Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20140415 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, April 15, 2014 REGULAR MEETING: 4:30 p.m. Sister Cities room 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen I. ROLL CALL II. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public III. MINUTES IV. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST V. PUBLIC HEARINGS — A. Aspen Club (1450 Crystal Lake Rd) — PUD Amendment B. Hotel Aspen (110 W Main St)— Growth Management Allotments VI. OTHER BUSINESS VII. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1) Conflicts of Interest(handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of hearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised April 2, 2014 Regular Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission April 2,2014 Pi U Erspamer,Chair, called the meeting to order at 4:30 PM with members Gibbs, McNellis, Nieuwland- Zlotnicki and Goode present. Also present from City staff; Debbie Quinn,Sara Naldony and Chris Bendon COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Mr. Erspamer stated he worked at the airport this past weekend helping with the disabled veterans arriving. STAFF COMMENTS: Chris Bendon stated he is just here for the opening as he is also at the council work session. Debbie Quinn said there is a procedure format on the back of the agenda and this is the ideal. These meetings are a quasi-judicial process where facts are applied to standards. Ms.Quinn review the process. Mr. Erspamer asked if he can set a timeline. Mr. Bendon said Staff can help with that and will work with applicants to observe expected timelines. PUBLIC COMMENTS: There are no public comments. MINUTES - February 18, 2014 Mr. McNellis made a motion to approve the minutes as corrected,seconded by Mr.Goode. All in favor, motion passed. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST No declaration of conflict of interest. Public Hearings - 1330 Mountain View Drive - Residential Design Standards Variances Mr. Erspamer opened the public hearing. Ms.Quinn received the affidavits on notice,exhibit F,and notice has been appropriately provided. Sara Naldony, planning department, stated this is a public hearing to determine the granting of four variances. She stated the property is a one story single family home located in the R15 zone district. The home is on the corner of North Street and Mountain View Drive and currently oriented towards the corner. The driveway is currently accessed off of North Street. The applicants have received an administrative approval for a boundary adjustment between this and the neighboring north parcel but has not been updated in GIS yet. The applicant has proposed a two story single family home and has received permission to relocate the driveway off of Mtn View Drive. Ms. Nadolny stated that some of the design choices selected by the architects were due.to feedback given by Staff during the design process.: There are two criteria to consider to base a variance on. The first is to provide an appropriate pattern of design given the context of the neighborhood and the purpose of the particular standard. The second is fairness due to a site specific constraint. There are four variances requested. Ms. Nadolny stated the first two variances are due to design guidance given by Staff that this was a curvilinear street rather than a corner lot. This was earlier in the process but staff has reconsidered this to be a corner lot. 1 P 2 Regular Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission April 2,2014 1. Building orientation. The orientation is based on it being a curvilinear lot. On a corner street it requires both of the street facing facades to be parallel to the street. Staff has found it is typical of homes in the neighborhood to meet the standard and they have not found any site specific constraints that would grant the requirement of the variance. 2. Garage orientation. She stated garages that are in front of the buildings front facade should be side loaded with the doors hidden from view. She said the intention of the applicant was to meet the code by side loading the doors. She said it is not achieved due to the building orientation of it being a corner lot instead of a curvilinear one. Ms. Nadolny said it is not unusual to see front facing doors in this neighborhood but is not something Staff,wants to promote with new development. She also said they did not find any site specific constraint that would require the granting of the variance. 3. Location of front door. Ms. Nadolny said the residential design standard states the entry door shall be no more than ten feet back from the front most wall of the building. She said she is. measuring it as approximately 30 feet back when measured to the garage. The front door is .located in an area that is visible but is not quite typical of residences in this neighborhood. She said Staff does not find it to meet either criteria to grant the variance. 4. Windows that span the 9-12 foot zone. Ms. Nadolny said this is typically an area where a second story would exist. She said the windows are on either side of the transom and are located on a one story element and there is no mistaking that this could be a second level. She stated that given the intent and the purpose of the standard Staff finds the intent of the standard has been met. Ms. Nadolny said Staff is recommending clear approval of the variance request for the windows, number four. They are recommending denial for the requests relating to building orientation,garage orientation and front door location. She stated they have not found a clear relationship between the proposal and the criteria. She said that staff appreciates the design for the lot and they do need to defer to the commission. Mr. McNellis asked how the dialog transpired from a curvilinear lot to a corner lot. Ms. Nadolny said it started at the pre-app and went further before they decided it was a corner lot. She said there was a lot of discussion between Staff on this. She said she was basing her original recommendation on a property on Francis Street. Mr. Erspamer asked if North Street is a public street and Ms. Nadolny replied it is a private street. Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki asked what the required front yard set back is. Ms. Nadolny said 25 feet. Mr. Gibbs asked how many buildings off the area have side loaded garages. Ms. Nadolny said she couldn't say exactly but there are a fair amount of front facing garages. She said the size of the lot is what enables the garage to be in front of the house and side loaded. Mr. Erspamer asked what way the garage should sit. Ms. Nadolny said they would expect to see it facing Mountain View Drive. He said if there is a 30 foot set back for the door and the garage is there how can the door be ten foot back. Ms. Nadolny said it would depend on the design. Ms. Nadolny corrected that North Street is a public Street. 2 Regular Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission April 2,2014 P3 Ali Gidfar,Studio 303,and Michelle Frankel,Choreotect Studio are representing the applicant,The Joseph P.Tallman Legacy Trust. Mr.Gidfar said they were challenged by the triangular nature of the site. He said the design concept was to use the shape of the site to their advantage by creating a massing that looks like open arms to the street. He stated they have the support of the HOA. Mr.Gidfar said the house is formed by three wings,the west side family wing,the south side garage, kitchen and family room and the east wing is the guest wing. He stated the definition of the variance that is requested as variance one is the front facades of all principle structures shall be parallel to the street. On corner lots, both street facing facades must be parallel to the intersecting streets. He said according to the definition they will have to address both sides of the design. He said the main fagade that faces the street is parallel to the tangent of Mountain View and near parallel to North Street. He said they designed to what they thought was appropriate. Mr. Gidfar said based on variance one their interpretation of the garage doors is that they are perpendicular to North Street. He said they wanted to make sure people coming into the neighborhood would not be staring at the garage doors as well as people leaving the neighborhood. He said they will use landscaping to break up the mass of the garage. He showed an example of 1245 Mountain View of a garage that is 90 degrees to the street using trees to partially block the view. Mr.Gidfar said for variance three they feel the front door is very clear as to where it is due to the glazing on either side. He said even though it doesn't meet the letter of the code the spirit of it is there. The front door is prominent. He stated that for variance four they are violating the height by six inches but because how clear the second floor element is the glazing should be included as part of the first floor. Ms. Frankel pointed out that North Street is more of a cul-de-sac. She said they are embracing North Street as part of the fagade line. Mr.Gibbs asked.what the dimension from the door to the right side of the front of the building is. Mr. Gidfar replied 21 feet. Mr. McNellis asked assuming it is a curvilinear street, how many variances would be needed. Mr. Gidfar replied two,the front door and the glazing. He said they believe they have complied with the code. Ms. Nadoiny said if it was a curvilinear street they would only need the two variances. Mr. Gidfar said the issue of whether it is a corner lot or facing two streets,to them it is more about the two streets than a corner issue. He said the lot line is clearly there and it is about facing North Street. Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki said if they were to set back the building 25 feet from Mountain View Drive there isn't much left to face North Street and would support the site being curvilinear over a corner lot. Mr. Gidfar said he would agree with that. Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki asked if the front door is closer to the street than the majority of houses on Mountain View. Mr.Gidfar said it is very close. Mr.Goode said with the amount of glass being used on the ground level is there a concern with light. pollution to the neighbors. Mr. Gidfar said it will be detailed with shades for night and a porch covering. 3 P4 Regular Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission April 2,2014 Mr. Erspamer asked about the 30 foot set back and the code stating the door to the house should be set back 10 feet how would they do that. Mr.Gidfar said it would be a challenge. He said the door is still clear and inviting. Mr. Erspamer asked if the garage is 18 feet wide will there be two doors. Mr.Gidfar said it will be two single doors. Mr. Erspamer opened the public comment. 1. Michael Maple, 1250 Mountain View Dr;said the reason he is at the meeting is because of the Cemetery Lane Neighborhood Plan. In 2000 and 2001 the Cemetery Lane neighborhood met with the planning staff and created the plan. There are 304 property owners on Cemetery Lane and had 152 participants. He said there were many well attended meetings. He stated the plan was adopted by the P&Z and City Council in 2001. He said as part of the adoption it should be taken to the next level. Mr. Maple said the design guidelines that are being reviewed for this project are guidelines for the West End. He passed out a page from the plan, Exhibit G. Mr. Maple said page two is a review of 22 design standards and the neighborhoods assessment of which standards should apply to the Cemetery Lane neighborhood. He said the 152 respondents judged that only eight of the 22 should apply to their neighborhood. He stated that is why they asked for the code to be re-written for their neighborhood. He stated Staff has ignored that request for the last 13 years and as a result this applicant and P&Z has to review things they should not have to review. He stated the four variances the applicant has requested would not be a variance according to the Cemetery Lane plan. He said he encourages P&Z to look to the neighborhoods opinion and the document should be respected. 2. Raifie Bass stated he lives directly across the street and has been there for nine years. He said it is a difficult site and the curve of the street does not dictate what is a corner. He said it is a good job of designing a house that fits on the lot. 3. Dave Amory, 1370 Mountain View Drive, said he has lived 27 years in the neighborhood. He said he is concerned that they voted to have a 25 foot height limitation and wants to know if they are within that. He said from an aerial standpoint the building is divided into two halves and is concerned it looks like a duplex. He stated he is also concerned that new structures will have very little relationship with mountain architecture. He said it is a family oriented street and the house looks like a nice place for someone with no children. He also asked how it affects neighbors and is it a spec house or being designed for someone moving into the neighborhood. 4. Jeff Lizotte said he lives on Sage Court which is on the north side of the building. He said there is not a good perspective on how it affects the people on Sage Court. He said the slope from the north side drops at about a 50 degree angle and drops to the bottom. Mr. Lizotte said he is worried about new home owners who leave all their lights on flooding the neighborhood with light. 4 Regular Meeting Planning& Zoning Commission April 2, 2014 P5 Mr. Erspamer closed the public comment. Mr.Gibbs asked if there is an issue with height. Ms. Frankel said the HOA has a stricter height restriction than the City and they are an inch below the requirement. Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki asked if Staff has an opinion on Cemetery Lane having a different context. Ms. Nadolny said she is not familiar with the Cemetery Lane plan. She said this neighborhood is different and outside the Aspen infill area. She said a lot of this applies more to the typical West End neighborhood district and Staff agrees with that. Ms.Quinn said when they are looking at standards under section A,the information Mr. Maple presented could be considered in determining the context in which the development was proposed. Mr. Erspamer stated Staff recommended approval of the window variance and asked if there was any opposition. There was no commission opposition to the window variance. Mr. Erspamer said his feeling towards building orientation is more towards Staff's position. If it is redesigned it could solve the front and garage door variances as well. Mr. McNellis said he agrees with Staffs interpretation of a corner but he can see how it can be interpreted as a curvilinear lot. He said he is concerned that the applicant went with the interpretation with Staff then had it turn on them. Mr. McNellis said he is inclined to say it is a curvilinear lot in which case no variances would be required. He stated he puts a lot of weight on the Cemetery Lane plan. Mr. Nieuwland-Zlotnicki said with the house set so far back it is not exposed to North Street. He said for him that would make it a curvilinear lot with no variances required. Mr.. Erspamer said curvilinear is a curve and there are hard edges to this and why he did not lean that way. Mr.Gibbs stated he supports all the variances. He said the orientation of the garage door is a response to a site specific constraint. He said he does not believe it is curvilinear but this is an unusual non- rectilinear property. He said the shape of the lot provides a constraint and you would lose the whole left side of the lot if you were to conform with the code. He said the variance with the door being ten feet back the standard needs to be looked at compared to the standard of side loaded doors. He said if you comply with the side door standard it immediately puts the front of the building 20 feet back. He said he does not believe in this neighborhood it is important. Mr.Goode said he is curious to see how many other neighborhoods have a plan like the Cemetery Lane one. He said the variances should be granted and it is a modern interesting design. Mr. Erspamer said he has not been convinced to change his feeling. Mr. McNellis made a motion to approve Resolution 4, 2014 as drafted, seconded by Mr. Nieuwland- Zlotnicki. Roll call vote; Goode yes,Gibbs yes, Nieuwland-Zlotnicki yes, McNellis yes, Erspamer no. Motion Carries. Mr. Gibbs made a motion to adjourn, seconded by Mr.Goode. All in favor, motion carries. 5 P6 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jessica Garrow, Long Range Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director RE: 1450 Crystal Lake Road—PUD Amendment Resolution No.� Series of 2014 MEETING DATE: April 15, 2014 APPLICANT/OWNER: Aspen Club and Spa, LLC REPRESENTATIVE: Sunny Vann, Vann Associates, LLC LOCATION: 1450 Crystal Lake Road—Lot 15 of the Callahan Subdivision CURRENT ZONING: lee RR/PUD/SPA(Rural Residential) zone district z " with a Planned Unit Development(PUD) Overlay and a Specially Planned Area(SPA) Ci Overlays CY r� � 4 e�TML Ax �_}c�,] t•f,fTi-5l S,"p. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests a PUD amendment to memorialize floor area and to allow for retaining walls within a setback. �� STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendment. Photo: Aspen Club building and location. REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: ® A PUD Other Amendment Review (Chapter 26.445.100.B Other Amendment) for the development of retaining walls in a setback and to memorialize floor area. (The Planning Aspen Club PUD Amendment 4.15.2014 Page 1 of 3 P7 and Zoning Commission is the final review authori ty.) Note the applicant is vested under the 2007 Land Use Code,which is referenced here. BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The Aspen Club is located in the Rural Residential (RR) zone district with a PUD overlay and an SPA overlay. The Club is part of the Callahan Subdivision and PUD, which was initially approved in 1976. A number of PUD Amendments have been made to the Callahan Subdivision since the original approval, the most recent of which was the PUD and SPA approved in 2010 (Ordinance 2, Series of 2010). The property is approved for a redevelopment including 21 timeshare units, 12 2- bedroom affordable housing units, and a reconfigured recreation club. A total of 133 parking spaces are approved for the development—35 spaces across the river on lots 14A& 14W and 98 on . the Club parcel (Lot 15-A). After receiving all the final approvals, the Applicant began working on construction drawings and perfecting their calculations and their drainage and grading plans. It was discovered that an error was made in their floor area calculations, and the applicant requests a PUD amendment to memorialize the correct calculation. The building size and location are unchanged. The Aspen Club building was approved for a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 31,870 sq ft. The Applicant has discovered that the correctly calculated FAR for the approved building is actually 47,595 sq ft, a difference of 15,725 sq ft. The calculation error occurred because the initial calculation did not accurately take into account the amount of exposed wall area in the subgrade parking garage. In addition, the applicant requests a PUD amendment to allow for retaining wall work in the eastern-most setback (along the Silverlining Ranch property). The Land Use Code allows retaining walls in the setback of up to thirty inches above grade. Due to the steep slopes on the property, and the need to create positive drainage (i.e. allow water to drain downhill), the applicant is proposing retaining walls that range in height from approximately four (4) feet to approximately seven (7) feet. Sections of the proposed retaining walls are included in the Application(Exhibit B). STAFF COMMENTS: FLOOR AREA: For sub-grade areas, Floor Area calculations are based on the overall square footage.of the level and the amount of exposed wall. The theory is that sub-grade areas are less visible, so only those portions that are above grade or are exposed and therefore seen should count. Between the Conceptual and Final PUD Reviews the applicant amended the design to expose more of the sub- grade garage wall area. At the time the calculations were updated to reflect the change, but they were not calculated correctly and staff did not catch the error. The actual gross building size remains unchanged from what P&Z and City Council previously approved — it is just the calculation that is updated. Staff finds this meets the criteria for a PUD Other Amendment and reconnnends approval of the request. RETAINING WALLS: Aspen Club PUD Amendment 4.15.2014 Page 2 of 3 P8 Setbacks are intended to provide a visual break in development between the property line and a structure. Some items are allowed to be constructed in the setback, including retaining walls that are limited to 30 inches above grade. This allows flexibility on a site to meet various earth retention requirements and the desire to create some open areas. The Aspen Club site includes a number of areas with significant grade changes, including along the eastern-most property line. The Applicant represented that some grading and retaining wall work would occur in this areas, but specific dimensions were not included, as it was assumed the code's 30 inch allowance would be enough to accommodate the needs. The applicant has refined their drainage plan, and discovered the need to include more grading and retaining wall work than was originally anticipated. While staff understands the importance of creating positive drainage, staff recommends the applicant study this setback area again and determine if a stepping of retaining walls rather than single retaining walls could be accommodated within the 30 inches allowed in the code. This has been included as a condition of approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the amendment, with conditions, as it meets the review criteria as outlined in Exhibit A. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2014, approving a PUD Amendment for the Aspen Club project." Attachments Exhibit A-PUD Amendment Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B - Application Aspen Club PUD Amendment 4.15.2014 Page 3 of 3 P9 RESOLUTION NO. , (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD (THE ASPEN CLUB), LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 15 OF CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2 73 7-181-32-019 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Aspen Club and Spa, LLC, represented by Sunny Vann of Vann Associates, LLC and Gateway management Company requesting a PUD Amendment to the Aspen Club project; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Conceptual Commercial Design Review from the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 1,2008 via Resolution 9, Series of 2008; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received final Specially Planned Area (SPA), final Planned Unit Development (PUD), final Timeshare, Stream Margin, Affordable Housing Growth Management Allotments, Multi-Year Growth Management Lodge Allotments, Rezoning, and Subdivision, to develop a sub-grade garage, twenty (20) timeshare units and twelve (12) affordable housing units, and to redesign existing commercial spaces, from the Aspen City Council on June 1,2010 via Ordinance 2, Series of 2010; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant received Final Commercial Design Review from the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 6,2011 via Resolution 17, Series of 2011; and, WHEREAS,the Applicant received approval for one (1) additional unit and a total of six (6) additional lodge pillow allotments from the Planning and Zoning Commission on September 18, 2012 via Resolution 16, Series of 2012; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant requests approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission for a PUD Other Amendment; and, WHEREAS,upon initial review of the application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 15, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution No. _, Series of 2014, by a to L— vote, approving a PUD Other Amendment; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public cominent; and, Resolution No Series 2014 Page 1 of 3 Flo WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and, WHEREAS,the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO THAT: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a PUD Other Amendment memorializing the following items: • The allowed FAR for the Aspen Club Building(on Lot 1, aka 15-A)is of 47,595 sq ft. • Retaining walls are permitted to exceed 30 inches above grade along the eastern-most property line, as outlined in Exhibit A to this Resolution. The Applicant shall study the ability to include further stepping down of the retaining walls to better comply with the 30-inch rule. In studying this, the applicant shall demonstrate to Community Development staff that no other option exists that would meet the requirements in the Land Use Code. Section 2• All conditions outlined in all previous approvals remain valid and in effect. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Resolution No Series 2014 Page 2 of 3 P11 APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this 15th day of April,2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Debbie Quinn,Special Counsel LJ Erspamer,Chair ATTEST: Linda Manning,Deputy City Clerk Resolution No Series 2014 Page 3 of 3 P12 EXHIBIT A Chapter 26.445, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (note, the project is vested under the 2007 Land Use Code) 26.445.100. Amendment of PUD development order. B. Other amendment. An amendment found to be consistent with or an enhancement of the approved final development plan by the Community Development Director, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment,may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission, at a public hearing pursuant to Subsection 26.445.030.C, Step 3. The action by the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be considered the final action,unless the decision is appealed. Staff Finding. The Applicant proposes to update an incorrect floor area calculation and to include grading and retaining wall work in the eastern-most setback area. The floor area update corrects a math error that was included in the final PUD approval, when the total amount of exposed wall area in the sub-grade garage was calculated incorrectly. The grading and retaining wall work proposed in the setback area is requested to ensure proper drainage on that portion of the site. There are existing grade changes that make additional grading and retaining wall work necessary to ensure positive drainage. Staff recommends approval of both requests,but would prefer the grading and retaining wall work to be at a minimum. Staff has included a condition of approval asking the applicant to restudy this item. Overall, Staff finds this review criterion to be met. Exhibit A—PUD Review Criteria Page 1 of 1 13 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Senior Planner THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Community Development Deputy Director RE: 110 W. Main Street, Hotel Aspen—GMQS Resolution No._, Series of 2014 MEETING DATE: May 21,2013 APPLICANT/OWNER: Michael Brown `; REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Clauson Associates ' " LOCATION: 110 W. Main Street CURRENT ZONING: " R-6 and MU with the LP overlay (recently rezoned to MU with LP overlay) SUMMARY: The Applicant requests growth management allotments for 3 free market residential units, the addition of 9 new lodge rooms, and approval to develop onsite affordable housing. { Establishment of Housing Credits for ^~� 1.45 FTEs is also requested. x }' a; U M STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request. d Top: Current photograph of Hotel Aspen Bottom: Zone District Map Page 1 of 4 Hotel Aspen— 110 W. Main St. GMQS Memo P14 REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals to scrape and replace the existing building: • A Growth Management Review(Chapter 26.470.080.2,New free market residential units within a multi family or mixed use project) for the development of new free market residential units. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) • A Growth Management Review (Chapter 26.470.080.3, Lodge Development) for the redevelopment of the existing lodge with 9 new lodge units and an average room size of 300 square feet. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) • A Growth Management Review (Chapter 26.470.070.5, Demolition or.redevelopment of multi family housing) for the replacement of existing multi-family housing. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) • A Growth Management Review (Chapter 26.470.070.4, Affordable Housing) for the development of affordable housing. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) • Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits (Chapter 26.540, Certificate of Affordable Housing Credits) to establish housing credits for the non-mitigation affordable housing proposed. (The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority.) BACKGROUND AND PROJECT SUMMARY: The subject property is a 27,000 square feet lot that borders Main Street, Garmisch Street, and Bleeker Street. The property is currently zoned MU Mixed Use along Main Street, R-6 Medium Density Residential along Bleeker Street; and the entire property has the LP Lodge Preservation Overlay. The applicant proposes to demolish the majority of the existing lodge and to construct a mixed use project that includes lodge (54 rooms), affordable housing (3 units) and free market residential (3 units)uses. Existing Conditions and Previous Approvals: The hotel currently contains 45 lodge rooms and 1 onsite 2-bedroom affordable housing unit. The affordable housing unit was approved in 1984 when the lodge was converted from the Nugget Lodge to the Hotel Aspen. The proposed project has received Conceptual design approvals from the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) via Resolution 914, Series of 2013. The P & Z heard the project twice: the first hearing was extensive background and explanation of the project by the applicant, and the second hearing included staff recommendations. The applicant requested a decision at the second hearing: P & Z voted 3-1-1 in denial of the project. A PUD plan, Subdivision, and Rezoning to MU/LP was granted by City Council via Ordinance #51, Series of 2013. After GMQS review, the project is required to apply for final design reviews by HPC. Proposed Development: The approved PUD plan includes 3 detached free market residential units along Bleeker Street, 54 lodge rooms with an average of 300 square feet each, and 3 affordable housing units. The Page 2 of 4 Hotel Aspen— 110 W. Main St. GMQS Memo P15 lodge and affordable housing uses are proposed in 1 building. The three free market residential units are proposed in 3 separate buildings. A large subgrade parking garage that contains some lodge components and some free market residential component is proposed. Table 1: Approved floor area for each use: Approved Hotel Aspen Dimensional Requirements: floor area Maximum free market multi-family 8,400 sf total: residential floor area 2,800 sf per unit Maximum net livable area for free 3 units @ 4,400 sf net livable per unit market multi-family residential dwelling unit size Maximum lodge floor area 24,650 sf Maximum affordable housing floor area 2,000 sf Hotel Aspen is subject to the Land Use Code in place on October 19, 2012, which allowed onsite housing to serve multiple affordable housing requirements. This Section, which has since been repealed from the Code, permits a project to mitigate only for the higher affordable housing requirement when there are multiple requirements for one project — with the condition that the housing is provided onsite. The required mitigation is based only on the new square footage and the new lodge units. The applicant is providing all of the required mitigation onsite. The calculation is as follows: Lodge: Mitigate for the additional 9 lodge rooms @ 10% of employees generated 9 lodge units * 0.3 FTEs=2.7 FTEs generated 2.7 FTEs @ 10%mitigation=0.27 FTEs required mitigation for lodge Free Market Residential: 13,200 sf net livable area/400 sf=33 FTEs generated 33 FTEs @ 10% mitigation=3.3 FTEs required mitigation for free market residential Affordable Housing: Required for mitigation for the demolition of the existing 2-bedroom AH unit 2-bedroom unit=2.25 FTEs required mitigation for affordable housinI The project is required to provide 3.3 FTEs onsite—the largest of the mitigation requirements listed above. Table 2: Proposed affordable housing units: Unit type Proposed net livable Minimum size FTEs housed area re uirement for Cat. 2 1-bedroom 603 600 . 1.75 1-bedroom 643 600 1.75 Studio 401 400 1.25 TOTALS 1,647 sf 4.75 Page 3 of 4 Hotel Aspen— 110 W. Main St. GMQS Memo P16 The housing units are proposed to be Category 2 rentals with the intention of renting to lodge employees. As per the PUD approval, the project is required to provide 3 garage parking spaces for the affordable housing units. STAFF COMMENTS: GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEW The project proposes onsite affordable housing consistent with the "onsite housing to serve multiple affordable housing requirements" provision that allows a concurrent mitigation calculation. The project requires 3.3 FTEs to be mitigated onsite to meet this requirement. The project proposes 4.75 which exceeds the requirement. The Land Use Code requires the housing units to be deed restricted to Category 4 or less. The 3 units are proposed to be Category 2 rental units. In reviewing the Growth Management portion of the application, Staff finds that the proposal meets all applicable review requirements (see Exhibit A). In accordance with the Land Use Code, the applicant is providing onsite affordable housing mitigation in the form of Category 2 rental units. A referral from APCHA is included as Exhibit B. AFFORDABLE MOUSING CREDITS The project mitigates for 4.75 FTEs where 3.3 FTEs are required. Affordable housing credits for the studio unit— 1.25 FTEs at Category 2 - are proposed as non-mitigation units. The ability to apply to establish affordable housing credits requires an amendment to the PUD and Subdivision approval at City Council. Staff finds that the review criteria listed in Exhibit B are met conditioned upon City Council amending Ordinance #51, Series of 2013 to allow housing credits to be apart of the Hotel Aspen PUD/Subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the project, with the following conditions: PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution # , Series 2014, approving Growth Management Reviews for the Hotel Aspen project located at 110 West Main Street." Attachments: Exhibit A—Growth Management Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit B—Establishment of Affordable Housing Credits Review Criteria, Staff Findings Exhibit C -Referral comments from APCHA Exhibit D - Application Page 4 of 4 Hotel Aspen— 110 W. Main St. GMQS Memo P17 RESOLUTION N0. (SERIES OF 2014) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION GRANTING GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOTMENTS AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING CREDITS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 110 WEST MAIN STREET, HOTEL ASPEN CONDOMINIUMS, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN,,PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel ID: 2735-124-61-800 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Garmisch Lodging LLC represented by Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. requesting approval of a redevelopment of the existing lodge; and, WHEREAS, the property is zoned Mixed Use (MU), Medium Density Residential (R-6), Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP) and Main Street Historic District Overlay; and, WHEREAS, the property is partially located within the Main Street Historic District and is not considered a contributing building to the integrity of the Historic District; and WHEREAS, on April 24, 2013, the Historic Preservation Commission granted Conceptual Commercial Design Review and Conceptual Major Development Review approval via Resolution#14, Series of 2013; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2014; the Aspen City Council granted Planned Unit Development, Subdivision, and Rezoning approvals via Ordinance #51, Series of 2013; and WHEREAS, upon review of the growth management application and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended. approval of the application; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on April 15, 2014, the Planning and Zoning Commission by a vote of , approved growth management allotments as specified herein; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director,the applicable referral agencies, and has taken and considered public comment; and, Resolution No_, Series 2014 Hotel Aspen Pagel of 5 P18 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO THAT: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission grants the following allotments from the 2014 annual limits: 18 lodging pillows for 9 new lodge rooms 3 free market residential units 3 affordable housing units The project is subject to all conditions included in Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) Resolution #14, Series of 2013, and City Council Ordinance #51, Series of 2013, and requires Final Commercial Design, and Final Major Development approval prior to the issuance of a development order. Section 2: Affordable Housing 3 affordable housing rental units at Category 2 are approved as follows: Unit type Proposed net livable FTEs housed area 1-bedroom 603 1.75 1-bedroom 643 1.75 Studio 401 1.25 TOTALS 1,647 sf 4.75 Rental Unit: 1. The deed restriction shall require that all tenants are approved PRIOR to tenancy through APCHA and must re-qualify every two years. If the tenants work specifically for the Hotel Aspen, the income and assets shall be waived; however, the rental rate charged cannot exceed the Category 2 maximum rental rate stated in the Guidelines. 2. The units shall be classified no higher than Category 2. 3. Owner and APCHA stipulate and agree that, in accordance with CRS 38-12- 301(1)(a) and (b), this Deed Restriction constitutes a voluntary agreement and deed restriction to limit rent on the property subject hereto and to otherwise Resolution No_, Series 2014 Hotel Aspen Page 2 of 5 P19 provide affordable housing stock. Owner waives any right it may have to claim that the Deed Restriction violates CRS 38-12-301. 4. The rental deed restriction will be recorded with the following conditions: a. The use and occupancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit shall henceforth be limited exclusively to housing for employees and their families who are employed in Pitkin County and who meet the definition of"qualified Category 2 employee" as that term is defined by the qualification guidelines established and indexed by the Authority on an annual basis. The Owner shall have the right to lease the Employee Dwelling Unit to a"qualified Category 2 employee"of his own selection. b. The Employee Dwelling Unit shall not be occupied by the Owner or members of the immediate family ("Immediate Family" shall mean a person related by blood or marriage who is a first cousin [or closer relative]and his or her children),unless the family member is a qualified employee and obtains approval by APCHA prior to occupancy. The unit shall at no time be used as a guesthouse or guest facility. C. Written verification of employment of employee(s) proposed to reside in the Employee Dwelling Unit shall be completed and filed with the Authority by the Owner of the Employee Dwelling Unit prior to occupancy thereof, and such verification must be acceptable to the Authority. d. The maximum rental rate shall not exceed the Category 2,studio or one-bedroom rental rates as set forth in the Rental Guidelines established by the Authority and may be adjusted annually as set forth by the Guidelines. The maximum permitted rent for the unit on the date of execution of this deed restriction as stated in the Guidelines at the time the deed-restriction is recorded. Rent shall be verified and approved by the Authority upon submission and approval of the lease. Employees shall be qualified by the Authority as to employment, maximum income and asset limitations on a yearly basis. The signed lease must be provided to APCHA. e. The Unit must meet minimum occupancy;i.e.,one person per bedroom. f. Owner agrees to provide to APCHA upon request all information reasonably necessary to determine if there is full compliance with this Agreement. g. In the event that APCHA has reasonable cause to believe the Owner and/or tenant is violating the provisions of this Agreement, the APCHA, by its authorized representative, may inspect the Property or Affordable Housing Unit between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, after providing the Owner with no less than 24 hours' written notice. h. The APCHA, in the event a violation of this Agreement is discovered,shall send a notice of violation to the Owner and/or tenant, as may be applicable, detailing the nature of the violation and allowing the Owner or tenant fifteen(15)days to cure. Said notice shall state that the Owner or tenant may request a quasi-judicial hearing before the APCHA Board pursuant to the Grievance Procedures of the APCHA Guidelines within fifteen (15)days to determine the merits of.the allegations. If no hearing is requested and the violation is not cured within the fifteen(15)day period,the Owner or tenant shall be considered in violation of this Agreement. If a hearing is held before the APCHA Board, the decision of the APCHA Board based on the record of such hearing shall be final for the purpose of determining if a violation has occurred and for the purpose of judicial review. i. There is hereby reserved to the parties' hereto any and all remedies provided by law for breach of this Agreement or any of its terms. In the event the parties resort to litigation with respect to any or all provisions of this Agreement,the prevailing party shall recover damages and costs,including reasonable attorney's fees. j. In the event an Affordable Housing Unit is leased without compliance herewith, such lease shall be wholly null and void and shall confer no title whatsoever upon the purported tenant. Each and every lease, for all purposes, shall be deemed to include and incorporate by this reference,the covenants herein contained,even without reference therein to this Agreement. Resolution No_, Series 2014 Hotel Aspen Page 3 of 5 P20 k. In the event that the Owner or tenant fails to cure any breach,the APCHA may resort to any and all available legal action, including, but not limited to, specific performance of this Agreement or a mandatory injunction requiring compliance by Owner and/or tenant. 1. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement and any other related document shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law;but if any such provision shall be invalid or prohibited under applicable law,such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or prohibition without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement or other document. m. This Agreement is to be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. n. No claim of waiver,consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be valid against any part hereto except on the basis of a written instrument executed by the parties to this agreement. However, the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted herein shall have the unilateral right to waive such condition. o. The parties to this Agreement agree that any modifications of this Agreement shall be effective only when made in writing signed by both parties and recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County,Colorado. P. The terms and provisions of this Deed Restriction shall constitute covenants running with the title to the Affordable Housing Units as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the Managing Agent, the Association and/or Owner, by the Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Colorado, and by their respective successors and assigns, by any appropriate legal action including, but not limited to, injunction,abatement, or eviction of non-qualified tenants. q. Lease agreements executed for occupancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit shall provide for a rental term of not less than six(6)consecutive months. A signed and executed copy of the lease shall be provided to the Authority by the Owner within ten (10) days of approval of employee(s) for the Employee Dwelling Unit. Upon vacancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit,the Owner is granted forty-five(45)days in which to locate a qualified employee. If an employee is not placed by the Owner,the Authority may rent the Employee Dwelling Unit to a qualified employee. r. When the option to convert any unit to a sale unit is exercised, the owner must adopt a new deed restriction in the form adopted by APCHA that is applicable to sale units. If the units are found to be out of compliance for one year, or the owner requests the units to become ownership units shall comply with APCHA standards. Section 3: Certificate of Occupancy The deed restricted affordable housing units and the lodging portion of the project shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to,or in conjunction with,the free-market residential homes. The deed restriction for the affordable housing units shall be recorded prior to Certificate of Occupancy. Section 4: Affordable Housing Credits The project proposes 4.75 FTEs at Category 2 and is required to mitigate for 3.3 FTEs at Category 4 or lower for the new free market residential component. Affordable housing credits for the onsite studio unit, equal to 1.25 FTEs at Category 2, are hereby approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission with the condition that an amendment to Ordinance #51, Series of 2013 is required to allow affordable housing credits to be included as part of the overall project representations. Resolution No ,Series 2014 Hotel Aspen Page 4 of 5 P21 Section 5• All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein,unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6• This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7• If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate,distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED BY the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Aspen on this th day of , 2014. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Debbie Quinn,Asst. City Attorney LJ Erspamer, Chair ATTEST: Linda Manning,Deputy City Clerk Resolution No Series 2014 Hotel Aspen Page 5 of 5 P22 Exhibit A—Staff Findings, Growth Management 26.470.050. General requirements. B. General requirements: All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1. Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development, pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D. Applications for multi-year development allotment, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Staff Findings: Adequate growth management allotments exist for the request. Staff finds this criterion is met. 18 lodging pillows are available, 3 free market residential dwelling units are available and 3 affordable housing units are available from the current year. 2. The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area, as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. Staff Findings: There are no applicable adopted Master Plans for this property. This is a mixed-use building that includes lodge, residential and commercial uses, which conforms with and is compatible with the uses in the immediate block and the zone district in general. Staff f nds this criterion is met. 3. The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Staff Findings: The development is consistent with the approved PUD plan (City Council Ordinance 51, Series of 2013), and where applicable conforms to the Mixed Use and Lodge Preservation Zone Districts. Staff finds.this criterion is met. 4. The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval, the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval, as applicable. Staff Findings: The proposed development is generally consistent with the lodge portion of the Conceptual Historic Preservation approvals, including Conceptual Design Review. Staff finds this criterion is met. 5. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter, sixty percent (60%) of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development, according to Subsection 26.470.100.A, Employee generation rates, are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at. a lower category Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page l of 7 P23 designation. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. Staff Findings: n/a— the project is subject to mitigation requirements specified below for new lodge development. 6. Affordable housing net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher, shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%) of the additional free-market residential net livable area, for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement ("voluntary units") may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability, including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation, pursuant to Chapter 26.540, such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate, utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. Staff Findings: n/a the project is subject to mitigation requirements specific to free market residential use as part of a lodge project as described below. 7. The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure, or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes, but is not limited to, water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control, fire and police protection, solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services. Staff Findings: The addition of 9 lodge rooms, 3 free market residential units, and affordable housing is mitigated through improvements proposed as part of the project that are specified in the approved City Council Ordinance 51, Series of 2013. Staff finds this criterion is met. 26.470.070. Minor Planning and Zoning Commission applications. 4. Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 2 of 7 P24 a. The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. Staff Findings: An updated APCHA recommendation has been provided. Staff finds this criterion is met. b. Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units. Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits. Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2. If the mitigation requirement is less than one (1) full unit, a cash-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. If the mitigation requirement is one (1) or more units, a cash- in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval, pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3. A Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director, pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate. Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes three affordable housing units at Category 112 as described below. Stafffinds this criterion is met. PROPOSED required AFFORDABLE HOUSING- bedrooms net livable area category APCHA -enerated 1 studio 401 2 400 1.25 1 1-bedroom 643 2 600 1.75 1 1-bedroom 603 2 600 1.75 total: 3 3 1647 4.75 c. Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent (50%) or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade, whichever is higher. This dimensional requirement may be varied through Special Review,Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. Staff Findings: The proposed units are entirely above grade. Staff finds this criterion is met. d. The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as "for sale" units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers, subject to the Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 3 of 7 P25 aforementioned qualifications, with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, as amended. The proposed units may be rental units, including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization, if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units. The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory "for sale" provision. Staff Findings: The applicant proposes to deed restrict the units as Category 2 rental units. APCHA supports the configuration of the onsite affordable housing units; however they find that the project needs to provide more affordable housing mitigation in the form of housing credits for 0.8 FTEs. Staff finds that a referral was provided and that this criterion is met. e. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing. Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation, but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. Staff Findings: The proposed development has an excess of 1.45 FTEs of affordable housing proposed. The applicant requests Housing Credits as described in Exhibit B. 5. Demolition or redevelopment of multi-family housing. The City's neighborhoods have traditionally been comprised of a mix of housing types, including those affordable by its working residents. However, because of Aspen's attractiveness as a resort environment and because of the physical constraints of the upper Roaring Fork Valley, there is constant pressure for the redevelopment of dwellings currently providing resident housing for tourist and second-home use. Such redevelopment results in the displacement of individuals and families who, are an integral part of the Aspen work force. Given the extremely high cost of and demand for market- rate housing, resident housing opportunities for displaced working residents, which are now minimal, will continue to decrease. Preservation of the housing inventory and provision of dispersed housing opportunities in Aspen have been long-standing planning goals of the community. Achievement of these goals will serve to promote a socially and economically balanced community, limit the number of individuals who face a long and sometimes dangerous commute on State Highway 82, reduce the air Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 4 of 7 P26 pollution effects of commuting and prevent exclusion of working residents from the City's neighborhoods. The Aspen Area Community Plan established a goal that affordable housing for working residents be provided by both the public and private sectors. The City and the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority have provided affordable housing both-within and adjacent to the City limits. The private sector has also provided affordable housing. Nevertheless, as a result of the replacement of resident housing with second homes and tourist accommodations and the steady increase in the size of the workforce required to assure the continued viability of Aspen area businesses and the City's tourist-based economy, the City has found it necessary, in concert with other regulations, to adopt limitations on the combining, demolition or conversion of existing multi-family housing in order to minimize the displacement of working residents, to ensure that the private sector maintains its role in the provision of resident housing and to prevent a housing shortfall from occurring. The combining, demolition, conversion or redevelopment of multi-family housing shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on compliance with the following requirements (see definition of demolition.): 2. Requirements for demolishing affordable multi-family housing units: In the event a project proposes to demolish or replace existing deed-restricted affordable housing units, the redevelopment may increase or decrease the number of units, bedrooms or net livable area such that there is no decrease in the total numb_ er of employees housed by the existing units. The overall number of replacement units, unit sizes, bedrooms and category of the units shall be reviewed by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority and a recommendation forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Staff Findings: The project is required to replace the existing number of FTEs currently housing — 2.25 are currently housed on site in a 2-bedroom unit. The applicant is providing 4.75 FTEs onsite. Staff finds that this criterion is met. 26.470.080. Major Planning and Zoning Commission applications. 3. Lodge development. The expansion of an existing lodge or the development of a new lodge shall be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a. If the project contains a minimum of one (1) lodge unit per five hundred (500) square feet of lot area, the following affordable housing mitigation standards shall apply: Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 5 of 7 P27 1) Affordable housing net livable area equaling a percentage, as defined in the unit size table below, of the additional free-market residential net livable area shall be mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. 2) A percentage, as defined in the table below, of the employees generated by the additional lodge, timeshare lodge, exempt timeshare units and associated commercial development, according to Paragraph 26.470.100.A.1, Employee generation, shall be mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. Affordable Net Livable Area Affordable Housing Net Percentage of Employee of Lodge Units Being Added Livable Area Required Generation Requiring the to the Parcel (Percentage of Free Market Provision of Mitigation Net Livable Area) 600 square feet or greater 30% 60% 500 square feet 30% 40% 400 square feet 20% 20% 300 square feet 10% 10% When the average unit size falls between the square-footage categories, the required affordable housing shall be determined by interpolating the above schedule. For example, a lodge project with an average unit size of four hundred fifty (450) square feet shall be required to provide mitigation for thirty percent (30%) of the employees generated. Affordable housing units provided shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4, Affordable housing, and be restricted to a maximum of a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Staff Findings: The project proposes and average lodge unit size of 300 square feet net livable area which falls into the yellow highlighted area of the mitigation chart above. The project is required to provide mitigation equal to 10% of the free market net livable area and 10% of the lodge employee generation. The calculations are as follows: Lode: Mitigate for the additional 9 lodge rooms @ 10% 9 lodge units * 0.3 FTEs=2.7 FTEs generated 2.7 FTEs @ 10%mitigation=0.27 FTEs required mitigation for lodge Free Market Residential: 13,200 sf net livable area/400 sf= 33 FTEs generated 33 FTEs @ 10%mitigation=3.3 FTEs required mitigation for free market residential The applicant is subject to the Land Use Code in place on October 19, 2012, which permits a concurrent calculation for onsite affordable housing as described below: Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 6 of 7 P28 26.470.100.A.6. On-site housing serves multiple affordable housing requirements. Whenever affordable housing is provided on site (with actual units) in order to satisfy one (1) requirement, the same on-site affordable housing may also be used to satisfy any other affordable housing requirement concurrently. For example: A mixed-use project may require two (2) affordable housing units to mitigate an increase in commercial employee generation and two (2) affordable housing units to mitigate free-market residential development. In this case, providing two (2) on-site affordable housing units shall satisfy both requirements concurrently. Whenever required affordable housing is provided by means other than on-site provision, such housing, or payment in lieu thereof, shall accrue consecutively to individual requirements and shall not serve requirements concurrently. In the above example, provision of four (4) units would be required. Staff Findings: Staff finds that the application is required to mitigate for 3.3 FTEs onsite as described below. 4.75 FTEs are provided onsite. Staff finds that the review criterion is met. 0.27 FTEs required mitigation for lodge 3.3 FTEs required mitigation for free market residential 2.25 FTEs required mitigation for affordable housing The project is required to provide 3.3 FTEs onsite—the largest of the mitigation requirements listed above. Exhibit A Hotel Aspen Growth Management Page 7 of 7 P29 Exhibit B—Staff Findings,Affordable Housing Credits 26.540.070 Review criteria for establishing an affordable housing credit An Affordable Housing Credit may be established by the Planning and Zoning Commission if all of the following criteria are met. The proposed units do not need to be constructed prior to this review. A. The proposed affordable housing unit(s) comply with the review standards of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). Staff Findings: Staff finds that the review criteria listed in Section 26.470.070.4 a-d are met as described in Exhibit A. B. The affordable housing unit(s) are not an obligation of a Development Order and are not otherwise required by this Title to mitigate the impacts of development. Staff Findings: The applicant did not represent an intention to apply for housing credits for the excess FTEs mitigated onsite. A Development Order has not been granted for this project; however the representations made to City Council require an amendment to Ordinance #51, Series of 2013 to clarify that housing credits may be applied to this project. Exhibit B Hotel Aspen Housing Credits Page 1 of 1 P30 MEMORANDUM TO: Sara Adams, Community Development Department FROM: Cindy Christensen,APCHA Operations Manager DATE: March 31,2014 RE: Redevelopment of 110 West Main Street(Hotel Aspen) ISSUE: The applicant is seeking approval for the redevelopment of the Hotel Aspen property located at 110 West Main Street. BACKGROUND: The proposed project would reconfigure most of the existing lodge units to an average size of 292 square feet, along with the construction of two duplex units (four,new free- market residential units). The addition of small lodge units is a goal of the Aspen Area Community Plan as well as a priority of City Council. The project will increase the number of lodge rooms from 45 units to 54 units, as well as provide 4 new free-market residential units, organized as two duplexes. The Hotel Aspen currently contains a Category 2 two-bedroom deed- restricted unit, mitigating for 2.25 FTE's. The redevelopment of the project will eliminate the existing two-bedroom unit. The redevelopment is proposed to include three affordable housing units— 1 studio and 2 one-bedroom units, providing mitigation for 4.75 FTE's; therefore,the new units would provide mitigation for an additional 2.50 FTE's. DISCUSSION: APCHA's referral will be based strictly on the required mitigation for the redevelopment. The required mitigation is as follows: • Additional 9 lodge units requires mitigation of 0.27 FTE's (9 X .3 FTE's X 10% = 0.27 FTE). • New.Free-Market residential net livable of 13,200 sf requires mitigation of 3.3 FTE's (13,200 X 10%-400 =3.3 FTE's). • Replacement of existing AH two-bedroom unit=2.25 FTE's. Mitigation is required at the largest requirement; however, the loss of the existing two-bedroom unit is for the existing development and must be replaced as well; therefore,the mitigation required for this development is 3.3 +2.25 =5.55 FTE's. Proposed Affordable Housing Units: The proposal is to add three on-site mitigation units—one studio and two one-bedroom units—for a total of 4.75 FTE's (1.25 FTE for the Studio and 1.75 per each One-Bedroom). The studio is proposed at 401 square feet net livable and the one bedroom units at 603 and 642 square feet net Hotel Aspen Land Use Referral Page 1 P31 livable. All of the units are proposed at the Category 2 level. The current minimum square footages for newly deed'restricted units according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Affordable Housing Guidelines for a Category 1 and 2 studio is 400 square feet and 600 square feet for a one-bedroom; therefore,the proposed units meet the minimum requirements as stated in the Guidelines. Total Mitigation: Under the Land Use Code, as stated below, the total mitigation required for the redevelopment of the Hotel Aspen property is 3.33 FTE's;however, APCHA Staff believes that the elimination of the existing two-bedroom unit at 2.25 FTE's (which was required for the existing development) requires replacement since the existing development is not going away; therefore, APCHA Staff requests that mitigation be required at 5.55 FTE's— 3.3 + 2.25. The three additional units provide mitigation for 4.75 FTE's leaving a deficit of.8 FTE's. Section 26.470.100.A.6. On-site housing serves multiple affordable housing requirements. Whenever affordable housing is provided on site (with actual units) in order to satisfy one (1) requirement, the same on-site affordable housing may also be used to satisfy any other affordable housing requirement concurrently. For example: A mixed-use project may require two (2) affordable housing units to mitigate an increase in commercial employee generation and two (2) affordable housing units to mitigate free-market residential development. In this case, providing two (2) on-site affordable housing units shall satisfy both requirements concurrently. Whenever required affordable housing is provided by means other than on-site provision, such housing, or payment in lieu thereof, shall accrue consecutively to individual requirements and shall not serve requirements concurrently. In the above example,provision of four(4) units would be required. RECOMMENDATION. Based on the Land Use Code APCHA recommends approval of the redevelopment of the Hotel Aspen property if affordable housing is mitigated at 5.5 FTE's. APCHA recommends that the deficit be satisfied by the purchase of Affordable Housing Credits at Category 2 or by providing additional on-site housing. APCHA does not recommend satisfying the deficit via a fee-in-lieu. The deed restricted units shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy prior to,or in conjunction with,the addition of the lodge rooms and/or the free-market homes. The deed restriction shall be recorded . PRIOR to Certificate of Occupancy. Rental Unit: 1. The deed restriction shall require that all tenants are approved PRIOR to tenancy through APCHA and must re-qualify every two years. If the tenants work specifically for the Hotel Aspen, the income and assets shall be waived; however, the rental rate charged cannot exceed the Category 2 maximum rental rate stated in the Guidelines. 2. The units shall be classified no higher than Category 2. Hotel Aspen Land Use Referral Page 2 P32 ' 3. Owner and APCHA stipulate and agree that, in accordance with CRS 38-12-301(1)(a) and (b), this Deed Restriction constitutes a voluntary agreement and deed restriction to limit rent on the property subject hereto and to otherwise provide affordable housing stock. Owner waives any right it may have to claim that the Deed Restriction violates CRS 38-12-301. 4. The rental deed restriction will be recorded with the.following conditions: a. The use and occupancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit shall henceforth be limited exclusively to housing for employees and their families who are employed in Pitkin County and who meet the definition of"qualified Category'2 employee" as that term is defined by the qualification guidelines established and indexed by the Authority on an annual basis. The Owner shall have the right to lease the Employee Dwelling Unit to a"qualified Category 2 employee"of his own selection. b. The Employee Dwelling Unit shall not be occupied by the Owner or members of the immediate family("Immediate Family" shall mean a person related by blood or marriage who is a first cousin[or closer relative] and his or her children),unless the family member is a qualified employee and obtains approval by APCHA prior to occupancy. The unit shall at no time be used as a guesthouse or guest facility. C. Written verification of employment of employee(s)proposed to reside in the Employee Dwelling Unit shall be completed and filed with the Authority by the Owner of the Employee Dwelling Unit prior to occupancy thereof,and such verification must be acceptable to the Authority. d. The maximum rental rate shall not exceed the Category 2, studio or one-bedroom rental rates as set forth in the Rental Guidelines established by the Authority and may be adjusted annually as set forth by the Guidelines. The maximum permitted rent for the unit on the date of execution of this deed restriction as stated in the Guidelines at the time the deed-restriction is recorded. Rent shall be verified and approved by the Authority upon submission and approval of the lease. Employees shall be qualified by the Authority as to employment, maximum income and asset limitations on a yearly basis. The signed lease must be provided to APCHA. e. The Unit must meet minimum occupancy;i.e.,one person per bedroom. f. Owner agrees to provide to APCHA upon request all information reasonably necessary to determine if there is full compliance with this Agreement. g. In the event that APCHA has reasonable cause to believe the Owner and/or tenant is violating the provisions of this Agreement,the APCHA,by its authorized representative,may inspect the Property or Affordable Housing Unit between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, after providing the Owner with no less than 24 hours'written notice. h. The APCHA, in the event a violation of this Agreement is discovered,shall send a notice of violation to the Owner and/or tenant, as may be applicable, detailing the nature of the violation and allowing the Owner or tenant fifteen (15) days to cure. Said notice shall state that the Owner or tenant may request a quasi-judicial hearing before the APCHA Board pursuant to the Grievance Procedures of the APCHA Guidelines within fifteen (15) days to determine the merits of the allegations. If no hearing is requested and the violation is not cured within the fifteen (15) day period, the Owner or tenant shall be considered in violation of this Agreement. If a hearing is held before the APCHA Board, the decision of the APCHA Board based on the record of such hearing shall be final for the purpose of determining if a violation has occurred and for the purpose of judicial review. Hotel Aspen Land Use Referral Page 3 P33 i. There is hereby reserved to the parties'hereto any and all remedies provided by law for breach of this Agreement or any of its terms. In the event the parties resort to litigation with respect to any or all provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover damages and costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. j. In the event an Affordable Housing Unit is leased without compliance herewith, such lease shall be wholly null and void and shall confer no title whatsoever upon the purported tenant. Each and every lease, for all purposes, shall be deemed to include and incorporate by this reference, the covenants herein contained,even without reference therein to this Agreement. k. In the event that the Owner or tenant fails to cure any breach,the APCHA may resort to any and all available legal action, including, but not limited to, specific performance of this Agreement or a mandatory injunction requiring compliance by Owner and/or tenant. 1. Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement and any other related document shall be interpreted in such a manner as to be valid under applicable law; but if any such provision shall be invalid or prohibited under applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective to the extent of such invalidity or prohibition without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement or other document. M. This Agreement is to be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. n. No claim of waiver, consent or acquiescence with respect to any provision of this Agreement shall be valid against any part hereto except on the basis of a written instrument executed by the parties to this agreement. However, the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted herein shall have the unilateral right to waive such condition. o. The parties to this Agreement agree that any modifications of this Agreement shall be effective only when made in writing signed by both parties and recorded with the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County,Colorado. p. The terms and provisions of this Deed Restriction shall constitute covenants running with the title to the Affordable Housing Units as a burden thereon for the benefit of, and shall be specifically enforceable by, the Managing Agent, the Association and/or Owner, by the Housing Authority, the City of Aspen, Colorado, and by their respective successors and assigns, by any appropriate legal action including,but not limited to,injunction,abatement,or eviction of non-qualified tenants. q. Lease agreements executed for occupancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit shall provide for a rental term of not less than six (6) consecutive months. A signed.and executed copy of the lease shall be provided to the Authority by the Owner within ten (10) days of approval of employee(s).for the Employee Dwelling Unit. Upon vacancy of the Employee Dwelling Unit,the Owner is granted forty- five(45)days in which to locate a qualified employee. If an employee is not placed by the Owner,the Authority may rent the Employee Dwelling Unit to a qualified employee. r. When the option to convert any unit to a sale unit is exercised, the owner must adopt a new deed restriction in the form adopted by APCHA that is applicable to sale units. If the units are found to be out of compliance for one year, or the owner requests the units to become ownership units,the following shall apply: Sales Unit: 1. The units shall be an ownership unit and sold through the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority lottery system. Hotel Aspen Land Use Referral Page 4 P34 2. The units shall be classified as Category 2. 3. The condominium documents shall reflect that any common area maintenance shall be assessed based on the actual values of the free-market homes versus the deed-restricted units. Any property management fees or other fees associated with the commercial or free-market aspect of the property shall not be charged to the deed-restricted owner. The condominium documents shall be reviewed and approved by APCHA prior to Certificate of Occupancy to include language in the event the deed-restricted units revert to ownership units. The goal is to protect the affordable housing units from excessive monthly and/or special assessments having to do with luxury items and/or expensive modifications. Hotel Aspen Land Use Referral Page 5 bi+ B Aspen Club PUD Amendment Introduction Over the course of the past few months the Aspen Club team has been working to further refine the grading plans associated with the PUD. The result of this further refinement has been a better understanding of the site grading and any associated impacts on the PUD approval. In each instance the grading has been refined in a way that enables the project to maintain consistency with the prior PUD approvals, including but not limited to the Commercial Design Review for the project. Floor Area The Aspen Club PUD contains a parking structure that is adjacent to the west and northwest portions of the Club building. This parking structure has a lower and at grade level. The lower level of the structure is connected to the lower level of the Club building. In the event that there are portions of a structure that are partially exposed due to site grading,Floor Area calculations within the Land Use Code require a highly technical analysis of the ratio of exposed portion of the structure to the buried portion of the structure. In the further refinement of the site grading for the Aspen Club PUD it was determined that having a larger portion of the lower level of the parking garage exposed on the north face was preferable to introducing additional site walls and creating a less natural environment. The unintended consequence of this decision required a recalculation of the Floor Area of the lower level of the Club (this is a recalculation/allocation only). This recalculation is based upon the exact same footprint and mass of the Club building,but factors in the additional partially exposed area of the lower level of the garage. Because this partially exposed area increased, the mathematical calculation of the Floor Area on the lower level increased. The attached Exhibit 1 compares the current calculation of Floor Area to the previous calculation of Floor Area. Again, it is important to emphasize that this is a mathematical calculation and the overall bulk and mass of the Club building is consistent with all of the prior approvals. Site Grading/Walls—Eastern Propertv Line The site plan for the Aspen Club PUD was approved with specific locations of buildings and specific setback requirements. As a part of the further site grading and detailed design, it has been discovered that in order to meet the parameters of the approved site plan it is necessary to grade areas within the setback on the eastern property line. In dealing with setbacks and site grading, the Land Use Code does not allow changes of grade within the setback of greater than 30". The reason for this is that there would be a requirement for a site retaining wall and site retaining walls are considered structures for purposes of the setback requirements. Once again, more detailed site design, grading and drainage analysis have revealed the need for changing the grade greater than 30"and the installation of site retaining walls in limited areas along the eastern 1 property line in order to maintain the approved site plan within the PUD. The attached Exhibit 2 shows the areas along the eastern property boundary where these site walls occur. Included in this exhibit are sections to illustrate the grading and walls that are necessary in this area. Once again, it is important to emphasize that this is a change in the grading in this area and the site plan is in conformance with the approved Aspen Club PUD. 2 poss y� ARCNI'[ECURE+PLANNING 1,3 Mk 'ice+ a .! a,N NW-61RAW THE UYhB N611 � ff5❑fl Miff f•ifEi u•n iaE000O uui 4` til vi0i f3f f1>f 111 f%v l9iv i ',: CmsuRfal iC ..2•. �s GONDOLA $RYNO?EL ,. ASPEN ALPSr a. „A. EHE uANT E= z ASPEN CLUB A.-PrN CCCLD LAS ROAD 2 S d E 0 o NORTH SHEET,FU VICINCiY MAP g ASPEN CLUB n, VICINITY MAP MAP �A 1 0 2010 50' 100, 2CO' i , vo,f..:e• d� iffy IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT/TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF: THE ASPEN CLUB A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW14 OF SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADOr SHEET 1 OF 3 "' 3 •.' ! gi J, a -43 4 -MART RODES K a•W4i((2�I\ - l• \ - ",'+•A?w t'{��R�dM4 t ) .;.I 1 U�EI T4.NE 0 TM R3in 21) LOT (27377013 PAN7HERA LLV P 4 NARAS BLVD 10-W7 100 YEM f0G�'05-E 165.6/• II 17 WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT,/ OF WCY4.f'YT.p ACCESS EASEMENT SK 478 PC]861 s GB c ``�i0\ •� //'/ !)1 f lI.\ 1'r��f�'y��•�311��6 , ��f,' r \ �f _- y1 B,• \- - CENTERLINE 20'WIDE M1\ )L A ff k1 EwsnNG RIVERSIDE 1 �, ��-•1� ° ^5 `kc 7 / t I \II DITCH,FINAL PLAT AND ( .L f• ""� � � SUED/VISION \-� FOUND REBSRP "4,�' \` \.-• \ fir/ / 77 ^` ,\ b / ,`�� \-` \ .`\ LOT 1'/ ASPEN CLUB L LAKE 11RD fi816 (273719131801) Id WIDE UNDEFGROUND, \ r -® pp -•C.Epj�NEa$EMENrp � �\� s'o �\ �\ '`e:' RICH SAM LINE 7V WIDE UNDERGROEN° {., \� "✓O�O r\ `� \ �1 �• ��'�'+J`� �!{�� '��A � fi+ 1 ! GRAVEL-il •/ TELEPHONE EASEMENT Q / -��+:__y\ ��� °"o•.�k c"A .�\\\ .� :1 o Y\��i �.i \m \ t:�pfil I f�}..)a .�\I� �b 11% LOT 16 1 PONDER HOUSE CONDO ASSOC \„` 1260 TE U AVE/18 \ `j \,. __ r IFIITY MAP ASP ,CO 81811 I I / -- - A. (2737EN18158800 _�_____�__--.".�.-.�. —.-.'•_.�_' t'.2oo0 , _ \'WADE Pu9uc unuTr EASEMENT, FOUND'X'TOP OF SAND FOUND RE&1R k CAP J'/ _..nr .� ._ __�� OF THE ASPEN CLUB CONDOVWNMS RE86748 M'w STONE ROCK CORNER No.9 RIVERSIDE PLACER M.S.3905 ! . / l) \...,\ •\ .\ __________—______________ LINE 9-1 RIVERSIDE PLACER M.S.J905 A.M. \ 4303 �`�\\\ FOUND 1954 BEM BRASS CAP CORNER Na.I RIVERSIDE PLACER qk M.S 13805 UTILITY EASEMENT,AMENDED FINAL PLAT % ., •,.'\ r DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION SK 6 PG 16 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION t)TTLTTY EASEMENTS --a-��~'-\. =•:Y`'.�� ' j I per FINAL PLAT ontl DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REC/183889 5'UTILITY EASEMENT,AMENDED FINAL PLAT /�// \ �• - .� Parcel A: UTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION �!"- \ BOUND EASEMENTS SHALL BE 10 FEET IN WIDTH ALONG ALL BK 6 PG 16 �, ...�i= rm9N5iaR Lot 15,9 1976 in Plat Bo SUBDIVISION,according to the maps thereof recorded BOUNDARY LINES OF THE SUBDIVISION AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON ` May 1B, a 18 in Plat Hook 6 at page 7,August 17, I977 in Plat Hook EACH SIDE OF EACH INTERIOR LOT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE 5.00'UTILITY EASEMENT,AMENDED FINAL PUT / _ - _ COURT 8 et Page I8. NOTED. AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION I /�- _-_ ,y,•/. SURVOACHMENTL COUNTY OF PITKIN SK 6 PC 16 / R.CARMI HAEi STATE OF COLORADO 0 UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR EXISTING UTIL=S EXCEPTING WATER l k I (EXCEPTION 15) LINES SHALL BE 10 FEET IN WIDTH LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE 10. / ✓'"'�� / z 'ems.. OF THE CENTERLINE OF EACH UTILITY AS BUILT AND NOTES CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN HEREON EXCEPT FOR THOSE UTILITIES 1) Date of Survey: July-August 2004, March 2009. WHICH ARE TO BE ABANDONED AS SHOWN AND NOTED HEREON. /HEATER UNIT Updated January-March 2013. (P UTI1JTY EASEMENTS FOR PROPOSED & EXISTING UTILITIES, SEWER AND WATER, SHALL BE 20 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING 10 FEET ON '1� RI y'�gi`Ll• 2) Date of Preparation: July-August 2004, March 2009. EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SA UTILITIES AS Updated November 2013. CONSTRUCTED. (SEE SHEET No.2) ,•\ "� / _„ter--� 3) Basis of Bearing: A bearing of N 74'14'05”W between the TRAD.EASEMENTS CANOPY found 1998 City of Aspen Control Street Monuments per FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REC/183889 LOT" located at the Hopkins and Garmisch and Hopkins and 215,234 sq.1L OR 4.841 o<roe) Galena street intersection. This established a Project 0 THE MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL AS SHOWN ON SHEET 3 SHALL HAVE ♦ `� _�. THE ASPEN CLUB& SPA LLC G / Bearing Base of N 88'18'29"W between the found 1964 BLM AN EASEMENT WIDTH OF 14 FEET LYING 7 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF F•• r 1430 CRYSTAL LAKE ROAD / Breast Cap monumenting Corner No. 1 Riverside Placer and THE CENTERLINE OF SAID TRAIL AS CONSTRUCTED. ASPEN CO,81611 'I the found sandstone Monumenting corner No. 9 Riverside �•i \-; ' (273718132019) LOT Placer. EASEMENTS `�� ,• / > FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT,FINAL L.[/I 5 AMENDED FINAL PLAT and DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SIIBOINSION REC 96746 • �.�PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN STILLWATER RANCH 4) Basis of Survey: The 1999 City of Aspen/Drexel Barrell per n CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION BK S \��, �'•Qg_ /j PG 7 �IVISI�/� Control Survey Plat, the recorded Callahan Subdivision (5) DO HEREBY GRANT TO THE PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR PUBLIC GAB` \ BURGESS JOHN K&ELIZABETH Plat, various documents of record and the found survey UTILITY PURPOSES THE TEN (10) FOOT EASEMENTS ALONG ALL 700 LITE AVE 5202 monuments, as shown. BOUNDARY LINES OF THE INTERIOR LOT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE ASPEN,CO 81611 SHOWN AND NOTED HEREON; THE EASEMENTS FOR EXISTING �t1 f FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT,FINAL l (273718408805) 5) This survey does not constitute a title search by Sopris UTILITIES AS SHOWN AND NOTED HEREON; THE PUBLIC UTILITY \ ./ PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Engineering, LLC (SE) to determine ownership or easements EASEMENT; THE WATER LINE EASEMENTS "A'AND "B THE CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION OK 5 10'UTILITY EASEMENT,AMENDED FINAL PLAT of record. For all information regarding easements, rights TRANSFORMER EASEMENTS A"AND "B", AND THE 15 FOOT WIDE PC 7 AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION of way and/or title of record, SE relied upon the above SEWER EASEMENT AS SHOWN AND NOTED HEREON; SK 6 PG 16 said plats described in note 4 and the Title Commitment AMENDED,EASEMENT ' prepared ffective date September County Title 2013.c. Case No. PCT23547P4 °E't•ELLOP PUT e CALLAHAN SUB T PUN 1 (E 6 Basis o1 elevation: The 1998 City [ en Drexel Barrel BK 6 P D1T.. � l CPS 18(14)E-SIDE OF HWY ) y � IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT CERTIFICATE 44 �. °1s control datum, which is based on an elevation of 7720.88' A OF SUSelA7ECY 60.J' •G �4P � \+'. Nw OF BussroP AT (NAND 1998) on the NGS station 5-159". This established 0f,+•q �� ♦ MCSKIMMING RD two site benchmarks, as shown on page 1. 1 hereby state that this improvement survey plat was prepared j'4D ``\ \'+� `� ( a by Sopris Engineering, LLC (SE) for Aspen Club & Spa LLC, A / ib 7) Contour Interval: One (1) foot. Colorado Limited Liability Company and Pitkin County Title, UrE Inc.. `tea l A 8) 100 Year Flood Plain Boundary is Based on F.E.M.A. Panel No. 0809700204 C Dated June 4, 1987 I furthermore state that the improvements on the above i \ described parcel on this date, March 12. 2013, except utility % 9) Agreement for maintenance between Aspen Club Spa LLC connections are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel CPS 19(14)CENTERLINE OF HWY and Holy Cross Electric Association is recorded as except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the 82 AND ROARING FORK DR Reception 408796 Pitkin Count Records described p /{ Y premises by improvements on any adjoining J / ! premises, except as indicated, and that there is no apparent GRAPHIC SCALE ! SET PK NAIL WASHER evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any L.S.128463 part of said parcel, except ed. I furthermore state that MENT this property is subject na, restrictions, covenants and easements of reco i I furthermore state, the �(Q7 ) ,,/ (APPRO)TA( AREA) SO RIS ENGINEERING - LLC positional 1:15,000. Be ��t-of tht ey odes not exceed I inch= 40 It ! CIVIL CONSULTANTS U'g 3 p o . i AVE R.O.W.&CUL-DE-SAC -_-__-__-__-!J:1 WATER RANCH 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTICE. ACCORDING TO CDL CT I UHI Ydl MUST ININ EIHR ANY LEGAL /� / \' SUBDIVISION/P.UD.BK 35 PC 66 ACTON BASm UPON ANY DEJECT D THIS SURVEY E—T THREE NEARS / %J, r j/ ,�,.- CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 Mark S. Bee er AFTER YW RRSi DISCOVER$UCH DEFECT. eJ O EVENT MAY ANY ACTON BASED UPON NVY DEFECT IN 1H15 SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN \ ,�,\ I (970) 704-0311 YEARS FROM tNE GATE OF CERTFICATON SNOHN HEREON. •' 28128 2013-I1-22 28128E%-CON'02.D IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT/TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF: _ " THE ASPEN CLUB��_ ' EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NWY'4 OF SECTION 14 m EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE w ou EXISTING OVERHEAD URURES E TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. ® EXISTING WATER MANHOLE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES EXISTING DRAINAGE MANHOLE —of of— EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO ® EX STING SEWER MANHOLE =ue «t— EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE \ \ EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC E XIS!G UUIL WIRE SHEET 2 OF 3 O EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ``'�:: - - 0 EI(ISTNG GUYfn MANHOLE —w° w°— 12'WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT OF 1 \ `\ .¢. EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING SEWER ACCESS EASEMENT BN 478 681 :\�� `\ /'< �c' EXISRNG WATER EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT —u9u9— EXISTING GAS `\`�\` `\ � � EXISTING WATER VALVE —ateele— EXISTING COMMON TRENCH / `\ `\�`\ /,< YJ EXISTING CURB STOP EXISTING TIE RETAINING WALL , EXISTING GAS METER p \ EXISTING ROCK RETAINING WALL lG0 TE,7R-EI.00D PLAke m EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER — o— EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE / I \ ,_ � EXISTING ELECTRIC METER p o— EXISRNG WOOD FENCE -1 _ -------- \ i D ----- -_---- ----_� II,4�`\`f\ \ Y��` \��' m EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL _ x- _ JJJJ - EXISTING MRE FENCE --- '-_-- -' � �--- \ - - `� EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL �y. � CENTERLINE 20'W10E EXISRNG ' `\ \ �a RIVERSIDE DITCH.FINAL PLAT AND m EXISRNG ELECTRIC SERVICE (D EXISTING BOULDER `, `- '---f---- MOOD FENCE t RA6.ROAD 1]E RETABNNG �\ DE1•ELOPMEN7 PLAN CALLAHAN �'�--`_ -— ;_ —__—__—_ ''L . k7• `\ �T�, �' �Ui ISION REC/18JBBS 0 EXISRNG TELEPHONE SERVICE EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT -STING DECIOUWS TREE \h \ (REDUCED BY 1/2 FOR CLARITY) �{ :• :( - ) \`\ f �"6o-G `.</' •� \, \ EXISTING LIGHT POLE �'riC' - '_ \� / 'O�Qn �' `\ `\ •.\ ` v EXISTING SIGN ^�yyy�} Z.,JD "'� ���•C 'y''° /4"M;'r E RAC7T EXISRNG ASPEN zr.'• \� •'e' A ,;fi. � J \ HIGH WATER LINE fI1 �' -\ " ®a EXISTING GAS MARKER (REDUCED BY 1/2 FOR CLARITY) \ Y 0' 1 / - 7 _*'• ?B y;,r FrE.\ -.fr/ b;'I \ -. \ "\ �c' A \ �Y. EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX * EXISTING CONIFER TREE �/ / \ \ \` ``\ • EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX (REDUCED BY 1/2 FOR CLARITY) <r?�• _'\Y-b rs`79� •AJ r- ). \.`\ \\\\ 7 •( / �\ EXISTING BUSH \ \ �xrs RLV>=A1MLNC w °'_z� loq \� ``\ .\ n °�'.,o,Q� �O� \ '\ �\ `�\ (..✓ RETAIN O `\ EXISTING EDGE OF VcGETARON 1." TERL6E a • ` R� 6tr ar PATH wAU y, \ \\ GENERAL UTILITY NOTE: THE LOCATIONS OF PLOTTED BASED ON UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE N/BEENN �I f._. @ X•g+, , f.. ' ��` AfHxYA rs - \ •.�\ ` �`� ./ `,� \ ,'\ ��\\ PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY UTILITY COMPANIES AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE 1 T ••. i >•m u x; \`' \`� \ ,`� \� `'\\� UTILITIES,AS SHOWN. MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD \ CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR •- `� +•>�`• Nk ? '�" �\ \ TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. \`` \'< ' EXTERIOR WALL B.ARINGS: -x x1z41'0e"E W-E S7T38'52"E GRAVEL PARKING YDCHT CPP a q, �L.e ;p,T �. xY0' FA7L..ROAO' � \�� � • \ / r I r ary r r �\ •xzs• d 6?;ra23 � � �.Y4��,,�. �1�,y �� { � .°+ ti� a T^. LlcHr 7BBS ��°z �q,�'.:. �T.D.�tM'A� r•' - F`�: .y`£? r a; d \ ° ;". \ / r2`xso' \I �•::\ ,\ (PERAaROPOSTD A00'U77LIn EASEMENT, DE51 ) ' TEE 0:•'Ri I ')+ Y k.' `-\ T G\ .FC 3 `\ �\\ AMENDED FINAL PLAT I I �} 24;> •'O4rt RA` FOAD``,' .m xlS\ ( 'S•PS g. -,.y. \•� • `�„ .\ej cN.LAHAN"suM O1H9oN~ �o Aae7IE's�R 1� 1� tc9i ..`.�<�.AlRF9+ w" K. V x `\\ \ 60• �'�-�C�\\\� �' BK 6 PG T6 ' ..RI�1N t §z ., �c:. •4P�., `> tiRA L' -.\ / `\ @�, < \, .A,'� eDm. k x'x",' .:�� ..�..`NT:Tt� .:,` it-.`'� .e _ \ \' �G •�-��' \� \. 4""+ •ir - Ty 6.00'UTILITY EASEMENT AMENDED FINAL PLAT AND FIN CALLAHANOPRET PLAN Pi-.8_B4O-.A. �—_....tF t ;�;Kl:X'I. ...-.y-ZA�.y.�r..-)wZ"n�^F...c_.,s Li',Ts!,(•`;.-•,":r„,.a.s..,. '�....-'ti,. f T..-. i -6_xf-I I � µ.,. `V..^� � Y..-". '?R'b r?.-' r' , � � `' I„.�S r ♦ C. \�/. \ i ^'\.. •.�\\� \'A l _r Z";3;':• `•�'.^�1 ._ SUBDIVISION SK 6 PG 16 D a w '•n s•.10•,yo xao - '' b..,,' i' �\ ,k .;0;.. \ �, BRIDGE %\ �\� \\\`!`\\ _-- --—- I �• /� _.ar' L w n< ;zK:Y. .MYh `x�kt; ..s: ...3a, e"sM \' - ;�. r•,a, .\ EX-SEWER MANHOLE _—_- - tt •,•LL E"' •,• yR.,k,5r� ury RAILb RHAD'•1 T, O It6 '� - t B7+ 4 I F.L'I'°'<.. ``_ `\ / // ,`\ `\ ``\ INNRIM 8000.86 Vk' pt _ y' •� at BETN171T(G�__ _ __ ` OUT a=7995.]8 • E a „ „Ag, (' ' ��'—• •�•_• -�-_—_: _- M'V M.i -CI - 7T.aAY p 'i F �' p.�Y 6• Z .. / � B" V 20'WDE SANITARY ® SETEE EASEMENT 1/I VVViiig\\\yL�', 6'x.r o'�+�5,.,ae y .- Y•"al t�i'..: yjfY^;7Qs'{�✓�$,�L,ti '•'VX.�l"° �v;y i�I.T ,Mt'�..•}.y 3.�t U y A f J�^, �i�vte,'.�i._y 2.�.z,s(r -°' �z'y�'.,,•��i+{�Y�'2'i'... T.�"p' .4A r ? ";• I F;.'X a 1'C. \ r W E 0L�E �...•`. \ ` `� �� I.5 IO`'. WDf PUBLIC UTILITY EA MNT , EX--EWER MANHOLE CONDOMINIUM MAP OF THE A57EEN RIM 8001.81 2. CLUB CONDOMNIUMS REC II 96746 NV W7 7991.20 INN °M tn�. fq\ t. >p. 'I '": U77I.ITY EASEMENTS yq 1/ �7999.78 m �+' { I ;�:: -# w, "? 1 T"Fr r° s4 ��" I ss,d A�, �7, ,r'. �.87A ) �r�'Yi�ti;` �^•.. �•t. \\ TN Per FINAL PUT antl DEVLOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REC 183889 /' / / W 4 tC "S• -r 4� " r�. �.�� A �� a.. ...:� F1':. s x w:, y�A I f -7988.62 •., .N, r BOUNDARY UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL U IV FEET IN WIDTH ALONG ALL BOUNDARY LINES OF THE SUBDIVISION LOT ILI AND 5 FEET IN WIDTH ON �s > .+ �• r�.' # c` � •' g •�.� � .° !'".+"'•\�, �^-sy- ;,•�L�tj•q�.niF n� EACH SIDE OF EACH INTERIOR LOT LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE �I Q A X � Yk— } yu r \ A n x k, n.0 n � ,q' �7?•m Ku,++ ..� NOTED. ©UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPTING WATER .e ! _� A +".Tt` a - 3* ;t S• _A,"*'��" S.' ,,,•,,+!AJ "• r +` LINES SHALL BE 10 FEET IN WIDTH LYING 5 FEET ON EACH SIDE y. 4 xC 'a;p.Xx- .� ay ", ` +f\ t .?,q; f. .�• i s7"XR. _�}Cy. ,. tF-_- v; bxIO' '"� i y� T IXEp.! y. „T � �:,! •G 1 ' -,', y�c+�F�: YXS_,' - �a.N � �•. OF HE CENTERLINE OF EACH UTILITY AS BUILT AND CONSTRUCTED � as M,.- e ., 'T,.7..�r; V." - >' - J� c^�• ' "7''3'x. AS SHOWN HEREON EXCEPT FOR THOSE UTILITIES WHICH ARE TO e` • a'e iF' a - A. 5•`, rT x HE ABANDONED AS SHOWN AND NOTED HEREON. u � c .x I o, •� w 0 ( ::. •,,,. .� . ...'. .. x 5+ .r•a q d u `( \ g.... ax �•'' RETNNINC WALL ®UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR PROPOSED &EXISTING UTILITIES, SEWER •.y*-BOIS. �, .-s'i.,s. a'.$a z•z �r f..�"'t t :.�.:•�; . ' 4• BLEAtXaERS AND WATER, SHALL BE 20 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING 10 FEET ON '^.•'/ :: +. _"l� A.,rF= L 4 31T7'1^7s+a. �-�•+.,. - —'___-- _. __.—_ _ _ EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF SAID UTILITIES AS y s y.,AYys�} ,,�g• - ` gs ', ;-„ sn iI ,t ----- - _-_ -- - I CONSTRUCTED. (SEE SHEET No.2) ,,I *ey �Y.r' ..,�01Y t t" ;k�Y�� .,:;}�!!1 �C. -':+:.• •S, `, PATH LqI '.{ A. .--__�_`.1�- �'`k�I ._.y � p.,FINAL PLAT ad DEVELOPMENT PLAN CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION REC/187889 A1N 7 < / 6076.24 1f TM,.+ Ib OQfUAFFTY_' SEI )� • yt'a- <., a,^ -PA �• e• � RA9,RDA0-'R€- —"�-\ '>F„y.�r'yc. 4 :. 6p O THE MULTI-PURPOSE TRAIL AS SHOWN ON SHEET 3 SHALL HAVE AN EASEMENT WIDTH OF 14 4 FEET LYING 7 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF r '.; ,ef_ _ '�80T2B �xI !'-�a + 'X7.40• �.tZ"-�. - --ice •�+,�'L f�.1. :E THE CENTERLINE OF SAID TRAIL AS CONSTRUCTED. ray: ` a < I'.4r'� PA'RILG'�!rt SX1_�.- —.:•BOt^�.72•' I"7.�. 1.10' ra. T T��N�"�_ ,at�� -"� r•. s3s '� S OPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC GRAPHIC SCAL \ ` y PARKfNC.' ...�,?6• �, q A?l .'GA s .scN` D.u'' � � ' vuNTER f $ �y t: i CIVIL CONSULTANTS - - 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL �' f t CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 I inch FEET 0)fl. ACTRI BASED UPON ANY DEFECT N THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS ,^ -`� ` A _r �, ,.ALTS,,: a: f (l SHEET ' OF SUBMITTAL AFTER YOU ORST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTON ......—_ �.�_?CAfJ1ER:�Z�� (970) 704-0311 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN III SURVEY BE COMMENCED..RE THAN lEN 2Bt 28 201]-11-32 ]81 TEE%-COND2.D IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT/TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OF: THE ASPEN CLUB PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE NW/4 OF SECTION 14 � � 4 N • - � .•• - •'• �8003 51 6003 52 � TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 85 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO STDRM SHEET 3 OF 3 ¢ a/ ".:4I4J j REruNNC wAu BLEACHERS_ —— _ 1 'x�R ,A �G' r.•WNE/ - 7AIRS--8009� GENERAL UTILITY NOTE- THE EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES ! ••+F'"3 L T I u.l��r 3'EdI'RrL` �.'� �•. �rq��,g, A`A - --_.r\1 .� — � t LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES HAVE BEEN —011—O1— PLOTTED BASED ON UTILITY RAPS, CONSTRUCTION DESIGN —uu—uu— E%ISTI NC OVERHEAD UTILITIES F y ;a4 <•� ,8076.24 ' ^�-\ PLANS, OTHER INFORMATION PROVIDED BY U COMPANIES S'- •,�+s�,,:• CURB kTN-LICNi �+n �.�, �n _ �AaROArn --�-` _ �`s<ti', p: �AP.B k AND ACTUAL FIELD LOCATIONS IN SOME INSTANCES. THESE —of—at— EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE 5.00'VRUtt EASEMENT; , �..Y^A��,1�j CU7 .. '-tIDF2.e � ---- -_-- ,6x10' � j 30 � IND-x�A(.0—`.._ � ;. I E- A•iP R . UTILITIES, AS SHOWN, MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FIELD —ut ut— EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE AMENDED FlNAL CONDITIONS. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DEVELOPMENT TO CONTACT ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR FIELD LOCATION OF —00-00— EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC caLLAHAN SUBDIVISIONh rl� /77;40 '1a.ss• 1'pgs•. xtlpo,�E �,<^gN+,', "�v� B 4?,', pp i� 68, 2' 4 • L 0B' T5'. ` _ , cS h . UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. —u•—ue— EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC BK 6 PG 16 � } Ba• X0. a ,,�'.','. � ^asy `,L ��. ' �T. EXI F.]('TF.RiOR WALL BEARINGS, STING SEWER T Lr�"ZOSId( tf,. TB". 'a.'. .. ..a 5/' tZ.�`i y 6 y'y.,, ,✓' I EXISTING WATER N AL 4}•-H .L t+"hy" / -'^�LAN_TE1RSi� 1 PLANTER..4 1Y+,y' .4a` p•s S-N N12.41'OB"E \ W W 5.00'VTILITr EASEMENT, -sr y > _ �• �, ,r W-E S7TIB52"E `\, —V9—u9— EXISTING GAS AND EDEYIIOPMENT PUN , �" '9Y5 B�I� T ~ N ,ri�1�f '\ —etc—stc— EXISTING COMMON TRENCH CALLAHAN SUBDIWSION \ EXISTING TIE RETAINING WALL BK 6 PG 16 , f 4, ''�-0t V�. PLANTER RANhS �Vf `\•..\ EXISTING ROCK RETAINING WALL tl s . — •&113 _ o—O— EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE qu 5 ', T ,�O EXISTING WOOD FENCE t'yt LI TH LIGHT , x x— EXISTING WIRE FENCE I ,�j% +� 4 kh• .{lULTJ-STORY WOOD FRAN6'& CONCRETE STRUCTURE Z,=_. v,��_ µTO c SHUT OFF SWITCH \ 'I � ! 8- I FF 8016.35(UPPER) PLANTER ` - \., FLDP \.• •.\ tP '• L7 T'`-T gAq'(ER `� �• � ��, ^ ��. _ 'S �'I�• .�y,pGY :.4Y¢r, iY•M�aA ABC Ids y S7aT0 c 1ybfi k boils a t r �� WALL \ `EX--�•`�WER MANHOLE 'h IN LIGHT v } Y3P'V`A.A q"Twr`�. tfsA:MyeaS "\ Rs4=8018.53 ZS" 'fA�iri„ �"Ypy'1 ' FL I' 2yy'�y�lt�1p1. Y a \ WV OUT'=8007.13 `•\ WV E_`40007.42 LL �\ �11...�. . ��• 24.00' � 70.00' �\ FIRE ACCESS 74.7)' '! / E EASEMENT NtlOD ASEMENT UTILITY UT ROOF PER P / ENCLOSED LAP POOL OVERHANG T /! EXISTING CONDITIONS LEGEND �dTT ASPEN GLUb v 0 ® EXISTING ELECTRIC MANHOLE sIaN� BUILDING \ -,' 8077 � ® EXISTING WATER MANHOLE ® EXISTING DRAINAGE MANHOLE ® EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE ® EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE , `( '! -t.",.�•� �� DWOOD ECK ® EXISTING UTILITY MANHOLE \ j 4 a 0 / DECK A "�, $ sa( FF-8016.62' ao ;� N EXISTING GUY WIRE LOT JARK SUBDIVISION ``\ \ I ,',Mj 4" �:- ,V. O M R0p(\� 1 'II. EXISTING POWER POLE \\. 3,ZV {•A l'' ` EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT ��\ i� N,SIGN )�1.;-\ Y`�f 7 LTO7S.4B �•, `•\ \ .) EXISTING WATER VALVE 'S 6•' '� �'S•j ,;`: "\ \ / ,�RD(;IETAININO.. @ '(f EXISTING CURB SLOP .tA \ �., STOf}AI CRATE-' b J� 'R. I •e 6 1 804 Ta�. FRENCH DRAIN EXISTING GAS METER ``\ � � � EL=8011.28 ® E%1511NC ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 3 s m EXISTING ELECTRIC METER 0.65' STORM INLET I ' '' 10.00'UTILITY EASEMENT, m EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL i AMENDED RIVAL PLA 1 RIM E1EV 802).81' "'� � �� I AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN ® EXISTING CATV PEDESTAL 24.00 FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT. CUP INLET ``\ \ .•�4.,3t � � ,¢ A � F7NAL PUT AND DEVELOPMENT R1M�V I CALLAHAN SUBDIVISION cl SILTED F BK 6 PG,6(EXCEPTION 9) EXISTING ELECTRIC SERVICE T .}'§� STORM INLET '�� Fr' k. 'A ^...WY PLAN CALLAMAN SUED/VISION„ �H01789'l., O EXISTING TELEPHONE SERVICE ` \ L ,i s j+Y �sr nYl{l u rA F RIM ELEV.-8021.03' BK 5 PC 7 / I OLD E EXISTING SEWER CLEANOUT \ L� A: S yR 4 �'° RIM S�V 00.28' FENC CPS 18(N) E # EXISTING OCHT POLE `\vT 4. 'l $}"6"2, 6,WOO rte-' , 0 l (v 82 APPROXIM p� a,.L�w a '-", _ (�J N OF BUSS v EXISTING SIGN "',�q C^ ,.� —� 1\ / �. EXISTING Cps MARKER `\ I M SKIMMING lO.DO' >o, P a t?t. T L Y""`%^ _ x LBAiE-'� ^ - ® EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX R.O.W ``\ RESERVATION 'rF • EXISTING IRRIGATION VALVE BOX ` \ "3^ -�\ 6 � .q �, `� ppg„, /+ , 0• J EXISTING BOULDER EXISTING OECI.000.TREE ��..rrttXX ow NA.ZT �V z �, �.. -., I ao• n. r � 6•,1z o' '' T- ' `% ._. �!� �, Idei > EXISTING ASPEN / N!V E a `7 \ B G 16 �LI"W'W 7t i✓ 00 UTILITY EASEA EN \ \\ .,-..+, ^'•\ i �// PLAT EXISTING CONIFER TREE PER N\ �" �'-- � _• , ,� �, � T' '��/ GPS 19(N ® UTE PARK sLeDniS ``\ E' \ \ I ,� __"' I rl= / ✓' 82 AND R 10N EXISTING BUSH LOT 4 EXISTING EDGE OF VEGETATION \ \ M. WAY.SICK AtAb F GRAPHIC SCALE NO RA"* `\ '$1 Y + r A• ��ASENENT I SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC N PLAT CIVIL CONSULTANTS IN Peer 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 1 m.n= 20 rL NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YW MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL S CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 \� x * ' "80j / SHEET 3 OF SUBMITTAL ACTION BASED UPoI ANY DEFECT xi 1X15 SURVEY WTTHIN THREE YEARS ry +N AFTER YW FIRST DEFECT I SUCH DEFECT. xl NO EVERT MAY ANY ACTON (9 70)O) 704-0311 zB11a ]Ot3-11-zx selsaEx-cONDZD BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN IRIS SURVEY COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN • Existing Lower Level EXHIBIT 1 43079 SF Approved Floor Area _ POSS Approved Floor Building Group Area(s.f.) ARCHITECTURE+PLANNi6 Aspen 'tub&Spa 31,870 Townhouse Units 34,410 e : iClub Units _ 16,080 - " ,Affordable Housing Units 12,390 \J /~e / Proposed Floor Area .. ._ ...,...r. F Proposed Floor coo:n.o, Building Group Area(s.fJ PRIMARILY ;Aspen Club&Spa 47,595 !Townhouse Units No Change { BELOW GRA DE :Club Units No Change Affordable Housing Units No Change /' 155ue / 1 1 Em in¢Floor Area Lower Level 1.OZ. SCALE 1'=30'-0' Lower Levelllll 76840 SF LL BELOW GR DE-~- --- — -- ---- Jam----- ., w i ASPEN CLUB AND SPA 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen,CO : a ' � I OPEN TO BELOW PART ALLY Basement PARTIALLY ` // BVWW GRADE 5637 SF BELOW / GRADE , i/ j, 2RO��� � BASEMENT ENTIRELY SHEET THU 11 / ✓ .4 � / % BELOW GRADE FLOOR AREA-LOWER : , BELOW GRADE LEVEL AND BASEMENT SCALE: I �L----------PARTrattY-BE-LOW-��A�-€-------- � G1.02.1 d r2 \ Floor Area Lower Level 3 1.OZ. Floor Area New Basement SCALE r=3o-o• _ 1.OZ. SCALE 1•-30'-0• 5 .��rt�..��x�irzcivau�nr,mac. ^1 anxiw.�nriu. rwoi.£..moarms ra:mc IN Tennis Dome EXHIBIT 1 Approved Floor Area 7116 S poss F Approved Floor Building Group Area(s.f.) / -------_-..— -__---- ARCHTECTURf r PtANNIf PARTIALLY ABOVE Aspen Club&Spa 31,870 Townhouse Units 34,410 p� AND BELOW ' G� Club Units 16,080 J __..... GRADE Affordable Housing Units 12,390 ' J Existing Main Le Proposed Floor Area , ..;.,;.rr, ' I i Propose Floor 34217 SF Building Group Area(s.f.) Aspen Club&Spa 47,595 OPEN TO --- BELOW Townhouse Units No Change Club Units No Change Affordable Housing Units No Change j j4 =_ _ v 1 Existine Floor Area Main Level 1.02. SCALE 1'=30'-0' / .............. II j / II \ Main Level 29823 SF r BELOW GRADE I i � I i u r 1 I Up per Lev el 720 SF -`- ASPEN CLUB AND SPA : 1 1450 Crystal Lake Road Aspen,CO 111"' OPEN TO BELOW I do : 5 ,ter Nr y r ;'.•' -.; . --L '� 't � .:. L.S"' ," q :� ,' " � ._`� P0.01ECi NO .. _T.. .,g –'--; .:. / / '., /,... 1 :, ,'-2–'. —"'–,• ._._ 21101.00 ABOVE ` :. GRADE J - - sxEErmEE fr/✓ 1•.'�-:•{ � ='x - - � FLOOR AREA MAIN AND f UPPER LEVELS UPPER LEVEL SCAU ENTIRELY ABOVE J_-�� .=-. .�.-- . __ / '1 ., - --- ....- _ - -- —�.- GRADE G 2 / , 0 2011 xc maxn mvu r vFN590r614MEAp11Rt @MWI619[IiI1N1 _ 3 raarm,neva�nx ..Rrue Floor Area Main Level Flab area I1n0' PVPI uA � 1.02. SCALE 1'=30'0' 1.OZ.yi SCALE 1'=30'-0' M61 A� section ProPG1 ' :i 1 4� / / I AHU , & 10 J .AHU 1,5 &9, b p ope Gade - ---- Area within 15'setback to be revegetated with native grasses i% %where tennis court demolition requires access into this area section — / j 9 TH UNIT 10 AHU 3,7& 11 Section TH 15'setback From Top of Slope _ TH TH UNIT / - TH UNIT 12 UNIT 13 / 1. Landscape % UNIT I / walls In this %'/ TH UNIT 9 + New 'A area to help i �,,. / aal AHU 4,a& 12 % minimize C e ' slope and sp maintain tree TH UNIT 8 planting wells ` m if- _ �F 3. Landscape m �o - -- / h S Ir a i area to this ` TH uwT i _ ` minimize T. ° % Native " Ir slope and Grasses& ) -__ ( �. Patio maintain tree Service . / 1 % i Existing _ Vegetation - i Paho Yard � planting nti w ells / Native TH UNIT 6 Grasses 8 - 1 Existing Vegetation j z ) 2.The East Property Line has two areas where the grading solution requests a landscape Rooftop Patio wall/change in grade greater than 30". (upper Level) 2 section are provided to illustrate these grade RpmP,p i / w differences. ^prop^d i _ • J _ ' Parking Exercise Ara°& -— Pot o Rom ar j % r Gden ��• _Green Roof Graft Roof 3 Ra n GardenP ¢ O° ' �� I i \ _ --` TH UNIT S b� s 11 � p• v TH UNIT 4 r Pa king I LEGEND TH UNIT 3 Existing Trees to Remain E ' Pa �7 z Nanve , %., Pro osed Evergreen Trees 1 Grasses& -_ TH UNIT 2 - �� (spruce,Ponderosa Pine,Bristlecone)• Existing 'l x Veg±e�tation •\ \\ 1 i - Entry Drive Proposed Deciduous Trees „f e (Aspen,Ash,Crabapple,Cottonwood)* 1 i �• TH UNIT 1 ''` I - • a - Ll arkin i g•� _ �.�. �= Q r, Proposed Planted Areas (to be determined:native grasses,lawn 1 I and/or perennial beds) water awe a con storm __. crefe - I b Rain Property Line *Note: I arde - 90%of plant material shall be native. No invasive plants shall be introduced. jl II / These plans are conceptual or illustrative in nature. Precise information shall be provided as part of the building permit application, and in situations where the final PUD Development Plans and approved building permit differ,the approved building permit shall rule. j (Per requirement#12 of the Notice of Approval recorded on 7/24/13.) ASPEN CLUB & SPA SUBDIVISION / PUD / SPA PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW SITE PLAN Aspen,CO GREG MOMN AND ASSOCIATES INC L 1 D O ARCHITECTURE+PLANNING Landscape Arciitedt Environmental Ptanaissg EXHIBIT 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN 905 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, OOLORApp 81811 709 A1f�d A- U BWB, COlpr.d0 9]521 1 119)91925 A)55 IF19T919R9)950 _ ._—.-____., _ NORTH 0 0 40 V=20' .'-. tt.2�.'I$ POP- B , '. UNITg I 5' U N m 10 i s s $ � FE= 005' ) I I ` PROPOSED BUI DING I I 803DB � 4 i P- <O b^.' II II y is 1 _ k__ 900 Lo p8..• ' I - f 5008 6 0 I . . . . . . . . co �O� o ) ITS 1 "1 T11 FFE_8 _ -807 1 q 9020.2 UNIT 12 8 6020.20 FFE=8016' <o — m N p co N n1 -I II II - J Lq l ME43 UNIT 13 Q 8D26.0 - E%TERNAI PROPERTY UNE FFE_8017' St ti eo2a.o2 I v a � f ` G G o r ( m :;o 0 UN FFE=801 7 D n <_ 7C / A N m `. �= EFAA ROPERTY LINE __-,:'•I I.`, ' P ^� . Z I ' SIk_I IINE \ w 4 L I—:—:.—.— 5 80m.24 I I; Al L12 m ci r D ( Q) ' Aj� 1. l oar B , D 2 f j o _ D i m z = 8 E ASPEN CLUB LIVING "° kfbiSiON v E C PRIS z J O ENGINEERING,LLC. INITIALS DATE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO I CIVIL CONSULTANTS DESIDNEDBY i A 502 MAIN STREET DRAWN BY EAST PROPERTY LINE SECTIONS CARBONDALE.CO81623 CHECKED BY ' a (970)704-0311 EXHIBIT FAX:(970}704-0313 MAJOR GROWTH MANAGEMENT APPLICATION UPDATE Hotel Aspen 1 April 2014 Location: 110 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado r_ r .s—I — t m u Revisions to an application for Major Growth Management for redevelopment of an existing lodge within the Main Street Historic District and the Small Lodge Character Area. Represented By: STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATESmc landscape architecture.planning.resort design 412 North Mill Street Aspen,Colorado 81611 L970/925-2323 0970/920-1628 info@scaplanning.com www.scaptanning.com PROJECT OVERVIEW This revised application is submitted for Major Growth Management for the redevelopment of the existing Hotel Aspen as a small lodge preservation project with associated residential development. Major Development (Conceptual), Commercial Design (Conceptual), and Demolition Approval for the Property was granted by Resolution #14,Series of 2012. Final PUD, Subdivision,and Rezoning, Multi-Family free-market residential units, and affordable housing were granted by Ordinance No. 51,Series of 2013. The revisions contained herein are based on the approvals provided by Ordinance No. 51,Series of 2013 and supersede the prior growth management portion of our consolidated application. The subject site is a 27,000 SF parcel spanning from Main Street to Bleeker Street, and bordering Garmisch Street. The property lies partially within the Main Street Historic District, straddles the Mixed Use (MU) and Medium-Density Residential (R-6) zone districts, and has a Lodge Preservation Overlay (LP) impacting the entire parcel. It is understood that the LP Overlay Zoning District will determine the permitted uses and the maximum net livable of the free-market multi-family residential of the Property with a PUD overlay for other parameters which are generally based on the MU and R-6 zone districts. Approximately 15,000 SF of the Property lies in the MU zone district and 12,000 SF lie in the R-6 zone district. The proposed project reconfigures most of the existing lodge units such that the units will average 300 SF in size. Three (3) multi-family residential units have been approved for the rear of the property along Bleeker Street. The Growth Management allocations required are as follows: • Nine (9) lodging units,increasing the total number of lodging units from 45 to 54 units; • Three (3) new free-market residential units, as provided in the land use code to incentivize small lodge development; • Three units of affordable housing,with a floor area of approximately 2,000 square feet and a net livable of 1,647 square feet, mitigates for 4.75 FTEs. The proposed affordable housing units will be fully compliant with Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. The three units of affordable housing provide mitigation for more than the 3.33 FTE mitigation associated with the residential development. This level of mitigation is the greater of the required mitigation for lodging, replacement, or residential development, as provided in the Land Use Code applicable at the time of application submittal. The proposed three units of affordable housing,which will be utilized by employees of the lodge, will result in an excess amount of affordable housing relative to the required mitigation. The applicant is requesting Affordable Housing Credits reflecting an excess provision of affordable housing in the amount of 1.42 FTEs. The Affordable Housing Credits may be issued for the excess amount of affordable housing. This excess provision is not an obligation of a Development Order and not otherwise required to mitigate the impacts of development. Some additional review may be required for the issuance of these credits, but we believe that the Planning &Zoning Commission can provide the requested action at this time. The Applicants have worked to design a project that meets City goals with respect to small lodge development with smaller rooms and a more economical cost basis. We look forward to the implementation of this important community project. Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street,Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page I Land Use Code Sections Sec.26.470 Growth Management Quota System(GMQS) The purposes of this Chapter are as follows: 1. To implement the Aspen Area Community Plan's goals and policies,in conjunction with the background research and studies conducted in support of the Plan; The proposed development is consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan, particularly by providing for"entry-level" lodging which will encourage a diverse lodging inventory in the City. 2.To ensure that new growth occurs in an orderly and efficient manner in the City; The proposed development adheres to the City's desire for orderly and efficient manner of development. 3.To ensure sufficient public facilities to accommodate new growth and development; The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure as it is a redevelopment of an existing lodge. Sufficient water supply, sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities, drainage control,fire and police protection,solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services will be designed for and/or accommodated. Modifications to the sanitary sewer system have been discussed and will be incorporated into the redevelopment of the Property. 4.To ensure that new growth and development is designed and constructed to maintain the character and ambiance of the City; The proposed development has been designed and will be constructed in a manner that will ensure the character and ambiance of the City. The proposed development is consistent with the HPC Conceptual approval, Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval, and Conceptual Major Development approval pursuant to Resolution #14, Series of 2012 and the Final PUD,Subdivision, and Rezoning, Multi-Family free-market residential units,and affordable housing approval granted by City Council Ordinance No.51,Series of 2013. 5.To ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing,businesses and events that serve the local,permanent community and the area's tourist base; Affordable housing provided on site will fully mitigate all new development. In addition to one studio unit,two (2) one-bedroom Category 2 affordable housing units will be provided. These affordable housing units will represent the mitigation of 4.75 FTEs. Existing development requires the mitigation of a total of 3.3 FTEs. A balance of 1.42 FTEs will remain for which the Applicants request Affordable Housing Credits be issued. The proposed units will be fully compliant with the Guidelines of.the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. Motel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street Aspen,CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 2 6.To ensure that growth does not overextend the community's ability to provide support services,including employee housing,traffic control and parking;and The prosed development will not overextend the community's ability to provide support services,including employee housing,traffic control, and parking. The applicants have and will continue to work with the Community Development Department,the City Engineering Department,and other City departments to ensure the proposed development meets this goal. 7.To ensure that the resulting employees generated and impacts created by development and redevelopment are mitigated by said development and redevelopment. Affordable housing provided on site will fully mitigate all new development. In addition to one studio unit, two (2) one-bedroom Category 2 affordable housing units will be provided. These affordable housing units represent mitigation of 4.75 FTEs. Existing development requires the mitigation of a total of 3.3 FTEs. A balance of 1.42 FTEs will remain for which the Applicants request that Affordable Housing Credits be issued. The proposed units are fully compliant with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A.Purpose:The intent of growth management is to provide for orderly development and redevelopment of the City while providing mitigation from the impacts said development and redevelopment creates. Different types of development are categorized below,as well as the necessary review process and review standards for the proposed development. A proposal may fall into multiple categories and therefore have multiple processes and standards to adhere to and meet. B.General requirements:All development applications for growth management review shall comply with the following standards. The reviewing body shall approve,approve with conditions or deny an application for growth management review based on the following generally applicable criteria and the review criteria applicable to the specific type of development: 1.Sufficient growth management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development,pursuant to Subsection 26.470.030.D.Applications for multi-year development allotment,pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.1 shall not be required to meet this standard. Sufficient Growth Management allotments are available to accommodate the proposed development without requesting multi-year allotments. 2.The proposed development is compatible with land uses in the surrounding area,as well as with any applicable adopted regulatory master plan. The proposed development will continue the existing lodging use of the property, with the additional of new free-market residential units as provided in the Land Use Code as an incentive for lodging development. The proposed uses are compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the Aspen Area Community Plan,in particular by providing for"entry-level" lodging which will encourage a diverse lodging inventory in the City. 3.The development conforms to the requirements and limitations of the zone district. Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 3 The proposed dimensional requirements and limitations will be in conformance with the approved PUD as provided under City Council Ordinance 51,Series of 2013, and consistent with the LP Overlay District. 4.The proposed development is consistent with the Conceptual Historic Preservation Commission approval,the Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval and the Conceptual Planned Unit Development approval,as applicable. The proposed development is consistent with the HPC Conceptual approval, Conceptual Commercial Design Review approval, and Conceptual Major Development approval pursuant to Resolution #14,Series of 2012 and the Final PUD, Subdivision, and Rezoning, Multi-Family free-market residential units, and affordable housing approval granted by Ordinance No. 51,Series of 2013. 5.Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter,sixty percent(60%)of the employees generated by the additional commercial or lodge development,according to Subsection 26.470.100.A,Employee generation rates,are mitigated through the provision of affordable housing. The employee generation mitigation plan shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4,Affordable housing,at a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines, as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. If an applicant chooses to use a.Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation,pursuant to Chapter 26.540,such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate. (Ord.No.6—2010,§2) The provisions of this paragraph are superceded by other provisions relating to mitigation for small lodge development. The proposed project contemplates lodge development with an average room size of 300 SF The Property currently contains 45 units. Based on an average of 300 SF or smaller units being added, mitigation would be required at the rate of 10% of additional employees generated. Employee generation rates are provided in Sec.26.470.100 and are calculated at the rate of 0.3 employees per lodging bedroom. The existing development contains 444 SF of affordable housing net livable. The addition of nine (9) new lodge units, with an average size of 292 SF in size would generate 2.7employees or Full Time Equivalents (FTEs),mitigated at a rate of 10%. This would require mitigation of 0.27 FTEs. 6.Affordable housing net livable area,for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade,whichever is higher,shall be provided in an amount equal to at least thirty percent (30%)of the additional free-market residential net livable area,for which the finished floor level is at or above natural or finished grade,whichever is higher. The provisions of this paragraph are superceded by other provisions relating to mitigation for small lodge development. Similar to the mitigation for the expanded lodge,the free-market net livable area would be mitigated at a rate of 10%of net livable. The 13,200 SF of residential net livable area would result in 1,320 SF of required mitigation or the equivalent of 3.3 FTEs. According to Community Development Staff, pursuant to the applicable code in effect at the time of submission, the greater of the commercial or the residential is the required mitigation. Therefore, the mitigation associated with the residential development, or 3.3 FTEs,is the required affordable housing mitigation. Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street,Aspen,CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management I April 2014 Page 4 Affordable housing shall be approved pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.070.4,Affordable housing,and be restricted to a Category 4 rate as defined in the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines,as amended. An applicant may choose to provide mitigation units at a lower category designation. Affordable housing units that are being provided absent a requirement("voluntary units")may be deed-restricted at any level of affordability,including residential occupied. If an applicant chooses to use a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit as mitigation,pursuant to Chapter 26.540,such Certificate shall be extinguished pursuant to Chapter 26.540.90 Criteria for Administrative Extinguishment of the Certificate,utilizing the calculations in Section 26.470.100 Employee/Square Footage Conversion. (Ord.No.6—2010,§2) Affordable housing provided on site will fully mitigate all new development. In addition to one studio unit,two (2) one-bedroom Category 2 affordable housing units will be provided. These affordable housing units will represent the mitigation of 4.75 FTEs. Existing development requires the mitigation of a total of 3.3 FTEs. A balance of 1.42 FTEs will remain for which the Applicants request that Affordable Housing Credits be issued. 7.The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure,or such additional demand is mitigated through improvement proposed as part of the project. Public infrastructure includes,but is not limited to,water supply,sewage treatment,energy and communication utilities, drainage control,fire and police protection,solid waste disposal,parking and road and transit services. (Ord.No.14,2007,§1) The project represents minimal additional demand on public infrastructure as it is a redevelopment of an existing lodge. Sufficient water supply,sewage treatment, energy and communication utilities,drainage control, fire and police protection,solid waste disposal, parking and road and transit services will be designed for and/or accommodated. Modifications to the sanitary sewer system have been discussed and will be incorporated into the redevelopment of the Property. Sec.26.470.070.4. Development of Affordable Housing 4.Affordable housing. The development of affordable housing deed-restricted in accordance with the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines shall be approved,approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission based on the following criteria: a.The proposed units comply with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. A recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority shall be required for this standard. The Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority may choose to hold a public hearing with the Board of Directors. The proposed units will be fully compliant with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority. b.Affordable housing required for mitigation purposes shall be in the form of actual newly built units or buy-down units.Off-site units shall be provided within the City limits.Units outside the City limits may be accepted as mitigation by the City Council,pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.2.If the mitigation requirement is less than one(1)full unit,a cash-in-lieu payment may be accepted by the Planning and Zoning Commission upon a recommendation from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority.If the mitigation requirement is one(1)or more units,a cash-in-lieu payment shall require City Council approval,pursuant to Paragraph 26.470.090.3.A Certificate of Affordable Housing Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street,Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 5 Credit may be used to satisfy mitigation requirements by approval of the Community Development Department Director,pursuant to Section 26.540.080 Extinguishment of the Certificate.Required affordable housing may be provided through a mix of these methods. The project will provide fully compliant affordable housing units onsite which will more than fully mitigate for the existing affordable housing, the expansion of lodge units,and the additional of free-market residential. c.Each unit provided shall be designed such that the finished floor level of fifty percent(50%)or more of the unit's net livable area is at or above natural or finished grade,whichever is higher.This dimensional requirement maybe varied through Special Review,Pursuant to Chapter 26.430. The project will provide fully compliant,fully above-grade affordable housing units. d.The proposed units shall be deed-restricted as"for sale"units and transferred to qualified purchasers according to the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines.The owner may be entitled to select the first purchasers,subject to the aforementioned qualifications,with approval from the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority.The deed restriction shall authorize the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority or the City to own the unit and rent it to qualified renters as defined in the Affordable Housing Guidelines established by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority,as amended. The proposed units may be rental units,including but not limited to rental units owned by an employer or nonprofit organization,if a legal instrument in a form acceptable to the City Attorney ensures permanent affordability of the units.The City encourages affordable housing units required for lodge development to be rental units associated with the lodge operation and contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. Units owned by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority,the City of Aspen,Pitkin County or other similar governmental or quasi-municipal agency shall not be subject to this mandatory"for sale"provision. The affordable housing units associated with this lodge development will be rental units for employees associated with the lodge operation,thus contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. c. Non-Mitigation Affordable Housing.Affordable housing units that are not required for mitigation,but meet the requirements of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d).The owner of such non-mitigation affordable housing is eligible to receive a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit pursuant to Chapter 26.540. A balance of 1.42 FTEs will remain following fully mitigating the 3.3 FTEs generated by the project. The Applicants request that Affordable Housing Credits be issued. 26.470.100.Calculations. 6.0n-site housing serves multiple affordable housing requirements.Whenever affordable housing is provided on site(with actual units)in order to satisfy one(1)requirement,the same on-site affordable housing may also be used to satisfy any other affordable housing requirement concurrently.For example: A mixed-use project may require two(2)affordable housing units to mitigate an increase in commercial employee generation and two(2)affordable housing units to mitigate free-market residential Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street,Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management I April 2014 Page 6 development.In this case,providing two(2)on-site affordable housing units shall satisfy both requirements concurrently.Whenever required affordable housing is provided by means other than on- site provision,such housing,or payment in lieu thereof,shall accrue consecutively to individual requirements and shall not serve requirements concurrently.In the above example,provision of four(4) units would be required. The addition of nine (9) new lodge units,with an average size of 300 SF in size would generate 2.7 employees or Full Time Equivalents (FTEs),mitigated at a rate of 10%. This would require mitigation of 0.27 FTEs. Similar to the mitigation for the expanded lodge, the free-market net livable area would be mitigated at a rate of 1017o of net livable. The 13,200 SF of residential net livable area would result in 1,320 SF of required mitigation or the equivalent of 3.3 FTEs. As confirmed by Staff, the greater of the commercial or the residential is the required mitigation. Therefore, the mitigation associated with the residential development,or 3.3 FTEs,is the required affordable housing mitigation. 26.540.050 Application All applications shall include the information required under Chapter 26.304,Common Development Review Procedures. In addition,all applications must also include the following information. 9.The net livable square footage of each unit. The three units of affordable housing have a floor area of approximately 2,000 square feet and a net livable of 1,647 square feet. The individual units sizes consist of 643 SF net livable (one bedroom), 603 SF net livable (one bedroom), and 401 SF net livable (studio). 10.If applicable,the conditions under which reductions from net minimum livable square footage requirements are requested according to Aspen Pitkin County Housing Authority Guidelines. All units are conforming. No reductions from net minimum livable square footage requirements are requested. 11.Proposed Category Designation of sale or rental restriction for each unit. The units are proposed to be Category 4 and are technically classified as rental units though the units are intended to be utilized by lodge employees. 12.Proposed employees housed by the affordable housing units in increments of no less than one-one- hundredth(.01)according to Section 26.470.100.2—Employees Housed. The proposed full time equivalent of the employees to be housed by the units is 4.75. 26.540.060 Procedures for establishing an affordable housing credit A development application to establish a certificate of Affordable Housing Credit shall be reviewed pursuant to the Common Development Review Procedures set forth at Chapter 26.304,and the following procedures and standards.The City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission shall review a recommendation from the Community Development Director and shall approve,approve with conditions,or deny an application to establish Certificates of Affordable Housing Credit.This requires a one-step process as follows: Hotel Aspen/ 110 Wiest Main Street,Aspen,CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 7 The applicant is requesting Affordable Housing Credits reflecting an excess provision of affordable housing in the amount of 1.42 FTEs. The Affordable Housing Credits may be issued for the excess amount of affordable housing. This excess provision is not an obligation of a Development Order and not otherwise required to mitigate the impacts of development. Some additional review may be required for the issuance of these credits, but we believe that the Planning 8,Zoning Commission can provide the requested action at this time. A.Step One—Review before the Planning and Zoning Commission. 1.Purpose: To determine if the application meets the standards for authorizing establishment of a Certificate of Affordable Housing Credit 2.Process:The Planning and Zoning Commission shall approve,approve with conditions,or deny the application after considering the recommendation of the Community Development Director. We believe that the Planning &Zoning Commission can approve the issuance of the affordable housing credits at this time. Although the Land Use Code does not appear to specify it, additional discussion before City Council may be required. 3.Standards of review:26.540.070 Pursuant to the standards of review contained in 26.540.070, a-d, the proposed units will be: • Fully compliant with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority; • Fully compliant affordable housing units onsite which will more than fully mitigate for the exisfing affordable housing, the expansion of lodge units, and the additional of free-market residential; • Fully compliant,fully above-grade affordable housing units;and • Affordable housing units associated with the lodge development that will be rental units for employees associated with the lodge operation,thus contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. 4.Form of decision:Planning and Zoning Commission decision shall be by resolution.The resolution may include a description or diagram of the affordable housing. A diagram of the affordable housing has been included with this application. 5.Notice requirements:The requirements of 26.212.060 shall apply.No public hearing notice is required. 26.540.070 Review criteria for establishing an affordable housing credit An Affordable Housing Credit may be established by the Planning and Zoning Commission if all of the following criteria are met.The proposed units do not need to be constructed prior to this review. A.The proposed affordable housing unit(s)comply with the review standards of Section 26.470.070.4(a-d). Pursuant to the standards of review contained in 26.540.070,a-d,the proposed units will be: • Fully compliant with the Guidelines of the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority; Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street,Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 8 r • Fully compliant affordable housing units onsite which will more than fully mitigate for the existing affordable housing, the expansion of lodge units, and the additional of free-market residential; • Fully compliant,fully above-grade affordable housing units;and • Affordable housing units associated with the lodge development that will be rental units for employees associated with the lodge operation,thus contributing to the long-term viability of the lodge. B.The affordable housing unit(s)are not an obligation of a Development Order and are not otherwise required by this Title to mitigate the impacts of development. The excess of 1.42 FTEs are not a not an obligation of a Development Order issued in conjunction with Ordinance 51,Series 2013 and are not otherwise required by the Land Use Code as mitigation of the impacts of development. Hotel Aspen/ 110 West Main Street Aspen, CO Amended Application for Major Growth Management 1 April 2014 Page 9 S ATTACHMENT 2—LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT* Name: Major Growth Management Location: 110 West Main Street,Aspen, CO (indicate street address,lot&block number,legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID#(REQUIRED) 273512461800 APPPLicANT: Name: Hotel Aspen Address: c/o Michael H. Brown, PO Box 5109,Aspen, CO 81612 Phone#; 970-930-1754 RGPRESENTATIVE: Name: Stan Clauson,AICP,ASLA, Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. Address: 412 N. Mill Street,Aspen, CO 81611 Phone#: 970-925-2323 TYPt of APrt:tCATiON:(please check all that apply): GMQS Exemption 0 Conceptual PUD ❑ Temporary Use GMQS Allotment ❑ Final PUD(&PUD Amendment) ❑ Text/Map Amendment ❑ Special Review ❑ Subdivision ❑ Conceptual SPA ❑ ESA—8040 Greenline,Stream ❑ Subdivision Exemption(includes ❑ Final SPA(&SPA Margin,Hallam Lake Bluff, condonliniumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane ❑ Commercial Design Review 0 Lot Split ❑ Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion © Residential Design Variance ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Other: ❑ Conditional Use 9XISTtNC CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings,uses,previous approvals,etc.) The subject site is a 27,000 SF parcel spanning Main Street to Bleeker Street. The property lies partially within the Main StreE t Historic District, straddles the Mixed Use(MU)and Medium-Density Residential (R-6)zone districts, and bas a Lodge Preservation Overlay(LP).The existing lodges contains 45 units which average 372 sq.ft. in size. l'ROPOSAI..: (description of proposed buildings,uses,modifications,etc.) The applicant has received approval to reconfigure most of the existing lodge units into 54 units so that the units will average 300 SF in size. Multi-family residential is proposed for the rear of the property. The addition of small lodge units is a stated goal of the Aspen Area Community Plan. Have you attached the following? .FEES DUE:$previously provided with 0 Pre-Application Conference Summary Consolidated PUD ❑ Attachment#1,Signed Fee Agreement Application 0 Response to Attachment#3,Dimensional Requirements Form Q .Response to Attachment#4,Submittal Requirements-Including Written Responses to Review Standards ❑ X 3-D Model for large project All Mans that are larger than 8.5"X 1 t"must be folded. A disk with an electr=ic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format)must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-1)model. ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: Hotel Aspen Major Growth Management .Applicant: Hotel Aspen Location: 110 West Main,Aspen , CO Zone District: Mixed-Use(MU), Medium-Density Residential (R-6)with Lodge Preservation Overlay(LP) Lot Size: 27,000 sq.ft. Lot Area: 27,000 sq.ft. (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area,Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark,easements,and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: 18,454 SF Proposed. 17,847 SF Number of residential units: E'x'isting. 0 Prol)ose& 3 Number of bedrooms: Existing: o _—Prvpvse& 12 Proposed %of demolition.(Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS` Floor Area: Existing:23,148 SF Allolvahle: 33,750 SF Proposed. 35,050 SF Principal bldg. height: Existing: 25-30' Allowable: 32' Proposed.* 28'Lodge, 25' MF Res. Access. bldg.lteiglit: Existing: Allowa-ale: Proposed.- On-Site parking: Existing.• 0 Re wire& 8 Proposed: 13 % Site coverage: Existing: 82% Reciuired: n/a Proposed. 87% % Open Space: Existing: 4,857 sq.ft.Required.• 4,857 sq.ft. Proposed: 4,030 sq.ft. Front Setback: Existing: 10 Required, 10' Proposed.- 5'Main St., 10'Bleeker St. Rear Setback: Existing: 30' Required: 5' Proposed: n/a Combined F/R: Existing: 40' Required: 15' Propose,.: 20' Side Setback: Existing: 5' Required.- 5' Pr-opnse& 5'Lodge, 0'Garmisch St. Side Setback: Existing: 5' Rec wire& 5' Proposed: Combined Sides: Existing: 10�Required. 10' Proposed. .Distance Between Existing 7' Require., 10' Proposed: 10'Lodge/MF Res. Buildings 10'MF Res. Existing riot.-conformities or encroachments: None. Variations requested: None. INDEX 1. INDEX - '� 2. SITE PLAN 3. NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE j 4. GARMISCH PERSPECTIVE 5. NORTHWEST PERSPECTIVE • , 6. SOUTHEAST PERSPECTIVE 7. SOUTHWEST PERSPECTIVE r _- 8. NORTH ELEVATION 21,14�. �:; .: .� 9. EAST ELEVATION 10. SOUTH ELEVATION �j� .t 1� ►' `� �` " - I H _ 11. STREET VIEWS }� 'E °-nr 12. EAST HOTEL STREET VIEWS _ i 13. HOTEL PERSPECTIVES 1 - _ .,,, 14. HOTEL PERSPECTIVES l . : - _ —�- �.- I: t . ' �t` __.. - 15. LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN —16. LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN _ - ... ................. -18. LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN 19. ENLARGED AHU PLANS _.. T NOTE: The drawings contained in this package conform to City Council Ordinance 51, series of 2013. HOTEL ASPEN pOSS A.FJ", • -':u:_+iU - GMQS SUBMISSION : INDEX M M13Mm¢r tF)../= 2= 0 2011:;:„r4a;:au;�w,_. MARCH 31,2014 Ql novae ms tF1 B)a hem uao NORTH GARMISCH ST. r LANDSCAPE ISLAND 1t -LkNDSCAPEISLAND f OUSTING STREET TREES r-ADA ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE - i SSHHAADE TOLERANT SH HERRY / I i I r KARL FOERSTER •:- _.., �. f i'- LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 1 - rll4DEN GRASS f • R I . f r t r 1 SLOP PElIALKS _LE`i 4TION. L E SHALL NOT - 5% _ SO ✓', _t. "."m L91l. - i EDGE OF AWNING 7,777 7 _ � MEGOD ALONE I PLANTERS N HOUN EXISTING STREET TREES PLANTER VVALL I EVATED) A�UAL BEDS P ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE'• 's .I) ,. ,,...,,,/// i .. - i - --SOD PROPOSEt{ .=^ _ •si PAVERS - (YARD sY� ,� KARL FOERSTER GRASS r MADEN GRAS _ i SPRING SNOW CRASAPPLE —- 1 /- L C' - -77- 1t -.-1 _ @ •-. .' ,,, a —____-..EXISTING STREET TREES I SHADE TOLERANT SHRUBS I __ BISHOPSWEED--'�- -_-' I - I Ft OPOSED - ASPEN CLUMP - "� YARD - --- - - -- r V COURTYARD AN❑GREENSPACE TO 3 DESIGNED TJ THE FUTURE i • ' PROPOSEDGROUNDAEVEL r :,'.�'• LL I eTT , xoTE<FOOTPRINIT Z 3} Y . ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE , A _L— _____ _PATIO ENTRANCE sur'. ¢`' _ _ - 1 i,' ,} � EXISTING STREET LIGHT CL I \ / _3* • F.' ' (,� _ _ 1 POOL RIRCN_AIENTS TO B� �•p 11 ( --. Y ... (ri I 5t g? g DES IGNED `'Fc� ',�•• .. - ff l DO - 1 -I - _ _ - , i �IXtSfING POOLTERRACE: Lu Ni w - ' -6k TI e3•# De F PIOPOSHS <t',F = I - si."-.. Z -�� !� ¢ _ ����� � •`;„ - �,''_, I I POOL, L~/1 -� w ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE I ) z - \ ` FENCE TRASH/ Tour.R -- I PXISIING POOL 1 y C NG! ' j ! 1 TAB 8 REUCHERAS m ! UTILITY RCIUYU PA'2KING Um eo i G L tr HDIwa�w IIHE NvsacK ALLEY I' � EXMNG II L \ HOT TUB � 41 ltl-Y _. -��� -� /' yl'-DI? -~2!'-Y-'-�_.. I�':lT' 7•S I: FENCE - K \ 1 a" ..:: _•- a �. • _ J-._ -_ �--. -__' - til' , � _. _-r._ _._ _.. _ ate... _. __ HOTEL ASPEN posy GMQS SUBMISSION : SITE PLAN 2 IWS FAST IIAn siIED A1rLA,wtantoa nsH ' u rou�:�..�, �� MARCH 31,2014 IT)SN 1315.55 (1).01810 1980 : � t I ji! Llk ar vi I lit- i I j I � �t �— <_. HOTEL ASPEN pOSS GMQS SUBMISSION : NORTHEAST PERSPECTIVE B0a"Wamm 1VU,mWpyOO Yla11 m no,as.ria pt ato i as aso ..�.�,a,.."•,.•••... o zou,;�•."°"�"'", MARCH 31,2014 a9 b i _ �f� --- - `' _ 5 .r , _-�--'�— ��` Er- � y Wiz- t�,` E` �c�'• __- _ — � r . ,l — — HOTEL ASPEN PUSSm9 GMQS SUBMISSION : GARMISCH STREET PERSPECTIVE �4A rasa wux sl6EEr a9PEN,oamuooei611 Ot011,,,,;s F;cri,uwrc MARCH 31,201: 0 6101]39 4755 l r Y 610 1 930 3650 i i t f i : , i I ' i i : .. .. rte. Ilk Al lip '..o-�_-�^ xr��k_-,� �„�.".':-•�'^`�_� .'�°-^�,v..,-.�,�� ._*rye HOTEL ASPEN OSS ' Al "" ''' GMQS SUBMISSION : NORTHWEST CORNER PERSPECTIVE Peos[asi nwx nem ur[n mmL-A O 2011°. rnaaac P4.u%.c MARCH 31,2014 m s�o i ass ass ul wo r sna zsso r- L +R W - r : Aj : 79, RR hill I x. HOTEL ASPEN ' GMQS SUBMISSION : SOUTHEAST CORNER PERSPECTIVE pOSS :` 1'I " �c MARCH 31,2014 sos usr xux srcczr swe,azaumeren Ozou°L.oti��,� mM134.ns IrIMismpeso ti i - , I HOTEL ASPEN pOSS .r: tt ;, � r.;tl r t; GMQS SUBMISSION : SOUTHWEST CORNER PERSPECTIVE mwu src¢r wnlmm�ooncn O .,�.�.,.".,.,...._ zou �- � MARCH 31,2014 .l 1 : J : Fl ! i — 1B 11 r r ;.6 .......__. ......... - .. ............ ..... ...._ ...... ;r : : bi -------- F a .....__...... ................. I ....._.... .._ 11LJ I i —_—_—_r_— A i —_— .•._ —_—_—_— _—___—_ ! ry _ SECOND LEVEL PLAN ............. ........... 111-0 Ll F1 : I r i - i FIRST LEVEL PLAN —-—- 700'•0' I I I I I I I I I � I I e I I r 1 � I r I I __ � _�------T T ---- LOWEBO'-'P(_ARARq_NO1LEVEL-�ak- rL________________________ _ I ------------------------------ L_---__ HOTEL ASPEN pOSS F?f ASK GMQS SUBMISSION : NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION Eos FUE NEn sTOEeT WEN NO�OEiEIi m ff"1325 aES E FE FM i e]o 2M ©2011 MARCH 31,2014 a � � 4 1 4 —_—___—_—_—_—_ —_-- _ —_—_—_—_ _—_ SECOND LEVEL PLAN ip a 111'.0' �w I _ Ell 4 ..... .... ------------- ....................... ....................... ........................... i FIRST LEVEL PLAN I _ I 4 I —_—_—_—_— I _—_—_—_—_— 0—(p= HOTEL ASPEN pOSS ` GMQS SUBMISSION : EAST BUILDING ELEVATION am UST NE21 RnEEr 85PD1,GYO8a0081911 Q ZOl!wimmam�w�amrs MARCH 31,2014 mso/2154M IF)MI= 2950 e" ;1 i ; i -- '1 Lill, _ L EVEL PLAN 0 SEGONO L_ I............ ........... ................ ...................................... .L i Lim FIRST LEVEL PLAN- ---_ I I 1 1 I I i I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I i 1 I I —J__— LOWER LPAR ONOlLEVEL -----r- -- ------ - -r---- - - --------------------------------- --------------------------------- I----------- -------------------� � soa HOTEL ASPEN pOSS GMQS SUBMISSION : SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION SWEWIAIIPIfiPELT AsPU,�naumncn .."� IT)MI=ass ())MI OW o mu, ..,o„ASS MARCH 31,2014 ----•----------------••--------- ------------ . -........... - ..... ..... - ® I ' NI Ffflfl ri HOTEL ASPEN pOSS EAST-S SEET ASPEN, GMQS SUBMISSION : STREET VIEWS 665 C6L66A666 611 m s�6 i zas nss p7 sT6l sza zss6 O toll ,oaln�_„�; MARCH 31,2014 L. r__ i 9 THIRD LEVEL 2--_—_—_—_—_ I SECOND LEVEL PLAN I'1 — - 1 _—_ —_—_—_—_ I l t = 0 JC o :�( fl[ 7 ..IRSTLEVEL _ ------ PLAN._.. 0 LOWER PARIONO PLAN LEVEL PREVIOUS HOTEL MASSING TOP OF PARAPET 128'-0" HOTEL HIGH POINT 129'-9" PREVIOUS HOTEL MASSING ROOF LEVEL PLAN _ _— .--.— _—_ —_ — { �SECOND LEVEL PLAN �- TT <5• " _ t 9 c / FIRST LEVEL PLAN .... .._ .............. i 4 ! c LOVJEN PAR 00 PLAN � LEVEL PROPOSED HOTEL MASSING HOTEL ASPEN PaSS ,f.' r,;,. u. GMQS SUBMISSION : EAST HOTEL STREET VIEWS �l msuvN SiRFf A4mommucn m m/oz+ass (F)m/m m O to11 tl1. ,v°c' ra MARCH 31,2014 _r C �n z I ; j'• J I 0 5 c IL- - $_ ► - PREVIOUS HOTEL MASSING i� k Sig, • �a�l_ 1T,�r `�., —_ ' �� -- _ � III _ YC 1. � j 3 � i ✓.� I PROPOSED HOTEL MASSING HOTEL ASPEN pOSS GMQS SUBMISSION : HOTEL PERSPECTIVE VIEWS 605=uT WW rnrtFT A=PFq Ndt/DO stall -•-'.,,,-,�uv+:.�_ !7" O>ou:;` - MARCH 31,2014 m ew i ass nss ,t i s�o i mo also -- — - -- — — -z -- — ------------- _- 1 _ - I !t 3 I I L i 1 i J PREVIOUS HOTEL MASSING f i f 11 UA- I I PROPOSED HOTEL MASSING HOTEL ASPEN OSS '`�-' GMQS SUBMISSION : HOTEL PERSPECTIVE VIEWS Ll4 PBOS FAST MNX 9 PE ASPE L 09A00l+a17 O toll MARCH 31,2014 (T)970/925 C55 (F)97019]0 ]950 yr-y 107-II I/2' —-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- -—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-- I I --- -I "' - - --------Z--r- I I J 1 2 3 4 $ 6 7 -- AREA OF RESNEASSISTANCE I LOWER LEVEL m --- FREE MARKET 4 UNRI 1 I 1 I 8 1 I r--J L--------------—--- GARAGE I I 13 PAWNGSPAC3 I 9 I 1 I y I q a-nrr es u•v r.v a-e I I I I 9 I RAW I STCRAGE/ I LOWER LEVEL � _____ _ ----- EVATOR MECHANIGL . I FREE MARKET 1 UNIT 2 J I 1 13 12 � I1 IO I I R I I i i i i i i i --------------------- I L----------------------- I I 1 y UP 1 Noussau NG/LAUNDRY 3°LOCxEIE 1 I I I LOWER LEVEL FREE MARKET UNIT 3 I I a 1 I I 1 MECHANIC-Al. I I 0 I I 1 I `a 9—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- I I 1 I I lK7M WI1 PROPERTTUN: IIYPJ I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 L—— ———————I'-- J ---------------------------------�J PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN-LLl �------------ - 1 SCALE 1/S�1'd HOTEL ASPEN puss GMQS SUBMISSION : LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN .Ya CAST HAIR STaEST ,:RLR..RR tit alRlald a]aa(Fl a]o Ia)R 1RaR OIII A. 03.31.2014 �'r �cucn NMIR Y S-I- CANCPTA30VE ]5.61? S-S T•C 4-? iS-6- i7-6' IS-6' 15-6' " 9.8 6-r I1'-C P COLUMNS(I11J— — --------- --- __ -- -- — ---- -- ----- ---- _ 1 I I I f-S f-Z' If•P I - I a ® ® ® ® 1 I I I ED I L I IN1 MAIN LEVEL I y ---------- t au[sr ou[eT aeEa _^•' on+ r I - °f� a I I FREE MARKET I loz Ia l06 100 >. - 4 R I I UNIT IYARD o I I I --- LoevT/ I AWIN f..DECK q __ OFFICE ' ,Z- O D D e 9 r I C3 i I 1 ® AF)OmARLf- _ - o a b COLD E RE3IROOM RBlROOM I 1 STORAGE STUDIO ETSF 10[811 1001RI 9 MFflIRa YARD G ROOM toOM ROOM 303 103 101 El I MAIN LEVEL I - I 1 FREE MARKET q ' IrtfTABGNT G UNIT 2 i A y I v /MR N 1 r I I I I I q I I I I Y Y q tt R o i 1 I I _ - _ S if Y T•P S-P 3B-P Y r YARD ❑ If P i PIN—] ® (, M 18[8 °, I I A[taeDAel[ 4' f<�N[/ Y 1 xouslNa I I I I I urt MAIN LEVEL ES, FREE MARKET UNIT 3 °° ® ❑ n i I I . i w0"A Y � I UP Ful 6 I I u mu MEIAISCREENSIm.I I . I I I i PATIO . °E" _ I RECY�CLC/G U w 117 I q 1>� I ------------------------- IS-S f-7 RAMP . ON I 1 lROOIVt nR I I I I I I PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN-Ll (I SCALEIAT-7'd ----------------------------------------------- HOTEL ASPEN p oss _. ? s GMQS SUBMISSION : LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN 16' 006[A[T Ye1R [i1[[T AirEIL Ce LDRA00 eleli O Q3m ui i01ii� > 03,31.M14 C_.. 111 e)0/R30 e)60(fl e)e/e)0 Yeee M.r11Yas IlYIM a u GNOPY MOVE _ Y cIUSOPY COWAIID RTPJ l^I� _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_— _—_—_—_—- —-—_—_—_—_—_— _—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—_—-— _—_—-—_—_ ._ l•f P-7 IS•f 14.6 14-f IT-C S•0' IS•9 14•Y �• frt 'Ft - �`-d`----- ------- 1 0 I I y 1 L I Flom WEA Gum a2. , ❑I___ADA Wl3T ADAOUT roO/A UPPER LEVEL z10 z1z FREE MARKET -1 ti UNFTI I -� � I I II n w I ROOM N I o 0 0 0 0 �MAS, - WEST�� PS P) 4 Q ��' CI 2118 y 1 I l ® ® ❑ I UPPER LEVEL _ 1 -- -- I . FREE MARKET I -- -- a UNIT y II ❑ WE)T Aou I I F I ROOM BDOM - 0 1 1 9 a y 211 213 I--- I WEST I 4 BOOM I v-4 ❑_ _ _ _ q 21K 1 I I — L__ —� �r-a sn- ze-v • r•1 � I -- - I WlST I Wlst Boots ms i I I � I I � I I I �roBOAe p El xoozao . OWNS ? [Ell FREE LEVEL am EIR E17 FREE MARKET 643 NET SF I UNIT I ® 1 I DOOM UP 216 I I I I I ~ a ❑ I I 1 1 _ WlST I �� WEST I I I a ® I I zn _ _ I o ❑ ❑ � I ' I I GUM A I I I I 218 1 I I I PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN-L2 CL3 -----------------------------------------------� 1 SCALE I/f-1'4r HOTEL ASPEN p O S � ; ; ; " GMU SUBMISSION : LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN 1'T- OB EAST MAIN Tit AS)E&COIOBAOO 01.11 O 1 1 0701,02. 41 BF(i)f]0/020 3f 60 071E pia 03.31.2014 L1Ll I. aallmaa N" IIIIINIIINIII�NIIINI o a —— —— � 4RDroo4r - --- DRCk ry UP m= 0 (D MTH lEDROOR] © I R4rx O ❑ .. ® DINIxO RB/W aRY OWNO �n bABLE`-__ IIIIIIIINN�IIIIIINIIf c HOUSING mcxa LINRI aFOLISIN Le © STUDlo ° 1$V HOUSING SF c UNR4 I BEDROOM maa �_ 603 NET SF Q O soFn/em AFFORDABLE 00_ - uviNCRDON HOUSNG UN RB arRr unuc mow O 0 643 NET SF R6/FK oN CU�71 MTM O mcxa (� I II IN IuI I II I II I N li 1 1 1 11 O Q u ATD PATIO t= TR1]RX/ �- ' RECTCI)ND/ mun ry a LEVEL 2-AHU 3 ENLARGED PLAN LEVEL 1 -AHU 2 ENLARGED PLAN LEVEL 1 -AHU 1 ENLARGED PLAN scue v4• ra pons ; I ; }{ �. HOTEL ASPEN soR [r um rtu)r Ru[u "So nnl O IT)....... 4)t0 fi)oTO)o10 ]oro as u ion GMQS SUBMISSION ENLARGED AHU PLANS OsNA�XwCra 03.31.2014 1 1;9'x, 1 G - GUEST GUM U'Um wom iii == = �+• - %f IIIIIIIII P• LAM� , C3 Drlu GUEST SA IIIIIIIII - r mll EST � mllm!!� � 1 - i ■ ■ ■ ■il \� � El � �o El IIIIIIIII r� - .l. GUEST GUEST ., ■ I 16� El GUEST 0 • T . FLOOR ILAN c HOTEL ASPEN GMQS SUBMISSION LEVEL 3 FLOOR PLAN p i , z J r ZIAzIl- Lz 14 6 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO S HEDULED) PUBLIC HEARING D�' 20�j STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing ' Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal As l en section of an official fifteen 15) ' paper or a paper of general circulation in the City p days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high,, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen( )and including the date and time . on the _ day of > 20—, to of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sia 1) is attached-hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to. the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage ;prepaid,U.S,-�mail to all owners of property within three hundred (3 00) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text a7nendnient. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the plaru-iing agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 7 Signa The oregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before Me t1jiscZNav of , 204, by VN PUBLIC NOTICE RE:HOTEL ASPEN-GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS " NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL will be held on Tuesday April 15,2014,at a meet- ing to begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Aspen Plan- ning and Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Room, City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to consider an application submitted by Garmisch Lodging LLC, M CO1I1S510n expires- for the property located at 110 West Main Street (commonly known as Hotel Aspen),represented by Stan Clauson Associates,Inc.The applicant re- quests Growth Management approval to redevelop the existing lodge including an increase in lodge unit density,a decrease in lodge room size,3 free Not Public - market residential units,and onsite affordable housing units.The property is legally described as: Units 100 through Units 122 inclusive,Units 201 through 211 inclusive,Units 215 through 223 inclu- sive,Units 315 through 318 inclusive,and Unit 323, Hotel Aspen according to Condominium Map NOTARY PUBLIC thereof recorded February 28,1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 1 as Reception No.266353. STATE OF COLORADO For further information,contact Sara Adams at the "MENTS AS APPLICABLE: .NOTARY ID#19964002767 City of Aspen Community Development Depart- ment, 130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970) T MY Commission E)Ores Februa 15,2016 ° 429.2778,sara.adamsOcityofaspen.com. [ION ° m 1 —:r POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) O Published in the Aspen Times on March 27,2014. IAD GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED [10048782] 1S 1L ® APPLICANT CERTIFICATIONOFMINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. x'24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 110 W. Main Street ,Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 15 April 920 14 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) h Stan Clauson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: X Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. X Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing on the 31 day of March , 20 14, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. X Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) X Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. , The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 3 day of 20&,by pA-ra-tC IG- PATRICK S. RAWLEY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC o �� STATE OF COLORADO My commission expires: NOTARY ID#19994012259 MY Commission Expires July 26,2016 Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: HOTEL ASPEN-GROWTH MANAGEMENT REVIEWS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday April 15,2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Garmisch Lodging LLC, for the property located at 110 West Main Street (commonly known as Hotel Aspen), represented by Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. The applicant requests Growth Management approval to redevelop the existing lodge including an increase in lodge unit density, a decrease in lodge room size, 3 free market residential units, and onsite affordable housing units. The property is legally described as: Units 100 through Units 122 inclusive, Units 201 through 211 inclusive, Units 215 through 223 inclusive, Units 315 through 318 inclusive, and Unit 323, Hotel Aspen according to Condominium Map thereof recorded February 28, 1985 in Plat Book 17 at Page 1 as Reception No. 266353. For further information, contact Sara Adams at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St.,Aspen,CO, (970)429.2778, sara.adams @cityofaspen.com. s/LJ Erspamer Chair Published in the Aspen Times on March 27, 2014 City of Aspen Account PUBLIC NOTICE- ,* _ DATE: 15 April 2014 TIME: 144.• 30 PM PLACE: basement Of • City Hall_, 130 S. GALENA ST. PURPOSE: -� Planning & Zonin g shall r request for review a r Growth Managem Review to redeVelo ent lodge, add 3 p the existing residential units' free market affordab its, and add onsite le housing units . applicant is Garmisc The represented b h Lodging LLC Associates y Stan Clawson Inc.,97o-925_23 FOR F 23. FURTHER INFORM AD FUR ASPEN INFORMATION CO S PLANNING 6eP CONTACT ARA (970) 429-2778 ARTMENT AT r .._—._._....._ 0 itu 01u119 Pop-up Ed eTm 1 caaay t Goa t.awata Feed Paper expose p' P 9 Use Avery@ Template 51600 A 120 EAST MAIN PARTNERS LLC 132 WEST MAIN STREET ASSOC LLC 100 EAST MAIN STREET LLC IN ST PO BOX 6565 120 E MA 133 PROSPECTOR RD#4102 ASPEN, IN 81611 SNOWMASS VILLAGE,CO 816156565 ASPEN,CO 81611 46%201 WEST HALLAM HOLDINGS LLC BROCKWAY LEX1E CHISHOLM EDITH S 46 205 W MAIN ST 500 S DIXIE HWY#201 7714 FISHER ISLAND ASPEN,CO 81611 CORAL GABLES, FL 33146 FISHER ISLAND, FL 33311 09-0966 CITY OF ASPEN COLLINS CINDA REV TRUST CRAWFORD RANDALL&ABIGAIL ATTN FINANCE DEPT 42 PARK LN 124 N GARMISCH ST 130 S GALENA ST MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 DOMINGUE FAMILY TRUST GARCIA STEVEN J DIMITRIUS RALLI TRUST PO BOX 2293 120 N GARMISCH 535 FREMONT DR WINTER PARK,FL 32790 ASPEN,CO 81611 PASADENA,CA 91103 GORMAN PATRICIA GSW FAMILY INV LP GLICKMAN ADAM 1426 ROSE GLEN RD 1320 HUNSICKER RD PO BOX 1207 GLADWYNE, PA 19035 LANCASTER, PA 17601 ASPEN,CO 81612 HITE HENRY H&ANGELA R HOGUET CONSTANCE M HAYMAX LODGING LLC PO BOX 155 333 E 68TH ST 101 W MAIN ST WOODY CREEK,CO 81656 NEW YORK,NY 10065 ASPEN,CO 81611 KING LOUISE LLC JOHNSON RICHARD&MONTAE IMBT KAPILOFF BRIAN J &TRACY M KI KI BOX 1467 6820 BRADBURY 3713 DEL MONTE DR BASALT, CO 81621 DALLAS,TX 75230 HOUSTON,TX 77019 MELTON DAVID PARDUBA JIRI LANDIS CAROLYN 135 W MAIN ST 116 N GARMISCH ST 128 N GARMISCH ST ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 RILEY AMY CLARK 98.76% PESIKOFF DAVID&SARAH PIETRZAK BOB&SUE LLC CLARK AMY L 124% 1811 NORTH BLVD 1796 E SOPRIS CREEK DR 129 W BLEEKER ST HOUSTON,TX 77098 BASALT, CO 81621 ASPEN,CO 81611 SARDY HOUSE NEW LLC SKILOFT LLC ROSE BRANDON 240 CRANDON BLVD#167 11 GREENWAY PLAZA#2000 625 MT HOPE RD KEY BISCAYNE,FL 33149 HOUSTON,TX 77046 WHARTON,NJ 07885 Repliez A la hachure afin de', www.avery.com ttiquettes faciles A peter Sens de MOW le rehord Pop•upTM� 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le gabarit AVERY 51600 charnement �(Jphy /affiDOi - ✓ vv ' Feed Piper expose Pop-6p EdgeTM {LSO Use Template 5160 � TARADA LLC SPEARS NANCY M 205 W MAIN STEVENSON KAREN H 27% 1934 O DGALLOWS RD 2ND FL PO BOX 2630 AS E MAIN 81 VIENNA,VA 22182 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 WEESE KATE B IRV TRST 2 WEST HOPKINS LLC TYROLEAN LODGE LLC 37 KINGSTON RD PO BOX 6150 200 W MAIN ST KESINGTON, CA 94707 POTOMAC,MD 20859 ASPEN,CO 81611 WOLKENMUTH EDWARD F JR&STEELE ZATS JULIE KRUMM DONALD PAUL REV TRUST JULIANNE BELL REV TRUST 118 N GARMISCH PO BOX 874 121 W BLEEKER ST ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN,CO 81611 Repliez a la hachure afin de i www.avery.com ttiquettes faclles a peler Sens de rev6ler le rebord pap-upT'' 1-800-GO-AVERY Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5160® j cbargement N JOHNSON 0 60 120 I(�IT RICHARD& L I W 201 WEST '�l MONTAE IMBTr Feet S HANGS GORMAN This map/drawing/image is a graphical representation HOLDINGS LLC PATRICIA of the features depicted and is not a legal KRUMM DONALD` I representation. The accuracy may change PAUL REV-, depending on the enlargement or reduction. CITY OF L TRUSjj W ASPEN Copyright 2014 Aspen/Pitkin G l S 114'EAST 3252014 4:45:26 PM C:\GIS\temp\Marchl4\300fi_HotelAspen,m BROCKWAVY THOGUET EKE SKILOFT r j LEXIE STREET ASSOC CONDO LLC U SP,�EARS � NANCY M - < GSW x FAMILY `HOGUET Q INV.Lp CONSTANCE'M F ( �.. W z H z W BLEEKER ST E BLEEKER S7 LL N z j VICTORIANS U) G�LICK AN H RILEY AMY AT BLEEKER Q AD_AM CLARK CONDO-ASSOC z ��TYROL z WEESE 98.76% ROSE APARTMENTS KATE B IRV BRANDON kU.S. EST PE8 KOFF LLC T2 WOLKENMUTH ED RD F empt( D DIS IN &SARAH _„_JR&STEELE JULI NE �'- - CAROLYN I BELL REV TRU V ? - j, _ 120 EAST MAIN AJAX VIEW HOTEL ASPEN ?LI IE PARTNERS,LLC COMMERCIAL/NORTH STAR i FFICE PIET [FA 11 D SARDY KING TYROLEAN PARTNER IP 100 EAST HOUSE LOUISE ! pI� K MAIN 120 EAST MAIN NEW LLC LLC LODGE LLC IN WEST B STREET LLC PARTNERS LLC MAIN STREET BOB ASSOC LLC SUE L L NORTHSTAR OFF E ASPEN CLINIC BUILDING CONDO A BUILDING:__ CONDOASSOC — — --------- W MAIN ST E MAIN ST _.. ----- HAYMAX A G SKI CHISHOLM� LODGING LLC, LODGE CONDO EDITH MELTON ASSOC S46% DAVID ASPEN SKI LODGE F- I DIMITRIUSIDO'ASSOC I _ RALLITRUST F U CITY OF N U KAPILOFF U ASPEN ~ BRIAN J to z ---- &TRACY M 2 W d U WEST HENRYEH& HAYMAX TARADA Q Q LODGING LLC LLC 0 HOPKINS ANGELA R U U) LLC W HOPKINS AVE E HOPKINS AVE 1 I I STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES INC landscape architecture. planning. resort design 2 2 0 20-1628 412 North Mill Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 t.97o/9 z 5 3 3 f.97 /9 info @scaplanning.com www.scaptanning.com 3 April 2014 Ms. Sara Adams, AICP City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 110 West Main Street / Research of Mineral Estate Owners Dear Sara: Management I On behalf of our clients, Hotel Aspen, and in Street,we teetlhhave perfohmed the public Review for the property located at 110 We st Main notice requirements as required by Sec. 26.304.060(E) of the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Among the requirements contained in Sec. 26.304.060(E) is the requirement to notify affected mineral estate owners by certified mailing at least fifteen (1 S) days prior to the date of the public hearing. Stan Clauson Associates, Inc. has researched the existence of mining claim or possession deeds dating to the late 19th century with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's records (the "Public Records") using the Title Policy issued by Stewart Title, File Number 01330-14101, issued to Garmisch Lodging, LLC. A review of the Public Records does not generate any record of deeds relating to mining claims or possession deeds. This letter is submitted to you to confirm our good-faith attempts to locate a list of mineral estate owners. Please call me with any questions. Very truly yours, Signed before me this 3rd day of April, 2014 by Stan Clauson. _..__�—�____J WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFIC L SE Stan Clauso , A1CP, ASLA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 'I �to L'p STAN CLAUSON ASSOCIATES, INC. C V Notary Public PATRICK S. RAWLEY !!!f 0--n NOTARY PUBLIC � 51 ATE OF COLORADO Notary Public's Signature NOTARY ID#19994012259 My Commission Expires July 26,2016 i AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE AD RESS OF PROPERTY: Aspen, CO S gEDULED PUBL�C HEARING DATE: 20 ILI STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) j i n (name, please print) I, �nc� Colorado hereby personally being or representing Applicant to the City of Aspen, certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: cial _ Publication of notice: By the publication in the f Aspen attleast fifteen (1) paper or a paper of general circulation m tl e publication is attached hereto. days prior to the public hearing. A copy of p Posting of notice: By posting of notice, wluch form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high„ and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen(15) days prior to the public hearing , 20 , to and including the date and time on the _ day of of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300 ) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, sunumarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued 072 next page) Mineral Estate ONnaer Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business Hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signa The for going "Affidavit of Not' e" was ac owledged before e thisday of p t , 20a, by PUBLIC NOTICE WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL RE: 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE DRIVE- PUD AMENDMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday April 15 2014,at a meet- My comnrnnssnon expires: 7A ing to begin at 4:30 p.m.before the Aspen Plan- ning and Zoning Commission,Sister Cities Meet- ing Room,City Hall,130 S.Galena St.,Aspen,to - consider an application submitted by the Aspen Glub and Spa,LLC,for the property located at 1450 Crystal Lake Road(commonly known as the Aspen Club and Spa),represented by Vann Asso- Notary Public ciates,LLC and Gateway Management Company. The applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to memorialize updated floor area calculations and retaining wall height. The gross building size does KAREN REED PATTERSON not change with this amendment.The property is legally described as Lot 15,Callahan Subdivision, NOTARY PUBLIC City of Aspen,Pitkin County,Colorado. For further information,contact Jessica Garrow at the City of a STATE OF COLORADO Aspen Community Development Department,130 1.lnTARY ID#19964002767 S.Galena St.,Aspen,CO,(970)429.2760,�IENTS AS APPLICABLE: 2o�s ' lessica.garrowOcityofaspen.com. :,;n1 1155KN1 EXpQBS�9bfU8t�t�5+ • s/LJ Erspamer,Chair rON �• 0 1 Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission OSTED NOTICE (SIGN) 1 P blis gedgin the Aspen Times on March 27,2014. 0 ,D GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 0 APPLICANT CERTIFICA TION OF MINERAL ESTAE O WNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. x'24-65.5-103.3 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 5��r f� ,Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, �G�j��iC,/Y (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15)days prior to the public hearing on the _ day of , 20 , to and including the date and time o he public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) A1'4 Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signa re The foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was ac owledgeId efore me this Okay of , 20 A, by IN WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL KAREN REED PATTERSON My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#19964002767 Notary Public My Commission Expires February 15,2016 ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICA TION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE(SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BYMAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE DRIVE—PUD AMENDMENT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Tuesday, April 15, 2014, at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Sister Cities Meeting Room, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Aspen Club and Spa, LLC, for the property located at 1450 Crystal Lake Road (commonly known as the Aspen Club and Spa), represented by Vann Associates, LLC and Gateway Management Company. The applicant is requesting a PUD amendment to memorialize updated floor area calculations and retaining wall height. The gross building size does not change with this amendment. The property is legally described as Lot 15, Callahan Subdivision, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 429.2780, j essica.garrow @cityofaspen.com. s/LJ Erspamer,Chair Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Published in the Aspen Times on March 27,2014 City of Aspen Account T , AU3AV-09-008-6 Widn-dod pjogaj al ja{anaa luap suas 0965 AH3AV I!aegeB al zas!l!;D ' wox Aism- mm 'op u!a am 3e e e za!do ap suag } 4 4 I _ I a salad a selpell sauanbl 43 10TH MTN DIVISION HUT ASSOC INC 1280 LITE LLC ALPHA FAMILY TRUST 1280 LITE AVE 1280 LITE AVE#16 C/O SABAN CAPITAL GROUP INC ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 10100 SANTA MONICA BLVD#2600 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 ARMYTAGE GAYLE M ASPEN CLUB ASPEN8 LLC 1434 CRYSTAL LAKE RD 1450 CRYSTAL LAKE RD 15700 SOUTH PARK BLVD ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 SHAKER HEIGHTS,OH 441201670 BASS EDWARD P BCL TRUST BECKWITT MANAGEMENT TRUST C/O DORSEY CROUSE 1707 MARKET PLACE BLVD#250 1707 MARKET PLACE BLVD#250 201 MAIN ST#2700 IRVING,TX 75063 IRVING,TX 75063 FORT WORTH,TX 76102 BEHRHORST DAVID G BURGESS JOHN K&ELIZABETH CITY OF ASPEN 1280 LITE AVE STE 32 700 UTE AVE#202 ATTN FINANCE DEPT ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN,CO 81611 CLINE LEONARD J COTE RICHARD CRICENTI-MUNVES PALMIRA 634 CARONDELET ST 1280 LITE AVE PO BOX 24 NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-3504 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 FALLIN RICHARD ALDEN FARVER JOAN LIVING TRUST FRETZ FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 6819 617 FRANKLIN PL#200 1432 CRYSTAL LAKE RD SNOWMASS VILLAGE, CO 81615-6819 PELLA, IA 50219 ASPEN, CO 81611 GIBSON DYLAN J GOODMAN HERBERT I&MARY K GOODMAN LEONARD C 1280 LITE AVE 5710 TECUMSEH CIR 222 N LASALLE ST#800 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON,TX 770571317 CHICAGO, IL 60601 GORDON JOHN CHARLES GORDON MARIE FABIENNE JESSEMIE HAHN TRUST 10356 E STATE HIGHWAY 82 BENEDICT 1650 FARNAM ST TWIN LAKES, CO 812519766 10356 E STATE HIGHWAY 82 OMAHA, NE 68102 TWIN LAKES,CO 812519766 HART H RODES&PATRICIA I HEAD FREDERICK F HOFFMAN EVELINE REV TRUST 3001 HILLSBORO RD 1451 LITE AVE 1427 CRYSTAL LAKE RD BRENTWOOD,TN 37027 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 J ARIEL HOLDINGS TRUST 50% JCCL TRUST JONES FAMILY REV TRUST 25 ORINDA WY#300 1707 MARKET PLACE BLVD#250 2105 LEE SHORE PL ORINDA,CA 94563 IRVING,TX 75063 WILMINGTON,NC 28405 T .AQLC 1]��Ab ,a6p3 do-dod asodxa jaded paad @09LS a}eldwal®AaaAd ash @ f I sianei—jaad ASea A213AV-09-008-6 f widn-dod pjogaj ai j919Aaj luawa6jey: f ®0965®Aa3AV Wege6 al zesinin op sues i wow Ame•Amm ap u�}e amy3ey el a zalldaa - ialed a salpe}sa}lar&13 i LUTTRELL MARTHA MANAGING SPACES LLC MCCLAIN PETER K C/O FRANCIS&FREEDMAN PO BOX 4362 1461 UTE AVE 501 S BEVERLY DR 3RD FL ASPEN,CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS,CA 90212 MITCHELL TODD MORRIS CLIFTON H JR&SHERIDAN C MRK ASPEN INVESTMENTS LLC 1280 UTE AVE#7 1409 INDIAN CREEK 34 W DILIDO DR ASPEN, CO 81611 WESTOVER HILLS,TX 76107 MIAMI, FL 33139 MUNVES ANDREW NATHANSON FAMILY TRUST NOVAK JEFFERY T&KATHERINE PIKE PO BOX 24 101 OCEAN AVE#C-600 1463 UTE AVE ASPEN, CO 81612 SANTA MONICA, CA 90402 ASPEN,CO 81611 OTTE PATRICIA K OTTE WILSON MICHAEL PANTHERA LLLP 1280 UTE AVE STE 16 1280 UTE AVE#16 774 MARYS BLVD 10-557 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 INCLINE VILLAGE,NV 89451 POGLIANO GINA POLGRAVE INVESTMENTS LTD POWDER HOUSE CONDO ASSOC 1467 UTE AVE 2121 PONCE DE LEON BLVD,STE 650 1280 LITE AVE#16 ASPEN,CO 81611 CORAL GABLES, FL 33134 ASPEN,CO 81611 PUBLIC COUNSEL OF THE ROCKIES RC ASPEN TRUST REESE JOHN W 1280 UTE AVE STE 4 222 N LASALLE ST#800 257 EASTWOOD DR ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60601 ASPEN,CO 81611 ROESER ELLEN QPRT S ARIEL HOLDINGS TRUST 50% SALVADORE TERESA 1900 HIGHLAND PARK CIR 25 ORINDA WY#300 ARMSTRONG BERNARD&TATIANA FORT WORTH,TX 76107 ORINDA, CA 94563 1122 COUNTY RD 106 CARBONDALE,CO 81623 SEBASTIAN SEAN D S&AMY P S SHARPE HOLDINGS LP SHELDON ROBERT&BARBARA 321 GRANT ST 10490 WILSHIRE BLVD#1603 11 BROOKSIDE DR SEWICKLEY, PA 15143 LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 WESTPORT, CT 06880 SMITH BRADLEY&DOLECKI SMITH STILLWATER RANCH OPEN SPACE SHUMAN RUTH L JENNIFER ASSOC 1120 PARK AVE 1455 UTE AVE PO BOX 11597 NEW YORK, NY 10128 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81612 UHALT HUGH C VALLEY GROUP LLC WAYNE WILLIAM&MARSHA TRUSTEES 634 CARONDELET ST 3001 HILLSBORO RD 1483 BONNYMEDE DR NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130-3504 BRENTWOOD,TN 37027 SANTA BARBARA,CA 93108 wla6p3 do-dod asodxa � jaded paaj T ®096S a;eldwaj®fJ8AlV asi • el-mnn-1 -IAOJ Ap tasy reel—caoets Use AveryO Template 51600 I j . feed Paper � Mena along une to I ® AVERY®5160 ; expose Pop-up EdgeTM j 1 66968 OO 'N3dSV 6#3nV 31f1 0826 AWN 3SIM 6 6968 OO 'N3dSV 6176t76 VO 'A3IIVA IIIN E68Z66968 OO 'N3dSV NI i•13H1V3H ZgZO 3AV 3IVa3HlIl8 3 gt?9 3AV 31(1 S g9n AUMW R III G Hem 3SIM H SVNOHl NOSIIM N3A31S'R VIN NOSIIM Etiquettes faciles a peler I I i Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com , Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 cha Sens de gement reveler le rebord Pop-upTM j 1-800-GO-AVERY 1 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ,Aspen,CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATC: ,20- STA'L'E OF COLORADO ) { ss. County of Pitkin ) I (name,please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, Hereby personally certify that I have complied witli the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached he)•eto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15)days prior to the public hearing on the a day of AIN V-CA 204, to and including the date and tinic of the public hearing. A photograph ofthe pasted)notice (vig n) is attached hereto. R7r)iling of'notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(l')(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15)days prior to the public hearing, notice Nvas band delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. "file names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy cif the owmi v and goi er)rtnetttal agencies so)noticed is attached hereto. i Areighbo•hood Ouu-each: Applicant attests that neigllborllood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of' the neighbo'hood outreach summa y, inchicling the method of jmblic not)ltcation and a cohv of arty documentatio)that was presented to the public is attached he)-eto_ (controlled on next pttge) i 1lineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30)days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkln County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially � Planned Areas,are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text tnnen(Imem. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this I Title,or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning I agency during all business hours For Fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Si,1ature i Tile foregoing"Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this Wday of 11l Gt�tL lit _ 20 111, by -t kc-_1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JENNIF=ER S. EMIG NOTARY PUBLIC + My commission expires: STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID#20134066334 [MY COmmission EXPIMS oetobar 17,2017 J Notary I ATTACIIMENTS AS APPLICABLE: f • COPY OF TITE PUBI,ICATIOIV • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTPD NOT'IC'E ff1GAq i • LIST OF THE OI HERS A ND GO VEIUVt1IENTAL A GEATCIE.S NOTICED i BY HAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF, AHNERAL ESTAE Oli/HERS NOTICE AS REQUIRCD BY C.R.S.§24-65.5103.3 � �•g1j°1 `fig � �Lq �7 �`t 1J.. _ y` y ?.✓,II��/'�•�Ry'k-�:. I�i .A` �Q+�` 1, �.V1 -- �i+ �,��!�� �ni '♦ L� ��••"�ih•,,'_�h�� �+� '���5!af•�7�,i�1 �Q R R.ti 1',���t' .. F �.�- ':'+. fi ►'ttt'`''1 F rl ). ; � d .irk ;is ••• ATM. " Y � a , ;, 4 r ��. r ��r�ij w���. �'� tF � �t��F' .,yet!•?'" .l Jt..�> �•��������•Y s�ry�• 1 •, • • •Y. Lv� �t Y ., 6_��c,�C.• �lra � �.• — �•�•aYJ `�j It th fir •} ,r ;r , _ .Time:I R SS`! { •r''� ip ,� J IT m= 'INOTIC PUBLIC l April 15, 2014 Date . p Time : 4:30pm Placen 130 S Galena , City Hall Sister Cities Meeting Rm Purpose : For P&Z to consider an a licatio �p n submitted by Aspen Club & oa I .` 450 Cr stal Lake Rd fi � ®r this . d ro ert As e�Club . re � The a lien quests an arnen fi PI dment t® their Planned Unit DeVel r ® ment �U� rmen�®rialize u to talc plated fl®®r ulations and r area �Qrfur etain�n then inform all hei h As e ation c t, .1 97om n plannin contact the ,429-27� e t, at