The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.20020424ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 24, 2002 REGULAR MEETING, 5:00 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 4- NOON - SITE VISITS - Please meet at the first site. 323 W. Hallam 819 E. Hopkins 202/208 E. Main Street 5:00 I. Roll call II. Approval of minutes - April 10, 2002 III. Public Comments IV. Commission member comments V. Disclosure of conf[ict of interest (actual and apparent) VI. Project Monitoring VII. Staff comments: Certificates of No Negative Effect issued (Next resolution # will be #13) VIII. OLD BUSINESS I \ 5:05 A. 640 N. Third Street - Extension of Conceptual Approval 2033 /3.4 My~ 5:10 B. 513 W. Smuggler Street - Final - Public Hearing 66 /<4 â‚¬ *749 / A- 5:30 C. 633 W. Main Street - Final and Variances - Public Hearing /3-- /0,co, d %4-77 f 5:50 D. Approval of graphics for Wagner Park Public Facilities IX. NEW BUSINESS 6:05 , A. 323 W. Hallam Street - Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Variances g X. WORKSESSIONS ':35 A. 819 E. Hopkins Ave. , :00 XI. ADJOURN INE 41 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director )49 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 640 N. Third Street- Extension of conceptual approval DATE: April 24,2002 SUMMARY: This project received conceptual development approval on May 23, 2001. Section 26.415.010.C.2.b.1 of the Land Use Code provides that an application for final development review shall be filed within one year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless HPC grants an extension, failure to file the final development application shall make the approval null and void. This application was submitted under the old HPC ordinance, and those regulations will be used for final review. The old ordinance allowed HPC to grant one year extensions of the conceptual development plan, and did not limit how many extensions could be approved. It also did not provide criteria for the HPC's determination, however, the Board has typically avoided allowing the conceptual approval to continue to be valid if there has been a major change in the program, such as the adoption of our new design guidelines in 2000. The guidelines were in place and were used in the evaluation of the 640 N. Third Street project. The major program change that has occurred since this application was submitted is the new historic preservation ordinance, which staff does not believe includes any provisions that would change the outcome of this review. It should be noted however that in the new ordinance HPC did set a policy that only one six month extension of conceptual approval will be allowed for any project. The owner of 640 N. Third Street requests a six month extension, until November 23, 2002. In the attached letter, it is explained that the delay in bringing forward a final application is due to concerns about the real estate market and a desire to monitor the outcome of other code amendments that the City is currently contemplating, to see what new development options they may include for this site. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that HPC's interests are not served by requiring a final application to be submitted now, and recommends that a one-time extension be granted. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution #_, Series of 2002, granting a six month extension of conceptual approval for 640 N. Third Street." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2002 A. Conceptual approval- resolution and drawings RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AT 640 N. THIRD STREET, LOTS 4, 5, AND 6 (LESS THE SOUTHERLY 3.2 FEET OF LOT 6), BLOCK 102, HALLAM'S ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 2002 WHEREAS, the applicant, Jim Daggs, has requested a six month extension of the HPC conceptual approval for the property located at 640 N. Third Street, Lots 4,5, and 6 (less the southerly 3.2 feet of Lot 6), Block 102, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen, Colorado. The conceptual approval was originally granted on May 23, 2001 and the property is a designated historic landmark; and WHEREAS, Section 26.415.010.C.2.b.1 of the Municipal Code states that application for a final development plan shall be filed within one (1) year of the date of approval of a conceptual development plan. Unless an extension is granted by HPC, failure to file such an application shall render null and void the approval of a conceptual development plan previously granted by the HPC; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002, recommended a one time extension be granted; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting of the Historic Preservation Commission on April 24, 2002, the Commission considered and approved the request by a vote of_ to _. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That a one time six month extension of conceptual approval (starting from May 23,2002) be granted for 640 N. Third Street, Lots 4,5, and 6 (less the southerly 3.2 feet of Lot 6), Block 102, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Aspen, Colorado, to expire on November 23,2002. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of April 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk CHARLES CUNNIFFE ARCHITECTS TECTURE ING INTERIORS Charles L. Cunniffe, AIA Principal Janver C. Derrington, AIA Principal April 2,2002 Amy Guthrie Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 S. Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Daggs Residence 640 N. Third Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Amy: Thank you for your letter of March 21, 2002, alerting Jim and me about the approaching deadline for HPC final development review submittal. In our telephone conference today, you indicated that if we chose to request an extension of the deadline up to six months, it would be considered at the April 24 regular HPC meeting. While it would be possible for us to have an application for final review submitted by May 23, Jim would prefer to have more time to consider his options in the light of pending ordinances that the city is considering regarding the infill program, etc. He has also been monitoring the current local real estate market and feels it would be prudent to wait awhile longer before deciding his best course of action for developing his property. We therefore respectfully request that you recommend a six month extension of the deadline for final review submittal to the HPC at the April 24 meeting. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, Jan1er C. Derrington, AIT P~cipal/Senior Proje~Architect 610 EAST HYMAN AVE ASPEN, CO 81611 970.925.5590 fax: 970.925-5076 info@cunniffe.com www.cunniffe.com ASPEN + STEAMBOAT + TELLURIDE + VAIL + WHITEFISH RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AN APPLICATION FOR A HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT AND GRANTING APPROVAL FOR CONCEPTUAL DESIGN, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, ON-SITE RELOCATION, AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 640 N. THIRD STREET, LOTS 4, 5, AND 6 (LESS THE SOUTHERLY 3.2 FEET OF LOT 6), BLOCK 102, HALLAM'S ADDITION TO THE CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION #24, SERIES OF 2001 Parcel ID: 2735-121-08-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Jim and Gae Daggs, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects, have requested Historic Landmark Designation, Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition, On-site relocation, and Historic Landmark Lot Split approval for the property located at 640 N. Third Street, Lots 4,5, and 6 (less the southerly 3.2 feet of Lot 6), Block 102, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. The property is listed on the "Inventory of Historic Sites and Structures; and WHEREAS, Any structure or site that meets two (2) or more of the following standards may be designated as "H," Historic Overlay District, and/or historic landmark. A. Historical importance. The structure or site is a principal or secondary structure or site commonly identified or associated with a person or an event of historical significance to the cultural, social, or political history of Aspen, the State of Colorado, or the United States. B. Architectural importance. Based on the building form, use, or specimen, the structure or site reflects an architectural style that is unique, distinct, or of traditional Aspen character, or the structure or site embodies the distinguishing characteristics of a significant or unique architectural type. C. Designer. The structure is a significant work of an architect or designer whose individual work has influenced the character of Aspen. D. Neighborhood character. The structure or site is a significant component of an historically significant neighborhood and the preservation of the structure or site is important for the maintenance of that neighborhood character. E. Community character. The structure or site is critical to the preservation of the character of the Aspen community because of its relationship in terms of size, location, and architectural similarity to other structures or sites of historical or architectural importance; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed.the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character o f the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting. demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, No approval for on-site relocation shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The relocation activity is demonstrated to be the best preservation method for the character and integrity of the structure and the historic integrity of the existing neighborhood and adjacent structures will not be diminished due to the relocation. B. The structure has been demonstrated to be capable of withstanding the physical impacts of the relocation and re-siting. A structural report shall be submitted by a licensed engineer demonstrating the soundness of the structure proposed for relocation. C. A relocation plan shall be submitted, including posting a bond or other financial security approved by HPC with the engineering department, to insure the safe relocation, preservation, and repair (if required) of the structure, site preparation and infrastructure connections. The receiving site shall be prepared in advance of the physical relocation; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated May 23, 2001, performed an analysis ofthe application based on the standards, and recommended approval of the project; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on May 23, 2001, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and to be consistent with the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines" and approved the application by a vote of4 to 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That HPC grants approval for Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition, and On-site relocation and recommends Council approval of Historic Landmark Designation and a Historic Landmark Lot Split for the property located at 640 N. Third Street, Lots 4,5, and 6 (less the southerly 3.2 feet of Lot 6), Block 102, Hallam's Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with the following conditions: 1. The HPC hereby grants a 5 foot rear yard setback variance and 500 square foot floor area bonus. 2. The HPC hereby grants a waiver from the maximum footprint requirement for ADU bonuses. 3. Eliminate the flanking windows on the upper floor, south faâ„¢le of the historic house. Eliminate the shed dormers over the front gable unless it is found, during construction, that they are part of the original framing. 4. The scale and material of the deck columns is to be restudied. 5. For final review, there will be significant discussion about the material palette. 6. Further information will be required about the character of the landscaping in the areas in front of the old house. The applicant should be clear about whether the proposed planters are raised planter boxes or just flower beds (preferred), and what the detailing of the lightwell at the front o f the house will be. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 23rd day of May, 2001. Approved as to Form: 01 -4-- David Hoefer, Assistane City Attorney Approved as to content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzan a Reid, Chhir V ATTEST: Kathy @trickla*d, Chief Deputy Clerk EXHI *70 1+ *41â‚¬,ED 6/2#\ e BeÂ·14 hol- D erÂ¢VT'&*9 STDOE 9,0â€¢LIÂ£.9*7' FL,Â£;te Ta,NE r*no 1 .....0 - '_ /../ 44 =tn LAWN r - }c_} - 1 r.1 1 1 Ft-ANÂ¥ IN~ il) Ugu 11 1 -P-4.AÂ» 24Â·151*tr WUW're I . - '. 9 ,~.d..~,.,4 ..-1--a 2 A.' ' 1 L_i Ut-Trgl p z==Arl-:4 71-4-~Â· i-1 .- , U ~-9 - P - -- -I..-. 0 -J O - STUDY 11 m ~Â· Â· - MUI:> i -4- wA i .. I. . 4.- I L 1-BRY FLAWTES- 4- . . -+11 . - I .,41211 - I . 01 4 ..r ' I I. , Â· r-j J\. 1 11 Â· Â· - . I. ..... CoN CRE-re= 1 m - PRNEWNÂ¥ , , 14-' - - <Le,ER 2. --2 , 4 fl,â€¢17Â·-rrÂ·-Â¥ , GARAAE ~ M. 1 fogit t.. ,40 - fy /4*ty . 6 5%715.12. 0 ) - I. STOK, 6 , 13*70}+ 1 ME-12Â» 1 . Â» - 1 .- I 4. 2:*. C Â· *4-4 L,W. 21 / . - 5 L d' A L- .--- -*-- LAWN uu,,- L.Yl. C u j 1-0,4. A . r LAWN | 1 ./ r , JI 794 r - I /11 V 11 - r 11â€¢J, - 1 - 1 .6 : A-15(A . 1 I . tr-~ di'c,J*r-~-# - â‚¬rkgrt l V~ Ur>t<- - -L rgy-'â‚¬4 Ic.t- 1-.~40%6 ~,Ar~LJ>4 4 7211 -1 b . , Â£/'-lh-i ~'h .. Â»TO 1 - . .- 113- CLI) 4-07* t, 5 --4- , r WAÂ» MAIN LEVEL fLAN - RE\/195-5 /11 11 /=~ LOI Â¢17 K G 9 0 4 /rkv 1 50<+1/MIT +1- RE-V/*EP 9Â§/01 9 OF,4 rr 0-3 h 1 . *.44-71/1-)13 K, ~ ~-3-1 /-1 0 , -. , LIZ'//DR, Room--M' 3 _d cOp'., b 0/ 9 1-3 UL~ A-PLA . L. 8001= L.R. 1 BR, 14 -1 1 h==. *Kerr 1 lio U W 0 0 A - 1 ~ ~ECK L RM -.-k- 1 1 MI -7 _UPPES LEVEL FLAN - IKEVIOED Ati I t'=, 101 ----- - l 27/19/0\ . et st ol ED<+11 VIT H Revi eap *â‚¬ot 10 0,14 4,/..9 nftÂ»Â« - Ric>ce elerÂ£-; aftf PAINTEE> \0/SOC> FÂ»rect,â€¢ 4.-rie.IAA, Â· ~\ / / 9A1-v, BETAL FLUE Ria*â€¢ Ex 4 *COAR. SHâ€¢KKE Ccuo t- C,JAR.144ATEP *Al-Vâ€¢ ..c>rÂ· MALMAY-REM-*LE vÂ« ~ 94'. METAL- gOÂ©F/)400 / Â¢4101 FJC iN'>UMrEP god, 47**TE-AA N EW CCO+RL 6)4#+246; S,U P,12 - il * I- 804,~7-~mlr_~~:%2%llt 1 i litiil~Ill'~"iii" Ekl'M iii'limmili j i 0,!lf],iimt~:217 U ; 1._5.'. 1-El â€¢ in li}4 1 he--4+V li 11 A+1 li ''~ 1 lf' mils 1 2=9- 11 . 21-4.-Lf.r-1 7 _nE=11 ]1 11=:1 ~ . -'I|' - . i ,7 , T ', I Â·*= r.---r. -Fll F 1,-- -iA,i h'Pr (4, r~lrâ€¢ prf-,126 Â»--~,E:k__4/46444/4./1 'tiggE/r- 1111:,6;'Iril--- REM'412. * REPA# kiT ah.. I r#mt: 'rrr.----Li--2 +- --T-18 ~~1EEE LEE 91 PINC, 4 -nâ€¢IM. - a LI'lIT )r 64<'6, WOOD LAr - It if i; 1 :' ' ' _,1-+422f~r,t.il--:-li It -. It A - ./----Il- .....I-/.*-- 11 41 Ij 'b!j~ :' "Illl/,Ilij'lail?ji~ m - - r . -./. Â·t~-- - 11'... 1-C...... -i ; -4.-r"I l'Â·41' Ell#111' Ii'WI, U r. 1.-: -=314 ".j~ Â£ 11,1. -- - - , 1.--,1 1 1 1,1 ! 41 -1'i -JL--j ' CÂ«*E mi â€ž '-CE.DAR SM A*LE SID,NG, - I T 1 1, 1 , 1 r- 1 GUN-V. MON CORRud. culverr r- -1 r -7 C/4-0 +4 C,N C.&STS PILL - - - H'6TDAIC %10Â£4605 .r It PROPOSED SDU 7-1+ El-EVA-1-ION - R#VISED ~ - -2 .... ................--.. â€¢r . - . I 111=lot 5/ \9/0 1 5/96/0\ I C - Extit blT H REV le Ep 5/4/01 I 1 Â© P It 9 ~vtmrt-k-LL.L n 11 11- u_Ist~p-~~---- ...B~lili li'il ~ Il ~ 11 N Ill~~ EFEE 414111{!jil ill A lit Tilt#}111Â¥60,;?ilil?11.1~41*111% fi{11111,11112*~T ~~~~~~~~ ~r ~~~ !i#~liti~ j!1~11!111, iiti;~i EJL147:=rf tuu- Mi - r--1114[ r -Jawk-4 1 . )IE-- 6==9:2 7.. - 1. 11 1 1 5=y='C==imillint,Il =:270---. EL. 21 1 / â€ž.48- . 1 11 ' 1.1 11 11 ' lili 111. i ---1 1 . - - r t. / -4Â· P-4+71 - IEEE -, 1- 1 -- . 1.- . 1 -1 1 i Hlt"ft:'810 4404'56 1 pwoposED ADCNT-low EW# CA~AitA4 C H act 6 E. 1 f 6 - . 4 < -I -- 1A.- FRO FOSED N 08-TH ELEVATION - REVISED i w = col 2. /\9 /01 5/8/0\ L CxtilibiT 1-1- RE>/ leap 5/40 1 (-2- aflt KE"ovt Â£*4 ces>0..z. el**44* COLD ROOFÂ»Â»'Â¥ * RE.M.Mpt VÂ¢ Nivq c e. 848 SI+INALâ€¢ SUPExt,Jeul.Arrp i rÂ· RE,Al 12 + R .â€žth} 7 i I - .- tEl 1 t E,KT. LA-P Slpt N 4 4 7714 -z --1 -- - P "4 &-Etri - - .0.- = M Â»-Â«=7'V )/ r . 12. ..L- 1- i flj:M 4 - 1 - -. -..,Filmair. 4-tI~ 1 --m .- il 1.-7 -*-1 ith= + 40-1 ~31 ---7- 1~j~lv 1 Pl-/4 REVISED EAST ElaV. REVre>ED MAOT ELSMER Okl OF a ARAG,2 /Â» PU (LAKE AVENUE) / 1 1 -1 -0 1 11=21 0 1 1 11 ME-Â»1- Roapl h~, Cere.Ru4. GrALV 94, ~ - FAI ATED WP. aâ€¢4444 -- -- 1 - - 1 5946 Â¢ TRIA< ,tnnl - --: , p Â· _-2..2illililiiÂ£,0-&,9.-'666,&/4--/BI r- . Â·i.. . - w' RE AR, P AU,4-Rp- r_f - j n -"---T=--1 +36--rir,1 $2,4 l- 1-; tR A 659 REPLACE EWA Ft,ED ~1743- 1 43 4 l.. wr v., P. pou aL/- i \4 "- 124--rr--- .41-= -V Â· WUM A WINDS*/0 . . m 1 9 -4==- U -1+AL..--.-.-0 --; 11 I. 1 *Lm..010*8Â·*0!NALE 11 1 - A iii -n,c==g , diff/1- 1(101 .9:FiT-1 1 1 . / 5/PLACh 1 17 '1 ~~1 f #71! 1--16 IT+FIL , -- - YAN T _u, 11 rn=arl 1 0 *-- Cal=RUG . drALV. IR,>61 j4 -1 Artirm-* 542 1 1 : CIL CE*AL SÂ»INALE ZE--i-=* t: I aL+f-t.[ 1 et:PING, ro KE,Â£,6. m~ i Mi m- 2:22 -i~ i l c ; i M..J_=RI / I , 214, 2â‚¬51 M E . . 1 1 1 i 1 /104:3 1 tÂ·;J }54 li i - _._.-i_==LI=,- 4 1 141 451 ; 2 1 .Â¢A . -1 ,1 -- ,? 11 ... Â¥'1 11 REÂ¥1 DED WEST- ELEVATION R EV I S ED COM VO 5 JTE WED-r oF ADDITION- ELEVATION -(TBIR.[D STREEE) -22/\Ci /01 C CH=10, + i6lo C - 51â‚¬)(01 mixt*(BIT 1+ Rsv te m P 5/8/01 0 ep.14 . -"fth. 2* , i -=- ~.1 . 06 L i z=R-i 1 Pt k) ING, fi,''Ill, 1- Â£ -re-/4* 11 11111'11#1 1 ./ T--7 1 - 14 1 M- f {i j .1-V - imâ‚¬!% 17 : , -- SU (Lts>I ht# 45101- loht A-_ \11=io 3/19/31 S / e>/01 /* : APR-02-2002 TUE 09:33 AM FAX NO, r. uo 6 EXHIBIT -9- 1 . 1 9-122 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: .973 l43< -*;4649(ex -~TEETT- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: Afâ€¢,Â£- 24 , 2004 gilt_ 0/PE Daid ~ STATE OF COLORADO ) County of Pickin ) I, 2/Aw gru .r. : /6,1 -1;*f AR+,gers (name, please print) being~or representing an Applictne to thd Ciry of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify chat I have complied with che public notice requirements of Sedtion 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 1~f Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official C) paper ora paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. '<~~ Posting efnaride.- By poscing ofnotice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, 2, 2:-trproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed o f letters not less than one inch iii height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the-3 day of , 200 2- to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A phocograph of the posted notice (sign) is arrached hereto. 1~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community r Development Departments which contains the information described in Section -~3,26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the tootpublic hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.Si mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, servied dismict or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pltkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy Of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is actached hereto. (contimled on next page) APR-02-2002 TUE 09:33 AM r MA kiu. lÂ· Rezoning or terI amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as par[ of a general revision o f this Titie, or whenever the teXC of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulanon, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and che notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, rhe proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (i 5) days prior to the public hearing on such amend:r~ENEs,A~ /Z i 946 Â»51 0 4 The foreuoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this Â£J day or Aprl\ , 200 2, by _Sy A in 12 8114 leq .,0,#m#. WIt-NESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 4031'!f.f,*,~ EBOTAA),\ 1 My commission expires: ~4/ /03 %E Â·PUBLIC ..~ f .<P 6{JAA,U.G>*,0 L %4,like' Notary'Public J MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: March 11, 2003 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL *Uitilliâ€ž,%4 ........ PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET FINAL HI'C DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be hcld on Wednesday, April 24,2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p,m. before the Aspen IÂ·Iistoric Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Drew Harman represented by Harry Teague Architects requesting Final HPC design approval for the property located at 513 West Smuggler Street, Lots E, F, and G, Block 21, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pilkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 6,2002 City of Aspen Account /11 . 0 9, . *4 - , 1 - -1 'R . Â¢41 . P A 0 C D J J. * 1 '- 0.4 . f '43: 7 YW Iii PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET 47 -3 ---- -4- - r - %24 -Ii=â€ž4*La ot- FINAL HPC DESIGN REVIEW I . .... 14 ~ 1...2.7. k . 6 -t.&7,0.ip-.-~ 4 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a put*c heanng wil} be held on Wednesday. April 24, , '.1 2002 at a meet,ng to begin at 5:00 p m ..641 , I. ,. i 18) r-; 3) = 4 , 5 7) d before the Aspen Historic Preservation 1 .. 4-7 P Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall. 130 S.Galena St., Aspen, to consider ic . P an applicalion submitted by Drew Hannan Â¥ i 1 4 4% ; LY 1 r f iepfesented by Harry Teague Architects 'f 0 0 2 4 ,# requesbng Final HPC des,gn app,oval for the 1) i propeny located at 513 West Smuggler , B -1 Street. Lots E.F. and G, Block 21, City and Towns,te of Aspen 4 0/ lat t-~- -, ---$*-v-,t 1,0.0. *~~L CO #1 AL Â¥ 2 318 FOURTH STREET LTD 609 CORPORATION BASS RAIFIEL I 5 CIO BUSTER FELDOM A COLORADO CORPORATION 606 E HYMAN PO BOX 445 PO BOX 1819 ASPEN CO 81611 HOUSTON TX 77001 ASPEN CO 81612 BERLINER ARTHUR S BLAICH ROBERT I CROWN TAPPER PATRICIA C/O WALDEN BLAICH JANET S 5 POLO CLUB DR 750 BATTERY ST #700 319 N FOURTH ST DENVER CO 80209 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94705 ASPEN CO 8161 I CUNDILL JOAN REED DIKEOU LUCY SHARP DOREMUS FAMILY LTD PARTNE 432 W FRANCIS ST 25 POLO CLUB CIR 85 GLEN GARRY DR ASPEN CO 81611 DENVER CO 80209 '; ASPEN CO 81611 FIVE CONTINENTS ASPEN REA EPSTEIN ROBERT FINKLE S MARCUS & SARA F C/O EDWARDS JOSEPH III ' 5000 PLAZA ON THE LAKE BLVD 117 AABC 502 MAIN ST STE 201 AUSTIN TX 78746 ASPEN CO 81611 CARBONDALE CO 81623 FOX SAM GELL-MANN/MURDOCK PARTNER HALL CHARLES L FOX MARILYN 500 W FRANCIS PO BOX 1819 7701 FORSYTH BLVD STE 600 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 CLAYTON MO 63105 HELZBERG SHIRLEY BUSH TRU HALPERIN ELLEN & BARRY HARMAN ANDREW J QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE 420 W FRANCIS ST 563 HOMER AVE TRUST ASPEN CO 81611-1233 PALO ALTO CA 94301 4520 MAIN STE 1050 KANSAS CITY MO 64111 HOFFMAN JOHN L HOFFMASTER THOMAS J HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D 1035 W 57TH ST 437 W SMUGGLER ST 782C N KALAHEO KANSAS CITY MO 64113 ASPEN CO 81611 KAILUA HI 96734 KELLNER GEORGE A IBBOTSON ANNE B ISRAEL CHARLES B KELLNER MARTHA B 505 N 5TH ST 522 W FRANCIS ST ' 117 E 78TH ST ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611-1235 ~ NEW YORK NY 10021 ' LEWIS ADAM KIENAST CHRISTIE A KOEHLER DAVID R TRUST CO KATHLEENÂ·HONOHAN @NATIONA 406 W SMUGGLER ST 618 W SMUGGLER ST CITY BANK ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 1900 E 9TH ST LOC 2030 CLEVELAND OH 44114 OXLEY JOHN C 50% MULLEN MICHEL NEISSER JUDITH E REVOCABL ATTN BARBARA WALKER 8411 PRESTON RD #730 LB 2 132 E DELAWARE APT 6201 1437 S BOULDER AVE #1475 DALLAS TX 75225 CHICAGO IL 60611 TULSA OK 74119 j , PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP POPE WILLIAM H SFP 1996 PERSONAL RESIDEN C/O CHRISTOPHER HEWE'IT 540 W SMUGGLER #2 PINE HILL LN PO BOX 2577 ASPEN CO 8I611 HOUSTON TX 77019 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 SILVERMAN JACK E SMALL ALBERT H & SHIRLEY STAPLETON FAMILY LLLP 612 W FRANCIS ST 7116 GLENBROOK RD 1350 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR ASPEN CO 81611 BETHESDA MD 20814 ASPEN CO 81611 THALBERG KATHARINE VERLEGER PHILIP K & MARGA WALTON CAROLYN F 434 W SMUGGLER ST 15 TORREY PINES LN 413 W SMUGGLER ASPEN CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 ASPEN CO 8161I WEST SMUGGLER LOT SPLIT L WAX RICHARD A & HILDEGARD WEINGLASS GABRIELE PEPPER C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 2727 SULPHUR SPRINGS AVE 533 W SMUGGLER i PO BOX 11509 ST HELENA CA 94574 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 WHIPPLE RALPH U & LYNNE C i 855 GIBSON AVE 1 ASPEN Co 81611 MAR-26:2062 TUE 09:45 AM FAX NO, P, 03 ,. EXHIBIT *- f=] 1 cau-2*h AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 373 Uesr.41 149 Ler ~71Â£271- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC IIEARING DATE: 6/L- 22 , 200_2. Hwyumi LA.*,4.- Lyr 6. t,1- STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I,-24AW -A,enÂ· : /400-61vE /4#mua (name, please print) beind or representing an Applicant to tne City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~~ Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy ofthepublication is attached hereto. 1~ Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproofmaterials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide ' and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the 3 day of A-ptz CL_ , 200 '*, to and including the date and time of the public hear\ng. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto, -JI~ Mailing ofnotice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section Appl, ij 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the 190 public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners ofproperty within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses ofproperty owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing, A copy ofthe owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) MAR-28-2002 TUE 09:45 AM FAX NO, P. 04 - Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever thc official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing ofnames and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all busines, hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendmenks, / / 1 Signatur~ 9 6 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowl&died before me this < day of OfrU , 1002, by 31Â¢.p A CALL .5'4*9 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL #Pilwl#R//,4 /'*OTARY.... i Mpg~mmission expires: -31,1 -]01 - \ *UBL\0.4 # #NZU*ZE *,TOFCOG",0. Notary*u6lic W.-1 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: March 11,2003 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL K.t"Imm,4, I I PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, April 22,2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Drew Harman represented by Harry Teague Architects requesting approval of a historic landmark lot split of the property located at 513 West Smuggler Street, Lots E, F, and G, Block 21, City and Townsite ofAspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. 1/Helen Kalin Klanderud. Mayor Aspen City Council Published in the Aspen Times on March 30,2002 City ofAspen Account hy--_ "-7 - ... r / /11 , I . 1 - I /1 . h . I , C.. . 60 .4 . I ..11. . 1- * ..1 /4 2!146 4 . PUBLIC NOTICE . ., RE: 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET HISTORIC LANDMARK LOT SPLIT I V . ..1.. . ~ < NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thai a pubbc heanng wi# be held on Monday. Apnl 22. 2002 at a meebng to begin at 5 00 pm ~S 4, riA 2. 24 befole ihe Aspen C,ty Counal. City Councd + /)791 ../130 Â·Â·>7 4.-P,j Chambed,Oty Hall 130 S. Galena St. .E: A.-~ * 1, Aspen. to consider an appkabon submtted ' m/trtill .er?Â¥4 , B W by Drew Hannan represented by Harry .: Teague Architects request,ng approval of a ij ./ fr- w rt / U historic landmark lot split of the property -UL 4 located at 513 West Smuggle, Street. Lots E. F, and G, Block 21, C,ty and Towns,te 01 Aspen 49 0--0,4 00.....<4 Ao/9.,I....,05 0**MA A.-CO +WI L .Al k 1,1. #r 318 FOURTH STREET LTD 609 CORPORATION BASS RAIFIEL I CIO BUSTER FELDOM A COLORADO CORPORATION L'. 606 E HYMAN PO BOX 445 POBOX 1819 ASPEN CO 81611 HOUSTON TX 77001 ASPEN CO 81612 BERLINER ARTHUR S BLAICH ROBERT I CROWN TAPPER PATRICIA C/O WALDEN BLAICH JANET S 5 POLO CLUB DR 750 BATTERY ST #700 319 N FOURTH ST DENVER CO 80209 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94705 ASPEN CO 81611 CUNDILL JOAN REED DIKEOU LUCY SHARP DOREMUS FAMILY LTD PARTNE 432 W FRANCIS ST 25 POLO CLUB CIR 85 GLEN GARRY DR ASPEN CO 81611 DENVER CO 80209 ASPEN CO 81611 , FIVE CONTINENTS ASPEN REA EPSTEIN ROBERT FINKLE S MARCUS & SARA F C/O EDWARDS JOSEPH III ' 5000 PLAZA ON THE LAKE BLVD 117 AABC 502 MAIN ST STE 201 AUSTIN TX 78746 ' ASPEN CO 81611 CARBONDALE CO 81623 FOX SAM GELL-MANN/MURDOCK PARTNER HALL CHARLES L FOX MARILYN 500 W FRANCIS n PO BOX 1819 7701 FORSYTH BLVD STE 600 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 CLAYTON MO 63105 HELZBERG SHIRLEY BUSH TRU HALPERIN ELLEN & BARRY HARMAN ANDREW J QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE 420 W FRANCIS ST 563 HOMER AVE TRUST ASPEN CO 81611-1233 PALO ALTO CA 94301 4520 MAIN STE 1050 KANSAS CITY MO 64111 HOFFMAN JOHN L HOFFMASTER THOMAS J HOOK BRADLEY K & PAMELA D 1035 W 57TH ST 437 W SMUGGLER ST 782C N KALAHEO KANSAS CITY MO 64113 ASPEN CO 81611 KAILUA HI 96734 KELLNER GEORGE A IBBOTSON ANNE B ISRAEL CHARLES B KELLNER MARTHA B 505 N 5TH ST 522 W FRANCIS ST ' 117 E 78TH ST ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611-1235 ~ NEW YORK NY 10021 ! LEWIS ADAM KIENAST CHRISTIE A . KOEHLER DAVID R TRUST C/O KATHLEEN HONOHAN @NATIONA 406 W SMUGGLER ST ' 618 W SMUGGLER ST CITY BANK ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 1900 E 9TH ST LOC 2030 CLEVELAND OH 44114 OXLEY JOHN C 50% MULLEN MICHEL NEISSER JUDITH E REVOCABL ATTN BARBARA WALKER 8411 PRESTON RD #730 LB 2 132 E DELAWARE APT 6201 1437 S BOULDER AVE #1475 DALLAS TX 75225 CHICAGO IL 60611 TULSA OK 74119 t , PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP POPE WILLIAM H SFP 1996 PERSONAL RESIDEN p C/O CHRISTOPHER HEWEIT 540 W SMUGGLER #2 PINE HILL LN PO BOX 2577 ASPEN CO 81611 HOUSTON TX 77019 RANCHO SANTA FE CA 92067 SILVERMAN JACK E SMALL ALBERT H & SHIRLEY STAPLETON FAMILY LLLP 612 W FRANCIS ST 7116 GLENBROOK RD 1350 MOUNTAIN VIEW DR ASPEN CO 81611 BETHESDA MD 20814 ASPEN CO &1611 THALBERG KATHARINE VERLEGER PHILIP K & MARGA WALTON CAROLYN F 434 W SMUGGLER ST 15 TORREY PINES LN 413 W SMUGGLER ASPEN CO 81611 NEWPORT BEACH CA 92660 ASPEN CO 81611 WEST SMUGGLER LOT SPLIT L WAX RICHARD A & HILDEGARD WEINGLASS GABRIELE PEPPER C/O LEONARD WEINGLASS 2727 SULPHUR SPRINGS AVE 533 W SMUGGLER , PO BOX 11509 ST HELENA CA 94574 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 1 WHIPPLE RALPH U & LYNNE C 855 GIBSON AVE 1 ., ASPEN CO 81611 NFE B) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Director 043 ~ FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 513 W. Smuggler Street- Final Development- Public Hearing DATE: April 24,2002 SUMMARY: The project involves demolishing large additions to the historic house on this site, relocating and restoring it, and building a new addition. The eastern portion of the property is to be split off for future development. APPLICANT: Drew Harman, represented by Harry Teague Architects. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-10-002. ADDRESS: 513 W. Smuggler Street, Lots E, F, and G, Block 27, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential) SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and 1 *LG l b i 4- /4 Staff Finding: In 2001, HPC granted approval to demolish the non-historic construction that surrounds this house and to replace it with a new addition that was approximately 3,000 square feet in size. The building was to be used as a single family residence. The owner has since determined that a lot split with two smaller homes is a more feasible plan and requests HPC approval to move the historic house to the west, restore the porch to its original appearance, reconstruct demolished walls of the house, and make a 1,790 square foot addition. A proposal for a residence on the east lot will be brought before HPC in the future. Staff is happy to see the project going in this direction because it more effectively "retrieves" this historic resource, which has been heavily impacted by inappropriate alterations. The proposed addition is smaller than the last approval allowed for, and it is located entirely behind the historic building. Discussion at the HPC conceptual review meetings centered on moving the addition back as far on the lot as possible to create a good separation from the historic house, and restudy of the height of the addition. Both were accomplished to the HPC's satisfaction, and approval was granted on March 13th. Final review is focused on addressing any conditions established at conceptual (in this case there were none), and approval ofmaterials. The applicant proposes to retain the existing siding on the historic house and match it where reconstruction or patching is occurring. Any historic windows or doors that remain on the house must be preserved, and where new units are to be installed, they must be wood, with a manufacturer's cut sheet submitted for staff and monitor approval. Staff s only concern with regard to the historic house is the proposed standing seam metal rooÂ£ The architect's notes state that this is meant to be similar to the tar paper roof that can be seen on the house in an old photograph. Staff is not convinced that this will create the same character, particularly if the seams are too pronounced. A detail would be helpful for HPC's decision on this issue. The Design Guidelines state that when replacing roof material on a historic building, it is very important to consider the texture and pattern. Standing seam roofs, they note, create a vertical pattern. The relevant guidelines are: 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materials such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. 2 o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. o If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non- reflective finish. 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detract from the historic appearance of the building. o A metal roof material should have an earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o A metal roof with a lead-like patina also is an acceptable alternative. o Seams should be of a low profile. o A roof assembly with a high profile seam or thick edge is inappropriate. The proposed addition successfully uses simple forms, materials, and fenestration in a manner which is promoted by the design guidelines and staff does not have any concerns with the final detailing that is being presented. There have been concerns expressed about the overall size of the new construction, however it has been determined that the use of a connector, appropriate siting of the addition, and reduction in height, have been effective. Staff finds that this review standard is met. There are a number of standard conditions that will be placed on the approval to ensure that the restoration work on the house is accomplished according to historic preservation policies, and that the overall character of the site, including major landscaping and exterior lighting, is sympathetic to the historic resource. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: By creating two detached homes on the site and transferring some of the FAR to a new structure, the miner's cottage can be better preserved and the structures on the site can be consistent with the size of homes that have historically existed in the West . End neighborhood. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance Of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project will enhance the historic significance of the home by removing some inappropriate alterations that have occurred over the years. 3 d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The reconstruction and restoration entailed in this project will enhance the architectural character and integrity of the house significantly. The new addition is large, but a great deal more sensitive than what exists on this building currently. RECOMMENDATION: Staffrecommends HPC grant Final approval, finding that the review standards and design guidelines are met, with the following conditions: 1. Provide a detail of the proposed standing seam metal roof for the final review hearing. 2. Provide a cut sheet for any new wood windows or doors that must be installed on the outside o f the historic house for review by staff and monitor. 3. Confirm what paving material will be used for the front sidewalk. 4. Confirm that the site plan represents all major landscaping that is to take place. 5. HPC has granted a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, a 20 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, and a 500 square foot FAR bonus. 6. Provide a structural report demonstrating that the buildings can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover. 7. Provide a bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation ofthe structure. 8. Provide a relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored. 9. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating what materials on the exterior of the house are historic, and how those materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all 4 original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 13. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 15. The preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2002, final review for 513 W. Smuggler Street." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2002 A. Staff memo dated April 24,2002 B. Application C. Relevant Design Guidelines 5 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 513 W. SMUGGLER STREET, LOTS E, F, AND G, Block 27, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. __, SERIES OF 2002 Parcel ID #: 2735-124-10-002 WHEREAS, the applicant, Drew Harman, represented by Harry Teague Architects, has requested Final Development approval for the property located at 513 W. Smuggler Street, Lots E, F, and G, Block 27, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on April 24, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application by a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves final development for the property located at 513 W. Smuggler Street, Lots E, F, and G, Block 27, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, finding that the review standards are met, with the following conditions: 1. Provide a detail of the proposed standing seam metal roof for the final review hearing. 2. Provide a cut sheet for any new wood windows or doors that must be installed on the outside of the historic house for review by staff and monitor. 3. Confirm what paving material will be used for the front sidewalk. 4. Confirm that the site plan represents all major landscaping that is to take place. 5. HPC has granted a 10 foot rear yard setback variance, a 20 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, and a 500 square foot FAR bonus. 6. Provide a structural report demonstrating that the buildings can be moved and/or information about how the house will be stabilized from the housemover. 7. Provide a bond or letter of credit in the amount of $30,000 to insure the safe relocation ofthe structure. 8. Provide a relocation plan detailing how and where the building will be stored. 9. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 10. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 11. Submit a preservation plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating what materials on the exterior of the house are historic, and how those materials, which are to be retained, will be restored. The requirement is to retain/repair all original materials and replicate only those that are determined by HPC staff and monitor to be beyond salvage. 12. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 13. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 14. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 15. The preservation plan described above, as well as the conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 16. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 17. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of April, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 624(43 RELEVANT DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR 513 W. SMUGGLER 1.9 Maintain the established progression of public-to-private spaces when considering a rehabilitation project. o This includes a sequence of experiences, beginning with the "public" sidewalk, proceeding along a "semi-public" walkway, to a "semi-private" porch or entry feature and ending in the "private" spaces beyond. o Provide a walkway running perpendicular from the street to the front entry. Meandering walkways are discouraged, except where it is needed to avoid a tree. o Use paving materials that are similar to those used historically for the building style. Concrete, wood or sandstone may be appropriate for certain building styles. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.11 Preserve and maintain mature landscaping on site, particularly landmark trees and shrubs. o Protect established vegetation during construction to avoid damage. Replacement of damaged, aged or diseased trees must be approved by the Parks Department. o If a tree must be removed as part of the addition or alteration, replace it with species of a large enough scale to have a visual impact in the early years of the project. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. o Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. o Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. o Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. o Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. o Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. o It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. 6 o Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. o Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. o Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. o Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. o Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. o Always prepare a good substrate. Prior to painting, remove damaged or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer, using the gentlest means possible. o Use compatible paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints without a primer coat. 2.4 Brick or stone that was not painted historically should not be painted. o Masonry naturally has a water-protective layer, or patina, to protect it from the elements. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. o Avoid the removal of damaged materials that can be repaired. o Isolated areas of damage may be stabilized or fixed, using consolidants. Epoxies and resins may be considered for wood repair and special masonry repair components also may be used. 2.6 Maintain masonry walls in good condition. o Original mortar that is in good condition should be preserved in place. o Repoint only those mortar joints where there is evidence of a moisture problem or when mortar is missing. o Duplicate the original mortar in strength, composition, color, texture, joint width and profile. o Mortar joints should be cleared with hand tools. Using electric saws and hammers to remove mortar can seriously damage the adjacent brick. o Do not use mortar with a high portland cement content, which will be substantially harder than the brick and does not allow for expansion and contraction. The result is deterioration of the brick itself. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. o If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. o Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. 7 2.8 Do not use synthetic materials as replacements for primary building materials. o In some instances, substitute materials may be used for replacing architectural details, but doing so is not encouraged. If it is necessary to use a new material, such as a fiberglass column, the style and detail should precisely match that of the historic model. o Primary building materials such as wood siding and brick should not be replaced with synthetic materials. o Synthetic materials include: aluminum, vinyl siding and panelized brick. o EIFS (synthetic stucco) is not an appropriate replacement for real stucco. 3.1 Preserve the functional and decorative features of a historic window. o Features important to the character of a window include its frame, sash, muntins/mullions, sills, heads, jambs, moldings, operation and groupings of windows. o Repair frames and sashes rather than replacing them, whenever conditions permit. o Preserve the original glass, when feasible. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. o Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. o Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double- hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. 8 o A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 3.8 Use a storm window to enhance energy conservation rather than to replace a historic window. o Install a storm window on the interior, when feasible. This will allow the character of the original window to be seen from the public way. o If a storm window is to be installed on the exterior, match the sash design and material of the original window. It should fit tightly within the window opening without the need for sub-frames or panning around the perimeter. 4.1 Preserve historically significant doors. o Maintain features important to the character of a historic doorway. These may include the door, door frame, screen door, threshold, glass panes, paneling, hardware, detailing, transoms and flanking sidelights. o Do not change the position and function of original front doors and primary entrances. o If a secondary entrance must be sealed shut, any work that is done must be reversible so that the door can be used at a later time, if necessary. Also, keep the door in place, in its historic position. o If the secondary entrance is sealed shut the original entrance on the primary facade must remain operable. 4.2 Maintain the original size of a door and its opening. o Altering its size and shape is inappropriate. It should not be widened or raised in height. 4.3 When a historic door is damaged, repair it and maintain its general historic appearance. o For additional information see Chapter 14: General Guidelines "On-Going Maintenance of Historic Properties". 4.4 If a new screen door is used, it should be in character with the primary door. o Match the frame design and color of the primary door. o If the entrance door is constructed of wood, the frame of the screen door should also be wood. 4.5 When replacing a door, use a design that has an appearance similar to the original door or a door associated with the style of the house. o A replica of the original, if evidence exists, is the preferred replacement. o A historic door from a similar building also may be considered. o Simple paneled doors were typical. o Very ornate doors, including stained or leaded glass, are discouraged, unless photographic evidence can support their use. 9 4.6 If energy conservation and heat loss are concerns, consider using a storm door instead of replacing a historic entry door. o Generally, wood storm doors are most appropriate when the original door is wood. o If a storm door is to be installed, match the frame design, character and color of the original door. 5.1 Preserve an original porch. o Replace missing posts and railings when necessary. Match the original proportions and spacing of balusters when replacing missing ones. o Unless used historically on the property, wrought iron, especially the "licorice stick" style that emerged in the 1950s and 1960s, is inappropriate. o Expanding the size of a historic porch is inappropriate. 5.5 If porch replacement is necessary, reconstruct it to match the original in form and detail. o Use materials that appear similar to the original. o While matching original materials is preferred, when detailed correctly and painted appropriately, alternative materials may be considered. o Where no evidence of the appearance of the historic porch exists, a new porch may be considered that is similar in character to those found on comparable buildings. Keep the style and form simple. Also, avoid applying decorative elements that are not known to have been used on the house or others like it. o When constructing a new porch, its depth should be in scale with the building. o The scale of porch columns also should be similar to that of the trimwork. o The height of the railing and the spacing of balusters should appear similar to those used historically as well. 6.1 Preserve significant architectural features. o Repair only those features that are deteriorated. o Patch, piece-in, splice, consolidate or otherwise upgrade the existing material, using recognized preservation methods whenever possible. o Isolated areas of damage may be stabilized or fixed, using consolidants. Epoxies and resins may be considered for wood repair and special masonry repair components also may be used. o Removing a damaged feature when it can be repaired is inappropriate. 6.2 When disassembly of a historic element is necessary for its restoration, use methods that minimize damage to the original material. o Document its location so it may be repositioned accurately. Always devise methods of replacing the disassembled material in its original configuration. 6.3 Remove only the portion of the detail that is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Match the original in composition, scale, and finish when replacing materials or features. 10 o If the original detail was made of wood, for example, then the replacement material should be wood, when feasible. It should match the original in size and finish, which traditionally was a smooth painted finish. 6.4 Repair or replacement of missing or deteriorated features should be based on original designs. o The design should be substantiated by physical or pictorial evidence to avoid creating a misrepresentation of the building's heritage. o When reconstruction of an element is impossible because there is no historical evidence, develop a compatible new design that is a simplified interpretation of the original, and maintains similar scale, proportion and material. 6.5 Do not guess at "historic" designs for replacement parts. o Where "scars" on the exterior suggest that architectural features existed, but there is no other physical or photographic evidence, then new features may be designed that are similar in character to related buildings. o Using overly ornate materials on a building for which there is no documentation is inappropriate. o It is acceptable to use salvaged materials from other buildings only if they are similar in style and detailing to other features on the building where they are to be installed. 6.6 Replacement of missing elements may be included in repair activities. o Replace only those portions that are beyond repair. o Replacement elements should be based on documented evidence. o Use the same kind of material as the original when feasible. o A substitute material may be acceptable if the form and design of the substitute itself conveys the visual appearance of the original material. For example, a fiberglass cornice may be considered at the top of a building. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. o Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. o Retain and repair roof detailing. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. o The shadows created by traditional overhangs contribute to one's perception of the building's historic scale and therefore, these overhangs should be preserved. 7.5 Preserve original chimneys, even if they are made non-functional. 7.8 Preserve original roof materials. o Avoid removing historic roofing material that is in good condition. When replacement is necessary, use a material that is similar to the original in both style as well as physical qualities and use a color that is similar to that seen historically. o Specialty materials such as tile, slate or concrete should be replaced with a matching material. 11 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. o If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non- reflective finish. 7.10 If it is to be used, a metal roof should be applied and detailed in a manner that is compatible and does not detract from the historic appearance of the building. o A metal roof material should have an earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o A metal roof with a lead-like patina also is an acceptable alternative. o Seams should be of a low profile. o A roof assembly with a high profile seam or thick edge is inappropriate. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. o A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. o If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. o If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 9.1 Proposals to relocate a building will be considered on a case-by-case basis. o In general, relocation has less of an impact on individual landmark structures than those in a historic district. o It must be demonstrated that relocation is the best preservation alternative. o Rehabilitation of a historic building must occur as a first phase of any improvements. o A relocated building must be carefully rehabilitated to retain original architectural details and materials. .o Before a building is moved, a plan must be in place to secure the structure and provide a new foundation, utilities, and to restore the house. o The design of a new structure on the site should be in accordance with the guidelines for new construction. o In general, moving a building to an entirely different site or neighborhood is not approved. 9.3 If relocation is deemed appropriate by the HPC, a structure must remain within the boundaries of its historic parcel. 12 o If a historic building straddles two lots, then it may be shifted to sit entirely on one of the lots. Both lots shall remain landmarked properties. 9.4 Site the structure in a position similar to its historic orientation. o It should face the same direction and have a relatively similar setback. o It may not for example, be moved to the rear of the parcel to accommodate a new building in front of it. 9.5 A new foundation should appear similar in design and materials to the historic foundation. o On modest structures, a simple foundation is appropriate. Constructing a stone foundation on a modest miner's cottage is discouraged because it would be out of character. o Where a stone foundation was used historically, and is to be replaced, the replacement should be similar in the cut of the stone and design of the mortar joints. 9.6 When rebuilding a foundation, locate the structure at its approximate historic elevation above grade. o Raising the building slightly above its original elevation is acceptable. However, lifting it substantially above the ground level is inappropriate. o Changing the historic elevation is discouraged, unless it can be demonstrated that it enhances the resource. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. o In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). o The size of a lightwell should be minimized. o A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 13 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. o Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. o Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. (Advisory) o Using one base color for the building is preferred. o Using only one or two accent colors is also encouraged, except where precedent exists for using more than two colors with some architectural styles. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. (Advisory) o Using the color scheme to establish a sense of overall composition for the building is strongly encouraged. 14 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. (Advisory) o Choose a base color that will link the entire building face together. For a commercial building, it can tie signs, ornamentation, awnings and entrances together. On residences, it can function similarly. It can also help your building relate better to others in the district. o The complexity of the accent colors should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building. o Doors may be painted a bright accent color, or they may be left a natural wood finish. Historically, many of the doors would have simply had a stain applied. o Window sashes are also an excellent opportunity for accent color. o Brilliant luminescent or "day-glo" colors are not appropriate. Lighting 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. o Do not wash an entire building facade in light. o Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street. o When it is feasible, screen service areas from view, especially those associated with commercial and multifamily developments. o This includes locations for trash containers and loading clocks. o Service areas should be accessed off of the alley, if one exists. 15 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. o Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. o Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. o Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges. o A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. o Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly visible roof planes. o Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. 14.16 Locate standpipes, meters and other service equipment such that they will not damage historic facade materials. o Cutting channels into historic facade materials damages the historic building fabric and is inappropriate. Do not locate equipment on the front facade. o If a channel must be cut, either locate it on a secondary facade, or place it low on the wall. 14.17 Design a new driveway in a manner that minimizes its visual impact. o Plan parking areas and driveways in a manner that utilizes existing curb cuts. New curb cuts are not permitted. o If an alley exists, a new driveway must be located off of it. 14.22 Driveways leading to parking areas should be located to the side or rear of a primary structure. o Locating drives away from the primary facade will maintain the visual importance the structure has along a block. See Chapter 8: Secondary Structures. 16 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET application for hpc final review 03.20.02 contents attachment 1 land use application form attachment 2 dimensional requirements form attachment 3 general submission rcquircments CONCEPTUAL APP. attachment 1 specific submission requirements: . conceptual review, partial demolition, on sitc relocation, variance, and historic landmark lot split CONCEPTUAL APP. attachment 5 specific submission requirements: final review Â· written description Â· existing site plan/survey Â· proposed site plan Â· floor plans (3) Â· building elevations (4) Â· statement of how plan conforms to representations made at conceptual review and responds to conditions placed thereon attachment 6 residential design standards . CONCEPTUAL APP. ... ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name ~Awl,w '85/pEA)CE. 2. Project location -5/3 Wes,r _5Â»,u'ii'.514 -5714,1- : Aspew, Co Sws 2-1 : LOT-3 g,F, 61 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning g Â·G 4. Lot size 90.06'x loo.04 = 1006 4 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Deew hkgpM,J 5! 3 Wer SM oh 9 uelt Srmarr : ApEN 926-Â·6343 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 4:2,/ -7Ag vE 7-tze#77EETS 4 12- Rownâ€¢ MILL 91-zerr : Anpgro 925 2551 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA >< Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA >< Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominium,ization Design Review ><C Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 4 BED,zooM 12â‚¬51.6Â·ACC -Two. 5-raid~ PTIzucrultâ‚¬ - Apped 1 365:b + INGLUDESÂ· .900 0 v,crzm:,0.0 /V'INEXS <SABW 9. Descriptiori of development application 60Â·r spuT /.rro -rwo 45'r toD ' L-073 war Low : DEMOL!8.M *p,1 7106) - FELDCA#E AKÂ©, PERbÂ·64-7-F rME,1 4 00*yrizuer- 2-33,0 * 4â‚¬W HDO62: (560+ c.a.A < 11-10 f kÂ»,774 - 4 Dge!20-5 EN:r Lo-r'Â· c D.ls-rev(r 1150 + NEW #â€¢966 - 4 Bepmeeâ€žs 10. Have you completed and attached the following? Attachment 1- Land use application form Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments 4 and 5 ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Dp,~J }-laMAA Address: 913> Wes-r fEMo.~uriz-.Srzeer- Zone district: 72.6 Lot size: 90.OC,10[).co'= 90064 -m mr mvipee m-ro 1-WE> 45'0100' , 4500# 00-71 Existing FAR: 0.3 6 522 0 Allowable FAR: .prelt- Ler.sp,pr 4 4060 cop,BmeD + EDO m,c. 20005 Proposed EAR. 45-80 0 Co,43/NED : 2330 weyr :-0-r + 22.St e,MT 6-6-1- Existing net leasable- (commercial) - Proposed net leasable (commercial): - Existing % of site coverage: '* 3090 oF 9000 + u.r Proposed%of site coverage: 3907. /wer wr) 0* 452,0 446.1-/A-3â‚¬10 (*gr &.4 /~Â«371. Iripâ€¢-, Existing % of open space: u 70 2 , Proposed % of open space: = 5 1 L (wes:)/Â·m *Fl.o (EW) /-031 -TD771-1- Existing maximum height: Principal bldg: 23 70" Accesorv bldg: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 2.Go" Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: -839. Existing number of bedrooms: 4 Proposed number of bedrooms: 4 am CACH LOT Existing on-site parking spaces: 3 On-site parking spaces required: ~ FC /2 etr ,-2 Â£-of Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: (myr Lo-r Â·,pL,Â·r) Proposed: Front: 135-' Front: /0.0 ' Front: lo.o' Rear: 13.5 ' Rear: /0.0' Rear: 0.0. Combined. Combined Combined-- Front/rear: 27.0 ' (1<*36.4 Front/rear: 30.0 Front/rear:_/EL Side: 5.g' CM,Al /0.0,) Side: 5.0' Side: S. o ' Side: 5.5' 4,~ /0.0') Side: 510' Side: 50' Combined Combined Combined Sides: //.0' Sides: /0.0' Sides: /0.0' Existing nonconformities or encroachments: 4 0 9 (DO F O R M 1 AJ Â£1 -â‚¬ f-7-71*ff %5 - COMB\Â«9 Ptom< TEE?rk - Su-T-74- 5Â»eS. Variations requested: 19241% 7'rt, VAP. 2-0' c.e,MBioet> (flzeâ€¢j-r~ee:*12) VME. 560Â¢ 9,- BONO= (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft.,Â· site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) HARRY TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 513 West Smuggler Street Conceptual Review Application Responses to Attachment 5 HARRYTEAGUEARCHITECTS 412 north mill aspen co 81611 t 970 925 2556 f 970 925 7981 mail@teaguearch.com 513 West Smuggler Street Conceptual Review Application Responses to Attachment 5 written description of proposal This proposal is for a Historic Landmark Lot Split at 513 West Smuggler Street. The existing 90.06' x 100.00' (9606 s.f.) lot would be split into two 45.03' x 100.00' (4503 s.f.) lots. Following the lot split, the proposal includes the relocation and renovation of, and addition to the residence on the new western lot of 513 West Smuggler Street, as well as the construction of a new residence on the new eastern lot. The existing structure is an approximately 3,650 square foot, two story residence with four bedrooms and an ADU. The residence is built around an original 560 square foot Victorian miner's cabin. The cabin is on the Smuggler Street elevation, but an addition has distorted the cabin by extruding its east wing into a long element, making it difficult to read the size of the cabin, or to distinguish the cabin from the current addition. The recent additions to the hou.se have little relation to the original cabin. The owner proposes to demolish the existing addition, preserving and renovating only the historic cabin. The cabin is to be relocated to the northwest end of the western lot, set back ten feet from the northern property boundary. The new addition will consist of a 'U' shaped gabled element connected to the back of the original cabin footprint allowing the cabin to retain it's position as the sole element along the street. The proportions of these gabled elements are derived from the Victorian structure-the gable elevations preserve the fourteen foot width of the cabin gables, and will appear similar in scale and proportion to the cabin. The original north elevation and parts of the west elevation are fairly intact and will be restored, but the east facade of the cabin will need to be reconstructed as it does not exist in the current layout. The proposed remodel aims to restore the integrity of the original Victorian cabin. It does this in part by removing additions that confuse the distinction between old and new. Furthermore, the proposed construction is consistent in scale and proportion to the original. However, the new building elements do not attempt to imitate the historic cabin, but rather to complement it. The materials used in the new part of the residence will be subdued in color and texture; details such as roof eaves will be minimal and contemporary, and will contrast with the traditional detailing of the cabin. Our intention is to provide a contemporary backdrop that respects and highlights the historic structure. 513 West Smuggler Street Conceptual Review Application Responses to Attachment 5 conformity of final plan to conceptual plan/ adaptation of hpc conditions The final plan varies only slightly from the conceptual plan. Both the massing and scale of the approved conceptual proposal remain unchanged. Several minor changes have occurred in the interior plan-mainly within the connector element-which have slightly altered window placements. Based on the conceptual review process, we have made the following major changes to our design. We have slid the two-story mass further back on the lot thanks to a setback variance and lengthened the connector element by five feet (from three feet in the original concept to six feet and eventually to the approved eight feet). The "office" space has been modified so that we may recreate the corner of the original cabin structure-this portion of the building will now have a flat roof over it so as not to compete with the form of the original miner' s cabin. In an effort to reduce the mass of the addition relative to the cabin, we have lowered the entire two-story addition by twelve inches. (All of these changes were presented and approved in the second conceptual review hearing.) It is our intent to allow the existing historic miner's cabin to read as its own structure and retain its identity and volume. As it currently stands, only the north elevation and parts of the west elevation are intact. These will be carefully restored. Our plan is to reconstruct-based on photographs-the east facade of the cabin and to recreate the original footprint of the 1887 structure to the best of our ability. It is also our goal to fully integrate the cabin into the overall plan and not allow it to become a separate building with limited usage. To these ends we will connect the additions with sensitive detailing at the cabin's edges and scale the additions appropriate to the cabin's size. HARR) TEAGUE ARCHITECTS 412 M â€¢â€¢U ST ASPEN CO .el ./.5 252,6 FAX 00 /2/ 796 % - B , - cor-Am,Â¢ *n* 10+7 11 / , - . - . 1 1 rilf firar- _1 -'-5- : 25---9 '4 L - 41.- 1% fi 1- - 1 1 |'| 1-Â·Â·i'.~06;41Â·7 --Â·Â¢4Â· -- Â·~Â· 4---~ 't.Â·,I~..ILbLI.il..,I. .... I I , -7 1, '1 A;. ,/ A 1111111 1- I. Â· Â· giee#." 1 j i 1 111 11 ~ ~~ ~~~~~ ~~;~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~01.1 1 . ~ / 1 .'. .. : IF.=~- 111 111 1' ~ 3'5:...~..I~Â·~ Mai&*4%*' 22 0.--Ii ,; -- -4- --1 . - ffEft,009 2 w F W I. ./ 1 h Â· . --R - 1. 1 , I r .- . 4 e i-li. a ~i . t-1 - . .' R }. I i .1 .. 1" J 8,22250 SF , L . ..~ -,2 2/.51.--4.: 1 U : /2 . EN*3111*9 41!31 Â·-i ..2 ------ .... . 6-6- 1 1 36 2 - fy,i Â·Â« 0 211 1 02.13= hpC Â®rnoâ€¢P~- - 91-2402 ,- fh. * 0 0 0 LL 0,07 site plan 1/8- = 1'-0' A001 eouepisei Jee.Ils Jel86nuls 19849 Jel86nlus ;Se/A ELS opejoloo uedse 46'-0 w I . b, '.- * alley block 27 \: 1 ' 1 I .1 -1-:I 441 6 -- 4 . k 1 1 - , 1 c 1 1 1/ 1 11 , t W. .- 0 91 1 7 -22<- :lk.4 Â· Â·!rl Â· 1 ,\.1 1 1 1. 1 1 .1 Â·Â· Â·Â·Â·- ' 1 , t, Il lilli 1 /1 I I I < 1 1 1 '4 1/1----1 * - 1 - f.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,- ./. i.. I -7/33ZZI1ZZLIZIEZ1 1 r' z L Â·Â·- 35-2.14-- -- - -Â·â‚¬AL#Â·- AU'. . . . 2.' 4 / A..VI... west imuggler street e NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11 imil' 33 ,1= 0 Â® 4 1 12 --13 &~g ~ rn , smuggler street residence I 6 j -*-5 1 1/1 8 4 1 =1 i f i for't@ 3.-)1 O q :G f1ll ER-01'1:~ 513 west smuggler street 2 rtic ~~iflc:u g- ...St aspen colorado 2 -i - 4> 1 1 11 {03) 1 1 11 1 1 11 1 11 1 11 1 1 L 1 1 N 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 5 1 r R =-3,2 1 I .2 -rÂ·-27 8 ~ 1 i Lai J $ 1 L~.4.11~.~,.6:31;~12. I - 00 1 < 1" 4 1 1 . 1 E LI 1: 43 4 Â¥ 1 5 1 0 0 p. 1 7/ F 5 & i Z : 11 1 - 55.'iM>*14'4*.@Rit,gÂ»)<rÂ·.; .ti:-i~1'~'t~ Â· 1 (11 } 1 1 11Â·> f 'At-- 1 1 71 i I :'r,1, 10~ 1 Ott 11 1 6 1 141 I j Et 010 L_~EÂ»FEENI~ 0 26â‚¬ L 1 C.-h. I - O) Â£/ 1 -Â· r I--' 1 1.1 C . 1 A LE & L r.... Icr 1 1 1 r-- .1 i 1 f.0Â«J ,Bi 3 ' 1 1 1 2 ' m 4 1 1. O N 141 7 1 ,f i- 1 . Lf LI-IlL 13 5 1 1 1 1 1 1.-1 0 . 1., 1 @ 1 I i I 1 1 /,-h [IJ) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 lo 1 1 1 1 1 1 12'-0" 5'.0â€¢ 9,-0â€ž 44 - (-4 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 11 6:201 1 11 28139 8 4 -1 I 8 1 smuggler street residence 1 1% ff ~31Â» ."P 1Â·.M.'Â· $ m O 1 illi #-1 ALNE - 1 4.7 1 513 west smuggler street 3 (D f-:--;...:1 2 L '.1 1% aspen colorado 18 Oc) 2 2 . . .â€ž-Â· ' -U'-i.1 11 ":4 --,4Â· - i/VI:,[449-148*fe.Ba isee meclia nom aug eouaJ woolieid fence line _(D~ n@#44 001.V lower I 970 9252555 FAX g70 gZ5 79 r .Â·Â·.t.4 Â· f A k . ., '4 1 1 1 . /,0 'i.Â·1 I ' -? 1 .4 ... L -1 1 0/ .1" -0 1 f r + , Â£ r f d. 4 1: , : Â»ta. -, ..4111 4*. P [9144-949 1 /7.:300- 11 , --=*.Â· -3~-Â· .t ~ 4#../ 1 37 '1 ' 1 11 , -2.-4 ..<.7 -21.-4- I i F Q I ' ' 11 .*re// , 1Â» .24 11 1 9 -jy//7 \ 8 16 / \94 1.' . 1/7 / d \4 - 0,# 4 111 -: 1 >i ji / , 1 . 1 1, I U).9-9/kdp 9 1~: / - 1 1 ''1 1 - m) 1 1% i i 1 1 00 . i f -0 +-3 1 -1 Il 1 . m,; 1 1 1 91 2 --/ 1*- 1 / 10 1'k i .__Irpi- :.1=L- ~ i /7% 1 r -EEN! 1.21 I 'A - - --- K $3 61 L 1 5 1. (D rf & 0 r:ZI -- 1 1 18 'Â· i w i j 4 ... 1 i r W f,)'/ - 11 , 4 =2-1 'i 1 - 6 # - 0 1 1 1 ---------- 1 -I. 1 1 1 - 9 M -2- F -. 49 k [1 11 1---1 ' 1 E? -- -- -- --ij~ 1 3 1215 lit 0 -1 p '.7 1/1,1 - 1 1/3 ; '823 1 1 lial r-1 , 1. 1 01 - 1 4 j \3 F 1 j D â€¢ -- -- 1--- / 1 ------ - --. -I - - -- --- '-9, 7,4 r A-----1-2-J / 3Â£[ I- [i Â· b 14 1 / 2744- - H _ __ - 1 4 1 r--1 1 1 O 0 0 U It ~-- 1 . 1'. ( 2---- d-- 1 1 1, 4 - U . - - -#36 =od 1-/ 14 1 - 41 <-I 1 r ' r 1 / i i * 4 9'-0. N 1- W /4/ 1,3 -V 0-0 . 1 (N 52 b (-4 . /4 r- F 1, f : * \341.02 1 ---l -2NAL //r i !! 1 1 \2\ ~ U *- 1 \ \ 4. ' /1 / . I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Â» =3 li 28*9. Â» 4 aff i smuggler street residence 1 i 0 = % 25 1 if 9 I 1 1 1 1 i - 07-2 513 west smuggler street ~8 Â¤ - ..71 93 aspen colorado 9-1 le iii I Mids Joilo apil fence line (C> 21'-3-< 412/ TEAGU HARR 970 925/56 FU @70 92579 :f 89Â§1 51 1 - Wails Jei86nlUS JeeM elg ZE Ope.10100 uedge j~1,<iÂ· ~ Â·. g;g: < < 4 t&. I H- S E 11101@131: 11 1 J .1 el 1 1 Â£ TJ & B eouep!se.1 jee.lis Jel85nuls I !1!1!1:1 19 Cl 4141912 1 1 ki &2 :I :92 NOI.LOnkllSNOO %10:I lON 4 1 1 ' 1 1 . 7 \\ # I. )-.1 4/. Â·- p' -6/1 i I -:412 Â·Â· .- f (rj 1 3, ~44,7 1 1 \UL-- i<,Â· - N.-1 : . O , i./7 ../.4 3 9 / \ 1 1 3.7-1-l'.:twÂ·r.Â·-h .61 r---------ILLL- .._---7< ~ Lf ~c'(4 43 1 1 1. 1.-7.1 111 1 ~ --9 -r 4 0 11 11 1.1 , I 2.=441:121 24_._.-_-2 ...N -1-z.:U:.1.LL-LE,.=1=_C. Â· (9) 1 1 1 60 1 C t A 111 E 2 - 1. /0/ 1 4.V LE#Â· 2 ' -1-LLY Cl [--t 0 1 1 4 42= f ---- 10----- 1 1 â‚¬ 1 4 bo 11 ll 1 1 &) 1 11 A 1 1 .--? 1 1 <--13 2 F N --Â·-21--<-. <Â·Al *13-2-- rn' ..=1-1-=J . ../9.'' 4,-Â·72.- '<-1 | r., . ./.' 0 I. 1 | -4- ---*'--*--- --- ____L___ - GUE ARCHITECTS ill 1 11 9 7 111 -1/ .1. IJ 11- /3 , 1/ 1 0-11~( 6 2 1 1. . 1 I- -f 112- 11!C .-.41.----- 24- 1.id:#,2/1 / . 0 1 .. .. 7,1 1 1 ':i E ~iL========4 /1/ 11 .If---- i -i.:':f:.SiÂ«>f'.:.'/ '' I. uo.) -- I W.Gâ‚¬*tfli 5*-----tr n 1 , -Ic-Zznzmr . 1 Ir- -1- 11 1 1- -- -' 1 FW#MS*11 ~ I '' 'Â·. 1~2*4*rl 1 1 4 14 . 099â‚¬**ER*#-' 1. 1 1 11.1,9 , 1 1. , 11 ..1 , , , 11 1 1 Â·.64 7Â·,--:K:#-3.:,12'jCS' . I I , 1 1.1 11 1. - 1 1= , , 100 11 1 -..1 4.39:11-1.:T o'~- ' 1.1 .1 :Ii, 1'/."l:tÂ· .9/-4.:1 4Â· ~-7.Â·. 11-'-Â·:./' 1 ~ 1 r Â·Â·Â· Â· 1 1,1. , :In I:?*44-i.4:11.1,?1 -- .11 . - 1 1 1 1 ''4 I /./m';'.,2 1'.Â·~~2.2t~ ' ~- ...3 4 ' . , 1 .11 1 -Â· 0 ... ' 'I j 1 i. m ) , ..' IÂ· 1 1, Â·Â·Â·-- PrTTTTTTT1 --9-Â·Â·Â·y----*/t-- ri-1 . . Â· 1 1 . ".2 - I.' 1~ 1 , 3 1 11.. 14 ,/- 1 ~ 1 1~~ . 4 i ,-. Ilf: . -1 ..,9{2,3 *9: 4:Â·i 11 0 11 1,1 1 -2 lii ' 1. Â·Â· 1 1 . / IN :1 11 11. 1-1 1 1 11 -1 lilli 14 i ' fÂ· 11:-V r. Â· 1â€ž'393>2..1.:-6Â»1 , ,C .-;f !' 3'~f 1 fiftiÂ·liÂ·L O ' - Â·-1 . 16 1 12 ' i t'. 1 1 1 /101 ': il & Â· -Â·___._- -/2.-: e -1.11:. . 1 111.-=N =----2 --JJ--.6 --JILI-ER 4 8* 1 p - , 1 =11., 1. 1t . 1'.1 1 L.,~.....% ~~i.:...~....~.... <4 ---=. 1 Ik-!-- 11. Â·. 1 . ] 1 - .- 1 --1 . F CO) 111 .0 1 . 4-=-il I Â· '11 4 1 A Â·0 4 'h' Ag-.-i r 1- 1 J 1- - ..ill 1 , 1 . -- I - +---- -4- 0 - ' 0 - '- ------- Â·1' \, 1 .11 + 1 1 1 1 11 i i ..1 , N ,..1 !-1 4'i ill la 1.. . 1, I 44 i f U M &8 ll; Â· ' - rp"/AnTST,Xm/ ,}' - 1141 11' iii |i| li *11 1 1 t 1:1S' , , 1,0/.'J ''16:414.2./ 1 1 1 1&1 1 2111 1 lik i .. 1 = 100; ~mzr:razgamgm::Eam, ..2 1, ' /I.......;.Wj.;.~/ I' 4 -/%11 I . - .1 .1 -â€ž -- .:- ~ -i- . f---~11 IrITILV]k \ 11 1 \ Â· Â·Â·Â· A , 0.20 ' [19 rE[pil' 'r, ..1- f.i .J.- 11 .f!Â©Iffi[El.{Lr .4 \ 4 1 \ 4 \ i m *11 1 ~ 11 F it 1 111 it r! 1 11 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 61:1516 1 , 1%2 ~fÂ¢i <~1~#--f--f-smugglerstreetresidence~ifi--f-- M I if O 4~ e o 4 2 513 west smuggler street 88: In [1 - m J 1 2. . s iliii[ *2 -I lE-41 I 0 21 aspen colorado uo!}BAe le isee <'~~ TEAGU 970 925 25/ FAX 970 9:3 HARR TEAGU 1 341 5 2 ARCHITECT â€¢12 N -usÂ¥ .spe, CO 0,1 ' 970~2525.6 FAX 970 9:57$ 1=-r ,my ---A **'0 - -' m.................. _ _0.-W.2. Â»4 Â»pil â‚¬ ysÂ·*- ~Â·'4 ~290)N'} . 1 157- 4 -- ,?AB LF -I-'...../- teÂ«â€¢N *iÂ·*AE. 8>5 ft#94 'IN-e -â€¢ --NjrÂ» 1*.1 - ~00':-7 I.. 99.4/ 23 NÂ»V 1 1 .9;â‚¬424 Â·67- *Â·Ar,A Et*9 le*,42Â· 1 11 1 i J h f !.3.% 1 111 111 IIi 11 11 11 i 1 1 2 1--1111 - 11111 11 1 4 11 11 -1' -1 --111-72-- lilli 1 r:--71 9.11 r"Ir- ho.-0 & b-" IMI, /-44-,/bâ€¢ di/-11/9/ -* 11 0.----Ill-----Â«221 1 1 - P.-d- by.,ch.. 1Â¥,c,~Il'...*M 1 1 11--t~ . ~. y 11. 11 lillil Â£... .... I I. <~> south elevation 22 :D (E 1.4. BA - 8.-21.- 4 14'-0- 18'-0~ _â‚¬-9--- - 7 4- - - -- -. 84r - - 1AK - / ----- 2- I - 12.-7- ' G t -------7---0=2:* \\ -,103Â«1- It-':,B,1,"':,;","&liE,'â€ž,#/I'.9.-'I.9,-'Ir-F,-1 1 ii I! 111.11 8 - ---- feasit---- ) %N tc--zIzzz~ U) irrf= Â»A , - 1 11 1 1- 1 11 1 11 11 11 11 111 id'T-=i;TI 1 -1 1 I'll.....'.Il'/*Il. I.-I --%'....*/4 ----~ 34~"0""0 1 1 1 . 9 11111111-----11-7----1 .1.- - lilli .111111 1 1!11Â· LI,1,1, 11 1 ---22- =.9==19...1. Imm/lill'llifilgaill//Ill//Ill//3/mil/'llial://Imill'"IN/1/2/1- 131ill'.'Ell k~IZEZEZZIE-- ft'#:Â·itÂ· --J -IL-1 r 1 4' t# it n li, r:EE' ~ .>Â·br--, 71--4;lMililimB i lll' fF N.# r"+1 Â·ap/1 0 IlÂ· R I.1 1.r.'51 . Â»1 pui,ss:.44(LAYM =.2 - i 11 1 hi 1 1 -It]____-_---~%- 9 .1 ... , 1 33 04 74: ****Â»*** ---1--i#*-W-. .61/. + L.-- -I-.-' 1 11 1 1 Ill -1 -li lli, 11 lili V - f. 1, 44 }. 91 ---,--L----====L=====HI 1+3:4.94.i'.9275.11--$ dige:Â¢71 l-'- --7-- , 1 , Il m. ki~E'14 - - ---- Â»Vf -I- 49Â·?DI ..00. .C ...,-8-08 11 -Â· 1 - -7 " l' I' l' H'Â·Â·'ll ll Â·Â·,pIEn==2=EZIn.n__uzzzZI 1 b- 9% 128.TABI ' M 02 lam -0.-1.-, 1Â»*,1 li'#31 .T:<P U 111., C - - : ,*Â·Â·ir... id-El||- -|L i| dII li :l ILII li' 1-LÂ¥i#AL,Ik0Â»R------' ..1./.__ ~" 1 Llut*Â»'H.rum-T *friT=+-*=*=,4~3Â» 2- 7 -Â·,...... ad.%4@ . 2_.I-ki=1--_._ 0 0113.02 --* ------ 1 I ... ..1. .. , . . % . . 1 . 107â€¢Â¢ 2 04.24.02 --- 10Â£./ 1 0 .... ..... .. . 1 . .. '. ... ~~.I .. ... . .. .. 1 .. . . 0 - a: - 0107 0 - % ' . . 1 . . .. . ... . elevations Â· .. Â· 'y' â‚¬-2' south & west 1/4'=1'-07 O west elevation A201 ~ eouepls;Js;I;us~seMEE opejoloo uedse .Ils .18156nul . EXHIBIT ELIZABETH RODWELL DART 747 Galena Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611. USA 1 4-22Â« Tel: 970 920 3874 - Fax: 970 920 2829 rE] Email: Memo to: Amy Guthrie From: Hailey Dart (Elizabeth R Dart) Date: 8 April 2002 Re: 633 West Main street Aspen Please find enclosed: The notarized Affidavit 01 Public Notice Copy of Publication Photograph of the posted notice (sign), and List ofthe owners and governmental agencies noticed bv mail foJE* /1-U PUBLIC NOTICE DATE 4*11 M. ss TIME_20 e' P!_A" 4.-tlcill';U-45#c#Re&- PURE 'OSE - 44# 4~ ' h,<1 ~A'L_fflt:Zi....d..5.0, _ ._auul_aunt J .8 41% 4 1 ': r ALLENÂ· DOLGLAS P 41ik' DOUGLAS P M' < W MAIN LLC 520 E COOPER AVE SE 230 fOOPER AVE STE :30 ~MAE Sl $ fk n20 j flo f C ASPEN CO 81611 AiPEN- CO 8161 j 321?N CO &161! ANSON WESTON f & Sl <AN BA:l EY AOYAMA TE. 199.1 & AKIKO ASPEN AWN RESCUE 8030 EL PASEO GRANDE 01(13 \-l KESNICK DR 630 W MAIN ST LA JOLLA CA 9293+ SEA-ITLE WA 98'05-2.49 ASPEN CO 8 1 611 ASPEN/FITKIN LULA-, i + T(-)1 41\(: BARBER EDGAR F BERR LLC AUTHORITY 61 1 W \111% SI PO BON 4678 530 E MAIN ST ASPEN CO 8 i 6 1 2 ASPEN C O 8161 i ASPEN CO 8151 1 BODURTHA SUSAN M BRIN.KNEYER THOMAS K BRYA-N SHE]LAH JUDITH ~PEN CO 8161 1 ASPL.\ Cl] 61(42 <.SPiÂ·.!< co 81611 W MAIN ST #2{,6.- 70 BOX 9022 PO BOX 976 BUDSEY NIKLF(jR & <L.4 1.\ 1 2 bURN.$ Jt ME \ CA\ E DERYK REVOCABLE TRUST 728 W HOPKINS .4% E T 19 W MAIN Sl :CO.I PO BOX 1 3 674 ASPEN CO 8101 j ASPEN CO AVE] ASPEN CO 81612 CHRISIOPHER 11.ARIDE}-1 ...TrY OF' AiDEN (ACCARELI-6 MAORT & R{.il,{ARTN 42]5NCIVIC C>1!K Bl 1 627 W MAIN 3(}b OAY J.Nn Â« API 374 95' 00 01 1 APEN CO 31611 SCOTTSALF .42 8325 1 ~OULTER (it YN>di DANA.1, MEREDITH NELSON & GA CROCKETT ANN K TRI 'S'l Ek OF THE PRICE LiVING fl<l'bT Po BOX Lj 724 W HOPKM 10848 MORA DR ASPEN CO 8 1612 ASPEN CO 806 i I 1 08 ALTOS H]LI.4 CA 940.14 DENSDON S MICHAELE END :ERRY E-FRIES INC BORKENHAGEN DAVID A 1265 MOUNTAIN VIEW PO BOX 1,17 617 WMAINST #D : -t ' .ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 ASPEN CO 8161 1-1619 FELD ANNE S HAHLK )uK\r,: 0 GAMARk.1 ANA M & Jtj'.ANC 1700 PACII:]C- AVE 51]< -11'r.' â€ž05 w \.1..\tx' ST PENIHOUSI L PO BOX 98-77 DALLAS TX 75201 1.<PEN CO 816' 1 ASPI >Â·.0 0 81612 GOLDSMI 11Â·1 El.i EN 11.,[.'DAD N.\A. 1 Y J W.A.HN Et..IZABETH EVANS ... 719 K N./.A]N >1 81' i 70 BOX 1 !45,4 ASPEN CO R 16 1 1 AbVEN CDR:N- 237 ADDINTAIN CT BA<; AL[' 4 0 8]62 1,Â·9271 4,1. r * HABFELD MICHAEL DOE(;1..\i lA HAMLIN CONNIE E HANLE JEFFREY I fELD LISA YERKE PO BOX 1Â®6 1 25 5 77 1-1 ST \SPEN CO 8161i 931'EN CO 3162 ASPEN CO 816! 1 H.AYES MARY UNILY P:90.NERSHIP ESPATE GRP HaXYINGION TRUST CON,A :RUBTE , CO FINSER CORP B KEON C OWELLS TRS-f CATR Of NY ATTN L LTD LLLP WILL I:\MS PO BOX 497 5.30 Bli. fhil)RE WY ASPEN CO 8i612 CORAL GABLFS FL .13134 PO BOX 95021 IHENDERSON NY 89009-5021 IGLEHART JIM EL.EHARr JIM Il,>INSON JUL,IE A 610 W HALLAM E DiF W MAE,N Si~ -19 W. MAIN ST #207 ASPE.\ CO albil ,ASPEN CO 8161! ASPEN CO 8161 1 ILE[N DEBBIE JOHNSON S f:ANFORD H [47Â·.PI .AN BURi ON B A COLORADO CDR.FORK! ION 90 BOX 32102 19'}7 LAKE. AVE- ~46 41('SKil.Â·!MING RD ~CSON AZ 8575 1 >-11(31 1! AND [1. tol,t}-1 5 LSPEÂ·N CO Â§1(.C i KRCIDENER (HARIIABLE FOUNDAT] KNIGHT GLENDA C KOU LE ALIC[ ,\(-,1 7401, .1. '/'v PO BOX 328 PO 3(-2< 34' 1 , D LOCUS Â£ S i SNOWMASS 00 81'2Â·; 4*j,EN CO &16!2 Dj} S MOINES M 50309 LL:<10 fED; LARY LANCE R 1,2 LEÂ¥!Ii WILLEAM A REY Ll\'1NG TRUS 03 -ANX' 1 E\10 719 W MAIN ST #301 . ) 1 U 1 PENN PLZ STE 723 81.00\11 {El.i) NLW vORK NY 10; 19-0799 ~ ASPEN CO 8101 1 ROME \ \ 1 3 441 1 l.lili INVEST, ,".11'1~l iii [ k LE ALE'ANDE. k 1 MADSEN. WARTHA W vin; N I 2' ..1. L 43 3 E MAIA 5 I 7 : 9 U MAIN ST â€¢204 (,08 W HOPKINS .AVE, jiPT. 9 ~SPEN CO Si 6!1 ASPEN 00 8161 1 ASPEN, C O 510 1 1 NIANCLARK WiMA-M & DARLEEN M.\E\VEST MI MARSHALL ELLEN AÂ·1& THOMAS Mt TRUSI PO BOX 3 1 53 300 RIVERSIDE AVE 3:3 E BAY FRONT ASPEN CO 8!612 ASPEN (.O 816]] BALBOA ISLAND CA 92662 AMWICKE FREDERIK H MOGARVEY JAMES N.IR & PAULA S MEANS GRAÂ£ME 719 W MAIN #205 S! PC}NTE VEDRA. BLVD 189 MEADWOOD DR ASPEN CO 8161 1 PON'rE VEDR-\ BEACH Ft. 32082 ASPEN CO 81611.3341 1 .MED]?.1 CRJSTIN.4 .5. D AN It. H-YER & Al Pa ,\Â·f E N' r. 1 M AN A VE â€¢ h.' 6 - I. 620 E H YA 1,4'Â·. ..1 v f 134 3 77!1 Qi PO BOX I }238 4SPEN CO S !61 ! -\ S PEN CU bl<, ! . Â»>M'N 70 81652 1.,ER SUSAN $(Off & RUSELL WEWNS ROBERI.tl & WENDY $ O XEIL BRiAN & SliANNE 30 BOX ! 1433 POBON :99 ASPEN CO 8!612 \.3PEN CO 816]Z 1.\VERTER FI. 33070 01_SHAN BURTON D ! '2 OSU!-1.IVAN -11]KE & L!3:1 OLSHAN BURTON D 1Â·2 i)LiIAN KAT~1*{LELA U 12 PO BOX 4476 5408 OLD LEEDS RD 5108 OLD LEEDS RD ASPEN CO Nioi2 BiRMINGHAM Al. 33:10 BIRMINGHAM AL ;5320 PARKER GALE M PATERSON CHARLES & FONDA PE.ARSON MARK M & LEES M FO BO.X 1490 500 W HOPKiNS .dVE 702 W MA!\ ST ASPEN CO *162 .ASPEN 00 81611 8.SPEN Â¢0 8lf, 11 REID BETSY M RHE) 30.ANAH \ K <CHROEDER SARA .-i9 FALLON DR POBOX ]0443 634 MA:A ST Â£2 ~RT H HA\'liN CT :Â·5.-1 E?EN' 0 0 31612 \SPEN CO 81611 ~ 311.ADOW MIN amP itiONK CHIÂ·RPL BARKER SMA! I AND ! ARGL FRIES LLC 00 OATES HUGHER & .4.NE.ZE\JCH P C F:Â·401 KORi ! 1 @TH ?1 ACE 1265 MOUN]AIN VIEW : ~ ASPEN CO 8Ioll 533 E HOPKINS Art- PAR,j,DIM< VALLEY 42 85251 ASPEN CO 816H STARFORD PROPER]Â» \\ KEON WILLIAN.jÂ· C o ,[015.Â·\I f.lall:. Josti.PIÂ·UNE tÂ·\YLOR jOi [N W I , 0' E 30111 .: 1 030 W' THOMPSON LN 530 BIL IMORE U'AY 9! H I r. SCONI)!DO CA 92.'15 HA!<11.AND \\'1 53029 CORAL G.ABLES FL ,33:.,4 TERRY IONYA M 1 !!RONÂ·1 901.10!...15 H :0MCIC]Â·1 WILLIAM - 744 W HOPKINS AL E 61 7 W MAIN S 1 PA BOX :498 ~SPEN CO 3161!-162,4 ASPEN 00 316! 1 ASPEN CO 81312.149% VERA UNDA 30% MEREST TONER M.ARK K VALLEY MR 719 WMAIN ST #]03 740 W HOPKINS AVE i-[AI.! TERESA 50% INTERES I ASPEN CO &1611 ASPEN CO 816il 605 W MAIN ST ASPEN CO 81611 \'ILLARI ;O.-iN' 1 RUST WEST ALFRED P JR 00 HERBERT NEC'HIN \\ EST LORALEE S WEIEN J ROBERT 120 N LASALLE S 1 3871-! FL '09 W MAIN S I CHICAGO 11. 60602 P.Â·AO'..1 FA 19301 ASPEN Cr' 8161. 12 GRI Fi<BlUAR LN \\ FS't i:Hk h FF.R 151\ i-Â·.11 *Lil V I, .NC c UN'ORA. 1 1(G J j<L S -' C T. NI ..k. WHITEFI.D. DONNAMARIE Â¢ 1 , : ./ . / + I ,Â· 1 / ->27 ?r 3.,?Rt))(.,i)? ~~Â» ~' ~ Â° WINGSTONE TOY COMPANY LLC W~ORTH HOLDINGS [1_( YOUNG DORALD L JABEENBRIAR EN PC) BOX 3334 617 W MAIN rT ~ PA 1930 1 AVON CO 81620 ASPEN CO 8!oIl ZIEGLER JUSTIN C 719 W MAN ST#201 ASPEN CO 8!611 1 - . __-e,-- L- @re- A 4. =7 - AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 6 3 -5 ~AtÂ·EÂ©T- A- Al , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 24-LA-'-CH , 200_27 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, EL_/ 2-A-.&:En-f A 4-4-27 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: 4 Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section ofan official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. /%1 kilfh. 3 Posting of notice: By posting ofnotice, which form was obia{44%Â·'faiiiÂ· tite,1 Community Development Depaament, which was made o~sâ‚¬ttible, waterproo f materials, which was not less than twenty-two ~22j ia@!18?1~~ and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composedaf--4MPM.Not /44*~ less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at kasif&92&:110)Â·.days?%~' prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from t}Â£4110-3,~~380 , 200 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~ Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses o f property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ( CY) 1 hr-] . U. V flo Uuu Signature i lk' The foregoing Affidavit o f Notice" was acknowledged before ge this .Â£ day of ~91..7 , 2004 by /%)6604 /â‚¬ 2Â£40' WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 0/. .Â«, My commission expires: 7// b /8 2. < KAREN C. ~ .,~ANNO~* 4-Er- 0 - â‚¬ &'1~317 ndÂ¥-9 Notary Public O' colu 533 E . U.Â·p,E- Ae., 7*1.-al -W Mi As ff#, 30 916/1 ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 633 W. MAIN STREET FINAL HPC DESIGN REVIEW AND VARIANCE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 24,2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Elizabeth Dart, requesting final design approval for the property located at 633 W. Main Street, which is described as Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite of Aspen. An east sideyard setback variance of l' is also requested. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amvg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 6,2002 City of Aspen Account g:\planning\aspen\notices Saturday-Sunday, April 6-7,2002 â€¢ The Aspen Tunes 21-B PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLK NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE OF A WAREHOUSEMAN'S SALE RE HARSH Â§PECIAL REVIEW FOR A CARETAKER NOTICE OF A CHANGE IN THE TARIFFS OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC TRUSTEE SALE [hstnct Court Pitkin County Colorado Notice is hereby given that under and pursuant DWELLING UN[T (PO 19-02) HOLY CROSS ENER(,Y Public Trustee No 02-07 Court Address 506 E Main St Aspen, CO 81621 to the statues of the State of Colorado giving NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing Glenwood Springs, Colorado To Whom it may Concern This Notice ts given In Re Petitioner Sandra l Francis v warehousemen a lien on goods deposited with will be held on Wednesday May 8 2002 at a regu- You are hereby notified that the above named with regard to the following described Died of Respondent/Co-Petitioner Michael T [)awkins them for all lawful charges and expense, m rela lar meeting to begin at 3.00 PM or a5 soon there- Aqsociation proposes to make the following Trust Case Number ()2DR18 tion to said goods and in accordance with the after as the conduct of business allows, before revisions to its Wholesale Power Cost Adjust- Grantor (Borrower) Michael McHugh ORDER FOR PUBLICATIC)N terms of a notice given to each of the following the Board of County Commissioners Plaza One ment Rate Rider tanff to become effective Original Beneficiary THIS MATTER comes before thus Court on Peti- named person the same being the respective Conference Room, 530 E Main St , Aspen to con- April 4 2{)02 Pitkin County Bank & Trust Company tionen Applicability Current Owner of the Evidence of Debt Venhed Motion for Publication of Summons owners or person on which the accounts the sider an application wbmitted by Glenn Harsh to Apphcable to all metered and unmetered con- lountrywide Home Loans, Inc The Court having reviewed the Motion ts satis- goods mentioned are held or who claim an inter- legalize an existing attached accessory dwelling sumers receiving service from Holy Cross En- D ate of Deed of Trmt September 6, 1995 fied that the Petitioner hab used due diligence to e,t in said goods the undersigned COLUMBINE unit as a caretaker dwelling unit The property is ergy under Tariff Sheet Numbers 2,3 4 9, Recording Date of Deed of Trust obtain personal service upon the Respondent STORAGE CENTER, INC to satisfy the claims for located at 0705 Seven Oaks Road and is desert- 10,11,12,13,14,15.16,17,20 and that ail such efforts have failed September 6, 1995 wh/h It has a warehousemen s lien against in bed as a trait of land situated in Tracts 12 in the Note 1) Tariffs 4 and 9 - the PCA will be ap Original Principal Amount of Evidence of Debt Therefore the Court orders said goods will, beginning at the hour of 11 00 NE1/4 of Section 34, Township 8 South, Range 88 plied to both on and off peak energy The Clerk of this Court shall comply with the pro- $169,600.00 am on Saturday, Ap!Â·11 13, 2002 at the Colum- West of the 6th P M The application/resolution 2) Tariff 13 - the PCA will only be ap Outstanding Principal Amount of Evidence of visions of Â§14-10-107(4),CRS as amended, bine Storage Center, Inc warehouse located at are available for public Inspection m the Com- plied to the Power Supply Energy Charge 411 ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER, AS munity Development Department City Hall, 130 Monthly Rate Debt as of the date hereof $159,309.64 BY THE COURT s/Thomas W Ossola ~ PEN, CO bell by auction for cash the following de- b Gatena St Aspen CO 81611 The Whole,ate Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) County of Recording Pitkin District Court Judge For further information contact Ezra Louthis at shall be calculated and applied monthly based Bdok and Page No or Reteption No of Recorded Dated March 12,2002 aribed goods to wit Lot # AARONSON Sherry Aaronson 5525 (970) 920-5442 upon the difference, positive or negative, be- Deed of Trust in Book 792 at Page 784 CERTIFICATE OF MAILING Jeanette Jones, Deputy County Clerk tween the Twelve Month Average Power Cost Legal Description â€žf Real Property North Stanton Street El Paso, TX 79912 4 pie- I certify that a copy of Foregoing was mailed to all SEE EXHIBIT 'lA' ATTACHED HERETO AND IN- Couniel of Record This 12th day of March 20()2 Board of County Commissioners and the Base Cost of Power tures 3 wardrobe cartons, 5 large cartons, 7 me- CORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE dium cartons 4 4 5 cartons 8 book cartons Publahed in The Aspen Times on April 6,2002 Thus PCA = Twelve Month Average Power s/Francis CSA white table, red suitcase 2 foot stools bar-bq (8579) Cost - Base Adjustments to applicable con WHICH HAS THE ADDRESS OF ()035 Lower Wood- District Court PR kin County, Colorado sumers shall be monthly and calculated as fol bridge Rd #106B Snowmass Village, CO 81615 Court Address 5()6 E Main St Aspen, CO 81621 Jrill and propane tank, 4 chairs, desk and chatr, PUBLIC NOTICE low,s THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN BALL OF Case Number 02DR18 scale, hvtng room chair, 2 black bar stools 2 COMBINED COURT PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO kWh X PCA Rate ($'s/kWIi) THE PROPERTY ENCUMBERED BY THE LIEN OF in Re the Marriage of Petitioner Sandra J France, small wooded stook, cactus plant, 2 black pots, Case No 02 C 57 PCA adjustment amounts are in addition to THE DEED OF TRUST Respondent/Co-Petitioner Michael T Dawkins Burton snowboard Volll sbs siu poles, art glass IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF the standard amountÂ·, billed as an energy THE LIEN FORECLOSED MAY NOT BE A FIRST Attorney or Party Without Attorney pieces, golden trunk, 2 red chairs tool box, black JUDY ANN MCKENDRICK Adult charge, per kWh, as provided within the con- UEN (Name and Address) Sandra Francis suitcase four tubes 2 black stools, 2 metal Public Notice is hereby given that on March 27 sumer's applicable Tariff Countryw,de Home Loans Inc the owner of the 2459 Emma Rd, Basalt, CO 81621 wheels, metal table, curtains black chair and a 2002 by an Order of the Court of Pltkon County, If you have questions or defire a copy of the Evidence of Debt secured by the Deed of Trust Phone Number 970-927-0895 black bench Colorado, the following name was changed The complete proposed tariff. please contact Del described herein has filed written election and FAX Number 970-9274]894 Lot# HENDERSON Gary Henderson PO name of JUDY ANN MCKENDRICK was changed to Worley or Dave Church at Holy Cross Energy demand for sale as provided by law and in said SUMMONS FOR DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE Box 144, Northeast MD 21901 8 medium cartons JUDY ANN ST ROMA[N (970) 945-5491 Deed of Trust OR LEGAL SEPARATION 4 dintng room chairs, wooden rocker, coffee ta- Patrick Peterson, Clerk of the Court Anyone who desires to complain about the THEREFORE, Notice Is Hereby Given that AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ble 2 end tables, small suitcase, floor lamp, head- By s/Glenita L Melnick Deputy Clerk proposed changes shall file a written com- I will, at 10.00 0'clock in the forenoon of Wed- TO THE RESPONDENT NAMED ABOVE plaint with the Association at P O Drower nesday, April 24,2002, At the South front door, You are summoned and required to file with the board and footboard and 1 large carton Published m The Aspen Times April 6, 13, 20, 215t) Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81602 at Pitkin County Courthouse, 506 East Mall, A, clerk of this court a Response to the attached Pe- Lot# PARRA Ferando Gonzales Parra, San- 2{)02 (8573) least 10 days before the proposed effective pen, Colorado, sell at pub)Itc auction to the high- tit:on within twenty (20) dayb after this Summons ter #25 Cd San Rafael Del Azcapotzalco Mexico date est and best bidder for cash, the said real proper- is served on you in the State of Colorado or with- DF 02101 11 large cartons 445 cartons, 14 book PUBLIC NOTICE The Association may hold a hearing to deter- ty and all interest of the said Grantorts) in thuty (30) days after this Summons is served cartons 3 wardrobe cartons 2 medium cartons, NOTICE iS HEREBY (,lVEN to the general public mine what changes will be authorized The Grantor(s) he, râ€¢. and assigns therein, for the pur- on you outside of the State of Colorado, or ts pub- plastic wagon, 3 black duffle bags, gray duffle that on March 19 20(12 the Hearing Officer of Pit- changes ultimately authorized may or may pose of paying the mdebtedness provided m said lished bag 3 black ski bagq 2 exercise bikes, 2 plastic lan County granted approval for the Coal Basin not be the sanie as those proposed and may Evidence of Debt secured by the Deed of Trust, After ninety (90) days from the date of service or bags of clothes, 11 pair of ski poles Hexcel skis 5 1041 Hazard Review and Conceptual Submission include changes different than those tariffs plus attorneys' fees the expenses of sale and oth Init your marttal status, dividing marital property publtcation, the court may enter a decree affect- pair Rossignot sbs, Salomon skis, 2 DynaÂ·tar skis, for Midcon Realty LLC application (P0044)2) This proposed or currently In effect Anyone who er Items allowed by law and will dellver to the and addressing iswes involving children, child K,! skis, toy rifle blue duffle bag, picnic basket, site specific development plan grants a vested desires to receive notice of hearing af any, purchaser a Certikate of Purchase, all as provid support maintenance, attorney fees and costs to wagon 3 wheel logger, bike, 3 sleds 2 children s property right pursuant to Title 24 Article 68, shall make a written request therefore to the ed by law bikes 2 car seats wood chair doll stroller and Colorado Revised Statutes Association, at the above address, at least 10 THE LAW FIRM OF CASTLE, BARRETT, DAFFIN the extent the court has jurisdiction boom box s/James True days before the proposed effective date 1 f you fail to file a Response or enter your appear- & FRAPPIER, LLC IS ATTEMPTING TO COLLECT ance in thus case, any or all of the matters above Lot# THOMAS Peter Thomas, 434 E Heanng Officer By Kent Benham, Chief Executive Officer A DEBT AND ANY INFORMAT]ON OBTAINED or any related matters, which tome before this Cooper, Aspen CO 81611 Large conference table Pitkin County Colorado Published in The Aspen Times on April 6, WILL BE USED FOR THAT PURPOSE and 28 cartons Published m The Aspen Times on April 6, 2002 2002 (8571) court may be decided without further notice to Lot# BOURKE Barbara Bourke, P O Box (8581) Dated February 26,2002 you Thomas Carl Oken 392, Gypsum CO 81637 Chandelier mirror tar- This is an action to obtain a decree of Dissolu Public Trustee tn and for ton, 1 book carton, 2 rolled rugs, end table, mtr- PUBLIC NOTICE PUBL]C NOTICE tion of Marriage ds more fully described in the at- the County of Pitkin, Colorado ror pack cedar trunk, exerclse equipment, 3 step NOTICE OF ELECTION Of tached Petition. and if you have children for or- By Carol L Foote up and 2 dumb bells TO WliOM IT MAY CONCERN, and particularly to DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL ders regarding the children of the marriage Deputy Public Trustee NOTICE Colorado Revised Statutes Â§14-18107, Lot# DANNA Sherre Danna, 2419 24th the electors of the WHITE HORSE SPRINGS WA- Notice fs hereby given to the general public of First Publication March 9 2002 provides that upon the filing of a Petition for Dis- ~ e, Rifle CO 81650 Bakers Rack TER DISTRICTof Pitkin County, Colorado the approval of a wte specific development plan Last Publication April 6,2002 solution of Marriage or Legal Separation by the ished in The Aspen Ames on April 6, 21)02 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that an election will be and the creation of a vested property right pur- Name of Publication The Aspen Times Petitioner or CoÂ·-Petitioner or upon personlt_ 2) suant to the Land Use lucie of the City of Aspen Attorney Castle Barrett Daffin & Frappier, LLC servlie of the Petition and bummons on the~ held on the 7th day of May 2002 between the and Title 24 Article 68 Colorado Revised Stat- Caren Jacobs Cavt le spondent, or upon waiver and acceptanc~ hours of 7 am and 7 pm at the designated polling utes, pertaining to the following described prop- 1099 18th St, Suite 1600 PUBLIC NOTICE service by the Respondent an automatic te RE 513 WEST SMUGGLER STREET FINAL HPC DE- place 205 1 M<-Lain Flatf Road the residence of erty Lot 4A Alpine Acres Subdivtbion by ordi Denver, Colorado 80202 rary injunction â€¢.hall be m effect against both/-I Kenneth & Betty Moore nance of the Aspen City Council numbered 8 ser- (303) 296-5251 ties until the final decree is entered or the Peti- SIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing At *aid election, the electors of the District shall ies of 2002 The approval is for a substantial PUD EXHIBIT A tion is dismissed, or until further Order ofthe will be held on Wednesday April 24, 2002 at a vote for Directors to serve the followlng terms of Amendment to allow for Lot 48 Alpine Acres Sub- Condommium Unit 106, Buildmg B, as shown on Court Either party mav apply to the court for fur- meeting to begin at 5.00 p m before the Aspen ofhce on the Board of Directors of the District division to be eligible to apply for Historic Preser- the Supplemental Condominium Map for SEA- ther temporary orders, an expanded temporary Historic Preservation Comm.sion City Council Two Direc tors for a Four Year Term vation Bonuses SONS 4 appearing m the record, of the County injunction or modification or revocation under Chambers, City Hall, 130 S Gatena St Aspen to The names of persons nominated are as follows For further information contact Julie Ann Woods Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, C R S 414-10-108 or any other appropriate stat- consider an application submitted by Drew Har- Carol Dopkin for a Four Year Term at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development in Plat Book 4 at Page 219, and as defined and de- ute man represented by Harry Teague Architects re- Betty Moore for a Four Year Term Dept 130 S Galena St Aspen Colorado (970-) 920- scribed in the Condommium Declaration for Sea- AITTOMATIC TEMPORARY INJUNCTION - BY 5090 sons 4 appearing in cuch mords in Book 256 at ORDER OF THE COURT, POU AND YOUR questink Final HPC design approval for the prop- NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that an eligible elec erTy located at 513 We,t Smuggler Street, Lots E, Publ,shed m The Aspen Times on April 6, 2002 Page 23() as Reception NO 146257 as supple SPOUSE ARE F and G Block 21, City and Townsite of Aspen tor of said District for the purpose of said elec- (8589) _ mented by First Supplemental Declaration to Sea- 1 Restrained from transferring encumbering For further information contact Amy Guthrie at tion is a perscin registered to vote pursuant to sons 4 appearing in such records in Book 279 at concealing or in any way dispo,ing of without the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development De- the Colorado Uniform Election Code of 1992 and PUBLIC M)TICE page 955 as Reception No 162526 County Of Pit- the consent of the other party or an Order of the partment, 130 S Galena St , Aspen, CO, (970) 920- (1) who has been a resident of the District for not Of kin, State of Colorado Court, any marital property, except in the usual 5096, ainyg@ci aspen co us less than thirty days or (2) who, or whose DEVELOPMEN r APPROVAL Published m The Aspen Times March 9, 16, 23, course of business or for the necessities of life s/Suzannah Reid, Chair spouse owns taxable real or personal property Notice is hereby given to the general public of 30, April 6,2002 (8439) and requiring each party to notify the other party of and proposed extraordinary expenditures and Aspen Historic Preservation Commission withm the District, whether said person restdes the approval of a site specific development plan to account to the court for all extraordinary ex- Published in The Aspen Times on April 6, 2002 within the District or not A person who li obli suant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen PUBLIC NOT[CE penditures made after the injunction ts in effect, and the creation of a ve.ted property right pur- (8584) Â· gated to pay taxes under a contract to purchase and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised btat- DISTRICT COURT P[TKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 2 Enjoined from molesting or disturbing the peace of the other party, PUBLIC NOTICE taxable property within the District shall be con- utes pertallung to the following described prop- 506 East Main Street NOTICE OF FINAL SETTLEMENT s,dered an owner of taxable property for the pur- erty Lots N&O Block 37, City and Townsite of Aspen CO 81611 3 Restrained from removing the minor child or Ff PROJECT# CR300-078 pose of quahlying as an eligible elector Aspen by resolution of the Historic Preservation Case Number 01 CV 195 children of the parties 11 any from the State wl/I out the consent of the other party or an Ordi~ SUB ACCOUNT #13338 NOTICE [S FURTHER GIVEN that applications for Commission numbered 9 xnes of 2002 Condi Plaintiff(s) DOUGLAS ROBERT CASEY and CONTI- the Court and ccordance with the notice provisions con- and return of absent voter s ballots may be filed tional Use Approval was granted for a Roof- NENTAL PROPERTY GROUP, LLC, a Delaware lim- 4 Restrained without at least fourteen day~ Â·d in 38-26-107 CRS 1973 as amended, the with MEAD METCALF, SECRETARY at the offices mounted Telecommunicaten Antenna withm the ited liability company vance notification and the written consent of th- p / ARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF of THE CRYSTAL PALACE CORP, 300 East Hyman, Historic District Defendant(s) NETTLESH[P FAMILY PARTNERS, a other party or an Order of the Court, from cancel- COLORADO has established April 24,2002, as the Aspen, Colorado 81611 between the hours of 9 30 at the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development LIMITED PARTNERS, a Washington limited part- for nonpayment of premiums any policy of For further information contact Julie Ann Woods Washington partnership NETTLESHIP FAMILY ing, modifying, terminating, or allowing to lapse date of final settlement with Mark Rite Lines of am and 6.00 pm until the close of business on the Dept 130 S Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920- nership, NETTLESHIP FAMILY LIMITED PART- health Insurance, homeowners or renter's insur Montana Inc Project C R300-078, located in Del- Friday mmediately precedlng the regular ele{> 5090 NERS [1[, a Colorado limited partnership, PATRI arce, or automobile Insurance that provides cov- ta, Eagle, Garfield Grand Gunnison. Lake, Mesa, Moffat, Montrose, Pitkin, Rio Blanco, and Routt hon May 1 2002 Publtshed In The Aspen Times on April 6,2002 CIA NETTLESHIP a/k/a PATRICIA S NETTLESHIP, erage to either of the parties or the minor chll- SELF NOMINATION FORMS are available from (8588) individually, COLUMBIA FEDERAL SAVINGS dren or any policy of life insurance that names ei- counties (twelve highways) requiring epoxy pavement markings, consisting of striping with Mead Metcalf, Secretary of the District at Box BANK, NORWEST BANK MINNESOTA WELLS ther of the partiesbr the minor children as a ben- epoxy paint, the right and left edge lines, center 808 Aspen Colorado 81612 or at the offices of PUBLIC NOTICE FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC SUMMIT BANK, eficiary broken line, and wide white hnes at gore areas on the CRYSTAL PALACE CORP located at 30(} East PLEASE TAKE NOTICE That the Board of County FIRST OF AMERICA BANK -LA PORTE NA, SUC- DATE 3/20/()2 1-70,1-70 ramps, Rad 11 at ranips center should- Hyman Aspen Colorado 81611 Commissioners of Pitkin County Colorado, at its CESSOR TRUSTEE, THOMAS CARL OKEN, THE s/GLENITA L MELNICK regular meeting on March 27 2002 and after a du- PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUN1 Y AND ALL Signature of the [Deputy] Clerk of Court er and channel,zing hnes at all other locattons WHITE HORSE SPRINGS WATER DISTRICT ly notice public hearing, approved the following UNKNOWN PERSONS WHO MAY CLAIM ANY IN- WAIVER AND ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE Claims containing a verified statement of the Mead Metcalf, Secretary TEREST IN THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THIS AG I declare under oath that 1 am the Respondent in Resolution amounts due and unpaid must be in the form of a Published in The Aspen Times March 30 Aprt] 6, RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM- TX)N this case, that I received and accepted service of written affidavit and must be received by the 2002 (8542) MISSIONERS OF P[TKIN C<)UNTY, COLC)RADO Attorney or Party Without Attorney the Summons and Petition 113 this case, that I CONTROLLER Department of Transportation at AUTHORIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF A $4 50 KRABACHER AND SANDERS PC waive any other service and consent to the jurls 42()1 E Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado, PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE AT THE ASPEN/ 201 North Mill St Suite 201 diction of thus court to determine all iSSUes raised 80222 on or before 5 ()() p m of the final settle- PUBLIC NOTICE PITKIN COUNTY AIRI'ORT in the pleadmgs as If I were served by personal ment date above Aspen CO 81611 service within the State of Colorado RE MOORE SPECIAL REVIEW FOR A CARETAKER Copies of the full text of the Resolution are availa- (970) 925-6300 John M Unbewust, Chief Engineer, Check one DWELUNG UN[T (PO16-02) ble for public inspection during regular business (970) 925-1181 facsimile Diviwon of Highways _ I am not in the military service This waiver 01 Published m The Aspen Times on April 6 13, NOTICE 15 HEREBY (,IVEN that a public hearing hours in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder 530 krabacher@krabacher com seryice 1* not to be construed as an admission by 20()2 (8552) will be held on Wednesday May 8 2002 at a regu East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone SUMMONS [BY PUBLICATION] me of the truth of the allegations in the Petition lar meeting to begin at 3.00 PM or as soon there- (970) 920-5157 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and I reserve the rieht to receive notices of set- PUBLIC NOTICE after as the conduct of business allows, before leanette Jones TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANTS tings and the right to respond and appear in per- RE 323 W HALLAM MAJOR DEVELOPMENT RE- the Board of County Commissioners Plaza One Deputy County Clerk You are hereby summoned and required to al}- son if ] wish VIEW (O)NCEPTUAL ) AND VARIANCES Conference Room 530 E Main St Aspen to con- Published m the Weekend Edition of The Aspen pear and defend against the claims of the com- OR NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing wder an application submitted by Alexander Times on April 6,2002 (8582) plaint filed with the court in this action, by filing _ [ am m the active military service of the United will be held on Wednesday April 24,2002 at a Moore to convert an existing guest house into a with the clerk of thus court an answer or other re- States of America After consultation with the meeting to begin at 5.00 p m before the Aspen Caretaker Dwelling Unit The property Is located sponse You are required to file your answer or base legal officer or other counsel of my choice, 1 PUBLIC NOTICE Historic Preservation Commission, City Council at 160 Riverside Drive and is described as a tract 01 other response within thirty (30) days after the walve the provisions of the Soldiers and Sailor s Chambers, City Hall, 130 S Galena St Aspen to of land situated in Section 34, Township 8 South, DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL service of thr, summons upon you Service of thus Relief Act of 1942, as amended including my right consider an application submitted by Peter Ris- Range 88 West of the 6th PM The application/ Notice is hereby given to the general public of summons shall be complete on the day of the last to court-appinted counsel and permit the ac- poli and Donna Dilanni requesting Major Develop_ resolution are available for public mspection in . the approval of a site specific development plan, publication A copy of the complaint may be ob- tion to proceed without further notice to me ment Review (Conceptual) for the property locat- the Community Development Department, City and the creation of a veâ€¢,ted property right pur- tained from the clerk of the court ed at 323 W Hallam St The property is legally Hall, 130 S Galena St, Aspen CO 81611 suant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen If you fail to file your answer or other response to Signature of Respondent Date described as Lots D and E, Block 43 City and For further Information contact Ezra Louthus at and Tttle 24, Article 68 Colorado Revised Stat- the complaint in writing within thirty (30) days Signed under oath before me on Townsite of Aspen The prolect requires the fol (970) 920-548.2.~ utes, pertalmng to the following described prop- after the date of the last publication, judgment by My commission expires- lowing variances a 12 foot combined front and ,~ erty Lots K-M Block 51, City and Townsite of As- default may be rendered against you by the court rear yard setback variance,a32 foot west side- ~ Deputy Couall'A pen by resolution of the Historic Preservation for the relief demanded m the complaint without Notary Public/Address RETURN OF SERVICE yard setback vanance for the existing location of AV Board of County Commiss!~~ Commission numbered 8, series of 2002 Final further notice State of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard set-~Mb lished in The Aspen Times on April 6,2004 2 Design Approval was given for an expansion Thr, 1% an action to quiet title of Plaintiffs in and County of back vanance for d small section of the propos~(8580) ~he Christmas Inn to the real property situate in Pitkin County, Col- 1 declare under oath that I served thus Summons addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus ~ ~Irther information contact Julie Ann Woods orado, more particularly descrtbed on Exhibit A, and a copy of the Petition in this case on the Re- PUBLIC NOTICE For further information, contact Amy Guth .t a~ Aspen/Pitkin Community Development attached hereto and by this reference made a spondent in - County on - (clate) the Aspen/Pitlan Community Developme~De- RE 633 W MAIN STREET FINAL HPC DESIGN RE- Del~ S Gatena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920- part hereof at at the following location partment, 130 S Galena St Aspen, CO, (9~ 920- VIEW AND VARIANCE Check one 5096 amyg@ci aspen co us NOTICE [S HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing 509(11. Dated March 2lst, 2002 Publi~d in The Aspen Times on April 6,2002 KRABACHER & SANDERS, PC By handing it to a person identified to me as s/Suzannah ~ Chair will be held on Wednesday, April 24,2002 at a Aspen Historic Preservation alhmision meeting to begin at 5.00 p m before the Aspen (8587)1. A Professional Corporation the Respondent BY s/Jennifer M Causing #30719 - By leaving it with the Respondent who re- Published m The Aspen Times on A 1 6,2002 Historic Preservation Commission, Council Joseph Krabacher #10240 fused service Chambers, City Hall, 130 S Galena St, Aspen, to ~ PUBLIC NOTICE 201 North Mill St , Ste 201 _ By leavIng it with designated to (8585) receive servlce for the Respondent consider an application submitted by Elizabeth COMBIN~ COURT, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Aspen Colorado 81611 PUBLIC NOTICE 1 Dart, requestmg final design approval for the Case No ~ C 55 (970) 925-6300 - I am over the age of 18 years and am not In NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the g~eral public property located at 633 W &lam Street, which is IN THE !~rTER OF THE PETITION OF Attorneys for Plaintiff terested m nora party to this case that on March 19, 2002 the Hearing ~icer of Pit- described as Lot A Block 25, City and Towns,te T]MOTH~MARTIN FAGER Adult EXHIBIT A - I attempted to serve the Respondent on lan County granted approval for t~ Sweeney of Aspen An east sideyard setback vanance of 1 Public N.ce is hereby given that on March 19, LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY - occasions but have not been able to 10- Scenic ()verlay Review applicatio~(P{)30-Â·02) Is also requested 2002, b* Order of the Court of Pitkin County Athirty (30) foot "Pnvate Road Easement identi- cate the Respondent Th,s site specift, development plan gl~ts a vest- For further information contact Amy Guthrie at Colorad0the following name was changed The lied in the Plat of HIDDEN MEADOWb SUBDIVI- Return to the Petitioner is made on - (date) ed property right pursuant to Title 24~rticle 68, the Aspen/ Pitkin Community Development De- name o~IMOTHY MARTIN FAGER was changed SION, as recorded in Plat Book 6 at Page 40 Pit- Signed under oath before me on (date) Colorado Revised Statutes partment 130 S Galena St, Aspen, CO (970) 920- to TIM(~HY ISAAC MARTIN kin County Colorado My commission expires s True 5096, amyg@ci aspen co us Patriclileterson Published in The Aspen Times (Notary Public/Address) Hearill~fficer s/Suzannah Reid Chair Clerk /he Court First Publication March 30th, 2002 Private process server - Sheriff Pitkin County, C~ado Aspen Historic Preservation Commission By s//enita L Melrick, Deputy Clerk 1 ast Publication April 6th, 2002 Published In The Aspen Times on April 6~2 Published m The Aspen Times on April 6,2002 Publi~,ed in The Aspen Times March 30 April 6, Published m The Aspen Times March 30 April 6 2002 (8541,8553) Published iii The Aspen Times March 30, April 6, (8578) U . (8586) 13 ~)2 (8548) 13 20,27,2002 (8551) \ 1 ~- 22-B The Aspen Times Weekly â€¢ Saturday -Sunday, April 13 - 14,2002 ' 1 .. ASPEN TIMES ~EEKLY service directory 1 925-9937 fax: 925-5647 email: classifieds@aspentimes.com Service Directory 1650 Cleaning 2235 Gift Baskets 2750 Massage 3170 Property Management 1 DaP ConA,uction & mechanical 5pring 5pecia| HOUSE CLEANING BlACandvflorist.com A Great Maseage...Guaranteed! General Contracting Mechanical & Master Plumber licenses. Need some cleaning done? ~~ FREE local delivery There are 168 hours in a week! Looking to manage your home' Kari or lohn, 922-0495. Experience, reliability, Spend at least 1 hour getting or ranch or do remodels. references. 970-920-0267 maseage therapy with... - (970) 995Â®07 - 14 years experience - Chocolate Flowers Fred Thiemer, LMT. FREE - -- D~-W A Great Massage 948-8842 3250 Remodeling 16, ak#46(ORe Full Celer! "For the BEST cleaning" 3000 Pet Care 925-1585 HOUBE CLEANING 2450 Home Improvement/Repair Ill Homes â€¢ Condoe â€¢ Officee WHOLESALE KITCHEN & Call zacharg at Velia & Patricia Rodriguez BATH CABINETS REMODELING SPECIALIST 925-9957 References available! and (970)963-9384*(970)309-3278 Our product lines offer quality 0%7%11 3630 Tutorial ~ R, 3 style for any budget /1. ..// ext. 233 Scott 970-379-8583 1 A SCHOOL Or V /7 SPANISH CONNECTION ~ to finel out how ljOU can get free 1825 Culinary Jamie 970-379-8683 -OGTRZIX93~0 Translation, interpretation, 9 instruction 4 color in pour service ad. This offer Boarded Training 0 ifor both newandexisting dients, < Call Elaine Harvey: - ch>me, t#Fme &06,tien~ , , â€¢ Consultations 970-948-5460 pemenÂ«/ chehemirc* Chudy Tile & Carpentry Puppy and Dog Classes , I. 911: A= T= â€¢ Save Time â€¢ Eat Well â€¢ Simplijj Life â€¢ New and Remodele Start April 1st ~ Come home to custom, A non-traditional Kennel facility IGLESIA DEL Dios Vivo Cultos .1 prepared meals, ready with an in-home atmosphere. (970)963-0365 (970)379-5710 cell En Espanol. Domingos 6 a 8pm. M 2 - ASPEN TIMES ~MEEKLÂ¥ li~ to eat in 20 minutes. 1]chudy@peoplepc.com Call 970-963-5713 *# (970) 963-1287 @ Jueves 7a9 pm. Para mayor 1 Informacio, (970) 923-3598. . il ASPEN TIMES~EEKLY classifiedads t 925-9937 fax: 925-5647 email: classifieds@aspentimes.com -1 ASPENTIMESWEEKLY Announcements/Employment 925-9937 fax: 925-5647 email: classifieds@aspentimes.com Merchandise Recreation Real Estate - Rentals Classified Index 5020 Antiques/Art 5670 Bicycles 7060 Real Estate Wanted Under Each Rental Location 5000 Art Supplies 17 5680 Boats 7100 Open Houses 8100 Housing Wanted Miscellaneous Wanted 5650 Aviation (~~ 7030 Real Estate Notices Roommate Categories Service Directory 5050 Appliances Â°' '1 4 5700 7120 RE Aspen/Snowmass 8120 Renta s Aspen/Snowmass Camping Equipment 8150 Renta s Avon Announcements 5100 Auctions YY 6050 Hunting Equipment *Â·~ 8170 Renta s Basalt Area 7130 RE Avon 4000 Public Notices/Legals 5110 Barter/Trade 7140 RE Basalt 6100 Misc. Sports Equipment 7160 RE Breckerridge <0~ 8200 Renta s Breck 4050 Lost 5120 Books/Educational 6200 Ski Equipment 7180 - RE Carbondale *-A.<~.,~~ 8220 Renta s Carbondale 4100 Found 4200 Personals 5140 Collectibles 6250 Snowboard Equipment ._Â·,2~30 RE Clear Creek County fd~ 5130 Children/Baby Items 8250 Renta s Copper Mtn 8300 Rentas Dillon 6270 Snowmobiles 4250 Valentines 5150 Computers RE Copper Mtn. 8330 Renta s Eagle 4300 Announcements 5160 Construction Equip/Materials 6300 All Terrain Vehicles D 7260 RE Dillon 8350 Rento s Eagle Vail 4310 Auditions 5170 Electronic/Photo 7300 RE Eagle . 8400 Renta 5 Edwards Transportation - 7330 RE Eagle Vail 4320 Classes/Tutoring/Instruction 5180 Firewood/Pellets 8450 Renta s Frisco 6410 Auto Parts/Accessories 7360 RE Edwards 8470 Renta s Glenwood Springs 4330 Housesitters Available 5220 Furniture 6430 Autos 7400 8500 Renta s Gypsum 4350 Situations Wanted 5230 Garage/yard Sale RE Frisco 4400 Volunteers Wanted 5250 6440 Camper Shells/Toppers 7420 RE Glenwood Springs 8550 Renta s Keystone r, Health & Beauty RE Gypsum 4450 Ride Share/Carpools 5255 Horses/Livestock 0~ 6450 Campers/RVs/Trailers 7430 8570 Renta s Lake County,g~ Employment 5260 Hot-tubs/Spos j ~|| 6460 Classic Vehicles 7460 RE Keystone 8600 Renta s Minturn qvq,Il 4500 Employment Wanted 9 5270 Jewelry/Clothing L---r~ 6470 Heavy Equipment 7500 RE Lake County 8610 Renta s New Castle ~ _ 1 7520 RE Minturn 8620 Renta s Other Areas 4550 General Employment 5280 Lawn & Garden Â£5~& 6500 Motorcycles 7530 RE New Castle 8650. Renta s Park County 4570 Employment Business Ops ~ 5300 Miscellaneous items ~ 6600 Pickup ~ 7550 RE Other 8670 Renta s Rifle/Silt/Parachute 4600 Childcare 5320 Musical 6650 SUVS 7600 RE Park County 8700 Renta s Silverthorne 4630 Construction/Trades JIL 5330 Office Equipment 6700 Utility Trailers -~E* 7620 RE Rifle/5ilt/Parachute 8750 Renta s Summit Cove 4650 Delivery/Drivers 5350 Pets/Animals 6750 Vans :4 7630 RE 5ilverthorne 8800 Renta s Vail 4760 Housekeeping/Janitorial 5360 Restaurant Equipment 7660 RE Summit Cove 8830 Renta s Commercial 4780 Landscaping 5370 Snowblowers Financial . 7700 RE Vail 8860 Renta s Short-term 4800 Lodging 8930 Bed & Breakfasts 5375 5nowplows 6830 Business Ops 7730 RE Mobile/Manufactured Homes 8900 Renta s Vacation/Resort 4830 Office 5380 Tickets/Ski Passes 6860 Financial 4* 7750 RE Commercial 4840 Part-Time 0%2*<7 5400 Tools/Hardware 6900 Investment Ops ~ a ** 7800 RE Lots & Acreage 8950 Exchanges 4850 Restaurant 432Â¢p/ 5420 Travel 6930 Mortgages 7850 RE Farms & Ranches -- 8990 Warehouse Space 8970 Storage 4900 Retail The Swap ~ 5430 Woodstoves/Fireplaces 4!~7 7900 RE Timeshares 4930 Sales 5470 7950 RE Exchanges - Real Estate Photo Ads - 'ELL 0 , MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce 0hlson, Deputy Planning Director JAO FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 633 West Main Street- Final Development and Variance - Public Hearing DATE: April 24,2002 SUMMARY: The project involves partial demolition of an existing addition to the historic house, and construction of a second story master bedroom suite with a garage off the alley. Skylights are proposed to be removed on the east side of the historic house and replaced with a dormer similar to the one previously installed on the west, and an alteration to the windows in the west dormer is planned. HPC granted conceptual approval for this project on March 1301, including a rear yard setback variance for the garage. The applicant was directed to create an offset in the long wall on the east side of the building, which has resulted in them requesting a new 1 foot east sideyard setback variance in their final application. HPC's other concern at conceptual was simplification of the new fenestration. APPLICANT: Elizabeth Dart, represented by Barbra Long and Associates. PARCEL ID: 2735 - 124 - 48 - 001. ADDRESS: 633 West Main Street, Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. ZONING: Office SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side 1 yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units, and Staff Finding: There are three alterations proposed to the historic structure itself: replacing one of the skylights on the east side with a dormer, adding a window on the east wall of the building, and adding more windows in the existing dormer on the west. Staff finds that the actions related to the dormers are not in conflict with the design guidelines, but recommends there be discussion as to whether or not the ridgeline of the new east dormer should be required to match that on the west since simplicity and symmetry are important to the character of this building. The guideline which offers some information on this topic is: 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. o A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. o The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. Staff questions whether the window proposed for the west wall is an appropriate alteration. The architect is responding to concerns from staff and the HPC about the blank character of this wall, and has looked at old plans to try to locate original window openings. Interior remodeling that has taken place previously prevents the installation of windows in any location that can be documented. The location that is proposed in the plans is not totally accurate and is closer to the corner of the house than, in staff' s opinion, would probably have been done historically. The following guideline offers some direction, but overall, staffs concern is that if the window doesn't represent an authentic condition, then it is probably better not to install it. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. o Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. o Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 2 The new construction includes a master bedroom suite and a garage. Because of the simple character of the historic house, HPC gave direction at the conceptual hearing that dormers proposed for the new garage should be eliminated because they created a roof that was much more "cluttered" than was appropriate for a house of this nature. The architect has made that change. The architect has also created the requested jog in the east wall. The proposed materials for the new construction are vertical wood siding, to create a distinction from the original building, wood fencing and deck railing, and an asphalt roof to match the existing. Staff finds that the design guidelines are all being met for this project aside from the two mentioned above, and that this review standard will be met if the dormers are aligned in height and the window is not added on the east wall. The one foot east sideyard setback variance being asked for on the garage is to accomplish the goal of distinguishing it as a small piece of the addition and to avoid a long, unbroken wall surface. Staffrecommends that the variance be approved. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: The proposal is consistent with the character of the neighborhood, where numerous other historic buildings have been expanded. Staff finds this standard is met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels, and Staff Finding: The project does not detract from the historic significance of the existing structure, a simple 19th century home. Staff finds this standard is met. Â£ The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The architect has restudied all the aspects of this project which appeared to be problematic and staff finds those changes are successful. The project will not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of the house. Staff finds that this standard is met. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the review standards and design guidelines are met and recommends HPC grant final approval and variances with the following conditions: 1. Provide a cut sheet for any new wood windows that are being installed on the outside of the historic house for review by staff and monitor. 3 2. Confirm that the site plan represents all major landscaping that is to take place. 3. HPC has granted a 10 foot rear yard setback variance and a 1 foot east sideyard setback variance. 4. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 5. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 6. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 7. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 8. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 9. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 10. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 11. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2002, final review for 633 W. Main Street, Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite ofAspen." Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2002 A. Staffmemo dated April 24,2002 B. Application C. Checklist of relevant Historic Preservation Design Guidelines 4 Â»Ur O 1.2 A new replacement fence should use materials that appear similar to that of the original. o Any fence which is visible from a public right-of-way must be built of wood or wrought iron. Wire fences also may be considered. o A wood picket fence is an appropriate replacement in most locations. A simple wire or metal fence, similar to traditional 'twrought iron," also may be considered. o Chain link is prohibited and solid "stockade" fences are only allowed in side and rear yards. 1.3 A new replacement fence should have a "transparent" quality allowing views into the yard from the street. o A fence that defines a front yard is usually low to the ground and "transparent" in nature. o On residential properties, a fence which is located forward of the front building facade may not be taller than 42" from natural grade. (For additional information, see the City of Aspen's "Residential Design Standards".) o A privacy fence may be used in back yards and along alleys, but not forward of the front facade of a building. o Note that using no fencing at all is often the best approach. o Contemporary interpretations of traditional fences should be compatible with the historic context. 1.4 New fence components should be similar in scale with those seen traditionally. o Fence columns or piers should be proportional to the fence segment. 1.6 Replacement or new fencing between side yards and along the alley should be compatible with the historic context. o A side yard fence is usually taller than its front yard counterpart. It also is less transparent. A side yard fence may reach heights taller than front yard fences (up to six feet), but should incorporate transparent elements to minimize the possible visual impacts. o Consider staggering the fence boards on either side of the fence rail. This will give the appearance of a solid plank fence when seen head on. o Also consider using lattice, or other transparent detailing, on the upper portions of the fence. 1.10 Preserve historic elements of the yard to provide an appropriate context for historic structures. o The front yard should be maintained in a traditional manner, with planting material and sod, and not covered with paving, for example. 1.13 Revisions or additions to the landscape should be consistent with the historic context of the site. o Select plant and tree material according to its mature size, to allow for the long-term impact of mature growth. o Reserve the use of exotic plants to small areas for accent. o Do not cover grassy areas with gravel, rock or paving materials. 1.14 Additions to the landscape that could interfere with historic structures are inappropriate. o Do not plant climbing ivy or trees too close to a building. New trees should be no closer than the mature canopy size. o Do not locate plants or trees in locations that will obscure significant architectural features or block views to the building. o It is not appropriate to plant a hedge row that will block views into the yard. 1.15 Minimize the visual impacts of site lighting. o Site lighting should be shielded to avoid glare onto adjacent properties. Focus lighting on walks and entries, rather than up into trees and onto facade planes. 1.17 Maintain historic irrigation ditches as an integral component of the streetscape. The character of an irrigation ditch should be maintained. o It is inappropriate to use an irrigation ditch as a planting bed, or to fill it with another material. o Ditches cannot by culverted except where crossed by a walkway or driveway, and a culvert must be approved by the Parks Department. 2.1 Preserve original building materials. o Do not remove siding that is in good condition or that can be repaired in place. o Only remove siding which is deteriorated and must be replaced. o Masonry features that define the overall historic character, such as walls, cornices, pediments, steps and foundations, should be preserved. o Avoid rebuilding a major portion of an exterior wall that could be repaired. Reconstruction may result in a building which no longer retains its historic integrity. 2.2 Protect wood features from deterioration. o Provide proper drainage and ventilation to minimize rot. o Maintain protective coatings to retard drying and ultraviolet damage. 2.3 Plan repainting carefully. o Always prepare a good substrate. Prior to painting, remove damaged or deteriorated paint only to the next intact layer, using the gentlest means possible. o Use compatible paints. Some latex paints will not bond well to earlier oil-based paints without a primer coat. 2.5 Repair deteriorated primary building materials by patching, piecing-in, consolidating or otherwise reinforcing the material. o Avoid the removal of damaged materials that can be repaired. o Isolated areas of damage may be stabilized or fixed, using consolidants. Epoxies and resins may be considered for wood repair and special masonry repair components also may be used. 2.7 Match the original material in composition, scale and finish when replacing materials on primary surfaces. o If the original material is wood clapboard, for example, then the replacement material must be wood as well. It should match the original in size, the amount of exposed lap and finish. o Replace only the amount required. If a few boards are damaged beyond repair, then only those should be replaced, not the entire wall. 3.2 Preserve the position, number and arrangement of historic windows in a building wall. o Enclosing a historic window opening in a key character-defining facade is inappropriate, as is adding a new window opening. This is especially important on primary facades where the historic ratio of solid-to-void is a character-defining feature. o Greater flexibility in installing new windows may be considered on rear walls. o Do not reduce an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or door or increase it to receive a larger window on primary facades. 3.4 Match a replacement window to the original in its design. o If the original is double-hung, then the replacement window should also be double- hung, or at a minimum, appear to be so. Match the replacement also in the number and position of glass panes. o Matching the original design is particularly important on key character-defining facades. 3.5 In a replacement window, use materials that appear similar to the original. o Using the same material as the original is preferred, especially on character-defining facades. However, a substitute material may be considered if the appearance of the window components will match those of the original in dimension, profile and finish. 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to acconunodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 3.7 Match, as closely as possible, the profile of the sash and its components to that of the original window. o A historic window often has a complex profile. Within the window's easing, the sash steps back to the plane of the glazing (glass) in several increments. These increments, which individually only measure in eighths or quarters of inches, are important details. They distinguish the actual window from the surrounding plane of the wall. 7.1 Preserve the original form of a roof. o Do not alter the angle of a historic roof. Instead, maintain the perceived line and orientation of the roof as seen from the street. o Retain and repair roof detailing. 7.2 Preserve the original eave depth. o The shadows created by traditional overhangs contribute to one's perception of the building's historic scale and therefore, these overhangs should be preserved. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 7.7 A new dormer should remain subordinate to the historic roof in scale and character. o A new dormer should fit within the existing wall plane. It should be lower than the ridgeline and set in from the eave. It should also be in proportion with the building. o The mass and scale of a dormer addition must be subordinate to the scale of the historic building. 7.9 New or replacement roof materials should convey a scale, color and texture similar to those used traditionally. o Replacement materials should be similar to those used historically on comparably styled buildings. o If a substitute is used, such as composition shingle, the roof material should be earth tone and have a matte, non-reflective finish. o Flashing should be in scale with the roof material. o If copper flashing is to be used, it should be treated to establish a matte, non- reflective finish. 8.4 A garage door should be compatible with the character of the historic structure. o A wood-clad hinged door is preferred on a historic structure. o If an overhead door is used, the materials should match that of the secondary structure. o If the existing doors are hinged, they can be adapted with an automatic opener. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacl<s of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.5 When planning an addition to a building in a historic district, preserve historic alignments that may exist on the street. o Some roof lines and porch eaves on historic buildings in the area may align at approximately the same height. An addition should not be placed in a location where these relationships would be altered or obscured. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.11 On a new addition, use exterior materials that are compatible with the historic materials of the primary building. o The new materials should be either similar or subordinate to the original materials. 0O 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 14.3 Keep color schemes simple. (Advisory) o Using one base color for the building is preferred. o Using only one or two accent colors is also encouraged, except where precedent exists for using more than two colors with some architectural styles. 14.4 Coordinating the entire building in one color scheme is usually more successful than working with a variety of palettes. (Advisory) o Using the color scheme to establish a sense of overall composition for the building is strongly encouraged. 14.5 Develop a color scheme for the entire building front that coordinates all the facade elements. (Advisory) o Choose a base color that will link the entire building face together. For a commercial building, it can tie signs, ornamentation, awnings and entrances together. On residences, it can function similarly. It can also help your building relate better to others in the district. o The complexity of the accent colors should be appropriate to the architectural style of the building. o Doors may be painted a bright accent color, or they may be left a natural wood finish. Historically, many of the doors would have simply had a stain applied. o Window sashes are also an excellent opportunity for accent color. o Brilliant luminescent or "day-glo" colors are not appropriate. 14.6 Exterior lights should be simple in character and similar in color and intensity to that used traditionally. o The design of a fixture should be simple in form and detail. Exterior lighting must be approved by the HPC. o All exterior light sources should have a low level of luminescence. 14.7 Minimize the visual impacts of site and architectural lighting. o Unshielded, high intensity light sources and those which direct light upward will not be permitted. o Shield lighting associated with service areas, parking lots and parking structures. o Timers or activity switches may be required to prevent unnecessary sources of light by controlling the length of time that exterior lights are in use late at night. 0 Do not wash an entire building facade in light. o Avoid placing exposed light fixtures in highly visible locations, such as on the upper walls of buildings. o Avoid duplicating fixtures. For example, do not use two fixtures that light the same area. 14.8 Minimize the visual impact of light spill from a building. o Prevent glare onto adjacent properties by using shielded and focused light sources that direct light onto the ground. The use of downlights, with the bulb fully enclosed within the shade, or step lights which direct light only on to walkways, is strongly encouraged. o Lighting shall be carefully located so as not to shine into residential living space, on or off the property or into public rights-of-way. 14.14 Minimize the visual impacts of service areas as seen from the street. o When it is feasible, screen service areas from view, especially those associated with commercial and multifamily developments. o This includes locations for trash containers and loading docks. o Service areas should be accessed off of the alley, if one exists. 14.15 Minimize the visual impacts of mechanical equipment as seen from the public way. o Mechanical equipment may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. o Mechanical equipment or vents on a roof must be grouped together to minimize their visual impact. Where rooftop units are visible, provide screening with materials that are compatible with those of the building itself. o Screen ground-mounted units with fences, stone walls or hedges. o A window air conditioning unit may only be installed on an alley facade, and only if it does not create a negative visual impact. o Use low-profile mechanical units on rooftops so they will not be visible from the street or alley. Also minimize the visual impacts of utility connections and service boxes. Use smaller satellite dishes and mount them low to the ground and away from front yards, significant building facades or highly visible roof planes. o Paint telecommunications and mechanical equipment in muted colors that will minimize their appearance by blending with their backgrounds. 14.16 Locate standpipes, meters and other service equipment such that they will not damage historic facade materials. o Cutting channels into historic facade materials damages the historic building fabric and is inappropriate. Do not locate equipment on the front facade. o If a channel must be cut either locate it on a secondary facade, or place it low on the wall. RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 633 W. MAIN STREET, LOT A, BLOCK 25, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. ~L SERIES OF 2002 Parcel ID #: 2735-124-48-001 WHEREAS, the applicant, Elizabeth Dart, represented by Barbara Long, has requested Final Development and Variances approval for the property located at 633 W. Main Street, Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite ofAspen; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, and recommended the application be approved with conditions; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on April 24, 2002, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves final development and variances for the property located at 633 W. Main Street, Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite ofAspen, finding that the review standards are met, with the following conditions: 1. Provide a cut sheet for any new wood windows that are being installed on the outside of the historic house for review by staff and monitor. 2. Confirm that the site plan represents all major landscaping that is to take place. 3. HPC has granted a 10 foot rear yard setback variance and a 1 foot east sideyard setback variance. 4. Information on all venting locations and meter locations not described in the approved drawings shall be provided for review and approval by staff and monitor when the information is available. 5. Submit a demolition plan, as part of the building permit plan set, indicating exactly what areas of the historic house are to be removed as part of the renovation. 6. No elements are to be added to the historic house that did not previously exist. No existing exterior materials other than what has been specifically approved herein may be removed without the approval of staff and monitor. 7. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 8. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 9. The conditions of approval will be required to be printed on the cover sheet of the building permit plan set and all other prints made for the purpose of construction. 10. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 11. The General Contractor and/or Superintendent shall be required to obtain a specialty license in historic preservation prior to receiving a building permit. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of April, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk BARBARA LONG AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 8603 â€¢ASPEN,COLORADO 8161 2 â€¢ 970Â·925Â·6880 â€¢ 970Â·925.8780 FAX March 18, 2002 Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen, Community Development Department 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Dart Residence Renovation & Addition 633 West Main Street ' Lot A, Block 25 City & Township of Aspen, Colorado Dear Sirs, The attached application is for Final Review by the Historic Preservation Commission. The development is a renovation to 633 West Main Street, Aspen, Colorado. Following the HPC Conceptual Review meeting on March 13, 2002, we have amended the attached plans to address the subsequent concerns placed on our proposal by the commission. 1. Simplify the garage roof The 4 dormers located at the garage addition have been eliminated. Windows have been added to the east and west wall which provide additional light as requested by the owner. We feel these windows are more in keeping with the simplicity ofthe home than those previously presented. 2. Restudy selected fenestration: The added east stairwell window has been modified. It is now 2-6 from the corner of the building, but because the window is over the stair, the top of the rough opening is at approximately 7'-11" from finish floor. 3. Provide a visual distinction between the garage addition and living space: The garage has been offset 1'-0" to the east of the original wall. A variance is being requested for a proposed 4'-0" side yard setback at the garage only. The garage and lower level roof planes are now offset, providing even more definition than originally presented. The following materials required for the renovation are included in this application: 1. All exterior window and door trim, facia and roofing details are to match the existing. 2. The vertical siding on the additions is similar to the attached photo. 3. The picket fence detail is to be similar to the attached photo, 3'-0" tall maximum. BUILDING DESIGN â€¢ SPACE PLANNING â€¢ INTERIOR ARCHITECTURAL DETAILING 4. The upper level deck rail will have a lattice detail similar the existing rear fence. A photo ofthe newel posts is attached. We feel that these revisions meet the Commission's reservations placed during Conceptual Review. Sincerely, Barbara W. Long ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. PIG#kname 22â€¢,2 r #42 * 0.06 6. ) A DD, 1704 2. Project location 67 Z W. hf 4/' f 6 1* : J *pek/ 1 06 Lor A , D 1- 00 k '2.'4 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 1 , 3. Present zoning 0 Lor"bm) 4. Lot size Ibo 00 4 5. Afplicant's name, address and phone number ~Alkâ€¢ W ~1.,7.Me,fA OAÂ·â€¢2.7- 147 61AAEÂ·KJA ! A#FF,J 8 0 2,161/ 120'Â· 31574 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number ~#1,04 4-* Louf 4 1.+Jo c. 11 6 dÂ· M <Li- 4, ill !A tpa,-1 6 614 11 114, 9 000 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA -7 Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision Text/Map Amend. 4 Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption B*< Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization Design Review Lot SpliULot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms any previous approvals granted to the prowN\ 47/ AJAE 6 <AÂ·kt AW <E 6,10614 -1-j A L 97- ~5612'cpowl-'5 9. Description of development application ' ~ UAL- lÂ·~/6 BE vi E.J- &1â€¢Jo = c'DEÂ·6 p-[[+61-1Â· E.P U R.-1-[E Â£) 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4 Attachment 1- Land use application form / Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form Response to Attachment 3 w Response to Attachments 4 and 5 lilli111 fc , Â£ ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: ~A,5161' -ELIZA 66Â¥W Â£)Aer Address: 091 0 . MAid sTÂ· i Asped , do Zone district: 0 ( Opp â€¢6Â«) Lot size: Â· 9000 0. Existing FAR: 9/62'35Â¢1 Allowable FAR: 9400 Proposed FAR: 24 DÂ©r ,. (101'M 6 + 250 St.-11Â£ Oe 4'WÂ»t, 'god.) Existing net leasable (commercial): Proposed net leasable (commercial): Existing % of site coverage: 00 266-7 21 LT tod Proposed % of site coverage: Existing % of open space: 00 2/QUIEEÂ·01*df* Proposed % of open space: Existing maximum height: Principal bldct: 1-~-6 Accesorv blda: Proposed max. height: Principal bldg: 17- -6 4, Accessory bldg: Proposed % of demolition: 4% C19-4 e MA+1-22 *50Â·Deooppl Existing number of bedrooms: 6 Proposed number of bedrooms: 9 Existing on-site parking spaces: 6 ( On-site parking spaces required: 1 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: Front: Front: 10/ Front: Rear: Rear: I6' Rear: 6 ' Combined Combined Combined FronUrear: FronUrear: Front/rear: Â£ +57-- Side: 6, Side: e Side: 1-' Side: Side: Side: Combined Combined Combined Sides: Sides: Sides: Existing nonconformities orencroachments: 'AJEer- #Ic:,6. 15*=P -' E!:>L t:7,51 . La,ED +Ff'< 110 fcÂ°'1 porteTT Lida - 4 1.161-E.E- 50>< OVE-e FeÂ«Ea r r -11-1 6 Variations rdquested: 4 ' 12.g>Â»Â· E. hfÂ»% EP 4 4' 5 5-67 6 'DE- ~Ae,D 36+88Â·614 25 <SiA 2-46,\E, bal-T (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) L r 7 1 :kill 1 -Â· 1 4 -f lilli 4 0 1 1 7 1 I 1 111 11 1 11 1 i 13 ' 44 1-111 1 1Â·-Â·Â· 1 '11 1 Â»I *111 1 -, J 11,1 1 1 -1.F - t-1- 2 " 1 11 11 -T 1 9 j. 14 .7 U 1 =111 . - 1 4 1-+ 1 111Â· 1 1 11 1! 1 + 1 11- 1 1-411,Â· 7/ 1 1 -,14111; .r, 164 . 1 r cÂ¥ I 1 4. 'L_ 44 ---- _,- -rl=TI " -Trlr,mmllÂ·'n~~ ..1, - 44-1-@I 1 1.- 1 lili- Â· 1 - 11 1 9 '':11 - + li + " I -1-~I'|Â·i'~41EF -4 ttilit- i' 1111.111 .1 TIM. -1 1 1 *Â¥1 + 111â€ž111 1.lili 1 T Iii '1 9.1#11Â·- * 4- 1 7 1 - ..11Â¢ 1 1 1 11 1 bl ft#, ' d 1 11 11111 11 11 .1 1 311111 - 11-11 111'lli~11 _ 7 -1 111 b ii~ Â· i i 11 1 z lili :., 111' .4 ! 11 . H.lili 1~1)411.11 1.11 1 1 11 11.1 !1 I lili 4 11.1111 1 1~ - .1 1 11 1 91 ' 1 444 .11.11 4. - 11Â¢.11. 111 1.lili ' . 1 lili - 4, 1 1 . 1. 111 Â·~ . - 1 4 01 5 '1 1 r !1 + ]11+ 1.11111.. 11 64= 1-'b . lili 1 - - 1 f 1 1 111 1 lili 1 ~~77,4#****4 1 wii ~r â‚¬ I + 1. 1 1 4*-Ill'llet I 111: 11 . 1 9 Â»i , 1 1 i I iii- 11 1 id'11 1 . 1 It 1 14 1. . 1 1Â·/ 11 4/ 1-_ i 1 11.- 1 LIli r lili lili 11 11 11 1.1 1 Ir - | 4 1| -4 ! -IlE +-2 - lilli 1 - 1 .lilli - -Fil:I. 911 lili . 1.= 11 1 1. 1.1 1111.Ir 111 k Â· I.Ili 1 1 ' 1 1.1 1 WhiÂ·1 +Li 1-1 . 111 1 11 0 1 111 11,~t. 1 1 1111,1 1 Â¥ 4 '4 2-=11 11 1 . 1.1 11 I . .~ l* 1-11 ~1:1-Â· ~1111.IiÂ·i' ''' 111 111 1 1 1111 1 1. 11 1 - 1 40, 4 - 44~ jil If P _ -1 11 1!111 .1 111 1111111 . 14'i'. +1 1 1 1 lili 1 1 4.- 1 11 1 -1 lili 1 1 01 11,11 91 11111.jil 1'1'1" 11 lili i Af ' 11 1 Il I !11! Al .-Il ' .F 4,1" 'Â·i'll ' .11 'i"Â·4 I ii~i , ~ S + 1 L. i 1 11. lili Al! .1111,1-1 111 1 lilli - 1 -11 IAF I 1 11 11 11!IIi -- 1 .Fi' 11-' . 111: 1=,1 ' 1. .~*t 1 1 I lili 1 11 11 111.1 1 - 1 1 11 le 1 1 1 3: 11. i + 1 lili 1.- 17 ! 11" 111-ilÂ·1, 1 4-i. - - Â·ri TÂ·Â· -11 111 11- 14 - d li'. t-1- 1-, 11@ .IMI|*lili:+44 1 -=- - 1Â· 11 |.,171 1 + 1 1 _1#,-Â·~*IIi -.1 4 Il! 1 '!''il' Iii iiil|Ii' 4 10- - 1 1 1- i 4 1 IP 0----141 -. 11.11.1 Ah= 1*1 1 1 1:! lili -Al 1 1 1 M' 1 1 1~ 1 17 111 411!Â· 11 1 -11 + 1 14 1 + 4 1, 411- -=t#+ - 1 ..1,*. ..9- !11 ..1 111:'111 d'111 111, 1111 2,t lili 41 .1/ 11 14 . ill - 1; Id g ll|'2 -iii'- IL i. Ii, 111~ :1 iii 11, Il .lÂ·] Ill'11 1 ~ 1 Â¥ 14 -11 1- 11 - .t i ' iÂ·11 ! - ' J 1. A - 1 11 i|-1 Ii| 1 .. Inr a . 7 2 lili leil lili Â· lili 11 1 W. 4 - 1-1 ' 7 1 . 111,11 , 1 11*r 1.1 - 14.1 =1 2 Â· 1 11 11 11 1 III + 1.1 1 1 I lillill'll Jl' i '11 1 '114111.- 1 - 4- r- I ..1 ~~1| r 117 1. 11 1 111 - 1 11@111111- ,/1 411 1.lilli 11 111111 -.1 1011 lilli 11 1 - 11 1 41.1111'11 1 -1 11 1 - 111 Â· 1-1.1-hi||11/.Al 111!1111 1 11 1 11 ...1 1. 11 + 11.1 #lili Il!" - lillI lili 1 1.1.1 111, 1..11 1 =10- I - 1 1 11 1 #!. .111 1 - 61 -- 1 /1 -- lili - 10 .140 LF .1 -/ 1.. 2 :-.- / -0. UE J ~ Il|1' 1 .11 41Â¥: , - .10....[02 . 1,Â·0.'04 11 1= ~~~LLIW i~ 1 1~c Itf ..3.!1111 - Mi,-'lli * 21 0 1.1 -1 Aim 2 ~L -1.- 1"6 1 1~111 1~ )1 1 1 1 ; 1 Lt l '0 ' :I + L~#,II**I'INIIÂ¢j.'*IN~"k-fÂ· + 44. . 1,1.. 4,4,":EN'11111..'11.t 'fj'%1.<im li 1 . 1 ..111111111'l. 11~11~-1, 1 2,1,2~ 1,k. 1..4,d'll ~ *3~ T Â· 1#~ ,t~ j ~ ~0~r,~~il~ 1* P t. 11 -- 0Â¥32 U. 9 $- 1 + $ 11 1* F1. 4 fy [4 4 11 At $ 4 E Â¢ i f 1 ff,t Et 1 GIL 6-1- TE#36â‚¬- -r 11 1 l. 4 I!~1 :Vi.. 1... 4 .Id.Â¥7--1,--Ar &~f# b SM %*1# f 0~ ~1 -- a /~/7- f'151 1 1 -1, 111 11 + 4 -2 -11, 11 1,11 d 1 f Â¢ 4 4 141 .GIll 1 E. 1.11 1 1- 4 1 + .1 4(1.11\ *-m,111 f 1 / til i'!- -J I 1 -41 4 1 1 1 /1 1 41 11 111 lili I .1 r* 0/, Iii 1 lili 1 4, r "P+ *I' *' il'lll Ir': ,i lil ' FWA+T' ij: 41 5,6- * Y Â¥ 1 1 ,"1' ;!0 -*= /' P T| ~ :'h Ve 4 QF ' ~ |PE.Ir -1 -i lr, r -6,4- A ~I~|~% . - 4~ ir- 4 . BL~Â· + h Lf-L .- i pit 41144%14+0 A L . ./ f l. T -raa- V 1 *W. 16 - 116,11 4' *fi -11.1.8~111- 1141 4 4,';- â€¢ 4#349* 162' *,tÂ£#6* EW#114#:FILIJ#~4 t+128 ' 2 ' t-' 41 + , - m ir lili r 4,11- IiI 11."11 1 11 ,11 ' Mil#. 1* 1 . ./ 1 .111 4~k 11 1111111'fill'[1111 111!1~111,11 '1 1 - 11-. + ili~- ~ %|.~4~ 14+ 7~ ...1Â¥Fll. # t 1119 11, 1 2!1 1 1, ~11 r 1 ,-d" -2- 11% /11 - 1 â€¢ilil i ' i iT id ti#' .C' 9 ~ *@i.III t~ ~ ' 4$ ~41~~1411,~-1,11;1.-1: 0 1 u Â·1 4~1 I "i'm"BI +MI" ~~!IiI|Ii!|lilli I # 11~11~14!-4-11 +--1 ~4 Il iM~| ~~11|- - Â·t ;AILiF UÂ·* it!'.rift #-7-#6 Â·Vt i'#11411111 1 0 4411'~11~'-=111!1~,Ii,kIi I ' i biiJ ~.11 11 111 1 !1 11,~1 1 11~111~ 1 111 1 1 1 1 . 1 111 1 .1 1 1 1 . 144 1. il, S -11.1, 1 6 4 - -1. f -,1 + 1 =F 1 = p 3 E 1 1 i Â·- 1, i l, 1 1-1 t j - 1 Â£ ' ijl 111 Al I E l 1 1 1 1 1 4 -5 1 IL 1, %444*161* ,~6- 9-6â‚¬. 3.sod -190'9N 109(r 1Â£ 44- C f, 11 1 1 .11,--1 -//1 I ..1-4-4|~~- 1.~ _, ||sf-Y~L ' A 111' .1 11 1 1 21'1-f'144 -1.1 1 041 11 1.1 1 / li li LATS' dr ~4 -151+1 . T- 1 '., i 4 1 1 71-11 P .-Ck*. 1 Z 11.:4 i . J lEi 1 L,1 1 -1 /'!11 . It--1- 1 .11 0 :- 14- ' 4 4-1 1 . I 48''L. I .. - 1 , 1 -A l I it69 /T ~ Il:,t i,~ -11 '1 .1- 11 L Z 1 '11 - 1 1 1 I. Z-17 ~Ii-p *214: IL;Ij A} fo :4 11 1, 217 li YF J . 11 1- . , 1 -1, 1 -1 1 1 4-'Ill :, & L 1, 7,1 4 + 1 1 1 1 c. L ' r 14 z - NE/l-17 23 ~7:~,~-~,~'+~~T~'3: r, i -) + J. 1- 1 -1, t.-Al,IZ'* 9- 9 -Â¥--_ Ii:~ z# *LY ', ~ ~1 . 111 I a , // A ' 6 -Â£~-=22â‚¬u=y EAST DORMER EAST DORMER TO MATCH EXISTING / TO MATCH EXISTING , WEST DORMER IN WEST DORMER IN ' HEIGHT AND '/3 HEIGHT AND WIDTH WIDTH - ~ 12:12 PP. 12.12 TrP. Â·~- ~ 1/3 ~ 6 -- 11 1 1/3 - 1-r Â« 2 ./1 1 34,1.:Â«: m--m ju~ --.: 2 ../-/3 60 2140 FLOOR & . ___ OND FLOOR I ___ ____ EL.EV. 101'-8" 7 ELEV. 1014" 7 - W 11 liLi 11 0 UNE OF 1 a~: 1 11 1 1 11 111111 1 11111111 4 lill '"IN 1.1 111Â· kill J 11 - IST FLOOR . d IST FLOOR 1 __ ~ ELEV. 100'-0Â·' /'h SOUTH ELEVATION PV HEISHT LIMITS 4 MINPOR-POOR CONFISURATION OFF SOUTH PATIO Ah SOUTH ELEVATION V#.I,- REDUCE WINDOW WIDTH O DORMER 0 1 1 1 r.- 1= 11 111 1 ADD 1 DOUBLE-HUNG i Â· , WINDow To MATCH 1 L 11 0 0 El ~ 6 m U ImilL_lilli_IllÂ«' m UEXIST. PLUMBING 1 1 | t=== 1 1 Y L VENT (TYP) / uiL=.=46==.=Jitil u - , 1 IND FLOOR Aw _ I IND FLOOR E[EV33F;-&'7-- t--- MAINTAIN EXIST. ROOF UNE L.a ELF/~0I-6 p 112=lEd. - DATE: 4/25/02 OT FLOOR I J 6 IUT FLOOR (FINAL HPC) EBETEEVT-17 -... - - . 7 m.2,.~00-0, EXIST. METER LOCATION ORISINAL STRUCTURE EXISTINe ADDITION eARASE APPITION VERnCAL SIDING ON NEW & 2 NEW WINDOWS ADDED O EXISITING ADDITONS WEST WALL BRESTELEVATION LA ~/4.. , SHEET NO: 8B PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 25-0 HEISHT LIMIT TO THE LOPER 1/3 OCIVHOIOO 'NEIdS~ AO dIHSNMQI. CINV AID SELL JOSSÂ¥ 2 ONOI VHVEnIVE[ EAST DORMER TO MATCH EXISTING WEST DORMER IN HEIGHT AND - WIDTH 0 'LOO~ I I _____ I -EE*33*WT-~- u E LJ E c E 00 ---- ---- - ils ET FLOOR I J ........ . 81 ra NORTH ELEVATION 5 2 - U. s r.0. ~ 6 REDUCE WINDOW WIDTH g DORMER C REMOVE EXIST. / SKYLIGHT - ADDIEW DORMER 1 / (SAME SIZE AND HEIGHT 1 4 / 1 AS EXIST ON WEST SIDE) \ 110~ , /.- / / (DIMENS]ONS OF EXIST. WEST / l DORIER TO BE FIELD VERIFIED â‚¬ i ' > DURING DEMOLITION) J 4000 ,49* \ RETAIN pROPOF?PONS j WINDOW SIZES ADJUSTED TO / 1 1 111 1 11 lili EXIST. VENT 111111!;;~ 1 QND FLOOR 6 1 1 --- 4 6 220 FLOOR ELEV. lOg'-5Â»7 -_- - - - 1 1 ~9 ELEV. 1011'.8 9 25#"1 111.03 El El 1 i i, Â¢ff-'blifff '(f al J I 02 1 1,11] ~ 14 -1 n I'lll DATE: 4/2/02 IST FLOOR / -- *- iL-i .....a__ ..........._ 1Â©T FLOOR (FINAL HPC) ELEV. 100'-/ ELEVI//2 OME PROPOSED DORM ERS O GARAGE ADDiT]ON EXIST. RADON VENT AND ADD WINDOWS FOR LIGHT NEW WINDOWS TO BE SIMILAR IN ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WIDTH TO NARROW DOUBLE- HUNGS, BUT SHORTER O M IT AD DED EAST ELEVATION FOR CABINETS BELOW WINDOW D 1/4.- 1'-0 OFFSET GARAGE ADDITON 1-0 TO THE EAST f SHEET NO: 9B PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 30NaGISE[H INVC[ MAIN S n )004. 14EET -8 CITY MONUMENT NORTHEAST CORNER 9'câ€¢ BLOCK 19, HORIZONTAL CONTROL 6 8 FS HSE WALK 29 - DITCH i AD 1 0 0-- i E-- N 75009'1 1 '* I N 75909'llk - / DISTURBED c - N 30.001 - 30 00 Â¥7 25947 10 0 FRONT YARD SETBAL< 0. 0 0 144 144 I - '08(4 / *0 : 0 9.5 2 1 1 1 ISTING 0 am OUSE EXISTIN Z S. , ~ HOUSE u W Q 4% . 0 ' 04 0 Â© 0 67 2 8 & k 0 0 2 0 -0 0 a "Â§; 0 0 31 ADJACENT 2 ADJACENT r * 1 ENCROAC EN, *------ : , 5 2 . , BLDG 0. ./- , --- ~ , HOUSE ~ HOUSE UPPER LEVEL DEMOLITION f -00Â« 0 UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 1 0 a, 7.5 * ~Â·-LELE . DECT I = 1. 5 0 SIDE YARD SETBACK 44,1,1 --,11> 9 1 1 2 UPPER LEVEL DEC< ~ - I I MA N LEVEL APPITION 16. ./:liA 1 1 * 5.0 SIDE YAW SETBACK DECK 4, DECK 17 24 / m Y / 2 -7. 23 4.0 FEOPSED S DE YARD SETBACK I eARAGE LOT 4 |5.QJ REAR YARD SE~BACK 3 PARKING 4,1.[V.C= APPITION PDRK\NG ~ t & 75*09 11-6 B 02 SET 25947 S 75/09'11'2 5.0' PROPOSED SETBACK VARtANGE 30.00 3000. i LEGIBLE RED CAP ILLEGIBLE RED CAP 2 Emi ALLEY BLOCK 25 ALLEY BLOCK 25 . g le: () EXISTING SITE PLAN ~ r--h PROPOSED SITE PLAN O 1 n DATE: DRAWING INDEX 5/\8/02 1 SITE PLANS 2 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 3 EXISTING FLOOR PLANS 4 EXISTINe ROOF PLAN SHEET NO: 5 EXISTING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS e PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS ~ 7 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 8 PROPOSED EXT'ERIOR ELEVATIONS p SITE PLAN q PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CONC 4* OGVHOTIOO 'NE[dSÂ¥ dO SIXTH STREET 80 Â» 8~~\2>ft,1608â‚¬ OF PAVWENT SNOW COVERED 100. ocr - - '101,0 - 13 saw INVC[ (018 39&0 LEGEND AND NOTES O FOUND OR SET SURVEY MONUMENT 4 DESCRIBED A ~~ $ CITY MONUMENT MANHOLE POSTED ADDRESS. -633 a SURVEY CONTROL Ti TLE INFORMATION FURNISHED BY STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN INC. ORDER NO 00029294 DATED NovEMBER 09 200 BEAR I NGS BASED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF BLOCK ] 9 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER BLOCK 31 AS SHOWN (N 75Â·09 11 'Wi SNOW ON PROPERTY AT TIME OF SURVEY 0 0 0 FENCE MAIN S 00 4 r, 2 2 7 CITY MONUMENT NORTHEAST CORNER BLOCK 19 HOR:ZONTAL CONTROL - 1 --*LUE* 1 ------- 03 STURBED 1 4 75Â·09 f W - 1 1 C. if 0, ; SET 25947 1 1%1 / 0 / , 01 1 2 f Â¥ 5 -11 5 CORNER Block 34 1 1 ALUMINIUM CAP NORTHWEST IIi r - i f /~ / HOU S E Tel | ENCROACHMENT HAIT 9 / / h- BLDG O 3 + 1 . ROOF O 8 ./ 4 44 . 4 e. 39* 3 4 c - ....:0/ -- ~ : ~b\~ Â·7.3~ 7~ CERT16#CATIN THE UNDERSIGNED #TATES THIT,THE. PROP~RTY DESCRIBED HEREIN WAS F,ELD SURVEYED DURING 2002 IND 4 3 ACCURATE BASED ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE AS SHOWN. AND THAT THERE ARE NO 1 11 -4_._ 451%6 DISCREPANCIES OF RECORD BOUNDARY LINE CONFLICTS ENCROACHMENTS ASEMENTS OR RIGHTS OF WAY IN FIELD EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME APPURTENANCâ‚¬, ,,Â»1 DOCUMENTS OF RECORD NOT SUPPL 'ED TO THE WITH TH~.*A'At?Â·34:6 Â·42.Â£YoR BELOW 7 /4' -.;'*r--- .----folf-0 ; a,4 7 2.Â· Â· F 4% 1 -1-0 1 164 ExÂ·*woetio s. 3'Â¥W '21.1 - 460 ' 11 -4 / 8 5E- 25947 009 /1.6 ~daa*e~~~ 30.00 1 ILLEGIBLE RED CAP ALLEY BLA~ - 0 UCK 2 3 37/j&/01 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY 0F LOT I BLOCK 25 CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN COUNTY Op PiTKIN STATE OF COLORADO AREA 3 000 S F ./- (0.069 ACRES) C 2. j PREPARED BY - ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, NO JI l r .,Il#.2 ark / EXCEPT AS HEREON SHOWN UNDERGROUND UTIL I Ti ES W] TH No ABOVEGROUND J â€¢ : A Z SURVEYOR &@rÂ·*Cly,% 1% SURVEY IS VOiD UNLESS WET STAMPED -1, 210 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN COLORADO 8011 HOT'CE ACCORDING TO COLORADO LA* YOU MUST COMMENCE ANÂ¥ LEGAL ACT;ON /660 UPON ANY DEFET ON â„¢15 PLAT Wi THIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. 1. NO EVENT .AY ANY ACTION PHONE/=AX (9701 925-38,6 BASED UPON ANY DEFECT;N THIS PLAT BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE OATE ./ THE CERT,FICAT ION ./IN HERE. THE CERTIACATION :5 VOID [F NOT WET STÂ»lpED WITH THE SEAL & THE 102 32001 SU"EYOR D'.XE JOB (<523 4 1 I x it R :'TR fE 7' iPPROX I MATE EDGE OF MINT SNOW COVERED - - *- -# ----- -- - -*- ITCH -- #--- --x* 3 :4Â·50'49Â·w e00 00 -%#---- --_PAVE NOILIGCIV/1*ION3H 1 OaÂ¥%[0100 ' 345Â¥ 30 SNIMaL Â¥ iLD NIV* 93& 8 6- H .< OCIVEIOO 'NE[dSV AO d[HSNMOL (INV AID 2 XEIE[ Â¥ 107 0BLHE6 (OW XVd 49-516 (0Â£@ tf 0 mm oavÂ»0100 NE,EV 133HIS NIVW .ISEIM D m SUIns 'JEAUS 7- HINON EL 8 rf.) 3 E09Â« XOH Ud BIONHG[SHM INVG SHIVIOOSSÂ¥ T DNOl VNVE[HVH m L L /9-1,1 â€ž 9-, b C 1 1 al- 1 1 4 1 7 01 1 - - 91 1~ 0 v-4 1 1 r- 0 1 4 *9 P 1 LE 7 203 1 ~ I ty 1 E 1% 7- - 1~ -Â¥% 4 1 11- - 1 I 0 9 ' D iÂ® EDK Â®- 1 IiI f 11 t U '1 Z 1- :; .i~ :: 1 40 1 T 1 / ~ f ~~<- L~F L 2 0*66 0 1 11_ . 1 I 9 / 0 J . 1 ViEr-1 //i 8 / 1 1 1 81 0 1 1. 1 11 /1 2 ' 2 -1 k 1 __ 3 0 ~ 9----- -1 K 0 1 Â® ~\\\\ 7-4 i EJ i i Â® L _ -_ b.1 L ALLN" 1 ------ ====4 Frtil LIli 0 uâ€¢ 13 1 0 -ILÂ»91 9-19 , 119-1 L ~ 1 1 '&Â«37< ~ -*0'& ' ilir# 4 4 ON 133HS 31Â¥0 HQ/OI' STORA66 STORASE ~~(g STORAeE NV-1,1 100-1=1 hIEMO-1 eNUGIXE ~ OFFICE Vt-leHT Ollvel 11VMEIGG EXIST'ble ADPITION DRISINAL Sâ„¢UCTURE , 1 1 SKYLIGHT /19 0 11 SICALIGHT g 1 2-1 E-1 Kn*T iw |Sle'LIGHT|| -1 skYLISHT SKYL-!GHT . 912 e i 11&3 R ~ i DATE: 3/\-8/02 ~ EXISTING ROOF PLAN SHEET NO: 91 0 44 EXIST ROOF PLAN -i 30NHC[[SE[H .UIVCI OGYNOIOD~~~~M CINV X310 ' UZZIZZE 1 Â£ <gpgW.ij 5 0 4 1 r-- elt**1111_111==:liNS' 1 1 1[Â«19-1.11 m' 1 0 [EallLUI[~ll , [-rÂ« 4 . --th - - 2/ FLOQL 20/60Â£ 1 , __ .._.-_-- - - -..-..- -.--------- ELEV. 10*,a~- ------~~--~----~---=- i " ELEV. lof-8 f=Fe=Â¥1- 7 3 1 11~---Â·4127----Â·---T-ZE]lir--11:r-~Izzz~ __-. ..3 W 9-,K-#t-)I[~~I_~I~Â§~I~21--- ~ -~11--- --- +1 __-LITITIO _u__22___-2---+4 RETÂ«=ty -l=*=r-+ nuzzzu--unnuzuu 13 ~~-~tbuzz~zz-til liik--~------ 11'tmi 1411111'FE 2---r -- - , 1 -4 2- 11 '111 14 - -------- I - ------& Mt----- a--- 91=*Eatz~~ ~_ _ S ~,1 IST FLOOR 6 . Â» -- --/ --------------------------- ----u--------------------- --------------- ---------- ----------------%W.a-M i-.-I--- --- ~ -----/ZI==I=/==.I----~i- IST FLOOR ELEV '00-0Â· 7 91-123-ravÂ¥-7 + --1 rILI-CZI-*Zx-)- (33 SOUTH ELEVATION BREST-ELEMATION g R - 1/411 = j'-Oil 1 1 1 F--- --11 4---6*UI@=42~ 1 1 --1 -1 *423Â«21111 1112222.2. 0 00 ~14===Ill EEEB i j 1 $ 1 [~4 - _ ..6 2140 FLOOR. 1 --------- ~_rpÂ·fÂ»aÂ»=-=IEEPEÂ»*Â»22~*~ --_Â·=-~ ~ m=I=LIZE=7 -1- 1 Â»Â»01 .-- %E31Â«t L - - --~------------ --9-~ --=-Â»- ~11_JII' 9Â«IlÂ«Il~ L==:=Ar-2 - -97 1100111~ 1 ~-Ir,/FLE**F Enu-2-2=222 ZIZE- ----- ------ ----- FOATE: 1 3~16'02 liT FLOOR 6 J ELE*-16-1â„¢- 1Â»Â«-Â»Â»344Â« ~--- -- ----==24 - -Â»22922 1 (-NORIMELEMATION EAST-ELEMATION ~ SHEET NO: - 1/4,1 .1,-0. 15_~ EXISTING ELEVATIONS OaVH01OO 'NadSV AO 2 NJOIE[ V 101 GISE[H IMVC[ =-~ Sa-IVI~ Â¥ DNUI VHVE[MVE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL ADDITION ORLIENAL STRUCTURE , 12'-O 15'-0' 53'4 1 1 11 ir 3 Â«1.19 1 1 STORAIE 77 Â· Â·Â· Â·r Â·/i +I -n. rl I ---.-. -- -v .'. -. -T -- - .~1 'Lizr'!----, r - 1 Ifl || | ~| ---412779 4 22~ 1 *_3 J J 10 3 1 lili 0 Ill 11 1 1 9 1Â«7 -- L 1 111 ~ i -/ 4,\E 1 // L-- | ( i**:U~ M~~ 1 1 11 111 1 0.1 1 T 11 1 1 1 1 F 1 BATH <* " 1 / H '1 1 ' 024 - BEE)ROCOM 2 1 1 41 , 91 1 - 1 1/ ~ h - ~ 11 1 0' MASTER SUITE 11 ' 1 - [/ = , LL-- 0 . ~ 211 1 [Â«5 . 1 1 _ 7- - 1 7--' HALL 1 P lilli - /1 5 1 -J c'.4i -,m--- -- 1 1 1 /111- A /4- W , OPEN TO 1 1 1,11 11[ - Tr i .12 1 11 111- - It==r- --- 2-i~ ./ OFF]ob BELOI 1%,3.3.2123-7:==Ilill- -:":=IT I .. .~i L 11 I lili ~ EXIT. i 0~ LI. 1 : 4.-r.v ~ ST/-2 .i! 1 : 11.-52 f - 113791/ / ,ABOVE :11.11 1 A 1 11 1 1 REMOVE EX;ST SKYLIGHT - ADD i NEW DORMER, & EGRESS ~ WINDOWS AS RgO. <-~ PROPOSED UPPER FLOOR PLAN X EXISTINe ADDITION oveleINAL STRUCTURE %-0 - ADD NEW WINDOWS O EXISTING ADDITION (WIDTH TO BE SIMILAR j TO BEDROOM WINDOW) ~ . .--1.11 lk--11 0---11 It------11 14 -- REMOVE DOORS AS REQUIRED 1 \ FOR THE GARAGE ADDITION. 4 "i /t RECONFIGURE WINDOWS AND EXIST. PATIO -=== FRENCH DOORS TO PATIO AREA '1 1' i i LIVING I 11 / - PAM LY KITCHEN h BEDÂ©Â©MI_ ___~-3 1 /1 - ----- 1 ~1-~ [21] 9 Â»on LI 1 I *=E=*~E--4.I IN 2111 = -- 5 2,@1 - 41 - 2. 2.--~ 779 . - 1- FOYER U ON--4 1 1. . ':Ef '. 1 1 4 1 . 1- 124' . - 11 i Â·~0- 9,e,RAGEf"jl~~0.~. -~.fi}l !!, Â·. I" I,, /1 1 [ in - 11 - / f. . . -,111 1 , t-i- f' i BATH I. L, MA BAR C- I ing . r ' 0 UP DATE: -1,1 ~ ' 11---11 0-3 r h , 5/0/02 ... 1 /---/1 ~D 2 WINDOWS 1 ADD WINDOW SIMILAR U TO WWHAT WAS REMOVED DURING 1997 REMODEL , LOCATION CANNOT BE t THE SAME BECAUSE THE STAIR WAS RECONFIGURED i F'ROPOSED GARASE ADDIT ON , F,POSED FAIL/ ROOM ADDITION 1 . SHEET NO: f '1 6 22'-66" 381-4 41-16' E 2 ' /3 PROPOSED LOPIER FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS 00Â¥HO'IOO 'NE[dSÂ¥ AO d~EN*01 (INV AID ~8% EXISTINS ADDITION ORIGINAL STRUCTURE PROPOSED UPPER LEVEL ADDITION 1 1 /el I 6 0 1 1 11:11111; d 2 EXISTING SKYLISHT 1 1 UN 117 ROD= pECK. _L --1 1Â· le, - 6 g N 43 . .. .13 4 6 1" ---1 id -- 3 8 S m 1! I 11 -- BA W 0 11 1 1 43 1 1 1 lilli lili 1 1 EXISTING EXISTING ~ SCrLIeHT SKÂ¥1.16+4Â·r 4 =@ME el 1~ 11 0:RE ri \1 1 1 a, m Agi42 N54 DORMER ij DATE: 3/\8/02 g-) PROPOSED ROOF PLAN SHEET NO: PROPOSED ROOF PLAN HONFIGISE[H E- C 91- 73 - ' 1/3\ 3 1212 TYP 12:12 TYP. 2 .~ 1/3 F- 1 2\ 1 1/3 'r AL-1 2-- 1. --- 1 --1\~ - ti- %4 =IIâ€ž ) 1 1 ./ Ul il /2. -PufL 'lli ! Il 1 221 Â« f ....1 1,1 ju # 13 } b K 90 / ra==v ~ I I ...11 1.- 5..111< 1.12< / Nll~~~111 J 1 4.-=JI ~ 11 111'r-------4 2NP FLOOR 6 < /NIP FLOOR - --1 Ill_111 r- --4 61 EEVI./14 ' -Â£-i-- M.-&~- , 6 .1/11111:1 !1 i,11 11 1,1 LET -r-Â·,Ilml' IF=f 1/1=r 'li lifill 'i ' Ir-IJ lilli' i UNE OF c #Â·*, i,r iÂ·9;Mt-Â·~ -~~~~; c-11'AL|~ ~~~,~~11:@1~~!!Ii ~ @A I , PATIO '- 1 FENCE 1 0 1|1 'bilm 1,1.41 lilli 8 2: ..Â·i.Â· ,,21-4 1 1 1.1 1 lilli 41$'1-UÂ».~ % It$~g 1!1~1$10&*Â· I 1 O,il~ :11 lt,i:,1. .1,12 4 ~~| , 1 1- 11 ~ 1*LE16225_._.L- _ -_- - 6 - _ - Â«1 -WEE 4 -- 4 ,pli 44411111'14Tli Â·'| 1:p :1 ||1 Â·f 1 11 41 11,p Ir.,7.~:'.i~.i.~ lilli }i I hildy ~ 114 ELEV leoÂ·-01 (h SOUTH ELEVATION W HEIGHT LIMITS 4 KINPOR-DOOR CONFISURATION OFF SOUTH PATIO A-SQUIERLEMATION 94'*1-0' - 1/4â€ž IlL-0 F-- //411'11~1}\ ~ ADD 1 DOUBLE-HUNG i 02 11 1 A \.Â»~ -43=unnalhx Â»2141:~~~-aUTIO~ w,voow To w) A EXISTING 4*DICÂ» 1 TEDLE W W li - 1*Ulult' 1 4 412 - ~1~ MAINTAIN EXIST. ROOF UNE Le I *Â»4 Â·0~~j~~Â£. 4 '~ - 2~22222222222ZZ2IZIZZL22ZZILILLZZIZZLIZLIZELLI.ZEZZILI~LULLEZZINIZZZrZEZZ27---- 1 ___________-_-_--_-____ --4- ------P-----------6 -I- & 2NLD /LOOR 9 ELEV. loque --'~-~-I----~1- Il ~<~ .= 1 9 DATE: 3/\8/02 [ST FLOOR 6 3 . IST FLOOR EMU--20-I'-- ~ = - i/3 EEÂ£9336-3 Â· EXIST. METER LOCATION ORIeINAL STRUCTURE EXIISTING ADDITION -~- - ----__2flief ApDiliON 1 1 OMIT PROPOSED DORMERS @ GARAGE ADDION < VERTICAL SIDING ON NEW & 2 NEW W:NDOWS ADDED @ AND ADD WINDOWS FOR LiGHT WEST WALL- - 1/4' . |-0' 1 SHEET NO: PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 25-0 HERDHT L IMIT TO THE LOYNER 1/3 OGVH(7100 'NadSÂ¥ 30 /416.El $4Â©901#M&**Lat//34 ~g,f~*~Â¢4444% 14 U-lim .Ill r .16, 1 El' I ~| 4 ~-7-7 1 2 KE *&+ 1 1 .10 TL r L.1 17- T 2//FLOOR . ELEEBEE--r- * -0 9 W 92Â« -&If~eE__Â£_~_- ___ __ _ ELEV \00'-Oll h - ra NORTH ELEVATION Â»9\ 1 ,0.~Ii --1 1 &174 ~ SKYLIGHT - ADD B EMOVE EXIST J llE NEW DORMER /7/ 1~ -111-,-1-l.LLL[1133\â€ž 1 ~ /ki|1=:~' L[~ ~AFE~Ss - 1 31 -11'F -1 - 1 :lil 11 1 IIi lili "111 1. Eli-Ill-lili Â· XI/- .7: -- 1 22.21-__unm~-___1__11-1111zIL-L_-_mÂ»*~----_i --- -|- ---- ----------------2.------- -- ------ - - ----- ELEV Of 4 -2712- - L FLA DATE: 2&5'92/-~------- 1*LAggE ELEV. ID/'4 OMIT PROPOSED DORMERS O GARAGE ADDITION AND ADD WiNDOWS FOR LIGHT NEW WINDOWS TO BE SIMILAR IN ORISINAL STRUCTURE WIDTH TO NARROW DOUBLE- 1__-__~ _~-1 EAST ELEVATION ~g'G~4B~N~:SS~~~~R ADD WINDOW SIMILAR TO ONE REMOVED IN 1997 REMODEL 1/4â€ž . 11-0. [-SHEETNO: OFFSET GARAGE ADDIT ON 1-0 TO THE EAST 191 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 30 OCIVHO[00 'NE[dSV I I.=7 f *Mi|STOR 123 :,21'5-3#&,11&1@ 1,11'RAIR/1111Â«1'71110 MEETING DATE: +I'24~ov NAME OF PROJECT: 2 251 Uu/. Ra,\\ a.l.,0'. CLERK: STAFF: WITNESSES: (1) pbl-6 Vicpoi i (2) (3) (4) (5) EXHIBITS: 1 Staff Report C ) (Check If Applicable) 2 Affidavit of Notice C ) (Check If Applicable) 3 Board Criteria Sheet C ) (Check If Applicable) 4 (_044â‚¬v -tvow, 431Â©t ve + Dect â‚¬'hi:#d: 5 MOTION: .Al'*40 vego -4 966 *04-- 00' bu lÂ»l~r' 4* 6Â£02Â»1 (190Jj, 400(,l 6 r '/0Â£00~ a/JU Ouevt, LS 8.20{44 l.t/10 wl'~rot'. VOTE: YES Q NO Q J JEFFREY HALFERTY YES ,~ NO NEILL HIRST YES 4 NO GILBERT SANCHEZ YES V NO MIKE HOFFMAN YES NO -1 -*- RALLY DUPPS YES NO PAUL D'AMATO YES V NO TERESA MELVILLE YES ~ NO SUZANNAH REID YES V NO MELANIE ROSCHKO YES NO HPCVOTE .. EXHIBIT- N ~-1 U 0-44 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OFPROPERTY: GA 23 \k) 1-lolita,M -94- , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC H.EARING DATE: Accri\ 2 4 , 2001 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) I, Pe;1-6~'- P\t~SpOH (name, please print) being or representing an Applicantlto the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) o f the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: "9~ Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official / - paper or a paper of general circulationCEthEâ‚¬ity of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. Af<WyÂ·ofthe*ublication is attached hereto. H *f Â»C22â‚¬\ '6' 4 Â¥ Posting of notice: By posting ofÂ·notice:Flifdh fdrmt-was obtained from the ' Community Development DepaRrif&('*fU3Ajgs r#ade of suitable, waterproo f materials, which was noT#~s4jh5/21Â£y-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, ard!44{Rt&9~;dmposed of letters not . less than one inch in height. Sid notice was posted at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the ~ day of hr,vi\ , 200-1 to and including the date and time of the public hearir?g. A photograph Of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. ~l Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class, postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application, and, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to any federal agency, state, county, municipal government, school, service district or other governmental or quasi-governmental agency that owns property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses o f property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use ~ regulation, or otherwise, tile requirement of an accurate survey map or other s,ifficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map has been available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. ELÂ« lk- Â·D r.& 1 S ignature i The ibregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledeed before me this *tiday of (3" LIt, , 2OQk, by FUe- Â·Rls,0 1 1 (J #474. .4(fa':L 12< -~011 MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL a 4 t'~~~ssioi, expires: 43/ A.3 ~otary Public ATTACHMENTS: COPY OF THE PUBLICATION PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED B Y MAIL SCHLOFFER BRUNHILDE P SIRKIN ALICIA SMART PAMELA PO BOX 941 3500 S BAYHOMES DR 1040 W CONWAY DR ASPEN CO 81612 MIAMI FL 33133 ATLANTA GA 30305 STILWELL REED & CLAIRE TEAGUE LEWIS TRUST TITUS JOHN & JOAN REVOCABLE TRUS1 191 UNIVERSITY BLVD #714 862 NORTH BEVERLY GLEN BLVD 3025 BRYN MAWR VER CO 80206 LOS ANGELES CA 90077 DALLAS TX 75225 UHL MARGARETE A WE[SE RICHARD H Â· WHYTE RUTH PO BOX 122 5451 N E RIVER RD #503 ' - PO BOX 202 ASPEN CO 81612 CHICAGO IL 60656 ASPEN CO 81612 BENNINGHOFF ESTHER ICHARD CORBETT BARKER CARRYN ADRIANNA TRUST 1 /2 N WEST SHORE BLVD STE 110 INT 233 W HALLAM AVE PA FL 33607-5749 PO BOX 7943 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 BLEVINS J RONALD & PHYLLIS M C CREEK PROPERTIES MGMT LP CITY OF ASPEN 20320 FAIRWAY OAKS DR #353 1717 MAIN ST STE 5200 130 S GALENA ST BOCA RATON FL 33434 DALLAS TX 75201 ASPEN CO 8161[ CONNOR F HAYDEN COOPER JOHN T COX CAROLYN M 444 GRAPE ST P O BOX 1747 961 PASEO DEL SUR DENVER CO 80220 SPRINGFIELD MO 65802 SANTA FE NM 87501 DE WOLF NICHOLAS DEVOS ESTHER LEONARD DOBBS JOHN C & SARA F 233 W BLEEKER ST PO BOX 3238 PO BOX 241750 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81612 MEMPHIS TN 38124 EPPLER KLAUS TRUSTEE PROSKAUER ROSE GOETZ & FIRESTEIN CHESTER & BEVERLY FISCHER SISTIE MENDELSHON C/O 9777 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 501 442 W BLEEKER GLADES RD #340 W BEVERLY HILLS CA 90212 ASPEN CO 8161 1 RATON FL 33431 FRIEDBERG BARRY S GALLANT MARILYN JANSS MARY 1992 REVOCABLE LIVING 555 PARK AVE 7W 617 VINE ST STE 1430 TRUST NEW YORK NY 10021 CINCINNATI OH 45202 403 W HALLAM ASPEN CO 81611 JONES STEPHEN MARTIN TRUST IV 500 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HWY N KINNEY STEPHEN J & SUSAN M KOUTSOUBOS TED A P O BOX 330010 415 E HYMAN AVE #206 BLD 6 STE 125 AUSTIN TX 78746 MiAMI FL 33233 ASPEN CO 81611 MCANIFF RICHARD J C/O KATHY KUNZ MYERS JOSEPH V JR NATHAN REVOCABLE TRUST 421 W HALLAM ST 718 N LINDEN DR 777 108TH AVE NE SUITE 2000 ASPEN CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210 BELLEVUE WA 98004-5118 PATRICK JAMES K POTVIN SALLY ALLEN RH ASPEN LLC 417 W HALLAM ST 320 W BLEEKER ST 323 W FRANCIS ST ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 ASPEN CO 81611 RICHTER SAM 50% INT RISPOLI PETER SAX JOEL D 7874 AFTON VILLA CT 323 W HALLAM ST 303 W FRANCIS ST BOCA RATON FL 33433 ASPEN CO 81611 A e D[27.1 0/1 01/1. PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 323 W. HALLAM MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW (CONCEPTUAL) AND VARIANCES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 24,2002 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, City Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by Peter Rispoli and Donna Dilanni requesting Major Development Review (Conceptual) for the property located at 323 W. Hallam St. The property is legally described as Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen. The project requires the following variances: a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid. Chair Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on April 6,2002 City of Aspen Account 04/24/2002 15:23 3032965969 STUDIO PAGE 02 â‚¬46, y g 23. April, 2002 Sulannah Retd 412 N Mill Aspen, CO 80611 RE: Proposed addition & variance requests, 323 W Hallam; phone conversation today w/ S. Reid Dear Ms Reid, Thanks for your time on the phone today. We appreciate your responsiveness, especially given the last- minute nature of our communications. Per our previous conversation and our letter to Amy Guthrie, we would like to put down our thoughts for the record concerning the above referenced property, as we will not be able to attend the hearing tonite. As we noted in the letter to Ms. Guthrie, we have only recently become aware of the proposed addition and our ability to participate in Aspen's review process, so we are currently unable to offer any informed of studied comments concerning the proposed addition. We would, however, like to express out thoughts about our potential concerns. Our comments, were we to have any, would revolve around wanting to understand the impact of the proposed addition, and the FAR increase variance, on the property we own to the north (327 Hallam) with regard to 5un and views. Would we be able to respectfully request that some section studies be made at winter and summer sol- stice showing the shadow Cast from the new adddition as part of the ongoing review process, or to re- quest that the board consider this to be part of the criteria for ongoing review and consideration? If the addition were found to have minimal impact on the sunlight to, and/or views from, the yard of 327 Hallam, it Is unlikely that we would have any objections to the requested FAR or setback variance. Thanks again for your time. Please feel free to call if you have any questions or other thoughts concern- ing this letter. Sincerely, 1, Claire and Reed Stilwell 327 W Hallam (mail: 191 University BL #714 Denver, CO 80206) 303-333-3863 (Claire) 303-717-9078 (Reed) 04/24/2002 11:56 3032965969 STUDIO PAGE 03 â‚¬463â‚¬I 23. April, 2002 Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer 0 + 40# 5 AA**6V E City of Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department 130 S Galena $4'15 k i d,/(64aul Fl Aspen, CO 80611 0*litfu f 2, v\Q+ RE: Proposed addition & varlance requests, 323 W Hallam * f AR . t Dear Ms Guthrie, We have recently received (on the 15th of April) the notice in the mail postmarked 9. April, 2002 (attached). Fred Jarman of your office was able to send us a copy of your memorandum dated 24. April, 2002, and we do have a few questions. I hope to be able to speak with you about them today, but I am faxing you in case we are unable to speak to each other directly. Neither I nor my husband will be able to make it up to Aspen for the hearing tomorrow, so we hope that this correspondence and telephone call Will be sufficient. A. FAR increase: 1. Does the request for an FAR increase imply a increase in the allowable bulk limit? < 2. Indeed, does the notion of a 'bulk limit' exist in the Aspen code, or is this obviated by height and other form limitations? 3. If so, what are these provisions and how have they been addressed herel Â«___~ 8. What provisions currently exist in the code and the design review process to analyze and/or prevent the obstruction of sun and/or views from adjacent properties? 1. Has this been studied and presented? 2. If not, must we request one in order to have it performed or is thus a normal subsequent step In the review process? 3. If we have concerns, what are our options? C. Design review process status: 1. At what stage are we in the process? What are the next steps? Are there other hearings or meetings scheduled that we should Plan to 4ttend? 2. Is this hearing our last moment of recourse, should we have concerns about the proposed addition? 3. Are there further opportunities in the process for ongoing review and comment? Thanks for your time. I hope to speak with you soon. 2t* L A M a... ,â€ž,well 327 W Hallam (mail: 191 University BL #714 Denver, CO 80206) 303-333-3863 (Claire's telephone) cc: Suzanna Reid, Chair, AHPC *IE 42 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 323 W. Hallam Street- Conceptual Development, Variances, Partial Demolition- Public Hearing DATE: April 24,2002 SUMMARY: The project involves restoration of a front window on this historic house, alterations to a non-historic addition, and construction of a new addition at the rear of the site. APPLICANT: Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni, owners. PARCEL ID: 2735-124-34-002. ADDRESS: 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado. ZONING: R-6 (Medium Density Residential). SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site covered by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 A floor area bonus will only be awarded to projects which in the opinion of the HPC make an "outstanding preservation ejfort." Examples to be considered would include the retention of historic outbuildings or the creation of breezeway or connector elements between the historic resource and new construction. Lots which are larger than 9,000 square feet and properties which receive approval for a "historic landmark lot split" may also be considered for the bonus. th Staff Finding: HPC held a worksession on this project on March 14 . The applicant was given direction to restudy the height of the new addition and the connector pieces between it and the historic house. These changes have been made for conceptual review. This project does not involve any changes directly to the historic house except for the restoration of the original double hung windows under the front porch. Currently, a non- historic horizontal leaded glass window is in place. The owner plans to do limited demolition of drywall to locate the original framed openings and install the correct window. This is being proposed as part of the basis for a floor area bonus. This is consistent with the following design guideline: 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. At the back of the historic house is an addition that was built in 1967. The owner plans to demolish a carport and otherwise modify this piece somewhat to make it into the connector to the new addition. At the rear of the site is proposed new living space. It is relatively simple in character, uses a low plate height on the second floor, and is no taller than the historic resource. Staff finds that the addition meets the design guidelines in terms of mass, scale, and placement on the lot, the issues that are pertinent to conceptual review. Final review will include some discussion about increasing the distinction between new and old through the selection of materials and details, but overall the project appears to be successful. The guidelines that are relevant to additions like this one are: 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. 2 o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. 3 OO o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. The board should discuss whether they feel it is important for this project to comply with standard 8.3: 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This guideline is primarily aimed at avoiding attaching a historic outbuilding to a primary structure. The board may find that it is beneficial to create new detached garages in order to break up the overall mass of a house. The "Residential Design Standards" require that of all new residences. Staff believes that in this case, connectors have been used to create three distinct volumes in the project already and that the intent ofthe guideline is met. The project requires the following variances: a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. Staff finds that these bonuses are appropriate. Setback variances are helpful in achieving the best site plan for the historic resource. The floor area bonus is justified by the restoration effort being undertaken on the front of the house and the good design, which involves the owner sacrificing height on the upper level for the benefit ofthe original house. Staff finds that this review standard is met. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development, and Staff Finding: There are two historic buildings across the street from this one. All are two story buildings and, due to their size, can accommodate larger additions with less negative impacts than is often the case with the miner's cottages. Staff finds that this review standard is met. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed fordevelopmentoronadjacentparcels, and Staff Finding: The historic significance of the home, which was built in 1889, will not be affected by this addition. The owner has done a good deal of research into its construction, which is included in the application. Staff finds that this standard is met. 4 d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Staff Finding: The only work that will directly affect the historic resource is restorative in nature. As discussed above, staff finds that the addition has been sensitively designed and will not detract from the architectural character and integrity of the house. Staff finds that this standard is met. PARTIAL DEMOLITION No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: A. The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. Staff Finding: The areas proposed to be demolished are recent construction and there are no issues with their demolition. Staff finds that this standard is met. B. The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: (1) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and (2) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure. Staff Finding: The project is appropriate, as discussed above. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval including a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location ofthe historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section of the proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. RECOMMENDED MOTION "I move to approve Resolution # , Series of 2002, granting conceptual approval, partial demolition, and variances for 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite ofAspen, Colorado." 5 Exhibits: Resolution # , Series of 2002 A. Staffmemo dated April 24,2002 B. Design Guidelines relevant to this project at the conceptual level C. Application 6 Relevant Design Guidelines- Conceptual Review, 323 W. Hallam 3.6 Preserve the size and proportion of a historic window opening. o Reducing an original opening to accommodate a smaller window or increasing it to receive a larger window is inappropriate. o Consider reopening and restoring an original window opening where altered. 7.3 Minimize the visual impacts of skylights and other rooftop devices. o Flat skylights that are flush with the roof plane may be considered only in an obscure location on a historic structure. Locating a skylight or a solar panel on a front roof plane is not allowed. o A skylight or solar panel should not interrupt the plane of a historic roof. It should be positioned below the ridgeline. 8.3 Avoid attaching a garage or carport to the primary structure. o Traditionally, a garage was sited as a separate structure at the rear of the lot; this pattern should be maintained. Any proposal to attach an accessory structure is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. 9.7 A lightwell may be used to permit light into below-grade living space. o In general, a lightwell is prohibited on a wall that faces a street (per the Residential Design Standards). o The size of a lightwell should be minimized. o A lightwell that is used as a walkout space may be used only in limited situations and will be considered on a case-by-case basis. If a walkout space is feasible, it should be surrounded by a simple fence or rail. 10.2 A more recent addition that is not historically significant may be removed. 10.3 Design a new addition such that one's ability to interpret the historic character of the primary building is maintained. o A new addition that creates an appearance inconsistent with the historic character of the primary building is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an earlier period than that of the primary building also is inappropriate. o An addition that seeks to imply an inaccurate variation of the primary building's historic style should be avoided. o An addition that covers historically significant features is inappropriate. 10.4 Design a new addition to be recognized as a product of its own time. o An addition should be made distinguishable from the historic building, while also remaining visually compatible with these earlier features. o A change in setbacks of the addition from the historic building, a subtle change in material or a differentiation between historic, and more current styles are all techniques that may be considered to help define a change from old to new construction. 7 10.6 Design an addition to be compatible in size and scale with the main building. o An addition that is lower than or similar to the height of the primary building is preferred. 10.7 If it is necessary to design an addition that is taller than a historic building, set it back substantially from significant facades and use a "connector" to link it to the historic building. o A 1-story connector is preferred. o The connector should be a minimum of 10 feet long between the addition and the primary building. o The connector also should be proportional to the primary building. 10.8 Place an addition at the rear of a building or set it back from the front to minimize the visual impact on the historic structure and to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. o Locating an addition at the front of a structure is inappropriate. o Additional floor area may also be located under the building in a basement which will not alter the exterior mass of a building. o Set back an addition from primary facades in order to allow the original proportions and character to remain prominent. A minimum setback of 10 feet on primary structures is recommended. 10.9 Roof forms should be similar to those of the historic building. Typically, gable, hip and shed roofs are appropriate. Flat roofs are generally inappropriate for additions on residential structures with sloped roofs. 10.10 Design an addition to a historic structure such that it will not destroy or obscure historically important architectural features. o For example, loss or alteration of architectural details, cornices and eavelines should be avoided. 10.14 The roof form and slope of a new addition should be in character with the historic building. o If the roof of the historic building is symmetrically proportioned, the roof of the addition should be similar. o Eave lines on the addition should be similar to those of the historic building or structure. 8 0O RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT, PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND VARIANCES FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 323 W. HALLAM STREET, LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 2002 Parcel ID #: 2735-124-34-002 WHEREAS, the applicants, Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni, have requested Conceptual Development, Partial Demolition, and Variances approval for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite ofAspen; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, No approval for partial demolition shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds all of the following standards are met: 1. Standard: The partial demolition is required for the renovation, restoration or rehabilitation of the structure, or the structure does not contribute to the historic significance of the parcel. 2. Standard: The applicant has mitigated, to the greatest extent possible: a) Impacts on the historic significance of the structure or structures located on the parcel by limiting demolition of original or significant features and additions, and b) Impacts on the architectural character or integrity of the structure or structures located on the parcel by designing new additions that are compatible in mass and scale with the historic structure; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated April 24,2002 performed an analysis of the application based on the standards and the "City of Aspen Historic Preservation Design Guidelines," and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, at a regular meeting held on April 24, 2002 the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards and the design guidelines, and approved the application with a vote of_ to _. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the HPC approves conceptual development, partial demolition and variances for the property located at 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D and E, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen including a 12 foot combined front and rear yard setback variance, a 3.2 foot west sideyard setback variance for the existing location of the historic house, a 2.25 foot west sideyard setback variance for a small section ofthe proposed addition, and a 405 square foot FAR bonus. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 24th day of April, 2002. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chair ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name 39.3 'Al. Ral\Am *HY,et- Ar,Jet,+AM 2. Project location 9 13 \N. Wa lia ovs 3 29*=%-, As pen, CO Lots D anc{ E, 8 lo~K 41 (indicate street address, lot and block number or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning R-6 4. Lot size 604 100 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number Peter Â¥Iispal; a Ad Denna O;:Caâ€žni - 3518 4â‚¬94Â» Mallarn C.lk, As fem 05 â‚¬1614 5 44 694-7 H. 9 49 -9*11 t 6. Representative's name, address, and phone number 9/14 7. Type of application (check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA ~< Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA Final HPC 8040 Greenline Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC Subdivision TexUMap Amend. Historic Landmark GMQS allotment GMQS exemption >< Derno(NEi259ERi> View Plane Condominiumization Desig,i-Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate lqÂ· ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) I /1. S+09 = - Be.treovns 1- ba:thâ‚¬ 1711 s~f-t 9. Description of development application;A':W lum- car- 6,ar=1â€¢ m-traain <taran e, k:it.han/raini Â¥ d.aa ln.f' A Ke.1,~ b..4-1., clos;243- Wis:eman* -For s-be.Ca~a, 4-82â€¢l-0-4 a.9,H,s an.1 . r Ie. roow, _ 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4 Attachment 1- Land use application form 4 Attachment 2- Dimensional requirements form , Response to Attachment 3 Response to Attachments~ and 5 J ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Applicant: Pote f R,-Gpal I Address: -3 1 3 West 1-1 all .1 w, S t, AE ipen 00 8011 Zone district: R-6 Lot size: 609 100 Existing FAR: 1721 Allowable FAR: 3' 140 Proposed FAR: 30 645 Existing net leasable (commetcial): n" Proposed net leasable (commercial): :111 Existing % of site coverage: 2 3 54 f 1900 0.,:t,9 Proposed % of site coverage: ' 67% f 4,414 sÂ¥f 1 j Existing % of open space: Proposed % of open space: 6651 Existing maximum height: Principal blda: 24'- 9 Accesorv bida: w â€¢, Proposed max. height: Principal blda: 04'-D" Accessory blda: N.K Proposed % of demolition: Mi storic-0% 20/yovt Onli Existing number of bedrooms: 1 Proposed number of bedrooms: 5 Existing on-site parking spaces: 1 On-site parking spaces required: 1 Setbacks Existing: Minimum required: Proposed: rt Front: \3.05' Front: io' Front: '3.05 5 Rear: 33.0 b Rear: 9' Rear: s. Combined Combined Combined N,+5. Front/rear:_lihia51 Front/rear: 30' Front/rear: 18.05 \N Side: 1.2 Side: 5' E Side: 5. E Side: 26.DO ' Side: 1,0, Side: I n. Combined Combined Combined Sides: 977. g Sides: f 5 Sides: \5 Existing nonconformities or encroachments: Exist t ng En).f 00.24Â¥,tr,At e u+ 6'h"lf'y - AZIAA-con wit' eanâ‚¬,,r Â·Â·. 4 4' sc-4 64(K -cle..0 04 covt,0, 4 Witi 1 sson e nerockEY.,4 Variations requested: Front, Reor * 9,1, '1Â·-f loACks FA R 2604Â·,c :405- ~ fÂ·* (HPC has the ability to vary the following requirements: setbacks, distance between buildings, FAR bonus of up to 500 sq.ft., site coverage variance up to 5%, height variations under the cottage infill program, parking waivers for residential uses in the R-6, R-15, RMF, CC, and O zone districts) HPC General Submission Requirement #1 Applicant Info Peter Rispoli Donna DiIanni 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Tel. 970-544-6947 Fax. 970-544-6961 HPC General Submission Requirement #2 Location of Development 323 West Hallam Street Lots D and E, Block 43 Aspen, CO PCT 14542C3 HPC General Submission Requirement # 3 Disclosure of Ownership rL 1 1414ZLJ PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. P.O. BOX 1417 23286 HIGHWAY 82 SUITE 22 BASALT, CO~17 970-927-4993 1 970-927-4096 FAX JANUARY 13, 2000 PETER RISPOLI AND DONNA DI IANNI 323 WEST HALLAM STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 RE: LOTS D AND E, BLOCK 43, ASPEN PCT14542C3 Pitkin County Title, Inc. is pleased to provide you with the owners policy relative to the above mentioned file. : review the policy in its entirety. We at Pitkin County Title, line. believe in providing you, our customer, with a quality suct which will serve your needs. In the event you do find a discrepancy, or if you have any questions or comments regarding your final policy, please contact us and we will gladly handle any request you may have as efficiently and quickly as possible. We have assigned the above number to your records to assure prompt processing of future title orders involving the property. If you sell or obtain a loan on this property within 5 years, ask your broker or agent to contact our office to ensure re-issue rates which may be available to you. Thank you very much for giving Pitkin County Title, Inc. the opportunity to serve you. Sincerely, , r j:' P ,/ALLÂ· Rdlynne VanBuren ENCS: COPY OF TAX CERTIFICATE FOR QUESTIONS ON YOUR FINAL TITLE POLICY, PLEASE CONTACT ROILYNNE VANBUREN AT THE ABOVE NUMBER TO PLACE NEW ORDERS FOR A SALE OR RE-FINANCE. PLEASE CONTACT KIM SHULTZ AT THE ABOVE NUMBER. 09 Current Map % %14 1, % 4 HPC General Submission Requirement ~ # 4 Vicinity Map r I 'l ... Gillespie St , Ms,4- . 1,40. St ; CO 04 St . 8 1 L % k W.4.8, 84â€¢40,& rt\4:z4 . 0 0 510 E MAIN ST : I. t E*48, . CO Â¥' 0 E f j - CO 00 woeen m : 0 b -PER.1/ k ~44 ' It. X / ~.0~YRIGHTâ€¢f--1085ETAKINC '~ ~82 9* 3Â»' 9 4 Meadows Rd N 501 St i 'C..:...%- Castl, C-k nr u uellet al OUUillibbluil r\equitclitclii # 5 Site Plan - - Hallam Street , I--- 1 1 3 Old Cottonwood Trees \ 3 (City of Aspen) 0 / /1 - i: p L --/ ------ ---- . - 0 fIL .L T' 11 It i 1 L u i 1 1 PORCH - i41 1 1 1 1 1 01 Existing ' 1 MrÂ·- 1 3 1 - House LE=L | - 0, i c====~LJ , U 1 \ 1 Mature Apple Tree 1--- i l. 11 11'j L 0 -2 \ 1 1 - 11 1 1 tb _ B 11 1 11 11 11 j bl i i 3 . | 31 -1 1 ADDITION I Addition 111 1 H 'i Mud 1' Room 'i 1, 1 3 r IL==- " C== -4 , 1 1 4 , GARAGE ' j -- Alley * .1 HPC General Submission Requirement # 7 Written Description of Proposed Addition: 11,4 story addition with full basement below addition. Basement Rec. room, 2 bedrooms, 2 baths, laundry, utility and storage. First Floor Kitchen/Family area, mudroom, 2-car garage. Second Floor 1 bedroom, bath, closets FAR Calculations: Existing House: I st Floor 833 889 206 Floor Total Existing House 1,722 sq. ft. Addition: 1st Floor 711 952 2Â°d Floor 125 Garage (>250) Garage (>500) 9 Basement* 126 Total Addition 1,923 sq. ft. Total Proposed 3,645 sq. ft. Total Allowed 3.240 sq. ft. Bonus FAR required: 405 sq. ft. (* Exposed wall \ Total Wall x Total Floor = Basement Total Sq. Ft.) Description: The proposed additions design is sensitive to the original homes architectural character and scale. Careful consideration was given not to overpower the existing home with an addition. Plate heights have been held to 3 feet on the second floor which will compliment the size, scale and massing of the original home. Gables match the existing homes rooflines and width. Dormers, also appropriately scaled, have been utilized where headroom is required. The footprint of the addition will yield rectangular modules and intersecting gables that are visually compatible. The addition has been located entirely to the rear of the lot to minimize any visual competition with the existing house. A connector has been incorporated into the design and it's size and scale should visually separate the existing home from the addition. HPC General Submission Requirement # 8 Additional Materials, Documentation or Reports History of Ownership 323 West Hallam Street Records indicate the following: 05/09/85 H.C. Gilbert to D.E. Frantz 10/07/87 D.E. Frantz to J.B. Wheeler & Co. (Log Cabin on lot IE) 05/17/89 Town of Aspen to Edward Gray 03/06/90 Edward Gray to D.M. VanHovenberg 05/-/97 J.B. Wheeler & Co. to Herbert L. McNair 10/09/97 Herbert L MeNair to Sarah L. Lowary 08/28/64 Francis Lawary to Mary E Griffith 11/02/65 Mary E Griffith to Peter Vought 12/14/73 Peter Vought to Tom & Sharon Prior /-/95 Tom & Sharon Prior to James Denkins 12/20/99 James Denkins to Peter Rispoli & Donna Dilanni HISTORICAL RESEARCH FOR: 323 West Hallam Street Aspen, Colorado Historically Significant Owners of Record D.EFranz J.B.Wheeler & Co. D.M. VanHoevenberg The Aspen Directoo from the 1880's and 1890's was very helpful in piecing together 323 West Hallam's history. Unfortunately the archives at the Historical Society contain only directories for the years 1885,1889,1892,1893. While the City of Aspen's records of property transactions clearly indicate the owners name during those years it is The Aspen Directory that lists the person name who actually lives in the home. "The Aspen Directory" in 1885 Onaugural edition) listed: "Gilbert, Cliff miner, Hallam, between 2nd & 3'd " It appears that Cliff Gilbert, the miner, built a smalllog cabin on lot E. Cliff Gilbert sold the cabin to D.E. Franz who is not listed in The Aspen Directory for any ofthe years available. It is well known that D.E. Franz owned a local sawmill and constructed many houses in the neighborhood. In any case, Franz sold the cabin and the lots (ABDE) 2 M years later to J.B. Wheeler and Co. Wheeler then sold 1 1/2 years later in May 1889 to "Edward Gray." 323 W. Hallam was built in 1889. An Aspen Daily Times newspaper was found in the recess of a wall dated August 1889. My guess is the home was completed in October 1889 in a very "hot" sellers real estate market. Since The Aspen Directory from 1890 is not available it is uncertain whether Edward Gray lived in the house or if he just built the house and sold it 10 months later on March 6, 1890 to D.M. VanHoevenberg. Four years before 323 W. Hallam was built, D.M. VanHoevenberg was working as the "cashier" for JR Wheeler & Co., Bankers (see attached ad - Aspen Daily Times: Sept. 12,1885). The Directory lists: r. 232 East Hallam. Alsointhe 1885 Directory is: VanHovenberg M. Mrs., r. 232 East Hallam. IthirkMrs.M.NanRoevenbergisD.M..'s mother and they shared the house. By 1889 the Directory listed: FanHoevenberg Mrs. M., (M. VanHoevenberg & Co.) "The Corner Drug Store, " Corner of Mill & Hyman. In 1889, as Aspen's growth was in full swing, J.B. Wheeler ran an ad in the Aspen Directory: "1B. Wheeler & Co., Bankers, Established in 18837 Further stating " The Oldest Bank House in Colorado - D.M. Vanhoevenberg, Cashier, H.T. Tissington - Assistant Cashier and Fred Adams- paying teller. " Obviously things were going well for J.B. Wheeler in those heady days. D.M. VanHoevenberg was also doing rather well since he now had two assistants: H.T. Tissington and Fred Adams. D.M. VanHoevenberg purchased 323 West Hallam St from Edward Gray. In 1892, however, The Aspen Directory listed: Brown C Leonard mining engineer, rooms 5 and 6 Brown and Cowenhoven Block, r. 323 West Hallam St. It seems likely that D.M. Vanhoevenberg never occupied the house and it may have been strictly an investment property. The 1892 Directory continues to list D.M.'s residence as 232 East Hallam. By this time he had left J.B. Wheeler and The Aspen Directory lists him as: VanHovenberg D.M., Proprietor, "The Corner Drug Store.," 400 E. Hyman. R. 232 East HaUam. Mrs. M. VanHovenberg was listed simply: FanHovenberg Mrs. M, r. 232 East Hallam. Upon his departure from the bank, subsequent ads run in the Aspen Daily Times show that H.T. Tissington got the nod to become "Head Cashier" for J.B. Wheeler. As Aspen crashed with the Sherman Act D.M. VanHoevenberg held onto 323 West Hallam Street. C. Leonard Brown lived in the House through at least 1893 or 1894. Again, The Aspen Directory was not published after 1893. Eventually, in 1897 D.M. VanHoevenberg sold the property back to his long-time friend and employer J.B. Wheeler. It's possible, D.M. VanHovenberg may have died in 1897 and upon his death, left his affairs to Jerome Wheeler to take care. Wheeler "Assigned the Deed" to Herbert L. McNair. H.L. MeNair was listed in the business section of the Directory under "Attorneys." Records show 5 months later Herbert L MeNair (QCD) to Sarah L. Lowary. The Lowary family occupied the house for the next 67 years until 1964. I was able to find Sarah L. (Louise) Lowary's daughter Eloise (Lowary) Ilgen who resides in Carbondale. Elloise was born in the house at 323 West Hallam in 1926. Her mother, was also born in the house, in 1897. Ellouise Ilgen was able to provide me with some interesting insights into the house. Most notable and at the same time unfortunate was her recollection of a fire in the house around 1958 or so. The fire started upstairs when an "oil heater" spilled and ignited. The unfortunate aspect of the fire is that all her family photographs were lost. I was hoping she might be able to provide some sort ofphoto documentation of the house from earlier times and specifically the Street Elevation. . Francis Lowary sold to Mary Griffith is 1964 and she in turn sold to Peter Vought in 1967. According to neighbors and Eloise Ilgen it was Peter Vought that made some of the more significant changes to the house. Vought added the eight-sided "tower," the rear porch roof and the garage around 1968. Vought sold to Tom and Sharon Prior in 1973. The Priors sold to James Denkins in 1995. James Denkins sold 323 West Hallam to Peter Rispoli and Donna DiIanni in December 1999. 1 11 1 - 1 1 1-J - '1191. i.~7Â· ' '?b~l. '71"fl4*f*% 44- 6 1:1, '21; - f '. I i 1 4,0 - 1.,1,6.4 4. -//vv. 9 , I. Ild**4***06iand 81681Â£0*nka'*hariE: - , *--n'Â· â€ž-c 1 -* . p -,FAY,I~,,:.* 1 :~4#. 44*f i. ~ 664 84;in68,{PrihtÂ» .0~ 9460Â»7 84*25**dirda,..,5.18 per i fults *er : *: , f - s-*pr -. *pbkiqi trilite!~Bilp#,Rble monthly. trhe em., cible to Keep the Best f ay-Withf;**mlizu- in. 11381,-sha 11â€¢01 - k-16160417.#re.-pitirk=U tjustÂ· Ai*ived: Twotoat!,- 3#adi~alting mining anddther proper:i Â°~ . Consisting< oflâ€¢** 0*m:,inneflabl *-eontrols,nore Roodf 1,1 1. 1 .ta' amg otalmi on the mainootitaot .th*h 1 r,otheridompan,topendiman Pitkin.i Them- at.4Â£4- Lowest -Fy#1-2 - < it : FONIER; intÂ¥.Ita--revennes from property l terÂ·*an mines{are Bumcientto insare, ces--This is Our Prin- . r 81*ady poyment of diÂ¥iddnds on the 1 960*41~oak. Atoong prominentmiaÂ· 1 ciple and .is -the >1~1*#(irtlerin irhiehuit m largely' in- ~ Queenk* muted are theform, Joblin, Oaseade, 44 d Bashwhaolier on Smuggler Foundation of the Success J.. 4 2 The Apex or Carbonate ' on , Adpen tuountaiu --and--Popularity of_ the __~__ AH- glo-9-diso kiat t I e Little Annie group | Eadjaeent *roperty on *tiohn&onÂ£1+.... Colmer DrUg Store. ~ ed stock in the city, . ---Siveral of these properties will be I king rekulap shibments of mineral beÂ·~e,v UNDER~ ,~e peroent- an Hoevenberth & Co. bf the prooeede will also be divided I TELEPHON-M-8~----2 )ng-tbie holders of Continental Di- 1 , stock. The company is pracheally Wheeler Opera House !. - ol debt, but there are liens 'against ~ . tâ€¢jof the property recently purchased 1 . the management -bas decided to sell J. B. WHEELER, - - - Proprietor iment preferred stock to pay the liens : 14. J. CUTLER, Â· - - - - Manager .~ . Necurea fund to open the valuable ' ing territory owned und controlled , hocompany, As the stock is sold, --2~6-Hil-JINFE,; lied to the payment of liens on prop- VL-.,-ILllLVVJEri,Illivl-.9-Il-0- and th* other half placed to the %1 -6- -Ila~ Litof tlie development fund Go that receipts from mineral and other SALISBURY'S u rebs, can be paid to stockholders. 1--mp-=------#-IM--ilit i,id0mTnre~id-the *th-of avery : - th. For partioulars and full lists of ~ erties and enterprises of the com- -----------~-------=-------~---~-a, ... -Trotijhdot_lt _ ~. apply to B.CLARK WHEELR, Pres- L an Cianm,Ir-ainultger 8 ue, Aepen, Colorado. - WILL APPEAR Dooble Loeomotives. e Railroad Gazett@ calls attention to ible locomotive for the Indian atate October 7,1889 Milling, Smelting, S rays which is-a novel departure from i - piavtice. The de*iguis.really mknant cinli hle header: that is. it 18 1 FOR , 1 AV.y 99 ...JAA-A VA a/* , 1'.e . - - =Le-1.-0 - , 1 -r 4-1 . $ 14~ h .... - #Wg - 994 4- 17-11- -TF~:a ' -Â¥2kr\ *' I -19~ rl . - ' â€¢.1 T. r $ i . 1 + -4 2 - - '2Â£ :9â€¢=r:,~-4 " -~' Â·Â·: '" 'Â· .-' 0 -*e . 4. â‚¬ ,/ I . ~4.-''I*:W~~:5.''ll"WR~:9 *3 24*gisMAWS - ".4 4 Â¢, 9 re.Â·~;*th.Â·unt Â«w.z.Â·i.'.:.?i-'~:int,nek# '? I >4 i 6 t. ., . 44Â¢ 32345:~ x:.14â€¢4@w:9%,Â£ P- 414 ,~ ft 4 - Â·'--J -,~=4- --. i'%46....f : . 4, -1 â€¢529.1 ...: 4,1,~67~~~: 4-*"+ fie - Â· a # --.---4-34*P.4..S . , 'W, h Jâ€¢ 76..0 17 - ..1 ~ 1.0- : ~,x2 . 44.-9 ...f . *i 1* I ;?P, ...~ , Â¥Â¥. ff A: :,-~17,,1 -*% & ~ . ~87#71),f~iliSMI J~ 2QO *w'T.~1.tle.1.21Â»ft=fifÂ·iÂ· Â·-,Â·- 1[1 .--:,j,...- ir.,.ij Â· i 4 . I - Â·+71*"ad'%~*44*- 7 .4.0 it Â·412.C.1 +4*Â·ALÂ·M ' .1 , ' n.va=Werilicillris~li_ 1 4 'Al *-19&**5914*4*~2 L~Trn"-=v- AT 1 11, A_Â· 1 Â·35 >Rit :... -U41 17 of-isâ€¢#ibkt-'f ~ 41111{1 J 1 - *aa# : om.in mavin & M.Eâ„¢, 1. . , 1/Wi I . Mqi 1/4 an*hot. Buil{ling. +, . 1 1 - .4 I'.4 ~ . 141 4~ ..8,1 1 - U:1 Â¥ I .! 4 1 91.'. b ./ COLORADO -'KIT ==j". qU//##3274%+01.~d'', Tr inâ€¢â„¢ew: f ref thl, I ./- . -w=,-t.,544 â€¢,Â·e E- E. BbiR#111:Br Al[E . â‚¬* 'S . V %%7- 10/*:*li*It,i#/twed; lot 8/1/U*~7- -2*hâ€¢linblie .S.6,-ajailoo *#Within *turtÂ¥44i #tter *607 *Rd Ght~mtgat /,abetate" 861* A .. * Utio 1*rdÂ¢Kee df BilÂ® 61*t y, . . WA ... , .0 1 ... 7*wholl for,44) of 'aid act 187 ULISHED IN 1860. ,. 1. a.somatio'Lor company of Elample* by mnil or NFBriao Will reooi- pt . - M. Imic:*p 40-68*11*ant. or eu. i . sed car ofet mt:en iD . noId *841*ilver %~'t m <0604*400* Or posâ€¢eaing, Of' r,8.ed. metted.Ad~80*,e*ore.1.-4 wrae .. OUL, nitlat Withilil)Â£10*iÂ¥ for terme, U*14*wre]*0â€¢ *tr.Â£ Denver. Colo, 141*:*tioti.of ga f. 0 k ,-4 , *dyâ€žqtvoR:. ~ . - ' f~*.*AUâ€¢-* ~-Â¢4di~BiiiW*'.C -#*.3.- .'-: .4'.....~F. I. *b'-0.'46&'-1,1-2~/--1,I t.~4- - ..49 k: -..1. -2 5 ' 4 ~#92~D.3- -â€¢1- Â·:.Imt* .... $Â». ..0-?Al~ 1 1 51/0/I'llung""Milm'IMMI'llill//Il,Im â‚¬621- il \385 ASPEN PAI!_91-\Ues I , . ... . b :' I - i. Â»X. 1* ..i#Z it .4 li i. , I , . '4 1.2 44.2. . e.= - *-4- a,*46*Â· 1',Â·fcÂ· 4# /' 4 :, i~~ 2~Â· ~7*-0 ~-,fi<9fiÂ·-Â»Â·bult-Â·31Â«e ~~btiV,Ii,{ '3*:r~~~,i--upyjAV' i 1% Â·"h'Â£* tÂ·E,â€¢t.--Â·-1-, Â¢* 56 2 >9.L<+il-Ggaid : 796!0 Itd PArtic#1*Â¢~Clisald V .. /* SMg'Â· / 4 ..' & .2/1,43,55,1~ 2* Goods- Assen's .Bead- It ~~ + ..Â· ~~!r 4.16;VEFF*Ed<d City, is .,9 k 2 quarters for Fine s Â·:. %-I-:f.*22544{MI ' E + -* den. t- - , #n...I- ... , .'9 Â· Â· t#*trje 4 k '19*eer, st,t,~11. knowh merchant 1.4.~~-1/.~I~.6~"6<*14Â©8+46 ipruifs. FihhinÂ¢ Tackle, Toi-~ ,* - I Â·i, I. #t, u. - .. .Â· I:Jle :widia, :hbey, a weit-known minti,g - Aiticlesi is at the 7 minot LeadÂ¥*te,-1.111#he city. ,. let I I . 1 .....1,11~10 .-0. ~-Ima Oari006 has vohe to Asheroft to J~-n_bÂ»61aim, 16 Judleitts. Corner Drii g Store. ._ 4 , .4 1149;.13@2 --- O El Meyers, of Garland, Kansas, ar~ ived i#the city Friday morning. ~- 'rhe -Olde 68 86118 Brothers' circus and menag- 1 rie Will sbow 10 Aspen on the 29th. . Â·~ Seavy Ury Goods Fallu 1*n J. White, a prplninent citizen PHILADELI'HIA, July 25.- SUrprUIe was an=4 Coloradn, 18 m the city. i occasioned in business circles tbis mornÂ· 4-ing by the announcement that the firm - Furniture ant W. A. Green 181)atting up 8 neat three f of Lewis Bros. & C o.,wholesale dry goode Â®m co:tage on East Hopkins avenue. i dealers, Chestnut street, above 86â‚¬ond, -00.11 r Mnâ€¢gmn in building a line reel- I had made an assignment. While tbe ex- Cari y 4 Ful enee on Mill street on the bluff just be- I aBL amount, eau'L .6 yet Le aaoâ‚¬atained, :1~elw*-ele.1- ond the pew HoÂ¢el Jerome, it is the'ught the liabilities will Bum up 1 nearly-lour.millions, The firm is one of - T. J. Zollare. Mrs. S. W. Zollarâ€¢, F. N. 1 the largestin its line of business in the P irady and W. O. Morrison, of Denfer, . bity, and perhaps in the country. It has fe registered at tbe Clarendon. I hobses in many large cities of the United Â·6, Bal t.TA*lertaker and_ JITIL W. B. Root left Go yeater day'g States, notably--New=-1.exkrOIL~ - -*ime,e-and Bostani._The members of the [idland tram for Den ver, wherdifi@ Will imain about ten days visiting friends firm resident in thia city are -George W. -_ Wharion, Joseph= W. Lewis and Henry Judge R. G. Withers returned yeeter ~: Lewis. Wharton, when seen this mom- ay from Frying Pan, where be had gone ing, promptly admiged the authenticity --li.---I ;k:14&7&â€¢:*4"SparhrEpllirth~k# 10 4.':,atÂ·.4- 6/1*61'i-UILGE Widelnefjh Â£Â£2-Ilod'211:la:84.b,-- Â· -- _ - _--_ -â€ž-, ..assig;*men&-frn,nal,11â€¢1 1~ Ttligil of the i er.inge mjet,DE_Â§; Athletin Pack. First New York finn ot Bliss. Faboru ~ Cu..lie oe will be called -promptry - at - elated,- was the assignee. "I am ouable," continued Wharton, 1 ~ 30 p. m "to place the amount of our liabilities. ~ ~ The Midia],d train arrived at 2:15 this However, I feel confident that they will I ~ rs on board. The road is not yet en- ' course it's impossible to determine these I '~ 'eli repaired. i things until an examination of the books i '_~ ' has been made. We are now going over ~ ~ amily of Mr. M. O. Sherman bas l our books and will Drobably kuow more i ~ en poseession of the newly built I d.finitely how and where we staud." 71 ~ t._-- on East Hopkins avenue. owned i ..If we could have had only two retÂ· Mra,Gillespie. 3 three days more I am sure we would l'he first case in the police court for ' have been able to tide over tbe dinicult- ~ ree dave was the trial of Jim Me(Jou rt i 188, but the blow fell just nt the worst -Ii........B,il-7-p-1/"1 1.-:-- A...1, An TIT-,1- r..An,â€¢ warroo t time and nnrnnlv morse was to make I . r.,â€¢. r.l ... 3-0 LY 1- 6 Â£ 8%9 A-SPER PA,l 1.-Y 1-IME-9 West Hallam Street Old Cottonwood Trees (City of Aspen) PORCH Existing i 11 , House ~ 0 J Mature Apple Tree 0/0 i J LLI i :=: L.11.1 ADDITION Addition -37 & 1 Mud i Room 1 - -1 J I GARAGE Alley bl, FIRST FLOOR PLAN F -Â·-~11=~1-rn~--i--.i i iii 63[[nrl -T - - 15Â·1 - 1 Bedroom 1 STORAGE ~ CLOSE' ~ -.~ Max's ~ CLOSE~_1 Bedroom Study NOOK ~1 BATH 3'6 0 ~ CLOSET HALL CONNECTOR 1-1 DN 1 DRESSING T- i |2_ OPEN BELOW 11=3 OPEN BELOW 1/ k BEDROOM ~ |-,Â· 18 1 5 DECK 224 2ND FLOOR PLAN =Wil"*&==4~lrilill il.i' SE -_-_ ' I-* 1 ___Â»t 1l + j 1 11 BEDROOM 1 ..4 SLAB 9 FAMILY HALL lue- I 2 14\ --= rl . 8=00* 1 1 UTtlrrY i.â€¢ 'I BATH . HALL STORAGE BASEMENT LEVEL 4. t, ' * vt"4..FA ''*41% yll, 4 ; . *64Â£49 - %4 4-9 5 ** 0,~ 33*ki - -fl.3 ~ 4, .141 Â· 1- '5, .. *~3:04. y LJ -4 0634 1 1.4 4'Â·4Â·4*<jiÂ¥.-A;Â·:t Â·Â·w :L .~:4Â·Â·re'--~~ 42 t I. ~ y.i....... I 9 66*ed 4,1Â¥ #2, 4 i , -1- - 0 1 - 4 r.i i OU-7.Ia ~ I Rhia~arb.*,' 2- S- '4 :,en 112,- - tralt -9-7 -44-- 1 - 2Â£ S 4.. â‚¬ T.k 4.- .1 .if14=* V 4 =- 1 1 11 1 1 - -I 4 jit'-r-1~.. 411 1 ,-* 1 41 a- 1 1-9 Â·Â·44% 2223 Â£ ,, 1-7 4 .r,Â· 1 b. WILLIS PEMBER ARCHITECTS INC 412 NORTH MILL STREET ASPEN CO 81611 Ms. Amy Guthrie 4.11.02 Aspen Historic Preservation Commission City of Aspen Community Development Department Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Wagner Park Edge - Graphic Panel Review Dear Amy, It is our pleasure to submit for the commission's review a proposal for the public exhibition on the exterior of the new restroom facility at Wagner Park. In addition to the attached graphics, at the time of the review, we will present a scale mock-up of the exhibit, actual samples of a typical panel substrate as well as a partial image. This submission represents a close collaboration between the Architects, Ajax Design and the Aspen Parks department. Sincerely, Scott Chism., Aspen Parks Department Willis Pember, AIA Art Burrows - Ajax Design Suzannah Reid, AIA VC 970 920 1727 Â· NCARB Â· AIA Â· FX 970 920 4461 WAGNER PARK INTERPRETIVE DISPLAYS ~ Ajax Design & Communications April 11, 2002 A. South panel Sandstone panels with touch screen monitors A Concept: An interesting, colorful informational display illustrating A $ r L ~U~*1 HI i f f 9 Aspen's rich history from the Ute Indians to mining to agriculture, 1121--- Up ~ v.- skiing and the cultural renaissance of the fifties. , . 1 ..?rki- 1 1.- 91, . < 1 4 f k I. I. Ej. . .1â€ž - , Substrate: Diebond if 4mm - Alucobond if 6mm 11. 1 v '6,Â· Â·CJ 7 - ..Â» *it ./.1. , This material is strong, lightweight and has tremendous longevity. It r..1-7--am- . ~ 1 is commonly used for permanent outdoor signage and as the outer skin . 1*7> , 04 -: 0% 0 :' of skyscrapers. . Graphic images will be imaged using UV resistant colors on outdoor / 7 4 3 Â£ matt finish vinyls with 3mil UV laminate. They will then be adhered e. , - *41 .s 3/1/'- 2 422 . 21:, . . 4 ....7 4/ ./6 0 . / to the substrate panels. .. . 1 I :. 196 ' J I. Â·'*im' . - ; The vinyls can removed, redesigned, updated and re-adhered every year W if desired. B. East panel 1 e , / Uvy#L f 91 - 4 . 114 i- 1.11;i ' ._ r. .. '44 4-1 F 6 *' . 4. diIA . Â¥ 1 . 110 d 4 , * / /96 2 1 4 1 ' . I li. 1 / 4/. ../.1/ili~: . I . - . * '.- + I -1 4/ Tr ill. 0 - *// 4 I ./. - -* Ak , . , . I 'r . : 1/ I , I I.' 4 1 -A~/A' ' . , . 1 : ,f : - *-A'r 0 M 12 42 6 <f-: T.i~.Itakidic,t:P *,Â£*7 LL--2. +1 - 9 4<*C . . 1.\ .1, r=V7 iAFT.77 %' Etrk.ta F *F"-am. F Abi 1 1.- 9% 1. , , . -ar 21Â· d. a . 7-/ t'' -- - Aid'Il,W,1. .,1 6/djf& Irâ€ž~ILYW////4 N ME : Al .al' 1 M e wil I ho:uâ€¢ hi res i....4 2 (19 fix,h'tâ€¢+0'u., 40 tyr' e. r . . r r 13* . Â·Jil.r,~L~fÂ· ~ , 1&* 9, :; i? i *-tr --aneâ€¢TrÂ·-7Â·5-â€¢â€¢-Â·4 2, . 7/1- -4 ? 4 4 : 1 lill'Ill I : 9 - =97 k -d - 5 ~ 0.-.MN *eAt.... 5 : 2. 4 Â£ I Â»13 4%41: :, .... I ." . 24 3,~ r . 1/ - 3#I â‚¬ . -..g .1 4 '4Â·3025:Â· -Â· ..m I-_ I I -I 1 . & - .- 1 Ir-/ 5 A 3.... , .......'.....1_ - I I I Â·~ /-- ~-I~|- 1... - I. - 1 2 1.-14.1 4:1 1 24...j Â·23.1.14 . ..9, - 4 1- , I IA 4,2 I g.. K ...%:.- - E 2 :I-/ p.:.M' . *I.*- / * 1 ' r -.. 2 ..Ot . St 4 .1 3 -1.-t 424?465 . - . I 'Â·#4Â¢425 4 . .. 5 .0, W I ../..7-I.M. 4: 41~42'99'~ 9. I . 4... 1 ..W 4 ' r 0. @4 4 " ~- 1 I Â·14 . L : la- + > 19 E., 6 + 4. , - 27 . 24* - .1 ... 11 1 Â·: 7 # . 0*9Â·:f.rit;.Â·~Â·24**3-.3,27?6...,.~..41% ...... 1 Â·r?tifÂ·'3'.~.*.'-~'-:*4 / : . â€ž1.41 . 5 -42#SWak.:Â· Â· -Â· Â·Â· Â· ;:7227: L.J..:.6441â‚¬/..?I.G.IÂ¢-2 -7.:---,f'....6..f ' I ,-2.A r,-1 I - â‚¬#k..44 - -Â· t*W'~ e i .fi ki#.*.~1 .p-,Aht:'. ..~i si D. I . '4- + , r.-*2 ne,râ€¢-I .; I kir......r-= 04 .:- e.) - -1 k a Ed" â‚¬- * f . te '2 4 ~ ~1' dmmpEE - 4 / 4 -94 i 4.8 - Â· 51*1~ -t ... 1.+ I . ./ ''I 62.' 7. St= I ./1Â·.6..05'ji.-4~Â·.INÂ·. Wi' *4 Â· - . a. I ' â€¢ Mt- N. 1 . 'E ... r I - 3 . NE'~A -' Ei,W./ 7 :I/- f L 'WOL. /2- - I '- 2 Ua4 m.-I Vill'll'.I ..â€¢re E Â· "* ./ -2 - ./- (/ I r., 1 ke:t 1-Il 1+ 4% ill. 4. Â· Â·Â·4 . dz: â‚¬ Â· 2/ **4401 .:CJ' Q..~ , Ir.5 ..A,- : Â· - ?trÂ·- 9. . n Â· lia. - I. -' Â·V' .....:1 - 4 ' -' . Zie I - â‚¬ ~W.,.=:4,8 i. I i J J d LI, : f ~~~ *p. + ............- -=a. r * 8, .U-?:L,4 I . U 71~ r 6-f.. 13 r -: 15..IN ri * Â· ft- 2 9/Ff 16 \ 3Â°i %25Â· I ' - 4 2 -I. '.r"th# 1. lilli - ..1. W.' ..!~ B U 0.9 0 . t . fV FOUR DEDICATION UL r-t j PLAQUES RELOCATED > < FROM EXISTING | O FACILITY. ILI 4'-9 3/4" 2'-6" I m ADA STANDARD /- 9 k-\-- 5'-O"kNIDE x 5'-6"DEEP 61-11/3 MCÂ·TER 1. 11 1[ 9 .-- 9/ hi / C f) 1 MI --1 16AS - Illo. ~9*4*,---------_ #4T - 14 OuTstix F.O. 1 1 14* 1 t' I [BO!!=Eij rwrER 4 /~ STEM ~FNAL ~ METER A ~/ 1% 1 1 Al i- r 1 4. 51/2 1 -1 - 100 12 1 1 1 9- PR]NKINe m ~ FOUNTA~Ne I F < 'TI 2 1/4" SINK PNALLL CHASE. F... L-L l Ei I 1 DI 4'-4 5/8" 0 1 1 1 n 1 /f-T.O. (SCE EL.~101'-1" r -- 2 / 4- Al , 2 114/ ib 7.0. 5-r* hALL DCLOhl 5 -4 7/8" 1 1 Ft-- 1 1 1 1 1 MOMEN'S|ROOM C.155/25 / 1 1 71 [1617 419 1 1 14 3 1 F.O. 0-rEM j/ ~ ~09 8 Â»1411- A \' /04-) 1 1 - L E- , TOUCH DEREEN.~ 9 1 1 1 ----Â· I Li laj 10 1 ' ' 9 -2 -* ---47---7 MONITPR IFIA L- , -1 1 1| 1 4 /4 1,1 Hme 1 ' 1 ~ 4.-// 00 TRENCH | CRATE ~ ~ 11 I | - 11/8' FINISH -rrP- 1 5'-5 1/4" ADA IADD 4 r !/2,1 5 5- - ~4Â·--------~~~ STALL. 3,_c>~~ x 5,-O" PNOMEN'B FLEX .1 A Â«111 2>,4 CHASE ,~â€ž,li.~I 1 1 9 Pan 1 /m 5'-10[F*-- 1 -%f-,(ALL H ~ (am 1 1 6 f 4 41 kÂ« U i I 1 Â°- i - -- d A I 1 -(10 11 1 111 40 5/0â€¢ lili 1 1 1 lili ~ F.O. STEM ||| | FINISH I~T. ~ i MALL lili + 1 ~ ~lâ€¢\LL~ TRENCH DRAIN ~ tr 1 1 R.D.- ( 1 111 1 Ill 111 1 i.f 1 1 LIU 1 \ All 1 1 14 21 1 11J 1 1 1 1 00 RAIN \ 1 1 LIA Â» 1 9 U 4/ -1 rfigh . 1 ~ rbih ~F Â© fg'Yl 1 - Ecro J b UPI 77 1 / A \ 1 2 '- J 1,5 L, 1 .L, ] \ YWATER /1 \ n FIN SH ~ [3*3 ' MIN'S ROOM - i < METER ~ \ 4 1 1 MALL - i ,- p ADA STALL - ~-1 5'-0"xe'-5 1/4' 2- - | MEN'D Fl~~'~'~~ ' ~ | ~ 5 1/2 i :-1 lili 1 - l'rg~ 4,- d', '\~ 11'-tO 3/4' I.O. STEM FNALL - RE,-.lyâ‚¬-CL> Toll 1 1 Yi It---A 1 //. DU~Oâ‚¬KB,r~Mt ' 01 ' 2- _ 1 Â« I ~ FINISH -3 1 2/5 lili 74ALL k Â«too 8 , 10/ b I 1 8 1' R PILÂ»-7 _,ralcuÂ©-t~L - - 12~1 - ---- - 1 A ) 1 --- . In_(1-1- 4- ------ -Ft - 1 ---1 DOLID ROD- ABO\,-12 -' e Â«Â»fÂ»--Dip ISSUE: 2*4 CHASE FNALL SK 4: Il.12.01 / \1 - 1 F.O. STEM FNALL -' FINISH 0 1 FNALL 1 8'-8 -1/8" ~ 2 1/4" SINK MALL CHASE ~ ~ | 12'-3 ~4 T.O.CHASE EL.lot'-1' A.F.F. ' ' 1 ~ TOUCH SCREEN ~ MONITOR AND CPU 8 ~-A-P)1-1-0- PA NEL 'A' L,/ ll) PLANS 0 --r- RESTROOMS PROJECi # 0103 FILENAME: 0103-AZORP 0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN - PLUMB ING LAYOUT SK 4 A2.1 1/4,1 = 11-0 LILI 086 6 O '61 L'.9.1-9 00 NE<SV =63-LS 71'IN N E Lt 91-1-1IM 33"3 113 N 9Â¥ M 11Â¥'Al 13'ElulS 1-Illal HlnOS - L, 00Â¥80100 V 111 WPLE' ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 640 N. THIRD ST. - EXTENSION OF CONCEPTUAL' 1 513 W. SMUGGLER ST. - FINAL - PUBLIC HEARING 1 633 W. MAIN ST. - FINAL APPROVAL - VARIANCES - PUBLIC HEARING 323 W. HALLAM STREET - CONCEPTUAL, PARTIAL DEMOLITION, VARIANCES WAGNER PARK - GRAPHIC PANEL REVIEW 5 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 Chairperson, Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Vice-chair Gilbert Sanchez, Jeffrey Halferty, Teresa Melville, Neill Hirst, Michael Hoffman and Paul D'Amato. Melanie Roschko and Rally Dupps were excused. Staff present: Assistant City Attorney, David Hoe fer Historic Preservation Planner, Amy Guthrie Chief Deputy Clerk, Kathy Strickland MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve the minutes ofApril 10, 2002; second by Neill. All in favor, motion carried. Suzannah will recuse herself on the Wagner Park graphics. Certificate ofno Negative effect issues for Ute Mountaineer. They are connecting to a space in the gallery behind them and making a small walkway on the second floor. 640 N. Third St. - Extension of conceptual MOTION: Jeffrey moved to approve Resolution #13, 2002 allowing an extension of conceptual until Nov. 23,2002; second by Teresa. All in favor, motion carried. Yes vote: Jeffrey, Gilbert, Neill, Paul, Teresa, Suzannah 513 W. Smuggler St. - Final - Public Hearing Affidavit ofposting was entered into the record as Exhibit I. Sworn in: Drew Harman, Ryan Sturtz, Eric Hendrix, Harry Teague Amy said one concern was the seamed metal roof but Ryan explained that the roof would be a flat seamed roof. There needs to be a little more discussion of the site design and the tree plantings. Ryan said the dimension etc. have remained the same since conceptual. They tweaked windows in the cabin. The roo f will still have vertical lines. The exterior materials are being picked up from the cabin. The cabin is 1 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 clapboard siding and shingles and all the clapboard will be cleaned up and kept as they are and painted. There will be places that will need replication of the clapboard where they don't exist such as the corners. The color will be a neutral off white color with white trim and black windows. The roofs will be flat metal roofs, dark gray mat. There is currently a stone foundation and on the new foundation it will be a stone veneer only on the cabin and not the addition. Drew said they are not planning on planting trees directly in front of the cabin although there is a 120 year old maple tree. There are two prominent trees on the lot that will be kept. There maybe a tree planted in front of the addition. Amy inquired about rolled asphalt for the miner's cottage and is it durable enough. It might look more like the original and it might be better to have the roofs different. Drew said he would wood single the miner's cottage and at one point the cabin had wood shingles. Shingles would help distinguish the two buildings. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Stewart Lusk, neighbor was sworn in. Stewart said the maple tree has been chopped off and wanted to know if it was an importantee. Drew said the maple tree is on the city right-of-way. The Parks Department said the maple has to stay. Stewart said the tree should be cut down in order to show off the property. Chairperson Suzannah Reid closed the public hearing. The board agreed with staff regarding the change o f roof material on the cabin in order to distinguish old from new. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve Resolution #14, 2002 for final development for 513 W. Smuggler Street with an amendment to condition #1- wood shingles will be used on the roof of the cabin; second by Jeffrey. All in favor, motion carried 6-0. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 Yes vote: Jeffrey, Gilbert, Teresa, Neill, Paul Suzannah 633 W. Main St. - Final Approval - Variances - Public Hearing Sworn in: Elizabeth Haley Dodge, owner and Barbara Long, architect Amy relayed the concerns from conceptual: Fenestration and dormers proposed for the garage. The architect has addressed all of those issues. Staff as two concerns for tonight. On the historic house there is currently a dormer on the west and one is proposed to be added to the east side and the ridge height of the two dormers do not align. Symmetry is a characteristic of the building and it is a very simple roof. All of the windows have been previously removed on the east side of the building and staff discussed with the applicant if there was a possibility of restoring one o f them due to the length of that wall. Barbara said the dormer is going to be an office and the egress requirements are different and they can make the two dormers identical sizes. Regarding the window being added to the east side the applicant can go either way. On the west elevation they proposed dormers windows and would like to make those smaller that in the elevation. Chaireprson Suzannah Reid opened and closed the public hearing. Amy said they are also asking for a one-foot variance for the offset of the garage. The board was in favor of the reduction in size of the windows and lowering the dormer. MOTION: jeffrey moved to approve Resolution #15, 2002 for 633 W. Main St. Lot A, Block 25, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado with conditions 1 - 11 and condition 12, no eastern window on the historic resource; second by Gilbert. All infavor, motion carried 5-0. Yes vote: Paul, Neill, Gilbert, Jeffrey, Suzannah Teresa abstained 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 323 W. Hallam Street - Conceptual, Partial Demolition, Variances Affidavit ofposting entered into the record as Exhibit I. Sworn in : Peter Rispoli Amy relayed that the house is a 1 h story building and has been altered in the back with a turret tower piece and a carport which will be demolished. In the back yard an addition is proposed and has held the plate height down very low. There are nice connecting pieces throughout the project and simple roof forms. There are a few variances requested. The design is very good and the original windows on the front porch are intended to be restored. Staff feels the bonus is justified because the addition doesn't in any way create a situation that overwhelms the historic structure. Pete Rispoli walked the board through the model. The Victorian built in 1889 is about two feet away from the property line on the northwest corner of the lot. The plate heights were kept at three feet to match the original. They enjoyed the back yard but need to expand for practical reasons. Suzannah told the board that as the applicant uncovers the existing porch structure, Amy will review that and make a determination as to what needs removed and what needs to be retained and reconstructed. Pete said a shed dormer was added in the 70's. Regarding the porch it has already been fixed once and there should not be a lot of historic material disrupted. The variances include the back and side yard for the existing house and FAR bonus. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened the public hearing. Amy said the concern of the owner o f the vacant lot next door, Claire and Reed Stillwell, is the overall effect of the sunlight upon their property. They are requesting studies of summer and winter solstice. Letters were entered at Exhibit II and III. Chairperson Suzannah Reid closed the public hearing. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF, APRIL 24, 2002 Jeffrey commented that it is very rate that we have new construction that has kept the ridge height lowered. The massing works well. Gilbert, Teresa, Paul and Suzannah said the project is incredibly successful. Neill said this is a project that warrants an FAR bonus. MOTION: Gilbert moved to approve Resolution #16, 2002 granting conceptual, partial demolition and variances for 323 W. Hallam Street, Lots D & E Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colo. with a statement to be added to the resolution that states that the front porch issue has been addressed under a previous permit; second by Neill. All in favor, motion carried 7-0. Yes vote: Jejfrey, Gilbert, Teresa, Neill, Paul, Suzannah Wagner Park - Graphic Panel Review Suzannah stepped down. Amy reported that this project is under HPC's jurisdiction, but we do not have specific standards. MOTION: Michael moved to approve the Wagner Park Graphic panel design; second by Jejfrey. AlI in favor, motion carried. MOTION: Suzannah moved to adjourn; second by Teresa. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Kathleen J. Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 5