The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.Truscott Pl.A153-00 ~ CASE NUMBER PARCEL ill # CASE NAME PROJECT ADDRESS PLANNER CASE TYPE OWNER/APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE DATE OF FINAL ACTION CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION ADMIN ACTION BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED BY ~ A 153-00 2735-111-09702 Truscott PUD Amendment #1 Truscott Chris Bendon PUD Amendment Aspen/Pitkin Housing Authority 2/16/01 Approved Admin. 4/11/01 J. Lindt r-.. ~ ~ "'"""" Notice of Decision Insubstantial Planned Unit Development Amendment Ed Sadler, Asset Manager for the City of Aspen, has applied for administrative approval of an Insubstantial Amendment to the Aspen Golf and Tennis Club/Truscott Housing PUD. The amendment straightens the internal street, providing 15 additional parking spaces, and accomplishes the housing maintenance building during a later phase. The Community Development Director shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny a land use application for an insubstantial PUD amendment pursuant to Sections 26.445.100 (A) and 26.304 of the Aspen Municipal Code if an application is found to be consistent with the following review criteria: 1. The proposed PUD amendment meets the criteria of Section 26.445.100 (A), PUD Insubstantial Amendments. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DECISION The Community Development Director finds that the proposed amendment to the Aspen Golf and Tennis ClublTruscott Housing PUD to be consistent with the review criteria, and hereby approves the insubstantial PUD amendment on this ~day of if d~ ' 2001 with no conditions. t/l ulie Ann Woods, Community Development Director EXHIBITS Exhibit A: Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Exhibit B: Application , ~ , \ J-'" EXHIBIT A Zone District 'f2A1p - POl> Date ,-aYrAbj II '2l%>f Insubstantial PUD Amendment Checklist Case No. Parcel ID No. Reviewed By A fli3-dJ 0I/tt6 ~ 26. 445.100 Review Criteria All insubstantial PUD Amendments shall meet the following criteria, pursuant to Section 26.445.100, Amendment to PUD Development Order: 'd" The proposed amendment does not change the use or character of the development. 1::(' ~ ~ The proposed amendment does not increase by greater than three (3) percent the overall coverage of structures on the land. The proposed amendment does not substantially increases trip generation rates of the proposed development, or the demand for public facilities. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved open space by greater than three (3) percent. ~ The proposed amendment does not reduce the off street parking and loading space by greater than one (1) percent. I::(" The proposed amendment does not reduce required pavement widths or rights-of- way for streets and easements. '""'"-- a-" l\v' ~ The proposed amendment does not increase the approved gross leasable floor area of commercial building by greater than two (2) percent. The proposed amendment does not increase the approved residential density of the development by greater than one (1) percent. The proposed amendment will not enact a change which is inconsistent with a condition or representation of the project's original approval or which requires granting a variation from the project's approved use or dimensional requirements. ~iv' ~ttk ~rit{fA d ...........~ ~ ........., . , ~ ' ." /+15s-{;C 6 - 00 " . " RECEIVED DEe 1 4 2000 , ASPEN I PITKIN " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ...., ,.,. , THE .cITY OF ASPEN December 14, 2000 Julie Ann Woods Community Development Director CitY of Asper! . 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Julie Ann: The City of Aspen is requesting an extension on the time limit for filing a plat and an insubstantial amendment to the PUD approval for the Aspen Golf & Tennis Club! Truscott Housing Approval. The project was granted final approval by City Council on August 14, 2000 under ordinance,34, Series of 2000. The basic scope of the project was for. the deveiopment of 99 new units of affordable housing, a new clubhouse building, new terlis courts and significant in:!Tastructure improvements. In the ensuing months, value engineering has been required to reduce the costs of the project. This value engineering has led to delays in recording a final plat and some minor changes to the approved site plan. The City is. requesting a six month extension on the time limit for recording the final plat. Under .the current app;oval, the plat is required to be recorded by January 15. We will not be able to meet that deadline. While we expect to pursue recordation in early February, we are asking for a longerextensio~ in case any other signIficant changes occur. The City is also requesting an insubstantial amendment to the PUD: The insubstantial amendment requests two changes. The first is the realignment of the central drive and the second is to allow delaying construction of a ne~ housing maintenance shop until phase 3. , The approved site plim'shows a curvilinear street through the housiI).g project. This street design was used as a traffic calming measure that would provide for, safer and more enjoyable pedestrian ' movements through the project. In addition to maintenance and snow removal concerns, the curvilinear street proved to be prohipitively expensive. Instead, the City is requesting that a pattern similar to the existing condition be used, but with some improvements: Head in parking will continue to exist in front of the existing Truscott 200 and 300 buildings. The head-in parking in front of the Truscott 100 building will be changed to parallel parking. Thiswill create 15 additional spaces beyond what Was approved in August. Parking in front of the new Phase 2 . housing will stay as shown in the final approval. Islands have been created to break up the parking and to identify pedestrian rout~s across the street. A walk has also been added between. I I I I I I I i 130 S~UTH GALENA STREET' ASPEN, COLORADQ 81611-1975 . PHOI\'E 970.920.5000 . FAX 970.920.5191 PrinledQnRecyclcdPJper c ~~ -,,'> """ I ~ 't!'".)/ the parallel parking 'and the Truscott 100 building. These measu~es should significllntly improve pedestrian movements through the project. . The second requested change is to allow construction of the approved housing maintenance facility during a later phase of constrUction. The existing facility is located at the west end of the Truscott 100 building. A new building was planned for the east end of the housing area. That space wit! continue to be reserved for a future building, but construction of that building will not occur until w-ork begins on Phase 3 of the Truscott redevelopment. The exterior of the maintenance shop will be cleaned up and re-Iandscaped. We thank you for considering these two requests. If you have any Jurther questions about these requests, please feel free to contact Lee Novak in the Housing Office at 920-5137. q;/~ , Ed Sadler , Asset Manager City of Aspen r [ , J ~) :~\ \~-) "....." \ I ; \ \\.\ ~ J) o '/11 0.,,).,;1,/ \ ' ~ O~I '/ ! (~ V cjl ( ;! II ) o)j ,~ II ,); \ I! ~ ) I) [\ \ 0,',c4/ IIIII 't"~\' \ ~~! /1/11 ~\\ l~ I,.f /'/1111 -r !,\j)hO! ! I r 1 @/7'" . / I L !~~+ 1 1/11 \<$ I ' ! I ! I " c@'+j'I/11! , I (! ( /; , I ,Ii ! II ~ /%;,1 I i j J ~/ I! / ':"" '.;. //);1, /1 ! ~":'ilil""'! . , ". ~> ,', ,'! +/! ... ~~ 1/ " \ I ~ .>e:' -------- 1"""\.. < ~ " ~ , ~ (/--\ ~-_/) r: : !' (Ii - :: ,I J !'~ J :, " III il il / " :' 1II1 ! I I' . ' ,J I' ", \".' ---,.__ I'~' " I ! '''! '" ,1,1 '. ! t;:," 1 ~, I...) I ~ -,' 1 "iil11l" ..;' :::::~j-t~-t II i~t'l,' )/I! i . i \ -t--'_.:._i' f I ,I ! I I' \ I II II II /1 It 'I' ,I I \ \ Il~ \ \ I I I , , I , i ~C=~ o (i=::::==:::" o o 0 0 '" - o 0 00 '" , [QQ)~ dJ d -T[' Q~ @ -11: = i ~ l5 MJ] ~ (QS I!=@ @~ ~dd3J~ffi ~aM~~ d-2S a ~ a I!= ~ ~ ~S ~ ~Q Q ~! @(Qf: ~I!=