall be accessed from an alley or private road. b. If the garage doors are visible from a street or alley, then they shall be single-stall doors or double-stall doors designed to appear like single-stall doors. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 15 c. If the garage doors are not visible f°om a street or alley, the garage doors may be either single-stall or normal double-stall garage doors. The garages will remain in their existing location, which is side loaded/perpendicular to the street. There is no access available from a private road or alley, but the driveway is shared with the home to the east (3 dwellings are served by a single driveway/curbcut). Both garage doors on the subject structure are of the single-stall variety. 2. For all residential uses that have access only from a public street, the following standards shall be apply: a. On the street facing facade(s), the width of the living area on the first floor shall be at least five (5)feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. b. The fi°ont facade of the garage or the front-most supporting column of a carport shall be set back at least ten (10)feet further f tom the street than the front-most wall of the house. c. On lots of at least fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet in size, the garage or carport may be forward of the front facade of the house only if the garage doors or carport entry are perpendicular to the street(side-loaded). d. When the floor of a garage or carport is above or below the street level, the driveway cut within the front yard setback shall not exceed two (2)feet in depth, measured fi°om natural grade. e. The vehicular entrance width of a garage or carport shall not be greater than twenty-four (24)feet. f. If the garage doors are visible ftom a public street or alley, then they shall be single-stall doors or double-stall doors designed to appear like single- stall doors. These standards are inapplicable since the access is pre-existing and not changing. The garage doors are not on the street-facing fagade. The garage doors are set almost seventy-five (75) feet back from the front property line while the front-most wall of the house is set just thirty (3 0) feet back from the front lot line, greatly exceeding the ten(10) foot differential required. There is no driveway cut within the front yard setback. The vehicle entrances to the pair of single-stall garage doors are each less than twenty-four (24) feet. Please also see the response provide for Standard 2.C., above. D. Building elements. The intent of the following building element standards is to ensure that each residential building has street facing architectural details and elements, which provide human scale to the facade, enhance the walking experience and reinforce local building traditions. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. All single-family homes and duplexes, except as outlined in Subsection 26410.010.B.4 shall have a street- oriented entrance and a street facing principal window. Multi family units shall have at least one (1) street-oriented entrance for every four (4) units and front units must have a street facing a principal window. On corner lots, entries and principal windows should face whichever street has a greater block length. This standard shall be satisfied if all of the following conditions are met: 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 16 a. The entry door shall face the street and be no more than ten (10)feet back from the front-most wall of the building. Entry doors shall not be taller than eight (8)feet. The historic home has a street-oriented entrance, a front porch and street-facing principal windows. Further, the front entry door faces the street, is well within ten (10) feet of the building's front-most wall, and is not taller than eight (8) feet in height. All of these elements will be restored to the original/historic character and still comply with the requirements of this standard, as shown on the accompanying plans set. b. A covered entry porch of fifty (50) or more square feet, with a minimum depth of six (6)feet, shall be part of the front facade. Entry porches and canopies shall not be more than one (1) story in height. The historic dimensions of the covered entry porch on the resource are not being changed. It is 7'-9" deep, approximately 54 square feet in area, and 6'-10"tall. As such, the covered front entry porch complies with the requirements of this standard. c. A street facing principal window requires that a significant window or group of windows face street. The home includes a significant window facing the street, and it will be maintained, albeit in a historically accurate, restored form as a pair of double-hung windows within the existing opening. 2. First story element. All residential buildings shall have a first story street facing element the width of which comprises at least twenty percent (20%) of the building's overall width and the depth of which is at least six (6)feet from the wall the first story element is projecting from. Assuming that the first story element includes interior living space, the height of the first story element shall not exceed ten (10)feet, as measured to the plate height. A first story element may be a porch or living space. Accessible space (whether it is a deck, porch or enclosed area) shall not be allowed over the first story element; however, accessible space over the remaining first story elements on the front facade shall not be precluded. The existing historic Miner's cottage will be restored and maintained. Its height and massing will not change, except to significantly lower (by more than seven (7) feet) the ridge height of its primary cross-gable roof to its original form. The historic cottage is 100% of the front facade width and its depth greatly exceeds six feet. 3. Windows. a. Street facing windows shall not span through the area where a second floor level would typically exist, which is between nine (9) and twelve feet (12) above the finished first floor. For interior staircases, this measurement will 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 11 be made from the first landing if one exists. A transom window above the main entry is exempt from this standard. No windows on the historic, street-facing portion of the residence span through the area where a second floor would typically exist; the historic portion of the building does not even have a second floor. In other words, no street-facing windows span or will span into or through the area between nine (9) and twelve (12) feet above the finish first floor. b. No more than one (1) nonorthogonal window shall be allowed on each facade of the building. A single nonorthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still be considered one (1) nonorthogonal window. The requirement shall only apply to Subsection 26.410.010.B.2. All proposed windows are rectilinear. There are no nonorthogonal windows proposed. Rather, all of the many non-historic, nonorthogonal windows on the Victorian and elsewhere will be removed. 4. Lightwells. All areaways, lightwells and/or stairwells on the street facing facades) of a building shall be entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. All lightwells are entirely recessed behind the front-most wall of the building. No areaways or stairwells are proposed on the street-facing facade. E. Context. The intent of the following standards is to reinforce the unique character of Aspen and the region by drawing upon Aspen's vernacular architecture and neighborhood characteristics in designing new structures. 1. Materials. The following standards must be met: a. The quality of the exterior materials and details and their application shall be consistent on all sides of the building. All building materials are of the highest quality and their application will be consistent on all sides of the building, as demonstrated on the accompanying plans set and renderings. b. Materials shall be used in ways that are true to their characteristics. For instance stucco, which is a light or nonbearing material, shall not be used below a heavy material, such as stone. All materials are being used in ways that are true to their characteristics. The quality of the exterior materials and details, and their application are consistent on both the historic miner's cottage and the addition behind. The historic miner's cottage is brick on all exposed sides and the non-historic addition is to be clad in wood. The two materials, while of high quality, will remain different from one another as recommended in the HP Design Guidelines. c. Highly reflective surfaces shall not be used as exterior materials. 212 Lake Avenue (PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 18 No exterior materials proposed have highly reflective surfaces. 2. Inflection. The following standard must be met for parcels which are six thousand (6,000) square feet or over and as outlined in Subsection 26410.010.B.2: a. If a one-story building exists directly adjacent to the subject site, then the new construction must step down to one-story in height along their common lot line. If there are one-story buildings on both sides of the subject site, the applicant may choose the side toward which to inflect. A one-story building shall be defined as follows: A one-story building shall mean a structure or portion of a structure, where there is only one (])floor of fully usable living space, at least twelve (12)feet wide across the street frontage. This standard shall be met by providing a one-story element which is also at least twelve (12) feet wide across the street frontage and one (1) story tall as far back along the common lot line as the adjacent building is one (1) story. No changes are proposed to the existing historic, brick miner cottage's massing or scale, other than lowering the roof addition back to its original, historic ridgeline height. Variances, Section 26.415.110 Setbacks and Site Coverage Pursuant to Section 26.415.110.0 of the Code, Dimensional variations are allowed for projects involving designated properties to create development that is more consistent with the character of the historic property or district than what would be required by the underlying zoning's dimensional standards. 1. The HPC may grant variances of the Land Use Code for designated properties to allow: a) Development in the side, rear and front setbacks; b) Development that does not meet the minimum distance requirements between buildings; c) Up to five percent(5%) additional site coverage; d) Less public amenity than required for the on-site relocation of commercial historic properties. The proposed development requires variances from each of the individual side-yard setbacks (east and west sides), the combined side-yard setback requirement, and the site coverage limitation. More specifically, the following variances are requested: 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 19 • The west side-yard setback requires an 8.8-foot variance to accommodate maintenance of the existing 6.2 foot setback where a 15 foot setback is otherwise required; • The east side-yard setback requires a 2.1-foot variance to accommodate maintenance of the existing 12.9 foot setback where a 15 foot setback is otherwise required; • The required combined side-yard setback for this property is 38 feet but the two existing side yard setbacks total to just 19.1 feet, resulting in the need for an 18.9 foot variance; and • The allowable site coverage is 33% but the existing site coverage is 34.47%. After the proposed remodel, the site coverage will be approximately 33.81%, which is not even 1% more than what is allowed and less than what currently exists. As such, a 1%variance from the site coverage requirement is requested. All of these nonconformities already exist and were legally established, as can be gleaned by reviewing the documents provided herewith in Exhibit 5 along with the building layout/plan depicted on the Shaw WPW Subdivision Exemption Lot 18 Plat (recorded in Book 11 at Page 97; copy provided on plan Sheet Z008). The proposal does not enlarge or expand any of these nonconformities, but the variances are requested both to accommodate the proposed remodel (including changes to occur within the nonconformity areas) and to eliminate the nonconforming status of the structure with regard to all applicable dimensional standards other than floor area. The floor area nonconformity will simply be maintained but decreased in degree. Additionally,pursuant to Code Section 26.415.110(C)(2), 2. In granting a variance, the HPC must make a finding that such a variance: a) Is similar to the pattern, features and character of the historic property or district, and/or b) Enhances or mitigates an adverse impact to the historic significance or architectural character of the historic property, an adjoining designated historic property or historic district. Not only are the variances requested herein similar to the patterns, features and character of the historic property, they actually are the patterns, features and character of the historic property. That is, as mentioned above, the proposal does not enlarge or expand any of these existing, legally established nonconformities, but the variances are requested both to accommodate the proposed remodel (including changes to occur within the nonconformity areas) and to eliminate the nonconforming status of the structure with regard to the applicable dimensional standards. Further, the granting of the requested variances will allow the proposed remodel, which indubitably enhances and mitigates adverse impacts to the historic significance and architectural character of the historic property/resource. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 20 Off-Street Parking The proposed development also needs a variance from the parking requirements, pursuant to Code Section 26.415.110(D). Said Section 26.415.110(D) of the Code allows for parking reductions for designated historic properties on sites unable to contain the number of on-site parking spaces required by the underlying zoning. The on-site parking requirement for the existing duplex structure is two (2) spaces per residence, or a total of four (4) off-street spaces. However, after the remodel, Unit A will have just two bedrooms, thus maintaining an off-street parking requirement of two (2) spaces while Unit B will become a one-bedroom unit requiring just one (1) off-street parking space. The property maintains two (2) single-stall garages, each accommodating off-street parking for one vehicle. Although there is space in the driveway for the parking of additional vehicles, the City does not count such "tandem" spaces toward the requirement. As such, a parking requirement waiver of one (1) space is needed and hereby requested. That said, the Code clearly provides in several instances that, "An existing deficit of parking may be maintained when a property is redeveloped." While the subject property is not being "redeveloped," it stands to reason that the remodeling of a property should be entitled to the same ability to maintain a parking deficit. Accordingly, the subject property should be entitled to maintain its existing parking deficit of one space per residence through the proposed remodel, especially since the combined bedroom count will be decreasing by 50% (from 6 to 3). In fact, maintenance of only half of the two-space deficit is needed. Consistent with the criteria listed in Code Section 26.515.040(A), the parking needs of the subject property's residents and guests are met by the two garage spaces and the driveway area, combined with the ample and available on-street parking in front of the house and along Lake Avenue, in general. The property's two garages, its driveway and the on-street parking in the area have satisfactorily met the needs of the property for many years now and proposed remodel will actually decrease the required parking by 25%, from four (4) spaces to three (3). That is, in effect, the subject property is already nonconforming with regard to off-street parking requirements but the proposed remodel will effectively decrease the degree of nonconformity by 25%. The addition of a third on-site parking space to satisfy to code requirement would result in an undesirable scenario given the affect such would have on the applicant's laudable plans for historic restoration. Further, the addition of a third off-street space would be practically difficult given the resulting requirement to amend the terms of the shared driveway agreement with the next-door neighbor to the southeast, who would be under no obligation whatsoever to agree to any such amendment. In addition to the above-demonstrated consistency with the review criteria listed in Chapter 26.515, the one space parking reduction and waiver of payment-in-lieu fees 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 21 should be approved by the HPC as it will enhance or mitigate the adverse impacts the addition of a third garage stall would have on the historic significance or architectural character of a designated historic property. Hallam Lake Bluff Review, Section 26.435.060 Any "development" within the Hallam Lake Bluff(HLB) is subject to heightened review so as to reduce noise and visual impacts on the nature preserve, protect against slope erosion and landslide, minimize impacts on surface runoff, maintain views to and from the nature preserve, and ensure the aesthetic and historical integrity of Hallam Lake and the nature preserve. The subject property and its existing residence are located within the Hallam Lake Bluff Review (HLBR) Area. A substantial portion of the existing structure, including its living room area and parts of the rear decks and patios, is located within the 15' setback of the field-located top of slope (see Improvement Survey and Site Plans in the accompanying plans set). The proposed demolition, remodeling and restoration work falls within the parameters of"development,"making this proposal subject to HLBR. Section 26.435.060(A) of the Code provides that all development in that HLBR area running approximately on a north-south axis bordering and/or overlooking the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES) nature preserve and bounded on the east by the 7850-foot mean sea level elevation line and extending one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, up slope and there terminating, and bounded on the north by the southeast lot line of Lot 7A of the Aspen Company Subdivision, and on the south by the centerline of West Francis Street, shall be subject to the review standards as set forth in this Section. The applicant's representatives at Haas Land Planning, LLC, met with the Director of ACES, Chris Lane, to review the proposed plans set provided herewith. As explained throughout the foregoing, the structure is merely being remodeled and an exemplary, substantial effort is going into historic restoration efforts. Furthermore, exceeding the City's 40% demolition threshold carries with it substantial enough consequences for the subject property that a complete demolition of the rear portion of Unit B for redevelopment in full compliance with the standards for HLBR is simply not achievable. That said, the applicant's plans have been sensitively designed to minimize potential for impacts on ACES by substantially reducing the degree to which the structure and associated improvements will encroach on the fifteen foot setback area and its associated progressive height limit. More specifically, the total volume of structure protruding beyond the top of slope setback and its progressive height limit will be reduced by 26%. In essence, the proposal is fully consistent with the purpose of HLBR inasmuch as it will significantly reduce visual impacts on the nature preserve, protect against slope erosion and landslide, minimize impacts on surface runoff, maintain and enhance views to and from the nature preserve, and ensure the aesthetic and historical integrity of Hallam Lake and the nature preserve. Accordingly, while ACES representatives will have an 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 22 opportunity to comment for themselves as part of this application's review process, it is fair to say that staff and the Director of ACES had a favorable response to and an appreciation for the changes and improvements being made with the development proposal. Section 26.435.060(C) of the Code explains that no development shall be permitted within the Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area(ESA) unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development meets all of the following requirements (the standards are provided below in indented and italicized print and each is followed by a response demonstrating compliance and/or consistency therewith, as applicable): 1. No development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. The proposed development is simply demolition of portions of the existing duplex structure and a remodel that will decrease the amount (volume) of structure located within the HLB setback area by some 26%. Moreover, no development, excavation or fill, other than selective removal of non-native vegetation and replanting with native vegetation will take place below the field-located top of slope line. The applicant's representative met on-site with the City Forester and then with Jim Kravitz of ACES to discuss selective removal of non-native vegetation and both agreed that such could be accomplished. Any actual plans for such restoration will be coordinated with ACES staff to ensure the most sensitive timing and methods are employed. 2. All development within the fifteen foot setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the fifteen foot setback shall not be approved unless the Planning and Zoning Commission determines that the following conditions can be met: a. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top of slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. b. Any intrusion into the top of slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. c. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top of slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. d. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setbackfrom all adjoining properties. There is a good deal of existing development within the 15-foot setback area, including covered and uncovered outdoor patios, a sunken courtyard/areawell, the gable-end side of the residence (over a living room space), and a second-story deck space (see the existing Site Plan, Sheet Nos. Z-010 and Z-012). The applicant will significantly improve upon this situation by greatly decreasing the height, volume, and total amount of development within the setback area. However, not all such development will be eliminated. The second-story deck will be removed altogether, leaving only the uncovered patio below remaining. This patio area is more or less at grade and its expanse and height will be 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 23 unaltered. The two-story mass of the gable-end will be remodeled into a single-story space with a roof"monitor." All second floor deck space will be pulled back behind the setback line and its associated progressive height limit. Additionally, the mature vegetation on the slope from Hallam Lake already screens much of the development from view. Again, the resulting mass, height, volume and total amount of development within the setback area will be substantially and significantly reduced. More precisely, the total volume of structure protruding beyond the top of slope setback and its progressive height limit will be reduced by 26%. 3. All development outside the fifteen foot setback from top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top-of-slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and the method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020. As mentioned and explained above, although some of the development will project above the progressive height limit associated with the top of slope line, the overall height, bulk and mass of structure projecting over the progressive height limit will be significantly less than is currently the case. For detailed views of the differences, please refer to plan Sheets Z-012, Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204, and Z-205. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50) percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. This standard is primarily aimed at new development within the HLBR area. However, as mentioned above, the applicant would like to sensitively and selectively remove all non-native vegetation in the Hallam Lake Bluff area of the property and replace these with native vegetation. Any such work will be done in consultation with ACES staff and with as little site disturbance as practicable. Furthermore, the height and mass of the development as viewed from below will be decreased given the proposed remodel plans. A Landscape Plan is included on Sheet Z-302 of the accompanying plans set. The proposed landscaping is minimal and almost exclusively limited to the front and side yard areas that have no bearing on the HLB. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with section 26575.150. All exterior lighting will be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. All exterior lighting will be in compliance with Section 26.575.150 of the Code. An exterior lighting plan and a fixture specifications sheet are provided in the accompanying plans set at Sheets Z-300 and Z-301. 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 24 6 No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. No fill materials or debris will be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates will be maintained. Full drainage and erosion control plans will be provided as part of the building permit application, as required. There is no pool or hot tub on the properly and no such improvements are proposed. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Please see the attached site section drawings at Sheet Z-204 of the accompanying plans set. These site section drawings were prepared, signed and stamped by a registered architect. The drawings show all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and all pertinent elevations above sea level. These drawings demonstrate compliance and/or consistency, as applicable, with all of the foregoing standards. It is hoped that the information provided herein and in the accompanying plans set proves helpful in the review and approval of this exceptional project and exemplary restoration and preservation effort. If you should have any questions or desire any additional information,please do not hesitate to contact me. Truly yours, Haas Land Planning, LLC Mitch Haas Owner/Manager ATTACHMENTS Exhibit 1: Completed Land Use Application& Dimensional Requirements Forms Exhibit 2: Pre-Application Conference Summary Exhibit 3: Proof of Ownership & Statement of Authority Exhibit 4: Authorization to Represent Exhibit 5: Copies of applicable building permits, letters of completion and Certificates of Occupancy Exhibit 6: Agreement for Payment of Application Fees Exhibit 7: Affected Property Owners List (to be provided under separate cover) 212 Lake Avenue(PID#2735-124-89-004 and-005) Page 25 EXHIBIT ATTACHMENT 2 - Historic Preservation Land Use Application PROJECT: Name: wj� Location: 21'2-- La Ve"_ vP..,n1u7 (42 ike (Indicate street address,lot&block number or metes and bounds description of property) Parcel ID# (REQUIRED) 9,7.- 00V APPLICANT: Name: A5a-2y? Address: V, I Phone Fax#: E-mail: REPRESENTATIVE: Name: L(Qz36 40yij Address: Phone#( Fax#: E-mail:M, Re 1,067W O7 uo) TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): F-1 Historic Designation ❑ Relocation(temporary,on F-1 Certificate of No Negative Effect F-1 or off-site) ❑ Certificate of Appropriateness E] Demolition(total X -Minor Historic Development demolition) F-1 -Major Historic Development F-1 Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ -Conceptual Historic Development u- i4a[lam La�e U44 ❑ -Final Historic Development e-v) -Substantial Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) I-A.n6max-2 1)es '1* �)m4ed - _S --e e nc-cory)I)ar) i PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings, uses,modifications, etc.) e, Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 General Information Please check the appropriate boxes below and submit this page along with your application. This information will help us review your plans and, if necessary, coordinate with other agencies that may be involved. YES NO ❑ Does the work you are planning include exterior work; including additions, demolitions,new construction, remodeling, rehabilitation or restoration? ❑ Does the work you are planning include interior work; including remodeling, rehabilitation, or restoration? ❑ Do you plan other future changes or improvements that could be reviewed at this time? ❑ In addition to City of Aspen approval for a Certificate of Appropriateness or No Negative Effect and a building permit, are you seeking to meet the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation or restoration of a National Register of Historic Places property in order to qualify for state or federal tax credits? ❑ ❑ If yes, are you seeking federal rehabilitation investment tax credits in conjunction with this project? (Only income producing properties listed on the National Register are eligible. Owner-occupied residential properties are not.) ❑ 0 If yes, are you seeking the Colorado State Income Tax Credit for Historical Preservation? Please check all City of Aspen Historic Preservation Benefits which you plan to use: ❑ Rehabilitation Loan Fund ❑.Conservation Easement Program Dimensional Variances ❑ Increased Density ❑Historic Landmark Lot Split ❑ Waiver of Park Dedication Fees 0 Conditional Uses ❑ Exemption from Growth Management Quota System ❑ Tax Credits Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 ATTACHMENT 3- Dimensional Requirements Form (It//em#10 on the submittal requirements key. Not necessary for all projects.) Project: h-a .e""), '40 v-I(e rdrZ 1/6 u� - le --e Applicant: A5-R&l'l !fir" Project Location: zl z L I(e Aw✓, ue , Zone District: UI1�, i' 7 Lot Size: Jj S ol, e Lot Area: i 0 YS%.5A seg r,"J Ar X61'''2©d / / f :& e' (For the purposes of calculating Ploor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements,and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: /V Number of residential units: Existing.- 2 Proposed: Number of bedrooms: Existing:Proposed: _ c� Proposed%of demolition: DIMENSIONS: (write n/a where no requirement exists in the zone district) Floor Area: Existing:_5.3V 5f Allowable: i;173 5r Proposed. 26OS-rl" Height p Principal Bldg.: Existing:2 Allowable: Proposed: Accessory Bldg.: Existing: K"al Allowable: Y A Propo sed.• /- 1 Required: 1S a<On-Site parking: Existin g �&Required: PS Proposed.- " �e— % Site coverage: Existing: • J�J w Proposed.-,55,97 o %Open Space: Existing: Required:Proposed:AI IA Front Setback: Existing:5( 74 Required: Proposed: Rear Setback: Existing:15,J Required: Id Proposed: /K. Combined Front/Rear: NIA. Y1 Indicate N, S,E, W� Existing: — p Required: Proposed: Side Setback: s V Existing: Required.• 4514- Proposed:i �2- Side Setback: Existing. 1), 3 4k Required: 2vl �l Proposed:/,Z T/i/- Combined Sides: Existing: !, f Required: ✓9- IL Proposed:/7 4/ Distance between Existing:A1 1f Required:�Proposed: Af 4 buildings: Existing non-conformities or encrgachments and note if encroachment licenses have been issued:WP ccz I� bt7� lG� r n a.f/ S- c i/?a '✓! Vars requested(identify the exact variances needed): ,e /..fir! i7C�I Aspen Historic Preservation�ZSGQ�C� Land Use Application Requirements,Updated:May 29,2007 U EXHIBIT CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY 9 PLANNER: Amy Simon, 429.2758 DATE: 12.18.13 AMENDED: 12.27.13 AMENDED: 1.14.14 PROJECT: 212 Lake Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Haas Land Planning LAND USE REQUEST: Hallam Lake Bluff Review, Special Review for Non-conforming Structure, HPC Minor Development Review DESCRIPTION: 212 Lake Avenue contains a duplex which is a Victorian era brick home with a substantial addition. The new owner is planning an interior remodel and minor exterior changes. The existing development is non-conforming in several ways, including floor area. It projects into the Hallam Lake setback area, because it was built before the regulations were adopted. The applicant must demonstrate that the non-conforming conditions were legally established in order to maintain them. The scope of the proposed remodel qualifies as a Minor Development Review by the Historic Preservation Commission, which is a one-step process. While much of the exterior work is focused on the rear half of the building, staff encourages the applicant to undertake any factually based restoration work that can be accomplished on the Victorian portion of the structure, to reinforce the original architectural design and scale of the house. The applicant generally wishes to avoid crossing the 40% demolition threshold on this project due to the implications to non-conforming conditions. The applicant may however request Special Review approval from HPC to retain the existing floor area even if demolition occurs. HPC will review all exterior changes to the property according to their design guidelines; link provided below. They will also apply the "Residential Design Standards" which are relevant throughout Aspen. HPC will conduct the Hallam Lake Bluff review, relative to changes proposed at the back of the house. Parks and Engineering Departments are referral departments for the Hallam Lake Bluff Review. Even if the 40% demolition threshold is exceeded, the HPC can allow the existing construction, or a portion of it, to remain in place according to the review standards. Even in the case of demolition, no affordable housing mitigation will be due for this project according to Growth Management Section 26.470.060.1, Single family and duplex development on historic landmark properties. Application: http://www aspen pitkin com/Portals/O/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2011%20Historic%2 Oland%20Use%20App%20Form.pdf Municipal Code/Land Use Code: http://www aspenpitkin com/Departments/Community-Development/PIanning-and-Zoning/Titie-26-Land- Use-Code/ Pre-application summary-212 Lake Page 1 of 3 S ' City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/H istoric-Preservation/Historic- Properties/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.412 Residential Design Standards 26.415.070.0 Minor Historic Development 26.415.110 Benefits 26.430 Special Review 26.435.060 Hallam Lake Bluff review Review by: Staff for recommendation, HPC for determination Public Notice: Required at HPC Planning Fees: $3,250 deposit for 10 hours (additional/lesser staff time billed/refunded at the hourly rate of$325/hr.) Referral Fees: Parks ($975), Engineering ($265/hr). Total Deposit: $4,490. To apply, please submit 1 copy of: ❑ Signed fee agreement with payment. • Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant which states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. • Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current certificate from a title insurance company, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. • List of adjacent property owners within 300' for public hearing. • Prior approvals. And 12 copies of: • An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. • Site improvement survey including topography and vegetation showing the current status, including all easements and vacated rights of way, of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor, licensed in the state of Colorado. • Scaled elevations and/or drawings of the proposed work and its relationship to the designated historic buildings, structures, sites and features within its vicinity. • An accurate representation of all building materials and finishes to be used in the development. • Supplemental materials to provide a visual description of the context surrounding the designated historic property or historic district including at least one (1) of the following: diagrams, maps, photographs, models or streetscape elevations. Pre-application summary—212 Lake Page 2 of 3 ❑ A written description of the proposal and an explanation of how the proposed development, and any requested variances or bonuses, complies with the review standards and design guidelines relevant to the application. Applicants are advised that building plans will be required to meet the International Building Code as adopted by the City of Aspen, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and CRS 9.5.112. Please make sure that your application submittal addresses these building-related and accessibility regulations. You may contact the Building Department at 920-5090 for additional information. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. Pre-application summary-212 Lake Page 3 of 3 I/10/14 Parcel Detail EE;XHIBIT Y Pitkin Count Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset Query I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Reception Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search GIS Man I GIS Help Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photographs Tax Account Parcel Property 2013 Mill Area Number Number Type Levy [::001 j R015380 273512489004 CONDO 32.843 Primary Owner Name and Address ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS LLC 186 VAIL LN NORTH SALEM, NY 10560 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS Unit: A Location Physical Address: 212 LAKE AVE ASPEN Subdivision: 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS Land Acres: Land Sq Ft: 0 2013 Property Value Summary IF- IF- www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Parcel.asp?AccountNumber=RO 15380 1/3 1/10/14 Parcel Detail II Actual Value II Assessed Value Land: 0 0 Improvements: 3,651,3 F 290,640 Total: 3,651,300 1 290,640 Sale Date: 9/19/2013 Sale Price: 10,500,000 Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: 1 Number of Comm/Ind Buildings: 0 Residential Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics UNFINISHED BSMT: 1190 2ND FLOOR: 829 WOOD BALCONY: 310 FINISHED GARAGE: 234 FIRST FLOOR: 1,428 Total Heated Area: 2,257 Property Class: DUPLEX CONDO IMPS Actual Year Built: 1888 Effective Year Built: 1999 Last Remodel: 2005 Bedrooms: 3 Baths: 3.5 Quality of Construction: DUP CONDO 13+ Exterior Wall: FACE BRICK Interior Wall: BASE Floor: BASE Heat Type: RAD WATER Heating Fuel: GAS Roof Cover: CEDAR SHAK Roof Structure: GABLEMIP Neighborhood: JINORTH WEST END Super Nbad: CITY OF ASPEN www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/pareel.asp?AccountNumber=RO15380 2/3 1/10/14 Parcel Detail Pitkin County Assessor Parcel Detail Information Assessor Property Search I Assessor Subset OuerX I Assessor Sales Search Clerk & Recorder Recel2tion Search I Treasurer Tax Search Search GIS Man I GIS Heln Basic Building Characteristics I Value Summary Parcel Detail I Value Detail I Sales Detail I Residential/Commercial Improvement Detail Owner Detail I Land Detail I Photogral2hs Tax Account Parcel Property 2013 Mill Area Number Number Type Levy [:�001 j R015381 273512489005 CONDO 32.843 Primary Owner Name and Address ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS LLC 186 VAIL LN NORTH SALEM,NY 10560 Additional Owner Detail Legal Description Subdivision: 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS Unit: B Location Physical Address: IF212 LAKE AVE ASPEN Subdivision: 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS Land Acres: IF— Land Sq Ft: 0 2013 Property Value Summary www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/Pareel.asp?AccountNumber=RO15381 1/3 1/10/14 Parcel Detail II Actual Value II Assessed Value Land: 11 0 F 0 Improvements: I 6,016,300 1 478,900 Total: IF 6,016,300 478,900 Sale Date: 9A W2013 Sale Price: 10,500,000 Additional Sales Detail Basic Building Characteristics Number of Residential Buildings: 1 Number of Comm/lnd Buildings:JFO Residential Building Occurrence 0 Characteristics STONE PATIO: 1120 2ND FLOOR: I 922 ROOF DECK: 109 OPEN PORCH: 40 FINISHED BSMT: 11,17 6 FIRST FLOOR: 12,119 UNFINISHED BSMT: 90 FINISHED GARAGE: 276 Total Heated Area: 14,217 Property Class: DUPLEX CONDO IMPS Actual Year Built: 1888 Effective Year Built: 1999 Last Remodel: 2005 Bedrooms: 3 Baths: 3.5 Quality of Construction: JIDUP CONDO 13+ Exterior Wall: FACE BRICK Interior Wa IBASE Floor: BASE Heat Type: RAD WATER Heating Fuel: GAS Roof Cover: CEDAR SHAK www.pitkinassessor.org/assessor/ParceI.asp?AccountNumber=RO15381 2/3 Old Republic National Title Insurance Company ALTA COMMITMENT Our Order No. Q62005486-3 Schedule A Cust. Ref.: Property Address: 212 LAKE AVE#A&B ASPEN, CO 81611 1. Effective Date: August 26, 2013 at 5:00 P.M. 2. Policy to be Issued, and Proposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner's Policy 06-17-06 Proposed Insured: ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: PETER B. LEWIS 5. The Land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: SEE ATTACHED PAGE(S) FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION Copyright 2006-2013 American Land Title Association.All rights reserved. - AMERICAN The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in p pood standin as of the date of use. LAN TION g ASSOCC IAATION All other uses are prohibited.Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. TM Our Order No: Q62005486-3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONDOMINIUM UNITS A AND B, 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM MAP THEREOF RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1981 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 33 AND ACCORDING TO THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1981 IN BOOK 416 AT PAGE 510. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-1 (Requirements) Our Order No. Q62005486-3 The following are the requirements to be complied with: Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: 1. (ITEM INTENTIONALLY DELETED) 2. EVIDENCE SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF THE TOWN OF ASPEN TRANSFER TAX HAVE BEEN SATISFIED. 3. A FULL COPY OF THE FULLY EXECUTED OPERATING AGREEMENT AND ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO FOR ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MUST BE FURNISHED TO LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY. SAID AGREEMENT MUST DISCLOSE WHO MAY CONVEY,ACQUIRE, ENCUMBER, LEASE OR OTHERWISE DEAL WITH INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY FOR SAID ENTITY. NOTE: ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY UPON REVIEW OF THIS DOCUMENTATION. 4. DULY EXECUTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY SETTING FORTH THE NAME OF ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AS A LLC.THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST STATE UNDER WHICH LAWS THE ENTITY WAS CREATED, THE MAILING ADDRESS OF THE ENTITY, AND THE NAME AND POSITION OF THE PERSON(S) AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE INSTRUMENTS CONVEYING, ENCUMBERING, OR OTHERWISE AFFECTING TITLE TO REAL PROPERTY ON BEHALF OF THE ENTITY AND OTHERWISE COMPLYING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 38-30-172, CRS. NOTE: THE STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY MUST BE RECORDED WITH THE CLERK AND RECORDER. 5. WARRANTY DEED FROM PETER B. LEWIS TO ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. NOTE: ITEMS 1-3 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ARE HEREBY DELETED. NOTE: UPON APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE LOAN POLICY WILL BE DELETED. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-1 (Requirements) Our Order No. Q62005486-3 Continued: UPON THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPANY AND THE RECEIPT OF A NOTARIZED FINAL LIEN AFFIDAVIT, ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS ON THE OWNER'S POLICY WILL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: ITEM NO. 4 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS IS DELETED AS TO ANY LIENS OR FUTURE LIENS RESULTING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF PETER B. LEWIS. OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY LIENS ARISING FROM WORK OR MATERIAL FURNISHED AT THE REQUEST OF ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC,A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY. NOTE: ITEM 5 OF THE STANDARD EXCEPTIONS WILL BE DELETED IF LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONDUCTS THE CLOSING OF THE CONTEMPLATED TRANSACTIONS) AND RECORDS THE DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. NOTE: UPON PROOF OF PAYMENT OF ALL TAXES, ITEM 6 WILL BE AMENDED TO READ: TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS FOR THE YEAR 2013 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. NOTE: ITEM 7A AND 7B OF THE GENERAL EXCEPTIONS ARE HEREBY DELETED. ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. Q62005486-3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements,liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachment, encumbrance,violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 7. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a), (b), or(c) are shown by the Public Records. 8. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE TO EXTRACT AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PREMISES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED JUNE 08, 1888, IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 2. 9. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS DISCLOSED ON THE SHAW WPW SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION LOT 18 PLAT RECORDED JUNE 3, 1981 IN PLAT BOOK 11 AT PAGE 60 AND FIRST AMENDMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1981 IN PLAT BOOK 11 AT PAGE 97. 10. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE# 17, SERIES OF 1980 RECORDED AUGUST 25, 1980 IN BOOK 393 AT PAGE 606. 11. CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS,WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX,SEXUAL ORIENTATION,FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, ALTA COMMITMENT Schedule B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order No. Q62005486-3 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: NATIONAL ORIGIN,ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1981, IN BOOK 416 AT PAGE 510. 12. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS DISCLOSED ON THE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF 212 LAKE AVENUE CONDOMINIUMS RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1981 IN PLAT BOOK 12 AT PAGE 33,AMENDED PLAT-UNIT B RECORDED JANUARY 7, 1993 IN PLAT BOOK 30 AT PAGE 21 AND BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT PLAT RECORDED JANUARY 6, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 35 AT PAGE 92. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF DRIVEWAY EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1995 AT RECEPTION NO. 378020. 14. ANY FACTS, RIGHTS. INTERESTS OR CLAIMS WHICH MAY EXIST OR ARISE BY REASON OF THE FOLLOWING FACTS SHOWN ON IMPROVEMENT SURVEY DATED AUGUST 30 2013 PREPARED BY PEAK SURVEYING. INC.. TOB# 13058: FENCELINES NOT LOCATED ON SUBJECT PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINES. WOOD FENCE EXTENDS INTO LOT 17, SHAW WPW SUBDIVISION. STONE STEPS EXTEND INTO HALLAM LAKE PRESERVE. UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF MEMBER AND MANAGER OF ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS,LLC (a Colorado limited liability company) The undersigned,being the sole Member and Manager of ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the "Company"), does hereby consent to and adopt the following resolutions as the action of the Member and the Manager in lieu of a formal meeting: WHEREAS, the Company is an applicant for land use and development approvals with the Minor Historic Development and Hallam Lake Bluff Review on 212 Lake Avenue, Aspen, PID#s 2735-124-89-004 and-005 (collectively,the"Approvals"); WHEREAS, it is necessary for the Company to provide authorization for third parties to assist with the Approvals; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Company, hereby authorizes Haas Land Planning, LLC ("HLP") and John B. Murray Architect,LLC ("JBMA")to act as designated and authorized representatives of the Company for the preparation, submittal and processing of an application requesting the Approvals, as well as any subsequent or incidental applications that may be associated therewith; and that HLP and JBMA shall also authorized to represent the Company in meetings with City staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Aspen City Council; RESOLVED, that Laurence D. Fink, as Manager of the Company (the "Manager"), is hereby authorized and empowered and directed to execute and deliver in the name of and on behalf of the Company the Authorization Letter and Agreement to Pay Application Fees, and such other documents, instruments and agreements, as may be necessary or desirable to effectuate the Approvals; RESOLVED, that the execution and delivery by the Manager of any agreement, certificate or other document, and the taking of any other action in connection with any of the preceding matters shall evidence the approval thereof and the authority therefor and the approval and ratification by the Member and Manager of the Company and by the Company of such agreement, certificate, document or action; and RESOLVED, that all actions of the Member and/or Manager of the Company taken in connection with any of the foregoing prior to the date hereof are hereby ratified, confirmed,adopted, accepted and approved as acts of the Company. [Signature pages attached] MEMBER: Dated:January° 72014 7z LAUREACE D. FINK MANAGER: Dated:January�7 2014 4NCAIE D. FINK b -2 - EXHIBIT City of Aspen Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 RE: 212 Lake Avenue, Aspen (PID#s 2735-124-89-004 and-005) Minor Historic Development and Hallam Lake Bluff Review To whom it may concern: As applicant for Minor Historic Development and Hallam Lake Bluff Review on the above referenced property, I hereby authorize Haas Land Planning, LLC (HLP) and John B. Murray Architect, LLC (JBMA) to act as designated and authorized representatives for the preparation, submittal and processing of an application requesting the approvals listed above, as well as, any subsequent or incidental applications that may be associated therewith. HLP and JBMA are also authorized to represent Aspen River Rendezvous, LLC in meetings with City staff, the Historic Preservation Commission, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Aspen City Council. Should you have any need to contact me during the course of your review, please do so through Haas Land Planning, LLC. Yours truly, L-.�AspA *Ver Rendezvous, LLC By: Laurence Fink, Manager 186 Vail Lane North Salem, NY 10560 EXHIBIT IL I IT LI Jurisdiction of Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. i JOB ADDR ESS / LOT NO. BLK TRACT / (\a fr^ gaSEE ATTACHED SHEET) LEGAL {{)) ✓ (N •.•1 ✓7"yl 1 DESCR. b� {If y 4( . ZIP .PHONE r MAIL ADDRESS OWNER !_ 2t °u> �� 2 v� 7 r✓ ('9 MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. CONTRACTOR I ET � f, ' 7x 7 3 X4.5�LT_ fW ! 2 7 y' /17C PHONE LICENSE NO. q ARCHITECT GR DESIGNER /'` � MAIL ADnDR ESS `¢ �/t/{1`• { ft( rF S'c�''d '�CACfi�� o('v !/(9P`-� jrr 4• '_ �` {r� PHONE LICENSE NO. C MAIL ADDRESS ENGINEER BRANCH MAIL ADDRESS LENDER 6 USE OF BUILDING r 8 Class of work: El NEW SADDITION KI ALTERATION El REPAIR El MOVE ❑ REMOVE 9 Describe work: 10 Change of use from Change of use to 11 Valuation of work: $ PLAN CHECK FEE c PERMIT FEE SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Type of occupancy Const. Y Group Division Size of Bldg. No.of Max. (Total)Sq. Ft. Stories Occ. Load Fire ' Use Fire Sprinklers Zone Required ❑Yes ❑NO APPLICATION ACCEPTED BY: PLANS W KED BY: APPRED F OR_ISSUANCE v: Zone �xry ` (('�j�j� OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: A!\ C Dwelling Units Covered Uncovered Special Approvals Required Received Not Required NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMB- ZONING ING,HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. . DEPT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CNSTRUC- FIRE DEPT. TION AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 60 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A SOIL REPORT PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COM- OTHER (Specify). MENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS UE AND CORRECT. APPLICATION AND THE SAME TO BE TR ALL PROVISIONS OF KNOW R I LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERN NG FI S COMPLIED WITH ED HEREINFORO NOT,I THEE GRANTING OF AW ERM T DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS"OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCT N OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CCOONSTRUCTION. SIGNATURE OF CONTRAC (DATE)O'R OR AUTHORIZED AGENT A � SIGN b . NER IF OWN-ER BU-i'L"D'E FY1t (DATE) UII-0-IEN PROPERLY VALIDATED (IN Till A ) TC1 l�l k MI PLA E LT ATKAT leis 'CK. M.O. CASH P [3 ION I . M.D. CASH JUN R.1 it ' II f�f 11� COUP, iy ,q, _' r t.O(3lt�RAt_f 8161:(1. gITK RA1Ki 81 INSPECTOR "f rr(r�r'i:45"' v 7. t !.x \ ry .t!S.• •', ,:•`•1r'r•••'II'•,•I,I,,/•,,,•''iii'I•..,1,';�111'•,�:r.+.•'„';,;JrIF....,4.4. 4'r= a :I :vR ,f4'�•TI <{: I! tt DEPARTMENT .s •S _ .:1..x:4 C=� .3 'fib-• s. 43•! x^ ar rar ry - ;r,<.Z...r.r,\ P.'VrOr7'¢rrw.'Vi •i�''"'r: 4ss - �'i!l i£s' I VSV:CIF.57 rtp,0•V•VrF.'¢r rV:•^:rVIR7.a•Vr::a.Ne�:• ' ��`•�'' '�p� an'vraa at -e,c•.aa'c•ce'a•a.�wrrarv,veea.r•a¢'a-ram¢raara•mvr n,e•.rran:� �'�°'• �j�ice' -a,.FFf., ;.,,:.•,• This Certificate issued t _ .. pursuant o the requirements of Section 306 of the Uniform B�sildrng' = =�*\i Code certifying that at the time of issuance this structure was in-compliance' with or dina�zcec the vat ii�us' µ=`' X14, Viz, I a s of the County regulating build construction owing: zg 11Zg or use. For'the flop Use Classification Residence Bldg.'Permit No.-3209 r >> Group Type Construction V—N e a =''' Use Zon R-6 Owner of Building—Henry Pederson i = =+'s g Address 212 Lake Avenue % �j '!}•:.•\ Building Address 212 Lake Avenue ` u Locality i I : i Connlen is and Restrictions: y : c:• r > 1 uildin Date July 26 , 1982 g Offi L—_- �,�(��'' �- �` -t k_ y,J,:� of '•'a'• e- „d� �„ - POST IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE t eJ -t`e c'd'e'c2's•m••e'd•ee^•c•rse neced ddee�eeecee d d :�•�=_• •� jY�:'r;l; �.! tiyQ E ,ter' 1}! e /n/a✓e'mxm'n'auammd'er i•- - dre'M' �.l� 1 f r i. .:.t"s,A. .€, ..t,. t.€ - ed'ereL'e'erer�r-.,'e'e'e'd•eU'eL• - 't 1'. .t Ml - .•45 r .il:• ier,•dr�r�r�rJr�l�^e'9he•,.drerer+r... 1.: :.TM U�U:: �1 4.• h°`^r. £J/�{' .7 _ .•t r.0. }r ♦ -G• ct ,..I l'=::': 44 .,s r... - 1• 4£ 1 .3 .i•. :r j��. ?j:' _ R€ V. 5•\ / nr t .r. r - nI •!. ,1.. :}/:' •..:5':444 ,l.�. r, .r •!�ti:s.• rr. 4�.::i�, ',firt77f,;i•�tt;:fiit,.,^,. ..!, 'ht li.:•''• r 5,...... , •,4,*y44 yM1 4'.14 r ':r• ,!,` _ .•N t �:•i .4.4' •4•'s' i:it' 1 .may.✓•.' ''"•:i:'::Y ! 1 ••1 ;tit:\:•... .J r• r• 130 S. Galena L1U1 L 0�N G GERM, �7 i-kPPLOC�:, i MM Cons ruction Aspen,GO 81611 ,1_-t ���gQpO�i C�OGUJ G L�OOo f�9l iLl C aDOLL @��II�3 oDC I G�sSP''Al Permit 303/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY❑ CITY OF ASPEN Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No. JOB ADDRESS- a 1. LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION (0 SEE ATTACHED SHEET) DESC. 2 MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE 3NER 3. p ! 6� PHONE LICENSE NO. CONTRACTOR MAILADDRESS kT_13(Aj L1, 4. PHONE LICENSE NO. ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS 5. AN3�.�`�� d ENGINEER MAILADDRESS � PHONE NO. 6' " `°° ���� "'-"'°"�•'""' CE7F�TFEE QE TOTAL FEE CLASS OF WORK: 7 ❑NEW ❑ADDITION ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE ❑WRECK PLAN CHECK FEE; E-1. E TAX DEP. USE OF BUILDING _ VALUATION OF WORK ' Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area s.. ®DZ?� T=.k1 -3%NCI-i _ Size of Building �,T No.of Stories Occ.Load 10. Remarks (Total Square Ft.)+ G.— NO.OF BEDR MIS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: EXISTING ADDED f ❑Yes o No.of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: // Covered Uncovered �. SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY DATE ZONING .�,. :.).., t::.'. Iii✓ _ H.P.C. Al. ",41-t T �" r / I ? q Fixture Count: A/Et /�, =r = PARI(DEDICATIOM A _ �,/ _� e7 .r-z '&,, -�-� HEALTH DEPARTMENT / D rt' S -¢/ FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL �► +( By v?u�e f�81 I'�4h �ni¢p BY--;!t—� 9M y{ya .f�.t:ai PRINKLER ( L'�!�(`V DATE c� C l t'•'[ t�"t` I-El' DATE JOLnV 9 DATE DATE WATER TAP MSAI—��NOTICE OTHER i /. A SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, I HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. ^S t EO'[ON OF METHOD FOR POLY ANT OF IT THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE.SUB MITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- l STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD: 3%OF 25%OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF PERMIT DOES NOT AT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT SUBCONTRACTORS P ESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO IOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF H OTHE STATE OR LOCAL LAW LATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- MANC OF CO TRU ION. ❑ EXEMPT: STATE&PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. EXEMPT ORGANIZATION IG .E Co AC R R U HORIZEDAG DATE) T141S FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) Ian ChecMid"tto .,Permit Validptiap 3%Use Tax Deposit Validation if t WHITE—FILE COPY GREEN—FINANCE DE PI K—BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW—ASSESSOR GOLD—CUSTOMER 130 S. Galena BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION General Aspen, CO 81611 ASPEN PB4D<DP\,A PEGODNAL I ®LVOLDI �G DEPARTMENT Construction 303/920-5440 Permit PITKIN COUNTY El CITY OF ASPEN❑ Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. No ;L IS f • T NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVI S ION (❑SEE ATTACHED SHEET) `t �j OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE CONTRACTOR MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. I ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE tJd. ° ENGINEER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 6. CLASS OF WORK: CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE 7. ❑NEW ❑ADDITION ❑ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE ❑WRECK q)q ) USE OF BUILDING PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE 3%USE TAX DER. 8. ) t I""� VALUATION OF WORK Type of Construction Occupancy Group - Lot Area 9. $ � 10. Remarks `1! F r" size of Building No.of Stories Occ.Load (Total Square Ft.) f NO.OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required: _ _ EXISTING ADDED t� / El Yes [7rNo^^- . C.�C.It...� 'tf--1 t r<�.l t ,� `� � <— _rfT�iyt•i 8���VC�� rrt No.of Dwelling Units ( OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: N. lti-,i i •`.t' [�j�'` � / 's• Covered Uncovered • r� � b !"' _' ` I SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED '• AUTHORIZED BY DATE ZONING �f"'7�311.11:ktt::lti'.rv�i" H.P.C. r PARK DEDICATION fixture Count HEALTH DEPARTMENT FIREPLACE ESUB AL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED R ISSUANCE V �° ,`i FIRE MARSHAL �+'V� aV BV SPRINKLER G' �. sl 3 7E - t DaTE� DaTE R _ / DATE - f WATER TAP NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ❑ MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD:3%OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD ORDINANCES G VERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WtiETH I SPEC�i D HERE[ NOT.THE GRANTING OF PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS `., ,ESU E TO I E UTH TY VIOLATE OR C A NCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. Y O ER •LO LA REGU TING NSTRUCTION R TH r PER- �iM GE F dN ❑ EXEMPT: STATE&PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. EXEMPT ORGANIZATION G O A R R AUTHORIZD AG ( TE THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) Plan Check Validation /J Permit Validation 3%Use Tax Deposit Validation WHITE—FILE COPY GREEN—FINANCE DEPT. PINK—BUILDING DEPARTMENT YELLOW—ASSESSOR GOLD—CUSTOMER General 130 S. Galena BJLD G PERMIT APPUCG ON Construction spen, CO 81611 L��IPC�O�1Qp04 Uf�0 RTEGOONAL Cg3MOL©Ofiv� (]�� L 51'fivvJC f�O� Permit --{]103/920-5440 PITKIN COUNTY❑ CITY OF ASPEN f' pplicant to complete numbered spaces only. JOB ADDRESS 1, �,�i'1 (0 SEE ATTACHED SHEET) LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION DESC. 2• ZIP PHONE�?•� `�•�" G� MAILAID�l1U DY ESS O E R ld 5g 1.g�•l�G.{.3 V� ��•}Li �� ° r LICENSE NOJ'.o vT 3 Y 3. /` 'V• PNE r,. CONTRACTOR MAILADDRES C—I 4. '�'� 1c, Z �J � PHONE LICENSE NO. ARCHITICTORDESIGNER MAILADDRES J. 11j 1y {a 7" .t�✓ i� PHONE LICENSE NO. ENGINEER MAIL ADDRESS 6• C SUS COD• TOTAL FEE CLASS OF WORK: ,� 1 J_ 7 ❑NEW ❑ADDITION ALTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE ❑WRECK e °l PLAN CHECK FEE 7 — PERMITE 3%USE TAX DER. USE OFBUIL ING s. --® p VALUATION OF WORK j1410- �.- Type of Construction occupancy Group Lot Area�� No.of Stories Occ.Load S' a of Builcc��Ing 10. Remarks (Z S (Total Squ�Ft) •��6.d�tWr="'�' L..�r Yi!60 4�— Fire Sprinklers Required: P! NO. F BEDR OMS Use Zone ❑Yes ❑ o d"✓{4J L+ P�',�, d"" C.__. d f..- °"' EXISTING ADDED p PC I / No.of Dwelling UnitsCC ss+ O ET PARKING SPACES: Uncovered Covered n� SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED DATE�RIZED BY f •7 ,( ZONINGr-t H.P.C. c. f0 L? 11. Fixture Count: ' PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMEN 0"-C =� FIREPLACE P SUBMITTAL PPLICATION ACCEPTED P NS ED J fi� FIRE MARSHAL 'y. B BY M, ti `� SPRINKLER OAT � DA� JC — WATER TAP NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,.PLUMBING, SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX HEATING,VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- A DEPOSIT METHOD:3%OF 25% OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED ORABANDONED FORAPERIOD El OF 120 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH MUST REPORT AND HETHER PECIFI Hg REIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR ALL SUBCONTRACTOR R OWN PERMIT SLIME GIV , U i ORITY TO ATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF OTH STA O OCAL W LATING CONSTRUCTION O THE PER El EXEMPT. STATE&PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. M C OF NS R TI / EXEMPT ORGANIZATION I (ATE) THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. I- A RE O GUN I PAC OR AU OR D GEN WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE (DATE) SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) ermit Validation 3%Use Tax.Deposit Validation Plan Check Vall�lion i;r.� Y =>-°'"� ' ` WHITE—FILE COPY GREEN—FINANCE DEPT. PINK—BUILDING DEPARTMENT LLOW—ASSESSOR GOLD—CUSTOMER �n�087611 BUOL LNG PERPJiIVu APFUCAy�®IN 3 ;/ 215440 Q 6�pf�J q�C�0�G�9L�lLl f�MOL�Do�G�� D o o General PITKIN COUNTY CL�gGZS1'IDVG�J1� Construction AFs. �carr to complete numbered spaces only. CITY OF ASPEN j' Permit vt (-44 ' r jt, BLOCK TRACTOR SUBDIVISION A _119 SEE ATTACHED SHEET) MAILADDRESS • �,�J 6 •�Y� �Vtl a7 `'� ��.- / ,� fit•-• j��7 ZIP PHONE e CC P`,!a ATOR ` � / 6 i � h�L.�'al'IL't•II---�• R'� ` } s J�•ZO�y�y y MAILADDRESS C?`-�ll.�Y �`^�+J,..:9 a al ` `�� e� ��� � PHONE L¢F'� ( r� :3313" i--i IT,TOR DESIGNER � � C{{ 1` hi) �I/ LICENSE NO AID J MAIL ADDRESS ~ ""°t" 8A - PHONE LICENSE No �hG=N=Efl �\\\ MAIL ADDRESS . 6• CLASS OFWORK: PHONE LICENSE NO. 0 I19 E W ❑ADDITION1ACT'Eq jON i! 1J r�In a 7. ® ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE . "°I•k; CENSUS CODE TOTAL FEE USE C)F BUILDING 'El .� PLAN CHECK FEE �,3 q S• - `CJ L' !� '),_ 1,r, -..._._, PERMIT FEE VALURTIONOFWORK. / A'��'� ` o/ ''� "`I✓yy� 3%USE TAX DEP. 9. Type of Construction Occupancy Group � Lot Area remarks 10_ , ep Size of Building (Total Square Ft.) No.of Slo es y'�t•,t �rS Occ.Load �- L�. NO.OF BEDROOMS Use Zone 7. EXISTING ADDED Fire Sprinklers Required: i ❑Yes 11 NO No,of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY ZONING D TE 11. Fixture Count: �` � ' H-P.C. ' _ , _ PARK DEDICATION I V�i HEALTH DEPARTMENT / PRESUBMITr,AL APPLICATION ACCEPTED �J �/ p/ PLANS CHECKED APPROVED O ISS FIREPLADE �`--LL •�6 N P ' P CrE� !![a BY - 9 ua �� By� �@ 4MARSHAL r rr {jam SPRINKLER DAT DAT e��.--9✓ f f —��— DATE /.—V 7 WATER TAP NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, OTHER HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. THIS PERMITBECOMES NULLAND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD ❑ MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. OF 120 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD:3% o I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND OF 25/° OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH COT MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF WHETHER SPECIFIED E AUTHORITYTp NOT OLATE OR CANCEL HE PROVISIONS DOES NOT S OF GENERAL CONTRACTORS REMIT TAX FOR CHOOSING THIS METHOD P, SUME TO�STAT OR L CAL AW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- MUST REPORT AND OTHE L SUBCONTRACTORS MAI�ClOF C I N T CTIO THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. k ❑ EXEMPT: STATE&PITKIN COUNTY RESALE.NO. IGNATURE OF CONTRAC q HOR ED AGENT yr[[[,,�•• .�"al r EXEMPT ORGANIZATION I•t THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) I (DATE) WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Plan ChecloPValldatiolY Permit Validation ' I r:Z: 3%Use Tax De J--� posit Validation WHITE—FILE COPY _. .,_ «GREEN—FINANCE DEPT. PINK—BUILDING DEPARTMENT -YELLOW—ASSESSOR :s GOLD—CUSTOMER r 130 S.Galena C���L�MMIG-1 PERNT QI�(�f� CMT10W Construction ' St Permit As en O 81611 Qa p�� Q �uTKII REG(DPAA� �MBLD[INP3 DEPART MEM 4Lp+ 303/920-5440 a PITKIN COUNTY El OF ASPEN I II t ply �{ . LNo. /j_ pplicant to complete numbered spaces only. JOB ' ADDRESS -d.- ukp, C . y, �V TRACTOR SUBDIVISION (O SEE ATTACHED SHEET) LEGAL ! LOT NO. BLOCK DESC. _ 2• PHOnNE g _T.ER p MAILADDRE9SS� a ZIP 0 "��. � @ ` ` � aC,l�,� p'"`Siva � �. ��(, l��`i�"�����a�+'�'"� �4��- .1 ¢s �� � r .f .q.B + PHONE LICENSE NO. CON ACTOR MAILADDRESS v 4. �t-kl'w 4og jNw'1-F_'V'_ Av L. -ala__ARCFYIT CT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. r �r~ 5. PHONE LICENSE NO. ENGINEER MAILADDRESS 6. CEN$US CODE TOTAL FEE CLASS OF WORK: , 7 ❑NEW ❑ADDITION ITERATION ❑REPAIR ❑MOVE ❑WRECK [� PLAN CHECK FEE Je yr� PERMIT FEE✓ 3%USE TAX DEP. USEOFBUILDING - ®"--"° ' VALUATION OF WORK / Type of Construction Occupancy Group Lot Area Size of Building No.of Storie Occ.Load 10. Remarks y y (Total Square Ft.) y o �(-`y Q s NO.OF BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers equired: el lr 1`�� `-p' �- EXISTING ADDED ❑Yes o rte. No.of Dwelling Units OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered Uncovered © SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED B''Y��y DATE 1 2 H.P.C. fj 4j 11. Fixture Count: PARK DEDICATION HEALTH DEPARTMENT C�l ` d� ! - (• FIREPLACE PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE FIRE MARSHAL By' _y- Err 8,x .1 � � SPRINKLER � DATE/U DATF" DAT- DATE �� WATER TAP �� G NOTICE OTHER SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR F.LEQTRICAL, PLUMBING, HEATING,VrRTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. SELECTION OF METHOD FOR PAYMENT OF USE TAX THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION ❑ MONTHLY USE OF QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CON- STRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FORA PERIOD ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD:3% OF 25%OF PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOW OF 120 DAYS AT ANYTIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. AT ISSUANCE. FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL MATERIALS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND COST MUST BE FILED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND WORK. GENERAL CONTRACTORS CHOOSING THIS METHOD ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT MUST REPORT AND REMIT TAX FOR ALL SUBCONTRACTORS f�IR SLIME 10 GI AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF THAT DO NOT OBTAIN THEIR OWN PERMIT. OTH STAT R OCAL LAW GULAG CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- RM N !OF C T UCT N. ❑ EXEMPT: STATE&PITKIN COUNTY RESALE NO. ! r Z EXEMPT ORGANIZATION TURE OF CONTRA FOR ORIZED THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED. SIGNA AG WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) Plan Cbeck,Validation- Permit Validation M 3%Use Tax Deposit Validation d a � h Ir I h Il If _ WHITE—FILE COPY GREEN—FINANCE DEPT. PINK—BUILDING jEPARfMENT YELLOW—ASSESSOR GOLD—CUSTOMER n"ap GO Q CSC u CSC IM C�DOCUC(iV URQ0 V D EVaLOD vi IEP\94 0EPAG°'7i Nlul EY\D7 l�C f�Gv�i C u P LCC�Q�i COD G� PITKIN COUK. . ❑ CITY OF ASPEN ❑ I 130 South Galena 970/920-5526 970/920-5090 0 �, 2 V ` �abl Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-5532 Inspection Line 970/920-5448 Inspection Line PERMIT NO. General Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. Permit JOB ADDRESS 1. .212- AVM 01q.1 r A �f_71.2_o rj i[ ® LEGAL I LOT NO. 2. DESC. BLOCK TRACTOR SUBDIVISION - (❑SEE ATTACHED SHEET) CO CG.'�/QC>+ �/� G.-��/'•,�_ `�F/V Uf_ S �I��° /'���d �/ OWNER DE MAIL ADDRESS � ZIP PHONE 3. f�F'F1� ED w;5 PO Scx .�07G Ce..L vEt,+-f'� c�/1- -4-4101 f��®�( OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO FM 4. iM H 5. CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO @GIs J-) IT`I�r ENGI G�AV 57`r`IJC�Cd•/ /fV C Po 8n 10-45-3 A 5joF_�( ✓0247-�s- � �C✓� oo�vvuu� ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD MAILADDRESS P NE LICENSE NO 6. Liat�l SPL.A� 1�1 �o �3c�5)�!" �-1zUa SI� �� l Il� ill; �f CUU�� 5) "'313 FL :a3i3 i 7. CLASS OF WORK ENERGY CODE-FEE USE TAX CENSUS CODE G.I.S.F E'Y ❑NEW ❑ADDITION [PP LTERATION ❑REPAIR ❑ 0 N � �" USE OF BUILDING M`8INGLE FAMILY ❑ MULTI-FAMILY PLAN CHECKYFEE PER T FEE -ZONING FEE 8' ❑COMMERCIALIRESIDENTIAL ❑COMMERCIAL ❑OTHER (� G�'n I`IlIJ �D VALUATION OF WORK `/ `V/ 1 L`✓+ \ _ FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE 9. / � F�A THIS PERMIT TA Type of Const action Occupancy Group Lot Area irk 11. Is there food service in this building ❑YES 2O Size of gg (Total SquarenFt. No.of Stories Occ.Load Is LPG used? ❑YES [M<O ''" ! Z 1 � J M qq /`1 / NO. BEDROOMS Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required? El Yes 2,No 13. Parcel ID#call 920-5160 �S/ q i X i IXISTING ADDED (r VVV Alarm System Required? ❑Yes ❑No `•""� 1- Description of Work /"A,A 5�G, 8A 1— �lc���3 I<C—7 No.of Dwelling Units OFFSTREEf PARKING SPACES Covered Uncovered '� GL,(:� � L.�L+'a� -+!`• SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHOR BY. DATE ZONING H.P.C. ^ PARK DEDICATION PRESUBMITTAL APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED ENVIRO. HEALTH APPROV LANCE ENGINEERING 1 BY M�i BY BY BY. PARKS + ' jy NATURAL RESOURCES ATE DATE � DATE�� � � V ^ FIRE MARSHAL NOTICE WATER TAP Z2 ,® lll!!! SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING,HEATING,VENTILATING 4J OR AIR CONDITIONING. ASPEN CONSOL.SAN.DIST. „q THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS OTHER f NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 12 MONTHS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS ATANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. PAYMENT OF PITKIM COUNTY USE TAX I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THEHL, Y OF{QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOV- �J ERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD.5%OF 25%OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- AT ISSUANCE.A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST STRUCTION OR TH ERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO BE FILED WITH IN 90 DAYS OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OF RE THE APP ED PLANS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEREON WORK AND/OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. AN SEE THAT PHE S UCTURE AND/OR PROJECT IS BUILT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COD /p ❑ EXEMPT: EXEMPT ORGANIZATION 12 ��� ❑ RESALE: STATE&PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. S N TUR OF CO CTOR (DATE) ANYONE WHO USES AND/OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN INTN E PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE.5%USE TAX. PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND/OR THE CON- SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Fee Plan Check Fee Zoning Fee GIS Fee Permit Fee Use Tax Deposit Fee Other Fees l(o _ � 2�1 w9 too 12- -1(0—,C) WHITE-FILE COPY CANARY-APPLICANT . ZZ12--b A SpEN Q p0-FKUG\A C cM\jv1 Gv�'"��D i`�> I OF-WE LOpGv�li F-WI ❑o 1EPAN�'Clv�i�,Q�I p�G°3 vl�� G1G°�G°�d�C�`51 BOO 1��9 PITKIN COUI,r Y ❑ CITY OF ASPEN ❑ a y�l n 130 South Galena 970/920-5526 970/920-5090 V I G 1 General Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-5532 Inspection Line 970/920-5448 Inspection Line PERMIT NO. Permit Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. JOB ADDRESS y BD 1• 212- ILA KE A v`/E- v�� � .8'A' �.—C r`) (❑SEE ATTACHED SHEET) 00 LEGAL LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION 2• DESC. C�i�lF/lJ: Zr �F��� AU "Ufr C6-F- -4W5 ul" /3 D� MAIL ADDRESS ZIP PHONE FD OWNER I�� 3. P,=—F� r3 c I s PC) �« SCE is r`t Vre1.gr�l� 0;-1 4 FN MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO M OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT M ill 4. CONTRACTOR MAIL ADDRESS PHONE L10ENSENO �Vq9 5. f-414r,r5F�y Col�tS�,eUC;�cr� tl:r i00 �aK i0493 ids -"f 92i-155 i}cs G�G� ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD MAIL ADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO sum 6. f p .i� � r �I co L'�r �r�+� r F`4.- . _5►3 7 3�5 �i�v'►?�� i Si Sq� A f,A 30i'_ �NCE SUS CODE G.I.S.FEG`L C ENERGY CODE FEE✓ USE TAX n r CLASS OF WORK f _N Z 7. [1 NEW ❑ADDITION [ALTERATION ❑REPAIR El PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE ZONING FEE 0 USE OF BUILDING [DI SINGLE FAMILY ❑MULTI-FAMILY ``�� $' ❑COMMERCIAURESIDENTIAL ❑COMMERCIAL ❑OTHER 2 .� 1t,Uaj 0 VALUATION OF WORK EXISTING SO.FOOTAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE Type oftConstruction Occupancy Group Lot Area � THIS PERMIT -7 f= Size of Buildin No.of Stories Occ,Load 11. Is there food service in this building El YES 1�0 (Total Square( Is LPG used? M 7 ES ❑NO NO.OF BEDROOMS Use Zone / Fire Sprinklers Required? ❑Yes� o 13. Parcel ID#call 920-5160 / i 0 EXISTING ADDED ( i� �GJ Alarm System Required? ❑Yes ❑No 14. Description of Work 1�E q c QEL �/�I��/� / �i No.of Dwelling Units O veered ET PARKING SPACES i �— �;,�Ui � Covered _1_' Uncovered t SPECIAL APPROVALS REQUIRED AUTHORIZED B DATE OCv iD F_1Z GOB 7 L ZONING W PARK DEDICATION ENVIRO. HEALTH ` PRE B�MITTAL BY APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CHECKED APPROV ANCE ENGINEERING By By� PARKS BY Y @gI r ( / DATE ° � DATE kp E `' A NATURAL RESOURCES DAT o 3-O D FIRE MARSHAL �gu. NOTICE ICE WATER TAP I Z SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL,PLUMBING,HEATING,VENTILATING ASPEN CONGOL.SAN.DIST. OR AIR CONDITIONING. C9 THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK'OR CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZED IS OTHER NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 12 MONTHS,OR IF CONSTRUCTION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED PAYMENT OF PITKIN COUNTY USE TAX OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 180 DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMENCED. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION AND KNOW THE MONTHLY OR QUARTERLY RETURNS WILL BE SUBMITTED. SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT.ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOV- ERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR ❑ DEPOSIT METHOD.5%OF 25%OF THE PERMIT VALUATION PAID NOT.THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE AT ISSUANCE.A FINAL REPORT ON TOTAL ACTUAL COST MUST OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CON- STRUCTION BE OR THE PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION.IT IS MY RESPONSIBILITY TO WORK AND/OR ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. REVIEW THE APPROVED PLANS AND ANY COMMENTS THAT ARE CONTAINED THEREON AND E THAT THE S UCTURE AND/OR PROJECT IS BUILT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL El EXEMPT- EXEMPT ORGANIZATION APPLI BLE CODES 16 0A ❑ RESALE: STATE&PITKIN COUNTRY RESALE NO. 12 SIGNAL, E OF ONT TOR (DATE) ANYONE WHO USES AND/OR CONSUMES BUILDING MATERIALS AND FIXTURES IN PITKIN COUNTY IS SUBJECT TO THE.5%USE TAX. PRll'r NAM PROPERTY LIENS MAY BE PLACED ON THE OWNER'S AND/OR THE CON- TRACTOR'S PROPERTY WHEN USE TAX IS NOT PAID SIGNATURE OF OWNER(IF OWNER BUILDER) (DATE) THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY WHEN VALIDATED WORK STARTED WITHOUT PERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE Energy Code Fee Plan Check Fee Zoning Fee GIS Fee Permit Fee Use Tax Deposit Fee Other Fees WHITE—FILE COPY CANARY—APPLICANT 1 LETTER OF COMPLETION City of Aspen Community Development Department, Building Permit: 0091.2004.ARBU Owner of Building: LEWIS PETER B Building Address: 212 LAKE AVE A ASPEN CO 81611 Group: IRC - Type of Construction: V-B rl THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ABOVE I DESCRIBED AND PERMITTED PROJECT HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION AND FINAL INSPECTION THE WORK WAS FOUND TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING AND BUILDING REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE IN THE CITY WITH THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: Chief Building Offici Date ti Note: In all occupancies,except R,this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near th.e main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this letter and subject it to revocation. i LETTER OF COMPLETION City of Aspen Community Development Department Building Permit: 0092.2004.ARBU Owner of Building: . LEWIS PETER B Building Address: 212 LAKE AVE B ASPEN CO 81611 Group: IRC Type of Construction: V-B Z. THE PLANS AND CONSTRUCTION FOR THE ABOVE I .I DESCRIB ED.A ND PERMIT.TED PROJECT HAVE BEEN INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF ASPEN _ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.AT THE TIME OF COMPLETION AND FINAL INSPECTION THE WORK WAS FOUND . TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING AND BUILDING -REGULATIONS EFFECTIVE IN THE CITY WITH THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: Chief Building Officia Date Note: In all occupancies,except R,this certificate must be posted in a conspicuous place near the main exit on the premises for which it is issued. Any alteration or use of these described premises or portion thereof without the written approval of the Building Official shall negate this letter and subject it to revocation. EXHIBIT COMMUNITY • ' DEPARTMENT Agreement to Pay Application Fees Anagreement between the City of Aspen ("City")and Property Aspen River Rendezvous, LLC Phone No.: Owner("I"): Email: Address of 212 Lake Avenue, Aspen Billing 186 Vail Lane Property: Address: North Salem, NY 10560 (subject of (send bills here) application) understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. $ $975 flat fee for Parks $ flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 3,250 deposit for 10 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$325 per hour. $ 265 deposit for_1 hours of Engineering Department staff time.Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at$265 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owner: Chris Bendon As n River Rendezvous, Community Development Director By: Laurence Fink City Use: Title: Manager Fees Due:$ Received: $ November. 2011 City of 1 920-5090 EXHIBIT I Mailing addresses of record for all property owners locate n 60 days will be provided under separate cover withi of the subject property p of the first scheduled public hearing date and/or with the affidavit of pubic notice. EXHIBIT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE I ley, REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY'; -- 017 l 2 � t, f� °/l�/� Aspen, CO SCHE UI�E/ PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 120 STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pitkin ) ss. I' s tA2pel! (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the Cit f orado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Sid notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of /�q�� , 20A, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hear gea as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) IJ A Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ' h - a ( 4a� i ature�� The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowl dged�efore me this da of . t ( , 20 , by r� ,+te — Y CHRISTOPHER LUNDGREN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO My iss' n e pires: R NOTARY ID 20144000722 COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN.09,2018 lic ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPYOFTHEPUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE 0WIVERSAND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 210 WEST FRANCIS LLC 229 WEST SMUGGLER LLC 255 13TH AVE SOUTH#202 426 NORTH SECOND LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 3509 CRESCENT AVE DALLAS, TX 75205 3509 CRESCENT AVE DALLAS, TX 75205 ASPEN CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES ATCHLEY MARK AMES 50% 100 PUPPY SMITH ST 292 RIVERSIDE DR#5A BARNHART PAUL F JR ATTN KATIE SCHWOERER NEW YORK, NY 10025 2121 SAGE RD#333 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77056 BRUNDIGE CHELSEA C CITY OF ASPEN 1755 SNOWMASS CREEK RD ATTN FINANCE DEPT CONOVER CATHRINE M SNOWMASS, CO 81654 130 S GALENA ST 1010 WISCONSIN AVE NW STE#550 ASPEN, CO 81611 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 COTSEN 1985 TRUST FRANCIS AND SECOND ST LLC 12100 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 905 4545 POST OAK PLACE DR#144 GREENBERG ASPEN LP 50% LOS ANGELES, CA 90025 #3 BRENTMOOR HOUSTON, TX 77026 ST LOUIS, MO 63105 GREENBERG RONALD K TRUSTEE 50% HANSON LUCY C 230 S BEMISTON AVE#101 1775 F ST LAKE 206 LLC FIR ST LOUIS, MO 631051907 PORT IR ST ND, WA 98368 PO BOX 3337 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 LEWIS JONATHAN D REV TRUST LEWIS JUDITH 414 N FIRST ST 215 W SMUGGLER ST LUNDY NICHOLAS BURWELL 50% ASPEN, CO 81611 292 RIVERSIDE DR#5A ASPEN, CO 81611 NEW YORK, NY 10025 MCMANUS JAMES R PHILLIPPE THOMAS E JR &SUSAN 430 GRAND BAY DR#301 MARIE RANDALL EDWARD III 50% KEY BISCAYNE, FL 33149 225 W SMUGGLER ST FIVE POST OAK PARK#2580 ASPEN, CO 81611-1356 4400 POST OAK PKWY HOUSTON, TX 77027 RANDALL ELLEN MIDDLETON TRUST 50% SCHERMER LLOYD G& BETTY A 600 JEFFERSON STE#350 210 LAKE AVE SCHIFF DAVID T HOUSTON, TX 77002 ASPEN, CO 81611-1347 E AVE OF THE AMERICAS 42ND FL NEW YORK, NY 10036 TENEDOS LLC 79 LOCUST RD WINNETKA, IL 60093 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 212 LAKE AVENUE—MINOR DEVELOPMENT AND HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,April 9, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, in Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Aspen River Rendezvous, LLC, 186 Vail Lane, North Salem, NY, 10560, owners of the property located at 212 Lake Avenue, Units A and B, 212 Lake Avenue Condominiums, City and Townsite of Aspen, PID 42735-124-89-004 and -005. The applicant requests Minor Development approval for exterior remodeling of the existing duplex and requests HPC approval for sideyard setback variances, a site coverage variance and an on-site parking reduction, addressing existing conditions. The applicant also requests Hallam Lake Bluff approval for work along the rear portion of the lot. For further information, contact Amy Simon at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen, CO, (970)429-2758, amy.simon @cityofaspen.com. s/v Wit_ Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 20,2014 City of Aspen Account ,� ,i :� ��' r. � '� , ' � �* !r. .Y w .,_ 1 _� f ' � � ,� r � � , L- ti,� i � 1 .ski` � II a i ��r ��r� .._ ��� �. ^��1r r� r 1 �� _� w .. .. � � _ � �,. .:. ,R ,. � �4�J*� r i .u�;�-� 1 i. �� P '; � t. ,� �.� 4 �� �. i-. - � T •��- �`�. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1 `J C (1 u e— , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 20 ILI STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, C-,(- mt ll � 1 � M�=�-�t (1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the— day of , 20 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and goi)ern7nental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, suminarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach suninzary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 077 next page) i Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing notice, ri r to the requested, to affected mineral estate owners by a t east thirty 30) days p date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimuin, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Tof anda accurate enactment d e survey map or other sufficient legal otherwise, the requirement description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business Hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ' r C � /' tore. The fo$elj%"Affidavit of NotiAby " was acknowledged before me thisay of , 20 PUBLIC NOTICE RE:212 LAKE AVENUE-MINOR DEVELOP- MENT AND HALLAM LAKE BLUFF REVIEW WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday,April 9,2014,at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m.before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission,in Council Chambers,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to My commission expires: consider an application submitted by Aspen River - Rendezvous,LLC,186 Vail Lane,North Salem, _ NY,10560,owners of the property located at 212 --- Lake Avenue,Units A and B,212 Lake Avenue Condominiums,City and Townsite of Aspen,PID -- #2735-124-89-004 and-005. The applicant re- 7,. Guests Minor Development approval for exterior 'Not Public remodeling of the existing duplex and requests HPC approval for sidayard setback variances,a KAREN REED PATTERSON site coverage variance and anon-site parking re- NOTARY PUBLIC duction,addressing existing conditions. The appli- cant also requests Hallam Lake Bluff approval for - STATE OF COLORADO work along the rear portion of the lot. For further information,contact Amy Simon at the City of As- NOTARY�D#1 gg64QQ2767 pen Community Development Department,130 S. 2016 Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429-2758,amy.si- ILA.Commission Expires February 15, 2016 s/JayMaynn ;MMENTS AS APPLICABLE: Chair,Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ATION 4Published in the Aspen Times Weekly on March 20,2014. [10031691) __,:E POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ES TAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3