HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.HP.510 E Hyman Ave.0025.2019.AHPC•
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
CITY OF ASPEN
CASE NUMBER 0025.20119.AHPC
PROJECT ADDRESS 510 E HYMAN AVE 4300
PARCELID 273718213800
PLANNER AMY SIMON
CASE DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE AFFECT
REPRESENTATIVE GRETCHEN GREENWOOD ARCHITECTS
DATE OF FINAL 7/22/2019
ACTION
CLOSED BY LILLY CULVER 10/8/2019
Permit type �hpc I Aspen Historic Land U
Address 510 E HYMAN AVE
City JASPEN
Permit Information
Permit # 0025.2019.AHPC —�
ApUbeuite 300
State i.n Zip 181611
hl aster permit Routing queue aslul 5 Applied 07/15/2019
Project Status pending Approved
PID L,,_,, 82 800
Description CERTIFICATE OF NO NEGATIVE EFFECT Issued
Closed/Final
Submitted MIKE HAMAN 970.925-9071 I Clock Running_ Days F0 Expires 07/09/2020
Submitted via
Owner
Last name I BPO ELKS —� First name 510 E HYMAN
Phone (970) 925-9071 Address ASPEN CO 81611
Applicant
❑✓ Owner is applicant?
Last name I BPO ELKS I First name
Phone (970) 925-9071 Cust # 31318
Email
❑ Contractor is applicant?
510 E HYMAN
ASPEN CO 81611
Address
Lender
Last name First name
Phone ( ) Address
;�„ ,-lr ncDFRI
Certificate of No Negative Effect
Q Approved ❑ Denied
Applicant: BPOE Aspen 224, Elks Lodge, 510 E. Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611.
Property: 510 E. Hyman Avenue, B.P.O.E. Condos, Unit 4, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Colorado. PID #2737-182-13-8o1.
Determination: This 22nd day of Julyr, 20�9, the following alterations have been approved
as represented in the land use application.
• Replacement of all third floor windows.
The project qualifies for a Certificate of No Negative Effect according to Section 26.415.070.B
of the Municipal Code as it entails replacement of non -historic windows and creates no change
to the exterior physical appearance of the building.
Based on a review of the applicable Historic Preservation Design Guidelines and the
Commercial, Lodging and Historic District Design Standards and Guidelines (attached) staff
finds that the design guidelines applicable to this scope of work are met, with no conditions.
y Simon, Il stork Areservation Officer
Expires 3 ye s from date of separately issued Development Order. Issuance of this certificate does
not exempt tte applicant from complying with all City codes, including land use and building codes.
Relevant Design Guidelines
3.2 Preserve the position, number, and arrangement of historic windows in a building
wall.
• Enclosing a historic window is inappropriate.
• Do not change the size of an original window opening.
3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in its design.
• If the original is double -hung, then the replacement window must also be double -hung. If the
sash have divided lights, match that characteristic as well.
3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same as the original.
3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening.
• Changing the window opening is not permitted.
• Consider restoring an original window opening that was enclosed in the past.
3.6 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of
the original window.
• A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's casing, the sash steps back
to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually
only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual
window from the surrounding plane of the wall.
• The historic profile on AspenModern properties is typically minimal.
3.7 Adding new openings on a historic structure is generally not allowed.
• Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear or secondary walls.
• New windows should be similar in scale to the historic openings on the building, but should in
some way be distinguishable as new, through the use of somewhat different detailing, etc.
• Preserve the historic ratio of window openings to solid wall on a fagade.
• Significantly increasing the amount of glass on a character defining fagade will negatively affect
the integrity of a structure.
•
Agreement to Pay Application Fees
An agreement between the City of Aspen ("Gty") and
Please type or print in all caps
Address of Property: 510 EAST HYMAN AVENUE
Property Owner Name: _BPOE ASPEN 224 Representative Name (if different from Property Owner)_
MIKE HAMAN Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: 510 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, CO.81611
Contact info for billing: e-mail: _manager@aspenelks.org Phone: 970-925-9071
1 understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. 30, Series of 2017, review fees for Land Use application's and
payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property
owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application.
For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are
non-refundable.
101—flat fee for V Oil. $. flat fee for
$. flat fee for $, flat fee for
For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, It is not
possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional
costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete
processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project
consideration, unless invoices are paid in full.
The City and i understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to
the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of
an invoice by the City for such services.
I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no -payment. 1 agree to pay
the following Initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. 1 understand that payment of a deposit does not
render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I
agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly
rates hereinafter stated.
deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time
above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
$ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the
deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour.
City of Aspen:
Signature:
Jessica Garrow, AICP
Community Development Director PRINT Name: MIKE HAMAN
City Use. Title:BOARD-MEMEBER
Fees Due: $ Received $
Case #
PERMIT NUMBER:
ADDRESS:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION COMPLIANCE FORM MuCncwAsm
All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance
with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property
owner or Authorized Agent representing the property owner. The following certification shall accompany the
application for a permit.
AD� 510 East Hyman Ave.
I, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one)
UNIT#3rd Floor PARCELIo# 273718213801
This property is not subject to a homeowner's association or other form of private covenant.
❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements
proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant
beneficiary.
❑ This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements
proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary.
I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of
private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public
document.
Owner Signature
Owner Printed Name
OR
Authorized Agent Signature
Authorized Agent Printed Name
Mike Haman
Date
—tee 1-30-2019
CITY OF ASPENAug-t2o17 130 S. GALENA ST I ASPEN CO 81611
•
GRETCHEN GREENWOOD ARCHITECT, INC.
210 South Galena Street Suite 30
Aspen CO. 81611
0: 970-925-4502
E-mail.ggreenwoodOggaaspen.com
June 28, 2019
Elks Lodge
510 East Hymans # 300
Aspen, CO. 81611 Gregg Hemming
RE: Owner's Authorization to Represent
Parcel ID # 2737182139W
To whom it may concern:
This letter is to certify that the Board of the Elks Lodge at 510 East Hyman Ave. # 300 e.
gives Gretchen Greenwood & Associates, Inc. permission to represent me for the
submittal of the a, Historic Preservation Land Use Application for No Negative Effect to
the City of Aspen Community Development Department.
The contact information for Gretchen Greenwood & Associates, is as follows:
Gretchen Greenwood, Architect
Gretchen Greenwood & Associates, Inc.
210 South Galena Street # 30
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Office: 970.925.4502
Mobile: 970.948.2081
�c/ 1 ly yours,
Elks Lodge Board
2. Street Address/Legal Description/ Parcel ID
APPLICANT'S NAME
BPOE ASPEN 224
ELKS LODGE
510 EAST HYMAN AVE.
ASPEN, CO. 81611
970-920-9079
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
B.P.O.E. CONDOS UNIT 4
PARCEL ID:
273718213804
PROPERTY ADDRESS:
510 EAST HYMAN AVE.
ASPS, CO. 81611
970-920-9079
0 0
.11, 00
I Id
City of Aspen
7. WRITTEN DE5CRIPTION FOR THE NON -HISTORIC WINDOW REPLACEMENT
FOR THE THIRD FLOOR ONLY.
BACKGROUND:
• The Elks have a goal for the historic building to increase its energy
efficiency.
• The Elks plan is to upgrade all the non -historic windows (there are no
historic windows on the building) over a period of time for maximum
energy efficiency. The first phase of the energy retrofit is to replace
the 3' floor windows. This minor development application is for the 3rd
floor only.
• The existing 3rd floor windows are non -historic and 27 years old.
• The non -historic windows are in disrepair, the colors are all different,
they are all drafty and do not operate properly to open and close.
• Anderson Windows has provided a double hung, energy efficient window
with the required U value of .28. The windows have been built to match
the non -historic windows exactly. The new windows are double hung, the
frames are 2-1/2" in width and the sill detail from the stone ledge to the
glazing is 7-1 /2" high off the stone ledge, just 1 /8" higher than the
existing non -historic sill detail, which is 7-5/8". DRAWING EXHIBIT I
• The new windows were not approved prior to ordering by the City and
so we are applying for a Certificate of No Negative Effect to be able to
install these windows. During management and personnel change the
Board of Directors understood that the previous management had
acquired approval for the windows.
• Attached DRAWING EXHIBIT I show the Existing Window and 501 detail
profile and the Proposed Window and 51ll detail profile for comparison.
The only difference between the Existing non -historic window and the
New Proposed windows is the angle of the sill detail on the new window.
The frame sizes, sash sizes, location of the glazing above the stone
ledge are exactly the same.
• The Elks and Anderson Windows followed the historic guidelines for the
new window design. Around town, the sills of many non -historic and
historic windows are not consistent. Pictures are attached showing
these different conditions. EXHIBIT 2
• From a viewpoint from the street, to the 3rd floor of the building which is
about 32 feet off the street, the angle of the sill detail is not seen on
the existing window or the new window. What is most significant is that
the start of the glazing off the stone ledge is exactly the same as the
existing windows and the height of the sill and bottom frame of the new
window off the stone ledge remains the same as the existing windows. In
0 •
addition, the header detail remains the same from the existing windows
to the new windows.
• No historic material including the sill, header or sashes sides of the
window openings remove or coverup any historic material.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE HISTORIC GUIDELINES
REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS THAT ARE BEYOND REPAIR, OR HAVE
BEEN REMOVED.
3.3 Match a replacement window to the original in it design.
The new windows are matching the characteristics of the existing non -
historic double hung design in character, frame size, glass size and
function, while providing energy efficiency. DRAWING EXHIBIT 1.
3.4 When replacing an original window, use materials that are the same
as the original.
The existing windows are not historic. Over the years the Elk's building
have had a variety of window configurations and details, including double
hung and triple hung. PHOTO EXHIBIT 3
The new proposed windows will be energy efficient and includes a frame
that is a LEEDS certified product, synthetic bonded polymer, fade
resistant and is consistent in color, that will not be affected by UV rays
and simulates the look of wood.
3.5 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening.
The new windows match the proportions of the existing non -historic
windows. The frame and glazing are the same and is in the exact location
as existing.
3.G Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its
components to that of the original window.
The frame, sash and sill details match the non -historic windows. The sill
detail is slightly different by inches, but visually the glazing and frame of
the existing windows and proposed remains the same. So, the new
windows have been built to match as closely as possible. See attached
drawing for the existing and proposed dimensions. DRAWING EXHIBIT I
0 Si
3.7 Adding new openings is not allowed.
No new openings are proposed.
3.8 Energy Conservation: Use a storm window to enhance energy
conservation rather than replace a historic window.
In lieu of not installing the purchased windows, it is not a popular option
for the Elks to add storm windows to all the windows on the building to
meet the energy efficiency goals that the Elks want for the building. But
may be a p0551bility.
IN SUMMARY
The existing window that need to be replaced are non -historic and not
energy efficient. The Elks are choosing to replace the windows at a cost
of $ 120,000.00 dollars, which has already been paid for and are ready
for installation in April.
The loss to the Elks Foundation if these windows cannot be used 15
devastating. The Elk's provide a needed community benefit providing more
than $ 1 ,8G7,000.00 dollars over a five-year period to the community
including, College Scholarships, Youth activities, Drug Awareness, Shining
Stars, Veterans support, Senior Support and Various Community Events
for all members and non-members. In addition, the Elks offer low income
rent to local businesses. The at rent money is fed back into the
community. All money earned is spent back into the community.
The Elks are not going to buy different windows and loose the
$ 120,000.00 investment into new windows, as the cost 15 not possible
without losing programs.
It is the opinion of the Elks' Board and members that these windows meet
the H15toric Design Guidelines.
WOOD WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW GLAZING
WINDOW GLAZING
61.
EXISTING PROFILE OF ELK'S WINDOW
SCALE: = 1'-0"
VIEWED FROM EXTERIOR
SCALE: J' = I'-0"
=DGE
•
•
J
7 8�
r
EDGE OF
F
STONE LEDGE
EXISTING PROFILE OF SILL DETAIL
N
ODICf
w
„WOOD WINDOW
SLOPING SILL
-
STONE LEDGE
PROPOSED EXTERIOR WINDOW ELE
VIEWED FROM EXTERIOR
SCALE: -)" = 1'-O`
-- WOOD WINDOW FRAME
WINDOW GLAZING
- - WINDOW GLAZING
/ATION
NEW PROFILE OF ELK'S WINDOW
SCA'_E:-° = 1 O"
0 •
DGE OF
TONE LEDGE
PROPOSED FROFI LE OF SILL DETAIL
•
7" 81
ALTERED PKOEI LE OF SI LL DETAIL
7A
%aqL.4.A—�, !,,� . . "a
k' � i
0
•
Andersen. CASEMENT & AWNING WINDOWS
Andersen- Window and Patio Door Center of Glass Performance Data
Dual -Pane Glass (Air filled)
Andersen' Product
Visible
Light'
SC2
SHW
RNG4
TUV'
Fang
TDW'
U-Fkwr'
%RH
@colter'
Illaw
Casement/Awning, Narronne' Doutde-Hung, Nunuflm' Tnrwr•, 200 Series TtH-Wash
93%
0.91
0.79
tag
63%
65%
0.49
38%
43'F
and Gilding Window
Casement/Arming Picture/Transom, 200 Series Fixed Un fs (Tempered)
82%
0.99
O.T8
196
SB%
61%
0.48
39%
44"F
Persia -Shield' Patio Door
82%
0.89
0.78
186
58%
61%
0.48
39%
44•F
Narroltnc' Gilding Patio Door 82% 0,87 0.75 180 55%
High -Performance" Low -EC and Low-E Glass (Dual -pane, Low-E, argon blend glass)
59% 0.48 39% 44°F
Visible
wing
%RH
Andersen' Product
Light'
SC2
SHGC'
RHG'
TUV'
To*'
U-Factor'
@ center'
IGSTe
Caement/hudng, 400 Serlm Ink -Wash, Narmine D obleHu it, Nonoene 7tarsonti
73%
0.48
0.42
99
11%
34%
025
61%
56°F
200 Series Tilt Wash and 6Tdiog Widow
Woodwright' FaiFFrase Double -Hung, Woedwdgtd" Inset Doable-Hant Wtndew
73%
0.48
0.42
99
17%
34%
025
61%
56°F
Caseuanrt/Awrdng Pichire/T-084 Danhl 410M Wedwdgid' Rdaa/fsetam,
72%
0.47
0.41
98
16%
33%
0.26
59%
551F
WoodmighF Insert (Tempered) Window
Pichrre/Fraosom, Circle Tap; Ord, Clrek, 200 Series Fbrd Units
72%
0.47
0.41
98
16%
33%
026
69%
55°F
400 Series Gilding Window
72%
0.48
0.41
99
16%
33%
0.25
61%
56sF
Redf unia, AM,. SpdeOioe; Fall Chad, Good,, ripi OdI9014 Ad Road, Qartw heat
70%
0.46
0.40
95
14%
31%
025
61%
56°F
Fienotaaad MqK Data leg and Di4g Dow, Fmeehaaod. PAD Dow SI1e0L1rVrraawra,
71%
0.47
0.41
97
16%
33%
025
61%
56°F
NamBm 01iAne Dow
High -Performance" Low-E4' Sun and Low-E Sun Glass (Dual -pane, tinted Low-E, argon blend glass)
Visible
Fading
%RH
Anderson* Product
tight'
SC2
SHGC'
RHG'
TUV'
TOW.
U-Factor'
@bider•
IGST'
coloom yAlaabg, 4@0 Sai TWAU , NanwOee" D=We4i iq, Narmorm Transoa,
40%
029
026
62
17%
25%
025
61%
56•F
200 Sda7@4Ma0 ad GO" MlaAaa
Wedarl0lt' Foll4rare DwWe-Hslg, Wodadgbf hi art Double -lung Window
40%
029
026
62
11%
25%
025
61%
56"F
Casemart/Awdng picono/Thim ore, D°ahk4Yeg (icture, Woodalight Full -Frame PlcSrre/Trarawq
40%
029
025
60
16%
24%
026
59%
55°F
Waot anted Insert (Tempered) Widow
_ -
Plcbac/Tmnsom, Circle Top-, Out, Circle
40%
0.29
025
60
16%
24%
0.26
59%
55°F
200 Scrics Fixed Window
40%
0.29
0.25
60
16%
24%
0.26
59%
551F
400 Sodcs Gilding Window
40%
029
026
62
17%
25%
0.25
61%
56•F
Redhome; Arty Spdngliine, Fun Chord, GGt'dc, Elliptical. Octagon, Full Round, Quarter Round
37%
028
024
59
13%
22%
025
61%
56°F
F aidayaed Hkgp* Or6wbrg and Gf!ding Dow, Frenchaoorf Patter Dow SIdeOAd/Traesae,
39%
029
025
60
15%
23%
025
61%
56°F
Namine"BDdrg Deer _. ____- _
Low-E4• SmartSun' and Low-E SmartSun Glass (Dual -pane, tinted Low-E, argon blend glass)
Visible Fading %RH
Andersen- Product Light' SC2 SHCC' RHG' TUV` TDW U Factor' @ cerder° IGS1"
Caserand/Awnbrg, 400 Sores Tllt-Wash Window
65%
032
027
66
5%
21%
0.24
61%
56°F
Woodwdght Fuil-Frame Double -Hung, Wcvklvv� Insert Doable -Hung, 200 Series Tilt -Wash
65%
0.32
027
66
5%
21%
0.24
61%
56°F
and Gilding Wlndew
Casement/Awning FicStre/Tronsom, Doab!c-Hung Picture, WaadwrW Fu0-Frarx PlcWre/Transom,
655%
0.31
0.27
65
5%
21%
0.25
fit%
561F
Wnedwngt insist (Tempered) Window
Fltxiframe; Arch, Spdognne, W0 Clarr4 fnOdy Elliptical, OetaOoo, Fait Rout, Qwaher Immr4 200
63.4
031
027
65
4%
20%
0.24
61%
56°F
series Flrcd Window
Frenctsood' Hirged, OutsMng and 60mig Dow, FetiSweud Patio Door SidNpd/Tmosas
64%
031
027
66
5%
21%
0.24
61%
56°F
• •lligh-Performance Low-E4' (HP Law-E4).'SmartSun' and *High -Performance Low-E4 Sun- (HP Sun) are Andersen trademarks for al-E• glass.
• Based on NFRC testinVsimulatlon conditions using Windows 5.2 and NFRC validated spectral data. 0°F outside temperature, 70°F Inside temperature and a 15 mph wind.
' Visible Transmittance (VT) measures how much light comes through the glass. The higher the value, from 0 to 1. the more daylight the glass lets in. Visible Transmittance is measured over the 380 to 160 nanometer portion
of the solar spectrum.
2 Shading Coefficient (SC) defines the amount of heal gain through the glass compared to a single file of clear 1B' (3 kit) glass.
2 Solar Heat Gain Coefficient (SHGC) defines the fraction of solar radiation admitted through the glass both directly transmitted and absorbed and subsequently released inward. The lower the value, the less heat is
transmitted through the glass.
' Relative Heal Gain (RHG) is the amount of neat gam through a glazing incorporating U-Factor and Solar Heal Gam Coefficient.
Transmission Ultra -Violet Energy (TUV). The transmission of short wave energy in the 300-380 nanometer portion of the solar spectrum. fhe energy can cause fabric fading.
" Transmission Damage Function (TDW). The transmission of UV and visible light energy in the 300-600 manometer portion of the solar spectrum. The value includes both the UV and visible light energy that can cause fabric
fading. This rating has also been referrec to as the Krochmann Damage Function. This rating better predicts fading potential than UV bansmisslor. alone. The lower the Damage Function rating, the less transmission of short
wave energy through the glass that can potentially cause fabric fading. Fabric type is also a key component of fading potential.
' U-Factor in this table Is a measure of the heat loss through the center of glass in BTU/hr deg. F sq. ft. This U-Factor should not be confused with U-Factor as measured by the National Fenestration Rating Council (NFRC)
which represents heat lass through the total unit. Only NFRC total unit U-factor Ratings should be used when assessing building or energy code compliance.
e Percent relative humidity before condensation occurs at the center of glass, taken using center of glass temperature.
° Inside glass surface temperatures are taken at the center of glass.
• This data Is accurate as of December 2010- Due to ongoing product changes. updated test results or new industry standards, this data may change over time. Contact your Andersen supplier for current performance
information or upgrade options.
• Contact your Andersen supplier or visit andersenwindows.com for center of glass performance data an windows with laminated glass, patterned glass, tempered glass and products ordered with capillary breather tubes.
• PassiveSun` glass values are available online at anderserwindows.com.
2011-12 4002O0 Series Product Guid9 1 Of 1
j
41
of
k
IL
•
� �
I
VI
0 0
ILACk A% i %I'
SYMBOL LF;ENO
WEST ELEVATION �A— SOUTH ELEVATION
•arA
mow
DO
J;
EASTELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION .......
As j3uaT ELEVATIONS/ A4.0
DEMOLMON PLILI(S
window m