The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.apz.202105181 AGENDA ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION May 18, 2021 4:30 PM, Virtual Meeting at www.webex.com Click "Join" & enter Meeting number: 182 882 2249 Password: 81611 OR Call 1-408-418-9388 Access Code 182 882 2249# I.WEBEX MEETING INSTRUCTIONS TO JOIN ONLINE: Go to www.webex.com and click on "Join" in the top right corner Enter Meeting Number: 182 882 2249 Enter Password: 81611 Click "Join Meeting" -- OR -- JOIN BY PHONE Call: 1-408-418-9388 Enter Meeting Number: 182 882 2249 Enter Password: 81611 II.ROLL CALL III.COMMENTS IV.MINUTES None V.DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI.PUBLIC HEARINGS VI.A.225 Smuggler St - Residential Design Standard Variations Memo_225 Smuggler_RDS Variation.pdf Resolution No. __, Series of 2021_225 Smuggler_RDS Variation.pdf Exhibit A - Application.pdf Exhibit B - RDS Checklist.pdf Exhibit C - Review Criteria.pdf Exhibit D - Public Notice Affidavit.pdf VI.B.Silver Circle Ice Rink– Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Silver Circle Ice Rink Memo_Minor PD.pdf 1 2 Resolution No. X_Series of 2021_Silver Circle Ice Rink.pdf Exhibit A_Detailed Review Criteria_Silver Circle Ice Rink.pdf Exhibit B_Silver Circle Ice Rink Minor PD Amendment Application.pdf VII.OTHER BUSINESS None VIII.ADJOURN Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1)Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affidavit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clarifications of applicant 7) Public comments 8)Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal/clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 11) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met or not met. Revised January 8, 2021 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Garrett Larimer, Senior Planner THRU: Amy Simon, Planning Director RE: 225 Smuggler Rd. – RDS Variation for Articulation of Building Mass & Window Placement MEETING DATE: May 18th, 2021 APPLICANT: Continental Holdings LLC 15 E. 26th St., Suite 602 New York, New York 10010 REPRESENTATIVE: Carson Davis, EYRC Architects 10865 Washington Blvd., Culver City, CA 90232 LOCATION: 225 W. Smuggler St. ZONING: Moderate Density Residential, (R-6) SUMMARY: The Applicant is requesting variations to the Articulation of Building Mass and Window Placement Residential Design Standards (RDS) in order to redevelop the lot with a single-family residence. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the requested variations. Figure 1: Subject Site Figure 2: Proposed Rendering (North Facade) 3 Page 2 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: The Applicant requests the Planning and Zoning Commission consider two Residential Design Standards Variations (Section 26.410.020.C Variations): 1. Articulation of Building Mass (Section 26.410.030.B.1) for a design alternative that does not meet any of the three options provided in the code. 2. Window Placement (Section 26.410.030.E.2) for a window that measures more than 10’ and spans two stories. Applications that do not comply with the standards contained in the RDS section of the code must apply for alternative compliance review for an RDS Variation. Each standard is identified in the code as either “flexible” or “non-flexible.” The code allows for alternative compliance for flexible standards to be reviewed administratively, but non-flexible standards must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z). In order to qualify for a variation, a finding must be made that: 1. A design alternative is provided that meets the intent of the standard, as well as the general intent statements in the RDS Chapter; OR, 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints, in essence a hardship. The Articulation of Building Mass standard is a non-flexible standard. The Window Placement Standard is a flexible standard. The two flexible and non-flexible standards have been combined into a single review at P&Z for efficiency. The P&Z can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the standards outlined in section 26.410.020.C, Variation Review Standards. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority. LOCATION/BACKGROUND: The subject site is located across the street from Triangle Park in the west end. The lot is 6,000 square feet and is zoned R-6. The property currently contains a single-family residence that was built in 1995 which is proposed to be demolished and replaced. Staff has reviewed the application for compliance with the Residential Design Standards and determined that all other standards have been met or do not apply. The RDS Checklist is attached as Exhibit B, for reference. Figure 3: Existing Residence 4 Page 3 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 REQUEST: Residential Design Standard Variations Articulation of Building Mass: The Articulation of Building Mass Standard provides three options for compliance: 1. Maximum Sidewall depth, 2. Off-set with One-Story Ground Level Connector, 3. Increased Side Setbacks at reard and Step Down. Option 1, Maximum Sidewall Depth, sets a maximum sidewall depth (front most wall to rear most wall) as 50’. There are no requirements for articulation, or restrictions on massing, within the 50’ maximum sidewall depth option. Option 2, Off-set with One-Story Ground Level Connector, requires a one-story connector between two-story massing elements. The one- story connector must be within 45’ of the front most wall, must be at least 10’ long, and must be setback 5’ from the sidewall of the primary structure. Option 3, Rear stepdown, requires a one-story element at the rear of the structure, that must start within 45’ feet from the front most wall, and must be setback from the sidewall of the primary structure 5’. In order to comply with the standard, one of the three options must be met. The current design does not meet any of the three options. The intent of the Articulation of Building Mass Standard is “…to reduce the overall perceived mass and bulk of buildings on a property as viewed from all sides. Designs should promote light and air access between adjacent properties. Designs should articulate building walls by utilizing multiple forms to break up large expansive wall planes. Buildings should include massing and articulation that convey forms that are similar in massing to historic Aspen residential buildings. This standard is critical in Figure 4: Option 1 - Maximum Sidewall Depth Figure 5: Option 2 - Off-set with One-Story Ground Level Connector Figure 6: Option 3 - Increased Side Setbacks at Rear and Step Down 5 Page 4 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 the Infill Area where small lots, small side and front setbacks, alleys and historic Aspen building forms are prevalent. Designs should change the plane of a building's sidewall, step a primary building's height down to one-story in the rear portion or limit the overall depth of the structure.” Window Placement: The Window Placement Standard applies to all lots except those on lots located substantially above the elevation of the adjacent right-of-way. The standard requires all street facing windows span less than one-story as defined by RDS. One story is defined in the RDS Chapter as 10’. The intent of the standard is, “to preserve the historic architectural character of Aspen by preventing large expanses of vertical glass windows that dominate street-facing façades. Overly tall expanses of glass on a street-facing façade do not relate well to human scale. Designs should utilize windows that provide a sense of demarcation between stories and pedestrian scale. Where an upper story window is located directly above a lower story window, a gap with no window should be provided between them that is easily recognizable from the street and clearly differentiates lower and upper stories. This standard is important in all areas of the city.” PROPOSAL: The Application includes a design with an overall sidewall depth (front most wall to rear most wall) of ~79’. A one-story garage is off the rear of the structure accessed from the alley and measures ~25’. The west façade, or top of Figure X, steps back 5’ at a sidewall depth of ~44’ from the front most wall. The east façade steps back ~14’ at 54’. Figure 7 West Facade 6 Page 5 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 The second story contains an architectural projection that cantilevers over the 1st story and is the front most street facing feature of the structure. This feature does not count toward the measurement of the sidewall but does affect perceived massing of the building from both side yards. The architectural projection measures just over 6’. Figure 7: Proposed Rendering (Northeast corner of property) Figure 8: West Facade (highlighting architectural projection) 7 Page 6 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 The front façade contains a glass stair enclosure to the west of the primary two-story mass. The western most portion of the two storytwo-story glass stair enclosure measures approximately 21’6”, exceeding that maximum window height of 10’ allowed by the code. Figure 9: Proposed Rendering ( Northwest corner of property - highlighting stair enclosure) Figure 10: Close-up of stair enclosure 8 Page 7 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 Figure 11: North Elevation STAFF DISCUSSION: Articulation of Building Mass The intent of this standard is to provide articulation of form to prevent large, expansive wall planes, and to reduce the perceived mass of a building. This can be achieved by a change in the plane of the sidewalls. This standard is identified as critical in the Aspen Infill area. Staff has found the proposed design to meet the intent of the Articulation of Building Mass Standard intent statement, as well as the General Intent Statements. On the west façade the proposed design meets Option 2 – Off-Set One-Story Ground Level Connector because a 5’ setback from the primary sidewall is provided within 45’ of the front most wall. To comply with Figure 12: Proposed Rendering (Southwest perspective, from alley) 9 Page 8 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 that standard, a 5’ setback must be provided within 45’ on each side of the structure. On the east side the step-down doesn’t occur until 54’. On the east façade, the proposed design uses changes in wall plane, fenestration, and materials to articulate the façade. The design provides includes visual interest and a variety of textures that it helps to break up the wall plane and prevents the wall from appearing as overly large or expansive. On this façade a ~14’ setback is proposed from the side wall at 54’. Although this is 9’ beyond the step-down requirement for Option 2, it is almost three times the minimum required setback. This further contributes to the proposed design resulting in an appropriate or reduced perceived mass on this side. Although the dimensions of the design don’t fit squarely in any of the three options provided, there are elements of options 2 and 3 that are provided. A one-story element makes up approximately a third of the overall length, is at the rear of the structure and is consistent with historical architectural development patterns in Aspen. The garage is one story, to the rear, with a two-story primary massing element to the front of the lot. The two-story component, although one side wall does not meet the step-down dimensional requirement, it does use design elements that achieve the intent of the standard. Window Placement: The proposed window measures ~21’6” and spans 2 stories, in practice, and as it relates to the definition in the RDS. The proposed window includes a mullion at the midpoint of the window, and metal screening over the entire glass stair enclosure. Typically, mullions are not considered to provide an adequate gap breaking up a window when considering the Window Placement Standard. Staff has found the use of the metal screening, the mullions, and width of the window relative to the remaining front façade, as design alternatives provided that help meet the intent Figure 13: Proposed Rendering (Southeast perspective - from alley) Figure 14: Front Facade 10 Page 9 of 9 225 Smuggler St. Resolution No. __, Series of 2021 of the standard. The Applicant has indicated the screening will remain fixed, except during maintenance and cleaning. The window is also immediately behind a entry feature that is one- story which helps demarcate the first and second level. With all of these factors considered collectively, Staff has found the proposed design to meet the intent of the standard. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of variations to the Articulation of Building Mass and Window Placement Standards as a design alternative is provided meeting the standard’s intent, as well as the General Intent Statements. PROPOSED MOTIONS: “I move to approve Resolution No. __, Series of 2021, approving variations to the Articulation of Building Mass and Window Placement Residential Design Standards, in order to redevelop the property with a single-family residence, as depicted in Exhibit A to the resolution.” Attachments: Exhibit A – Application (Compiled) Exhibit B – RDS Checklist Exhibit C – Residential Design Standard Variation Review Criteria Exhibit D – Public Notice Affidavits 11 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION NO. XX (SERIES OF 2021) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATIONS FOR A PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT D AND E, BLOCK 48, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. COMMONLY KNOWN AS 225 WEST SMUGGLER STREET Parcel No. 2735-124-17-007 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Continental Holdings LLC, 15 E. 26th St., Suite 602, New York, New York 10010 requesting approval for Residential Design Standard Variations for the property at 225 W. Smuggler St.; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of a Residential Design Standard Variation to the Articulation of Building Mass (Section 26.410.030.B.1) and Window Placement (Section 26.410.030.E.2) standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 18th, 2021; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution No. XX, Series of 2021, by a ___ to ___ (_-_) vote, granting approval of the Residential Design Standard Variations as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Residential Design Standard Variation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the following requests for variations (Chapter 26.410.020.C, Variations)” 12 Page 2 of 3 A. Articulation of Building Mass (Section 26.410.030.B.1): for an overall building width of seventy-nine feet (79’), measured from the front most wall to the rear most wall, with the following design requirements: a. A five foot (5’) stepdown on the west façade shall occur at a maximum sidewall depth of forty-five feet (45’), as depicted in Exhibit A. b. A minimum thirteen-foot (13’) step down on the east façade shall occur at a maximum sidewall of fifty-four feet (54’), as depicted in Exhibit A. B. Window Placement (Section 26.410.030.E.2): for up to a two foot (2’) wide twenty-one foot six inch (21’6”) tall window on the front façade of western most portion of the glass stair enclosure, as depicted in Exhibit A. Issuance of this variation does not alter the applicability or intent of the Residential Design Standards as applied to development activities within the City of Aspen. All other dimensional standards including height and setbacks shall be met. Section 2: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at a Regular Meeting on May 18th, 2021. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ___________________________ ________________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Spencer McKnight, Chair Attest: ____________________________ Cindy Klob, Deputy City Clerk 13 Page 3 of 3 Exhibits: Exhibit A: Approved Plans Exhibit B: Signed RDS Checklist 14 225 W SMUGGLER STREET Aspen CO, 81611 04.19.2021 Proposal The proposed design consists of two levels above grade at the street, with an attached one-story, two-car garage accessed from the back alley. Below grade is a large basement with attached subgrade garage accessed via a car lift from the street level garage. There will be a large, fully drained, and accessible light-well on the east side and an additional small light-well on the west side, which provide light and emergency egress to the basement bedrooms. The combined three levels will be connected by an open, sculptural stair and residential size elevator. An interior light- well, adjacent to the large exterior light well on the east, will connect the basement to an open living, dining, and kitchen space on the ground level. The second level contains the master suite, gym, and study, which is cantilevered at the front and rear to provide shade to the openings below and articulation on the facades. The proposed structure will have a concrete basement foundation with crawlspace and type V-B construction above grade with steel beams and moment frames where required. The roofs are designed to be low-slope flat roofs to accommodate photovoltaic panels at the back and stay under the required height limit of 25 ft. Standards for which variations are requested: Articulation of Building mass - 26.410.030.B.1 Along the west side of the house, a 5 ft. deep x 10 ft. long indentation is provided between the one-story garage and the two-story principal building. This makes the principal building wall less than 45 ft. long and therefore meets the intent of the code standard. On the east side of the house, the principal building is 50 ft. long on the first level with an approximate 12 ft. step-back in plan to the one-story garage beyond. The conditioned, occupiable space on the second level is also 50 ft in length, although it has un-enclosed, un-occupiable building extensions at the front and rear that provide shade and articulation to the front and rear facades. The second level is also differentiated by both a material change and a 1 ft. overhang along the east elevation. We believe that, although the 50 ft. east wall is longer than what is specified in the RDS, the proposed design achieves the intent of breaking down the overall mass of the building through materiality and articulation. Please see attached images showing the design. Window Placement - 26.410.030.E.2 On the north side of the stairwell facing the street, the glazing is designed to maximize light and thus extends from level 1 to level 2 with only a single horizontal mullion division. From the outside, these windows are obscured by a perforated metal screen. The screens will only be operable for maintenance and will otherwise be permanently covering the glazing and thus the scale will not be apparent from the street. Please see attached images showing the design. 15 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 OVERALL VIEW FROM NORTHEAST OVERALL VIEW FROM NORTHWEST 16 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 OVERALL VIEW FROM SOUTHEAST OVERALL VIEW FROM SOUTHWEST 17 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 VIEW OF EAST FACADE FROM NORTHEAST Articulation of Building Mass - Level 1 and Level 2 are expressed with different materials - Level 2 overhangs level 1 by 1 ft - The length of Level 2 is broken down by windows and a material change 18 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 VIEW OF EAST FACADE FROM SOUTHEAST Window Placement - At the rear yard, Level 2 has a 4 ft, un-enclosed and un-occupiable building extension to provide shade and weather protection to the glazing. 19 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 VIEW OF ENTRY AND STREET FACING STAIR GLAZING FROM NORTHWEST Window Placement - The 2 story street facing glazing at the stair is shrouded in a perforated metal screen. - The section of glazing is not easily distinguished behind the articulation of the foyer and adjacent vegetation. 20 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this package are the following attachments: 1.Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement to Pay Application Fees Form 2.Land Use Application Form 3.Dimensional Requirements Form (if required) 4.HOA Compliance Form 5.Development Review Procedure All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at https://library.municode.com/co/aspen/codes/municipal_code. We require all applicants to hold a Pre-Application Conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. This meeting can happen in person or by phone or email. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and staff time. Wlease recoŐniǌe that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen >and hse ZeŐulations. thile this application packaŐe attempts to summariǌe the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development͕ it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. /f you have Ƌuestions that are not answered by the materials in this packaŐe͕ we suŐŐest that you contact the staff member assiŐned to your case͕ contact Wlanner of the ay ;ϵϳϬͲϰ2ϵͲ2ϳ6ϰ/plannerofthedayΛŐmail.comͿ͕ or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen >and hse Code. 21 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community evelopment for applications that normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Zeview fees for other City epartments reviewinŐ the application ;referral departmentsͿ also will be collected when necessary. &lat fees are cumulative͕ i.e.͕ an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. &lat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community evelopment when more eǆtensive staff time is reƋuired. Actual staff time spent will be charŐed aŐainst the deposit. sarious City staff also may charŐe their time spent on the case in addition to the Case Wlanner. The deposit amount may be reduced if͕ in the opinion of the Community evelopment epartment irector͕ the proũect is eǆpected to take siŐnificantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made durinŐ the preͲapplication conference by the Case Wlanner. Hourly billinŐ shall still apply. All applications must include an AŐreement to Way Application &ees. One payment includinŐ the deposit for WlanninŐ and referral aŐency fees must be submitted with each land use application͕ made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processinŐ without the reƋuired fee;sͿ. The Community evelopment epartment shall keep an accurate record of the actual time reƋuired to process a land use application reƋuirinŐ a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s reƋuest. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processinŐ of an application by the Community evelopment epartment takes more time or eǆpense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a proũect review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charŐe. /n the event the processinŐ of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit͕ the epartment shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. &ees shall be due reŐardless of whether an applicant receives approval. hnless otherwise combined by the irector for simplicity of billinŐ͕ all applications for conceptual͕ final͕ and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billinŐ. hpon conceptual approval͕ all billinŐ shall be reconciled͕ and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the irector acceptinŐ an application for final review. &inal review shall reƋuire a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission. hpon final approval͕ all billinŐ shall aŐain be reconciled prior to the irector acceptinŐ an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community evelopment irector may cease processinŐ of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is ϯϬ or more days past due. hnpaid invoices of ϵϬ days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of ϭ.ϳϱй per month. An unpaid invoice of ϭ2Ϭ days or more may be subũect to additional actions as may be assiŐned by the Municipal Court ũudŐe. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a evelopment Order or recordation of development aŐreements and plats. The City will not accept a buildinŐ permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. &or permits already accepted͕ any unpaid invoice of ϵϬ or more days may result in cessation of buildinŐ permit processinŐ or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. 22 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An agreement between the City of Aspen (“City”) and Address of Property: Please type or print in all caps Property Owner Name: Representative Name (if different from Property Owner): Billing Name and Address - Send Bills to: Contact info for billing: e-mail: Phone: / understand that the City has adopted͕ via Ordinance Eo. 2Ϭ͕ ^eries of 2Ϭ2Ϭ͕ review fees for >and hse applications͕ and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determininŐ application completeness. / understand that as the property owner͕ / am responsible for payinŐ all fees for this development application. &or flat fees and referral fees͗ / aŐree to pay the followinŐ fees for the services indicated. / understand that these flat fees are nonͲrefundable. $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for $. flat fee for . $. flat fee for &or deposit cases only͗ The City and / understand that because of the siǌe͕ nature͕ or scope of the proposed proũect͕ it is not possible at this time to know the full eǆtent or total costs involved in processinŐ the application. / understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. / understand and aŐree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processinŐ͕ review͕ and presentation of sufficient information to enable leŐally reƋuired findinŐs to be made for proũect consideration unless invoices are paid in full. The City and / understand and aŐree that invoices sent by the City to the above listed billinŐ address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as beinŐ received by me. / aŐree to remit payment within ϯϬ days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. / have read͕ understood͕ and aŐree to the >and hse Zeview &ee Wolicy͕ includinŐ conseƋuences for nonͲpayment. / aŐree to pay the followinŐ initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. / understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. /f actual recorded costs eǆceed the initial deposit͕ / aŐree to pay additional monthly billinŐs to the City to reimburse the City for processinŐ my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Phillip Supino, AICP Community Development Director City Use: Fees Due: $ Received $ Case # Signature: PRINT Name: Title: 23 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Description: Existing and Proposed Conditions Review: Administrative or Board Review Required Land Use Review(s): Growth Management Quota System (GMQS) required fields: Net Leasable square footage Lodge Pillows Free Market dwelling units Affordable Housing dwelling units Essential Public Facility square footage Have you included the following? FEES DUE: $ Pre-Application Conference Summary Signed Fee Agreement HOA Compliance form All items listed in checklist on PreApplication Conference Summary Name: Address: Phone#: email: Address: Phone #: email: Name: Project Name and Address: Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) This project involves the demolition of an existing, 3,528 SF non-historic Single family home and construction of a new, 6,252 SF Single Family home. The proposed new home will be comprised of a 2,644 SF Basement, 1,758 SF ground level with attached 569 SF Garage, and 1,281 SF 2nd Level. There will be a 333 SF front porch and 465 SF rear yard porch. 24 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 April 2020 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Complete only if required by the PreApplication checklist Project and Location Applicant: Zone District: Gross Lot Area: Net Lot Area: **Please refer to section 26.575.020 for information on how to calculate Net Lot Area Please fill out all relevant dimensions Single Family and Duplex Residential 1) Floor Area (square feet) 2) Maximum Height 3) Front Setback 4) Rear Setback 5) Side Setbacks 6) Combined Side Setbacks 7) % Site Coverage Existing Allowed Proposed Multi-family Residential 1)Number of Units 2)Parcel Density (see 26.710.090.C.10) 3)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 4)Floor Area (square feet) Existing Allowed Proposed 8) Minimum distance between buildings Proposed % of demolition ϱͿ Maximum Height 6Ϳ Front Setback ϳͿ Rear Setback ϴͿ Side Setbacks Proposed % of demolition Commercial Proposed Use(s) Existing Allowed Proposed 1) FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2) Floor Area (square feet) 3) Maximum Height 4) Off-Street Parking Spaces 5) Second Tier (square feet) 6) Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Variations requested: Lodge Additional Use(s) 1)FAR (Floor Area Ratio) 2)Floor Area (square feet) 3)Maximum Height 4)Free Market Residential(square feet) 4)Front setback 5)Rear setback 6)Side setbacks 7)Off-Street Parking Spaces 8)Pedestrian Amenity (square feet) Proposed % of demolition Existing Allowed Proposed 3,153 SF 3,490 SF 3,489 SF - 25'-0" 25'-0" 30'-0" 10' / 5' Garage 5' 15' 2,327 SF 10'100% - Articulation of Building Mass – Section 26.410.030.B.1 (Non-Flexible) - Window Placement - 26.410.030.E.2 None 25 April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying that the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Property Owner (“I”): Name: Email: Phone No.: Address of Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) □This property is not subject to a homeowner association or other form of private c ovenant. □This property is subject to a homeowner association or private covenant, and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. □This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners a ssociation or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Date: Owner printed name: or, Attorney signature: Date: Attorney printed name: 225 W. Smuggler Street Aspen, CO 81611 Continental Hotel Holdings, LLC aspen@goodbearco.com 26 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE ϭ.Attend pre-application conference. During this one-on-one meeting, staff will determine the review process applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application. 2.Submit Development Application. Based on your pre-application meeting, you should complete to the application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department. ϯ.Determination of Completeness. Within five ;ϱͿ working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the application and notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are required. Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient to obtain approval. ϰ.Staff Review of Development Application. Once your application is determined to be complete͕ it will be reviewed by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code. urinŐ the staff review staŐe͕ the application will be referred to other aŐencies for comments. The Wlanner assiŐned to your case or the aŐency may contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified. ^taff will draft a memo for siŐnature by the Community evelopment irector that eǆplains whether your application complies with the Code͕ and will list any conditions that should apply if the application is to be approved. &inal approval of any evelopment Application that amends a recorded document͕ such as a plat͕ aŐreement͕ or deed restriction͕ will reƋuire the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and approval by staff. ^taff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat. The City Attorney is normally in charŐe of the form for recorded aŐreements and deed restrictions. te suŐŐest that you not Őo to the trouble or eǆpense of preparinŐ these documents until the staff has determined that your application is eliŐible for the reƋuested amendment or eǆemption. 5. Board Review of Application. /f a public hearinŐ is reƋuired for the land use action that you are reƋuestinŐ͕ the WlanninŐ staff will schedule a hearinŐ date for the application upon determination that the application is complete. The hearinŐ;sͿ will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewinŐ board;sͿ. The applicant will be reƋuired to mail notice ;one copy provided by the Community evelopment epartmentͿ to property owners within ϯϬ feet of the subũect property and post notice ;siŐn available at the Community evelopment epartmentͿ of the public hearinŐ on the site at least fifteen ;ϭϱͿ days prior to the hearinŐ date. ;Wlease see Attachment 6 for instructions.Ϳ The WlanninŐ staff will publish notice of the hearinŐ in the paper for land use reƋuests that reƋuire publication. The WlanninŐ staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use reƋuest and draft a memo to the reviewinŐ board;sͿ. ^taff will supply the applicant with a copy of the WlanninŐ staff’s memo͕ approǆimately five ;ϱͿ days prior to the hearinŐ. The public hearinŐ;sͿ will take place before the appropriate review boards. Wublic hearinŐs include a presentation by the WlanninŐ staff͕ a presentation by the applicant ;optionalͿ͕ consideration of public comment͕ and the reviewinŐ board’s Ƌuestions and decision. (Continued on next page) 27 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT April 2020 City of Aspen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090 6.Issuance of Development Order. /f the land use review is approved͕ then the WlanninŐ staff will issue a evelopment Order͕ which allows the applicant to submit a buildinŐ permit application. ϳ.Receipt of Building Permit. Once you have received a copy of the siŐned staff approval͕ you may apply for a buildinŐ permit. urinŐ this time͕ your proũect will be eǆamined for its compliance with the hniform uildinŐ Code. /t also will be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the >and hse ZeŐulations that were not reviewed in detail durinŐ the land use case review. ;This miŐht include a check of floor area ratios͕ setbacks͕ parkinŐ͕ open space and the likeͿ. /mpact fees for water͕ sewer͕ parks͕ and employee housinŐ will be collected as part of the permittinŐ process. Any document reƋuired to be recorded͕ such as a plat͕ deed restriction͕ or aŐreement͕ will be reviewed and recorded before a buildinŐ permit application is submitted. 28 SQUARE SEVEN April 15, 2021 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FOR AGENT CONCERNING CONTINENTAL HOTEL HOLDINGS LLC To Whom It May Concern: This letter shall confirm that Carson Davis of Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects is a duly authorized representative of Continental Hotel Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Owner”). Mr. Davis has full authority to act on behalf of the Owner. This authority includes, but is not limited to, acting as the main point of contact in regard to the redevelopment of the single-family residence at 225 W Smuggler Street. Applicant: Name: Continental Hotel Holdings LLC Address: 15 E 26th St. Ste 602 New York, NY 10010 Phone Number: (415) 967-2827 Representative: Name: Carson Davis of Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects Address: 10865 Washington Blvd Culver City, CA 90232 Phone Number: (310) 838-9700 Should you have any questions concerning the scope of this authorization, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely, Brian Caulin Authorized Individual, Square Seven Management, LLC Continental Hotel Holdings LLC DocuSign Envelope ID: 6FE93D16-A170-4268-9B61-79B7ADFCEB0E 29 30 31 32 33 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Does Not Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Approved: (Approved plans/elevations attached) 34 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Doesn’t Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Approved: 35 A3.011 A3.01 A3.02 A3.02 2 1 2 1 A4.01 6 5 1 1 A4.05 1 A4.02 1 A4.06 2 460' - 0"10' - 0" 100' - 0"5' - 6"6' - 6"8' - 1 3/8"10' - 9 7/8"12' - 7 1/2"6' - 5 1/4"60' - 0"PROPERTY LINEGARAGE SETBACKHOUSE SETBACK5' - 0"PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINESETBACK451 SF LOUNGE 179 SF BED 3 93 SF LAUNDRY 98 SF MECHANICAL 272 SF GARAGE (LOWER)STAIR 164 SF BEDROOM 1 59 SF BATH 1 62 SF BATH 2 185 SF BEDROOM 2 119 SF HALL HALL HALL LIGHT WELL UP ELEV. WD-01 WD-01 TL-02 WD-01 TL-02 WD-01 TL-02 C-02 C-02 T-02 3 1 A4.04 UP 5' - 0" ADGFCBE 6'X10' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT; LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED 1 A4.07 1 A4.03 50' - 4" 24' - 6"4' - 2"6' - 10"8' - 6 7/8"19' - 8 1/2"15' - 2 5/8"44' - 6"7' - 6"10' - 9 7/8"13' - 9 3/8"19' - 6 7/8"34' - 11 1/8" 18' - 0" OPEN TO ABOVE 2.28 F.F. 88' - 9" F.F. 88' - 9" 61 018 60 010 007 011 004 005 001 006 E00 014 2.29 6' - 9 1/2"7' - 9"A5.01 13 2 6' - 0"A5.04 9 43' - 6"6' - 9 1/2"11' - 8 3/8" 1 A4.10 2 A4.10 A6.10 1 1' - 2 3/8"1 A4.12 CRAWL SPACE 012 015 009008 016 013 3' - 7 5/8" 1 A4.13 3.01 1.27 1.27 1.29 D W 2.28 AV 3.06 3.01 3.01 3.01 BATH 3 WC 3.01 3.18 3.17 3.01 3.01 1.27 3.19 1.27 LIGHT WELL 3.01 3.064' - 5 1/8"2' - 11 7/8"4' - 3 1/4" 1' - 3 1/2"1' - 8 3/4"3.01 1.29 7' - 2 7/8" LIN.4' - 4 1/8"3' - 0" 2X6 WALL 1-HOUR WALL SEPARATION SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE FLOOR LEVEL TRANSITION + H" 1. THE PANEL OR SUBPANEL SHALL PROVIDE CAPACITY TO INSTALL A 40-AMP MIN. DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT AND SPACE(S) RESERVED TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF A BRANCH CIRCUIT OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE. 2. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING AS EV CAPABLE. THE RACEWAY TERMINATION LOCATION SHALL BE PERMANENT AND VISIBLY MARKED EV CAPABLE. 3. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL DESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASED UPON A 40-AMP MIN. BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 4. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LA ELECT. CODE. 5. THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE-POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION. THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC." NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTESLEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:24 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA2.01 BASEMENT PLAN SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0"1 BASEMENT PLAN NOTES N N 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 36 2X6 WALL 1-HOUR WALL SEPARATION SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE FLOOR LEVEL TRANSITION + H" 1. THE PANEL OR SUBPANEL SHALL PROVIDE CAPACITY TO INSTALL A 40-AMP MIN. DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT AND SPACE(S) RESERVED TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF A BRANCH CIRCUIT OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE. 2. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING AS EV CAPABLE. THE RACEWAY TERMINATION LOCATION SHALL BE PERMANENT AND VISIBLY MARKED EV CAPABLE. 3. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL DESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASED UPON A 40-AMP MIN. BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 4. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LA ELECT. CODE. 5. THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE-POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION. THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC." A3.011 A3.01 A3.02 A3.02 2 1 2 1 A4.01 6 5 1 1 A4.05 1 A4.02 1 A4.06 5' - 0"60' - 0"10' - 0"100' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0"5' - 6"6' - 6"8' - 1 3/8"10' - 9 7/8"12' - 7 1/2"6' - 5 1/4"437 SF LIVING ROOM 244 SF KITCHEN 101 SF MUD RM 162 SF FOYER 521 SF GARAGE 32 SF PWDR PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE60' - 0"PROPERTY LINE 2 4 SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE 11"5' - 0"GARAGE SETBACKHOUSE SETBACKSETBACKOPEN TO BELOW T-01 T-01 T-01 T-01 T-01 T-01 C-02 1.22 1.22 ABOVE ABOVE 3 01 09 A5.11 3 9 12 LIGHT WELL BELOW 260 SF DINING 1 A4.04 T-02 6'X10' ELECTRICAL EASEMENT; LOCATION TO BE CONFIRMED DN OPEN TO BELOW 17' - 10"8' - 10"ADGFCBE UP 1 A4.07 1 A4.03 24' - 6"4' - 2"6' - 10"8' - 6 7/8"19' - 8 1/2"15' - 2 5/8"5' - 10 1/2"29' - 1 1/2"7' - 5 1/8"24' - 10 3/4"11' - 0 1/4"7' - 6 3/8"1' - 0 1/2"10"18' - 10 1/2"0"2' - 8 3/4"9' - 8 1/8"2' - 9 3/4" T-02 11' - 11 1/2"ABOVE 14 12 13 11 10 8 7 6 5 2 3 4 1.23 1.19 2.04 2.20 2.21 2.07 2.092.20 LIGHT WELL 1.17 F.F. 100' - 0" F.F. 100' - 0" F.F. 100' - 0" 101 102 103 104 108 105 107 2.01 2.01 2.01 1.20 1.21 G02 G03 G01 1.16 1.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 1.08 1.07 1.21 16' - 6"6' - 7"A5.14 1 3.06 DOG WASH A5.14 4 1' - 8 7/8"A5.11 1 A5.12 1 1 A4.10 2 A4.10 A6.10 2 1 A4.12 69 SF PANTRY 1 A4.133.02 3.02 3.01 1.27 3.06 1.27 T-01 FRIDGE COFFEE STATION 3.03 3.03ELEV. 3' - 9 3/4" 50' - 0" NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTESLEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:26 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA2.02 LEVEL 1 FLOOR PLAN SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 1 PLAN NOTES 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE N N ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 37 A3.011 A3.01 A3.02 A3.02 2 1 2 1 A4.01 6 5 1 1 A4.05 1 A4.02 1 A4.06 317 SF MASTER BEDROOM 304 SF GYM 206 SF HALL / STUDY 105 SF CLOSET 152 SF MASTER BATH 2 4 5' - 0"60' - 0"10' - 0"100' - 0" 10' - 0" 10' - 0"5' - 6"6' - 6"8' - 1 3/8"10' - 9 7/8"12' - 7 1/2"6' - 5 1/4"60' - 0"6"5' - 0"T-01 RB-01 T-01 ST-02 3 PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEGARAGE SETBACKHOUSE SETBACKSETBACKW/D 1 A4.04 A OPEN TO BELOW DN ST-02 DGF C BE 1 A4.07 1 A4.03 F.F. 113' - 0" F.F. 113' - 0" F.F. 113' - 0" GC-01 GC-01 24' - 6"4' - 2"6' - 10"8' - 6 7/8"19' - 8 1/2"15' - 2 5/8"37' - 5 1/8"2' - 0 7/8"13' - 10 1/2"21' - 6"13' - 7 7/8"8' - 8 3/4"5' - 4 1/2"4' - 6 1/2"2.09 2.09 76 75 74 73 FS08 FS07 FS06 FS02FS03FS04FS05 2.11 2.11 2.13 82 71 72 207 79 208 3' - 9 1/8"20' - 9 5/8"12' - 9 7/8" 2.29 A5.22 1 1 A4.10 2 A4.10 A6.10 3 1 A4.12 2.11 A8.01 7 A8.01 10 A8.01 3 A8.01 8 A8.01 6 A6.20 1 A8.01 5 10 A8.02 FCU 1 A4.13 3.01 3.01 3.14 3.01 STAIR ELEV. 6' - 8 3/4" 4' - 0"49' - 7 1/2"6' - 4 1/4"21' - 6"2X6 WALL 1-HOUR WALL SEPARATION SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE FLOOR LEVEL TRANSITION + H" 1. THE PANEL OR SUBPANEL SHALL PROVIDE CAPACITY TO INSTALL A 40-AMP MIN. DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT AND SPACE(S) RESERVED TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF A BRANCH CIRCUIT OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE. 2. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING AS EV CAPABLE. THE RACEWAY TERMINATION LOCATION SHALL BE PERMANENT AND VISIBLY MARKED EV CAPABLE. 3. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL DESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASED UPON A 40-AMP MIN. BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 4. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LA ELECT. CODE. 5. THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE-POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION. THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC." NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTESLEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:27 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA2.03 LEVEL 2 FLOOR PLAN SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 LEVEL 2 PLAN NOTES N N 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 38 T12 2X6 WALL 1-HOUR WALL SEPARATION SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE FLOOR LEVEL TRANSITION + H" 1. THE PANEL OR SUBPANEL SHALL PROVIDE CAPACITY TO INSTALL A 40-AMP MIN. DEDICATED BRANCH CIRCUIT AND SPACE(S) RESERVED TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF A BRANCH CIRCUIT OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE. 2. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING AS EV CAPABLE. THE RACEWAY TERMINATION LOCATION SHALL BE PERMANENT AND VISIBLY MARKED EV CAPABLE. 3. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHALL HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SIMULTANEOUSLY CHARGE ALL DESIGNATED EV SPACES AT THE FULL RATED AMPERAGE OF THE EVSE. PLAN DESIGN SHALL BE BASED UPON A 40-AMP MIN. BRANCH CIRCUIT. A SEPARATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED. 4. THE SERVICE PANEL OR SUBPANEL CIRCUIT DIRECTORY SHALL IDENTIFY THE OVERCURRENT PROTECTIVE DEVICE SPACE(S) RESERVED FOR FUTURE EV CHARGING PURPOSES AS EV CAPABLE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LA ELECT. CODE. 5. THE MAIN ELECTRICAL SERVICE PANEL SHALL HAVE A RESERVED SPACE TO ALLOW FOR INSTALLATION OF A DOUBLE-POLE CIRCUIT BREAKER FOR A FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC INSTALLATION. THE RESERVED SPACE SHALL BE POSITIONED AT THE OPPOSITE (LOAD) END FROM THE INPUT FEEDER LOCATION OR MAIN CIRCUIT LOCATION AND SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED AS "FOR FUTURE SOLAR ELECTRIC." A3.011 A3.01 A3.02 A3.02 2 1 2 1 A4.01 6 5 1 1 A4.05 1 A4.02 1 A4.06 2 4 3 PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE SETBACK LINE GARAGE SETBACKHOUSE SETBACKSETBACK5' - 0"5' - 0"90' - 0"60' - 0"0"LIGHT WELL LIGHT WELL 1 A4.04 ADGFCBE 1 A4.07 1 A4.03 2.25 2.10 2.10 2.11 2.10 2.11 59' - 11 3/4" 124' - 6" 113' - 0" 113' - 0" 111' - 0" 108' - 2" 100' - 0" 123' - 10" 100' - 0"90' - 1" 99' - 6" 2.11 2.10 21' - 6"2.13 POTENTIAL PV ARRAY; TBD 15' - 11 1/8"21' - 8 5/8"12' - 3 1/4" 25' - 4"10' - 2"24' - 7 3/4"18' - 4"15' - 0"NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTESLEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:28 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA2.04 ROOF PLAN SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 N N NOTES SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF PLAN 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 39 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 - FF 113' - 0" T.O. ROOF 124' - 6" BASEMENT - FF 88' - 9" LEVEL 1 - FC 111' - 3" LEVEL 2 - FC 122' - 9" 1 A4.05 BASEMENT - FC 97' - 9" LEVEL 1 - FC DROP 109' - 0" 1 A4.06 1' - 9"9' - 9"1' - 9"11' - 3"2' - 3"9' - 0"9' - 0"LIGHT WELL ST-01 ST-01 ST-01 GC-01 GC-01 MT-01 1 A4.04 ADGFCBE1 A4.07 12 14 107 11 018 727182 2.25 5' - 7 1/2" 1.25 1.21 G03 5' - 11 1/2"2.02 2.02 MT-01 11' - 9"21' - 6 3/8"23' - 2 3/8"15' - 3" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 - FF 113' - 0" T.O. ROOF 124' - 6" 1 A4.01 6 5 1 LEVEL 1 - FC 111' - 3" LEVEL 2 - FC 122' - 9" 1 A4.02 LEVEL 1 - FC DROP 109' - 0" 24 1' - 9"9' - 9"1' - 9"11' - 3"9' - 0"3 ST-01 GC-01 MT-03 MT-03 1 A4.03 1 101 1312 207 7574 BEHIND SCREEN BEHIND SCREEN 73 BEHIND SCREEN 3 BEHIND SCREEN C-0125' - 0"1.253' - 6"6' - 0"1.21 3.08 2.20 2.08 4' - 6"8' - 0"2.25 MT-01 MT-02 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES LEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:29 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA3.01 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 EAST SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 NORTH 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 40 LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 - FF 113' - 0" T.O. ROOF 124' - 6"1' - 9"9' - 9"1' - 9"11' - 3"1 A4.01 651 LEVEL 1 - FC 111' - 3" LEVEL 2 - FC 122' - 9" 1 A4.02 LEVEL 1 - FC DROP 109' - 0" 2 4 9' - 0"31 A4.03 20879 10105 9 MT-01 MT-01 MT-01 GC-01 ST-01 ST-01 5' - 8"1.1725' - 0"2.20 3.08 MT-02 109108 1' - 0" 18' - 0" LEVEL 1 100' - 0" LEVEL 2 - FF 113' - 0" T.O. ROOF 124' - 6" BASEMENT - FF 88' - 9" LEVEL 1 - FC 111' - 3" LEVEL 2 - FC 122' - 9" 1 A4.05 BASEMENT - FC 97' - 9" LEVEL 1 - FC DROP 109' - 0" 1 A4.06 11' - 3"11' - 3"1' - 9"9' - 9"1' - 9"9' - 0"LIGHT WELL GC-01 GC-01 9' - 0"1 A4.04 A D GFCBE1 A4.07 62 8765 4 BEHIND SCREEN 76 BEHIND SCREEN MT-03 2 MT-01 MT-01 MT-01 MT-01 ST-01 2.25 11' - 9"25' - 0"FS02 FS03 FS04 FS05 1.08 1.07 2.13 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 SOUTH SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 WEST NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES LEGEND JOB NUMBER: DATE: The plans and specifications prepared by Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects, LLP are protected from unauthorized modification, reuse and/or release under California Business & Professions Code section 5536.4, Health & Safety Code Section 19851(a), and Education Code Section 17316.4/19/2021 8:03:30 PMBIM 360://709_Smuggler Street/709_Smuggler_St_2020.rvtA3.02 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SMUGGLER 225 W. Smuggler St. Aspen, CO 81611 000 0.01 (E) STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.02 (E) DRIVEWAY TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.03 (E) TREE TO BE REMOVED; SEE ARBORIST REPORT 0.04 (E) STAIR TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.05 (E) SITE WALL/FENCE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.06 (E) PATHWAY/PATIO TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.07 (E) TREE TO REMAIN 0.08 (E) GATE TO BE DEMOLISHED 0.09 (E) MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT TO BE REMOVED 0.10 (E) TRANSFORMER AND CONC. PAD TO REMAIN 1.07 GAS METER 1.08 ELECTRIC METER 1.16 MECHANICAL / ELEC. CONC. PAD 1.17 ELEC. TRANSFORMER 1.18 TRASH BIN COMPARTMENT 1.19 FRONT PORCH, SNOW MELTED 1.20 CONCRETE TILE PATIO, SNOW MELTED 1.21 FENCE/RAILING 1.22 SITE WALL 1.23 FRONT PATH, SNOW MELTED 1.25 NATURAL GRADE 1.26 DRIVEWAY, SNOW MELTED 1.27 MECHANICAL CHASE 1.29 CRAWL SPACE ACCESS HATCH 2.01 EDGE OF LEVEL/ROOF/OVERHANG ABOVE 2.02 BRAKE METAL FASCIA, FIN PER SCHED 2.04 GFRC CLADDING 2.07 STONE CLADDING 2.08 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, OPERABLE , POCKETING 2.09 PERFORATED METAL SCREEN, FIXED 2.10 ROOF, SINGLE-PLY TPO MEMBRANE ROOFING (CLASS A) 2.11 ROOF, STONE BALLAST, SEE SPEC. 2.13 ROOF MOUNTED ELECTRIC PV SYSTEM 2.20 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME WINDOW SYSTEM, SEE SCHED. 2.21 THERMALLY BROKEN ALUM. FRAME BUTT GLAZED WINDOWS, SEE SCHED. 2.25 METAL AWNING 2.27 GARAGE DOOR; STEEL PANEL TO MATCH CLADDING 2.28 SUBTERRANEAN CAR LIFT; SEE SPEC. 2.29 ELEVATOR, ELECTRIC MRL TRACTION, SEE SPEC. 3.01 FINISHED WOOD/LAMINATE MILLWORK, TYP. TBD 3.02 BUILT-IN SHELVING SYSTEM, SEE ELEVATION 3.03 COAT CLOSET, SEE ELEV. 3.06 BENCH, BUILT-IN, SEE ELEV. 3.08 GUARDRAIL, FRAMELESS GLASS 3.14 BUILT-IN DESK; FINISHED WOOD AND BLACKENED STEEL 3.17 CASEWORK W/ POCKETING DOORS AND WET BAR 3.18 BUILT-IN BANQUETTE WITH STORAGE BELOW 3.19 BUILT-IN NIGHT STAND ISSUE DATES NO. DATE REVISION 41 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY DATE: March 1, 2021 PLANNER: Garrett Larimer, 970-319-6950 PROJECT ADDRESS: 225 Smuggler St. REPRESENTATIVE: Carson Davis, Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects (cdavis@eyrc.com) DESCRIPTION: The potential Applicant is requesting Residential Design Standard variations to redevelop the site with a single family residence at 225 Smuggler St. This property is located in the Aspen Infill Area and is zoned R-6. The proposed design requires a variation to four standards: - Articulation of Building Mass – Section 26.410.030.B.1 (Non-Flexible) - Window Placement – 26.410.030.E.2 (Flexible) The Residential Design Standards chapter provides direction for reviewing variations to the standards when the proposed design does not meet the standard. Per Code Section 26.410.020, if an application is found to be inconsistent with any of the Non-Flexible Standards, variations to those standards must be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Flexible standards may be reviewed administratively for Alternative Compliance by the Community Development Director. All variations requested will be combined for review by the Planning and Zoning Commission for efficiency. The review for variations will determine if the design meets the intent of the specific standard as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3. Please include written responses or graphics that demonstrate how the design meets the intent statement of the standard in which variations are requested, and general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3. An initial administrative review of the proposed design has been completed for the other RDS standards. If any additional standards are found to be not met during the review of the application, those may be added to the variation review request. That process will be finalized during the review of a land use application. Once the application is ready to be submitted, please email the completed application packet to Garrett Larimer at garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com. Once the application is deemed complete, we will contact you to provide payment for the land use application fee. RELEVANT LAND USE CODE SECTIONS: 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.010.A RDS General Intent Statements 26.410.020.D RDS Variation Review Standards 26.410.030.B.1 Articulation of Building Mass (Non-Flexible) 26.410.030.E.2 Window Placement (Flexible) For your convenience – links to the Land Use Application and Land Use Code are below: Land Use Application Land Use Code REVIEW BY: Community Development Staff for complete application and recommendation to P&Z. Planning and Zoning Commission for Decision PUBLIC HEARING: Yes, Planning and Zoning Commission 42 PLANNING FEES: $3,250 deposit for 10 hours of staff time (Additional/lesser time will be billed or refunded at a rate of $325/hr.) REFERRAL FEES: None. TOTAL DEPOSIT: $3,250 APPLICATION CHECKLIST – These items should be emailed to Garrett.Larimer@cityofaspen.com:  Completed Land Use Application, HOA Compliance Policy, and signed Fee Agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document).  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number, contained within a letter signed by the applicant stating the name, address, and telephone number of the representative authorized to action on behalf of the applicant.  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the intent statement and review standards associated with the request.  Completed copy of the Residential Design Standard Checklist: https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/1697  Written responses to all applicable review criteria. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted:  Total fee for review of the application. Depending on further review of the case, additional items may be requested of the application. Once the application is deemed complete by staff, the applicant/applicant’s representative will receive an e-mail requesting submission of an electronic copy of the complete application and the deposit. Once the deposit is received, the case will be assigned to a planner and the land use review will begin. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 43 225 W. SMUGGLER STREET 04.19.2021 PROPERTY VICINITY MAP 225 W. SMUGGLER ST. 44 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Does Not Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Approved: (Approved plans/elevations attached) 45 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Doesn’t Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Approved: 46 1 Exhibit C Residential Design Standards Variation Review Criteria Section 26.410.020.D, Residential Design Standard Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or Staff Response: Section 26.410.030.B.1 – Articulation of Building Mass: The intent of this standard is to “reduce the overall perceived mass and bulk of buildings on a property as viewed from all sides.” Designs should provide articulation to prevent large expansive walls and designs should convey similar forms to historical development in Aspen. This standard is identified as critical in the infill area. Designs should change the plane of the sidewall and step down to one story in the rear. Three options are provided in the code to comply with this standard. The third option is a one-story step-down at the rear of the structure. On the west façade the proposed design meets Option 2 – Off-Set One-Story Ground Level Connector because a 5’ setback from the primary sidewall is provided within 45’ of the front most wall. To comply with that standard, a 5’ setback must be provided within 45’ on each side of the structure. On the east side the step-down doesn’t occur until 54’. On the east façade, the proposed design uses changes in wall plane, fenestration, and materials to articulate the façade. The design provides includes visual interest and a variety of textures that it helps to break up the wall plane and prevents the wall from appearing as overly large or expansive. On this façade a ~14’ setback is proposed from the side wall at 54’. Although this is 9’ beyond the step-down requirement for Option 2, it is almost three times the minimum required setback. This further contributes to the proposed design resulting in an appropriate or reduced perceived mass on this side. Although the dimensions of the design don’t fit squarely in any of the three options provided, there are elements of options 2 and 3 that are provided. A one-story element makes up approximately a third of the overall length, is at the rear of the structure and is consistent with historical architectural development patterns in Aspen. The garage is one story, to the rear, with a two-story primary massing element to the front of the lot. The two- story component, although one side wall does not meet the step-down dimensional requirement, it does use design elements that achieve the intent of the standard. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Section 26.410.030.E.2 – Window Placement: The intent of this standard is to “to preserve the historic architectural character of Aspen by preventing large expanses of vertical glass windows that dominate street-facing façades. Overly tall expanses of glass on a street- facing façade do not relate well to human scale. Designs should utilize windows that provide a sense of demarcation between stories and pedestrian scale. Where an upper 47 2 story window is located directly above a lower story window, a gap with no window should be provided between them that is easily recognizable from the street and clearly differentiates lower and upper stories. This standard is important in all areas of the city.” Staff has found that the proposed window that spans two stories contains mullions that break up the appearance as a single large piece of fenestrations, a metal screen is used to provide visual interest, and the relative width of the window compared to the rest of the front façade result in minimal impact and a design alternative that meets the intent. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: There are no site-specific constraints or existing conditions that would prevent compliance with the Residential Design Standards, Staff finds this criterion to be not met. 48 49 50 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: ________________________________________________, Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ______________________________________, 20___ STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, _____________________________________________________ (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: _____ Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. _____ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the ___ day of ________________, 20___, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. _____ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. _____ Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Lisa Guida 225 Smuggler St May 18 21 51 _____ Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, PDs that create more than one lot, and new Planned Developments are subject to this notice requirement. _____ Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ____________________________________ Signature The foregoing “Affidavit of Notice” was acknowledged before me this _30th_ day of ___April___________, 2021__, by Maria Renee Espinoza___________________. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: July 10th, 2022___ ______________________________________ Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: •COPY OF THE PUBLICATION •PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) •LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL •APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 52 Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. From Parcel: 273512417007 on 04/28/2021 Instructions: Disclaimer: http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com 53 GREENBERG ASPEN LP ASPEN, CO 81611 240 LAKE AVE 230 LAKE LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FLR 201 WEST SMUGGLER LLC HOUSTON , TX 77056 2121 SAGE RD #333 SIERRA ADVISORS LP HOUSTON, TX 77024 333 LITTLE JOHN LN SMUGGLER FB3 LLC NAPLES, FL 34106 PO BOX 2097 CMML PROPERTIES LLC NEW YORK, NY 10022 120 E 56TH ST #320 234 WEST FRANCIS LLC DENVER , CO 80203 303 E 17TH AVE STE 600 426 NORTH SECOND LLC DALLAS, TX 75205 4502 ABBOTT AVE APT 106B BARNHART PAUL F JR HOUSTON, TX 77056 2121 SAGE RD #333 SCHERMER GREGORY P & GRANT E ASPEN, CO 81611-1347 210 LAKE AVE LEWIS TOBY D TRUST CLEVELAND, OH 44114 1111 SUPERIOR AVE #700 ARGON LLC ASPEN, CO 81611 533 E HOPKINS AVE 3RD FL SCHIFF DAVID T NEW YORK, NY 10036 1177 AVE OF AMERICAS 42ND FL WEST SMUGGLER CONDO ASSOC ASPEN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 322 W SMUGGLER FULLERTON JESSICA RES TRST ASPEN, CO 81611 306 W FRANCIS ST FRANCIS STREET HOLDINGS LLC MALIBU, CA 90265 28884 CLIFFSIDE DR 210 WEST FRANCIS LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 255 13TH AVE S #202 KAPLAN NATHALIE 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR SECOND AND SMUGGLER CONDO ASSOC ASEPN, CO 81611 COMMON AREA 426 N SECOND ST 212 WEST FRANCIS LLC NAPLES, FL 34102 255 13TH AVE SOUTH #202 ASPEN RIVER RENDEZVOUS LLC GARDEN CITY, NY 11530 PO BOX 7138 WINTON CHARLES & BARBARA REV TRUST BERKELEY, CA 94705 2949 AVALON AVE 229 WEST SMUGGLER LLC DALLAS, TX 75205 4502 ABBOTT AVE APT 106B 326 WEST SMUGGLER LLC CHARLOTTE, NC 28202 500 E MOORHEAD ST #200 LEWIS JONATHAN D TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 414 N FIRST ST SCHERMER LLOYD G & BETTY A ASPEN, CO 81611-1347 210 LAKE AVE HANSON LUCY C PORT TOWNSEND, WA 98368 1775 FIR ST TRIANGLE LAKE LLC LOS ANGELES, CA 90024 10880 WILSHIRE BLVD #800 FULLERTON TRUST ASPEN, CO 81611 306 W FRANCIS ST LAKE 206 LLC BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212 PO BOX 3337 54 VICENZI GEORGE A TRUST ASPEN, CO 81612 PO BOX 2238 MOORE DIANE ASPEN, CO 81611 303 W FRANCIS LAMB KARYN 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR 322 SMUGGLER LLC TULSA, OK 74136 6120 S YALE AVE #813 SAX JOEL ASPEN, CO 81611 303 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN CTR FOR ENVIRON STUDIES ASPEN, CO 81611 100 PUPPY SMITH ST FULLERTON JOHN RES TRST ASPEN, CO 81611 306 W FRANCIS ST KINNEY FAMILY LP ASPEN, CO 81611 307 W FRANCIS ST CONOVER CATHRINE M WASHINGTON, DC 20007 1010 WISCONSIN AVE NW #550 BRUNDIGE CHELSEA C SNOWMASS, CO 81654 1755 SNOWMASS CREEK RD GERSCHEL EDOUARD 2020 QPRT NEW YORK, NY 10022 600 MADISON AVE 16TH FLR CITY OF ASPEN ASPEN, CO 81611 130 S GALENA ST GOTHAM AJAX LLC NEW YORK, NY 100202346 600 5TH AVE FL 14 55 Photograph of Posted Notice at 225 Smuggler Street taken on 4/30/2021 56 Publication listing in the Aspen Times on 4/29/2021 57 Page 1 of 5 Memorandum TO: Aspen Planning & Zoning Commission FROM: Amy Simon, Planning Director MEETING DATE: May 18, 2021 RE: Silver Circle Ice Rink– Minor Amendment to Detailed Review, PUBLIC HEARING ___________________________________________________________________________ Applicant: G.A. Resort Condo Association, Inc., c/o Hyatt Residence Club, Bob Weisman, President, 415 E. Dean St., Aspen, CO 81611 Representative: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, 300 S. Spring St. #202, Aspen, CO 81611 Location: 433 E. Durant Avenue, Lot 6, Aspen Mountain Subdivision and PD Current Zoning & Use: P - Park Summary: As part of the approval of the Aspen Mountain PD in 1992, one lot in the development was required to be zoned Park and to include a public amenity in the form of a seasonal outdoor ice rink. After the original mechanical system for the rink failed and could not be repaired, the Grand Hyatt installed a synthetic ice surface for one season, but complaints about the usability of that surface caused a return to natural ice via a large chiller unit placed at the corner of the property. The chiller has been allowed through a series of Temporary Use approvals granted by City Council in 2019/2020. The applicant has determined permanent use of the chiller to be the best long-term solution and requests a PD Amendment for installation. Staff Recommendation: During Council’s Temporary Use reviews, it has been clear that retaining the ice rink for the community is a priority. The chiller needed to accomplish this is fairly large, but has been accommodated on the site for almost two years without apparent negative impact on the property or neighbors. It is placed in a paved area that has limited usability for other purposes and where it can be screened from view. Staff recommends approval of a Minor PD amendment to allow the unit to remain in place, with conditions noted in the proposed resolution. Silver Circle Ice Rink (Photo Courtesy of www.uncovercolorado.com) 58 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND: The existing ice rink and associated landscaped area are in the Park (P) zone district. The facility was approved in 1992 as part of the Aspen Mountain PD and the Hyatt Grand Aspen development, the timeshare lodge located to the south, at 415 E. Dean St. Figure 1: Area Map Ordinance #12, Series 1992 granted approval for the development of the “Aspen Winter Garden” in lieu of the payment of subdivision, park and water tap fees for the Grand Hyatt Aspen. The park area also fulfills the development’s open space requirements. The Grand Hyatt Aspen retains ownership over the property and is responsible for the park, including the upkeep of the ice refrigeration system which maintains the skating surface throughout the winter season. Management of the rink operation and associated services is contracted with the owners of CP Burger, the restaurant located on site. The 1992 approval stipulates several features and activities which must be present on the site to ensure it provides a public park amenity as originally approved by Council. The approval includes specific language about the type of refrigeration system provided and its maintenance. The approval requires that an ice-skating rink be provided in perpetuity until such time as the approval is amended or the property redeveloped. In 2018, the applicant approached the City with a proposal to replace the refrigerated natural ice surface with “synthetic ice”. The original refrigeration system required increasing maintenance to function properly, and the coolant used in the system (CFC-22) was required to be phased- out of use in 2020 according to the EPA. Without CFC-22, modifications and additional maintenance of the system were required in order to continue to provide an ice-skating surface. Citing maintenance challenges and associated costs, as well as a desire to reprogram the site in the future, the applicant requested an Insubstantial Planned Development Amendment from the Community Development Department to replace the ice with a “synthetic ice” surface which did not require refrigeration. 59 Page 3 of 5 That administrative amendment was granted November 19, 2018 based on representations made by the applicant appearing to meet the criteria for such an amendment. During the first few months of the 2019-2020 winter season, the Community Development Department received complaints from customers, members of the public, and City Council members about the suitability of the synthetic skating surface and the unsatisfactory user experience. On April 2, 2019, the Community Development Director revoked the approval. The consequence of the revocation was the requirement that the applicant reinstate the ice-skating amenity as described in the 1992 approval. Subsequently, the applicant appealed the Director’s action, but stayed their pursuit of the appeal and instead sought Temporary Use approval from City Council for a rented chiller that could create natural ice. Temporary Use approvals are only permitted in six month increments. During the Temporary Use reviews held in 2019 and 2020, Council indicated that the commitments made to provide a public amenity on this site are a high priority. Both the applicant and the community benefit from the previous agreements. Council unanimously favored the continued use of a refrigerated ice surface as required in the original approval and encouraged at least the short-term use of a modern above grade chiller unit. The applicant has indicated that a below grade location would potentially require significant modifications to the site and may raise new waterproofing issues. After consideration of their alternatives, they request approval for a chiller of the type currently on site to be permanent. (Please note: the current unit is rented and cannot be purchased. The supplier does not have a new unit to sell the applicant at this time, so it is expected that the rental unit will remain in place until the soonest opportunity for it to be replaced with like for like, or smaller equipment if possible. The permanent equipment will be verified through this issuance of a mechanical/building permit.) REQUEST OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) The Applicant is seeking the following land use approval: • Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval (Section 26.445.110.e) to install a chiller at the northwest corner of the site. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review authority. STAFF COMMENTS: Pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.445.110.e, Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval, Detailed Review is intended to focus on the evaluation of specific aspects of a development such as materials, landscape, drainage, transportation improvements, etc. Staff believes it is important that this site continue to provide an engaging and pleasant amenity to the public as envisioned in the 1992 approval. The proposed PD amendment to permanently install a ground mounted chiller is consistent with the existing approval for the use of the park site, insofar as it provides the expected refrigerated ice-skating surface. As detailed in the staff findings in Exhibit A, the amendment is appropriate with conditions for further review of screening, drainage and sound mitigation. The exact unit that will be permanently installed has not yet been sourced. When that is finalized, staff will review a screening wall that the applicant has represented in plan view and which will be made of brick and stone to match the adjacent surfaces. Some accommodations for ventilation and gate 60 Page 4 of 5 access will be needed. Staff recommends P&Z approve a fence height of up to 8’ and require the applicant to place the unit so as to be as screened as possible. Figure 2: View of the site before and after the existing chiller installation. The City has a noise ordinance in place which sets the maximum allowable decibel level for mechanical equipment when measured from adjacent property lines. The visual and noise impacts of the existing chiller unit were evaluated in depth before the first Temporary Use approval was granted by City Council. The unit is very large but is located in what has always been a utilitarian corner of the site. The permanent chiller unit will be required to demonstrate compliance with the maximum permitted noise level in commercial zone districts. This will be Figure 3: Proposed site plan 61 Page 5 of 5 verified during permit review and may be achieved through the use of sound baffling devices located on the inside of the equipment enclosure. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that P&Z approve a Minor PD amendment for subject to the following conditions: 1. Within 180 days, the applicant shall submit a plat documenting this approval in the form of a dimensioned site plan and elevations depicting the design for the screen wall, as required by Municipal Code Chapter 26.490 approval documents. 2. The existing equipment, which is rented, may remain in place with the understanding that the applicant is to source a unit for purchase and must receive a permit and install that unit within one year of this approval. The permanent equipment shall be no larger than the existing and shall be set on the site so that, to the greatest extent possible it is screened from view by a wall which will be no more than 8’ above the grade it sits on. 3. The screening wall for the chiller shall be placed as depicted in the application, with a final design to be reviewed and approved by Community Development staff during permit review. The screen wall will be constructed of masonry and stone to match the adjacent surfaces. Accommodation for ventilation and access to the equipment will be made, again with the goal of hiding the equipment from view as much as possible. 4. The equipment must operate within the limits of the City’s noise ordinance and shall be unused except during the dates when the rink is in operation. Sound baffling devices may be installed inside of the equipment enclosure. 5. The final design for drainage is to be to be reviewed and approved by Engineering at building permit. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution #____, Series of 2021 Exhibit A – Detailed Review Staff Findings Exhibit B – Application 62 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION #__, SERIES OF 2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION (P&Z) GRANTING A MINOR AMENDMENT TO DETAILED REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 433 E. DURANT AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 6, ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL ID: 2737-182-85-006 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Chris Bendon of BendonAdams, LLC, on behalf of G.A. Resort Condo. Association, Inc., c/o Hyatt Residence Club, Bob Weisman, President, requesting a Minor PD amendment to install a new refrigeration system to operate the Silver Circle Ice Rink, a required public facility located on Lot 5 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision and PD ; and WHEREAS, upon review of the application and the Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Minor Amendment to Detailed Review; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director and took and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on May 18, 2021; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare, and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approves Resolution #__, Series of 2021, by a __to __ (x-x) vote, granting approval of the Minor Amendment to Detailed Review as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Minor Amendment to Detailed Review: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval to install a ground mounted chiller as depicted in the land use application. 63 Page 2 of 3 Section 2: Conditions of Approval: The approval is granted with the following conditions: 1. Within 180 days, the applicant shall submit a plat documenting this approval in the form of a dimensioned site plan and elevations depicting the design for the screen wall, as required by Municipal Code Chapter 26.490 approval documents. 2. The existing equipment, which is rented, may remain in place with the understanding that the applicant is to source a unit for purchase and must receive a permit and install that unit within one year of this approval. The permanent equipment shall be no larger than the existing and shall be set on the site so that, to the greatest extent possible it is screened from view by a wall which will be no more than 8’ above the grade it sits on. 3. The screening wall for the chiller shall be placed as depicted in the application, with a final design to be reviewed and approved by Community Development staff during permit review. The screen wall will be constructed of masonry and stone to match the adjacent surfaces. Accommodation for ventilation and access to the equipment will be made, again with the goal of hiding the equipment from view as much as possible. 4. The equipment must operate within the limits of the City’s noise ordinance and shall be unused except during the dates when the rink is in operation. Sound baffling devices may be installed inside of the equipment enclosure. 5. The final design for drainage is to be to be reviewed and approved by Engineering at building permit. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. 64 Page 3 of 3 APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on May 18, 2021. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ___________________________________ ___________________________ Katharine Johnson, Assistant City Attorney Spencer McKnight, Chair ATTEST: ____________________________ Cindy Klob, Records Manager 65 Exhibit A Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Section 26.445.070 Staff Findings Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: a. Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. Staff Response: The ice rink itself is a familiar and valued feature of downtown. During the time the chiller has been in place, no concerns have been raised to Community Development to indicate that the temporary equipment it is in conflict with surrounding area. The 1992 PD approval for this site required the provision of public space and a recreation amenity to serve the development and the public. The proposed equipment is necessary to achieve that function, therefore staff finds this criterion met. b. Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments or is concurrently seeking allotments. Staff Response: The proposed work does not create net leasable space requiring Growth Management allocation; therefore staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. c. Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. 2. Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. 66 3. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. 4. All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. 5. Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. Staff Response: The location of the refrigeration unit against two walls, at the rear of the site, and adjacent to required electrical and mechanical locations is the most appropriate available. The location concentrates visual and noise impacts from the mechanical equipment in one area and ensures the impacts of the unit on the use of the site and appearance from public rights-of-way are minimized to the extent possible. The area where the unit is to be located is already paved, and necessary site drainage is already provided. The applicant proposes a new drain be installed adjacent to the unit as an extra measure to collect condensation or water around the chiller. As a condition of approval, the final design for drainage is to be recommended to be reviewed and approved by Engineering at building permit. Staff finds that this criterion will be met, with conditions. d. Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: 1. The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. 2. Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. 3. Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. 4. Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. 67 5. All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. Staff Response: Currently the mechanical unit is partially screened with a wood fence that is 6’ tall; the standard allowance for fences. Staff recommends a condition of approval that the applicant construct a brick screen wall to match the surrounding materials, and that this wall be permitted to be up to 8’ tall, to fully screen the 7.5’ tall unit. Because the current equipment is rented and needs to be replaced, the final design and construction of the screen wall should be reviewed and approved by staff as part of a building permit. The applicant has suggested that the permanent unit may not require the existing platform base and may therefore be lower in height. Please note that a brick wall will likely need to have some design elements that allow for air circulation, as well as gates providing maintenance access. The chiller should only be in operation during the season when the ice rink is open. At all times it must operate in compliance with the City’s noise ordinance. Noise mitigation features may need to be accommodated on the interior of the screen wall to ensure this is outcome. Staff finds that, with a condition for final review of the screen wall and noise mitigation, this criterion will be met. e. Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. Staff Response: There is no change to the ownership or operation of the ice rink. Staff finds this criterion to be met. f. Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost 68 estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff Response: The proposal has no impact on any of the described transportation systems, therefore staff finds this criterion not applicable. g. Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29— Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff response: The design for drainage around the chiller will be approved by City Engineering. Otherwise, the scope of work has no impact on the engineering design standards, therefore staff finds this criterion not applicable. h. Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. Staff response: The scope of work has no impact on surrounding public infrastructure and facilities; therefore staff finds this criterion not applicable. i. Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, 69 and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. Staff response: There is no plan to phase the project, therefore staff finds this criterion not applicable. 70 Exhibit 2 71 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM February 24, 2021 Ms. Amy Simon Planning Director City of Aspen 130 So. Galena St. Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Silver Circle Ice Rink – Planned Development Minor Amendment Ms. Simon: Please accept this application for a Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Approval for the Silver Circle Ice Rink. In 2018/2019 the Hyatt was approved to replace the original ice-chilling system, which was failing, with a synthetic ice system. It was brought to the attention of the Hyatt team, after installation, that the synthetic ice system had some issues with functionality of the actual surface – and the approval was revoked and an application for a temporary use was filed with the City of Aspen to request the installation of a new chiller to return the rink to an ice-based system. The request was approved on September 9, 2019 via Resolution #91, Series 2019, and allowed for the placement of the chiller for the 2019/2020 winter season. The Temporary Use was extended due to the onset of COVID-19, and the chiller remained in place past the initial deadline for removal due to the inability to remove the equipment from site. City Council approved an extension through September 17, 2020 via Resolution #45, Series of 2020. An additional extension was granted in July of 2020 to cover the 2020/2021 winter season, at which time the applicant was encouraged to pursue a more permanent solution in lieu of piece- meal extensions to cover the location and use of the chiller. At this time, the applicant is interested in pursuing a PD Amendment to a Detailed Review Approval to memorialize the location of the existing chiller and update its screening as needed, while still providing adequate access for any maintenance of the unit. From discussions with staff, 72 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM it is the applicant’s understanding that the updated enclosure would not create any net leasable space and does not require a Growth Management review. This request will not alter existing maintenance of common areas – walkways, landscaped areas, or the ice rink facilities. The existing maintenance plan will remain in place. The unit is roughly 7.5 feet tall and about 17 feet long and includes a platform base. The existing location represents the least-impactful location regarding aesthetics and sound. A screening wall was developed around the unit for aesthetics and to mitigate noise, as previously requested by City of Aspen staff and City Council. The location was selected to be away from the restaurant and from the bus loading area with minimal landscape changes required for its installation. The unit has a listed operating sound level of 67dBa, measured from 30 feet away. This figure was confirmed by the installer and is roughly the sound level of an idling RFTA bus. The system comes with “super-quiet” fans and the installer utilized additional sound blankets inside the frame of the device to further baffle sound. Noise from the unit was negligible in the 19/20 season and no noise complaints have been received by the City. We believe that we have provided adequate information for staff to review this application, but please reach out if you have questions about this ground-mount system that we or the installer can answer. Kind Regards, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams LLC Attachments: 1. Response to Review Criteria 2. COA Land Use Application 3. Pre-Application Conference Summary 4. Letter of Authorization 5. Proof of Ownership 6. Agreement to Pay 7. HOA Form 8. Vicinity Map 9. Site Drainage 10. Draft Amended PD Site Plan 11. Site Plan 73 Ex. 1, Page 1 Exhibit 1 Review Criteria Sec. 26.445.040. - Procedures for Review. (a) General. Any development within a Planned Development or on land designated Planned Development on the Official Zone District Map shall be reviewed pursuant to the procedures and standards in this Chapter and the Common Development Review Procedures set forth at Chapter 26.304. Any land previously designated on the Official Zone District Map or granted Planned Unit Development (PUD) or Specially Planned Area (SPA) approval shall be subject to the terms of this Chapter. (b) Planned Development Review. All development proposed within a Planned Development shall be subject to a three-step review consisting of the following steps: Public hearings are required at each step. (3) Step Three — Detailed Review with Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable. a. Purpose: To determine if the application meets the standards for Detailed Review. Detailed Review shall focus on refining a project design and operational characteristics, including final architectural details and materials, landscape details, utility and other infrastructure details. The intent is to perfect and finalize all detail aspects of the project, but not to reconsider previously resolved issues. The Project Review approval shall not be revisited as part of the Detailed Review. Approval of Detailed Review together with the Project Review approval shall constitute approval of a Final Development Plan. b. Process: The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, with a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Detailed Review, based on the standards of review. The Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, shall approve, approve with conditions or disapprove an Detailed Review after considering the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and comments and testimony from the public at a duly noticed public hearing. c. Standards of review: The proposed development shall comply with Section 26.445.070, Detailed Review. d. Form of decision: The decision shall be by resolution. e. Notice requirements: Publication, posting and mailing pursuant to Section 26.304.060(e)(3)a—c. 74 Ex. 1, Page 2 Sec. 26.445.070. - Detailed Review Standards. Detailed Review shall focus on the comprehensive evaluation of the specific aspects of the development, including utility placement, and architectural materials. In the review of a development application for Detailed Review, the Planning and Zoning Commission, or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, shall consider the following: (a) Compliance with Project Review Approval. The proposed development, including all dimensions and uses, is consistent with the Project Review approval and adequately addresses conditions on the approval and direction received during the Project Review. RESPONSE: The nature of this request does not impact the property’s overall compliance with the original project review approval. (b) Growth Management. The proposed development has received all required GMQS allotments or is concurrently seeking allotments. RESPONSE: As stated in the pre-application summary, the type of enclosure proposed does not create any net leasable space and therefore does not require a Growth Management review. (c) Site Planning and Landscape Architecture. The site plan is compatible with the context and visual character of the area. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The landscape plan exhibits a well-designed treatment of exterior spaces, preserves existing significant vegetation, and provides an ample quantity and variety of ornamental plant species suitable for the Aspen area climate. Vegetation removal, protection, and restoration plans shall be acceptable to the Director of Parks and Open Space. (2) Buildings and site grading provide simple, at-grade entrances and minimize extensive grade changes along building exteriors. The project meets or exceeds the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act and applicable requirements for emergency, maintenance, and service vehicle access. Adequate snow storage is accommodated. (3) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into the landscape in a manner that enhances the site. (4) All site lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. (5) Site drainage is accommodated for the proposed development in compliance with Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and shall not negatively impact surrounding properties. 75 Ex. 1, Page 3 RESPONSE: The proposed scope of work is minimal and does not change the previously approved nature or character of the site planning or landscape architecture. The parcel, currently utilized as a park, will remain the same with the exception of the ice chiller being memorialized in its current location (approved under temporary use approvals). The applica nt is proposing to update the screening as needed with like materials in order to allow for long -term placement of the ice chiller while minimizing visual impacts from the street. The applicant team has provided information on drainage to support the current location of the chiller and is proposing to include a concrete curb to inhibit the flow of stormwater into the chiller area and a new area drain be installed to collect stormwater and condensation from the chiller. The drain is proposed to be routed to the area drain. (d) Design Standards and Architecture. The proposed architectural details emphasize quality construction and design characteristics. In meeting this standard, the following criteria shall be used: (1) The project architecture provides for visual interest and incorporates present-day details and use of materials respectful of the community's past without attempting to mimic history. (2) Exterior materials are of a high quality, durability, and comply with applicable design standards, including those outlined in Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards, Chapter 26.412, Commercial Design Standards, and Chapter 26.415, Historic Preservation. (3) Building entrances are sited or designed to minimize icing and snow shedding effects. (4) Energy efficiency or production features are integrated into structures in a manner that enhances the architecture. (5) All structure lighting is proposed so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or lands. All exterior lighting shall comply with the City's outdoor lighting standards. RESPONSE: There is no new building or related architecture included in this proposal. The screening materials will be of a durable high quality. The proposal is considered to be a minor amendment to a planned development – which set the parameters and design for the entire development including this parcel – and will comply with a ny applicable design requirements. There are no building entrances included in this proposal, and no roofs or coverings for the ice chiller that would require any de-icing or snow shedding mitigation. There is no new lighting proposed as part of this project. (e) Common Parks, Open Space, Recreation Areas, or Facilities. If the proposed development includes common parks, open space, recreation areas, or common facilities, a proportionate, 76 Ex. 1, Page 4 undivided interest is deeded in perpetuity to each lot or dwelling unit owner within the Planned Development. An adequate assurance through a Development Agreement for the permanent care and maintenance of open spaces, recreation areas, and shared facilities together with a prohibition against future development is required. RESPONSE: The proposal does not change the nature of the facilities currently sited in the park, nor does it change the required maintenance or responsibilities as outlined in the original approvals. This request will not alter existing maintenance of common areas – walkways, landscaped areas, or the ice rink facilities. The existing maintenance plan will remain in place. (f) Pedestrian, bicycle & transit facilities. The development improves pedestrian, bicycle, and transit facilities. These facilities and improvements shall be prioritized over vehicular facilities and improvements. Any new vehicular access points minimize impacts on existing pedestrian, bicycle and transit facilities. Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of the Project Review and as otherwise required in the Land Use Code. These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements and to determine any required cost estimating for surety requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. RESPONSE: The proposal does not change the current pedestrian or bicycle facilities on site, nor does it have any impacts along the transportation / RFTA corridor. (g) Engineering Design Standards. There has been accurate identification of engineering design and mitigation techniques necessary for development of the proposed subdivision to comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29—Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29— Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. RESPONSE: The proposal does not include any required changes to the previously approved engineering for the ice-skating rink or associated uses in the park. (h) Public Infrastructure and Facilities. The proposed Planned Development shall upgrade public infrastructure and facilities necessary to serve the project. Improvements shall be at the sole costs of the developer. 77 Ex. 1, Page 5 Any specific designs, mitigation techniques, and implementation timelines as required during Project Review comply with the applicable requirements of Municipal Code Title 29— Engineering Design Standards and the City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP). These plans shall provide sufficient detail to determine if the design or mitigation concept complies with the intent of the requirements, but do not need to be detailed construction documents. RESPONSE: The proposal does not include any changes to public infrastructure or facilities on site. The ice chiller and screening have been in place since the 2019 winter season. (i) Phasing of development plan. If phasing of the development plan is proposed, each phase shall be designed to function as a complete development and shall not be reliant on subsequent phases. Phasing shall insulate, to the extent practical, occupants of initial phases from the construction of later phases. All necessary or proportionate improvements to public facilities, payment of impact fees and fees-in-lieu, construction of any facilities to be used jointly by residents of the Planned Development, construction of any required affordable housing, and any mitigation measures shall be completed concurrent or prior to the respective impacts associated with the phase. RESPONSE: There is no phasing associated with this proposal. 78 Ex. 1, Page 6 Sec. 26.445.110. - Amendments. Amendments to an approved Project Review or to an approved Detailed Review shall be reviewed according to the standards and procedures outline below. Amendments to Planned Unit Development and Specially Planned Area approvals (pre-Ordinance 36, 2013, approvals) shall also proceed according to the standards and procedures outline below and the Community Development Director shall determine the type of procedure most-applicable to the requested amendment. (e) Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review approval. An amendment found by the Community Development Director consistent with a Project Review approval and to be generally consistent with the allowances and limitations of a Detailed Review approval, or which otherwise represents an insubstantial change, but which does not meet the established thresholds for an insubstantial amendment, may be approved, approved with conditions or denied by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Historic Preservation Commission as applicable, pursuant to 26.445.040(b)(3) - Step Three. RESPONSE: The proposal meets all of the requirements above as listed in Section 26. 445.040(b)(3). 79 1 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Amy Simon, Community Development Department, amy.simon@cityofaspen.com DATE: 6.16.2020 PROPERTY: 433 E. Durant Avenue, Silver City Ice Rink REPRESENTATIVE: Chris Bendon, BendonAdams, chris@bendonadams.com TYPE OF APPLICATION: Minor Amendment to Detailed Review Approval DESCRIPTION: The Hyatt Grand Aspen is the owner of Lot 6 of the Aspen Mountain PD. According to the 1992 PD approval allowing the existing development, Lot 6 is to function as a community activity center and seasonal public ice skating rink. In 2018/2019, after the original ice-making equipment installed to serve this property became problematic, the Hyatt attempted the use of a synthetic ice system. Problems with the functionality of the synthetic surface led to a Temporary Use approval granted by City Council on September 9, 2019 via Resolution #91, Series of 2019, for the installation of an updated chiller to create ice for the rink during the 2019/2020 winter season. This chiller, somewhat conspicuously located adjacent to the rink, was intended to be a short-term solution. The Temporary Use approval expired on March 31, 2020, at which time the property owner was to remove the mechanical equipment. The on-set of Covid-19 prevented this work from taking place before the deadline. On June 9, 2020, City Council granted an extension of the approval to September 17, 2020 via Resolution #45, Series of 2020. The refrigeration system is allowed to remain in the current configuration, but shall be out of operation at all times during this period, and the existing screening around the equipment shall remain in place at all times. These restrictions shall not prevent any necessary maintenance of the unit. By July 1st, 2020, the applicant is required to submit a complete land use application requesting another extension, or proposing an alternative. This pre-application addresses a request for a PD Amendment. While staff has also prepared a pre-app for another Temporary Use extension, it is unclear whether Council can, or will, grant an extension. Ultimately, a permanent solution is needed. It is staff’s understanding, that the likely proposal for this PD amendment will be to install the temporary chiller on a long-term basis, with a more substantial and taller screening wall around Exhibit 3 80 2 it. This type of enclosure would not create net leasable space and therefore does not require Growth Management review. Other than the mechanical equipment, the proposal is anticipated to remain in compliance with the original ice rink approval contained in Ordinance #12, Series of 1992. The property is zoned Park, with a PD overlay. All dimensional requirements are established through the adoption of a site specific development plan. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.445.040.B.3 Planned Development- Detailed Review Process 26.445.070 Planned Development – Detailed Review Standards 26.445.080.B Planned Development – Detailed Review Application Contents 26.445.110.E Minor Amendment to a Detailed Review 26.490.040.D Approval Documents - Approved Plan Set 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.240 Park (P) Zone District Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use Code: https://www.cityofaspen.com/191/Municipal-Code. Land Use Application: https://www.cityofaspen.com/DocumentCenter/View/1835/Land-Use-Application-Packet-2017. Review by: • Community Development Staff for complete application and recommendation • Planning and Zoning Commission for determination Public Hearing: Yes Planning Fees: $4,550.00 Deposit for up to 14 billable hours. Lesser/additional hours will be refunded or billed at a rate of $325 per hour Referral Fees: Engineering Department - $325 deposit for one hour of review, additional hours of review will be billed at $325/hour. Total Deposit: $4,875.00 Please submit one copy of the following in the form of a single pdf emailed to amy.simon@cityofaspen.com:  Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement.  Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). 81 3  Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application.  Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen.  HOA Compliance form (Attached).  A letter from the owner of the property authorizing the applicant to pursue the proposed scope of work.  A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property.  An accurate and recent survey (within 1 year) of the property proposed for amendment. The survey must meet the requirements of Title 29, Engineering Design Standards.  A grading and drainage plan showing all grading and how drainage and stormwater is accommodated, and that meets the Conceptual Drainage Plan and Report requirements in the Urban Runoff Management Plan (URMP).  A statement specifying the method of maintaining any proposed common areas on the site, including but not limited to common parking areas, walkways, landscaped areas and recreational facilities and what specific assurances will be made to ensure the continual maintenance of said areas.  Proposed Planned Development plans, a draft PD plat, and a draft Development Agreement containing the applicable information required by Chapter 26.490, Approval Documents. Once the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following, the applicant will be asked to submit the fee. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 82 Exhibit 4 83 Land Title Guarantee Company Customer Distribution PREVENT FRAUD - Please remember to call a member of our closing team when initiating a wire transfer or providing wiring instructions. Order Number:BANA62010520-3 Date: 02/23/2021 Property Address:433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 PLEASE CONTACT YOUR CLOSER OR CLOSER'S ASSISTANT FOR WIRE TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS For Closing Assistance For Title Assistance Land Title Roaring Fork Valley Title Team 200 BASALT CENTER CIRCLE BASALT, CO 81621 PO BOX 3440 (970) 927-0405 (Work) (970) 925-0610 (Work Fax) valleyresponse@ltgc.com Buyer/Borrower GA RESORT CONDO ASSOC 140 FOUNTAIN PKWY # 570 ST PETERSBURG, FL 33716 Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery CHRIS BENDON Attention: CHRIS BENDON CHRIS@BENDONADAMS.COM riley@bendonadams.com Delivered via: Electronic Mail Mortgage Broker DAVIS MASSARANO Attention: DAVIS MASSARANO (832) 563-4042 (Cell) DAVID@MASSARANOLAW.COM Delivered via: No Commitment Delivery Exhibit 5 84 Order Number:BANA62010520-3 Date: 02/23/2021 Property Address:433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Chain of Title Documents: Pitkin county recorded 12/21/2005 under reception no. 518732 Pitkin county recorded 12/19/2005 under reception no. 518619 Plat Map(s): Pitkin county recorded 02/09/1993 at book 30 page 69 85 This Report is based on a limited search of the county real property records and provides the name(s) of the vested owner(s), the legal description, tax information (taken from information provided by the county treasurer on its website) and encumbrances, which, for the purposes of this report, means deed of trust and mortgages, and liens recorded against the property and the owner(s) in the records of the clerk and recorder for the county in which the subject is located. This Report does not constitute any form of warranty or guarantee of title or title insurance. The liability of Land Title Guarantee Company is strictly limited to (1) the recipient of the Report, and no other person, and (2) the amount paid for the report. Prepared For: DAVIS MASSARANO This Report is dated: 02/12/2021 at 5:00 P.M. Address: 433 E DURANT AVE, ASPEN, CO 81611 Legal Description: LOT 6, ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE SEVENTH AMENDED PLAT OF ASPEN MOUNTAIN SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 9, 1993 IN BOOK 30 AT PAGE 69. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Record Owner: GA RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION We find the following documents of record affecting subject property: ***************** PROPERTY TAX INFORMATION ********************** Parcel No.: 273718285006 2020 Land Assessed Value $1,286,300.00 2020 Improvements Assessed Value $34,600.00 2021 real property taxes PAID in the amount of $13,799.72. **************************************************************** 1.SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 19, 2005 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 518619 AND RERECORDED DECEMBER 21, 2005 AS RECEPTION NO. 518732. NO ENCUMBRANCES Land Title Guarantee Company Full Property Report Order Number:BANA62010520-3 86 Exhibit 6 87 Exhibit 7 88 Exhibit 8 433 E. Durant St. (Silver Circle Ice Rink) – Vicinity Map 89 Job No. Drawn by: Date: Of File: PE:QC: Revision#Date By 2016-408.001 CF 12/16/2016 RG MC-PFD RG 2 00 Mitchell Cooper Water System Improvements Process Flow Diagram Preliminary Not For Construction 118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com PDSH PDSH LIT LE Sweetwater Lake 2020-572 2/8/21 CONCRETE CONTACT TANK WITH BAFFLE WALLS SPRING BOX AE AIT RW TURBIDIMETER NTURW FLOWMETER FIT FQI FE CHECK VALVE CHECK VALVE 2020-432 2/26/21 Hyatt Hotel Ice Rink Drainage and Site Improvements Drainage and Site Plan N.T.S. 90 www.sgm-inc.com GLENWOOD SPRINGS 118 West Sixth St, Suite 200 | Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 | 970.945.1004 1 Reilly Thimons 300 S. Spring St #202 Aspen CO 81611 RE: Drainage Review and Comments Below are my comments with regards to the site drainage at the ice rink based on a site visit on Tuesday 9/22/20 and review of the existing conditions survey map. 1. The streets surrounding the ice rink have curb and gutter with stormwater inlets. Under normal conditions, stormwater would not flow onto the site and would be collected and routed through the stormwater system in the road. The proposed chiller is located adjacent to the ice rink and similar to the ice rink, would not be subjected to off-site stormwater flows. 2. There are multiple area drains located in the immediate vicinity of the proposed chiller. These existing area drains will collect precipitation and stormwater than falls around the rink. Additionally, the area where the chiller is proposed to be located slopes toward an area drain. 3. It is proposed that at least one area drain be installed within the chiller area to collect stormwater or condensate from the chiller. The drainpipe from the chiller should be routed to the area drain. 4. It is proposed that a concrete curb be constructed around the new chiller area. The curb would be located along the same alignment as the existing fence. The curb would prevent stormwater from flowing into the chiller area and would also prevent stormwater or condensate water from the chiller from flowing onto the adjacent ice rink area. 5. The existing fence would be re-installed on top of the proposed curb and would be located along the same alignment Please contact me if you have any questions regarding these comments at 970-384-9034. Sincerely, Ryan Gordon, PE 91 2-10"8"- VICINITY MAP -Scale: 1 Inch = 2000 Feet10"6"12"12"12"14"6"12"10"12"26"10"12"10"10"12"12"6"6"6"6"12"4"8"8"10"10"10"E Durant StreetE Dean StreetS Mill Street S Gal e n a S t r e e t LOT 627,080 Sq. Ft.Approved:Title:ExistingConditionsMapRevision#Sheet No.Lot 6, Aspen Mountain Subdivision City of Aspen, Pitkin County, ColoradoJob No.Drawn by:Date:File:2020-432.001HS9-17/2020JLWAspenIceRink118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:1 .Of :--PLS:Graphic ScaleIn U.S. Feet : 1" = 20'0102040Existing Conditions MapLot 6, Block 91, Aspen Mountain Subdivision and Planned Unit DevelopmentSection 18, Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th P.M.City of AspenPitkin County, ColoradoJoshua L. WilsonColorado PLS # 38417For, and on behalf of SGMDetail - Chiller AreaScale: 1" = 5'11.11.2092 2-10"8"- VICINITY MAP -Scale: 1 Inch = 2000 Feet10"6"12"12"12"14"6"12"10"12"26"10"12"10"10"12"12"6"6"6"6"12"4"8"8"10"10"10"E Durant StreetE Dean StreetS Mill Street S Gal e n a S t r e e t LOT 627,080 Sq. Ft.Approved:Title:AddendumtoRecord MapRevision#Sheet No.Lot 6, Aspen Mountain Subdivision City of Aspen, Pitkin County, ColoradoJob No.Drawn by:Date:File:2020-432.001HS3/9/2021JLWAspenIceRink_Adendum118 West Sixth Street, Suite 200 Glenwood Springs, CO 81601 970.945.1004 www.sgm-inc.com Date By:11Of :--PLS:Graphic ScaleIn U.S. Feet : 1" = 20'0102040Addendum toGrand Aspen Recordation Setas shown inPlat Book 64, Page 92City of AspenPitkin County, ColoradoDetail - Chiller AreaScale: 1" = 5'93 Ñg ÑÑ$.$.50505050503),6%2#)2#,%)#%2).+#0"52'%2Ñg ÑÑg Ñ% $52!.4!6%-%4!,'5!2$2!),!2/5.$4(%0%2)-%4%2/&4(%)#%2).+Ñ!&&Exhibit 1194 300 SO SPRING ST | 202 | ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.2855 | BENDONADAMS.COM February 26, 2021 Amy Simon Planning Director Community Development Director RE: Statement of Maintenance for 433 E Durant Ave (Silver City Ice Rink) Ms. Simon, Lot 6 of the Aspen Mountain Subdivision is currently owned and maintained by the GA Resort Condo Association. This includes all common area improvements, landscaped areas, and parking areas associated with the PUD. The proposal does not affect the current maintenance scheme or delivery as it does not propose to change the existing layout of the site plan but rather memorialize the location, drainage plans, and screening for the chiller. If the scope of the project expands or changes during staff review – we would be happy to submit an updated statement describing in detail what areas may be affected during the interim construction period and what changes if any would be made to current maintenance plans. Kind Regards, Chris Bendon, AICP BendonAdams, LLC 95